Tesla Stock Is Getting Hammered on Coronavirus Fears, but It Isnt Capitulation – Barron’s

Text size

Highflying stocks such as Tesla and Virgin Galactic are getting hammered in the coronavirus-related stock market selloff. But it isnt a sign of investor capitulation regarding stocks with high valuations. Bearish investors cant claim people are coming to their senses. The worst-performing stocks are getting hit just as hard as the highflying names.

Tesla (ticker: TSLA) stock, however, is off 21% over the past week. Virgin Galactic (SPCE) is down 36% over the same span. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, for comparison, is down 9.1% and the S&P 500 has dropped 8.9%.

That might sound like capitulation. What's more, shares of large companies up more than 50% year to date are down about 16% on average over the past week.

But Tesla and Galactic shares are still up more than 85% and 100%, respectively. The average gain for stocks in the plus-50% year-to-date club is 86%.

The other highfliers are, Enphase Energy (ENPH), Sprint (S) and PG&E (PCG). Health-care stock Moderna (MRNA) just missed the cut. That stock is up a lot, but not quite 50%, because it has a potential vaccine for the coronavirus.

It isnt capitulation at the other end of market. Beaten up shares are getting sold just as hard. Stocks that have fallen more than 30% year to date, are down 19% on average, worse than the performance of the highfliers.

There are a lot of oil and travel stocks, however, populating the bottom of the year-to-date return lists. Those sectors have been harder hit by virus fears. Excluding the oil and travel sectors, stocks suffering big 2020 losses are down about 12% over the past week. That is still worse than the overall market and only a little better than the highfliers.

This means, in part, the recent selloff appears based in fear. Investors are taking a sell first, ask questions later approach. It is painful, but it bodes well for stocks when coronavirus fears fade.

Write to Al Root at allen.root@dowjones.com

See original here:

Tesla Stock Is Getting Hammered on Coronavirus Fears, but It Isnt Capitulation - Barron's

Financial Independence: How to achieve FIRE w/ $1.5 million

Financial independence is the moment when your investments start paying more than your expenses. Once that happens, youre free.

Free from havingto work for a living.

Free from having to worry about paying rent on time.

And free from a TON of other financial obligations.

BUT how long would it take the average American to become financially independent?

Assuming you earn $75,000 a yearandyour annual expenses are about $60,000, you need to save roughly $1,500,000 to become financially independent.

When youre done picking your jaw up off the floor, Ill let you in on the process of how to get there:

There are no slick tactics or sexy ways to go about this. If youre the average American who needs $1,500,000 to hit your FIRE goal, you need to work hard and be determined. But the feeling of freedom when you reach financial independence will make it all worth it.

Were using the $1,500,000 goal based on the average salary and living expenses of Americans. If you want to find a number more specific to YOUR situation though, youll have to use the 4% Rule.

The 4% Rule is known as the safe withdrawal rate,or the amount of expenses you should be able to withdraw from your savings each year when you retire without touching the principal. (This number is based on a study from Trinity University.)

Finding out your safe withdrawal rate is the first step to learning how to become financially independent.

So how do you find out how much you need to save? Do two things:

This will give you enough expenses to withdraw 4% for years and years to come.

Heres a handy chart to show you how much youll need to save based on possible yearly expenses.

Using the above information coupled with your annual after-tax income, youll be able to come up with an annual savings rate (i.e., how much you need to save each year).

Luckily, you dont have to strain too hard with back-of-the-napkin math to figure it out, as there are a bunch of retirement calculators online. This one is our favorite. It outlines exactly how many years itll take to save depending on your savings rate.

Play around with the calculator until youve come up with a savings rate that works for you. After that, youll know exactly how much you should be saving every time you get a paycheck.

In terms of the percentage, I suggest you save 65% of your after-tax income, says Mad Fientist. That may seem like a ton but its possible. I averaged around 75% to 80% when I was saving.

Meanwhile, Physician on FIRE suggests you should actually save about 50% of your income to go towards your goals.

When pursuing FIRE, PoF says, keep in mind that youre locking yourself into the same lifestyle as when you reach financial independence. [So] if youre making too many frugal choices that dont jive with your persona, start living the way you want to and base your FI target on that.

Remember our example using the average salary and expenses? Looking at the chart, we know now that the average American needs to save about $1,500,000 in order to retire early. Our savings rate will then be about 32% of our annual income each year in order to save enough money to retire early (well go into how long itll take later).

Everyone that goes for FI has to decide something important:Should you try to live as frugally and retire as early as possible and minimize your expenses, or would you rathertake part in the finer things in lifebut retire later?

Luckily, there are two communities that embrace FIRE in different ways that can help you decide.

Bonus: Struggling to take control of your expenses? Check out my Ultimate Guide to Personal Finance to learn how to automate your finances so you can reach financial independence sooner.

There are typically two schools of thought when it comes to financial independence: leanFIRE and fatFIRE.

Though they sound more like weight loss supplements or descriptions of my latest mixtapethan systems for financial independence, theres no need to be intimidated by them.

LeanFIRE and fatFIRE are just terms for how much you plan to live on when you retire, the Mad Fientist says. Theres no better way. Just test out your spending until you find a method that works for you.

While both have the same goal of achieving financial independence, aspects such as how much you spend, save, and even quality of life can be affected by which approach you choose.

leanFIRE

This approach requires you to have a low spending rate each year (typically less than $40,000/year).

To be leanFIRE is to subsist on a comparatively low level of spending much like most of us did in college, PoF says.

This means adopting a frugal lifestyle and sacrificing certain luxuries like cars. It can even determine the places in the world you can live in (its easier to live cheaply in Norman, Oklahoma, than NYC for instance).

On the other side of the coin, theres a FIRE movement that aims to keep up the benefits of financial independence while still retaining a life of semi-luxury: fatFIRE.

Bonus: A higher salary could help you reach financial independence sooner. Check out my huge free guide to salary negotiation to get the raise you deserve.

fatFIRE

FatFIRE is the system of financial independence that allows you to live a more high-class lifestyle. But it takes longer to complete.

FatFIRE is to be financially independent on a more typical level of spending, PoF says. Id say to qualify as fat, your anticipated spending should probably be somewhere north of the national average.

According to PoF, thatd be an annual spending rate of around at least $80,000. That lends itself nicely to a round number of $2 million saved to have a budget with a 4% annual withdrawal rate, he says.

This is the practice that PoF embraces and his reason might convince you to pursue the lifestyle as well.

Lets assume you dont want to sacrifice your $60,000-a-year lifestyle and want to save enough money to get there. Youll need a higher rate of saving AND earning to do that

which brings us to:

Do you know how long itll take you to save $1,500,000 on a salary of $73,000 and a savings rate of 34%?

More than 26 years.

Thats a long time, and if you want to retire early, you might not want to wait that long.

Luckily theres a way to DRASTICALLY shorten that time: Earning more money.

Earning more allows you to increase your savings AND speed up your financial independence goals. While there are a lot of ways to make more money, the best way is starting a side hustle.Its a big win.

Below are our resources that have helped thousands of readers start their side hustles:

To help you get started, today, I want to show you how to find a great side hustle idea. Its one of the biggest barriers preventing people from starting their own business and making extra income. You can find a great idea by answering four simple questions about your life:

Find an answer to those questions and youll be on the same path as thousands of our students who have found a profitable business idea.

Bonus: Need help coming up with a business idea? Click here to receive your very own PDF of 30 proven business ideas.

A lot of us tend to DREAD the idea of cutting costs and with good reason. Thoughts of not being able to go to your favorite fast food restaurant or your father yelling at you when you change the thermostat just a fraction of a degree often crop up.

Scrutinize and be conscious of your spending, he says. If you see a nice BMW you think you want consider one thing: You could have the BMW or you could be a year closer to not having to work for anyone ever again. Framing it that way helps. Its not like youre saving. Youre working towards your financial freedom.

Conscious of your spending. Conscious spending

I wonder where Ive heard that before?

Conscious spending allows you to know exactly how much money is in your bank account to spend without you worrying about having to make rent and pay the bills, because its already been done for you.

How? Through automated finances. This is the system where your paycheck automatically divvies up and transfers to where it needs to go as soon as you receive it.

Heres a 12-minute video of Ramit explaining exactly how to do it.

NOTE: If youre pursuing financial independence, youre going to want to adjust the percentage of money you put away to savings when you implement your plan. You can choose to save around 65% like Mad Fientist suggests, or you can choose to put half your paycheck into your savings like PoF encourages. Or you could go a different route. Its all up to you and your savings goals.

Using a conscious spending plan also allows you to not sweat the small things you like.

Realize that the small stuff is just that small stuff, PoF says. The biggest expenses are the big stuff like housing, transportation, and travel. Dont rent or buy too much home, spend too much on a luxury auto or lengthy commute, and learn to be comfortable at a Comfort Inn.

Remember: cut things you DONT care about, to focus on the things you do. Dont just indiscriminately cut everything.

You can also learn to cut costs by leveraging retirement accounts that give you amazing tax advantages.

If you want to find out more about awesome accounts like the Roth IRA and 401k be sure to check out our articles on the topic:

But for now, I want to talk to you about an account with fantastic tax leverages you might not have heard of before: health savings accounts (HSA).

According to the Mad Fientist, HSAs are tax-advantaged savings accounts available for people who are enrolled in high-deductible health insurance plans.

He continues, HSA account holders can contribute pre-tax dollars to the account and can then withdraw money from the account, tax-free, when paying for qualified medical expenses.

So you contribute tax-free money AND withdraw tax-free money.

As of writing this, you can contribute $3,400/year for individuals and $6,750/year for familiesto an HSA. By maxing it out each year, you can reduce your taxable income by $3,400.

In 2018, the contribution limits for both individuals and families will go up to $3,450 and $6,900respectively.

Sure, you cant take the money out other than to pay for certain medical expenses but when you turn 65 you can without incurring any penalties.

That means all that tax-free money is yours, effectively lowering your taxed income over your lifetime by $3,400/year.

You should do all that you can to legally reduce your tax burden, PoF explains. If you max out your workplace retirement accounts and an HSA [Health Savings Account], you can deduct a significant sum from your taxable income. Theres only so much a wage earner can do, but do all that you can to pay the least and save the most.

Once you have your retirement accounts set up, youve taken steps to cut costs, and youre ready to earn more money, congrats! Youre on the road to early retirement.

Now I want to offer you something to dramatically cut down the time it takes to save for retirement even MORE:

This guide will give you the exact systems you need to help you earn extra income on the side and eventually achieve financial independence (if you want it).

Youll find our tactics to:

Download a FREE copy of the Ultimate Guide today by entering your name and email below and start your financial independence journey today.

Read more:

Financial Independence: How to achieve FIRE w/ $1.5 million

How to Become Financially Independent – The Balance

There are several myths and misnomers when it comes to financial planning, and individuals can take in a lot advice from many good and not-so-good sources. Mistakes can range from confusing high incomes with wealth to not knowing the importance of taxasset placementwhen choosing your investments. This article attempts to shed some light on these areas and to help provide individuals with some key insights that can lead to a more financially independent life.

This guide to financial independence is part of theHow to GetRichtrilogyfor new investors.

Most people believe the key to wealth is a high-paying job. Yes, it's easier to amass assets if you have more monthly income, but one key to increasing your net worth is to spend less than you make. Ultimately, spending habits are the reason a professional athlete making $20 million a year can quickly go bankrupt while a bus driver can retire a multi-millionaire. It may be a clich, but it is a fundamental reality of money.

To escape the spending trap, you need to understand the difference between income and long-term wealth. While income is an obvious component of wealth, it's not the only factor. Many people see wealth as their total net worth at any given time. In other words, wealth can be thought of as the equity on your balance sheetyour assets minusliabilities.

Thinking long term is an important characteristic of accumulating wealth and achieving financial independence regardless of your income level. There are several considerations for long-term wealth, and they will differ for everyone.

If you are a doctor or lawyer, you need to put in long hours after years of education and specialty training to get a paycheck. That paycheck, however, does not necessarily translate to wealth. With long-term thinking, helping to ensure your jobs security, taking initiative to achieve a promotion, or taking steps that will result in higher sales commissions can all be factors for wealth and ways to move toward financial independence.

Side gigs, private investments, and a host of other variables can also be ways to think long term and accumulate wealth. A few considerations here may include a portfolio of private businesses, car washes, parking garages, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, real estate, patents, or trademarks. Some of these cash generators can be relied on for long-term income in addition to your job or just as cash generators that can pull in money while you take long vacations or sit by the pool.

When you take a look at your personal balance sheet, you may already have organic investments you can rely on in your quest for financial independence. Oftentimes, this is wealth that generatescapital gains, income, and dividends without labor. The more of these investments you can afford, the sooner you can fully achieve financial independence.

Overall, the real value of your income is partially determined by the amount you can invest to achieve a financial independence goal. Setting this goal can be important for keeping your perspective on income in check. At your goal, you can successfully maintain the lifestyle you want without working.

Working with a financial adviser can help you to set a goal for wealth accumulation that allows you to maintain your standard of living without an additional paycheck and achieve the financial independence of your dreams. This goal can be lofty,however, as most peoples annual spending includes a long list of budget items, such as mortgage payments, car payments, clothing, college tuitions, music lessons, entertainment expenses, and more.

The only way to take advantage of investment opportunities is to have the money to invest. In successful investing, there is a certain point where you reach critical mass, and the returns generated on your assets can change your life.

Earning a 10% return on $10,000 is only going to net you $1,000 before taxeshardly earth-shattering. But the same return on a $1,000,000 portfolio is $100,000, which has far more utility despite requiring the same effort and research.

Amassing wealth and becoming financially independent is a slow process that takes time. You do small things every daycut your expenses, generate extra income, and put the money into brokerage and tax-deferred retirement accounts. With time, it begins to amount to something.

As each new opportunity appears, you can react on a larger scale than your previous investments. That's calledcompounding. It's when the interest, dividends, and capital gains your money has earned begin to generate their own interest, dividends, and capital gains, and on and on in a virtuous cycle. It's how $10,000 can grow to $2,890,000 over 50 years at a 12% return.

Not all income is equal. Where and how you hold your assets can mean the difference between being somewhat well off and obscenely rich. Those with little or no wealth generate a lot of taxable income, while those who end up financially independent generate large unrealized gains in the form of real estate appreciation, unrealized capital gains, and profits made through tax-advantaged or tax-free accounts, such as an IRAor401(k).

A physician earning $250,000 per year is going to get taxed heavily, probably paying $95,000 in taxes for a net income of $155,000. Yet, if he had earned the same amount from within a pension plan or IRA, he wouldn't pay a single penny in taxes. That's an extra $95,000 per year compounding for him. At 12% over 30 years, that's an extra $23 million in wealth. That's right$23,000,000 simply because the money is earned within a tax-advantaged account instead of regular labor.

This is why you should do everything you can, within reason, to fully fund your retirement plans, as well as to focus on how your seemingly small decisions help or hurt tax planning. No decision is too small.

Gaining complete control over your time is often one factor in achieving financial independence. You may not have totally reached the investing goal that allows you to maintain your lifestyle without an additional paycheck, but if you have the freedom to spend your time how you want to, that might be the most powerful definition of wealth for you.

If each morning, when you show up to the office, or the job site, or the practice field, or studio, it feels like you are unwrapping a Christmas giftthen you are on track for achieving financial independence.

If you find the profession that gives you that feeling, and you are disciplined in managing the business side of it by controlling costs, you have a huge advantage over your competition. You may continue to work 8, 10, 12 hours a day or two, four, or 10 years longer, not because you need to, but because you love the process and product itself.

According to decades of extensive research by Thomas J. Stanley, Ph.D., author ofThe Millionaire Next Door, the grades one earns in school have no correlation with the economic wealth and success outside the medical and legal professions. That's not to say education isn't important88% of American millionaires did, in fact, graduate with an undergraduate degreebut academic performance is not all it's cracked up to be.

Why then, do parents, teachers, and counselors continue to tell children that they won't be successful if they have a C- GPA? Statistically speaking, according to Stanley, it's because often these people are themselves not financially successful. Therefore, they have no idea what it takes to achieve financial independence and thus buy into the great myth that good students go further in life. They measure analytical intelligence only and not the creative intelligence that is responsible for sparking innovations, societal advancements, and crafting solutions in niche markets that so many others miss.

They also fail to realize that most millionaires wear blue jeans, overalls, or work shirts, not a suit and tie. They eat McDonald's and Burger King. They live in ordinary, well-established neighborhoods. Most own their own business.

Statistically, if you want to guess who is going to be wealthy and financially independent, you'd be more likely to guess right choosing a self-sufficient student in shop class who paid for their own car, gets decent (but not spectacular) grades, has a job, and enjoys what they do than selecting someone from the honor roll. It's counterintuitive, but it's often true.

No matter how successful you are, unless your spouse is equally disciplined, frugal, and investment-oriented, your efforts toward a better, financially independent life are going to feel like struggling in quicksand.

The emotional, financial, and social toll that marrying the wrong person can take on your life will overwhelm almost any progress you can make in your career or pocketbook. As you try to build a life, they will be out spending your money, making it nearly impossible for you to achieve financial independence.

It may sound surprising, but a tremendous amount of success is based on proper temperament and psychology. How can you focus on your work and creating the life you always dreamed of if you are worried about the situation at home? To truly build a life, you need to have the kind of support that allows you to take risks because you know, no matter what happens, there will always be someone waiting for you at home who loves you unconditionally and shares your overarching financial goals.

Billionaire investorCharlie Mungerhas remarked that entrepreneurs can thrive if they specialize in an overlooked economic niche, much like animals in nature. Often, these niches are extremely lucrative but not likely to win you friends at cocktail parties.

Conjure up images of a multi-millionaire. What do you see? High-tech 20-somethings on a yacht? Molecular biologists? Although there are a few, most of the big money is in industries such as waste management, pizza, clothing stores, trailer parks, candles, and shipping.

Consider the case ofSam Walton. He built a tiny dime store from the corner of Arkansas into the biggest retailer in the world, amassing a family fortune of more than $191 billion.

There's nothing particularly exciting about selling 50-cent flip-flops and bottles of cheap cologne in small towns, but Walton was on a mission to bring affordable goods to everyday Americans. He was a man possessed with vision. He built his company one store at a timeone might even say one checkout at a timewith no fanfare or red carpet walks.

Business owners represent a disproportionately large segment of the millionaire population. It's hard to believe, but there's a good chance that the biggest hardware store owner or plumber in your town has a net worth many times that of the highest-paid doctor. Part of the reason is a concept we've discussed called capitalized earnings. Another reason is one Dr. Stanley mentioned in his book. Doctors are pressured to buy status symbols to convince their patients they are successful. Not the plumber. They can put more money into retirement accounts. Over decades, the result is millions in additional wealth for the guy who unclogged toilets instead of arteries. That's not something you learn about in school.

It is almost always a mistake to provide gifts of cash and support to those relatives who are unable to generate high incomes on their own or who are constantly in financial trouble.

Consider the incentive system you set up. One son becomes a physician and one daughter an attorney and you say they don't "need" your money, while at the same time you provide free rent, board, and bailouts for their sibling, who sits at home in credit card debt but refuses to look for work.

You have managed to effectively turn that child into a financial and credit junkie; its unlikely they'll ever get over their addiction. The child may tell you that they only need one more loan, but the fundamental, underlying problem is theinability to manage money. The support you give to your relatives should help them become financially independent themselves, not create a dependence on you. That's one way to ensure you'll never have financial freedom.

Read the original here:

How to Become Financially Independent - The Balance

Achieving Financial Independence at Any Age – Forbes

Balloons flying free

Retirement can be defined as achieving financial independence in the third stage of life - typically after age 62 when you can claim Social Security.

Theres also a rapidly growing movement around FIRE (Financial Independence Retirement Early) where people aim to achieve financial independence and gain complete control over their scarcest resource, their time, at a much younger age. There are multiple FIRE communities with tens of thousands of people online who are trying to achieve financial independence in 10-15 years vs a traditional career of 40 years; one of the most active is ChooseFI. Theres even a movie coming out about it in 2019 Playing with FIRE.

Its worth noting that early retirement is still the exception with less than 1% of the population retiring before 50.

Traditional Retirement Still Dominates

What is Financial Independence

JD Roth, one of the original personal finance bloggers, defines it this way: without the need to earn more money. You might choose to work for other reasons such as passion or purpose but you no longer need a job to fund your lifestyle.

Hes even written a handy article on the six stages of financial independence - which is a great way to break down the problem and assess your own progress.

How to Achieve Financial Independence

To answer the question of how to achieve financial independence its worth examining the approach taken by the FIRE community since they have a bigger hurdle than traditional retirees, because they cant yet use Social Security or Medicare and have to fund a longer time period.

So lets look at the method used by FIRE and then we can explore some of the additional levers that traditional retirement people can use.

FIRE Method

The FIRE method basically comes down to a few core ideas - cut your expenses, save > 50% of your income and invest efficiently. Frugality is key for FIRE and youll see why below.

The typical approach to achieving FIRE is:

Traditional Retirement Method

Even though FIRE is hard to achieve and may by very hard for people with children, special needs or who live in HCOL (high cost of living) areas, there are still lessons for folks pursuing traditional retirement.

Traditional retirement provides for some key benefits for older people since they can take advantage of mortality credits - basically the fact that they have a shorter life expectancy means higher benefits in programs and products like Social Security, Medicare, Annuities and home equity products like Reverse Mortgages.

The retirement planning method that we follow at NewRetirement is:

The good news is that the body of knowledge about how to plan and achieve a secure retirement is growing. As more people enter retirement the market is getting more efficient with lower fees and more transparency across the board. A great way to get started is to use a simple retirement calculator to see where you stand and take the first step.

Read more here:

Achieving Financial Independence at Any Age - Forbes

The FIRE Movement | Financial Independence Retire Early

Updated: February 12 2020 | Grant Sabatier This article includes links which we may receive compensation for if you click, at no cost to you.

We live in such a remarkable time. Its never been easier in history to make enough money to live a life you love.

People even 20 years ago would be so jealous of the opportunities we have today to live the life we want. We can work anywhere. Travel the world for less. This is at the core of the FIRE (financial independence retire early) movement.

And there are so many incredible blueprints for living a non-traditional life where youre stuck in a cubicle all day doing work you hate.

Theres a growing movement of people choosing to live life on their own terms. And Im part of it. Were the FIRE movement.

It truly can change your life. FIRE definitely changed mine. But when I started my own financial independence journey in 2010, there wasnt a movement yet.

We were a relatively small group of people all over the world using money as a tool to create more freedom in our lives. We figured out that the higher your savings rate the faster you can retire early.

Between 2010 and 2015 I launched a bunch of side hustles, saved upwards of 82% of my income and invested my money so it could grow.

This helped me reach financial independence and retire at the age of 30. I wrote an entire book about my journey and a step-by-step blueprint that anyone can follow titled Financial Freedom: A Proven Path to All The Money You Will Ever Need(Penguin Random House).

FI stands for financial independence.

While there are many definitions of financial independence, a simple way to sum it up, is you have reached financial independence when you are free from the worry of money.

For some people, this happens when theyd gotten out of debt and for others its the moment when you no longer have to work for money.

RE stands for retire early.

As surprising as it may seem, there are also many definitions of early retirement.

For some, it means the moment when you check out and never work again for the rest of your life (aka old school retirement).

But for others retiring early simply means theyve gotten to the point where they no longer have to work, but they might keep working, or switch to a job that they are more passionate about.

When you put FI and RE together you get FIRE.

But FIRE is more than just about money or personal finance optimization, its more about life optimization. The central question is What makes you happy? and aligning your spending and saving, and financial life around maximizing your happiness.

With that goal in mind, the FIRE movement also integrates psychology and philosophical concepts from other movements like Stoicism and even Buddhism.

Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) is ultimately a personal journey.

There are also many facets of FIRE that have spring up over the years:

New pockets of the FIRE movement seem to be popping up every day.

As you can see what FIRE means is ultimately up to you. Thats the beauty of it -- you truly can create your own path.

While the origins of the movement are hotly debated and evidently the term FIRE was first coined in an old Motley Fool forum sometime in the early 90s, the FIRE movement largely began in 1992 with the publication of one of my all-time favorite books, Your Money or Your Lifeby Joe Dominguez and Vicki Robin.

In the book, they outline a simple yet transcendent idea: that whenever youre working your actually trading your life energy for money. So whenever you buy something you should think about it in terms of hours of your life since you can always go out and make more money, but you can never get back your time.

To explore the 9 Steps in Your Money or Your Life check out the Free 5 Day Your Money or Your Life Email Course.

Hanging out with Vicki Robin the Godmother of the FIRE Movement on Whidbey Island, Washington

When I read Your Money or Your Life in August 2010 it completely changed my life. Over the past few years, Ive had the opportunity to become close friends with the co-author Vicki Robin and she graciously wrote the foreword to my book.

I feel so grateful to be able to work closely with Vicki to help make financial independence available to everyone.

But back 8 years ago when I started my own financial independence and early retirement journey, there were very few people on the FIRE path. In fact, I only knew of a handful of what are now known as FIRE bloggers.

Today there are thousands of bloggers documenting their financial independence journeys, an incredibly active financial independence subreddit, hundreds of podcasts, and even a documentary about the FIRE movement that Im in called Playing with FIRE that will be released soon and includes others members of the financial independence retire early community.

Im so stoked about it. Check out a preview of the documentary below.

Also, any good movement needs a folk song and there wasnt one about the FIRE movement so I wrote one. Heres me playing my FIRE movement folk song.

For anyone interested in the FIRE Movement, heres how it works.

Its simple in theory (which is why I could sum it up in a 90-second song) but is a little more challenging in execution.

To make it as simple as possible, here are the 9 steps to reach FIRE (financial independence retire early).

The biggest problem with mainstream personal finance and money advice is its all about the money!

But whats more important than money is life. You can always go out and make more money, but you can never get back your time. So before you even start thinking about the money, first think about what kind of life you want to live. Seriously, write it down.

What does the perfect day look like? Why is it perfect? What are the 10 things that make you happiest?

When I did this exercise I quickly realized that most of the things I enjoy most in life are actually pretty inexpensive or even free. It doesnt cost any money to walk my dog in a park on a Saturday, play guitar with my friends, or board games with my wife.

Once I started thinking in terms of the life I wanted to live and what I enjoyed most, it became easier to prioritize where to spend my money and where to save.

At the end of the day money only matters if you live a life you love. Ive always believed that money is not the goal, time is. But you need to think about what kind of life you want to live -- what is important to you?

Its always easier in life to chase that next thing -- whether its the next job promotion, raise, or save 1 million dollars.

Whats harder to do is take the time to figure out what actually makes you happy and what kind of life you want to live. But once you look within instead of just outside, the easier it will be to plan for financial freedom.

The next step is to figure out how much money you need to live that life awesome life! I remember being in college and dreaming about driving a Maserati and living in a big lake house, but now when I see a Maserati driving down the road I dont see $200,000, I see $1,200,000 in 30 years!

In 2010 when I started my financial independence journey, I didnt set a goal for how long it would take. All I knew was that when I did the math I was never going to be able to retire if I was only able to save 5-10% of a $40,000 -- $50,000 income.

The math I did was pretty simple. If I was able to save $5,000 per year maximum, even with an expected compounding rate of 6%, I would have about $433,000 in 30 years. While that might seem like a lot of money today,its not going to be that much in 30 years, because of two expected variables--taxes and inflation.

You will need to pay tax on that money when you take it out, assuming a 30% tax rate that cuts the after-tax value to $308,000, which when adjusted for 2% annual conservative inflation amount (it could be higher than this even!), then the future value of that money after taxes and inflation is approximately $170,000.

While $170,000 is still a lot of money, its not going to be in 30 years. It definitely wont be enough to live on for 20+ years.

Typical wisdom is that you need 25x your annual expenses to retire early. When I did this calculation, I anticipated my annual expenses would be at least $50,000 in the future (who knows if I will actually be able to live off $50,000 in the future--I sure hope so!).

But it was the best starting point I had, so by simply multiplying 25x by $50,000, I determined that I would need to save $1,250,000. Thats a big number, but it was my target.

You can sit down with a piece of paper and see how much money you need to retire early by checking this calculator I built.

Saving is an opportunity to live a life you love. Its not a sacrifice. As long as you view it as a sacrifice youre always going be in a scarcity mindset.

The only way that youll be able to reach financial freedom and FIRE is by saving as much money as you can and investing it to grow.

Remember what I said about living differently? A 50% saving/investing rate is more common than you would think amongst the FIRE (financial independence early retirement) crowd. I know a lot of people that save this much each month because they get it.

Saving 50%+ of your income is definitely going against the status quo, but thats how you fast track wealth. If you want to go deeper, here are two posts onhow much money you should be saving and my investing strategy.

The easiest way to monitor how much money youre saving is by tracking whats known as your savings rate. Your savings rate is simply the percentage of your income(s) that you are saving.

To calculate your savings rate, you want to add up all of the dollars that you save, both in pretax accounts (for example, 401(k)s and IRAs) and after-tax accounts (brokerage) and divide it by your income.

Here is an example of how it looks if you have a $100,000 income and are saving 40 percent.

Its pretty simple. The more money you can save the faster, and bigger, it can grow. The average savings rate in the United States is currently around 3.2%, which based on simple math means that a majority of Americans will never be able to retire.

But if you can get that savings rate to 20%, 30%, or even 50% youll be able to cut years and even decades off of your retirement.

Keeping a budget is really hard and its what stops most people from really fast tracking their financial independence.

Im not going to tell you to create a budget or cut back on all of your expenses. What you need is to balance how much you spend. Ive always viewed saving as an opportunity, not a sacrifice.

But you do need to find a way to reduce how much you are spending so you can increase how much you save.

The easiest way to do it is by cutting back on your housing, transportation, and food costs. The average American spends 70% of their money on housing, transportation, and food, so if you can spend less on them (say 25% or so, then you can bank the difference). If you move to a smaller apartment, walk to work, and cook at home, you could realistically increase your savings rate to 25%+ or even higher.

By reducing what I spent on my housing, transportation, and food costs, I increased my savings rate to 40% and sometimes as high as 80% while I was fast tracking my financial independence. The only way I was able to fast track was by cutting way back on my living expenses and investing the difference.

Focus on where you spend the most money to save the most money. Cut back your housing expense as much as you can through a strategy known as house hacking where you rent or buy a 3 or 4 bedroom apartment or house and rent out the other room. Youre going to save a lot more money doing that than by cutting out things like your $5 latte.

Im not here to tell you what to buy or not to buy, but its important to recognize that whenever you buy anything youre actually trading your future freedom for it.

At the end of the day it comes down to a personal choice, but I was happy moving to a smaller apartment, moving closer to my office, and eating out less, to bank the difference. And I definitely was able to bank the difference--saving at least an additional $13,000 per year by cutting back.

While I dont have the exact figures, I estimate that cutting back for 2 years, before buying my first home, I was able to save about $25,000 that I invested in 2011 and 2012, and that cutting back is now worth more than $100,000 in my investment accounts. Im going to continue to let it grow and hopefully making that decision 2 years ago will compound in 20 years into a lot more money. It was totally worth cutting back on my three biggest expenses. Try it out.

When I was on my own financial independence journey I calculated that for every $100 I saved I was buying a week of freedom in the future.

Not all debt is created equal. There is good debt vs bad debt. Some debt you lose money on and some debt you can make money with.

Good debt is debt like mortgage debt you use for investing in real estate or building a real estate empire or in some cases student loan debt if it helps you get a better job or make more money over your career.

Bad debt is credit card debt since the interest rate on it is probably over 20%. Pay down any credit card debt you have immediately since you are losing money with it.

While there are a bunch of different debt payoff strategies, the best strategy is simply to pay down your debt with the highest interest rate first, which in most cases is going to be credit card debt, then any personal loans, followed by student loans, and then mortgages.

The simple rationale is that compounding works both ways, meaning that just like your investments can grow and compound over time, so can your debt.

So whenever youre paying off a debt you want to pay down your highest interest rate debt because its like getting that percentage return on your money.

If you pay off your 20% interest rate credit card its like you made 20% because your debt is no longer growing, as opposed to paying down your student loan balance with a 5% interest rate where youd only be getting 5% on your money.

Since your full-time job is where youre likely currently making the most money, its important to try and get paid as much as possible.

The simple fact is that most people deserve a raise, but theyre too afraid to ask for one. The impact of a single raise of a few thousands of dollars can actually add up to tons of additional money over time.

Just getting 1 percent bigger raises each year can make you literally hundreds of thousands of dollars richer over the next twenty to thirty years by investing and compounding that small raise difference.

A simple study that looked at an annual 3 percent versus a 4 percent raise each year showed that after thirty years the 4 percent raise was worth $578,549 more when that small 1 percent difference was invested in the stock market.

This is because your future earning potential is impacted by your base salary today. Most people are underpaid in their roles, but many dont do anything about it.

Eighty-nine percent of Americans believe they deserve a raise, but only 54 percent plan to ask for one in the next year.

We typically spend more time planning for a vacation than working to improve and optimize our careers, which is a missed opportunity.

In reality, most of the jobs that will exist in 20 years havent even been created yet, so while traditional advice is that you should become an expert in one thing, its actually more valuable to have a broad range of complementary skill sets.

For example, if you know how to use Google Analytics, you should also learn about branding and how to start a blog.

A side hustle is anything you do to make money outside of your full-time job.

While you can make money doing literally anything, the best side hustles are the ones where you can make money doing something you actually enjoy and where you can control what youre getting paid and when you work.

Far too many people drive for Lyft or Uber and are limited by the hours in a day they have to drive and what they get paid because the rates are set by the company, not the drivers.

While there is an infinite number of side hustles that you can launch, I like the side hustles that you can do online because they give you the ultimate flexibility to make money from anywhere in the world and on your own time.

Some of the best current side hustles are learning how to become a virtual assistant, start a blog using Bluehost (check out how to make money blogging), and running Facebook ads.

Its essential to switch from a saving to an investing mindset. Its not possible to fast track financial independence by keeping your money in a savings account--investing is an essential ingredient.

I have made more money through investing than anything else and most of it in my sleep! Just recently, I was looking at my investing returns over a 90 day period and realized that I had made over $15,000 in gains from one of my investments, which is more money than I made in 6 months working at my first job after college. If you really want to make money, then you need to be investing as much money as you can.

Investing your money is what really accelerates your ability to reach financial freedom faster because your money starts making money and then the growth accelerates.

While you can invest in literally anything, the most dependable investments are stocks, bonds, and real estate. You need a short term investing strategy (money youre going to need in the next 5 years) and long term investing strategy (for the money youre going to need in 10+ years).

Note: Its always worth keeping at least 6 months of expenses saved in high-interest online savings account for any unexpected emergencies in whats known as an emergency fund.

Your short term investments should be kept in a high interest online savings account and your long term investments for retirement should be largely kept in low cost highly diversified index funds like the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (VTSAX) or something similar that holds most of the stocks in the U.S. stock market.

More here:

The FIRE Movement | Financial Independence Retire Early

This Is How Much These Finance Experts Saved By 30 To Retire Early – Forbes

Fueled by the news of ballooning student loans and pernicious credit card debt, a small but growing group of Americans are taking control of their money.

Part of the financial independence, retire early or FIRE movement, they are committed to saving money from their corporate jobs and even taking on side hustles to build additional income.

Aiming to save money - oftentimes 60% to 70% of their incomes - a group of Americans are taking ... [+] control of their personal finances, and participating in the financial independence, retire early movement.

Their goal? Build a substantial nest egg and then retire. Although many end up working in what they call retirement - running blogs or taking care of kids - the idea is to achieve financial independence, whereby they can choose their activities, rather than be tied to a workplace for a paycheck.

Inspired by the 2008 personal finance book Your Money or Your Life by Vicki Robin and Joe Dominguez, they promote what many Americans would consider to be unusual tactics to cutting costs from driving 30 year old cars to living in 52 square foot room.

And while every FIRE practitioner takes a different tact, here are three of the bigger names in the movement on how much theyd saved by 30, as well as a tactic they used to up their savings rate.

Fidelity recommends that the average American to have one year of their salary saved for retirement by 30. So if you make $50,000 a year, you should have $50,000 in a retirement account. Heres how these money experts in the financial independence, retire early movement compared.

Jillian Johnsrud of Montana Money Adventures

Saved (with husband) : $375,000, plus a pension valued at $400,000

Jillian Johnsrud and her husband saved nearly half a million dollars in order to fund their ... [+] Financial Independence, Retire Early lifestyle with five children.

My husband and I committed to saving half our income when we got married. Because we never earned six-figures that meant driving older cars, having a roommateeven after we had kids and finding low cost meals. I was passionate about travel, so we accepted a duty station in Europe and were able to travel frugally by driving and camping. We also opted to buy a home that needed a lot of work and slowly learned how to fix and upgrade it ourselves, which came in handy in the rentals we bought next.

Julien Saunders of Rich And Regular

Saved: around $20,000

By 30, Julien Saunders had saved over $20,000 in order to reach financial independence, retire early ... [+] by his late 30s.

In 2010 I was 30, and I had about $20,000 saved, between a savings account, a traditional IRA carried over from my twenties and one year of contributions to a 401k. It was during this time, I realized how little joy I got from cable and decided to cut the cord for good.

I then took it a step further and downgraded my cable internet to a high speed DSL service which was significantly less expensive and worked just as well for my needs.I've not had cable TV since and didn't regain cable internet until 2018. Every little bit helps!

Steph and Cel of Incoming Assets

Saved (together) by 30: $211, 658

Vancouverites Steph and Cel love to travel, and thanks to their frugal lifestyle they can visit far ... [+] flung destinations, while still working towards their financial independence retire early goals.

The only expense we ever really curtailed was lifestyle inflation. When we first met our income was very low and our spending reflected that. Then as we went from poverty-level income to normal income, we just kept our spending the same. Early on we did cut out a weekly home grocery delivery service that we had been using for a few years, though that was also inspired by their warehouse getting a nasty aphid infestation.

Originally posted here:

This Is How Much These Finance Experts Saved By 30 To Retire Early - Forbes

My plan to retire by 50, even though I’ve never saved for retirement – Business Insider

Like a lot of millennials, I long assumed I'd never be able to retire, so I didn't bother saving for retirement. I also felt like I could barely make a dent in a savings account for most of my 20s anyway, as I was busy paying off debt and trying to find a decent-paying job.

However, as I approached 30, my mindset changed. I started to think more about what I wanted my future to look like, and not just a year or two in advance, but a decade or two. I also watched my dad and stepmom retire in their early 50s, more than a decade before most of their peers.

Suddenly, I wanted to be able to retire early. The only problem was that I felt way too far behind.

My savings account balance hovered around $0 for most of my 20s. The few times I managed to save up money, or contributed to my 401(k) for a few years, I just as quickly drained it to travel or move across the country.

At age 29, I finally paid off all my debt and started a small emergency savings fund. By the time I turned 30, I was debt-free, and I'd built up my emergency savings fund to cover a year's worth of basic living expenses. However, by my 30th birthday, I still had $0 saved for retirement.

I kept saving, though, and a few months into my 30th year I had enough extra money stashed away to invest in index funds with Vanguard. I opened an account and finally started my retirement fund with a $10,000 balance.

I decided to set a goal for myself to retire by 50, despite having just started saving at age 30. That would give me 20 years to save and invest enough money to retire.

My dad's original goal was to retire by 50, so it seemed like a good age to me. Learning about the FIRE movement (financial independence, retire early) also inspired me to do this. It's all about changing up your lifestyle so you can increase your savings rate as much as possible, and then investing all of your savings until you have enough money invested that you can draw a salary from the dividends your investments earn.

Most members of this movement aim to retire much quicker, often within the next 10 years, or in their 30s and 40s. They do this by living frugally and saving at least 50% of their income, (a lot save 75%). In retirement, they often continue to live just as frugally.

To be honest, I'm not interested in living frugally, now or in retirement. So, I decided to meet the FIRE movement in the middle and give myself 20 years to save for retirement and achieve "financial independence," meaning I could live off my investments. To achieve this, you need to achieve a net worth that's 25 times your annual living expenses.

Using an early retirement calculator, I set my age to 30, my annual income to $80,000, my annual expenses to $45,000, and my current net worth to $10,000. These numbers gave me the magic age I was looking for: financial independence by 50.

With my savings rate at 44%, this plan is considered too spendy for most people in the early retirement movement. However, I felt that it was a reasonable compromise that would allow me to fully enjoy my life now while still achieving financial independence early on in life.

Under my current plan, my monthly expenses have to stay below $3,750 so that I can save $2,917 each month. If my income increases dramatically, I'll try to increase my savings rate along with it instead of falling prey to lifestyle inflation and spending all of that extra money. That way, I might retire even earlier, or I have an extra cushion in case my income ever takes a hit.

Switching to remote work and self-employment has, ironically, helped me save a lot of money. I have control over my income and can learn new, lucrative skills that allow me to demand higher rates and make more money.

I can also work from anywhere in the world, allowing me to live in low cost-of-living areas while making a higher salary. I moved abroad where I can afford to live the lifestyle I want without going into debt.

My strategy for keeping my savings rate up is to focus on keeping my three biggest fixed costs to a minimum: housing, transportation, and food. To be fair, I don't always keep my food costs to a minimum. But I make up for it by finding places to rent that are extremely low cost, by either living outside of city centers or renting with roommates, and getting around on foot and by public transportation. I don't own a car.

This won't work for everyone. Your own preferences and needs will dictate where you can and can't cut costs. However, if you're willing to make some big changes to your current life, it's possible to retire a lot earlier than you think.

Excerpt from:

My plan to retire by 50, even though I've never saved for retirement - Business Insider

Echoes of 1970 as row breaks out at celebration of feminist conference – The Guardian

The 50th anniversary of the first Womens Liberation Conference in Oxford was planned as a celebration of social struggle and triumphant survival. But on Saturday morning the event quickly turned into an angry and full-throated demonstration of the ongoing arguments inside the movement.

The alleged no platforming of feminist historian Selina Todd the night before the conference prompted loud protests from the packed hall at the former site of Ruskin College, the spot of the original meeting in 1970. This is cowardice. How can we do this to a woman who has worked all her life on behalf of other disenfranchised women? asked Julie Bindel, the radical feminist writer.

Organisers said that Todd had not been banned from the conference, but was asked to give up her short thank you speech slot on behalf of the Oxford University history faculty in response to a boycott threat from other speakers.

Author Lola Olufemi, a billed panellist who had pulled out of the event when she learned of Todds involvement, said in a statement that she felt the conference planners had not done enough to investigate Todds alignment with the Womans Place UK group, which she regards as transphobic. I have seen first-hand how middle-class white women with social capital have used their gatekeeping power to harass trans people, threaten them with defamation, actively work to curtail their rights, refused to extend solidarity, and then claim victimhood, she said, explaining why she withdrew from the event.

Womans Place UK is pushing for government ministers to consult more widely about changes to the Gender Recognition Act, which would allow people to legally self-identify as a man or a woman without medical approval. It rejects accusations that it is transphobic and trans-exclusionist. Its founders say it aims to ensure that womens voices are heard and our sex-based rights upheld. However, critics say it is trying to limit the rights of trans people.

Todd was re-invited into the hall after a show of hands in favour from a large majority, among them at least 15 women who were at the 1970 conference, including Sheila Rowbotham, Sue OSullivan and Sally Alexander, the activist played by Keira Knightley in the new film Misbehaviour.

Todd did not appear at the morning session, but a statement issued in criticism of her treatment and distributed around the hall said: Selina Todd supports the right of women and girls to same-sex spaces (such as refuges). This is enshrined in law. Her opponents believe the law should be changed. They arent willing to engage in respectful debate with those who disagree, preferring to silence feminists.

The text of Todds undelivered speech to the conference opened with thanks to Ruskin College, the trade union-sponsored educational establishment now based outside the city in Headington, as the place where her parents had met in 1967. Of feminisms future, she would have said: Weve got far to go and its easy to despair. But history reminds us feminism never starts from a good place: it is borne from oppression.

The BBC presenter Samira Ahmed also addressed the conference, saying she was concerned by the no platforming of Todd as she believed it was important to listen to each other.

Speaking about her recent battle for equal pay, one of four key demands back in 1970, she said: I never thought I would have to make a sex discrimination pay claim. I thought it would all be sorted.

Other demands of the original conference were improved education, 24-hour nurseries, free contraception and abortion on demand.

The mood of the 40th anniversary events was comparatively warm and nostalgic, according to accounts. The 50th birthday row, it seems, was much more in keeping with the fiery debate of the first conference, which had been called for by Rowbotham and was initially focused on womens collective history until it was realised so little had ever been recorded. Instead it turned to contemporary issues, and in a then radical twist, men ran a creche so that any mothers were free to speak.

Alexander, who as a student helped set up the first event, said she recalled it as episodic and chaotic. We had expected 100 women and 600 came, she said, going on to praise the calm manner of Sue Vickery who chaired the 1970 event. We were feeling our way, she said, and borrowing the vocabulary of other movements, like the civil rights campaign. We used the word woman then with a sense of enthusiasm and pride. The phrase Womens Liberation raised fear then for ourselves and for others, and sometimes it still does.

Seven other national Womens Liberation Movement conferences followed the initial Oxford event in 1970. Further central demands were added along the way, including legal and financial independence for all women, an end to discrimination against lesbians, freedom from intimidation by the threat or use of violence or sexual coercion, either in or outside marriage, and an end to laws and assumptions that shore up the male domination of women.

Most pertinently though it had different significance then a controversial decision made at the Birmingham conference put the right to a self-defined sexuality at the top as a preface to all the other demands.

See the original post:

Echoes of 1970 as row breaks out at celebration of feminist conference - The Guardian

Hazlehurst: What do we do with all this stuff? – Colorado Springs Business Journal

Like many of our late-middle-aged peers, we have too much stuff. The garage is full of tools, utensils, scraps of wood and metal, bicycles and bicycle parts, coolers, boxes of old magazines and newspapers and stacked storage bins filled with things I couldnt bear to get rid of. Alas, theres no room for our cars.

And then theres the house and basement. We have about 4,000 books, more than 250 prints, paintings, ceramics and sculptures and the usual array of furniture, electronics, clothing, appliances large and small and enough kitchen stuff to equip a medium-sized restaurant.

It wasnt always thus. During my 20s, I lived on a medium-sized sailboat, and had no stuff. There was space for everything necessary and no space for anything else. It was great until real life intervened and I found myself married with kids, living in Rockrimmon.

And so began the era of acquisition and accumulation. We bought stuff and replaced it with better stuff. We moved into a bigger house, and bought bigger furniture. Marie Kondo had yet to tell us that we didnt own our stuff it owned us.

We were obedient consumers, doing our part to fuel the stuff-based economy. At the time, it seemed like an endless and beneficent cycle buy things, keep the good stuff, preserve tangible memories, care for treasures passed down from past generations and eventually give everything to the kids and move to Florida.

But what if the kids dont want any stuff? Gen X, Millennials and Gen Z seem more attracted to uncluttered lives, reduced carbon footprints and the freedom and flexibility of stuff-free lives. They prefer clean, spare spaces without much visual clutter. They dont want to be burdened by oriental rugs, shelves of books, antique furniture or gilt-framed 19th century landscape paintings.

Their preferences may combine with other trends to reconfigure our economy locally, as well as nationally. Downtowns explosive growth has been strongly influenced by minimalist adults who prefer urban amenities to suburban commutes. Automobiles are seen as expensive pains in the butt, not buoyant symbols of freedom and mobility. And climate change? Its real, its happening now and we have to radically alter our lifestyles to prevent it from destroying civilization. Every one of us ought to travel less, walk and bike more and temper consumption.

Consider FIRE, the movement to combine frugal living and savings rates of 50-70 percent of income to achieve financial independence within 10-15 years and retire early. The concept, first framed by Vicki Robin and Joe Dominguez in their 1992 book Your Money or Your Life: Transforming Your Relationship with Money and Achieving Financial Independence, is to stop trading your time for money to buy consumer goods.

Youre buying back your life, said Robin, Your one wild and precious life. Minimalists remind us that time is irreplaceable and that We spend money we dont have to buy things we dont need to impress people we dont even know.

Do these related phenomena signal a major cultural shift?

If so, legacy companies like Ford may go broke and our easternmost suburbs may stop expanding long before they reach the Kansas line. Amazon may hire a couple thousand folks in Colorado Springs, but many more may lose their jobs as retail outlets continue to close or shrink.

Given our military/military contractor economic base, were well positioned to avoid the worst of the coming cultural storm. And if Americans follow Greta Thunbergs example and avoid international plane travel, our visitor industry should thrive. Forget Rome, Paris and Bangkok come to COS!

Cultural shift or not, its difficult to believe that a country headed by a luxury-loving billionaire from Queens would ever forsake the high life.

Yet as tastes change, so do the prices of the baubles once prized by wealthy American strivers. Less-than-pristine collector cars havent drawn much interest at recent auctions, while second-tier Midwestern regionalist art from the 1930s has cratered.

And unlike the FIRE folks, I didnt make good investment decisions. I sold my 1969 428 SCJ Mercury Cyclone for a few thousand bucks before the prices of rare muscle cars exploded and am still holding on to my Midwestern regionalists, although theyre worth a lot less than I paid 30 years ago. Meanwhile, Im trying get rid of the junk. Anybody want some old newspapers?

But first I have to reread them all

Read the original here:

Hazlehurst: What do we do with all this stuff? - Colorado Springs Business Journal

Its just basic survival: the financial toll of being a carer – The Guardian

Giving up your job to look after a family member or friend may not be something youve given much thought to, but two in three UK adults can expect to become an unpaid carer during their lifetime, according to Carers UK.

About 600 people a day quit work to look after for someone who is older, disabled or seriously ill, and the emotional and financial impact on these individuals can be huge.

While research suggests unpaid carers save the UK economy about 132bn a year, the main carers benefit, carers allowance, is just 66.15 a week if you care for someone for at least 35 hours a week.

Four carers tell us how they make ends meet.

Mary Adeson, 33, is an auditor and lives in London. She has helped care for her mother, Caroline, 57, who has schizophrenia, with her two sisters since she was a teenager

From a young age, my twin sister, Hannah, and my sister Heide, 27, and I have looked after my mum. Shed often feel really depressed. We didnt realise she had a mental health disorder until she was repeatedly sectioned after a number of incidents over the years. We didnt want to put additional pressure on her, so we learned to manage ourselves. We became very self-sufficient.

By the time I was in year 11, I had part-time jobs. Hannah and I had to go to work as mum wasnt able to. We couldnt depend on her to pay the bills, and letters would pile up. Hannah and I just split the costs. When I was at college I worked evenings and weekends and then over the holidays. I always worked while studying.

Now I work full-time as an auditor and still live at home with my mum and Heide. We both handle all the finances. While my mum receives disability allowance, we dont claim for carers allowance. With my salary, I dont feel like its necessary.

Do I feel like Ive missed out on any luxuries? For a long time now Ive always just worked out what my budget is. I know how much Ive got and what my expenses are, so nothing comes as a surprise. I felt more of an impact when I was working during school, college and university. It was difficult paying for accommodation as well as dealing with my financial responsibilities at home. But I just had to find a way to make it work.

I do have to watch my spending, and Im quite mindful about the future. I worry about what will happen if mum gets worse and we need to pay for her to go into a home. Im always thinking about how to make my money work harder: I invest in stocks and shares and art, and I have a pension. I dont have the luxury not to think about it.

John Stefanyszyn, 64, lives in Sheffield and looks after his wife, Joanna, 46, and his niece, Lauren, 20, who both have ME

My wife has had ME since she was 14, but in the past year shes also suffered from pudendal neuralgia. Shes in constant pain and has to spend a lot of time in bed. While a nerve-block injection last June improved her condition slightly, the past year has been very dark.

Im between a rock and a hard place trying to survive. I stopped working as an NVQ enroller about three years ago to care for my wife. I receive a carers allowance of just 66.15 a week. Fortunately, I receive a private pension of 400 a month from my 16 years working in the civil service and as an Investors in People manager. Without that, Id be destitute.

My wife receives employment support and personal independence payment (Pip) of about 700-800 a month. But with outgoings such as mortgage, insurance, car and groceries, we struggle every month. We have to sit down and look at what goes in and out.

A year ago, I thought about redecorating downstairs, but now were struggling to get that done because of the cost. Fortunately the Sheffield Carers Trust managed to sort out a holiday for us to a B&B in Scarborough in October. But otherwise theres no way you can pay for holidays and sustain your life. Without my pension wed be absolutely screwed I dont know how we could afford anything. I try to stay on top of things but its difficult. For the past three years Ive also looked after my niece. Shes in her own flat, and carers go to visit, but I look after her advocacy and fight for her rights.

I spend half my time worrying about money and the other half battling for basics and being an advocate. Its a constant fight for resources across the board, and it takes time, energy and capability. Sometimes its easier to just give up and let injustice walk over you.

I do worry for the future. If anything happens to me, who will look after my wife and niece? You do go through some bad moods, thinking you are better off dead. You dont choose this life. Its not fun, its just basic survival.

Helen, 48, lives in Salisbury and cares for her daughter, Maja, 21, who has Kleefstra syndrome, a rare genetic disorder, and has specialist learning and physical support needs

Maja was born with Kleefstra syndrome, which means she has floppy joints and isnt so stable. She didnt start walking or talking until she was eight. She functions like a four- to seven-year-old, depending on the activity. She can write and has a good vocabulary. Shes really sociable but shes prone to low moods and mental health problems.

Maja attends a specialist college on Monday to Friday, 9am to 3pm. We live on benefits as its difficult to find a job because of the holidays. Last summer Maja had eight weeks off, then theres Christmas holidays and so on. An employer that flexible just doesnt exist. I always try to keep an eye out for a job. I receive income support of 87.60 every two weeks and a carers allowance of 66.15 every week. Maja receives personal independence payment of 350.60 and 588 in universal credit every month.

Waiting five weeks for her universal credit to come through left me in debt. Ive a 500 overdraft now. I dont seem to be able to get out of it. Im recently married but my husband doesnt live with me, so Im financially in control. I pay the bills, but he does help out because he feels like he should but, at the same time, he has property elsewhere and has bills to pay. Its difficult to get a break. I receive income for a carer to come in for three hours a week.

When Maja was 18, I received 43 nights of care per year, and she would go to a respite centre in Salisbury, which she loved. This was taken away in July. Maja misses it terribly. I miss it too. An overnight break is very important for us both.

Im grateful that I live in the UK and that we have a benefits system at all. However, the problem is that if youre a carer like me, my daughters condition isnt going to change. If it does, it will only get worse. What I mean is, there is no cure for my daughter this is a permanent situation. So we live on benefits.

I put money aside for Majas pocket money and her needs, clubs, activities and special holidays, but we cant afford to replace old clothes, shoes or broken furniture, electrical appliances and to generally maintain and upkeep our place. My choice has always been: do I give my daughter a myriad of opportunities and experiences, or use the money to maintain my home and garden better?

Syreeta Challinger, 38, founder of a lifestyle store, lives in Frome, Somerset, and cares for her husband Rob, 42, who is paralysed on his right side and has aphasia and epilepsy after having a brain haemorrhage and stroke in 2014

Rob and I had been living and working in Hong Kong for several years when he suffered a brain haemorrhage and stroke while on holiday in Sydney. It resulted in Rob losing his speech and requiring 24-hour care. As we hadnt been recently residing in the UK, we were unable to claim any benefits for the first two years, and we moved in with Robs parents in Lincoln.

I managed to keep my job and work remotely, but it meant commuting to Hong Kong every three to four weeks. Commuting to another continent is not good for anyone, never mind with what we were going through. I ended up quitting to become a full-time carer.

Over the years Ive applied for so many jobs, but once you tell employers your circumstances and that you potentially require flexible working, youre not such a suitable candidate any more. I did work part-time in a local shop for 8 an hour, but having worked in high-end roles before meant I was probably too can-do for the job.

At the moment, Rob receives Pip of 350 a month, and I receive carers allowance of 66 a week. What are you supposed to buy with 66 a week? It hardly covers a food shop. In the summer we moved from Lincoln to Frome to be closer to friends. Were renting a bungalow, which is doable through financial support from family members and savings from the good jobs we had in Hong Kong. However, were literally on zero now.

The focus this year has been figuring out how to get back to supporting the three of us our son, Grayson, was born in the summer. Rob doesnt receive employment and support allowance any more, as Im attempting to work. A job coach at the Department for Work and Pensions advised that I would be financially better off if I didnt work, but Im just 38 I dont want to be staring at four walls every day.

Im trying to figure out a solution that works around Robs needs. Im excited but also extremely scared about how were going to make this work, but I have hope now Rob doesnt need 24/7 care, his speech is coming back and he communicates through drawings.

In 2016 I launched Moments of Sense and Style, a lifestyle store selling products that align with our story and offering a message of courage, strength and hope. I spend 10 hours a week on it but Id love to market it more. For the future, I want to get on top of the bills and then have a little fun again and maybe take a holiday. Things have been really stripped back for us since the incident.

The proposed closure of UK borders to low-skilled workers after Brexit has caused carers to be dragged into the discussion.

The home secretary, Priti Patel, has been heavily criticised in some quarters for suggesting employers could plug the gap with some of the 8 million Britons between the ages of 16 and 64 classed as economically inactive a cohort that includes those with caring responsibilities, long-term sick and retired people, and students.

Helen Walker, the chief executive of Carers UK, says caring for a loved one round the clock can mean a real struggle to make ends meet. Many carers have to manage on a reduced income, and the majority spend that limited income or savings on the cost of care, specialist equipment or products reducing their financial resilience.

Our research shows that financial hardship worsens for carers the longer they are caring, with double the proportion of carers in debt after 15 years of caring, compared with those in their first year. More than half of unpaid carers save nothing for retirement. This has huge implications for carers and the economy in the long term, with many left drained of money in later life and in need of support from the state and our social care system which in its current form is already creaking.

Carers UK wants the government to increase the carers allowance and allow unpaid carers to earn more and keep their benefit. We must see unpaid carers put at the heart of a reformed and sustainable adult social care system, says Walker.

Read more here:

Its just basic survival: the financial toll of being a carer - The Guardian

CPAC exiles grapple with the new devotion to Trump – POLITICO

The environment thats been created now is so hostile to anyone that has a different view. And particularly those of us who have taken principled stands against Donald Trump as conservatives, said Tara Setmayer, a Republican communications director on Capitol Hill in the pre-Trump era.

Setmayer said she attended 15 CPACs, starting when she was a college student in 1993, and stopped after 2015. And in the age of Trump, going now was out of the question. I don't think I would feel safe going to speak, or even walking through CPAC given my position against stuff.

With a speaker lineup stacked with Cabinet members, campaign officials, and Trump progeny not to mention their spouses it was clear that Trump was the center of the conference, keeping everyone in his orbit with the pull of anti-socialism. Even the American Conservative Union, the group that organizes the event every year, was not separate: The wife of the organizer, Mercedes Schlapp, was a White House official until she left last year for the Trump 2020 campaign.

Movement conservatives saw themselves as being separate from the administration, recalled Matt Lewis, a columnist at The Daily Beast who was, at one point, honored as CPACs Blogger of the Year in 2010. Part of our job was to hold them accountable and to cheer them when they did well, boo them when they did bad. And now I think theres a sense that theyre really one and the same. The conservative movement is the Republican party, is CPAC, is Donald Trump.

A former CPAC organizer admitted that this symbiosis with the White House was a likely draw for attendees. I cant imagine that it hasnt garnered attendees that may have attended before and never got to experience a sitting president and First Family, as well as a sitting VP and almost every cabinet secretary representative or cabinet level official, said this organizer.

Admittedly, CPACs exiles now have other options to network with their political ilk. This weekend alone, two other conservative groups are holding events in Washington in direct competition with CPAC. The Summit on Principled Conservatism, held by young Trump critic Heath Mayo and focusing on the meaning of conservatism, its future, and its core principles, set up shop at the National Press Club.

I wanted to be with like-minded people that like good, thoughtful, deep discussion about what future is for conservatism, said University of Virginia doctoral student Alex Welch, who had attended CPAC from 2011 through 2013.

It went the other way as well. Across town at the Omni Shoreham, Infowarss Alex Jones and nationalist podcaster Nick Fuentes spoke at the National File Emergency First Amendment Summit on Wednesday, a tiny, far-right conference for Groypers with speakers railing against immigration, and claiming that ACU chairman Matt Schlapp was blunting Trumps New America agenda for the gain of his corporate clients.

But for an event thats nearly 50 years old and has a keystone place in the history of the modern conservative movement Ronald Reagan first spoke of his shining city upon a hill at the very first CPAC in 1974 watching the conference become one and the same with the Trump administration has been nothing short of depressing for Trump critics.

They have ginned up this sentiment where people, because we have a difference of opinion, political opinion, that we're no longer safe or welcome in the same room, said Setmayer. That is hard to fathom, and certainly not conservatism in the traditional sense.

View post:

CPAC exiles grapple with the new devotion to Trump - POLITICO

Asawin Suebsaeng of the Daily Beast on Donald Trump’s poisoned swamp – Salon

What would you do if Trump defender andOscar-winning actor Jon Voight called you, mistakenly believingyou were Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, and shared his ideas to help President Trump win re-election? Would you let him talk or inform him he hadthe wrong number? How would you react if Rudy Giuliani suddenly texted you, claiming he was being held hostage on an airplane by Robert Mueller, who wouldn't release him until he ratted out Trump? Would you laugh it off or write about it?

These are just a small fraction of the experiences that Daily Beast reporters Asawin "Swin" Suebsaeng and Lachlan Markay lay out in their new book about covering Trump World, "Sinking in the Swamp: How Trump's Minions and Misfits Poisoned Washington."Suebsaeng and I spoke about the book recently on"Salon Talks."

"Sinking in the Swamp"is a no-holds-barred look at the reporters' first-hand experiences of covering all things Trump. As Suebsaeng details, Trump's Washingtonhotel is "swamp central," where administration officials and their dubious allies flockto show their loyalty, while in essence paying tribute to theirleaderby spending lavishly at the hotel he owns.

Suebsaeng and Markay also detail theirhilarious interactions with Trump's best-known defenders in the media some of whom I've had run-ins with as well from Sebastian "Dragon of Budapest" Gorka to Dan "Own the Libs" Bongino.They also reveal who the two biggest liars inTrumpWorld are and that's a stiff competition.

Despite this buffet of hucksters, liarsand all around ethics-free sleazebags,Suebsaeng makesthat the most dangerous person of all is the swamp's proprietor,Donald J. Trump. And if he wins again in November, no one can predict how deep, dark and dangerous thatswamp will become. Watch my "Salon Talks" withAsawin Suebsaeng here, or read a transcriptof our conversation below, lightly edited for length and clarity.

The title of your book is "Sinking in the Swamp," but I know you wanted something else.Tell us about that.

We'd originally pitched the title, "Another S**tstorm in F**ktown: The Donald J. Trump Odyssey." We, or at the very leastI, earnestly wanted that to be the title of the book. In my point of view, it is an appropriate title for a book about the current political era. Now, everybody involved in the decision-making process actually had a sway over thisbook agents or people working for the publisher 100 percent vetoed that title. The compromise was that "Another S**tstorm in F**ktown" is the title of the first chapter of the book. You can't get everything in life, but there's compromises to be had.

I want to get your sense of what "the swamp" is exactly, because what I thought Trump meant by the swamp is clearly not the same as what you mean unless he was being sarcastic when he said he was going to drain it. So when you say "Trump's swamp," what do you mean by that?

When we talk about the swam, it fits a little bit with Trump and his apparatchiks' messaging about "draining the swamp." He has been saying for years that he and his administration are draining the swamp and that his supporters should be very proud of him for that. What he means by that is sort of attacking the legalized and normalized form of corruption that the political class in Washington, D.C., and elsewhere has allowed to fester in this country for years, if not decades or centuries.

Now, it may shock your viewers to hear me say this, but it's just another lie. It's another lie that Trump tells the media and tells his supporters, because there is no swamp-draining whatsoever. All of thatlegalized form of corruption in Washington and influence-peddling and people with well-connected families and well-connected social networks, they're still getting the exact same jobs. When he says he's getting rid of that and draining that, that's just a complete lie. It's bullshit.

The second category is this more in-your-face Trumpian, almost reality-TV form of corruption. Obviously, the pre-eminent example of that that we've seen in recent years was the Trump-Ukraine scandal.

Speaking of Donald Trump's in-your-face corruption, last week he granted clemency to Paul Pogue,a Republican donor who gave $85,000 to the Trump Victory fund and $150,000 the Republican National Committee in the last year. Trump is literally selling clemency to people, yet his base just cheers at the rallies. To them, Trump's promise to clean the swamp means nothing. Or are they in this for other reasons?

Well, obviously there are so many reasons, in terms of cultural grievance and concrete policy, that Trump's base of supporters will never abandoned him. But when it comes to the drain-the-swamp rhetoric, whichis just a complete and total lie, it doesn't really matter. It'sa catchphrase at this point for them. As you pointed out, when it comes to any rational or objective definition of the Washingtonswamp, granting favors for donors or close buddies and sort of maintaining a cliquewhere the rules simply don't apply by any reasonable, objective standard, Donald Trump is the poster boy for that.

But as with so many other calculations that he and his team make, they came to the determination a long time ago that political hypocrisy does not matter, at least not as it pertains to the Republican Party, Republicans on Capitol Hill or his base of supporters. It's just something he has gotten away with lying about and will continue to get away with lying about as long as he's in power. Because the Republican Partyhas decided it does not matter and this is our guy.

I get the sense from your book that the TrumpInternational Hotel in Washingtonis Swamp Central. Is thatwhere the swamp creatures go to hang out, meet and work with each other?

Oh, 100 percent. Trump International Hotel in Washington, which is just a stone's throw away from the Oval Office, it's just as much of a character as any of the human beings we profile in"Sinking in the Swamp." I mean, when Obama was in office, there obviously was not an Obama International Hotel just walking distancefrom the West Wing. But here, it's just completely in your face, available for anybody to witness. The lobby of the Trump International Hotel it'ssort of a clich at this point to describe it asa Star Wars cantina of characters in Trump World, whether they are highly prominent media people or senior administration officials or campaign hands mingling, buying extremely overpriced drinks, going there for fundraisers, going there for various pro-Trump events. Trump himself will show up there routinely to attend some of these events, or mingle with people, or just grab a well-done steak with ketchup on it at the steakhouse in the lobby.

And again, all of this is high-powered people sometimes foreign dignitaries, sometimes senior officials in his own White House who are just putting money directly into Donald J. Trump's pocket and the pocket of his family empire. It's incredibly quiet when he wants to talk about the "corruption" of the Biden family, when this is all happening in broad daylight, just a rock's throw away from the White House.

You write about some of the personal connections you developed talking to well-known Trump people. You have an interesting relationship with actor Jon Voight, who has become the biggest Trump defender in Hollywood. Why did you call Jon Voight? Why did you think he would talk to you?

During the 2016 campaign, part of my function at the Daily Beast was to cover the intersection of Hollywood and politics. At some point, I just happened to come upon his personal phone number and I started calling him to ask him about Donald Trump and what he was doing forthe campaign and what degree of coordination there was. This telephone-tag relationship sort of continued throughout the wild months of the 2016 campaign. One day I just called him to bother him about something, which was a speech he was about to deliver in Washingtonin support of Republicans and in support of Trump.

We had a brief conversation where I annoyed him for, I think, a couple ofminutes. I hung up the phone. I was alone in the Daily Beast office a few hours later. I was working into the early evening, just alonein the office counting down the minutes till I could go home. And then suddenly, my phone starts buzzing, and it's Jon Voight again. Obviously, this makes me curious. As we recount in the book, I pick it up and he starts asking me something to the effect of, "Is this a good time? I hope I'm not bothering you." He's extremely deferential, which is a complete 180 from how he usually is when we talk, which is usually just pissed off that I'm bothering him.

I tell him, "No, go ahead Jon. What do you want to talk about?" "I really hope I'm not bothering you," he saidagain, sort of gingerly. And I'm completely weirded out by this. I ask him, "OK, just get on with it. What do you want to talk to me about?" And he starts saying something to the effect of, "Well, I had some ideas for the upcoming Trump event and if you have a moment, I'd like to go over with you X, Yand Z." And then he cuts himself off, and he asked me, "Wait a minute, is this Steve?Steve Mnuchin?" Who was obviously the former Hollywood executive producerwho at the time was Trump's campaignfinance chair, and who's now treasury secretary of the United States. So journalistic ethics preventedme from lying.

I was extremely curious about what he would have said to me if I were actually Steve Mnuchin, and we were able to talk about details about a fundraiser, or an eventor what have you. So unfortunately I had to break and say, "No, Jon, this is Asawin Suebsaeng, we spoke a couple of hours ago." So he immediately said, "Oh, all right. Sorry lad. Thank you. Bye." And he just hung up the phone. To this day I still wonder what Jon Voight was about to dish to me had he continued to think I was Steve Mnuchin.

You've also spokenwith Rudy Giuliani, but one incident where he's texting you while on a plane is justbizarre. Tell us about that one.

This was in December 2018, shortly before Christmas, I believe. I'm sitting in my in-laws' house in Ohio, just working remote out of the office. It was early evening and I'm counting down the minutes or hours before I can start hanging out with my in-laws and my wifeand stop working. And suddenly, my phone starts dinging and it's text messages from Trump's attorney, Rudy Giuliani. This is recounted verbatim in the book, but I'm going to lightly paraphrase here.

He starts claiming to me that he's stuck on a tarmac in New York and that he's convinced Robert Mueller has basically taken him hostage, and he's trying to sweat him out to get him to rat on President Trump. He sends a little rat emoji with this ridiculous text message and starts saying, "I'm no rat. Mueller wants me to squeal on these unpaid parking tickets that Trump had in the 1970s when he was parked in front of the Moscow Embassy but he's not going to break me. I'm no snitch. I'm trying to liberate the plane. I try and get him to list my pals and FDNY or the NYPD, to come save us."I have no idea what's going on. I'm thinking through my head, is he drunk? Did he sync his phone with his laptop and he left his laptop open and someone saw this, and is now pretending to be Rudy Giuliani and just fucking with a journalist who happens to be in his contacts?

I couldn't for the life of me figure out what was going on at the time. So I messaged him back, "Is this like a weirdo tweet that you accidentally sent to me?" He says, "No, no, no. This is a secret text, I'm trying to give you the low down on what's going on." I'm convinced he's pranking me or that someone's pranking me. So I try to ignore it and get up from the table where I was sitting and put the phone in my pocket. And then it starts ringing and it says, Rudy Giuliani. So I pick it up and the guy is clearly Rudy Giuliani, it's not somebody else.

He's saying, "Well, Asawin, I've liberated the plane and everything's OKnow. Just wanted to let you know." I'm really confused as to what's going on. At some point, after he senses my utter befuddlement at the scenario, he breaks character, starts laughing and reveals to me that he was just prank-texting me and prank-calling me. This was all a ruse andhe is stuck on a tarmac in New York, but it was for completely mundane reasons and he was bored. So he decided to pull up about 10 contacts or so in his phone and start sending people the exact same messages. Some of them were journalists, he said. Some of them were Trump World associates or friends. He wasjust seeing how people would respond. Part of him was curious, if he would send these messages to a reporter, if thereporter would tweet it out,taking them at face value and basically print fake newssaying, "Rudy Giuliani is going nuts about trying to liberate some plane from Robert Mueller." Or something like that.

We had kind of a good awkward laugh about it, we hung up and I just sort of stared into the mouth of madness for a moment that the president's personal attorney, while defending him in this extremely high stakesMueller-Russia probe, was wasting his time prank-calling and prank-texting a bunch of people, just because.

It was an utterly surreal moment that in a weird way encapsulated my experiences of covering Trump World and the administration. Much later on, after Lev Parnas started supplying information to Capitol Hill investigators and they released some of the private text messages between him and Rudy Giuliani as the impeachment inquiry was getting underway, I realized that one of the people he was sending these exact same text messages and emojis to was Lev Parnas, that same night.

You made Rudy Giuliani's top 10! It makes you wonder about some of the statements Giuliani has made on television, and if that was partly fun for him. You also talk about a sea of professional liars in Washington. There's two people you say youwill never cite as sources because they lack credibility. Who are they?

You basically hear lies from multiple sources, from different angles.These people have different agendas and different biases, and you cross reference those lies. And somewhere, while talking to these administration officials or Trump World sources, you cross-reference enough lies that you find the little kernel of truth and agreement at the center in between. And you take that little kernel of reportable truth and that's what ends up being published. So that's, I think, a healthily cynical way to go about reporting, just to help ensure that you're not getting played bythese people who very frequently are granted anonymity and could be trying to shovel bullshit or spin us their way.

In grappling with that, at some point you encounter fairly prominent people within Trump World who just exhaust all your goodwill and good faith to the point where look, you can make the argument that perhaps everybody within Trump World is a mendacious, prolific liar.

For me as a political reporter, I have to be able to look at myself comfortably in the mirror in the morning while I'm shaving. There are just some things I cannot bring myself to do. And two things I have not been able to bring myself to do for years are to grant anonymity to two specific peoplein particular:Roger Stone and Corey Lewandowski. Obviously, Roger Stone has been in the news quite a bit recently, and the two of them happen to be mortal foes and hate each other's guts.

But as we detail in the book, there came a point early on in the Trump era where we straight up told Corey Lewandowski directly, "OK, if we're talking to you as reporters, we don't go off the record ever and we're not going to grant you anonymity. Everything that we say to each other from this point out is now on the record because we just cannot trust you and you are such a proven, prolific, shameless liar that that's the deal we're making with you right now. And if you don't like it, literally never speak to us ever again because there's just no way we can justify doing it without everything being on the record and usable as quotes attributed directly to Corey Lewandowski, because you're going to lie shamelessly to us. We're not going to let you get away with doing it with the cloak of anonymity."

I think it's very healthy for political reporters, not just covering this presidentbut any American president, to draw lines in the sandwith people who have proven that they don't deserve your good faith as a reporter and that they should not be trusted for a split second.

What'sthe line where you're trying to get access to people, but if you press too hard or you write a hideous story about them,you lose access to them? That's your currency as a White House reporter, the idea of having access to certain people in the administration. Is there a push and pull, a balance that you have to keep?

There's 100 percent a balancing act and it's different in every individual case and for each individual reporter. I'm not going to sit here and judge anybody else in this profession for how they decide to go about their job, but for me, generally the line is that you have conclusively determined that someone has tried to fuck you before you hit publication, before you hit publish on a story. They're clearly trying to ratfuck you or trying to get you to printlies, either for their own agenda, to screw over a colleague or just to mess with you. Then if you've conclusively proved that, get on the phone with themand tell them, "Either the only time we're going to talk is going to becompletely on the record or I'm never calling you again. Good luck and godspeedtrying to do this with any of the scores of other liberal reporters, but you're not going to do it with me."

Again, case by case basis, but there are definitely senior people in the White House right now who I no longer talk to. Not because it was necessarily their decision, but because I determined that there's no use and trying to wring even a kernel of truth out of talking to them, whether on the record, anonymously or off the record.

One last thing: You have interacted for years now with people who were inTrump World, left and now are back, like Hope Hicks. You talk about her in your book a great deal. You've dealt with people like Sebastian Gorka and Giuliani and the like. Are you concerned with the idea that some people in Trump's world would literallydo anything to keep him in power?

I think it's important, not just as a political reporter, but just as a citizen who consumes this stuff on a semi-regular basis, to be extremely vigilant about what's going on right now. I don't think people need to necessarily set their hairon fire or get hysterical about anything, but we are seeing in real time whatlooks like President Trump's active attempts to politicize as much as he can, and wring as much fealty as he can, out of supposedly nonpartisan and independent institutions like, say, the Justice Departmentor the intelligence community.

What is going on in plain sight every day and what we know, and what Trump almost freely admits on a public basis, is that he would prefer these institutions, whether they're the FBI, DOJ, CIA or ODNI, to be unflinchingly loyal to him. Not to the Constitution, not to the country, not even necessarily to a political party, but to Donald J. Trump himself. That is a way scarier prospect what is currently being attempted, however clumsily, by this president than someone like Sebastian Gorka,who is easier to write off more as sort of a bumbling character.

View post:

Asawin Suebsaeng of the Daily Beast on Donald Trump's poisoned swamp - Salon

Donald Trump’s Twitter Tantrums Do One Thing Quite Well – The National Interest Online

President Donald Trump has shown a unique ability to use Twitter as a way to connect directly with his followers.

His tweets show his supporters what he is thinking, directly and unvarnished. Less well appreciated, but apparent in our research based on new polling, is how Trumps anger and its targets are quickly adopted and internalized by large numbers of his followers. What he says, they say. What he believes, they believe.

How is it that Donald Trumps tweets have this kind of power? I contend that much of the explanation is in the power of memes.

Leaping from brain to brain

A meme is an idea, a catchphrase read my lips or even a tune or image that has grown into a cultural phenomenon. Richard Dawkins in The Selfish Gene called a meme a new kind of replicator which leaps from brain to brain with a speed that we humans have not seen before. Dawkins recognized that in the new millennium, within the nutrient-rich culture of the internet, memes spread virally.

The internet allows all kinds of misinformation to spread. There was, for example, the widely publicized story that a Jewish couple in Pennsylvania had to pull their child from school because they were blamed for the cancellation of the schools holiday play.

Memes are not restricted to liberals or conservatives. But they can, I contend, help us understand the connection between Trump and his supporters. They explain the way falsehoods develop through conservative media, are amplified through his tweets and are replicated in the words and thoughts of his followers.

Intuitively, you may have suspected that this had been happening. But a unique type of poll from Penn States McCourtney Institute for Democracy allowed us to begin tracking the development and transmission of these memes.

How the poll works

Along with Eric Plutzer, the poll director and a professor of political science and sociology, I have been working for many years on the link between public opinion and public policy. The new McCourtney Institutes Mood of the Nation Poll is a scientific internet-based survey conducted for us by YouGov that poses a series of open-ended questions to a representative sample of 1,000 Americans.

Rather than selecting from a predetermined set of answers, half of the sample was asked to tell us in their own words what in politics made them angry or proud. The other half was asked about what in the news made them angry or proud. Answers to both prompts are combined in this analysis. All respondents were also asked what, looking ahead, made them hopeful and worried. Their responses give us a unique opportunity to witness the ways in which the public is imitating Trump.

The most recent poll took place one week after Election Day in November 2016. This was in the immediate aftermath of protests that erupted after the election and which continued for several days at colleges, universities and major cities across the country. In response, just two days after his election, Trump tweeted:

The accusation that protesters were professional in other words, paid was false. As The New York Times reported less than two weeks after Election Day, the charge likely started with a single fake news tweet about protesters being bused into Austin, Texas.

Russia Today, which has been linked to Russian interference in the election, also falsely reported that post-election protesters were paid by Democratic-supporting billionaire George Soros. These reports went viral among conservative websites and were repeated on television by Kellyanne Conway and Rudy Giuliani.

Our poll shows these claims were also picked up by and spontaneously repeated by Trumps supporters.

When we asked Trump supporters to tell us without being prompted what made them angry, one-third mentioned these protests. Another 11 percent mentioned the media. It is possible that the same people mentioned both; each response receives up to three codes.

That means that over 40 percent of Trump supporters were angry about exactly the issues raised in Donald Trumps tweet. And the sources of their anger differs quite dramatically from that of Hillary Clintons supporters, who were overwhelmingly angry at Donald Trump, not at all angry at protesters and in only a very few cases (less than 2 percent) angry at the media.

Another difference is that Trump supporters werent just angry; they were very angry. Seventy-three percent of Trump supporters answering the media said they were extremely angry, as did 58 percent of those who said the protesters made them angry. Indeed, the protests consumed Trump supporters. Another 15 percent gave answers about groups and individuals who sounded an awful lot like those who were protesting, even if the protesters themselves were not explicitly mentioned. For example, a 27-year-old Trump supporter wrote that he was angry about my idiot generation being sore losers.

These voters had a remarkably similar take on these protests, using words that reflect directly on Trumps tweets. Many respondents mimicked the idea that the protests were not spontaneous, but rather the result of professional organizing and a complicit media.

A 33-year-old Pennsylvania Democrat who voted for Trump vented his anger at the The anti Trump protests! This makes me sick because I have seen proof that they are PAID probably by the Clinton admin or Obama. Im sure not all of them but a good amount

Indeed, some of the Trump supporters who were angry at the protesters explicitly blamed financier George Soros. One 71-year-old woman from Texas brought many of these ideas together when she said she was angry at the continual spin about the protesters being afraid. Many of them are PAID agitators from the DNC or SOROS orgs.

It is worth noting that within a day Trump sent out another tweet that was far more magnanimous, praising the protesters for their passion and predicting that we will all come together and be proud.

We looked for evidence that this sentiment too was resonating in Trump supporters, but our poll shows no evidence that any of his supporters picked up on this theme. Perhaps Trump supporters are looking for validation of their anger, and are therefore more likely to incubate and spread memes that do so.

It is early in the Trump administration. We do not know if he will continue to tweet as frequently, nor if his tweets will continue to convey such anger. But if they do, we are confident that his followers are likely to stay angry too. And therefore we are unlikely to see movements toward national unity that were more in evidence after other presidential elections.

Michael Berkman, Professor Political Science and Director of McCourtney Institute for Democracy, Pennsylvania State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Image: Reuters

Go here to see the original:

Donald Trump's Twitter Tantrums Do One Thing Quite Well - The National Interest Online

Trumps answer to Bernies youth brigade: Don Jr. – POLITICO

So its an oppressive politically correct culture and climate on campus and people are just tired of it, and when they see someone like Trump Jr. coming to campus and disrupting that and being a counter force of that, its refreshing and makes people excited.

The emerging dynamics of the 2020 race threaten to escalate the campus culture wars, pitting the young activist left particularly college students energized behind Bernie Sanders and others clamoring for free college and health care against a conservative base railing against the leftist socialist.

The dynamic is already on display at the CPAC 2020 conference in the Washington area, where Kirk spoke Thursday about what activists could do to fight the cartel of colleges.

Stop giving money to your alma mater. Stop it. Cut them off, Kirk said. They do not need your money. These universities are indoctrinating the next generation around ideas of open borders and Marxism. And where Senator Sanders gets his base is a limitless supply of millions and millions of students who are entering our university system, and theyre being turned into activists.

He also called on the packed room to become involved in local school board elections, where they could influence what would be written in textbooks, and to stop sending their children to four-year colleges, especially so-called elite colleges. I would not send anyone that I care about to those schools unless you want to play Russian roulette with their values.

The longstanding grievance that conservative students have against their left-leaning peers has been the subject of most college appearances by Kirk and Don Jr., who is positioning himself as a bridge between his father and young activists on the right in the 2020 cycle and generating speculation about his own political future.

Several students who attended Don Jr. events on college campuses boiled his appeal down to a few factors: his in-person humor, his bluntness and his talents as an internet memelord blasting scathing GIFs and images of his enemies into social media, and writing shocking tweets on the verge of bad taste, all in the name of owning socialist libs and weak cucks.

I think hes hilarious, said Parker Marlow, a University of Georgia student who helped organize his October 2018 visit. One of the reasons why I like to follow him is because he posts memes all the time and theyre hilarious. (Don Jr. has embraced this reputation, with his Instagram bio describing himself as a General in the Meme Wars.)

Whether or not I find everything he says to be funny is one thing, said Kevin Lorusso, a TPUSA campus coordinator who organized Don Jr.s appearance at Colorado State University in October. But I think the way that he tries at least to shed light on some of the more serious, uh, full part of the way the culture has gone. He cited Kevin Harts cancellation as the host of the 2018 Oscars for previous offensive comments as one example.

But even if Don Jr. wasnt Kevin Hart-level funny, Lorusso said Don Jr. had the stature and resources to avoid the boycotts and reputational damage that Hart and his equally-cancelled ilk experienced. You have a world of cancel culture? Well hes someone that cant really be canceled.

And where Don Jr. goes, interest in the culture wars follows.

Anna Kelchner, the president of Liberty Universitys TPUSA chapter, remembered the moment Kirk and Don Jr. mentioned that a new chapter of the group was formed. We were getting messages on Turning Point accounts from over I'm not even exaggerating over 75 students saying I had no idea that was a Turning Point chapter until Charlie announced it today! How do I get involved?"

That response had never happened whenever another conservative political figure came to campus and spoke at the highly conservative Liberty, she added. Though visiting the universitys biweekly convocation has become a virtual requirement for anyone with a rising career on the right, Kelchner said that theyd often come in with the expectation that everyone on Libertys campus were plugged-in activists, talking right over the average students head. People come to our campus and think that we're like Congressmen, at times, she said.

With Don Jr., however, the audience all students forced into mandatory attendance was more amenable, because he went through the trouble of actually explaining political points and his fathers presidency, peppered with jokes about life as a trouble-making college student. He doesn't just talk about it like everybody already knows.

The idea that Don Jr. is bringing a cultural revolution to the youth still generates skepticism among people tracking the space.

Nationwide, conservative students make up about 30 percent of college campuses, while self-identified liberals make up 70 percent, said Nancy Thomas, the director of the Institute for Democracy and Higher Education at Tufts University.

I'm not seeing any big wave of support for him or even for Donald Trump on college campuses, she said. Certainly on some of the ones that are more conservative or located in more conservative parts of the country, it will happen. But even then, you know, it's 40% Republican, 40% Democrat and 20% somewhere in the middle.

The origin of pro-Trump college fervor, she suggested, came from an amplified sense of grievance that their ideas were not being accepted an assertion she said was false, citing a study she and her colleagues did on college campus free speech before the 2016 election.

Your guide to the permanent campaign weekday mornings, in your inbox.

Thomas said she had observed a rise in watchdog groups, think tanks and other outside forces attempting to weaponize academia in ideological warfare, and that faculty members shed spoken to were now terrified of being candid in classrooms.

They are worried that theyre going to be taped, and that what they say is going to be taken out of context and then blasted out on social media. And it will be brought to the attention of the legislature and the legislature demand that a faculty member be fired.

People close to both Don Jr. and Kirk said it was unlikely that Don would appear at more TPUSA events during the upcoming general election, but should he decide to visit a college campus this cycle, hes got a small but vocal fan base already waiting.

Marlow said that a year later, people still talked about Don Jr.s appearance at UGA. I was actually talking to a guy just about a week ago. He's like, Yeah, I was there. I was there before I knew what Turning Point was."

And even if he doesnt visit a single campus again, his fan base is already focused on the specter of socialism and leftism on campus and beyond.

Lorusso, who once was a self-described Bernie bro, credited the ideas and the people he met through Turning Point with his conversion. Once you realize that the only way that laws that can exist and a government can exist is the threat of violence, you realize, well, I don't really want that. And it was this realization that the hardest socialism is compulsion, is coercion.

Others were less philosophical, conflating socialism with all things left-wing on campus, particularly the protests. A lot of people on the left know these people are effective. So they want to shut it down, said Semanko, citing the protests that Don Jr. and other highly controversial speakers faced when they visited a TPUSA event.

Don Jr. was not coming back to campus, Semanko added, but I bet in this current climate, if he or somebody else were to come back ... you would see extreme backlash from the left.

Read the original:

Trumps answer to Bernies youth brigade: Don Jr. - POLITICO

Mark Twain Would Have Hated Donald Trump – Yahoo News

Thanks to the criticisms theyve leveled in articles, interviews, tweets and letters to the editor, we know that many contemporary authors, from Philip Roth to J.K. Rowling, have a dim view of Donald J. Trump.

But what would leading writers of the past have made of him?

We can only speculate (well, until someone invents a Rowling-like potion capable of bringing long dead writers back to life). But if I could ask one dead writer what he thinks of Trump, it would be Mark Twain, my favorite American author and someone whose travel articles Ive written about in the past. While Twain is best-known for his novels, he was also an opinionated, prolific commentator on the personalities and political issues of his day.

I suspect Twain would have found Trump the showman the pre-2016 version a fascinating figure. He would have been appalled, however, by much about Trump the president.

A champion of irreverence

Read the original article.

See original here:

Mark Twain Would Have Hated Donald Trump - Yahoo News

Who is the best Dem candidate to face Donald Trump? Heres a thought | Opinion – nj.com

By Rev. Alexander Santora

My first presidential election vote went to Democrat George McGovern in 1972. In fact, I was his co-chair, along with Joyce Calefati Booth, a prominent lawyer today, of the McGovern campaign at then-St. Peters College. I was impressed with McGoverns Midwest populism coupled with his deep religiosity. I was too young, ideal and inexperienced to realize that McGovern not only did not represent the majority of the Democratic Party, he did not represent that of the country. In the election he suffered a 61 percent to 37 percent defeat to Richard Nixon at the time, the second biggest landslide in American history, with an Electoral College total of 520 to 17.

He ran at a time of enormous systemic change in the country marked by protests over the Vietnam War, which he opposed, civil rights and womens rights. He tried to harness this rage but most voters did not buy it. What he did achieve was to alienate many blue-collar voters from the Democratic Party for nearly half a century. This allowed Ronald Reagan to venture into Hoboken for the St. Anns Feast campaigning for re-election in 1984. It was monumental that he would show up in the middle of staunchly Democratic Hudson County.

Why am I getting the feeling that the national Democratic Party is ready to make the same mistake by nominating Bernie Sanders to be its standard bearer? For one, I do not see how an Independent who claims to be a Socialist can debate on the same stage as dyed-in-the-wool Democrats, pointed out by Pete Buttigieg in the Nevada debate. Even plutocrat Michael Bloomberg is technically a Republican so ditto.

I think Tom Perez should resign as head of the Democratic National Committee. This nominating process, so old by now, has been going on way too long and mirrors a vanity contest. What chops does Rep. Eric Swalwell have to even stand on the debate stage let alone Tulsi Gabbard. The Democrats allow anyone to run, draining needed campaign funds for the eventual standard bearer. Now the knives come out and instead of savaging Trump, who not only lowered but eliminated any bar for a president, they give Trump ammunition for the general campaign.

Trumps election was a fluke allowed by 77,744 voters in three states. And his ratings show he still does not have the support of most of the American people. Yet, the Democrats will hand him re-election because they fail to read the need for a moderate candidate who can beat Trump. My choice is Joe Biden, who can go toe-to-toe with him. He has vast experience and can hit the ground running. I do not think a Socialist, a gay man or a woman can win this time round. I would vote for the latter two when the time is right as I did for Hillary in 2016. Trumps re-election would precipitate a second Civil War in this country and may permanently fracture our international alliances.

There is still hope if Buttigieg and Klobuchar drop out soon and their followers move to Biden. Warren is passionate but she has fallen too far. Sanders is too arrogant and, like Trump, narcissistic enough to hurt the partys chances by fighting to the bitter end and giving his supporters reason to sit on their hands and stay home Nov. 3.

I predict a brokered convention and the Democrats have one other trick to pull out of the hat. I think the best person to lead the party to victory and put Trump in his place is someone who has not run in primaries or debated but showed her mettle over time and given Trump a dishonor he takes to eternity. She earned the respect of the American people. I think the Dem convention delegates could vote by acclamation for Nancy Pelosi.

Rev. Alexander Santora is pastor of Our Lady of Grace Church in Hoboken. He writes a weekly column on faith for The Jersey Journal.

Submit letters to the editor and guest columns for The Jersey Journal to jjletters@jjournal.com

Originally posted here:

Who is the best Dem candidate to face Donald Trump? Heres a thought | Opinion - nj.com

The Ties That Bind Deutsche Bank and Donald Trump – The New York Times

Subscribe: iTunes | Google Play Music | How to Listen

In the best-selling Dark Towers: Deutsche Bank, Donald Trump, and an Epic Trail of Destruction, David Enrich, the finance editor of The New York Times, shows how greed and unchecked ambition toppled Deutsche Bank from its position as a paragon of European institutional lending.

While its true that just about every bank under the sun has been attached to one or more financial scandals over the years, Deutsche Bank really has been involved in a disproportionate number, Enrich says on this weeks podcast. But to me, the better measure of its destructive capacity is the havoc its wreaked around the world. You can really look in probably almost every continent of the world and see some major and pretty bad scandal that the bank was involved with that caused real harm.

Kiran Millwood Hargrave visits the podcast this week to discuss her first novel for adults, The Mercies, which was inspired by a witch hunt in 17th-century Norway.

There wasnt that much concrete research that I could go to, to fall back on and really give it a solid grounding, Hargrave says. The trials were staggering in their scale, and yet even in Norway, theyre not talked about, theyre not taught in schools. The Salem witch trials are ubiquitous, even here in the U.K., and in Norway their equivalent just isnt discussed. The silence around these trials was very interesting to me.

Also on this weeks episode, Dwight Garner, Jennifer Szalai and John Williams talk about recent reviews. Pamela Paul is the host.

Here are the books discussed by The Timess critics this week:

We would love to hear your thoughts about this episode, and about the Book Reviews podcast in general. You can send them to books@nytimes.com.

Follow this link:

The Ties That Bind Deutsche Bank and Donald Trump - The New York Times

Donald Trump’s Climate Policy: ‘Get Your Mops and Buckets Ready’ – The Nation

President Donald Trump tosses paper towels into a crowd as he hands out supplies at Calvary Chapel, October 3, 2017, in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico. (Evan Vucci / AP Photo)

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

This article is adapted from The Climate Beat, the weekly newsletter of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism initiative committed to more and better climate coverage.Ad Policy

On October 30, 1975, the New York Daily News published one of the great headlines of all time: ford to city: drop dead. President Gerald Ford had just announced that the federal government would refuse to bail out New York if the city government went bankrupt. Ford later said that the headline and ensuing popular outrage helped cost him the 1976 presidential election.

Today, Donald Trump is inviting similarly damning headlines for his willingness to let New York flood from climate-driven disasters. Sorry, youll just have to get your mops and buckets ready! the president tweeted on January 18. He was responding to a New York Times article describing a possible plan to build a sea wall to protect the city from floodwaters during fierce storms like Sandy, the 2012 hurricane that killed at least 285 people and displaced thousands more.

The proposed six-mile-long barrier, extending from Queens to New Jersey, was to cost an estimated $119 billion. Now, as Gothamist reported on February 25, the Trump administration has abruptly halted the Army Corps of Engineers study of storm defense options for New York. The administrations elimination of funding for the study is dangerous and unprecedented, Robert Freudenberg of the Regional Plan Association, an urban research and advocacy group, told Gothamist.

The move is only the latest in a series of harsh environmental policy rollbacks from the Trump team. Grist reports that the rollbacks are deeply unpopular among swing voters, but theres a problem: Many dont know anything about them. As we argued in the Climate Beat last week, with the stakes for our planet so high, the climate crisis must be a central focus of 2020 campaign coverage.

As the incumbent president campaigns for another four years in office, his cavalier attitude toward the crisis deserves much more attention and scrutiny by the press. So do the climate platforms of Democratic candidates. (Sadly, the moderators of CBS Newss February 25 debate in South Carolina asked not a single question about climate change, a noticeable contrast to the 16 minutes of climate discussion during NBCs debate in Nevada on February 19.)

With Election Day eight months away, there is still time for national and local news outlets to give the climate crisis the visibility that science demands and opinion polls say voters want. And with the president tweeting about mops and buckets, killer headlines should come easy.

See the original post here:

Donald Trump's Climate Policy: 'Get Your Mops and Buckets Ready' - The Nation

History repeats itself: Donald Trump tweets that John Ratcliffe will be director of national intelligence, again – Roll Call

A week later, Trump said Ratcliffe had withdrawn his name from consideration, with the president citing the congressman being treated very unfairly by the LameStream Media as cause for the nomination to be pulled back.

Concerns had been raised about exaggerations and amplifications in Ratcliffes record at the time, which were clarified by staff.

Following Coats departure in August, Joseph Maguire succeeded him as acting director. Grenell replaced Maguire earlier this month, but like Macguire, he would not be able to serve in the position past March 11, unless the White House sends a nomination to the Senate for consideration before then. A formal nomination of Ratcliffe would, in effect, stop the clock.

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer urged his colleagues to reject Ratcliffes nomination, saying Trump has shown once again his lack of respect for the rule of law and the intelligence community.

Replacing one highly partisan operative with another does nothing to keep our country safe, the New York Democrat said in a statement. At a time when the Russians are interfering in our elections, we need a nonpartisan leader at the helm of the Intelligence Community who sees the world objectively and speaks truth to power, and unfortunately neither Acting Director Grenell nor Rep. Ratcliffe comes even close to that.

See the rest here:

History repeats itself: Donald Trump tweets that John Ratcliffe will be director of national intelligence, again - Roll Call

What Did Donald Trump Eat in India, and When Did He Eat It? – Vanity Fair

Here on this website, we ask a lot of questions. Usually theyre questions about people of means and fame and power and the situations they get into. We try to glean from these peoples business some sort of lesson that us non-stars can use. So we ask questions like, why? Also, what for? And how?

But sometimes, we dont have to because others do that work for us. So here now from the Daily Mail, a question: Did he try the goat? Donald Trump ate NOTHING from a vegetarian menu at first stop in Indian visit and was presented with challenging choices at beef-free state dinner.

Yes, did the president try the raan ali-shan on his 36-hour trip to India, where he met with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a strict vegetarian, several times, usually over a banquet of food? Trump didnt eat the vegetables, according to the Washington Post. But did he eat the meat? What did he eat and when did he eat it?

Whats the big deal? you, a person who understands boundaries and never logs on except for right now for some reason, asks. The big deal is that this guy has a pretty exclusive relationship with beef. He loves steak and he loves it rock hard, baby. Hamburgers line his guts. Sometimes, he orders the meatloaf. A source close to Trump told CNN prior to this trip, I have never seen him eat a vegetable.

Folks like the presidents son Eric calls the general outcry over whats in daddys mouth a sign of liberal overreach into personal lives. Who cares what the guy eats? Mind your own arteries! To others, Trumps lack of curiosity speaks to a larger lack of curiosity for the world and the people in it. Both arguments are fairly compelling, but there is something undeniably disconcerting about a grown man who wont eat his vegetables no matter how many airplane noises you make on the forks way to his sloppy, wet maw. Plus, one hopes a president would take care of his mind and body, since he works for the people. One hopes, too, that he wouldnt offend by, say, yucking New Delhis yum.

Curiously, for one luncheon, per the menu posted online, the chef changed the traditional samosa to one filled with broccoli. As Jaya Saxena of Eater said, Given that one of the most traditional fillings for samosas is potato, its not like the hotel needed to find a new vegetarian option, especially considering that fried potatoes are in fact a favorite of nonadventurous eaters in the White House and beyond. Clearly, this is a move to ensure the president spends his entire time in the country suffering from cruciferous farts. I suppose the president routed them on this one, though. He did not try it, reportedly.

So the next issue is goat, which is a meat. Trump likes meat but does he like goat? Unfortunately, we dont know. Journalists werent allowed in the state dinner, so there are no well-observed accounts about what he ate like hes some ingenue on the occasion of her first big profile.

So I guess were left with a big blackout. The lights went out at the opportune moment. No one else was in the room where it happened (it being whether or not the president ate a dish). So what now? Whats the lesson we can take from nothing? Maybe in the dearth of the knowable, theres hope for the best. We can dream a dream that he tried every dish and remarked kindly on it with a little self-deprecation, and asked a question or two about it. Then they moved on to discussing, I dont know, arms deals or whatever those two were up to. Also, maybe, the lesson is that it doesnt matter what the president did or didnt do. You can try the goat. Youll probably like it.

More Great Stories From Vanity Fair

How a teenager uncovered Belgiums royal scandal Oscars 2020: All the best-dressed stars on the red carpet The dangers of flying rich and flying private What this years nominees wore to their first Oscars Harry and Meghan are lying lowbut not for long Can Princess Beatrices wedding solve the royal family crisis? From the Archive: The women of Palm Beach

Looking for more? Sign up for our daily newsletter and never miss a story.

Continued here:

What Did Donald Trump Eat in India, and When Did He Eat It? - Vanity Fair