How the EEA Made Ethereum Palatable to Big Business – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Ethereum has attracted the attention of large companies for almost as long as it has been around. But it wasnt until early 2017 that a formal business-focused consortium came into being: the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (EEA).

The EEA created a concerted effort to get large corporates and tech providers on the same page when implementing private (or permissioned) versions of Ethereum technology. Thereafter, the EEA became a kind of standards organization for blockchain business, with one eye on a future state when the public blockchain might morph together with private implementations.

After all, company intranets gradually became part of the internet, or so blockchain believers will tell you.

Back in February 2017 when the EEA launched, Julio Faura, who was head of blockchain at Banco Santander at the time, volunteered to become EEA founding chairman, a position he held until July 2018.

A few of us just got together to try to make the technology a little bit more suitable for enterprise uses, recalls Faura, now the CEO of blockchain-based payments company Adhara. We were all doing our own rudimentary attempts to use the technology. But it wasnt conceived for enterprise use rather for trustless and public use and was very far from being ready.

Along came Quorum

Megabank JPMorgan Chase had released its open-source Ethereum-based blockchain client, Quorum, towards the end of 2016. The banks privacy-centric take on Ethereum became a powerful driver for enterprise adoption, said Faura.

Quorum came along and it was a blessing, he said, because it made doing permissioned networks with a consensus algorithm much easier. Suddenly performance started to go up. I remember configuring networks myself with thousands of transactions per second, so it was very exciting.

No matter what enterprise platforms look like in 15 years, there will be pieces that evolved from industry coopetition conversations that never would have happened otherwise.

JPMorgan was one of the founding members of the EEA, a group of 30 or so companies that included Microsoft, Santander, ConsenSys, CME Group and Intel (a further 86 members were announced a couple of months later at CoinDesks 2017 Consensus event).

The EEA inspired huge organizations to think about solving long-bemoaned data coordination challenges in new ways, said Amber Baldet, CEO of Ethereum-based startup Clovyr. No matter what enterprise platforms look like in 15 years, there will be pieces that evolved from industry coopetition conversations that never would have happened otherwise.

Baldet, who led the team at JPM that built Quorum, said that while theres still a long way to go, enterprises are building more creative systems for decentralized data sharing than ever before.

The EEA will continue to shape core technologies that move tons of records (and crypto assets) and most consumers will continue to know nothing about any of it and that is success, she said.

After the early blockchain hype, which saw almost every decent-sized bank either joining a consortium or announcing a proof-of-concept, the enterprise distributed ledger technology (DLT) space seems to have fallen into what Gartner calls the trough of disillusionment. Call it an inevitable phase in the lifecycle of new and potentially transformative technologies.

If you ask the banks and enterprise teams involved in blockchain work whats happening, most will tell you its simply been a case of keeping their heads down and building. Behind the scenes, the EEA has been working hard on standards work, said Yorke E. Rhodes III, a program manager on Microsoft Azures blockchain team.

There has been a tremendous amount of specification work going on, said Rhodes. We are building on a foundation of not only five years of Ethereum, but three-plus years with an enterprise focus. Its a good spot. The things that needed to happen are really happening.

Freedom of choice

A crucial characteristic of the enterprise Ethereum ecosystem is choice, said Adharas Faura.

Its very important whatever technology ends up being used is not controlled by a single software vendor, because that creates a huge strategic risk, Faura said.

The choice of enterprise Ethereum clients widened considerably last year with the release of Hyperledger Besu, a high-profile cross-pollination between the two ecosystems, built by ConsenSys engineers, and designed from the ground up to incorporate the Ethereum mainnet.

Ethereums community was really keen to see this platform used, not just by anarchists and radicals and people who wanted to take down the banks, but by the banks themselves.

A hat-tip must go to the then-EEA lead Ron Resnick, who worked tirelessly to broker a deal between Ethereum and Hyperledger, added Faura.

In fact, a bridge between Ethereum and Hyperledger had been a long time coming. Before he became the executive director of Hyperledger, Brian Behlendorf recalls meeting Ethereum chief scientist Vitalik Buterin.

Behlendorf, a leading figure in the open-source software movement, said Ethereum and its growing community reminded him of the culture of the Apache Software Foundation and its friendly approach to corporate use cases.

I remember being fascinated by the idea of decentralization at the heart of architecture, and something much more interesting than just a cryptocurrency play, said Behlendorf. This was a programmatic network for building decentralized applications, and its community was really keen to see this platform used, not just by anarchists and radicals and people who wanted to take down the banks, but by the banks themselves.

For his part, current EEA Executive Director Daniel C. Burnett said there is a ton of stuff to be excited about, flagging up ConsenSys engineer John Wolperts Baseline Protocol as an interesting enterprise project in 2020.

More generally, Burnett pointed to the stability of Ethereum and the end of the frontier mindset of previous years.

In the past couple of years, things are beginning to settle a bit, Burnett said. Its certainly not boring, but were a little less of the Wild West.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Go here to see the original:

How the EEA Made Ethereum Palatable to Big Business - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis July 29th, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

EOS

EOS rallied by 5.06% on Tuesday. Following on from a 5.07% gain on Monday, EOS ended the day at $3.0048.

It was another mixed start to the day. EOS rose to an early morning high $2.9204 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $2.9785, EOS slid to a late morning intraday low $2.7830.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $2.6879, EOS rallied to a late intraday high $3.0799.

EOS broke through the first major resistance level at $2.9785 before easing back.

At the time of writing, EOS was up by 0.30% to $3.0137. A bullish start to the day saw EOS rise from an early morning low $3.0040 to a high $3.0191.

EOS left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

EOS would need to avoid a fall through the $2.9559 pivot level to support a run at the first major resistance level at $3.1288.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for EOS to break out from Tuesdays high $3.0799.

Barring another extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level at $3.1288 would likely cap any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $2.9559 pivot would bring the first major support level at $2.8319 into play.

Barring an extended sell-off, EOS should steer well clear of sub-$2.80 levels. The first major support level at $2.8319 should limit any downside.

First Major Support Level: $2.8319

Pivot Level: $2.9559

First Major Resistance Level: $3.1288

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $6.62

38% FIB Retracement Level: $9.76

62% FIB Retracement Level: $14.82

Ethereum fell by 1.49% on Tuesday. Partially reversing a 3.47% gain from Monday, Ethereum ended the day at $317.59.

A bullish start saw Ethereum rise to an early morning intraday high $327.34 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $333.93, Ethereum fell to a late morning intraday low $306.29.

The pullback saw Ethereum fall through the first major support level at $310.97 before moving back to $323 levels.

A bearish end to the day, however, left Ethereum at sub-$320 levels and in the red.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was up by 0.54% to $319.29. A bullish start to the day saw Ethereum rise from an early morning low $317.52 to a high $319.50.

Ethereum left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Story continues

Ethereum would need to avoid a fall through the $317 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $327.86.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ethereum to break out from Tuesdays high $327.34.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Tuesdays high should cap any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $317 pivot would bring the first major support level at $306.81 into play.

Barring an extended sell-off, however, Ethereum should steer clear of sub-$300 levels. The first major support level should limit any downside.

First Major Support Level: $306.81

Pivot Level: $317

First Major Resistance Level: $327.86

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $257

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $367

62% FIB Retracement Level: $543

Ripples XRP rose by 2.67% on Tuesday. Following on from a 4.33% rally on Monday, Ripples XRP ended the day at $0.23070.

It was a mixed start to the day, with Ripples XRP rising to an early morning high $0.22698 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $0.2333, Ripples XRP slid to a late morning intraday low $0.21773.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $0.2127, Ripples XRP rallied to a late intraday high $0.23499.

Ripples XRP broke back through the first major resistance level at $0.2333 before sliding back to sub-$0.23 levels.

Finding late support, however, Ripples XRP wrapped up the day at $0.23 levels for the 1st time since March.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was up by 0.87% to $0.23271. A bullish start to the day saw Ripples XRP rise from an early morning low $0.23085 to a high $0.23271.

Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Ripples XRP will need to avoid a fall through the $0.2287 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.2379.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ripples XRP to break out from Tuesdays high $0.23499.

Barring a broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level should cap any upside.

In the event of a breakout, Ripples XRP should test the second major resistance level at $0.2451 before any pullback.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $0.2278 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.2206 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, Ripples XRP should avoid sub-$0.22 levels and the second major support level at $0.2105.

First Major Support Level: $0.2206

Pivot Level: $0.2278

First Major Resistance Level: $0.2379

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.3638

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $0.4800

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.6678

Please let us know what you think in the comments below.

Thanks, Bob

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

View original post here:

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis July 29th, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Coin Race: Top Winners/Losers of July; Ethereum Up the Most, Bitcoin Least – Cryptonews

Source: Adobe/Kalyakan

The crypto market seems to have acquired a habit of surprising us near the end of a month - albeit not always positively. July, however, ended up very much positively.

July has seen a mini crypto revival, one may say. After weeks of unusual lack of movement, or better said - volatility, which we are all used to seeing from many digital assets, the market swiftly moved upwards. It might've been true that it was 'resting,' preparing for a fast bull coming its way, as very few coins finished the month in the red.

Just as the month neared its end, bitcoin (BTC) moved upwards from the USD 9,000 level it had seemed stuck at, and first jumped to USD 10,000, followed by USD 11,000. The first days of August, saw the coin hit the USD 12,000 level shortly, then crashing in minutes.

Altcoins weren't left behind either. Ethereum (ETH) surpassed the USD 300 mark and is standing near the USD 400 one, currently separated by some USD 15 from it. As a matter of fact, ETH appreciated the most among the top 10 coins by market capitalization in July.

Additionally, ETH - which celebrated its fifth aniversary on July 30 - was one up on bitcoin. Namely, its price grew in July more than double that of bitcoin's. This trend continues with the yearly, quarterly, and weekly numbers as well.

Furthermore, XRP, cardano (ADA), and bitcoin SV (BSV) all appreciated more than 50% during July.

The rest of the coins on the top 10 list also had a productive July, all appreciating between 30% and 50% - except bitcoin. The world's most popular coin appreciated the least over the course of the past month.

Among the top 50 coins by market capitalization, elrond (ERD) is leading the top 10 winners by more than double the increase of the second-placed aave (LEND), which was one of the winners in June as well. The two have appreciated more than 200% and 100%, respectively.

Both also had news to share in July. Elrond Network announced it's live on mainet, with decentralized app Maiar as the first to launch on it, also adding that they will transform their economic model. Meanwhile, Aave announced its tokenomics upgrade proposal, genesis governance, and governance token, with LEND's migration to AAVE.

Three top 10 coins found themselves among the most appreciating coins. Generally, the coins on the list went up between 50% and 80%, with the 10th-placed cosmos (ATOM)'s price increasing by 52%.

Chainlink (LINK) is also among these coins, going up nearly 65%. It had a turbulent July, with a controversial campaign against it run by a secretive company called Zeus Capital.

The past month has been so good to the market, that there are only two coins on the losers list to speak of this time around, compared to quite a few of them back in June.

Not taking stablecoins into account, the two coins whose prices have decreased are hedgetrade (HEDGE) and ampleforth (AMPL). The former dropped more than 3% and the latter more than 54%.

Ampleforth received more attention in the Cryptoverse after it had rallied to become the best-performing coin among the top 50 cryptoassets by market capitalization in mid-July, while at the same time seeing extreme volatility both to the upside and downside.

Band protocol (BAND) sits at the top of the green list in July among the top 100 coins, having appreciated nearly 270%. It's followed by elrond, as well as advanced internet blocks (AIB) - all of which went up more than 100%. Another four coins increased by more than 100%.

Nine coins in the top 100 dropped in July. This includes the mentioned AMPL, which is at the top here as well. The midas touch gold (TMTG) is in the second place, followed by verge (XVG) and quant (QNT) - all of which recorded double-digit drops. The remaining coins' prices decreased less than 4%.

View original post here:

Coin Race: Top Winners/Losers of July; Ethereum Up the Most, Bitcoin Least - Cryptonews

Ethereum vs Ripple: which one should be in your portfolio in 2020? – Capital.com

A brief summary of Ripple and Ethereum

Despite all the turmoil and uncertainty in the global financial markets, cryptocurrencies are currently experiencing somewhat of a bull run. While new projects attract most of the attention, Ethereum, Ripple and Bitcoin continue to dominate the market cap rankings.

In this Ripple vs Ethereum guide, we compare two of the most significant crypto projects and check out whether they belong in your investment portfolio. However, before we dive in, here's a quick summary of the projects.

Ripple is an open-source protocol that supports real-time cross-border transactions. It was created by Ripple Labs in 2012 and aims to modernise the world of payments, exchange rates and replace the SWIFT network. XRP is the native token of the platform and acts as a medium of exchange, representing the transfer of value on the network.

Ethereum is best known for its smart contracts functionality. In brief, it's a distributed computer that allows developers to build applications on top of the Ethereum blockchain. Ether or ETH is the native token used to pay for transactions and other interactions with the protocol.

When looking at Ripple vs Ethereum, investors should remember that they are entirely different projects, designed to address different markets and solve different problems. Same applies to ETH vs XRP tokens.

Technology and utility aside, there are apparent ideological differences behind the two projects. Ripple Labs is a for-profit technology company that invented and continues to develop the Ripple protocol. It owns a majority of the XRP tokens and has commercial interests, including a potential IPO. Ethereum, on the other hand, is a decentralised network supported by the Ethereum Foundation, a Swiss non-profit organisation.

So, is Ethereum better than Ripple? Lets look at the main differences to find out.

Ethereum blockchain currently uses Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism to validate transactions. In PoW consensus, miners compete with each other to solve complex mathematical puzzles and are rewarded with ETH. Anyone can mine ETH, which contributes to the decentralisation of the Ethereum blockchain.

Ripple network uses a unique distributed consensus mechanism. A network of trusted "transaction validators", mostly banks that use Ripple technology, decide which transactions are valid and authentic. Network participants can select which nodes they trust. However, they are encouraged to adopt Unique Node Lists (UNLs) maintained by Ripple Labs. Because of this, the Ripple network is often viewed as centralised in the crypto community.

There's currently almost 12m ETH and new coins are created as a reward for miners who maintain the network. There's no hard cap on the total amount of ETH that can be issued. The system is decentralised and no central authority controls the issuance of ETH.

XRP, on the other hand, is pre-mined with a total supply of 100bn tokens. However, only 45bn are currently in circulation. The rest are held in escrow and released to Ripple Labs at a rate of 1bn per month. The company can choose if they want to put XRP back into escrow, sell it on the market or sell directly to financial institutions that use Ripple technology. For Ripple Labs, selling XRP is part of the business model and a way to maintain profitability ahead of the potential IPO.

At the moment, the Ethereum network can, at its best, process roughly 15 transactions per second. The transaction fees on the network have been climbing recently due to the emergence of stable coins and decentralised finance (DeFi) projects. The average transaction fee on Ethereum is currently around $1.50, up from $0.10 in April 2020.

Ripple network can process a transaction in four seconds and can handle 1,500 transactions per second, according to the company. The standard transaction fee on the Ripple network is 0.00001 XRP per transaction, which gets burned, creating a deflationary mechanism.

Truth be told, early investors in both cryptocurrencies have done exceptionally well. ETH went from trading below $10 at the beginning of 2017 to an all-time high of above $1,400 in January 2018. Similarly, XRP was trading below $0.01 in March 2017 and after going on an impressive run, reached $3.40 in January 2018.

Simple and intuitive platform

Since January 2018, however, ETH is down over 75 per cent while XRP is down more than 90 per cent. Regardless, it is worth noting that more recently, since the March 2020 lows, ETH rallied over 200 per cent going from $100 to just over $300. XRP lagged during the same period, only appreciating by about 35 per cent.

In the latest news, the Ethereum community continues to focus on scalability solutions and the transition to Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus. The initial phase, or Phase 0, has been delayed multiple times but is still expected in 2020. The team will release the last testnet on August 4, at the earliest, with the mainnet launch expected to follow later in the year. It's near impossible to discuss Ethereum without mentioning the impressive growth in DeFi. There's currently more than 4m ETH locked in various DeFi platforms, contributing to the demand for ETH.

Ripple is well known for its extensive list of partnerships with financial institutions around the world. From that perspective, it is set to benefit from the recent decision by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to allow banks that are licensed in the US to offer crypto custody services. In other news, Santander, one of the large retail banks working with Ripple, has recently expanded available regions for its international payments app. The app is a borderless blockchain payment tool, built alongside Ripple, that aims to make transactions cheaper, faster and more transparent.

On a less positive note, Ripple continues to battle a string of class-action lawsuits claiming it violated securities laws in the US. The lawsuits allege that XRP is a security and was not registered with relevant authorities when it was marketed and sold in the US.

So now that we know what both projects are about and the main differences between them, which one is a better investment in 2020, ETH or XRP?

The usual disclaimer here, no one knows which token will perform better in the future, so it is always crucial to do your own research. What we can do, however, is consider whether the Ethereum or Ripple network has better prospects.

On that front, Ethereum has a brighter future. Most decentralised applications are currently built on the Ethereum blockchain. DeFi projects are an easy example of Ethereum's utility. Over the long-term, there are many other areas, like energy, where Ethereum's smart contract functionality could make a big difference. And while the future is bright, Ethereum does need to execute on its PoS roadmap as well as other scaling solutions.

For XRP, the source of fundamental demand for the token is unclear. Many retail investors abandoned XRP after the 2017 bull run. Institutional investors are also not too keen. The Grayscale XRP trust, for instance, had $6.6m in AUM in June 2018, compared to just $2.7m at the end of June 2020. An additional supply of 1bn new XRP every month is likely to limit any sustained price upside. The pending lawsuits also present a substantial risk. If the SEC designates XRP as a security, its utility as a medium of exchange will disappear.

Undoubtedly, ETH, XRP and other cryptocurrencies present attractive investment opportunities. Their volatility also makes them great assets for traders and speculators.

For those who prefer to take advantage of that growing volatility, without holding the underlying coins, contracts for difference (CFDs) might be a way to go. CFDs allow investors to take long and short positions as well as trade on margin. CFDs could be used to hedge existing exposures or for speculation.

You can trade cryptocurrencies CFDs with Capital.com and take advantage of our AI-powered trading platform. A quick note of caution, because CFD trading involves the usage of leverage, both gains and losses are magnified.

Find out how to trade crypto CFDs by reading our comprehensive guide.

Ready to get started?

Download Capital.com

Read the original post:

Ethereum vs Ripple: which one should be in your portfolio in 2020? - Capital.com

EDCON Ethereum Conference to take place virtually August 9-11 – TechNode

EDCON, the Community Ethereum Development Conference, announced today that EDCON will go fully virtual this year on Aug. 9-11.

EDCON 2020 Online Edition will feature a keynote address by Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin, core researchers and developers Danny Ryan, Karl Floersch, Hsiao-Wei Wang, Aditya Asgaonkar, and others from across Ethereum core development team, Ethereum Foundation, and the Ethereum community.

This year, all other Ethereum-related conferences have been canceled, leaving EDCON the only existing large-scale conference that brings together the Ethereum community. The latest development updates, new projects, and features will be announced, including topics such as the current state of Ethereum, Ethereum 2.0, DeFi, dapp development, DAO, governance community building, infrastructure, developer ecosystem, and more. All keynotes and sessions will be made publicly available without charge, and everyone who is interested in Ethereum technology or blockchain in general is welcome to join.

EDCON 2020 Online Edition starts at8:00 a.m. eastern timeevery day fromAug. 9 through 11, streaming athttps://next.brella.io/join/edcon2020.

Replay tracks will be available on Youtube here if you miss the sessions.

Stay tuned on TechNode for an interview with Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin.

EDCON is a non-profit global Ethereum conference that is held annually in different countries. It is committed to serving the Ethereum ecosystem by boosting communication among Ethereum communities worldwide. For more information, visit https://edcon.io/.

For sponsors: sponsor@edcon.io

For speakers: speaker@edcon.io

For press: media@edcon.io

Read the rest here:

EDCON Ethereum Conference to take place virtually August 9-11 - TechNode

Happy fifth birthday to Ethereum. What has it learned? – finder.com.au

On 30 July 2015, a new baby Ethereum came into the world. Then lots of people started maniacally cooing over it and they haven't stopped since, which is how it got to where it is today.

Ethereum has already returned their adoration many times over and doesn't show any signs of stopping.

Ethereum has been the main driving force for most blockchain innovation, helping popularise the transition from the idea of blockchain as a vehicle for magic Internet money, to the idea of blockchain for everything.

Ethereum's position as a driving force for innovation has been apparent even at its ostensibly low points. The DAO hack is practically a distant memory now, but in hindsight the $60 million lost seems a small price to pay for the lessons it taught about security, decentralisation and the stakes at play. Similarly, the actually-not-that-fateful decision to split off into Ethereum Classic has also turned out to not really matter, while being a teachable moment.

By making those big mistakes early, the Ethereum community was better able to shrug off later misadventures like the $160 million Parity Wallet freeze. If the Ethereum community hadn't navigated issues like forking to recover funds earlier, it probably would have done it later with much worse outcomes.

In hindsight, the cost of those incidents was quite low although you'd probably have a different perspective on that if you personally lost funds while the benefits were quite large.

The ICO boom was arguably a much bigger challenge, but also brought even more innovation and understanding.

At its peak about 80% of ICOs were scams while 19% were just plain bad. This era is best exemplified by an ICO called BlockBroker, which launched an ICO to raise funds for a project that would somehow use tokens to fight ICO fraud, before exit scamming itself.

With every new scam depleting public goodwill and tarnishing the entire industry, the biggest pessimists at the time were ready to write the whole thing off as another failed experiment. And yet, a few years later we can see the lasting benefits of the boom.

The scam waves washed a lot of garbage onto the beach of innovation, but they also brought lots of beautiful seashells that still remain today while most of the garbage is long gone.

ICOs created success stories like Binance, which is itself now pouring money into other blockchain developments, as well as many of the DeFi projects that appear on track to define Ethereum in its current phase, such as Chainlink, Synthetix and many more.

Just as importantly, the sheer excesses of the era finally forced regulatory intervention, which helped bring some order to the chaos and encouraged a more nuanced, pragmatic vision of what Ethereum could be, how it could grow and where the worlds of centralised and decentralised finance might one day meet in the real world.

Perhaps it was these experiences, of Ethereum and its community simultaneously being on both, all and no sides of the fence that have made it such an adaptable and pragmatic system. They've helped pave the way for the vision of Ethereum 2.0 where the main Ethereum chain is a centre point in a garden of permissioned, hybrid and other permissionless chains.

This history has served Ethereum well, imbuing it with the flexibility it needs in a complicated world.

"One of the core reasons behind Ethereums success is its innate malleability," says GSX Group CEO Nick Cowan. "Much like how the rise of Web 2.0 powered a groundswell of momentum from a technological standpoint, Ethereums emergence was the battering ram for the ascent of blockchain more broadly... Blockchains use-cases extend into almost every industry and sector, with many of those innovations leaning on Ethereum as a foundational layer."

"[Ethereum's] success has been predicated on the ease at which both hybrid and fully decentralised autonomous systems, applications, and organisations can operate utilising its framework," said HXRO CEO Dan Gunsberg. The real beauty of Ethereum is that it is the ultimate laboratory for innovation across an almost infinite spectrum of market segments."

The ability to integrate with permissioned chains is integral to this success.

"I can tell you firsthand that Ethereum is the most requested chain, right up there with Bitcoin, that companies ask Blockset to support, likely due to its capabilities of building private chains," says BRD CEO and Blockset creator Adam Traidman.

Clear CEO Eran Haggiag predicts further developments along those lines:

"Looking to the future, in the next five years, I believe DLT will become a pivotal infrastructure facilitating cross-company financial applications, identity management, and traceability something most companies won't be able to operate without," he says. "Due to the conservative nature of many enterprises, most of these networks are now permissioned, choosing DLT technology based on different parameters, resulting in multiple DLTs for different networks."

"By enabling a DLT-agnostic infrastructure, cross-network connections can be rapidly created and application providers can write an application once, and easily deploy it anywhere. Enabling seamless migration between DLTs, infrastructure that is DLT-agnostic will create the path to future move into public networks like Ethereum or integration with them for payment and other DeFi applications."

It's funny to think that absolutely none of these considerations were top of mind as Ethereum navigated its way through times like the DAO hack, Parity Freeze, ICO frenzy and the attack of the Cryptokitties, but that somehow, in some way, responding to and growing from those helped shape its way for future success.

Disclosure: The author holds cryptocurrencies including BTC, ETH, BNB, KDA, BAND, CELO, FET, HBAR at the time of writing

Disclaimer: This information should not be interpreted as an endorsement of cryptocurrency or any specific provider, service or offering. It is not a recommendation to trade. Cryptocurrencies are speculative, complex and involve significant risks they are highly volatile and sensitive to secondary activity. Performance is unpredictable and past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Consider your own circumstances, and obtain your own advice, before relying on this information. You should also verify the nature of any product or service (including its legal status and relevant regulatory requirements) and consult the relevant Regulators' websites before making any decision. Finder, or the author, may have holdings in the cryptocurrencies discussed.

Picture: Shutterstock

Original post:

Happy fifth birthday to Ethereum. What has it learned? - finder.com.au

Ethereum Price Analysis: ETH/USD struggles to hold the gains, bears target at $350.00 – FXStreet

Ethereum, the second-largest digital asset, hit the new high at $415 on Sunday, August 2, and retreated to $379.70 by press time. The second-largest digital asset has gained nearly 3% since the beginning of the day, though it is still down 1% in the recent 24 hours.

On the intraday charts, ETH/USD is supported by the upward-looking middle line of the 1-hour Bollinger Band $375.50 closely followed 50-hour SMA at $373.50. Once it is out of the way, the sell-off is likely to gain traction with the next focus on psychological $350.00 reinforced by 1-hour SMA100. The intraday RSI is flat in the neutral position, which means the price may stay continue moving inside the range for some time before the growth is resumed. The short-term trend remains bullish as long as the price stays above $350.00.

On the daily charts, strong resistance is created by $400.00. This psychological barrier is supported by the upper line of the Bollinger Band. Once it is broken, the recent high of $415 will come into focus. A sustainable move above this area will take ETH/USD into uncharted territory.

View post:

Ethereum Price Analysis: ETH/USD struggles to hold the gains, bears target at $350.00 - FXStreet

College Football Needs to Change. The Pac-12s Players Are Making That Happen. – The Ringer

This week, major college football schools and administrators may learn the drawback to the model of amateurism that theyve clung to for more than a century. Sure, theyve built a multibillion-dollar industry on the premise that college athletes shouldnt get salaries or be able to profit off of their names, images, and likenesses. Not paying players has allowed schools to hand coaches and athletic directors huge salaries and commission lavish, state-of-the-art facilties. Its allowed them to subsidize other sports without dipping into their billion-dollar endowments. But when the players cant make money, theres not much the schools or administrators can do if they decide not to work.

More is riding on college football players working in 2020 than ever before. College sports administrators have been loud and clear about how much they need this football season to happen to keep the entire college sports economy afloat. When the coronavirus was spreading across the United States in May, Georgia athletic director Greg McGarity told ESPN, You can run all of the numbers and projections, but if you dont have that football part, its just agonizing. If you dont have football revenue, where does your revenue come from? This is because, according to its most recent NCAA membership financial report, Georgias football program generated nearly half of the athletic departments $174 million in revenue from ticket sales and contributions in the 2018-19 fiscal year alone. The numbers are similar at other Power Five schools.

Given this breakdown, youd think that schools and administrators would take steps to ensure that the college athletes they need to play so badly would be protected from the coronavirus. Instead, there appears to be no discernible plan at all. The players will not compete in a contained bubble, the approach used by the NBA, WNBA, NHL, NWSL, and MLS. There are no uniform testing procedures; some schools had dozens of players test positive for COVID-19 and kept practicing, while some schools arent even testing players at all. Players at several schools have received helmets with shields that are designed to prevent them from spreading the virus, but those helmets reportedly make it difficult to breathe. During a pandemic, thousands of unpaid athletes, who are predominantly Black, are being asked to risk their health to make money for their coaches and administrators, who overwhelmingly are white. When you say it out loud, its bad.

Its also led college football players to realize the power they hold. On Sunday, a group of Pac-12 football players reportedly numbering in the hundreds published a letter in The Players Tribune threatening to sit out the coming college football season unless their schools agree to a list of demands to improve athlete welfare. Among them: the implementation of mandatory health and safety protections for players during the pandemic; the creation of a civic-engagement task force to address racial injustice in college sports and on campuses; a rollback of excessive expenditures, including the salaries of coaches and of league commissioner Larry Scott; and the freedom to secure representation, receive basic necessities from any third party, and earn money for use of our name, image, and likeness rights. The players are also asking to be paid. The final section of the letter calls for 50 percent of each sports conference revenue to be distributed evenly among athletes in their respective sports. All of these demands would represent important steps toward making college football better for the players without whom it couldnt exist, but none are as revolutionary as the demand to be paid. The rest could be achieved within the framework of the NCAA as it has existed for more than 100 years. The players getting paid would be a breakthrough.

Its unclear what comes next, for the players, the schools, or the sport. College football players have protested in the past, but never to this extent, with hundreds of players at multiple power-conference schools all collectively refusing to play. If the reported number of players is accurate, it could be difficult for some Pac-12 schools to field teams. And the players have invited college athletes from other conferences to unite with us for change. This is a tipping point, and what follows could reshape the very foundation of the sport.

The first attempt to push back against the players came from Washington State head coach Nick Rolovich, who was recorded on a phone call with wide receiver Kassidy Woods. Woods told Rolovich that he was opting out of this season because he has sickle cell trait, a condition that puts him at increased risk of serious complications from COVID-19. Rolovich said he had no issue with that, but then asked whether Woods was joining this Pac-12 unity movement and said it would be an issue if you align with them as far as future stuff. For the rest of the call, Rolovich not-so-subtly told Woods that he could lose his scholarship if he was part of the unity group, rather succinctly showcasing why reform is so desperately needed. Rolovich is a millionaire with the power to strip a players non-monetary compensation on a whim if he feels like it. Theres no rule stopping him. The only protection the players have is the idea that coaches cant be too mean because that would hurt them when it comes to recruiting.

College football has evolved over the years, and in some marginal ways its gotten better. But one thing has remained constant: The players have never had a seat at the table. Even when restrictions are loosened to supposedly benefit the players, theyre loosened as slowly as possible. For instance, in the past decade public opinion has shifted to the point that most people now favor giving players the right to make money off their names, images, and likenesses. But the NCAA didnt simply give the players these rights, nor let them have a say in how any change would be implemented. Instead, the players are only set to get NIL rights after a yearslong process that requires legislation to be passed in multiple states and potentially in Congress. The end result is a diluted, NCAA-friendly proposal.

In 2020, its become clear that college football players cannot wait a decade for half-measures. Their health is at risk now. More is being asked of them than ever, but the same old nothing is being given to them in return. Lets spell this out again: During a pandemic, thousands of unpaid athletes, who predominantly are Black, are being asked to risk their health to make money for their coaches and administrators, who overwhelmingly are white. Say it again and again and again. It sounds just as bad every time.

The belief from colleges and administrators was apparently that the athletes would just accept this fate. After all, the powers that be have believed that forever, and its allowed them to cash in. A spot on a high-level FBS team is a shot at an NFL career that players have dreamed about for their whole lives, and a scholarship can offer a pathway to a better life. Players might not be willing to put those things at risk. Washington State defensive lineman Lamonte McDougle tweeted Sunday that he supported the players threatening to sit out, but that not playing this season wasnt an option for him. If the NCAA wants to use me as a lab rat, he wrote, it is what it is.

But others have recognized the sports glaring financial inequities. In 1970, the median Division I athletic department revenue was $6.1 million, according to a 2014 story from The New York Times. In 2012, the median revenue was up to $56 million. And the most profitable programs make way more than that. According to the U.S. Department of Education, 14 FBS programs grossed more than $85 million off football in 2018, led by Texas ($156 million), Georgia ($123 million), Michigan ($122 million), Notre Dame ($116 million), and Ohio State ($115 million). The salaries for the players remain the same today as they were back in 1970 (zero dollars).

The truth is that college football players at Power Five schools create so much value while getting so little in return that their demands hold weight. In June, Mississippi State running back Kylin Hill threatened to sit out of the 2020 season unless the state of Mississippi removed the Confederate battle emblem from its state flag. Within weeks, the flag came down.

Last month, I wrote about how the time for meaningful change in college football was now. Colleges have plainly stated how much they need their players, and yet theyre still doing the bare minimum to keep those players safe. While the players shouldnt have had to drive the movement for change, the sports history has made clear that it wasnt going to come from anywhere else. That movement was taken to a new level on Sunday, and it seems like its only the beginning.

As long as major college football schools and administrators keep clinging to a model in which players are unpaid, theres not much they can do if the players choose not to play. But if the Pac-12 players letter is any indication, that model wont last much longer.

Continued here:

College Football Needs to Change. The Pac-12s Players Are Making That Happen. - The Ringer

Blockstack CEO Says Bitcoin Is a Better DeFi Solution Than Most Think – Cointelegraph

As interest in smart contracts surges, some Bitcoiners are asking: why can't Bitcoin (BTC) become the foundation for smart contracts too, instead of Ethereum (ETH)?

Muneeb Ali, co-founder and CEO of Blockstack open-source platform, believes that the best way to bring about a user-owned internet "is to anchor applications and smart contracts to the Bitcoin network in a way that uses Bitcoin as a reserve currency and its powerful blockchain as a security mechanism."

In a conversation with Cointelegraph, Ali stated that Bitcoin has been the king of blockchains for more than a decade, as most people have come to recognize that the Bitcoin network is unparalleled when it comes to security:

We believe that the new Stacks 2.0 blockchain, currently in testnet, holds one solution for making Bitcoin the foundation for smart contracts in Web 3.0. With the Clarity smart contract programming language and the Proof of Transfer mechanism, developers can build smart contracts in a much more secure language that is predictable, decidable.

Traditionally, Bitcoin has been recognized as a secure network, whereas Ethereum has been a frontrunner when it comes to smart contracts, according to Ali. Blockstacks founder elaborated further on the discussion:

Bitcoins limited scripting language has been seen as a dealbreaker to developers looking to build dapps or deploy smart contracts. As a result, many developers end up building their own blockchains, hoping to bootstrap native proof-of-work protocols or proof-of-stake, but these tend to be much less secure. One of the results is developers assume Ethereum is better suited for launching smart contracts, but I believe this is premature.

Ali also pointed out that the future of the internet will not be a tradeoff of convenience for security, but will instead be tying that security to web applications in a way that uses Bitcoin as a reserve currency along with its blockchain as a security mechanism.

Regarding the web 3.0 era, Ali thinks that of particular note is the recent rise in conversation about the possibilities of DeFi on the Bitcoin. For the Blockstacks founder, this means more people are looking to anchor in the security of Bitcoin when it comes to financial products:

Many people think that it is easier to recreate Bitcoin on top of Ethereum, but it actually makes more sense to create Ethereum functionality on top of Bitcoin. The adoption of this is still nascent but people are definitely starting to realize the value of building on the Bitcoin ecosystem rather than parallel to it.

Originally posted here:

Blockstack CEO Says Bitcoin Is a Better DeFi Solution Than Most Think - Cointelegraph

Bitcoin and Ripples XRP Weekly Technical Analysis August 3rd, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin

Bitcoin rallied by 11.11% in the week ending 2nd August. Following on from a 7.77% gain from the previous week, Bitcoin ended the week at $11,053.8.

It was a bullish week for Bitcoin and the broader market. Bitcoin slipped to a Monday intraweek low $9,944.9 before making a move.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $9,339, Bitcoin rallied to a Sunday intraweek high $12,097.0.

Bitcoin broke through the weeks major resistance levels before sliding back to sub-$11,000 levels.

Bitcoin fell back through the third major resistance level at $11,835 and the second major resistance level at $10,800.

Steering well clear of the first major support level at $9,339, however, Bitcoin broke back through the first major resistance level.

5 days in the green that included an 11.01% rally on Monday and 4.01% gain on Saturday delivered the upside for the week. A 6.36% slide on Sunday reversed some of the gains, however.

Bitcoin would need to avoid a fall through $11,032 pivot to bring the first major resistance level at $12,119 into play.

Support from the broader market would be needed for Bitcoin to break out from last weeks high $12,097.

Barring another extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely cap any upside.

In the event of a breakout, Bitcoin could take a run at the second major resistance level at $13,184.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $11,032 pivot would bring support levels into play.

Barring a broad-based sell-off, Bitcoin should avoid sub-$10,500 levels and the first major support level at $9,967.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was up by 0.87% to $11,150.0. A mixed start to the week saw Bitcoin fall to an early morning low $10,943 before rising to a high $11,200 on Monday.

Bitcoin left the major support and resistance levels untested at the start of the week.

Ripples XRP surged by 33.50% in the week ending 2nd August. Following on from a 7.8% gain from the previous week, Ripples XRP ended the week at $0.28764.

A mixed start to the week saw Ripples XRP fall to a Monday intraweek low $0.20949 before making a move.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $0.19669, Ripples XRP rallied to a Sunday intraweek high $0.32620.

Ripples XRP broke through the major resistance levels sliding back to sub-$0.25 levels.

The pullback saw Ripples XRP fall through the third major resistance level at $0.27739 and the second major resistance level at $0.24422.

Finding late support, however, Ripples XRP broke back through the second major resistance level to end the week at $0.28 levels.

6-days in the green that included a 12.01% rally on Saturday delivered the upside for the week.

Ripples XRP would need to avoid a fall through the $0.27434 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.33950.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ripples XRP to break out from last weeks high $0.32620.

Barring another extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely cap any upside.

In the event of another breakout, the second major resistance level at $0.39135 and $0.40 levels could come into play.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $0.27434 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.22249 into play.

Story continues

Barring an extended broader-market sell-off, however, Ripples XRP should steer of sub-$0.24 levels in the week.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was up by 2.59% to $0.29510. A mixed start to the week saw Ripples XRP fall to an early Monday low $0.28383 before rising to a high $0.29958.

Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested at the start of the week.

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Read more:

Bitcoin and Ripples XRP Weekly Technical Analysis August 3rd, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin will drop to $10K before rally resumes – Asia Times

Despite being extremely volatile when compared to traditional asset classes, bitcoin (BTC) maintains a market equilibrium nature for the majority of the time, according to arecent report by cryptocurrency research firm Zubr.

The report emerged just a few days after bitcoin rallied beyond the $12,000 mark and its volatility finallyrecovered from a multi-year low, Cointelegraph reports.

Using data from CoinAPI, a cryptocurrency market data provider, Zubr found that bitcoin price swings are typically accompanied by nearly symmetrical movements on the opposite side, creating opportunities both on the positive and negative side.

According to Zubr: The majority of the time, Bitcoin will almost mimic the exact percentage increase with a percentage decrease on the very same day.

Typically, this mirror effect takes place within the same trading day, but Zubr also found that it can also occur over the course of longer time periods.

This means that over the short term, bitcoins recent rally to $12,000 could see a similar return to the $10,000 levels and a number of otherfactors point to the possibility of this pullback.

Developing a better awareness of market equilibrium and its relation to bitcoins price can be extremely insightful when incorporated into a day-trading strategy, especially considering that the volatility phenomenon discussed earlier has been constant since 2017.

Traders can ride the volatility and gain from both shorting and longing bitcoin on a daily basis. However, this is only one of the many things traders should have in mind.

According to Zubr: What the data is effectively indicating is lower risk opportunities are possible if one is to trust the historical events and deem such a swing intrinsic to bitcoins trading character. For example, should bitcoin increase by 10% and retreat back to its opening price, history indicates that there is an overwhelming chance (over 50%) that the price drops between 9-12% within the same day or following day.

While inconclusive on its own, this data point can be used when composing a strategy for intraday and momentum trading styles.

In the meantime, only time will tell if Bitcoin will maintain its current market equilibrium or continue higher above the $12K mark.

Asia Times Financialis now live. Linking accurate news, insightful analysis and local knowledge with the ATF China Bond 50 Index, the world'sfirst benchmark cross sector Chinese Bond Indices.Read ATFnow.

Read the original post:

Bitcoin will drop to $10K before rally resumes - Asia Times

Bitcoin and Biotech on My Mind as Defiant Bears Get Crushed – RealMoney

Strong momentum in big-cap technology stocks continues Monday morning as Apple (AAPL) continues to fly higher and the Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) hits a a new all-time high.

Breadth is running about four gainers for every three sellers so it is still a narrow market but the strength in the FATMAAN stocks (Facebook (FB) , Apple, Tesla (TSLA) , Microsoft (MSFT) Amazon (AMZN) , Alphabet (GOOGL) , Netflix (NFLX) ) is keeping sentiment very positive and crushing the bears that are fighting it.

Once again there is no real fundamental reason for the strength. It is a combination of liquidity, fear of missing out, and a short squeeze that is driving the action. The same bearish arguments that have been out there for many weeks still apply and are still being ignored.

Small-caps are lagging again but are still in positive territory. My list of 10% movers remains relatively short and there is an odd mix of action with no real dominant theme.

Biotechnology is bouncing back after some recent rough action and precious metals are pulling back due to strength in the dollar.

One new buy I added Monday morning is Xeris Pharmaceuticals (XERS) , which Dan Rosenblum of Shark Biotechnology points out has seen two weeks of good prescription data. The stock has been trading in a tight range after doing a secondary offering and has a good foundation for upside once the story is more widely understood.

I've also added a little Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) , which continues to see good technical development. Over the weekend, bitcoin suffered a 10% "flash crash" but that was largely recouped and is not reflected in GBTC, which only trades during regular market hours.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Follow this link:

Bitcoin and Biotech on My Mind as Defiant Bears Get Crushed - RealMoney

Bitcoin Will Hit $28K and Correct, Then Hit Six Figures Max Keiser – Cointelegraph

Bitcoin (BTC) will not stop rising until it hits $28,000, Max Keiser believes as the largest cryptocurrency gains over 20% in a week.

In a series of tweets on July 27, the famously outspoken host of the Keiser Report forecast that BTC/USD was headed for six figures after a correction period near $30,000.

Keiser made the prediction as Bitcoin passed $11,200 during a day of surprises. As Cointelegraph reported, $10,000 managed to hold for longer than a matter of hours, and data indicated that this latest trip to five figures was sturdier than others in 2020.

$28,000 is in play before we see a pullback - and then were heading to 6-figures, Keiser summarized.

Well known for his optimism and heavy preference for BTC over other cryptocurrencies, Keiser further took a swipe at gold bug Peter Schiff. Schiff, who has been celebrating gold hitting all-time highs against the U.S. dollar, had previously dismissed Bitcoins rise.

Its put up or shut up for Bitcoin its got to hold $10,000 now, he said during a debate with Morgan Creek Digital co-founder, Anthony Pompliano, on his YouTube channel on Sunday.

Keiser had little time for this and Schiffs other arguments, claiming that in fact, the Bitcoin skeptic was secretly regretting his choice of gold.

Somewhere, @PeterSchiff is puking his brains out right now, the same tweet reads.

Bitcoin versus gold 3-month chart. Source: Skew

As Cointelegraph noted on Monday, gold is part of a safe haven boom which is seeing impressive performance across assets as the U.S. dollar weakens.

Another giant stimulus injection from the Federal Reserve, inflating the money supply, has combined with geopolitical tensions and the ongoing coronavirus outbreak to produce unease among investors.

At press time, BTC/USD was circling $10,730 after reaching its local highs of $11,380 overnight.

For Cointelegraph Markets analyst filbfilb, however, even flipping slightly lower levels as support would be a turning point for Bitcoin, with $10,500 formerly marking severe resistance.

Breakout! $10,500 the level that needs to become support... then... then things get real interesting, he wrote on his Telegram trading channel.

See the original post here:

Bitcoin Will Hit $28K and Correct, Then Hit Six Figures Max Keiser - Cointelegraph

Bitcoin Trading Is Booming in Uncertain Russia, With 350% Spike in New Users on Paxful | Exchanges – Bitcoin News

Bitcoin trading is growing in Russia. Thats despite attempts by the government to make it difficult for investors to do so.

For years, Russian lawmakers have blown hot and cold over cryptocurrency regulation, creating an atmosphere that has often left the entire digital asset industry in the country on tenterhooks.

According to Paxful, Russian users joining the peer-to-peer bitcoin (BTC) exchange have increased by 350% over the last 12 months. New registrations have swelled to record highs month-on-month since the new coronavirus outbreak in March.

The exchange said it is now seeing an average monthly trading volume of $4 million in the Eastern European country, compared to other P2P platforms.

For payment, Russians prefer to use gift cards, online wallets, bank transfers, and credit or debit cards, it stated in a statement shared with news.Bitcoin.com. Anton Kozlov, Paxfuls Manager for the Russian market, said:

Crisis aside, Russia has always had a monolithic banking system that is dominated by a few players, and the sentiment we get is that Russians are increasingly looking to find alternative ways to grow their earnings and participate in the financial market. Bitcoin within the P2P context allows them much more freedom to do so and our data is proving it.

A new law passed on July 22 prohibits the use of bitcoin to pay for goods and services, but grants legal recognition to cryptocurrencies. Such clarity may help drive further growth of the Russian digital asset market.

Russia is reportedly the largest P2P bitcoin trading market in Europe, but a lot of the trading takes place on Localbitcoins, with a volume of about $32 million changing hands this month, according to data from Useful Tulips.

For the same period, the research firm puts Paxfuls BTC trading volume in Russia at just $405,000 a figure that contradicts the one issued by the exchange itself as cited elsewhere in this report.

Paxful said earlier this July that its bitcoin trading volumes climbed 35% to $1.1 billion during the first six months of 2020 compared to $817 million a year ago.

The growing U.S. exchange revealed that more than $182 million worth of BTC, on average, was traded on the platform every month between January and June this year. Nigeria, U.S., Ghana, India, and Kenya led the growth, with emerging markets rising fastest.

To date, Paxful has accumulated 4.5 million users and reached a total of $4.6 billion trading volume for BTC since it started operations in 2015.

What do you think about Russias growing bitcoin trading activity? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Continued here:

Bitcoin Trading Is Booming in Uncertain Russia, With 350% Spike in New Users on Paxful | Exchanges - Bitcoin News

17-year-old accused of masterminding Twitter bitcoin scam – CNBC

A 17-year-old in Tampa, Florida, is accused of taking over the Twitter accounts of Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Barack Obama and numerous other celebrities to scam people into sending the teen bitcoin.

The teen, whose name and photo CNBC is not publishing because the teen is a minor, was arrested and charged, the office of Hillsborough County State Attorney Andrew Warrenannounced on Friday.

Warren's office described the teen as the "mastermind" behind the attack.

"These crimes were perpetrated using the names of famous people and celebrities, but they're not the primary victims here," Warren said in a statement. "This 'Bit-Con' was designed to steal money from regular Americans from all over the country, including here in Florida. This massive fraud was orchestrated right here in our backyard, and we will not stand for that."

Warren's office has filed 30 felony charges against the 17-year-old. The charges include organized fraud, communications fraud, fraudulent use of personal information and access of computer or electronic device without authority.

Two adults were also charged, the Department of Justice said Friday.

Mason Sheppard, aka "Chaewon," 19, of Bognor Regis, in the United Kingdom, was charged in a criminal complaint in the Northern District of California with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and the intentional access of a protected computer.

Nima Fazeli, aka "Rolex," 22, of Orlando, Florida, was charged in a criminal complaint in the Northern District of California with aiding and abetting the intentional access of a protected computer.

The teen's scam reaped more than $100,000 worth of bitcoin on July 15, according to Warren's office.

Twitter provided its most recent update into the attack on Thursday evening.

"The social engineering that occurred on July 15, 2020, targeted a small number of employees through a phone spear phishing attack,"Twitter said in a blog post. "A successful attack required the attackers to obtain access to both our internal network as well as specific employee credentials that granted them access to our internal support tools. Not all of the employees that were initially targeted had permissions to use account management tools, but the attackers used their credentials to access our internal systems and gain information about our processes."

Twitter acknowledged the charges and arrest on Friday.

"We appreciate the swift actions of law enforcement in this investigation and will continue to cooperate as the case progresses," Twitter said in a tweet. "For our part, we are focused on being transparent and providing updates regularly."

Read more here:

17-year-old accused of masterminding Twitter bitcoin scam - CNBC

Bitcoin Scaling Tech Could Have Saved Companies and Users $500M in Fees: Report – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

A new study from Bitcoin startup Veriphi finds companies and users sending bitcoin transactions could have saved more than half a billion dollars in fees if all companies, including wallets and exchanges, had used the most up-to-date technology.

Each bitcoin transaction has an optional fee tacked on. Users have the ability to choose the amount of this fee. If the Bitcoin blockchain is particularly busy, seeing too many transactions at once, a higher fee will ensure a transaction gets picked up by miners and goes through faster.

Bitcoin fees cost an average of about $3 per transaction, according to Bitcoin statistic site bitinfocharts. Fees rise with demand. There have been times in Bitcoins history, particularly in 2017, when fees exploded due to increasing demand. Bitcoin has limited space for transactions, so users had to pay higher fees if they wanted their transaction to go through faster.

These fees are a pain, so bitcoin developers have spent a lot of energy on carving out more Bitcoin block space to make room for new users and their transactions while keeping within the actual block-size constraint of 1 MB.

Transaction batching and SegWit

Veriphis report concludes companies could have saved 21,131.97 BTC in fees (worth $195 million) if all transactions from January 2012 to June 2020 had used a technique called transaction batching.

Transaction batching is a way of sending multiple transactions at once in order to cut down on paying for each individual transaction. This option is more likely to be used by companies, like exchanges Coinbase and Kraken, which send several transactions at once, rather than singular users.

Plus, users could have saved 36,685.72 BTC in fees (worth $339 million) if SegWit had been used on all transactions from August 2017 to June 2020. That adds up to a total of 57,817.69 BTC, worth more than $534 million at the time the report was released.

SegWit, officially added to Bitcoin in 2017, is a technology that allows for more space for transactions per block.

Even though SegWit was activated nearly three years ago, each individual wallet and bitcoin service needs to individually add support for these types of transactions. In some cases, individual users still need to opt in to using SegWit-enabled addresses for their transactions.

As can be expected, wallets and other bitcoin services have so far adopted SegWit at their own pace. Adding a new way to send transactions isnt a trivial task and requires engineering bandwidth; as such, some companies have not prioritized making the necessary infrastructure changes to their platforms.

If average fees grow higher than users would like, however, users who want to save on fees may jump from these slow-to-act platforms over to a bitcoin wallet or exchange thats adopted SegWit.

Bitcoin fees and the next bull run

That said, Gustavo J. Flores, Veriphi head of product and research argued that both SegWit and transaction batching have been around for years. And users of these wallets and services could have saved a lot of money if these technologies had been used for that entire time.

I saw the news a couple of months ago of Coinbase integrating transaction batching into their system and I thought how late that was, given that batching has been around since 2011 or 2012. We were wondering, how big was the impact of all these companies and users that hadnt adopted batching and Segwit? And it turned out to be a pretty substantial number: half a billion dollars, Flores told CoinDesk.

Now that bitcoins price has jumped to more than $11,000, perhaps signalling the start of the next bull run, its time to consider a scenario where fees might be on the rise again.

In the report, Veriphi encourages any person or entity responsible for sending many transactions to think about best practices for saving money on fees.

The savings potential presented is significant and those conducting large amounts of transactions should seriously consider employing these tools in order to remain competitive and save money.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Excerpt from:

Bitcoin Scaling Tech Could Have Saved Companies and Users $500M in Fees: Report - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

This is the ‘type of action’ bitcoin bulls like to see, Oppenheimer says – CNBC

Gold and digital gold are rallying side by side.

Prices of gold hit another record high Tuesday, touching $1,974 earlier in the day and adding to an 8% rally this month. Cryptocurrency bitcoin, meanwhile, held above $10,900 and is up nearly 20% so far in July.

Ari Wald, head of technical analysis at Oppenheimer, said gold still looks good after its run-up.

"We've been recommending gold as a way to play the expansion of the [Federal Reserve's] balance sheet. It's actually the high momentum commodity, it ranks highest above all commodities out there in terms of momentum," Wald said Monday on CNBC's "Trading Nation."

However, he adds, "We do recommend sticking with it but I think it's worthwhile to highlight bitcoin instead which isn't as extended."

Wald notes that its recent breakout is setting up more gains ahead.

"Bitcoin is reversing its downtrend dating back to its 2017 peak. If you are a long-term holder, this is the type of action you'd like to see," he said.

Bitcoin remains well below its December 2017 peak of nearly $20,000.

Michael Binger, president of Gradient Investments, is still in the gold over bitcoin camp.

"Between the two I would really lean on the gold side here. When you think about it, it is really a Goldilocks environment for gold investors right now. I mean, you have a weak U.S. dollar, you have negative real interest rates. All of this is based on the prospect of rising inflation," Binger said during the same segment.

Binger agrees with Wald that bitcoin is a momentum play, but adds that it is not a "valid currency yet."

Both are up on the year. Bitcoin has rallied 53% in 2020 and gold has added 28%.

Disclaimer

Read the original post:

This is the 'type of action' bitcoin bulls like to see, Oppenheimer says - CNBC

A Present and a Former DMACC Have Been Selected as NASA L’Space-Lucy Ambassadors – kwbg.com

FormerDMACC Boone Campusstudent Pedro Salazar of Des Moines and currentDMACC Ankeny Campusstudent Mehmet Sefer of Ames, have been selected for yet another NASA project. Salazar, a 2015 graduate of Des Moines East High School, and Sefer, a 2018 graduate ofHorizon International School of Uganda,were most recently each chosen as a 2020-2021 NASA Lucy Student Pipeline Accelerator and Competency Enabler (LSPACE) Lucy Ambassador. The virtual program was designed around NASAs upcoming 2021Lucy mission.

Salazar, who just graduated from the DMACC Boone Campus, said Lucy will be the first space mission to explore a population of small asteroids known as the Trojans. The Trojans, orbiting the Sun, provide a unique, never-before-explored sample of the remnants of our early Solar System. The mission takes its name from the fossilized human ancestor (called Lucy by her discoverers) whose skeleton provided unique insight into humanitys evolution.

Earlier, he was named a Summer 2020 NASA internship recipient chosen to participate in the NASA Ames Research Center in Silicon Valley, CA.

During the fall 2019 semester, Salazar was chosen to work for 12-weeks at theLSPACE Virtual Academy.

In addition, he has also completed the NCAS (Nasa Community Aerospace Scholars) program.

Im very excited for Pedro! He continues to volunteer his time, energies and talent in amazing ways, said DMACC Boone Campus Physics and Math Professor Dr. Nancy Woods.

Salazar and Sefer said they have been having biweekly Zoom meetings with Sheri Klug Boonstra, Director of the NASA LSPACE Program; Dann Garcia, Deputy Director of the NASA LSPACE Program and Katherine Kretke, Lucy Team Liaison Researcher at Southwest Research Institute since mid-July.

As Lucy Ambassadors, Sefer and Salazar are two of about 70 students who take part in these discussions focusing on an overview of the Lucy Mission, its expectations and resources.

They are referred to as Ambassadors for the NASA Lucy Mission to the Trojan Asteroids.

Salazar said his one-year commitment as a Lucy Ambassador means he is responsible for three outreach events during the year.

The presentations can last anywhere from 30 minutes to one hour each, Salazar said. I hope to conduct at least one in Spanish so the Hispanic community can be informed, too, of what is happening with the Lucy Mission.

Salazar admits he has followed NASA his entire life.

As a kid I looked up to NASA because they never stopped asking questions, Salazar said. Curiosity is something we all share, and the Lucy Mission is just that, looking for answers about the solar system history, what are the asteroids really made of and what do they look like.

Sefer will be a second-year DMACC Liberal Arts student in the fall and enrolled in the Admission Partnership Program between DMACC and Iowa State University, where he plans to major in Aerospace Engineering.

Sefer, too, said he has been invited to participate in several NASA programs. Earlier this year, he was selected as a NASA LSPACE Mission Concept Academy participant. His eight-member team selected him as project manager. Under his leadership, Sefer said the team developed a ten kilogram lander which will investigate the polar ice on the Lunar South Pole. His team also submitted a 190-page proposal, which is being reviewed by NASA.

In addition, Sefer was selected as a member of the NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge, where the participating teams were required to design and build a human-powered rover by considering unusual Lunar and Martian surfaces.

Sefer said as part of his role as a Lucy Ambassador he will be talking about theLucy Mission and the future of the space industry.

I will be trained by NASA administrators in the fields of Science Communication strategies, tactics and time management, Sefer said.

He said hes excited about where this next round of space exploration is heading.

Under the leadership of NASA, exploration in this new area of space will give us deeper information about our Solar System and lay the foundations for the next research, Sefer said. To go even further in space, NASA is going back in time and following the traces of the birth of our Solar System.

Sefer and Salazar both said they hope to be able to attend the launch in October 2021.

I feel that as an ambassador, I will have a voice to help recruit more students into the LSPACE Academy, the Lucy mission and NASA in general, Salazar said. I want to show other students that even during these difficult times, they can participate in diverse NASA programs.

For more on the Lucy mission, click here.

(contributed article and photos, DMACC)

Excerpt from:

A Present and a Former DMACC Have Been Selected as NASA L'Space-Lucy Ambassadors - kwbg.com

Aerospace Thermal Management System Market Status, Players, Types, Applications, and Forecast 2016-2028 – WOLE TV

A recent report published by QMI on aerospace thermal management system market is a detailed assessment of the most important market dynamics. After carrying out thorough research of aerospace thermal management system market historical as well as current growth parameters, business expectations for growth are obtained with utmost precision. The study identifies specific and important factors affecting the market for aerospace thermal management system during the forecast period. It can enable companies investing in aerospace thermal management system market to change their production and marketing strategies in order to envisage maximum growth.

Get Sample Copy of This Report @https://www.quincemarketinsights.com/request-sample-62330?utm_source=Pooja/WO

According to the report, theaerospace thermal management system market has been segmentedby type (air-to-air thermal transfer type, air-to-liquid thermal transfer type), by application (aircraft, spacecraft).

Insights about regional distribution of market:

The market has been segmented in major regions to understand the global development and demand patterns of this market. For aerospace thermal management system market, the segments by region are North America, Asia Pacific, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Rest of the World. During the forecast period, North America, Asia Pacific and Western Europe are expected to be major regions on the aerospace thermal management system market.

North America and Western Europe have been dominant players in this market with the presence of major companies which have a strong infrastructure to boost aerospace &defense sector. In addition, some of the major countries like the US, France, UK, and Canada has been global exporters of aerospace &defense technologies due to established research & development centers, and others.Also, some of the major companies operating in aerospace thermal management system market are headquartered in these regions.

Company profiled in this report based on Business overview, Financial data, Product landscape,Strategic outlook & SWOT analysis:

Make an Inquiry for purchasing this Report @https://www.quincemarketinsights.com/enquiry-before-buying/enquiry-before-buying-62330?utm_source=Pooja/WO

The Asia Pacific region is estimated to register fastest growing aerospace thermal management system market since some of the major economies like China, India, and South Korea are present in the region. In recent decades, these countries have witnessed strong government spending on defense infrastructure, as well as promoting air transport and space research. During the forecast period, the Middle East region is estimated to be a potential region for aerospace thermal management system market in the aerospace and defense sector. It is estimated that Eastern Europe will have stable demand during the forecast period. Also, the rest of the world is expected to be an emerging market with increasing demand.

Market Segmentation:

By Type:

Air-to-Air Thermal Transfer Type

Air-to-Liquid Thermal Transfer Type

By Application:

Aircraft

Spacecraft

By Region:

North America

North America, by Country

US

Canada

Mexico

North America, by Type

North America, by Application

Western Europe

Western Europe, by Country

Germany

UK

France

Italy

Spain

The Netherlands

Rest of Western Europe

Western Europe, by Type

Western Europe, by Application

Asia Pacific

Asia Pacific, by Country

China

India

Japan

South Korea

Australia

Indonesia

Rest of Asia Pacific

Asia Pacific, by Type

Asia Pacific, by Application

Eastern Europe

Eastern Europe, by Country

Russia

Turkey

Rest of Eastern Europe

Eastern Europe, by Type

Eastern Europe, by Application

Middle East

Middle East, by Country

UAE

Saudi Arabia

Qatar

Iran

Rest of Middle East

Middle East, by Type

Middle East, by Application

Rest of the World

Rest of the World, by Country

South America

Africa

Rest of the World, by Type

Rest of the World, by Application

Objectives of this report:

Reasons to Buy This Report:

Customization:

This study is customized to meet your specific requirements:

Contact UsQuince Market InsightsAjay D. (Knowledge Partner)Office No- A109,Pune, Maharashtra 411028Phone: +1 208 405 2835 /+441444390986 /+91 706 672 4848Email:sales@quincemarketinsights.comWeb:www.quincemarketinsights.com

ABOUT US:QMI has the most comprehensive collection of market research products and services available on the web. We deliver reports from virtually all major publications and refresh our list regularly to provide you with immediate online access to the worlds most extensive and up-to-date archive of professional insights into global markets, companies, goods, and patterns.

Excerpt from:

Aerospace Thermal Management System Market Status, Players, Types, Applications, and Forecast 2016-2028 - WOLE TV

Aerospace Titanium Blisk Market: Factors Influencing the Growth Rate of Industry in Key Regions – Market Research Posts

The report on the Aerospace Titanium Blisk market provides a birds eye view of the current proceeding within the Aerospace Titanium Blisk market. Further, the report also takes into account the impact of the novel COVID-19 pandemic on the Aerospace Titanium Blisk market and offers a clear assessment of the projected market fluctuations during the forecast period. The different factors that are likely to impact the overall dynamics of the Aerospace Titanium Blisk market over the forecast period (2020-2026) including the current trends, growth opportunities, restraining factors, and more are discussed in detail in the market study.

Aerospace Titanium Blisk Market report provides in-depth review of the Expansion Drivers, Potential Challenges, Distinctive Trends, and Opportunities for market participants equip readers to totally comprehend the landscape of the Aerospace Titanium Blisk market. Major prime key manufactures enclosed within the report alongside Market Share, Stock Determinations and Figures, Contact information, Sales, Capacity, Production, Price, Cost, Revenue and Business Profiles are (Starrag Group, Makino Milling Machine, PM-AEROTEC, GE Aviation, GKN PLC, EDAC Technology Corp., NFT Inc., Rolls-Royce Holdings, MTU Aero Engines, DMG Mori, OKUMA Corporation,).The main objective of the Aerospace Titanium Blisk industry report is to Supply Key Insights on Competition Positioning, Current Trends, Market Potential, Growth Rates, and Alternative Relevant Statistics.

Get Free Sample PDF (including COVID19 Impact Analysis, full TOC, Tables and Figures) of Aerospace Titanium Blisk Market Report @ https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=S&repid2382022

Aerospace Titanium Blisk Market By Capability, Production and Share By Manufacturers, Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers,Aerospace Titanium Blisk Market Share of Manufacturers, Revenue and Share By Manufacturers, Producing Base Distribution, Sales Area, Product Kind, Market Competitive Scenario And Trends, Market Concentration Rate.

Later, the report gives detailed analysis about the major factors fuelling the expansion of Aerospace Titanium Blisk Market in the coming years. Some of the major factors driving the growth of Aerospace Titanium Blisk Market are-

Aerospace Titanium Blisk Market: Regional analysis includes:

Moving forward, the researched report gives details about the strategies applied by companies as well as new entrants to expand its presence in the market.

Enquiry For Discount or to Get Customized Report: https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=D&repid2382022

On the basis on the end users/applications,this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, sales volume, Aerospace Titanium Blisk market share and growth rate of Aerospace Titanium Blisk foreach application, including-

On the basis of product,this report displays the sales volume, revenue (Million USD), product price, Aerospace Titanium Blisk market share and growth rate ofeach type, primarily split into-

The market study report also fragments the market on basis regions and sub regions. Furthermore, discusses the contribution of major regions that are likely to influence the market in the coming years.

Key Questions Answered in the Report:-

Do You Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry Expert @ https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=E&repid2382022

Some of the Major Highlights of TOC covers:

For More Information Kindly Contact: ResearchMozMr. Rohit Bhisey,90 State Street,Albany NY,United States 12207Tel: +1-518-621-2074USA-Canada Toll Free: 866-997-4948Email: [emailprotected]Follow us on LinkedIn @ http://bit.ly/1TBmnVGMedia Release: https://www.researchmoz.us/pressreleaseFollow me on : http://marketresearchlatestreports.blogspot.com/

Go here to see the original:

Aerospace Titanium Blisk Market: Factors Influencing the Growth Rate of Industry in Key Regions - Market Research Posts