Governments talk about how to reopen the beaches – Fernandina Beach News-Leader

Several city and county officials took part in a conference call Monday afternoon to discuss how, and when, to reopen the beaches on Amelia Island.

Local beaches will not be opening in the foreseeable future, but Danny Leeper, chairman of the Nassau County Board of County Commissioners, said the purpose of the conference call was not to reopen the beaches, but to look ahead at what the opening of the beaches might look like. He said the opening should be done in stages with cooperation from all local agencies involved.

This is not about opening the beaches immediately today, or even next week, or maybe even next month, Leeper said. Our priority is to protect the public, but also to give our residents hope that your elected officials are doing all we can to bring some type of gradual return to normal life, whatever that might look like in the future. The goal is to have some concerted effort with our neighboring agencies that we all can agree on and not just one decision maker. Quite frankly, theres very little regional cooperation going on at the moment.

Fernandina Beach City Commis-sioner Chip Ross, who is an emergency room doctor, gave four benchmarks he believes should be met before beaches open again. He said local beaches should not open until all beaches in Northeast Florida, including the state parks on Amelia Island, are opened.

If one opens and the other one doesnt, I think the capillary reaction would be chaos or overloading that area, he said.

Ross said the Florida Department of Health issued a public advisory when the beaches closed that said all people over the age of 65 should stay at home. That advisory, he said, should be lifted before local beaches are opened, as well as the ban on the public use of restaurants in Florida.

Ross added he wants Dr. Eugenia Ngo-Seidel, director of the Florida Department of Health Nassau County, to issue a public statement indicating when open access to the beaches is safe and meets the standard of preserving the health, safety, and welfare of the community.

However, Ngo-Seidel said she doesnt think her department will issue a statement. She said Nassau County should use federal and state guidelines as a minimum level of safety precautions.

All the people involved in the call said that cooperation between local agencies is crucial and that the beaches should be opened incrementally.

I have been in contact with other coastal counties in our region from Flagler to here, and the discussion has started about what will happen when we open regionally, Nassau County Emergency Management Director Greg Foster said. A phased opening is the general consensus, from letting people get to the beach without parking to full opening. There will be a regional plan, and if we wish to follow it, it will be discussed and ready to go.

County Manager and Attorney Mike Mullin said the county, with help from the Amelia Island Tourist Development Council, is keeping tabs, as much as possible, on people from other regions coming into the county. Mullin also said he is looking at policies set forth in Jacksonville, although he did not say those policies would be implemented in Nassau County.

Weve been tracking the lodging industry and who is checking in and checking out, Mullin said. We have some evidence of people from New York who checked in before the governors order, and were trying to see if we need to change the order. The mayor in Jacksonville has issued an order determining which lodging establishments are essential and which guests are essential. Its hard to discern the basis for that, but were looking at that.

Also discussed are businesses that have large stores where many people could be inside. Foster said that there has been no edict from the state limiting the number of customers a store can have inside, but that some smaller local businesses have been doing so.

All those who participated in the call said they believe the beaches should stay closed for the foreseeable future.

I think it would be foolish to open the beach any time soon, Nassau County Sheriff Bill Leeper said. Florida is a tourist state, Nassau is a tourist destination. People come here from all over the world, so we have to be aware of that. The majority of our citizens are following the emergency executive orders that have been put in place. We do, however, have a few that think theyre special and the order doesnt apply to them, that we have to shoo off the beach, which creates a strain on our resources.

Opening the beaches at this time would be contrary to the advice of epidemiologists, Ross said. People need to stay home except for buying food and supplies and medical necessities.

Its critical that we dont open the beaches up until we know we are getting the all-clear sign, AITDC Managing Director Gil Langley said. A misstep could hurt us more than what has occurred already.

Also participating in the call were Assistant County Manager Taco Pope, County Maintenance and Facilities Director Doug Podiak, Nassau County Sheriffs Office Legal Counsel Bobby Lippelman, NCSO Director of Operations Butch Osborne, and Fernandina Beach City Manager Dale Martin.

jroberts@fbnewsleader.com

More here:

Governments talk about how to reopen the beaches - Fernandina Beach News-Leader

3 more Ocean County beaches closing this week as coronavirus cases mount – NJ.com

Three more Ocean County towns have collectively decided to close their beaches as the number of coronavirus cases in the county continued to mount this month.

The beaches of Point Pleasant Beach, Mantoloking and Bay Head will all close on Friday until further notice, the three towns announced in a Facebook post earlier this week.

While we deeply regret having to restrict this access to those who enjoy our beaches and have respected the Governors essential travel restrictions and practiced proper social distancing, the mounting numbers of coronavirus cases in Ocean County and New Jersey have made this decision a necessity to protect the safety and well-being of our local residents and other beachgoers, the joint announcement said.

As of Wednesday afternoon there at are least 1,209 positive coronavirus cases in Ocean County, the local health department reported, and 23 deaths, according to the latest numbers provided by Gov. Phil Murphy on Thursday.

Come Friday, only one town on the Barnegat Peninsula will not have closed its beaches; Seaside Park. The 20-mile, narrow barrier peninsula stretches from Point Pleasant Beach to Seaside Park, and is a popular destination for summer visitors to the Jersey Shore. It has opted to close its boardwalk.

Seaside Heights, Ortley Beach and Lavallette closed boardwalks and beaches late last month, while Point Pleasant Beach had originally only elected to close its boardwalk.

Seaside Heights has also announced an emergency order prohibiting the rental of homes and any other type of rental units via AirBNB, VRBO and other online marketplaces in the borough.

If you would like updates on New Jersey-specific coronavirus news, subscribe to our Coronavirus in N.J. newsletter.

Tell us your coronavirus stories, whether its a news tip, a topic you want us to cover, or a personal story you want to share.

Chris Sheldon may be reached at csheldon@njadvancemedia.com. Follow him on Twitter @chrisrsheldon Find NJ.com on Facebook. Have a tip? Tell us. nj.com/tips.

Go here to read the rest:

3 more Ocean County beaches closing this week as coronavirus cases mount - NJ.com

With Social Distancing Their Only Tool, Maine Health Officials Prepare For Range Of Grim Outcomes – Maine Public

As the number of cases of COVID-19 continues to accelerate, researchers and epidemiologists at the Maine Center for Disease Control are using several scientific models to prepare for an outbreak that could kill between 100 and 1,000 residents.

The wide variance in the fatality forecast, as well as the potential overwhelming of the states health care system, reflects the imprecision of epidemiological modeling. Included in those forecasts are scientists evolving understanding of the novel coronavirus that is now hitting its peak in certain parts of the U.S.

[What Mainers Need To Know About The Coronavirus]

Also underpinning the forecasts is Mainers adherence to social distancing restrictions implemented by Gov. Janet Mills - something thats difficult to track or quantify, but central to Maines fight against an outbreak thats already killed 10 residents as of Monday, while hospitalizing nearly 100 others.

In the absence of a vaccine, the human distancing restrictions are all weve got against COVID-19, said Dr. Nirav Shah, director of the Maine CDC.

Shah revealed the CDC modeling with three reporters at the Maine Emergency Management Agency offices in Augusta. He emphasized repeatedly that the models were for planning, not predictions, adding that the forecasts were designed to produce a range of scenarios so that state public health officials can prepare for a medical surge that could overwhelm Maines critical care beds or require more people to operate ventilators than are currently in the workforce.

While Shah said he believed the chances of a worst-case scenario seemed small, he also said its important to understand how devastating COVID-19 could be in a state with the oldest median age in the country.

This is a really serious disease. The fatality rate is not anything to trifle with. It spreads a lot more easily than the flu, he said.

The forecasts center on a range of assumptions that include whats known as the basic reproduction number, or how many people can be infected by coming into contact with just one person. Shah says that number is determined by how infectious the disease is, but also how society and people respond to it by limiting human interactions, travel or frequent handwashing.

When we talk about flattening the curve, this is precisely what were talking about, he said.

For example, one person with the flu can transmit the virus to between one and two people. Early research shows that one person with COVID-19 can spread the virus to nearly four people, a single digit increase over the flu that can have far more devastating consequences.

Likewise, reducing the COVID-19 reproduction number even by a small percentage can produce widely different results.

Shah showed models forecasting the effects of a 60- and 70-percent decrease in reproduction on the availability of critical care beds in Maine hospitals. A 70 percent decrease showed that Maines inventory of critical care beds could be sufficient. A 60 percent decrease showed a significant shortfall.

The same scenario applied to COVID-19 case numbers. A 70 percent decrease in the reproduction rate showed case counts slowly accumulating over the next few months before leveling off. A 60 percent decrease showed cases skyrocketing to cases in the thousands each day.

In nearly all of the modeling scenarios, Maine could see the peak of the outbreak in the next couple of weeks.

Shah said the duration will depend on whether Mainers continue to follow social distancing rules. He acknowledged that measuring adherence to social distancing is also tricky. But he said state officials are tracking it through traffic and cellphone data. He said the state is using publicly available cell phone data supplied by carrier companies, not accessing it on its own.

Shah says Maine CDC is also using county-level traffic data gathered by the Maine Department of Transportation.

Early traffic data show a 50 percent drop in travel. In Cumberland County, Shah said there was an additional 17 percent reduction. Not reflected in those findings is the impact of Gov. Mills stay at home order issued last week. Shah said that it can take two to three weeks to measure the impact of any kind of restriction, whether its on gatherings of people or on travel.

He said aggressive actions and adherence to them are Maines best chance against COVID-19.

Many of the governors mandates began as recommendations. Given that changes in Mainers behavior can play a significant role in reducing the reproduction rate of COVID-19 cases, Shah was asked if the governors restrictions were aggressive and timely enough.

Yeah, I think so, he said. I think the order and the timing in which we took the steps was when they needed to be.

He said social distancing remains the core strategy, but the aggressiveness of that strategy - such as enforcement measures - could change if it looks like Maines reproduction rate of COVID-19 is tracking with a worst-case scenario.

Shah said he debated whether to show reporters the fatality forecasts knowing that they could be wrong.

I want to be straight because I know thats a question thats on everyones mind, he said. And ... this is serious stuff.

Shah also said that the epidemiological models are not glimpses at the future, but instead a range of possibilities - possibilities that are highly sensitive to people taking the potential outcomes seriously.

Read the original here:
With Social Distancing Their Only Tool, Maine Health Officials Prepare For Range Of Grim Outcomes - Maine Public

[Op-Ed]Sexual and reproductive health and rights are an important component of human rights – Health-e News

As South Africa joins the global community in fighting a pandemic, this presents an opportune moment to also reflect holistically on our health system, especially health services for womxn. As today marks World Health Day, its also important to remind ourselves of the importance of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) for our overall health and well-being. ByAngelica Pino, Programmes Director, Sonke Gender Justice.

Read More

The last several weeks have witnessed a flurry of crucial actions and activities that have been implemented as countries globally battle the deadly, novel coronavirus. South Africa has not been spared either and in line with other countries across the globe, the government has now implemented a 21-day lockdown with the hope that we may be spared the worst of this ravaging pandemic.

It has evidently not been an easy decision and there are concerns about access to other health services that have been raised by citizens on various public fora. These include womxn who are anxious about their ability to access crucial sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services during this lockdown.

Several activists and organisations in the last weeks have been raising awareness and working to ensure that SRH and gender-based violence issues remain a priority in the discourse around Covid-19. This includes sharing information and preparing womxn for possible challenges and delays they might encounter when they seek services and ways to mitigate this, like taking home pregnancy tests, seeking safe abortion services earlier, encouraging the use of emergency contraceptives, among others. They also encourage staying at home in case of symptoms of Covid-19 and rather, phoning for assistance.

As we mark World Health Day, lets celebrate our constitution, which is one of the most progressive in the world, one that enables South Africans from all walks of life to exercise their freedoms and rights, which include SRHR for all. SRHR is defined as a state of physical, emotional, mental, and social wellbeing in relation to all aspects of sexuality and reproduction, not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction, or infirmity1.

According to the World Health Organisation, SRHR includes access to a comprehensive suite of SRH interventions, which are an essential component of the overall health, rights and well-being of womxn. These include access to family planning, contraception and abortion services; prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer as well as sexually transmitted and reproductive tract infections; and prevention of female genital mutilation and violence against womxn, among others. But it is not just about the accessibility to services; it is also about the quality. Womxn need and deserve access to safe, non-judgmental SRH services (including youth-friendly setups) that respect the rights to confidentiality and privacy of those who seek it.

Unfortunately, the promises of our constitution have not been always been fulfilled, in particular for poor women who have to make use of the public health sector services. Violations of womxs SRH rights have been frequent in our country. These are manifested through challenges in accessing SRH services, which is most concerning in a context of high rates of gender-based violence. Womxn have reported lack of post-trauma care in instances of rape and violence, prolonged contraceptive stockouts are common and there is the long-standing refusal of care by many healthcare providers when patients seek services like abortion. Most shockingly, an investigation by the Commission for Gender Equality revealed in February this year that state hospitals in South Africa have sterilized some pregnant HIV-positive womxn without their consent. The lack of youth-friendly SRH services continues to disadvantage girls and young womxn, which is evident in the high rates of unintended teenage pregnancies. This also speaks to lack of access to family planning needs and safe and legal abortion services.

According to the new draft National Integrated SRHR policy, all individuals have a right to make decisions governing their bodies and to access services that support that right. As a society, we must keep working to create an enabling environment so that all South African womxn can exercise their reproductive rights, so that we stay on our path to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity.

As we fight the scourge of Covid-19, its important to keep these rights in mind and support womxn so they dont face challenges while trying to access essential services. This is an opportunity to reflect as well on the deep socio-economic inequalities that prevent the majority of our population from accessing quality health care. As activists for social justice, we must reflect and learn from the Covid-19 crisis and integrate these lessons in our discussions around the National Health Insurance Bill.

In solidarity and with determination, we will overcome this current health crisis, but we must also use this time to reflect on strategies that will further intensify our efforts to promote health and save the lives of womxn and girls in South Africa. As the old rallying cry of feminists all over the world saywomxns rights are human rights!

See more here:
[Op-Ed]Sexual and reproductive health and rights are an important component of human rights - Health-e News

Taking Care of Each Other Is Essential Work – VICE

In 2016, a few months before Donald Trumps election, Nancy Fraser, a professor of philosophy and politics at the New School and acclaimed critical theorist, argued that the country was facing a crisis of care. Care work, which Fraser defined more broadly as social reproduction, included everything from raising children and caring for friends and family to maintaining the social bonds that bring communities together. Fraser contended that our capitalist system devalued this type of work, despite the fact that we all depend on such care every daypaying very little for it or taking it for granted and subsequently making it more and more difficult to do.

During the pandemic, the essential nature of care work has been made more clear. The value of the work that was being done in the shadows, by the nannies and cleaners who can no longer come into our buildings, is now suddenly obvious as we try to live without it. The infrastructure that we dont usually define as care, from our public school system to our grocery stores, is now apparent as such. The connections that we didnt know existed, like those made among strangers offering each other mutual aid, are now our lifelines. But to Frasers point, were also seeing how our system has devalued that workwhether its the precarious conditions for teachers and domestic workers or the lack of universal child care to help essential workers do their jobs right now.

VICE called up Fraser at her Vermont home, where she was waiting on a grocery delivery in social isolation. While we were in this care crisis long before coronavirus came along, Fraser said that this pandemic is like a lightning flash, illuminating all of the failures in our capitalist system. We also spoke about the new visibility of care work, what we can learn from this current moment, and whether or not she sees the potential for a more socialist feminist future after coronavirus.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Youve argued that weve long been in a crisis of care. Can you talk about that crisis and the ways in which this epidemic has reinforced it?

What I would have said before is that theres a deep bias in capitalist societies against the whole aspect of the care economy that is unwaged and often much less visible. Capital, which is a huge center of power in our society, is kind of primed in its DNA to try to avoid paying for that absolutely necessary care work. It wants to help itself to the fruits of that activitythe workers that get birthed and raised and educated. It wants the benefits of all of that, the home-life where workers can rest and replenish before they go back the next day, without paying for it. A huge aspect of class struggle in the history of capitalism has been over that care work and whos going to pay for it.

I would say that our current form of capitalism, which many people would call neoliberal capitalism, is a perfect storm of this kind of care crisis even before COVID-19. On the one hand, it has massively recruited women into the paid workforcenot just young unmarried women, but everybody. And at the same time, the whole financial sector puts enormous pressure on governments to cut social spending to institute what they euphemistically call austerity.

So we now have women being expected to devote many more hours to waged labor, while the governments providing less and less of the social provision that would conceivably take up some of the slack. Then you add in real wages being driven downwards despite the huge rise in profits, which means every household requires more and more hours of waged labor in order to just end up with the same amount of income to support the household. This is a kind of time crunch, if you see what I mean. Whos going to provide unwaged care work under these conditions? Weve been seeing this long before coronavirus came, this huge squeeze on the whole social reproductive sector.

So how are we seeing this play out in the current moment?

What coronavirus does in a way is it shows us the huge costs that weve incurredlets say the unpaid bill for social reproductionthat has been accumulating for decades, if not longer. Decades of unreplenished energies and costs including those questions about disinvestment in the infrastructure of public health, which is so consequential right now. What was a simmering of a crisis, now its become really explosive in a way.

We were already facing a crisis of care before coronavirus hit because of this under-investment in social reproduction and the shifting of more and more energies and resources and human capacities into the for-profit sector. I would say coronavirus in the age of neoliberalism is a textbook lesson of the absolute imperative for a socialist feminist reorganization of society. It gives new meaning to the idea of disaster capitalism. Its not that the disaster comes from outside and [capitalism] is not able to deal with it so well. It is the disaster itself.

Care work under capitalism is defined by its invisibility. Yet as coronavirus has forced everyone to socially isolate, children are being sent home from school, domestic workers cant come to work, and families staying home, all have to take on care duties now. Do you see this pandemic as a moment when care work seems more visible than ever?

Yes I do. Or at least, a great deal of it. It puts the spotlight on peoples interior lives and what it takes under these conditions to keep a household running. In theory those who are staying home now have time for the domestic front of care work. But on the other hand, they have whole new burdens, such as disinfecting everything, homeschooling, or dealing with children who are not normally home. Many people are working from home, theyre still juggling. And then you add the stress level that everybodys under, including being in a confined space with people you're not used to spending 24 hours with, and all the worrythat is also part of care work.

What coronavirus does in a way is it shows us the huge costs that weve incurredlets say the unpaid bill for social reproductionthat has been accumulating for decades, if not longer.

The other part about care work is that we should not only define it in these domestic familial terms. The whole public health system is also a part of care. The spotlight is really on that and on the ways it's been allowed to deteriorate through underinvestment. So I define care work broadly, not just doing the laundry and so on, but it includes education, health, all of the functions, some of which are done outside the home, usually by public employees.

The health part is where there is really a new kind of visibility, in that we think about health provisions too narrowly. Weve been thinking who has insurance and who doesnt, who can go to a doctor and who cant, who has access to abortion and who doesnt. But what were now seeing is the infrastructural side and that includes hospitals, clinics, personal protective equipment, ventilators. All of this is part of the material infrastructure that makes care possible, so its not just the people who we usually think of performing the care, but all those who are keeping the supply chain going or failing to do so.

Its not just that care has become visible, which it has. But I think were starting to see how production and reproduction are so intertwined that you cant care without this material infrastructure. And to the degree that that is organized on the basis of a for-profit production system, there are all kinds of gross irrationalities that cause a breakdown in the supply chain in the need for care. Thats the most important insight Ive gotten out of all of this. We socialist feminists in particular are always going on and on ad nauseam about the importance of care. Youre right, that's becoming crystal clear. But I think we now see the other side of this; it's not just that the production system depends on the care work, the care work depends on the production system. At this moment, thats one of the key bottlenecks and irrationalities in how this all works under a capitalist for-profit system.

And that extends beyond health care.

Right. Just keeping the food system going and uncontaminated and whos an essential worker and who isntall of this is really crying out for a socialist feminist analysis.

Some states have now made grocery workers essential personnel and are providing them free child care . When their labor is suddenly seen as valuable so is the need for their care, like their child care and health care. What does this have to say about how care under capitalism works?

There are many lessons to be learned here, which have a much broader applicability than the specific case at hand. You give us a specific example about grocery store workers: Everybody understands under coronavirus conditions why their work is so essential and why we have to do whatever it takes to make sure they can do that work, including child care and so on. That becomes clear in a flash. It lights up a whole understanding. The key question though is how broadly we apply this flash of illumination.

What do we do after we get through the worst of this? Are we going to take what we learn and apply it to some significant social transformation? I mean, why do we have people doing work that is not essential. Why would we have non-essential work at all, why wouldnt we just have leisure? Why isnt everything that people do designed to be essential and therefore why isnt child care just taken for granted as an obvious thing that is available across the board?

These are the kind of lessons that you could learn, and of course there are lots of people on the left who have been entertaining these heterodox and scandalous radical ideas here and there for a while. Lets include Bernie Sanders in that category. These people are now getting a bigger audience. One thing about a crisis is it forces people to think outside the box. You cant fall back on the same old bromides that are so patently useless and harmful. So in times like this, its possible to get a bigger hearing for very radical ideas. Thats great. Then its important that we all rise to the occasion and think together and try to develop some kind of vision for a new society, a new way of coming out of this on the other side. We need a set of strategies for how we convince broader strata that this is the way to go.

Speaking of new understandings, we also have this situation where some people cannot reach their nuclear families and are relying on their neighbors, friends, mutual aid from strangers. Do you think this is a moment where we can redefine care as something that is not necessarily tied to the family unit and is valuable beyond the metrics of the market?

I think the realitybefore, during, and presumably after coronavirusis that care was never confined within the walls of a private dwelling. Its never been an exclusively familial situation. But in the imagination, people always think of the home, the mother, the housewife. And I do think that this is another lightning flash, its like coronavirus lights up the skies and shows us that. It calls on us really to depend on those who are at hand. That can forge relationships even if only through a window, like this woman whos getting my groceries.

Why would we have non-essential work at all, why wouldnt we just have leisure? Why isnt everything that people do designed to be essential and therefore why isnt child care just taken for granted as an obvious thing that is available across the board?

These networks of interdependencies can actually make people feel very much more connected, like their fates are tied together. This question of whether you observe social distancing is one kind of test of that. Whether you see how you cant take care of your own health or that of your familys without at the same time taking care of everyone else. Again, the connection between public health and individual health all becomes lit up in a way that is normally not clear in daily life. Thats the nature of pandemic.

The impulse here is towards broader solidarity, but on the other hand you see this kind of survivalism. You have to figure out, how can New York get these ventilators instead of California. This is also on the personal, smaller levelhow can I make sure I get the toilet paper, the masks. Both things are going on at once. The question, then, is how can we take the better impulses that are coming out and highlight them. We need to show where they might lead and show why the restrictive, self-protective forms of survival are irrational.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Read the rest here:
Taking Care of Each Other Is Essential Work - VICE

Coronavirus Disease Discriminates. Our Health Care Doesn’t Have To | Opinion – Newsweek

Are we really all in this together? It is true that until December 2019, no human had encountered the 2019 novel coronavirus, and so none of us was immune. It is also true that political and national boundaries have not halted the spread of this contagion throughout the world. But it is just as true that COVID-19 has washed away any veneer of equal opportunity or equal risk in the population.

The "pre-existing health conditions" that put a person at risk of severe disease and death from COVID-19 are over-represented in communities of color and poor communities as a result of long-term disinvestment and neglect. And now our country's delayed response to the looming pandemic has resulted in unprecedented and under-resourced demands on our health care system. It has raised the specter of health care providers having to make decisions in real time, at the bedside, of who will receive life-saving treatment and who will not.

These decisions used to be made from a distance by our insurance companies, economic system and legally structured racial residential segregation. Now, they will seem personal and real in a whole new way.

Health equity is assurance of the conditions for optimal health for all people. It is a process, not a magical outcome. As we navigate through the immediate health, economic and social demands of the COVID-19 pandemic, three principles for achieving health equity can provide us with both a moral and practical compass: valuing all individuals and populations equally, recognizing and rectifying historical injustices, and providing resources according to need.

These principles can serve as a framework for evaluating current and proposed policy solutions, as well as a checklist for identifying gaps in policy where no solutions have yet been suggested. They can also be the basis for decision-making at the health care provider level.

How can we operationalize these principles for our response to the COVID-19 pandemic?

We need to consider how to reach all communities with our life-saving messages of social distancing, frequent hand-washing, stay-at-home orders and symptoms of COVID-19. And we need to enable all individuals to take up these practices. We need to value those who are detained in jails, prisons and immigration detention centers, as well as those who are unhoused, as much as we value people living in senior communities. We need to anticipate all of the needs that exist.

And we have to be bold in imagining solutions to the issues raised when we decide to value all individuals and populations equally. For example, the decarceration of jailed, imprisoned and detained people who pose little risk to society and are at high risk of death from COVID-19 due to their age or underlying health status. And connection to community resources to support these returning citizens. Or the housing of previously unhoused individuals in available vacant properties. Or at least providing hand-washing stations and opening public restrooms for their use.

At the policy level, the most important way to value all individuals and populations equally is by looking at who is at the decision-making table and who is not, what is on the agenda and what is not. When any of us is at a decision-making table, we need to look around and ask, "Who is not here who has an interest in this proceeding?" And then our job is not just to represent the interests of the missing parties, although that may be a necessary short-term strategy. Our job is to create space for them at the table.

Even now, when Congress is working on the fourth COVID-19 rescue plan for the nation, we need to ensure that all voices can be heard in the deliberations. In the short term, that may be active solicitation of citizen input by our elected representatives. In the long term, that may take overturning Citizens United.

Communities of color should not be "sacrifice zones" with regard to the COVID-19 response. One wonders about the decision to disembark infected persons from the Diamond Princess cruise ship in Oakland Bay rather than in San Francisco Bay, noting that Oakland has a much higher population of color. Or about the decision to convert Carney Hospital in the Dorchester neighborhood of Boston to be the country's first hospital devoted to the care of COVID-19 patients, depriving that predominantly black neighborhood of access to other medical services and possibly increasing the risk of infection in the area.

Certainly, the since-abandoned policy proposal to provide lower one-time cash payments to Americans with lower incomes was the opposite of valuing all individuals and populations equally.

At the bedside, decisions about the allocation of life-saving treatments should not be done by the medical professionals directly involved in the patient's care. It is too easy for implicit bias about relative worth based on race or ethnicity, class, gender, language, disability or other characteristics to manifest itself in decision-making when a provider is tired or stressed. If patient prioritization will instead be done by a hospital ethics board, the composition of that board also needs to be examined for balance along axes of difference and power, and community input into the criteria and processes for decision-making should be rapidly sought.

If we really want to value all individuals and populations equally, should we use a lottery system for allocation of scarce resources? At least structured inequity and subjective valuation would be taken out of the decision-making. This is a provocative suggestion. But perhaps the threat of a fair system in which all people would have equal chances at life would stimulate a more rapid production and distribution of life-saving health resources, solving the issue of scarcity.

The principle manifestation of historical injustices during the crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic is how segregation of resources and risks, societal devaluation, and environmental hazards and degradation are written into the bodies of people of color and poor people. The greater health burden borne by these people may not only predispose them to more severe manifestations of the virus itself, but may also disadvantage them in any ethical protocol established for the rationing of scarce health resources. That would be wrong. It would be counter to the health equity principle of recognizing and rectifying historical injustices, putting at double jeopardy those who already bear the brunt of chronic assaults to health. Instead, this principle should lead to the provision of more ventilators and health services in populations with higher pre-existing health burdens.

Recognizing and rectifying historical injustices also necessitates collection and disaggregation of data on coronavirus testing, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome by "race" and ethnicity so that the impacts of those historical injustices can be recognized and addressed.

In the longer term, attention by policymakers to the history of each problem to be solved will always provide useful insight into effective solutions. Understanding how a knot got tied will always help in untying the knot. The United States population is notoriously ahistorical, thinking that the present is disconnected from the past and that the current distribution of advantage and disadvantage is just a happenstance. The long-term application of this principle will involve the large-scale teaching of our full histories as a nation and a commitment to apologize and make reparations for past injustices, recognizing that they continue to have present-day impacts.

This is perhaps the easiest of the three principles to understand but often the hardest to implement. It takes a tremendous amount of political will. The first step is to establish a metric of need on which there is wide consensus. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, it might be the number of diagnosed cases or indicators of the trajectory of the epidemic (including doubling time and basic reproduction number) in a given jurisdiction. It might include projected number of deaths, projected demands on the health care system, current health system capacity or current levels of resources in an area.

Once a metric of need is established and agreed upon, it would then seem simple to take all available resources and distribute them according to that metric of need. However, even in the clear current situation of New York, topping out these measures of need all around, there is not a rapid deployment of national resources to the city. Other jurisdictions are holding on to theirs because of projected need in a few weeks. And the federal government is slow in using its full power to rapidly commission and deploy resources to areas of need. Instead of conducting targeted and fluid mobilization as the pandemic moves across the nation, there appears to be a stance of disbelief and paralysis at the scope of the need.

As often happens, people (and political jurisdictions) never compare themselves to those who have less than what they have. They always compare themselves to those who have more, so they always feel needy. A pre-established metric of need should solve that. But perhaps strong community pressure is also required.

This pandemic will not end in days or weeks. It could be a year, maybe 18 months. By then, the world will have faced immeasurable loss in terms of life. And economies will need to get back into gear. But maybe the lesson that we are all human and all vulnerable will have sunken through to those who feel better than, or removed from, or insulated from the conditions of others.

It is my hope that these three principles for achieving health equity will be useful in guiding decision-making during these treacherous times. But looking forward, I also hope that they will provide a guide for how we value and treat one another as we build a better, new normal after COVID-19.

Camara Phyllis Jones, M.D., Ph.D., is the Evelyn Green Davis Fellow of Harvard University's Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, a senior fellow at the Morehouse School of Medicine and past president of the American Public Health Association.

The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

More:
Coronavirus Disease Discriminates. Our Health Care Doesn't Have To | Opinion - Newsweek

Evolution Presupposes Intelligent Design: Case of the Coronavirus – Discovery Institute

Darwinian biologist P.Z. Myers has replied to my observation that the coronavirus pandemic is a dramatic example of the destructive power of natural selection. Natural selection is analogous to entropy it degrades functional complexity.

Myers disagrees, and insists that the COVID-19 virus is a fine example of the constructive potential of random variation and natural selection:

What was undergoing natural selection here was the virus, not us, and it has acquired attributes that make it wildly successful it is now colonizing vast fields of billions of human beings, producing uncountable numbers of progeny, infecting more people at an accelerating rate. The virus is stronger and thriving thanks to those features, and doing very well thank you very much. Humans are now possibly undergoing a round of natural selection in response.

These are truisms for the most part. Obviously, if the virus werent wildly successful, generating uncountable progeny, we wouldnt be talking about it. Undeniably, it thrives by thriving. But Myers misunderstands Darwins theory and he misunderstands the dynamics of whatever minimal evolutionary change can occur by undirected processes.

Darwin didnt discover heritable variation and differential reproduction. Men have known since prehistory that offspring vary and some are more successful than others. Breeders mimicked the essentially metaphysical fact about nature possibilities can be actualized and they imitated nature and selected and bred the best of their herds. It was not news to them that something like breeding may happen naturally. They learned to breed by observing nature.

What Darwin proposed was far more radical. He proposed that all adaptation is the result of mundane unintelligent variation and selection. Darwin proposed that nature did what breeders do breeders already knew that but Darwin made the radical and astonishing claim that nature did it all without purpose. Darwin claimed that what breeders did deliberately in a human lifetime to their herds nature did in eons to all of life, except that what nature did was without design.

We need to remember what Darwin actually claimed and what Darwinists actually believe. Darwin didnt propose a theory that populations change by heritable variation and differential reproduction. Thats a trivial observation known to all. Darwin proposed that life can be fully explained by heritable variation and differential reproduction and nothing else. He proposed that heritable variation and differential reproduction was the only cause of evolution of a microbe in a warm little pond into a fish and a bird and a mammal and a man. He proposed that heritable variation and differential reproduction is the origin the only origin of species.

In terms of our present viral pandemic, what Myers and other Darwinists claim is that all lifes diversity arose by the same mechanism that this pandemic arose chance mutation and undirected reproductive wildfire. In other words, to Myers, evolution is pandemics, all the way down. Randomness and survival of survivors explains all.

Yet a careful look at the coronavirus shows why viral evolution is not an example of evolution of new species nor an example of how lifes complexity evolves. It is doubtful that a virus is even a living thing. The coronavirus is essentially a non-living parasite. It depends wholly on the biological mechanisms of immeasurably more complex living organisms us and bats to persist and replicate. Without humans (or bats), coronavirus disintegrates in hours or days. Whatever its exact (as yet unknown) lethality, the coronavirus doesnt succeed when it kills. A virus that kills its individual host has failed, because the virus disappears if its host dies. Viruses need living hosts for their very existence. The coronavirus does kill some hosts, but since hosts usually survive it is on the whole successful. And if a virus isnt alive, then viral mutation and differential reproduction is not an example of the evolution of life anyway.

The coronaviruss evolution the pandemic depends on the living specified complexity of humans and bats. Intelligent design in nature is the prerequisite for all natural selection nature without teleology would be chaos, and no evolution at all.

Aristotle saw this in his definition of chance in nature chance is the accidental conjunction of purposeful events. Without purpose there can be no chance. His example is instructive: he considered a farmer who ploughs his field and by chance discovers a treasure buried by someone else. The treasure is discovered by chance, but everything else the farmers ownership of the field, his decision to plough it, the accumulation and burial of the treasure by the other man is purposeful, and in fact the only reason the accident of discovery happened is because it is embedded in a world of purpose. Chance cant happen the word has no meaning in an entirely accidental world. Chance presupposes design.

The novel coronavirus evolved (it appears) by chance and necessity by mutation and natural selection but evolution by mutation and natural selection presupposes a framework of purpose and design. Moreover, the virus depends entirely on the design of more complex living organisms (like us and bats) for its existence, and the virus would not and could not evolve or even exist were it not for the intricate specified complexity of its living hosts.

Undirected natural selection cant lift itself by its own bootstraps accidents cant happen in nature except in a sea of design. The evolution of the COVID-19 virus is a clear and terrible example of the undeniable teleology in nature. Darwinian random variation and selection, when it happens, is parasitic on biological and natural design.

Photo: A coronavirus, by CDC/ Alissa Eckert, MS; Dan Higgins, MAM / Public domain.

See the original post:
Evolution Presupposes Intelligent Design: Case of the Coronavirus - Discovery Institute

‘Never Rarely Sometimes Always’ | Anatomy of a Scene – The New York Times

Hi. My name is Eliza Hittman. And I am the writer and director of Never Rarely Sometimes Always. I want to spend a few minutes talking with you about your relationships, O.K.? Because they can affect your health. Did you know that? The scene that youre watching an excerpt from is the pivotal scene of the entire film. The main character her name is Autumn. The actors name is Sidney Flanigan has finally reached Planned Parenthood in Brooklyn. And she is going through her intake questionnaire with a counselor before she has an abortion. The scene is shot actually at Margaret Sanger, which is a Planned Parenthood on Bleecker Street. And that level of authenticity was really important for me in shooting the film. And the actress, Sidney Flanigan, is doing the scene not with another actor, but with an actual counselor named Kelly Chapman who I met doing research for the film. Always. Why are you asking me this? I want to make sure that youre safe. The shooting style of the scene was very simple, intentionally so. I didnt want to do anything stagy to get in the way of the intimacy of the questions that are being asked. Your partner has hit you, slapped you, or physically hurt you. Never, rarely, sometimes, always. So we went for a very stripped down, minimal approach. We used two cameras. One is frontal on Sidney, and one is actually 3/4 profile. And those two cameras were pushed very, very, very close to her. Because we wanted to trap her a little bit to intensify the emotions of the scene. Its just a couple more questions, all right? I spent a lot of time rehearsing the scene, because it was so important. And on the day that we shot, I took Sidney aside. Because, sometimes, when you work on an independent film set, its a little like being on a construction site. And I wanted to quarantine her away from all of the commotion. And I found a private office for her to sit in. And she sat for several hours. And I remember, I came in, and she said, Im ready, lets do it. And the scene that is in the film, its actually the first take. Then after she did it, she said it was cathartic, and she couldnt do it again. - Has anyone forced you into a sexual act ever in your lifetime? Yes or no.

Read more here:
'Never Rarely Sometimes Always' | Anatomy of a Scene - The New York Times

Avengers Anatomy: 5 Weirdest Things About Thor’s Body, Explained – CBR – Comic Book Resources

Marvel is known for its attempts to quantify its characters and make them as scientific as possible, but how does that work with a magical being like Thor? As a fantastical god who hurls lightning and tosses mountains, Thor is far from having a typical person's anatomy. But the minute details of how his biology works aren't just awesome, they're downright mythical.

The first thing to understand about Thor's anatomy is that, despite appearances, it's truly nothing like a typical human's. While Thor has worn the form of a Dr. Donald Blake, his true form is that of an Asgardian. Marvel guidebooks make it very clear that all Asgardians are far above humans when it comes to their physicality, with denser flesh and bones and multi-ton strength. On top of that, Thor is one of the strongest Asgardians of all.

RELATED: Watch Skurge The Executioner Become A Legend

Either due to his special heritage as the son of Odin or just through his own lifetime of adventures and training, Thor has managed to become several orders of magnitude stronger than other Asgardians. Whereas most Asgardians can lift or press 25-30 tons, Thorcan lift 100+, and his shattering of mountains and threatening of planets with his blows indicates that there may be no upper limit to how strong an Asgardian can grow.

It would seem that Thor is just as hardy on the inside as the outside, as his magical nature grants him immunity to almost all forms of disease or virus. Hehaseven walked through European villages suffering from the Black Death, seeing villagers sick at their bedside without becoming infected with the plague. But this does not mean that no disease has ever managed to hurt Thor.

When Ragnarok once threatened the Nine Realms, Thor came under the influence of a magical disease that blew through his body's defenses. He noted that he had never been sick before, and he grew increasingly weak over time. Even then, Thor managed to recover, and this might just be one of his most underrated abilities in his repertoire considering the times that Thor was moonlighting as a doctor.

RELATED:MCU: 5 Times Chris Hemsworth's Thor Was Comic Accurate (& 5 Times He Wasn't)

As scientific as Marvel can get about Thor's biology, at the end of the day, magic is magic, and that grants Thor anincredible level of durability, even to esoteric forms of damage. Being the God of Thunder naturally grants him a resistance to electricity, but even conventional forms of thermal damage, like ice and fire, show little effect on the golden-haired Avenger.

Even weirder forms of attacks, like reality-warping or telepathic assault, have been shown to struggle immenselyagainst Thor's natural magical resistances. In an early adventure when a being called the Space Phantom was teleporting Avengers to Limbo and assuming their powers, the Space Phantom tried the trick on Thor and the teleportation beam bounced off and sent the Space Phantom to Limbo instead! There's just no telling what Thorisresistant to.

RELATED:10 Comic Characters Not From Marvel Or DC Who Would Be Worthy Of Mjolnir

On top of the all-around physical and magical superiority that Thor demonstrates,even his sensory input greatly exceeds the average human. Whole new colors and sounds are available to the senses of the God of Thunder, and there's a magical sixth sense that can't even be described. In the Ultimate Universe, Thor was able to sense when others were wielding lightning powers, and his status as a god allowed him to hear the prayers of people around the world.

By the miraculous circumstance that Thor is able to be injured, his body tends to regenerate at a superhuman degree and to a superhuman extent.Throughout his long life, Thor has had his teeth and eyes removed, his flesh seared off, and even been impaled. And yet, he always bounces back, fully regenerating if granted enough time.

Of course, that's not to say that he's never been dealt lasting damage. Most famously, Thor's arm was ripped off and eventually replaced with the arm of the Destroyer armor, andmovie audiences know his MCU incarnation lost an eye. Rocket was luckily able toprovideThor a bionic replacement, but given just how hardy his comic book counterpart is, don't be surprised if the original grows right back when the character next appears on the big screen.

KEEP READING:X-Men Anatomy: The 5 Weirdest Things About Cyclops' Body, Explained

Unworthy Thors: 5 Marvel Villains (and Other Jerks) Who Lifted Mjolnir

Visit link:
Avengers Anatomy: 5 Weirdest Things About Thor's Body, Explained - CBR - Comic Book Resources

The Anatomy of the Clinical Trials: How Researchers are Testing COVID-19 Treatments – Cornell University The Cornell Daily Sun

As COVID-19 cases continue to soar across New York and around the globe, the race to find coronavirus treatments has led to a surge of clinical trials seeking to test the efficacy of different treatments against the virus.

Experts such as Dr. Anthony Fauci M.D. 66 have emphasized the importance of using controlled clinical trials to scientifically prove whether experimental drugs actually work against COVID-19.

But what are clinical trials, and how do they work?

Weill Cornell physician-scientist Dr. Marshall Glesby, who works for the Clinical and Translational Science Center, explained that clinical trials are research studies that test how well new medical interventions or approaches work in people.

An intervention commonly takes the form of an investigational drug, although it could also be a medical procedure or a change to a participants behavior.

According to Glesby, before a clinical trial for a drug treatment can even begin, researchers must thoroughly study a proposed biological mechanism for the drug, acquire promising data from laboratory studies, and advance the study to an animal model to test for preliminary efficacy and any signs of toxicity.

Before youd actually [administer a drug] thats never been given to a person, youd want to have some compelling reasons to do it and some safety data, usually [from] animals, Glesby said.

After these initial stages, the drug still has a long way to go before being tested in humans.

For researchers, a clinical trial begins months in advance of actually testing on patients by first designing a protocol a guidebook that details how the study will be implemented, as well as criteria and assessments to determine participants eligibility, Glesby explained.

Within the design of a protocol, there are many measures incorporated to ensure that the results of the experiment are statistically and scientifically valid.

For example, studies must have control groups to provide researchers with a comparison so they can determine whether a new treatment actually worked. Glesby explained that in clinical trials, controls can be the existing standard of treatment, a different combination of drugs, or a placebo, depending on the medical condition being treated.

Participants are then typically randomly assigned to one treatment group or another, which serves to ensure that each patient has an equal possibility of receiving any treatment under the study.

According to Glesby, trials can also be double-blinded, in which neither the participants nor the researchers have prior knowledge of which treatment the participant received, a precaution designed to eliminate any further bias.

Glesby added that the protocol would then have to be reviewed by the Institutional Review Board, and for drug interventions, the protocol would also have to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration to further protect participants from the risks of clinical trials.

Only after this often months-long approval process can participants finally be recruited and enrolled into the study.

After participants have been recruited and undergone initial screening, participants are regularly assessed throughout the trial to evaluate any possible adverse effects that could result from the drug treatment, Glesby explained.

[At the end of the study] the data are compiled to determine whether the intervention is safe and efficacious, Glesby said.

According to Glesby, the clinical trial process start-to-finish usually take years to complete, as trials gradually expand to include more and more participants. However, in extreme cases, there are ways the process can be accelerated to quickly get clinical trials started something that has become the norm as the severity of the pandemic rapidly mounts.

With what were living through now with COVID-19, undoubtedly there will be expedited paths for drugs to be developed and approved, Glesby said. If there is no available treatment for something, then those [drugs] can be reviewed in a more timely fashion.

Even though the FDA has been expediting trials and waiving many typical requirements, Glesby still expressed awe at how fast the testing of COVID-19 treatments has been implemented.

Whats been amazing to me is that in the context of this COVID-19 pandemic, my colleagues and I have been able to implement studies over a handful of days, as opposed to months, Glesby said. And thats in large part because everyone has ralliedand recognized that this is a real priority because we dont have [any proven treatment] to offer people other than supportive measures.

Although the potential of a number of treatments have been heralded by some President Donald Trump, for example, has repeatedly championed the use of anti-malarial drug chloroquine Glesby noted that anecdotal evidence is not valid in proving the efficacy of certain treatments.

There are a lot of things that are being studied that we dont know if theyre going to be harmful or helpful, and the only way to know is to do a controlled experiment, which is why we do randomized, controlled trials, Glesby said.

As it stands, several different treatments for COVID-19, such as antiviral drugs, like Remdesivir, and immunomodulatory therapy, have rapidly entered clinical trials.

A vaccine developed by Washington-based biotech firm Moderna has already begun human-testing a turnaround time that, according to Fauci, launched in record speed,

But even though these clinical trials are being fast-tracked at an unprecedented speed, Glesby stressed that definitive results are still well over months away.

If something is successful, then maybe its possible it could become available in the 9 to 12 month rangeits hard to know, he said.

More:
The Anatomy of the Clinical Trials: How Researchers are Testing COVID-19 Treatments - Cornell University The Cornell Daily Sun

How Never Rarely Sometimes Always Answers Tough Questions – The New York Times

In Anatomy of a Scene, we ask directors to reveal the secrets that go into making key scenes in their movies. See new episodes in the series each Friday. You can also watch our collection of more than 150 videos on YouTube and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

A series of questions posed to a young woman at an abortion clinic takes an emotional toll in the drama Never Rarely Sometimes Always, written and directed by Eliza Hittman and now available on demand.

The main character, Autumn, played by Sidney Flanigan, has traveled from her home in Pennsylvania to New York City to seek an abortion. At a Planned Parenthood clinic, a social worker (Kelly Chapman, an actual counselor Hittman met doing research for the film) goes over a list of questions, mainly about her relationships, with four possible responses: never, rarely, sometimes or always. That questioning becomes increasingly more taxing for Autumn as the scene progresses.

Follow this link:
How Never Rarely Sometimes Always Answers Tough Questions - The New York Times

Will Jackson Avery Leave ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ for ‘Station 19? – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

[Spoiler alert: Station 19 Season 3, Episode 11.] After the April 2 episode of Station 19 Season 3, Shondaland fans wondered whether Jackson Avery (Jesse Williams) will leave Greys Anatomy for the spinoff series. The Grey Sloan Memorial plastic surgeon visited his old co-worker and friend, Ben Warren (Jason George). But a quick tour seemed to spark a fire within Jackson one audiences have seen before in Ben. So will Jackson jump ship from Greys Anatomy to Station 19? Fans certainly think its possible.

In the Station 19 Season 3 episode titled No Days Off, Ben shows off his latest toy, which is basically an impressive O.R. on wheels. First, Ben brings in Grey Sloans trauma attending, Owen Hunt (Kevin McKidd). But when Owen starts to doubt its capabilities, Ben crosses Owens name off of a list, which also includes Jo Wilson (Camilla Luddington), Maggie Pierce (Kelly McCreary), and Teddy Altman (Kim Raver).

Later, Teddy comes in and shes excited about the potential. Then Ben reveals the reason for the list. I need someone to run it with me to be my partner, he says. However, Teddy turns down the offer. She is running cardio and doesnt exactly miss trauma, especially now with her newborn daughter.

Finally, Ben gets Jackson. Ultimately, the last man standing from the Plastics Posse is just as impressed as Teddy. I know traumas not usually your thing usually, Ben says. But Ive seen you in the pit, right? In a crisis, you get calmer. Thats what I need in a partner.

Then Ben gets called in to help Andy Herrera (Jaina Lee Ortiz) and takes Jackson along with him. The pair save a cook from ICE, bringing him in for a burn. And although the case isnt medically exciting, Jackson feels good about their work. We saved his life, his family. So its a pretty damn good day to be a doctor, Jackson says.

But now theres a big disaster to take care of. Ben is called in for a five-alarm fire. They need everyone and the tour is over. Jackson is hesitant about going back to Grey Sloan. However, it seems Ben picks up on this. He asks Jackson to come.

There will be injuries. You know, full-thickness burns, compartment syndome. Someone may even need an escharotomy, Ben says.Then Jackson replies, Yeah, you had me at fire.

Once Jackson and Ben arrive on the scene, we learn what a five-alarm fire means every firefighter in the city gets called in. This includes Jacksons ex-girlfriend, Victoria Hughes (Barrett Doss). And when the former flames spot each other at the scene, Jacksons excitement about the job diminishes.

Following No Days Off on April 2, fans wondered whether Jackson will leave Greys Anatomy for Station 19. With Ben in need of a partner and Jacksons hesitation to head back to Grey Sloan, everyones curiosity is piqued.

So theyre really setting it up for Jackson to leave #GreysAnatomy and go to #Station19? a fan wrote on Twitter.

Is Jackson Avery going to be a regular on #Station19 next season? #GreysAnatomy, another fan tweeted.

But all the surprise aside, it seems Station 19 and Greys Anatomy fans have mixed feelings about Jacksons potential departure from the flagship series.

If they make Jackson Bens permanent partner and keep Jesse on #Station19 I will scream, a fan wrote, later explaining they dont want to see a Jackson, Vic, and Dean Miller (Okieriete Onaodowan) love triangle.

Meanwhile, another viewer expressed their excitement about the new partnership between Ben and Jackson. Im here for the jackson and ben teamup!! the fan wrote.

In the Greys Anatomy Season 16 episode titled Sing It Again, Jackson returned from the five-alarm fire to support his mom, Catherine Fox (Debbie Allen), and Richard Webber (James Pickens Jr.). Fans didnt even see Jackson in action before he came back to Grey Sloan Memorial.

So for now, Greys Anatomy and Station 19 viewers will just have to wait and see what showrunner Krista Vernoff plans next. But we just hope everyone gets to witness Jacksons character develop on both shows. And who knows? Maybe hell even make a certain trauma surgeon proud, too.

Read more: Is Station 19 Season 4 Renewed or Canceled? Shondaland Fans Can Rest Easy Now

Read the original post:
Will Jackson Avery Leave 'Grey's Anatomy' for 'Station 19? - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

NZIER survey sheds light on anatomy of the business confidence collapse – Stuff.co.nz

123RF

NZIER survey shows businesses weren't calm before the storm finally hit.

Business confidence was crashingin the lead up to New Zealand's coronavirus lockdown, according to the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research'squarterly survey of business opinion.

The index showed a net 67 per cent of firms were expecting economic conditions in the year ahead to deteriorate.

The surveyclosed on March 20, six days before the lockdown, but five days after the Government had ordered all travellers to New Zealand to self-isolate on arrival.

However, the majority of responses were received earlier, during the seven days ending on March 11.

READ MORE:*Air NZ lays off pilots* The stats that show lockdown may be working* Business confidence sinks but ANZ warns the worst may be yet to come

A net 11 per centreported weaker demand in their own business in the March quarter, anda net 13 per cent were also expecting that in the three months to the end of June.

NZIER saidwhileactivity held up reasonably well in the weeks leading up to the lockdown, businesses were looking to pare back operations in anticipation of weaker demand ahead.

An extrapolation of the pattern of responsessuggestedthat almost 70 per cent of businesses would probablyhave reported a deterioration in demand towards the end of March, NZIER said.

"Unsurprisingly, services sector firms reported a weakening in their own trading activity as the weeks progressed.

"In contrast, manufacturers and builders saw an improvement in demand over the weeks leading up to the lockdown."

Visit link:
NZIER survey sheds light on anatomy of the business confidence collapse - Stuff.co.nz

Greys Anatomy Fans Are Convinced They Saw a Training Dummy in an Operation Scene Last Night – Cosmopolitan

[There are spoilers ahead for last nights episode of Greys Anatomy.]

Alright, Greys fans. Gather round for maybe the most bonkers/absurd Greys article youll read this season. During last nights episode, Tom Koracick had to operate on his ex-wifes son, who had a brain tumor that had spread to his spine. That was plenty of drama in and of itself, but fans of the show noticed something pretty off during the operating scene. It looked like there was a training dummy where the childs body should be. No, Im not kidding.

Im going to provide you with some screenshots of the scene so you know what were dealing with here. Fair warning, the photo quality isnt perfect!

I mean, I dont want to be the definitive authority on whether that is a real person or not, but...Im skeptical. Fans on Reddit had a pretty good time poking fun at it. What in the dollar store mannequin... one fan wrote. Someone responded, I seriously thought they just had a random prop there for some reason. And then I realized it was supposed to be the kid and I felt dumb. Glad Im not the only one who thought that it looked extremely fake. The best response, though, was this one: I really hope that crash test dummy survives to see another airbag.

Heres what the actor playing Guthrie looked like in other scenes.

Let me just say that if the show did decide to use a dummy there, I totally get it. That does not look like a super-comfy position to put a child actor in! Especially considering how long it can take to shoot a scene. And its also totally possible the fans are wrong and it is actually the real actor in there, in which case, we have even more questions for whoever lit this scene....

Read more here:
Greys Anatomy Fans Are Convinced They Saw a Training Dummy in an Operation Scene Last Night - Cosmopolitan

The TVLine-Up: What’s Leaving, New and Returning the Week of April 5 – TVLine

RELATED STORIES

This weekly feature is in addition to TVLines daily What to Watch listings.

With more than 530 scripted shows now airing across broadcast, cable and streaming, its easy to forget that a favorite comedy is returning, or that the new prestige drama you anticipated is about to debut. So consider this our reminder to set your DVR, order a Season Pass, pop a fresh Memorex into the VCR however it is you roll.

This week, youll find seven season premieres (including The Good Fight and the Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? revival), three makeshift season finales (including Greys Anatomy and The Walking Dead) and 20 series premieres 15 of which hail from Quibi! (All times are Eastern.)

SUNDAY, APRIL 57 pm Kim Kardashian West: The Justice Project documentary premiere (Oxygen)8 pm Atlantas Missing and Murdered: The Lost Children docuseries premiere (HBO)8 pm ACM Presents: Our Country special (CBS)8 pm Extreme Makeover: Home Edition Season 11 finale (HGTV)9 pm The Walking Dead (ersatz) Season 10 finale (AMC)9 pm War of the Worlds Season 1 finale (Epix)9 pm World on Fire series premiere (PBS)10:02 pm Talking Dead Season 9 finale (AMC)

MONDAY, APRIL 63 am &Music documentary premiere (Quibi)3 am Chrissys Court series premiere (Quibi)3 am Dishmantled series premiere (Quibi)3 am Fierce Queens documentary premiere (Quibi)3 am Flipped series premiere (Quibi)3 am Gayme Show! series premiere (Quibi)3 am Gone Mental With Lior (unscripted)3 am I Promise documentary premiere (Quibi)3 am Memory Hole series premiere (Quibi)3 am Most Dangerous Game series premiere (Quibi)3 am Murder House Flip series premiere (Quibi)3 am NighGowns documentary premiere (Quibi)3 am Nikki Fre$h series premiere (Quibi)3 am Prodigy documentary premiere (Quibi)3 am Punkd series premiere (Quibi)3 am Run This City documentary premiere (Quibi)3 am The Sauce series premiere (Quibi)3 am Shape of Pasta documentary premiere (Quibi)3 am Singled Out series premiere (Quibi)3 am Skrrt With Offset series premiere (Quibi)3 am Survive series premiere (Quibi)3 am Thanks A Million series premiere (Quibi)3 am When the Streetlights Go On series premiere (Quibi)3 am You Aint Got These documentary premiere (Quibi)10 pm Manifest Season 2 finale (NBC)10 pm Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Secrets & Surprises special (ABC)

TUESDAY, APRIL 73 am Terrace House: Tokyo 2019-2020 Part 3 premiere (Netflix; all episodes)3 am Tooning Out the News series premiere (CBS All Access)8 pm The Resident (ersatz) Season 3 finale (Fox)8 pm Schitts Creek series finale (Pop TV; special time)8:30 pm Schitts Creek: Best Wishes, Warmest Regards special (Pop TV)9 pm Empire Episode No. 100 (Fox)10:30 pm The Last O.G. Season 3 premiere (TBS)

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 88 pm Ghost Hunters Season 13 premiere (A&E; two hours)8 pm Modern Family: A Modern Farewell special (ABC; one hour)9 pm Modern Family series finale (ABC; one hour)10 pm Celebrity Ghost Stories Season 7 premiere (A&E)10 pm Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Season 9 premiere (ABC)11 pm Liar Season 2 premiere (Sundance TV)

THURSDAY, APRIL 93 am The Circle: France series premiere (Netflix; first four episodes)3 am Hi Girl Season 2 premiere (Netflix; all episodes)9 am The Good Fight Season 4 premiere (CBS All Access)9 pm Greys Anatomy (ersatz) Season 16 finale (ABC)

FRIDAY, APRIL 103 am A Celebration of the Music from Coco special (Disney+)3 am Brews Brothers series premiere (Netflix; all episodes)3 am Les Misrables (2020) movie premiere (Amazon Prime)3 am Love Wedding Repeat original movie premiere (Netflix)3 am The Main Event original movie premiere (Netflix)3 am Tigertail original movie premiere (Netflix)9 pm Magnum P.I. returns (CBS)

For the latest renewal/cancellation status on your favorite shows, visit our Cable, Streaming and Broadcast-TV renewal scorecards.

Want scoop on any of the above shows? Email InsideLine@tvline.com and your question may be answered via Matts Inside Line.

Read the rest here:
The TVLine-Up: What's Leaving, New and Returning the Week of April 5 - TVLine

Grey’s Anatomy: Why Cristina And Izzy Aren’t Real Friends – Screen Rant

In the 16 years since Grey's Anatomy has been on the air, there has yet to be a group of interns that were as iconic as M.A.G.I.C..Although they were majorly competitive and got into some huge fights, Team M.A.G.I.C. was excessively loyal to one another. No matter what happened, their bond was completely unbreakable.

RELATED: Grey's Anatomy: Why Cristina & Meredith Aren't Real Friends

However, this didn't mean they were all "friends" especially if fans take a closer look at Cristina and Izzie's relationship. Apart from Cristina saving Izzie's life, the pair had nothing in common. Don't believe it? Keep reading to discover 10 reasons why Cristina and Izzie aren't real friends.

One of the main reasons why Cristina and Izzie aren't real friends is due to their opposing personalities. Where Izzie is optimistic and happy, Cristina is dark and twisty. Izzie got emotionally involved with her patients and Cristina liked to keep an objective view. They were like chalk and cheese.

If fans watch the first five seasons again, they will find that Cristina and Izzie only hung out in group events. Any other time, Cristina was usually seen with Mere, and Izzie with George. Cristina and Izzie just didn't have that personal connection.

Another prime example as to why Izzie and Cristina weren't true friends was when Cristina helped Alex study for his intern exam. In "Grandma Got Run Over By a Reindeer," Cristina and the other internsfound out that Alex had failed his exam and decided to help him study.

RELATED: Grey's Anatomy: 10 Things You Didn't Know About Meredith And Cristina's Friendship

However, this all came about after they also discovered that Alex had cheated on Izzie, meaning they weren't meant to be speaking to him. As a result, Cristina agrees to tutor him in secret. When Izzie did find out, she was livid as it proved Cristina wasn't a friend you could count on. If there was no loyalty between them then they couldn't be very good friends.

In season 5, Cristina and Izzie ended up getting into a mini argument when the oncologistlearned that Cristina stole her apartment. In "Here Comes The Flood," Izzie founds out that she may be homeless after she walked in to see Derek measuring her room. She then began searching for a new apartment and subtly hinted to Cristina about becoming roommates.

However, Cristina didn't seem to pick up on Izzie's hints, and ended up putting an offer down with Callie. What's even worse is that Cristina didn't volunteer to help Izzie find another place. She could have given Izzie Burke's old apartment. Just goes to show Cristina didn't care about Izzie's personal problems.

Cristina and Izzie also proved they were never good friends when the cardiothoracic surgeon made jokes about Izzie's cancer. In "Goodbye," Izzie confided in Meredith and Cristina about the lack of intimacy between her and Alex. Instead of reassuring her, Cristina decided to inappropriately joke about them having cancer sex which upset Izzie greatly.

RELATED: Grey's Anatomy: 10 Reasons Why Derek And Mark Aren't Real Friends

Although Cristina's attitude derived from her relationship problems with Owen, this doesn't excuse how insensitive and rude she was being. Especially when she was making cruel jokes about a "friend" who was going through a tough time. If this was the support system Izzie had, she was better off without it. No one deserves to be treated this way.

The beginning of season 3 saw a division between Cristina and the other residents when she decided to help cover up Burke's tremor. However, their secret was soon uncovered when Cristina confessed all to the Chief after Burke allowed his injury to jeopardize one of their patients.

As a result, Cristina is frozen out by all of her colleagues including Izzie, who demanded she be punished. Considering what she did with Denny's LVAD, Izzie wasn't exactly in the position to judge someone. If anything, she should have been the one to stand up for Cristina since she knew how easy it was to make a mistake. The fact that she was baying for her blood proves why they weren't good friends.

Keeping with the previous entry, Izzie proved to be a terrible friend when she jeopardized Cristina's career for her own selfish gain. In "Deterioration of the Fight or Flight Response," Izzie cut Denny's LVAD wire and dragged the rest of the residents into her plan.

RELATED: Grey's Anatomy: 5 Best Friendships (& 5 Worst)

For one, friends would never put each other in such a position where they feel like they have to compromise their morals and integrity. They also wouldn't make you jeopardize your career because they did something wrong. Izzie knew how much Cristina valued her career and yet she did all this anyway.

After Izzie cut Denny's LVAD, team M.A.G.I.C. banded together and refused to reveal what went down in Denny's room. However, Cristina seemed to have a change of heart when it came to her interrogation with the Chief.

As Webber tried to get to the bottom of the Duquette situation, he forbade any of the residents from entering the O.R., and questioned them one-on-one. What he didn't expect was for Cristina to say she would tell him what happened if he would tell her how she could get her edge. Nice to see how much Izzie's friendship was worth to her.

One of the more obvious entries on the list that proves why Cristina and Izzie aren't real friends is the fact that the oncologist left without saying goodbye. In "Invasion," Izzie was fired after she makes an error that compromised a patient's health. However, what no one expected was for her to skipped town and leave Alex a "Dear John" letter.

RELATED: Grey's Anatomy: 5 Friendships We Would Have Loved To Have Seen (& 5 We Don't Care About)

For months, Izzie then proceeded to ghost everyone, including Cristina, who was worried about her not turning up for her treatment. While everyone understood that Izzie wasn't in the best place, she was wrong for not saying goodbye and for making her friends worry. If they were true friends, Izzie would have respected Cristina enough to say she was leaving.

Season 4 also saw Cristina and Izzie have a brief falling out when the cardiothoracic resident discovered Izzie had slept with George. As fans know, Izzie broke up George and Callie's marriage when they had a one-night stand. When this secret was discovered, Cristina was disgusted by Izzie's actions and berated her for sleeping with a married man.

However, Izzie retaliated by mentioning that Cristina's okay with Meredith doing it. Their relationship becomes further strained when Cristina becomes closer to Callie, and asks the orthopedic surgeon to move in with her. At this point, it's clear that Cristina wasn't very attached to the idea of becoming best friends with Izzie.

Ironically, Izzie made it clear that she and Cristina weren't friends when she chose to confide in her about her cancer diagnosis. After spending weeks deliberating what to do, Izzie decides to tell Cristina because she knew she would be objective and stoic ("I Will Follow You into the Dark").

When she first approached Cristina, Izzie told the cardiothoracic surgeon that she knows "she doesn't like her" but it was okay. The fact that she feels this is okay and Cristina doesn't deny it proves they are not friends. There is no emotional connection between them. Izzie basically confided in Cristina because she wanted "Dr. Yang's" professional opinion.

NEXT: Grey's Anatomy: 6 Best Couples (And 5 Worst)

NextTwo And A Half Men: 5 Of Charlie's Girlfriends We'd Love To Date (& 5 We Wouldn't)

A writer, reader and tv fanatic, Kayleigh enjoys reading movie news and your film reviews. She has attained an Undergraduate degree in Creative Writing and is also the creator of the film and television blog 'The Critics' Corner'.

More:
Grey's Anatomy: Why Cristina And Izzy Aren't Real Friends - Screen Rant

Greys Anatomy, House and other medical dramas to watch on World Health Day – Republic World – Republic World

The World Health Day is today i.e April 7, 2020. Amidst the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, the conversation of healthcare and the respect towards healthcare professionals has seen significant developments. While people maintain social distancing and stay indoors, they are indulging in watching various TV shows and films. Below are some of the best medical dramas to watch on World Health Day 2020.

Also read:'Greys Anatomy' Character Richard Webber Leaves Fans Worried After Recent Episode

Grey's Anatomy has evidently earned a massive following over the years. The show revolves around the lives of surgeons and how they balance the equilibrium between their professional and personal lives. The series debuted back in 2005 and has been on the air for over a decade but still continues to rake in viewership from across the globe. Viewers can feast their eyes to over 360 episodes of Grey's Anatomy on Amazon Prime Video.

Also read:'Greys Anatomy' Character Richard Webber Leaves Fans Worried After Recent Episode

House aka House MD is considered to be actor Hugh Laurie's most prominent work in the entertainment industry. House debuted back in 2004 and ran for eight seasons. Hugh Laurie can be seen playing the titular character of Doctor Gregory House, a rebellious medical professional who does not follow hospital rules and goes overboard in every direction possible in order to help his patients.

Also read:Coronavirus Crisis: 'Greys Anatomy' Donates Its Gloves, Gowns To First Responders

The Good Doctor is a fairly new series that debuted back in 2017. The show revolves around a young doctor who has autism and savant syndrome. The Good Doctor has a total of three completed seasons yet with the fourth season having debuted in March 2020.

Also read:Ellen Pompeo Aka Dr Meredith Grey's Best Moments In 'Grey's Anatomy'

Also read:'Grey's Anatomy' Wraps Up Earlier Than Its Scheduled Finale Due To Coronavirus In US

Get the latest entertainment news from India & around the world. Now follow your favourite television celebs and telly updates. Republic World is your one-stop destination for trending Bollywood news. Tune in today to stay updated with all the latest news and headlines from the world of entertainment.

Original post:
Greys Anatomy, House and other medical dramas to watch on World Health Day - Republic World - Republic World

Grey’s Anatomy: Why Alex And Aren’t Real Friends | ScreenRant – Screen Rant

Grey's Anatomy has seen a lot of characters come and go, and, as a result, some amazing friendships have been struck up on the way. When Alex Karev first appeared in the pilot episode back in 2005, the character was written in late to give the show a bit of an edge, as Alex was a total jerk.

RELATED: Grey's Anatomy: The D&D Moral Alignments Of The Main Characters

Over time, though, Alex gradually began to mellow and became the man everyone knew he was inside. A major factor in Alex's growth was Arizona Robbins, head of Pediatric surgery, who taught Alex to be a better person and a brilliant surgeon. However,there are many reasons why these two aren't really friends.

When Alex and Arizona first met, Arizona was the new attending assigned to a young boy's case after the previous doctor died. Arizona insisted on putting the child on the transplant list as soon as possible, and she was surprised that nobody had done that already, given the state of the boy's intestines and liver.

Both Alex and Miranda Bailey didn't like Arizona's new approach, and they complained about her behind her back.Alex was bugged by Arizona's perkiness, even when they had to harvest a dying child's organs to save their own patient.

When Arizona made her Grey's Anatomy debut in season five, she and Callie Torres were immediately attracted to each other. After a slow start, they embarked on a relationship with each other, going on to become an extremely popular fan-favorite couple.

However, in the season nine finale, Arizona cheated on Callie, who was understandably devastated and angry, refusing to forgive Arizona. Arizona planned an elaborate apology, but Alex told her to just say sorry, shaming her. While Arizona's actions were questionable, you just don't shame a friend like that.

In one of season 14's funniest episodes, the majority of the surgical staff at Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital were rendered useless after Arizona was accidentally given homemade cookies laced with weed from a grateful patient. Arizonahad already handed the cookies around before she realized.

RELATED: Grey's Anatomy: 15 Famous Cameos You Might Have Missed

One of the recipients of the weed cookies was Alex, who started acting high, forcing Amelia Shepherd and Owen Hunt to bring him home with them. While this was a great episode, Alex (and the other doctors) could have gotten into serious trouble all because of Arizona's mistake.

To be clear, neither Alex nor Callie cheated on Arizona, as this all took place in a flashback. In season six, the doctors attended a series of lectures given by attendings and senior members of staff, including Callie. Callie was struggling with nerves, and so Alex and Arizona encouraged her from the audience.

After a shaky start, Callie soon found her groove, and her chosen case was actually quite interesting. After encountering difficulties, Alex and Callie managed to save their patient, which led to them celebrating by having sex. Arizona didn't know about this, and so she was understandably a bit cross.

When Alex appeared in early seasons, he was a misogynistic, arrogant, hot-headed ass. Thankfully, though, he soon grew up to become a likable and trustworthy colleague. However, things soon got awkward.

In season 13, Arizona was then living with Andrew DeLuca, and they had built up quite a sweet friendship despite Arizona being DeLuca's boss. Unfortunately, due to a fatal misunderstanding, Alex saw DeLuca with Jo Wilson and severely beat him up. DeLuca had to undergo multiple surgeries, and Alex was arrested. It shouldn't have to be said, but beating up your friend's flatmate is a no go where friendship is concerned.

In season 8, Alex and all the other fifth-year residents became involved in a mad scramble in a bid to find a fellowship for next year. Alex was struggling slightly, as his project where he brought children to the hospital for surgery was over a year ago. Just when he was about to give up, he got an offer from Johns Hopkins.

They were incredibly impressed by his performance at his board exams and made him a once in a lifetime offer. Naturally, Alex considered all his options before choosing to accept the offer. However, this meant betraying Arizona who had taught him everything he knew and who was expecting him to stay with her.

Arizona and Callie's relationship was great while it lasted, but, sadly, in season 11, the two surgeons went their separate ways. Fortunately, they still remained civil towards each other and even considered them to be friends. However, when Callie announced she was moving to New York, that all went out the window.

RELATED: Grey's Anatomy: 10 Things To Expect By Season 16's Finale

Callie assumed she would be taking Sofia with her, much to Arizona's horror. The couple then initiated a savage custody battle that didn't exactly paint either woman in a good light. However, Arizona needed her friends to vouch for her, and, when she asked Alex, he refused, stating he couldn't choose sides.

When Arizona found out that Alex was leaving her for Johns Hopkins, it's safe to say that she was not at all happy. In all fairness to Alex, Arizona's bad mood was not only due to his perceived betrayal; earlier that day, Arizona's late brother's childhood friend told her that he was dying.

Unable to cope with the fact that she would soon lose another part of her brother, Arizona was already on edge. When Alex told her about his decision, she snapped and took his place on the plane, as well as removing Alex from all pediatric surgeries. If it weren't for Alex, Arizona would still have her leg.

For the most part, watching Arizona's and Alex's friendship blossom over the course of ten seasons was a joy to behold. Alex learned how to be sensitive, not just with his young patients, but their parents, as well, and Arizona got a brilliant new peds surgeon.

This all went swimmingly until the dreaded plane crash occurred. If anything, the aftermath was even more brutal than the crash itself. The injured were transferred to Seattle Grace, but Arizona's infection in her leg threatened to kill her. Therefore Alex had to cut off her leg, potentially jeopardizing their friendship.

Alex and Arizona did have an amazing relationship on Grey's Anatomy, despite all their ups and downs. However, the main reason why they are not truly friends is because their relationship consists of a mentor/mentee situation.

They've never really hung out together outside of work properly, and they don't really discuss their personal lives with each other. They like each other and respect the hell out of each other, but it's mainly professional between the two. Despite this, both Arizona and Alex have had a massive impact on each other's lives, and they will always be important to one another.

NEXT: Grey's Anatomy: 5 Characters Who Have Grown A Lot (& 5 Who Haven't)

NextTwo And A Half Men: 5 Of Charlie's Girlfriends We'd Love To Date (& 5 We Wouldn't)

Ben Pettitt is a recent English graduate of the University of Nottingham. He loves to write, read and watch Netflix. This is one of the reasons why he decided to come and display his knowledge of pop culture as a writer for Screen Rant.

Originally posted here:
Grey's Anatomy: Why Alex And Aren't Real Friends | ScreenRant - Screen Rant

VIDEO: Watch the Trailer For the Season 16 Finale of GREY’S ANATOMY – Broadway World

The season 16 finale of Grey's Anatomy airs Thursday, April 9th, on ABC.

A new trailer for the episode has been released. In the trailer, Link tries to convince Amelia to take it easy during the final stage of her pregnancy. Hayes asks Meredith a surprising question, and Owen makes a shocking discovery.

Check out the trailer below!

Grey's Anatomy is an American medical drama television series that premiered on March 27, 2005, on the American Broadcasting Company (ABC) as a mid-season replacement. The fictional series focuses on the lives of surgical interns, residents, and attending doctors, as they develop into seasoned doctors while trying to maintain personal lives and relationships.

Shonda Rhimes developed the pilot and continues to write for the series; she is also one of the executive producers, along with Betsy Beers, Mark Gordon, Krista Vernoff, Rob Corn, Mark Wilding, and Allan Heinberg.

See more here:
VIDEO: Watch the Trailer For the Season 16 Finale of GREY'S ANATOMY - Broadway World

Will Season 17 Be The Last For Greys Anatomy? Release Date, Cast, and Expected Story Plot – BingePost

The Witcher is all set to launch its second season. Its an American hypothesis drama sequence who already launched its first season and the subsequent is on the door to shock its focused viewers. The sequence was the adoption of Andrzej Sapkowskis novel by the identical identify and Sapkowasi was a polish author. its e book has additionally adopted the sequence sample. This fantasy drama sequence produced by Lauren Schmidt Hissrich for Netflix.

A gaggle of people who dont find out about this system, it is best to know that the sequence is about on fictional and Continent. the Witcher scout the legend of Geralt of Rivia and princess Ciriand and theyre linked by future to one another.

Right heres the detailed of the upcoming second season of The Witcher and ensure to bookmark this web page by urgent CTRL+D, as you all get the updates.

The official announcement date for The Witcher season second has not been proclaimed, nevertheless. Additionally, this imprisonment state of affairs due to COVID-19 the world over critically has an impact on the meeting pace of the sequence. Inside a month sequence premiered on Netflix, they said that the sequence was renewed for the second season 2.

Manufacturing of the sequence additionally will get affected by the pandemic. Netflix reported in regards to the halted manufacturing on season 2 of the sequence.

Henry Cavill, Anya Chalotra and Freya Allan are all set to again because the three predominant characters like Geralt, Yennefer and Ciri. additionally, we see the face within the sequence Tissaia( MyAnna Buring), Filvandrel( Tom Canton), Murta(Lilly Cooper), Yaepin Zigrin(Jeremy Crawford), Cahir(Eamon Farren), Vilgefortz(Mahesh Jadu), Artorius(Terence Maynard), Sabrina(Therica Wilson Learn) and the record had been continued with many faces.

Netflix revealed a brand new forged group joins The Witcher household in season 2 through Twitter on February 21:

Yasen Atour as CoenAgnes Bjorn as VereenaPaul Bullion as LambertKristofer Hivju as NivellenThue Ersted Rasmussen as EskelAisha Fabienne Ross as LydiaMecia Simson as Francesca

The plot detailed has not been so but disclosed. However the storyline of season 2 is extra simple. In a latest interview Hissrich saying Whats nice about season two, I can inform you, is that, in what weve written, the story turns into rather more targeted. Theres a stronger drive within the story, as a result of the entire relationships that weve been organising in season one, really begin to come into fruition in season two. Later Hissrich added Characters begin assembly and interacting extra. That goes properly generally. It doesnt go properly generally. However its sort of like, all of these constructing blocks that we arrange for the world, lastly, begin to come collectively into one thing somewhat extra concrete.

See the original post:
Will Season 17 Be The Last For Greys Anatomy? Release Date, Cast, and Expected Story Plot - BingePost