Celebrate Space Exploration Day with a look at the 1st lunar landing [photo gallery] (July 20) – US Embassy in Georgia

Celebrate Space Exploration Day by looking up at the sky on July 20 and reflecting on human achievements in space andall thats to come.

On July 20, 1969, U.S. astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin became the first humans to set foot on the moons surface. Fellow astronaut Michael Collins flew the command module.

Here is a look back at the first moon landing:

All of the Apollo 11 crew had flown at least one space mission. Pictured from left: Neil Armstrong, commander; Michael Collins, module pilot; Edwin E. Buzz Aldrin, lunar module pilot, on March 30, 1969. (NASA/AP Images)

Neil Armstrong, waving in front, heads for the van that will take the crew to the rocket for launch to the moon at Kennedy Space Center in Merritt Island, Florida, on July 16, 1969. ( AP Images)

The 363-foot Saturn V rocket carrying the Apollo 11 crew launches July 16, 1969, from Pad A, Launch Complex 39, at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida. (NASA/AP Images)

Left: The Chicago Cubs (foreground), Philadelphia Phillies and fans in attendance bow their heads in a moment of silent prayer in Philadelphia on July 20, 1969, hoping for the safe voyage of the Apollo 11 mission to the moon. ( Bill Ingraham/AP Images)

Right: Berliners stand in front of a TV shop and watch the Apollo 11 space mission on television July 16, 1969, in Germany. ( Edwin Reichert/AP Images)

Thats one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind, said astronaut Neil Armstrong as he became the first human to set foot on the moon, as shown in the image from television. (NASA/AP Photo)

Left: Buzz Aldrin leaves a footprint on the moons Sea of Tranquility. Photographs of the footprints were actually part of a planned experiment by Aldrin to study the nature of the lunar dust and the effects of pressure on the surface. (Buzz Aldrin/NASA/AP Images)

Right: Neil Armstrong took this picture of Buzz Aldrin, which shows a reflection of Armstrong and the Lunar Module in Aldrins visor. (Neil Armstrong/NASA/AP Images)

Left: This photo of Earthrise over the lunar horizon, taken July 20, 1969, from the orbiting command module, is one of the most famous images captured by the space program, although even the astronauts cannot remember who actually took the photo. (NASA)

Right: After lifting off from the lunar surface, the lunar module made its rendezvous with the command module. The Eagle docked with Columbia, and the lunar samples were brought aboard. (NASA/AP Images)

Left: The three astronauts and a Navy frogman, all wearing biological isolation garments, awaiting helicopter pickup and transport to the USS Hornet after the lunar module splashed down about 1,504 kilometers southwest of Hawaii at 16:50 UTC on July 24, 1969. They stayed in quarantine for three weeks. (NASA)

Right: NASA flight controllers at the Mission Operations Control Room in the Mission Control Center at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston celebrate the successful conclusion of the Apollo 11 lunar landing mission. (NASA/AP Images)

By U.S. Embassy Tbilisi | 20 July, 2020 | Topics: History, News, Science & Tech, U.S. Agencies | Tags: engineering, NASA, science, space technology

See the article here:

Celebrate Space Exploration Day with a look at the 1st lunar landing [photo gallery] (July 20) - US Embassy in Georgia

Satellites uncover widespread illegal fishing in Pacific Ocean – Space.com

Satellite imagery has dragged "dark" fishing fleets out into the light.

Orbital observations have revealed extensive illegal fishing of Pacific flying squid (Todarodes pacificus) in the Pacific Ocean around Russia, Japan and North and South Korea in 2017 and 2018, a new study reports.

In fact, "extensive" may not be a strong enough word. More than 900 vessels of Chinese origin probably violated United Nations sanctions by fishing in North Korean waters in 2017, and another 700 did the same in 2018, the study found.

Related: 50 breathtaking images from Earth's oceans

These scofflaw ships likely hauled in more than 176,000 tons (160,000 metric tons) of Pacific flying squid over those two years, a catch worth about US $440 million, study team members said. That's nearly equivalent to the combined T. pacificus catch of Japan and South Korea over the same span.

"The scale of the fleet involved in this illegal fishing is about one-third the size of China's entire distant-water fishing fleet," said study co-lead author Jaeyoon Park, a senior data scientist at Global Fishing Watch, an international nonprofit organization dedicated to increasing ocean sustainability via greater transparency.

"It is the largest known case of illegal fishing perpetrated by vessels originating from one country operating in another nation's waters," Park said in a statement.

Park and his colleagues tracked fishing activity in the Pacific around the Koreas, Japan and Russia, a big patch of poorly monitored ocean.

Many of the vessels plying these waters are dark, meaning they don't publicly broadcast their positions and don't show up in monitoring databases. So the researchers got a bird's-eye view, studying the region using four different types of satellite information.

For example, the researchers pored through Automatic Identification System (AIS) data, which is designed to help ships keep tabs on traffic in their area and avoid collisions. AIS signals stream continuously from transponders on ships, and these signals are often detected via satellite. But many ships don't beam out AIS signals, and the ones operating illegally are very unlikely to do so.

The team also looked at optical imagery gathered by Earth-observing satellites operated by San Francisco-based company Planet. The researchers analyzed wide-field photos captured by Planet's shoebox-sized Dove cubesats, as well as targeted imagery from larger, sharper-eyed SkySats.

Related: Photos of Earth by Planet satellites

In addition, Park and his colleagues scrutinized data from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) instrument aboard Suomi NPP, a satellite operated jointly by NASA and the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. VIIRS can spot brightly lit ships at night, which makes it well suited to hunt squid boats; these vessels usually operate after dark, drawing squid up from the depths with huge banks of very bright lights.

The researchers also used synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) imagery to hunt for large metal vessels in the region. The team used SAR data from several different satellites: the European Space Agency's Sentinel-1, the Japanese Space Exploration Agency's PALSAR-2, and RADARSAT-2, which is operated by the company Kongsberg Satellite Services.

Combining all of this information allowed the team to determine the extent of illegal fishing in the area something that had never been done on this scale, team members said.

"These novel insights are now possible thanks to advances in machine learning and the rapidly growing volume of high-resolution, high-frequency imagery that was unavailable even a couple of years ago," co-author David Kroodsma, Global Fishing Watch research and innovation director, said in the same statement. "We've shown we can track industrial fishing vessels that are not broadcasting their locations."

The new study, which was published online today (July 22) in the journal Science Advances, suggests that the illegal vessels pose a significant threat to the management of the T. pacificus fishery. That fishery is extremely valuable T. pacificus is the top seafood by production value in South Korea, and one of the top five seafoods eaten in Japan and it's on an unsustainable trajectory. Since 2003, reported catches of T. pacificus have dropped by 80% and 82% in South Korean and Japanese waters, respectively, study team members said.

"Global fisheries have long been dominated by a culture of unnecessary confidentiality and concealment. Achieving a comprehensive view of fishing activity is an important step toward truly sustainable and cooperative fisheries management, and satellite monitoring is a key part of the solution," co-author Quentin Hanich, an associate professor at the Australian National Center for Ocean Resources and Security at the University of Wollongong, said in the same statement.

"This analysis represents the beginning of a new era in ocean management and transparency," Hanich added.

The team also determined that about 3,000 North Korean ships fished illegally in Russian waters in 2018, likely pushed so far afield by competition with the illegal Chinese vessels in their own backyard. Most of the North Korean boats are small and made of wood, and therefore not designed for such long open-ocean voyages.

Indeed, hundreds of North Korean fishing vessels have washed up on Japanese and Russian shores in recent years, study team members said.

"The consequences of this shifting effort for North Korean small-scale fishers are profound, and represent an alarming and potentially growing human rights concern," study co-author Katherine Seto, an assistant professor of environmental studies at the University of California, Santa Cruz, said in the same statement.

Mike Wall is the author of "Out There" (Grand Central Publishing, 2018; illustrated by Karl Tate), a book about the search for alien life. Follow him on Twitter @michaeldwall. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom or Facebook.

Read more:

Satellites uncover widespread illegal fishing in Pacific Ocean - Space.com

The National Space Society intends to bring the solar system experience to everyone through an online presence – 3rd Watch News

TheNational Space Societyintends to bring the solar system experience to everyone through an online presence. The agency hopes to televise or showcase the spaceflight and exploration experiences in an online stream.

The NSS chief executive of and media personality Geoffrey Notkin and the Apollo 11 veteran crew Buzz Aldrin will be narrating and displaying the past glory of exploring space. The two experienced space exploration proponents will also be thinking aloud about the future exploits of the solar system.

Space exploration advocate Alan Stern will stream and explain Plutos journey and even deeper to the planetary body Arrokoth which at first was called Ultima Thule. He will also be detailing the battles surrounding the New Horizon venture throughout the planetary systems. NSSs Senior Operating Officer Bruce Pittman will be explaining the joint venture of Wernher von Braun and Gerald ONeill to establish the National Space Society.

NewSpace financier Steve Jurvetson narrates the tales of cashing into SpaceX to help the Planet Labs R&D department. Additionally, Steve vows to give money to ensure the smooth exploration of space orbitals.

See the rest here:

The National Space Society intends to bring the solar system experience to everyone through an online presence - 3rd Watch News

Wilton Bulletin Board: Smores, voting, space – The Wilton Bulletin

Published 5:00am EDT, Thursday, July 23, 2020

The family can enjoy smores at Woodcock Nature Center and meet the resident animals on July 26.

The family can enjoy smores at Woodcock Nature Center and meet the resident animals on July 26.

Photo: Jena Ardell / Getty Images

The family can enjoy smores at Woodcock Nature Center and meet the resident animals on July 26.

The family can enjoy smores at Woodcock Nature Center and meet the resident animals on July 26.

Wilton Bulletin Board: Smores, voting, space

The Bulletin Board will publicize events that take place in person and electronically via videoconference, Facebook Live or other means. Send submissions to editor@wiltonbulletin.com by 5 p.m. Wednesday for inclusion in the next weeks edition of The Wilton Bulletin.

Thursday, July 23

Summer Poetry with Judson Scruton, 10:30 a.m.-noon, Wilton Library. Third of a four-week, online seminar on selected works of Coleridge, Whitman, Browning and Crane, augmented with commentary by the late Harold Bloom. Poetry is emailed in advance. Registration required: http://www.wiltonlibrary.org.

iPhone Photograpy for Teens, 3-4 p.m., Wilton Library. This is the second of a two-day, Zoom workshop for teens entering sixth through 12th grade. Must have an iPhone, preferably version 7.0 and up. Registration required: http://www.wiltonlibrary.org.

Sunday, July 26

Family Smores & more! 5-6:30 p.m., Woodcock Nature Center, 56 Deer Run Road. Enjoy smores and then visit the more than 30 resident reptiles and amphibians at the nature center. No dogs. Free, registration required at woodcocknaturecenter.org.

Monday, July 27

Stitch Time for Knitters & Crocheters on Zoom, 1-2 p.m., Wilton Library. Show off creations, seek advice, chat while working on a project. Registration required: http://www.wiltonlibrary.org.

Tuesday, July 28

Special Voter Enrollment Session, noon-2 p.m., Town Hall, 238 Danbury Road. The registrars will be correcting the list of Wilton electors. Residents may register, check their party enrollment, and if unaffiliated, may join a political party in order to vote in the primaries on Aug. 11.

Privatization and Partnership is the New Space Frontier, 5-6 p.m., Wilton Library. A virtual program on new developments in space exploration presented by David Mestre, planetarium director at the Discovery Museum in Bridgeport. Registration required: http://www.wiltonlibrary.org.

Thursday, July 30

Summer Poetry with Judson Scruton, 10:30 a.m.-noon, Wilton Library. Last of a four-week, online seminar on selected works of Coleridge, Whitman, Browning and Crane, augmented with commentary by the late Harold Bloom. Poetry is emailed in advance. Registration required: http://www.wiltonlibrary.org.

See original here:

Wilton Bulletin Board: Smores, voting, space - The Wilton Bulletin

Fortnite: soon space exploration in the game ? – The Saxon

Share on Facebook

Atmosphere Star wars on Fortnite ! In fact, the game of Battle Royale comes to welcome a spaceship is stranded on the island.

Chapter 2 of season 3 of Fortnite arrives with a bang ! While we have had to deal with a recession, a spaceship shows the tip of his wing. MCE TV tells you everything from A to Z.

You talked about it already a little earlier : Fortnite welcomes a new place. In fact, whilewe are waiting for the next recession, a new island has just made its appearance.

Finally, it is still under the waves, but should soon land. It is thanks to a leaker that we have been able to have this info, datamine in the files of the game.

We see, therefore, an astronaut, apparently trapped in its cockpit. It is known from the outset that there will be lots of missions to accomplish for the out of there.

It is therefore in the patch 13.30 we were able to discover this island, on which was stranded this spacecraft. A shuttle that has all the air to come out of Star Wars, for that matter !

It is next to Craggy Cliffs that we will be able to identify this new area, which we reserve a lot of surprise. And that will delight surely the players of Fortnite in search of new challenges.

Fortnite: soon space exploration in the game ?

With the arrival of the space ship, we also have to deal with the new rewards. But also a bunch of surprises like a loading screen on the theme of space.

You could also win a brand new glider in order to show off like an astronaut. FortTroy, the famous datamineur we in any case blast with this little teasing of what Fortnite we reserve.

On the steps of this new challenge, it may be that the next update of Fortnite we go find the old ship. Then, to recover the missing part, install it, and dto attend the launch of the shuttle.

Follow this link:

Fortnite: soon space exploration in the game ? - The Saxon

NATO MMU cleared to begin training ops – IHS Jane’s 360

20 July 2020

by Gareth Jennings

NATO has been cleared to begin training operations on its first recently received Airbus A330 Multi-Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) aircraft, the Multinational Multirole Tanker Transport Unit (MMU) announced on 20 July.

The first of eight A330 MRTT aircraft that NATO members Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Norway are to operate as a joint fleet under the MMF initiative was formally delivered on 29 June. The MMU that operates the fleet is now cleared to commence training operations. (Airbus)

With the first of eight aircraft now at the MMUs main operating base (MOB) at Eindhoven airbase in the Netherlands, the receipt of the required airworthiness certification from the Dutch Military Aviation Authority has now cleared the way for the commencement of training.

The Multinational Multi-Role Tanker and Transport Fleet (MMF) is operated by the MMU on behalf of NATO members Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Norway. Managed by the NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA) with support from the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR), the capability will provide the six participating nations pooled access to aerial refuelling (hose-and-drogue and boom/receptacle) strategic passenger and cargo airlift, as well as aero-medical evacuation (medevac) capabilities.

With aircraft MMF1 now in the hands of NATO, MMF2 is ready for delivery shortly. As previously noted, MMF3 and MMF4 are currently undergoing military conversion at Airbus facility in Getafe, Spain, and are due to be delivered in October and early 2021 respectively.

Already a Janes subscriber? Read the full article via theClient LoginInterested in subscribing, see What we do

Share

NATO has been cleared to begin training operations on its first recently received Airbus A330 Multi-...

More:

NATO MMU cleared to begin training ops - IHS Jane's 360

Turkish spy agency MIT surveilled critics in Canada, a NATO ally – Nordic Research and Monitoring Network

Abdullah Bozkurt

Turkeys spy agency (Milli Istihabarat Tekilat, or MIT) has collected intelligence on critics and opponents of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoan in Canada, a NATO ally, secret documents have revealed.

According to the secret intelligence report, sent to the prosecutors office in Ankara with a cover letter from the agency and bearing the signature of the MIT legal counsellor on behalf of the intelligence chief, about two dozen people, Canadian nationals and residents, were spied on. The MIT document, which confirms for the first time the spy agencys activities targeting critics in North America, was submitted on January 16, 2020 to Birol Tufan, the public prosecutor in the counterterrorism unit of the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutors Office.

The information collected [about people targeted in Canada] as a result of the intelligence is presented in the annex, the letter, signed on behalf of agency head Hakan Fidan by mit Ulvi Canik, the legal counsellor, stated. The attached 10-page report, also classified as secret, provided detailed information on 15 people as well as the spouses of some. All of them were accused of being involved with the Glen movement, a group that is highly critical of Erdoan for a variety of reasons, from pervasive corruption in the government to Turkeys aiding and abetting of armed jihadist groups in Syria.

Secret document from Turkish intelligence agency MIT that confirms spying activities in Canada:

The report listed what appears to be the legitimate activities of Canadian nationals and residentsas if they amounted to terrorist activity, which is not surprising given the fact that Turkeys rulers often abuse the criminal justice system, especially counterterrorism laws, to prosecute and imprison critical journalists, human rights defenders, dissidents and others en masse. The report shows that Turkish intelligence also profiled the spouses, parents, siblings and in-laws of people who were put under surveillance on Canadian soil.

The intelligence report was shared with the prosecutors office after Tufan wrote a letter to the intelligence agency on December 13, 2019, asking the agency to forward the intelligence collected on 15 Canadian nationals and residents, almost all of Turkish origin. It is not clear how the prosecutors office managed to get these names in the first place as there is no paper trail to explain it. However, as in other spying activities abroad targeting the Glen group, the list most likely originated in the Turkish Embassy in Ottawa when diplomats were asked by the Turkish Foreign Ministry to profile Erdoan critics.

It is not surprising to see multiple lists with similar names sincethe Turkish intelligence agents who were deployed in Canadian territory either under the disguise of diplomats or as independent operatives whoblendin with the diaspora file their reports directly with the headquarters in Ankara, not through the Foreign Ministry, which has its own intelligence department under the name of the Security and Research Directorate. The public prosecutors letter reveals similar people were spied on and profiled by multiple agencies of the Turkish government.

All 15 names listed in the prosecutors document were listed as suspects in a terrorism investigation,and case file No. 2018/224693 was assigned, meaning that the investigation into them was launched in the year 2018 and is still ongoing. The MIT intelligence gathered on these people was incorporated as criminal evidence against them although no violent or terrorist activity is included in any document.

The 10-page MIT report has a warning printed on both the top and bottom of each page, cautioning that the intelligence must be used without identifying the source. It also highlighted that intelligence notes cannot be used as legal evidence in a court of law, a stipulation of the Code on Criminal Procedure (CMUK). But in practice such notes have often been used in prosecutions in recent years since the government started to intensify its crackdown on critics and opponents in a blatant abuse of the criminal justice system. Under the CMUK, at least on paper, any evidence presented to the court must be obtained legally and authorized and reviewed by a court, and prosecutors must use only law enforcement agencies such as the police, not intelligence units, when they investigate.

The secret 10-page report details the information collected by the Turkish spy agency. (Redactions done by Nordic Monitor.):

The police, the main law enforcement agency in Turkey, was also involved in the investigation of these 15 people and their relatives. On February 14, 2019, prosecutor Tufan wrote to counterterrorism unit of the Ankara Police Department asking the police to investigate the 15 people listed in the letter. He even provided 10 criteria for them to look at such as membership in Glen-linked unions, NGOs and foundations, subscriptions to critical media outlets, participation in protests, the posting of messages on social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook, their foreign travels and use of the ByLock encrypted messaging application.

The prosecutor also noted that if needed, search and seizure and arrest warrants could be secured through his office and asked the police to take the suspects statements and refer them to his office for further interrogation. Although no indictment was filed at this stage, arrest warrants were most likely issued for the listed individuals in absentia. The Turkish government would eventually seek the extradition of these people and file Interpol notices for them.

The investigation of Canadian nationals and residents on false terrorism charges will have far-reaching repercussions. They risk arrest if they travel to Turkey as well as the loss of their assets located there. They may also get stuck in a third country when they travel if the Turkish government manages to get them on the Interpol database. The most notorious example of Turkeys abuse of the Lost and Stolen Documents/Passports database in the Interpol system took place when NBA star player Enes Kanter, a Turk, was stranded in Romania on such a notice until the US government intervened and freed him before he was deported to Turkey.

Those who also have Turkish nationality would be denied consular services such as passport renewal, notary, power of attorney and birth registry offered by the Turkish consulates and embassy in Canada. Since they were already flagged by Turkish intelligence and other government agencies, further surveillance and tracking of their movements is quite possible.

Turkish prosecutors letter to MIT:

Erdoan, incriminated in a major corruption scandal in 2013 that exposed secret kickbacks in money laundering schemes involving Iranian sanctions buster Reza Zarrab, blamed the Glen movement for the graft investigations into his family members and business and political associates. He branded the group as a terrorist entity although no violent action has ever been associated with it, and launched a major crackdown on the group, jailing and/or purging tens of thousands of government employees, unlawfully seizing their assets, shutting down schools, universities, NGOs, media outlets, hospitals and others that were owned or operated by people associated with the movement.

The Erdoan government accused 79-year-old Turkish Muslim scholar Fethullah Glen, leader of the eponymous movement, who has been living in self-imposed exile in the US since 1999, of attempting to overthrow the government in 2016. Glen has repeatedly and strongly denied the accusations, and the Erdoan government has failed to present any evidence linking Glen to the abortive putsch. The US Department of Justice said the evidence presented by Turkey to secure his extradition would not stand up to US court scrutiny.

Canada has been a destination for critics, especially Glenists, who had to flee the Turkish government crackdown on rights and freedoms.

Turkish prosecutors letter asking the police to investigate Canadian nationals and residents:

According to the MIT report, Turkish intelligence surveilled the following persons in Canada: E.K.K., a member of the Turkish-Canadian Chamber of Commerce (TCCC); F.K.K., a teacher at the non-profit Turkish Community Center in Ottawa, his wife S.K., his father M.Z.K., his mother M.K. and his mother-in-law S.D.; .P., a member of the Canadian-Turkish Friendship Community (CTFC) and TCCC; A.A., an administrator at the Northern Lights Educational Services; .B., a teacher at the Nile Academy and his wife. E.B., a manager at the Intercultural Dialogue Center; S.U., a member of the Dicle Islamic Society; E.S., who was involved with the Intercultural Dialogue Institute, the CanadaTurknews outlet and the Circle blog, and his wife, S.S., who is also affiliated with the Intercultural Dialogue Institute; B.B., a member of the Manitoba Fellowship Organization (MFO) and the Edmonton Nebula Foundation; M.F.Y., who was affiliated with the Intercultural Dialogue Institute-Greater Toronto Area (IDI-GTA) and the Anatolian Heritage Federation(AHF), his wife, A.Y., who also works for IDI-GTA; his brother M.K. and his father I.B.Y.; M.B., coordinator at the Intercultural Dialogue Institute; H.Y., a writer and editor with CanadaTurk and the Canatolian news outlets; A.A., the former manager of the Beam Education Community Center (BECC); his wife, E.A. also involved with BECC; E.B.. of the Canadian-Turkish lslamic Foundation, her father M.., her mother .. and her sister Z..; and .K., a member of the TCCC and CTFC.

Related

Read more here:

Turkish spy agency MIT surveilled critics in Canada, a NATO ally - Nordic Research and Monitoring Network

Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Trends, Future Growth and Competitive Analysis – Cole of Duty

Data Bridge Market Research has recently published the Global research Report TitledTestosterone Replacement Therapy Market. The study provides an overview of current statistics and future predictions of the Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market.The study highlights a detailed assessment of the Market and displays market sizing trends by revenue & volume (if applicable), current growth factors, expert opinions, facts, and industry validated market development data.

Order a Free Sample Copy of thisTestosterone Replacement Therapy Market Report:https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-testosterone-replacement-therapy-market

The Global Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market research report assembles data collected from different regulatory organizations to assess the growth of the segments. In addition, the study also appraises the global Testosterone Replacement Therapy market on the basis of topography. It reviews the macro- and microeconomic features influencing the growth of the Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market in each region. Various methodological tools are used to analyze the growth of the worldwide Testosterone Replacement Therapy market.

List of Companies Profiled in the Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Report are:

AbbVie Inc., Bausch Health Companies Inc., Allergan, Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Pfizer Inc., Endo International plc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Perrigo Company plc, Cipla Inc., Lupin, Novartis AG, Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC, among others.

Major Regions as Follows:

North America

Europe

Asia-Pacific

South America

Middle East and Africa

Key Pointers Covered in the Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Industry Trendsand Forecast to 2026

A complete value chain of the global Testosterone Replacement Therapy market is presented in the research report. It is associated with the review of the downstream and upstream components of the Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market. The market is spliton the basis of the categories of products and clientapplication segments. The market analysis demonstrates the expansion of each segment of the global Testosterone Replacement Therapy market. The research report assists the user in taking a decisive step on the way tobe a milestone ingrowingandexpandingtheirorganizationsinside theworldwideTestosterone Replacement Therapy market.

How Does This Market Insights Help?

Complete Report is Available (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Graphs, and Chart):https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/toc/?dbmr=global-testosterone-replacement-therapy-market

The report highlights current and future market trends and carries out an analysis of the effect of buyers, substitutes, new entrants, competitors, and suppliers on the market. The key topics that have been explained in this Testosterone Replacement Therapy market report include market definition, market segmentation, key developments, competitive analysis and research methodology.

Why choose us:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part 01:Executive Summary

Part 02:Scope of the Report

Part 03:Research Methodology

Part 04:Market Landscape

Part 05:Pipeline Analysis

Part 06:Market Sizing

Market Definition

Market Sizing

Market Size And Forecast

Part 07:Five Forces Analysis

Bargaining Power Of Buyers

Bargaining Power Of Suppliers

Threat Of New Entrants

Threat Of Substitutes

Threat Of Rivalry

Market Condition

Part 08:Market Segmentation

Segmentation

Comparison

Market Opportunity

Part 09:Customer Landscape

Part 10:Regional Landscape

Part 11:Decision Framework

Part 12:Drivers and Challenges

Part 13:Market Trends

Part 14:Vendor Landscape

Part 15:Vendor Analysis

Vendors Covered

Vendor Classification

Market Positioning Of Vendors

Part 16:Appendix

In conclusion, the Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market report is a reliable source for accessing the research data that is projected to exponentially accelerate your business. The report Give information such as economic scenarios, benefits, limits, trends, market growth rates, and figures. SWOT analysis is also incorporated in the report along with speculation attainability inspection and venture return investigation.

To Get the Short-Term and Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 on this Market:https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/inquire-before-buying/?dbmr=global-testosterone-replacement-therapy-market

Thank you for reading this article. You can also get chapter-wise sections or region-wise report coverage for North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa.

Customization of the Report:

Data Bridge Market Research also provides customization options to tailor the reports as per client requirements. This report can be personalized to cater to your research needs. Feel free to get in touch with our sales team, who will ensure that you get a report as per your needs.

About Us:

Data Bridge Market Research set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with an unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market. Data Bridge Market Research provides appropriate solutions to complex business challenges and initiates an effortless decision-making process.

Contact:

US: +1 888 387 2818

UK: +44 208 089 1725

Hong Kong: +852 8192 7475

[emailprotected]

Read the original here:
Testosterone Replacement Therapy Market Trends, Future Growth and Competitive Analysis - Cole of Duty

Judaism, baseball, and the drive for normal – The Jewish Standard

Dr. Solomon Schechter, president of the Jewish Theological Seminary, once told my young grandfather, Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, then a student at the seminary, Unless you can play baseball, youll never get to be a rabbi in America.

My grandfather never played baseball and never really understood the game. He told me he once went to a game but didnt enjoy it; the noise kept interrupting his thinking. My grandfather ultimately was more interested in the Book of Ruth than Babe Ruth and Talmud more than a triple play.

I grew up in different generation, as an avid Mets fan who still had a keen interest in Talmud, and the Schechter quote was always a source of amusement to me. I never felt that a rabbi had to know baseball, and I dont believe that Schechter did either. What he was conveying to my young grandfather was the belief that in America, or anyplace else, a rabbi had to be part of the people and aware of the culture in which he or she was living.

Get The Jewish Standard Newsletter by email and never miss our top storiesFree Sign Up

Taking this for granted, I never fully appreciated the significance of sports and sporting events in America as much as now. I have always understood the oversized aspect of sports in America and recognized the overblown importance it has in our society. In America, sports teams have the ability to elicit civic pride and sports bring communities together in a way that few other activities and organizations do. But throughout this pandemic, sports and sporting events have taken on a new role, the drive for normalcy.

The past few months have been frightening, stressful, and the most unusual months in our lives. The vision of empty streets and the sounds of sirens still haunt many. It is no wonder that when restrictions were eased, even a bit, many took the opportunity to celebrate and return to normal life. Many areas throughout our country are paying a steep price for such actions, and while it is easy to castigate them, the drive for normalcy is very real, very understandable, and very human.

All this brings me back to baseball. Baseball is called Americas game. In early spring, as teams were preparing for a new season, the virus hit. Sporting events were literally stopped mid-game, and leagues put their seasons on pause. The past few weeks have seen the resumption of some sporting events, but this week baseball started its season, with great restrictions, and the National Basketball Association will be resuming its season with similar caution as well. I dont know if these attempts will be successful, but I am rooting for them, more than for any individual team. You see, these events are more than games. They are a beacon of hope and a reminder that life continues even in a pandemic.

None of this diminishes the danger of the disease or of the real pain physical, economic, and emotional that this virus has and is inflicting on people and our society. The dangers are real, but so is the human need for socialization and normal life. We find ourselves on the edge of a knife trying to navigate safe and prudent behavior with our need for normalcy. This is the balancing act that we, too, are navigating at the Montebello Jewish Center.

Several weeks ago, we resumed our in-person Shabbat morning services. There was trepidation, but with strict limits and guidelines, we were able to gather for prayers. Not everyone is comfortable, and some should not put themselves in the way of even a diminished risk, so we are also livestreaming our services.

At the end of our first Shabbat service, there was a feeling of elation. We were able to pray together and be together. For the first time in weeks, we could feel normal or as normal as you can while wearing a mask and sitting at least six feet away from your neighbor. Still, the experience brought joy, and the renewed belief that we will get through this and return to normal life, whatever that may look like after the pandemic.

This week, our country started such an experiment in baseball stadiums around the country and on basketball courts in Orlando, Florida. There are no fans in the seats and the games are different, but there are games, and with them comes the hope of normalcy.

Some of us may not follow baseball, but I believe that all will be rooting for it now. Resuming games in a safe fashion may serve to teach us that we can resume life in a safe fashion, and we will all be better for it.

Joshua S. Finkelstein is the rabbi of the Montebello Jewish Center, an egalitarian Conservative synagogue in Suffern.

Go here to read the rest:

Judaism, baseball, and the drive for normal - The Jewish Standard

Who Wrote the Bible? – History

Over centuries, billions of people have read the Bible. Scholars have spent their lives studying it, while rabbis, ministers and priests have focused on interpreting, teaching and preaching from its pages.

As the sacred text for two of the worlds leading religions, Judaism and Christianity, as well as other faiths, the Bible has also had an unmatched influence on literatureparticularly in the Western world. It has been translated into nearly 700 languages, and while exact sales figures are hard to come by, its widely considered to be the worlds best-selling book.

But despite the Bibles undeniable influence, mysteries continue to linger over its origins. Even after nearly 2,000 years of its existence, and centuries of investigation by biblical scholars, we still dont know with certainty who wrote its various texts, when they were written or under what circumstances.

READ MORE: The Bible Says Jesus Was Real. What Other Proof Exists?

The Old Testament, or Hebrew Bible, narrates the history of the people of Israel over about a millennium, beginning with Gods creation of the world and humankind, and contains the stories, laws and moral lessons that form the basis of religious life for both Jews and Christians. For at least 1,000 years, both Jewish and Christian tradition held that a single author wrote the first five books of the BibleGenesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomywhich together are known as the Torah (Hebrew for instruction) and the Pentateuch (Greek for five scrolls). That single author was believed to be Moses, the Hebrew prophet who led the Israelites out of captivity in Egypt and guided them across the Red Sea toward the Promised Land.

Yet nearly from the beginning, readers of the Bible observed that there were things in the so-called Five Books of Moses that Moses himself could not possibly have witnessed: His own death, for example, occurs near the end of Deuteronomy. A volume of the Talmud, the collection of Jewish laws recorded between the 3rd and 5th centuries A.D., dealt with this inconsistency by explaining that Joshua (Moses successor as leader of the Israelites) likely wrote the verses about Moses death.

READ MORE: Inside the Conversion Tactics of the Early Christian Church

Rembrandt van Rijn, painting of Moses Breaking the Tablets of the Law, 1659.

Fine Art Images/Heritage Images/Getty Images

That's one opinion among many, says Joel Baden, a professor at Yale Divinity School and author of The Composition of the Pentateuch: Renewing the Documentary Hypothesis. But they're already asking the questionwas it possible or not possible for [Moses] to have written them?

By the time the Enlightenment began in the 17th century, most religious scholars were more seriously questioning the idea of Moses authorship, as well as the idea that the Bible could possibly have been the work of any single author. Those first five books were filled with contradictory, repetitive material, and often seemed to tell different versions of the Israelites story even within a single section of text.

As Baden explains, the classic example of this confusion is the story of Noah and the flood (Genesis 6:9). You read along and you say, I dont know how many animals Noah took on the ark with him, he says. In this sentence it says two of every animal. In this sentence, he takes two of some animals and 14 of any animals. Similarly, the text records the length of the flood as 40 days in one place, and 150 days in another.

READ MORE: Discovery Shows Early Christians Didn't Always Take the Bible Literally

To explain the Bibles contradictions, repetitions and general idiosyncrasies, most scholars today agree that the stories and laws it contains were communicated orally, through prose and poetry, over centuries. Starting around the 7th century B.C., different groups, or schools, of authors wrote them down at different times, before they were at some point (probably during the first century B.C.) combined into the single, multi-layered work we know today.

Of the three major blocks of source material that scholars agree comprise the Bibles first five books, the first was believed to have been written by a group of priests, or priestly authors, whose work scholars designate as P. A second block of source material is known as Dfor Deuteronomist, meaning the author(s) of the vast majority of the book of Deuteronomy. The two of them are not really related to each other in any significant way, Baden explains, except that they're both giving laws and telling a story of Israel's early history.

According to some scholars, including Baden, the third major block of source material in the Torah can be divided into two different, equally coherent schools, named for the word that each uses for God: Yahweh and Elohim. The stories using the name Elohim are classified as E, while the others are called J (for Jawhe, the German translation of Yahweh). Other scholars don't agree on two complete sources for the non-priestly material. Instead, says Baden, they see a much more gradual process, in which material from numerous smaller sources was layered together over a longer period of time.

READ MORE: Why Bibles Given to Slaves Omitted Most of the Old Testament

Just as the Old Testament chronicles the story of the Israelites in the millennium or so leading up to the birth of Jesus Christ, the New Testament records Jesuss life, from his birth and teachings to his death and later resurrection, a narrative that forms the fundamental basis of Christianity. Beginning around 70 A.D., about four decades after Jesuss crucifixion (according to the Bible), four anonymously written chronicles of his life emerged that would become central documents in the Christian faith. Named for Jesuss most devoted earthly disciples, or apostlesMatthew, Mark, Luke and Johnthe four canonical Gospels were traditionally thought to be eyewitness accounts of Jesuss life, death and resurrection.

12th-13th century depiction of evangelists Luke and Matthew writing the Gospels.

DeAgostini/Getty Images

But for more than a century, scholars have generally agreed that the Gospels, like many of the books of the New Testament, were not actually written by the people to whom they are attributed. In fact, it seems clear that the stories that form the basis of Christianity were first communicated orally, and passed down from generation to generation, before they were collected and written down.

READ MORE: What Did Jesus Look Like?

Names are attached to the titles of the Gospels (the Gospel according to Matthew), writes Bible scholar Bart Ehrman in his book Jesus, Interrupted. But these titles are later additions to the Gospels, provided by editors and scribes to inform readers who the editors thought were the authorities behind the different versions.

Traditionally, 13 of the 27 books of the New Testament were attributed to Paul the Apostle, who famously converted to Christianity after meeting Jesus on the road to Damascus and wrote a series of letters that helped spread the faith throughout the Mediterranean world. But scholars now agree on the authenticity of only seven of Pauls epistles: Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, Philemon. These are believed to have been written between A.D. 50-60, making them the earliest known evidence for Christianity. Authors of the later epistles may have been followers of Paul, who used his name to lend authenticity to the works.

By the 4th century A.D., Christianity had been established as the dominant religion in the Western world, and the New and Old Testaments as its most sacred texts. In the centuries to come, the Bible would only become more central to the lives and faiths of millions of people around the world, despite the mystery surrounding its origins and the ongoing, complex debate over its authorship.

More here:

Who Wrote the Bible? - History

Glimpsing The Beis HaMikdash – The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com

Photo Credit: Jewish Press

Most of the year, the haftorah is thematically connected to the parshah. During the Three Weeks, however, we read haftoros (the tlasa dpuranisa) that have no connection to the weekly parshah. The last of these three haftoros starts, Chazon Yeshayahu The vision of [the prophet] Yeshayahu which gives this Shabbos its name: Shabbos Chazon.

Every aspect of our Torah even a seemingly incidental custom is precise and significant. Since Jews customarily call this Shabbos Shabbos Chazon, we may assume that on this Shabbos some vision is accessible to all Jews.

What vision is that? Every year the Rebbe would cite an answer given by the renowned Rabbi Levi Yitzchok of Berditchev that on this Shabbos, a distant vision of the future Beis HaMikdash is shown to every Jew. Rabbi Levi Yitzchok explained his answer with a parable:

A father had an expensive garment made for his son. The son, however, misbehaved and the garment got torn to pieces. His father had another garment made for him, but the son got that one torn, too. His father then had a third garment made, but he didnt give it to his son to wear; instead, he showed it to him on rare occasions, telling him that if he behaved well, he would eventually wear it. That way, he accustomed his son to behave properly until such time that behaving well would become so natural to him that he would be given the garment to wear.

Both the first and the second Beis HaMikdash were destroyed because of our misdeeds. Subsequently, Hashem constructed the third Beis HaMikdash in heaven and withheld it from us until such time that we will deserve it. To arouse our yearning to possess this priceless treasure, Hashem shows us once a year on Shabbos Chazon a distant vision of it, inspiring us to conduct ourselves properly so that we will merit attaining it.

One might ask: To perceive this exalted vision, a person has to be at an extraordinarily high spiritual level. Most of us arent on this level and dont actually see it, so whats the point of telling us were being shown this vision?

The Rebbe answered citing the Talmuds explanation (Megillah 3a, Sanhedrin 94a) on Daniel 10:7: I, Daniel alone, saw the sight, and the men who were with me did not see the sight, but a great fright fell upon them and they fled to be hidden. Since they didnt see, asks the Talmud, why were they frightened? It answers, Although they didnt see, their mazal [spiritual source] saw.

Similarly, the source of our soul which far transcends the level of the soul in our body perceives the vision of the future Beis HaMikdash, and that seeps down to the soul within our body, inspiring us to improve our conduct and grow closer to Hashem.

One might ask further: Why is this vision shown right before Tisha BAv, when the Beis HaMikdash was destroyed, rather than on Shabbos Nachamu (after Tisha BAv), which consoles us for the destruction and our exile?

And if it must be shown during the Three Weeks to inspire us to improve our conduct, why not at the beginning of the Three Weeks as opposed to their end? And why were we told this explanation of Shabbos Chazon only 200 years ago (by Rabbi Levi Yitzchok, who lived from 1740-1809), as opposed to the many previous centuries of our exile?

The Rebbe explained that whenever Hashems presence is concealed, it is concealed for the purpose of a subsequent greater revelation. Chassidus offers the analogy of a great scholar who, in the midst of a profound lecture, suddenly grasps an even deeper intellectual idea. For a while, he stops explaining the subject matter while he delves mentally into the ideas depth, exploring its details and wealth of explanation. Only after this interruption during which his previous process of revelation is temporarily concealed from his students does he resume his lecture, which now is substantially enriched by his new realization.

Since the purpose of the Three Weeks of concealment is an eventual greater revelation of the era of Moshiach their inner essence is that revelation, and the greater the darkness, the greater the ultimate inner revelation. And since improving our conduct overcomes the concealment, the best time to inspire us to improve is near the end of the Three Weeks concealment, when the darkness is greatest.

Likewise, over the course of our long exile, the best time to inspire us to bring about this exalted revelation is during the darkness close to our exiles end. Hence the reason for us not knowing this explanation of Shabbos Chazon until the generation of Rabbi Levi Yitzchok.

May our heartfelt efforts finally bring our exile to a close.

(Based on teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe)

Excerpt from:

Glimpsing The Beis HaMikdash - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com

Theres no right to infect – The Ledger

"I don't need a mask!" declared the San Diego woman to a Starbucks barista. The woman apparently believed she had a right to enter mask-free, contrary to the coffee bar's policy.

A surprising number of Americans treat expectations of mask-wearing during the coronavirus pandemic in a similar way as if these expectations were paternalistic, limiting people's liberty for their own good. They are dead wrong.

Their thinking reflects what we might call "faux libertarianism," a deformation of the classic liberal theory. Libertarianism is the political and moral philosophy according to which everyone has rights to life, liberty and property and various specific rights that flow from these fundamental ones.

Libertarian rights are rights of noninterference, rather than entitlements to be provided with services. So your right to life is a right not to be killed and does not include a right to life-sustaining health care services. And your right to property is a right to acquire and retain property through your own lawful actions, not a right to be provided with property.

Libertarianism lies at the opposite end of the political spectrum from socialism, which asserts positive rights to such basic needs as food, clothing, housing and health care. According to libertarianism, a fundamental right to liberty supports several more specific rights, including freedom of movement, freedom of association and freedom of religious worship. Neither the state nor other individuals may violate these rights of competent adults for their own protection. To do so would be unjustifiably paternalistic, say libertarians, treating grown-ups as if they needed parenting.

Why do I claim that Americans who resist mask-wearing in public embrace faux libertarianism, a disfigured version of the classic liberty-loving philosophy? Because they miss the fact that a compelling justification for mask-wearing rules is not paternalistic at all not focused on the agent's own good but rather appeals to people's responsibilities regarding public health. This point is entirely consistent with libertarianism.

Consider your right to freedom of movement. This right does not include a right to punch someone in the face, unless you both agree to a boxing match, and does not include a right to enter someone else's house without an invitation. Rights extend only so far.

Once we appreciate that rights have boundaries, rather than being limitless, we can see the relationship between liberty rights and public health.

Your rights to freedom of movement, freedom of association, and so on do not encompass a prerogative to place others at undue risk. This idea justifies our sensible laws against drunk driving. So even a libertarian can, and should, applaud Starbucks and its barista for insisting on mask-wearing during the coronavirus pandemic.

The fallacy of faux libertarianism is thinking that liberty rights have unlimited scope. That would mean there could be no legitimate laws or social norms since all laws and norms limit liberty in some way or another. Then the only legitimate government would be no government at all. And if no social norms were legitimate, then each of us would lack not only legal rights but also moral rights. In that case, we would have no right to liberty or anything else.

I am no fan of libertarianism, which I find problematic. But it is far more compelling than its incoherent impostor, faux libertarianism. Mask up, people, before you enter crowded, public spaces!

David DeGrazia is the Elton Professor of Philosophy at George Washington University.

View post:

Theres no right to infect - The Ledger

Justin Amash’s Tenure as the Libertarian Party’s First Member in Congress Will Be Shortlived – Reason

Amash isn't runningfor anything. After Rep. Justin Amash's brief foray into seeking the Libertarian Party's presidential nomination, many thought that Amasha Tea Party Republican turned Trump-era independent and, now, Congress' first and only Libertarian membermight try to hold his seat representing Michigan in the House of Representatives. That's not to be.

Following a Detroit News report Thursday night that Amash's congressional campaign was inactive, Amash tweeted:

I love representing our community in Congress. I always will. This is my choice, but I'm still going to miss it. Thank you for your trust.

Amash adviser Poppy Nelson had told The Detroit News earlier that Amash "hasn't been campaigning for any office and doesn't plan to seek the nomination for any office."

The paper notes that Amash's campaign "raised only $24,200 for the quarter ending June 30another indication he's not running for federal office. He previously raised over $1.1 million toward re-election."

Amash was first elected to Congress in 2010 and has served five terms.

Nicholas Sarwark, former chairman of the Libertarian National Committee, told The Detroit News that with Amash "as our first Libertarian congressmanI would like to keep that seat. But I understand if he thinks there's a better way for him to advance the Libertarian Party and improve the conditions of this countrythat he has to do what he thinks is right."

More horrifying scenes out of Portland.Earlier this week, it was federal agents shooting impact munitions at protesters in Portland, Oregonhitting one man directly in the head, knocking him over and putting him in the hospital. At the time, Sen. Ron Wyden (DOre.) accused the feds of acting like an "occupying army." Now, unidentified federal agents wearing camouflage have been driving around Portland, snatching people off the streets, and taking them away in unmarked vehicles.

"Federal law enforcement officers have been using unmarked vehicles to drive around downtown Portland and detain protesters since at least July 14," Oregon Public Broadcasting reports.

Personal accounts and multiple videos posted online show the officers driving up to people, detaining individuals with no explanation of why they are being arrested, and driving off.

The tactic appears to be another escalation in federal force deployed on Portland city streets, as federal officials and President Donald Trump have said they plan to "quell" nightly protests outside the federal courthouse and Multnomah County Justice Center that have lasted for more than six weeks.

Another good reason to wear a mask. A May 22 memo from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) explores the agency's fears that widespread mask wearing will thwart federal facial recognition programs. The memo was "drafted by the DHS Intelligence Enterprise Counterterrorism Mission Center in conjunction with a variety of other agencies, including Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement," and brought to the public's attention by The Intercept.

In its own words, the intelligence memo discusses "the potential impacts that widespread use of protective masks could have on security operations that incorporate face recognition systemssuch as video cameras, image processing hardware and software, and image recognition algorithms."

"Violent extremists and other criminals who have historically maintained an interest in avoiding face recognition" may "opportunistically seize upon public safety measures recommending the wearing of face masks to hinder the effectiveness of face recognition systems in public spaces by security partners," the feds fret, while noting that they have "no specific information" about this actually happening.

The Homeland Security memo also "cites as cause for concern tactics used in recent pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong," notes The Intercept.

D.C. efforts to decriminalize psilocybin draw interference. Yesterday members of Congresswhich still has veto power over local D.C. lawsdebated a proposal to decriminalize psychedelic mushrooms in the District. "We certainlydon't want to be known as the drug capital of the world," said Rep. Andy Harris (RMd.), who had introduced an amendment to forbid D.C. from putting the issue up for a vote this fall.

"We all can agree that policies that increase the availability of psychedelic drugs in the nation's capitalthat's dangerous," Rep. Tom Graves (RGa.) said at the House Appropriations Committee hearing.

Not all of the committee agreed.

"If the district's residents want to make mushrooms a lower priority and focus limited law enforcement resources on other issues, that is their prerogative," said Rep. Mike Quigley (DIll.).

Harris ultimately withdrew his amendmentfor now. "This is a new issue to the committee," he said in a statement. "Between now and the meeting of the conference committee this fall, the issue of whether this will be on the ballot will be resolved. Fortunately, in that time, members will also have time to learn more about this complicated medical issue."

America is seeing a dramatic shift in party affiliation. Since the start of the year, "what had been a two-percentage-point Republican advantage in U.S. party identification and leaning has become an 11-point Democratic advantage, with more of that movement reflecting a loss in Republican identification and leaning (down eight points) than a gain in Democratic identification and leaning (up five points)," notes Gallup:

Currently, half of U.S. adults identify as Democrats (32%) or are independents who lean toward the Democratic Party (18%). Meanwhile, 39% identify as Republicans (26%) or are Republican leaners (13%).

These results are based on monthly averages of Gallup U.S. telephone surveys in 2020.

Another federal execution took place yesterday:

It's impossible to reform policing without taking on police unions.

Florida man does a few things right.

See the rest here:

Justin Amash's Tenure as the Libertarian Party's First Member in Congress Will Be Shortlived - Reason

We have now reached peak Libertarianism and it is literally killing us – AlterNet

We have now reached peak Libertarianism, and this bizarre experiment that has been promoted by the billionaire class for over 40 years is literally killing us.

Back in the years before Reagan, areal estate lobbying groupcalled the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) came up with the idea of creating a political party to justify deregulating the real estate and finance industries so they could make more money. The party would give them ideological and political cover, and they developed an elaborate theology around it.

It was called the Libertarian Party, and their principal argument was that if everybody acted separately and independently, in all cases with maximum selfishness, that that would benefit society. There would be no government needed beyond an army and a police force, and a court system to defend the rights of property owners.

In 1980, billionaire David Koch ran for vice president on the newly formed Libertarian Party ticket. His platform was to privatize the Post Office, shut down all public schools, privatize Medicare and Medicaid, end food stamps and all other forms of welfare, deregulate all corporate oversight, and sell off much of the federal governments land and other assets to billionaires and big corporations.

Since then, Libertarian billionaires and right-wing media have been working hard to get Americans to agree with Ronald Reagansstatementfrom his first inaugural address that, [G]overnment is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.

And Trump is getting us there now.

Every federal agency of any consequence is now run by a lobbyist or former industry insider.

The Labor Department is trying todestroy organized labor; the Interior Department is selling off our public lands; the EPA is promoting deadly pesticides and allowing more and more pollution; the FCC is dancing to the tune of giant telecom companies; theEducation Departmentis actively working to shut down and privatize our public school systems; the USDA is shutting down food inspections; the Defense Department is run by aformer weapons lobbyist; even theIRSandSocial Securityagencies have been gutted, withtens of thousands of their employeesoffered early retirement or laid off so that very, very wealthy people are no longer being audited and the wait time for a Social Security disability claim is now overtwo years.

The guy Trump put in charge of the Post Office is activelydestroyingthe Post Office, and the bonus for Trump might be that this willthrowa huge monkey wrench in any effort to vote by mail in November.

Trump hasremovedthe United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, and fossil fuel lobbyists nowcontrolAmericas response to global warming.

Our nations response to the coronavirus has been turned over toprivate testinganddrug companies, and the Trump administration refuses to implement any official government policy, with Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar saying that its all up toindividual responsibility.

The result is more than 140,000 dead Americans and 3 million infected, with many fearing for their lives.

While the Libertarian ideas and policies promoted by that real estate lobbying group that invented the Libertarian Party have made CEOs and billionaire investors very, very rich, its killing the rest of us.

In the 1930s and 1940s, Franklin Delano Roosevelt put America back together after the Republican Great Depression and built the largest and wealthiestmiddle classin the history of the world at the time.

Now, 40 years of libertarian Reaganomics have gutted the middle class, made ahandful of oligarchswealthier than anybody in the history of the world, and brought an entire generation of hustlers and grifters into public office via the GOP.

When America was still coasting on FDRs success in rebuilding our government and institutions, nobody took very seriously the crackpot efforts to tear it all down.

Now that theyve had 40 years to make their project work, were hitting peak Libertarianism and its tearing our country apart, pitting Americans against each other, and literallykillinghundreds of people every day.

If America is to survive as a functioning democratic republic, we must repudiate the greed is good ideology of Libertarianism, get billionaires and their money out of politics, and rebuild our civil institutions.

That starts with waking Americans up to the incredible damage that 40 years of libertarian Reaganism has done to this country.

Pass it on.

Thom Hartmann is atalk-show hostand the author ofThe Hidden History of American Oligarchyand more than30 other books in print. His most recent project is a science podcast calledThe Science Revolution. He is a writing fellow at theIndependent Media Institute.

This article was produced byEconomy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

then let us make a small request. AlterNets journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. Were here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And were proud to say that weve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 yearslonger than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

Its through the generosity of our supporters that were able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone cant pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

More here:

We have now reached peak Libertarianism and it is literally killing us - AlterNet

Commentary: Mask wearing: Maybe you have a right to put your health at risk, but not that of others – West Hawaii Today

I dont need a mask! declared the San Diego woman to a Starbucks barista. The woman apparently believed she had a right to enter mask-free, contrary to the coffee bars policy. A surprising number of Americans treat expectations of mask-wearing during the coronavirus pandemic in a similar way as if these expectations were paternalistic, limiting peoples liberty for their own good. They are dead wrong.

Their thinking reflects what we might call faux libertarianism, a deformation of the classic liberal theory known as libertarianism. Libertarianism is the political and moral philosophy according to which everyone has rights to life, liberty and property and various specific rights that flow from these fundamental ones. Libertarian rights are rights of noninterference, rather than entitlements to be provided with services. So your right to life is a right not to be killed and does not include a right to life-sustaining health care services. And your right to property is a right to acquire and retain property through your own lawful actions, not a right to be provided property.

Libertarianism lies at the opposite end of the political spectrum from socialism, which asserts positive rights to such basic needs as food, clothing, housing and health care. According to libertarianism, a fundamental right to liberty supports several more specific rights including freedom of movement, freedom of association and freedom of religious worship. Neither the state nor other individuals may violate these rights of competent adults for their own protection. To do so would be unjustifiably paternalistic, say libertarians, treating grown-ups as if they needed parenting.

Why do I claim that Americans who resist mask-wearing in public embrace faux libertarianism, a disfigured version of the classic liberty-loving philosophy? Because they miss the fact that a compelling justification for mask-wearing rules is not paternalistic at all not focused on the agents own good but rather appeals to peoples responsibilities regarding public health. This point is entirely consistent with libertarianism.

Consider your right to freedom of movement. This right does not include a right to punch someone in the face, unless you both agree to a boxing match, and does not include a right to enter someone elses house, without an invitation. Rights extend only so far. They do not encompass prerogatives to harm others (without their consent) or violate their rights. Once we appreciate that rights have boundaries, rather than being limitless, we can see the relationship between liberty rights and public health.

Your rights to freedom of movement, freedom of association, and so on do not encompass a prerogative to place others at undue risk; to endanger others in this way is to violate their rights, which you have no right to do. This idea justifies our sensible laws against drunk driving. So even a libertarian can, and should, applaud Starbucks and its barista for insisting on mask-wearing during the coronavirus pandemic. Whether the woman who said she didnt need a mask had a right to ignore her own health, she had no right to put other customers and Starbucks employees at risk either directly, by possibly spreading infection, or indirectly, by flouting a norm of mask-wearing that is reasonably related to public health and protecting other people from harm and rights violations.

The fallacy of faux libertarianism is thinking that liberty rights have unlimited scopes, that ones right to freedom of association, for example, means a right to get together with anyone, at any time, under any circumstances, even if doing so endangers others. If liberty rights had unlimited scopes, then there could be no legitimate laws or social norms since all laws and norms limit liberty in some way or another. That means that, if faux libertarianism were correct, then the only legitimate government would be no government at all, which is to say anarchy as opposed to civil society. And if no social norms were legitimate, then each of us would lack not only legal rights but also moral rights. In that case, we would have no right to liberty or anything else.

Unlike libertarianism, which is a coherent outlook, faux libertarianism refutes itself by destroying any intelligible basis for rights to life, liberty, and property. I am no fan of libertarianism, which I find problematic at various levels. But it is far more compelling than its incoherent impostor, faux libertarianism. Mask up, people, before you enter crowded, public spaces!

David DeGrazi is the Elton Professor of Philosophy at George Washington University.

View post:

Commentary: Mask wearing: Maybe you have a right to put your health at risk, but not that of others - West Hawaii Today

Protests and imaginings – Counterpoint – ABC News

What is the difference between a riot and a protest and does that depend on who you ask? Dr Bradley Campbell believes so. He argues that we all make moral judgements based on what we believe. He says that 'we need to have clear definitions that allow us to classify similar behaviours consistently, regardless of whether we approve or disapprove of the cause that gave rise to these behaviours, whether we approve or disapprove of those involved, and whether we approve or disapprove of the behaviours themselves. To call something a riot, then, neednt be a way of taking sides in some larger conflict: it can just be a way of communicating whats happening'. If we has those clear definitions it 'would help us distinguish, for example, between agreeing with a cause and agreeing with a particular way of pursuing it'.

Then (at 13 mins) what would happen if the liberal order, set up in the aftermath of the second World War as a set of international institutions agreed upon by nation states, collapsed? Dr Benjamin Studebaker examines the history of the liberal order and how its changed. He argues that 'it has become an engine for globalisation, economically integrating the whole world into a singular system. The liberal order has transformed from a means of defending liberalism into a means of exporting it everywhere....it does this by making two things mobile: capital and labour'. He believes we are faced with a terrible choice, so what should we do?

Also, (at 28mins) the Australian Space Agency was established in July 2018. Two years later, how do we compare to the rest of the world? Professor Anna Moore explains that 'we are currently leaders in advanced and quantum communication that would make deep space communication possible, as well as creating unhackable communications on Earth'. We also help enable others. 'Space technologies are transferrable to Earth-bound sectors such as health and mining' and 'our nation is set to give rise to bespoke satellites that are proprietary to Australia. We will have our own satellite constellations to address critical issues like drought, water quality management and bushfires'.

Finally, (at 38 mins) it's often thought that science fiction 'is by its very nature progressive'. Jordan Alexander Hill believes otherwise. He has studied the libertarian history of science fiction. ' From conservatarian voices like Robert Heinlein, Larry Niven, Vernor Vinge, Poul Anderson, and F. Paul Wilson to those of a more flexible classical liberal bent like Ray Bradbury, David Brin, Charles Stross, Ken McLeod, and Terry Pratchett, libertarian-leaning authors have had an outsized, lasting influence on the field'. He argues that 'While dystopias satirize and allegorize the flawed political systems and social practices that govern the world we know, SF is more often about exploring new worlds and systems'. So grab a book and get reading, or put in that DVD and watch it anew.

View post:

Protests and imaginings - Counterpoint - ABC News

EYE ON ILLINOIS: Filing deadline yields clearer picture of legislative election math – The Herald-News

OK, election math fans, its time to sharpen your pencils.

Monday was the deadline for nomination petitions for third-party candidates, and although the ballot could still change with resignations, deaths, expulsions and so on (its hard to rule out anything in Illinois), in the larger sense the stakes are established for Novembers General Assembly races.

First, the baseline: there are 54 uncontested House seats, 45 will go to Democrats and nine to Republicans.

Of 64 contested races, 58 have a Democrat candidate and 55 have a Republican candidate. There now are 25 third-party candidates involved in 20 House races. Aside from five independents, there are six Green Party candidates, nine Libertarians, two from the Constitution Party and one each from the Bullmoose, Pro Guns Pro Life and Patriot parties.

A dozen House races have three official candidates, including three where no incumbent is on the ballot (the 52nd, 85th and 115th districts). Of the nine Libertarians, six are running in races with no GOP candidate. All six Green Party candidates have Republican opponents, four of those races also include a Democrat.

With a clean sweep, Democrats would have 103 of 118 House seats. They need to hold just six to retain their majority and must keep 17 for a supermajority.

If every Republican House candidate wins, the party would yield 64 seats. But with only nine guarantees theyll need to go 51-4 in contested races to reclaim the majority. File that under technically possible but highly unlikely.

There are 20 of 59 Senate seats up for election; 19 standard and one special election. Only nine are uncontested. Seven Democratic incumbents will cruise to new terms and two GOP vacancies will be filled by current House members moving up to the Senate Darren Bailey in the 55th and Terri Bryant in the 58th.

The filing deadline didnt change much here with only two third-party candidates independent Marcus Throneburg is challenging Republican Win Stoller for the right to replace retiring Sen. Chuck Weaver, and Mari Brown, of the Democracy in America party, wants to unseat Sen. Celina Villanueva in the 11th District special election.

That means Republicans and Democrats each could pick up 10 seats. The Democrats could make out at 41 of 59 seats, the GOP ceiling is 27. With 30 needed for a majority, control of the Senate is not in play, and should either of the independents win theyll likely caucus alone.

Change is a given: retirements, a primary defeat and incumbents pursuing higher office. The variety of third-party options is interesting give credit to eased ballot access requirements but ultimately, Democrats should control the Legislature.

One question remains: Will Speaker Mike Madigans bribery scandal jeopardize his House supermajority?

Scott T. Holland writes about state government issues for Shaw Media Illinois. Follow him on Twitter at @sth749. He can be reached at [ mailto:sholland@shawmedia.com ]sholland@shawmedia.com.

Read more:

EYE ON ILLINOIS: Filing deadline yields clearer picture of legislative election math - The Herald-News

Chad Blair: There’s A High Bar For Legislative Candidates Without A – Honolulu Civil Beat

Paul Shiraishi, a first-time candidate for office in Hawaii, is doing many of the important things needed to attract votes.

Hes got a great campaign website, for one, with the donate button featured on every page.

There are also great photos including Shiraishi in aloha wear with a kukui nut necklace, surfing, in his Marine uniform and with his grandmother.

He makes clear that he is offering a new, independent voice in the race to represent the state Senates 10th District (Kaimuki, Kapahulu, Palolo, Maunalani Heights, St. Louis Heights, Moiliili, Ala Wai).

Shiraishis biography is compelling, too: five years on active duty with the Marines, most of it in the Asia-Pacific region. Although born on Hawaiis ninth island i.e., Las Vegas he stresses local roots that extend three generations.

He studied economics and political science at UH Manoa, interned at the Hawaii State Judiciary and volunteered with Honolulu Habitat for Humanity.

At age 29 and ambitious, Paul Shiraishi would seem to have a good bet in getting elected to the Hawaii Legislature.

Theres just one very big catch: Shiraishi is running as a nonpartisan candidate in a mostly partisan field, for a legislative body that is heavily dominated by one political party.

According to election results going back decades, a nonpartisan candidate has yet to be elected to the Legislature. It is likely due in no small part to a state law that requires nonpartisan candidates to garner a precise number of votes in the primary election in order to advance to the general. (More on that in a minute.)

Shiraishi knows the odds and is not deterred.

If somebody doesnt necessarily agree with the Democratic Party, or maybe just wants to present competition to one-party dominance, they have nowhere to go, he said. They either pledge loyalty to Trump as a Republican, or they run as an independent. That is the only relative option.

Its not too hard to qualify for Hawaiis legislative primary ballot: A candidate must be a state resident for at least three years prior to the election, submit a petition with 15 valid signatures from registered voters in the district, fill out nomination papers and a financial disclosure form and fork over $250.

But, while Democratic, Republican, Green, Libertarian and other qualified independent party candidates have a good shot at advancing to the general election they merely have to win their race, and many partisan primary contests are uncontested or heavily favor incumbents nonpartisan candidates have one of two pathways, both largely beyond their control.

The first is to earn at least 10% of all the votes cast for the office in that particular primary. The second is to earn a vote equal to or greater than the lowest vote received by the partisan candidate who was nominated.

Heres how the State Elections Office explains it:

But is it a fair and reasonable formula? No, says one elections expert.

Its just dumb, says Richard Winger, editor of San Francisco-based Ballot Access News. I wish the Hawaii Legislature would get rid of it. There is no other state like it in the country for independent candidates, unless you include California and Washington, where the top two finishers advance.

Winger, whose expertise is recommended by the nonpartisan National Conference of State Legislatures, said the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that states cannot go above 5% as a vote requirement for moving on from the primary to the general election.

Only Georgia and Illinois use the 5% figure, and Winger said legal challenges will likely lead to throwing out the requirement. (Alabama uses 3%.)

Hawaiis 10% law was challenged in 1988 by Ted Erum, a Kauai resident. But he lost.

He should have won, said Winger.

Minor parties such as Green and Libertarian have had greater success in challenging and changing election laws because they have members. But nonpartisan candidates are invariably solo operators, so its hard to lobby on their behalf, said Winger.

Still, nearly every state legislator in the country is either a Democrat or a Republican, with minor party and independents making with the exception of states like Vermont and Alaska few inroads.

And here at home Greens and Libertarians have yet to send one of their own to the Hawaii Legislature.

The primary vote hurdle likely scares off candidates running as an NP.

Of the 29 candidates running for 13 state Senate seats this year, only two are nonpartisan. Of the 131 candidates running for 51 state House seats, only three are nonpartisan.

Heres another hurdle: Even though Hawaii voters are not required to register their party affiliation with the state, primary voters can only pick the ballot of one party in the primary. Its called an open primary, in that voters may choose which partys ballot to vote, as the NCSL puts it.

This permits a voter to cast a vote across party lines for the primary election, says the NCSL. Critics argue that the open primary dilutes the parties ability to nominate. Supporters say this system gives voters maximal flexibility allowing them to cross party lines and maintains their privacy.

Sen. Les Ihara says he welcomes electoral competition.

Nathan Eagle/Civil Beat

But here is whats undemocratic to me: In the general election this year voters could, if they so choose, vote for a Republican for the U.S. House, a Democrat for the state Senate and a Green or Libertarian or Aloha Aina party candidate for the state House. But in the primary they can only pull one partys ballot or the nonpartisan ballot.

The trend line may be moving away from party politics. While races for Congress, governor and lieutenant governor remain partisan in Hawaii, all county offices are nonpartisan.

Sen. Les Ihara, 69, who has served in the Legislature since 1987 first in the House and since 1995 in the Senate says he welcomes Shiraishi to the District 10 race. Same goes for his Democratic primary opponents Vicki Higgins and Jesus Arriola.

My policy is to always have competition because you have to give voters a choice, said Ihara. I trust the voters will vote on who they think is best.

Thus far, in Iharas case it has always been him and the races have not been very close. He won the 2016 primary and general each with 70% of the vote.

Because about 8,000 people voted in the 2016 primary, Shiraishi figures he needs to get between 800 and 900 votes on Aug. 8 in order to go on to Nov. 3.

I hope Paul makes it past this years primary election, or else there is only the Democratic winners name on the general ballot, said Ihara. If its me, it might be my first ever unopposed general election.

And that may be the biggest reason Shiraishi is running, besides wanting to serve: to offer choice.

Win or lose, I really feel it should be easier to run as a nonpartisan and qualify for the general, especially given the state of politics in 2020, said Shiraishi, who said his politics lean conservative but he broke with the GOP over Trump. There is a frustration about divisive party politics with the president obviously but also with Democrats.

Sign Up

Sorry. That's an invalid e-mail.

Thanks! We'll send you a confirmation e-mail shortly.

Originally posted here:

Chad Blair: There's A High Bar For Legislative Candidates Without A - Honolulu Civil Beat

The Business of Drugs: Why The US Drug War Can NEVER Be Won – Screen Rant

Why won't the U.S. ever win the war on drugs? Here's why America is complicit, according to the Netflix documentary series The Business of Drugs.

The United Stateswill never win the war on drugs because, according toThe Business of Drugs, a Netflixdocumentary series hosted by Amaryllis Fox, America is complicit in a distribution operationthat most people don't fully understand. The Business of Drugs doesn't identifyone specific reason why the U.S. drug war will fail, butdoes explain various factors that make it almost impossible to stop the worldwide distribution of drugs like cocaine, heroin, and meth, along with synthetics and opioids.

The Business of Drugs isn't focused solely on the U.S. drug war, and that thematic choiceconnects to America'sinability to prevent narcotics trafficking. Divided into six episodes, all of which prioritizesocietalrealitiesover societalcliches, the Netflix documentary series aims to educate streamers about the relationship between Digital Age economics andculture shifts. The Business of Drugs opens with Fox explaining her backstory, as she was raised by an economist and lived in various international locations before ultimately working as a CIA analyst for 10 years. She's the wife ofRobert F. Kennedy III and the inspiration for the upcoming Apple TV+ series starring Brie Larson.In The Business of Drugs, Fox travels the world and attempts to understand the motivating factors for drug producers and distributors.

Related:How To Fix A Drug Scandal: Biggest Reveals From Netflix's Documentary

In the first episode of The Business of Drugs on Netflix, appropriately titled "Cocaine," Fox pieces together a narrative that ultimately connects to the United States drug war. She visits the Colombian port town Buenaventura, and learns thatthe only viable way to survive, at least for many locals, is to participate in cocaine production and distribution. The problem, however, is that a pyramid structure allows the most powerful figures to control rates that never really seem to change.Now, in 2020,the "value chain" allows Mexican drug cartels to sustain power through violence, with Sinaloa being the "gold standard" for the operation. Essentially, risk equals profitability, and cocaine demand from the United States means that many drug-hungry Americans inadvertently fund"a chain of human suffering," according to Fox. The Business of Drugs host also states that "Legalization may seem pretty extreme to most Americans, but as long as thedemand continues to climb, and the prices remain astronomically high became of no legal competition, I can't help wonder whether legalization and regulation is the only real option."

Fox digs deeper in The Business of Drugs episode about heroin, as she details how Kenya has become the new hub for international distribution. The host, who once lived in Africaas a child, admits that she doesn't correlate acity like Mombasa with heroin, andtherein lies the problem for the U.S. drug war. Methods of distribution continue to rapidly change in different parts of the world, andnarco-traffickers find new ways to exploit people working for them. According to Fox, "the real story lies in distribution." She states that the drug war involves fighting "darkness" and "evil," and that the war on drugs "has not made a dent." Overall, the Netflix documentary serieslinks American complicity to American naivete.

The Business of Drugs features a revelatory episode about meth production and distribution in Myanmar, with Fox reinforcing the idea thatTruly understanding the way things connect is the only we we can hope to change them." To her, it's seemingly impossible to prevent meth distribution if people don't know that Myanmar produces pills like McDonald's produces hamburgers. That's not a joke either, as one intervieweeconfirms.

As for synthetic drugs like MDMA, otherwise known as "Molly" or "Ecstasy," The Business of Drugs shows that America mostly correlates the drugs with clubs kids rather than with itstherapeutic potential, especiallyfor people suffering from PTSD. InThe Business of Drugs series finale on Netflix, Fox sums up the U.S. drug war problem by referencing "a terrible collision of circumstances." Regulations affects big business, big business affects politicians. Meanwhile, innovative drug distributors find new ways to deliver their product while manipulating rates and employees whoneed drug money to survive. The war on drugs isn't necessarily about good vs. bad, it's about information and power (among many other sociopolitical and economic factors).

More:Ecstasy May Be The Answer To PTSD Reveals Netflix's Business of Drugs

The Walking Dead: How Long Rick Was In The Coma

Q.V. Hough is a Screen Rant staff writer. He's also the founding editor at Vague Visages, and has contributed to RogerEbert.com and Fandor.

See more here:

The Business of Drugs: Why The US Drug War Can NEVER Be Won - Screen Rant

Police Murders and the War on Drugs – LA Progressive

What George Floyd and Breonna Taylor can teach us about the history of the War on Drugs and needed police reforms

The murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor ignited protests around the nation calling for major police reform. The calls for police reform include many layers, and one important question to rise is the role of policing drug use and the militarized way the War on Drugs has been fought in this country for over 40 years. Using armed police to deal with drug abuse has been one of the most ineffective and costly aspects of the War on Drugs costly in terms of resources and costly in terms of lives. Now is the time to finally change the way we envision our countrys War on Drugs and how we, as a society, handle the effects of drug use and abuse.

Using armed police to deal with drug abuse has been one of the most ineffective and costly aspects of the War on Drugs

The arrest, murder, and original autopsy report for George Floyd reminds us of the long history of deeply rooted stereotypes associating black men with drug use and drug crimes. During Floyds arrest when he was face down on the pavement on a south Minneapolis street corner, Officer Thomas Lane told Officer Derek Chauvin that he was worried about excited delirium. Chauvin responded with thats why we have him on his stomach. A few minutes later George Floyd was dead.

Excited delirium is a controversial diagnosis in which people can become aggressive, incoherent, and exhibit superhuman strength after taking stimulant drugs such as methamphetamine or cocaine. It is important to note that this condition is not recognized by the American Psychiatric Association nor the World Health Organization. In fact, critics of this diagnosis often argue it is used to excuse death caused by use of force from police officers. Research shows that in cases of unexpected death associated with the controversial state of excited delirium, the deaths were associated with restraint, with the person in the prone position, and pressure on the neck.

Even more problematic is the fact that excited delirium is disproportionately cited as the cause of death in cases where black and Hispanic men die in the custody of police. There is also ample evidence to suggest that even without the concern of excited delirium, police use more force against people of color than against whites. For example, a recent study after the murder of George Floyd showed that in Minneapolis the police use force against black people 7 times more often than against white people. And recent research shows that at the national level black men are approximately 2.5 times more likely than white men to be killed by the police. Moreover, there is a substantial amount of research showing black people are more likely than white people to be pulled over and searched while driving, despite the fact that drugs are found more often on white people.

George Floyds death was not caused by excited delirium. Even though the police were not called for a drug-related crime in this case, we must take this opportunity to acknowledge the fear and stereotypes present during Floyds arrest, and be critical of how they may have contributed to his murder at the hands of police.

The Hennepin County Medical Examiner autopsy report for George Floyd reported the presence of fentanyl and methamphetamine in his system at the time of his death. This prompted many media outlets to highlight this piece of the autopsy report, such as that published by celebrity website TMZ, suggesting somehow Floyd was to blame for his own death.

The mention of drugs in this case conjures an image of the black male drug user that is rooted in a long history of stereotyping black men as drug users who are threatening and criminal. This false narrative is dangerous and is often used to divert conversations from the real consequences of the abuse of power by police. It also works to erase how the War on Drugs has led to the over-policing of drug crimes in black and brown communities.

According to experts in this field and multiple autopsy reports, including the aforementioned report by the Hennepin County Medical Examiner, Floyds death was not caused by drug use, and we need to be vigilant against letting the presence of drugs in Floyds system distract us from the fact that he was murdered by a police officer. Being a drug user should not be viewed as a justification for murder.

Associating black men with drug use and criminality is nothing new. For example, in 1914, the New York Times published an article by a prominent physician stating cocaine gave black men supernatural powers and made them impervious to bullets. The associations made between black men and drug use and crime contributes to the extreme racial bias in how the War on Drugs continues to play out, targeting poor communities of color.

In 1982 when the War on Drugs was announced, drug use rates were on the decline in the United States. Despite this fact, policing for drug crimes on the street increased substantially, especially in communities of color, and incarceration rates for drug crimes skyrocketed, especially among black men. This all occurred even though black and white people used drugs at essentially the same rates.

Research shows that even though black people represent 12.5% of illicit drug use in the United States, they represent 29% of those arrested for drug offenses and 33% of those incarcerated for drug offenses. Even in an era of states legalizing marijuana around the nation, black people are arrested at higher rates for marijuana possession in every single state despite data showing black people do not use more marijuana than white people. Simply put, the War on Drugs has negatively impacted black and brown lives far more than it has impacted white lives, and it is imperative that we, as a country, finally fight to end the War on Drugs.

We should all be wary of police treating United States citizens as enemies in a war like the one we have seen with the War on Drugs. This was recently demonstrated in the tragic death of Breonna Taylor, a black woman who was killed by police during the execution of a no-knock warrant while she was sleeping in her home.

This case, along with George Floyds case, has fueled wide-spread protests around the world. A common demand within these protests has called for defunding the police, arguing that armed police are not the appropriate way to handle many of the reasons people call for help in the first place. Drug use and intoxication is a good example of this. Drug abuse is defined by the American Psychological Association as a mental health condition, and the criminality of drug use lies within the definitions of what drugs are legal to use based on laws that have changed throughout the history of our country and continue to change even today.

For example, all drug use used to be legal in this country, and during the time of prohibition, alcohol was once criminalized and made illegal. Laws related to drug use change as society changes. Police officers, the people charged with enforcing whatever drug laws are on the books at the time, are not experts in drug abuse and mental health. In fact, unlike mental health care providers and social workers who are educated about drugs and their effects and how to handle situations involving drug abuse and intoxication, police are trained to use a continuum of force and arrest authority to manage situations. This may result in the escalation of force, and sometimes deadly force, being used in situations that may have turned out differently if police were not the first to respond, especially considering police training inadequately prepares officers to de-escalate situations. This is an area of public safety that should be deferred to professionals with the expertise and sensitivity to handle these challenging situations, and we are starting to see more focus on this approach due to recent events.

The cost for the War on Drugs has not been shared equally. The increased militarization of police, which coincided with the implementation of the War on Drugs, has not made our communities safer. Instead, the militarized fight of the War on Drugs has been utilized disproportionaley on black and Latino citizens and has contributed to the mass incarceration of our citizens, mainly lower income people of color, and the unjust murders of many civilians, including Breonna Taylor.

The United States now incarcerates more people per capita than any other nation in the world. Research also shows that increased military equipment positively correlates with increased police killings of civilians. Furthermore, in the four decades after the declaration of the War on Drugs and subsequent police militarization, drug use among American citizens has increased.

Clearly, the use of SWAT teams and military weapons to battle drug-related crime has been wholly ineffective at reducing drug use and drug trafficking. Our communities should not be treated as warzones and the people of this country should not be treated as wartime enemies, especially when the militarized tactics do not work to reduce drug use and instead have been shown to be racially biased. Put simply, we should not be treating public health issues, such as drug use and abuse, with militant police responses.

The call for police reform has been around long before the murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor, and recent polls show that nearly 70% of Americans believe the murder of George Floyd represents a broader problem within law enforcement rather than an isolated incident. Now is the time for us to finally take a critical look at law enforcement in our country and reimagine what policing and community safety could look like, including the way we police drug crimes and enforce drug laws. In so doing, we can finally ensure justice, safety, and human dignity are actual priorities in our society.

The demonization and conflation of drug use and blackness in this country has, for far too long, been rationale and justification for murder. Let this moment be an opportunity to change that narrative. The murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor should not turn into more cases where we blame black people for the circumstance in which they find themselves. To do so would strip George Floyd and Breonna Taylor of their humanity and betrays the complete and utter lack of humanity shown by the officers in these cases. This is a narrative we have seen play out far too often in our country. George Floyd did not die from drug use. He was murdered at the hands of a police officer who had taken an oath to protect and serve.

Breonna Taylor was not a casualty of war. She was a victim of a decades-long campaign that has proven to be ineffective and damages the fabric of our society by punishing low-income black and brown communities unequally. George Floyds six year-old daughter Gianna Floyd said daddy changed the world. May her words ring true for generations to come and may we finally end the War on Drugs.

Jessica Siegel and Jessica Hodge

Jessica A. Siegel is Associate Professor, Psychology & Neuroscience, at the University of St. Thomas. Her research examines the long-term effects of methamphetamine exposure on the brain and behavior using a mouse model. She is currently exploring the effects of adolescent methamphetamine exposure on brain function and behavior, specifically examining the dopamine transporters in the striatum and serum cortisol levels. She is also interested in how other drugs, such as nicotine, interact with the effects of methamphetamine in the adolescent brain. She teaches Brain & Human Behavior and Drugs & Behavior in the Psychology Department, and Principles of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology in the Neuroscience Program.

Jessica Hodge is an Associate Professor in the Department of Justice & Society Studies and the Faculty Director with the Center for the Common Good at the University of St. Thomas. Prior to joining the faculty at UST, Dr. Hodge was an Assistant Professor at UMKC where she was also affiliated with the Womens and Gender Studies program. She received a doctorate in Criminology from the University of Delaware, and her primary research interests and publications are related to gender and crime issues, juvenile justice policies and practices, and the development and enforcement of hate crime laws.

See original here:

Police Murders and the War on Drugs - LA Progressive