UArizona researchers have breakthrough related to stomach cancer – Eastern Arizona Courier

TUCSON A promising new biomarker that appears in patients before stomach cancer develops may help with early detection of the disease and improve patient response to therapy, according to findings in a study led by University of Arizona Health Sciences researchers.

The biomarker can be detected through a simple blood test, saving time and lowering costs. Currently, stomach cancer diagnosis requires endoscopic collection of stomach tissue through a biopsy procedure, and then analysis by pathology.

Published in Gut, the journal of the British Society of Gastroenterology, the study was led by Juanita L. Merchant, MD, PhD, chief of the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at the UArizona College of Medicine Tucson, a cancer biology program researcher at the UArizona Cancer Center and an elected member of the National Academy of Medicine.

See a video of how Drs. Juanita Merchant and Yana Zavros found a new biomarker to help diagnose stomach cancer.

The biomarker, MiR130b, is a microRNA or small non-coding RNA molecule that can play an important role in regulating gene expression, affecting disease development and progression. MiR130b can be produced by a group of immune cells called myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), commonly associated with infections caused by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a bacteria associated with ulcers. These particular cell types in the stomach correlate with early, preneoplastic changes (before a tumor develops) that can lead to gastric cancer long after an H. pylori infection has passed.

The study included collaboration with Yana Zavros, PhD, associate head for research in the College of Medicine Tucsons Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and the Cancer Centers shared resource director for Tissue Acquisition Cellular and Molecular Analysis.

Even though you get can get rid of the bacteria, oftentimes the infection itself already has initiated a cascade of events that inevitably may lead to cancer, Dr. Zavros said. That is why early detection is so important.

A Blood Test Instead of a Procedure

The study arose out of basic science mouse models that simulated changes in the stomach similar to that caused by H. pylori. This led the researchers to identify MiR130b in the mouse models, and they also detected the same microRNA in the plasma of human patients that either had precancerous changes or those that already had progressed to cancer.

This was a retrospective study, said Dr. Merchant, who is a member of the universitys BIO5 Institute. It is very exciting because now we can begin looking at this biomarker more prospectively in different patient populations.

Although less common in the United States, the National Cancer Institute reports gastric (stomach) cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. The findings, however, could have major implications for Arizonas rural areas and Hispanic and Native American populations, which are at greater risk for developing gastric and other gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, because these diseases often are caused by dietary and environmental factors and may go undetected for long periods.

Dr. Merchants lab has a sub-project in the Cancer Centers U54 grant (Partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention) to study detection of the microRNA described in the Gut paper in members of Native American populations with H. pylori.

This molecular signature (the microRNA MiR130b) that we discovered may help us see if patients have changes in their mucosa (the membrane that lines the stomach) related to having H. pylori, Dr. Merchant said. And a blood sample would be less invasive and then could be a way to make the decision whether we need to bring a patient in for an endoscopy.

Broader Implications for Treatment

Once diagnosed, gastric cancer can be difficult to treat. Immunotherapies with proven effectiveness in treating other types of cancer are not as successful against most GI cancers, including stomach cancer. The researchers believe these new findings in gastric cancer may help to address why other GI cancers also are resistant to therapy.

The underlying mechanism by which a patient may not respond well in gastric cancer may be applicable in other organs as well Dr. Zavros said. The way the cells interact with each other to render that patient resistant to therapy may be quite similar between gastric, pancreatic and colon cancers.

Dr. Merchant added: There may be dual-purposes. We can look at it as a biomarker to help us from a diagnostic perspective, but we also can look at therapies that can be developed based on what this microRNA itself is targeting.

Another project funded by the Cancer Centers Sparking Bench-to-Bedside Team Science Project award is building from results of this study to explore therapies for pancreatic and gastric cancer. The investigators are exploring the tumor microenvironment, in particular the immune cell MDSCs, referred to previously, that appears to dampen the chemotherapeutic response to immunotherapies.

The project relies heavily on Dr. Zavros BioDroid program, which develops miniature organs in the lab with a realistic microanatomy, also known as organoids. These are used in collaboration with the Tissue Acquisition Repository for Gastrointestinal and HEpaTic Systems (TARGHETS), created by Dr. Merchant. TARGHETS is a GI/Hepatology biorepository that collects samples from patients who undergo endoscopy.

Both Drs. Zavros and Merchant are looking to the BioDroid and TARGHETS efforts to reveal additional information that will allow them to develop new approaches to address resistance of gastric cancer to immunotherapies.

We want to find a way to reprogram the cancer cells or the immune cells within that patients tumor environment to make the patient more responsive to the therapy, Dr. Zavros said. A biomarker gives us a place to start.

The rest is here:

UArizona researchers have breakthrough related to stomach cancer - Eastern Arizona Courier

Aviceda Therapeutics Announces Formation of Scientific Advisory Board – BioSpace

Oct. 27, 2020 12:00 UTC

CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Aviceda Therapeutics, a late-stage, pre-clinical biotech company focused on developing the next generation of immuno-modulators by harnessing the power of glycobiology to manipulate the innate immune system and chronic, non-resolving inflammation, is announcing the members of its Scientific Advisory Board who will help shape ongoing development efforts.

The Aviceda Scientific Advisory Board includes Pamela Stanley, PhD; Ajit Varki, MD; Christopher Scott, PhD; Geert-Jan Boons, PhD; Salem Chouaib, PhD; and Peng Wu, PhD.

Aviceda has assembled an extraordinary multi-disciplinary team of world-class scientists and renowned researchers to join our efforts in developing the next generation of glyco-immune therapeutics for the treatment of immune-dysfunction conditions, said Mohamed A. Genead, MD, Founder, CEO & President of Aviceda Therapeutics. Each individual offers a fresh perspective and unique strategic acumen that complements and strengthens the insights of our in-house leadership development team.

Prof. Scott, Aviceda Scientific Co-Founder, is Director of the Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology at Queens University Belfast. He is internationally renowned for his work in development of novel approaches in the field of antibody and nanomedicine-based therapies for the treatment of cancer and other conditions. Prof. Scott has a background in both the pharmaceutical industry and academia and was a founding scientist of Fusion Antibodies Plc. Research in his laboratory is funded by agencies such as Medical Research Council, UK charities and various industrial sources. He also held a Royal Society Industrial Fellowship with GSK from 2012 to 2015 and won the Vice Chancellors Prize for Innovation in 2015 with his groups work on developing a novel Siglec targeting nanomedicine for the treatment of sepsis and other inflammatory conditions.

The novelty of Avicedas platform technology is its potential to affect immune responses associated with a wide range of disease states, many of which are currently unmet or underserved needs. I look forward to the continued development of Avicedas core technology and moving forward to clinical trials that will pave the way for truly disruptive therapeutic strategies to enter the clinic that will significantly impact and improve patients lives in the not-too-distant future, said Prof. Scott.

Avicedas Scientific advisory chairwoman, Prof. Stanley, is the Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation Chair; Professor, Department of Cell Biology; and Associate Director for Laboratory Research of the Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York. She obtained a doctorate degree from the University of Melbourne, Australia, for studies of influenza virus, and was subsequently a postdoctoral fellow of the Medical Research Council of Canada in the laboratory of Louis Siminovitch, University of Toronto, where she studied somatic cell genetics. Prof. Stanleys laboratory is focused on identifying roles for mammalian glycans in development, cancer and Notch signaling. Among her many varied contributions, Prof. Stanleys laboratory has isolated a large panel of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) glycosylation mutants; characterized them at the biochemical, structural and genetic levels; and used them to identify new aspects of glycan synthesis and functions. She serves on the editorial boards of Scientific Reports, Glycobiology and FASEB Bio Advances; she is an editor of the textbook Essentials of Glycobiology; and her laboratory is the recipient of grants from the National Institutes of Health. Prof. Stanley has received numerous awards, including a MERIT award from the National Institutes of Health, an American Cancer Society Faculty Research Award, the Karl Meyer Award from the Society for Glycobiology (2003) and the International Glycoconjugate Organization (IGO) Award (2003).

Working with Aviceda represents a unique opportunity to contribute to science at the cutting edge. Its pipeline contains a broad range of candidates that represents numerous first-in-class opportunities, said Prof. Stanley.

Prof. Varki is currently a distinguished professor of medicine and cellular and molecular medicine, Co-director of the Glycobiology Research and Training Center and Executive Co-director for the UCSD/Salk Center for Academic Research and Training in Anthropogeny at the University of California, San Diego; and an Adjunct Professor at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies. Dr. Varki is also the executive editor of the textbook Essentials of Glycobiology. He received basic training in physiology, medicine, biology and biochemistry at the Christian Medical College, Vellore, The University of Nebraska, and Washington University in St. Louis, as well as formal training and certification in internal medicine, hematology and oncology. Dr. Varki is the recipient of numerous awards and recognitions, including election to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the US National Academy of Medicine, a MERIT award from the National Institutes of Health, an American Cancer Society Faculty Research Award, the Karl Meyer Award from the Society for Glycobiology and the International Glycoconjugate Organization (IGO) Award (2007).

The Aviceda team is already building on the foundational work in the emerging field of glycobiology to develop potential therapeutics and interventional strategies. Their work could be critically important for growing the understanding of how glycobiology and glycochemistry are applicable to immunology, and more broadly, to the field of drug and therapeutic development, said Prof. Varki.

Prof. Boons is a Distinguished Professor in Biochemical Sciences at the Department of Chemistry and the Complex Carbohydrate Research Center (CCRC) of the University of Georgia (USA) and Professor and Chair of the Department of Medicinal and Biological Chemistry of Utrecht University (The Netherlands). Prof. Boons directs a research program focused on the synthesis and biological functions of carbohydrates and glycoconjugates. The diversity of topics to which his group has significantly contributed includes the development of new and better methods for synthesizing exceptionally complex carbohydrates and glycoconjugates. Highlights of his research include contributions to the understanding of immunological properties of complex oligosaccharides and glycoconjugates at the molecular level, which is being used in the development of three-component vaccine candidates for many types of epithelial cancer; development of convergent strategies for complex oligosaccharide assembly, which make it possible to synthesize large collections of compounds with a minimal effort for structure activity relationship studies; and creation of a next generation glycan microarray that can probe the importance of glycan complexity for biological recognition, which in turn led to identification of glycan ligands for various glycan binding proteins that are being further developed as glycomimetics for drug development for various diseases. Among others, Prof. Boons has received the Creativity in Carbohydrate Science Award by the European Carbohydrate Association (2003), the Horace Isbell Award by the American Chemical Society (ACS) (2004), the Roy L. Whistler International Award in Carbohydrate

Chemistry by the International Carbohydrate Organization (2014), the Hudson Award (2015) and the Cope Mid-Career Scholar Award from ACS (2016).

Aviceda is leading the field of glycoimmunology in exciting new directions. I look forward to working with the company as it pursues multiple lines of development efforts that will someday transform the way immune-inflammatory conditions are treated in the clinic, said Prof. Boons.

Prof. Chouaib is the Director of Research, Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris, where he is active in research in tumor biology. Previously, Prof. Chouaib worked at the French National Institute of Health and Biomedical Research (INSERM) where he led a research unit focused on the investigation of the functional cross talk between cytotoxic cells and tumor targets in the context of tumor microenvironment complexity and plasticity. His research was directed at the transfer of fundamental concepts in clinical application in the field of cancer vaccines and cancer immunotherapy. Prof. Chouaib is a member of the American Association of Immunologists, New York Academy of Sciences, French Society of Immunologists, International Cytokine Society, American Association for Cancer Research, International Society for Biological Therapy of Cancer and American Association of Biological Chemistry. He was awarded the cancer research prize of the French ligue against cancer in 1992 and in 2004 the presidential prize in biotechnology. He was awarded for translational research and scientific excellency by INSERM. His research has resulted in more than 310 scientific articles and several reviews in the field of human immunology, tumor biology and cancer immunotherapy; he has also been an editor for several textbooks.

Dr. Wu is an Associate Professor in the Department of Molecular Medicine at Scripps Research. The current research in the Wu laboratory integrates synthetic chemistry with glycobiology to explore the relevance of protein glycosylation in human disease and cancer immunotherapy. In 2018, Dr. Wu developed a platform to construct antibody-cell conjugates for cancer immunotherapy, which does not require genetic engineering. Previously, while working as a postdoctoral fellow in the group of Professor Carolyn R. Bertozzi at the University of California, Berkeley, Dr. Wu developed an aldehyde-tag (SMARTag) based technology for site-specific labeling of monoclonal antibodies, which served as the foundation for Redwood Biosciences Inc., a biotech company co-founded by Bertozzi. In 2014, Redwood Bioscience Inc. and the SMARTag Antibody-Drug Conjugate technology platform was acquired by Catalent Pharma Solutions.

About Aviceda Therapeutics

Founded in 2018 and based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Aviceda Therapeutics is a late-stage, pre-clinical biotechnology company with a mission to develop the next generation of glyco-immune therapeutics (GITs) utilizing a proprietary technology platform to modulate the innate immune system and chronic, non-resolving inflammation. Aviceda has assembled a world-class, cross-disciplinary team of recognized scientists, clinicians and drug developers to tackle devastating ocular and systemic degenerative, fibrotic, oncologic and immuno-inflammatory diseases. At Aviceda, we exploit a unique family of receptors found expressed on all innate immune cells and their associated glycobiological interactions to develop transformative medicines. Combining the power of our biology with our innovative cell-based high-throughput screening platform and proprietary nanoparticle technology, we can modulate the innate immune response specifically and profoundly. Aviceda is developing a pipeline of GITs that are delivered via biodegradable nanoparticles and which safely and effectively target numerous immune-inflammatory conditions. Avicedas lead ophthalmic optimized nanoparticle, as an intravitreal formulation, AVD-104, is being developed to target various immune system responses that contribute to pathology associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201027005101/en/

See the rest here:

Aviceda Therapeutics Announces Formation of Scientific Advisory Board - BioSpace

Remdesivir approved by FDA to treat Covid-19, but the evidence is mixed – Vox.com

The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday gave its first full approval for a drug to treat Covid-19 to the antiviral remdesivir. But some researchers say the FDA is once again promoting a Covid-19 therapy based on shaky evidence.

Developed by Gilead Sciences and marketed under the brand name Veklury, remdesivir previously received emergency use authorization (EUA) from the FDA in May, which allowed it to be used to treat patients with severe Covid-19. In August, the FDA relaxed its guidelines to allow the drug to be used in less serious cases. President Donald Trump also took the drug as part of his treatment when he was diagnosed with Covid-19 earlier in October.

Full FDA approval promotes remdesivir to the standard of care for hospitalized patients, and other potential treatments for Covid-19 will now have to be compared to it during clinical research.

Todays approval is supported by data from multiple clinical trials that the agency has rigorously assessed and represents an important scientific milestone in the Covid-19 pandemic, FDA commissioner Stephen Hahn in a statement Thursday. The FDA based its decision on three randomized controlled trials. (The largest of those looked at 1,062 hospitalized patients.) The trials results showed that remdesivir reduced the length of hospital stays in some Covid-19 patients.

However, shortly before the approval was granted, a study from the World Health Organization announced preliminary results that found the drug had no effect on mortality and unlike the FDAs findings negligible effects on how long patients were in hospitals. The study, known as the Solidarity Trial, recruited almost 12,000 patients, making it the largest Covid-19 treatment study in the world thus far. Researchers say the findings should have given the FDA pause.

I think its really inappropriate to give this a full approval because the data dont support it, said Eric Topol, a professor of molecular medicine at the Scripps Research Translational Institute. What [the FDA] should have done instead of issuing the approval was put on the brakes.

Absent a vaccine, doctors are desperate for an effective treatment for Covid-19, and the FDAs approval of remdesivir finally gives them an option. In the United States, Covid-19 case counts are rising again, with states like Wisconsin opening field hospitals to deal with a looming surge.

But the approval of remdesivir has raised concerns, not only because of the results of the WHOs trial but also because it follows a number of questionable FDA authorizations for other Covid-19 therapies that appear to have been influenced by political pressure from the White House.

Now some researchers and doctors are concerned that remdesivir could not only be less effective than promised, but that its approval could also undermine other efforts to develop better Covid-19 therapies.

Remdesivir seems to be most effective relatively early on for hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19. To help beat back the illness, it interferes with how SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, makes copies of itself. The virus uses genetic instructions in the form of RNA, written in a code made of molecules represented by the letters A, U, G, and C. The drug mimics the molecule represented by A, adenosine. The fake adenosine blocks the virus from copying itself but doesnt fool human cells. The result is the virus cant reproduce as much within a patients body.

The antiviral drug was originally developed to treat the Ebola virus, and it has received a hefty investment from the US government over almost two decades, as Ekaterina Cleary, lead data analyst and research associate at the Center for Integration of Science and Industry, wrote in a piece for Stat News:

Research from the Center for Integration of Science and Industry, with which I am affiliated, determined that between gathering knowledge behind remdesivirs chemical structure and molecular target, the NIH invested as much as $6.5 billion between 2000 and 2019.

Remdesivir treatment is not without risks. It has been shown to cause some side effects in some people, such as elevated liver enzymes, which could indicate liver damage. The drug can also trigger allergic reactions, resulting in fever, shortness of breath, wheezing, swelling, low blood oxygen, and changes in blood pressure.

For a patient with private insurance, the intravenous drug can cost $3,120 for a five-day course of treatment.

Antivirals like remdesivir are most effective early on during the progression of Covid-19, when most of the damage is being done by the virus itself. Its less effective in later stages, when the problem isnt just the virus. The severe manifestations of the disease are caused by an out-of-control immune response to the infection, said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health.

If the immune system gets riled up, it can cause a lot more destruction than SARS-CoV-2 and require more-drastic interventions like intubation, at which point another approach is needed. Thats a big reason why corticosteroids like dexamethasone, which tamp down on the immune system, are the only drugs so far reliably demonstrated to actually reduce Covid-19 mortality.

But giving a patient steroids too early in an infection could prevent the immune system from mounting an effective response against SARS-CoV-2.

Coming up with an effective treatment regimen requires delicately balancing where a patient is in the course of their coronavirus infection and how severe their illness has become. But given how murky it is to identify an infection to begin with let alone confirming the diagnosis and starting the correct treatment during the appropriate window researchers have a hard time teasing out what interventions work best.

Thats why carefully controlled, large-scale clinical trials are so important. And with mixed results coming from the studies conducted to date, some scientists dont think the evidence for remdesivirs effectiveness is enough for the FDA to grant approval.

I was really surprised when I saw that news, Rasmussen said.

The FDA has already made some controversial decisions around Covid-19 drug treatments. The agency granted an EUA for the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine in March, after Trump called it a game changer. The FDA revoked the EUA in June, saying hydroxychloroquine was unlikely to be effective and could cause lead to heart problems.

Then in August, the agency granted an EUA for convalescent plasma to treat Covid-19. But the National Institutes of Health said the evidence used by the FDA was insufficient.

There is more evidence that remdesivir works compared with that of convalescent plasma, but thats not saying much. Its not as weak as the case for plasma, but thats no standard. The case for plasma is nonexistent, said Jeremy Faust, attending physician in emergency medicine at Brigham and Womens Hospital in Boston and an instructor at Harvard Medical School. There is actually randomized controlled trial data that suggests [that] for a subset of patients, remdesivir can decrease hospital length of stay.

The strongest results in favor of remdesivir show that patients who received it had a median recovery time of 10 days, compared to 15 days for those who took the placebo. Its a significant effect, but its not huge, and its certainly not a cure for Covid-19, nor a way to guarantee fewer deaths.

Faust said one of his concerns with the FDAs remdesivir approval is a phenomenon known as indication creep, in which a treatment shown to work in only a limited set of circumstances gets prescribed to more and more people. The worry here is that remdesivir, which is approved only for Covid-19 patients over 12 years old who required hospitalization, could start being used in patients with milder Covid-19 illness, or in more severe cases past the point where it could be effective.

What will happen, I guarantee, is people will start to use the medication more than they need it, Faust said. Since the course of treatment is five days, it could also extend the length of hospital stays in patients who would otherwise be discharged earlier, saddling them with unnecessary costs.

Another concern is that the approval of remdesivir, especially with such mixed evidence for its effectiveness, could undermine further research.

Topol noted that with remdesivir now as the only fully approved drug, it becomes much more difficult to conduct studies on other therapies because they now have to be compared against remdesivir, the new standard treatment, as well as a a placebo.

That raises the cost and complexity of trials, delaying results. Such comparisons are worthwhile if the standard of care is effective, but it adds unnecessary complications if its not.

It also makes it harder to recruit people for subsequent clinical trials of the drug to better validate its effectiveness. People may be more reluctant to sign up for a trial where they could get a placebo when they know they could get the actual drug.

The biggest, most serious problem is that we wont get to the truth, Topol said.

Its worth noting that remdesivir could still be a viable treatment for Covid-19, but the evidence presented so far is contradictory and more investigation is needed to clarify its effectiveness. So why did the FDA go ahead with its approval, then?

Its hard to say, but Herschel Nachlis, a research assistant professor of government at Dartmouth College, suggested the approval might be a strategic move by the agency to deflect political pressure away from the all-important Covid-19 vaccination campaign. Trump has linked a vaccine to his election prospects and blamed the FDA for holding it back. The appearance that a Covid-19 vaccine was rushed to meet political needs could make people reluctant to get vaccinated, so regulators are keen to distance themselves from the 2020 election campaign.

If, in the short term, approving remdesivir gives the President a win and alleviates some pressure on the agency from the President about vaccines, that helps buy the FDA important time, Nachlis told Vox in an email. It might be another case, like convalescent plasma, of giving up some ground in a battle to put yourself in the position to be able to win the broader war.

Whether Nachliss hypothesis is correct isnt yet known. But what is clear is that the evidence on remdesivirs effectiveness appears to be mixed, which is why it would have been helpful for the FDA to have held a public advisory committee meeting to discuss the evidence, a step it typically takes for full pharmaceutical approvals.

Since it may be months before a vaccine for Covid-19 is available, treatments are still urgently needed and other approaches are being studied. Trump, for example, also underwent a course of an experimental monoclonal antibody therapy from the company Regeneron when he was treated for Covid-19. There are multiple clinical trials of these drugs underway, but now they have competition.

Help keep Vox free for all

Millions turn to Vox each month to understand whats happening in the news, from the coronavirus crisis to a racial reckoning to what is, quite possibly, the most consequential presidential election of our lifetimes. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you havent, please consider helping everyone make sense of an increasingly chaotic world: Contribute today from as little as $3.

Go here to read the rest:

Remdesivir approved by FDA to treat Covid-19, but the evidence is mixed - Vox.com

FDA Approves New FoundationOneLiquid CDx Companion Diagnostic Indications for Three Targeted Therapies That Treat Advanced Ovarian, Breast and…

FoundationOne Liquid CDx analyzes the largest genomic region of any FDA-approved comprehensive liquid biopsy test and was approved in August to provide tumor mutation profiling in accordance with professional guidelines for patients with any solid tumor. Concurrently, it was approved as a companion diagnostic for a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor approved by the FDA for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with qualifying BRCA1/2 alterations, and for three first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients.

FoundationOne Liquid CDx offers oncologists an important and minimally invasive tool to consider when making treatment decisions for their patients, regardless of the type of cancer they have, said Brian Alexander, M.D., M.P.H., chief medical officer at Foundation Medicine. These three additional companion diagnostic claims expand the tests clinical utility into breast and ovarian cancer, demonstrating our commitment to bringing precision medicine to more patients, and we plan to continue working with our biopharma partners to increase that reach.

Todays approval expands FoundationOne Liquid CDxs companion diagnostic indications to include the following targeted therapies:

PIK3CA is the most commonly mutated gene in HR+/HER2- breast cancer; approximately 40% of patients living with HR+/HER2- breast cancer have this mutation.1

An estimated one in four women with epithelial ovarian cancer have a mutation of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene.2

Using a blood sample, FoundationOne Liquid CDx analyzes over 300 cancer-related genes for genomic alterations. FoundationOne Liquid CDx results are delivered in an integrated report that identifies alterations matched to FDA-approved therapies. It also enables accelerated companion diagnostic development for biopharma companies developing precision therapeutics.

As a laboratory professional service which has not been reviewed or approved by the FDA, the FoundationOne Liquid CDx report delivers information about the genomic signatures microsatellite instability (MSI) and blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB), as well as single gene alterations, including NTRK fusions, to help inform the use of other therapies including immunotherapies. Also, as a laboratory professional service, the report provides relevant clinical trial information and includes interpretive content developed in accordance with professional guidelines in oncology for patients with any solid tumor.

About FoundationOne Liquid CDx

FoundationOne Liquid CDx is a qualitative next generation sequencing based in vitro diagnostic test for prescription use only that uses targeted high throughput hybridization-based capture technology to analyze 324 genes utilizing circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolated from plasma derived from anti-coagulated peripheral whole blood of advanced cancer patients. The test is FDA-approved to report short variants in over 300 genes and is a companion diagnostic to identify patients who may benefit from treatment with specific therapies (listed in Table 1 of the Intended Use) in accordance with the approved therapeutic product labeling. Additional genomic findings may be reported and are not prescriptive or conclusive for labeled use of any specific therapeutic product. Use of the test does not guarantee a patient will be matched to a treatment. A negative result does not rule out the presence of an alteration. Patients who are negative for companion diagnostic mutations should be reflexed to tumor tissue testing and mutation status confirmed using an FDA-approved tumor tissue test, if feasible. For the complete label, including companion diagnostic indications and complete risk information, please visit http://www.F1LCDxLabel.com.

About Foundation Medicine

Foundation Medicine is a molecular information company dedicated to a transformation in cancer care in which treatment is informed by a deep understanding of the genomic changes that contribute to each patient's unique cancer. The company offers a full suite of comprehensive genomic profiling assays to identify the molecular alterations in a patients cancer and match them with relevant targeted therapies, immunotherapies and clinical trials. Foundation Medicines molecular information platform aims to improve day-to-day care for patients by serving the needs of clinicians, academic researchers and drug developers to help advance the science of molecular medicine in cancer. For more information, please visit http://www.FoundationMedicine.com or follow Foundation Medicine on Twitter (@FoundationATCG).

Foundation Medicine and FoundationOne are registered trademarks of Foundation Medicine, Inc.

PIQRAY is a registered trademark of Novartis AG.

RUBRACA is a registered trademark of Clovis Oncology, Inc.

ALECENSA is a registered trademark of Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.

Source: Foundation Medicine

1 The Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490(7418):61-70.2 Pennington et al, Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20(3):764-7753 Dearden et al. Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep; 24(9): 23712376.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201027005468/en/

See the original post:

FDA Approves New FoundationOneLiquid CDx Companion Diagnostic Indications for Three Targeted Therapies That Treat Advanced Ovarian, Breast and...

How Many Have Recovered From Covid-19 Cases? No One Knows. – msnNOW

Gabriela Bhaskar for The Wall Street Journal Coronavirus recoveries are undercounted in public-health statistics.

Health researchers collect various pieces of Covid-19 data to get a handle on the spread of the new coronavirus, but one metric has proven tough to pin down: how many infected people have recovered.

Among the 8.8 million coronavirus cases reported in the U.S. so far, some 3.5 million have recovered, according to Johns Hopkins University, which tracks the pandemic.

Yet the tally of recovered Covid-19 patients misses the mark, health experts say, while also failing to capture the many people who are struggling with lingering medical issues from their cases.

The data are so spotty, public-health authorities say they dont know what the true count is. The national figure displayed on trackers likely misses the true count by millions, estimates Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown University School of Public Health.

The spottiness stems from the absence of both an agreed-upon definition for a coronavirus recovery and a standardized way to track the numbers of patients, the health experts say. What constitutes recovery is so nebulous that some states dont even track it, and those that do probably undercount the true number.

Im not aware of anyone using the recovery figures, said Marcus Plescia, chief medical officer of the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. Ive seen that data, and Ive not paid attention to them.

The lack of clarity means the popular picture of Covid-19s toll misses a datapoint indicating that most infected people have overcome the illness. And it highlights the challenges in assembling data that would help health authorities track the virus and help people fight it.

Like a lot of these issues with data reporting for Covid, theres really not a clear standard for how to do it, said Lauren Gardner, a Johns Hopkins University associate engineering professor who leads the team that built the schools widely cited Covid-19 dashboard.

Both the general public and many health professionals tend to consider patients recovered if they feel the way they did before they became ill. Yet many states define coronavirus recovery differently.

These states count a Covid-19 case as a recovery simply because time has passed since a person developed symptoms or was discharged from the hospital.

Michigan defines recovered cases as the number of people with a confirmed Covid-19 diagnosis who are alive 30 days after getting symptoms. Texas estimates recoveries under a complex formula that subtracts deaths and certain other cases, and assumes it takes 32 days for hospitalized patients to recover and 14 days for nonhospitalized patients.

Such measurements might indicate how many people who tested positive for the coronavirus didnt die, but might miss those who never displayed symptoms and didnt undergo testing.

The metrics also miss the viruss individual impact, according to health experts. While some patients bounce back quickly, others can struggle with side effects for weeks or even months.

There is a variable path after people get sick, said Eric Topol, a cardiologist and professor of molecular medicine at the Scripps Research Institute. There are people who are still ill months after they get sick. We know those symptoms can be very severe, and people can be debilitated.

Given the complexities, some states dont try to count how many have recovered from Covid-19.

The California Department of Public Health said assessing who is recovered is too subjective, and the persistence of side effects in a subset of Covid-19 patients known as long-haulers makes it hard to get a good count.

The Florida Department of Health also doesnt provide a specific recovery metric. It said relying on hospital discharges or estimating length of illness doesnt capture recovery.

Without data from every state and accurate figures from states reporting data, the recovery numbers given by Covid-19 trackers available online are useless for assessing how many people have recovered, said Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist and senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

Dr. Nuzzo said she doesnt know what the true number of recovered patients is.

Covid-19 trackers get their recovery figures from states that are reporting the numbers. Alexis Madrigal, a founder of the widely cited Covid Tracking Project, said he has sometimes wanted to stop recording recoveries because of too much imprecision in what constitutes a recovery and in tallying them.

Most recovery definitions are not what they purport to be or what people expect, said Mr. Madrigal, who is also a staff writer at The Atlantic magazine.

Donna Bourne, of Shelby, Ohio, got sick and tested positive for Covid-19 in late March. Seven months later, she said, she still struggles with fatigue and severe shortness of breath climbing the stairs in her home. She uses her asthma inhaler every day, as opposed to once a week before getting Covid-19. She now also has an irregular heartbeat, recall problems and sometimes drools because the lower part of her face is partially paralyzed.

Despite her continued health issues, she fits the description of presumed recovered in Ohio, because she is still alive more than 21 days since she first developed symptoms.

Your body just does not recover from Covid the way it would from the flu, said Ms. Bourne, 55 years old, who was recently furloughed from her job assisting workers with disabilities. Its really, really hard on you.

Many state and local health departments ignore recovery tallies in gauging the progress of the pandemic.

Without a standard definition of Covid-19 recovery, there isnt a way to compare data between counties or cities, or to tell how well people living in these places are recovering, said Oscar Alleyne, chief of programs and services for the National Association of County and City Health Officials.

What health authorities could use is a figure capturing how people infected with Covid-19 are faring over time, Dr. Alleyne said. Armed with such data, public-health departments would be better equipped to write guidelines for treatment and allocate the resources that doctors and patients need, he said.

Write to Sarah Toy at sarah.toy@wsj.com

Read more:

How Many Have Recovered From Covid-19 Cases? No One Knows. - msnNOW

COVID-19 in the continent’s children: UK award supports new research – University of Cape Town News

Professor Heather Zar, the chair of the Department of Paediatrics and Child Health and the director of the South African Medical Research Council Unit on Child and Adolescent Health at the University of Cape Towns(UCT) Faculty of Health Sciences, is spearheading a research project that is one of 12 globally to receive a recent COVID-19 grant.

The National Institute for Health Research / United Kingdom Research and Innovation Global Effort on COVID-19(NIHR/UKRI GECO) grant is a collaborative funding opportunity. Under Professor Zar as the project leader, the study will offer a unique opportunity to understand the determinants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2(SARS-CoV-2) infection and coronavirus disease(COVID-19) in children in Africa in a low-middle-income country(LMIC) context. The award will enable Zar and her team to undertake a study titled Spectrum, determinants and long-term outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease in African children.

The reasons children typically develop mild illness or have asymptomatic infection are poorly understood. In LMICs, where children make up a large proportion of the population, risk factors such as malnutrition, HIV exposure, tuberculosis or prior infection with endemic coronaviruses may have an impact on the risk of infection and development of COVID-19.

This project aims to investigate the spectrum of illness in African children, the risk factors for infection or disease, and the immune or inflammatory factors protecting children against SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 disease.

Zar is collaborating with partners at the universities of Western Australia and Southampton in the United Kingdom for this research.

COVID-19 infection in African children

This funding provides a wonderful opportunity to better understand COVID-19 in African children in an LMIC context, she said.

This is particularly relevant because of the high burden of pneumonia, which continues to be the major single killer of children under five years of age, due to factors such as malnutrition, smoke exposure and the high burden of infectious disease in these settings.

Understanding why children are only mildly affected may be key to developing new strategies to prevent or ameliorate illness.

However, this hasnt occurred with COVID-19, said Zar, who is an affiliate member of the Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine(IDM) at UCT. Surprisingly, children in LMICs and globally are predominantly only mildly affected by COVID-19, with relatively few severe cases or deaths occurring in young children. The current project will investigate whether prior infection with other organisms (including seasonal coronaviruses) protects children against severe disease through development of immunity.

Understanding why children are only mildly affected may be key to developing new strategies to prevent or ameliorate illness, said Zar.

Drakenstein Child Health Study

Whitney Barnett, the projects programme manager, said that this funding will offer researchers the additional focus of investigating COVID-19 across different settings, ranging from communities to hospitals. SARS-CoV-2 infection will be investigated in children who are hospitalised with pneumonia as well as in children who are part of the population-based Drakenstein Child Health Study(DCHS), anovel African birth cohort study, which is led by Zar.

The DCHS has comprehensively investigated the early-life determinants of child health, and developmental pathways to health or disease from pregnancy through childhood so it provides a unique platform to study COVID-19 in children, and the impact of the pandemic on child health.

It is especially important to be able to do this study here because children make up a high proportion of the population.

The DCHS also bridges the intersection of infectious diseases and the emergence of non-communicable diseases, Zar said.

It is especially important to be able to do this study here because children make up a high proportion of the population, and risk factors such as malnutrition, pollution, poverty and a high burden of infections may contribute to their vulnerability to developing illness.

She added that the context of the DCHS offers further understanding of COVID-19-related childhood illness, including the protective or risk factors for infection or disease that have been carefully measured from the antenatal period through childhood, and the role of inflammation.

As a child health specialist in respiratory illness, Zar said that this will inform future research and healthcare approaches and provide a unique opportunity to generate new knowledge, identify risk factors for illness and develop novel strategies for prevention and treatment.

Read more:

COVID-19 in the continent's children: UK award supports new research - University of Cape Town News

FoundationOneCDx Receives FDA-Approval as a Companion Diagnostic for VITRAKVI(larotrectinib) to Identify Patients with NTRK Fusions Across All Solid…

Foundation Medicine, Inc. today announced that it has received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for FoundationOneCDx to be used as a companion diagnostic for VITRAKVI (larotrectinib), which is currently FDA-approved for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with solid tumors that have a neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) gene fusion without a known acquired resistance mutation, are metastatic or where surgical resection is likely to result in severe morbidity, and have no satisfactory alternative treatments or that have progressed following treatment. FoundationOne CDx, the only FDA-approved tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test, is now approved to detect NTRK1/2/3 fusions across all solid tumor types and identify patients who may be appropriate for treatment with VITRAKVI.

NTRK fusion positive cancer occurs when a piece of the chromosome containing the NTRK gene breaks off and binds to another chromosome. These NTRK gene fusions produce TRK fusion proteins, which may cause cancer cells to grow.1 NTRK fusions are more commonly found in rare cancer types, such as secretory carcinoma of the breast or salivary gland and infantile fibrosarcoma, but they can also occur across many more common cancer types including glioma, melanoma and carcinomas of the lung, thyroid and colon.2

"Taking a comprehensive and validated approach to genomic testing is critical for all advanced cancer patients, but especially for those harboring rare mutations that can be missed with alternative testing methods," said Brian Alexander, M.D., M.P.H., chief medical officer at Foundation Medicine. "Not only will this approval improve access to genomic testing and reinforce the role it plays in rare cancers, but it also confirms the incredible progress made toward tumor-agnostic cancer care. We're proud of the impact this will have on NTRK fusion positive cancer patients."

FoundationOne CDx is the first FDA-approved broad companion diagnostic that is clinically and analytically validated for solid tumors. The tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling test is currently approved as a companion diagnostic for more than 20 targeted therapies.

"Many patients with rare conditions, like NTRK fusion positive cancer have limited treatment options and poor access to targeted therapies," said Susan Spinosa, co-chair and patient founder of the NTRKers. "This companion diagnostic approval is a critical step forward in addressing this challenge as it provides this patient population with broader access to comprehensive genomic testing and appropriate treatment options."

The approval of VITRAKVI was based on data from three multicenter, open-label, single-arm clinical trials: LOXO-TRK-14001 (NCT02122913), SCOUT (NCT02637687), and NAVIGATE (NCT02576431). Identification of positive NTRK gene fusion status was prospectively determined in local laboratories using next generation sequencing (NGS) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). NTRK gene fusions were inferred in three pediatric patients with infantile fibrosarcoma who had a documented ETV6 translocation by FISH. The major efficacy outcome measures were overall response rate (ORR) and response duration, as determined by a blinded independent review committee according to RECIST 1.1. The clinical validation to support the FoundationOne CDx NTRK companion diagnostic approval was then achieved through a clinical bridging study between the local clinical trial assays and FoundationOne CDx.

About FoundationOne CDx

FoundationOne CDx is a next-generation sequencing based in vitro diagnostic device for detection of substitutions, insertion and deletion alterations (indels), and copy number alterations (CNAs) in 324 genes and select gene rearrangements, as well as genomic signatures including microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) using DNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue specimens. FoundationOne CDx is for prescription use only and is intended as a companion diagnostic to identify patients who may benefit from treatment with certain targeted therapies in accordance with their approved therapeutic product labeling. Additionally, FoundationOne CDx is intended to provide tumor mutation profiling to be used by qualified health care professionals in accordance with professional guidelines in oncology for patients with solid malignant neoplasms. Use of the test does not guarantee a patient will be matched to a treatment. A negative result does not rule out the presence of an alteration. Some patients may require a biopsy. For a full list of targeted therapies for which FoundationOne CDx is indicated as a companion diagnostic, please visit http://www.foundationmedicine.com/genomic-testing/foundation-one-cdx.

About Foundation Medicine

Foundation Medicine is a molecular information company dedicated to a transformation in cancer care in which treatment is informed by a deep understanding of the genomic changes that contribute to each patient's unique cancer. The company offers a full suite of comprehensive genomic profiling assays to identify the molecular alterations in a patient's cancer and match them with relevant targeted therapies, immunotherapies and clinical trials. Foundation Medicine's molecular information platform aims to improve day-to-day care for patients by serving the needs of clinicians, academic researchers and drug developers to help advance the science of molecular medicine in cancer. For more information, please visit http://www.FoundationMedicine.com or follow Foundation Medicine on Twitter (@FoundationATCG).

Foundation Medicine and FoundationOne are registered trademarks of Foundation Medicine, Inc.

Vitrakvi is a registered trademark of Bayer

Source: Foundation Medicine

1 National Cancer Institute. "NTRK Gene Fusion." https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/ntrk-gene-fusion

2 "Annals of Oncology. "Identifying patients with NTRK fusion cancer" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859817/

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201023005526/en/

More here:

FoundationOneCDx Receives FDA-Approval as a Companion Diagnostic for VITRAKVI(larotrectinib) to Identify Patients with NTRK Fusions Across All Solid...

Resveratrol Market anticipates revenue will hit up to XX% CAGR by 2026: Segmentation by Revenue, Gross margin, Industrial Analysis, Market Size &…

Resveratrol Market report would come handy to understand the competitors in the market and give an insight into sales, volumes, revenues in the Resveratrol Industry & will also assists in making strategic decisions. The report also helps to decide corporate product & marketing strategies. It reduces the risks involved in making decisions as well as strategies for companies and individuals interested in the Resveratrol industry. Both established and new players in Resveratrol industries can use the report to understand the Resveratrol market.

In Global Market, the Following Companies Are Covered:

Get a Sample Copy of the Report @ https://www.360marketupdates.com/enquiry/request-sample/14844419

Analysis of the Market:

Resveratrol is a stilbenoid, a type of natural phenol, and a phytoalexin produced naturally by several plants in response to injury or when the plant is under attack by pathogens such as bacteria or fungi. Sources of resveratrol in food include the Synthetic, blueberries, raspberries, mulberries and senna.

Resveratrol industry is concentrated highly. Currently, there are many resveratrol producing companies in the world Resveratrol industry. The main market players are DSM, Evolva, Sabinsa,, InterHealth, Maypro, Laurus Labs, JF-NATURAL, Great Forest Biomedical, Shaanxi Ciyuan Biotech, Chengdu Yazhong, Changsha Huir Biological-tech, Xian Gaoyuan Bio-Chem and Xian

These companies occupied 80.49% of the global production in 2016. The production of Resveratrol will increase to 131.05 MT in 2017 from 90.99 MT in 2012 with average growth rate of 7.57%. China is the largest production region with rich raw material source.

The global consumption value of Resveratrol increases with the 5.59% average growth rate. USA is the largest consumption region due to the bigger demand of downstream applications. In 2016, these this region occupied 54.39% of the global consumption value in total.

Resveratrol products mainly include three types, which include Synthetic, Fermentation and Plant Extract. And each type has application industries relatively. The application include Dietary Supplement, Cosmetic and Food and Beverage, the downstream application industries will need more Resveratrol. So, Resveratrol has a huge market potential in the future. Manufacturers engaged in the industry are trying to produce good performance Resveratrol through improving technology.

The major raw materials for Resveratrol are Reynoutria japonica Houtt root and other auxiliary materials. Fluctuations in the price of the upstream product will impact on the production cost of Resveratrol. The production cost of Resveratrol is also an important factor which could impact the price of Resveratrol. The Resveratrol manufacturers are trying to reduce production cost by developing production method.

We tend to believe this industry is a rising industry, and the consumption increasing degree will show a smooth growth curve. And the price presents fluctuation according to the economy development status and international competition. Also, there is fluctuation in gross margin.

The global Resveratrol market is valued at 58 million USD in 2020 is expected to reach 99.4 million USD by the end of 2026, growing at a CAGR of 8.0% during 2021-2026.

This report focuses on Resveratrol volume and value at the global level, regional level and company level. From a global perspective, this report represents overall Resveratrol market size by analysing historical data and future prospect. Regionally, this report focuses on several key regions: North America, Europe, China and Japan et

Resveratrol Market Breakdown by Types:

Resveratrol Market Breakdown by Application:

Critical highlights covered in the Global Resveratrol market include:

The information available in the Resveratrol Market report is segmented for proper understanding. The Table of contents contains Market outline, Market characteristics, Market segmentation analysis, Market sizing, customer landscape & Regional landscape. For further improving the understand ability various exhibits (Tabular Data & Pie Charts) has also been used in the Resveratrol Market report.

Get a Sample Copy of the Report @ https://www.360marketupdates.com/enquiry/request-sample/14844419

Reasons for Buy Resveratrol Market Report:

In the end, Resveratrol Industry report provides the main region, market conditions with the product price,profit, capacity, production, supply, demand and market growth rateand forecast etc. This report also Present newproject SWOT analysis,investment feasibility analysis, andinvestment return analysis.

Contact Us:

Name: Mr. Ajay More

Email: [emailprotected]

Organization: 360 Market Updates

Phone: +14242530807 / + 44 20 3239 8187

Global Poultry Drugs Market Size in 2020 (New Report): Manufacturers Data, Opportunity, Import Export Scenario, Application, Showing Impressive Growth by 2024

Global Glass Flake Coatings Market Size in 2020 (New Report): Manufacturers Data, Opportunity, Import Export Scenario, Application, Showing Impressive Growth by 2024

Global Window Automation Market anticipates revenue will hit up to CAGR by 2026: Segmentation by Top Companies, Market Size & Growth, Major Applications, Key Regions, Product Demand

Global Spend Management Software Market Share, By Product Analysis, Application, End-Use, Regional Viewpoint, Economical Strategies & Forecast up to 2025

Global Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) Generators Market 2020 Growth Analysis, Share, and consumption by Regional data, Investigation and Growth, Types and Analysis of Key Players- Showing Impressive Growth by 2024

Global Hollow Fiber Filtration Market Exhibit a Steady CAGR by 2026: Covering Market Share, Market Segmentation (by Major Players, Type, Application), Market Size & Growth

Continued here:
Resveratrol Market anticipates revenue will hit up to XX% CAGR by 2026: Segmentation by Revenue, Gross margin, Industrial Analysis, Market Size &...

ETFs in Focus on Bayer’s Bet on Gene Therapy – Yahoo Finance

TipRanks

America goes to the polls on Tuesday (well, actually, America has been early voting for a few weeks, now), and while Democrat Joe Biden has a solid lead in the polls, there is some of evidence that President Trump may still win a second term. Finally, with all of the early voting, mass absentee ballots, and possible extended counting deadlines, we might not know on Tuesday night who the winner is.Its a situation made of uncertainty, and financial markets dont like that. Which brings us to dividend stocks. Investors want a pad, something to protect their portfolio in case of a market drop, and dividends offer just that. These profit-sharing payments to stockholders provide a steady income stream, that typically stays reliable even in a modest downturn. Wall Streets analysts have been doing some of the footwork for us, pinpointing dividend-paying stocks that have kept up high yields, at least 8% to be exact. Opening up theTipRanks database, we examine the details behind those payments to find out what else makes these stocks compelling buys.Altria Group, Inc. (MO)Well start with Altria Group, the tobacco company best known for its iconic Marlboro cigarettes. Altria, like many of the so-called sin stocks, is one of the markets dividend champions, with a long history of reliable, high-yielding payments. The company has benefited from a psychological quirk of human nature during such a wild year as 2020: People will hunker down if necessary, but they wont give up their small pleasures.Cigarettes are exactly that, and even though overall smoking rates have been declining in recent years, Altria saw stable financial results in the last few quarters. The first and second quarters both showed $1.09 in earnings, well above the 97 cents expected in Q1 and modest beat against Q2s $1.06 forecast. Revenues hit $5.06 billion in Q2, in-line with the two previous quarters.Looking ahead, analysts expect Altria to post $1.15 per share in earnings on $5.5 billion in revenues when it reports Q3 results. That report is due out tomorrow morning. Meeting those results will help Altria maintain its dividend although the company has a long-standing, very public, commitment to do just that. Altria has kept its dividend reliable for the past 12 years, and for the last payment, made it September, the company even slightly raised the payout by 2.4%. The current dividend is 86 cents per common share, or $3.44 annualized, and yields an impressive 8.8%.Looking at Altria in the lead-up to the Q3 report, Deutsche Bank analyst Stephen Powers writes, [We] are positively biased on company fundamentals as we approach MO's results next weekreinforced by healthy scanned channel demand intraquarter across MO's core tobacco businesses, with particular strength in cigarettes driven by the Marlboro brand we believe continued operational execution in its core business will enable MO to more credibly position itself as a stable core tobacco investmentPowers rates the stock as a Buy, and his $51 price target implies a 37% upside for the coming year. (To watch Powers track record, click here)Overall, Altria has a Moderate Buy rating from the analyst consensus, based on 3 Buys and 2 Holds set in recent weeks. The stocks current share price is $37.04, and the average price target of $46 suggests a 24% one-year upside. (See MO stock analysis on TipRanks)American Finance Trust (AFIN)Next on our list is a Real Estate Investment Trust, a REIT. These companies are known for their high dividends, a fact resulting from a quirk of tax regulation. REITs are required to return a certain percentage of profits directly to shareholders, and dividends are one of the surest means of compliance. AFIN, which focuses its portfolio on single- and multi-tenant service-retail properties, is typical for its niche.And its niche has been solid. AFIN boasts major companies like Home Depot, Lowes, and Dollar General among its top ten tenants, and announced earlier this month that it has collected over 91% of its third quarter rents. Looking ahead to Q3 results next week, EPS is expected at 23 cents, a 15% increase from Q2. The company offers a monthly dividend, at a rate of 7.1 cents per common share, instead of the more common quarterly payments. The monthly format allows some flexibility in managing adjustments to the payout rate; in April, AFIN reduced the dividend from 9 cents to 7.1 as part of efforts to manage the corona crisis effects on business. The current payment annualizes to 85.2 cents per share, and yields a robust 14.7%. This is more than 7x higher than the average dividend yield found among S&P 500 companies.B. Riley analyst Bryan Maher notes the difficulties that AFIN has faced, as a property owner and manager during an economic downturn, but is confident in the companys ability to meet the challenges.Like most REIT's, AFIN has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which is not surprising given its portfolio has a large number of service retail assets. However, 71% of the portfolio is necessity-focused retail, with the balance being distribution and office properties. As such, AFIN collected 84% of cash rents due in 2Q20, including 96% of the cash rent due from its top 20 tenants. Cash rent collection for July improved to 88%. AFIN has been proactive in working with certain tenants to negotiate rent deferrals/credits Maher noted. To this end, Maher rates AFIN stock a Buy, and gives it a $10 price target. At current trading levels, this implies a strong one-year upside potential of 76%. (To watch Mahers track record, click here)AFIN is priced at $5.69, and its average target matches Mahers, at $10. The stock has a Moderate Buy from the analyst consensus, based on an even split between Buy and Hold reviews. (See AFIN stock analysis on TipRanks)Golub Capital BDC (GBDC)Last but not least is Golub Capital, a business development company and asset manager. Golub works with middle market companies, providing solutions for financing and lending. The company boasts a market cap of $2.2 billion, as well as over $30 billion in capital under management.In the months since the corona virus crisis hit the economy, Golub has seen a depressed share price and high volatility in its earnings. The stock is down 28% year-to-date. Earnings, which collapsed in 4Q19, have been bouncing in 2020. The first quarter showed 33 cent per share, while the Q2 figure came in at 28 cents. Looking ahead, the forecast expects a repeat of the second quarter EPS figure, 28 cents. Revenues have been just as volatile; the first quarter saw a deep net loss, but Q2 saw the top line bounce back to $145 million. This was the highest quarterly revenue figure in the past year.Golub believes in keeping up the dividend for investors, offering not only a reliable regular payment but also periodic special dividends. The company adjusted the payment earlier this year, both to keep it affordable during the coronavirus crisis and to keep the yield from getting too high. The result was a 12% cut, making the current payment 29 cents per common share quarterly. This still gives a high yield of 9.16%, which compares well to the 2.5% average found among finance sector peers.Finian OShea, from Well Fargo, notes that Golub has recently announced a $2 billion unsecured debt issue, a move that gives the company plenty of liquidity in a difficult time. He writes, GBDC isnt paying a hefty premium for unsecureds to begin with... We think the improved flexibility and longer tenor of unsecureds make them an attractive addition to the right side of the balance sheet, and see it as a vote of confidence in GBDCs underlying portfolio.OShea reiterates his Overweight (i.e. Buy) rating on this stock. His price target, at $13.50, indicates room for a modest 6% upside. (To watch OSheas track record, click here)Like AFIN above, Golub Capital has a Moderate Buy consensus rating, with 1 each Buy and Hold reviews. The stocks average price target matches OSheas, at $13.50. (See Golubs stock analysis at TipRanks)To find good ideas for dividend stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks equity insights.Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analysts. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.

Go here to read the rest:
ETFs in Focus on Bayer's Bet on Gene Therapy - Yahoo Finance

enGene Receives Funding Through Cystic Fibrosis Foundation’s Path to a Cure for the Discovery of Novel Gene Therapies to Treat Cystic Fibrosis -…

BOSTON and MONTRAL, Oct. 29, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -enGeneInc.,abiotechnology company developing non-viral gene therapies for local administration into mucosal tissues enabled by its proprietary DDX platform, announced today an award from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation for the discovery of genetic medicines to treat patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).

The award was made as a part of the CF Foundation's $500 million Path to a Cure initiative to accelerate the discovery and development of treatments that address the underlying cause of the disease.

Affecting over 75,000 patients worldwide, CF is a genetic disease caused by mutations in a gene known as the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) that render a non-functional CFTR protein. Consequently, multiple organs are affected by disease, chief among them the lungs, where chronic infections and a worsening ability to breathe leads to progressive lung damage and premature death. Patients with nonsense and other rare mutations in both copies of the CFTR gene currently have no therapies that treat the underlying cause of the disease.

"Gene therapy holds promise for the treatment of CF by delivering a functional copy of the CFTR gene to the lungs to restore function and alleviate disease. enGene is developing a DDX-based inhalable formulation to carry DNA to the airways with the goal of functional complementation of CFTR mutations. We are thrilled to have the support of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation to discover novel gene therapy candidates for patients with CF," commented Jose Lora, CSO of enGene.

In developing an inhalable gene therapy for CF, enGene is coupling a non-viral DNA payload to its biocompatible DDX carrier in an effort to create genetic medicines that allow repeatable and titratable dosing to achieve meaningful efficacy.

"Gene therapies have made a remarkable impact in many fields of medicine, but unlocking their full potential in mucosal tissues such as the lung has been elusive, leaving many patients with CF without available treatment options. We are honored to be working with the CF Foundation to accelerate our research and development efforts towards improving and extending the lives of all CF patients," said Jason Hanson, enGene's President and CEO.

About enGene Inc.enGene Inc. is a biotechnology company developing a proprietary non-viral gene therapy platform for localized delivery of nucleic acid payloads to mucosal tissues. The dually derived chitosan (DDX) platform has a high-degree of payload flexibility including DNA and various forms of RNA with broad tissue and disease applications. In addition to developing gene therapies for the lungs, enGene has developed a unique dual-immune activator for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer which has completed IND-enabling studies. The company is evolving its technology to enable applications in multiple mucosal tissues with areas of high unmet medical need.www.engene.com/

Note regarding forward-looking statementsThis press release contains certain "forward-looking statements" that reflect the Company's beliefs and assumptions based on currently available data and information. These forward-looking statements fall within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as: "target," "believe," "expect," "will," "may," "anticipate," "estimate," "would," "positioned," "future," and other similar expressions that predict or indicate future events or trends or that are not statements of historical matters. Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on enGene's current beliefs, expectations, and assumptions that by definition involve risks, uncertainties, that are difficult to predict and are subject to factors outside of management's control and that could cause actual results to differ substantially from statements made including but not limited to: risks associated with the success of preclinical studies, clinical trials, research and development programs, as well as regulatory approval processes. Actual results and outcomes may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. enGene has no approved drugs available for sale marketing at this time and may never have an approved drug. You are cautioned not to rely on enGene's forward looking statements, which are only made as of the date hereof. The Company is under no obligation to update these statements.

SOURCE enGene

Home

Read more:
enGene Receives Funding Through Cystic Fibrosis Foundation's Path to a Cure for the Discovery of Novel Gene Therapies to Treat Cystic Fibrosis -...

Sarepta Therapeutics to Announce Third Quarter 2020 Financial Results and Recent Corporate Developments on November 5, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

TipRanks

America goes to the polls on Tuesday (well, actually, America has been early voting for a few weeks, now), and while Democrat Joe Biden has a solid lead in the polls, there is some of evidence that President Trump may still win a second term. Finally, with all of the early voting, mass absentee ballots, and possible extended counting deadlines, we might not know on Tuesday night who the winner is.Its a situation made of uncertainty, and financial markets dont like that. Which brings us to dividend stocks. Investors want a pad, something to protect their portfolio in case of a market drop, and dividends offer just that. These profit-sharing payments to stockholders provide a steady income stream, that typically stays reliable even in a modest downturn. Wall Streets analysts have been doing some of the footwork for us, pinpointing dividend-paying stocks that have kept up high yields, at least 8% to be exact. Opening up theTipRanks database, we examine the details behind those payments to find out what else makes these stocks compelling buys.Altria Group, Inc. (MO)Well start with Altria Group, the tobacco company best known for its iconic Marlboro cigarettes. Altria, like many of the so-called sin stocks, is one of the markets dividend champions, with a long history of reliable, high-yielding payments. The company has benefited from a psychological quirk of human nature during such a wild year as 2020: People will hunker down if necessary, but they wont give up their small pleasures.Cigarettes are exactly that, and even though overall smoking rates have been declining in recent years, Altria saw stable financial results in the last few quarters. The first and second quarters both showed $1.09 in earnings, well above the 97 cents expected in Q1 and modest beat against Q2s $1.06 forecast. Revenues hit $5.06 billion in Q2, in-line with the two previous quarters.Looking ahead, analysts expect Altria to post $1.15 per share in earnings on $5.5 billion in revenues when it reports Q3 results. That report is due out tomorrow morning. Meeting those results will help Altria maintain its dividend although the company has a long-standing, very public, commitment to do just that. Altria has kept its dividend reliable for the past 12 years, and for the last payment, made it September, the company even slightly raised the payout by 2.4%. The current dividend is 86 cents per common share, or $3.44 annualized, and yields an impressive 8.8%.Looking at Altria in the lead-up to the Q3 report, Deutsche Bank analyst Stephen Powers writes, [We] are positively biased on company fundamentals as we approach MO's results next weekreinforced by healthy scanned channel demand intraquarter across MO's core tobacco businesses, with particular strength in cigarettes driven by the Marlboro brand we believe continued operational execution in its core business will enable MO to more credibly position itself as a stable core tobacco investmentPowers rates the stock as a Buy, and his $51 price target implies a 37% upside for the coming year. (To watch Powers track record, click here)Overall, Altria has a Moderate Buy rating from the analyst consensus, based on 3 Buys and 2 Holds set in recent weeks. The stocks current share price is $37.04, and the average price target of $46 suggests a 24% one-year upside. (See MO stock analysis on TipRanks)American Finance Trust (AFIN)Next on our list is a Real Estate Investment Trust, a REIT. These companies are known for their high dividends, a fact resulting from a quirk of tax regulation. REITs are required to return a certain percentage of profits directly to shareholders, and dividends are one of the surest means of compliance. AFIN, which focuses its portfolio on single- and multi-tenant service-retail properties, is typical for its niche.And its niche has been solid. AFIN boasts major companies like Home Depot, Lowes, and Dollar General among its top ten tenants, and announced earlier this month that it has collected over 91% of its third quarter rents. Looking ahead to Q3 results next week, EPS is expected at 23 cents, a 15% increase from Q2. The company offers a monthly dividend, at a rate of 7.1 cents per common share, instead of the more common quarterly payments. The monthly format allows some flexibility in managing adjustments to the payout rate; in April, AFIN reduced the dividend from 9 cents to 7.1 as part of efforts to manage the corona crisis effects on business. The current payment annualizes to 85.2 cents per share, and yields a robust 14.7%. This is more than 7x higher than the average dividend yield found among S&P 500 companies.B. Riley analyst Bryan Maher notes the difficulties that AFIN has faced, as a property owner and manager during an economic downturn, but is confident in the companys ability to meet the challenges.Like most REIT's, AFIN has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which is not surprising given its portfolio has a large number of service retail assets. However, 71% of the portfolio is necessity-focused retail, with the balance being distribution and office properties. As such, AFIN collected 84% of cash rents due in 2Q20, including 96% of the cash rent due from its top 20 tenants. Cash rent collection for July improved to 88%. AFIN has been proactive in working with certain tenants to negotiate rent deferrals/credits Maher noted. To this end, Maher rates AFIN stock a Buy, and gives it a $10 price target. At current trading levels, this implies a strong one-year upside potential of 76%. (To watch Mahers track record, click here)AFIN is priced at $5.69, and its average target matches Mahers, at $10. The stock has a Moderate Buy from the analyst consensus, based on an even split between Buy and Hold reviews. (See AFIN stock analysis on TipRanks)Golub Capital BDC (GBDC)Last but not least is Golub Capital, a business development company and asset manager. Golub works with middle market companies, providing solutions for financing and lending. The company boasts a market cap of $2.2 billion, as well as over $30 billion in capital under management.In the months since the corona virus crisis hit the economy, Golub has seen a depressed share price and high volatility in its earnings. The stock is down 28% year-to-date. Earnings, which collapsed in 4Q19, have been bouncing in 2020. The first quarter showed 33 cent per share, while the Q2 figure came in at 28 cents. Looking ahead, the forecast expects a repeat of the second quarter EPS figure, 28 cents. Revenues have been just as volatile; the first quarter saw a deep net loss, but Q2 saw the top line bounce back to $145 million. This was the highest quarterly revenue figure in the past year.Golub believes in keeping up the dividend for investors, offering not only a reliable regular payment but also periodic special dividends. The company adjusted the payment earlier this year, both to keep it affordable during the coronavirus crisis and to keep the yield from getting too high. The result was a 12% cut, making the current payment 29 cents per common share quarterly. This still gives a high yield of 9.16%, which compares well to the 2.5% average found among finance sector peers.Finian OShea, from Well Fargo, notes that Golub has recently announced a $2 billion unsecured debt issue, a move that gives the company plenty of liquidity in a difficult time. He writes, GBDC isnt paying a hefty premium for unsecureds to begin with... We think the improved flexibility and longer tenor of unsecureds make them an attractive addition to the right side of the balance sheet, and see it as a vote of confidence in GBDCs underlying portfolio.OShea reiterates his Overweight (i.e. Buy) rating on this stock. His price target, at $13.50, indicates room for a modest 6% upside. (To watch OSheas track record, click here)Like AFIN above, Golub Capital has a Moderate Buy consensus rating, with 1 each Buy and Hold reviews. The stocks average price target matches OSheas, at $13.50. (See Golubs stock analysis at TipRanks)To find good ideas for dividend stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks equity insights.Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analysts. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.

Here is the original post:
Sarepta Therapeutics to Announce Third Quarter 2020 Financial Results and Recent Corporate Developments on November 5, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Integrity and Trust – Harvard Medical School

Leaders from across academia, government and industry gathered to discuss regulatory science at the 2020 Global Conference on Regulatory Science. Top row, left to right: Peter Sorger, Amy Abernathy, George Daley, Norman Sharpless. Bottom row, left to right: Adam Palmer, Helga Gadarsdottir, Peter Mol, Steve Goodman.

Speakers and panelists from across academia, government and industry convened to discuss the future of the evaluation and regulation of new medicines at the first annual Global Conference on Regulatory Science, held virtually on Oct. 20 and 21.

While machine learning and data science were the conference themes, fundamental issues of integrity, transparency and patient trust were a refrain.

Get more HMS news here

The importance of these underlying issues has been starkly illuminated by the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, said Margaret Hamburg, former commissioner of the FDA and one of the events keynote speakers.

Even with all the best science, we can't generate the change we hope for if people don't trust it. Even a safe and effective vaccine won't help control the COVID-19 pandemic if people won't take it, said Hamburg.

For me, and I suspect or most of you, this is just enormously worrisome,"she added. "It's a powerful reminder that integrity and the trust it generates is such an essential foundation of everything else.

Scientific discoveries and technologies with the potential to transform human health emerge almost daily, and regulatory agencies like the FDA and its peers around the world have faced mounting challenges as they strive to keep up with the accelerating pace of innovationchallenges that have been amplified by the urgent need for therapeutics and vaccines for COVID-19.

Building trust among patients, balancing careful testing with timely approvals for potentially life-saving medicines, and other key topics were addressed over the course of the two-day conference, which was hosted by the Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science (CRS), a partnership between Harvard University, MIT and the FDA that aims to further develop and improve the science of how drugs and other products are evaluated and brought to market.

Regulatory science is an increasingly compelling opportunity for fundamental innovation and real-world impact in creating safe and effective medicines, diagnostics and devices, said Peter Sorger, the Otto Krayer Professor of Systems Pharmacology at HMS.

Our goal is to try and improve these processes, make them more efficient, and critically, bring needed innovation to unmet medical needs, said Sorger, who co-directs the CRS with Florence Bourgeois, HMS associate professor of pediatrics at Boston Childrens Hospital, and Laura Maliszewski, executive director of the Harvard Program in Therapeutic Science and the Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology.

More than 650 attendees from around the world joined in the virtual discussions, which centered on the theme of how machine learning, data science and new technologiesincluding telemedicine and wearable devicesare changing drug development, clinical trials, medical care and more.

Speakers and panelists included Norman Sharpless, director of the National Cancer Institute; George Q. Daley, dean of HMS; Amy Abernathy, principle deputy commissioner of the FDA; and a broad range of leaders from academia, hospitals, government and industry.

The process of regulating new medicines and biotechnologies begins with scientists themselves, noted Daley.

Scientists bear the responsibility to participate in a shared governance model that invites transparent and independent oversight, he said, highlighting the Asilomar conference in 1975, when an international group of scientists came together to create voluntary guidelines for the manipulation of DNA, then a novel technology.

This established a precedent for self-regulation by scientists, which then informed subsequent regulation by government agencies.

The need for the scientific community to engage in self-governance has only increased in urgency, with the remarkably rapid emergence of CRISPR gene-editing approaches that can make permanent, heritable changes to an individuals DNA. At a meeting in 2015, Daley joined a cohort of scientists, including Jennifer Doudna, now a Nobel laureate, to strongly discourage germline genome editing.

We knew that this would have to be a prohibition that would be practiced by scientists and clinicians themselves, because the knowledge was emerging so rapidly it wasn't clear that the regulators were going to be ready to catch up, said Daley.

But in 2018, a rogue scientist illicitly edited the genomes of two embryos that were carried to term in China, sparking international controversy. If there is ever to be a possible safe and ethical path forward for emerging technologies such as germline editing, it must be paved by the open cooperation and collaboration of scientists, regulators, and importantly, the public, Daley said.

The payoff for this kind of cooperation can be enormous, and perhaps the best examples can be found in recent successes in the development and approval of new cancer medicines, said Sharpless.

I predict that 2020 will be the best year thus far for cancer drug approvals, said Sharpless. That progress has occurred during a time when the FDA has been besieged by a global pandemic.

A historic surge of new cancer medicines has entered the U.S. market in recent years, Sharpless added, a windfall that stems from decades of productive research on cancer biology and therapeutics.

An improved scientific understanding of cancer has led to the development of new medicines that have prompted new approaches to regulation by the FDA. Some cancer drugs demonstrate such efficacy in small-scale clinical trials, he noted, that it can become essentially unethical to withhold them while waiting for large phase III trials to finish.

This has been a change for the regulatory thinking of the FDA, and I would argue has been a change for the good of the patients, Sharpless said. It has made agents available to patients at a sooner date and led the pharmaceutical industry to develop cancer drugs knowing that they can get approval at an earlier stage.

The recent successes of cancer drugs are to be celebrated, but the question of how to replicate these successes in other diseases, such as neurodegeneration and other intractable diseases, remains a pressing concern, he said.

This question was discussed by conference speakers and panelists in many different contexts, particularly the potential of emerging technologies to reshape how clinical trials are conducted in the future.

A wealth of new technologies, from telemedicine to wearable devices, are allowing physicians and scientists to engage with patients in unprecedented ways. This could have a transformative impact in medicine in many ways, including by augmenting clinical trials, speakers said.

Such technologies could enable more frequent physician-patient interaction and the continuous monitoring of real-world data and evidenceproviding far more information than the intermittent site visits that most current trials use to collect data.

In addition, new technologies could help reduce disparities in access to clinical trials, panelists said, and allow for vastly improved patient recruitment, which would help ensure that new medicines are being evaluated on patients who have the best chance of benefiting.

If this potential is to be realized, patients must have confidence that their privacy and data are protected, said conference speakers and panelists.

In many ways, trust in data security and privacy are as important as any innovations in technology itself, panelists noted. This is a key issue for new digital medicine technologies and approaches, they added, and thoughtful and transparent regulation are critical.

Conference speakers also addressed a wide and diverse range of other issues, including how new technologies, such as artificial intelligence and digital pathology, are transforming clinical care and how large data sources like electronic medical records are linked and mined for insights into improving health.

The rapid growth of these and many other new technologies in health care present myriad complex issues for those tasked with evaluation and regulation, speakers and panelists said. And in many cases, as with genetic engineering, decision-making will require societal discourse.

As such, neutral forums to consider and debate new innovations, policies and regulationsone of the key functions of the CRS and its annual conferenceplay an increasingly important role in moving the complex discipline of regulatory science forward.

Central to this process is the ability to effectively collaborate around stakeholders, across academia, industry and regulatory agencies, said Bourgeois.

This is where the center comes in, serving as a platform to foster interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder conversation, she said.

The remarkable discoveries and the acceleration and advances we are seeing in our understanding of diseases and how to treat themthese will most benefit patients if we have an efficient, rigorous and adaptable approach to the evaluation of the many rapidly emerging biotechnologies, Bourgeois said.

Read the original post:
Integrity and Trust - Harvard Medical School

PDUFA VII: FDA and industry set priorities in first round of negotiations – Regulatory Focus

After kicking off the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) reauthorization process in July, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released the first set of meeting summaries in its ongoing negotiations with industry that will shape its prescription drug review program from FY2023-2027.The meeting summaries, while brief, provide insights into what FDA and industry hope to get out of the multi-billion-dollar agreement, with representatives from government and industry alike agreeing that the exploding field of advanced biologic therapies must be a priority. In some other areas, though, the wish lists diverged. (RELATED: PDUFA VII: FDA, industry preview their reauthorization wish lists, Regulatory Focus 23 July 2020).Steering committeeThe PDUFA reauthorization steering committee met three times in September to hash out the ground rules for the negotiations and review the major topics and proposals both sides will work through via designated working groups.FDA and industry both noted the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the agency and the reauthorization process at the first meeting on 15 September.Despite historic workload and operating challenges in the time period, the steps taken in PDUFA VI to protect the program from financial uncertainty have proven critical and important to maintaining FDAs operations, FDA said.During the meeting, FDA pitched six areas it wants to focus on for PDUFA VII: digital health and informatics, postmarket, CBER-specific enhancements, pre-market, regulatory decision tools and finance.Industry, on the other hand, expressed interest in build[ing] upon past user fee agreements and to ensure FDA and industry can mutually keep pace with scientific development. Topics presented by industry include: strengthening scientific dialogue, enhancing patient-centric drug review, supporting the next wave of advanced biologic therapies, modernizing regulatory evidence generation, advancing digital and IT technologies, enhancing innovation in quality and manufacturing, and optimizing FDA infrastructure, staffing, and resources.Industry also said it was keen on adopting some of the lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and translating them into improved processes going forward.During the next steering committee meeting on 22 September, FDA and industry reviewed the overall timeline for reauthorization and the two sides sought clarification on each others proposed topics. The following week the committee met again and reviewed the timeline for communicating with Congress, agreed to topic assignments and looked at some of the overlap between the agencys COVID-19 response and PDUFA interests.CBER subgroupIncreased support for FDAs Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) is set to be a focus for both FDA and industry in the negotiations.FDA told industry at the first CBER breakout meeting that it would like to see enhanced resources for its cell and gene therapy program, which has been overwhelmed by an influx of applications and meeting requests in recent years.FDA noted that its new regenerative medicine advanced therapy (RMAT) designation program has seen exponential growth and is now outpacing breakthrough therapy designations in the Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies (OTAT), despite not receiving any dedicated resources for the fledgling program.With more resources, FDA told industry that it could spend more time on cell and gene therapy submissions, provide more opportunities for engagement and develop policy and guidance for sponsors. FDA also said it will seek dedicated resources for the RMAT program under PDUFA VII.Industry suggested three CBER-related commitments it would like to work into the reauthorization agreement, including workshops and guidance on the use of sponsor-specific prior knowledge in gene therapy submissions, evidentiary standards for RMAT designation and gene therapy manufacturing issues.Industry would like a public workshop to focus on key learnings from the RMAT program resulting in an update to the RMAT guidance, including potential uses of Real World Evidence (RWE) for regulatory decision making, FDA writes, noting that meaningful guidance on the matter may be difficult to develop due to the limited number of approved cell and gene therapy products and the fact that there have not been any products approved to date with RMAT designation.For gene therapy manufacturing, industry specifically said it would like to explore whether submitting portions of a chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC) module could facilitate biologics license approval (BLA) review. FDA said it has concerns that a partial submission could actually slow approval down if development is ongoing but agreed to carry the discussion forward.Regulatory decision toolsOn 29 September, the regulatory decision tools subgroup met for the first time, with FDA and industry reviewing potential areas of enhancement and agreeing to a schedule for the next several meetings.FDA raised four topics it would like to tackle in PDUFA VII, including model-informed drug development (MIDD), complex innovative trial designs (CID), patient-focused drug development (PFDD), and advancing translational models and tools for drug development (ATMT).For MIDD, FDA said its goal is to build on the lessons learned during PDUFA VI and to ensure the programs sustainability. Doing so would require public engagement and the development of comprehensive end-to-end guidance, which FDA said would necessitate increased staffing.Digital health and informaticsFDA and industry began discussions aimed at enhancing the use of digital health and informatics technologies under PDUFA VII on 30 September.FDA pitched three topics for discussion at the meeting, including a proposal for an integrated cloud-based technology environment, a framework for leveraging digital health technology-generated data in submissions, and CBER IT modernization.PremarketFDA and industry addressed several premarket issues in the first meeting of the premarket subgroup, including user related risk analysis (URRA) and human factor (HF) protocol review and developing efficacy endpoints for rare diseases.FDA proposed increasing the user fee timeline for reviewing HF protocols and said the current goals will be unsustainable in the future due to increasing volume and complexity of HF submissions. The two sides discussed the creation of a new user fee goal and timeline for review of URRA.FinanceAt the first of two finance subgroup meetings, FDA presented a host of goals for PDUFA VII: To enhance the operational capabilities, efficacy, and agility of the PDUFA program. FDA proposed continuing to advance resource capacity planning, updating the inflation adjustment to accurately account for program costs, enhancing flexibility in the operating reserve, eliminating a problematic limitation on allowable expenditures, streamlining annual reporting requirements, and implementing technical fixes.Industry representatives, however, stressed that their goal is to build on the enhancements made in PDUFA VI and to improve on user fee resource management, hiring and retention of review staff and performance reporting.During the second finance meeting, FDA and industry looked at a proposal to clarify the maximum and minimum amount of operating reserves to be maintained each year and a proposal to further implement the resource capacity planning (RCP) capability instituted in PDUFA VI.Stakeholder meetingFDA also released a meeting summary from the first round of stakeholder discussions. More than 60 stakeholder organizations, including patient groups, consumer representatives, public health advocates and medical associations, registered to attend the meeting, though a third of those registered did not attend.Some of the themes frequently cited by stakeholders included enhancing the incorporation of patient voice in drug development and regulatory decision making, modernizing FDAs infrastructure, ensuring FDA has adequate resources to recruit and retain qualified staff including in the areas of cell and gene therapy, increasing the strength and reach of patient and rare disease programs including improving diversity in clinical trials and patient engagement, enhancing FDAs use of regulatory science (e.g. COAs, MIDD, RWE), and improving the integration of and guidance for the use of real-world evidence (RWE), FDA reported. Stakeholders also raised decentralized trials and lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic as topics for future discussions.FDA tasked stakeholders with identifying their top issues for further discussion and said it would survey them to rank the topics on the agreed to shortlist.FDA

See the original post:
PDUFA VII: FDA and industry set priorities in first round of negotiations - Regulatory Focus

Novartis expands Kymriah manufacturing footprint with first-ever approved site for commercial CAR-T cell therapy manufacturing in Asia – GlobeNewswire

Basel, October 30, 2020 Novartis today announced the receipt of marketing authorization from Japans Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) for Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation at Kobe ("FBRI") to manufacture and supply commercial Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) for patients in Japan. This approval makes FBRI the first and only approved commercial manufacturing site for CAR-T cell therapy in Asia.

Behind our efforts to reimagine medicine with CAR-T cell therapy lies a commitment to build a manufacturing network that brings treatment closer to patients, commented Steffen Lang, Global Head of Novartis Technical Operations. The expertise and infrastructure of FBRI, a world-leading manufacturing organization, allows us to bring CAR-T manufacturing to Asia. With the Japan MHLW commercial manufacturing approval, the recent capacity expansion in the US and our ongoing efforts to optimize and evolve our processes, we are well-positioned to deliver this potentially curative treatment option to more patients around the world.

Novartis has the largest geographical CAR-T cell therapy manufacturing network in the world, including seven CAR-T manufacturing facilities, across four continents. Commercial manufacturing for Kymriah now takes place at five sites globally including at the Morris Plains, New Jersey facility, where the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved a further increase in manufacturing capacity.

Kymriah is the first-ever FDA-approved CAR-T cell therapy, and the first-ever CAR-T to be approved in two distinct indications. It is a one-time treatment designed to empower patients immune systems to fight their cancer. Kymriah is currently approved for the treatment of r/r pediatric and young adult (up to 25 years of age) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and r/r adult diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)1. Kymriah, approved in both indications by the Japan MHLW in 2019, is currently the only CAR-T cell therapy approved in Asia. Clinical manufacturing began at FBRI in 2019 and will continue alongside commercial manufacturing.

Kymriah was developed in collaboration with the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, a strategic alliance between industry and academia, which was first-of-its-kind in CAR-T research and development.

About Novartis Commitment to Oncology Cell & Gene Novartis has a mission to reimagine medicine by bringing curative cell & gene therapies to patients worldwide. Novartis has a deep CAR-T pipeline and ongoing investment in manufacturing and supply chain process improvements. With active research underway to broaden the impact of cell and gene therapy in oncology, Novartis is going deeper in hematological malignancies, reaching patients with other cancer types and evaluating next-generation CAR-T cell therapies that focus on new targets and utilize new technologies.

Novartis was the first pharmaceutical company to significantly invest in pioneering CAR-T research and initiate global CAR-T trials. Kymriah, the first approved CAR-T cell therapy, developed in collaboration with the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, is the foundation of Novartis commitment to CAR-T cell therapy. Kymriah is currently approved for use in at least one indication in 26 countries and at more than 260 certified treatment centers, with the ambition for further expansion to help fulfill the ultimate goal of bringing CAR-T cell therapy to every patient in need.

The Novartis global CAR-T manufacturing footprint spans seven facilities, across four continents. This comprehensive, integrated footprint strengthens the flexibility, resilience and sustainability of the Novartis manufacturing and supply chain. Commercial and clinical trial manufacturing is now ongoing at Novartis-owned facilities in Stein, Switzerland, Les Ulis, France and Morris Plains, New Jersey, USA, as well as at the contract manufacturing sites at Fraunhofer-Institut for cell therapy and immunology (Fraunhofer-Institut fr Zelltherapie und Immunologie) facility in Leipzig, Germany, and now FBRI in Kobe, Japan. Manufacturing production at Cell Therapies in Australia and Cellular Biomedicine Group in China is forthcoming.

ImportantSafety information from the Kymriah SmPC

EU Name of the medicinal product:

Kymriah 1.2 x 106 6 x 108 cells dispersion for infusion

Important note: Before prescribing, consult full prescribing information.

Presentation: Cell dispersion for infusion in 1 or more bags for intravenous use (tisagenlecleucel).

Indications: Treatment of pediatric and young adult patients up to and including 25 years of age with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory, in relapse posttransplant or in second or later relapse. Treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after two or more lines of systemic therapy.

Dosage and administration:

B-cell patients: For patients 50 kg and below: 0.2 to 5.0 x 106 CAR-positive viable T-cells/kg body weight. For patients above 50 kg: 0.1 to 2.5 x 108 CAR-positive viable T-cells (non-weight based).

DLBCL Patients: 0.6 to 6.0108 CAR-positive viable T-cells (non-weight based).

Pretreatment conditioning (lymphodepleting chemotherapy): Lymphodepleting chemotherapy is recommended to be administered before Kymriah infusion unless the white blood cell (WBC) count within one week prior to infusion is 1,000 cells/L. The availability of Kymriah must be confirmed prior to starting the lymphodepleting regimen.

Precautions before handling or administering Kymriah: Kymriah contains genetically modified human blood cells. Healthcare professionals handling Kymriah should therefore take appropriate precautions (wearing gloves and glasses) to avoid potential transmission of infectious diseases.

Preparation for infusionThe timing of thaw of Kymriah and infusion should be coordinated. Once Kymriah has been thawed and is at room temperature (20C 25C), it should be infused within 30minutes to maintain maximum product viability, including any interruption during the infusion.

Administration Kymriah should be administered as an intravenous infusion through latexfree intravenous tubing without a leukocyte depleting filter, at approximately 10 to 20mL per minute by gravity flow. If the volume of Kymriah to be administered is 20mL, intravenous push may be used as an alternative method of administration.

All contents of the infusion bag(s) should be infused.

Clinical assessment prior to infusion: Kymriah treatment should be delayed in some patient groups at risk (see Special warnings and precautions for use).

Monitoring after infusion: Patients should be monitored daily for the first 10 days following infusion for signs and symptoms of potential cytokine release syndrome, neurological events and other toxicities. Physicians should consider hospitalisation for the first 10 days post infusion or at the first signs/symptoms of CRS and/or neurological events. After the first 10 days following the infusion, the patient should be monitored at the physicians discretion. Patients should be instructed to remain within proximity of a qualified clinical facility for at least 4 weeks following infusion.

Elderly (above 65 years of age): Safety and efficacy have not been established in B-cell patients. No dose adjustment is required in patients over 65 years of age in DLBCL patients.

Paediatric patients: No formal studies have been performed in paediatric patients with B-cell ALL below 3 years of age. The safety and efficacy of Kymriah in children and adolescents below 18 years of age have not yet been established in DLBCL. No data are available.

Patients seropositive for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV): There is no experience with manufacturing Kymriah for patients with a positive test for HIV, active HBV, or active HCV infection. Leukapheresis material from these patients will not be accepted for Kymriah manufacturing.

Contraindications: Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of Kymriah. Contraindications of the lymphodepleting chemotherapy must be considered.

Warnings and precautions: Reasons to delay treatment: Due to the risks associated with Kymriah treatment, infusion should be delayed if a patient has any of the following conditions: Unresolved serious adverse reactions (especially pulmonary reactions, cardiac reactions or hypotension) from preceding chemotherapies, active uncontrolled infection, active graft versus host disease (GVHD), significant clinical worsening of leukaemia burden or rapid progression of lymphoma following lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Blood, organ, tissue and cell donation: Patients treated with Kymriah should not donate blood, organs, tissues or cells.

Active central nervous system (CNS) leukaemia or lymphoma: There is limited experience of use of Kymriah in patients with active CNS leukaemia and active CNS lymphoma. Therefore the risk/benefit of Kymriah has not been established in these populations. Risk of CRS: Occurred in almost all cases within 1 to 10 days post infusion with a median time to onset of 3 days and a median time to resolution of8 days. See full prescribing information for management algorithm of CRS. Risk of neurological events: Majority of events, in particular encephalopathy, confusional state or delirium, occurred within 8 weeks post infusion and were transient. The median time to onset of neurological events was 8 days in B-cell ALL and 6 days in DLBCL; the median time to resolution was 7 days for B-cell ALL and 13 days for DLBCL. Patients should be monitored for neurological events. Risk of infections: Delay start of therapy with Kymriah until active uncontrolled infections have resolved. As appropriate, administer prophylactic antibiotics and employ surveillance testing prior to and during treatment with Kymriah. Serious infections were observed in patients, some of which were life threatening or fatal. After Kymriah administration observe patient and ensure prompt management in case of signs of infection Risk of febrile neutropenia: Frequently observed after Kymriah infusion, may be concurrent with CRS. Appropriate management necessary. Risk of prolonged cytopenias: Appropriate management necessary. Prolonged cytopenia has been associated with increased risk of infections. Myeloid growth factors, particularly granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM CSF), not recommended during the first 3 weeks after Kymriah infusion or until CRS has been resolved. Risk of secondary malignancies: Patients treated with Kymriah may develop secondary malignancies or recurrence of their cancer and should be monitored lifelong for secondary malignancies. Risk of hypogammaglobulinemia or agammaglobulinemia: Infection precautions, antibiotic prophylaxis and immunoglobulin replacement should be managed per age and standard guidelines. In patients with low immunoglobulin levels preemptive measures such as immunoglobulin replacement and rapid attention to signs and symptoms of infection should be implemented. Live vaccines: The safety of immunisation with live viral vaccines during or following Kymriah treatment was not studied. Vaccination with live virus vaccines is not recommended at least 6 weeks prior to the start of lymphodepleting chemotherapy, during Kymriah treatment, and until immune recovery following treatment with Kymriah. Risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS): Patients with elevated uric acid or high tumor burden should receive allopurinol or alternative prophylaxis prior to Kymriah infusion. Continued monitoring for TLS following Kymriah administration should also be performed. Concomitant disease: Patients with a history of active CNS disorder or inadequate renal, hepatic, pulmonary or cardiac function are likely to be more vulnerable to the consequences of the adverse reactions of Kymriah and require special attention. Prior stem cell transplantation: Kymriah infusion is not recommended within 4 months of undergoing an allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) because of potential risk of worsening GVHD. Leukapheresis for Kymriah manufacturing should be performed at least 12weeks after allogeneic SCT. Serological testing: There is currently no experience with manufacturing Kymriah for patients testing positive for HBV, HCV and HIV. Screening for HBV, HCV and HIV, must be performed before collection of cells for manufacturing. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation, can occur in patients treated with medicinal products directed against B cells and could result in fulminant hepatitis, hepatic failure and death. Prior treatment with anti CD19 therapy: There is limited experience with Kymriah in patients exposed to prior CD19 directed therapy. Kymriah is not recommended if the patient has relapsed with CD19 negative leukaemia after prior anti-CD19 therapy. Interference with serological testing: Due to limited and short spans of identical genetic information between the lentiviral vector used to create Kymriah and HIV, some commercial HIV nucleic acid tests (NAT) may give a false positive result. Sodium and potassium content: This medicinal product contains 24.3 to 121.5mg sodium per dose, equivalent to 1 to 6% of the WHO recommended maximum daily intake of 2g sodium for an adult. This medicinal product contains potassium, less than 1mmol (39mg) per dose, i.e. essentially potassium free. Content of dextran 40 and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO): Contains 11 mg dextran 40 and 82.5 mg dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) per mL. Each of these excipients are known to possibly cause anaphylactic reaction following parenteral administration. Patients not previously exposed to dextran and DMSO should be observed closely during the first minutes of the infusion period.

Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction

Live vaccines: The safety of immunisation with live viral vaccines during or following Kymriah treatment has not been studied. Vaccination with live virus vaccines is not recommended for at least 6 weeks prior to the start of lymphodepleting chemotherapy, during Kymriah treatment, and until immune recovery following treatment with Kymriah.

Fertility, pregnancy and lactation

Women of childbearing potential/Contraception in males and females: Pregnancy status for females of reproductive potential should be verified prior to starting treatment with Kymriah. Consider the need for effective contraception in patients who receive the lymphodepleting chemotherapy. There are insufficient exposure data to provide a recommendation concerning duration of contraception following treatment with Kymriah.

Pregnancy: There are no data from the use of Kymriah in pregnant women. It is not known whether Kymriah has the potential to be transferred to the foetus via the placenta and could cause foetal toxicity, including B cell lymphocytopenia. Kymriah is not recommended during pregnancy and in women of childbearing potential not using contraception. Pregnant women should be advised on the potential risks to the foetus. Pregnancy after Kymriah therapy should be discussed with the treating physician. Pregnant women who have received Kymriah may have hypogammaglobulinaemia. Assessment of immunoglobulin levels is indicated in newborns of mothers treated with Kymriah.

Breast feeding: It is unknown whether Kymriah cells are excreted in human milk, a risk to the breast fed infant cannot be excluded. Women who are breast feeding should be advised of the potential risk to the breast fed infant. Breast-feeding should be discussed with the treating physician.

Fertility: There are no data on the effect of Kymriah on fertility.

Effects on ability to drive and use machinesDriving and engaging in hazardous activities in the 8 weeks following infusion should be refrained due to risks for altered or decreased consciousness or coordination.

Adverse drug reactions:

B-Cell ALL patients and DLBCL patients:

Very common (10%): Infections - pathogen unspecified, viral infections, bacterial infections, fungal infections, anaemia, haemorrhage, febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, cytokine release syndrome, hypogammaglobulinaemia, decreased appetite, hypokalaemia, hypophosphataemia, hypomagnesaemia, hypocalcaemia, anxiety, delirium, sleep disorder, headache, encephalopathy, arrhythmia, hypotension, hypertension, cough, dyspnoea, hypoxia, diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, constipation, abdominal pain, rash, arthralgia, acute kidney injury, pyrexia, fatigue, oedema, pain, chills, lymphocyte count decreased, white blood cell count decreased, haemoglobin decreased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, aspartate aminotransferase increased.

Common (1 to 10%): Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, leukopenia, pancytopenia, coagulopathy, lymphopenia, infusion-related reactions, graft versus host disease, hypoalbuminaemia, hyperglycaemia, hyponatraemia, hyperuricaemia, fluid overload, hypercalcemia, tumor lysis syndrome, hyperkalaemia, hyperphosphataemia, hypernatraemia, hypermagnesaemia, dizziness, peripheral neuropathy, tremor, motor dysfunction, seizure, speech disorder, neuralgia, ataxia, visual impairment, cardiac failure, cardiac arrest, thrombosis, capillary leak syndrome, oropharyngeal pain, pulmonary oedema, nasal congestion, pleural effusion, tachypnea, acute respiratory distress syndrome, stomatitis, abdominal distension, dry mouth, ascites, hyperbilirubinaemia, pruritus, erythema, hyperhidrosis, night sweats, back pain, myalgia, muscolosceletal pain, influenza-like illness, asthenia, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, alanine aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, weight decreased, serum ferritin increased, blood fibrinogen decreased, international normalized ratio increased, fibrin D dimer increased, activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged, blood alkaline phosphate increased, prothrombin time prolonged.

Uncommon: B-cell aplasia, ischaemic cerebral infarction, flushing, lung infiltration.

Packs and prices: Country-specific.

Legal classification: Country-specific.

DisclaimerThis press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified by words such as potential, can, will, plan, may, could, would, expect, anticipate, seek, look forward, believe, committed, investigational, pipeline, launch, or similar terms, or by express or implied discussions regarding potential marketing approvals, new indications or labeling for the investigational or approved products described in this press release, or regarding potential future revenues from such products. You should not place undue reliance on these statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs and expectations regarding future events, and are subject to significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. There can be no guarantee that the investigational or approved products described in this press release will be submitted or approved for sale or for any additional indications or labeling in any market, or at any particular time. Nor can there be any guarantee that such products will be commercially successful in the future. In particular, our expectations regarding such products could be affected by, among other things, the uncertainties inherent in research and development, including clinical trial results and additional analysis of existing clinical data; regulatory actions or delays or government regulation generally; global trends toward health care cost containment, including government, payor and general public pricing and reimbursement pressures and requirements for increased pricing transparency; our ability to obtain or maintain proprietary intellectual property protection; the particular prescribing preferences of physicians and patients; general political, economic and business conditions, including the effects of and efforts to mitigate pandemic diseases such as COVID-19; safety, quality, data integrity or manufacturing issues; potential or actual data security and data privacy breaches, or disruptions of our information technology systems, and other risks and factors referred to in Novartis AGs current Form 20-F on file with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Novartis is providing the information in this press release as of this date and does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in this press release as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

About NovartisNovartis is reimagining medicine to improve and extend peoples lives. As a leading global medicines company, we use innovative science and digital technologies to create transformative treatments in areas of great medical need. In our quest to find new medicines, we consistently rank among the worlds top companies investing in research and development. Novartis products reach nearly 800 million people globally and we are finding innovative ways to expand access to our latest treatments. About 110,000 people of more than 140 nationalities work at Novartis around the world. Find out more at https://www.novartis.com.

Novartis is on Twitter. Sign up to follow @Novartis at https://twitter.com/novartisnewsFor Novartis multimedia content, please visithttps://www.novartis.com/news/media-libraryFor questions about the site or required registration, please contact media.relations@novartis.com

References

1.Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), 2018.

# # #

Novartis Media RelationsE-mail: media.relations@novartis.com

Novartis Investor RelationsCentral investor relations line: +41 61 324 7944E-mail: investor.relations@novartis.com

Here is the original post:
Novartis expands Kymriah manufacturing footprint with first-ever approved site for commercial CAR-T cell therapy manufacturing in Asia - GlobeNewswire

AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine candidate: UH Cleveland Medical Center has been selected as a clinical trial site for the Phase 3 global study -…

University Hospitals (UH) and Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) announced today that UH Cleveland Medical Center has been selected as a clinical trial site for the Phase 3 global study of an investigational vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, sponsored by AstraZeneca (LSE/STO/NYSE: AZN). The trial is funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health, and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. UH is part of the NIAID-supported COVID-19 Prevention Network (CoVPN). UH will study AZD1222 as one of approximately 80 clinical investigational sites in the U.S. that will collectively enroll up to 30,000 participants.

AZD1222 was co-invented by the University of Oxford and Vaccitech and licensed to AstraZeneca. It uses a replication-deficient chimpanzee viral vector based on a weakened version of a common cold virus (adenovirus) that causes infections in chimpanzees and contains the genetic material of the SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein. After vaccination, the surface spike protein is produced, priming the immune system to attack the SARS-CoV-2 virus if it later infects the body.

We are pleased to be bringing our community another potential tool in our fight against the coronavirus, said Daniel I. Simon, MD, Chief Clinical & Scientific Officer and President, UH Cleveland Medical Center and the Herman K. Hellerstein Professor of Medicine at the CWRU School of Medicine. Since the beginning of the pandemic, UH physician-scientists and caregivers have worked tirelessly to secure a range of options for our patients related to the testing, treatment and prevention of COVID-19. In fact, UH currently has more than 130 interventional and observational clinical studies underway to gain understanding of the pathogenesis of COVID-19 as well as the impact and outcome of various therapeutic treatment options.

The Phase 3 trial is designed as a 2:1 investigational vaccine candidate to placebo, randomized, double-blinded study to obtain safety, immune response, and efficacy data needed for regulatory review for this unique vaccine development approach. This method uses a defective virus to deliver the gene for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which has been demonstrated in earlier human trials to generate neutralizing antibodies and cellular immune responses against the coronavirus. This vaccine platform is a non-replicating viral vector and is expected to induce durable immune response with two doses administered four weeks apart.

UH Cleveland Medical Center is one of 12 sites in North America participating in the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN), the worlds largest publicly-funded, multi-disciplinary international collaboration facilitating the development of vaccines to prevent HIV/AIDS, explained Grace McComsey, MD, Vice President of Research and Associate Chief Scientific Officer at UH and a professor at the CWRU School of Medicine. When the COVID-19 pandemic began, HVTN joined with other NIAID-funded clinical research networks to focus on clinical trials related to SARS-CoV-2, thus forming the CoVPN. Because of UHs involvement in HVTN, many UH physician-scientists have extensive knowledge in vaccine research and hence were natural choices for investigating the efficacy of the potential COVID-19 vaccines. It is a great honor to be collaborating with the scientific community and helping to find solutions for combatting the coronavirus.

The study, which aims to enroll non-pregnant adults older than 18, will be conducted at UH Cleveland Medical Center in collaboration with the CWRU School of Medicine. Jeffrey Jacobson, MD, attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, UH Cleveland Medical Center, and Professor of Medicine at CWRU School of Medicine will serve as the principal investigator. Additionally, Barbara Gripshover, MD, Medical Director of the Special Immunology Unit, UH Cleveland Medical Center, and Professor of Medicine at CWRU School of Medicine along with Leila Hojat, MD, attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, UH Cleveland Medical Center, and Assistant Professor of Medicine at CWRU School of Medicine will serve as co-investigators.

The trials primary endpoint will be prevention of COVID-19 illness after two doses in those who have not been infected by SARS-CoV-2 prior to immunization.

We are pleased to participate in an additional trial of a COVID-19 vaccine, enhancing options for potential coronavirus prevention, said Dr. Jacobson. Recently, the U.S. FDA had paused this trial in the U.S.; however, the FDA along with the Data and Safety Monitoring Board have carefully reviewed all the data from both the COVID-19 vaccine trial and all other trials using this type of vaccine and felt it was safe to continue the trial. There are numerous strict safety procedures in place during a trial to monitor the health of participants and show that the careful oversight process is working. And because of the disproportionate occurrence of COVID-19 among people of color, as well as a greater severity of disease and higher death rate, we will aim to have solid representation from this population group included in our study.

The trial has been approved by UHs Institutional Review Board and is expected to start enrolling study participants next week. Those interested in participating in the study at UH should call 216-844-4444 or emailcovid19research@UHhospitals.orgto learn more.

The rest is here:
AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine candidate: UH Cleveland Medical Center has been selected as a clinical trial site for the Phase 3 global study -...

SAIS students from around the world travel to Italy for in-person instruction – The Hub at Johns Hopkins

ByMike Broida

As the coronavirus pandemic has forced many schools and universities around the world, including Johns Hopkins, to conduct classes remotely, one Johns Hopkins campus has opened its doors to students and faculty this fall: SAIS Europe, the School of Advanced International Studies' campus in Bologna, Italy.

One of two overseas SAIS campuses, SAIS Europe has the distinction of not only being the sole Johns Hopkins division holding in-person instruction this semester, but also hosting students from the school's Washington, D.C., and Nanjing campuses as well.

"Our students, faculty, and staff are happy to be here," says Michael Plummer, director of SAIS Europe and a professor of international economics. "We're all very grateful to have an in-person experienceand after last spring it's not one we're taking for granted."

Last spring, Italy was one of the countries hardest hit by the COVID-19 pandemic. In March, as the country locked down to limit the spread of the virus, SAIS Europe swiftly switched to online instruction for the rest of the semester.

With the pivot to remote instruction, many students returned to their home countries, with some choosing to remain in Bologna. In May, after the end of the semester, SAIS Europe worked with school and university leaders to plan for a safe reopening in the fall. Over the summer, SAIS Europe transformed the Bologna Center to reflect best health and safety practices due to COVID-19 and to upgrade its existing remote learning infrastructure to accommodate students who were unable to take classes in person.

As the fall semester approached, another issue became a greater concern for the SAIS Europe staff: securing visas for international students. Administrators worked with incoming students from around the world to help them navigate the new and uncertain visa requirements due to the coronavirus pandemic. But as the visa scenario gradually became clearer for SAIS Europe, the same was not the case for SAIS' other overseas campus, the HopkinsNanjing Center.

Though coronavirus infections remained relatively low in China, HNC faculty and staff soon realized that many international studentsincluding Americanswould not be able to attain visas to enter the country. As HNC moved toward a remote fall semester, faculty and staff were conscious of a significant number of students who still wanted an in-person academic experience.

Image caption: A student works in the library at SAIS Bologna, where social distancing measures have been put in place to protect students, faculty, and staff

Image credit: Anna Fantuzzi / Johns Hopkins University

"In July, we started asking the question of whether we could be 'in exile' away from Nanjing," says Adam Webb, American co-director of the HNC and resident professor of political science. "Before COVID, we'd talked generally about fostering some type of exchange with our sister campuses in D.C. and Bologna, but once it was clear that we weren't going to open in person in Nanjing, we worked with SAIS Europe and leaders at SAIS to set a plan in motion."

In August, when SAIS Europe began its fall semester, it not only welcomed its own students but also 19 HNC students and 5 HNC faculty members, who joined "in exile" for the fall semester after quarantining for two weeks. In addition, SAIS Europe was also able to welcome 16 students who had planned to start their academic year in Washington. Students that are "in exile" take most of their classes remotely through their home campus, though they are able to make full use of the Bologna Center's resources this semester, including taking one or two courses from the SAIS Europe curriculum.

"We were planning on having a full house this fall," Plummer says. "And we certainly do have one nowjust not quite how we expected."

Michael Plummer

Director, SAIS Europe

In response to this unanticipated hybrid community, students and faculty are hoping to take advantage of the opportunity to forge new collaborations, relationships, and learning opportunities, while also maintaining health and safety measures. This semester, registration at SAIS has been expanded to allow students from HNC, SAIS Europe, or Washington to register for at least one class listed at another campus. HNC faculty are also planning to hold events in both Mandarin and English for students at the Bologna Center, some of which will also have online participation.

For SAIS, the integration at SAIS Europe this fall is emblematic of a future marked by greater collaboration and exchange among its three campuses. Plans are already underway to ensure that these continent-spanning partnerships remain in place beyond this semester.

"The coronavirus pandemic struck while SAIS was already in a time of major transformation," says SAIS Dean Eliot Cohen. "I couldn't be prouder of the way our team pulled together to unsnarl all the complications involved with having HNC and D.C. students taking classes in Bologna. Johns Hopkins is a place that really fosters this ability to make something good come out of awful circumstances. Folks here are always asking how can we use this moment to make ourselves better? This is a great example of that."

One of the HNC students "in exile" this fall is Nick Kaufman, who was previously a Fulbright grantee in the Chinese province of Anhui. When it was clear that HNC classes would be online, with a special option to temporarily join SAIS Europe in Bologna, Kaufman immediately warmed to the idea of starting his year in Italy. He was also excited by the opportunity to see China from a new, unconsidered perspective.

"At times, China studies can feel like tunnel vision, and very focused on China and the U.S.," he says. "Coming to SAIS Europe has been a great way to see how China interacts with Italy and Europe, and the way Europe interacts with China. It's a good opportunity to see China writ large, and I'm already learning a lot about how the EU relates to China. It's a unique perspective I wouldn't have received anywhere else."

Image caption: Natalie Smith

Image credit: Anna Fantuzzi / Johns Hopkins University

Joining Kaufman at SAIS Europe is Natalie Smith, a second-year SAIS master's student who spent her first year in Bologna. After the SAIS campus in Washington turned to remote instruction in August, Smith reached out about returning to Bologna for the fall semester, adding in-person instruction at SAIS Europe to the classes she was taking remotely.

"I'm a hands-on, interactive learner, and for me so much of the draw of SAIS and SAIS Europe has been the in-person engagementespecially in my coursework," Smith says. "I wasn't sure I would get as much out of my SAIS experience from taking classes online. I'm really grateful for the way SAIS and SAIS Europe has gone above and beyond to make in-person instruction happen and also to welcome in so many HNC or D.C. students to Bologna."

While classes are in session at SAIS Europe, many of the hallmarks and traditions of past years in Bologna look radically differentfrom classrooms rearranged to allow for social distancing to much more limited offerings at the on-campus caf. Some changes, however, represent a more permanent change, like new smartboards and cameras that have helped improve remote instruction. Despite the challenges and setbacks from the coronavirus pandemic, for SAIS, the potential for greater collaboration, both in person and online, is only just beginning.

"We are currently facing a world in extraordinary turmoil from a number of serious issues, not just the coronavirus," Cohen says. "There isand will bea tremendous need in every sector for the skills that our graduates possess. SAIS will be one of the institutions adapting to meet this need as we add more opportunities for students to learn in a time and mode that works for them. Even in this challenging moment, it's exciting to see this potential come to fruition."

Read more:

SAIS students from around the world travel to Italy for in-person instruction - The Hub at Johns Hopkins

New World, New Duties: Creating Tomorrows Travel, Today – Worth

When confidence reemerges, and travel comes back to a life we recognize, and incontrovertibly it shall, the full experienceincluding travel safetywill be viewed through a different prism.

The best business partnerships are those that have a shared mission and vision at the heart of it all. GeoSures partnership with the travel community is connected to the soul of what motivates online travel agencies (OTAs), travel management companies (TMCs), travel managers, industry platforms, destination marketers and others in our ecosystemwhich is a calling to help people find and afford opportunities to expand their personal horizons.

We are all driven by a fundamental urge to experience diverse places and cultures and make more of the world our own. GeoSure shares that goal, and our role in this mission is one we take seriously.

This goal of widened experiences extends broadly and powerfully, which is why a statement by Kim Albrecht earlier this year was so meaningful. As the visionary CMO of SAP Concur, Albrecht recognizes that the power of new technologies designed for women and LGBTQ+ travel safety is necessary and long overdue. She wrote: In 2020, these kinds of features wont be considered added; they will become an expected and common part of the traveler experience.

Just a year before that statement, Albrecht articulated an enlightened vision for the role of safety in the wider realm of corporate responsibility, predicting: safety will go hand-in-hand with employee satisfactionand female traveler safety, in particular, will rise to the top of corporate agendas.

The prescience of leaders like Albrecht, as well as trendsetting organizations, is even more consequential in todays world. The pandemic, and the consequent economic shockwaves it created, has inspired a searchat the highest levels of global corporate leadershipto identify new ways to engender trust and reassurance, improving both the leisure and business travel experience.

I have continually been impressed by the way that leaders have embraced new and more expansive obligations to their stakeholders in the wake of COVID-19. They have recognized that there is an unprecedented need for investment in the science and technology that can lead to a new culture of safety. The travel ecosystem has conceptualized and launched new ways to tackle the current insatiable demands for timely information as the world has become increasingly unpredictable. This data appetite is for usable and actionable statistics relating to the current spread, pervasiveness and manifestations of the coronavirus on the most localized levels possible.

These investments in travel safety correspond with what we have seen in the health care industry, including pharma, as unprecedented resources and efforts have been unleashed to treat COVID-19 and develop vaccines.

In short, there are many ways to address the existential challenges of this virus.

As noted above, the healthiest business partnerships emerge from common brand roots and shared values. We launched GeoSure into the world seven years ago, with a mission to open global horizons in parallel with what travel actors and others were focused on.

Long before COVID, we built a platform designed to use artificial intelligence, machine learning and the latest in information technology to capture and distribute travel safety insights in the form of proprietary GeoSafeScores. These scores are a confidence-driving set of metrics that benefit everyone in our industry.

The nature of society and our world has changed, and as a result, companies of all sizes are rethinking their obligations through a new lens. This widening of responsibility does not have a single source. Its predicated on a confluence of circumstances that call for new safety transparency and standards: the extraordinary data demands of COVID-19 transmission; societal demands for greater diversity, equality and inclusion; and awakening of the need to give the LGBTQ+community and other at-risk groups tools to help them stay safe.

We call that a #newdutyofcare.

Conventional duty of care was previously limited to a narrow scope of the risks of physical harm pertaining to business travelers on the road, those whom had access to precautions and risk mitigation measures provided through their employers.

The #newdutyofcare goes far beyond those responsibilities. It now includes the use of innovative technology to assure employee and associate well-being, confidence and empowerment across multiple dimensions of travel, including the safety and security of women and members of at-risk groups.

GeoSures vision of the #newdutyofcare for business travel has further widened the aperture to include leisure travelers.

As many of us now work from home, the lines between our business and personal lives have forever blurred. Corporations are recognizing they need be attentive to, and supportive of, the entirety of their employees lives, including areas that were outside the roles that employers traditionally played.

Self-care and respect for individual and family wellness are essential parts of a full and healthy life. Companies are starting to pay for stress-reduction and mindfulness programs, expanded child care and other enlightened programs that were unheard of just a few years ago.

We see the implications of those changes in the world of travel as an expansion of the traditional corporate duty of care to a new duty of self-caremaking safety a part of not just business and leisure travel, but indeed everyday life in ones own community.

Imagine searching for a hotel or destination, filtered by characteristics such as whether you are a solo female traveler, whether you are Black, white, Latinx, Caucasian or of Asian descent, straight, gay, transgender or otherwise. Imagine specific searches for your journey, and relevant safety results, as a function of your preferences and personal experience, returned by location. You select accordant safetyyou now have agency, youre in control. Not the other way around.

There is no doubt how empowering that experience would be. Contemplate how much travel will be boosted based on the self-confidence and trust that can be surfaced and made easily accessible. For everyone, anywhere. And thats only one element of GeoSures vision of the future of travel. And as Albrecht added, there is more to come. Much more, especially looking at enhanced individualization.

When confidence reemerges, and travel comes back to a life we recognize, and incontrovertibly it shall, the full experienceincluding travel safetywill be viewed through a different prism. Risk management and active travel safety will become embedded across the entire planning and booking process, along with the users itinerary, and perhaps even after we return home. Rich capabilities will be developed, costs will decline dramatically, usage will spike and organizations will deliver the most expansive definition of travel safety possible.

Fueled by this new dimension of expanded safety, paired with intelligent technologies, travel will arise stronger and smarter than ever before. The heretofore $8+ trillion global industry juggernaut will reach new economic heights and traveler fulfillment.

Our partners across the travel ecosystem will join us in reopening the world to joyful and unencumbered participation.

Together with destinations, organizations, travel platforms and communities, the shared missions of GeoSure and our partners will forever change the travel experience and well-being of the world, for the bettera safer, more predictableworld indeed.

Michael Becker is the cofounder ofGeoSure, a data science startup which aggregates thousands of data sources and signals through its proprietary predictive analytics and risk modeling platform.

An indispensable guide to finance, investing and entrepreneurship.

Read more:

New World, New Duties: Creating Tomorrows Travel, Today - Worth

These destinations were overwhelmed by tourists. Here’s how they’re doing now – CNN

(CNN) Overtourism was the travel buzzword of 2019, as destinations around the globe, from the hiking trails of Machu Picchu to the canals of Venice, battled the impact of throngs of visitors.

Amid all the planning, predicting and projecting, there's one thing these destinations couldn't envisage: the travel industry grinding to a screeching halt as Covid-19 spread across the world.

Travel bans, quarantines and nationwide lockdowns have forced most travelers to stay home, and destinations that previously struggled with too many tourists have been left reeling.

Dubrovnik, Croatia

Tourists in Dubrovnik in July 2020.

IVAN VUKOVIC/AFP via Getty Images

A sea of terracotta red roofs, a fortress-like Old Town and an association with one of the most popular TV series of the 2010s led the Croatian city of Dubrovnik to witness a surge in tourism numbers in recent years.

Alongside travelers who flew in for long weekends, Dubrovnik also saw footfall from thousands of cruise ship passengers who disembarked for the day, flooding the city's Old Town and leaving by nightfall.

Over the past couple of years, mayor Mato Frankovi and other city officials vowed to get the situation under control, as the city featured in "Game of Thrones" became increasingly packed.

New regulations came into place in 2019 to restrict the number of cruise ships in the city's old port to just two at a time, the result of a partnership with the Cruise Line International Association (CLIA).

As 2020 began, officials questioned whether such new rules would make an impact.

Then in March, the pandemic hit Europe. Croatia closed its borders and the tourists stopped coming.

When Dubrovnik left lockdown in early summer and tourism tentatively restarted, the tourists returning to Dubrovnik were mostly Croatians on staycations. It wasn't until flights started up again in the summer that international visitors began to return.

But it wasn't to last -- Covid numbers began to rise again and tourism declined once more.

"The UK put us on the red list, and then it went all down again. The airlines just one by one cut the number of flights," Dubrovnik's deputy mayor Jelka Tepi tells CNN Travel. "Without flights and without the UK market, Dubrovnik has very low tourist figures."

"The atmosphere this summer is the atmosphere like in the 90s, when the war was going on, only the grenades were not flying all over our heads," he tells CNN Travel.

The city may have grown from the ashes of war into a thriving tourism destination -- perhaps too thriving, in many locals' eyes -- but now the question is whether it can use the catastrophe of Covid-19 as a chance to reset.

Ivan Vukovic, Dubrovnik tour guide

Tepi says the cruise rules -- and Dubrovnik's other overtourism restrictions -- will not be relaxed when international flights recommence and the city encourages visitors to return.

Dubrovnik wants to make it clear to future visitors that the city takes both overtourism -- and the virus -- seriously.

"At the entrance of the Old City, we have a big banner warning people to wear masks, to keep distance, to wash hands, use the sanitizers etc. and beside those rules, we have the Respect the City program rules as well," says Tepi.

Unlike most European destinations, Croatia is permitting Americans to visit -- as long as they present a negative Covid-19 PCR test that's no older than 48 hours. A lack of flights makes this difficult for the average American to take advantage of, but some elite travelers with access to private jets are making the most of it.

Luxury tourism, says Tepi, is something the city will continue to focus on going forward.

That said, city officials and those in the private sector are keen for all kinds of visitors to return -- they just want a more sustainable, focused future.

The aim, says tour guide Vukovic, isn't a return to overtourism -- it's "some kind of 'normal' tourism, if possible."

Barcelona, Spain

A Barcelona restaurant sits empty on July 27, 2020.

Cesc Maymo/Getty Images Europe/Getty Images

The Catalan city of Barcelona, with its soaring Gaudi spires, sandy beach and al fresco bars, has been a tourism hotspot since the 1992 Olympic diving competition showcased the city's beauty to international audiences.

Today, tourism generates between 12 to 14% of the city's GDP and 9% of overall employment, says Xavier Marc, Barcelona City Council's councilor for Tourism and Creative Industries.

But in recent years, city officials and locals, worn down by overtourism, have started re-examining this reliance on holiday business.

The pandemic has served to further reinforce the importance of creating spaces in the city center that can be enjoyed by locals as well as tourists, Marc tells CNN Travel.

The restaurants and businesses in Barcelona's Ciutat Vella have been disproportionately impacted by the pandemic, he explains.

Prior to Covid-19, Barcelona had introduced a series of measures designed to combat some of the throes of overtourism.

The city clamped down on vacation rentals, introduced a tourism tax and encouraged travelers to visit neighborhoods outside the overcrowded old town.

Marc says Barcelona will "maintain its firmness intact" when it comes to these management strategies.

There are no plans to change the way the city clamps down on illegal rentals or tourist behavior -- "although logically, the decrease in activity has led to a reduction in incidents in these areas," adds the councilor.

Following the end of its strict lockdown, Barcelona only had a brief window in which international travelers could easily visit, before Spain found itself on other countries' quarantine lists.

By September, international tourism was down by 77%.

Today, the city, like others in Europe, is struggling to quash a fresh surge of Covid-19 cases, and a nighttime curfew is in place to try to stop rising figures.

Marc says he isn't worried about tourism failing to recover in the future, but he emphasizes the importance of avoiding the pitfalls of the past.

Machu Picchu, Peru

Machu Picchu has been largely off limits to visitors since the beginning of the pandemic.

PERCY HURTADO/AFP via Getty Images

The famous Inca citadel of Machu Picchu is atop many travelers' bucket lists, thanks to those soaring views of archaeological wonders framed by verdant mountains.

But for much of 2020, Peru's most famous landmark was out of bounds.

The South American country went into a strict lockdown on March 15, which lasted through June.

In the summer, it was announced that Machu Picchu would open to domestic tourism, but this failed to materialize as Covid cases in Peru rose.

Sarah Miginiac, general manager for South America at adventure company G Adventures, who lives in Peru, tells CNN Travel that tourism operators have been working closely with Peru's Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Environment to establish new protocols to keep visitors to Machu Picchu Covid-secure -- and ensure tourist numbers remain under control.

Since then, tourists must pre-book tickets that are valid for up to four hours. Under this system 5,000 people can complete the trek per day.

When Machu Picchu reopens, this number will be cut further in order to ensure social distancing.

"The new rule is that there's going to be only 75 persons allowed in Machu Picchu at a time," says Miginiac. "The size of the group is going to be a maximum of seven people, plus a guide -- we're going from over 5,000 to only 675 per day."

Ensuring travelers return to Machu Picchu in a more sustainable way is also key, with Miginiac suggesting that the current restrictions on visitor numbers could provide an opportunity to promote other beautiful, lesser known destinations within Peru.

Venice, Italy

A couple takes a selfie in Venice's normally bustling St. Mark's Square on October 3, 2020.

MIGUEL MEDINA/AFP/AFP via Getty Images

A visit to the Italian city has long been a popular city break, but as tourist numbers have soared over the past decade, locals have increasingly fought back -- protesting the cruise ships in the city's lagoon and vocalizing worries that Venice could become a theme-park-version of itself.

Various regulations and new rules designed to handle the influx of visitors have been introduced over the years -- including bans on new hotels and city center fast food spots. A steep access fee for day-trippers on popular dates was set to launch in July 2020, but ultimately postponed.

On top of its overtourism woes, last year the Italian city battled catastrophic floods.

Northern Italy became one of the first European regions to feel the brunt of Covid-19 in late February.

Venice went into lockdown and so began months with no tourists.

When international borders reopened in the summer, visitor numbers were nowhere near comparable to previous years.

For some locals, it was the bizarre culmination of what they'd been dreaming of for years -- just in terrible circumstances.

Jane da Mosto, Venice resident

"Everyday life is a lot more pleasant without the congestion created by the crowds of tourists that came in large groups," says Venetian Jane da Mosto, co-founder and executive director at We Are Here Venice, a non-profit association that's been campaigning for several years to reclaim Venice for locals.

As in Dubrovnik, cruise ships became a moot point as the industry shut down.

Pre-Covid, an estimated 32,000 cruise ship passengers visited Venice per day and many campaigners were actively discussing their impact on the city.

Fewer tourists means "the beauty of the city, it's architecture, water and views is much more evident," da Mosto tells CNN Travel.

"But it has come at an enormous cost - a lot of people are out of work, shops aren't selling much and the cultural sector has been drastically affected," she adds.

Expert view: Tourism will bounce back

A woman walks along Kuta Beach on the Indonesian resort island of Bali on August 15, 2020.

SONNY TUMBELAKA/AFP/AFP via Getty Images

Many other destinations around the word -- from historic cities like Amsterdam and Prague to beauty spots like Thailand's Maya Bay and the beaches of Bali, Indonesia -- have also suffered the consequences of too many tourists in recent years.

Now, they too are suffering the consequences of a lack of visitors.

And while overtourism might have wreaked havoc on destinations, the phenomenon also followed some predictable patterns: a destination became popular, people flocked there, the destination struggled to cope, solutions -- some effective, some less so -- were proposed.

Covid-19, however, is not particularly predictable, at least not in the long term.

This, says Tony Johnston, head of tourism at the Althone Institute of Technology in Ireland, makes planning for the future difficult.

"The [tourism] industry is an industry which has traditionally relied on very stable and very predictable models of growth," he tells CNN Travel. "And that's just been completely removed.

"Nobody knows how the next six months, 12 months or even longer-term future is going to look -- so it's very difficult for policymakers to plan, and very difficult for the commercial side of the industry to plan."

Johnston posits that no matter a destination's intentions now, when and if the Covid threat is mitigated, it'll be difficult for planners and policy makers to juggle pressure from industry lobby to bring tourists back quickly, while avoiding a return to the overtouristed problems of the past.

That said, there will be some travelers who will remain unwilling or unable to travel again, whether due to health concerns or considerations of their carbon footprint.

Still, there's a reason these destinations were overtouristed to begin with -- a lot of people want to visit them.

That's not likely to change irrevocably, even if numbers take a while to stabilize. After all, if you've never visited Venice, living through a global pandemic might make you wonder why you never got around to it.

"Bucket list travel locations are going to be one of the things that stimulate the recovery, for sure, people will want to do things immediately, once they have an opportunity to do so," suggests Johnston.

The tourism industry is "very volatile, but very, very resilient, and very adaptable," he adds.

Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly referred to Dubrovnik as the Croatian capital.

See original here:

These destinations were overwhelmed by tourists. Here's how they're doing now - CNN

Villas of Distinction Recognized with Cond Nast Traveler’s 2020 Readers’ Choice Award in Villas Category – Benzinga

WILMINGTON, Mass., Oct. 29, 2020 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- Cond Nast Traveler announced this month the results of its annual Readers' Choice Awards, with Villas of Distinction recognized in the Villas category. Villas of Distinction is the world's premier full-service luxury villa rental company and creates one-of-a-kind getaways at the world's top villas for its guests.

More than 715,000 Cond Nast Traveler readers submitted an incredible number of responses rating their travel experiences across the globe.

"The results of this year's survey, conducted at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, are a testament to the lasting power of a meaningful travel experience," said Jesse Ashlock, U.S. Editor of Cond Nast Traveler. "The winners represent the best of the best for our audience and offer plenty of trip-planning inspiration for all the adventures we can't wait to have next."

The Cond Nast Traveler Readers' Choice Awards are the longest-running and most prestigious recognition of excellence in the travel industry. The full list of winners can be found here.

"It is a distinct honor to be named one of the best-of-the-best by the readers of Cond Nast Traveler," said Willie Fernandez, general manager and vice president of Villas of Distinction. "We couldn't have received this honor without the loyalty of our guests, as well as the dedication of our travel advisor partners, and our Villas Specialists and Concierges, who as a team, not only book villa stays but create truly unique vacation experiences."

Villas of Distinction provides a better solution for consumers and agents looking for trustworthiness and effortless vacation planning. Each guest is assigned a personal Concierge to tailor the perfect travel experience down to the last detail. The luxury provider may not boast the largest number of villas, but it is known for having the highest quality because it ensures every villa meets strict standards so that each home exceeds expectations. Pair that with expertise, Villa Specialists average 14 years of experience, and that is how Villas of Distinction has gained its guests' trust.

The 2020 Readers' Choice Awards are published on Cond Nast Traveler's website at http://www.cntraveler.com/rca and celebrated in the November issue of Cond Nast Traveler US and UK print editions.

About Villas of Distinction Villas of Distinction, as part of World Travel Holdings, is an award-winning, full-service premier luxury villa experience creator with an extensive portfolio of thousands of privately-owned villas in more than 50 luxurious destinations worldwide including the Caribbean, Mexico, Hawaii, Europe, Central America, the United States and many private islands. Many villas feature private pools, butlers, maids and chefs. The luxury villa provider has gained its guests' trust by ensuring every villa meets strict standards so that each home exceeds expectations. Since 1989, Villas of Distinction's team of experts have made vacation planning effortless by helping travelers find their perfect vacation home and creating one-of-a-kind getaways and lasting memories at the world's top villas. http://www.VillasofDistinction.com.

About Cond Nast Traveler Cond Nast Traveler is the world's most distinguished travel title providing inspiration and advice for discerning travelers. Authoritative and influential, Cond Nast Traveler is a multi-platform, transatlantic brand. Publishing US and UK print editions under Editor-in-Chief Melinda Stevens, Cond Nast Traveler offers award-winning expertise in luxury travel from around the world. For more, visit http://www.cntraveler.com. For press inquiries, please contact: awards@condenasttraveler.com

###

SOURCE Villas of Distinction

View post:

Villas of Distinction Recognized with Cond Nast Traveler's 2020 Readers' Choice Award in Villas Category - Benzinga

Where Wes Anderson films ‘accidentally’ come to life – The Guardian

Theres something about director Wes Andersons style thats instantly recognisable. Immaculate composition, symmetrical lines, pastel colours, idiosyncratic and strangely alluring sets are trademarks in films from The Darjeeling Limited to The Grand Budapest Hotel.

But a new photography travel book, Accidentally Wes Anderson, is full of places in the real world that look as though they are from one of his films (but arent). Its the latest offering from the man behind the @accidentallywesanderson Instagram account, Brooklyn-based Wally Koval.

It started as a travel bucket list for me and my wife Amanda in 2017, inspired by images of places around the world that reminded me of a Wes movie, said Koval. We posted pictures from our travels, people started following, conversations began, ideas were swapped the response was phenomenal.

Today, the Instagram account has more than 1.2 million followers sharing discoveries across the globe.

Kovals love of Andersons style started young. I remember my dad was watching [1998 Anderson comedy] Rushmore and I was intrigued. I love his aesthetic, the symmetry theres something oddly soothing about it. Everything fits together like a puzzle, but theres always something darker beneath, a chaos within the characters ...

The book features 200 colourful images (whittled down from about 15,000 photos with a lot of arguments and tears), along with the stories behind them researched by Koval and his team.

From the Crawley Edge Boatshed on Australias Swan River, once threatened with demolition by the government and now the most-photographed spot in Perth, to Marfa Central Fire Station in Texas, founded as a water stop to replenish steam engines running trains between San Antonia and El Paso, and today run by 17 volunteers, each building has a tale to tell.

Other images from the Americas include the interior of the Post Office in Wrangell, Alaska, built as part of Roosevelts New Deal public works project and decorated with paintings of the American scene to soften the austerity of the architecture.

In Europe, theres pink Hotel Opera in Prague: nationalised by the Communist regime, the building then sat unused for decades but today is a family-run hotel once again. In Lisbon, the bright yellow Ascensor da Bica, a funicular railway built in 1892, is pleasingly framed in a gap between buildings. In Asia, striking pictures include 16th-century Amer Fort, overlooking Maota Lake in Rajasthan, with guards in white tunics a contrast against the ochre wall.

Its impossible for me to choose a favourite, said Koval. It changes all the time. There are so many layers to each one something might fascinate you about a photo and then you delve further into the stories behind them and theres always more to discover. We had to dig deep to gather the information we joined a local historical society, infiltrated private Facebook groups, and spent hours phoning and faxing far-flung places!

As well as being a perfect armchair travel read and an unusual guide, Koval hopes AccidentallyWes Anderson will inspire people to open their eyes and see the world differently.

We have travelled a lot, but we have always held that you dont need to go far to find interesting places. The pandemic has proven this. We couldnt go to Scotland or Spain as planned, but went to Delaware, where Amanda and I are from, and were blown away by things we found.

The ultimate stamp of approval came from Wes Anderson himself, who wrote the foreword to the book. The photographs in this book were taken by people I have never met, of places and things I have, almost without exception, never seen but I must say, I intend to. I now understand what it means to be accidentally myself. I am still confused about what it means to be deliberately me, if that is even what I am, but that is not important.

Accidentally Wes Anderson by Wally Koval is published on 29 October (Trapeze, 25). To order a copy for 21.75, including UK p&p, visit The Guardian Bookshop

Go here to read the rest:

Where Wes Anderson films 'accidentally' come to life - The Guardian