Researchers slowly discover censorship doesnt work – Reclaim The Net

Nobody said wholesale censorship on internet platforms used by billions of people would be easy, and this is something that is now becoming apparent, almost six months into giant social media networks attempts to tightly control information, and the narrative around the coronavirus pandemic.

But censorship of this magnitude is not seen as a problem in itself; a major headache emerging now for Twitter, Facebook, and others, is that it doesnt actually work. Instead, banning content that has already gained wide exposure means its reach could grow almost exponentially, as the ban itself becomes a news story.

Reports are now recognizing this, treating it as a novel phenomenon (though its unclear why censorship is nothing new, and its well documented that in the pre-internet era authoritarian regimes banned print books and they would quickly become a hot commodity.)

Be that as it may, researchers and analysts quoted are not merely acknowledging the difficulty in effectively suppressing misinformation, such as a recent banned video showing the Americas Frontline Doctors group promoting the use of the drug hydroxychloroquine.

Double your web browsing speed with today's sponsor. Get Brave.

They are also looking at what went wrong and why centralized social media platforms arent doing a better job of blocking information they dont want their users to see.

It appears to be nothing more than the nature of these networks itself, and how they propel any message to visibility: content is posted at a small scale, gains momentum, travels from one platform to another, such as from Facebook to Twitter, where users with a large number of followers further accelerate its dissemination.

And if a ban comes at this stage, the media pick that up while social media websites are left playing the role of facilitators of the flow of information and online communication (which is what they should be doing anyway, instead of struggling to editorialize the internet).

Theyre trying to do the right thing, but addressing something that is already viral is a really hard problem, says Annie Klomhaus of social media research company Yonder, referring to (mis) information suppression and how that tends to fail.

Twitter, Facebook, and others are advised to act more quickly and not allow several hours to pass before they take content down and also, improve their technical and human content moderation methods.

Read the original:

Researchers slowly discover censorship doesnt work - Reclaim The Net

Brother Nut, the Artist, Taking Vow of Silence to Protest Chinas Censorship – VOA Asia

WASHINGTON - If I cant tell the truth, I will keep my mouth shut for a month, thats 720 hours.

Meet Beijing-based Chinese performance artist Brother Nut. Born in Shenzhen in 1981, hes internationally known only by his pseudonym.

From 4 p.m. June 1, until 4 p.m. July 1, he barely opened his mouth. Thats part of his project Shut Up for 30 Days, which is designed to spotlight Chinas shrinking space for freedom of speech, particularly regarding the coronavirus pandemic.

He sealed his lips in different ways, using metal clamps, gloves and a surgical face mask inscribed with shut up. He also wore packing tape marked with the characters Error 404, in reference to Chinas Great Internet Firewall.

During a telephone interview with VOA from Beijing, he said there were a few times when he slipped up and uttered a comment. On those rare occasions, he said he slapped himself 16 times and ate only white rice for all three meals after that.

Self-punishment, you know, he said, just like if the authority asks you to shut up and you fail to do so, you will be punished.

He named himself Brother Nut 10 years ago when he began his performance arts.

Nut, in English, it means someone whos weird and hard to deal with, the 39-year-old told VOA. I think it represents my attitude perfectly.

Living up to that name, he has done quite a few crazy and weird things over the past 10 years.

In 2015, he launched Project Dust, in which he created a brick made entirely from dust he vacuumed out of the heavily polluted Beijing city air over 100 days. The project highlighted Beijings air pollution problems at a time when China sought to recast itself as an environmentally aware nation.

In 2018, he made headlines with project Nongfu Spring Market, in which he filled 9,000 water bottles with cloudy and contaminated water from a village in Shaanxi, in northwestern China, and exhibited them in Beijings art district, 798 Art Zone, to showcase the countrys water problems.

In 2019, he collected 400 dolls from the children of migrant workers in Shenzhen in southeastern China, and he used an excavator to throw all the dolls into the air, advocating for the kids who lost the opportunity to get an education because of land seizures back home.

Brother Nut says that in a country like China, art is a symbol of resistance.

In the past two months, he has launched several projects regarding freedom of speech.

In addition to Shut Up for 30 Days, he has set up the truth award to salute journalists who dare to speak out during the countrys battle with COVID-19.

Brother Nut raised just short of $3,000 from 73 netizens, and he gave the award and money to Gong Jingqi, a journalist from Chinas People Magazine. She wrote a bombshell feature story on whistleblower doctor Ai Fen, the director of the emergency department at Wuhan Central Hospital, one of the hospitals most directly affected by COVID-19. The original piece was quickly deleted from Chinas tightly controlled social media, yet its copy was widely circulated online.

His project Error 404 invited netizens to list sensitive words banned on Chinas internet. More than 100 netizens participated, listing roughly 1,000 words as the most sensitive words in 2020. These included National Security Law, Soviet Union has died and raise your hand if you disagree.

Brother Nut said people are so used to Error 404 they feel indifferent when they see the words. These banned phrases are the epitaph of our time, he told VOA.

From air pollution, water pollution and migrant workers, to freedom of speech, he said hes inching closer to the dangerous red line.

But this red line can move, you know. Maybe instead of me moving closer to the red line, it is the red line drawing closer to everybody, he shrugged.

He was taken away by Chinas secret police for tea drinking, which is an unofficial way of interrogating and intimidating anyone who dares to voice different opinions. The first thing they told me were artists are garbage. I was pretty shocked, he said.

Last year, he was detained for 10 days for a project he undertook on financial fraud.

After his release from prison, Brother Nut continued his performance art. Im on this land, so Im focusing on the things happening here, he said.

Chinas shrinking creative space has made it hard for artists, but Brother Nut said he wants to do something to create change.

We have to believe theres a future for us.

See the original post here:

Brother Nut, the Artist, Taking Vow of Silence to Protest Chinas Censorship - VOA Asia

Setlist: Wiley, Twitter and the online censorship debate – Complete Music Update

Artist News Business News Live Business Setlist By Andy Malt and Chris Cooke | Published on Monday 3 August 2020

CMUs Andy Malt and Chris Cooke review key events in music and the music business from the last week, including Wileys antisemitic social media posts and what responsibilities the social media platforms have when their users offend, plus the call from various big name musicians for politicians to stop using their music (or any music) without permission.

SECTION TIMES01: Wiley antisemitic social media posts (00:07:39)02: Musicians letter to politicians (00:25:11)

SUBSCRIBE TO SETLISTListen to Setlist and sign up to receive new episodes for free automatically each week through any of these services

Acast | Apple Podcasts|audioBoom | CastBox | Deezer | Google Play | iHeart | Mixcloud | RSS | Spotify | Stitcher | TuneIn

STORIES DISCUSSED THIS WEEK Wiley condemned over antisemitic social media outburst Wiley insists hes not racist despite his antisemitic Twitter tirade Musicians call on politicians to stop using their music without permission

ALSO MENTIONED Socially-distanced gig pilot didnt provide a commercially viable model Return of indoor shows delayed (BBC News) Setlist 6 Jul 2020: Rolling Stones threaten to sue Donald Trump if he plays their music at another campaign rally

MORE FROM CMU Buy the new Dissecting The Digital Dollar on Amazon Sign up to receive the CMU Daily news bulletin

Read the original post:

Setlist: Wiley, Twitter and the online censorship debate - Complete Music Update

The line between legislating in opposition to disinformation and censorship could be very skinny – Pledge Times

We have to create, among all of us, politicians, technologists, journalists, etc., an ethical code to know how to act with technology, for example in terms of data exploitation. Three young women well aware of the challenges of the technological revolution explained their ideas, fears and solutions in the debate that was broadcast live from the newsroom of El PAS. The guests were Nagua Alba, psychologist and deputy for Guipzcoa (Podemos), who is the youngest deputy in the Chamber; Clara Jimnez, journalist, founder of Maldita.es and one of the experts appointed by the European Commission in its plan to deal with disinformation and fake news; and Nerea Luis Mingueza, researcher in robotics and artificial intelligence at the Carlos III University, who was the one who pronounced the sentence with which the paragraph begins. The reason for the meeting was to find out what has been the impact of this transformation among the youngest, a more vulnerable group but also more flexible and with greater capacity to adapt. Also invited was Roco Vidal, scientific disseminator on YouTube, creator of the successful channel La Gata by Schrdinger, who was unable to arrive in time due to a problem with transportation.

Politics lags behind society when it comes to the use of technology, said Alba, reality is always on top of politicians. The deputy believes that this revolution is catching the leaders with the wrong foot, but warned about the risks that legislative measures could pose against disinformation, for example. The line between legislating against disinformation and censorship is very thin, said Jimnez, aware that many governments may try to take advantage of this controversy to curtail freedom of expression and of the press. Alba proposed that it would be more useful to train educating the critical spirit of the citizenry to discern what it is that they are reading. In this sense, Luis insisted that much more should be done in technological training from a young age, giving them access to information.

The guests talked about the risks of social networks, in the propagation of hoaxes immediately and massively. What worries the technology community the most is the speed with which the false sources are shared, because the denials will not spread as much, explained the robotics and artificial intelligence specialist. In the same way, Jimnez recalled that there are already 36% of Spaniards already reported by WhatsApp: Which means that we consume more information, but also more disinformation. And he warned: More and more misinformation comes to us about migrations and it is something that is happening throughout Europe: hoaxes, videos against migrants, which arise in Spain and which in two days are in Italy or Germany. However, they all insisted that the networks have a positive side, as Jimnez and Alba recalled, by empowering women around the mobilizations for Womens Day or #MeToo.

Politics lags behind society when it comes to the use of technology. Reality is always on top of politicians, lamented Alba

Faced with the labor and unemployment problems that will arise with robotization and artificial intelligence, Nerea Luis stated that there will be a tendency to replace jobs dedicated to repetitive tasks with robots, but what is in a more creative field is going to be harder to replace. The political response to this challenge was provided by Nagua Alba: It will be good if we have to work less, to dedicate ourselves to leisure or care. But the political question is whether we abandon people who will not be able to work, said the deputy, defending the possibility of introducing basic income.

This debate is the first event of a special, called The age of puzzlement, with reports and interviews where expert anthropologists, philosophers, psychologists, economists and technologists will debate, from different perspectives, what awaits humanity in the face of the technological changes that are underway, and also those that will come in the medium term and that we do not even expect .

This special will culminate on November 27 in Madrid a debate in which three of the worlds leading experts will participate in the consequences of the evolution of technology and artificial intelligence. Continuing the debate generated by the book The age of puzzlement, from Openmind, the speakers will discuss issues such as the future of democracy and work, analyzing the role of disruptive technologies in politics and the economy. The three speakers are Nuria Oliver, Director of Research in Data Sciences at Vodafone, Luciano Floridi, Director of the Digital Ethics Lab and professor of Philosophy and Information Ethics at the University of Oxford, and Jannis Kallinikos, professor of Information Systems in the Management Department of the London School of Economics.

Read more:

The line between legislating in opposition to disinformation and censorship could be very skinny - Pledge Times

In a future of mind uploading, will you still be you, and …

Achieving immortality has long been humanitys holy grail. Ever since we first became aware of the fragility of our own existence, weve been looking for ways to cheat death and prolong our lives indefinitely. Although advancements in medicine have enabled us to significantly increase our lifespan, true immortality has remained out of reach. Achieving physical immortality may very well prove to be beyond our capabilities, but what about digital immortality?

A US startup called Nectome recently unveiled plans to help humanity achieve digital immortality by preserving the brain using a revolutionary new embalming technique and subsequently uploading it to the cloud. The process is called vitrifixation, or Aldehyde-Stabilised Cryopreservation. It involves replacing the blood flow in the brain with embalming chemicals that preserve its neuronal structure in microscopic detail, basically by turning it into frozen glass. You can think of what we do as a fancy form of embalming that preserves not just the outer details but the inner details, explains Robert McIntyre, a co-founder of Nectome.

There are a couple of caveats, though. The biggest one is that you cant actually survive the procedure. Furthermore, in order for it to work, it needs to be performed on a living brain. If the brain has been dead even for a short amount of time, it will become irreparably damaged and the procedure wont be successful. That means that it would essentially be a form of suicide, which would make it legal only in those US states that allow euthanasia, such as California. Another major downside is that Nectome still isnt even close to developing a method for reviving or uploading the preserved brain to the cloud.

However, this uncertainty didnt stop people from investing in the idea, with 25 people already having joined the waiting list by paying a $10,000, fully-refundable deposit. One of those people is Sam Altman, the chief executive of the successful startup accelerator Y Combinator, which recently welcomed Nectome into its fold. The company managed to raise more than $1 million in funding so far and was awarded two prizes by the Brain Preservation Foundation, as well as a large government grant to collaborate with MIT. However, the widespread public criticism that followed the waiting list announcement resulted in MIT cutting all ties with Nectome.

Nectome isnt the only company working on uploading our minds to a computer. In 2011, the Russian businessman and billionaire Dmitry Itskov founded the 2045 Initiative, an organisation that aims to help humanity achieve immortality by 2045. Within the next 30 years, I am going to make sure that we can all live forever, claims Itskov. The ultimate goal of my plan is to transfer someones personality into a completely new body.

The 2045 Initiative has laid out its plan in three stages. The first stage involves building a humanoid robot called the Avatar, and a cutting-edge brain-computer interface system. The second stage consists of building a life support system for the human brain, and linking it with the Avatar. The third and final stage involves creating an artificial brain that would hold the original individual consciousness.

So, can it actually be done? Is it really possible to upload a mind to a computer? The short answer is: yes, theoretically. All of the evidence seems to say in theory its possible its extremely difficult, but its possible, says neuroscientist Randal Koene, the scientific director of the 2045 Initiative. The human brain is an incredibly complex organ, consisting of about 86 billion neurons that constantly exchange information with one another. All of the connections between the neurons in a brain are called the connectome, and many scientists believe that this connectome actually holds the information that makes us who we are. And mapping it could potentially allow us to recreate a persons mind.

Our current assumption is that all brain activity is computable. If thats true and the brain does work like a computer, and if we could find a way to map that activity, scan the brain at the necessary level of detail, interpret the scan in a way that would allow us to reconstruct the brains neural network and create a faithful simulation, and if we had enough computing power to run such a simulation, then we should be able to recreate the human mind in a computer. Thats a lot of ifs, but until we know different, it remains in the realm of possibility. However, its a very remote possibility at this point. We are pitifully far away from mapping a human connectome, says Dr Ken Hayworth, a neuroscientist at the Janelia Research Campus in Virginia. To put it in perspective, to image a whole fly brain it is going to take us approximately one to two years. The idea of mapping a whole human brain with the existing technology that we have today is simply impossible.

The main problem is that there are so many things about the human brain we dont know yet. We dont know how the mind is created. We dont know what consciousness is or how to measure it, so even if we were able to create a simulation of the human brain, we wouldnt be able to determine whether that simulation really is conscious. We dont even know exactly which brain structures and biomolecules need to be preserved to recreate a persons memory or personality, or if its even possible.

Many scientists are certain it cant be done. You cannot code intuition; you cannot code aesthetic beauty; you cannot code love or hate, argues Dr Miguel Nicolelis, a neuroscientist at Duke University. There is no way you will ever see a human brain reduced to a digital medium. Its simply impossible to reduce that complexity to the kind of algorithmic process that you will have to have to do that.

The whole idea is also rife with ethical issues, and some experts are suggesting that Can we do it? isnt even the right question to ask. Instead, what we should be asking is Should we do it?. Lets say that weve successfully uploaded a human mind onto a computer. Does that mean that personal identity has also transferred along with memories and that this person is still the same? Or is it a new person with a different identity that just happens to share the same memories? What rights would this digital person have? And if you could create one copy of yourself, why wouldnt you be able to create multiple copies? In that case, which one of those copies would be the real you? And since you wouldnt have a physical body anymore and would essentially be reduced to a stream of data, who would that data belong to? Who would own you? How could you prevent major corporations from misusing your data?

Mind uploading is a fascinating concept, but were not sure yet whether its even possible. Our existing technology and our understanding of the human brain arent advanced enough to answer that question at this time. Even if uploading the human mind onto a computer eventually turns out to be impossible, the idea is still worth pursuing further, because the technology Nectome and others are working on could have many other useful applications. For example, it could facilitate brain banking for future research into health and disease states, help us discover new brain disorder drugs, or enhance our basic neuroscience circuit mapping.

Here is the original post:

In a future of mind uploading, will you still be you, and ...

The immortalist: Uploading the mind to a computer – BBC News

While many tech moguls dream of changing the way we live with new smart devices or social media apps, one Russian internet millionaire is trying to change nothing less than our destiny, by making it possible to upload a human brain to a computer, reports Tristan Quinn.

"Within the next 30 years," promises Dmitry Itskov, "I am going to make sure that we can all live forever."

It sounds preposterous, but there is no doubting the seriousness of this softly spoken 35-year-old, who says he left the business world to devote himself to something more useful to humanity. "I'm 100% confident it will happen. Otherwise I wouldn't have started it," he says.

It is a breathtaking ambition, but could it actually be done? Itskov doesn't have too much time to find out.

"If there is no immortality technology, I'll be dead in the next 35 years," he laments. Death is inevitable - currently at least - because as we get older the cells that make up our bodies lose their ability to repair themselves, making us vulnerable to cardiovascular disease and other age-related conditions that kill about two-thirds of us.

So Itskov is putting a slice of his fortune in to a bold plan he has devised to bypass ageing. He wants to use cutting-edge science to unlock the secrets of the human brain and then upload an individual's mind to a computer, freeing them from the biological constraints of the body.

"The ultimate goal of my plan is to transfer someone's personality into a completely new body," he says.

Itskov's interest in making the impossible possible began as a child in the Soviet Union in the 1980s. "My biggest dream was to be a cosmonaut, to fly in to outer space," he says. One science fiction novel made a lasting impression: "The hero took some immortality pill and he ended up flying the orbit of Earth. I remember myself questioning what I was going to do if I'm immortal."

But does his plan to allow us all to upload our minds to computers amount to anything more than sci-fi? The scientific director of Itskov's 2045 Initiative, Dr Randal Koene - a neuroscientist who worked as a research professor at Boston University's Center for Memory and Brain - laughs off any suggestion Itskov might have lost touch with reality.

"All of the evidence seems to say in theory it's possible - it's extremely difficult, but it's possible," he says. "So then you could say someone like that is visionary, but not mad because that implies you're thinking of something that's just impossible, and that's not the case."

The theoretical possibility Randal refers to is rooted in questions about how our brains work that neuroscience has yet to answer. Our brains are made up of about 86 billion neurons, connected cells that send information to each other by firing electrical charges that propagate through this organ in our skulls like waves.

But exactly how the brain generates our mind is a mystery like no other in science, according to the neurobiologist Prof Rafael Yuste of Columbia University. "The challenge is precisely how to go from a physical substrate of cells that are connected inside this organ, to our mental world, our thoughts, our memories, our feelings," he says.

Find out more

Horizon: The Immortalist, produced and directed by Tristan Quinn, will be shown on BBC 2 at 20:00 on Wednesday 16 March 2016 - viewers in the UK can catch up later on the BBC iPlayer

To try to unlock its workings, many neuroscientists approach the brain as if it were a computer. In this analogy the brain turns inputs, sensory data, into outputs, our behaviour, through computations. This is where the theoretical argument for mind uploading starts. If this process could be mapped, the brain could perhaps be copied in a computer, along with the individual mind it gives rise to.

That's the view of Dr Ken Hayworth, a neuroscientist who maps slivers of mouse brain at the Janelia Research Campus in Virginia by day, and by night grapples with the problem of how to upload his mind. Ken believes mapping the connectome - the complex connections of all the neurons in a brain - holds the key, because he believes it encodes all the information that makes us who we are, though this is not proven. "In the same sense that my computer is really just the ones and zeros on my hard drive, and I don't care what happens as long as those ones and zeros make it to the next computer it should be the same thing with me," he says, "I don't care if my connectome is implemented in this physical body or a computer simulation controlling a robotic body."

But Ken is a realist. "We are pitifully far away from mapping a human connectome," he acknowledges. "To put it in perspective, to image a whole fly brain it is going to take us approximately one to two years. The idea of mapping a whole human brain with the existing technology that we have today is simply impossible." And there's another theoretical challenge. Even if we could create the wiring diagram of a human brain, mind uploading would also most likely require reading the constant activity of all its neurons too.

Here Itskov might get some unexpected help, according to Yuste - who helped bring about the world's biggest neuroscience research project, the Brain Initiative. As part of this $6bn American programme aimed at solving the mysteries of brain disorders like Alzheimer's, he is hoping to map the continual interaction of neurons - the patterns of firing - in the brain over time, "We want to measure every spike from all the neurons at once simultaneously. Many people said it's just impossible."

It is an approach that does not rely on mapping the connectome first. In research yet to be published, Yuste has for the first time imaged over time the hypnotic electrical flashes that make up the activity of nearly all the neurons - up to several thousand - in one of the simplest nervous systems in evolution, a tiny invertebrate called a hydra. "It was very exciting," he says. But "today we just cannot tell you what these patterns mean. So it's a bit like listening in on a conversation in a foreign language that you don't understand."

Within 15 years Yuste hopes to map - and interpret - the activity of all the neurons in a mouse cortex. But the ultimate aim is to read the activity of the human brain.

"If the brain were a digital computer, if you wanted to upload the mind you need to be able to decipher it or download it first. So I think the Brain Initiative is a step that is necessary for this uploading to happen."

But Itskov is far from home and dry. At Duke University, one leading neuroscientist argues that the brain's dynamic complexity - from which the human condition emerges - cannot be replicated. "You cannot code intuition; you cannot code aesthetic beauty; you cannot code love or hate," says Dr Miguel Nicolelis, who is developing a mind-controlled exoskeleton aimed at helping the paralysed walk. "There is no way you will ever see a human brain reduced to a digital medium. It's simply impossible to reduce that complexity to the kind of algorithmic process that you will have to have to do that."

Yuste is also very far from certain the brain works like a computer and could ever be copied in a machine. But because neuroscience cannot yet explain how exactly the brain gives rise to us and prove that mind uploading is impossible, he believes society should start considering what the consequences might be if Itskov succeeded in his ambition.

"The pathway that leads with the new neural technologies to our understanding of the brain is the same pathway that could lead, theoretically, to the possibility of mind uploading," says Yuste. "Scientists that are involved in these methods have the responsibility to think ahead."

Mind uploading would usher in a world fraught with risks.

"If you could replicate the mind and upload it into a different material, you can in principle clone minds," says Yuste. "These are complicated issues because they deal with the core of defining what is a person."

Itskov is more sanguine: "I will answer you to the question of ethics by the opinion which was given to me by his holiness the Dalai Llama when I visited him in 2013. His point was that you can do everything if your motivation is to help people."

But this assurance is not enough for Yuste, who sits on the Brain Initiative's ethics panel: "I would put mind uploading in the list of the topics that should be very carefully discussed and thought through."

Itskov is already planning his endless life. "For the next few centuries I envision having multiple bodies, one somewhere in space, another hologram-like, my consciousness just moving from one to another."

It is estimated that 107 billion people have died before us. As our understanding of the brain advances in the decades ahead it will become clear whether Itskov is really the momentous visionary he claims to be, or merely the latest dreamer of impossible dreams.

Tristan Quinn produced and directed Horizon: The Immortalist, which will be shown on BBC 2 Wednesday at 20:00 on 16 March 2016 - viewers in the UK can catch up later on the BBC iPlayer

Subscribe to the BBC News Magazine's email newsletter to get articles sent to your inbox.

Read this article:

The immortalist: Uploading the mind to a computer - BBC News

The Singularity Is Near: Mind Uploading by 2045? | Live …

NEW YORK By 2045, humans will achieve digital immortality by uploading their minds to computers or at least that's what some futurists believe. This notion formed the basis for the Global Future 2045 International Congress, a futuristic conference held here June 15-16.

The conference, which is the brainchild of Russian multimillionaire Dmitry Itskov, fell somewhere between hardcore science and science fiction. It featured a diverse cast of speakers, from scientific luminaries like Ray Kurzweil, Peter Diamandis and Marvin Minsky, to Swamis and other spiritual leaders.

In the year 2045

Kurzweil an inventor, futurist and now director of engineering at Google predicts that by 2045, technology will have surpassed human brainpower to create a kind of superintelligence an event known as the singularity. Other scientists have said that robots will overtake humans by 2100. [Super-Intelligent Machines: 7 Robotic Futures]

According to Moore's law, computing power doubles approximately every two years. Several technologies are undergoing similar exponential advances, from genetic sequencing to 3D printing, Kurzweil told conference attendees. He illustrated the point with a series of graphs showing the inexorable upward climb of various technologies.

By 2045, "based on conservative estimates of the amount of computation you need to functionally simulate a human brain, we'll be able to expand the scope of our intelligence a billion-fold," Kurzweil said.

Itskov and other so-called "transhumanists" interpret this impending singularity as digital immortality. Specifically, they believe that in a few decades, humans will be able to upload their minds to a computer, transcending the need for a biological body. The idea sounds like sci-fi, and it is at least for now. The reality, however, is that neural engineering is making significant strides toward modeling the brain and developing technologies to restore or replace some of its biological functions.

Brain prostheses

Substantial achievements have been made in the field of brain-computer interfaces, or BCIs (also called brain-machine interfaces). The cochlear implant in which the brain's cochlear nerve is electronically stimulated to restore a sense of sound to someone who is hard of hearing was the first true BCI. Many groups are now developing BCIs to restore motor skills, following damage to the nervous system from a stroke or spinal cord injury.

Jos Carmena and Michel Maharbiz, electrical engineers at the University of California, Berkeley, are working to develop state-of-the-art motor BCIs. These devices consist of pill-size electrode arrays that record neural signals from the brain's motor areas, which are then decoded by a computer and used to control a computer cursor or prosthetic limb (such as a robotic arm). Carmena and Maharbiz spoke of the challenge of making a BCI that works stably over time and does not require being tethered to wires.

Theodore Berger, a neural engineer at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, is taking BCIs to a new level by developing a memory prosthesis. Berger aims to replace part of the brain's hippocampus, the region that converts short-term memories into long-term ones, with a BCI. The device records the electrical activity that encodes a simple short-term memory (such as pushing a button) and converts it to a digital signal. That signal is passed into a computer where it is mathematically transformed and then fed back into the brain, where it gets sealed in as a long-term memory. He has successfully tested the device in rats and monkeys, and is now working with human patients. [Bionic Humans: Top 10 Technologies]

Mind uploading

The conference took a surreal turn when Martine Rothblatt a lawyer, author and entrepreneur, and CEO of biotech company United Therapeutics Corp. took the stage. Even the title of Rothblatt's talk was provocative: "The Purpose of Biotechnology is the End of Death."

Rothblatt introduced the concept of "mindclones" digital versions of humans that can live forever. She described how the mind clones are created from a "mindfile," a sort of online repository of our personalities, which she argued humans already have (in the form of Facebook, for example). This mindfile would be run on "mindware," a kind of software for consciousness. "The first company that develops mindware will have [as much success as] a thousand Googles," Rothblatt said.

But would such a mindclone be alive? Rothblatt thinks so. She cited one definition of life as a self-replicating code that maintains itself against disorder. Some critics have shunned what Rothblatt called "spooky Cartesian dualism," arguing that the mind must be embedded in biology. On the contrary, software and hardware are as good as wet ware, or biological materials, she argued.

Rothblatt went on to discuss the implications of creating mindclones. Continuity of the self is one issue, because your persona would no longer inhabit just a biological body. Then, there are mind-clone civil rights, which would be the "cause clbre" for the 21st century, Rothblatt said. Even mindclone procreation and reanimation after death were mentioned.

The quantum world

In parallel with the talk of brain technologies and mind-uploading, much was said about the nature of consciousness in the universe. Physicist Roger Penrose of the University of Oxford and others disagree with the interpretation of the brain as a mere computer. Penrose argued that consciousness is a quantum mechanical phenomenon arising from the fabric of the universe. Those of the "Penrose school" think uploading the brain would have to involve quantum computers a development unlikely to happen by 2045.

But Itskov thinks otherwise. The 32-year-old president of the Global Future 2045 Congress is dead set on living forever.

Editor's Note: This article was updated on June 19, 2013, to correct the dates of the Global Future 2045 International Congress (it was held June 15-16, not June 14-15, as previously stated.)

Follow Tanya Lewis on Twitterand Google+.Follow us @livescience, Facebook& Google+. Original article onLive Science .

Read the original here:

The Singularity Is Near: Mind Uploading by 2045? | Live ...

Heads Up Poker Podcast: 234 – Steve and Carlos: WITWICWRN – Pokerfuse

Full Episode Description For those wondering, Steve's easy acronym - WITWICWRN - stands for 'Where in The World Is Carlos Welch RIght Now'. While it does not roll of the tongue, it is a question that always comes up when we have Carlos on. The two discuss about fishing, cryptocurrency, and at 30:50 they dive into a strategy hand discussion. Remember that you can always submit a hand for our resident poker analysts to dissect by emailing [emailprotected]! Alex Fitzgerald gives away for FREE his 3 Hour Training Packon 3 betting. He has also put out a class Master Small Stakes Cash Games in One Class, and his tournament version, Master Tournament Poker in One Class. Use the code hupoker to get your discount, good until 2/21/2020. Elliot Roe! Start with thefreeTilt-Buster MP3, or look at his collection ofMental Game MP3s. If you need to be putting in more volume, thenThe Simple Volume Systemis for you. Total Mindset Makeover? Join thePoker Mind Coach Courses. If you are atournament poker player, you may already know aboutTournament Poker Edge. Check out somefree training videoshere. Check out all things poker atHeadsUpPoker.info. Sign up for a coaching session with Steve, watch instructional videos, and check out all previous podcasts. You can contact Steve viaTwitter,Facebook, or email at[emailprotected]

Read more:

Heads Up Poker Podcast: 234 - Steve and Carlos: WITWICWRN - Pokerfuse

How to Keep an Edge in the Era of Pervasive AI? – Via News Agency

AI adopters should be proactive in implementing certain measures if they want to gain or maintain an advantage over their industry peers as the disruptive technology becomes mainstream, according to global accounting firm Deloitte.

In the 3rd edition of its State of AI in the Enterprise report, Deloitte says there are three things that both current and future adopters can do.

Deloittes analysiswhich is based on a survey of2,737 IT and line-of-business executives from around the worldfound that many AI adopters are focused more on improving what they have than on creating something new.

Making processes more efficientandenhancing existing products and serviceswere the top two benefits that the respondents were seeking from AI technologies.

Read more: COVID-19: A Pivotal Moment for Future of AI

We found that companies are still using AI technologies mostly in IT- and cybersecurity-related functions. Forty-seven percent of respondents indicated that IT was one of the top two functions for which AI was primarily used, the accounting firm wrote.

As major functions for AI applications, IT was followed by cybersecurity, production and manufacturing, and engineering and product development. This is while marketing, human resources, legal, and procurement ranked at the bottom of the list.

VIA NEWS LIVE TV

According to the report, businesses will soon need to use AI to differentiate themselves by going beyond using the technology to just improve efficiency and automation.

They will need to use the technology to differentiate themselves and can do that by taking inspiration from inventive use cases to come up with solutions that are both usefuland novel.

Push boundaries.Businesses should try to pursue a more diverse set of projects that could help enhance multiple business functions across the enterprise.

Create the new. A great area of opportunity for businesses. is developing new AI-powered products and services that can solve problems that humans cant.

Expand the circle.In addition to the IT department, employees in other sections should become involved in AI efforts. New vendors, data sources, tools, techniques, and partnerships can be instrumental in achieving this goal.

The survey showed that AI adopters tend to buy their capabilities rather than build them.

About 50 percent are buying more than they build, and another 30 percent use an even blend of buying and building from scratch. Seasoned (53 percent) and Skilled (51 percent) adopters are more likely than Starters (44 percent) to buy the AI systems they need.

According to Deloitte, this suggests that many organizations prefer to experience a period of internal learning and experimentation before deciding on what is necessary.

AI adopters view being a smart consumer as critical to boosting competitive advantage. When asked to select the top initiative for increasing their competitive advantage from AI, adopters picked modernizing our data infrastructure for AI as their top choice, closely followed by gaining access to the newest and best AI technologies.

The findings of the survey show that less than half of adopters (47 percent) claim to possess a high level of skill for selecting AI technologies and technology suppliers.

As more partners and vendors are offering their services, Deloitte says organizations should become savvier and choose the best-equipped ones to gain access to the latest and greatest technologies.

Leverage a diverse team. Both technical and business experts should be included in selecting AI technologies and suppliers as it is important to have a broad perspective from developers, integrators, end-users, and business owners.

Take a centralized approach. Businesses are advised to coordinate experiments, implementations, selection of AI technologies, and vendors across the enterprise as it helps avoid duplication of effort, competing methods, and multiple vendors.

The use of working groups, dedicated leaders, or communities of practice should be considered.

Focus on integrating and scaling.It should be made sure that vendors and partners can help the business integrate AI solutions into its broader IT infrastructure. It should also be verified that solutions can grow with the needs of the enterprise.

Read more: AI Replacing Teachers Will Have Dire Consequences

Deloitte says adopters face reservations as well despite strong enthusiasm for their AI efforts.

In fact, they rank managing AI-related risks as the top challenge for their AI initiatives, tied with persistent difficulties of data management and integrating AI into their companys processes.

Additionally, the surveys findings show that a troubling preparedness gap exists for adopters across a wide range of these potential operational, strategic, and ethical risks.

More than half of adopters report major or extreme concerns about these potential risks for their AI initiatives, while only four in 10 adopters rate their organization as fully prepared to address them.

According to the survey, 56 percent agree that their organization is slowing the adoption of AI due to the emerging risks.

The same proportion believes that negative public perceptions will slow or stop the adoption of some AI technologies, reads the report.

Deloitte says businesses should develop a set of principles and processes to manage potential AI risks if they want to build trust within their business and with customers and partners.

Align risk-related efforts. As many of the risks associated with AI are not unique, it is important to integrate AI-related risk management with broader risk efforts. An AI specialist can help with training and coordination of efforts in this regard.

Challenge your vendors. Organizations should make sure that the AI solutions used are aligned with their ethical principles.

Monitor regulatory efforts. Businesses need to ensure that legal, risk, compliance, and IT leaders are informed of the latest laws and policies regarding AI technologies.

Deloitte states in its report that AIs early adopter phase is apparently ending and the market is now heading into the early majority chapter of this maturing set of technologies.

This is reflected in the forecasts of global market intelligence firm IDC, which predicts that spending on AI technologies will grow to $97.9 billion in 2023more than two and a half times the spending level of 2019.

VIA NEWS LIVE TV

See the original post here:

How to Keep an Edge in the Era of Pervasive AI? - Via News Agency

SentinelOne Research Identifies IoT Vulnerabilities Enabling Remote Takeover and Network Intrusion – Yahoo Finance

Barak Sternberg to Present Research Findings at DefCon after Working with Smart Device Provider HDL Automation on Vulnerability Patches

SentinelOne, the autonomous cybersecurity platform company, today announced that Barak Sternberg, SentinelLabs security researcher, has identified four unique vulnerabilities in HDL Automation smart devices. The vulnerabilities exposed thousands of HDL devices to remote control by adversaries, leading to possible network intrusion, secret exfiltration, and even ransomware attacks. SentinelOne alerted HDL to the issues via the responsible disclosure process, and the vulnerabilities have been patched. Sternberg will present the findings at DefCon on Saturday, August 8 at 9AM PST, and the complete research will be available on the SentinelLabs blog.

IoT devices are ubiquitous in the home and the workplace, connecting lights, air conditioning, and even heat-sensors to home or corporate networks. IoT devices are also potential security weak points that attackers target to exploit internal network configurations, change arbitrary controllers, and cause software or hardware damage. With enterprises adding more and more connected devices to their networks, vulnerabilities like those outlined in SentinelLabs research are concerning as every connection to the enterprise network is a potential vulnerability.

"IoT can pose a significant threat to enterprise security because, while anything you connect to your network is a potential point of ingress, not everyone considers that IoT devices contain unintended vendor-created backdoors" said Sternberg. "Many organizations dont design smart thermostats or refrigerators with security in mind. However, even mundane devices such as this can be open to attackers, making it critical to understand exactly how many devices you have connected to your network and to harden every endpoint."

SentinelLabs identified two vulnerabilities that enabled account takeover; a flaw in the "forgot your password" function and a takeover of the debug email account. Two additional vulnerabilities relating to endpoint APIs were also identified. Due to these flaws, SentinelLabs researchers were able to compromise remote servers used as proxies for configuring smart devices and worked with HDL Automation on patch solutions. If attackers were simply interested in causing chaos, they could do physical damage by raising the temperature in a server room, disabling security cameras, or disabling sensors designed to detect leaks or voltage surges. The four new-found IoT vulnerabilities highlight the sensitivity and cost of IoT cyberattacks in impacting our digital way of life.

Further details on SentinelOnes research will be released on the SentinelLabs blog at the time of the DefCon presentation. Sternberg will present his findings at DefCon IoT Village, on Saturday, August 8th at 9 AM PST.

To learn more about how SentinelOne secures IoT devices and protects corporate networks from IoT-related intrusions, visit http://www.sentinelone.com. The SentinelOne Singularity Platform includes broad IoT capabilities through SentinelOne Ranger, which identifies every connected device on the network and prevents them from being exploited.

About SentinelOne

SentinelOne is the only cybersecurity solution encompassing AI-powered prevention, detection, response and hunting across endpoints, containers, cloud workloads, and IoT devices in a single autonomous platform. With SentinelOne, organizations gain full transparency into everything happening across the network at machine speed to defeat every attack, at every stage of the threat lifecycle. To learn more visit http://www.sentinelone.com or follow us at @SentinelOne, on LinkedIn or Facebook.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200806005536/en/

Contacts

Will Clarkfama PR for SentinelOneP: 401-714-4192E: S1@famapr.com.

The rest is here:

SentinelOne Research Identifies IoT Vulnerabilities Enabling Remote Takeover and Network Intrusion - Yahoo Finance

Mayor Fine calls it quits, wont run for second term on council – The Daily Post

Palo Alto Mayor Adrian Fine

BY SARA TABINDaily Post Staff Writer

Palo Alto Mayor Adrian Fine, who campaigned four years ago as an advocate for more housing, announced today that he will not seek re-election to City Council.

Fine, 34, said he chose not to run because his wife is having a baby in October.

While he was an advocate for more housing, the citys housing numbers did not grow during his four-year term. Only one affordable housing project, Wilton Court, was approved during his tenure while the city lost 75 units when council approved the conversion of the President Hotel from housing to a hotel. The council also approved 50 new apartments at 3001 El Camino in 2017, but none of those units are affordable.

Fine drew ire from council colleagues when he sent letters of support for SB50, a now abandoned bill that would have pre-empted local zoning near transit and jobs, and the Caltrain tax. Other members of the council accused him of trying to endorse controversial legislation on behalf of the city. Fine said it was his right, as mayor, to use city stationery for his letters to other officials on these issues.

At a June 8 meeting where dozens of residents spoke out against police brutality, Fine incited anger by telling residents they couldnt name specific cops who have been accused of misconduct.

Some of the speakers named individual cops including Tom DeStefano, who was the subject of a $250,000 civil settlement in 2013 and is named in a current claim for $3.8 million against the city for alleged brutality.

Mayor Adrian Fine asked residents to focus on policy not people.

Mark Loveland said Fine was tone-deaf and insensitive for telling residents not to call out city officials by name. He said that if the police wont hold officers accountable, and residents cant call for accountability, then residents have no recourse.

At the next meeting, the prohibition against naming names had been dropped.

Fines employed as the marketing director of Autonomic, an arm of Ford Motor Co. that is developing connected vehicles.

In the November election, four seats are up for grabs on City Council and, at this point, it appears there will be 11 candidates.

Incumbents Greg Tanaka and Lydia Kou are running for second terms.

Other candidates in the hunt for one of the four seats include former Mayor Pat Burt, Human Rights Commission member Steven Lee, Planning and Transportation Commission members Cari Templeton and Ed Lauing, systems engineer Raven Malone, lawyer Rebecca Eisenberg, WhatsApp product management director Varma Ajit, former Human Relations Commission member Greer Stone and Brett Schilke, who works for Singularity University.

The deadline to file papers to run for council is Wednesday (Aug. 12), but would-be candidates need to talk to the city clerk a few days before the deadline to pull the necessary papers.

Incumbent Liz Kniss is unable to run again due to term limits.

Read more from the original source:

Mayor Fine calls it quits, wont run for second term on council - The Daily Post

Western Slope Skies – The Limits of Space – KVNF Public Radio

We consider our universe to be limitless. Over the decades, people have explored that infinity to discover what is out there, even who is out there. But what about the space closest to us? The low Earth orbit is overcrowded by satellites, space junk, and the leftover remnants of space exploration. These leftover pieces affect how scientists and people experience space.

Episode aired Friday, Aug. 7th & Wednesday, Aug. 12th, 2020

Orbital debris, also known as space junk, are objects left in space that no longer function as intended. Objects in orbit will eventually return to the ground but are currently launching faster than they are re-entering. Many objects stay in orbit for decades. NASA estimates the amount of orbital debris in the low Earth orbit exceeds over 100 million pieces, ranging from one millimeter to over ten centimeters. This is enough for around one third of Americans to have their own piece of space junk.

The low Earth orbit also holds many objects currently in use, like satellites for weather and communications, the Hubble Telescope, and the International Space Station. However, even these essential devices contribute to overcrowding. When stargazing or photographing the night sky, it is hard not to see the bright streak of a satellite in view.

The oldest man-made object still in orbit is Vanguard 1. Launched in 1958, it was the fourth satellite launched into space. On Earth, after 50 years even trash becomes a part of an areas historical landscape. Do we leave these random remnants of past space projects in orbit to commemorate the history of human space exploration?

In order to preserve the beauty of our night sky, we must balance objects that provide value to humanity with decluttering our orbit.

This balance may not be hard to strike. We can sustain the overcrowding of the low Earth orbit by removing five of the highest risk objects each year, both small pieces that risk collision and large pieces that affect long-term accumulation. Scientists are currently working on the best way to remove items, however, there is no overarching regulatory body to create concrete removal plans.

We consider space to be limitless, but just like any other resource, it does have limits. We need to learn how to balance this resource. Not just for the humans of right now, but also those of the future. Will we look back in 30 years and wonder why no one tried to preserve it earlier?

Western Slope Skies is produced by members and friends of the Black Canyon Astronomical Society. This episode was written and recorded by Megan Spencer from Devils Tower National Monument.

Read the rest here:

Western Slope Skies - The Limits of Space - KVNF Public Radio

The Eagle Has Landed – Georgia Southern University Newsroom

Georgia Southern Alumni Reflect on Work with NASA Space ProgramThe Vertical Assembly Building at Kennedy Space Center

In the summer of 1967, Georgia Southern graduates Bob Pound (67) and Charlie Abner (67) hopped in a car and headed for Cape Canaveral with one missionto fix NASA.

In January of that year, NASA was conducting a pre-flight check for the crew of Apollo 1the programs first crewed missionwhen a fire broke out in the cockpit and killed its three astronauts.

After that, we said Lets go down there and put the space program back on its feet, said Pound, a native of Statesboro.

They didnt call. They didnt have an appointment. They just pulled into the badging station on U.S. 1 and figured theyd found their destination. Wasnt a very big building, but it had some rockets out front, said Pound.

What can we do for you? the attendant asked.

Well, we came down here to get a job, said Pound.

Okay, who with?

Well, NASA, of course! Isnt this NASAs place here? Pound said they didnt realize it at the time, but there were several hundred contractors coming in and out of Kennedy Space Center (KSC).

Uh, let me make a few phone calls, said the attendant, and motioned them to wait in the lobby.

Pound listened as the attendant talked on the phone.

No, they dont have an appointment.theyre here! Theyre sitting right here! No, they just came in and said theyre looking for a job. No, theyre here already!

They said that over and over, recalled Pound, laughing.

The attendant hung up the phone and said, Theyre going to call me back.

Pound and Abner waited and waited, wondering with each passing minute if theyd made the trip for nothing. Then the phone rang.

It was a call that not only changed their lives, but also carved a path for several Georgia Southern graduates who would follow in their footsteps.

Pound and Abner were the first graduates of Georgia Southerns physics and mathematics degrees to join the ranks at NASA, and the tale of their success quickly spread through the small department.

Sonny Belson (68) traveled down to Cape Canaveral the next summer and showed up unannounced the way his classmates had. He interviewed and was offered a job the next day. Chris Fairey (69) skipped class to drive down to KSC and get his name on the list, and he was hired the summer after graduation.

It was absolutely amazing that you literally walked in, a cold call off the street, and here I am, said Belson. And Im still at it after all theseyears.

Though they all graduated with the same degrees, they were each assigned to wildly different roles within the Apollo program. Pound says this was a testament to the college and its faculty, especially Carroll W. Bryant, Ph.D., professor emeritus and head of the physics department at Georgia Southern from 1963-1975. He passed away in Statesboroin 1988.

Bryant was an accomplished physicist who served as a scientific advisor to the U.S. Armed Forces and most notably worked on the development of the atomic bomb. He was not only a knowledgeable physicist, but also had the wealth of experience to convey physics practical use for his students.

He was really an amazing man in terms of what he could convey to us in terms of theory and physics and his own application. said Fairey. You ask yourself, How am I going to use all of this? And what you realize at the end is that what theyre teaching you are the tools. You may not necessarily use a particular theorem or a math equation, but you understand how it evolved and why its there and how it can be used.

When Pound, Abner, Belson, Fairey and other alumni joined NASA, they were thrust into a workforce of more than 400,000 employees, contractors and consultants working all over the United States to achieve one goal, set by President John F. Kennedy: before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely toearth.

Pound was assigned to the Ground Instrumentation Systems technical staff in the Central Information Facility (CIF). His team collected real-time telemetry data surrounding the Saturn V rocket, and displayed it on the huge Eidophor Projectors in the Control Room. Abner started as a ground station engineer, working up to ground station manager before leaving to join the Air Forcein 1968.

Fairey joined Pound in the CIF, the entire second floor of which housed two giant GE 635 computers that were responsible for managing data for Apollo. Today, you have more computing power on your phone! saidFairey.

Belson went to work with the design engineering directorate in the communications electronics area, where he installed and designed the operational television system at the launchpad and towers around the complex, and the mobile television vans for use during launch andevents.

As each took on their small piece of the larger puzzle, they couldnt immediately see the true impact and scale of what they were doing. It wasnt long, however, before the picture became crystal clear.

Well, at the time, of course, it was just a job, said Pound. Then we saw how big it was and what all it encompassed, and we thought, Wow! This is going to be something big! And we felt like we were doing a pretty important job.

Its easy to get lost in the massive scale of NASA. There, everythingis big.

Anytime you put together a large program like the Apollo program that involved human spaceflight as well as the manufacturing of the launch vehicle and the facilities that manage it, you realize the scale of the vehicle itself, saidFairey.

The biggest part of the Apollo program was the Saturn V rocket, which is still the most powerful rocket ever built.

The Saturn V was a three-stage, expendable, super-heavy lift launch vehicle that was used to send Apollo missions into space between 1967 and 1973. It was 363 feet tall, weighed more than 6.5 million pounds and reached speeds of more than 17,000 mph to break free from earths gravity. To house the construction of these rockets, NASA constructed the Vertical Assembly Buildingthe VABwhich is still the largest and most visible complex at KSC. The building is 526 feet tall and covers 8 acres of square footage. Its a vast cavern with 40 floors of scaffolds and railings that allow thousands of technicians to reach every part of the spacecraft.

Once the Saturn V was built, it had to be moved to one of two launch pads, the closest of which was 3.5 miles away. To accomplish this impossible task, NASA used one of two machines called crawlers, weighing 6 million pounds each, to carry the launch vehiclefully uprightacross the complex, traveling at less than 1 mph. The journey took roughly 8 hours to complete.

Even more impressive was the level of detail involved in creating these rockets and executing their missions. Each stage of each rocket was built by a different American company, and each wire, duct, nozzle, rivet and screw was carefully designed by engineers who were armed with nothing but slide rules and an expert grasp of their field.

For each Georgia Southern alumnus, their role supported one step in an impossibly large number of procedures and processes that all came to fruition on July 16, 1969. The launch of Apollo 11, which carried the first men to step foot on the moon, was a history-altering event each of them witnessed firsthand.

Its kind of hard to describe until you see it, saidFairey.

From a mankind standpoint, this was a significant achievement, said Belson. You know, if you look at where we are today in all of that, its based on how we got there. So its very, very important for mankind overall that we were able to go do this. And somehow we played a part in that.

Accomplishing the goal of manned space flight came with difficulty and sometimes tragedy,however.

In 1970, while more than 210,000 miles from earth, the crew of Apollo 13 was doing a routine stir of the oxygen tanks on the service module when a faulty wire ignited and caused an explosion. With the service module inoperative, the crew of three astronauts had to use the lunar excursion module (LEM) as their lifeboat home, but it was only designed to support two men for two days.

Back on earth, engineers at Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in Houston worked around the clock to create procedures to reprogram and modify the LEM to support all three crew members for four days, and communicated the plans to astronauts who had limited power in their craft, a cold and wet cabin, and a shortage of potable water.

For Pound and others that worked in the Launch Control Center at KSC, these types of events meant quick decisions and immediate actionboth of which would mean the difference between life and death for the flight crew and ground personnel.

We used to say it was hours and hours of boredom punctuated by moments of sheer terror, said Pound. And we had to be able to make decisions pretty quickly without talking to the other people. And then we had to know who to talk to in case we needed answers to get things done.

While the story of Apollo 13 ended happily, there were other space program missions thatdid not.

In 1986, Fairey was the shuttle project engineer for the Space Shuttle Challenger, and one of the key figures involved in its launch. On Jan. 28, 1986, he was in the control room of KSC when, only 73 second into liftoff, a leak in one of Challengers rocket boosters caused the external fuel tank to explode, disintegrating the shuttle and killing its crew.

It was a horrible dayespecially due to the fact that I had trained with the crew. I knew the crew, saidFairey.

I was midfield of the shuttle landing facility, and actually was there with some of the astronaut family, said Belson. Its very close and personal and, you know, I still wont watch the video. I wont watch it today. Yeah, it was very emotional.

Fairey and his engineers spent the next two years going over the accident, learning what happened. As a result, they completely reworked all of their procedures, software and training and then completely retrained with their colleagues in Houston and Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville,Alabama.

You do all you can to minimize the risk, but its risky business, said Fairey. I mean, youre sitting on top of a bombliquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. It took a lot of people checking a lot of things, double checking, lots of tests and test firings. This is a risky business, and when you commit to human spaceflight, you have to be willing to take the risk.

Through both tragedy and triumph, mankinds pursuit of space changed the worldforever.

Since its establishment in 1958, and its charge to reach the moon within a decade in 1962, NASA has been a place where scientists and mathematicians can dream big. The space program enlarged those dreams, broadened them far beyond the bounds of earth, and made people believe that they could achieve anything to which they set their minds.

In addition to space exploration, however, the NASA space program also pioneered new technologies that people around the world now take for granted in their daily lives. Whether they use solar panel technology, cordless and battery-powered tools, reflective vests or even memory foam, they can thank NASA and the space program for these inventions.

The technology that came out of this program was awesome, said Fairey. It advanced the United States exponentially in terms of computing capability, material science and all thosethings.

The technology that came out of this program was awesome, said Fairey. It advanced the United States exponentially in terms of computing capability, material science and all thosethings.

During his tenure in the Apollo program, Fairey worked with researchers from the University of Arizona to pioneer a lightning detection system at KSC as lightning was an especially dangerous hazard during launch. Fairey worked on all the mathematical algorithms used in thesystem.

It was so accurate that you could actually see the electrical potential build up if a storm was coming from Orlando or out in the ocean, he said. And you could calculate when it would get here and make a determination of whether or not it was safe to launch. And so they use that today for all the launches.

Fairey passed away on April 8, 2020, but left a great legacy at NASA. He finished his career as the flow director for four missions of the Space Shuttle Discovery, an orbiter that launched several satellites and other hardware into space, including the Hubble Space Telescope. Most notably, Fairey arranged for Discovery astronauts to fly several Georgia Southern University flags on one of their missions, and then presented one of the flags to the University.

After more than 30 years of service, Fairey retired in 2002 and became a docent at NASA, sharing his knowledge and his love of teaching with camp participants and museum visitors, and inspiring the next generation of students interested in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics)fields.

In his interview, he reflected on the program and the impact it had on the world.

Youre proud to have been a part of a team that worked so hard for so many years that achieved this unbelievable goal that many people thought was not even possible, he said. So youre very humbled in the aspect of you being such a small portion, and just one individual of a very large team that achieved this magnificent goal.

Abner returned to NASA in 1974 and finished his career as the chief engineer for the Space Shuttle program. He is currently semi-retired as a staff engineer at the United Space Alliance.

Belson worked with the design engineering directorate throughout his career at NASA, and helped design the video systems that film the countdowns and launches, as well as the video simulators that astronauts used to train for their missions in space. He left NASA after the Challenger accident and went to work for the Department Of Defence supporting Expendable Launch Vehicle satellite programs being flown from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida and Vandenberg Air Force Station in California.

It gives you a certain sense of fulfillment that we had the opportunity to even participate in this, said Belson. When I go back and look at the history, I remember watching Dr. Wernher von Braun on TV talking about rockets and going to the moon and landing on the moon. So its not a job, its more of a vocation, you know?

Pound finished his career as chief of the NASA Test Directors office, the culmination of his many roles in coordinating and planning for all the missions at KSC. He worked at NASA for 28 years and retiredin 1995.

I hope it makes Georgia Southern feel proud of us, said Pound. Thats what Im hoping. I think we did a pretty good job while we were down here and glad we could do what we could. And then the Georgia Southern people looking at it and looking at us saying, Well, we were part of that. So Georgia Southern was a part ofit, too.

It was a really fun career, he added. I enjoyed every minute of it, except for the moments of sheer terror.Doy Cave

See more here:

The Eagle Has Landed - Georgia Southern University Newsroom

Casetify launches NASA-branded tech accessories on day of Perseverance rover launch – Space.com

A new set of phone cases, Apple Watch bands and other trinkets allows you to carry your love for NASA with you everywhere you go.

Lifestyle brand Casetify launched a special collection including dozens of accessories that feature NASA's famous "meatball" and "worm" logos, among other space-themed designs. You can check out the entire group here. (NASA likely gave its endorsement to Casetify, as the agency has strict rules around using the logo for commercial purposes.)

The official launch date for the accessories was Thursday (July 30), the same date that NASA's Perseverance rover successfully lifted off from Florida on its way to search for ancient life on Mars. The old-school NASA "worm" logo re-debuted on the Demo-2 astronaut launch aboard a SpaceX rocket in May, which marked the first crewed commercial orbital launch from the U.S.

Related: NASA re-embraces the 'worm,' its retro cool retired logo, for new merchandise

The Casetify collection has 16 NASA-inspired designs for iPhone and iPad cases, Macbook shells and Apple Watch bands, along with insignia rings. The designs include an astronaut's access badge, blueprints of the space shuttle, and mission assignments. The cases for phones and other devices are designed to be protective for falls of up to 6.2 feet (1.9 meters).

"When it comes to advanced technology and exploration, there's no better source for inspiration than NASA," Wes Ng, Casetify CEO and co-founder, said in a company statement. "We know our community will be over the moon to see NASA's emblems reimagined in true Casetify style."

Follow Elizabeth Howell on Twitter @howellspace. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Visit link:

Casetify launches NASA-branded tech accessories on day of Perseverance rover launch - Space.com

The next giant leaps: The UK missions getting us to the Moon – BBC Focus Magazine

In the middle of 2021, a small robotic spider may be taking its first tentative steps on the Moon. Its not exactly The Spiders From Mars, but the late David Bowie will have played a part in getting it there.

Pavlo Tanasyuk, CEO and founder of the British company Spacebit, remembers once listening to David Bowies The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars and wondering about one day building rovers with legs rather than wheels.

The idea lay dormant until Tanasyuk was visiting a friend at the Japan Aerospace Agency (JAXA), and mentioned his long-held idea of a spider robot on Mars or the Moon. The friend responded immediately with the Japanese proverb of the asagumo, the morning spider who brings fortune.

Read more about missions to the Moon:

Thats when it clicked and I decided that we actually should be doing this rover, says Tanasyuk.

He incorporated the UK company Spacebit to begin developing the asagumo spider robot. Launch is now scheduled for July 2021, onboard the Peregrine lander that has been developed by the private American company Astrobotic. Peregrine will be flown on a Vulcan Centaur rocket, and if all goes to plan, asagumo will be the UKs first lunar lander.

Walking on the Moon is tricky because of the regolith, which is the layer of rock fragments and dust that covers the lunar surface. For a walking rover the dangers are two-fold.

The asagumo spider robot will walk across the lunar surface to investigate lava tubes Spacebit

First, the legs can sink into this layer, impeding the movement. Second, the dust and fragments can get into the articulated parts of the legs and the motors, causing them to cease up.

To overcome the first problem, Spacebit is designing the legs to look more like ski poles, which have pads on the end to stop them disappearing beneath the surface. As for the second, it is a risk that the team are willing to take because they dont want their rover to walk on the surface indefinitely, just long enough to get to their real target: a lunar lava tube.

A lava tube is a natural tunnel formed by rivers of lava flowing away from a volcano. The top of the flow is exposed to the cooling air, and gradually hardens to solid rock, forming a roof over the lava flow.

When the lava has all drained away it leaves an empty lava tube. Since the Moon was once volcanically active, there are thought to be an abundance of lava tubes there.

Inside a lava tube, there is much less dust but more rocks, so legs are actually better suited to clambering over obstacles.

We already did tests in the lava tubes of Mount Fuji in Japan. I went inside the lava tube with the rover, and we tested how it walks. Basically we can see that the legs are better suited for the lava tubes than wheels [as legs let the robot clamber over obstacles], says Tanasyuk.

There are some lava tubes in the vicinity of the Peregrine landers touchdown area, and one of these will be the first target for the asagumo. The reason for the interest in lava tubes is that human bases may one day be constructed inside these natural rock formations.

While Spacebit may be sending the UKs first Moon lander, it is far from the only UK space mission that is currently in development. Indeed, it is just the tip of the lunar iceberg

The UKs lunar expertise has been built up since the days of NASAs Apollo missions, which took astronauts to the Moon in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Planetary scientists Grenville Turner and Colin Pillinger were two pioneers of UK space science. They were held in such high esteem that they were granted access to the lunar rocks that the American Apollo astronauts brought back to Earth.

In this graphic of asagumo, you can see the feet on the end of the legs, which should stop the robot from sinking into the regolith Spacebit

This was an accolade in itself. You had to be the best of the field to actually get access to these samples, says Sue Horne, head of space exploration at the UK Space Agency. She adds that Pillinger and Turner were wizards at instrumentation.

Together, the pair established the UKs excellence in the area of cosmochemistry, analysing samples not just from the Moon but from meteorites, some of which are now thought to have come from Mars. They also trained many students over the years who themselves have gone on to successful science careers, training more people in the process.

We are world-leading in the area of cosmochemistry, says Horne. As a result, the UK now routinely supplies key instruments for various science missions carried out by the European Space Agency (ESA).

These include the comet-chasing mission Rosetta, the recently launched Solar Orbiter, and the forthcoming JUpiter ICy moons Explorer (JUICE). By supplying instruments and expertise, the UKs scientists gain full access to the mission. By working with Europe, we can do a lot more than we can afford individually, says Horne.

Pavlo Tanasyuk, CEO and founder of British company Spacebit, and the man behind the spider bots Spacebit

The collaboration is set to continue in the future. For example, the Open University is developing a miniature chemical analysis laboratory for ESA. Called ProSPA, the lab will fly on the joint Russian-ESA Lunar Resource Lander mission (Luna 27) in 2025.

The company MDA UK is also working on the same mission, building a vital component of the autonomous landing system, a LiDAR to measure the distance to the ground.

And the UKs ambitions do not stop there.

Beyond science, Horne and her colleagues have identified an emerging need in space exploration: deep space communications. This may not sound glamorous, but it is going to become increasingly important as more and more people send spacecraft to the Moon.

In the past, virtually every lunar mission has had to carry a transmitter powerful enough to beam signals back to Earth. Now, however, the UK is building a dedicated communications satellite to orbit the Moon.

Called the Lunar Pathfinder, it will relay signals back to Earth, meaning that landers, rovers and other orbiters no longer need to carry the expensive, bulky pieces of kit that were once needed.

The ESA-funded Lunar Pathfinder is being built by Guildford-based Surrey Satellite Technology Limited. It will orbit the Moon, relaying signals from lunar landers, rovers and orbiters back to Earth SSTL

ESA has funded the Pathfinder, which is being made by Surrey Satellite Technology Limited (SSTL), in Guildford. ESA will also be the Pathfinders first customer.

Pathfinder is scheduled for launch in 2023. Once its up and running, the next step being considered by ESA is a constellation of satellites around the Moon that can also provide the lunar equivalent of GPS.

The idea is to have a number of satellites that will allow enhanced communications coverage of the Moon and high reliability navigation services, says Nelly Offord, the business line manager for exploration and head of lunar services at SSTL.

Of course, its all well and good providing a satellite that can beam messages back from the Moon, but you then need a ground station to receive them. This is where the once defunct Goonhilly Satellite Earth Station in Cornwall comes in.

Situated on the Lizard peninsula on the southern coast of Cornwall, Goonhilly was established in 1962 to receive signals from the experimental telecommunications satellite Telstar. Over the ensuing decades, the site grew into the worlds largest satellite ground station before gradually becoming obsolete.

In 2011, the rebirth began when a private company named Goonhilly Earth Station Limited leased the site from British Telecom and began to refurbish the antennas.

Now, almost a decade later, the site has attracted money from the Cornwall Local Enterprise Partnership fund and from ESA to help with the upgrading of the antennas, which were in a rather sorry state.

The Goonhilly Satellite Earth Station in Cornwall was established in 1962 before becoming defunct. Its now been brought back to life and upgraded to aid with ESA missions Goonhilly Earth Station Ltd/Nathanial Bradford

One antenna had a tree growing through it, says Matthew Cosby, Goonhillys director of space engineering.

Now, Goonhilly is poised to provide additional coverage for ESAs deep-space tracking system, called ESTRACK. In particular, the Cornish site will be receiving data from some of ESAs older missions, such as Integral, Gaia and Mars Express. It will also be the ground station for SSTLs Lunar Pathfinder.

Beyond ESA, there could also be another big customer on the horizon. It is no secret that the US is pushing hard to get back to the lunar surface. With the Artemis programme, the White House has set NASA a deadline of 2024 to have boots on the Moon.

This represents a considerable acceleration of the more realistic goal to land by 2028, and it is clear that not even NASA has the money or the workforce to make it happen by itself. While NASA is turning to US industry for help, particularly in building lunar landers, the space agency is going to have to turn to international partnerships to get other things done.

Offord thinks that providing reliable high-quality communications is one area in which ESA and the UK could help. NASA is very interested in using our services, and ESA is right now talking to them about which missions we could support, says Offord.

Sue Horne develops the UKs strategy for space exploration at the UK Space Agency

To stay ahead of this particular curve, Cosby is the UKs representative on the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS). This is where the standards for spaceflight communications are discussed and agreed, including the communications protocols for NASAs 2024 lunar landing.

Everything he learns is implemented at Goonhilly and across the UK, so that if the call comes, they will be ready to jump straight in and relay those historic images just as Goonhilly was used back in the 1970s to relay images and data from the original Apollo Moon landings.

Although NASA and ESA are the only real customers in town at the moment, it may not be long before private companies are looking to buy communications services too.

Read more about the Moon:

Take Tanasyuks Spacebit: next years mission with the spider robot is just the first of a rolling programme of increasingly complex missions for the asagumo. Depending on where they touch down, the first mission may or may not reach a lava tube.

Instead, the asagumo will be used to demonstrate the spider robot technology. It will take selfies, do some science and distribute the data to schools and universities for free, says Tanasyuk.

It is a time-limited mission, however. Asagumo is solar-powered and when the Sun sets on the Moon, it takes a fortnight to reappear. In that time, the tiny asagumo, which can fit into the palm of a hand, will have frozen forever. So the first mission will only last about one week.

For their second mission, Spacebit is designing a carrier, into which a number of asagumo will be able to climb. The mothership will be much larger and able to sustain the spider robots for the duration of the lunar night. At dawn, they will crawl back outside and continue their exploration.

If all goes well, for Spacebits third mission, the carrier will be taken from orbit to the lunar surface on a lander of the companys own making. And this is really where Spacebits future lies.

We are the only company not only in the UK, but in the whole European region to be designing and working on a lunar lander, says Tanasyuk. The idea is to corner at least part of the lunar transportation market.

The ProSPA chemical analysis lab is being developed by the Open University and will travel to the Moon in 2025 ESA

There can be no doubt that through the coordination of the UK Space Agency, companies and organisations across the UK are positioning themselves to play key roles in returning humans to the Moon. And as exciting as that is, Horne makes it clear it is also a dress rehearsal for something much larger: human missions to Mars.

The long term objective is to take humans to Mars. But to do that, we need to use the Moon as a testbed. We need to test out technologies and capabilities, says Horne.

In the 1960s, the UK flirted with the idea of becoming a space-faring country. It built the Black Arrow rocket and launched the Prospero satellite into low-Earth orbit. Then the country turned its back on the endeavour.

Now it appears that there is a renaissance of interest in space in the UK. And with companies like Spacebit, SSTL and Goonhilly Earth Station Limited, it seems there is no shortage of individuals and organisations ready to accept the challenge.

The new exploration of the Moon is a test of techniques and technology for the larger international endeavour of going to Mars.

While it is difficult to put absolute timescales on this endeavour because budgets are being worked out as each country goes along, it is possible to say roughly what the stages will be before humankind is ready to launch a Mars mission.

Illustration showing the five stages of missions from the Moon to Mars Acute Graphics

Follow this link:

The next giant leaps: The UK missions getting us to the Moon - BBC Focus Magazine

ITER, The Worlds Largest Nuclear Fusion Project: A Big Step Forward – Forbes

A picture shows the winding facility for the construction of poloidal field coils which will be ... [+] part of the magnetic system that will contribute to confine and model plasma during the launch of the assembly stage of nuclear fusion machine "Tokamak" of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) in Saint-Paul-les-Durance, southeastern France, on July 28, 2020. - Thirty-five nations are collaborating in the ITER energy project aimed at mastering energy production from hydrogen fusion, as in the heart of the sun, a potential new source of carbon-free and non-polluting energy. (Photo by CLEMENT MAHOUDEAU / AFP) (Photo by CLEMENT MAHOUDEAU/AFP via Getty Images)

ITER the worlds largest nuclear fusion project reached a construction milestone last week as the final components of the reactor arrived on the build site in southeastern France. The $25 billion endeavor, which aims to produce sustainable fusion energy on a commercial scale, is financed by seven of the worlds largest energy powerhouses: the European Union, United Kingdom China, India, Russia, Japan, South Korea and the United States.

The origins of the ambitious project go back to the Reagan-Gorbachev negotiations of the 1980s that envisioned equal participation by the Soviet Union, the United States, Japan and Europe. After decades of delays, the International Thermal Experimental Reactor was born. ITER began in earnest in 2010 and is now celebrating the commencement of the assembly phase wherein the reactors components can now start being put into place.

With millions of components manufactured from around the world, weighing in at 23,000 tons, and standing several stories high, ITER may be the most complicated engineering project in human history. The reactor will contain some 3,000 tons of superconducting magnets which will be linked by 160 miles of superconducting cables, all kept at -269C by the largest cryogenic plant in the world.

A picture shows a general view of the assembly hall during the launch of the assembly stage of ... [+] nuclear fusion machine "Tokamak" of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) in Saint-Paul-les-Durance, southeastern France, on July 28, 2020. - Thirty-five nations are collaborating in the ITER energy project aimed at mastering energy production from hydrogen fusion, as in the heart of the sun, a potential new source of carbon-free and non-polluting energy. (Photo by CLEMENT MAHOUDEAU / AFP) (Photo by CLEMENT MAHOUDEAU/AFP via Getty Images)

The fusion process is the same one that powers our sun: you can think of a star as one gigantic fusion reactor. Hydrogen atoms forced together under immense heat and pressure break their atomic bonds, fusing into a new heavier element, helium. Some mass is lost in the process, and great amounts of energy are released as a result. This is what Einstein's famous formulaE=mc describes: the tiny bit of lost mass (m), multiplied by the square of the speed of light (c), results in a very large figure (E), which is the amount of energy created by a fusion reaction.

The catch is that these reactions generate very hot and very unstable globs of plasma (in excess of 100 million Kelvin/500 million degrees Fahrenheit) which require tremendous amounts of energy to maintain. To date, the longest recorded sustained plasma operation is just overone minutelong. Enormous magnets are required to keep the plasma in a doughnut-shaped vacuum chamber, which is called a tokamak. ITER is far and away the largest tokamak reactor in existence.

Like conventional nuclear (fission) reactions, the fusion process does not emit carbon dioxide, but unlike a nuclear plant, a fusion reactor cannot melt down. Fusion plants can be fueled by the hydrogen found in just a few ounces of seawater and dont rely on radioactive materials. As a result the process produces virtually no waste, making it a climate friendly, safe, and reliable source of near unlimited power if we can get one to work.

ITER is supposed to become the worlds first reactor capable of self-burning plasma and would ideally generate up to 10 times the amount of heat that it consumes. The components of the reactor include a 100ft-diameter cryostat, a device manufactured by India that is intended to surround the reactor and keep its vital components from overheating. US-manufactured central solenoid magnets responsible for inducing and stabilizing the superheated plasma make the backbone of the reactor. When at full power, these super magnets they will have the capacity to lift an aircraft carrier.

Technicians work in the winding facility for the construction of poloidal field coils which will be ... [+] part of the magnetic system that will contribute to confine and model plasma during the launch of the assembly stage of nuclear fusion machine "Tokamak" of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) in Saint-Paul-les-Durance, southeastern France, on July 28, 2020. - Thirty-five nations are collaborating in the ITER energy project aimed at mastering energy production from hydrogen fusion, as in the heart of the sun, a potential new source of carbon-free and non-polluting energy. (Photo by CLEMENT MAHOUDEAU / AFP) (Photo by CLEMENT MAHOUDEAU/AFP via Getty Images)

Large-scale international cooperation on such a complex project is an example how scientific research knows no geographic borders. This model was and should be adopted in other areas of science, such as space exploration. Yet, the ITER project appears to be both bulky and expensive, and has inspired many smaller enterprises to develop their versions of fusion generation technology.

These include UK-based Tokamak Energy, which has already raised over $130 million in investment. Similarly, California-based Tri Alpha Energy, which is backed by Microsoft MSFT co-founder Paul Allen and Google GOOGL has attracted some $500 million in investment for its unique particle accelerator technology. Canadas General Fusion uses a vortex of molten lead and lithium for its plasma containment design which has attracted the support of Amazon AMZN s Jeff Bezos, as well as Britains First Light Fusion. Americas Lockheed Martin LMT is in the midst of developing a secretive compact fusion reactor no bigger than a truck that it claims will be ready for testing by 2028.

The start of the assembly stage of this colossal international project, though remarkable, does not mean that the project is yet near the finish line. ITER plans for all the core parts of the reactor to be installed, fully integrated, and ready to produce its first plasma by November 2025 (the 40 year anniversary of of Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachevs historic U.S.-Soviet Geneva summit). If successful, the reactor will draw 50 megawatts (MW) of electricity to ignite the fusion process and produce stable plasma. This plasma would then put out some 500MW of power (in short bursts), thereby generating a whopping 10x energy return.

Despite numerous delays over the years, ITER is aiming to achieve full plasma generation by 2030. While this may be consistent with a common adage in the power industry: Fusion power is always just 10 years away, progress in harnessing fusion is unquestionable, and, if commercial fusion is achieved, the current generation is likely to see a total revolution in energy in their lifetimes.

With Assistance from Bogdan Puchkov

Read more from the original source:

ITER, The Worlds Largest Nuclear Fusion Project: A Big Step Forward - Forbes

Exploring applications of ultraviolet disinfection technology – Health Europa

UVC light energy in the germicidal wavelength range between 200nm and 280nm has an array of applications throughout the field of infection prevention and control, particularly but not limited to within the healthcare sector.

HEQ explores some of the use cases where UV disinfection has proved beneficial.

A 2019 study conducted in Houston, Texas found that automated UVC infection control was able to significantly reduce the spread of hospital acquired infections (HAIs) spread through high-touch computer workstation surfaces. The review investigated the cleanliness of computers at nurses stations, on mobile carts and in patient rooms; and reported: [These workstations] are rarely manually wiped down or disinfected and there is seldom training or documented procedures around cleaning of computer workstations. Housekeeping, nursing and IT dispute over who is responsible for the computer workstation cleaning, making computer workstations one of the dirtiest places in healthcare, contributing to the prevalence of healthcare associated infections (HAIs) that lead to morbidity, mortality and excess healthcare expenditure.

The study compared keyboard cultures from 52 high-use workstations at HCA Houston Healthcare Southeast before and after the installation of no-touch UVC disinfection technology. All post-disinfection samples showed 0% presence of all pathogens for which they were tested.

Ultraviolet radiation has long been used to eliminate harmful microorganisms from fruits, vegetables and water, with UV treatment deployed to disinfect water supplies in Marseille, France, in 1908 and UV-irradiated milk introduced to the US in 1928. In agrifood, UV radiation is frequently used to destroy surface pathogens on fruits and vegetables.

In early 2020, researchers at Cornell AgriTech, New York, teamed with Norways SAGA Robotics to develop an autonomous robot capable of applying UV treatment to wine grapes, in order to defend them from harmful powdery and downy mildew fungi. The mildew spores evolve swiftly and can develop immunity to antifungal sprays over the course of a single season but they are particularly vulnerable to light radiation. The UV robot, named Thorvald, is programmed to apply equal doses UV radiation to each vine; though the Cornell researchers are working in partnership with academics at Carnegie Mellon University to develop imaging technology which will enable Thorvald to identify and target vines affected by mildew.

Floor-scrubbing robots at Pittsburgh International Airport have been retrofitted with UVC technology to eliminate coronavirus from floor surfaces, in the first such test case in the US. If the pilot programme, developed with the assistance of Pittsburgh robotics firm Carnegie Robotics, is effective, researchers predict it could be rolled out across the USAs 149 international airports.

Allegheny County Airport Authority CEO Christina Cassotis praised the contributions of Pittsburghs flourishing robotics industry to the wider community during the unprecedented crisis od COVID-19, saying: We have a whole innovation culture that is looking for ways to do things better, especially in the pandemic; and one of the things that we recognised immediately is that while we have to manage the crisis day to day we have to keep a line of sight into the future, to help inspire confidence in travel again.

In the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) became an exceptionally pressing issue for healthcare staff. Recognising the need to enable the reuse of PPE without compromising the safety of workers, a cross-disciplinary team of engineers from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in New York fast-tracked the development and production of a disinfection system which deploys UV radiation to sterilise protective face masks in large quantities.

Deepak Vashishth, Director of the RPI Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, said: Normally these things take a very long period of time, but given the national situation, I think there is an understanding at all levels that we need to look for solutions which are stable, good, and safe, and are delivered quickly. I think this is an example of where we came together to deliver a solution, and hopefully, this is going to be useful to the healthcare professionals and frontline workers.

As long form space missions become a closer possibility, many researchers have begun to focus on systems which will enable space travellers to eat and drink safely and cleanly while away from Earth for growing periods of time. One such project is the Biocontamination Integrated cOntrol of Wet sYstems for Space Exploration (BIOWYSE) project, supported by the EUs Horizon 2020 programme, which aims to address the issue of clean drinking water in space.

Astronauts on the International Space Station (ISS) are able to receive regular deliveries of food and water directly from Earth, with cargo spacecraft able to travel to the ISS in around six hours. For longer journeys, however, BIOWYSE is investigating ways to store and monitor water for contamination in real time. The project has developed a fully automated water dispenser which monitors water quality and automatically decontaminates it using UV radiation.

BIOWYSE co-ordinator Dr Emmanouil Detsis said: We wanted a system where you take it from A to Z, from storing the water to making it available for someone to drink. That means you store the water, you are able to monitor the biocontamination, you are able to disinfect if you have to, and finally you deliver to the cup for drinking. When someone wants to drink water, you press the button its like a water cooler.

In addition to producing potable drinking water, Detsis said, the machine is able to monitor and disinfect surfaces within the spacecraft which may be wet or damp from spillages or condensation, and which therefore may pose a potential contamination risk: Inside the closed habitat, you start having the humidity build up and you may have corners or areas where they are not clean, so we developed something that could check these areas in a fast way. The system is designed with future habitats in mind: a space station around the moon, or a field laboratory on Mars in decades to come. These are places where the water may have been sitting there some time before the crew arrives.

This article is from issue 14 of Health Europa. Clickhere to get your free subscription today.

Follow this link:

Exploring applications of ultraviolet disinfection technology - Health Europa

Sundays Are the Perfect Time to Buy the Bitcoin Dip, Data Shows – Cointelegraph

Recent data shows that Sunday evening is the best time to buy Bitcoin (BTC) according to Capriole digital asset manager Charles Edwards. As shown below, historically, BTC saw higher returns on Sunday evenings into early Monday morning.

Bitcoin shows higher returns on Sunday evenings. Source: Charles Edwards

Edwards said:

Bored on Sunday at midnight? It just so happens to be the best time to buy Bitcoin.

There are several reasons Bitcoin might perform better as the weekend comes to an end. First, the weekend typically records a lower volume, which raises the chances of high volatility.

Second, traditional markets that facilitate Bitcoin trades, like CME, close during weekends. As they open, it could cause a spike in volatility.

During the weekend, as traditional markets close, trading volume at Bitcoin exchanges also tends to drop off. When there are fewer active traders in the market, it leaves the market vulnerable to more volatile price action.

As an example, on July 25 and 26, the BTC/USDT pair on Binance recorded a daily volume of 40,000 BTC and 65,000 BTC respectively. Then, on July 27, which was a Monday, the volume abruptly surged to 150,000 BTC. Coincidentally, the price of Bitcoin also rose by 11%.

BTC-USD price and volume surge on Monday, July 27. Source: TradingView.com

Due to low Bitcoin trading volume during the weekend, BTC also tends to see sudden pullbacks. For instance, on Sunday, Aug 2, the price of BTC abruptly dropped by 6% overnight. This led to a volume spike, countering the above mentioned data.

The CME Bitcoin futures market and its closure during the weekend could also be impacting Bitcoins strong performances on Mondays. Similar to the U.S. stock market, CME closes its markets over the weekend and on national holidays.

Accredited and institutional investors that use the CME Bitcoin futures market have to wait until the market opens on Monday.

Unlike traditional assets, BTC is traded through the weekend and holidays on exchanges. Hence, when CME closes and opens on a Monday, there is usually a gap in price.

The CME gap fill is a theory that is widely recognized within the cryptocurrency market. Data shows that the Bitcoin exchange market usually moves to fill the gap between CME and the rest of the market. Consequently, following a weekend, Bitcoin often sees a major price action.

On Aug 2, when BTC declined by 6% within hours, more than $1 billion worth of futures contracts were wiped out. This coincidentally happened in the closing weekend of July, which is when the CME Bitcoin futures contract closes. The CME futures contract specification reads:

Trading terminates at 4:00 p.m. London time on the last Friday of the contract month. If this is not both a London and U.S. business day, trading terminates on the prior London and the U.S. business day.

In recent weeks, the open interest of the CME Bitcoin futures market has significantly increased and this could possibly be a reflection of how CME is increasing its influence over the global Bitcoin market.

Its also possible that the data is purely coincidental and reduced trading volume on weekends is the primary reason for Sundays offering discounted Bitcoin prices.

Read more here:

Sundays Are the Perfect Time to Buy the Bitcoin Dip, Data Shows - Cointelegraph

Bitcoin Association to partner with CSDN on Bitcoin SV DevCon: China – PRNewswire

ZUG, Switzerland, Aug. 6, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Bitcoin Association, the global industry organization that works to advance business with Bitcoin SV, today announces the first Chinese-language edition of its popular Bitcoin SV DevCon series will be held August 29-30 in partnership with CSDN and nChain.

The two-day virtual event will be hosted entirely in Chinese and will feature leading figures from China's technology and blockchain communities teaching sessions designed to educate and upskill developers interested in working with the Bitcoin SV blockchain. The weekend-long programme will provide a foundational understanding of the Bitcoin network, in addition to introducing advanced blockchain functionalities including smart contracts, cloud computing implementations and the miner fee economy.

A full schedule for Bitcoin SV DevCon: China is available at https://bsvdevcon.net/bitcoin-sv-devcon-august-2020

The inaugural Bitcoin SV DevCon was held last month over the weekend of July 18-19, with more than 3,000 attendees participating live. Following a strong response to Bitcoin SV developer initiatives already rolled out this year in partnership with CSDN, Bitcoin SV DevCon: China will meet a growing demand for blockchain education programmes emerging and is the latest sign of Bitcoin Association's strong ongoing commitment to its Chinese-speaking community.

CSDN is the largest IT and software developer community in China, with 31 million users and a top 30 Alexa Global ranking.CSDN's participation will help distribute the Bitcoin SV DevCon: China educational content to a large audience.

Attendance is free and registration is open now at https://bss.csdn.net/m/topic/bsvdevcon

Speaking on today's announcement, Bitcoin Association Founding President Jimmy Nguyen, commented:

"After the success of Bitcoin SV DevCon 2020 last month, Bitcoin Association are delighted to be able to extend our partnership with CSDN to produce our first-ever Chinese language DevCon for the growing Bitcoin SV community in China. There are great opportunities emerging for individuals with the knowledge and skillset to build with Bitcoin and I'm excited to see the development and innovation sure to emerge as a result of the DevCon."

Also speaking on today's announcement, CSDN Founder and Chairman Jiang Tao spoke of the importance of programmes like Bitcoin SV DevCon for developers:

"The 5G age will enhance the advantages of blockchain technology. Over the next decade, the Bitcoin blockchain platform will enable new industrial fields to emerge, meaning that now is a great time for developers to learn more about blockchain technologies."

Lise Li, China Manager for Bitcoin Association, commented on the organization's commitment to bringing further opportunities for China's Bitcoin SV community:

"Bitcoin SV developer initiatives have been a key goal for Bitcoin Association this year, which we've taken to implementing in China through a host of different measures, including the creation of the Bitcoin SV Developer Zone with CSDN, a series of Chinese-language webinars, and now, Bitcoin SV DevCon. Many innovative businesses and developers in China are working on blockchain solutions as present, so Bitcoin SV DevCon will be a good opportunity to introduce them to the power of the Bitcoin SV blockchain and show them what's possible when developing with it."

About Bitcoin Association

Bitcoin Associationis theSwitzerland-basedglobal industry organization that works to advance business on the Bitcoin SV blockchain. It brings together essential components of the Bitcoin SV ecosystem enterprises, start-up ventures, developers, merchants, exchanges, service providers, blockchain transaction processors (miners), and others working alongside them, as well as in a representative capacity, to drive further use of the Bitcoin SV blockchain and uptake of the BSV digital currency.

The Association works to build a regulation-friendly ecosystem that fosters lawful conduct while facilitating innovation using all aspects of Bitcoin technology. More than a digital currency and blockchain, Bitcoin is also a network protocol; just like Internet protocol, it is the foundational rule set for an entire data network. The Association supports use of the original Bitcoin protocol to operate the world's single blockchain on Bitcoin SV.

SOURCE Bitcoin Association

Excerpt from:

Bitcoin Association to partner with CSDN on Bitcoin SV DevCon: China - PRNewswire

OKCoin Exchange Awards Grant to One of Bitcoin Core’s Most Active Developers – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Announced Thursday, exchange OKCoin is awarding its largest individual grant so far to Bitcoin Core maintainer Marco Falke, the second-most prolific contributor to Bitcoin Core in the softwares history.

OKCoin is awarding Falke an Independent Developer Grant, which is the equivalent of a developer salary for the year, though Falke requested that the exact amount not be disclosed for the sake of his financial privacy.

With his grant, Falke will continue his work as maintainer of Bitcoin Core, the key software underpinning Bitcoin, which hes been heads-down on since 2016. His work helps to ensure that changes to Bitcoin Core are merged, helps to organize developers that are spread out over the globe, and runs tests to ensure the code is working properly, among other tasks.

When asked about his personal accomplishments, Falke emphasized that Bitcoin Core is a team effort, with developers from around the world making it what it is. I am proud to see what Bitcoin Core is today and how everyones contributions shaped Bitcoin Core for the future, Falke told CoinDesk.

'Maintenance' work

Falke is one of a handful of Bitcoin Core maintainers. Maintainers are sometimes described as the leaders of sorts of Bitcoins code. But, while maintainers are crucial to Bitcoin, the role isnt as authoritative as has been painted.

Some of my days are surprisingly unexciting maintenance work, as Falke put it.

Testing ensures code works as intended. He spends a lot of time keeping tests of the code in line, ensuring that any issues they expose will be fixed. On top of that, I am running my own nightly test runs, code coverage runs, benchmarks and fuzzers, Falke said.

In addition, he reviews proposed code changes and merges them into Bitcoin Core when they have been sufficiently vetted.

Helping to speed up this maintenance process is what he believes is his most useful contribution to Bitcoin Core.

DrahtBot

He created a little bot for GitHub, where Bitcoin Cores code is stored, and where developers propose code changes, and discuss them. The bot, called DrahtBot, does all the automatable things that I used to do, Falke said.

Many Bitcoin Core developers are working on the code at the same time. Its easy for little code clashes to arise. Once a change is approved and merged into the code base, it might impact other peoples code. DrahtBot notifies developers of these conflicts. The bot will also list all future conflicts, assuming a pull request was merged, to aid maintainers planning ahead, Falke added.

DrahtBot also builds the Bitcoin Core code into binaries that bitcoiners can run on their devices, among other tasks.

This bot frees up a lot more time for Falke to focus on other more difficult tasks, which cant be automated and taken over by a robot.

Fleeing COVID-19

One reason Falke is happy to be receiving this grant is that he is leaving Chaincode, a startup in New York City that funds developers and researchers dedicated to improving Bitcoin.

He decided to move back to his farm in Germany. Given that I grew up on a remote farm, away from big cities, NYC was definitely a new, lasting and exciting experience. Nonetheless, I couldnt see myself settle down in NYC long-term, Falke said.

Then, coronavirus hit, making New York City an even less attractive place to live for Falke.

Even before COVID, I saw many of my friends and colleagues leave NYC. Then with the COVID situation happening, and seeing politics and immigration policy becoming increasingly hostile towards immigrants and visa holders, it convinced me to move back to Germany, he said.

Chaincode only employs people who live in New York City. When Falke decided to depart, Chaincodes head of special projects Adam Jonas helped him find new funding at OKCoin.

Id like to thank Adam Jonas from Chaincode for reaching out to various companies in the space and showing them the importance of supporting Bitcoin developers, Falke said.

OKCoin: Funding Bitcoin Development

With a global health crisis thats far from over and a feeble world economy, 2020 has been a disaster of a year. The sliver of a silver lining, though, is that 2020 has been the best ever in terms of funding developers tinkering to make bitcoin better after a long dearth of funding.

These sorts of grants have been growing in popularity. Many open source Bitcoin developers work on the code as a side project, essentially improving the digital currency for free, despite their contributions helping everyone in the industry, including the companies profiting from it. But now, more exchanges and other bitcoin organizations are beginning to support this work financially.

We are inherently incentivized to invest in Bitcoin, which is fundamental to the growth of our industry, said OKCoin CEO Hong Fang in a statement. Supporting Marcos work on strengthening the testing framework in addition to his general responsibilities as a maintainer is important to continuing quality development.

OKCoin has awarded a number of grants this summer, including to Bitcoin Core contributor Amiti Uttarwar and to open-source payment processor BTCPay.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

See original here:

OKCoin Exchange Awards Grant to One of Bitcoin Core's Most Active Developers - CoinDesk - CoinDesk