Did America Use Bioweapons in Korea? Nicholson Baker Tried to Find Out – The New York Times

To my nonscientists eye. Similar caveats we may never have incontrovertible proof, its remotely possible, though perhaps eternally unprovable, we may never know, its at least possible, will we ever know?, let me just blurt out what I think happened, etc. infest Bakers narrative, usually preceded or followed by wild accusations (and, occasionally, by a sign of self-awareness: I lay in bed some of today reading more of this book, hating it, excited by it, embarrassed by it).

At times, the book is framed as a deliberate challenge to the intelligence community: I could be completely wrong. The only way to prove me wrong is by declassifying the entire document. But this is not how a historian proceeds. Again and again, Baker bristles with anger over actions that were seriously contemplated by the C.I.A., other intelligence agencies and the military but never undertaken. I felt trembly and disgusted at the same time, he writes of Operation Sphinx, a proposal to gas millions of Japanese from the air during World War II. Its a horrible and disillusioning thing to know that your own country was passing around a paper like Sphinx in the Pentagon. Really? To know that in a brutal war men thought brutal things?

At another point, he questions the long, interesting, confusing letter he got from Floyd ONeal, one of some 30 captured American airmen and Marines who confessed to germ-warfare bombing in Korea. ONeals confession is surprising and moving, though, whether or not its true, Baker tells us. ONeal recanted completely after he was released, and writes in his letter of sustaining torture so awful he still wont describe it to Baker more than 50 years later: What they did for the next days I dont care to discuss but I finally agreed to sign their confession. There is nothing surprising or moving about a coerced confession, save for ONeals ability to endure the price it exacted.

Baker concedes that Americans individually have done good things, a gesture followed by a banal list that includes sunglasses, topiary, no-hitters and the midcentury New Yorker. Yes, and also little baby ducks and old pickup trucks. This is another affectation of virtue, not a moral argument.

I share Bakers disgust with all the crazy, wasteful, illegal, counterproductive and murderous things the C.I.A. has done, and no doubt continues to do. Hell, I even like dogs. Bakers Olympian worldview, though, takes him to almost the same place he landed in Human Smoke, his paste-up 2008 history of the road to World War II: immobilized by purity and concluding that we should never have intervened, even to stop the Nazis. Americans are neither beasts nor angels, just human beings trying to forge our way through the murky moral choices this world poses. To pretend otherwise is perhaps the worst deception of all.

Read the original:

Did America Use Bioweapons in Korea? Nicholson Baker Tried to Find Out - The New York Times

Whats next after coronavirus? (letter to the editor) – SILive.com

It bothers me and lots of Americans, what happened to our great country. I do not know why the current administration is not clearly telling the American people who is responsible for this pandemic.

We only hear that China did all of this.

I was wondering, when all this happened, where was our intelligence community?

The whole world is suffering and people are dying right and left, why isnt there an investigation to find who is responsible for destroying the human race?

People had no experience with this kind of suffering. It is the responsibility of all those countries who have germ warfare labs to completely destroy these machines who are killing people. All these nukes are obsolete.

Now we are entering into a new era. It is in the best interest of all the countries who are making nuclear weapons and these warfare germs to destroy them completely and spend money for the humanity of the world so people can have a better life and clean water to drink.

I am wondering if this coronavirus is a natural disaster or an economic or political game among superpowers. I guess we will never know, as up until now we do not know who killed John F. Kennedy, who did 9/11 and who is doing this corona. I guess we have to live with these conspiracy theories. If this virus is doing human to human transmission, I hope the next virus after corona will not be airborne.

All these economic disasters have to be investigated, and those people or countries responsible should be punished to the fullest extent, so we can all live a normal life.

(Dr. Mohammad Khalid is a Todt Hill resident.)

View original post here:

Whats next after coronavirus? (letter to the editor) - SILive.com

Write Again … And you know who – Washington Daily News – thewashingtondailynews.com

Please let me, friends, thank you in advance for reading todays column. Your indulgence is not unappreciated.

You see, Ive written this, and versions of it, many, many times in my head. Even if I should get it right, I know there will be those who dont agree, who perhaps take issue with my assertions.

To them I would say, I respect your right to disagree. And I really do.

One of the glories of the form of government that was bequeathed us by our founders was the marvelous notion that we are allowed, even encouraged, to not only disagree, but to freely express such sentiments without fear of a government intervention, or worse. There are those who dont acknowledge this.

The First Amendment. To think there are, have always been, millions of human beings who are not now, have never, been permitted freedom of speech. Think of that, my fellow Americans, the next time someone, or some group, exercises their First Amendment rights by speech and or assembly with a viewpoint you oppose.

For those, however, who elect to use such protest as an excuse for vandalism, destruction of property, looting, please know that I abhor their actions, and believe they should be subject to those laws that prohibit such conduct. They are a minority, but do an injustice to those whose protests should be heard.

Back to my original intent regarding todays column. Here goes:

When Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, there were those in our land (two countries) at the time, who rejoiced.

You know who they were, and if you had to apply one of the now two much-used, over-used, political labels of our time, you know which would apply.

When Franklin Delano Roosevelt died, there were those in our land who were not saddened. You know who.

Eleanor Roosevelt was greatly admired throughout much of the world (this is not hyberpole) during her lifetime. There were those in our land, however, who despised her. You know who.

When John Fitzgerald Kennedy was assassinated, there were those in our land who were pleased. You know who.

When Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated, there were those in our land who thought he got what was coming to him. You know who.

When Robert (Bobby) Francis Kennedy was assassinated, there were those in our land who were not displeased. You know who.

Referencing those two political labels further, consider the following:

Who opposed the abolition of slavery? You know who.

Who opposed setting aside portions of our wilderness lands so as to preserve them in perpetuity? You know who.

Who opposed splitting up the monopolistic enterprises of the Robber Barons? You know who.

Who opposed establishing child labor laws? You know who.

Who opposed setting minimum wage requirements? You know who.

Who opposed limits on workers hours? You know who.

Who opposed Womens Suffrage? You know who.

Who opposed unions? You know who.

Who opposed programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid? You know who.

Who opposed desegregation of our military? You know who.

Who opposes environmental/conservation safeguards? You know who.

Who opposed the Civil Rights Act? You know who.

Who opposed the Voting Rights Act? You know who.

Who opposed racial integration? You know who.

Who opposed/opposes making it easier to vote? You know who.

Who opposed/opposes strengthening gun safety requirements? You know who.

And who have the opposers consistently blamed at one time or another for all these things they have found so objectionable? The media the government the intellectuals the liberals the blacks (there was a time when another word was commonly used) the Jews

Why, there was another country that once had those who used such despicable tactics to come to power in Europe in the 1930s. We know how that came out, dont we?

Perhaps most recent, who opposes mandatory wearing of masks during this pandemic? You know who.

Now, in closing (bet youre glad to read that) let me assert that there are those who fall into the opposers column, who dont buy into all of such a negative, anti-progressive philosophy.

And, conversely, there are some who are on the other side who do not espouse and fully support some of their agenda as well.

If you made it here to the end, thanks for sticking with me. Perhaps more important, as I wrote near the beginning of this much too lengthy expository exercise, if you disagree in full or in part with anything Ive written, I respect your right to do so.

If you agree in full or in part with anything Ive written, well, then you know your history.

Should you choose to meet me here again next week, Ill look forward to it.

Peace.

Follow this link:

Write Again ... And you know who - Washington Daily News - thewashingtondailynews.com

How The First Amendment Can Fight BLM Messages – ValueWalk

How The First Amendment Can Fight BLM Messages, Rosewood City Removes Street Art After Receiving Demand

Get our free ebook on how the Soviet Union became Putin's Russia.

Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

WASHINGTON, D.C. (July 22, 2020) - Many cities have permitted supporters of Black Lives Matter [BLM] and related causes to post messages supporting their views, but those who think there should be some balance may have a new weapon.

In 2016, Warren Buffett made what has turned out to be a very astute and well-timed investment decision. The Oracle of Omaha decided to invest $1 billion of Berkshire Hathaway's capital on nearly 10 million worth of shares in Apple during the first quarter of the year. If youre looking for value stocks, and exclusive Read More

Although Rosewood City in California had permitted a group to paint the words "BLACK LIVES MATTER" on a city street, they ordered the words removed just after receiving a request from an attorney to be able to paint the words "MAGA 2020" on the same stretch of street, or nearby.

Although the City provided another explanation for suddenly agreeing to remove the BLM message, and pledged that "no further art installation will be authorized on the City's streets," it's more likely that the City realized that it cannot constitutionally permit one group to post a message, and deny that same privilege to another group with another message, says public interest law professor John Banzhaf, whose similar complaint forced radio and TV stations to balance cigarette commercials with antismoking messages, and led to the ban on cigarette commercials.

The City claimed that it ordered the removal of the BLM words because"staff is concerned about public safety issues that may arise from painting murals on its public streets, which could result in driver confusion and traffic accidents," but the timing makes it more likely that the removal was prompted by a fear of a law suit for violating the First Amendment, says Banzhaf.

Professor Banzhaf explained that streets, sidewalks, and parks have traditionally been classified as "public forums" (or "open forums") where, under the First Amendment, speech (including signs) cannot be restricted based upon their content or meaning.

So, while the government can impose content-neutral - commonly known as "time, place, and manner" - restrictions on free speech activities in public forums, it cannot constitutionally permit "Black Lives Matter" and prohibit "MAGA 2020," anymore than it could permit the words "Pro Life" and refuse "Pro Choice," or OK "Yes Israel" but nix "OK Palestine" or "No Israel," says Banzhaf. who has testified as a First Amendment expert before a congressional committee.

Thus those who oppose the message or viewpoint convened by "BLM" or simply think there should be some balance to the messages displayed on city property, can fight back by demanding the right, under the First Amendment, to pose a contrasting message, suggests Banzhaf.

In many cases the result may be, as in Redwood City, that the BLM message will be removed or, in some cases, messages expressing a different viewpoint will be posted by other groups or individuals, suggests Banzhaf.

See the original post:

How The First Amendment Can Fight BLM Messages - ValueWalk

David Arbeitman: Columnist provides sanitized version of history – GazetteNET

Published: 7/24/2020 4:47:58 PM

Jay Fleitmans Securing liberty for all (July 7) is plagued by bias and important omissions. If we are to distill his message to its essence, the gist of his column seems to be be proud of our country and look on the bright side.

This strikes me as particularly tone-deaf during our pandemic, economic recession, police violence and systemic racism, and climate emergency. Yes, there is a nod to the decimation of the indigenous native population and slavery, which he refers to as great blots in American history but no recognition that social injustice and racism is not just a relic of the past, but institutionalized into the fabric of our current society.

In reviewing our tumultuous past, he highlights anarchist bombings, labor unrest and communist subversion as notable threats to our democracy, but neglects to mention that the McCarthy era was a much greater threat to our democracy than any communist subversion.

For a person who claims to be a defender of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights including the First Amendment he does not explicitly reject Trump repeatedly attacking a free press and labeling the news media as the enemy of the people.

As a student of history, is he not aware that Hitler and Stalin used the same terms to muzzle dissenting opinions and criminalize criticism of their regimes? While he presumably celebrates the right to peaceably assemble, he portrays protesters as rioters and looters, even though the vast majority were peaceful when exercising their First Amendment rights.

I, for one, am quite relieved that Fleitman is not teaching U.S. history to our students in our public schools as he would present a sanitized version of our history. I believe that the greatest threat to our democracy and our national security is President Trump. In accepting and encouraging help form foreign powers to help him steal the election, Trump showed and continues to show disdain for our Constitution and our electoral process.

Those who do not stand up to would-be dictators who threaten our democracy are complicit in undermining democratic values and the rule of law and will be judged harshly by history.

David Arbeitman

Florence

View original post here:

David Arbeitman: Columnist provides sanitized version of history - GazetteNET

RCFP supports fight for records related to Jamal Khashoggi killing – Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Amicus brief filed by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 32 media organizations

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Date Filed: July 23, 2020

Background: In 2018, the Committee to Protect Journalists and the Knight First Amendment Institute separately submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to five federal agencies related to the Saudi Arabian governments execution of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

The two organizations sought records about the duty to warn a person about a known threat, under Intelligence Community Directive 191, and specifically about the duty to warn Khashoggi prior to his murder.

After all of the agencies failed to respond to the FOIA requests, the Knight Institute filed a lawsuit, which CPJ joined. During litigation, each of the agencies except the State Department responded to the request by invoking the Glomar doctrine, claiming that acknowledging the existence or non-existence of documents responsive to the requests would compromise national security. Subsequently, the Knight Institute voluntarily dismissed its claims, leaving CPJ as the sole plaintiff. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia upheld the Glomar responses, granting summary judgment for the government.

CPJ then appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Our Position: The D.C. Circuit should reverse the district courts decision that the intelligence agencies adequately justified their Glomar responses to the FOIA requests.

Quote: Given the unbridled growth of Glomar responses across federal agencies, the pernicious way in which overclassification of documents interacts with the Glomar doctrine, and the press freedoms implicated by the records at issue, district courts should be required to apply a heightened standard of proof in this case and others like it would bring the doctrine back in line with the language and purpose of the [Freedom of Information] Act.

Related: In 2019, a D.C. district court ruled that the FBI could not invoke the Glomar doctrine in response to a FOIA request about the agencys impersonation of documentary filmmakers. The Reporters Committee filed suit after the agency invoked the doctrine to avoid searching for records related to agents impersonation of a documentary film crew to investigate Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and his followers after a 2014 armed standoff between Bundy and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.

In 2016, a New York appeals court allowed the New York City Police Department to invoke the Glomar doctrine in response to a FOIA request about the departments surveillance of two Muslim men. The Reporters Committee and 20 media organizations submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, arguing that the doctrine cannot be invoked by a state.

More here:

RCFP supports fight for records related to Jamal Khashoggi killing - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Elon Musk and coronavirus skeptic Alex Berenson reportedly discussed starting their own publication – MSN Money

Provided by Business Insider Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. Susan Walsh/Associated Press

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and writer Alex Berenson, who have both been skeptical about the severity of the coronavirus outbreak, reportedly discussed starting their own publication.

According to The New York Times' Ben Smith, Musk and Berenson considered launching their own news company, and Berenson held discussions about bringing on reporters. He has since abandoned the plan, The Times reports.

Musk told The Times that he and Berenson "basically just agree that there's room for a fiercely nonpartisan news company." Representatives for Musk did not immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment.

Berenson, an author and former New York Times reporter, has been outspoken about his theoriesthat the response to the coronavirus outbreak has been overblown, despite evidence from experts. He has incorrectly said "kids, children, almost anybody under 30 is at no risk" of contracting COVID-19 and that the lockdowns themselves are the source of problems related to the virus.

He has also tweeted that "Masks are useless," despite evidence that wearing a mask prevents the spread of the virus and saves lives.

In June, Berenson published a booklet called "Unreported Truths about COVID-19 and Lockdowns," which Amazon's Kindle Direct Publishing service initially declined to publish, saying that the book did not comply with its guidelines. Berenson tweeted a screenshot of Amazon's email, saying the company "censored" his book.

Musk quickly spoke up, tweeting at Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos that the situation was "insane." "Time to break up Amazon," Musk tweeted. "Monopolies are wrong!" Soon after, Amazon said the book was blocked in error and would be reinstated.

Musk appears to agree with Berenson on many of his views, calling the early response to the outbreak a "panic" and "dumb" and falsely saying that children are "essentially immune" to the virus. Musk has pushed for reopening businesses throughout the country, describing stay-at-home orders as "fascist" and at first defying local ordinances to reopen his Tesla plant in California.

Musk has also described coronavirus death counts in the US as "misleading," despite the fact thatexperts estimate the US has undercounted deaths.

Video: Dr. Fauci responds to negative comments of his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic (USA TODAY)

UP NEXT

View original post here:

Elon Musk and coronavirus skeptic Alex Berenson reportedly discussed starting their own publication - MSN Money

Is Giving to Biden or Trump Grounds for Getting Fired? New Poll Finds a Disturbing Number of People Who Think It Should Be – Reason

Poll finds self-censorship on the rise across political groups. A disturbingly high percentage of people polled earlier this month think private political donations should be grounds for getting fired. The number was especially high among respondents under age 30, with 44 percent of the youngest group saying business leaders who donate to Donald Trump should be fired and 27 percent saying the same for execs who give to Joe Biden. Meanwhile, 62 percent of all respondents said they're reluctant to share their political views for fear of offending othersup four points from when the same question was posed in 2017.

Those are a few of the findings in a new national poll conducted by the Cato Institute and YouGov.

When it comes to free expression, the "fears cross partisan lines," writes Cato Director of Polling Emily Ekins. "Majorities of Democrats (52%), independents (59%) and Republicans (77%) all agree they have political opinions they are afraid to share."

There are some differences of degree. A majority (58 percent) of people who categorized themselves as "very" liberal told pollsters they felt they could express themselves freely, while only 48 percent of "moderate" liberals said the same.

"Political expression is an issue that divides the Democratic coalition between centrist Democrats and their left flank," suggests Ekins.

The percentage of respondents who felt they could speak freely was even lower among those who labeled themselves "moderate" (36 percent), "conservative" (23 percent), or "very conservative" (23 percent).

Of course, the poll doesn't tell us how much people's perceptions on this front are true to life and how much they reflect distorted evaluations. Maybe staunch liberals feel they can speak more freely because cultural currents do indeed allow it; maybe they just don't realize when their free expression is offending or alienating people. Maybe it's a little of both, plus a lot of other reasons.

On the conservative side, the strong feeling of having to self-censor is likely somewhat rooted in a media and political culture that thrives on peddling its own marginalization. But there's also statistical evidence that self-identification with conservatism and the Republican Party are on the decline, and no doubt that conservative ideas are sidelined in many elite institutions.

It's also hard to guess what people actually mean about their politics when they describe themselves as stronger or less-strong "liberals" or "conservatives" in an era where these meanings are mutable and often bizarre.

Ekins notes that even strong liberals are less confident in their ability to speak freely in 2020 then they were in 2017: "the share who feel pressured to self-censor rose 12 points from 30% in 2017 to 42% in 2020." At the same time,

The share of moderates who self-censor increased 7 points from 57% to 64%, and the share of conservatives rose 70% to 77%, also a 7-point increase. Strong conservatives are the only group with little change. They are about as likely now (77%) to say they hold back their views as in 2017 (76%).

Self-censorship is widespread across demographic groups as well. Nearly two-thirds of Latino Americans (65%) and White Americans (64%) and nearly half of African Americans (49%) have political views they are afraid to share. Majorities of men (65%) and women (59%), people with incomes over $100,000 (60%) and people with incomes less than $20,000 (58%), people under 35 (55%) and over 65 (66%), religious (71%) and non-religious (56%) all agree that the political climate prevents them from expressing their true beliefs.

Not all self-censorship is bad, of course. There are times and places for restraint. So it's hard to know quite how to interpret the results above.

Alas, another part of the study is much more unambiguously depressing: A large number of people think whether someone is employable ought to be tied to their personal politics.

"Nearly a quarter (22%) of Americans would support firing a business executive who personally donates to Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden's campaign," notes Ekins. "Even more, 31% support firing a business executive who donates to Donald Trump's re-election campaign." And:

Support rises among political subgroups. Support increases to 50% of strong liberals who support firing executives who personally donate to Trump. And more than a third (36%) of strong conservatives support firing an executive for donating to Biden's presidential campaign.

Young Americans are also more likely than older Americans to support punishing people at work for personal donations to Trump. Forty-four percent (44%) of Americans under 30 support firing executives if they donate to Trump. This share declines to 22% among those over 55 years olda 20-point difference. An age gap also exists for Biden donors, but is less pronounced. Twenty-seven percent (27%) of Americans under 30 support firing executives who donate to Biden compared to 20% of those over 55a 7-point difference.

Respondents also expressed fear that their own political opinions or donations would cost them a job or a career opportunity. "Younger people are also more concerned than older people, irrespective of political viewpoint," notes Ekins.

Examining all Americans under 65, 37% of those under 30 are worried their political opinions could harm their career trajectories, compared to 30% of 3054 year-olds and 24% of 5564 year-olds. But the age gap is more striking taking into account political views.

A slim majority (51%) of Republicans under 30 fear their views could harm their career prospects compared to 39% of 3044 year-olds, 34% of 4554 year-olds, and 28% of 5564 year-old Republicans.

Democrats reflect a similar but less pronounced pattern. A third (33%) of Democrats under 30 worry they have views that could harm their current and future jobs, compared to 27% of 3054 year-olds, and 19% of 5564 year-old Democrats.

You can find the full surveyconducted July 16, 2020, with a national sample of 2,000 American adultshere. The sections on political donations and self-censorship are here. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.36 percentage points.

A couple of (positive) Portland updates:

Twitter is exploring subscription options.

The Malaysian government is backtracking on making people who post videos to their personal social-media accounts get a license.

A new documentary goes inside Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Read the original:

Is Giving to Biden or Trump Grounds for Getting Fired? New Poll Finds a Disturbing Number of People Who Think It Should Be - Reason

A Nollywood film about two women in love faces an uphill battle in a country where homophobia is rampant – The Philadelphia Tribune

Two women lay in bed in a tight embrace, one is stroking the other's hair and whispers that she is in love with her.

These intimate scenes wouldn't be out of place in a Hollywood movie, but in Nigeria's film industry, Nollywood, they are near taboo.

But Nigerian filmmaker Uyaiedu Ikpe-Etim says she is tackling the subject head-on in her new film titled "Ife," to create space for queer characters in the country's prolific movie industry.

"Ife'" means love in the Yoruba language, spoken in West Africa, and most prominently in southern Nigeria.

LGBTQ characters are described poorly in Nollywood and are viewed in problematic roles that encourage violence or judgment from viewers, Ikpe-Etim says.

"I'm queer so 'Ife' is dear to my heart. I wanted to represent LGBTQ characters in a different light than how they are shown in past stories, to change how heterosexuals view them," she explained.

Homophobia in Nigeria

The story centers on two women Ife and Adaora and the uncertainty surrounding their relationship. It is created in partnership with Equality hub, an NGO in Nigeria focused on fighting social injustices against sexual minorities.

"They come into problems when they are not certain of the future of their relationship considering that these two women live in Nigeria which is a homophobic country," she said of the storyline.

In the West African nation where homophobia runs rampant,Ikpe-Etim is anadvocate for the country's lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ) community.

Homosexuality is illegal in Nigeria. The Same-Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act of 2014 says anyone found guilty of homosexuality faces up to 14 years in prison.

A 2019 survey by The Initiative for Equal Rights (TIERS), a Nigerian human rights organization, found that 75% of people in the country support the continued enforcement of the anti-gay laws.

Censorship of queer films

Ikpe-Etim, 31, says "Ife" has no fixed release date yet but will be out before the end of the year.

What is certain is that it faces an uphill battle with Nigeria's film censors, who have said they may "go after the producers," if they find that the film promotes homosexuality.

Adedayo Thomas, executive director of the NFVCB, told CNN the board will not approve films that promote themes that don't conform with the country's "constitution, morals and traditions."

"We are monitoring the progress of the movie, and if it goes against the law by promoting homosexuality, we will be forced at some point to go after the producer and executive producer," he added.

According to Thomas, Ife was never submitted to the NFVCB before its trailer was released, making it impossible to classify or censor the film.

"We look at the content of the film and we look at the end. For example, in a movie that glorifies fraud, we look at how it ends, did the fraudster meet their waterloo? How the movie ends will determine our censorship. You wouldn't watch your kid to watch a film that glorifies fraud," he told CNN.

"Ife's" producer Pamela Adie says agencies like NFVCB suppress the creativity of filmmakers.

"If there is a demand for films like Ife and if people want it, and the censor's board does not approve then it means they are indirectly stifling the creative powers of filmmakers. To deny a film simply because of queer characters is discrimination," she said.

Stereotyping queer characters

Nollywood has always had a problematic relationship with its queer characters, portraying them as mentally ill, under the influence of witchcraft or troubled.

In Emotional Crack, a 2003 film, one of the lead characters, Camilla falls in love with Crystal, a married woman who suffered domestic abuse from her husband.

Both women kicked off a relationship that eventually ended when Crystal became unsure of remaining in a same-sex relationship.

While the film was one of the country's early introductions into LGBTQ relationships, it repeated damaging stereotypes like branding Camilla as violent, predatory, and suggested that Crystal's lesbianism was as a result of being mistreated by a man.

Similarly, in a 2010 film, "Men in Love," the affair of the lead couple was explained away by a "strong satanic bond."

Adie told CNN that she wants to challenge other filmmakers in Nollywood to create more nuanced queer stories devoid of the usual stereotypes.

"My hope is that Ife shapes things up, and mainstream Nollywood starts to think about stories that portray the reality of LGBT Nigerians," she explained.

The 36-year-old added that "Ife" is one of few films with a focus on lesbians in Nigeria, "a lot of representation has been geared towards gay men," she says.

Outpouring of support

Nigeria is not the only country with strict rules regarding films with strong LGBTQ representation.

In April 2018, Rafiki was banned by Kenya's Film and Classification Board (KFCB) because of its intent to "promote lesbianism," in the East African nation.

Despite the challenges around creating queer centered films in Nigeria, Adie says there has been an outpouring of support for "Ife" from audiences in the country.

"It is something that is groundbreaking. We have received support, from when we released the poster to the trailer. It feels like people didn't know they wanted this kind of content till now."

View original post here:

A Nollywood film about two women in love faces an uphill battle in a country where homophobia is rampant - The Philadelphia Tribune

"Ife," a film about two woman in love faces an uphill battle in a country where homophobia runs rampant – MSN Money

The Equality Hub A new film, titled 'Ife,' about two women in love, is challenging queer stereotypes in Nigeria's movie industry

Two women lay in bed in a tight embrace, one is stroking the other's hair and whispers that she is in love with her.

These intimate scenes wouldn't be out of place in a Hollywood movie, but in Nigeria's film industry, Nollywood, they are near taboo.

But Nigerian filmmaker Uyaiedu Ikpe-Etim says she is tackling the subject head-on in her new film titled "Ife," to create space for queer characters in the country's prolific movie industry.

"Ife'" means love in the Yoruba language, spoken in West Africa, and most prominently in southern Nigeria.

LGBTQ characters are described poorly in Nollywood and are viewed in problematic roles that encourage violence or judgment from viewers, Ikpe-Etim says.

"I'm queer so 'Ife' is dear to my heart. I wanted to represent LGBTQ characters in a different light than how they are shown in past stories, to change how heterosexuals view them," she explained.

The story centers on two women Ife and Adaora and the uncertainty surrounding their relationship. It is created in partnership with Equality hub, an NGO in Nigeria focused on fighting social injustices against sexual minorities.

"They come into problems when they are not certain of the future of their relationship considering that these two women live in Nigeria which is a homophobic country," she said of the storyline.

In the West African nation where homophobia runs rampant, Ikpe-Etim is an advocate for the country's lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ) community.

Homosexuality is frowned upon in Nigeria. The Same-Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act of 2014 says anyone found guilty of same-sex marriage faces up to 14 years in prison.

A 2019 survey by The Initiative for Equal Rights (TIERS), a Nigerian human rights organization, found that 75% of people in the country support the continued enforcement of the anti-gay laws.

Ikpe-Etim, 31, says "Ife" has no fixed release date yet but will be out before the end of the year.

What is certain is that it faces an uphill battle with Nigeria's film censors, who have said they may "go after the producers," if they find that the film promotes homosexuality.

The National Film and Video Censors Board (NFVCB) is the government agency set up to regulate films and videos in Nigeria.

Adedayo Thomas, executive director of the NFVCB, told CNN the board will not approve films that promote themes that don't conform with the country's "constitution, morals and traditions."

"We are monitoring the progress of the movie, and if it goes against the law by promoting homosexuality, we will be forced at some point to go after the producer and executive producer," he added.

According to Thomas, Ife was never submitted to the NFVCB before its trailer was released, making it impossible to classify or censor the film.

"We look at the content of the film and we look at the end. For example, in a movie that glorifies fraud, we look at how it ends, did the fraudster meet their waterloo? How the movie ends will determine our censorship. You wouldn't watch your kid to watch a film that glorifies fraud," he told CNN.

"Ife's" producer Pamela Adie says agencies like NFVCB suppress the creativity of filmmakers.

"If there is a demand for films like Ife and if people want it, and the censor's board does not approve then it means they are indirectly stifling the creative powers of filmmakers. To deny a film simply because of queer characters is discrimination," she said.

Nollywood has always had a problematic relationship with its queer characters, portraying them as mentally ill, under the influence of witchcraft or troubled.

In Emotional Crack, a 2003 film, one of the lead characters, Camilla falls in love with Crystal, a married woman who suffered domestic abuse from her husband.

Both women kicked off a relationship that eventually ended when Crystal became unsure of remaining in a same-sex relationship.

While the film was one of the country's early introductions into LGBTQ relationships, it repeated damaging stereotypes like branding Camilla as violent, predatory, and suggested that Crystal's lesbianism was as a result of being mistreated by a man.

Similarly, in a 2010 film, "Men in Love," the affair of the lead couple was tagged a "strong satanic bond."

Adie told CNN that she wants to challenge other filmmakers in Nollywood to create more nuanced queer stories devoid of the usual stereotypes.

"My hope is that Ife shapes things up, and mainstream Nollywood starts to think about stories that portray the reality of LGBT Nigerians," she explained.

The 36-year-old added that "Ife" is one of few films with a focus on lesbians in Nigeria, "a lot of representation has been geared towards gay men," she says.

Nigeria is not the only country with strict rules regarding films with strong LGBTQ representation.

In April 2018, Rafiki was banned by Kenya's Film and Classification Board (KFCB) because of its intent to "promote lesbianism," in the East African nation.

Despite the challenges around creating queer centered films in Nigeria, Adie says there has been an outpouring of support for "Ife" from audiences in the country.

"It is something that is groundbreaking. We have received support, from when we released the poster to the trailer. It feels like people didn't know they wanted this kind of content till now."

Continued here:

"Ife," a film about two woman in love faces an uphill battle in a country where homophobia runs rampant - MSN Money

Zuckerberg, Bezos, other tech CEOs to testify at anti-trust hearing – Toronto Star

WASHINGTONFour Big Tech CEOs Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg, Amazons Jeff Bezos, Googles Sundar Pichai and Apples Tim Cook will answer for their companies practices before Congress at a hearing Wednesday by the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.

The panel has conducted a bipartisan investigation over the past year of the tech giants market dominance and their effect on consumers.

Its the first such congressional review of the tech industry. It has aimed to determine whether existing competition policies and century-old antitrust laws are adequate or if new legislation and more funding for enforcement are needed.

The four CEOs are expected to testify remotely.

The hearing originally was set for Monday. It was rescheduled to allow lawmakers who are committee members to participate in commemorations at the U.S. Capitol on Monday and Tuesday for Rep. John Lewis, the civil rights icon and longtime Georgia congressman who died July 17.

Original post:

Zuckerberg, Bezos, other tech CEOs to testify at anti-trust hearing - Toronto Star

Amazon To Invest In Reliance Retail: Is Big Tech Joining Hands To Conquer India? – Inc42 Media

Amazon Inc is in talks to buy a 9.9% stake in Reliance Retail

Amazon wants a preferred, strategic stake in Reliance Retail for JioMart

Mukesh Ambani recently highlighted that its retail unit has received a strong interest from strategic and financial investors

Almost a week after Mukesh Ambani announced that Reliance will now push for the growth of Reliance Retail, reports have surfaced that Amazon Inc is in talks to buy a 9.9% stake in Reliance Retail.

Amazon wants a preferred, strategic stake in Reliance Retail for JioMart, the report added. However, the value of this deal remains unknown. The reports bring a deja vu to April when Facebook picked up a 9.9% stake in Reliance Jio and the company went on to raise approx $20.2 Bn between April and July. Is Reliance Retail the next Jio?

Reliance Retail, founded in 2006, is the largest retail chain in India. It serves over 3.5 million customers each week through its nearly 10,000 physical stores in more than 6,500 cities and towns in the country.

Speaking at the 43rd annual general meeting (AGM) 2020, Reliances chairperson and managing director Mukesh Ambani highlighted that its retail unit has received a strong interest from strategic and financial investors. However, Ambani did not emphasise on this topic further.

Reliance Retail had recorded a turnover of INR 1.62 Lakh Cr in the financial year 2020, ending March this year. With this, Reliance has managed to widen its gap with the competitor Kishore Biyanis Future Group that has an annual turnover of INR 30,000 Cr. Both Amazon and Reliance Retail have also been locked in a battle to acquire a majority stake in Future Retail.

According to media reports, Reliance Industries may also acquire 30% stake in Future Groups Future Retails retail unit Future Retail for INR 6K Cr.

Though Ambani did not mention any elaborate platform for fundraising through Reliance Retail, Morgan Stanley, which served as the financial advisor to Reliance Industries for Jio Platforms deals, recently valued Reliance Retail at about $29 Bn.

Ambani had announced that JioMart will function closely with WhatsApp to create new opportunities for the local kirana stores and the consumers. He noted that Reliance Jio has successfully piloted the beta version of JioMart Grocery in 200 cities, delivering close to 2.50 Lakh orders daily. Therefore, it now aims to spread it across to other categories as well.

With this, JioMart will be a direct competitor to ecommerce platforms like Amazon and Flipkart, who have marked their presence in all segments except pharmaceuticals.

JioMart has now enabled a multipurpose point of service (POS) service to enable smooth transactions between stores and their customers. Isha Ambani noted that the grocery delivery platform will further empower and engage kirana stores by allowing them to stay connected with their customers through multifunctional PoS.

Isha Ambani emphasised that the JioMart was built on two fundamental pillars. First, to create a powerful omnichannel tech-platform to unite customers, kiranas and producers. Second, to have a physical network of Reliance Retail that takes benefits of new commerce to every corner.

Amazon always had ambitions of consolidating with a local partner to smoothen its Indian play, but that failed after Flipkart was acquired by Walmart. Hence, with Reliance Retail, Amazon is bound to smoothen its tough times with the Indian government as well to strengthen its ecommerce foothold in the country.

View original post here:

Amazon To Invest In Reliance Retail: Is Big Tech Joining Hands To Conquer India? - Inc42 Media

Private Islands AWE

Episode 1

Did you know that there are 12 thousand private islands in the world? On this episode of Private Islands we're showing you how to find your own secluded paradise.

Escape from the pressures of everyday life with Private Islands. On this episode were showing you how your front yard can be miles of palm trees and glittering coastline.

Join us as we explore the most magical and luxurious private resort island in the world. Owned by famed illusionist David Copperfield, Musha Cay provides a memorable one-of-a-kind experience like nowhere else on earth.

We're traveling 1,000 miles away from anywhere in search of the perfect private island. Forget about the jet lag because when you land in paradise, your dream becomes reality. It's first-class service on the private island of Desroches.

The Bahamas has grown into private island real estates most in-demand market. Escape to the most exotic and remote islands a multi-millionaire buyer, celebrity, or luxury-seeking tourist can find on this episode of Private Islands!

There's nothing like it in the Caribbean, or even in the world! The result of seven years of construction, Emerald Cay in Turks and Caicos combines pristine natural beauty with state-of-the-art luxury to provide the ultimate private island paradise.

Come see how the affluent are rediscovering themselves in the private island of Turks and Caicos. Immerse yourself in sunshine, sea and surf, just 500 miles off the coast of Florida. Life's short, but your quality time doesn't have to be!

Join host Christina Cindrich as she takes you on a magical journey through the private island of French Polynesia. Discover heaven on earth in your own utopian paradise full of beauty, adventure and above all, sheer escapism.

Tales of pirates, betrayal and hidden treasure all share a part of this island's past. There are some places on earth that simply must be experienced to fully understand and Peter Island in the British Virgin Islands is one of those places.

Roatan is one of the best kept secrets of the Caribbean. We take viewers on an underwater adventure and show the most luxurious private islands Honduras has to offer.

From Miami to colorful Key West, the Florida Keys have become one of the America's favorite tropical escapes. Join host Christina Cindrich as she takes you to some of the most secluded private islands for an experience that cannot be beat.

Join host Christina Cindrich in a country that combines both adventure and luxury into one complete island experience. With one foot planted in the mysterious jungles and the other dipped in the Caribbean Sea, Belize will awaken all of your senses.

Located off the coast of "The Spice Isle" Granada in the Caribbean is one of the most luxurious private islands you'll ever see. Calivigny Island is truly the ultimate escape for the affluent traveler in search of their own slice of paradise.

Youll live as few have lived before in a place where the finest luxuries co-exist in absolute harmony with nature. This is Little Bokeelia Island, a private island paradise that could be yours!

Join host Christina Cindrich as she takes you to one of the worlds most exotic destinations, Fiji! Noted for its magical landscape, stunning beaches, and friendly people, these islands are a spectacular taste of heaven right here on Earth.

Join host Christina Cindrich in the postcard perfect island nation of Fiji. With its white sandy beaches, fascinating culture and magical underwater world, this is an unforgettable Private Island experience that youll never want to be rescued from!

Join host Christina Cindrich on a 300-acre private island paradise off the coast of Antigua. With its gorgeous villas and multi-million dollar estates, Jumby Bay's beauty will cast an unforgettable spell of serene enchantment.

Join host Christina Cindrich for an unforgettable experience on two Four Seasons luxury island resorts in the Maldives. Your postcard perfect paradise will come to life right before your eyes in a destination that will surely take your breath away.

Experience the romance of the South Pacific, the laid-back beauty of the Caribbean, the adventure of Central America and the exotic splendor of Asia. Host Christina Cindrich takes you to her top 10 most incredible private islands in the world.

Perhaps nowhere else in Thailand can you enjoy the combination of sun, beach and nightlife quite like in Phuket. Thailand's largest and most popular island seduces its visitors with a vibrant mix of nighttime entertainment and beach culture.

Isla Simca is a jungle hideaway where natural beauty, art, adventure and architecture fuse into a one-of-a-kind retreat. Join host Christina Cindrich on this Panamanian island that until now has been hidden away from the world's prying eyes!

The Grenadines, an island chain deep in the Caribbean. The name alone elicit visions of exotic and peaceful scenery. St. Vincent being the largest, but away from the hustle and traffic, become mesmerized by the beauty of these castaway islands.

The name Laucala is whispered in all the best circles partly because only the best know how to pronounce it. Owned by the co-founder of Red Bull, this Fijian paradise is one of the worlds top island resorts and once there its easy to see why.

Conjuring up postcard-perfect images of South Pacific indulgence and breathtaking scenery, Bora Bora is a haven of exclusive luxury in French Polynesia. Join host Christina Cindrich in this exclusive Private Islands episode you wont want to miss!

Join host Christina Cindrich in a destination known as the real Africa. With its private river islands and abundance of wildlife, Zambia gives an authentic feeling of a wilderness that is wild, beautiful, and slightly unpredictable.

Read more from the original source:

Private Islands AWE

Can I visit the Maldives? Here’s how to do it as the islands reopen to tourism – Telegraph.co.uk

A travel corridor which would exempt British holidaymakers from UK quarantine is imminent, suggests tourism leader

The Maldives reopened to international tourists on July 15; Britons are not required to quarantine on arrival or present a negative Covid-19 test.

As resorts gradually welcome back guests and airlines increase services, British holidaymakers can enjoy a stay on one of the 1,192 coral islands, albeit facing quarantine on their return.

The Maldives is excluded from the Foreign Office (FCO) advisory against all but essential travel, making it less arduous to secure travel insurance for a trip there.

However, the country has yet to be included on the UK Governments travel corridors list, which means those travelling from the Maldives to the UK are required to self-isolate for 14 days.

This could soon change. Mr Thoyyib Mohamed, managing director of Maldives Marketing and PR Corporation, told Telegraph Travel: With the Maldives High Commission in the United Kingdom and the government of Maldives, discussions are underway to ease the travel restrictions for travellers from the UK. We hope that the Maldives will soon meet the conditions required for an easing of [the UK's] travel and border measures."

Tour operators have urged for the inclusion of this Indian Ocean nation, which lends itself to socially-distanced holidays think overwater villas for two and private beach dining.

"It's time for the UK Government to adopt a more pragmatic approach to its air bridge and quarantine advice, to help the travel industry, Brian Young, managing director of tour operator G Adventures, told Telegraph Travel. "Places like the Maldives are perfect for those wanting a remote holiday, with secluded accommodation, private villas and small sailing options [...] providing an ideal option for those wanting to create a physically distanced bubble holiday with close friends or family.

There are further signs that the Maldives could be included in the Governments next batch of travel corridors. An amendment to the FCO advice page for the country mirrors a note added to each of the countries included in the first batch of exemptions in the days before the first official announcement of travel corridors.

Derek Jones, chief executive of Kuoni, told Telegraph Travel that he is hopeful there will soon be a Government update on Maldives travel advice .As it stands now we see no reason why it shouldnt be added [...]. The destination has done a lot of work with hotel partners to create plans for keeping customers safe.

The tourism industry accounts for nearly 30 per cent of GDP in the Maldives, so its reopening has been a priority.

Abdulla Shahid, the archipelagos minister for foreign affairs, referred to a sense of relief and excitement as the country welcomes back tourists.

Among a population of 540,000, the country has recorded 2,831 cases of the virus and 15 deaths, as of July 16.

Below we answer the key questions for those considering a holiday in the Maldives.

Yes, Britons can holiday at a resort without having to quarantine on arrival.

International tourists can enter the Maldives, without quarantine, at Velana International Airport in Mal, as of July 15. Visitors are not required to present a negative Covid-19 test on arrival, or to pay any additional fees.

The Maldives requires passengers on flights to the country to wear face masks, with exemptions for children under six and those with certain medical conditions.

Tourists are required to fill out a Traveller Health Declaration Form 24 hours before departing for the Maldives. They are also encouraged to download the Trace Ekee contract tracing app before landing in the country.

Temperature and screening checks are set up for arriving passengers with quarantine facilities installed for any suspected cases of the virus.

Those displaying symptoms on arrival are required to take a PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test at their own cost or at the cost of the tourism facility where they are due to stay. Additionally, local health authorities may conduct random testing, at no cost to travellers.

Yes, airlines are offering a handful of flights to the Maldives with connections in the Middle East.

Emirates and Qatar Airways are running services between London and Mal. Mal Velana International Airport is on Hulhul Island and serves as a gateway for international tourists. Transfers to your resort will be by boat, sea plane or a domestic flight. Return flights are available in July, starting from 620, with Emirates.

Qatar Airways resumed flights to the Maldives on July 15 out of Doha, offering connections through major hubs, including London.

Etihad resumed flights from Abu Dhabi to the Maldives from July 16. Turkish Airlines is tentatively starting flights from July 17.

Initially, international tourists will only be able to stay at resorts. Hotels and guest houses located on inhabited islands will be allowed to open from August 1, 2020.

Of more than 150 resorts in the Maldives, at least 40 are set to reopen in the latter half of July. This includes resorts that have stayed open throughout worldwide lockdowns and travel restrictions.

Among the popular resorts welcoming guests are: Banyan Tree Vabbinfaru, three Four Seasons resorts (Four Seasons Resort Maldives at Kuda Huraa; Four Seasons Private Island Maldives at Voavah; Four Seasons Resort Maldives at Landaa Giraavaru), Soneva Fushi (the original barefoot Maldives retreat) and Soneva Jani.

More will follow suit in August; around 50 more will resume business in September and October.

Tourists are only initially allowed into island resorts, with the exemption for those transferring from the international airport to their hotel.

Despite the resumption of tourism, the country extended its state of public health emergency until August 7. However, restrictions have been eased with government offices and businesses, including shops,cafs and restaurants, having reopened since July 1.

The Maldives Government has given Safe Tourism licences to businesses that meet legislation and safety rules, such as having a medical professional on call or the required stock of PPE.

Rules vary among island resorts. Guests of Soneva properties, for example, will be issued a mask on arrival and be tested for Covid-19. They will then be required to self-isolate in their room or villa until the results come back, which could be up to 24 hours. If the test comes back negative, they will be free to move around the resort, but will need to undergo daily temperature checks and another test on the fourth day of their stay.

You might consider that this is excessive and that were being overcautious, said Sonu Shivdasani, chief executive of Soneva, in a video explaining the process. Yet he said the aim was to make all our private islands Covid-free environments so the guests can truly relax and engage with our hosts (and) fellow guests.

Hilton is slowly reopening its properties on the island nation its guests will have their temperatures checked, but will not be required to take Covid-19 tests.

The company has rolled out new guidelines called Hilton CleanStay for all of its properties. Measures include increased cleaning of public spaces and putting a seal on the doors after cleaning a room to show customers that nobody has since entered.

Meanwhile, Marriott International, which plans to reopen its Maldives resorts in October, is putting in new policies, such as requiring guests to sit at the same table each day for breakfast.

More:

Can I visit the Maldives? Here's how to do it as the islands reopen to tourism - Telegraph.co.uk

Infant with heart condition airlifted from Lakshadweep islands to Kochi for treatment, dies – The New Indian Express

By PTI

KOCHI:In a heart-rending incident, a nine-day old infant suffering from serious heart ailment died on Sunday despite being flown in a chopper from Lakshadweep islands to the port city for better medical care.

The infant was brought to Cochin International Airport in a helicopter arranged by the Lakshadweep administration.

The child, however, died due to cardiac arrest while it was being transported in a special ambulance to a private hospital here, a hospital spokesman said.

The infant's death was confirmed by the doctors at the hospital.

The ailing new-born was airlifted from Lakshadweep under the supervision of a medical board.

The new-born was diagnosed with serious heart ailment soon after its birth nine days ago.

When its condition worsened, the doctors of the island hospital decided to bring it to Kochi to provide better treatment and the Lakshadweep administration made all arrangements for its travel.

Link:

Infant with heart condition airlifted from Lakshadweep islands to Kochi for treatment, dies - The New Indian Express

Zeitgeist of Now: Privacy in today’s world & what it means for brands – MarkLives.com

by Jason Stewart (@HaveYouHeard_SA) Privacy is the state in which one is not observed or disturbed by other people, or being free from public attention, according to the Oxford Dictionary. Less than a decade ago, privacy was easy to achieve: we simply shut the door or walked away from the conversation. Not so today.

Today, we voluntarily keep a device close at hand that can watch us, listen to us and track us, even during what should be our most-private moments (around 75% of people scroll on their phones while on the toilet, and almost all people have their phones within a few feet of them while having sex). Nor do we really know what datas being collected because the big tech companies wont tell us or show us.

What we do know is that it can run into thousands of different data points per person and, as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning evolves, the companies thatve collected that data will be able to do much more with it.

When this data is used to enhance the personalised service we get and boosts convenience, many are prepared to pooh-pooh those who warn about the risks. This is because humans struggle to perceive true threats; were pretty much like the frog in the pot of water and its only now passing lukewarm.

Paranoid? Maybe not.

At the beginning of 2020, ClearView AI was declared a major threat to personal privacy. The company provided software to almost 500 law enforcement agencies, predominantly in North America. It was claimed that these agencies solved cold cases in just 20 seconds just by trawling the internet with facial-recognition software. The same software can be used by criminals, and this is why there are now class-action lawsuits against the company.

At least two years prior to Clearview AI, an opensource tool called Social Mapper trawled eight different social media platforms and pulled together every piece of content that had your face and identity attached to it. Oh, and there was also Face Swap in 2018 (whether you believe the conspiracy theories or not, there was an enormous amount of data uploaded voluntarily onto servers across the world).

Then theres cheaply accessible software that allows you to stealthily spy on people (so long as you manually upload a file onto their phone). For US$40 per month, you can see every click, swipe and instant message, along with live access to someones camera and microphone. On any of their devices, such as the smart food processor, Siri and smart fridge. The explosion of 5G and IoT devices (internet of thing appliances that generate data) and new services like driverless cars are all possible because of more connectivity which means more data storing and more sharing, linked to each individual.

The impact this has on our psychology is that it changes how we feel about what were doing. It makes us hypervigilant and modifies our behaviour. It takes away the ability to freely explore, express or try. It means someone is always watching and recording and whatever we do or say can be used against us in the court of public opinion. So, wed better be careful and stay in our box.

Anonymity will soon be a highly sought-after state. Even before the covid-19 pandemic, people were wearing masks in public, specifically activists in countries with authoritarian governments such as Hong Kong. The Digital Emancipation movement is gaining momentum; children are suing their parents for posting photographs of them online.

Designers, too, have invented ways to avoid surveillance and keep data private. This has seen the publics fear and concern permeate pop culture. Take this puffer jacket from The Arrivals that has a Faraday pocket made from a blend of polyester, copper and nickel, for example. This combination blocks radio-frequency identification (RFID), near field communication (NFC), electromagnetic fields (EMR and EMF) and radiation signals all the methods of delivery to mobile phones for push notifications, GPS tracking, text messages, and more.

In 2019, Polish designer Ewa Nowak launched a jewellery range, Incognito, aimed at thwarting facial recognition technologies and which has proved successful at beating Facebooks DeepFace algorithm.

Accessories for the Paranoid, too, abound: devices that may be hooked onto technology in the home and feed it mis-information. One slots over a computer webcam and feeds it fake images, while another links to Amazons Alexa and plays it white noise or feeds it distracting fake tasks.

Jason Stewart is co-founder of HaveYouHeard (@HaveYouHeard_SA), a full-service agency. Zeitgeist of Now, his new column on MarkLives, is inspired by the agencys proprietary tool developed to understand the invisible but powerful forces that influence people, products, culture and societies. If we appreciate these, he argues, we become more-effective marketers.

Sign up now for the MarkLives newsletter, including Ramify.biz headlines and become a MarkLives Member, too, to ensure continued coverage.

Go here to see the original:

Zeitgeist of Now: Privacy in today's world & what it means for brands - MarkLives.com

I Have to Go in and Decolonize: Europes Black Theater Makers Discuss the Scene – The New York Times

LONDON This summer, a coalition of American theater artists issued a statement, We See You, White American Theater, calling for an overhaul of the countrys theater landscape. There should be term limits on theater industry leaders to improve representation, it said, and at least half of casts and creative teams should be people of color.

Many of the same issues of representation plague the theater in Europe. Last month, Black Lives Matter protests sprung up across Britain and theaters issued messages of support, as well as statements pledging action on racism. This month, 400 British creatives signed an open letter calling for industry reform. We cannot accept empty gestures, it said, before listing five areas for change.

Representation in the theater business is an issue elsewhere in Europe, too, despite most major theaters receiving government subsidies and growing calls for theaters to reflect their local populations onstage.

On Wednesday, Kwame Kwei-Armah, 53, the artistic director of the Young Vic theater in London; Julia Wissert, 36, the artistic director of Schauspiel Dortmund in Germany; and Eva Doumbia, 51, the founder of the French theater company La Part du Pauvre, met on Zoom to discuss their experiences.

I am so wildly excited to be doing this, said Kwei-Armah as he joined the call.

Over two hours, the group found some differences and many similarities in the theater landscapes of their countries. When Doumbia (who spoke through a translator), said she had set up a festival to present work by Afro-European writers and directors, Wissert who is the only Black head of a major theater in Germany replied that she didnt think that would work in Germany. If youre too explicit here when talking about racism, everyone just freezes, she said.

Were all having to negotiate and shadowbox with white supremacy, Kwei-Armah said. But the recent Black Lives Matter protests inspired a change of mind. I am done, he said.

The three also discussed white universality, decolonizing theater institutions and their issues with the word diversity. These are edited excerpts from the conversation.

What is the state of diversity in your countries theater scenes?

JULIA WISSERT I just hate speaking about diversity, because Im not interested in diversity. I dont want to diversify anything. Im interested in the question of representation: Representation in the structure, in positions of power, among people who give money to theaters, artistic directorships.

Most of these [people in charge in Germany] are homogeneous: White, middle class, mostly male, mostly cisgender. Its very slowly changing, but at the end of the day I think were very much at the beginning of this conversation.

When I got my job one journalist started an interview with, Were you as shocked about this announcement as the theater world was? And I can understand that people thought it was a surprise because Im obviously way too young to hold that position, because you have to be 60 to be an artistic director here, and of course you have to be male and of course you shouldnt be Black.

EVA DOUMBIA I dont like talking about diversity either. When I do, its always on a diplomatic level more than anything. In France, most of the time we use the idea of diversity as a tool to polish our racism and put it in opposition with the racism in the United States. We call that the real racism.

But the Black Lives Movement and what happened with George Floyd, there was a French echo to it with Adama Traor [a 24-year-old man who died in police custody in 2016]. The Black Lives Matter protests reactivated those feelings here and its reignited that issue of representation in society, in theater.

KWAME KWEI-ARMAH What we have found in Britain is the people who invariably are the George Floyds, the people on the front line, are normally of African descent. But when it comes to diversity, we are normally right at the back of the queue.

The history of structural inequality here has meant there are few Black British artistic directors who have been in place for longer than two or three years. This is a wonderful moment where we are saying, We want this time to be about us! And within the sphere of theater, thats revolutionary because it means when I go into an institution, I have to go in and decolonize not just whats on the stage but the business model and the culture of the organization.

Do you feel able to stage plays about the reality of Black lives in your country?

DOUMBIA What tends to happen in France is we invite people from Africa directors, creatives. Theres a sort of comfort that theyre speaking from their perspective, so its not the view of someone born in France whos known its racism since kindergarten. Theres a sense of confidence that they will never challenge whats established here.

We do have French racism talked about onstage, but its never being addressed by Black people. Its mainly white directors making plays for white audiences. Its OK to have Black performers, actors, dancers, but Black creators are not as accepted.

WISSERT I would say here its exactly the same. The biggest discussions were having at the moment in Germany is the question of white universality the white body as being neutral and the white artist being able to speak to any time. Theres no understanding.

DOUMBIA I get a sensation of feeling a little bit stuck sometimes. Because you want to be able to tell your stories and tell them to the biggest number of people. But at the same time, you feel youre being assigned to a category being seen as a Black person from the white gaze.

KWEI-ARMAH I dont quite know what Black work is, and as we know, the word Black is a political construction. It means different things in different spaces. But what I am really clear about is there is a tax from our white audiences, many of whom are quite tribal, and who, the moment that they see someone Black on the poster, think that [the play] is somehow niche.

When we see a white story, we see a white actor in it and race becomes secondary. We go, Oh, this is a story about redemption. But sometimes the white audience will see a Black face and go, Oh, this is a story about racism. Or Oh, its for them. And thats the false binary we need to defeat in this country. And we are nowhere near defeating it.

Are diversity targets or quotas the answer?

DOUMBIA Can I make an analogy with the face masks were always talking about? In a normal world with Covid, you wouldnt have to tell people to wear a mask in order not to get sick, right? And yet you have to tell them. Its the same with quotas. In a world with common sense we wouldnt have to ask for them and yet without them nothing will be done. Although itd be hard to have them here, because we have this huge tradition of official color blindness. [In France it remains illegal to collect data on race for almost all official purposes.]

WISSERT In Germany, I wish we had a quota because I think, or hope, it would start a conversation and force colleagues to think differently, as well as give other artists a chance of gaining positions of power. Ive had enough of people saying, I really want to do something. I dont want to hear good will anymore, because good will didnt get us anywhere.

Id even go further and connect that quota to subsidies: There are no repercussions at the moment if you dont have any people of color in your institution. You can get shamed on social media and people call you out. But thats basically it.

Do you have quotas at the Young Vic, Kwame?

KWEI-ARMAH My previous shadowboxing self would have broken down the connotations of quotas and tried to make it sound polite and soft and nonthreatening to my white colleagues to not make them worry that somehow they would lose something that they were born naturally into.

My post-Black Lives Matter self actually says, I dont understand the question. Democracy means that you should reflect your environment. And if youre not reflecting your environment, youre suppressing someone. Quotas is a euphemism for Should we let Black people in?

In truth, incremental change is fine, but were not in the moment of incremental change.

Theaters across Europe are currently facing financial hardship after they were forced to close because of the coronavirus. Are you worried that could affect efforts to improve diversity?

WISSERT Our season had been announced when Covid happened. But what it did for us was allow us to rethink the idea of what theater really is. Its a question of: How do we engage with an audience? What stories are we actually telling? So we used this crisis to go to the city and say, Were not going to make money for maybe two years, but were going to go out to the communities and create projects that can really engage with people who wouldnt normally come to the theater.

KWEI-ARMAH When we went into Covid, I was about to announce my new season and the centerpiece of that was themed around for want of a better term a Black British experience. And as soon as we started hemorrhaging money, I went, Thats the one that has to go. The writers are not that well known, and its a big expensive project.

But then Black Lives Matter happened, and I went, No! Thats got to be the leader of the pack. Everything else takes a second seat this now becomes the zeitgeist since theater is here to reflect society and speak about it from its heart. This time has allowed me to stand in my truth without compromise.

Read the original:

I Have to Go in and Decolonize: Europes Black Theater Makers Discuss the Scene - The New York Times

Protesters gather downtown in solidarity with the other Portland – Press Herald

Protesters marched through downtown Portland Friday night to show solidarity with the citizens of Portland, Oregon, who have faced violent confrontations with federal agents for more than a week.

The event was organized by Ahmed Beshir, a 22-year-old accountant from Gorham. He said he was spurred to act after seeing video footage of federal agents, sent to Oregon by President Trump to quell protests, using tear gas, pepper spray and physical force against protesters. Protests there have been ongoing since George Floyd was killed by a former Minneapolis police officer two months ago. Trump has called the protesters in Oregon agitators and anarchists.

The march Friday began at Lincoln Park on Congress Street, where Beshir told people he had only begun organizing the event days earlier and wasnt sure how many people might turn out. The size of the crowd was not as important, he said, as the personal commitment each marcher has to change the racial and social injustice that exists in society. He told the crowd that they needed to protest the kind of government force being used in Oregon while we still have the chance.

It doesnt matter if we have 20 people or 20,000, were still making a statement, each of us, that I myself will be the change, Beshir said. We cant have the mindset thats its not really that serious yet, because soon it will be too late.

Beshir led the group, about 30 people at first, from Lincoln Park down Federal Street to the United States Courthouse, then up Congress Street past Congress Square, then back down Congress Street to City Hall. By then the group had grown to about 200 people, many with signs. They chanted Black Lives Matter, and No Justice, No Peace, among other things. They walked in the street, with one Portland police vehicle leading them and another following.

At City Hall, the marchers joined a camping protest over the citys homelessness problem, that was in its third day. Using a megaphone, Beshir addressed the crowd there and told them that the problems of homelessness and racial injustice were related, and had to be fought together.

The same system has failed us, Beshir told the group at City Hall.

Beshir planned to eventually lead the march to the Portland Police headquarters later Friday night.

Local officials in Oregon have called for federal agents to leave. On Wednesday Mayor Ted Wheeler was present at a protest when he was tear gassed by federal agents. The state of Oregon is seeking a legal order limiting federal agents arrest powers during the demonstrations. The Oregon Attorney General has sued multiple federal agencies, alleging agents in unmarked vehicles have grabbed people off the street without a warrant.

Beshir said he wanted to draw attention to the fact that people in Portland, Oregon, have been protesting police brutality and racial injustice for nearly two months, while other protests sparked by Floyds death have faded. Beshir thinks the Oregon protests have gotten stronger the more authorities have used violent force to stop them.

This isnt normal and this isnt right. We cant idly stand by sedated by the comforts of our lives and watch it unfold until its too late, Beshir wrote in a Facebook post announcing the event Friday. We must stand in solidarity against this authoritarian police state and fight back the tyranny and oppression that come with it.

Beshir, who was born in Sudan and came to the United States in 2005, said hes not part of any specific group. He said had not been involved in any protests until the death of Floyd and the launch of Black Lives Matter events that followed.

Some of the people who joined the march Friday they wanted to not only show solidarity with people in Oregon, but with people experiencing racism everywhere.

I need to use my white privilege and my voice to speak up for what is right, said Brooke Bolduc, 20, of Minot.

Anthony Fiori, 21 of Brunswick, said he was concerned that if people in Maine, and elsewhere, didnt stand up against what is happening in Oregon such use of government force to squelch protest will only spread.

When tyranny is rising, you have to stop it as soon as possible, you cant just say its not that bad yet, Fiori said.

Previous

Next

Read the original post:

Protesters gather downtown in solidarity with the other Portland - Press Herald

Anti-Aging Medicine – Aging Theories

Medicine is largely an exercise in cause and effect. Because senescence has such a diffuse and multi-symptom nature and also is of such a long-term nature, it is probably the most difficult area of medicine in which to establish cause-and-effect relationships. This is one reason that theories of aging that suggest research directions are so critical to the development of treatments for age-related diseases and conditions.

The term anti-aging medicine means different things to different people. Many see anti-aging medicine as essentially a cosmetic or esthetics effort. We can delay the appearance of aging with tummy-tucks, face lifts, and Botox.

Another view is towards healthy aging, or better aging. We can work to extend the healthy and happy portion of our lives and decrease the length of the nursing-home-stage but not necessarily live much longer. Life-style modification including exercise and diet are frequently part of this approach. Lifestyle protocols are not very controversial; most physicians favor less obesity, healthy diet, more exercise, a generally more active life, and avoiding dangerous behaviors like smoking, alcoholism and drug abuse. There is wide respect for a use it or lose it concept in which exercise and activity are beneficial. Even exercising a persons mind is thought to delay age-related mental deficits.

Finally, some are looking toward essentially treating aging, per se, and delaying the age at which manifestations of aging would otherwise appear in a particular individual. Some consider that such manifestations are reversible and that regenerative medicine could reverse or reduce some symptoms of aging including age-related diseases. Average and maximum human lifespan could be extended. Since there is little actual clinical evidence of pharmaceutically extending maximum human lifespan and this idea is unpopular in the general public and the medical community, most practitioners are careful not to make extravagant claims in this area. Treating aging, per se, might be expected to have more obvious effects on older people.

In a twist to this idea, it is widely agreed that senescence is largely an inherited characteristic and varies between individuals. The old saw goes: If you want to live a long life, choose long-lived parents. An anti-aging practitioner might say Your hormone levels are not typical for a person your age and need to be adjusted. Of course, if that is a valid approach, the patient might say: I would like to have my hormone levels adjusted to those of a typical 110-year-old or whatever levels the 110-year-old had when they were my age! See more on hormones below.

The thousands of prescription drugs are tested and certified for use in treating a particular disease or condition. However, a physician can prescribe most prescription drugs off book for other uses. In addition there are thousands of over-the-counter non-prescription drugs thought to be beneficial in treating some disease or condition as well as thousands of foods and substances sold by vitamin and health food stores also thought to have beneficial effects. Hard evidence of effectiveness such as double-blind clinical trials is usually much less available on the non-prescription substances.

Programmed aging theories suggest that aging is substantially the result of a biological mechanism and therefore that agents can be found that affect this mechanism just as they can be found for treating the disease and condition-specific mechanisms. As programmed aging theories become more popular we can expect to see many substances suspected of having anti-aging properties. Because it is progressively harder to establish cause and effect for anti-aging agents in longer-lived organisms such as humans a lot of the evidence will be coming from experiments with shorter-lived organisms such a mice (~2.5 years), some short-lived fish species (8 weeks), even worms and flies that may or may not be directly applicable to humans. Agents can also be evaluated by measuring their effect on senescence indicators such as telomere length, hormone levels, etc.

Non-programmed theories suggest that anti-damage agents such as anti-oxidants or anti-inflammatory agents might be effective.

The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute on Aging (NIA) is operating a search for anti-aging agents that they call the Interventions Testing Program. Oral agents are tested in mice and evaluated for effects on lifespan. This program can only evaluate a few agents per year and does not deal with injected agents or experiments that require special handling such as exercise regimens.

Human testing in elderly subjects might provide relatively rapid results depending on the nature of the aging mechanism. For example if aging is reversible, such testing may provide measurable results in a short period.

Suspected anti-aging agents include: rapamycin, metformin, resveratrol, vitamin D3, Cycloastragenol, and deprenyl.

Because some suspected anti-aging agents apparently have few side-effects large scale human trials are possible.

Programmed aging theories suggest that aging is the result of a biological program that purposely causes or allows manifestations of aging to appear on a species-specific schedule. If this program is similar to other biological programs such as the ones involved in reproduction, or glucose metabolism, or circadian rhythms, or stress responses, then it is likely that some part of our body determines when to apply the aging function and sends signals to other parts to implement the function. These signals can be nervous or chemical (hormonal) in nature and hormone signals are typically distributed in blood plasma. Therefore, if aging is programmed we could logically expect to see age or dont age signals (or both) in blood plasma. Indeed, many human hormones are observed to either decrease or increase with age.

Experiments have been performed in which tissue from older animals is exposed to plasma from young animals. Senescence markers were observed to change in response.

Heterochronic plasma exchange (HPE), or infusion of young plasma into old patients (or infusion of old plasma into young animals) is being explored as a way to study anti-aging effects of blood factors. The advantage of this approach is that is not necessary to understand which hormones are involved or exactly how they work in order to demonstrate an anti-aging effect. HPE trials could also result in near-term anti-aging treatments. See Young Blood Institute and Ambrosia Company.

Therapeutic plasma infusion is a recognized technique used in treatment of various diseases. However, the trials and prospects for treatments are highly controversial, at least partly because of attitudes described in companion articles.

Any signaling scheme must have means for both asserting and removing the signal. Hormone concentrations naturally decay. Some hormones are cancelled by other associated hormones and endocrinology is a complex subject. It is therefore somewhat unclear if plasma therapy would have beneficial effects for long enough to be practical. The importance of this issue depends on which hormones are actually important in aging.

At least in the U.S. anti-aging medicine is an established medical specialty. The American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M) is a medical specialty association like the American Podiatric Medical Association, or those supporting any other branch of medicine. From A4M literature:

The American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M) is dedicated to the advancement of tools, technology, and transformations in healthcare that can detect, treat, and prevent diseases associated with aging. A4M further promotes the research of practices and protocols that have the potential to optimize the human aging process.

The organization is also dedicated to educating healthcare professionals and practitioners, scientists, and members of the public on biomedical sciences, breakthrough technologies, and medical protocols through our advanced education entity: Metabolic Medical Institute (MMI).

A4M is a U.S. federally registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization comprised of over 26,000 members across the globe, including physicians (85%), scientists and researchers (12%) , and governmental officials, media, and general public (3%), all of whom collectively represent over 120 nations.

A4M is focused on spreading awareness about innovative, cutting-edge science and research, in addition to treatment modalities designed to prolong the human life span.

The core of the NEW medicine is based on scientific principles of comprehensive medical care, which encompass many other specialties within healthcare.

A4M Provides continuing medical education (CME) and training to over 65,000 physicians and health practitioners at multiple live conferences worldwide, as well as online CME education in the functional, metabolic, and regenerative medical sciences. A4M supports advanced education, conferences, certifications, fellowships, online courses, and graduate programs.

A4M practitioners include those supporting all of the treatment viewpoints described earlier. Many practitioners have expanded existing physician practices in some other specialty to include anti-aging medicine. With regard to pharmaceutically delaying aging there are currently (2018) two major initiatives in the A4M community:

Telomerase Activators

Telomeres are the end caps on chromosome molecules that tend to shorten with age. Since the 1960s age-related telomere shortening has been suspected as part of an aging mechanism. Telomerase is a naturally occurring enzyme that repairs (lengthens) telomeres. Telomerase activators that stimulate production of telomerase and therefore increase telomere length are in use by some anti-aging practitioners. Clinical trials show that these oral medications do increase telomere length but actual lifespan extension is much harder to demonstrate.

From Wikipedia: The NASDAQ listed company Geron has developed a telomerase activator TAT0002, which is the saponin cycloastragenol in Chinese herb Astragalus propinquus. Geron has granted a license to Telomerase Activation Sciences to sell TA-65, the telomerase activator agent also derived from astragalus. In October 2010 Intertek/AAC Labs, an ISO 17025 internationally recognized lab, found the largest component of TA-65 to be Cycloastragenol.

Bio-identical Hormone Replacement Therapy (BHRT)

Age-related changes in hormones are specifically suggested by programmed theories as parts of a programmed aging mechanism. Since many human hormones decrease with age and some increase with age enhancing concentrations of the former and interfering with the latter are obvious possibilities for an anti-aging treatment. However, hormone replacement (estrogen, testosterone, steroids) has been historically associated with significant adverse side-effects. BHRT practitioners suggest that this problem has been reduced or eliminated by using a different bio-identical form of the hormone(s) and using reduced dosage relative to the earlier treatments.

Conclusion: It is possible that therapies and agents that already exist have some effect in treating aging, per se, and therefore produce lifespan extension. However the extreme difficulty in establishing definitive cause and effect evidence and current unpopularity of this idea (see companion articles index) suggest that no definite medical conclusions can be expected in the near future. Plausibility of such result depends heavily on which of the many aging theories one accepts. Trials of therapies and agents that have a reasonable demonstration of safety in relatively elderly patients appear to have the best prospects for demonstrating effectiveness in this area.

Aging Theories Articles Index

Go here to see the original:
Anti-Aging Medicine - Aging Theories

Is red wine good for your heart? Yes, but only in moderation here’s how much you should drink – Insider – INSIDER

Research has found that drinking red wine in moderation can be good for your heart. However, consuming too much red wine, or any alcohol, is particularly bad for your heart, and can increase your risk for heart disease.

Here's what you should know about the heart benefits of red wine and how much of it is considered healthy.

The link between red wine and a healthy heart may be due to the high level of micronutrients, called polyphenols, found in the skin and seeds of grapes.

During the production process, red wine is fermented with the grape skins and seeds for a longer period of time than white wine, which means the polyphenols are much more concentrated. For example, a glass of red wine contains around 10 times more polyphenols than a glass of white wine.

These polyphenols especially a polyphenol called resveratrol have been shown to protect and support heart health.

The polyphenols in red wine have antioxidant properties. This means they prevent or reduce the oxidation of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), the "bad" type of cholesterol molecules we carry in our bloodstream.

When LDLs are oxidized, they build up in the walls of our arteries and narrow them, so that less blood and oxygen can reach the heart. This can cause coronary heart disease, the most common type of heart disease, and the leading cause of death in the US.

Moderate consumption of red wine can also increase the level of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or the "good cholesterol" in our blood, which is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease. HDL cholesterol is good because it helps remove excess LDL cholesterol from the blood vessels.

For example, a small controlled study published in the journal Atherosclerosis in 2006 found that after drinking 400 ml (about two to three glasses) of red wine every day for six weeks, LDL cholesterol decreased by 8% in postmenopausal women who had high LDL levels, while HDL cholesterol increased by 17%.

Another study published in 2005 in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that four weeks of moderate red wine consumption daily 300 ml for males and 200 ml for females increased levels of HDL cholesterol by a greater amount than drinking the non-alcoholic, wine-equivalent dose of red grape extract tablets with water.

Some research has found that drinking red wine may decrease platelet aggregation, which can also help reduce your risk for cardiovascular disease.

Platelets are tiny cells in our blood that bind together around damaged blood vessels when we become injured. This clotting is what stops us from bleeding and helps us heal when we get a minor cut.

However, when platelets aggregate too much, they can form blood clots. Blood clots are serious because they can block the flow of blood and oxygen to vital organs, increasing your risk of having a heart attack or stroke.

By reducing the stickiness of the platelets in your blood, red wine can help prevent blood clots and reduce your risk for health complications. For example, a 2002 study published in the International Journal of Molecular Medicine measured platelet aggregation levels in male volunteers after moderate wine consumption and found they were significantly inhibited.

In order to receive the heart health benefits of red wine, the American Heart Association (AHA) recommends no more than one drink a day for women and two a day for men. For reference, one drink is equal to five ounces, or 140ml of wine.

Drinking too much wine, or any type of alcohol in excess, is very bad for your heart, says Robert A. Kloner MD, PhD, Chief Science Officer of Huntington Medical Research Institutes in Pasadena, California and Professor of Medicine at the University of Southern California.

That's because too much alcohol can cause high blood pressure and raise levels of triglycerides, which will increase your risk of heart disease, heart attack, or stroke.

Excessive drinking can also lead to heart failure a disease which makes it harder for your heart to pump blood around your body and atrial fibrillation, which is a type of arrhythmia where the heart beats quickly and irregularly.

Read more to learn about how different levels of alcohol consumption affect the heart.

Drinking several glasses of red wine throughout the week can be part of a heart healthy lifestyle. But in general, you shouldn't drink more than one or two glasses each night.

In addition, it's important to note that there are many other foods that contain the polyphenols found in red wine which may have the same heart health benefits. For instance, you can find resveratrol in grape juice, peanuts, cocoa, blueberries, and cranberries.

You don't need to drink red wine to have a healthy heart. But, if you like drinking red wine, the good news is that it may have some heart benefits just make sure you drink in moderation.

See original here:

Is red wine good for your heart? Yes, but only in moderation here's how much you should drink - Insider - INSIDER