How to survive the apocalypse: A practical guide to the end of days – CNET

Getty Images This story is part of Road Trip 2020, CNET's series on how we're preparing now for what could come next.

Frankly, 2020 feels pretty apocalyptic.

If you had global pandemic, catastrophic bushfires, trans-atlantic dust storm, murder hornets, plagues of locusts, zombie cicadas and monkeys stealing vials of COVID blood on your bingo card, then you win.

But if the world was really reaching the end of days, is there anything we could do to stop the carnage? Can we really prepare for doomsday?

It's a question we've been asking ourselves for a long time. In the 1950s, Bert the Turtle coached schoolchildren across the United States to Duck and Cover to avoid "the atomic bomb." In more recent years, Bear Grylls taught ordinary suburbanites how to stay alive if they, too, should find themselves in the wild, by fossicking for edible bugs.

But with so many potential disasters facing us and so many ways to prepare for each one, where can the average person start? What choices can we make now that could really make a difference later?

Thankfully, before the murder hornets started rearing their heads and the global outbreak hit, I spent a good deal of time trying to answer that very question. For CNET's recent documentary series Hacking the Apocalypse I travelled around the United States speaking to leading experts about how to escape the end of days. Just how real is the threat of Nuclear Winter? Will the world run out of water? Is the entire Pacific Northwest going to be carved off by a giant earthquake and tsunami?

In the spirit of "forewarned is forearmed," let's walk through the apocalyptic situations you could face -- and how you can survive.

From the lab to your inbox. Get the latest science stories from CNET every week.

First up, there's not much use in preparing for the kind of cataclysmic, world-ending scenarios you've seen in your standard Roland Emmerich film -- you can't duck and cover from a giant asteroid impact or alien invasion.

But on the plus side, the odds of an event that catastrophic happening in our lifetimes is pretty slim. NASA's Planetary Defense Coordination Office keeps track of "Near Earth Objects" and even those giant space rocks defined as "Potentially Hazardous Objects" are still only within 4.7 million miles of our planet. As for aliens, the best advice is make yourself valuable to the invading race so they don't force you toil in their underground sugar caves.

Now playing: Watch this: Surviving a nuclear apocalypse in a luxury doomsday bunker

15:12

There are roughly 14,000 nuclear weapons in the world and 90% of them are in the hands of Russia and the US, according to atmospheric scientist and nuclear expert Professor Brian Toon. And even the smallest weapon in the US arsenal (100 kilotons) would cause catastrophic devastation if it was detonated over a major city. Everything in a six-mile diameter would catch on fire and be destroyed.

"If you get within a mile or so [of the blast], the pressure wave is so intense, it will blow down concrete buildings," Toon told me. "And somewhere in that zone, there's a blast of radiation from the bomb basically half of the people exposed to that would die over a week or two from radiation burns on their skin and radiation poisoning."

If you survive the initial impact, your troubles are far from over. These kinds of nuclear blasts generate city-wide fires that would push smoke into the stratosphere, blocking out the sun for 10 years and sending temperatures back to what Earth experienced during the last ice age.

A nuclear blast would lead to fires that could block out the sun and bring about a nuclear winter.

The only way you survive in the immediate vicinity is to head underground. If you're used to the finer things in life, you might head to a place like the Survival Condo in rural Kansas, which offers luxury apartments and features like a cinema, swimming pool and climbing wall, all 15 storeys underground -- for $1 million a pop.

If that's not your vibe and you're further away from the impact zone, you could wait out Nuclear Winter in a prepping community, like Fortitude Ranch in West Virginia. It won't protect you from a direct blast, but it's ideal if you're looking for strength in numbers to survive the long, cold years of a post-apocalyptic winter with no food. And its rural location places it far away from city-dwelling marauding hordes.

There's also another solution -- work to stop the bombs from dropping in the first place. Considering donating to organizations like the Nuclear Threat Initiative or the Ploughshares Fund that work towards global nuclear disarmament.

For the better part of a century, the threat of a devastating pandemic has been the stuff of history books or Hollywood science fiction. Until 2020 rolled around.

Now, we've all had a crash course in pandemic survival -- from washing our hands thoroughly and wearing a mask, to social distancing and putting up with long lines at supermarkets. Oh, and did I mention the mask?

The fact is, most of us haven't had time to rush out and get an epidemiology degree since the coronavirus began sweeping around the world, so we have to put our trust in experts trained in pandemic response. They're the public health policymakers who have been walking through pandemic simulations for decades. They're the front-line health care workers putting their lives on the line to look after us in our time of need. And they're the scientists working overtime on developing a vaccine and new treatments that could help us develop immunity before we get sick.

As we've all learned, surviving a pandemic is a waiting game. But while you wait, we'll say it again -- wear that mask!

Some catastrophic events -- pandemic, nuclear posturing -- build slowly. Others come with zero warning, giving you minutes to make a life or death decision.

An earthquake or tornado could come in the middle of the night. You may have 10 minutes to escape a tsunami. And the difference between being in the direct path of a hurricane and missing it altogether can be a matter of tragic luck.

This tsunami survival capsule is designed to protect people living in tsunami-prone areas from deadly waves and debris.

Thankfully technology is being used in the fight against natural disasters. Firefighters are using big data to predict the path of wildfires in the US and Australia. Researchers are developing ways to use nuclear weapons tracking technology to detect infrasonic signals from tornados and predicting volcano eruptions with drones and lasers. And even when disasters can't be stopped, humans are getting resourceful. Facing a tsunami? You can always jump in your own personal escape pod.

Regardless of the disaster situation, there are things you can do to protect yourself. Be ready to evacuate. Store your important documents (passports, birth certificates) in one place. And pack a go-bag. What you pack will depend on the biggest threats in your area -- a go-bag looks different if you're packing it in earthquake-prone San Francisco or for a bushfire-prone house in Australian bush. But having everything in one spot will be a lifesaver if you're trying to get out quickly in the middle of the night.

Now playing: Watch this: How to pack a survival kit

5:09

Let's get this out of the way. We're beyond the debate about whether climate change is real -- it's a global emergency. And it's being spurred on by human actions. But despite the constant signs of climate change -- devastating fires in Australia, snow turning green in Antarctica, rising seas threatening Venice, the hottest five year stretch on Earth, ever -- humanity is well and truly dragging its feet on doing anything about the problem. This is the slow burn of apocalypses -- the threat feels distant, but we'll all feel the flames eventually.

You can prepare for the effects of climate change (see natural disasters above) but there are also steps you can take to make a difference when it comes to the cause.

Cut your power use. Drive less. Shop ethically (by choosing sustainable brands, working out where and how your clothes are made or even choosing vintage fashion). Reduce your reliance on plastics. And try cutting down on red meat (did you know beef production requires 28 times more land and 11 times more water than pork or chicken?)

And while you're making changes at home, lobby for change at the higher level. Call or write to your local politician (a social media like or retweet might feel like easy activism, but it's much easier for policymakers to dismiss). And make sure your views on climate change are felt at the ballot box. Enrol to vote.

If the apocalypse is coming and there's no way out, there may be one last way you can escape certain death. But you'll need to be dead first.

Welcome to the strange world of cryonics -- the experimental procedure that allows you to put your body in sub-zero "suspended animation," after you've been pronounced clinically dead.

It's unproven and, according to experts, not possible under the laws of neuroscience and biology as we know them. But proponents say it could be a way to gain a second life. By reducing your body temperature post-mortem and pumping your body full of medical-grade antifreeze, cryonicists say it's possible to vitrify a person's brain and organs so they can be preserved for decades in liquid nitrogen, sitting inside a stainless steel tank at -196 degrees Celsius. From there, it may be possible for future generations to restore you to full life (though the details on that side of the equation are sketchy at best).

It's not for everybody (not least because the procedure will set you back $220,000). But if you want to go all-in on a speculative second chance at life, it could be more of a sure thing compared to having your body incinerated and your ashes scattered to the winds.

The final way to escape the end of the world? Leave the world altogether. In the 2020s, humanity is once again turning its eyes skyward and planning ways to get off the planet -- sending the first woman and the next man to the moon and then sending humans on to Mars.

There's no doubt this is a long play. We won't be getting back to the moon until at least 2024. And while billionaires like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos want to turn humans into a multiplanetary species and have us living in floating space colonies, that won't happen any time soon.

But if you're a long-term prepper, there's no harm in getting your ducks in a row. Throw your hat in the ring for NASA's astronaut training program, start thinking about where you'll live on Marsand get ready for a very long commute (with a lot of naps). Just think of it like 2020 on steroids -- social distancing and isolation, taken to the extreme.

Now playing: Watch this: Escape to Mars: How you'll get there and where you'll...

13:59

See more here:

How to survive the apocalypse: A practical guide to the end of days - CNET

Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin Cryptocurrencies To Trade At The Stock Market As Grayscale Wins FINRA Approval – Yahoo Finance

Grayscale Investments, a company that manages cryptocurrency funds, announced Monday that shares of its Bitcoin Cash trust and Litecoin Trust have been approved for public listing by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

What Happened

The listings will representthe two cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin Cash (BCH)and Litecoin (LTC),which have market capitalizations of $4.2 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively.

Bitcoin Cash or BCash was created as a hard fork to the world's apex cryptocurrency in 2017.

Former Alphabet Inc.(NASDAQ: GOOGL) (NASDAQ: GOOG) employee Charlie Leecreated Litecoin as a Bitcoin-spinoff in October 2011, with theintention to make cryptocurrency transactions faster.

This would be the first time ever that publicly listed securities have ever derived their value from these cryptocurrencies.

The Bitcoin Cash trust will trade under the symbol BCHG and the Litcoin Trust under LTCN on the otc markets.

Grayscales offerings will allow institutional investors access to these cryptocurrencies, who have concerns about purchasing such assets directly, Fortunenoted. The shares will reportedly trade at a premium to the price of their underlying crypto assets.

Why It Matters

GreyscaleBitcoin Trust (OTC: GBTC)shares are said to be one of the top five equities held by millennials even ahead of shares of Netflix Inc, (NASDAQ: NFLX) according to Fortune.

The company has six such offerings, includingGreyscale Ethereum Trust (OTC: ETHE) and Greyscale Ethereum Classic Trust (OTC: ETCG).

Greyscales shares trade on the OTCQX, which is overseen by FINRA and does not require registration with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Price Action

Bitcoin Cash traded nearly 0.2% lower at $169.67 at press time on Tuesday, according to CoinMarketCap data. Litecoin traded about 0.4% lower at $42.35.

See more from Benzinga

2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

View post:

Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin Cryptocurrencies To Trade At The Stock Market As Grayscale Wins FINRA Approval - Yahoo Finance

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers July 22nd, 2020 – FX Empire

It was a bullish start to the day. Bitcoin rallied from an early morning intraday low $9,174.4 to an early afternoon intraday high $9,457.2.

Bitcoin broke through the major resistance levels before falling back to $9,340 levels.

The pullback saw Bitcoin fall through the third major resistance level at $9,358.03 before returning to $9,400 levels.

Resistance at $9,400 capped the upside late in the day.

The near-term bullish trend remained intact in spite of the early July pullback to sub-$9,000 levels. For the bears, Bitcoin would need to slide through the 62% FIB of $6,400 to form a near-term bearish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was a bullish day on Tuesday.

Tezos led the way, rallying by 9.29%.

Bitcoin Cash SV (+5.60%), Cardanos ADA (+4.66%), Ethereum (+4.13%), Litecoin (+4.53%), also found strong support.

Binance Coin (+1.43%), Bitcoin Cash ABC (+2.60%), EOS (+2.32%), Moneros XMR (+0.68%), Ripples XRP (+2.53%), Stellars Lumen (+2.59%), and Trons TRX (+2.42%) trailed the front runners.

At the start of the week, the crypto total market cap fell to a Monday low $262.70bn before striking a Tuesday high $274.62bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $270.71bn.

Bitcoins dominance fell to a Monday low 63.20% before rising to a Tuesday high 64.08%. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 63.76%.

More here:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers July 22nd, 2020 - FX Empire

What was statue’s true meaning? (letter) | Letters To The Editor – LancasterOnline

How do we determine the meaning of the Native American and African figures included on the equestrian statue of Theodore Roosevelt at the American Museum of Natural History in New York? Why were these figures included? Why were they not Caucasian men? The statues sculptor is long gone, but I believe he had a reason for the inclusion of these two specific men. Some believe their inclusion is demeaning and called for the statue to be removed, because the figures are depicted as being in servitude to Roosevelt.

However, it could also be interpreted that the sculptor of the statue knew President Roosevelt valued the lives of all people and by including these figures, he honored men of Native American and African descent by placing them in a prominent position next to Roosevelt. How will we ever know the sculptors intent? We cant.

But I choose to believe these figures were included with much thought in mind and had meaning. The meaning was to honor the men of these nationalities, not to demean them, as they are shown walking with Roosevelt as he sat astride his horse. The statue should not be removed because of some peoples prejudices or feelings of political correctness unless their view is backed up by specifics, not only interpretation. Wouldnt it be nice if a plaque describing the statue and its meaning had been included?

Subscribe today for only $2

' + submsgtxthtml + '

Get unlimited access to breaking news, ancestry archives, our daily E-newspaper, games and more.

Subscribe today for only $2

' + submsgtxthtml + '

Get unlimited access to breaking news, ancestry archives, our daily E-newspaper, games and more.

Subscribe today for only $2

' + submsgtxthtml + '

Get unlimited access to breaking news, ancestry archives, our daily E-newspaper, games and more.

Subscribe today for only $2

' + submsgtxthtml + '

See more here:

What was statue's true meaning? (letter) | Letters To The Editor - LancasterOnline

Five things John Lewis taught us about getting in good trouble – Brookings Institution

Get in good trouble, necessary trouble, and redeem the soul of America. John Lewis made this statement on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama on March 1, 2020 commemorating the tragic events of Bloody Sunday. Bloody Sunday occurred on March 7, 1965 as peaceful protesters were beaten by law enforcement officers for crossing the bridge. Lewis and others like Amelia Boynton Robinson were beaten so badly they were hospitalized.

The context behind the march is significant. The 600-person civil rights march was actually about police brutality. Jimmie Lee Jackson, a 26-year-old church deacon, was killed by James Bonard Fowler, a state trooper in Alabama. This march also occurred a year and a half after the infamous March on Washington highlighting that little had changed in the lives of Black people in America. Bloody Sunday was highlighted in Ava Duvernays Oscar-nominated best picture film Selma. Musicians John Legend and Common won an Oscar for the song Glory.

Bloody Sunday is often noted as a pinnacle of Lewis life. This defining moment encapsulates five things he taught us about getting in good trouble.

Vote, always

Your vote matters. If it didnt, why would some people keep trying to take it away? #goodtrouble Lewis sent this tweet on July 3, 2018. It highlights his lifes workequitable voting. One major part of the Civil Rights Movement was Black people gaining the right to vote. This finally occurred with the Voting Rights Act of 1965. But the Shelby v Holder Supreme Court decision in 2013 essentially gutted the Voting Rights Act and paved the way for widespread voter suppression and gerrymandering.

This is why it is imperative for Congress to act swiftly to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to ensure equitable access to the polls. Lewis was an original Freedom Rider, participated in many sit-ins, and was arrested dozens of times for people to have the right to vote. Some of us gave a little blood for the right to participate in the democratic process, said Lewis. Now, Congress must honor Lewis legacy and ensure an equitable participation in the democratic process.As Lewis noted, The vote is precious. It is almost sacred. It is the most powerful non-violent tool we have in a democracy.

Never too young to make a difference

As a founder and leader of the Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), Lewis was the youngest person to speak at the March on Washington. Elder civil rights leaders aimed to taper his words. Lewis was critical of the Kennedy administration and the slowness by which broad scale legislation change was occurring at the federal level. Lewis also critiqued civil rights legislation for not addressing police brutality against Black people. Imagine how this moment in the Movement for Black Lives may be different had elder Civil Rights leaders listened to Lewis. Lewis youth gave him a vision for a more transformative society that was mostly socialized out and, in some cases beaten out, of older leaders. Lewis teaches us that age is nothing but a number and young people have to be the change they want to see by pushing and forcing older people for equitable change. Older people are often socialized in the current arrangement of society and cannot fully envision a radically different world. Lewis stated, I want to see young people in America feel the spirit of the 1960s and find a way to get in the way. To find a way to get in trouble. Good trouble, necessary trouble. Young people can and should push for transformative change and hold us accountable to it.

Speak truth to power

Speak up, speak out, get in the way, said Lewis. He taught us the importance of speaking up and speaking out. We have to be willing to speak up about injustice, always, no matter the costs. My grandfather who served in two wars earning a Purple Heart and Bronze Star taught me from birth that my silence is my acceptance. Lewis stated, When you see something that is not right, not fair, not just, you have to speak up. You have to say something; you have to do something. This motto should apply in all aspects of our lives. Lewis epitomizes it and encourages us to not be silent. He was adamant about supporting free speech, but he was also adamant about condemning hate speech.I believe in freedom of speech, but I also believe that we have an obligation to condemn speech that is racist, bigoted, anti-Semitic, or hateful.

Become a racial equity broker

Lewis is the personification of transitioning from a political activist to a politician. I frame it as transitioning from a racial equity advocate to a racial equity broker. A racial equity advocate speaks up and speaks out, stands in the gap, and sits at the table to advocate for people who cannot advocate for themselves. There is a saying If you are not at the table, you are on the menu and someone is eating you for lunch. Shirley Chisholm said, If they dont give you a seat at the table, bring a folding chair. Lewis realized that to make transformative change, he had to be at the table and often bring his own chair. Once at the table, he realized that he needed to help draft the documents that got discussed at the table. This led him to becoming an elected official and a racial equity broker to alter, deconstruct, and restructure the laws, policies, procedures, and rules that inhibit racial equity.

Never give up

When Lewis was elected to Congress in 1986, one of his first bills was the creation of a national museum to chronicle the history, culture, and successes of Black Americans. The culmination of this bill was passed in 2003 and opened in 2016 as the National Museum of African American History and Culture. Lewis taught us persistence. He taught us that when a person has transformative ideas, they should not taper those ideas. Instead, they should push those ideas until others get on board. Simply because change is slow does not mean change agents have to move slowly towards it. Lewis was a lightning bolt for equity, social change, and social justice. We must continue his legacy, never forget history, pursue equity, and get in good trouble.

Original post:

Five things John Lewis taught us about getting in good trouble - Brookings Institution

Judge Orders Cohen Released, Citing Retaliation Over Tell-All Book – The New York Times

When Michael D. Cohen, President Trumps one-time lawyer and fixer, met with probation officers this month to complete paperwork that would have let him serve the balance of his prison term at home, he found a catch.

Mr. Cohen was already out on furlough because of the coronavirus. But to remain at home, he was asked to sign a document that would have barred him from publishing a book during the rest of his sentence. Mr. Cohen balked because he was, in fact, writing a book a tell-all memoir about his former boss, the president.

The officers sent him back to prison.

On Thursday, a federal judge ruled that the decision to return Mr. Cohen to custody amounted to retaliation by the government and ordered him to be released again into home confinement. Mr. Cohen is expected back in his Manhattan apartment on Friday.

I make the finding that the purpose of transferring Mr. Cohen from furlough and home confinement to jail is retaliatory, the judge, Alvin K. Hellerstein of Federal District Court in Manhattan, said in court. And its retaliatory because of his desire to exercise his First Amendment rights to publish a book and to discuss anything about the book or anything else he wants on social media and with others.

Judge Hellersteins decision was a remarkable rebuke of prison and probation officials and, by extension, the Trump administration. It raised concerns that the authorities had used the penal system to squelch the free speech rights of one of Mr. Trumps enemies in an effort to protect the president.

Justin Long, a spokesman for the Bureau of Prisons, said that it was not uncommon for prison officials to restrict inmates contact with the media. But he said that Mr. Cohens refusal to agree to the media ban played no role whatsoever in the decision to remand him to secure custody, nor did his intent to publish a book.

Any assertion that the decision to remand Michael Cohen to prison was a retaliatory action is patently false, Mr. Long said.

The question of Mr. Cohens release came before Judge Hellerstein after Mr. Cohen sued U.S. officials on Monday night, claiming that the Trump administration had sent him back to custody to prevent him from completing the book, violating his freedom of speech.

In court papers, Mr. Cohen said the book would paint Mr. Trump as a racist and offer revealing details about the presidents behavior behind closed doors.

Mr. Cohen also pointed out that Mr. Trump and his supporters had sought to derail the publication of books written by John R. Bolton, the former national security adviser, and Mr. Trumps niece, Mary L. Trump, whose best-selling memoir laid bare a history of dysfunction in her family.

E. Danya Perry, one of Mr. Cohens lawyers, called the judges order a victory for the First Amendment.

The court hearing on Thursday was the latest chapter in a long-running saga. Mr. Cohen, a legal bulldog who once bragged he would take a bullet for Mr. Trump, pleaded guilty in 2018 to campaign finance violations and other crimes and was sentenced to three years in prison.

As he entered his plea, Mr. Cohen pointed the finger at the president, telling the court that Mr. Trump had directed him during the 2016 election to arrange hush money payments to two women who claimed they had had affairs with Mr. Trump. The president has denied those allegations.

The provision that Mr. Cohen, 53, objected to would have barred him from engagement of any kind with the media, including print, TV, film, books. It also sought to keep him from posting on social media, according to a copy of the agreement attached to his lawsuit.

Judge Hellerstein, who was appointed to the bench in 1998 by President Clinton, said these measures seemed to him to be highly unusual and appeared to be directly related to Mr. Cohens forthcoming book.

In 21 years of being a judge and sentencing people and looking at the terms and conditions of supervised release, he said, I have never seen such a clause.

Both in court papers and during a hearing on Thursday, the government insisted that the probation officer in Mr. Cohens case, Adam Pakula, did not know about the book when he drafted the provisions. The government has denied the document was a gag order or that it was custom-made for Mr. Cohen by high levels of the executive branch.

Mr. Pakula, in court papers, said he drafted the agreement without input from the B.O.P. or anyone in the executive branch.

In court, Judge Hellerstein seemed skeptical.

Why would Pakula ask for something like this unless there was a purpose to it, unless there was a retaliatory purpose saying, You toe the line about giving up your First Amendment rights or we will send you to jail, the judge asked.

Judge Hellerstein also suggested that Mr. Pakula may have gotten some instruction about including the media ban in the agreement.

The government said in court papers earlier this week that the decision to send Mr. Cohen back to prison had nothing to do with his book, but had been made after he became combative while discussing the agreement, behavior the officers found unacceptable.

Judge Hellerstein said that such behavior seemed to him to be an attorneys effort to negotiate an agreement, which is very common.

In May, Mr. Cohen had been allowed to leave a minimum-security prison camp in Otisville, N.Y., and go home as part of an effort by the Bureau of Prisons to curb the spread of coronavirus in the federal prison system.

Mr. Cohens lawyers had argued that his health conditions, including severe hypertension and a history of respiratory problems, put him at risk if he remained in prison.

But on July 9, prison officials abruptly returned Mr. Cohen to Otisville.

In his suit, Mr. Cohen claimed that he never hid the fact that he was writing a book about Mr. Trump. He noted that he spent his mornings working on the manuscript in plain sight in the prisons law library, and said he also discussed the project openly with prison officials, staff members and even other inmates.

According to the suit, the book will give a glimpse into Mr. Cohens firsthand experiences with Mr. Trump and offer graphic details about the presidents behavior behind closed doors.

The narrative, the lawsuit says, describes pointedly certain anti-Semitic remarks against prominent Jewish people and virulently racist remarks against such Black leaders as President Barack Obama and Nelson Mandela.

The manuscript tentatively titled Disloyal: The True Story of Michael Cohen, Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump is only the latest book to have emerged in recent weeks containing detailed and critical revelations about the presidents personal and professional life.

Mr. Cohens suit contends that Mr. Trump and his supporters have sought to derail the publication of his book like the others.

In June, the Justice Department asked a judge to delay the release of The Room Where It Happened, a memoir by Mr. Bolton, the former national security adviser who, among other things, confirmed accusations at the heart of the Democratic impeachment case over the presidents dealings with Ukraine. The judge ultimately denied the request.

On the same day that Mr. Boltons book was published, Mr. Trumps younger brother, Robert S. Trump, filed a suit seeking to stop the publication of a family tell-all written by their niece, Mary Trump.

After a few weeks of whirlwind litigation, the judge in that case sided with Ms. Trump, allowing her to publish her memoir, which accused Mr. Trump of embracing cheating as a way of life and of paying someone to take his college entrance exams.

Read more here:

Judge Orders Cohen Released, Citing Retaliation Over Tell-All Book - The New York Times

Cancelling The Opinions Of Those You Dont Agree With Is A Slippery SlopeHeres A Better Option – Forbes

It's easy to reflexively cancel the opinions of people we disagree with. Here's why we shouldn't.

Last week I shared a post in my weekly newsletter about freedom of speech. The central point I made was that freedom of speech protects people from being legally prosecuted or sanctioned for their words. It does not, however, mean that a person can say whatever they want, without any consequences.

For example: if the CEO of a business states an opinion that is controversial or offensive to some, people are well within their right to refuse to buy from that business, or work at that company. But should they start shaming others to make that same decision?

When I published the post, I received several replies that pointed to the same question: just because people are allowed to ignore, silence or even attempt to antagonize people who disagree with them, does that mean they should? And what kind of culture does that behavior create?

Each of us has core valuesnon-negotiable principles that consciously or unconsciously guide our most important decisions. When somebody shares an opinion that sharply violates our core valueswhether its a political opinion, a lifestyle attitude, or otherwiseit can be natural to be upset, or even angry. We may even feel compelled to defensively turn to people who share our anger to vent as a group.

This type of reaction can be harmless. However, social media has exacerbated things by frequently showing us content that either confirms our beliefs, or is designed to anger us. Cordial debate is decidedly not part of the algorithm.

In this setting, difference of opinionand, to an extent, aspects of free speechare being weaponized to extremes. Youve probably seen somebody attack people they disagree with on social media or, elsewhere, cut off friendships and professional partnerships over political differences. In extreme cases, they might even threaten the person or attempt to get the person punished personally or professionally for their opinions and beliefs.

As a legal protection, freedom of speech doesnt stop this type of uncivil discourse. Whats missing from our marketplace of ideas todayespecially our online forumsare basic rules of engagement. Next time you encounter an opinion you fiercely disagree withespecially at workconsider these three strategies.

Invite dissent

While some truths are universal, we need to accept most issues dont have an objectively correct opinion. In order to grow, we need to be open to dissenting viewpoints, even if they make us uncomfortable.

We also need to acknowledge that while some of our opinions are guided by our non-negotiable principles, all of us have beliefs that we could be persuaded to change, assuming we are open to having our views challenged. Remember that, at one point, the prevailing worldview was that the Earth was flat.

Its important to surround yourself with people who will challenge you, rather than reflexively validate your opinions and actions. This is especially true in businessa CEO who is always certain they are correct, and hates having their beliefs challenged, will inevitably damage their organization by either stubbornly following the wrong course, or alienating talented people who refuse to be cheerleaders.

Next time you encounter a viewpoint you disagree witheven on a topic youre passionate aboutdo yourself a favor and at least listen and try to learn or understand. You may have your perspective changed for the better.

Embrace dissonance

In 1985, United States President Ronald Reagan made a controversial decision to lay a wreath at a cemetery in Bitburg, Germany, where former soldiers whod fought for Nazi Germany during World War II were buried. This action upset his friend and ally, Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, who was very critical of Regans action.

However, Peres did not make the mistake of throwing out the baby with the bathwater and instead offered this offered sage wisdom: When a friend makes a mistake, he remains a friend, but the mistake remains a mistake.

Its not a great idea to associate closely with people who consistently violate or dont align with your core values. However, many of us have found ourselves in a situation where a person we like and respecta friend, co-worker, family member or colleaguesays or does something we disagree with. When this occurs, we encounter powerful force called cognitive dissonance, or the discomfort associated with holding two contradictory beliefs or behaviors in our minds at once.

In short, when someone close to us says something we consider wrong, we struggle to reconcile our feelings about them as a person with our disagreement with their belief. Today, too many people handle this dissonance by simply cutting the person out of their lives completely.

Instead, consider the value of Peres approach and challenge yourself to hold space for duality. Genuinely try to maintain your relationship with the other person, while acknowledging that you disagree, or wont always approve of that persons actions. This practice may salvage vital personal and professional connections. Its also an essential practice in the workplace.

Dont waste your energy

While many online disagreements simply fade, in some cases these conflicts can spill over into the offline world, with damaging results. Today, we see people respond to opinions they find offensive by harassing others online, contacting their employers, or even publishing their personal information online, a practice known as doxing. This behavior is dangerous and may have grave consequences. It can also threaten free speech.

If a person is sharing hate speech online or inciting violence with their words, its understandable to want to silence or shame them. But in cases the disagreement is simply over politics, or religion, or lifestyle practices that ultimately dont directly cause harm, its damaging for everybody involved to harass or attack others online. Its also inexcusable to threaten physical harm or encourage others to do the same.

People who share inflammatory opinions online are often seeking attention or engagement. Consider these types of posts to be landmines; they can either lay dormant, or explode on impact. Rather than taking the bait, its often more productive to attempt to bridge the divide, understand the persons point of view, and respectfully attempt to persuade them. Getting into fights online almost never leads to any improvement and certainly doesnt add value to your own life.

Instead of spending time with loved ones, or taking a nice walk outdoors, you are using your energy and limited hours in a day for what is almost always a zero-sum game. Not only can attacking others online cause lasting harm, it is a genuine waste of time and energy. Focusing on a solution is far more productive.

We ultimately dictate the terms of the marketplace of ideas we operate in, and its up to us to set rules of engagement that lead to a better conversation. Next time you see or hear something that conflicts with your views, it may be helpful to consider these tacticsdoing so may create a better outcome for all.

Robert is the founder and CEO ofAcceleration Partners. Join 200,000+ global leaders who follow his inspirational weekly newsletterFriday Forwardorinvite him to speak. Robert is also a Wall Street Journal and USA Today bestselling author. His new book,Friday Forward: Inspiration and Motivation to End Your Week Stronger Than It Started,releases September 1, 2020.

Read more here:

Cancelling The Opinions Of Those You Dont Agree With Is A Slippery SlopeHeres A Better Option - Forbes

You are not allowed to speak – TheArticle

Freedom of belief and thought is of paramount importance in a liberal democracy. Ideologies provide meaning and belonging and are often described as vital for wellbeing however they can also be extreme. A key counter to extremism is the freedom to challenge all forms of thinking and to put alternative ideas. This allows us to exchange ideas freely. It allows revolutionary ideas to emerge and gain popularity and allows bad ideas to be scrutinised in debate. As the LGBT activist and dogged defender of freedom of speech Peter Tatchell puts it:

Free speech does not mean giving bigots a free pass. It includes the right and moral imperative to challenge, oppose and protest bigoted views. Bad ideas are most effectively defeated by good ideas backed up by ethics, reason rather than by bans and censorship.

But when groupthink creeps into society, freedom of speech and a willingness to debate ideas can be social, or career suicide. You run the risk of being cancelled.

Take JK Rowlings cancelling as a recent example. JK Rowling tweeted a question in response to an online article, which was headlined, Creating a more equal post Covid-19 world for people who menstruate. Why, she asked, did the article chose to use the phrase people who menstruate instead of women? For this she came under aggressive attack and threats of boycott. The transgender model and activist Munroe Bergdorf slammed Rowling as dangerous and a threat to LGBT people.

In response Rowling pleaded with those trying to silence her: All Im asking all I want is for similar empathy, similar understanding, to be extended to the many millions of women whose sole crime is wanting their concerns to be heard without receiving threats and abuse.

JK Rowling is far from the only victim of cancel culture, we relentlessly witness the far left aggressively shouting down ideas with which they disagree. This reflects an increased tendency for the progressive left to attack freedom of speech. But she shows that even the most successful and respected people can become victims of the societal attack on freedom of speech. This attack goes beyond cancel culture.

Last year the All Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims proposed a definition of Islamophobia saying that it is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.The definition was deeply problematic, as it failed to distinguish between moderate and extreme forms of religious expression. Religious ideology must never be above critique, whilst negative behaviour towards someone for believing a particular religion must not be tolerated the difference between the two is of crucial importance.

As Stephen Evans, chief executive of the National Secular Society, put it,Those who raise concerns about religious privileges which undermine womens rights, animal welfare, LGBT rights and the principle of one law for all are routinely shouted down as Islamophobes and marginalised from public conversation.

The adoption of the APPGs vague definition, which protects ill-defined expressions of Muslimness, would hasten this process, while undermining efforts to tackle bigotry against Muslims.

Despite this criticism, local authorities and political parties have adopted the definition. People who have argued against it have been branded islamophobic. These include the former UK equality watchdog chief and staunch defender of both minorities and freedom of speech, Trevor Phillips.

Ironically it is the institutions synonymous with debate and learning that have been hardest hit by the attack on freedom of speech. No-platforming at universities has seen right wing Tommy Robinson no-platformed twice. His opinions may be racist and offensive, but he is not a danger to the audience and it is better for people like him to be heard and debated, rather than marginalised. But ban him and it only reinforces his image as the put-up outsider. Less controversial characters like Maryam Namazie and feminist Germaine Greer were also no-platformed. Their crime was to hold opinions on gender and sex that run counter to far left groupthink.Tatchell has called the current no-platforming policy of the NUS a dangerous threat to free speech.

The erosion of free speech recently went a step further. Earlier in the summer, in the space of 24 hours, 14.6 million instagram users shared a blacked-out image with the hashtag #blackouttuessday but unease crept in with the worry that if you did not continue to participate you were complicit in the problem. Social media filled with a strict to do list on how to understand, speak about and take action over white privilege. Rather than looking for ways to bring about racial equality, the movement focused on dictating to white people how they must behave lest they be branded a racist. A shift had occurred. The attack on freedom of speech had changed to become an insistence on positive action to conform to the groups thinking.

In the last of a series of events surrounding the struggling survival of our right to freedom of speech a public letter was published onHarpers Magazine. Signed by 150 people, it recognised that the needed reckoning of racial and social justice had also intensified a new set of moral attitudes and political commitments that tend to weaken our norms of open debate and toleration of differences in favour of ideological conformity. Signaturies ranged fromJK Rowling and Noam Chomsky.

Ironically however, within days the signatories turned on each other and threatened to remove their signature because they did not agree with the other signatories.

Sadly it has come to a point where each of us must check ourselves if we want to continue to live in a free and safe liberal democracy and ensure we are not working against freedom of speech. Its time to remind ourselves of the words Evelyn Beatrice Hall attributed to Voltaire I disapprove of what you say,but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

Read more:

You are not allowed to speak - TheArticle

Hill Republicans begin jockeying for power in a possible post-Trump world – NBC News

WASHINGTON Amid a stalled fight in Congress over the future of a $1 trillion coronavirus aid package, a parallel battle has been coming into focus: a struggle for the future of the Republican Party.

Behind closed doors in both the House and Senate this week, Republican lawmakers saw their ire focused not on Democrats, but instead at each other, a product lawmakers and strategists say of President Donald Trumps sinking poll numbers.

Theyre dealing with a grim reality, Doug Heye, a Republican strategist and former senior House aide, said of the outlook in congressional campaign committees.

The disagreements that broke out last week appeared to be over fiscal issues like continuing the $600 a week unemployment payments and just how much money the federal government should continue to pump into the struggling economy.

But every fight revealed a party that appears to be looking past the dire outlook of November and on to the possibility of a leadership reshuffle in the winter.

If Trump loses re-election, Republicans in Congress will be left to grapple with how to respond to a President Joe Biden and which of their members is best suited to counter him. The risk remains that if Democrats secure a landslide, Republicans could lose control of the Senate.

If Trump is able to reverse his fortunes and secure re-election, there will be Republicans who hope to convert their loyalty to the president into a move up in the ranks.

The Republicans have figured out that Trump is not going to bulls--- his way out of this crisis and hes not going to be able to change the subject, Rick Tyler, a Republican strategist, said, explaining the recent intra-party fights. Not only is he going to lose by hundreds of electoral votes, theyre going to lose, they will lose seats in the House, they could possibly lose the Senate.

In the House, details leaked after a group of six conservative lawmakers at a closed-door meeting confronted Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., over her support of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has pushed for public health considerations over Trumps desire to reopen the U.S. economy.

It wasnt about a particular issue, it was about the president, period, Heye said. And that tells me that its all about what comes after Trump, if the elections go the way they look today.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

It was about jockeying for the post-Trump world, he said.

Cheney, the daughter of a former vice president, has quickly risen through the ranks of her party after being elected to Congress in 2016. The highest-ranking Republican woman, she is considered to be on a shortlist to lead her caucus in the future.

She was confronted by a group of men, led by Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who were once the most conservative voices in the caucus but since Trumps election have taken up the banner of presidential loyalty. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., piled on, joining the call that she should be removed from her leadership role.

Cheney has at times been both supportive and critical of Trump, a tack Heye argues will help her distance herself from him once he leaves office.

She is able to say, I stood with this administration 98 percent of the time, but when I had a problem with it, I stood up and said so, I didnt attack the president, I stood up and told truths, Heye said.

Cheneys quick rise in the party is seen as evidence that Republicans realize they need to do better appealing to women, a demographic that has been hemorrhaging support while Trump has been in office, in the future.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., who would face challenges to his control of Republicans in the chamber if Trump were to lose, admitted that the episode with men his party attacking Cheney exposed their problems with women.

I think we're improving. Do we have room for improvement? 100 percent yes, McCarthy said on Thursday.

In the Senate, the fight has fallen along more electoral lines, often pitting members up for re-election this fall against those who arent.

At a lunch meeting to discuss coronavirus aid on Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., heard an uprising of conservative members who dont want to renew a $600 weekly unemployment payment that was created at the beginning of the pandemic.

What in the hell are we doing? Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, declared in the meeting.

McConnell, who would likely face a challenge to his role as leader if Republicans lose the Senate, is also trying to ensure senators facing re-election dont have to return to their districts empty-handed.

There's a lot of disagreement amongst the members, said Mitt Romney, R-Utah, who has appeared to position himself as a leading voice in a post-Trump world.

Ideology is running square into the reality of the political crisis, said Tyler, the Republican strategist. Were stuck in a deep recession thats not coming back before November. The virus is not going away by November. The economy is not coming back by November.

Republicans have long argued about how to get their base excited ahead of an election, and conservatives are again making their case to Congress that fiscal austerity is the way to go.

The best strategy for Republicans right now, for Donald Trump, to put out a bill, not the proposal, a bill that contains all of the highest priorities of the Republican Party and the conservative movement, said Stephen Moore, a conservative economist who has supported Trump.

He said McConnells current trajectory authoring a bill that is the product of compromise in order to begin negotiations with Democrats will make the base unhappy.

Youre going to see a very divided Republican Party and a lot of conservative opposition to that bill, and thats not a good look going into the November elections, Moore said.

"Pandemic politics is at a fever pitch in both parties, said a conservative Republican strategist who spoke on background to speak frankly about internal political dynamics, adding that the party is "between a rock and a hard place.

Right now and we are still, politically speaking, light-years from the election the GOP is off-kilter."

Link:

Hill Republicans begin jockeying for power in a possible post-Trump world - NBC News

Mark Zuckerberg says theres no deal of any kind with Donald Trump – The Verge

Has Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg cut a secret deal with President Donald Trump, turning a blind eye to his lies and incendiary posts in the hope that the social media giant wont become the presidents next target? Rumors of this sort have been swirling for months, but Zuckerberg himself has now denied it, telling Axios that no such deal exists.

Ive heard this speculation, too, so let me be clear: Theres no deal of any kind, said Zuckerberg. Actually, the whole idea of a deal is pretty ridiculous.

The comments come in response to mounting concern over Zuckerbergs relationship with the president, which has remained cordial despite worries about the presidents use of social media. NBC News reported last year that Trump hosted Zuckerberg for a secret dinner at the White House. The dinner came just a week after Zuckerberg made a speech confirming that Facebook would not fact-check political ads, giving Trump license to share misleading videos, ads, and posts on the worlds biggest social network.

Since then, the president and his supporters have pushed the limits of Facebooks largesse, sharing doctored campaign videos and lies about mail-in ballots. There have also been incidents in which Facebook seems to have gone out of its way not to remove misinformation beloved by the political right.

Just this week, an investigation by HEATED and Popular Information found that Facebook removed the fact-check of a partly false article about climate change published by right-wing news site The Daily Wire. The company did so after the author complained he was being censored and a Republican congressman took up the cause. According to the investigation, the decision to remove the fact-check went right to the top of the company, involving Facebooks VP of global affairs and communications, the former British politician Nick Clegg.

Facebooks refusal to remove certain posts, like Trumps response to protests in Minneapolis against racist police violence (when the looting starts, the shooting starts) has certainly cost the company. Its faced employee walkouts and advertiser boycotts because of them. But Trump, who otherwise delights in picking fights with tech giants like Amazon and Twitter, has increasingly left Facebook alone. Its a state of affairs that hasnt gone unnoticed.

Roger McNamee, a venture capitalist who was an early investor in Facebook and now a noted critic of the company, told The New York Times last month that he believed the two had a deal of some sort. McNamee said the arrangement was probably implied rather than explicit and highly utilitarian, but mutually beneficent all the same.

Its basically about getting [Facebook] free rein and protection from regulation, said McNamee. Trump needs Facebooks thumb on the scale to win this election.

To support McNamees claim, the Times reported that the antitrust investigations being led by the Justice Department into US tech giants look like they will be kind to Zuckerbergs company. A source familiar with the investigations told the Times that while Google and Amazon were up against mature investigations, the probe into Facebook is not real at all.

The response from Zuckerberg and Facebook to accusations of a deal has been to point out the various disagreements theyve had with the White House over things like immigration policy and climate change. Speaking to Axios about the dinner with Trump last year, the Facebook CEO also noted that its hardly unusual for him to meet heads of state.

I accepted the invite for dinner because I was in town and he is the president of the United States, Zuckerberg told Axios. For what its worth, I also had multiple meals and meetings with President Obama ... both at the White House and outside, including hosting an event for him at Facebook HQ.

But just because no formal (or even implicit) deal exists, it doesnt mean that Zuckerberg and Trumps interests arent aligned right now. Zuckerberg wants to avoid accusations of anti-conservative bias and exhaustive antitrust investigations, while Trump wants to continue being able to say whatever he likes to the American public without fear of censorship.

As a recent report by The Washington Post noted, though, Zuckerberg has been shaping Facebooks rules to fit Trumps speech for a while now. In 2015, as Trump began to attract supporters as a candidate, he posted a video on Facebook in which he said he wanted to ban Muslims from entering the United States. As the Post reports, the video outraged many Facebook employees who said it violated the companys policies for hate speech, but Zuckerberg ultimately let the video stand because of its newsworthiness a standard which would become policy in 2016.

In other words, if Zuckerberg made a deal with Trump, he did so long ago.

See the original post:

Mark Zuckerberg says theres no deal of any kind with Donald Trump - The Verge

Donald Trump knows how to put on a show – theday.com

We are watching a show. It's important to keep that in mind.

It has its villains Mayor Lori Lightfoot of Chicago, Mayor Ted Wheeler of Portland and other supporters of the "liberal, radical left" idea that people have the right peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It has its victims, people in towns where they don't have or need symphony orchestras and art museums and the very idea of street protests fills them with existential horror.

And the show has its hero, too, President Donald John Trump, getting tough with those lawless cities, standing between the victims and their fears and not bothering overmuch about constitutional niceties while he does.

That's how you end up with the recent spectacle of at least one person reportedly snatched off the streets of Portland by federal agents bearing no badges or identifying insignia and stuffed into an unmarked van on no probable cause, or even an allegation of crime. At this writing, Trump is sending federal agents using, presumably, the same tactics to Chicago, which, in his telling, teeters on the edge of criminal anarchy, and he, alone, can save it.

If it smacks of despotism, this idea of government seizing those who it bears repeating are accused of no crime, well, Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf tells Fox "News" that sometimes you have to "proactively arrest" people. It's a nicely dystopian term that might have come out of "The Minority Report," the 1956 novella by Philip K. Dick (also a 2002 film starring Tom Cruise), which posits a world where "precogs" divine the future, enabling police to prevent crime instead of just solving it. Dick provides other terms Wolf might find useful: "precrime," "potential criminals," "prophylactic pre-detection."

If it occurs to you there's no such thing as "precogs," if this all seems to you like a civil liberties nightmare, well, you're missing the point. Again, this is a show.

And give him his due. Trump may have failed as a businessman, an educator, an airline mogul, a casino operator, a steak salesman and a human being, but he knows how to put on a show. He knows every moment we spend talking about American fascism is a moment not spent talking about Russia putting a price on American heads, which in turn keeps us from talking about the 143,000 who've died of a virus Trump said would magically disappear.

Even his distractions have distractions.

In fairness, this march toward fascist dystopia didn't begin in Portland. For years, we saw black and Hispanic men stopped and frisked in New York City without probable cause. We've seen cops empowered to take your money and border agents empowered to seize and search your laptops and smartphones, also without probable cause. In 2015, we saw a woman named Charnesia Corley subjected to a police search of her vagina on the pavement at a gas station.

What we haven't seen so much is public outrage.

So Trump's innovation is not stomping the Constitution, but making the stomping a show. If it doesn't seem like much of one to you, well, you're not the intended audience. For them, this is Dirty Harry and Rambo all rolled into one. For the rest of us, this show isn't about a tough guy. Rather, it's about a second-rate magician whose act has seen better days, whose top hat is worn, whose cards are frayed, whose every move reeks of flop-sweat desperation, the terror that he might be seen as, he really is.

Which makes this magician dangerous in the same way a cornered animal is. And if we aren't careful, he may pull off one last trick.

He may make freedom disappear.

Leonard Pitts is a columnist for The Miami Herald. His columns are distributed by Tribune Content Agency.

See the original post:

Donald Trump knows how to put on a show - theday.com

Trump tweets that he won’t throw first pitch at Stadium – Newsday

WASHINGTON Giancarlo Stanton apparently knew something already.

Stanton, who kneeled along with teammate Aaron Hicks during Saturday nights national anthem in support ofBlack Lives Matter and to protest racial injustice, was asked after the game about his feelings relating to President Donald Trumps announcement Thursday that he would be throwing out the ceremonial first pitch before an Aug. 15 against the Red Sox at the Stadium.

Im not positive thats a sure thing thats going to happen, Stanton said. Well get there when we get there. Thats in August. Its not something I have to worry about now.

And perhaps not on Aug. 15, either.

Because of my strong focus on the China Virus, including scheduled meetings on Vaccines, our economy and much else, I wont be able to be in New York to throw out the opening pitch for the @Yankees on August 15th, President Trump tweeted Sunday afternoon. We will make it later in the season!

The truth, however, might be a bit more complex than that.

Stanton and Hicks choosing to take a knee Saturday night something the pair informed their teammates and manager of beforehand was notable for more than a few reasons. The most significant was the seething anger felt by many in the organization a group that includes staff, players and executives regarding the invite, which President Trump said was extended by Yankees team president Randy Levine. The sentiment most often heard was the seeming incongruity between the lengthy statement released by the club June 8 about Black Lives Matter and racial inequities and reaching out to the President.

Receive stories, photos and videos about your favorite New York teams plus national sports news and events.

By clicking Sign up, you agree to our privacy policy.

Masahiro Tanaka, delayed slightly after taking a Stanton liner off his head in a July sim game, threw a two-inning simulated game at the alternate training campin Scranton early Sunday afternoon, striking out three.

One observer said Tanaka, who suffered a concussion when hit, seemed confident and unphased from the injury on the mound and looked very much like himself.

Tanaka could slot back into the rotation in five days.

Erik Boland started in Newsday's sports department in 2002. He covered high school and college sports, then shifted to the Jets beat. He has covered the Yankees since 2009.

Read the original post:

Trump tweets that he won't throw first pitch at Stadium - Newsday

Letters to editor: Sundial Bridge gathering, Donald Trump and COVID-19 – Record Searchlight

Worshippers came to Redding's Sundial Bridge on July 22, 2020. The crowd put the community 'at risk' for COVID-19, Shasta County health officials say. Redding Record Searchlight

I am appalled and dismayed at thegathering at the Sundial Bridge earlier this week. First, it's unconscionable to gather hundreds of people during a pandemic, no masks or distancing in place.Second, no permit was issued for this gathering, nor was one applied for. The lack of responsibility for this event is amazing.Did no one know about it?Well, all those attendees certainly did, so it seems unlikely that the higher-ups at Bethel didn't, and apparently they made no effort to stop this travesty.Sean Feucht, the alleged organizer, has had events like this recently in other counties in California completely disregarding the health of the communities he gathers in.Christian?I think not.The disregard for local citizens and our community is quite apparent. We live in a rural area.It's helped us stay off the State Watch List, so more businesses can stay open.There are so many small businesses struggling to keep afloat and then a stunt like this is pulled that jeopardized everyone's health.Where were the police?Did no one in city government know about this? When the spike in COVID-19cases comes, it will be because of this unlawful, unnecessary gathering.

Hazel Hughes,Redding

The GOP has long sustained a frontal attack on the ultimate value of science to society. In 2016, national alarms sounded as science marches rang bells with gangs of teachers, liberal arts sympathizers, and mobs of parents, kids, scientists, librarians, researchers, and servers marching to protest. Fiftyyears ago Richard Nixon established the EPA. He put weight behind the GOPs previous value of an old Greek proverbs essence - A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in. And then the Republican party changed. Again and again. From creationism, opposition to embryonic stem cells, attempting to link abortion with breast cancer and mental illness, rejecting contraception while absolving itself of millions of unplanned pregnancies for society to absorb, to global warming, the GOP became something new. Today it is the spectacle, foolishness, and mockery displayed almost daily. Science isnt infallible. But it always gives the best odds towards truth in all it seeks in earnest. It is always playing the best odds. Carl Sagan called science a candle in the dark." Dont let the light go out. Restore scientific integrity to the federal government. Insist upon representatives who richly value science.

Max Walter, Redding

Regarding the recent Back the Blue rally: I think it was a great idea. I think most of us have great respect for the police, just not those few who make them look bad. I support Black Lives Matter and peaceful protests.I am against using riot police, mace, clubs, and shields against peaceful protesters. I am against police brutality and brutality inflicted by citizens against each other and the police. I am against police disguised in camo hauling people into unmarked vans like is happening, as I speak, in Portland, Oregon. I am against rioting and property damage by individuals who scream their support for a cause but are using it to engage in disruptive and damaging behavior and are behaving in a way that justifies police action. I believe that the use of deadly force should be exceedingly rare. I believe police unions are allowing bad police to stay on the job.All of these beliefs are not mutually exclusive nor should they be politicized into for or against police or protesters.

Joyce Lively, Redding

The key to stopping the COVID-19economy from turning into a major depression is what President Trump has already started: reducing government regulatory control of the economy and letting thefree market self-correct. This is what President Harding did during thedepression of 1920-21. The economy roared back.Contrarily, President Roosevelt instituted every Marxist and unconstitutional control on the economy as possible during the depression that started in 1929 and the downturn lasted 13 years.If it were not for the huge increase in output for World War II, who knows how long it would have lasted. Secondly, I see nothing but COVID-19ignorance caused by pronouncements from our politically corrupthealth agencies. First, masks worn by everyone will not keep anyone from contracting COVID-19 only properly fitted respirators will. And that is the problem with dictating mask use. It makes the few who are vulnerable to death from COVID-19 come out from self-quarantine where they should stay.

Carl Reed, Igo

Have we become a nation of anger? Reminds me of a 2-year-old throwing a tantrum, and then the parents give in to the child's demands. What happened to counting from one to 10 to calm down? If you feel you've suffered an injustice, does that give you the right to burn, loot, and injure anyone and anything? And who pays for the destroyed police cars and burned buildings? The hard-working taxpayers in this country. Take positive action. If you feel the police are not doing a good job, why don't you become a policeman and show everyone how to perform fairly. President Kennedy said, "Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country." Martin Luther King Jr.'swords were "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. How is your character?

Miriam Johnson, Redding

We have a national pandemic that has killed 140,000-pluspeople nationwide and 7,697-plusin California and all State Sen. Brian Dahle is concerned about is the governor re-shutting down small businesses in the state because the coronavirus infection and death rates exploded. The governor had to do this because people did not practice the recommended safety measures that minimize spreading the coronavirus and businesses did not enforce them.Dahle tells us that people should be able to decide for themselves what is best to prevent catching the coronavirus and that wearing breathing masks should be left up to personal choice according to a July 14 Record Searchlight story.If everyone had practiced the recommended safety measures the impact on business would have been significantly lower. Dahle doesnt understand this simple concept. Dahles ideas are making matters worse. This November we need to get rid of Dahle and replace him with Pamela Swartz who has the ability to find solutions to important issues.

Tom Laurent,Yreka

On July 17, I loaded my car with items bought from Walmart and left my purse in the cart, realized about 10 minutes later after driving off, what I had done, returned to Walmart and checked with customer service and they had my purse. I want to thank the good person that did this kindness and turned it in.

Polly Thomson, Redding

There's this constant push from President Trump along withSecretary of Education, Betsy DeVos,to fully reopen our schools just as they were before the pandemic. If my biology teacher were still alive, I can hear her exclaiming, "You'll not put my studentsin a petri dish!"Before this latest push, our president had led the way to demand that businesses return to normal so we got the wild and crowded beach parties along with bars fully open and serving up drinks, etc.As predicted by the experts,these moves were followedshortly by a stunning increase in the spread of the virus. If we follow Trump, we will literally be drinking away our kid's futures. If we all succumb to the Trump-DeVosSyndrome,it's very likely that our country will be hit with permanent damage

Parker Pollock, Redding

The Roman Empire survived for 2,500 years, plus or minus, America has lasted 250, plus or minus, and are there any comparisons to be drawn? The madness on our streets and those who are the perpetrators have the same M.O. as those of Rome. There are also the rioters that led to the Russian Revolution, The Red Army revolt, and most hostile takeovers throughout history. Stir up the youth with propaganda and false promises and let their Utopian lusts do the rest. What is taking place in America today had warning signs for the last 100 years as our government started dismantling our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Using the same "Cosmic Morality" that is being used today we were slowly led down the "entitlement" passageway until it firmly coupled with the Marxist promise of "Equality for all through communism." If you don't like America now folks you will hate what is waiting in the wings. Why are they destroying your past, your language, your ethics, your faith, your future? Because people without a past cannot learn from or dictate their future without a past.

Vernon Packer, Redding

Read or Share this story: https://www.redding.com/story/opinion/2020/07/26/letters-editor-sundial-bridge-gathering-donald-trump-and-covid-19/5505849002/

See original here:

Letters to editor: Sundial Bridge gathering, Donald Trump and COVID-19 - Record Searchlight

Column: Donald Trump knows how to put on a show – The Oakland Press

We are watching a show. Its important to keep that in mind.

It has its villains -- Mayor Lori Lightfoot of Chicago, Mayor Ted Wheeler of Portland and other supporters of the liberal, radical left idea that people have the right peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It has its victims, people in towns where they dont have or need symphony orchestras and art museums and the very idea of street protests fills them with existential horror.

And the show has its hero, too, Donald John Trump, getting tough with those lawless cities, standing between the victims and their fears and not bothering overmuch about constitutional niceties while he does.

Thats how you end up with the recent spectacle of at least one person reportedly snatched off the streets of Portland by federal agents bearing no badges or identifying insignia and stuffed into an unmarked van on no probable cause, or even an allegation of crime. At this writing, Trump is sending federal agents -- using, presumably, the same tactics -- to Chicago, which, in his telling, teeters on the edge of criminal anarchy, and he, alone, can save it.

If it smacks of despotism, this idea of government seizing those who -- it bears repeating -- are accused of no crime, well, Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf tells Fox News that sometimes you have to proactively arrest people. Its a nicely dystopian term that might have come out of The Minority Report, the 1956 novella by Philip K. Dick (also a 2002 film starring Tom Cruise), which posits a world where precogs divine the future, enabling police to prevent crime instead of just solving it. Dick provides other terms Wolf might find useful: precrime, potential criminals, prophylactic pre-detection.

If it occurs to you theres no such thing as precogs, if this all seems to you like a civil liberties nightmare, well, youre missing the point. Again, this is a show.

And give him his due. Trump may have failed as a businessman, an educator, an airline mogul, a casino operator, a steak salesman and a human being, but he knows how to put on a show. He also knows every moment we spend talking about American fascism is a moment not spent talking about Russia putting a price on American heads, which in turn keeps us from talking about the 143,000 whove died of a virus Trump said would magically disappear.

Even his distractions have distractions.

In fairness, this march toward fascist dystopia didnt begin in Portland. For years, we saw black and Hispanic men stopped and frisked in New York City without probable cause. Weve seen cops empowered to take your money and border agents empowered to seize and search your laptops and smartphones, also without probable cause. In 2015, we saw a woman named Charnesia Corley subjected to a police search of her vagina on the pavement at a gas station.

What we havent seen so much is public outrage.

So Trumps innovation is not stomping the Constitution, but making the stomping a show. If it doesnt seem like much of one to you, well, youre not the intended audience. For them, this is Dirty Harry and Rambo all rolled into one. For the rest of us, this show isnt about a tough guy. Rather, its about a second-rate magician whose act has seen better days, whose top hat is worn, whose cards are frayed, whose every move reeks of flop-sweat desperation, the terror that he might be seen as he really is.

Which makes this magician dangerous in the same way a cornered animal is. And if we arent careful, he may pull off one last trick.

He may make freedom disappear.

Leonard Pitts Jr. is a columnist for the Miami Herald, 3511 NW 91st Ave., Miami, Fla., 33172. Readers may contact him via e-mail at lpitts@miamiherald.com.

Read more:

Column: Donald Trump knows how to put on a show - The Oakland Press

Watch: Mary Trump on Why Donald Trump Lies, Why He’s Racist, and Why She Wrote Her Book – Mother Jones

Many American families have their dysfunction. But in only one contemporary American family has the racist, misogynistic, ignorant blowhard uncle become the president of the United States. What is that like? Well, we dont have to guess. Because Mary L. Trump, the niece of Donald Trump, has written a bestseller about the horrific family environment that produced him. And this week she talked to Mother Jones about her uncle, her book, and how she came to write it.

After the Trump family went to court to stop the bookand lostit was published last week and has reportedly sold a million copies. This memoir/psychological dissection, Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the Worlds Most Dangerous Man, is a harrowing account of a man and a clan shaped by ego, rivalry, the pursuit of wealth, and profound pathology. Mary Trumps depiction of her uncle as a broken human beingbroken by his father, Fred, a ruthless patriarch with sociopathic traitsis more explanatory than revelatory. She doesnt show us a Trump we havent already seen. But she explains how and why he became a person more concerned about his TV ratings than the deaths of 140,000 fellow Americans.

I have a bit of a history with Mary Trump going back to 2016. Shortly before Election Day that year, I tracked her down. Throughout the campaign, she had practically no presence within all the stories about Donald Trump and his family. I hoped that she could provide information on him, the family, and their finances. After all, she had been involved in two bitter lawsuits against Trump and his siblingsone over the disposition of Freds estate and one challenging the decision of Trump and his siblings to cut off health insurance for Mary and her brothers families. (Her brother had an infant son at the time with a serious neurological disorder that resulted in tremendous medical bills.) Mary returned my call, expressed her horror at the prospect of her uncle becoming the most powerful man in the world, and explained that Fred, with Donald, had raised a mini-me sociopath. Donald Trump was not the most evil man in the world, she remarked to me; Fred was. But she said she could not speak on the record about any of this. (She has now given me permission to reveal our communications from that time.)

I chased Mary as a source for months and years, sensing she had much to share. I never persuaded her to go public. But now she has done so, and as her book has become a publishing sensation, I was finally able to talk openly with her. And I could ask her why she thanked me in her acknowledgments.

Explaining why she did not come forward at the time of the 2016 election, Mary noted in our interview, I didnt feel it would make a difference. She believed she didnt have that much to offer and would be dismissed as a disgruntled relative still upset over being screwed during the battle over Freds estate. She was also fearful of retribution from the Trump crew: Theyre very vindictive people. She explained that she had forgotten that within the records of her lawsuits were loads of documents detailing Trump family finances. It was when the New York Times came knocking in the spring of 2017, in search of this material, that Mary realized she possessed significant information related to Donald Trump. After persistent coaxing from a Timesreporter, she retrieved the material from her lawyers storage facility and handed it over to the newspaper. About a year later, the Times, using these documents, produced a blockbuster report showing that Trump and his family had committed fraud to avoid paying hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes. (The story also revealed that Trump had received about $413 million from his father, far more than the mere pittance of a $1 million loan that he had claimed.) Marys involvement with this project got her thinking: She did have something to say about Trump and her family. Soon she was contemplating writing a book.

In the interview, Mary, who has a PhD in clinical psychology, discussed her main thesis: Fred Trump was a straight-up sociopath who psychologically destroyed his oldest son and her father, Freddy, who wanted to be a commercial pilot rather than take over the family real estate business, and Donald Trump was permanently warped by witnessing this abuse and by other dysfunction within the family. Donald, Mary said, learnedin order to be safe, in order to protect himself from my grandfathers cruelty, he needed to make himself in his dads image, which I think was at the expense of his humanity. My grandfather had no redeeming characteristicsand [Donald Trump] no longer does. She added that there was a point [Trump] wasnt so cruel, not so deliberatively divisive.

One Trump family mystery involves a 1927New York Times story that reported Fred Trump was arrested at a KKK rally and march in Jamaica, Queens. The article didnt say why Fred was detained and gave no indication if he had been there as a supporter or opponent of the KKK. When I asked Mary about this, she replied that she never heard this matter discussed within her family, but she added, I have no doubt which side he wouldve been on. Fred, she explained, was quite anti-Semitic, and, as she has said elsewhere, the n-word was routinely used within her family circle.

She also shared her view that Donald Trump inherited his fathers bigotry. Hes racist, Mary said of her uncle. It has to be said honestly and straightforwardly.

I asked Mary if she could explain Donalds affinity for Vladimir Putin and other authoritarian rulers. And she could: I think he sees in somebody like a Putin or a Kim Jong Un or a Duterte or an Erdoan a person who has a lot of power and by associating with them it sort of confers on him that aura of strength and invincibility. And who cares what that leads to? Concentration camps in China. Or disappearing people. If hes associated with that [power], then it reflects on him.

So could she answer for me a question that Ive pondered for years: Does Donald Trump believe his own lies? After all, does Trump truly think he is the smartest guy of all time, that he knows more than the generals, that hes been more right about the coronavirus pandemic than anyone else, that his polls are great, that he has achieved more than any other president, and blah, blah, blah? Very often he is lying to himself, Mary said. It depends on the circumstances. She continued: The more stress hes under, the more besieged he feels, the more likely it is that the distance between the telling the lie and believing it is the truth is decreasing. Were getting to the point its instantaneous.

I pressed her on this point. Does he lie (so much!) as a means to get what he wants and knows this is what he is doingor is he delusional? Its a combination, she said. Is it just delusion or is it a tactic? I think it might start out as a tactic but it ends up being a delusion because his need to perpetuate a narrative about himselfa very specific narrative about himself as the winner, as always being rightis decades old. Its a defense mechanism to protect him against the reality of who he really isIf he had any insight into that, I dont know that he could bear it.

Mary Trumps book is a deep dive into Trumps damaged psyche, and it does ring trueespecially at a time when Americans are watching him botch the response to a pandemic due to his narcissism, ignorance, and lack of compassion. But does her analysis provide an escape route for her unclehes harming the nation because he was harmed as a child? Does this, I asked Mary, absolve Trump? I cant say this emphatically enough, she replied. Absolutely not. This was not in any way intended to let him off the hook. Hes a responsiblehes responsible for his actions. Hes an adult human being who knows the difference between right and wrong. He just doesnt think it applies to him. But he knows the difference. The point of the analysis of his developmental history was in its explanatory powerEven I feel sympathy for Donald the 2-and-a-half-year-old. A lot of people who end up being horrible criminals when they are adults had very abusive childhoods. You can have sympathy for that child. It does not at all, under any circumstances, diminish their responsibility for what they doHe does not get a pass. He needs to be held to account. Very seriously held to an account when this nightmare were living through is over.

View post:

Watch: Mary Trump on Why Donald Trump Lies, Why He's Racist, and Why She Wrote Her Book - Mother Jones

Here’s the most incredible thing about Donald Trump’s problem with facts – CNN

Which is stunning -- a mountain of exaggerations, half-truths and outright falsehoods constructed by the President as he seeks to invalidate the very notion of facts and truth.

But, the breadth of Trump's commitment to mistruth isn't even the most incredible -- or scary -- part of the Post's new report. That honor goes to this:

"The notion that Trump would exceed 20,000 claims before he finished his term appeared ludicrous when The Fact Checker started this project during the president's first 100 days in office. In that time, Trump averaged fewer than five claims a day, which would have added up to about 7,000 claims in a four-year presidential term. But the tsunami of untruths just keeps looming larger and larger."

As the Post notes, it took Trump 827 days to get to 10,000 "false and misleading claims." He got to 20,000 in just 440 days, meaning that between over that 14-month period, the President of the United States said 23 things a day that weren't factually accurate.

So, consider this: In his first 100 days in office, Trump said, on average, five things that were false or misleading. In his first 827 days in office, he averaged 12 mistruths a day. In the next 440 days -- through July 9 -- he averaged 23 false or misleading claims a day.

It doesn't take a mathematician (which is a good thing for me) to conclude that Trump has ratcheted up his misinformation peddling by almost five times since he entered office. He's not just saying some more things that aren't true every day. He's saying lots more things that aren't true every day.

There are two very important takeaways here:

1) Trump, unlike most politicians, isn't cowed by fact checks that show he is flat wrong in many of the things he says. Quite the contrary: Trump seems to revel in being cast as a purveyor of falsehoods by the mainstream media, believing it beefs up his credibility with his base.

What we have seen over these past few months is that as Trump's political fortunes have slid -- thanks to his botched handling of the pandemic and his tone-deaf response to the Floyd protests -- he has retreated more and more into a fact-free fantasy world of his own making. His pace of mistruths has rapidly increased as the actual facts -- be it on coronavirus cases, his support among people of color or his tumbling poll numbers -- turn more and more against him.

Read the original:

Here's the most incredible thing about Donald Trump's problem with facts - CNN

President Donald Trump, Justice Department say Cleveland will see surge of federal agents to combat crime – cleveland.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said that Cleveland is among the cities that will see a surge of federal law enforcement agents in the coming weeks that he said aim to restore safety and peace in U.S. cities.

Trump announced during an event at The White House the expansion of a program, Operation LeGend, to support high crime communities to the greatest extent possible.

The administration intends to send agents to several cities, including personnel from the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the U.S. Marshals Service and the Department of Homeland Security. Neither the president nor the other participants specifically mentioned Cleveland during the event, though The White House did in an email and in a summary of events on its website.

A source familiar with planning for the initiative in Cleveland said it dovetails with Operation Relentless Pursuit, which U.S. Attorney Justin Herdman announced in December during a news conference flanked with local and federal law enforcement.

The source differentiated the surge from the agents recently sent to Portland, which raised the alarm of civil rights advocates who said the agents did not identify themselves on their uniforms and detained people without cause before later releasing them without charges.

In Cleveland, were talking about traditional crime fighting, the source said, adding that its not guys in body armor dealing with protesters.

Cleveland officials contacted Wednesday said they were not aware of the anticipated surge.

Trump said the Justice Department-led new program was named in honor of LeGend Taliferro, a 4-year-old boy from Kansas City who was killed in his bed when a gunman opened fire in his apartment complex. Officials launched the initiative there.

The Justice Department will first send more agents to Chicago and Albuquerque. Federal officials plan to send more agents to Cleveland, along with Detroit and Milwaukee, within the next three weeks, according to The White Houses website.

The White House said the program would provide more than $61 million in Justice Department money to help local police departments hire more officers and will permanently reassign roughly 200 agents and deputy marshals to the cities it covers.

This is a different kind of operation, obviously, than the tactical teams we use to defend against riots and mob violence. , U.S. Attorney General William Barr said during the event. And were going to continue to confront mob violence, but the operations were discussing today are very different. They are classic crime fighting.

The presidents announcement comes amidst his campaign for re-election with polls showing him trailing Democratic candidate Joe Biden. Federal law enforcement under Trump has frequently and often misleadingly touted higher crime rates in many major cities in the U.S. that are led by Democratic mayors, in an effort to portray them as lawless war zones.

Cleveland, which has seen higher-than-average homicide rates in recent years, has interestingly not been the target of Trumps public ire like Chicago and other cities, though the Justice Department has devoted resources to combating violent and drug crime in the region. It also remains involved in a court-enforced effort to reform the Cleveland police department.

This rampage of violence shocks the conscience of our nation, and we will not stand by and watch it happen. Cant do that, Trump said Wednesday. The citizens of Chicago are citizens of America, and they have the same right as every other American to live in safety, dignity, and peace. No mother should ever have to cradle her dead child in her arms simply because politicians refuse to do what is necessary to secure their neighborhood and to secure their city.

The source familiar with Clevelands plans said the new surge will temporarily fill the number of positions called for under Operation Relentless Pursuit, the initiative Herdman and others previously announced. The latter includes the addition of more people from several agencies including the FBI, DEA, ATF and the marshals to address violent crimes in seven cities, including Cleveland. It also involves having more local police officers serve on federal task forces and offering grants for participating cities to hire additional cops.

While the goal of Operation Relentless Pursuit is to permanently place more federal law enforcement in certain areas, that was not fully completed because of the coronavirus pandemic, the source explained. Thats where Operation LeGend comes in, and the surge of additional agents will address the gaps in the short term for the positions the Justice Department has not filled, the source explained.

Still, without a formal announcement about Cleveland, some local officials appeared taken aback.

Mayor Frank Jacksons administration said in a statement that it has not been made aware of any additional federal law enforcement resources coming to the city.

The Cleveland Division of Police has in the past and will continue to partner with federal, state and local law enforcement agencies to combat violent crime in our neighborhoods, the statement continues. In (December), the Division of Police announced the Relentless Pursuit initiative, which is designed to combat violent crimes in our neighborhoods with our federal, state and local partners.

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Michael OMalley also said he wasnt aware of Clevelands involvement in the new federal initiative.

Cleveland Police Patrolmens Association President Jeff Follmer, who represents the rank-and-file officers, said that we werent expecting this.

We have to process the idea of federal agents being sent to Cleveland, he added.

U.S. Rep. Marcia Fudge, a Warrensville Heights Democrat, blasted the plan.

The deployment of militarized agents to Cleveland and cities across the country is unconstitutional and reminds us of the actions of dictators and despots of old, Fudge said in a statement. It disregards the right of our cities and states to govern and protect their residents.The President is not trying to protect Americans.Instead, he is attempting to intimidate and silence those who disagree with his policies. These unlawful actions must stop!

Reporters Adam Ferrise and Robert Higgs contributed to this story.

Here is the original post:

President Donald Trump, Justice Department say Cleveland will see surge of federal agents to combat crime - cleveland.com

Donald Trump on Ghislaine Maxwell: ‘I wish her well’ – The Guardian

Donald Trump has bestowed his good wishes on Ghislaine Maxwell, who faces federal charges for allegedly enabling the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epsteins sex trafficking of minor girls.

At a press conference ostensibly to discuss the coronavirus crisis gripping the US on Tuesday, Trump took questions from reporters, one of whom asked him about Maxwells recent arrest and whether she might implicate some of the powerful men who formed part of Epsteins jet set social circle.

I dont know I havent really been following it too much. I just wish her well, frankly, Trump responded. I have met her numerous times over the years, especially since I lived in Palm Beach, and I guess they lived in Palm Beach. But I wish her well, whatever it is.

Maxwell, a longtime associate of Epstein, was arrested this month and charged with conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, and perjury.

Epstein was arrested last July and killed himself in federal jail in August. His death sparked a flurry of speculation about what he knew about the powerful figures from the worlds of politics, science and entertainment with whom he had frequently associated, including figures like Trump, Bill Clinton and Britains Prince Andrew.

In the early 90s, Ghislaine Maxwell, the daughter of British media tycoon Robert Maxwell, met investment banker and financier Jeffrey Epstein. Their relationship was initially romantic, but it evolved into something more akin to that of Maxwell being a close friend, confidante and personal assistant.

The Duke of York, Prince Andrew, was reportedly introduced to Epstein through their mutual friend Maxwell in 1999, and Epstein reportedly visited the Queens private retreat in Aberdeenshire.

Some have suggested the introduction was made earlier. A 2011letter to the Times of Londonfrom the princes then private secretary, Alastair Watson, suggests Andrew and Epstein knew each other from the early 90s.

Andrew, Maxwell and Epstein are seen together at Donald Trumps Mar-a-Lago club in Florida. Later that year, Epstein and Maxwell attend a joint birthday party at Windsor Castle hosted by the Queen.

Andrew and Epstein holiday together and are pictured on a yacht in Phuket, Thailand,surrounded by topless women. The Times of London reported the princes holiday was paid for by Epstein.

In the same year, Virginia Giuffre, then 17, claims to have had sex with Andrew in Maxwells home in Belgravia, London. Giuffre, whose surname was Roberts at the time of the alleged incidents, says she slept with Andrew twice more, at Epsteins New York home and at an orgy on his private island in the Caribbean.

Epstein is jailed for 18 months by a Floridastate court after pleading guilty to prostituting minors.

Soon after his release, Epstein is visited by Andrew in New York. The pair are photographed together in Central Park. Footage emerges years later, reportedly shot on 6 December, that appears to show Andrew inside Epsteins Manhattan mansion waving goodbye to a woman from behind a door.

Andrew quits his role as UK trade envoy following a furore over the Central Park photos.

Allegations that Andrew had sex with Giuffre emerge in court documents in Florida related to Epstein. The papers say she was forced to have sex with Andrew when she was 17, which is under the age of consent under Florida law. Buckingham Palace denies the allegations. The claims against Andrew are later struck from US civil court records following a federal judges ruling.

Andrew is accused of sexual impropriety by a second alleged Epstein victim, Johanna Sjoberg. She claims he touched her breast at the billionaires Manhattan apartment in 2001. Buckingham Palace says the allegations are 'categorically untrue'.

Epstein is found dead in his jail cell after being re-arrested and charged with sex trafficking. A medical examiner says the death was a suicide.

A pilot on Epsteins private jet later that month claims Andrew was a passenger on past flights with the financier and Giuffre.

Andrew takes part in a disastrous BBC TV interview during which he claims he could not have hadsex with Giuffrebecause he was at home aftera visit to Pizza Express in Woking, and that her description of his dancing with her beforehand could not be true because he was unable to sweat, and that he had "no recollection of ever meeting this lady". After several days of negative reaction, Andrew announces he is to step back from public duties 'for the foreseeable future'.

US prosecutor Geoffrey Berman gives a public statement suggesting there has been 'zero cooperation' with the investigation from Andrew.

After Berman again claims the prince has 'completely shut the door' on cooperating with the US investigation in March, lawyers for Andrew insist he has repeatedly offered to cooperate and accuse US prosecutors of misleading the public and breaching confidentiality.

Maxwell, who has seldom been seen in public in recent years, is arrested by the FBIon charges related to Epstein.

Responding to the reporters question, Trump concluded by saying: I dont know the situation with Prince Andrew. Just dont know. Not aware of it.

Prince Andrew has categorically denied claims of sexual misconduct.

One picture taken at the Mar-a-Lago resort in February 2000 shows Trump and his now wife, Melania, with Maxwell and Epstein.

Maxwells trial date has been set for 12 July next year. The 58-year-old faces up to 35 years in federal prison if convicted of all six counts.

Maxwell has repeatedly denied wrongdoing. Her lawyers have said she vigorously denies the charges and is entitled to the presumption of innocence.

Maxwell was arrested at a mansion in New Hampshire in an FBI raid that ended months of speculation about her whereabouts, fueled by rumors of sightings across America and overseas. Prosecutors have contended that she crafted a life in hiding, designed to evade the authorities, while her lawyers say she was in touch with authorities and merely keeping a low profile.

See more here:

Donald Trump on Ghislaine Maxwell: 'I wish her well' - The Guardian

‘There will never be another’: Kathie Lee Gifford, President Trump, more react to Regis Philbin’s death – USA TODAY

Longtime media personality Regis Philbin, host of "Live! WIth Regis and Kathie Lee" and "Who Wants to Be A Millionaire?," has died. He was 88. USA TODAY

News of Regis Philbin's death shook social media Saturday as his former castmates, stars and even politicians paid tribute to the late TV personality.

The"Who Wants to Be A Millionaire"and "Live! With Regis and Kathie Lee"host died Friday of natural causes at 88, his family confirmed in a statement sent to USA TODAY by his representativeLewis Kay.

"We are deeply saddened to share that our beloved Regis Philbin passed away last night of natural causes, one month shy of his 89thbirthday," his family wrote, remembering"his warmth, his legendary sense of humor, and his singular ability to make every day into something worth talking about."

Shortly after news of Philbin's death broke, tributes poured in on Twitter and Instagram.

Kathie Lee Gifford, his longtime co-hoston "Live! With Regis and Kathie Lee," offered a simple,fitting tribute: "REGIS. There will never be another."

Kelly Ripa, his former co-host on "LiveWith Regis and Kelly," shared an old photo her and Philbin took with Mickey Mouse and Ryan Seacrest and wrote a loving joint tribute with Seacrest.

Regis Philbin dies: The beloved TV host of 'Regis and Kathie Lee' and 'Who Wants to Be A Millionaire' was88

"We are beyond saddened to learn about the loss of Regis Philbin. He was the ultimate class act, bringing his laughter and joy into our homes everyday on Live for more than 23 years," Ripa captioned the photo. "We were beyond lucky to have him as a mentor in our careers and aspire everyday to fill his shoes on the show. We send our deepest love and condolences to his family and hope they can find some comfort in knowing he left the world a better place."

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

President Donald Trump recalled Philbin's advice to him once upon a time and offered his condolences to Philbin'swife, Joy Philbin.

"One of the greats in the history of television, Regis Philbin has passed on to even greater airwaves, at 88. He was a fantastic person, and my friend. He kept telling me to run for President," Trump tweeted."Holds the record for most live television, and he did it well. Regis, we love you."

Comedian Ellen DeGeneres recognized Philbin's influence on telvision.

"Regis Philbin spent more time on television than almost anyone. And we were all better for it. Sending love to his family and his fans," she tweeted.

Larry King shared a photo of him and Philbin together and offered his condolences to his family and wife.

"Regis Philbin was such a prolific talent. He could do it all, and we loved him for it. I will miss him every day," King tweeted.

Henry Winkler recalled one of his very first interviews for promoting "Happy Days," the show that catapulted him tofame asArthur "Fonzie" Fonzarelli, was with Philbin.

Lisa Rinna called Philbin a "great friend and mentor" and noted that she would never forget his "generosity of spirit."

She added: "You changed my life and I will never forget the lessons you taught me. You showed me how to fly. May you Rest In Peace with the angels."

Former Disney CEO, Bob Iger, wrote that he was "heartbroken to hear that a long time colleague & friend, #regisphilbin passed away at the age of 88."

He continued: "Regis graced us with warmth, humor & a self-deprecating wit, always bringing happiness to us all. Our hearts go out to Joy and to his family. Rest In Peace, Regis."

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo gave atribute to Philbin, who was born in the Bronx.

"New York lost a TV legend today. Bronx born and raised, Regis Philbin greeted us for years with our morning coffee and at night after dinner. His humor and enthusiasm touched millions of Americans. My heart goes out to Joy and his loved ones," Cuomo tweeted.

Michael Strahan, who guest hosted "Live! with Regis and Kelly" shared a photo of him and Philbin together and wrote that he was "heartbroken."

"Regis was an incredible man who could light up any room. He always made me feel special no matter if I saw him in the studio or ran into him on the street. Legend and Icon arent strong enough words to describe him," he tweeted.

Josh Gad was saddened by Philbin's passing, writing that "this one hurts."

"A staple in our household growing up, his joy was infectious and his hosting skills among the greatest Ive ever seen. Whether on 'Live'or leading 'Who Wants to be a Millionaire'he was always captivating & hilarious," Gad tweeted.

Tony Bennett wrote: "Regis Philbin always made me laugh and I loved being on his show as he made everyone feel so welcome. We will miss him."

Craig Ferguson tweeted: "Awful news. Regis Philbin was a friend and a mentor to me. I will never forget his kindness and support. He truly was a mensch."

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio wrote aboutPhilbin's friendly demeanor.

"Regis Philbin brought humor, warmth and wit into so many homes. Many people who never met him feel as though theyve lost a personal friend and thats a testament to his character," he wrote. "He will be missed."

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2020/07/25/regis-philbin-dies-kelly-ripa-donald-trump-more-stars-react/5511261002/

View original post here:

'There will never be another': Kathie Lee Gifford, President Trump, more react to Regis Philbin's death - USA TODAY

Meghan McCain responds to Donald Trump’s old tweet that she ‘will never make it’ on TV – USA TODAY

During "The View," Meghan McCain called out to President Donald Trump's daughter and advisor on her stance. USA TODAY

Meghan McCain is responding to President Donald Trump's insult five years later, in which he doubted her television career potential.

Before joining "The View" in 2017, McCain worked at Fox News as a contributor, eventually co-hosting the afternoon talk show "Outnumbered." After she appeared on Fox's weekday opinion program"The Five" in 2015, Trump criticized the daughter of late senator John McCain on social media, stating that "she will never make it" on TV.

He also urged Fox News to "do so much better."

The 35-year-old TV host responded to the president's 2015tweet on Sunday, re-posting a screenshot of the old post after it resurfaced on an Instagram page called "Tweets That Don't Age Well."

"I forgot Trump even did this," she wrote."I think Im doing okay with the old tv career... fun fact,@theviewabcwon best daytime talk show Emmy while I have been one of the cohosts this year, Trump and The Apprentice never won one, ever."

"The View" recently received an Emmy Award forOutstanding Informative Talk Show last month at the47th annualDaytime Emmys,a ceremony reconfigured due to COVID-19. McCain could hardly contain her excitement at the time, expressing her pride on Twitter.

"CONGRATULATIONS@TheView!" McCaintweeted."Especially our fearless Executive Producer @Brianteta - hosts @WhoopiGoldberg @JoyVBehar @sunny and our incredible producers and entire team!!!!!"

More: Daytime Emmy winners acknowledge COVID-19 epidemic, racial justice efforts in remote ceremony

McCain joined "The View" in October 2017, quickly becoming one of the panel's most outspoken conservative commentators, frequentlybutting heads withJoy Behar and other co-hosts.

Earlier this year, McCain clarified that said sheself-identifies as a"conservative first and foremostbefore being a Republican."

"I'm still in the party and I still vote Republican and I will going forward, but Trump gets nothing from me," she said on"The View"on Jan. 28.

More: Why Meghan McCain is kind of 'grateful' that Donald Trump is president

Contributing: Cydney Henderson

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2020/07/20/donald-trump-tweet-insulting-meghan-mccain-resurfaces-she-responds/5470599002/

Visit link:

Meghan McCain responds to Donald Trump's old tweet that she 'will never make it' on TV - USA TODAY