Let’s be blunt about it: Russ Diamond is a jerk – The Times of Chester County

By Mike McGann, Editor The Times @mikemcgannpa

There are good people (lots, actually) and then well, and unfortunately theres no better way to put it some people are reprehensible jerks (and yes, I wanted to use a more succinct expletive, but it seemed immature).

One of the biggest in Pennsylvania is a State Representative from Lebanon County, Russ Diamond.

After State Health Secretary Rachel Levine, who is transgender, put out a statement this condemning those harassing her and others in LGBTQ community, Diamond put out a juvenile parody defending those people who refuse to wear masks.

Levine has been targeted with such abuse repeatedly by small-brained opponents as part of their temper tantrums about Gov. Tom Wolfs pandemic management.

While I have, at times disagreed with some of Levines decisions and her communications strategy and said so in this space the majority of her decisions have proven sound. By lowering themselves to such petty, thoughtless and discriminatory comments, some of Levines intolerant GOP critics, have shown themselves to be ignorant, transphobic twits. As Levine points out, these public comments can be hurtful to the greater LGBTQ community, especially young people, which was the point of her comments this week.

But in a hold my beer moment, Diamond decided to both mock those comments and dispute the need to wear a mask during a pandemic that has literally killed more than 150,000 Americans. I wont quote his missive, released on Wednesday, because frankly, it is so juvenile and pathetic that it does not deserve inadvertent amplification.

Gov. Wolf replied on social media, Thursday: Virtually no thinking person disputes mask-wearing as an effective means to stop the spread of COVID-19.

Proud non-mask-wearers such as Rep. Diamond are not displaying their freedom, but rather their ignorance and lack of respect for themselves and others.

Pretty much sums it up.

People who refuse to wear masks are selfish jerks.

Period.

They dont deserve special consideration or praise they deserve wide condemnation and shunning. They are willing to make people sick and die to prove some wrongheaded, ignorant, non-scientific argument.

Fortunately, the vast majority of Pennsylvanians get it new polling out this week shows large majorities supporting masks and the limited closures to fight COVID-19. Most people get it: wear a mask, keep socially distant and wash your hands. Avoid indoor gatherings, indoor bars and restaurants. No one likes it, but it is what responsible adults do to fight a pandemic.

Diamonds missive represents conduct unbecoming a state legislator.

Although I dont have confidence in the voters of Lebanon County, one would hope they would see this embarrassment and make a change.

In the near term, I would stress how important for your safety it is to avoid visiting or conducting business in Lebanon County as its county government and local leaders do not take COVID-19 seriously. By visiting, you put yourself and your family at risk by having any interaction with its businesses and citizens who in the main ignore science and pander to people like Diamond. I wish it wasnt true, but you need to protect yourself.

***

Republicans are spending a lot of time and effort to brand the Democrats as the party of #defundthepolice.

While there are arguments to redirect some police funding away from things like tanks toward community policing, Democrats have yet to take a single dollar away from police unlike their Republican colleagues.

Yup, its true.

By failing to offer funding to states and municipalities hard hit by the tax impact of COVID-19, Republicans in Congress are effectively cutting funding to police. And firefighters. And teachers.

As states like Pennsylvania which saw a $3.2 billion shortfall in the last fiscal year, ending June 30 are looking at fiscal holes across the budget. Its hard to imagine that the State Police which is the only police in much of Chester County wont see budget cuts and manpower reductions. The same is true for the larger communities in the county with their own police departments, especially those that depend on Earned Income Taxes they cant spend money they dont have.

If maintaining police funding were a priority, Republicans in Congress would have pushed for aid to states and municipalities. Instead, they oppose it. By their actions, the GOP is supporting police cuts.

You may want to ask them to explain that.

***

As a resident of Pennsylvania, you get to vote by mail, which in this year of the pandemic, is a really important thing.

Despite claims by President Donald Trump, mail-in voting fraud is extremely rare (rarer than that of in-person fraud, which is also rare). He and his GOP pals are lying because they know a big voter turnout will doom them.

Between bungling the COVID19 response and the subsequent destruction of the economy, Republicans deserve to get wrecked at the polls thats how democracy works. Do a lousy job, lose it. But Trump who floated the non-starter idea of delaying the election wants to find a way to cheat the system, again.

Dont fall for it. Mail-in voting is safe and has worked effectively since the 1860s.

Click here to request your mail in ballot. When you get it, make sure you mail it in well in advance of election day, as postal service is being intentionally slowed (how corporate America, which depends heavily on the U.S. Mail, is putting up with this mystifies me). Allow at least 10 days, if not more, for your vote to reach Voter Services.

You may or may not depending on the outcome of a lawsuit brought by Trump and Republicans also be able to drop your ballot off at Voter Services in Westtown. Dont assume you will be able to do so get your ballot as early as possible and return it as early as possible. Well keep you updated on the status of the drop boxes.

In a directly related matter, The Inquirer is reporting mail delays of up to two weeks thanks to the cost cutting moves of new Postmaster General Louis DeJoy (a major Trump fundraiser).

Just a reminder, the USPS is only losing money because Congress forced it to set aside pension funds for 75 years literally for employees who are not yet born something no other federal agency is required to do. The USPS uses no taxpayer money and operates entirely on its own revenue but it is now struggling financially because of these burdens (it would be profitable, otherwise).

So now, DeJoy ordered all sorts of cuts, slowdowns and such to save money. Coincidently, it will make voting by mail harder during a pandemic. Why this isnt being challenged in court it would seem to violate Federal law regarding slowing the mails is beyond me.

You may want to reach out to your U.S. Senator, Pat Toomey (U.S. Senator Bob Casey, Jr. and U.S. Rep. Chrissy Houlahan are aware and fighting against it already) to see why your mail isnt showing up and why hes not doing anything about it.

Here is the original post:

Let's be blunt about it: Russ Diamond is a jerk - The Times of Chester County

Designer Handbag Restoration Before And After Pictures And Videos – GLAMOUR UK

If you're anything like us - and the majority of fashion lovers - then you likely have a slight soft spot for designer bags. Sure, beautiful high-end dresses, sweaters and coats have their appeal, but nothing quite compares to the thrill of finally snapping up that bag you've had your eye on for months. Not least because you can wear it every single day without so much as a glance at the washing machine.

But there is a downside to their wearability. If you've got a bag that you love and use endlessly, chances are that it looks a little worn out after a while.

You can be super careful and even put it in the dust bag every night, but even the most cautious amongst us can spill a coffee, brush up against a dirty wall or, well, live in a smog-filled city with dirty pollution tarnishing your beloved bag every time you take it outside.

But far from a lost cause, the possibility (probability) of putting your beloved bag through a little wear and tear is no reason to avoid using it, or you may as well have never bought it in the first place. Instead, it's wise to learn about restoration options.

Cheaper, more sustainable and perhaps even more satisfying than buying a replacement, the world of upcycling has made major strides over recent years, with Handbag Clinic providing some of the most impressive restorations.

In order to see this embed, you must give consent to Social Media cookies. Open my cookie preferences.

"The loudest noise in fashion right now is the sustainability movement" acknowledges the brand, "and the last year has seen something of an awakening for the fashion industry at large as well as consumers."

"Sustainability has graduated from peripheral issue to central concern of the cultural zeitgeist. The more recent emphasis has been on the circular movement, which is concerned with the entire lifecycle of a product which must be considered at the design and sourcing stage."

"For consumers, circularity means not putting an end to the things they use."

Whether its spillages, tears, or merely general signs of wear, Handbag Clinic's before and after images not only showcase the level of transformation that can be achieved, but are also strangely addictive whether or not you have a bag that needs restoring.

And don't get us started on the videos - Are they the most captivating things you've ever seen or do we need to get out more? We're blaming the ASMR...

In order to see this embed, you must give consent to Social Media cookies. Open my cookie preferences.

If you decide that you want your bag to have an *entirely* new look, the brand also offers a transformative service that includes changing the colour, adding chains, editing straps and other forms of customisation to any leather handbag.

But Handbag Clinic don't only restore or transform your bags, they also provide a reselling service too. And you know what's more lucrative than reselling your beloved designer bag? Reselling your beloved designer bag once it's been restored to nearly-new.

"Handbag Clinic's resale service is simple and easy to use. Clients can drop into store, complete a form online for a quote and to have a bag collected from home, or London clients can book a home consultation service."

"Handbag Clinics dedicated team of experts can audit, authenticate, value, clean, restore, and sell client's designer handbags through their nationwide chain of stores and e-commerce platform. Clients will be paid instantly if they accept a cash offer, or receive up to 80% of its original value selling on consignment."

"With restoration at the heart of its business, customers can also sit back with the peace of mind that their beloved handbag will fetch its best possible price after being restored to its former glory."

Charlotte Staerck, co-founder and retail director at Handbag Clinic, has provided us with her top tips for both looking after your handbag and recognising when it's time to call in the professionals...

See the original post:

Designer Handbag Restoration Before And After Pictures And Videos - GLAMOUR UK

July DVD Releases: Sorry We Missed You, You Dont Nomi – The Spool

New Indie

We heard you liked Parasite, so weve got a lot seriously, a LOT of films to recommend by British auteur Ken Loach, starting with Sorry We Missed You (Kino Lorber Zeitgeist). Hes been digging deep into the class war for years now (hes on the side of the poor, by the way; sorry, billionaires) and his movies champion the dignity and communal power of people struggling to get by in a capitalist system designed to crush them. Sorry We Missed You is both furious and exceptionally relevant right now, telling the story of a family hanging by a thread as both parents work in precarious jobs that could disintegrate with the slightest hiccup. Then come the hiccups. Let it radicalize you.

Also available: Brian Cox stars as an independent man with Parkinsons who gets The Carer (Corinth), a caretaker he didnt ask for but who just might change his life; The Other Lamb (IFC Midnight) tells the chilling tale of a young woman who rebels against the cult she was born into; and Queen of Hip-Hop Soul Mary J. Blige stars as the only cop on the force who can see the supernatural entity wreaking havoc in the creepy Body Cam (Paramount).

New Foreign

Sometimes escapism is about watching someone else make their own literal escape. Chinese import The Wild Goose Lake (Film Movement), unfortunately timed for what turned out to be a truncated arthouse rollout earlier this year, is an elegant, suspenseful thriller from filmmaker Diao Yinan. Its about a small-time gangster on the run with a price on his head and a suspicious femme fatale along for the ride. The follow up to his breakthrough film Black Coal, Thin Ice, its an inventively shot, stylishly violent trip into deep dark noir.

Also available: Samurai Marathon (Well Go USA) has director Bernard Rose (Candyman) taking a feudal lord challenging a samurai to a punishing marathon and then adding a dizzying Philip Glass score to ramp up the action; 19thcentury Germans struggle against poverty and oppression in Home From Home: Chronicle of a Vision (Corinth), a four hour black-and-white arthouse odyssey; the Romanian New Wave gets an injection of sunshine, crime, and sexiness with Corneliu Porumboius stylish Cannes hit The Whistlers (Magnolia Home Entertainment).

Acclaimed filmmaker Kleber Mendonca Filho (Aquarius, Neighboring Sounds) joins forces with JulianoDornelles for the staggering Bacurau (Kino Lorber), a wild revenge tale about a rural Brazilian village thats mad as hell and not going take it anymore, starring Sonia Braga and featuring Udo Kier;The Prince (Artsploitation Films) is a downcast but still homoerotic Chilean prison drama that won Venice Film Festivals Queer Lion Award in 2019.

New Doc

Is Paul Verhoevens 1995 box office fiasco Showgirls a masterpiece? Or is it shit? Or is it a masterpiece of shit? This is the question explored in You Dont Nomi (RLJE), a provocative and utterly entertaining new documentary from director Jeffrey McHale. A wildly divergent variety of opinions and critical voices compete for the truth, and all of it is mixed with footage from the source material, vintage interviews, and corroborating evidence from Verhoeven films before and after Showgirls. You Dont Nomi takes a every stance about Showgirls all at once its feminist, its queer, its garbage, its brilliant, its camp, its an evisceration of everything hideous and banal about American life, its all of the above and makes you decide for yourself whos right. Just remember, its pronounced Ver-SAYSE.

Read: Interview with You Dont Nomi director Jeffrey McHale

Also available: Hands of God (Film Movement) chronicles the agonizing journey of the Iraqi Olympic Boxing Team when their gym is blown up; in 1985,Philadelphia police dropped a military-grade explosive on a residential building occupied by the Black liberation group MOVE, killing 5 children and 6 adults, and that shameful bit of U.S. history is explored in Target: Philadelphia (Indiepix Films).

HandMade Films, the George Harrisonbacked production company that gave us modern classics like Brazil and Withnail & I, is the subject of An Accidental Studio (RLJE Films), featuring interviews with Terry Gilliam, Neil Jordan, Michael Palin, Richard E. Grant and more; gerrymandering is one of the reasons American politics is currently such a nightmare, and Slay the Dragon (Magnolia Home Entertainment) explains what it is and how we can fight against it.

The Ballad of Genesis and Lady Jaye (Kino Lorber/Adopt), from Marie Losier, details the last stages in the lives of Throbbing Gristle founder Genesis Breyer P-Orridge and performance artist Lady Jaye, as their love story grew to involve intense physical transformations; Joseph Hillels City Dreamers (First Run Features) chronicles a quartet of influential mid-century female architects who forever changed the concept of urban living; the subject of female ejaculation gets overdue attention in Sacred Water (Icarus Films), when radio host and sex educator Dusabe Vestine goes on a mission in Rwanda to promote womens sexual pleasure.

New Grindhouse

Enter the Fat Dragon (Well Go USA Entertainment) is a remake of Sammo Hungs 1978 martial arts comedy classic, which was itself a parody of Bruce Lees 1972 film, The Way of the Dragon, which makes this update a meta-reboot-tribute-spoof. Donnie Yen stars this time as a police officer whose reassignment to the evidence room and a concurrent love of snack cakes makes him into a more plush version of himself. Does this stop him from fighting crime and using his martial-arts skills to regulate all the bad guys? It does not, which is something of an achievement in the cinematic representation of fat dudes existing and successfully delivering kicks to the throat. Its always better to tell the joke rather than to be the joke.

Also available:Have you seen The Room (Shudder/RLJE)? No, not that one, the one about people stuck in a Room. No, not that one, either. This is a horror film about a room that turns your wishes into trouble, and its got a title designed to confuse; little baby demons make the Vatican unhappy in Belzebuth (Shudder/RLJE), starring Saws Tobin Bell.

Kiss of the Vampire: Collectors Edition (Scream Factory) serves up classic 60s Hammer horror and all the lurid color-story that implies; in Inferno of Torture (Arrow), Japanese exploitation master Teruo Ishii (Horrors of Malformed Men, Orgies of Edo) sees to it that lots of young women are tattooed and tortured in the sixth film in his Abnormal Love series.

Indonesias most well-known comic book superhero, named Gundala (Well Go USA), goes up against a disfigured mob boss and his band of deadly orphan assassins; filmmaker Dietrich de Velsa, who later collaborated with Joseph Losey on Mr. Klein, directed exactly one movie: Equation to an Unknown (Altered Innocence), and its a masterpiece of downbeat French, queer erotic cinema. If you know, you know.

New Classic

Legendary producer Arthur Freed meets legendary choreographer Busby Berkeley (the guy who invented immaculate and elaborate musical production numbers that were shot overhead for maximum wow) meets legendary singer Judy Garland and her most enduring screen partner Mickey Rooney in Strike Up the Band (Warner Archive), a wild romp about high-school kids determined to make it big in the world of music. Spoiler: They succeed. Watch the big Conga number for a taste of what kind of taskmaster Buzz Berkeley was with his exhausted-yet-smiling-through-it-all young stars. Pairs well with another new-to-Blu Mickey and Judy hit, Girl Crazy (also Warner Archive).

Also available: Eco-thriller The Day the Earth Caught Fire (KL Studio Classics) is an eerily prescient 1961 British doomsday shocker, the godfather of all 70s disaster films, from director Val Guest; Go Go Mania aka Pop Gear (KL Studio Classics) is another 60s Brit artifact, a splashy concert affair with The Animals, Hermans Hermits, The Spencer Davis Group, and, oh, The Beatles.

Airplane! (Paramount Presents) is 40 years old, and heres the Blu-ray. Now you feel old, too; same goes for Clueless (Paramount) celebrating its own 25thanniversary with a loaded-up Blu-ray. Yes, the 90s are that far away. Deal with it.

Even older is the 1936 Buck Jones: The Phantom Rider (VCI) cowboy serials, restored and compiled on one very lengthy Blu-ray; meanwhile W.C. Fields 1941 Never Give a Sucker an Even Break (KL Studio Classics), the comedy legends last starring role, also gets the Blu-ray treatment; pre-code cult classic The Sin of Nora Moran gets revived from the folks at The Film Detective; andMdchen in Uniform (Kino Classics), a landmark in the history of lesbian cinema released back in 1931, remains powerful enough to stay relevant almost 90 years later. And if you really want to fire up the wayback machine, theres a new Blu-ray of the very first submarine feature ever made, the 1916 silent 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (Kino Classics). (If youre only aware of the later Disney adaptation of the Jules Verne novel, note that the remakes star, Kirk Douglas, was born in 1916.)

Kino Classics presents three new Blu-rays spotlighting the work of director Istvan Szabo: Mephisto won the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language film of 1981 for the story of an actor in World War II whose career benefits from Nazi rule; Oscar nominee Colonel Redl stars Klaus Maria Brandauer as a counter-intelligence expert whose secret gayness threatens to compromise his safety; and Confidence, another Best Foreign Film nominee, spins a love story between two Resistance fighters, each married to someone else, in the waning days of WWII.

Whoopi Goldberg won her own Academy Award for Ghost (Paramount Presents) now celebrating its 30th anniversary the monstrously popular supernatural drama where Patrick Swayze is the ghost of a murdered man who has to save lover Demi Moore from the same fate. Whoopi helps.

Thirteen Ghosts: Collectors Edition (Scream Factory) is the 2001 remake you never knew you needed, starring Matthew Lillard, Shannon Elizabeth, Rah Digga, and F. Murray Abraham; Pride and Prejudice (Warner Archive), another story that enjoys regular remakes, delivered a classic version with Greer Garson and Laurence Olivier; Esther Williams does all the elaborate swimming in the sparkly treat Million Dollar Mermaid (Warner Archive); and long before Guardians of the Galaxy, James Gunn wrote the 2000 cult comedy The Specials (La La Land Entertainment), which introduces the sixth-greatest superhero team in the world including Thomas Haden Church, Judy Greer, and Rob Lowe none of whom are million-dollar mermaids, alas.

Among the more sober offerings this month are Lorenzos Oil (KL Studio Classics), an exceptionally moving true story starring Nick Nolte and Susan Sarandon as parents who fought to find a cure for their childs mysterious and fatal illness; Keith Gordons acclaimed 1992 drama A Midnight Clear (Shout Select) depicts an attempted surrender during World War II that goes terribly wrong, featuring a stunning ensemble that includes Ethan Hawke, Gary Sinise, Arye Gross, Kevin Dillon, and Frank Whaley; and legendary filmmaker Luchino Viscontis last feature, the 1976 historical drama LInnocente (Film Movement), starring Giancarlo Giannini, Laura Antonelli, and Jennifer ONeill, finally gets a Blu-ray release.

New TV

Stephen Kings domestic creepshow The Outsider (HBO) begins with what appears to be an open-and-shut case of child murder. Theres a suspect. Theres camera footage. And yet theres also an ironclad alibi, and quite possibly a supernatural boogeyman at work. Simultaneously chilling and heartbreaking, its a miniseries about what happens when a town is torn apart by forces beyond its control, and how people go on living in the midst of rampant, inexplicable death. In other words, its about the United States. Cheers!

Also available: James Camerons Story of Science Fiction (AMC/RLJE) is a miniseries that wrangles the heavy hitters of sci-fi, including Steven Spielberg and George Lucas, to talk about their bodies of work;Castle Rock: The Complete Second Season (Warner Bros Home Entertainment) features Miserys Annie Wilkes (Lizzie Caplan) as she gets stuck in Castle Rock while an epic feud between warring families is underway.

For completists: Hawaii Five-O: The Final Season (Paramount) brings the hit reboot to a close; Murdoch Mysteries: Season 13 (Acorn/ITV) is here to refill your cozy mystery cup; and one of the shows that first taught audiences how to stream comes to a climax with Orange Is the New Black: The Final Season (Lionsgate).

The Birth of Ultraman (Mill Creek Entertainment) gathers seven classic episodes from the original series, as well as the very rarely seen Birth of Ultraman, a live stage show that aired on Japanese television in July of 1966 one week before the premiere of the original series; shot in black-and-white, it was the introduction of the character and has never been released in the US until now.

Alonso Duralde is a former editor for TheWrap and has written about film for Movieline, Salon, MSNBC.com. He also co-hosts the Linoleum Knife podcast and regularly appears on Who Shot Ya? and Breakfast All Day. Senior Programmer for the Outfest Film Festival in Los Angeles, he is also a consultant for the USA Film Festival/Dallas, where he spent five years as artistic director. A former arts and entertainment editor at the Advocate, he was a regular contributor to FilmStruck and to "The Rotten Tomatoes Show" on Current. He is the author of two books, "Have Yourself a Movie Little Christmas" (Limelight Editions) and "101 Must-See Movies for Gay Men" (Advocate Books).

Liked it? Take a second to support The Spool on Patreon!

Related

Originally posted here:

July DVD Releases: Sorry We Missed You, You Dont Nomi - The Spool

Letter: Homeless deserve chance to rebuild lives | Letters – Herald and News

The narrow mindedness and hypocrisy I have seen in Lakeview about this homeless housing project is shameful. Now I've noticed there are a majority who claim to be God-fearing Christians.

Doesn't it say in Matthew 7:12, "Do unto others as you would have them do to you?" What this means is Put yourself in their shoes. Picture ourselves as our fellow humans and recognize the sovereignty and emotions of each individual. That is our golden rule.

Now who are we to judge others, when in reality we don't know how they ended up in the situation they're in or what happened to them that lead to them being the person they are now? All I know is our past mistakes and our faults do not define who we are.

Some of these homeless people are actually people who just needed a little help and were afraid to reach out and ask for it, for fear of being judged by hypocrites. And yes, I know that's not every homeless persons story. But did you know in homeless housing there is: 1) No tolerance policy on drinking and drug use 2) Strict curfew 3) Must have a job or show proof you've been looking 4) Requirement to take prescribed medications, do daily chores and maintain a good standing in their community.

These types of housing are used to help get people back on their feet. Would you rather have our homeless population continue to take shelter in your garage, your shed, or potentially your home? Or would you prefer a supervised drug free environment where they're getting the help they need and the tools to becoming self sufficient again? I'd prefer the choice that helps them help themselves.

Kimberly Crowl

Lakeview

More here:

Letter: Homeless deserve chance to rebuild lives | Letters - Herald and News

Letter: Wear mask for others’ safety | Letters To The Editor – Kokomo Tribune

Wear mask for others safety

This is a free country and I have a constitutional right to wear or not wear whatever I want! This is a refrain I have heard on many occasions recently. So, what does our Constitution say about mandatory wearing of masks?

The Preamble to our Constitution states: We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, ESTABLISH JUSTICE, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the GENERAL WELFARE , do ordain and establish this Constitution (Emphasis mine).

Two comments about the Preamble: first, it states that the purpose of the Constitution is to promote the general welfare of all citizens of the United States. Since it is now scientifically and medically demonstrated that wearing a mask is, indeed, part of protecting everyone from the spread of the COVID-19 virus, mandating the wearing of a mask by everyone is promoting the general welfare of all the citizens. So, if citizens are not interested in voluntarily wearing a mask to protect others, then it is within the right of our governments (national, state, and local) to require masks to be worn.

Secondly, wearing masks protects others from getting sick, so requiring masks to be worn is part of establishing justice. Requiring masks is just and right because many of us do not want to be exposed to the possibility of being infected and dying from the sickness. Claiming a right to not wear what protects others from sickness is not justice for those who do not want to be exposed to sickness and possible death.

Our Constitution does, indeed, support the government in requiring that which will help ensure or promote safety and justice for everyone.

However, we might wish that all citizens would want to live by the Golden Rule: In everything do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets (Matthew 7:12). I will wear a mask to protect others, and I hope you will, too.

D. Bruce Roberts, Kokomo

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

See the original post here:

Letter: Wear mask for others' safety | Letters To The Editor - Kokomo Tribune

Ethereum Turns 5 But ETH Price Vs. Bitcoin Never Recovered Since 2018 – Cointelegraph

Ethereum is five years old and Ether (ETH) has surprised investors with a trip above $300 but compared to Bitcoin (BTC), the biggest altcoin is underperforming.

As data from on-chain monitoring resource Skew confirms, ETH/USD as a percentage of BTC/USD remains far below its all-time highs.

As of Ethereums birthday, Ethers share stood at 3.1% of the BTC price. At its peak in January 2018, the figure was 11%.

Since the altcoin boom over two years ago, Ether has failed to reclaim much of its lost ground as Bitcoin took over the broader cryptocurrency market cap.

As developers pushed ahead with Ethereums transformation to Ethereum 2.0, only recently has ETH/USD begun rewarding patient bagholders.

The past week alone has seen price gains of 45%, beating Bitcoins performance as previous resistance at $285 fell away. At press time, ETH/USD traded at $325, fuelled by the DeFi token phenomenon and associated trading boom.

Just tested former resistance as support to the sat, popular analyst Scott Melker confirmed on Tuesday.

Ether price as a percentage of Bitcoin price 3-year chart. Source: Skew

Nonetheless, not everyone was convinced.

ETH/BTC stops dumping for a change and ETH maxis go full blown manic, Blockstream developer Grubles wrote on Twitter on Sunday.

Just recently ETH/BTC was at Coinbase-listing levels from nearly 5 years ago.

Meanwhile, the past weeks have seen significant changes in realized correlation between the two cryptocurrencies, with the 1-month measure showing particular divergence from the norm.

ETH/BTC realized correlation comparison. Source: Skew

Cointelegraph has published a dedicated retrospective to celebrate Ethereums fifth anniversary, taking a look at the projects ups and downs since 2015.

Tomorrow, dont miss our upcoming conference Cointelegraph Crypto Traders Live. More than 30 star speakers including Raoul Pal, John Bollinger, Mike Novogratz, DataDash and Jon Najarian will gather on July 30th to discuss the challenges of crypto trading. Join the show for over 9 hours of crypto trading content!

Read the rest here:

Ethereum Turns 5 But ETH Price Vs. Bitcoin Never Recovered Since 2018 - Cointelegraph

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis August 3rd, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

EOS

EOS slid by 10.93% on Sunday. Reversing a 6.71% gain from Saturday, EOS ended the week up by 8.23% to $2.9409.

It was a choppy start to the day. EOS rose to an early morning intraday high $3.4852 before hitting reverse.

EOS broke through the first major resistance level at $3.4029 before tumbling to an early morning intraday low $2.4884.

The sell-off saw EOS slide through the days major support levels before briefly revisiting $3.0 levels.

EOS moved back through the third major support level at $2.7121 and the second major support level at $2.9748.

It was a bearish 2nd half of the day, however. EOS fell back through the second major support level to end the day in the deep red.

At the time of writing, EOS was up by 0.75% to $2.9631. A mixed start to the day saw EOS fall to an early morning low $2.9022 before rising to a high $2.9631.

EOS left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

EOS would need to move through the $2.9715 pivot level to support a run at the first major resistance level at $3.4546.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for EOS to break back through to $3.40 levels.

Barring another extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely cap any upside.

Failure to move through the $2.9715 pivot would bring the first major support level at $2.4578 into play.

Barring an extended sell-off, EOS should steer well clear of the second major support level at $1.9747.

First Major Support Level: $2.4578

Pivot Level: $2.9715

First Major Resistance Level: $3.4546

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $6.62

38% FIB Retracement Level: $9.76

62% FIB Retracement Level: $14.82

Ethereum fell by 3.92% on Sunday. Partially reversing an 11.69% rally from Saturday, Ethereum ended the week up by 19.52% to $371.21.

Tracking the broader market, Ethereum rallied to an early morning intraday high $415.00 before hitting reverse.

Ethereum broke through the first major resistance level at $406.35 before tumbling to an early morning intraday low $325.75.

The selloff saw Ethereum fall through the first major support level at $356.1 before finding support.

More significantly, Ethereum also fell through the 38.2% FIB of $367 before the partial recovery.

Ethereum moved back through to $389 levels before falling back to end the day at sub-$380.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was up by 1.00% to $375.93. A mixed start to the day saw Ethereum fall to an early morning low $366.34 before rising to a high $376.63.

While leaving the major support and resistance levels untested, Ethereum found support at the 38.2% FIB of $367 early on.

Story continues

Ethereum would need to avoid a fall through the $371 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $416.22.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ethereum to break out form Saturdays high $415.00.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level should cap any upside.

A fall through the $371 pivot would bring the first major support level at $326.97 into play.

Barring another extended sell-off, however, Ethereum should steer well clear of the second major support level at $281.74.

First Major Support Level: $326.97

Pivot Level: $371

First Major Resistance Level: $416.22

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $257

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $367

62% FIB Retracement Level: $543

Ripples XRP fell by 1.25% on Sunday. Following a 12.06% rally on Saturday, Ripples XRP ended the week up by 33.50% to $0.28764.

A bullish start to the day saw Ripples XRP rise to an early morning intraday high $0.3262 before hitting reverse.

Ripples XRP broke through the first major resistance level at $0.3071 and the second major resistance level at $0.3233.

The reversal saw Ripples XRP slide through the first major support level at $0.2653 to an intraday low $0.24158.

Steering clear of sub-$0.24 support levels, Ripples XRP revisited $0.30 levels before falling back into the red.

In spite of the bearish day, Ripples XRP moved back through the first major support level to limit the loss.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was up by 2.95% to $0.29612. A mixed start to the day saw Ripples XRP fall to an early morning low $0.28383 before rising to a high $0.29661.

Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Ripples XRP will need to avoid a fall through the $0.2851 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.3287.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ripples XRP to break out from Saturdays high $0.3262.

Barring another broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level should cap any upside.

In the event of a breakout, Ripples XRP could make a run at the second major resistance level at $0.0.3698.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $0.2851 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.2441 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, Ripples XRP should avoid sub-$0.24 levels, however.

First Major Support Level: $0.24441

Pivot Level: $0.2851

First Major Resistance Level: $0.3287

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.3638

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $0.4800

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.6678

Please let us know what you think in the comments below.

Thanks, Bob

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

View post:

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis August 3rd, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

A Birthday Look: 5 Years of Ethereum Network Updates, Delays and Changes – Cointelegraph

Five years ago to the month, a massive crypto project launched, forever changing the landscape of the crypto and blockchain space. Since its 2015 opening day in July, Ethereum has undergone a number of planned changes. The projects recent move into proof-of-stake, or PoS, has faced a number of delays.

On July 28, 2015, Ethereum unveiled details showing an expected launch for Frontier, the networks inaugural framework, between July 29 and July 30. The project started up on July 30, as planned.

By February of the next year, Ethereum had become a major player in the blockchain and crypto industry, with its Ether (ETH) asset holding the spot as the second most valuable crypto asset on the market.

Ethereum had four mains stops along its development journey: Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis and Serenity.

Ethereum publicized a planned move into its second phase, Homestead, on Feb. 29, 2016, expected to launch on March 14. Homestead arrived on the network on March 14, as expected, according to a blog post from Consensys.

With 2017 came talk of a move toward Metropolis, a hard fork expected to hit the network in the latter days of September of that year, as per August 2017 Cointelegraph reporting. Later reporting showed hard forks Byzantium and Constantinople as the anticipated outcome of the event. By September, the event looked paced for an on-time release.

According to Cointelegraph reporting in November 2019, Byzantium came on Oct. 16, 2017, while Constantinople arrived on Feb. 28, 2019. Istanbul followed on Dec. 7, 2019.

The fourth phase, Serenity, also known as Ethereum 2.0, or ETH 2.0, still remains in the works the result of a lengthy string of delays. The team touted a January 2020 launch date, although, by July, the industry still awaits the network alteration. A move that ushers in PoS, Ethereum 2.0s completed test network reportedly opens on Aug. 4.

Contemplating Ethereums journey through the years in a recent July interview, co-founder Vitalik Buterin told the host of the Hashing It Out podcast that he and the Ethereum team underestimated the length of time the update would take.

Excerpt from:

A Birthday Look: 5 Years of Ethereum Network Updates, Delays and Changes - Cointelegraph

Why DeFi on Ethereum Is Like Algorithmic Trading in the 90s – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Mona El Isa would never go back to traditional finance.

The former Goldman Sachs vice president developed the Melon protocol, a vehicle for creating Ethereum-based hedge funds without having to spend the tens of thousands of dollars it would take to launch a fund in traditional markets.

Managers who are used to a fund custodian and fund administrator are starting to experiment with automating technology, El Isa said.

El Isa admits that not many founders in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space have her background in traditional capital markets. In the traditional world, DeFi resembles what algorithmic trading was in the 1990s, said Tarun Chitra, CEO of Gauntlet Network, a business that does stress-tests on blockchain networks and DeFi platforms.

A lot of money was made on random equities on electronic exchanges, Chitra said of the Clinton-era innovation. They were people who were more technical than financial.

Now Ethereums surging DeFi sector could force a similar migration.

Chitra said some traders are beginning to move away from over-the-counter (OTC) desks in favor of emerging DeFi platforms like automated market maker (AMM) Curve and lending protocol Compound. Why bother with an OTC middleman?

Still, while proprietary traders have taken an interest in DeFi, few hedge funds and banks have entertained it, he said.

But builders whove come from equities to DeFi see a lot of opportunity for growth.

New interest

For example, in the Melon protocols first year there were almost no users and only $250,000 on the platform, El Isa said. After Melons user interface was updated last February, the platforms total assets increased to $1.2 million. Now the number of funds on Melon has tripled in the last four months, although many of them are experimental, El Isa added. Around two dozen of the funds on the platform are real funds.

The biggest success story on our platform is now half of the whole [assets under management], El Isa said, referring to a closed fund that only lets in whitelisted investors. Hes got $625,000 on his network.

For traditional funds, operation costs are normally less than $100,000 for the first year and $75,000 for every year after that, she added. On Melon, the setup cost is currently $100 for the first year and around $1,000 to $2,000 per year in gas prices after that (the cost was around a fourth of those estimates last year, before gas prices started to spike).

As funds build longer track records, El Isa hopes Melon will become more attractive to investors. The track records are not long enough to make that attractive for people yet, she said. I think in a few months people will be like, Wow, this fund has consistently been outperforming ether.

Even if El Isa ends up moving from building protocols to launching another fund, she said shes determined to do so in DeFi. Melon protocol is now decentralized and El Isa has launched Avantgarde Financial, a company that plays the lead developer role for Melon. El Isa was formerly the CEO of Melonport AG.

Less scary

Barney Mannerings, CEO of Vega Protocol, which aims to allow users to spin up a market for derivatives anywhere in the world, said that while DeFi is still in an experimental phase, he sees a great deal of interest from the large investment banks the ones he used to advise while at Capco and Accenture.

Instead of creating a new derivative over the course of a year, Vega will allow users to submit market proposals and deploy them over the course of a few hours.

In keeping with Ethereums ethos, the protocol was designed to cut out the middlemen: In this instance, the commercial bank or broker that consumers pay to trade and the investment bankers those middlemen pay to trade for the consumer.

I was always thinking about the traders that I knew in London and New York and the products that they used in the real economy, Mannerings said.

In addition to building out Vega, Mannerings said he hopes large countries like the United States develop more crypto integrations to the traditional economy.

If I want to hedge my U.S. dollar risk on Vega and I can do it for a fifth of the cost, thats great, but I also need to make sure that I can get U.S. dollars into an appropriate stablecoin and take that position easily, he said. We have to chip away at that risk and make it less and less scary.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Visit link:

Why DeFi on Ethereum Is Like Algorithmic Trading in the 90s - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

Ethereums Adoption Rate After 5 Years Far Exceeds Bitcoins – Cointelegraph

One key metric suggests that Ethereum (ETH) has enjoyed a much faster rate of adoption and growth in the first five years of existence than Bitcoin (BTC).

Comparing the total number of addresses after n days for both Bitcoin and Ethereum. Source: Cointelegraph, Glassnode, Etherscan.

We compared the total number of addresses created in the first five years on both major blockchain networks. While the number of addresses could be a good gauge of the rate adoption, it may not be perfect for various reasons. One reason is that the accounting systems in the two networks are different.

Total number of addresses in the first five years of existence Ethereum versus Bitcoin. Source: Cointelegraph, Glassnode, Etherscan.

In the first 600 days, the growth rate for both networks is quite similar. By mid-2017, however, Ethereums curve became much steeper. The most obvious explanation is the ICO boom. The creation of thousands of ERC20 tokens and their subsequent distribution and trading led to a much greater rate of Ethereum address creation.

Another advantage that Ethereum had from the beginning is that it was standing on the shoulders of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies; whereas Bitcoin was the worlds first decentralized electronic currency. Bitcoins adoption was slow and gradual. The slope of its curve never had an uplift similar to the ICO boom.

In another five years, a similar comparison will hopefully still remain relevant.

Go here to read the rest:

Ethereums Adoption Rate After 5 Years Far Exceeds Bitcoins - Cointelegraph

Ethereums First ICO Blazes Trail To A World Without Bosses – Forbes

Augur co-founders Jeremy Gardner (second-from left) and Joey Krug (second from right) gather with ... [+] their founding team.

If it werent for horses, Joey Krug might not have ever gotten into ethereum. Growing up in the small farming town of Knoxville, Illinois, he and his younger brother used to ride their bikes through fields of corn and soybeans looking for trouble. One day, when he was about 9 years old, Krug came across the farm of a local school teacher, who raised and rode horses. He instantly fell in love with the powerful creatures, and pedaled home as fast as he could to ask his parents for one.

Perhaps not realizing the entrepreneurial spirit already growing in their son, they offered him a deal. They said, No, but if you go there and you muck stalls every day for a year, we'll get you a horse, he says. I think they assumed there was no way I was going to do that. But I did. I went there every day, mucked stalls, brushed the horses. And so they finally got me this pink horse, a quarter horse named Shimmer.

When not riding horses, the young boy excelled on his familys computer, figuring out ways to hack it so it would turn on in the wrong order and get stuck trying to permanently boot up the CD-ROM. By the time he enrolled in an eighth-grade beginners computer course, it took him only 15 minutes to do 45 minutes worth of work. Instead of going home, the 12-year-old Krug deposited $20 of birthday money into an off-shore book, and placed a bet.

Not only did the bet win him $20, jump-starting more sophisticated models tracking race distance, jockey and track conditions in a spreadsheet, but it merged his love of horses with computers. Now 26, Krug is the co-chief investment officer at Pantera Capital and a cofounder of Augur, an open-source no-limits betting platform built on the ethereum blockchain that lets anyone build any kind of betting market, without a bookie.

Today, Krug and a team of open-source developers scattered around the world launched Version 2 of that platform, which amounts to a significant leap forward in the world of decentralized applications that function similar to the internet but without the need for trusted third parties. If successful, the profound upgrades could be used to more than just place horse-bets without a bookie; they could mark a turning point in the next generation of the internet.

When you think about centralized power, it kind of always corrupts, says Krug, 26, who might in other circumstances have the CEO title, if not for the unusual nature of the project he cofounded. Somehow, somebody takes too much power, and they do something they shouldn't. And if you think about regular businesses, too, they have the same incentive, to make as much money as possible. And so Auger is very different. It's sort of like public infrastructure.

Augur co-creator Joey Krug on Shimmer, the Palomino horse his parents got him after mucking horse ... [+] stalls for a year.

Born in July 1995, Krug grew up surrounded by farms, but his family werent farmers. His mom was a physicians assistant, and his dad an ER doctor. During his freshman year of college, he discovered bitcoin on Overclock.net, a forum dedicated to expanding computer processing power. Shortly thereafter, Krug read retired Congressman Ron Pauls The Case For Gold and was struck by how irresponsible bureaucracy had led to a U.S. debt of more than $10 trillion at the time.

After hearing further stories from his parents about how another bureaucracy, around the U.S. healthcare system, had deprived them of the joy they once felt helping others, Krug briefly enrolled in Pomona College, based in Claremont, California, with a double focus on computer science and pre-med, hoping he could streamline the process. Fate would have it, though, that hed get permanently derailed by blockchain. Still, his goal of fixing broken bureaucracy never wavered.

After founding a bitcoin club at school, Krug built a bitcoin point-of-sale app and went door to door to try to convince local Claremont businesses to accept the cryptocurrency. Unable to find customers, he moved to San Francisco in search of another way forward. At around this time a team of researchers at Princeton published an influential paper on creating decentralized prediction markets, or distributed autonomous organizations (DAOs), where betting is used as an incentive to create valuable data about the future. Unlike brash predictions carelessly made around the internet without repercussions, these predictions would have monetary repercussions, but no bookies, or any other middlemen to oversee them.

It's interesting from a wide range of aspects, says Krug, reminiscing about the paper, which also influenced ethereum inventor Vitalik Buterin, now 26. All the way from my horse-betting days to a real world informational standpoint, you can get data about the real world that you wouldn't necessarily have without it.

Initially, Krug joined forces with college friend Jeremy Gardner, now 28, and Jack Peterson, now 37, to build their own implementation of a project that had been circling around the cryptocurrency community, called TruthCoin, that used a modified version of the bitcoin blockchain to incentivize making accurate predictions. Buterin caught wind of the project and approached Krug, explaining that he was in the final stages of launching ethereum, a blockchain similar to bitcoin, but with a computer language that would make it much easier to write more elaborate instructions, called smart contracts, to directly connect bettors to each other.

To pay for all this, over a 45-day period in the fall of 2015, Augur ran the first-ever initial coin offering (ICO), in which tokens were issued on the ethereum blockchain. The privately-held Forecast Foundation, based in Estonia, sold or distributed 11,000 REP tokens to be used on Augur, 80% of which went to the crowd, or people interested in participating in the prediction market, 16% of which went to the Augur founding team, including Buterin, and 4% of which went to support the foundation itself. A total of about $5.2 million was raised for the development of the platform by selling more than one million ether tokens and 12,000 bitcoins used to pay for the tokens. At the current rates those tokens would be worth nearly a half-billion dollars.

But this was the very earliest days of what would come to be known as the ICO craze. Not only were the terms of the ICO more generous than many later capital raises using blockchain, but the founders objective was more philosophically aligned with the principles of decentralization inherent in blockchain. Just two years later an Augur competitor, Gnosis, raised more than twice what Augur did ($12 million) by selling a fraction of the tokens (5% instead of 80%), in a mere 15 minutes. That left the Gnosis team with 95% percent of the tokens, then valued at nearly $300 million, making them independently wealthy with little more than a white paper describing their idea. Between then and October 2018 more than $20 billion was raised in ICOs according to news site Coindesks tracker, before the bubble burst amid regulatory uncertainty around whether or not these tokens qualified as securities.

While REP tokens are able to accumulate and lose value, similar to securities, and are currently worth $20.90 each, for a total liquid market value of $230 million, according to data site Messari, they are unlike securities in that they are crucial for the proper functioning of the prediction market, giving them the unofficial status of utility tokens. So-called reporters in the Augur ecosystem are required to stake their REP (short for reputation) tokens while they are helping determine the outcome of an event. If the reporter reports in consensus with others, they receivea small portion of the protocols fees and their REP remains intact. A reporter can dispute the system 21 times, with their required stake doubling each time, before a fork, or copy, of Augur is automatically created and essentially two different versions of the truth exist.

Ultimately truth is going to be a public consensus that ends up being determined in the long run by which world does it appear that people want to live? says Forecast Foundation operations director Tom Kyser. And presumably that world is going to be the one that the general public and consensus believes accurately reflects reality.

In the early days of the build, a team of independent and paid coders from around the world worked largely under the management of Augur co-founder Jack Peterson, a biophysicist with a Ph.D from the University of California. After initially laying much of the groundwork for the code, Krug was selected to be a Peter Thiel fellow in June 2016 and the following year joined as the co-chief investor at cryptocurrency and blockchain investor Pantera Capital, which has approximately $500 million in assets under management.

The month after Krug joined Pantera, on July 9, 2018, the first version of Augur was launched, a very slow, expensive, difficult to use version, according to Krug. But one that showed that a gambling platform without bookies was possible, and that any kind of market could be built on it. At that point, nobody had any idea whether this would actually work at all, he says. A lot of these were untested ideas. In version one, dedicated users would have to wait between six hours and 12 hours just to download the app, and could then create markets, determine potential outcomes and make bets denominated in the highly volatile, and increasingly valuable ethereum cryptocurrency.

In total 2,895 markets were created on version one generating volume of 69,662 ether, or roughly $15 million to $20 million depending on the price of ether over the two year period, according to the Forecast Foundation, which helps oversee development. 2,609 unique visitors made more than 15,000 transactions. 650 reporters staked 1,385,843 REP tokens for fees resulting in 5,758 REP in disputes. To give an idea of how much thats worth, on the early platforms busiest day, $2.5 million worth of assets were locked in active bets at the same time.To give an idea of how much is at stake here, the global online betting industry alone, dominated by middlemen that connect bettors, including FanDuel and Draft Kings, generated $53 billion revenue last year, according to Grand View Research, and is on track to have a compound annual growth rate of 11.5% from 2020 to 2027.

One of the more prolific applications built on version one was Guesser, a venture-backed outfit based largely in Madrid that uses election forecasting models developed by the same market research firm employed by Marco Rubio in his 2016 Presidential campaign, Optimus Analytics, to let users bet on anything from how many times U.S. President Donald Trump mentions China in a speech, to whether or not hell be re-elected later this year. Today in politics, people rely a lot on public polling as a source of data for how a betting market might behave, says Guesser CEO, Jose Garay, 24. We provide them with a data engine with orders of magnitude more data points than you can get from simply public polling. And this allows you to set a very straight forward probability, a very solid price, on each outcome.

The problem was, ethers fluctuating price meant that if a market didnt fulfill for months down the road (imagine placing a bet on who wins the U.S. Presidential election today) users could accurately predict the future, but still lose money if their staked funds decreased in value. In addition, with the price of ethereum increasing from about $1.00 when Augur concluded its ICO to $316 today, many ether owners have been hesitant to trade it, resulting in low liquidity. If Augur version two has to crack one problem, or one challenge says Garay, It's bringing liquidity in big volumes.

While Jack Peterson was largely responsible for managing the somewhat autonomous team of developers working on version one, Krug worked overtime in addition to his job at Pantera Capital to help bring version two over the finish line. As of today, Pantera hasnt invested in any startups building on Augur, choosing rather to let the firms raise their own seed capital, then look to the best of those firms for a possible Series A investment, says Krug. We'd like to invest in whoever we think is doing the best.

Among the notable changes in version two, Augur now has a scam filter that moves likely-fraudulent markets to an area on the site not immediately accessible to new users, and is integrated with a number of distributed applications (dapps) that also dont rely on trusted third parties. For example, it is integrated with the 0x open source software that enables free peer-to-peer bets instead of the fee that was previously charged. Instead of betting ether, users bet DAI, a stablecoin pegged to the U.S, dollar, powered by another dapp called MakerDAO, that provides a free, open-source programming interface for anyone who wants to accept the token. Instead of relying on a trusted third-party to convert a users funds from ether or another cryptocurrency to DAI, Augur is now also integrated with Uniswap, another dapp to automatically provide liquidity on ethereum. Think of it as a DAO of dapps, among the first of a new kind of companies without bosses. Everything is sort of interweaved together to broadcast data in an automated fashion, says Krug.

Screen capture of Augur, v2's account summary page.

In a lot of ways, the launch of version two of Augur is a return to an earlier, more idealisticperhaps more naivetime when blockchain innovators might get rich, but thats not what they set out to do, according to Buterin. In addition to encouraging Krug and the founding Augur team to switch from building on a fork of bitcoin to ethereum, Buterin provided technical insight into how to simplify Augur game theory in a way that more efficiently incentivized truth-telling, and in-turn owns an undisclosed amount of REP.

At the beginning, it was much less certain that crypto could have worked as a thing at all. And so the teams that were going in were generally teams that have believed in the vision that we're really doing this collective project for the public good, says Buterin. Obviously you have to fund developments, but we're definitely not going to be greedy about it. And I think what happened over time, and as the model got validated, it started to be definitely this kind of change in mindset where just the fact that it seemed like a clear profit opportunity made it something closer to a kind of regular startup thing.

Now, thats not to say the Augur developers are philanthropists. While Krug and the Forecast Foundation team declined to share how much of the original ICO capital they still hold, they explained that the idea isnt to ever turn the foundation into a profit-generating entity. Rather, the goal is for the organization to follow a similar path as Melonport, a DAO for hedge fund infrastructure, and slowly dissolve once the code on which anyone else can build is complete. At that time, and that time alone, Krug says he might start looking for profit.

Someday the foundation will run out of money and basically, kind of disappear and this becomes an ongoing community developed open source software project, he says, At which point, we could maybe create a for-profit entity on top that does actually try to aggressively make money.

Read more:

Ethereums First ICO Blazes Trail To A World Without Bosses - Forbes

605 Days Later: How ArCoins Got the SEC Go-Ahead as an Ethereum-Traded Treasurys Fund – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Convincing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that the Ethereum blockchain is an acceptable medium to store regulated investment funds was no easy task for Mason Borda of Tokensoft.

The CEO of this Bay Area tokenization firm spent over two years crusading for a peer-to-peer tradable fund. Borda developed compliance-appeasing token standards, hired regulatory veterans to lead his transfer agent subsidiaries and even moved Tokensoft into the same San Francisco high-rise as the SECs West Coast enforcement wing (albeit on a different floor).

The effort paid off earlier this month: In early July, the SEC granted a notice of effectiveness to ArCoin, a cryptographically-traded U.S. Treasury Fund pursued by digital asset manager Arca Labs and designed by Tokensoft. Its the first Ethereum blockchain-native investment fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (a so-called 40 Act Fund).

ArCoins registration marks a shift in the regulators tolerance for public blockchain investment vehicles, Borda said. He and Arca CEO Rayne Steinberg both said ArCoins could light the way for future offerings with similarly decentralized structures.

But regulatory filings capture just how hard-fought first that victory was.

Long road

Arca signaled its earliest interest in offering a U.S Treasury Fund in an SEC filing from November 2018. Over the next 605 days, it filed volleys of prospectus amendments as nearly 10 different evolutions of what would eventually become ArCoins repeatedly hit a regulatory wall.

Steinberg said there was no guarantee his firms costly regulatory campaign would ultimately prevail.

Tokensoft signed on as Arcas tokenization specialist in July 2019, Borda told CoinDesk. Even then, a full year passed before ArCoin finally cleared that regulatory wall.

This took a lot of backchanneling with the SEC, Borda said.

10 floors apart

Borda said one benefit of running a compliance-focused tokenization firm from his high-rise in San Franciscos Financial District is that SEC regulators asking questions about his proposals are just an elevator ride away.

There was a case where I received a call the night before to do a presentation in the morning because the Crypto Czar was in town, Borda said, explaining office proximity (Tokensoft is on floor 38, the SEC is on floor 28) made meetings a lot more accessible.

That can be handy when meeting topics are as potentially contentious and fraught as the marriage of public blockchains and regulated investment vehicles. The SEC has been reticent to approve crypto-tied proposals before, perhaps most visibly in its ongoing denial of a bitcoin ETF.

The particulars behind one crypto projects failure before the SEC and anothers success are not interchangeable. For example, ArCoins do not represent an investment in the Ethereum blockchain, only a product (U.S. Treasurys) whose vehicle is traded on that blockchain.

But Borda said a major obstacle in pushing through a tokenized 40 Act Fund were regulators misconceptions of how crypto markets function.

There were a lot of preconceived notions just based on how the crypto space operates that we had to overcome: that these tokens are freely tradable, that theres no way to control them, Borda said.

He said regulators thought these securities worked like bitcoin. He made clear to CoinDesk that they dont.

The SEC declined a request for comment.

Restricted transfers

Borda said Tokensoft and Arca had to prove ArCoins blockchain backend was far more restrictive, regulatable and, well, permissioned than the permissionless Ethereum mainchain this funds smart contract lives atop. Ethereum is the leading smart contract platform in the world.

Unlike the vast majority of Ethereum tokens (and also completely dissimilar to bitcoin and most every other crypto asset), ArCoins cannot just jump around from wallet to wallet, Borda said.

Two critical functions are executed before a transfer prevents ArCoins from flying freely between wallets: detectTransferRestriction and messageForTransferRestriction. They comprise the core of the ERC-1404 standard, a whitelist-focused derivation of the ubiquitous ERC-20 token standard.

Tokensoft spearheaded development of the open-source ERC-1404 with the express purpose of creating a token standard that could pass regulators muster. Its outcome, unveiled in September 2018, restricts token activity like peer-to-peer transfers and trading during lock-up periods, among other concerns.

Though these caveats seemingly run counter to the permissionless, borderless and stateless ideals of some corners of Crypto Twitter, Borda said theyre essential for working inside regulators demands and even workable within the idealists framework.

It is possible to build a token on a public blockchain and have it follow the most aggressive standards in the world, he said.

ArCoins accomplishes this by checking intended recipients against a whitelist maintained by the funds transfer agent, Tokensoft subsidiary DTAC LLC, at the start of any transfer. Only investors who have passed AML and KYC protocols (and whose wallet addresses therefore appear on the whitelist) will receive their ArCoin.

Non-whitelisted addresses receive nothing Borda said the transfer simply wont go through.

The cool thing about having this on a blockchain is you can now prevent unauthorized transfers, the smart contract will just reject it, Borda said.

Appealing to Arca

Arca CEO Steinberg said his firm tapped Tokensoft only after considering at least eight different tokenization tech providers.

Steinberg said the only thing clear to Arca, a digital assets investment management firm, was that it didnt want to build that solution in-house. Though Steinberg admitted Arca could have programmatically restricted smart contract transfers without ERC-1404, he said thats kind of reinventing the wheel that already exists for something like this.

Specialists are most likely going to do that better and come up with novel solutions like a standard than you will in building it yourself, he said.

Steinberg sees this as a key value of utilizing standards like ERC-1404. His firm has now demonstrated that the SEC is comfortable granting effectiveness to a 40 Act investment vehicle that runs on ERC-1404.

ArCoins proving the concept may make what Steinberg described as the expensive, expansive and time-consuming procedure of bringing any investment product (and especially blockchain-based ones) past the SEC a little bit easier.

He noted that getting any product on the regulated market is never a sure thing, and recalled how the vast majority of people he spoke to after ArCoins green-light were shocked that the historically reticent SEC had allowed ArCoins to register.

The goal of Arca is to become a multiproduct asset manager with multiple different wrappers like this, he said.

Future groundwork

Borda chalked Tokensoft and Arcas success in registering ArCoins to a confluence of compliance and structural factors one major one was his tapping former SEC and CFTC regulator Alex Levine to head the legal team for Tokensofts affiliate transfer agent DTAC LLC.

Borda is even more bullish about ERC-1404 and the future of token-based securities in the 40 Act Fund mode, especially its potential appeal to regulators, who could use the built-in transfer restrictions of smart contracts to their benefit: They wont ever have to worry about unapproved transfers or bearer instruments falling into the wrong hands.

Companies could also catch that upside, he said:

This should prove to the companies out there that there is a path to have better compliance.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Read more here:

605 Days Later: How ArCoins Got the SEC Go-Ahead as an Ethereum-Traded Treasurys Fund - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

Proof-of-Stake Chains Team Up to Prove DeFi Is Bigger Than Ethereum – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Liquidity mining is coming to proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchains.

Anchor, the new decentralized finance (DeFi) platform from Terra, Cosmos, Web3 Foundation and Solana, is being designed to launch with a governance-token reward. Version 1 is going live in October, according to a Terra co-founder.

Anchor is a two-pronged platform for PoS token holders. The system offers savings accounts and a lending platform the bread and butter that made DeFi on Ethereum a multibillion-dollar enterprise.

Weve been looking at ways in order to earn passive income on our users, for unused balances in unused assets, Do Kwon, a co-founder of Terra and the startup built atop it, Chai, told CoinDesk in a phone call. Terra is a two-token stablecoin protocol that has risen to prominence in Korea as a payments provider known for saving users money.

As Kwon explained, Alipay rapidly gained market share by promising users a better savings rate if they held cash in their mobile app. Kwon believes his team can craft a DeFi system that can produce a predictable rate of return that performs considerably better than bank savings.

Further, if the trends so far hold, adding a liquidity mining element should bolster those returns.

The new governance token is likely to be named Anchor, like the platform, Kwon said. It will distribute over the course of five years and there will be no pre-mine for Anchors creators.

While its launching with a small set of PoS tokens, Kwon said Anchor hopes to make it very easy for other projects to join by meeting a set of technical standards. We really imagine this closer to the Rosetta standard that Coinbase published, Kwon said.

How Anchor will work

One of the general trends of DeFi is can you give consumers something that looks like a savings account, that is a yield-paying crypto asset, Zaki Manian, founder of Iqlusion and a leader in the Cosmos ecosystem, told CoinDesk in a phone call.

The first thing that has to be understood about DeFi is this: When someone deposits a token somewhere to earn yield, what they get back is a token. Users dont have an account like in Web2; they have a wallet. Depositors get a digital note in their wallet after making a deposit, and they can as easily give that to someone else as hold onto it.

Staking works the same way. PoS protocols require their validators (which function like bitcoin miners) to post a stake to do the computational work that blockchains require. Validators ante up to win block rewards, and their stake is at risk if they misbehave.

Staking is DeFi, Solana CEO Anatoly Yakovenko told CoinDesk in a phone call. Composability between chains is fairly easy to build between proof-of-stake networks.

Spreading the wealth

One fear PoS leaders have had is that a few big operations would dominate all the networks. The most obvious threat: major centralized exchanges. They can give traders convenience and staking returns, which is tough to beat.

If there isnt a decentralized alternative to this, proof-of-stake is not a viable idea. This is the frontier, Manian said.

This new token represents a future claim to yield. So, for example, if a Cosmos investor deposited 100 ATOM onto a staking platform advertising a 5% annual yield, they would get a token back for their deposit. If they traded that token in at the end of a year, they would get back 105 ATOM. Anchor calls these tokens that represent stakes bTokens.

Much like Compound or MakerDAO, Anchor will let PoS holders deposit bTokens as an asset on Anchor. These will serve as collateral for stablecoin loans (initially, these are likely to be primarily stablecoins created with Terra).

On the consumer side, users will be able to make stablecoin deposits in Terra and earn a predictable return.

We now have means to turn Anchor into a turnkey asset for passive income, Kwon said.

Manian concurred. Im interested in this because A.) DeFi and B.) the potential for what seems like a wider consumer product, he said.

Terra update

The Korea-based stablecoin project was first announced with a $32 million investment led by Binance in August 2018.

In October, Terra reported $54 million of payments through its Chai wallet app.

Terra has risen to be tied for fourth place as a payments platform in Korea, Kwon said. No small feat.

For users, Chai is able to provide users with discounts funded by new token emissions, which get minted whenever demand starts to push the price above its target.

Chai has already brokered a partnership for access to the Mongolian market. Kwon said travel restrictions under COVID-19 have dramatically slowed the teams ability to access other markets, although Taiwan is the next step.

Its another small country, but it has a lot of e-commerce activity, and Terra was created with e-commerce in mind.

While Chai hasnt shown up in the U.S. yet, Kwon is working on a partnership now that would enable U.S. customers to put funds into Anchor using fiat, over regulated payment rails. Further, its expansion to Solana reflects a larger strategy to expand Terras footprint.

We are building bridges to all the layer ones that dont currently have stablecoins, Kwon said.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Read more:

Proof-of-Stake Chains Team Up to Prove DeFi Is Bigger Than Ethereum - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

How the EEA Made Ethereum Palatable to Big Business – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Ethereum has attracted the attention of large companies for almost as long as it has been around. But it wasnt until early 2017 that a formal business-focused consortium came into being: the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (EEA).

The EEA created a concerted effort to get large corporates and tech providers on the same page when implementing private (or permissioned) versions of Ethereum technology. Thereafter, the EEA became a kind of standards organization for blockchain business, with one eye on a future state when the public blockchain might morph together with private implementations.

After all, company intranets gradually became part of the internet, or so blockchain believers will tell you.

Back in February 2017 when the EEA launched, Julio Faura, who was head of blockchain at Banco Santander at the time, volunteered to become EEA founding chairman, a position he held until July 2018.

A few of us just got together to try to make the technology a little bit more suitable for enterprise uses, recalls Faura, now the CEO of blockchain-based payments company Adhara. We were all doing our own rudimentary attempts to use the technology. But it wasnt conceived for enterprise use rather for trustless and public use and was very far from being ready.

Along came Quorum

Megabank JPMorgan Chase had released its open-source Ethereum-based blockchain client, Quorum, towards the end of 2016. The banks privacy-centric take on Ethereum became a powerful driver for enterprise adoption, said Faura.

Quorum came along and it was a blessing, he said, because it made doing permissioned networks with a consensus algorithm much easier. Suddenly performance started to go up. I remember configuring networks myself with thousands of transactions per second, so it was very exciting.

No matter what enterprise platforms look like in 15 years, there will be pieces that evolved from industry coopetition conversations that never would have happened otherwise.

JPMorgan was one of the founding members of the EEA, a group of 30 or so companies that included Microsoft, Santander, ConsenSys, CME Group and Intel (a further 86 members were announced a couple of months later at CoinDesks 2017 Consensus event).

The EEA inspired huge organizations to think about solving long-bemoaned data coordination challenges in new ways, said Amber Baldet, CEO of Ethereum-based startup Clovyr. No matter what enterprise platforms look like in 15 years, there will be pieces that evolved from industry coopetition conversations that never would have happened otherwise.

Baldet, who led the team at JPM that built Quorum, said that while theres still a long way to go, enterprises are building more creative systems for decentralized data sharing than ever before.

The EEA will continue to shape core technologies that move tons of records (and crypto assets) and most consumers will continue to know nothing about any of it and that is success, she said.

After the early blockchain hype, which saw almost every decent-sized bank either joining a consortium or announcing a proof-of-concept, the enterprise distributed ledger technology (DLT) space seems to have fallen into what Gartner calls the trough of disillusionment. Call it an inevitable phase in the lifecycle of new and potentially transformative technologies.

If you ask the banks and enterprise teams involved in blockchain work whats happening, most will tell you its simply been a case of keeping their heads down and building. Behind the scenes, the EEA has been working hard on standards work, said Yorke E. Rhodes III, a program manager on Microsoft Azures blockchain team.

There has been a tremendous amount of specification work going on, said Rhodes. We are building on a foundation of not only five years of Ethereum, but three-plus years with an enterprise focus. Its a good spot. The things that needed to happen are really happening.

Freedom of choice

A crucial characteristic of the enterprise Ethereum ecosystem is choice, said Adharas Faura.

Its very important whatever technology ends up being used is not controlled by a single software vendor, because that creates a huge strategic risk, Faura said.

The choice of enterprise Ethereum clients widened considerably last year with the release of Hyperledger Besu, a high-profile cross-pollination between the two ecosystems, built by ConsenSys engineers, and designed from the ground up to incorporate the Ethereum mainnet.

Ethereums community was really keen to see this platform used, not just by anarchists and radicals and people who wanted to take down the banks, but by the banks themselves.

A hat-tip must go to the then-EEA lead Ron Resnick, who worked tirelessly to broker a deal between Ethereum and Hyperledger, added Faura.

In fact, a bridge between Ethereum and Hyperledger had been a long time coming. Before he became the executive director of Hyperledger, Brian Behlendorf recalls meeting Ethereum chief scientist Vitalik Buterin.

Behlendorf, a leading figure in the open-source software movement, said Ethereum and its growing community reminded him of the culture of the Apache Software Foundation and its friendly approach to corporate use cases.

I remember being fascinated by the idea of decentralization at the heart of architecture, and something much more interesting than just a cryptocurrency play, said Behlendorf. This was a programmatic network for building decentralized applications, and its community was really keen to see this platform used, not just by anarchists and radicals and people who wanted to take down the banks, but by the banks themselves.

For his part, current EEA Executive Director Daniel C. Burnett said there is a ton of stuff to be excited about, flagging up ConsenSys engineer John Wolperts Baseline Protocol as an interesting enterprise project in 2020.

More generally, Burnett pointed to the stability of Ethereum and the end of the frontier mindset of previous years.

In the past couple of years, things are beginning to settle a bit, Burnett said. Its certainly not boring, but were a little less of the Wild West.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Go here to see the original:

How the EEA Made Ethereum Palatable to Big Business - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis July 29th, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

EOS

EOS rallied by 5.06% on Tuesday. Following on from a 5.07% gain on Monday, EOS ended the day at $3.0048.

It was another mixed start to the day. EOS rose to an early morning high $2.9204 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $2.9785, EOS slid to a late morning intraday low $2.7830.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $2.6879, EOS rallied to a late intraday high $3.0799.

EOS broke through the first major resistance level at $2.9785 before easing back.

At the time of writing, EOS was up by 0.30% to $3.0137. A bullish start to the day saw EOS rise from an early morning low $3.0040 to a high $3.0191.

EOS left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

EOS would need to avoid a fall through the $2.9559 pivot level to support a run at the first major resistance level at $3.1288.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for EOS to break out from Tuesdays high $3.0799.

Barring another extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level at $3.1288 would likely cap any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $2.9559 pivot would bring the first major support level at $2.8319 into play.

Barring an extended sell-off, EOS should steer well clear of sub-$2.80 levels. The first major support level at $2.8319 should limit any downside.

First Major Support Level: $2.8319

Pivot Level: $2.9559

First Major Resistance Level: $3.1288

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $6.62

38% FIB Retracement Level: $9.76

62% FIB Retracement Level: $14.82

Ethereum fell by 1.49% on Tuesday. Partially reversing a 3.47% gain from Monday, Ethereum ended the day at $317.59.

A bullish start saw Ethereum rise to an early morning intraday high $327.34 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $333.93, Ethereum fell to a late morning intraday low $306.29.

The pullback saw Ethereum fall through the first major support level at $310.97 before moving back to $323 levels.

A bearish end to the day, however, left Ethereum at sub-$320 levels and in the red.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was up by 0.54% to $319.29. A bullish start to the day saw Ethereum rise from an early morning low $317.52 to a high $319.50.

Ethereum left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Story continues

Ethereum would need to avoid a fall through the $317 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $327.86.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ethereum to break out from Tuesdays high $327.34.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Tuesdays high should cap any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $317 pivot would bring the first major support level at $306.81 into play.

Barring an extended sell-off, however, Ethereum should steer clear of sub-$300 levels. The first major support level should limit any downside.

First Major Support Level: $306.81

Pivot Level: $317

First Major Resistance Level: $327.86

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $257

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $367

62% FIB Retracement Level: $543

Ripples XRP rose by 2.67% on Tuesday. Following on from a 4.33% rally on Monday, Ripples XRP ended the day at $0.23070.

It was a mixed start to the day, with Ripples XRP rising to an early morning high $0.22698 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $0.2333, Ripples XRP slid to a late morning intraday low $0.21773.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $0.2127, Ripples XRP rallied to a late intraday high $0.23499.

Ripples XRP broke back through the first major resistance level at $0.2333 before sliding back to sub-$0.23 levels.

Finding late support, however, Ripples XRP wrapped up the day at $0.23 levels for the 1st time since March.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was up by 0.87% to $0.23271. A bullish start to the day saw Ripples XRP rise from an early morning low $0.23085 to a high $0.23271.

Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Ripples XRP will need to avoid a fall through the $0.2287 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.2379.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ripples XRP to break out from Tuesdays high $0.23499.

Barring a broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level should cap any upside.

In the event of a breakout, Ripples XRP should test the second major resistance level at $0.2451 before any pullback.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $0.2278 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.2206 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, Ripples XRP should avoid sub-$0.22 levels and the second major support level at $0.2105.

First Major Support Level: $0.2206

Pivot Level: $0.2278

First Major Resistance Level: $0.2379

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.3638

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $0.4800

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.6678

Please let us know what you think in the comments below.

Thanks, Bob

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

View original post here:

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis July 29th, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Coin Race: Top Winners/Losers of July; Ethereum Up the Most, Bitcoin Least – Cryptonews

Source: Adobe/Kalyakan

The crypto market seems to have acquired a habit of surprising us near the end of a month - albeit not always positively. July, however, ended up very much positively.

July has seen a mini crypto revival, one may say. After weeks of unusual lack of movement, or better said - volatility, which we are all used to seeing from many digital assets, the market swiftly moved upwards. It might've been true that it was 'resting,' preparing for a fast bull coming its way, as very few coins finished the month in the red.

Just as the month neared its end, bitcoin (BTC) moved upwards from the USD 9,000 level it had seemed stuck at, and first jumped to USD 10,000, followed by USD 11,000. The first days of August, saw the coin hit the USD 12,000 level shortly, then crashing in minutes.

Altcoins weren't left behind either. Ethereum (ETH) surpassed the USD 300 mark and is standing near the USD 400 one, currently separated by some USD 15 from it. As a matter of fact, ETH appreciated the most among the top 10 coins by market capitalization in July.

Additionally, ETH - which celebrated its fifth aniversary on July 30 - was one up on bitcoin. Namely, its price grew in July more than double that of bitcoin's. This trend continues with the yearly, quarterly, and weekly numbers as well.

Furthermore, XRP, cardano (ADA), and bitcoin SV (BSV) all appreciated more than 50% during July.

The rest of the coins on the top 10 list also had a productive July, all appreciating between 30% and 50% - except bitcoin. The world's most popular coin appreciated the least over the course of the past month.

Among the top 50 coins by market capitalization, elrond (ERD) is leading the top 10 winners by more than double the increase of the second-placed aave (LEND), which was one of the winners in June as well. The two have appreciated more than 200% and 100%, respectively.

Both also had news to share in July. Elrond Network announced it's live on mainet, with decentralized app Maiar as the first to launch on it, also adding that they will transform their economic model. Meanwhile, Aave announced its tokenomics upgrade proposal, genesis governance, and governance token, with LEND's migration to AAVE.

Three top 10 coins found themselves among the most appreciating coins. Generally, the coins on the list went up between 50% and 80%, with the 10th-placed cosmos (ATOM)'s price increasing by 52%.

Chainlink (LINK) is also among these coins, going up nearly 65%. It had a turbulent July, with a controversial campaign against it run by a secretive company called Zeus Capital.

The past month has been so good to the market, that there are only two coins on the losers list to speak of this time around, compared to quite a few of them back in June.

Not taking stablecoins into account, the two coins whose prices have decreased are hedgetrade (HEDGE) and ampleforth (AMPL). The former dropped more than 3% and the latter more than 54%.

Ampleforth received more attention in the Cryptoverse after it had rallied to become the best-performing coin among the top 50 cryptoassets by market capitalization in mid-July, while at the same time seeing extreme volatility both to the upside and downside.

Band protocol (BAND) sits at the top of the green list in July among the top 100 coins, having appreciated nearly 270%. It's followed by elrond, as well as advanced internet blocks (AIB) - all of which went up more than 100%. Another four coins increased by more than 100%.

Nine coins in the top 100 dropped in July. This includes the mentioned AMPL, which is at the top here as well. The midas touch gold (TMTG) is in the second place, followed by verge (XVG) and quant (QNT) - all of which recorded double-digit drops. The remaining coins' prices decreased less than 4%.

View original post here:

Coin Race: Top Winners/Losers of July; Ethereum Up the Most, Bitcoin Least - Cryptonews

Ethereum vs Ripple: which one should be in your portfolio in 2020? – Capital.com

A brief summary of Ripple and Ethereum

Despite all the turmoil and uncertainty in the global financial markets, cryptocurrencies are currently experiencing somewhat of a bull run. While new projects attract most of the attention, Ethereum, Ripple and Bitcoin continue to dominate the market cap rankings.

In this Ripple vs Ethereum guide, we compare two of the most significant crypto projects and check out whether they belong in your investment portfolio. However, before we dive in, here's a quick summary of the projects.

Ripple is an open-source protocol that supports real-time cross-border transactions. It was created by Ripple Labs in 2012 and aims to modernise the world of payments, exchange rates and replace the SWIFT network. XRP is the native token of the platform and acts as a medium of exchange, representing the transfer of value on the network.

Ethereum is best known for its smart contracts functionality. In brief, it's a distributed computer that allows developers to build applications on top of the Ethereum blockchain. Ether or ETH is the native token used to pay for transactions and other interactions with the protocol.

When looking at Ripple vs Ethereum, investors should remember that they are entirely different projects, designed to address different markets and solve different problems. Same applies to ETH vs XRP tokens.

Technology and utility aside, there are apparent ideological differences behind the two projects. Ripple Labs is a for-profit technology company that invented and continues to develop the Ripple protocol. It owns a majority of the XRP tokens and has commercial interests, including a potential IPO. Ethereum, on the other hand, is a decentralised network supported by the Ethereum Foundation, a Swiss non-profit organisation.

So, is Ethereum better than Ripple? Lets look at the main differences to find out.

Ethereum blockchain currently uses Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism to validate transactions. In PoW consensus, miners compete with each other to solve complex mathematical puzzles and are rewarded with ETH. Anyone can mine ETH, which contributes to the decentralisation of the Ethereum blockchain.

Ripple network uses a unique distributed consensus mechanism. A network of trusted "transaction validators", mostly banks that use Ripple technology, decide which transactions are valid and authentic. Network participants can select which nodes they trust. However, they are encouraged to adopt Unique Node Lists (UNLs) maintained by Ripple Labs. Because of this, the Ripple network is often viewed as centralised in the crypto community.

There's currently almost 12m ETH and new coins are created as a reward for miners who maintain the network. There's no hard cap on the total amount of ETH that can be issued. The system is decentralised and no central authority controls the issuance of ETH.

XRP, on the other hand, is pre-mined with a total supply of 100bn tokens. However, only 45bn are currently in circulation. The rest are held in escrow and released to Ripple Labs at a rate of 1bn per month. The company can choose if they want to put XRP back into escrow, sell it on the market or sell directly to financial institutions that use Ripple technology. For Ripple Labs, selling XRP is part of the business model and a way to maintain profitability ahead of the potential IPO.

At the moment, the Ethereum network can, at its best, process roughly 15 transactions per second. The transaction fees on the network have been climbing recently due to the emergence of stable coins and decentralised finance (DeFi) projects. The average transaction fee on Ethereum is currently around $1.50, up from $0.10 in April 2020.

Ripple network can process a transaction in four seconds and can handle 1,500 transactions per second, according to the company. The standard transaction fee on the Ripple network is 0.00001 XRP per transaction, which gets burned, creating a deflationary mechanism.

Truth be told, early investors in both cryptocurrencies have done exceptionally well. ETH went from trading below $10 at the beginning of 2017 to an all-time high of above $1,400 in January 2018. Similarly, XRP was trading below $0.01 in March 2017 and after going on an impressive run, reached $3.40 in January 2018.

Simple and intuitive platform

Since January 2018, however, ETH is down over 75 per cent while XRP is down more than 90 per cent. Regardless, it is worth noting that more recently, since the March 2020 lows, ETH rallied over 200 per cent going from $100 to just over $300. XRP lagged during the same period, only appreciating by about 35 per cent.

In the latest news, the Ethereum community continues to focus on scalability solutions and the transition to Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus. The initial phase, or Phase 0, has been delayed multiple times but is still expected in 2020. The team will release the last testnet on August 4, at the earliest, with the mainnet launch expected to follow later in the year. It's near impossible to discuss Ethereum without mentioning the impressive growth in DeFi. There's currently more than 4m ETH locked in various DeFi platforms, contributing to the demand for ETH.

Ripple is well known for its extensive list of partnerships with financial institutions around the world. From that perspective, it is set to benefit from the recent decision by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to allow banks that are licensed in the US to offer crypto custody services. In other news, Santander, one of the large retail banks working with Ripple, has recently expanded available regions for its international payments app. The app is a borderless blockchain payment tool, built alongside Ripple, that aims to make transactions cheaper, faster and more transparent.

On a less positive note, Ripple continues to battle a string of class-action lawsuits claiming it violated securities laws in the US. The lawsuits allege that XRP is a security and was not registered with relevant authorities when it was marketed and sold in the US.

So now that we know what both projects are about and the main differences between them, which one is a better investment in 2020, ETH or XRP?

The usual disclaimer here, no one knows which token will perform better in the future, so it is always crucial to do your own research. What we can do, however, is consider whether the Ethereum or Ripple network has better prospects.

On that front, Ethereum has a brighter future. Most decentralised applications are currently built on the Ethereum blockchain. DeFi projects are an easy example of Ethereum's utility. Over the long-term, there are many other areas, like energy, where Ethereum's smart contract functionality could make a big difference. And while the future is bright, Ethereum does need to execute on its PoS roadmap as well as other scaling solutions.

For XRP, the source of fundamental demand for the token is unclear. Many retail investors abandoned XRP after the 2017 bull run. Institutional investors are also not too keen. The Grayscale XRP trust, for instance, had $6.6m in AUM in June 2018, compared to just $2.7m at the end of June 2020. An additional supply of 1bn new XRP every month is likely to limit any sustained price upside. The pending lawsuits also present a substantial risk. If the SEC designates XRP as a security, its utility as a medium of exchange will disappear.

Undoubtedly, ETH, XRP and other cryptocurrencies present attractive investment opportunities. Their volatility also makes them great assets for traders and speculators.

For those who prefer to take advantage of that growing volatility, without holding the underlying coins, contracts for difference (CFDs) might be a way to go. CFDs allow investors to take long and short positions as well as trade on margin. CFDs could be used to hedge existing exposures or for speculation.

You can trade cryptocurrencies CFDs with Capital.com and take advantage of our AI-powered trading platform. A quick note of caution, because CFD trading involves the usage of leverage, both gains and losses are magnified.

Find out how to trade crypto CFDs by reading our comprehensive guide.

Ready to get started?

Download Capital.com

Read the original post:

Ethereum vs Ripple: which one should be in your portfolio in 2020? - Capital.com

EDCON Ethereum Conference to take place virtually August 9-11 – TechNode

EDCON, the Community Ethereum Development Conference, announced today that EDCON will go fully virtual this year on Aug. 9-11.

EDCON 2020 Online Edition will feature a keynote address by Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin, core researchers and developers Danny Ryan, Karl Floersch, Hsiao-Wei Wang, Aditya Asgaonkar, and others from across Ethereum core development team, Ethereum Foundation, and the Ethereum community.

This year, all other Ethereum-related conferences have been canceled, leaving EDCON the only existing large-scale conference that brings together the Ethereum community. The latest development updates, new projects, and features will be announced, including topics such as the current state of Ethereum, Ethereum 2.0, DeFi, dapp development, DAO, governance community building, infrastructure, developer ecosystem, and more. All keynotes and sessions will be made publicly available without charge, and everyone who is interested in Ethereum technology or blockchain in general is welcome to join.

EDCON 2020 Online Edition starts at8:00 a.m. eastern timeevery day fromAug. 9 through 11, streaming athttps://next.brella.io/join/edcon2020.

Replay tracks will be available on Youtube here if you miss the sessions.

Stay tuned on TechNode for an interview with Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin.

EDCON is a non-profit global Ethereum conference that is held annually in different countries. It is committed to serving the Ethereum ecosystem by boosting communication among Ethereum communities worldwide. For more information, visit https://edcon.io/.

For sponsors: sponsor@edcon.io

For speakers: speaker@edcon.io

For press: media@edcon.io

Read the rest here:

EDCON Ethereum Conference to take place virtually August 9-11 - TechNode

Happy fifth birthday to Ethereum. What has it learned? – finder.com.au

On 30 July 2015, a new baby Ethereum came into the world. Then lots of people started maniacally cooing over it and they haven't stopped since, which is how it got to where it is today.

Ethereum has already returned their adoration many times over and doesn't show any signs of stopping.

Ethereum has been the main driving force for most blockchain innovation, helping popularise the transition from the idea of blockchain as a vehicle for magic Internet money, to the idea of blockchain for everything.

Ethereum's position as a driving force for innovation has been apparent even at its ostensibly low points. The DAO hack is practically a distant memory now, but in hindsight the $60 million lost seems a small price to pay for the lessons it taught about security, decentralisation and the stakes at play. Similarly, the actually-not-that-fateful decision to split off into Ethereum Classic has also turned out to not really matter, while being a teachable moment.

By making those big mistakes early, the Ethereum community was better able to shrug off later misadventures like the $160 million Parity Wallet freeze. If the Ethereum community hadn't navigated issues like forking to recover funds earlier, it probably would have done it later with much worse outcomes.

In hindsight, the cost of those incidents was quite low although you'd probably have a different perspective on that if you personally lost funds while the benefits were quite large.

The ICO boom was arguably a much bigger challenge, but also brought even more innovation and understanding.

At its peak about 80% of ICOs were scams while 19% were just plain bad. This era is best exemplified by an ICO called BlockBroker, which launched an ICO to raise funds for a project that would somehow use tokens to fight ICO fraud, before exit scamming itself.

With every new scam depleting public goodwill and tarnishing the entire industry, the biggest pessimists at the time were ready to write the whole thing off as another failed experiment. And yet, a few years later we can see the lasting benefits of the boom.

The scam waves washed a lot of garbage onto the beach of innovation, but they also brought lots of beautiful seashells that still remain today while most of the garbage is long gone.

ICOs created success stories like Binance, which is itself now pouring money into other blockchain developments, as well as many of the DeFi projects that appear on track to define Ethereum in its current phase, such as Chainlink, Synthetix and many more.

Just as importantly, the sheer excesses of the era finally forced regulatory intervention, which helped bring some order to the chaos and encouraged a more nuanced, pragmatic vision of what Ethereum could be, how it could grow and where the worlds of centralised and decentralised finance might one day meet in the real world.

Perhaps it was these experiences, of Ethereum and its community simultaneously being on both, all and no sides of the fence that have made it such an adaptable and pragmatic system. They've helped pave the way for the vision of Ethereum 2.0 where the main Ethereum chain is a centre point in a garden of permissioned, hybrid and other permissionless chains.

This history has served Ethereum well, imbuing it with the flexibility it needs in a complicated world.

"One of the core reasons behind Ethereums success is its innate malleability," says GSX Group CEO Nick Cowan. "Much like how the rise of Web 2.0 powered a groundswell of momentum from a technological standpoint, Ethereums emergence was the battering ram for the ascent of blockchain more broadly... Blockchains use-cases extend into almost every industry and sector, with many of those innovations leaning on Ethereum as a foundational layer."

"[Ethereum's] success has been predicated on the ease at which both hybrid and fully decentralised autonomous systems, applications, and organisations can operate utilising its framework," said HXRO CEO Dan Gunsberg. The real beauty of Ethereum is that it is the ultimate laboratory for innovation across an almost infinite spectrum of market segments."

The ability to integrate with permissioned chains is integral to this success.

"I can tell you firsthand that Ethereum is the most requested chain, right up there with Bitcoin, that companies ask Blockset to support, likely due to its capabilities of building private chains," says BRD CEO and Blockset creator Adam Traidman.

Clear CEO Eran Haggiag predicts further developments along those lines:

"Looking to the future, in the next five years, I believe DLT will become a pivotal infrastructure facilitating cross-company financial applications, identity management, and traceability something most companies won't be able to operate without," he says. "Due to the conservative nature of many enterprises, most of these networks are now permissioned, choosing DLT technology based on different parameters, resulting in multiple DLTs for different networks."

"By enabling a DLT-agnostic infrastructure, cross-network connections can be rapidly created and application providers can write an application once, and easily deploy it anywhere. Enabling seamless migration between DLTs, infrastructure that is DLT-agnostic will create the path to future move into public networks like Ethereum or integration with them for payment and other DeFi applications."

It's funny to think that absolutely none of these considerations were top of mind as Ethereum navigated its way through times like the DAO hack, Parity Freeze, ICO frenzy and the attack of the Cryptokitties, but that somehow, in some way, responding to and growing from those helped shape its way for future success.

Disclosure: The author holds cryptocurrencies including BTC, ETH, BNB, KDA, BAND, CELO, FET, HBAR at the time of writing

Disclaimer: This information should not be interpreted as an endorsement of cryptocurrency or any specific provider, service or offering. It is not a recommendation to trade. Cryptocurrencies are speculative, complex and involve significant risks they are highly volatile and sensitive to secondary activity. Performance is unpredictable and past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Consider your own circumstances, and obtain your own advice, before relying on this information. You should also verify the nature of any product or service (including its legal status and relevant regulatory requirements) and consult the relevant Regulators' websites before making any decision. Finder, or the author, may have holdings in the cryptocurrencies discussed.

Picture: Shutterstock

Original post:

Happy fifth birthday to Ethereum. What has it learned? - finder.com.au

Ethereum Price Analysis: ETH/USD struggles to hold the gains, bears target at $350.00 – FXStreet

Ethereum, the second-largest digital asset, hit the new high at $415 on Sunday, August 2, and retreated to $379.70 by press time. The second-largest digital asset has gained nearly 3% since the beginning of the day, though it is still down 1% in the recent 24 hours.

On the intraday charts, ETH/USD is supported by the upward-looking middle line of the 1-hour Bollinger Band $375.50 closely followed 50-hour SMA at $373.50. Once it is out of the way, the sell-off is likely to gain traction with the next focus on psychological $350.00 reinforced by 1-hour SMA100. The intraday RSI is flat in the neutral position, which means the price may stay continue moving inside the range for some time before the growth is resumed. The short-term trend remains bullish as long as the price stays above $350.00.

On the daily charts, strong resistance is created by $400.00. This psychological barrier is supported by the upper line of the Bollinger Band. Once it is broken, the recent high of $415 will come into focus. A sustainable move above this area will take ETH/USD into uncharted territory.

View post:

Ethereum Price Analysis: ETH/USD struggles to hold the gains, bears target at $350.00 - FXStreet