Report: Smaller Canadian towns most likely to be impacted by automation – BetaKit

Smaller Canadian regions that specialize in mining, manufacturing, and other natural resources jobs are most vulnerable to automation, according to a new report from Brookfield Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (BII+E).

For the report, Automation Across the Nation: Understanding the potential impacts of technological trends across Canada, the Brookfield Institute applied findings from a recent report by McKinsey & Company on automation to employment figures from the 2011 Statistics Canada census, the most recent account of local labour statistics. Specifically, the Brookfield Institutes report aims to identify the Canadian cities and towns, as well as specific industries, that are most likely to be impacted by automation.

We expect that the impact of automation will vary considerably across Canadas towns and cities, said Sean Mullin, executive director of BII+E. By better understanding the geographic distribution of this trend, we believe the country will be much better prepared to weather the risks and reap the potential benefits of automation.

Industries most likely to be impacted by automation include accommodation and food services.

The report revealed that overall, 46 percent of work activities in Canada have the potential to be automated, across all industries, a figure that is equivalent to 7.7 million jobs. When it comes to specific industries, however, the report found that small regional economies that specialize in manufacturing or mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction are most susceptible to automation.

Some of these regions included Woodstock, Ontario, where 49.5 percent of work activities have the potential to be automated; Ingersoll, Ontario, where 50 percent of the work has the potential to be automated; and Quesnel, BC, where 49.64 percent of work activities have the potential to be automated.

On the contrary, the cities and towns that are less susceptible to automation are areas with a large hospital, post-secondary institution, or public sector presence such as Petawawa, Ontario, Ottawa-Gatineau, Ontario, and Fredericton, New Brunswick.

Diving further into specific industries, the report found that industries most likely to be impacted by automation also include accommodation and food services; transportation and warehousing; and agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting. According to the Institute, the proportion of work activities in industries with the potential to be automated is equal to 2.5 million jobs.

Large cities like Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver lie in the middle of the pack. The report suggested that while about 46 percent of work activities in these regions have the potential of being automated, workers displaced by automation may have an easier time finding new jobs as these cities tend to specialize in professional, scientific, and technical services.

Overall, the report suggests that while automation will bring certain benefits, it will also bring significant risks for individual Canadians and communities, particularly for Canadas smaller cities and towns.

While the rate and extent of adoption of different technologies across industries is unknown, the benefits, as well as the job displacement risks resulting from automation, are likely to be more concentrated in certain industries, and in certain cities and towns, the report reads. This suggests a need to more deeply understand the areas and people that are most at risk, and to design policy and program responses, including in the areas of training, upskilling, education, and social safety nets, that take this uneven distribution of risk into account.

The Brookfield Institute plans to continue examining the differentiated impacts of automation on various regions and individuals across Canada in the coming months.

This is not the first time the Brookfield Institute has examined the relationship between automation and jobs. In March, the Brookfield Institute and RBC released a report that found that people aged 15 to 24 are one of the population segments most likely to experience changes in job roles and skills demand due to automation. They reportedly make up nearly 20 percent of employees that have a high risk of being impacted by automation.

Excerpt from:

Report: Smaller Canadian towns most likely to be impacted by automation - BetaKit

Guide to Investing in Robotics Stocks: What’s the Future in Automation? – Zacks.com

When people think of future technologies that will change our lives, robotics and the general trend towards more automation is usually at the top of the list. And while some of the more sci-fi aspects of this technology still appears to be in the future, robotics and automation is already an important industry, and one that could surge in status in the years ahead as well.

The space is probably a lot bigger than you think too. Sure, most are familiar with companies like iRobot (IRBT - Free Report) , but the industry goes beyond vacuuming and pool cleaning robots at this point. In fact, many big-name players are getting into the robotics world, and it looks to be a high growth area for quite some time.

To learn more about this growing trend, I spoke with Bill Studebaker, the CIO and President of Robo Global. This company was the first to create a benchmark index to track the global robotics and automation market, acting as a barometer for companies across the space, and making Robo Global a firm in the know about the world of robotics and automation.

Investing in Robotics

Bill and I discuss the key growth areas of the robotics and automation world, as well as some of the top reasons for the greater push towards robotics as of late, including the prospect of rising wages. We also talk about how this industry may have reached a critical mass in recent years, and what this means for investors too.

We also look at what the hot areas of the robotics world are, and I get Studebakers take on Bill Gates recent commentary that we may have to consider taxing robots in the near future. We then investigate what is ahead for this industry, and why an index-based approach might make sense in this high-growth and higher-risk corner of the market.

Index in Focus

The index is also the basis for the Robo Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO - Free Report) , the most popular fundby assetsto track the space in the ETF world. We dive into the underlying benchmark in this podcast and I investigate how securities are chosen and weighted for the index.

This is especially important when you take a first glance at the index components for the benchmark, as some companies that make their way into the benchmark include large and well-known firms like Deere (DE - Free Report) and Northrop Grumman (NOC - Free Report) to name a few. We go over why these are in the index, as well as the wisdom behind including a number of semiconductor stocks such as Nvidia (NVDA - Free Report) , Qualcomm (QCOM - Free Report) , and Ambarella (AMBA - Free Report) too.

We also talk about the significant foreign exposure in this index, and why Japanese companies account for such a large portion of the benchmark as well. Finally, we talk about the market cap breakdown for companies in this space, and what could be ahead for this growing area.

If youve been interested in the world of robotics and how to invest in this space, definitely check out this podcast for a great guide to the industry!

Bottom Line

But what do you think about the world of robotics? Is this something youve considered for your portfolio? Make sure to write us in at podcast @ zacks.com or find me on Twitter@EricDutramto give us your thoughts on this, or anything else in the fund market.

But for more news and discussion regarding the world of investing, make sure to be on the lookout forthe next edition of the Dutram Report(each and every Thursday!) and check out themany other great Zacks podcasts as well!

Want key ETF info delivered straight to your inbox?

Zacks free Fund Newsletter will brief you on top news and analysis, as well as top-performing ETFs, each week.Get it free >>

Originally posted here:

Guide to Investing in Robotics Stocks: What's the Future in Automation? - Zacks.com

Automation nation: Which Canadian communities are most at risk? – The Globe and Mail

Nearly half of Canadas work activities could be automated, and the communities most susceptible tend to have smaller populations with an outsize share of manufacturing or natural resources jobs, according to a newreport.

On the other hand, the Canadian areas best insulated from tech disruption include those where hospitals, postsecondary institutions and the public sector are major employers, the Brookfield Institute for Innovation + Entrepreneurshipfinds.

The Toronto-based think tank applied McKinsey & Company data on automation to employment figures from the 2011 census, the most recent account of local labour statistics. (Labour figures from the 2016 census will be released inNovember.)

Census metropolitan areas with a higher share of non-routine work activities were less likely to be disrupted, the reportsays.

For example, one-third of Ottawa-Gatineau employees were working in health care, education services and professional scientific and technical services three industries that rely on human interaction and management. As a result, 44 per cent of the work activities in Ottawa-Gatineau had the potential to be automated, according to the study, making it the second-least susceptible area out of147.

In contrast, one-quarter of Ingersoll, Ont., employees were working in manufacturing and one-fifth in retail, restaurants and accommodation industries with highly repetitive tasks. The study found that 50 per cent of the work in Ingersoll had the potential to be automated, making it the area most at risk in thecountry.

Where does your city rank? Use the searchable table below to find out, or tap the column headings to order thefigures.

Source: BII + E

Read the original here:

Automation nation: Which Canadian communities are most at risk? - The Globe and Mail

Education & Wage Slavery | The Middle Finger Project

Ed-u-ca-tion.

Ah, the sound of the word alone evokes feelings of hope, prosperity, success andwhats that?money, you say? Ah, yes. And money.

We grow up believing that education can defeat all circumstance, transcend social classes, and pave a 24 carat, solid gold nugget path to upward mobility blissdom. Aaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh! (No, that was not a scream, people, those were the angels harmonizing. Clearly.)

And, isnt that the case?

Dont we go to school and get an education to learn, think independently, develop our interests and become all-around badasses? Dont we praise, worship and promote education as the be-all, end-all solution to the worlds worries? Dont we embark on philanthropic missions to spread the good word of education to those that dont have access? Doesnt education equal opportunity? Dont I ask a lot of rhetorical questions?

Were constantly talking about what education can do for us.

Sure, theres plenty that education can do for all of us. But in our flurry of excitement, we fail to recognize that tiny little detail called the law of reciprocity. What, exactly, are we doing for education in return?

The answer: A hell of a lot more than we realize.

Why do you suppose presidents go out of their way to make education a priority? And I quote, from President Obamas website:

Preparing our children to compete in the global economy is one of the most urgent challenges we face.

Sounds noble enough, doesnt it? (Note: This is not a political statement for or against President Obama. Just an example.) As much as wed like to believe that those in power are petitioning for education because theyre good people, or because theyre looking out for our personal well-being, or because they want social equality, or maybe just so we dont look like big, fumbling, sloppy idiots next to the Chineseits a happy little love story, but it isnt the real reason. The real reason is tucked nicely right into that quote up there. See it there? Look closely. See it now?

Economy.

Economy is a fun little word, especially right now. Our economy happens to be based on capitalism. This means that goods, or capital, is traded for profit, and profit is the name of the game. The term capital can encompass many things, but theres one form of capital in particular thats the most important form of all, and guess what?

That capital is YOU.

You probably think of yourself as far more than a mere factor of production,but human beings in a capitalist society are exactly thathuman capital. (Worse, what really stings is that economists refer to human capital as a fungible resource, which basically means that youre interchangeable. Ouch.) Basically, your knowledge contributes to your ability to perform labor, in order to produce economic value. Therefore, more knowledge = more labor = more economic value.

And how do you get more knowledge? Ed-u-ca-tion. (Cue angels.)

This is why education is promoted. And Im sure it comes as no surprise, the link between education and economic value. Weve always grasped that concept on on the surface, but the question is, do we understand what that means? For example, what if its the case that the only education youre receiving is that which contributes to your economic value? Some might argue that it is.

We educate people to perform the functions that are needed, so that they can be productive members of society. Youve heard that phrase before, right? In this sense, within the education system we are essentially a bunch of giant pawns that are manipulated, shaped and formed into what is needed in order to produce, AKA, what is needed in order to make a profit. We arent gaining knowledge for the sake of knowledge; we are gaining specific knowledgethat which is dictated by the elite, with their goals in mind, since they run the education system in the first placein order to perform certain functions later in life. Were being prepared for the work force. Were being primed to produce.

Were being used, in the deepest sense.

From this perspective, the economy doesnt exist to support its people; its people exist to support the economy. The term wage slave has never held more truth.

Lets say a school curriculum emphasizes mathematics over history. (It isnt too often you hear of AP History, do you?) Its highly probable that the students that attend that school will rank mathematics as more important than history. In turn, those people are going to regard jobs that require specialized skills in mathematics as more important than those that require specialized skills in history.

Students are told that jobs in mathematics will mean greater economic opportunities, which may be partly true, but what society gets out of promoting mathematics through the education system is a greater supply of math geniuses. A greater supply of math genius human capital. And a greater supply of math genius human capital translates into a more competitive society. And a more competitive society translates into a more profitable society. And a more profitable societyyou guessed ittranslates into a better economy.

Was the connection clear there?

So lets skip past all the wordy explanations and get down to itbasically, youre busting your ass to learn math so someone at the top can get even richer. Its a hidden curriculum, if you will. Its a case of those in power manipulating schooling to serve their own agenda. The opinions of the majority are formed mainly through education, and the government decides whats taught in an educational setting.

Coincidence? I think not.

The education system is the perfect way to transmit fundamental values necessary for capitalism to be successfulcompetition, individualism, consumerismbecause it has access to children right from the beginning, and for a really, really (really) long time. Its socialization by education. Education is a tool to wield power.

If you need more proof, think back to when schooling first became widespread, when Western nations tried to colonize indigenous peoples, providing them with moral guidance in an attempt to convert them to Western values and norms.

Why?

So Westerners could exploit them by extracting taxes and getting cheap labor, as well as encourage the spread of Western culture and language. Doesnt sound so much like an institution with your best interests in mind, does it? It was about power and money then, and its about power and money now.

But, its pretty hard to reject a piece of the status quo when youve spent your whole life unconsciously perpetuating it.

In school, too often we are taught what to think, not how to think, and theres a fundamental difference. Its crucial to acquire the latter if you want to do big things. Critical thinking skills are lacking, and thats why I blogto encourage it.

Sometimes it makes people uncomfortable, but thats the point. By inspiring critical thought, the hope is to nudge the human race forward, if only just a little bit. Critical thinking leads to action. And if we ever want to shake up the status quo, were going to have to act.

Am I rebelling against capitalism? No. But I am calling for a more conscious awareness of how the world works around usand how it affects us, in turn? Yes.

Am I rebelling against education? No. But am I calling for a broader base of knowledge within the education system? Hell yes.

I get capitalism, but heres the thing:

I dont like being someone elses capitalI want to be my own.

Read the original here:

Education & Wage Slavery | The Middle Finger Project

Modern-day slavery alive in Cambridge as couple refuses wages to domestic worker: AG – Metro US

The Massachusetts Attorney General's Office is cracking down on modern-day slavery, and a Cambridge couple is paying more than $35,000 following allegations they failed to pay a live-in domestic worker who cared for their children.

The story seems to be ripped straight from the cover of a recent Atlantic magazine detailing a family who emigrated (legally) from Southeast Asia, bringing with them a domestic worker who was expected to care for the children and cover basic household duties. The problem? The family never paid the domestic worker.

In Cambridge, married couple Shiou Voon Kayse Foo and Kay Jinn Wong failed to pay minimum wage, overtime and vacation pay, and they failed to comply with the states Domestic Workers Law in connection with their former live-in employee, Attorney General Maura Healey said in a statement.

These individuals exploited their live-in employee by forcing her to work without proper pay, Healey said. Massachusetts has strong laws to protect all workers and ensure they are treated fairly. This should send a message that this conduct is not acceptable, and we will go after those who do not pay their workers properly.

The Attorney Generals Office began investigating Foo and Wong based on a referral from Boston University Law Schools Human Trafficking Clinic in March. The couple, originally from Malaysia, was living in Cambridge and brought their domestic worker with them, whom they had previously employed, to help care for their children and to provide other domestic services.

The investigation revealed that once in Cambridge, Foo and Wong made only sporadic payments and failed to pay their employee for weeks at a time. Foo and Wong have denied any wrongdoing.

Massachusetts law for domestic workers regulates working and rest time, charges for food and lodging and circumstances of termination. The law also requires employers to make and keep records of the hours worked by any domestic worker and provides guidelines for work evaluations and written employment agreements. These protections apply regardless of a domestic worker's immigration status.

Original post:

Modern-day slavery alive in Cambridge as couple refuses wages to domestic worker: AG - Metro US

Jeff Sessions Says Social Media, Encrypted Apps Hamper War on ‘Modern Slavery’ – Reason (blog)

ERIK S. LESSER/EPA/NewscomU.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions told a gathering of more than 1,500 federal, state, and local law enforcement agents that he was ready to follow President Donald Trump's orders and "make our country safe again." For Sessions, that entails "mak[ing] the fight against child exploitation and human trafficking a top priority."

Both were major priorities for the Obama-era Department of Justice and FBI too, so Sessions' bluster is based on a bit of a false premise. But what difference does it makeprioritizing the protection of children and trafficking-victims can't be a bad thing, right?

Alas: When it's done by the likes of the Justice Department, it can be. Beyond all the big talk about saving kids, the agency actually allocates most of its anti-exploitation agenda to arresting adult sex workers and snagging people in stings that involve no actual victims. That is, when it's not aiding in the arrests of exploited children themselves. If Sessions' June 6 speechclosing the National Law Enforcement Training on Child Exploitation meeting in Atlantasignals greater federal investment in status-quo solutions, expect to see even more "human trafficking stings" targeting adults engaged in prostitution, immigrants eligible for deportation, and asset-heavy escort-advertising sites, as well as any broader civil liberties they can plausibly grab along the way.

In Atlanta, Sessions warned of the dangers of "emerging technologies," encrypted-communication platforms, social-networking sites, and "the so-called Darknet." These, he declared, are the tools of such "depraved people" as "child pornographers, sextortionists, and human traffickers."

"We need to help our fellow citizens know what to watch for, and encourage them to tell us when they see something troubling," Sessions urged. "Nothing less than a united effort will be enough to keep our children from becoming victims of exploitation."

Sessions finished his speech by presenting a video on "the importance of recognizing the signs of child sex-trafficking and reporting suspected crimes." It featured the tagline: "Modern day slavery exists. If you see it, report it." Even the aggressively neutral Politico couldn't avoid making drug war comparisons, describing the video as "hearkening back to the D.A.R.E era" with its "hyperbolic language" and its portrait of "a slippery slope of behavior leading to irrevocable consequences."

The idea that every American child is just one smartphone app away from being snatched into sex slavery is absurd, and it bears no relationship to what both anecdotes and data tell us about such matters. But it does make a nice narrative if you want to wage war on pesky encrypted technologies that thwart all sorts of investigators; or to insert more Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security, and FBI agents into community policing; or to get everyone from flight attendants to truck drivers telling federal agents about anyone "suspicious"; or to ensure the continued relevance of an agency whose drug-war glory days are behind it.

As Reason's Matt Welch pointed out in January, the Sessions confirmation hearing featured no lack of hysteria about human trafficking. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California) began her interrogation by asking about sex trafficking, which she called the second-largest criminal industry in Americaa "factually insane claim that will probably give [Sessions] more power," Welch noted:

In order for "human sex trafficking" to be the second largest criminal industry in the United States, it would at minimum need to supplant illegal narcotics (roughly $100 billion a year, according to a 2014 Rand Corp. estimate), or Medicare fraud (in the ballpark of $60 billion, according to the Government Accountability Office in 2015). So distant is reality from those numbers that even the commonly cited figure of $9.8 billion a year for all trafficking and keep in mind that human smuggling dwarfs sex trafficking was given "four Pinocchios" by Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler.

Senators at the confirmation hearing also grilled Sessions on whether pornography is a public health crisis and how open he is to aggressive use of obscenity laws.

Go here to read the rest:

Jeff Sessions Says Social Media, Encrypted Apps Hamper War on 'Modern Slavery' - Reason (blog)

A Myopic View Of Robert E. Lee – National Review

For most of the first century following the American Civil War, histories of the wars legacy particularly the Reconstruction era tended to suffer from the myopia of considering only the relationship between white Northerners and white Southerners. As the war neared its end, some in the Union (like Lincoln and Andrew Johnson, though in very different ways) stressed the need for reconciliation between the Union and the defeated Confederates; other Radical Republicans wanted a more vigorous demonstration of vengeance towards the rebels and their leaders for their treason. The result of looking at the war and its aftermath solely through this framework is that waves of revisionism swung back and forth between views sympathetic to the Radicals desire to remake the South and liberal-sounding histories that condemned them as hard-hearted zealots insistent on prolonging the nations divisions, and that painted Reconstruction as a cesspool of corruption. The latter type of history was largely responsible for the bad historical reputation of Ulysses S. Grants Radical-friendly presidency. It also colored denunciations of the impeachment of Andrew Johnson (although Johnson, who was wrong about Reconstruction, was right about the specific dispute at issue in the impeachment.) You can still catch a whiff of this latter view in the chapters on that era in John F. Kennedys Profiles in Courage.

The problem with the how hard should we have been on the Confederates debate is simple: it leaves black people out of the picture. Thats a rather large omission. The Civil War was not, as some would have you believe, fought only over the issue of slavery; it was the culmination of a series of disputes over ideas and policies, and seeing the war as a crusade to free the slaves was never more than the view of a sizeable minority faction in the North. Even Lincoln was willing, all the way to 1865, to make some concessions on the pace of abolition in order to end the war and preserve the Union. But slavery was unquestionably the main cause of the rupture between North and South, without which there would have been no war. The debates and resolutions adopted by Southern states when they seceded made it extraordinarily clear that the South was leaving mainly to protect the institution of slavery. (Moreover, many of the secondary disputes between the two sides were connected to the nature of the Southern slave economy). And in the debates over Reconstruction, the civil and economic rights of the freed slaves were a crucial battleground, one on which Northern Republicans fought long and hard for a decade before exhaustedly surrendering in 1876 in exchange for control of the White House.

If you have only ever read treatments of the life of Robert E. Lee that suffer from the myopic exclusion of black people, Adam Serwers latest piece in The Atlantic could offer you a useful corrective. But Serwer suffers from his own myopia.

Lee was widely revered in his own day even by his adversaries partly for being a great general, and partly as a paragon of a great many virtues valued by the (white) American society of his time. Serwer offers to add to that picture both a reminder that Lee shared the retrograde racial attitudes of his time and that the cause Lee fought for was inseparable in every particular from slavery. (He offers as one example the fact that Lee would not engage in prisoner of war exchanges that treated captured black Union soldiers as prisoners of war rather than escaped property). He also notes that Lees role as a postwar conciliator must be balanced against his continuing opposition to black civil rights, a movement that would mature into the full horror of Jim Crow within a few years of Lees 1870 death. If Serwer stopped there, hed be on solid enough ground.

But intent on attacking every aspect of Lees memory, Serwer keeps going. First, he berates Lee for the grand-strategic decision to wage a conventional war against the Union:

Despite his ability to win individual battles, his decision to fight a conventional war against the more densely populated and industrialized North is considered by many historians to have been a fatal strategic error.

This echoes a May 19 op-ed by Michael Rosenwald in the Washington Post, tendentiously titled The truth about Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee: He wasnt very good at his job, which chose to level the same charge at the same time, probably for the same reason:

Outmanned, Lee should have taken a more defensive posture, drawing the North into difficult Southern terrain. Instead, he was constantly on the offensive, which resulted in heavy casualties and broken spirits.

Its true that the Confederacys grand strategy in the war was badly flawed. Indeed, the decision to wage the war at all was insane: the Confederacy was far less of a match in manpower or industry for the Union than the Thirteen Colonies had been relative to Great Britain in 1775, and unlike the colonists, the Confederacy didnt have an ocean between themselves and their adversaries. The Confederate cause could succeed only if it was vastly better-led than the Union, and thanks in large part to Lee, it managed to pull that off for the first two and a half years of the war.

However, Serwers attack on Lee as a strategist completely ignores two vital points. One, Lee wasnt in charge of grand strategy, and in reality wasnt even a theater commander until June of 1862, when he was put in charge of the Army of Northern Virginia in time to halt a Union advance on the Confederate capital of Richmond. Lee had spent the year before that fighting relatively peripheral battles and supervising the construction of defensive trenches around Richmond. The Confederacy was a democracy, and its elected government was headed by Jefferson Davis, a West Point graduate, former Secretary of War and a colonel in the Mexican War who took an active role in military strategy. It wasnt Lee who decided to locate the new capital so close to the Union lines, necessitating the commitment of extensive resources to defend Eastern Virginia. It was Davis and his government, not Lee, who imposed the political imperatives that drove Confederate strategy.

More broadly, Serwer wholly fails to consider the moral consequences of a purely defensive war of Fabian retreats and guerilla fighting on Confederate turf. Such a war which Lee never wanted during the war, and which he rejected as a path of insurgency after Appomattox would have been one of scorched earth and embitterment, not only wrecking the South even in victory but making any permanent reconciliation vastly more difficult in defeat. The human toll of such a war could be seen from the places where it had erupted during the Revolution, like North Carolina. Sherman would ultimately bring scorched earth to Georgia, and the results hardly recommend a deliberate strategy to invite that for the entire war.

Related to this is how little credit he gives Lees eminence and gentlemanly surrender for preventing a long-term insurgency, avoiding an aftermath like the French Revolution, and enabling the country to return to being a single, functional political whole in time enough to see the vast rise in American prosperity and power between 1870 and 1945. If the old histories of Reconstruction were myopic in forgetting African-Americans, Serwers view is myopic in considering no one else, not even the majority of the population. Looking back at Jim Crow, he cannot see how anything could have been worse, why national reconciliation after the war had any value, or why anyone would have wanted peace in the America of 1865-76. We can use the distance of history to judge the national decision to fight no further, but we should have some understanding of what costs the people of the day had paid already, and what they spared by laying down the sword.

In fact, Lees willingness after the war to subordinate the interests of freed slaves to the cause of union and peace was not so radically different from the view that Lincoln himself took during the war. All the way up to the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865, Lincoln had held onto the view that some concessions on slavery (albeit fewer as the war wore on) could be exchanged for restoring the nation. That doesnt make Lee the moral equal of Lincoln, but the Americans of that day did not see things in the same terms we do now.

Lee was no hero; he fought for an unjust cause, and he lost. Unlike the Founding Fathers (even the slaveholders among them), he failed the basic test of history: leaving the world better and freer than he found it. And while he was not responsible for the Souths strategic failures, his lack of strategic vision places him below Grant, Sherman and Winfield Scott in any assessment of the wars greatest generals. We should not be building new monuments to him, but if we fail to understand why the men of his day revered him, we are likelier to fail to understand who people revere today, and why. And tearing down statues of Lee today is less about understanding the past than it is a contest to divide the people of todays America, and see who holds more power. Thats no better an attitude today than it was in Lees day.

As much as I value history understanding it is essential to understanding our own world today one should be suspicious of people looking to make a contemporary political cause out of the American Civil War, the most bloody and divisive episode in our nations past. The results are often more racial division and less understanding of history. Serwers interest in attacking General Lee is transparently about the present, not the past. That myopia is how he ends up down a blind alley.

See more here:

A Myopic View Of Robert E. Lee - National Review

What Pro Wrestling Would Look Like Under Socialism – Paste Magazine

Can pro wrestling, a medium with a history of bare-faced antagonism towards leftist politics, exist under socialism?

I think its contingent on the degree to which wrestlers and others in the business identify with the working class.

Its a spectrum. On one end, you have Zack Sabre Jr, who speaks out against neoliberalism and recently raised money for the ACLU. On the other, you have Matt Striker, who was, as I was writing this, using Twitter to mock the reporter assaulted by Greg Gianforte, a Montana Republican who was subsequently elected to Congress, and speak against a living wage for fast food workers.

Where there isnt wrestling, people will create their own. Ive seen enough lips busted on trampoline frames to know this. Whether or not we can develop a class consciousness within this industry will determine whether we have to start from scratch or if that knowledge, training and character that we identify with pro wrestling now will be preserved in this new iteration.

This isnt to downplay the irrevocable influences on wrestling that socialism would have. They are substantial, perhaps even drastic. Still, I think theyre necessary to ensure that the compassionate, sustainable future we advocate for is extended to wrestling (a thing many leftists love, often despite ourselves).

Longer Careers, Shorter Title Reigns

Whatever shape the political apparatus of a socialist America takes, its safe to say that industries and business will be run as worker co-ops, directed and managed democratically by the workers. Theres no reason wrestling would be the exception.

With the abolition of rent and wage labor, the incentive to grind your knees down on multiple house shows a week will be low. And everyone will be involved in local committee projects anyway; theyll need those knees to build houses and plant arugula.

How would you book yourself if you were focused on longevity? More tag matches, triple threats, battle royals. More chances to do spots and wow crowds while getting a few breathers in the corner.

Those add up to a longer, if less illustrious, career. Legacies like Hulk Hogan, Ric Flair and Kazuchika Okada are the result of a singular vision focused on capital. Titles, if they exist, could become a means of collective recognition of labor and talent.

In theory, at least. If you, say, had a habit of defecating in your co-workers gym bags in the previous regime, youre probably gonna be voted to lose. A lot.

The Tag Title Will Become The Top Title

The structures of wrestling reflect our values. The great man babyface perceives that being himself, by himself, reflects American ideals of individualism, distrust of teamwork, and frustration at the weak-willed, ineffectual governing apparatus that exists only to fetter their attempts to win custody of their adopted son.

A collectivist wrestling company living in a collectivist society will reflect that in its booking. An example of this would be CHIKARAs Campeonatas de Parajas, a tag title that preceded its equivalent of a world title by 5 years; I see a correlation in the increasing prestige of a top singles title with the CHIKARA brands transition from that of a local, community-supported indie fed to a destination for indie talent from all over the world.

Its possible this will extend beyond tag teams, and that wrestling promotions will break out into rival factions of varying alignments, like NJPW has right now. For one, it accurately reflects political discourse in a multi-tendency, big tent organization like the DSA.

On that note, it never fails to crack me up to see Bullet Club, a faction formed to antagonize a homogenous, xenophobic society with multiculturalism, in the Twitter avatars of white nationalists.

A Return To Rasslin

Wrestling has long run on a particular cycle of acquisition. The big companies see a trend in the smaller that they want to appropriate, and then buy up all the wrestlers they can who fit that trend, incorporating it into the mainstream style and forcing the remaining indies to find something new. CCK subtly references to this occurring to the new British style in their recent promo for PROGRESS.

Without this engine of imposition, the need for a rapidly developed diversity of hyper-specialized wrestling styles will be low. And some wrestlers, a demographic that leans hard to the right, will just quit the sport entirely. Less knowledge to be passed on to wrestlers who work less matches and travel less.

That will facilitate a return to basics. More rasslin, more catch-as-catch-can, more literal amateur hour.

I think this can be good. Part of what makes Lucha Underground, Hoodslam and Party World Rasslin beautiful is their ability to reach people who dont necessarily identify as wrestling fans by focusing on crafting their own narratives and culture instead of maintaining a certain fluency in current wrestling trends. Another part: they make Jim Cornette mad.

The Revolution At Ringside

What does it mean to distribute wealth? A capitalist might say Its whenever I have $2 and you have $0, you take $1 from me to make it even. Which isnt inaccurate.

A more fleshed out realization of it (in the simplest terms) would be if, whenever you have $2 and I have $0, I take that $1 while we work to abolish the things that require money (rent, lack of food access, etc) and then the money, now evenly distributed, is worthless.

So, in an economy that is in the process of, or has even completed the destruction of currency, who gets the best seats in the house? Maybe its the workers. Maybe its the syndicate or commune that collectively own the stadium.

I like to think that, if we use the Marxist axiom of from each according to their ability to each according to their need, we could start giving those ringside seats to the people who need them mostkids, seniors, disabled people.

Whatever we decide, it means some tall asshole in an nWo shirt who refuses to sit down cant block your view and ruin the show. We call that improving material conditions.

In Soviet America, Ref Bumps You

Pro wrestling referees are the definition of failing upward. Theyre prized for their incompetence, cowardice and impotent biases.They largely exist to prevent the face from achieving their goals or enact justice on heels.

This is what people like Vince McMahon and your neighbor who watches too much Fox News thinks about institutions who want to hold people to playing by the rules: weak-willed, easily circumvented, and unable to do whats necessary to bring the ill-willed to heel.

The process by which we achieve socialism in America would fundamentally change this systemic perception of justice. A bloodless grassroots revolution could lead to referees being heroic mediators who desperately try to keep carnage from all sides from boiling over.

An authoritarian vanguard could mean referees who impose order through force. A multi-tendency revolution could lead to sectarian refs endlessly feuding over slight variations of ideology.

Not all of these outcomes would necessarily make the product compelling. Thats the bad news.

The good news is the abolition of wages means thered be no one to sell contraband t-shirts to, so Earl Hebner can have his job back.

In a capitalist system, projects and institutions exist according to their capacity to generate (and/or extract) capital. If socialism is enacted in the United States, it will fundamentally change the social contract and conditions by which industries and institutions function. Anything you want to preserve amidst such a sea change needs a plan of adaptation.

If the thought of adjusting pro wrestling to accommodate a socialist society fills you with disgust or rage, I think its worth interrogating whether your attachment is actually to wrestling or to the society it reflects (before you answer: remember, we are revolting against that society).

Whatcha gonna do, comrade, when the proletariat dismantles the systems of exploitation running wild on you?

Jetta Rae is a writer and organizer based in Oakland. She runs the leftist food blog FRY HAVOC and can be found on Twitter.

Read the original post:

What Pro Wrestling Would Look Like Under Socialism - Paste Magazine

Stop unnecessary port charges Shipping lines urged – Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

The Ghana House of Port Agents (GHOPA), a group of importers, has asked shipping companies at the Tema port to bring an end to excessive charges on imported goods.

According to the group, since the announcement of the abolition of the 1% Special Import Levy by the Akufo-Addo-led government, owners of shipping lines have introduced new charges at the port.

A statement issued by the group said: On 2nd March, 2017, during the maiden budget statement of President Akufo Addos government presented by Hon Ken Ofori-Atta, we [GHOPA] developed a very strong confidence in the government, having the belief that some of the abolished taxes were going to help us unleash our fabulous policies to help redeem the image of businesses in our nation especially at the port in our various fields of work. Ever since those taxes were abolished, there have been a whole lot of unnecessary charges at the port by the shipping lines of which we [GHOPA] and the freight forwarders, as well as the importers, are not happy about.

Some of those charges that we [GHOPA] believe are unnecessary are: cleaning of container charges, container security charges, demurrage on public holidays, Saturdays and Sundays. What saddens our hearts most is the fact that they dont even work on weekends [Saturdays and Sundays] as well as on public holidays, meanwhile GPHA also charges on the same consignment (security fee)

Again, shipping lines like CMA Line, Maersk Line, Pacific International Line (PIL), and Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) always delay in issuance of their invoices especially when their system goes down and at the end of the day we are being charged for their own technical issues which caused the breakdown of their system. And their demurrage charges are too much. They charge as high as USD100 per day which we think is just too much.

In conclusion, we the Ghana House of Port Agents [GHOPA] wish to convey through this press release that we are pleading with the government, Ministry of Trade and Industry, and other bodies concerned to do something to put an end to all the unnecessary charges at the shipping lines in a month else we will advise ourselves either embarking on a massive demonstration against all the bodies including the government or the law court.

In a subsequent interview with Chief Jerry Forson, host of Ghana Yensom on Accra100.5FM on Wednesday, June 7, Prince Kofi Buamah, Public Relations Officer of the group, said: We are appealing to the government to focus its attention on the shipping lines because they are hurting our businesses at the Tema port. We cannot trust the Shippers Council to deal with this issue because we have put several of our issues before them but they havent handled them properly.

Ampadu Siaw, Secretary of the Secondhand Spare Parts Dealers Association, also commenting on the matter, commended the group for raising the matter.

Also speaking on the show, he said: I will commend them, it is a fight that all of us must support because it affects us. The leadership of spare parts dealers will be meeting on this and see how we can also involve ourselves in this matter.

As for Ghana Shippers Council, they are not serving our interests, they are serving their own interests because most of the issues that come before them are not addressed. Source: GhanaWeb

Link:

Stop unnecessary port charges Shipping lines urged - Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

Corbyn’s quiet revolution – Camden New Journal newspapers website

Jeremy Corbyn

AS members of Holborn and St Pancras constituency we would like to endorse the experience and feelings of optimism that other members and activists of the Labour Party around the country have spoken about.

What we are seeing when we go door to door on estates in Camden is a renewal of interest in politics across generations.

This is a remarkable phenomenon given the really hard times the many have had to put up with because of the enforced austerity policies of the last 10 years, alongside watching the wealth of the few grow like its on hormones.

Given that austerity and its terrible twin children, enforced debt and political disillusionment, have hit the youngest the hardest, their willingness to join the party in tens of thousands and get involved is wonderfully inspiring. We also have a new social movement, Momentum, that has been integral to the repositioning of socialism as the beating heart and soul of the party.

With this quiet revolution on the estates and in the streets is the transformation of the Labour Party into a mass membership organisation since Jeremy Corbyn was elected leader. It has quadrupled in size to become the biggest socialist party in Europe.

Some of the new members are returnees but many are young people energised by the hope, optimism and decency of Jeremy Corbyn practising a kind of politics that they have not seen intheir lifetime.

His vision of socialism represents a break from the war-torn neo-liberalism of the last 30 years. He has provided a life-support system to insecure, indebted, despairing people and laid out in the manifesto a blueprint for restoring society to full health.

Knocking on doors on council estates in Somers Town, Kentish Town, Gospel Oak and other working class areas of Camden, we find people enthusiastic about the policies of building one million homes to deal with the chronic shortage; renationalising our overpriced railways and other key utilities that we all rely on, properly funding both schools that nurture our young and the NHS that cares for us when were ill, and ending insecurity at work with the abolition of zero-hours contracts and the strengthening of trade union and employment rights.

These are improvements that benefit the 99 per cent, so selling the manifesto has not been difficult. A lot of voters tell us that for once they have a clear choice between more of the same and a chance to change direction.

Every Labour MP has an unprecedented number of party, Momentum and trade union activists helping in the campaign. It is face-to-face contact that is the most influential component in getting across policies, especially for a party like Labour that, while it has trade union support, has very few friends in the mainstream media and cannot rely on rich oligarchs to pay for infinite amounts of advertising and publicity.

People talking to each other is how well win this election and it is Jeremy Corbyns leadership that has led to hundreds of thousands joining and rejoining, enabling us to do this.

There is a world to win, a world where the unleashed creativity and imagination of everyone in our society is given the opportunity to flower and contribute, where co-operation not greed characterise us, where the young and old are cherished not impoverished, and where all feel valued, not just the few.

PHIL VASILI, Highgate, Holborn and St Pancras CLP SARAH WISE, Bloomsbury and Kings Cross, Holborn and St Pancras CLP SAM GISAGARA, Primrose Hill, Holborn and St Pancras CLP AMANDA SEBESTYEN, Highgate branch, Holborn and St Pancras CLP SHEZAN DIN RENNY, Highgate, Holborn and St Pancras CLP PAUL RENNY, Highgate, Holborn and St Pancras CLP JO ROSTRON, Primrose Hill, Holborn and St Pancras CLP LINDA SAYLE, Bloomsbury and Kings Cross, Holborn and St Pancras CLP ZULMA WICKENDEN, Highgate, Holborn and St Pancras CLP PETE WICKENDEN, Highgate, Holborn and St Pancras CLP REBEKAH BALL, Highgate, Holborn and St Pancras CLP MABEL SUMNER, Highgate, Holborn and St Pancras CLP SIMON GUNN, Highgate, Holborn and St Pancras CLP

More:

Corbyn's quiet revolution - Camden New Journal newspapers website

Menard introduces new Assistant Principal – KALB News (press release)

ALEXANDRIA, La. (Holy Savior Menard High School) - Holy Savior Menard Central High School will have a new face helping lead the way when the students return. New to Menard, but not to high quality education, Dwayne Lemoine has over 30 years of educational leadership experience in central Louisiana.

With core beliefs that center around transformative education, civic responsibility and personal empowerment, Menard will benefit from Lemoines strategic background and vision. Menard Principal, Joel Desselle, is looking forward to working with Lemoine because of his proven track record in this region.

As Superintendent of Avoyelles Parish, Dwayne helped create a system for significant academic and social growth of more than 6,000 students and maintained a balanced budget in a district where the per pupil funding is one of the lowest in the state. During his tenure as Principal of Pineville High School, Lemoine led the school to become the highest performing public high school in the district, as well as provided direction and guidance for the design and construction of a new $14 million-dollar school facility.

A Master of Education degree from Northwestern State University and many years of coaching and teaching experience, along with numerous awards and honors make Lemoine a uniquely qualified candidate to join the Menard family and continue raising the standards of excellence that have been established throughout the 125 years of Catholic secondary education in central Louisiana.

According to Lemoine, I am grateful and honored to be given the opportunity to work with the Holy Savior Menard community in advancing the school's mission."

Welcome to the Holy Savior Menard family Mr. Lemoine.

Read the original:

Menard introduces new Assistant Principal - KALB News (press release)

Heathen community continues the struggle to distance themselves … – The Wild Hunt

UNITED STATES Whentwo men were fatally stabbed and another injured on a Portland train in May, officials and journalists began to follow the predictable course of profiling the attacker in an effort to understand why he would resort to such actions. After a few short days, severalsources began to speculate on his Heathen religious practice, more specifically on Odinism.

This assumption rests squarely on Facebook posts made the attacker over the past year. On May 9, he wrote, Hail Vinland!! Hail Victory!!

[Photo credit: Paul Walker.]

The term Vinland has more recently become a rallying point for white supremacist groups and has been used in the naming of related organizations, such as the Wolves of Vinland. In a post last fall, the Oregon attacker wrote, I Hereby Solemnly swear to Die trying to Kill Hillary (Herself a filthy Murderess) Clinton and Donald Trump should they be elected to the post of President in my faire country on Vinland [sic].

The ideological meaning placed onVinland in these cases is not entirely dissimilar from the Trump administrations call to make America great again. At their core, both rallying cries center around a false nostalgia, hearkening back to a time whenlife was allegedly better than it is today, and promising that a return tothat illustrious time would fix all modern problems. Although similar, one cry is far more openly extreme than the other.

Along with using Vinland,the Portland attacker has alsoreferenced other Pagan or Heathen terminology, and has suggested that he harbors polytheist beliefs.According to one news report, he was introduced to such religiouspractices while in prison for another crime.

Most recently, in an Apr. 19 post, the stabber wrote, May all the Gods Bless Timothy McVeigh and then quoted William Ernest Henleys poem Invictus. In an earlier post he says hed like to put an end to the monotheist question, threatening to kill All Zionist Jews, All Christians who do not follow Christs teaching of Love, Charity, and Forgiveness.

As the mainstream media continued to follow the line of reasoning that the attacker was indeed an Odinist, various Heathen organizations issued statements in response to theseclaims.

The Trothcondemned the attack, reflecting on the need for in-prison military services.Mallory Brooks, program coordinator for the organizationsIn-Reach Heathen Prison Services, wrote: Our hearts go out to the targets and victims of last Fridays attack. The alleged perpetrator brought shame to our religion and, in the eyes of many, to our gods and goddesses. This is unacceptable.

Heathens United Against Racisms statement offered its support to the family, adding that the Portland Killer is our communitys responsibility, and we must do everything we can to prevent it from happening again.

The Portland Killers actions didnt happen in a vacuum, reads HUARs statement. In an environment where hate-speech is being normalized and promoted, it tends to bubble over into violence.

Both the statements from the Troth and HUAR work from the assumption that the man was indeed Heathen in some way, and send out acall to action to the greater Heathen community to join in the fight to stop theuse of Norse mythology and related modern religions to justify extremist violence. Their pleas are not unlike those often found in the Muslim community.

However, not all Heathens were convinced that this man was actually co-religionist. Wild Hunt writer and author of The Norse Mythology Blog Karl E. H. Seigfried told a reporter that the stabbers various Facebook rants invoke Lilith (Jewish), Tiamat (Babylonian), and Lucifer. His oath to Odin, Kali, Bastet and all other Pagan Gods and Goddesses in my Aryan Theosophical Nucleus concludes by invoking Jesus Christ and Bernie Sanders.

He goes on to argue: This muddles together Norse, Hindu, Egyptian, Christian, and Jewish figures with an unsectarian body of seekers whose founder was baptized in the Russian Orthodox Church.

To pick one thread out of this insane tapestry and declare it to be the religious determiner of [] hate would be nonsensical.

Seigfried makes a point. Over the past year, the stabber posted information aboutancient Egyptian gods and goddesses; he called specifically to Gaia, Kali Ma, and even Jesus. On Apr. 28 he wrote, Until you cross that line then nothing will stop our come to Jesus talk friend or foe. If our come to Jesus talk fails you will face the come to Lucifer talk.

The only term that stands out as repetitive is Vinland, which has become interwoven in contemporarywhite supremacist ideology, independent of religious practice. As Seigfried suggests, this points directly to the question of whether or not this man actually practices any form of religious Heathenry.

Are the stabbers words simply the markings of a supremacist viewpoint? If so, another question arises. Shouldthe use of Norse mythology simply as symbolism or as a coating for extremist ideology, rather than as true religion, be enough to pushHeathens into action? Is the attacker their responsibility, as suggested by HUAR and the Troth?

This is where the proverbial waters are muddied, and the Heathen communitys struggle becomes increasingly difficult. Publicly speaking, connections are being made between the religious practice, the mythology, and extremists acts. Picking them apart is not always easy.

In 2015, the Richmond Dispatcher asked the question: are white supremacists in prison using a Pagan religion to radicalize young men? The article was written after the FBI broke up a ring of men who were plottingto attack a number of synagogues and black churches in Virginia. The article posits that there has been a growing number of Odinists and Asatruar in the prison system, but it also notes that there is a growing number of white supremacists.

The analysis provides no speculation on where the intersections between religious beliefs and extremist views lie, and how the reported statistics correlate. Which ideology is bredfirst? Do white supremacists find Odinism? Or do Odinists find white supremacy? It is a chicken-and-egg question.

In the recent Troth statement, Brooks explains: Racist groups within prisons often engage in bullying tactics to instill fear into inmates who do not hold such views, and the racists rhetoric and dominance cause them to be the Heathens most visible to the correctional officers, chaplains, and administrators, who often do not understand the dynamics at play.

As such, the racists become who defines Heathenry in many of these facilities.

Brooks believes that a better, stronger, and more extensive Heathen prison ministry can help clarify the divide and support inmates, who are genuinely interested in the religion, from getting caught up in the game being played by supremacists.

As suggested by the above article, Heathenry, in these radicalizedforms, is reportedly attracting a large number of young men, which issimilar to reports on Islamic extremism.

Dr. Jennifer Snook, lecturer of sociology at Grinnell college, speculates: White supremacists are attracted to it []sometimes, but often just because theyve seen the show Vikings, and it allows them to enact a hypermasculine performance while appealing to their (imagined) super-white Northern European bloodlines a source of perceived privilege and status when other avenues of power (economic, political, manhood) begin to feel cut off.

It is a way for these young men to find personal empowerment within a contemporary and changing landscape.Snook explainsthat this says more about the supremacists than the religion, and she adds that the connection is nothing new.

There is historical precedent for white supremacists (think: Third Reich) to co-opt images of Germanic warriors, gods and heroes in an appeal to the epic past (think: Wagner). Norse mythology is the cultural inheritance of Northern Europe the whitest of white folks. Its also perceived as untarnished by Christians which is completely untrue (the stories were recorded by monks, after all) which white supremacists view as a desert religion for the racial other. Add to that an overdose of hypermasculinity, and youve got quite a mess.

As Snook suggests, the connection between the extremist ideology and symbolic presence of Norse mythology is obvious when placed in an historical context. However, what about the modern practice of Norse-basedreligions? In the suggested framework, these religions have become victims, being pulled unwittingly into a universe of hate.

Theincrease in white supremacy isnt a Heathen problem, its an American problem, Snook says. It indicates more about the current political climate in the United States than anything that Heathens are doing or saying.

Snooks comment returns to the question of responsibility; a question that canbe posed to any religious subgroup. Are violent extremists, who openly claim or use a religion to justify violence, the responsibility of the rest of that religious community, even if the extremist is not practicing?

As suggested by the recent public statements, the members of both HUAR and the Troth believe that it is their responsibility. Bothpublic opinion and the consistent media focus on the connection between Heathenry and extremism has significantly affected the work and lives of many Heathens worldwide. It keeps Heathen writers such as Seigfried and Snook busy with interview requests from mainstream journalists. This conflation wasthe catalyst for the formation of groups,such as theAlliance for Inclusive Heathenry, Heathens against Hate, and HUAR.

One interviewee who wished to remain anonymouskeeps his religious practice hidden from coworkers and superiors, not because hes worried about being labeled a devil worshiper, but because he is concerned, due to the public opinion, that hell be called white supremacist.

The reality of the situation has placed the Heathen community in the uncomfortable position of perpetual defense, waging a monthly, weekly and sometimes even daily public relations battle to protect and defend their religion against a minority of people who are using Norse mythology to define their ideology, whether or not they practice the religion.

This social problem shows no signs of ending; the Oregon attack is just another example in a long line of similar cases. Heathen organizations continue to remainvigilant with regard to the public relations issues, as well as suggesting proactive strategies to curb the problem.

HUAR is encouraging all Heathen groups and individuals to create and enforce anti-discrimination/anti-harassment statements.

With regard to her prison work, Brooks has said, We ultimately want to be able to bridge a gap to help both the Chaplains and inmates understand that they dont have to give into the hate. There are other ways and they dont have to follow the crowd. This is truly the hardest part of prison outreach.

We will not give up and we will not give in.

Visit link:

Heathen community continues the struggle to distance themselves ... - The Wild Hunt

Gina Yoryet: English Language Programs in Guadalajara – The Story Exchange

Name:Gina Yoryet

Business:Lingua Professional Services

Location:Guadalajara, Mexico

Industry:Education & Training

Reason for starting? My main reason for starting is because I want to help more people achieve their educational goals. One of my main concerns is the immigration issue in the U. S. Many peoples futures are at stake.My main interest is to help minority groups to find a professional and personal purpose through their hidden and many times unrecognized skills. I want to be part of their personal, social, spiritual, professional, and financial empowerment by finding their passion and using it to thrive.

I grew up in California, but thirteenyears ago I had to return to Mxico. Like many Mexicans, I was unfortunately denied permanent residency. When I came to Guadalajara, I was at a loss because my only world was the U. S. Although Mxico is my country of birth, I was oblivious to the system, I didnt know anyone, I went through emotional, financial, professional and personal hardship. My family and I moved to the U. S. in search of a better life. When I had finally defined my professional goals, reality hit me and before I could even react to it, I was told that I could no longer remain in the U. S. When I came to Mxico I was told that all the prior credits/classes didnt count towards my B. A. and I had to retake all my classes with the according recognition here in Mxico. Since I was denied that opportunity, I got motivated to help others. Thats why my business is geared towards education. I am certain that the right time and place to get my degree will come for me.

Related:Read about another entrepreneur working in the education field here.

How do you define success? Success is not simply a matter of skill acquisition. It involves a process of personal deconstruction and reconstruction in dealing with each student, client and individuals case, prior history, needs, priorities and objectives. This means that I must constantly evaluate my personal values, motives and goals, and I must be willing to make any necessary changes in order to evolve as a professional. My goal is to genuinely be of assistance to others, entice them and persuade them to reach towards a better and more promising tomorrow to reach wholeness.

Since 2006 Ive helped hundreds of Middle School, High School, College, University students, as well as entrepreneurs in reaching their goal; to improve their English in order to qualify for scholarships, grants, and be able to study abroad, mainly in the U. S., Canada, or other English speaking countries. We assist many people in Standarized College Testing, Advanced Composition, Medical Writing, Business Writing, Cover Letter, CV writing support, among others.Im very fulfilled because I share an igniting passion thatll help me achieve my own education goal. I am certain that by helping them, I am helping myself by gaining more business, education experience to complete my MBA before 2020 (one of my personal goals). This huge worldwide education need has made me more aware of the needs of our society as a whole, and philanthropy is one of my greatest passions.

Biggest success:Follow my fundamentals. Playing with words (writing) is first and foremost fundamental to my success. Writing was first a dream, then it became a passion and that passion then became areality. One of my testimonials and greatest achievements, is my blogin which all my emotions and achievements are channeled. For me it is a success being able to write in a language that is not my native language and being able to use that passion to help others.

What is your top challengeand how you have addressed it?My top challenge has been the culture and business mindset of people in Mexico. Guadalajara is by far, the most difficult city/state to establish long-lasting business relationships in. Doing business is not as straightforward as it is in the U. S., Canada, or other foreign countries. The bureaucracy involved makes everything take much longer than needed, which makes sales and growing a small business as an individual entity very difficult. I have educated myself through workshops, networking, meetings. I have invested money to learn how to get around that and to further understand the business mentality in this end. I have slowly learned but I still find it difficult.

Although I am Mexican, I am missing that part of how they conduct business. Because although Ive had to cross many barriers, and start from the bottom, I have not been daunted by those hurdles and I have not acquiesced my circumstances to dictate my fate. Also because in spite of not having a college degree yet, I have overturned that and other unfortunate life events, Ive instead invested thousands of pesos in my own education, despite not having a college degree yet. Im TEFL and Teaching English for a Specific Purpose Certified, FPELE Spanish as a Foreign Language Certified. I am also a Professional Translator/Interpreter and Ive published one book through the International Womens Leadership Association. As a result of that, I dont set any limitations when it comes to reaching my goals.And because through my skills, I am able to help others achieve their goals. Part of my work is charity work, so I help those who lack the financial means to accomplish that. Real living is living for others. Realize that anything you want in life can be obtained.

Related: TSE Quick Take: Why Womens Businesses Remain Stubbornly Small

Who is your most important role model?Ive had a role models since my early adolescence. When I was 14, Sandra Pizarro from my Latina Leadership Network Group.Currently, My friend Ann Whiting, an American woman whos lived Guadalajara since 1960 and whos done so much for our society. Shes been the founder of many important institutions here. Nelly Galan from the Adelante Movement andSister Madonna Buderare also role models. Every woman who has undergone constant hardship, but in spite of that, has never given up is a role model for me.

Edited by The Story Exchange

Posted: June 8, 2017

Original post:

Gina Yoryet: English Language Programs in Guadalajara - The Story Exchange

Spektral raises $2.8 million for development of AI-powered green screen technology – TechCrunch


TechCrunch
Spektral raises $2.8 million for development of AI-powered green screen technology
TechCrunch
The augmented reality acquisition space is hot Facebook, Snap, Apple and others are throwing money at teams and technologies that promise to increase user engagement. Spektral, a Danish startup, is the latest venture-backed visual effects company ...

and more »

Read more:

Spektral raises $2.8 million for development of AI-powered green screen technology - TechCrunch

Technology Will Erase JobsBut Also Make Everything Cheap or Free – Singularity Hub

At an event about how technology is shaping the future of money, it seems counterintuitive to talk about a future where technology has mostly done away with the need for money to live.

But thats the future Peter Diamandis envisions.

At Singularity Universitys Exponential Finance Summit in New York this week, Diamandis talked about the broad and specific trends he believes are leading to a demonetized world.

Its no secret that technology is threatening to take away jobs. For all the talk about robots working alongside humans rather than replacing them altogether, automations higher efficiency, lower costs, and increasing capability mean eventually workers will be removed from the equation in many jobs.

No one wants to be replaced by a machine, but theres a silver lining.

The counterbalance to technological unemployment, Diamandis said, is the demonetization of livingin other words, pretty much everything we need and do in our day-to-day lives is becoming radically cheaper, if not free, and technologys making it happen.

The most obvious and tangible example of this phenomenon is, of course, the smartphone. 20 years ago, we had a bunch of different things that each performed a single function: a camera took pictures, a flashlight lit up the dark, a TV was for watching shows, a VCR played movies, a boom box played music, and so on and so forth.

Now we have all that and more in the palm of our hands. More significantly, though, we got most of it for far less than in the past. If, Diamandis said, you add up the cost of all that hardware 20 years ago, youre looking at thousands of dollarsnow reduced to a few hundred. Similarly, the average smartphone being microfinanced for $50 in developing nations holds millions of dollars worth of software.

Demonetization is the fourth of Diamandis six Ds of technological disruption, happening after digitization but before democratization. Taking money out of the equation for a given product or service is a key part of making that product or service available to everyone.

Below are just a few of the examples Diamandis gave of demonetization he sees across various industries.

If you dont have a smartphone or computer, you cant have your data collectedand companies want your data. They want it so badly theyll soon be giving smartphones away, specifically in the areas of the world where the vast majority of would-be consumers arent online yet.

We used to drive to Blockbuster and pay a few dollars to rent one movie. Now we can pay a low flat rate and watch as many movies and shows as we want each month. Or we can watch stuff for free; YouTube streams millions of hours of free video per day.

The poorest countries in the world are the sunniest countries in the world, and solar power is becoming cheaper than coal. That means ultra-cheap electricity in developing nations.

When you own a car you have to pay for fuel, parking, insurance, tolls, and maintenancenot to mention buying the car itself. On-demand ride apps like Lyft and Uber are changing the way people get around and making it cheaper for them to do so. Why pay all that money for your own car when theres a service to get you from point A to point B at a fraction of the cost? Electric autonomous cars will disrupt transportation even more.

Self-driving cars will change the housing market by enabling people to commute from farther away more easily. Housing itself will get cheaper thanks to large-scale 3D printing.

The XPRIZE foundation recently launched its Global Learning XPRIZE. Participants are tasked with creating a software package that can take a group of illiterate kids to full literacy in 18 months. This sort of software will bring high-quality education to areas that currently lack itand it will be delivered in kids native language, in a context that fits their culture, at little to no cost to them.

Of all the industries listed, healthcare is the one most urgently in need of demonetization in the US. Its happening through AI-fueled diagnosis and personalization of care. Deep learning algorithms can now identify skin cancer as accurately as dermatologists can. IBMs Watson was able to diagnose a rare form of leukemia that no physician could diagnose by analyzing data from 20 million other diagnoses. The Tricorder XPRIZE yielded a system that can diagnose 12 different diseases and capture real-time vital signs using a smartphone and some add-ons. Genome sequencing will transition healthcare from being reactive to proactive, keeping people from getting sick in the first place.

I view the world as rapidly demonetizing, Diamandis said near the conclusion of his talk.

A world where lifes necessities are all cheap or free will be very different from the world we live in today. What will motivate people to work or be productive if they dont need money for the basics? What kinds of new innovations will spring up from people for who these resources used to be cost-prohibitive? How will social constructs built around wealth and class shift.

These are all questions well need to contemplate as technology continues to demonetize our lives. As the old saying goes, the best things in life are free, and if Diamandis vision becomes reality, well have to figure out which of the free things in life are best.

Image Credit: Pond5

The rest is here:

Technology Will Erase JobsBut Also Make Everything Cheap or Free - Singularity Hub

Israeli company showcases drone interception technology – The Jerusalem Post


The Jerusalem Post
Israeli company showcases drone interception technology
The Jerusalem Post
(photo credit:ORAD). With weaponized drones bringing a whole new assortment of security threats, several companies at the Israel Defense Exhibition in Tel Aviv this week, showcased the latest technology in neutralization and interception of the devices.

See original here:

Israeli company showcases drone interception technology - The Jerusalem Post

The Dark Side of Voting Technology – Project Syndicate

NEW YORK According to an unpublished kitchen table survey, conducted before last Novembers presidential election in the United States, approximately 95% of the predominantly Hispanic members of one of Americas largest domestic unions preferred the Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton to her Republican opponent Donald Trump. Yet less than 3% of that unions members actually planned to vote. The reason came down to economics.

For most of the people surveyed, the costs of voting including lost wages from time off work, transport to the polling station, and the need to secure proper identification (such as a drivers license or passport) were simply too large. This reflects a broader trend in the US, with poor Americans often unable to participate fully in their countrys democracy.

According to the US Census Bureau, fewer than half of eligible adults with family incomes of less than $20,000 per year voted in the 2012 presidential election, whereas voter participation among households with incomes of more than $75,000 was 77%. In the 2014 midterm election, the think tank Demos reports, 68.5% of people in households earning less than $30,000 per year didnt vote.

This is a serious problem. But the proposals most often put forward to address it have serious drawbacks.

The proposed solutions typically focus on digital technology, which many claim would boost voter participation, by lowering the costs of voting. For example, mobile apps have been touted as a means to boost voter turnout: people could vote at their convenience, whether in the break-room at work or from the comfort of their own home.

The idea certainly sounds appealing. In Estonia, which is widely considered to be a leader in the use of voting technology, almost one-quarter of all votes in the 2011 parliamentary election were cast online.

Yet the actual impact of such technology on voter participation remains dubious. Although the rate of online voting in Estonia increased by nearly 20% between the 2007 and 2011 elections there, overall voter turnout increased by fewer than two percentage points (from 61.9% to 63.5%). This suggests that online voting may simply encourage regular voters to change how they cast their ballots, rather than encouraging additional voters to participate.

But voting technology may not just be ineffective; it could actually be damaging. Such technology doesnt reduce costs only for voters; it also reduces costs for the state, making it easier than ever to conduct elections. The risk is that lower costs would encourage more frequent elections and referenda, thereby undermining the efficiency of government.

At a time of lackluster global economic growth and deteriorating living standards for many, efficient government could not be more important. According to the US Millennium Challenge Corporation, more efficient government helps to reduce poverty, improve education and health care, slow environmental degradation, and combat corruption.

A key feature of an efficient government is long-term thinking. Policymakers must work toward the policy goals that got them elected. But they must also be given enough political room to adjust to new developments, even if it means altering policy timelines.

Amid constant elections and referenda, that isnt really an option. Instead, policymakers face strong pressure to deliver short-term, voter-pleasing results or get punished at the polls. The likely result is a shortsighted agenda prone to sudden politically motivated reversals. Beyond hurting political credibility and market confidence, such volatility could create friction between elected politicians and civil-service technocrats, damaging a relationship that is critical to efficient, forward-looking, and fact-based decision-making.

Proponents of referenda hold them up as the epitome of democracy, giving ordinary citizens a direct say over specific policy decisions. But, in a representative democracy, referenda undermine the relationship between the voters and their political leaders, who have been entrusted to make policy on citizens behalf.

Ominously, referenda are already becoming an increasingly common and consequential feature of policymaking in the Western world. The United Kingdom has held just three referenda in its entire history; but two have been carried out just in the last six years (plus another in Scotland). Franois Fillon, a candidate for the French presidency, promised two referenda if he won the recent election and suggested that France needs as many as five.

Elections, too, are becoming more frequent. The average tenure of a G20 political leader has fallen to a record low of 3.7 years, compared to six years in 1946 a shift that, no doubt, is contributing to a rise in short-term thinking by governments.

It is not yet clear whether voting technology actually does spur greater voter participation. What is clear is that, if it is adopted widely, it could exacerbate trends that are undermining public policy, including governments ability to boost economic growth and improve social outcomes.

Reducing barriers to democratic participation for the poorest citizens is a worthy goal. But what good will achieving it do if those citizens interests are harmed as a result?

Follow this link:

The Dark Side of Voting Technology - Project Syndicate

AJC Peachtree Road Race technology through the years – Atlanta Journal Constitution

The technological side of road racing is on the fast track. Many runners and walkers want data and the more, the better

Joaquin Lara

The AJC Peachtree Road Race has changed a lot over the past 10 years, both in look and in execution. In fact, it wasnt until 2009 that every single participant of the worlds largest 10K was electronically chip-timed. This year, Atlanta Track Club is offering a 5K split time for each participant in addition to the finish time, and friends and family can receive updates on their runners progress in multiple ways.

The Club provided a 5K split as a test during the 2016 AJC Peachtree Road Race, and will offer this information officially this year. Each participant will be able to sign up for their race updates to be sent out automatically via Facebook and Twitter, and friends and family members will be able to sign up for social media or text message updates as well.

Were proud to be able to offer tracking options for the AJC Peachtree Road Race, says Paula Beebe, manager of registration and timing for Atlanta Track Club. There is a lot of excitement around running the largest road race in the country, and we want our participants to be able to easily share their performances with their friends and family.

Links to register for Facebook, Twitter and text message updates will be available in upcoming participant emails and in the participant instructions for the event.

Technology Timeline

2009: First year every participant is electronically timed

2010: First year start waves are assigned by verified performance; official race number transfer system implemented

2011: Registration switches to an online lottery application

2016: 5K split time test performed

2017: 5K split times officially offered for participants

Read the rest here:

AJC Peachtree Road Race technology through the years - Atlanta Journal Constitution

National science competition winners agree technology is taking over – Washington Times


Washington Times
National science competition winners agree technology is taking over
Washington Times
Stuyvesant chemistry teacher Gabriel Ting, the group's coach, did not say whether he agreed that technology is taking over much of society, but advocated for STEM education. Even if students do not pursue employment in the sciences, any job requires at ...

and more »

Read this article:

National science competition winners agree technology is taking over - Washington Times

Prepare for increasing ‘nation-state’ cyberattacks with strategy, not technology – ZDNet

Cybercriminals: 'They are everywhere and we don't know who they are'

Cyberwar and the Future of Cybersecurity

Today's security threats have expanded in scope and seriousness. There can now be millions -- or even billions -- of dollars at risk when information security isn't handled properly.

Let me pose a question: Is it a bad thing to give the average person a hand grenade with the pin pulled? I think most of us would respond to that question with an emphatic "Yes!"

No one would think it's a good idea to allow anyone without extensive military or professional training to access an explosive -- especially one that is live and has no safety device in use. Bad things would happen and people would probably lose their lives. At the very least, there would be damage to property. No matter what, this scenario would be a very bad thing and should never happen.

Now let me change that question a bit: Is it a bad thing for every person with a network connection to have access to extremely powerful nation-state-level cyber weapons? Hopefully you would respond similarly and say "Yes!"

Just as the hand grenade juggling is a problem, so is the proliferation of nation-state-level exploits. These malicious tools and frameworks have spread across the world and are presenting a very complicated problem that must be solved.

Unfortunately, the existing solution only amounts to a variety of vendors slinging solutions and tools that, without good strategy, cannot effectively combat the myriad of cyber artillery shells being weaponized against every system that touches the web. The bad guys have now officially proven that they can "outdev" the defensive technologies in place in many instances, and they've shown the likelihood that many installed legacy technologies are wide open to these weaponized attacks (anti-virus be darned) across the planet.

Just as there would be a problem with untrained persons walking around with live explosives, we have a problem with possibly explosive outcomes on the horizon. The reality is that NSA-level attack tools and government-"issued" weaponized exploits have leaked online, and within months, the bad guys had reconfigured them for their purposes, attacking more than 100 countries and many multinational companies.

In a few noted and publicized instances, the malicious actors using these tools and frameworks literally reconfigured code blocks and exploit samples overnight to ensure their effectiveness.

How fast can a defensive tool vendor move to fight that threat? Do you think your anti-virus tool vendor will move faster than a cybercriminal organization that has no bureaucracy and no motive other than profit?

An international cyber-criminal organization using nation-state-level exploits is a very bad thing. We should acknowledge the power that these players have and take the necessary precautions to protect ourselves in today's cyberworld, which shows no signs of slowing down in the near future.

Cybersecurity in an IoT and Mobile World

The technology world has spent so much of the past two decades focused on innovation that security has often been an afterthought. Learn how and why it is finally changing.

I know from working in classified environments for most of my life that there's a reason we tried to keep Pandora's Box shut and that these exploits are extremely powerful. In a massively interconnected world, it's a very bad day when folks (evil or altruistic) on the net have access to what basically equates to tactical cyber nukes -- ask anyone still dealing with the fallout last month.

It will take a long time and a lot of work for the anti-virus vendors and endpoint protection folks to address the follow-on issues that are sure to come (more exploits are coming, of that I am sure). The time for technical preparation has passed, and in many cases, has already proven ineffective. It is far too late to beat the bad guys at their own game and keep trying to "out-tech" them. They move faster and are leveraging more powerful tools that do one thing and one thing only: Find vulnerable systems and exploit the heck out of them.

Strategy and optimality of defensive ecosystems should now be at the front of our minds, not fighting a battle by tossing technology at the enemy and hoping we have the bigger bag of ammo on our side.

Technology can't save your network from these attacks on its own. The strategy you implement and how you use that entrenched secure ecosystem is where the difference will be made.

To learn more about why it's crucial to prioritize cybersecurity in the enterprise, listen to Forrester's latest podcast where security expert Jeff Pollard shares what to learn from the WannaCry cyberattack.

See the article here:

Prepare for increasing 'nation-state' cyberattacks with strategy, not technology - ZDNet