Tiny IDF Unit Is Brains Behind Israeli Army Artificial Intelligence – Haaretz

The operational research unit of the Military Intelligence Unit the software unit of the Israeli armys J6/C4i Directorates Lotem Unit doesnt look like the kind of place where state-of-the art artificial intelligence is being put to work.

There are no espresso machines, brightly colored couches or views of Tel Aviv from the top floors of an office tower. The unit conducts its work in the backwater of Ramat Gan and has the look and feel of any other army office.

But the unit is engaged in the same kind of AI work that the worlds biggest tech companies, like Google, Facebook and Chinas Baidu are doing in a race to apply machine learning to such functions as self-driving cars, analysis of salespeoples telephone pitches and cybersecurity or to fight Israels next war more intelligently.

Maj. Sefi Cohen, 34, is head of the unit, which in effect makes him the armys chief data officer. As he explains it, his units mission is to provide soldiers in the field data-based insights with the help of smart tools. We embed these capabilities in applications that help commanders in the field, he said.

One example is a system for predicting rocket launches from the Gaza Strip. After Operation Protective Edge we developed an app that learns from field sensors and other data we collected what are the most likely areas launchers will be set up and at what hours. That enables us to know in advance what will happen and what areas should be attacked in order to fight them more effectively, he explained.

We've got more newsletters we think you'll find interesting.

Please try again later.

This email address has already registered for this newsletter.

In one project the unit built a system based on neural networks whose purpose is to extract from a video a suspicious object and describe it in writing. It wont replace human observers, but instead of looking at five cameras, it will be able to be responsible for dozens, said Cohen.

Cohen said the amount of data at his disposal from the army is endless, reaching into petabytes (one million gigabytes) in some areas. It also makes use of data from outside sources and the apps it develops use open-source code. We return to the world things that we use, Cohen says, Models that are operational obviously do not go out.

Cohen got his start in combat signals corps. Near the end of his compulsory service he completed a course in Lotem and spent another 10 years at its command and control systems unit. Ive always loved algorithms. I was already involved with them in high school and worked in the field. When I saw drafted I wanted to combine the technology with a combat, he recalls.

Cohen set up the unit he now leads with the help of local high-tech executives. I convinced my commanders that we could use machine learning in combat, and from there I started to bring in more and more people, he said. The unit now comprises about 20 officers, all of them in the career army and holding advanced degrees in computer science, focusing on AI.

The units only female member left recently, so for the moment its an all-male team. Cohen says most are graduates of the armys elite Talpiot program; the one who isnt has a masters from the Technion Israel Institute of Technology. Everyone whos here is the tops. I learn a lot from them, he said.

Want to enjoy 'Zen' reading - with no ads and just the article? Subscribe today

Read more:

Tiny IDF Unit Is Brains Behind Israeli Army Artificial Intelligence - Haaretz

What does AI mean for the future of manufacture? – Telegraph.co.uk

The world is on the brink of the fourth industrial revolution, and it could change the way we use everything from cars to shoes.

The first three industrial revolutions brought us mechanisation, mass production and automation. Now, more than half a century after the first robots worked on production lines, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are shaking things up again.

Manufacturing is becoming less about muscle and more about brainsGreg Kinsey, VP, Hitachi Insight Group

Industry 4.0 uses technologies such as the internet of things to make manufacturing smarter allowing companies to revolutionise the way they make and ship goods. Manufacturing is becoming less about muscle and more about brains, says Greg Kinsey, vice president of Hitachi Insight Group.

It becomes less place-specific. You start to look at 3D printing. The shoe industry is contemplating: do we actually need to produce all these shoes in lots of variations in southeast Asia, ship them around the world, only to go to the shop and it doesnt have your size? Why not produce them at the point of sale put your foot in the scanner, measure the size and shape, swipe your credit card and pick your shoes up later that day?

The digital transformation of manufacturing and supply chains means that data from factories is directly analysed using technologies such as machine learning and AI. The process can lead to drastic efficiency gains up to 10pc, says Mr Kinsey. Companies can also see manufacturing lead times slashed in half.

Consumers will see a wider variety of products, to the point of mass customisation, where you can design your own, says Mr Kinsey. Product will become linked to emerging demand, so well never be in a position where things are just out of stock.

The first stage, says Mr Kinsey, is to get rid of paper-based processes something that many factories still rely on. Once digitised, the data can be crunched to ensure factories are operating efficiently. But the idea isnt to get rid of people; its to augment what they do.

When I graduated from university, I was heavily into industrial robots, says Mr Kinsey. Everyone said that robots were going to take our jobs. But the companies that invested heavily in robots like German car makers are now world leaders, employing many more people than they would otherwise have done.

When we use AI tools to predict bad quality, or to optimise the settings for a production line, we can manage it with more confidence. We have had a lot of clients tell us that this technology helps them improve the way they work. This is should be the real driver of innovation.

European companies are currently leading the charge in the digital transformation of industry, says Mr Kinsey. Many are also working closely with start-ups to enhance industrial processes.

Theres a lot of interest in working with start-ups, Mr Kinsey explains. When you embark on innovation, you dont always know what the solutions are.

Companies that invested heavily in robots are now world leaders, and employ more peopleGreg Kinsey, VP, Hitachi Insight Group

The resulting Industry 4.0 may change the way we all think about products, Mr Kinsey says and the first signs are already here.

In Europe, you have a lot of people thinking: Do I need to own a car? That would have been unthinkable 20 or 30 years ago. Michelin already has aircraft tyres that are on a pay-per-use basis: people pay based on the number of times the jet takes off.

You need to embrace this technology; if you dont, because you fear that you might lose some jobs, you are going to lose all the jobs, as your company will no longer be competitive. In fact, digital technologies can improve the workplace and quality of work.

Modern life is saturated with data, and new technologies are emerging nearly every day but how can we use these innovations to make a real difference to the world?

Hitachi believes that Social Innovation should underpin everything they do, so they can find ways to tackle the biggest issues we face today.

Visit social-innovation.hitachi to learn how Social Innovation is helping Hitachi drive change across the globe.

See the original post:

What does AI mean for the future of manufacture? - Telegraph.co.uk

‘It knew what you were going to do next’: AI learns from pro gamers then crushes them – Washington Post

For decades, the worlds smartest game-playing humans have been racking up losses to increasingly sophisticated forms of artificial intelligence.

The defeats began in the 1990s when IBMs Deep Blue computer conquered chess master Garry Kasparov. More recently,Ke Jie until then the worlds best player of the ancient Chinese board game Go was defeated by a Google computer programin May.

Now the AIsupergamers havemoved intothe world of e-sports. Last week, an artificial intelligence bot created by the Elon Musk-backed start-up OpenAI defeated some of the worlds most talented players of Dota 2, a fast-paced, highly complex, multiplayer online video game that draws fierce competition from all over the globe.

[Billionaire burn: Musk says Zuckerbergs understanding of AI threat is limited]

OpenAI unveiled itsbot at an annual Dota 2 tournament where players walk away with millions in prize money.It was a pivotal moment in gaming and in AI research largely because of how the bot developed its skills and how long it took to refine them enough to defeat the worlds most talented pros, according to Greg Brockman, co-founder and chief technology officer of OpenAI.

The somewhat frightening reality: It only took the bot two weeks to go from laughable novice to world-class competitor, a period in which Brockman said the bot gathered lifetimes of experience by playing itself.

During that period, players said, the botwent from behaving like a bot to behaving in a way that felt more alive.

[New artificial intelligence promises to make travel a little smarter. Does it?]

Danylo Dendi Ishutin, one of the games top players, was defeated twice by his AI competition, whichfelt a little like human, but a little like something else, he said, according to the Verge.

Brockman agreed with that perspective:You kind of see that this thing is super fast and no human can execute its moves as well, but it was also strategic, and it kind of knows what youre going to do, he said. When you go off screen, for example, it would predict what you were going to do next. Thats not something we expected.

Brockman said games are a great testing ground for AI because they offer a defined set of rules with baked-in complexity that allow developers to measure a bots changing skill level.He said one of the major revelations of the Dota 2 bots success was that it was achieved via self-play a form of training in which the bot would continuously play against a copy of itself until it amassed more and more knowledge while improving incrementally.

[Was this created by a human or computer? See if you can tell the difference.]

For a game as complicated as Dota 2 which incorporates more than 100 playable roles and thousands of moves self play proved more organic and comprehensive than having a human program the bots behavior.

If youre a novice playing against someone who is awesome playing tennis against Serena Williams, for example youre going to be crushed, and you wont realize there are slightly better techniques or ways of doing something, Brockman said. The magic happens when your opponent is exactly balanced with you so that if you explore and find a slightly better strategy it is then reflected in your performance in the game.

Tesla chief executive Elon Musk hailed the bots achievement in historic fashion on Twitter before going on to once again express his concerns about artificial intelligence, which he said poses vastly more risk than North Korea.

Musk unleashed a debateon the dangers of AI last month when he tweeted that Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerbergs understanding of the threat posed by AI is limited.

MORE READING:

Can a better nights sleep in a hipster bus replace flying?

One recipe at a time, YouTubes Binging With Babish is disrupting the content industry

I spent three minutes inside Teslas Model 3 and Im still thinking about it a day later

Read more:

'It knew what you were going to do next': AI learns from pro gamers then crushes them - Washington Post

What An Artificial Intelligence Researcher Fears About AI – IFLScience

As an artificial intelligence researcher, I often come across the idea that many people are afraid of what AI might bring. Its perhaps unsurprising, given both history and the entertainment industry, that we might be afraid of a cybernetic takeover that forces us to live locked away, Matrix-like, as some sort of human battery.

And yet it is hard for me to look up from the evolutionary computer models I use to develop AI, to think about how the innocent virtual creatures on my screen might become the monsters of the future. Might I become the destroyer of worlds, as Oppenheimer lamented after spearheading the construction of the first nuclear bomb?

I would take the fame, I suppose, but perhaps the critics are right. Maybe I shouldnt avoid asking: As an AI expert, what do I fear about artificial intelligence?

Fear of the unforeseen

The HAL 9000 computer, dreamed up byscience fiction author Arthur C. Clarkeand brought to life bymovie director Stanley Kubrickin 2001: A Space Odyssey, is a good example of a system that fails because of unintended consequences. In many complex systems the RMS Titanic, NASAs space shuttle, the Chernobyl nuclear power plant engineers layer many different components together. The designers may have known well how each element worked individually, but didnt know enough about how they all worked together.

That resulted in systems that could never be completely understood, and could fail in unpredictable ways. In each disaster sinking a ship, blowing up two shuttles and spreading radioactive contamination across Europe and Asia a set of relatively small failures combined together to create a catastrophe.

I can see how we could fall into the same trap in AI research. We look at the latest research from cognitive science, translate that into an algorithm and add it to an existing system. We try to engineer AI without understanding intelligence or cognition first.

Systems like IBMs Watson and Googles Alpha equip artificial neural networks with enormous computing power, and accomplish impressive feats. But if these machines make mistakes, they lose on Jeopardy! or dont defeat a Go master. These are not world-changing consequences; indeed, the worst that might happen to a regular person as a result is losing some money betting on their success.

But as AI designs get even more complex and computer processors even faster, their skills will improve. That will lead us to give them more responsibility, even as the risk of unintended consequences rises. We know that to err is human, so it is likely impossible for us to create a truly safe system.

Fear of misuse

Im not very concerned about unintended consequences in the types of AI I am developing, using an approach called neuroevolution. I create virtual environments and evolve digital creatures and their brains to solve increasingly complex tasks. The creatures performance is evaluated; those that perform the best are selected to reproduce, making the next generation. Over many generations these machine-creatures evolve cognitive abilities.

Right now we are taking baby steps to evolve machines that can do simple navigation tasks, make simple decisions, or remember a couple of bits. But soon we will evolve machines that can execute more complex tasks and have much better general intelligence. Ultimately we hope to create human-level intelligence.

Along the way, we will find and eliminate errors and problems through the process of evolution. With each generation, the machines get better at handling the errors that occurred in previous generations. That increases the chances that well find unintended consequences in simulation, which can be eliminated before they ever enter the real world.

Another possibility thats farther down the line is using evolution to influence the ethics of artificial intelligence systems. Its likely that human ethics and morals, such as trustworthiness and altruism, are a result of our evolution and factor in its continuation. We could set up our virtual environments to give evolutionary advantages to machines that demonstrate kindness, honesty and empathy. This might be a way to ensure that we develop more obedient servants or trustworthy companions and fewer ruthless killer robots.

While neuroevolution might reduce the likelihood of unintended consequences, it doesnt prevent misuse. But that is a moral question, not a scientific one. As a scientist, I must follow my obligation to the truth, reporting what I find in my experiments, whether I like the results or not. My focus is not on determining whether I like or approve of something; it matters only that I can unveil it.

Original post:

What An Artificial Intelligence Researcher Fears About AI - IFLScience

Magellan Aerospace: Too Cheap To Ignore – Seeking Alpha

Please note: All figures are in CAD unless otherwise stated. All data as at market close on Friday, August 11, 2017.

Magellan Aerospace (OTCPK:MALJF) [TSX:MAL] reported Q2 earnings after market close on Tuesday, August 8 - and by the looks of the chart, investors were disappointed. Magellan initially fell 2.3% after reporting earnings and extended those losses to fall 10.3% after two analyst downgrades. So, how bad were its numbers?

Source: YCharts

While Magellan's gross profit margin remained consistent, its revenues and earnings declined y/y due to lower production volumes and a one-time $1.3 million legal settlement. I believe that this decline is temporary; moving forward, I expect Magellan's revenue and profitability, particularly in the US and Canada, to increase due to higher production volumes from the 737's accelerated production schedule.

Source: Company Filings

Source: Company Filings

Magellan designs/manufactures complex aircraft components and provides MRO (maintenance, repair, and overhaul) services. They specialize in producing aircraft structural components, precision machining of metal alloys, composites, complex castings, and engine components. Within the aerospace industry, Magellan operates in two product groups: aerostructures and aeroengines. They operate 16 facilities throughout Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, India, and Poland.

The following process flow diagram illustrates the areas Magellan operates in:

Source: Aviation Week

In FY2016, Magellan derived 73% of its revenue from commercial markets and 27% from the defense market (more on this later). In my opinion, Magellan maintains an optimal balance between commercial and defense revenue. Magellans current revenue mix allows them to take advantage of the record backlog in commercial aircraft, while maintaining exposure to the more cyclical, but more lucrative government defense market.

Source: Company Filings

Boeing (NYSE:BA) and Airbus (OTCPK:EADSF) [EPA:AIR] have seen robust growth in commercial aircraft demand, primarily due to a rising middle class in emerging markets, greater demand for air travel, and high oil prices which accelerated fleet replacement schedules. This has led to a record commercial aircraft backlog, which Boeing and Airbus are tackling by increasing production. For example, Boeing is accelerating production of 737s from 42 per month in 2016 to 57 per month in 2019, increasing by 5 737s per month each year. In turn, Boeing and Airbus need their parts suppliers to meet their accelerated production schedules.

Source: Deloitte

Magellan is well-positioned to take advantage of the OEM's accelerated production schedules through their "key supplier" status. OEMs typically enter into multi-year sole-source agreements with parts manufacturers for a specific component due to the complexity and cost of developing the part. As part of the contract, Magellan assumes some design, development, and engineering costs in manufacturing the new part. New aircraft programs require further project risk/development cost sharing, in exchange for a lifetime agreement to supply the part.

Magellan presently produce parts for all major aircraft projects and those in development, as illustrated below. Looking ahead, with Magellan's strong relationship with OEMs, I anticipate they will renew contracts coming due in 2017-2018 and secure new long-term contracts, thus providing a strong revenue base.

Timeframe

Aircraft Project

Work

Est. Annual Revenue

2010-2020

A350XWB

Machined Detail & Structure Components

$10mm

2011-2021

A350XWB

Machining & Treatment of Lithium Components

$2mm+

2012- (Cont.)

B737, B747, B767, B777

Hard Metal Structural Assemblies

2012-2017+

B787

Hard Metal Structural Assemblies

2012-2017

A320, A330, A380

Aluminum & Lithium Structural Wing Components

53mm

2013-2033

F-35 (BAE Systems)

Complex Composite Horizontal Tail Assemblies

$60mm

2013-2017

A350XWB

Machined Structural Fuselage Components

$11mm

2014-2018

A320 (incl. Neo)

5-Axis Machined Wing Ribs

$5mm

2014-2024

B737MAX

Landing Gear Kits

$50mm

2015-2025

Pratt & Whitney

Magnesium & Aluminum Castings

$25mm

2016-2018

F-35 (BAE Systems)

Machined Titanium Components

$35mm

2016-2020

A320/330/350/380 (GKN Aerospace)

Aluminum/Titanium Parts & Assemblies

$42mm

2017-

B777X, B787

Machined Titanium Components

Source: Company Filings

Magellan currently produces tails to be used on F-35 fighter jets for Lockheed Martin's (NYSE:LMT) subcontractor, BAE Systems (OTCPK:BAESF) [LON:BA]. Presently, the US is planning on ordering ~2400 aircraft, with full delivery not expected until 2040. There are concerns about lost orders from the programs numerous delays and cost overruns; smaller customers and partners, such as the UK and Canada, have threatened to cancel F-35 orders. I believe that the risk to Magellan is minimal, given that the United States (which makes up the bulk of the F-35's orders) is unlikely to do so. After all, the Pentagon described the program as "too big to fail" due to significant sunk costs in the US $1.5 trillion project. Even with cancellations from other partner countries, the F-35 project will provide Magellan with stable production for the next 20 years. As such, I believe further delays in the F-35 program will have a negligible impact on Magellan.

Magellan introduced the Magellan Operating System (MOS) in 2007 to focus on operational efficiencies by standardizing and instilling best practices in their plants. In new acquisitions, Magellan strives to apply the MOS standard practices to mitigate acquisition risk. Since 2012, they have steadily increased their gross profit margin, EBITDA margin, and their FCF significantly, highlighting managements ability to execute the business.

Source: Bloomberg

Source: Bloomberg

Source: Bloomberg

To meet OEM demands for defect free products & 100% on time performance, Magellan is increasing investments in technology, capability, and capacity. This year, Magellan is also targeting employee communication and engagement. As a result of these investments, I believe that Magellan will be able modestly increase their gross profit margin, EBITDA margin, and FCF yield moving forward.

Since the US election, Magellan has diverged from and underperformed their parts manufacturer and OEM peers. I believe that concerns about President Trump and NAFTA renegotiations are overblown. Since the US leads the global aerospace industry with US $134.6 billion in exports in 2016, I believe that President Trump would not disrupt the aerospace industry. In the recently released NAFTA renegotiation objectives document, the USTR specifically wants to maintain existing reciprocal duty-free market access for industrial goods. As such, I see little impact on Magellan's operations and profitability and believe that their underperformance since the US election is unjustified.

Source: Capital IQ

Based on my comparable company analysis of comparable airplane parts manufacturers based in North America, Magellan trades at a discount to its peers on both P/E and EV/EBITDA metrics. Additionally, Magellan carries less debt relative to EBITDA than its peers, with Net Debt/EBITDA of 0.9x vs. the peer median of 1.7x. Source: Capital IQ

I believe that Magellan should trade at a premium to its peers, given their superior ROIC, margins, and future growth prospects. I believe that Magellans EV/EBITDA multiple will expand to at least peer median levels within a year to correct MALs present undervaluation.

However, to be conservative, I used a 9x (slight discount to peer average of 9.47x) 2017 EV/EBITDA multiple. I arrived at a target price of $26.32, implying 43% upside. A sensitivity analysis for the relative valuation highlights a range of target share prices based on EV/EBITDA multiple expansion and forward EBITDA estimates.

Source: Capital IQ

As a current shareholder, I've been using pullbacks to snap up more shares. Moving forward, I believe that Magellan will be able to improve both its top and bottom line. Its recent revenue decline should reverse as OEMs accelerate production to meet record aircraft demand. Particularly, increased 737 production should benefit Magellan's North American facilities, which saw revenue decline in 1Q17. Magellan's operational adjustments should continue to produce higher margins and help its bottom line. Ultimately, I think Magellan's significant discount to its peer group is unjustified given its strong operations, high margins, and high return on capital.

This article is part of Seeking Alpha PRO. PRO members receive exclusive access to Seeking Alpha's best ideas and professional tools to fully leverage the platform.

Disclosure: I am/we are long MALJF.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Editor's Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.

Original post:

Magellan Aerospace: Too Cheap To Ignore - Seeking Alpha

Aerospace reaches new heights in Oklahoma | News OK – NewsOK.com

A passenger jet takes off from Will Rogers World Airport in Oklahoma City. Commercial and general aviation airports help generate an economic impact of about $43.8 billion in Oklahoma's economy, a report released Monday said. [Photo by Paul Hellstern, The Oklahoman]

Economic incentives, the continued growth of military-related aviation missions and the hard work of local, state and regional economic development specialists and educators are showing results when it comes to the economic impact of the aerospace and aviation industries to Oklahoma's economy.

A study released Monday by the Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission estimates the industries now are the second-largest sector of Oklahoma's economy, generating an annual economic impact of about $43.8 billion.

The industry which consists of 109 airports, hundreds of off-airport aviation/aerospace employers and military aviation employs more than 200,000 people and creates an annual payroll of about $12 billion.

The study estimates military aviation continues to be the largest contributor, bringing an economic impact of $19.3 billion.

Off-airport aviation and aerospace employers are next, with $13.9 billion.

The state's 109 general and commercial aviation airports, which employ 74,002 workers, have an economic impact of $10.6 billion, the study estimates.

Charlie H. Dry, a University of Oklahoma physics graduate who went on to become a test astronaut for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and has spent most of his life in the field, said the current economic impact numbers are sound, adding he believes the state hasn't seen anything, yet.

This is a hardworking aerospace and aviation state, Dry said Monday afternoon, after Victor Bird, the aeronautics commission's director, presented the study's results at a gathering at the Oklahoma History Center.

We've been after this for a long, long time, Dry said. I think there is a great future here for our state.

Bird said Monday the study is the first the commission has conducted to evaluate the impact the aerospace and aviation industries have had on the state's economy since 1994.

This is the most comprehensive study on the economic impact for our civilian and military airports and our aviation and aerospace industry ever done, Bird said.

He said analysts have speculated the past two decades about whether the state's aerospace and aviation industries continued to grow with the help of state-created incentives, educational programs and the hard work of economic development specialists, despite the Great Recession's impact.

The answer to ... those questions is a resounding yes, Bird said.

Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin, who also spoke at Monday's event, agreed.

Right here in Oklahoma, we have the world's largest military aircraft repair facility in Tinker Air Force Base, and the largest commercial aircraft repair facility in Tulsa, for American Airlines, Fallin said.

The governor also mentioned various other companies that have brought aviation-related jobs and facilities to Oklahoma, thanked the state's Congressional delegation for its efforts to protect the state's military bases and thanked state legislators for protecting state-created economic incentives.

She also noted educators' effort to boost numbers of science and math graduates from Oklahoma colleges and universities also has played a role.

The footprint of aviation and aerospace is strong and growing in Oklahoma, Fallin said. (This report) is dramatic proof that our policies ... have helped us build a stronger, vibrant, diversified economy.

Bird said the study, which started about a year ago, cost about $540,000 and took about 7,000 hours to complete.

Data used as part of the study was obtained from airport representatives and tenants, other state businesses, the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Oklahoma Department of Commerce, the Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission and other public and private sources.

He said the study was paid for using grants of $245,000 from the FAA and the commission, a $25,000 grant from Oklahoma City Airport Trust and grants of $12,500 from both the Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust and the Tulsa Regional Chamber of Commerce.

Drones taking flight

Unmanned aerial systems is where Dry sees significant future growth in Oklahoma's aerospace and aviation industry.

Dry said he has a couple of companies involved in the development, evaluation and production of unmanned systems.

A report issued by the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International in 2013 estimated Oklahoma could see hundreds of new jobs and perhaps as much as nearly another $1 billion annual economic impact from that part of the aerospace industry by 2025.

The Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission believes Oklahoma is one of the top states in the country when it comes to related academic programs supporting the unmanned aerial vehicle industry, thanks to ongoing research at the University of Oklahoma and Oklahoma State University.

While Dry said drones were not well received initially when they were released as toys, designs being worked on now will be used for everything from inspecting wind turbines, pipelines, tanks, electrical lines and homes to surveillance and rescue tools for emergency responders.

When you are talking about professional drones, they can do anything and everything, he said.

View original post here:

Aerospace reaches new heights in Oklahoma | News OK - NewsOK.com

Aviation and aerospace bring $11.6 billion annually to Tulsa economy (copy) – Tulsa World

Tulsa International Airport and surrounding off-airport and aviation and aerospace businesses in the Tulsa Metropolitan Statistical Area generate an annual economic impact of $11.6 billion, a report shows.

According to an Oklahoma Aviation & Aerospace Economic Impact Study released Monday, on- and off-airport activity also produce 58,917 jobs, $3 billion in annual payroll and $8.5 billion in annual spending.

Jones Riverside Airport has an annual economic impact of nearly $95 million.

All told, aviation and aerospace businesses in the state generate $43.7 billion annually in economic activity, according to the Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission report, making aviation and aerospace the second-largest economic engine in the state behind oil and gas.

Oklahoma is one of the worlds premier destinations for the aerospace and defense industries, Gov. Mary Fallin said in a statement. It is centrally located with developed infrastructure, a highly skilled workforce, competitive incentives and low cost of doing business.

Since 1994, the industry has grown by 250 percent, said Vic Bird, director of the Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission. Of the $43.7 billion in economic activity, some $19.3 billion came from military aviation, according to the report.

Aviation and aerospace is extensive in Oklahoma, Bird said in a statement. It includes the 109 public airports that comprise the system, the tenants of those airports such as American Airlines and the FAA Monroney Aeronautical Center, the three air force bases and off-airport aerospace businesses like Boeing, NORDAM and FlightSafety.

The state has about 1,100 aerospace and aviation business-related companies, Fallin said. The average salary in aviation and aerospace is just over $73,000, according to the report.

In a two-part look at Oklahomas public airports, including civilian and military, the study measured the total economic impact of each individual airport and then combined these individual airport impacts to determine the overall economic impact of the 109 airports in the Oklahoma Airport System and the states three Air Force bases: Altus, Tinker, and Vance.

The last comprehensive study of the states airport system was conducted in 1994.

To make the study possible the aeronautics commission received a $245,000 system-planning grant from the Federal Aviation Administration. The agency was then able to match that amount with its own funds and received additional financial support from the Oklahoma City Airport Trust, Tulsa Airport Improvement Trust and the Tulsa Regional Chamber.

Tulsa International, which offers nonstop service to 17 cities, supports 18,369 direct jobs. In the Tulsa MSA, 286 businesses are related to aviation or aerospace. Tulsa is home to American Airlines largest maintenance facility, as well as NORDAM, a notable manufacturer of aviation equipment, and the Spartan College of Aeronautics and Technology. Also, Oklahoma Air National Guards 138th Fighter Wing is based on the northeast corner of the airport.

With 15 capital improvement projects planned for fiscal years 2018-22, the Tulsa airport has plans to spend $86 million, according to the study.

Terminal building rehabilitation will upgrade the fire suppression system, reduce unscheduled maintenance on utilities by improving utility racks, replace aging escalators and replace the terminals roof.

The terminal building rehabilitation will cost $11.5 million, with 85 percent of the funding from the airports collection of passenger facility charges.

Other projects include taxiway reconstruction and runway safety area improvement.

Rhett Morgan 918-581-8395

See more here:

Aviation and aerospace bring $11.6 billion annually to Tulsa economy (copy) - Tulsa World

Delorean Aerospace Is Working on Flying Cars – The Drive

The flying, time-traveling Delorean powered by Mr. Fusion in Back to the Future may have been science fiction, but a flying Delorean is getting closer to reality. Delorean Aerospace, a company run by Paul Delorean, nephew of the legendary John Delorean, is making real strides in a futuristic field. The company is building vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) personal transports, which is a fancy way of saying flying car.

Delorean Aerospace has been around since 2012 and it has built two prototypes so far of the DR-7 aircraft. The first was just 30 inches longbasically a drone to prove the physics of the design works. The second one is one-third scale. The body has a set of wings in front and another in back with small winglets underneath while two tandem seats in between hold the passengers. There are big fans that propel the vehicle in front and back that swivel to switch from takeoff-landing mode to forward flight mode.

The Delorean Aerospace DR-7 is all-electric and has an optimistic range. We are moving forward on a full-size, piloted prototype which will carry two passengers and is designed to operate, fully electric, for a range of 120 miles, Paul Delorean told Wired. Delorean wasnt specific about the powertrain, but we predict that the electric motor will produce 1.21 jigawatts propelling the DR-7 to a top speed of 88 mph.

The real kicker is that these flying cars will be autonomous. You wont need a pilots license, or any license at all for that matter, to use one of these things. While the air traffic control still needs to be figured out, the fact that anybody would be able to fly in a DR-7 is huge.

Theres no estimation of when these flying marvels will be available, nor is there a cost estimate. Delorean told Wired theres still a lot of testing to do. Even when a full-size prototype is complete, hes planning on doing lots of radio-controlled testing before putting anyone in a DR-7.

You might not be ready for the Delorean DR-7 yet But your kids are gonna love it.

Read the rest here:

Delorean Aerospace Is Working on Flying Cars - The Drive

Global Aerospace Lightning Strike Protection Market 2011-2022 – Analysis, Opportunities & Forecasts – PR Newswire (press release)

The global aerospace lightning strike protection market is expected to grow with a CAGR of 10.7% from 2017 to 2022.

Trends, opportunities and forecast in this market to 2022 by type (expanded foil, interwoven wires, metallized fabrics and fibers, coating and painting, lightning diverter strips, and others) and by region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Rest of the World)

The future of the global aerospace lightning strike protection market looks promising with opportunities in the commercial, regional, and military aircraft markets. The major growth drivers for this market are increasing penetration of composites in aircraft programs, proliferating aircraft deliveries, and aviation regulations and certification standards regarding the use of Lightning Strike Protection (LSP) in aircraft.

Emerging trends, which have a direct impact on the dynamics of the industry, include development of light weight LSP materials and nano-enhanced lightning strike protection.

North America is expected to remain the largest region by value and by volume during the forecast period due to highest number of aircraft delivery and production in this region.

Aerospace lightning strike protection companies profiled in this market include Dexmet Corporation, GKD Gebr. Kufferath AG, and Astroseal Products Mfg. Inc. are among the major suppliers of LSP materials.

Scope of the Report

Key Topics Covered:

1. Executive Summary

2. Market Background and Classification

3. Market Trend and Forecast Analysis from 2011 to 2022

4. Market Trends and Forecast Analysis by Region

5. Competitor Analysis

6. Growth Opportunities and Strategic Analysis

7. Company Profiles of Leading Players

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/3x5tsd/growth

Media Contact:

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-aerospace-lightning-strike-protection-market-2011-2022---analysis-opportunities--forecasts-300504491.html

SOURCE Research and Markets

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

Originally posted here:

Global Aerospace Lightning Strike Protection Market 2011-2022 - Analysis, Opportunities & Forecasts - PR Newswire (press release)

Aerospace workers’ union endorses Gwen Graham – Florida Politics (blog)

The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers announced it is endorsing Democrat Gwen Graham for governor, her campaign announced Tuesday.

With 39 lodges across the state of Florida, youll find our union members working in manufacturing and aerospace from Pensacola to Miami, Frank Ortis, president of the Florida State Council of Machinists, stated in a news release. We are excited to endorse Gwen Graham and ready to elect her Floridas next governor. Gwen has the experience and leadership Florida needs to create jobs, raise wages and lift up working families.

The Machinists and Aerospace Workers is the second major union to endorse in the race for governor, joining the United Steelworkers, which endorsed Graham in June.

Graham, a former Congresswoman from Tallahassee, faces Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum and Winter Park affordable housing developer Chris King in seeking the Democratic primary nomination to run for governor in 2018.

In Congress, Graham co-sponsored legislation to raise the minimum wage and opposed the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, and authored the bipartisan Middle STEP Act to expand technical education.

For almost twenty years the politicians in Tallahassee have had the wrong priorities for the wrong people. Theyve sold out to special interests and forgot the working men and women who built our state and drive our economy. Graham stated in the news release. We must do the common sense things other states have already done, like raise the minimum wage and pass paid sick leave but those proposals alone arent enough. As governor, I will fight to protect Floridas aerospace industry, create new manufacturing jobs and expand technical education in our schools.

Scott Powers is an Orlando-based political journalist with 30+ years experience, mostly at newspapers such as the Orlando Sentinel and the Columbus Dispatch. He covers local, state and federal politics and space news across much of Central Florida. His career earned numerous journalism awards for stories ranging from the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster to presidential elections to misplaced nuclear waste. He and his wife Connie have three grown children. Besides them, hes into mystery and suspense books and movies, rock, blues, basketball, baseball, writing unpublished novels, and being amused. Email him at scott@flordiapolitics.com or scottmichaelpowers@yahoo.com.

Follow this link:

Aerospace workers' union endorses Gwen Graham - Florida Politics (blog)

Study shows aviation, aerospace generate $43.7 billion annually for … – Tulsa World

OKLAHOMA CITY Aviation and aerospace businesses in the state generate $43.7 billion annually in economic activity, according to a report released Monday by the Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission.

The aerospace and aviation industry is now the second largest industry in the state, behind oil and gas, officials said.

Oklahoma is one of the worlds premier destinations for the aerospace and defense industries, said Gov. Mary Fallin. It is centrally located with developed infrastructure, a highly skilled workforce, competitive incentives and low cost of doing business.

Since 1994, the industry has grown by 250 percent, said Vic Bird, director of the Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission.

Of the $43.7 billion in economic activity, some $19.3 billion came from military aviation, according to the report.

Aviation and aerospace is extensive in Oklahoma, Bird said. It includes the 109 public airports that comprise the system, the tenants of those airports such as American Airlines and the FAA Monroney Aeronautical Center, the three air force bases and off-airport aerospace businesses like Boeing, NORDAM and FlightSafety, Bird said.

The state has about 1,100 aerospace and aviation business-related companies, Fallin said.

The average salary in aviation and aerospace is just over $73,000, according to the report.

Vince Howie, aerospace and defense director for the Oklahoma Department of Commerce, said the study will be used as a tool to recruit companies to the state.

Original post:

Study shows aviation, aerospace generate $43.7 billion annually for ... - Tulsa World

Local aerospace building roof collapse: three rescued – Alabama’s News Leader

Honeywell in Calhoun COunty courtesy Chief Bill Partridge.jpg

A partial roof collapse led to the rescue of three people Monday from a Calhoun County business.

Crews were able to get everyone out without any injury from the Honeywell Aerospace building.

Oxford Fire Battalion Chief Kyle Macoy said heavy rain is believed to have played a role in the collapse.

He says the company goes through building inspections and are very good about following safety protocol.

"We don't have any reason to question that," said Macoy.

What they are questioning, is how something like this could happen.

"We had two collapsed areas and both of them were on the east side of the building,those areas were approximately 70x70," said Macoy.

Engineers will come in to determine the cause of this; while the state fire marshal's office will determine the safety of the building.

Macoy said the fire suppression system was also affected leading to a large amount of flooding inside the building.

View post:

Local aerospace building roof collapse: three rescued - Alabama's News Leader

Sports medicine doctor on how to combat knee arthritis symptoms – CBS News

A new study found osteoarthritis of the knee is more than twice as common as it was just a few generations ago. It's estimated that the lifetime risk of developing this condition is 46 percent.

However, it is possible to protect your knees and even reverse some of the symptoms. Dr. Jordan Metzl, a sports medicine physician at New York's Hospital for Special Surgery, joined "CBS This Morning" to discuss what might be causing the increase and what you can do to reduce arthritic symptoms.

Asked what people are doing wrong when it comes to arthritis, Metzl said, "They're not recognizing the symptoms of arthritis."

The first thing to do if you are having symptoms, Metzl said, is to get an X-ray, which will show if there is a "narrowing between the bones."

Metzl also credits the inactivity of modern life. "If you were alive 100 years ago, you walked more, you were much more active," Metzl said.

"As this study shows us, the incidence of arthritis, the prevalence has more than doubled in the past hundred years and there are some different reasons for why that may be including people living longer and having higher weights but also related to activity," Metzl said.

X-rays of what a healthy knee versus an arthritic knee looks like.

CBS News

To reduce symptoms, he says the best thing to do is strengthen your muscles with exercises like squats and lunges instead of saying off of the knee and, in effect, becoming more inactive.

"We want them to be very active. When they get arthritis I get them started on exercise, strengthening," Metzl said.

While he says the wrong shoes can play a part in making symptoms worse, they don't necessarily cause arthritis.

"I think the shoes may be part of making the symptoms worse. I don't think it really has a lot to do with the reasons people get arthritis which are probably genetic, longevity, body index and then maybe inactivity but once you have arthritis we do a lot to control your symptoms," Metzl said.

2017 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

More here:
Sports medicine doctor on how to combat knee arthritis symptoms - CBS News

How glass-sealed connectors increase medical device longevity – Medical Design & Outsourcing

As medical instruments and technologies grow more sophisticated and complex, it is increasingly important to guard sensitive components from the autoclaving process while supporting their longevity. Glass offers a solution.

Jochen Herzberg, Schott Electronic Packaging

Autoclavable glass-sealed connector from Schott [Image courtesy of Schott Electronic Packaging]

Implementation of high-quality connectors using the right materials is crucial. Inferior components can weaken the protection of the devices electronics. Glass-to-metal sealing technology, already used in other harsh-environment applications such as aviation, aerospace and automotive safety, has emerged as an ideal solution in the development and manufacture of medical connectors. Glass-to-metal sealed connectors offer a resilient and dependable option that remains reliably gas-tight for over 3,500 autoclaving cycles, subsequently helping extend the lifespan of medical devices.

Many medical connectors are sealed with polymers or epoxy resins, which are not capable of maintaining a dependable seal over a long period. During the autoclaving process and especially after repeated cycles, polymer-based connectors will allow for a certain permeability of moisture. This can cause damage to electronic components. The binders and chemicals that make up polymer seals deteriorate over time, leaving a brittle shield incapable of providing truly reliable protection from autoclaving conditions.

The aging process and breakdown of these organic materials can happen quickly, sometimes after as few as 100 autoclaving cycles. The potential inability of polymer seals to stand up to the fundamentally important autoclaving process can lead to a plethora of problems: shortened device lifespan, failure during a procedure and increased total cost of ownership from compromised seal integrity.

A common argument against glass as a material is the idea that it is easily broken. Glass-to-metal sealing technology challenges this concept. Using advanced manufacturing processes, the glass preform and metal pieces are heated to a temperature that melts the glass, fusing glass and metal to create a gas-tight and pressure-proof seal.

During their use, glass seals maintain integrity because glass is inorganic and non-aging. It is non-porous and resistant to drastic environmental changes. This makes it a choice material to use in the manufacture of medical connectors because it has a proven ability to withstand the autoclaving process more than 3,500 times. The strong seal effectively prevents the ingress of moisture and other outside contaminants, safeguarding electronics from damaging humidity and particulates.

Confidence is of the utmost importance in medicine. A doctors confidence in his abilities, decisions, colleagues and treatment all come together in the effort to create a successful patient outcome. The same need for confidence applies to medical devices. Medical professionals must be able to have trust in their equipment. The use of devices with glass-to-metal sealed connectors goes a long way to help establish this on many fronts.

Cross-contamination incidents are one of the most substantial threats to patient safety and professional integrity in the medical industry. Mitigating the risk of such incidents is why the autoclaving process is extremely important in medical environments. Traditionally, steam sterilization presents a major strain on devices because it can accelerate wear on components. With protection for electronics from glass-to-metal connectors, devices can undergo a complete and intensive autoclaving cycle over 3,500 times without risk of accelerated damage or wear on the electronics.

Increased reliability aided by the use of glass-to-metal connectors eases worry both in the operating room and finance office. Glass-to-metal connectors can help extend device service life, reduce maintenance costs, and lessen the chance of warranty claims and physician frustrations. Surgeons and patients can experience the safety benefit of a decreased chance of device failure, while hospital budgets can experience a reduced burden thanks to a less-frequent device replacement schedule.

Versatility is another key benefit that sets glass-to-metal sealed connectors apart in a constantly developing medical landscape. Integration possibilities for medical applications include surgical tools, endoscopes or instruments for spectrometry and pulse oximetry. Customization possibilities can be met for individual and exact application needs, enabling design flexibility for medical device engineers. This creates the opportunity to conceptualize distinct ideas while still meeting strict regulatory requirements for medical devices.

Glass-to-metal sealed medical connectors can be custom-designed in a number of ways, including varying shapes, sizes and pin configurations to match requirements for integration in medical devices that require power and data supply and must be repeatedly autoclaved.

Devices and techniques will change, but the rigid standards for autoclaving requirements for hygienic operating rooms will remain a constant. As medical instruments and technologies grow more sophisticated and complex, it is increasingly important to guard sensitive components from the autoclaving process while supporting their longevity. Glass, in its distinct role as an inorganic and reliable sealing material, offers a way.

Jochen Herzberg is an innovation leader at Schott Electronic Packaging in Landshut, Germany.

(See the best minds in medtech live at DeviceTalks Boston on Oct. 2.)

Follow this link:
How glass-sealed connectors increase medical device longevity - Medical Design & Outsourcing

Home [www.esptnet.eu]

(April 14, 2017)

Dear ESPT member,First of all, I would like to thank you for your continued support of the European Society for Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Therapy (ESPT). With this email, I would like to update you on the activities of ESPT, and inform you about interactions with you as members regarding the direction and strategies of our society. The ESPT Board has been strengthened in October 2016 by Dr .Sanja Stankovic (Belgrade, Serbia) and Csilla Sipeky (Turku, Finland). Sanja took over the general secretariat from Janja Marc, whereas Ingolf Cascorbi (Kiel, Germany) took over the treasurer position from Sofia Siest. Janja Marc has taken over the Educational Division activities from Vangelis Manolopoulos. The Division Scientific Research and Clinical Implementation will be split in two individual Divisions, with Ron van Schaik (NL) leading the Clinical Implementation Division, collaborating with the European Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (www.eu-pic.net) whereas Marc Ansari (CH) will chair the Research Division. ESPT has now a new Executive office, located in Milan, giving us the opportunity to professionalize our society as well as having a physical headquarter for meetings. Address: ESPT Executive Office, Via Carlo Farini 81, 20159 Milano, ItalyThe ESPT society itself will maintain its main registration in France. As ESPT, have been active in 2017 in setting up and/or extending collaborations with the Finnish National Society for Pharmacogenetics , the Turkish Society for Pharmacogenetics and the Serbian Society for Pharmacogenetics. ESPT has been present at the CPIC meeting in Washington DC (March 15), the ASCPT Annual meeting (Washington DC, March 16-18) and the UK Pharmacogenomics & Stratified Medicine Network Meeting (March 23) in London, UK.The preparations for the ESPT Annual Meeting 2017 (Oct 4-7) in Catania, Sicily, are in full progress. At this moment, 90% of the invited speakers have confirmed. It is expected that registration will start in 6 weeks. Already, we received a lot of positive reactions to this meeting. Also, the ESPT General Assembly will take place in Catania. More information will follow shortly. In the next months, ESPT will be present at the QLAC meeting in Belgrade (April 19-21), the Global Genomic Medicine Alliance meeting (Athens, April 27-29) , the WPA Interzonal congress in Vilnius, Lithuania (May 4-6), the Pharmaceutical World Congress in Stockholm (May 21-24) and the Human Genome Variation Society meeting (Copenhagen, May 26). Hope this update will give you more insight in the developments ongoing!Kindest regards,

The Society

Continued here:
Home [www.esptnet.eu]

Frost & Sullivan Awards Akonni Biosystems for its Groundbreaking TruDiagnosis Molecular Diagnostics Platform – Markets Insider

Akonni'splatform delivers accurate, multiplexed analysis in a low-cost format, offering a valuable solution for healthcare applications such as disease prediction and prevention, early diagnosis, identification of drug resistance, and treatment monitoring.

SANTA CLARA, California, Aug. 15, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Based on its recent analysis of microarrays in molecular diagnostics (MDx), Frost & Sullivan recognizes Akonni Biosystems, Inc. with the 2017 North America Frost & Sullivan Award for New Product Innovation. Akonni's integrated MDx system, TruDiagnosis, is revolutionizing the point-of-care molecular testing market by enabling target detection from a variety of sample types. TruDiagnosis is powered by TruArray, a patented 3D gel-drop microarray technology for sample screening that instantly indicates the presence of disease markers in real time. Frost & Sullivan believes that Akonni is properly positioned to serve the precision medicine revolution.

Click here for the full multimedia experience of this release - http://bit.ly/2wJbPPQ

"TruDiagnosis offers rapid, reliable multiplexed analysis at a lower overall cost per array," reports Frost & Sullivan Senior Research Analyst Sanchari Chatterjee Maity. "The company modified this platform by replacing the traditional glass substrate with a cost-effective plastic film substrate for printing arrays without requiring functionalized coatings. Akonni also enhanced the manufacturing process for reel-to-reel manufacturing of arrays on film to generate greater cost efficiencies."

TruDiagnosis consists of Akonni's proprietary TruDx Imagers, TruArray Assays, and TruTip sample prep kits and includes nucleic acid extraction as well as fully-automated gridding and data analysis software for patient reporting. The platform serves a range of applications such as pharmacogenomics, chronic human diseases (cancer), infectious diseases, extensive drug-resistant tuberculosis, upper respiratory infections, viral encephalitis, and hospital-acquired infections.

At the heart of the platform is the TruArray 3D gel-drop technology, which delivers efficient immobilization capacity due to the innovative spacing design of the immobilized molecules throughout the volume of the gel drop. This design boasts high hybridization efficiency, which helps achieve specific hybridization to obtain incredibly accurate data. The low-density microarrays can carry between 5 and 400 3D gel-drops per array.

TruDiagnosis has garnered considerable praise for its easy mode of operation and accurate results. The testing procedure involves dropping a few microliters of the DNA sample onto a microfluidic test slide the size of a stick of chewing gum. The sample then flows over an array of the 3D gel-drops with probes that test for the targets of interest; for example, Akonni's multi-drug resistant mycobacterium TB (MDR-TB) test includes six tuberculosis (TB) genes and 88 strain-specific mutations. Akonni facilitates workflows by combining conventional target amplification, fragmentation, and labeling processes into a single microfluidic chamber. Additionally, the integrated, self-contained design of the microfluidic device alleviates the risk of amplicon contamination following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Once the assay is finished, the test is inserted in the TruDx reader, which detects and indicates a genetic match. This operational method takes significantly less computation time than other diagnostic microarrays.

Pre-clinical studies demonstrate the superiority of TruDiagnosis' clinical viability over traditional multiplexed platforms. "Akonni has won several projects from leading private as well as government entities in North America and Asia-Pacific due to the versatility of its diagnostic products," noted Chatterjee Maity. "Overall, it enjoys a solid market presence and is well positioned for higher growth due to its effective products, customer-friendly approach, strategic execution of business prospects, and cost effectiveness."

Each year, Frost & Sullivan presents this award to a company that develops an innovative product element by leveraging leading-edge technologies. The award recognizes the value-added features/benefits of the product and the increased ROI it affords customers, which, in turn, raises customer acquisition and overall market penetration potential.

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices awards recognize companies in a variety of regional and global markets for demonstrating outstanding achievement and superior performance in areas such as leadership, technological innovation, customer service, and strategic product development. Industry analysts compare market participants and measure performance through in-depth interviews, analysis, and extensive secondary research to identify best practices in the industry.

About Akonni Biosystems, Inc.

Akonni Biosystems was founded in 2003 and has been issued 21 US and 36 International patents primarily covering sample preparation, microfluidic devices, bioinstrumentation, and integrated systems. Product development has been supported by a series of government grants and contracts from NIH, CDC, DOE, DOD, NIJ, and NSF. The company significantly advanced the original technology by improving the system's capabilities from sample preparation to test result. Commercial products in Akonni's near-term pipeline include rapid sample preparation technologies for nucleic acid extraction and multiplex panel assays for detecting clinically relevant genotypes for pharmacogenomics, human chronic diseases, and genotypes for infectious diseases such as multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB), upper respiratory infections, viral encephalitis, and hospital-acquired infections (MRSA).

About Frost & Sullivan

Frost & Sullivan, the Growth Partnership Company, works in collaboration with clients to leverage visionary innovation that addresses the global challenges and related growth opportunities that will make or break today's market participants. For more than 50 years, we have been developing growth strategies for the global 1000, emerging businesses, the public sector and the investment community. Contact us: Start the discussion.

Contact:

Ana ArriagaP: 210.247.3823F: 210.348.1003E: rel="nofollow">ana.arriaga@frost.com

Read more:
Frost & Sullivan Awards Akonni Biosystems for its Groundbreaking TruDiagnosis Molecular Diagnostics Platform - Markets Insider

Gene-editing scientists to share $500K Albany Med prize – Albany Times Union

Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D. , professor, Molecular and Cell Biology and Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley. (UC-Berkeley)

Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D. , professor, Molecular and Cell Biology and Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley. (UC-Berkeley)

Luciano Marraffini, Ph.D., associate professor, Laboratory of Bacteriology, The Rockefeller University, New York City. (Mario Morgado)

Luciano Marraffini, Ph.D., associate professor, Laboratory of Bacteriology, The Rockefeller University, New York City. (Mario Morgado)

Gene-editing scientists to share $500K Albany Med prize

Albany

Five scientists whose work on the revolutionary gene-editing technology CRISPR will share the 2017 Albany Medical Center Prize in Medicine and Biomedical Research.

The decision by the Albany Prize National Selection Committee to award the $500,000 prize to these researchers stands out from recent announcements of the prestigious award, which have acknowledged scientists for groundbreaking work leading to current medical advances. While developments using CRISPR have exploded this year, its use in humans remains a promise, but one with far-reaching effects.

"The committee saw this technology as having huge potential for eradicating human disease," said Dr. Vincent Verdile, dean of Albany Medical College and chair of the prize committee.

CRISPR (pronounced "crisper") stands for "clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats." It is a DNA sequence that simple bacteria use to defend themselves against viruses by snipping out part of the virus DNA so it can be recognized by the bacteria's own immune systems. The technology based on it lets scientists "edit" genes at specific locations by removing, adding or altering parts of the DNA sequence.

In the last year, CRISPR technology has been used to remove a gene linked to heart disease from human embryos and to create a cancer-killing gene that shrinks tumors in mice. Last week, scientists revealed in the journal Science that they had created piglets stripped of viruses that could cause disease in humans; the technique could open the door for eventual transplantation of livers, hearts and other organs from pigs to people.

The scientists who will share the Albany Prize are:

Emmanuelle Charpentier of the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology in Germany. Charpentier is co-inventor and co-owner of the intellectual property comprising the CRISPR gene-editing system, and co-founder of two companies developing the technology for biotech and biomedical applications.

Jennifer Doudna of the University of California, Berkeley. Five years ago, Doudna described a simple way of editing the DNA of any organism using an RNA-guided protein founded in bacteria.

Luciano Marraffini of Rockefeller University in New York City. Marraffini discovered that CRISPR works by severing DNA and was the first to propose that it could be used to edit genes in organisms other than bacteria. With Feng Zhang, he performed the first successful CRISPR gene-editing experiment in human cells.

Francisco J.M. Mojica of the University of Alicante in Spain. Mojica's work has led to the development of tools used in the genetic manipulation of any living being, including humans.

Feng Zhang of the Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University. Zhang pioneered the development of gene editing tools for use in human cells from bacterial CRISPR systems.

The Albany Prize Committee's selection of five scientists to share the award this year reflects an increasing trend in science toward collaboration, where information is shared and groups of researchers move knowledge forward in ways that no one of them could do alone, Verdile said. It's a major change since the days when a single scientist would be credited with, say, the discovery of a vaccine.

"That's more of where the future of biomedical research is going what's good for the good of mankind, not me personally," Verdile said.

News reports in recent years have focused on the ethical aspects of CRISPR technology, which in addition to its potential to prevent devastating diseases, could also be used for cosmetic purposes or have unintended consequences that affect the descendants of the person whose genes are edited. The Albany Prize Committee did not consider such "what if" scenarios, Verdile said, leaving those conversations for future ethicists and policymakers as specific medical techniques are developed.

The Albany Prize, one of the nation's largest for science and medicine, was established in 2000 by the late Morris "Marty" Silverman, a New York City businessman and philanthropist who grew up in Troy. A commitment of $50 million from the Marty and Dorothy Silverman Foundation allows for the prize to be awarded annually for 100 years.

Albany Med released the 2017 award recipients' names Tuesday morning. The recipients will formally receive their awards at a Sept. 27 ceremony in Albany.

chughes@timesunion.com 518-454-5417 @hughesclaire

Visit link:
Gene-editing scientists to share $500K Albany Med prize - Albany Times Union

Genomic Medicine Has Entered the Building – Hospitals & Health Networks

After years of fanfare and a few false starts, the era of genomic medicine has finally arrived.

Across the country, thousands of patients are being treated, or having their treatment changed, based on information gleaned from their genome. Its a revolution that has been promised since the human genome was first published in 2001. But making it real required advances in information technologyinfrastructure and a precipitous drop in price.

Today, the cost of whole exome sequencing, which reveals the entire protein-coding portion of DNA, is now roughly equivalent to an MRI exam in many parts of the country, says Louanne Hudgins, M.D., president of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and director of perinatal genetics at Lucile Packard Children'sHospital Stanford, Palo Alto, Calif.

Genomic sequencing is a tool like any other tool in medicine, and its a noninvasive tool that continues to provide useful information for years after it is performed, she says.

Nowhere is this genomic transformation more apparent than in the realm of cancer treatment.

Companies like Menlo Park, Calif.-based Grail Inc. are forging ahead with large-scale genomic sequencing projects in collaboration with both academic medical centers and community health systems. Grails Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas study aims to identify genomic fingerprints shed from tumors that can be identified in a blood sample. The goal is to help identifycancers early when they are more treatable and to match a patients tumors to individualized treatment.

We are finding great enthusiasmas people want to participate in this effort, both patients and physicians, says Mark Lee, M.D., a practicing oncologist at Stanford and head of clinical development and medical affairs at Grail. Right now, he says, health systems and patients have an opportunity to participate in shaping the future of this genome-based medicine.

Supporting article:Maine Genomics Project Rethinks Cancer Care

Backed by investing giants like Amazon and Bill Gates, Grail has partnered with the Mayo Clinic, the Cleveland Clinic, the U.S. Oncology Networkand others to collect de-identified data from consenting patients for large-scale genomic studies.

And they have lots of company. The biotech company Regeneron has partnered with Pennsylvania-based Geisinger Health System to enroll interested patients in a project dubbed MyCode Community Health Initiative. A discovery-focused initiative, MyCode is also using genomic data to guide treatment decisions today. Currently, the project has enrolled more than 150,000 consenting patients and has returned what are considered actionable results to 340 patients and providersand counting.

For example, MyCode participant Barbara Barnes chose to have her reproductive organs removed after an analysis of her DNA determined that she was at increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. The surgeryrevealed that she already had a fallopian tube tumor that required treatment, and the early intervention may have saved her life. She shared her story in a Facebook video produced by Geisinger.

While anecdotal success stories provide a taste of whats possible, the Geisinger-Regeneron collaboration is aimed more toward matching genotypes with treatment on a population level, and that effort is starting to yield results.

In July, the group published a report in the New England Journal of Medicine describing a variant of the gene ANGPTL3 associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease detected in some MyCode participants. The gene variant codes for a protein that seems to lower cholesterol, and the company has developed a targeted treatment, evinacumab, that mimics the action of this protein. Evinacumab earned breakthrough therapy designation by the Food and Drug Administrationin April and is now in Phase 3 clinical trials for patients with an inherited tendency that manifests early in life to have high cholesterol levels, leading to deadly cardiovascular disease.

Another goal of Geisingers population-based study, says Andy Faucett, a principal investigator of MyCode and genomics researcher at Geisinger, is to determine how to scale the program and make it possible for more health systems to implement genomic screening for their patients.

We probably have a health system a week call us and ask us for help [setting up a genomics program], he says. We think its something that should be offered to every patient.

Genomic medicine has advanced to the point that genes and their variants now can be targets for drug treatments. Case in point: In May, the FDA approved pembrolizumab (Keytruda) to treat any unresectable or metastatic solid tumor with a specific genetic biomarker, irrespective of its location in the body.

This is an important first for the cancer community, Richard Pazdur, M.D., director of the FDA's Oncology Center of Excellence and acting director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in the FDAs Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a statement made at the time of the approval. We have now approved a drug based on a tumors biomarker without regard to the tumors original location.

Clinical trials matching genomic markers with targeted treatment are well underway and are only expected to increase, making identification of genomic targets an essential part of care.

Targeted therapies got another advance in July when an advisory panel convened by the FDA gave its unanimous recommendation for approval of the first gene-based medical treatment in the U.S. Chimeric antigen receptor T, or CAR-T,cell therapy, expected to be approved in November for a particularly aggressive form of leukemia, is the first in a wave of living drugs engineered to seek out and destroy cancerous tumors.

CAR-T cell therapy represents the culmination of decades of research to identify genetic features that are unique to each specific form of cancer that can be targeted by the immune system. The approach, coaxing a patients own immune system to recognize and attack cancerous cells, also delivers on the promise of personalized medicine, as T cells are harvested from each patient, re-engineered to recognize and attack cancer, and returned to the patient.

In the case of Novartis CTL019, the treatment on the cusp of FDA approval, complete response rates in clinical trials for acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients whohad relapsed despite multiple conventional treatments, reached 80-90%.

Physician-scientists like Brian Till of Seattles Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, who has been working on CAR-T for years but was not involved in the development of CTL019, say these early results are encouraging.

We have enough data right now to be optimistic that this could become standard of care for some cancers, says Till.

He quickly added that there will likely always be a role for chemotherapy or other standard treatments and that CAR-T will probably be limited in its early days to centers that have experience managing potential toxicities. But, he added, CAR-T has the potential to be given as an outpatient treatment with careful management of side effects.

Many questions remain about whether it makes sense for healthy people to learn the secrets hidden in their DNA, but those concerns are likely to be overshadowed by a cavalcade of genomic sequencing projects and targeted therapies now hitting clinics nationwide. Simply put, genomic sequencing will be part of standard care within the next decade.

In the realm of rare-disease diagnoses and treatment, genomics already has been transformative. As recently as five years ago, patients with myriad vague symptoms, mostly infants and children, could bounce from doctor to doctor and invasive procedure to invasive procedure without ever receiving a definitive diagnosis. While some disorders still do evade diagnosis, whole genome sequencing has dramatically reduced that number.

Our ability to diagnose genetic conditions has improved dramatically, says Hudgins. And we are gaining a much better understanding of the biology behind these genetic changes. Because of these advances, therapy and management of these diseases are much improved. So the idea that there is no treatment for genetic disorders is just not true anymore.

The speed of DNA sequencing and analysis now permits near real-time diagnosis, moving it into the clinical workflow.

At Rady Childrens HospitalSan Diego, an array of Illumina sequencing machines churns through clinical samples in as few as 37 hours, according to Stephen Kingsmore, M.D., director of its Institute forGenomic Medicine.

The rapid sequence analysis has resulted in almost half of patients receiving a genomic diagnosis, while 80 percent had their care altered as a result of sequencing.

Kingsmore is consulting with a dozen other childrens hospitals that want to offer real-time genomic testing to their patients within the next year. Every hospital should have access to rapid sequencing and analysis within a few years, he says.

For prospective parents, prenatal and perinatal diagnosis has entered a new realm as well.

Cell-free DNA prenatal screening has dramatically decreased the number of invasive procedures such as amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling that pregnant women undergo, Hudgins says. In the last few years, it has decreased fivefold in many areas of the U.S.

Even the granddaddy of all genomic medicine, gene therapy, is enjoying a renaissance. Early efforts to treat disease by replacing defective genes suffered many setbacks over the years, mainly due to the difficulty of efficiently delivering genes to affected tissues and organs. But next-generation modified viral delivery systems have shown they can get the job done safely and efficiently.

Philadelphia-based Spark Therapeutics' biologics license application for voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna)for inherited retinal disease has been accepted for review by the FDA with a decision expected early next year. The experimental treatment of 31 patients was the first successful randomized, controlled Phase 3gene therapy clinical trial, leading to FDA orphan drug designation in July.

Spark is one of several companies developing gene-based treatment for vision loss in the U.S. and Europe.

Similarly, Bluebird Bio Inc.'s gene-therapy treatment for thalassemia and sickle cell disease has shown promise. Results presented at the European Hematology Association meeting in Vienna in June suggested that a child treated for severe sickle cell disease in France might have been cured.

The company is running clinical trials to treat severe sickle cell disease at six hospitals in the U.S., including the Medical University of South Carolina. Julie Kanter, M.D., director of sickle cell research at MUSC and a primary investigator on the U.S. trial, says the new generation of gene-delivery systems is more efficient with fewer side effects.

I think weve made incredible headway and we are going to see some great things coming, she says.

Amid tumbling genomic sequencing costs, more people are having their DNA sequenced to match an underlying genetic defect withan increasing variety of targeted treatment options. From an estimated 1,000 genetic tests available only five years ago, the field has exploded to more than 52,000 available in the U.S., and that number grows daily. To find out more about what's out there, visit the National Center for Biotechnology Information's Genetic Testing Registry website at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr.

Read the original here:
Genomic Medicine Has Entered the Building - Hospitals & Health Networks

Feng Zhang to share Albany Medical Prize – MIT News

Feng Zhang, a member of the McGovern Institute for Brain Research and an associate professor in the Departments of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and of Biological Engineering, has been named a winner of the 2017 Albany Medical Center Prize in Medicine and Biomedical Research.

Zhang, who is the Poitras Professor in Neuroscience at MIT and a core member of the Broad Institute, is recognized for his contributions to the development of CRISPR-Cas9 as a gene editing technology, which in the words of the prize announcement has revolutionized biomedical research and provided new hope for the treatment of genetic diseases and more.

The $500,000 prize has been given annually since 2001 to those who have altered the course of medical research, and is one of the largest prizes in medicine and science in the United States. Past recipients include eight Nobel Laureates.

In announcing the award, the Dean of Albany Medical College, Vincent Verdile, said: Rarely has such a recent discovery transformed an entire field of research, as CRISPR has in biological research. Its implications for biological processes, including human health and disease are promising and quite profound.

Zhang will share the prize with four other CRISPR researchers: Emmanuelle Charpentier of the Max Planck Institute; Jennifer Doudna of University of California at Berkeley; Luciano Marraffini of Rockefeller University; and Francisco Mojica of the University of Alicante.

Read the original post:
Feng Zhang to share Albany Medical Prize - MIT News

Genetically Engineering Pigs to Grow Organs for People – The Atlantic

The idea of transplanting organs from pigs into humans has been around for a long time. And for a long time, xenotransplantsor putting organs from one species into anotherhas come up against two seemingly insurmountable problems.

The first problem is fairly intuitive: Pig organs provoke a massive and destructive immune response in humansfar more so than an organ from another person. The second problem is less obvious: Pig genomes are rife with DNA sequences of viruses that can infect human cells. In the 1990s, the pharmaceutical giant Novartis planned to throw as much $1 billion at animal-to-human transplant research, only to shutter its research unit after several years of failed experiments.

Quite suddenly, however, solving these two problems has become much easier and much faster thanks to the gene-editing technology CRISPR. With CRISPR, scientists can knock out the pig genes that trigger the human immune response. And they can inactivate the virusescalled porcine endogenous retroviruses, or PERVsthat lurk in the pig genome.

On Thursday, scientists working for a startup called eGenesis reported the birth of 37 PERV-free baby pigs in China, 15 of them still surviving. The black-and-white piglets are now several months old, and they belong to a breed of miniature pigs that will grow no bigger than 150 poundswith organs just the right size for transplant into adult humans.

eGenesis spun out of the lab of the Harvard geneticist George Church, who previously reported inactivating 62 copies of PERV from pig cells in 2015. But the jump from specialized pig cells that grow well in labs to living PERV-free piglets wasnt easy.

We didnt even know we could have viable pigs, says Luhan Yang, a former graduate student in Churchs lab and co-founder of eGenesis. When her team first tried to edit all 62 copies in pig cells that they wanted to turn into embryos, the cells died. They were more sensitive than the specialized cell lines. Eventually Yang and her team figured out a chemical cocktail that could keep these cells alive through the gene-editing process. This technique could be useful in large-scale gene-editing projects unrelated to xenotransplants, too.

When Yang and her team first inactivated PERV from cells in a lab, my colleague Ed Yong suggested that the work was an example of CRISPRs power rather than a huge breakthrough in pig-to-human transplants, given the challenges of immune compatibility. And true, Yang and Church come at this research as CRISPR pioneers, but not experts in transplantation. At a gathering of organ-transplantation researchers last Friday, Church said that his team had identified about 45 genes to make pig organs more compatible with humans, though he was open to more suggestions. I would bet we are not as sophisticated as we should be because weve only been recently invited [to meetings like this], he said. Its an active area of research for eGenesis, though Yang declined to disclose what the company has accomplished so far.

Its great genetic-engineering work. Its an accomplishment to inactivate that many genes, says Joseph Tector, a xenotransplant researcher at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Researchers like Tector, who is also a transplant surgeon, have been chipping away at the problem of immune incompatibility for years, though. CRISPR has sped up that research, too. The first pig gene implicated in the human immune response as one involved in making a molecule called alpha-gal. Making a pig that lacked alpha-gal via older genetic-engineering methods took three years. Now from concept to pig on the ground, its probably six months, says Tector.

Using CRISPR, his team has created a triple-knockout pig that lacks alpha-gal as well as two other genes involved in molecules that that provoke the human immune systems immediate hyperacute rejection of pig organs. For about 30 percent of people, the organs from these triple-knockout pigs should not cause hyperacute rejection. Tector thinks the patients who receive these pig organs could then be treated with the same immunosuppressant drugs that recipients take after an ordinary human-to-human transplant.

Tector and David Cooper, another transplant pioneer, were both recently recruited to the University of Alabama at Birmingham for a xenotransplant program funded by United Therapeutics, a Maryland biotech company that wants to manufacture transplantable organs.

Cooper has transplanted kidneys from pigs engineered by United Therapeutics to have six mutations, which lasted over 200 days in baboons. The result is promising enough that he says human trials could begin soon. These pigs were not created using CRISPR and they are not PERV-free, though recent research has suggested that PERV may not be that harmful to humans. It will be up to the FDA to decide whether pig organs with PERV are safe enough to transplant into people.

If it happens, routine pig-to-human transplants could truly transform healthcare beyond simply increasing the supply. Organs would go from a product of chancesomeone young and healthy dying, unexpectedlyto the product of a standardized manufacturing process. Its going to make such a huge difference that I dont think its possible to conceive of it, says Cooper. Organ transplants would no longer have to be emergency surgeries, requiring planes to deliver organs and surgical teams to scramble at any hour. Organs from pigs can be harvested on a schedule, and surgeries planned for exact times during the day. A patient that comes in with kidney failure could get a kidney the next dayeliminating the need for large dialysis centers. Hospital ICU beds will no longer be taken up by patients waiting for a heart transplant.

With the ability to engineer a donor pig, pig organs can go beyond simply matching a human organ. For example, Cooper says, you could engineer organs to protect themselves from the immune system in the long term, perhaps by making their own localized dose of immunosuppressant drugs.

'Big Pork' Wants to Get In on Organ Transplants

At last Fridays summit, Church speculated about making organs resistant to tumors or viruses. When an audience member asked about the possibility of genetically enhancing pig organs to work as well as Michael Phelpss lungs or Usain Bolts heart, he responded, We not only can but should enhance pig organs, even if were opposed to enhancing human beings ... They will go through safety and efficacy testing, but part of efficacy is making sure theyre robust and maybe they have to be as robust as Michael Phelps in order to do the job.

Xenotransplantation will raise ethical questions, of course, and genetically enhancing pigs might come uncomfortably close to the plot of Okja. These enhancements are hard to fathom for now because scientist dont yet know what genes to alter if they wanted to make, for example, super lungs. Its taken decades of research to pinpoint the handful of genes that could make pig organs simply compatible with humans. But the technical ability to make any editsor even dozens of edits at oncewith CRISPR is already here.

Here is the original post:
Genetically Engineering Pigs to Grow Organs for People - The Atlantic