NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL Unions Prepare for Sports Gambling – Sports Illustrated

The players unions of the NFL, NBA, NHL and MLB arent sure when sports gambling will be legalized. But they see it as a matter of if, not when. So theyre not going to waste time getting prepared.

The MMQB has learned that the four unions have had a number of formal meetings in New York over the past year-and-a-half to discuss the potential ramifications that legalized sports gambling could present for their players.

Yes, the sports unions have been discussing the issue, in particular around the integrity of our respective games, NFLPA executive George Atallah said Thursdayafternoon. Were collaborating on it. We might be open to changes that are coming because of (legalized sports gambling), but before we get to the revenue aspect of it, do we have the infrastructure in place to prevent any sort of shenanigans? Thats the issue.

Atallah said the unions have started looking at how legalized sports gambling and those associated issues are handled overseas in areas where its been legal for decades. Theyre also monitoring legislation in New Jersey, which has been the primary battleground for legalized sports gambling.

Nevada remains the only state where sports gambling is legal, and the sports leagues are about to set down roots there for the first time. The NHLs expansion Vegas Golden Knights begin play this fall. The NFLs Raiders will move from Oakland and into a new $1.9 billion stadium there in 2020, and could be there sooner depending on what happens with their lease in the Bay Area.

Meanwhile, the NBA held its All-Star Game in Vegas in 2007, and commissioner Adam Silver has come out as a proponent of legalizing sports gambling.

All of that signifies change, as Vegas was long seen as a forbidden land for professional sports. And while the NFLs comments publicly have been far more conservative than Silvers, there was a quiet admission from NFL ownersbefore they unanimously voted the Raiders move to Vegasthat a sea change was coming.

From a gambling standpoint? Thats a joke to even say thatd be a problem, one AFC owner told The MMQB in late March. That was an issue decades ago. Now? Sports gambling is going to be legal. We might as well embrace it and become part of the solution, rather than fight it. Its in everyones best interests for it to be above board.

The first question, naturally, is going to be about gambling, said an NFC owner. But any of us can pull our phones out of our pockets and place a bet right now. (The concern) is not 100 percent put to bed, but its relatively put to bed, just because of technology today.

The sports-gambling summits over the past 18 months have been attended by the executive directors of the four unionsthe NFLPAs DeMaurice Smith, the MLBPAs Tony Clark, the NBPAs Michele Roberts and the NHLPAs Donald Fehrand are just another acknowledgment of whats likely not far off.

For us, its about getting the right infrastructure in place, said Atallah. Before we get to the revenue splits, how do you monitor behavior like they do in other parts of the world to ensure what were all watching isnt fixed? Thats the question.

Question or comment?Email us attalkback@themmqb.com.

Read the original here:

NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL Unions Prepare for Sports Gambling - Sports Illustrated

Anti-police mural led to gambling charges, store owner claims – Fort Worth Star Telegram

Anti-police mural led to gambling charges, store owner claims
Fort Worth Star Telegram
A store owner repeatedly charged with gambling claimed Thursday that police targeted him because of a mural depicting police violence he had on the side of his building last year. Rocky's Drive Thru owner Ameer Rocky Hirani said the police are ...

Read this article:

Anti-police mural led to gambling charges, store owner claims - Fort Worth Star Telegram

Lehigh Valley lawmaker rolls the dice in gambling expansion vote – Allentown Morning Call

The Lehigh Valleys only lawmaker thus far supporting a House bill to add up to 40,000 video slot machines in the state happens to be an avid gambler herself.

Rep. Marcia Hahn, R-Northampton, has claimed earnings from casinos five out of six years she has filed Statement of Financial Interest forms with the state Ethics Commission.

Hahn was first elected in 2010. Her first filing was the following year.

Mt. Airy Casino and Sands Casino are her establishments of choice, according to financial forms filed between 2011 and 2016. Legislators arent required to list the amount of income, but are required to disclose where any outside income came from.Below are the details listed on those forms:

The slot machines and raffles havent quite paid off for Hahn, despite the income claimed.

Id probably say I lose more than I win, she said in a phone interview.

The House bill, approved 102-89 on Wednesday night, would legalize video betting machines in bars, nursing homes, VFWs, volunteer fire halls, restaurants, bowling alleys, truck stops, hotels and other places licensed to sell alcohol. The machines, known as video gaming terminals, or VGTS, are strongly opposed by all but one of the states casinons and a majority of the Senate.

The House added the VGT piece to a Senate plans that would legalize fantasy sports, internet betting and let the Pennsylvania Lottery sell tickets online.

The bill is now in the Senate, where Hahan may find company. Sen. Lisa boscola, D-Northampton, is a VGT supporter.

If the bill dies in the Senate, it could leave a $150 million hole in next years budget. Thats how much Gov. Tom Wolfs administration has earmarked in estimated tax revenue from expanded gambling in the fiscal year that starts July 1.

Go here to read the rest:

Lehigh Valley lawmaker rolls the dice in gambling expansion vote - Allentown Morning Call

Friday’s letters: We need a constitutional amendment on gambling – Tampabay.com

Legislature neglected gambling | Editorial, June 6

We need gambling amendment

The Times correctly pointed out in a recent editorial the dysfunction surrounding gambling policy in Florida. The problem is that in Tallahassee, a comprehensive solution to gambling has become a euphemism for expansion. It seems that in the eyes of some legislators, controlling gambling somehow requires expanding it. Solutions to serious problems are held hostage to unwanted expansion.

We saw that yet again in this year's legislative session as a so-called comprehensive bill passed by the Florida Senate included the biggest expansion of gambling in state history.

Luckily, the House did not bite. But if it had, rest assured this would not have been the final word. Given unlimited resources and unlimited time, gambling interests tend to get their way in state capitals.

The only way to manage gambling without expanding it is to return decisions over gambling expansion to voters. That's the way it was for decades, because Florida's Constitution includes a ban on most forms of gambling. But recent murky case law has given rise to the notion that legislators can ignore the Constitution and do whatever they want.

This is why we are moving forward with plans to place the Voter Control of Gambling Amendment on the 2018 ballot. The amendment provides a much needed bright line as to what forms of gambling are authorized in Florida by requiring that in order for casino gambling to be authorized in Florida, it must be approved by voters through citizens' initiative.

It removes legislators, lobbyists and gambling industry political contributions from the process of authorizing casino gambling. In doing so, it also closes gambling loopholes that have been exploited over the years.

This amendment is the only approach that will create a comprehensive and transparent solution to gambling expansion in Florida.

Paul Seago, Orlando The writer is executive director of No Casinos.

Mayors join climate pledge | June 5

Coastal Florida is at risk

Studies have shown Florida is more at risk from climate change than any other state. Still, some residents do not believe sea level is rising here. Plan a trip to southeast Florida or the Keys during an expected period of seasonal high tide. You will observe the ocean roll onto roads and sidewalks and gurgle up through manhole covers. Localized nuisance? Not really this has resulted in salt water getting into drinking water wells for cities and damage to other infrastructure. A one-foot rise can move the shoreline inward by more than a thousand feet.

Scientists at Ringling College carried out a demonstration to allow people to visualize what this would mean over time to Siesta Beach, recently voted "best beach" in the United States. Using NOAA predictions, by 2030 hundreds of feet of the beach will be underwater. By 2040 the beach will be gone, the current parking lots and a portion of Beach Road will be underwater.

An estimated $69 billion of Florida property sits on land less than two feet above high tide. By 2030, they will likely all be affected by sea water rise. The economic impact on this state will be enormous. Unless strong, immediate steps are taken to reduce further harmful emissions Florida's economy and people will suffer catastrophic damages.

Joseph Valenti, Tampa

Vote hack took aim at Florida | June 7

We're under cyber attack

I am furious that a foreign government intruded into the U.S. electoral process. Our country was isolationist in the late 1930s and early 1940s as our leaders watched the Axis roll across Europe. It wasn't until bombs rained down on Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, that we began to move away from isolationism. The country came together to fight the enemies that attacked us. I lived through those years.

Today our country is attacked by a foreign power not with bombs but in cyberspace. We are in the early stages of isolationism reminiscent of the 1930s. We are pulling away from our friends and are not banding together to face the enemy. Some of our political elite are more concerned about leaks than defending our country and its values.

Robert Bucklin, Zephyrhills

Water agency withdraws rule for rewrite | June 7

Residents need the water

Local "leaders" have finally admitted we have too many people for the water resources available. The only problem is the local "leaders" never implement building restrictions. The politicians tell us there are too many people using the water so you citizens stop using water. But they won't tell their real estate, development and construction buddies to stop building.

We citizens have to suffer for it. We can't use our water, we're stuck in the traffic jams, and the infrastructure continues to degrade, even with the insufferable, continuous (assuredly boondoggled) construction that never seems to end.

I do understand that if we don't progress we regress. But for us in the limited available acreage of most of Tampa Bay, shouldn't the politicians represent us current citizens in safety and quality of life? When do we stand up and say enough is enough? When they hand us one bottle of water and a loaf of bread?

Steve Krall, Seminole

Trump embarrasses himself and America again | Column, June 5

The math of bullets

President Trump tweeted "Do you notice we are not having a gun debate right now? That's because they used knives and a truck!"

But we should be having that debate. The three terrorists in London killed eight using knives and a van. A single terrorist in a crowded bar with an assault rifle in the United States killed 49 and wounded 53. England has strict restrictions on gun ownership. The math is easy to do. If assault rifles were as easy to get in London as in the United States the three London terrorists could have killed 147 instead of eight.

Peter Stecher, Brandon

Friday's letters: We need a constitutional amendment on gambling 06/08/17 [Last modified: Thursday, June 8, 2017 5:48pm] Photo reprints | Article reprints

Read more:

Friday's letters: We need a constitutional amendment on gambling - Tampabay.com

Illegal gambling operations busted in Northwest Ohio – 13abc Action News

Ohio (WTVG) - The Ohio Casino Control Commission busted three businesses in Erie, Huron and Sandusky Counties for illegal gambling.

According to agents with the commission, machines inside these businesses were paying out cash prizes, which is a violation of Ohio law.

Warrants were served at the following locations: -Do Drop In, 5500 Milan Rd. in Sandusky, Ohio -Do Drop In, 122 N. Washington St, in Tiffin, Ohio -Do Drop In, 115 Blossom Center Blvd. in Willard, Ohio -Moore Residence, 11903 Township Road 178 in Bellevue, Ohio -Patterson Residence, 3020 Egypt Rd in Willard, Ohio

Agents seized gaming machines during the multi-county raid. They did not make any arrests. The Ohio Casino Control Commission continues its investigation.

"The Commission takes its responsibility to ensure the integrity of gaming in Ohio seriously, and we will hold accountable those who choose to violate the state's gaming laws," said June Taylor, Chair of the Ohio Casino Control Commission. "We appreciate the assistance we received today from local law enforcement in shutting down these illegal establishments that take advantage of Ohioans."

Follow this link:

Illegal gambling operations busted in Northwest Ohio - 13abc Action News

What is euthanasia and assisted suicide law in the UK and what is the mercy killing debate? – The Sun

Euthanasia and assisted dying is a controversialissue, with passionate campaigners on each side of the argument

THE debate around euthanasia and assisted dying in the UK is a controversial and complicated one with some saying choosing when to die is to die with dignity, while others claim it undermines the value of human life.

So what is euthanasia and assisted suicide and what is the debate surrounding this issue? We explain the details surrounding this sensitive and divisive subject.

Getty Images

Euthanasia, sometimes known as mercy killing, is the practice of intentionally ending someones life to relieve their pain and suffering.

Assistedsuicide is deliberately helping or encouraging someone to take their own life, for example by providingthem with medicine to do so.

The term comes from an ancient Greek phrase meaning good death.

Both are illegal in the UK with euthanasia carrying a maximum penalty of life in jail, and assisted suicide 14 years. The only exception is passive euthanasia, which is where treatment that might extend someones life is withdrawn such as a life machine being turned off.

The only alternatives for terminally ill patients in the UK arehospice care or refusing treatment, which mentally capable patientshave the right to do.

As a result, some terminally ill people decide to travel abroad to die.In Switzerland, where assisted suicide is legal (but euthanasia is not), you do not have to be a Swiss citizen to use a clinic.However, it is not cheap assisted suicide non-profit Dignitas charges patients 3,380 for its services.

Reuters

Euthanasia anddying is a controversialissue with passionate campaigners on each side of the argument.

People who agree with euthanasia often argue that people should be allowed to die with dignity and they should be able to decide when and how they die, and potentially save their loved ones the pain of seeing them suffer.

Some also believe death is private, and its not the states place to interfere if a person wants to die.

Meanwhile, those in favour of euthanasia also point out that we euthanise our pets as an act of kindness and resources could be put towards people who want to live, or whose conditions are curable.

However, there are concerns that allowing euthanasia would give doctors too much power, and might even worsencare for the terminally ill and research into their illnesses.

Some also believe it goes against the job description of doctors and nurses and undermines the value of human life.

Others also worry about the possibility of someone potentially recovering, or changing their mind when its already too late. Some have even suggestedit could lead to people feeling pressured into asking to die, as they dont want to be a burden upon those around them.

Getty Images

Many religious people are opposed to euthanasia and assisted dying too, as they believe God decides when we die.

Right now, despite fierce campaigning from organisations such as Dignity in Dying, the law is showing no signs of changing in the UK.

In September 2015MPs debated the issue for the first time in almost 20 years but the Assisted Dying Bill was rejected by 330 votes to 118, leading to reformers branding MPs ridiculously out of touch.

Motor neurone disease sufferer Noel Conway is one of the latest to try and challenge UK law on assisted dying.

The retired college lecturer took his case to the Court of Appeal after he was refused permission to bring a judicial review over the blanket ban on providing a person with assistance to die.

His lawyers said when he has less than six months to live and retains the mental capacity to make the decision, he would wish to be able to enlist assistance to bring about a peaceful and dignified death.

He claims the Suicide Act 1961 is incompatible with Article 8, which relates to respect for private and family life, and Article 14, which protects from discrimination.

Sun columnist Lorraine Kelly agreed, saying it was cruel for the state to deny him a peaceful death.

Lord Justice McFarlane and Lord Justice Beatsondecided in his favour on April 12, 2017, granting him the right to bring a High Court legal challenge.

Earlier this year a Belgian Paralympian caused controversy when she told reporters in Rioshe signed euthanasia papers in 2008 but is not ready to go through with it yet.

Marieke Vervoort, 37,suffers from an incurable degenerative muscle disease andpicked up the silver medal in the 400m T52 final.

See original here:

What is euthanasia and assisted suicide law in the UK and what is the mercy killing debate? - The Sun

New Zealand likely to legalise euthanasia – 9news.com.au

Euthanasia could be legal in New Zealand in less than a year with legislation to come before parliament in as little as a few weeks.

The End of Life Choice Bill was plucked at random from the members' ballot on Thursday, almost two years after it was first included, and there's confidence it has the numbers to pass.

It would give people over 18 with a terminal illness or a "grievous" medical condition the option to choose assisted dying if they have the support of two doctors.

Act Party leader David Seymour, the party's sole MP, is confident MPs will easily pass the legislation and says at best, assisted suicide could be legal in just under a year.

He says Kiwis are capable of having the discussion, taking aim at Australian politicians who are yet to consider same-sex marriage or physician-assisted dying.

"It might be an issue with the Australian public but in New Zealand, they are quite capable of separating [issues around euthanasia]," he said.

But the timing could be troubling for some MPs, with it yet to be determined if the legislation will come before the House of Representatives ahead of the September election.

"It will then take another six months to a year after that before it's potentially passed into law and of course we've got to make sure we've got the numbers at each of the three votes," Mr Seymour said.

New Zealand's unicameral system means the legislation only needs to pass through a committee stage and three readings in the House of Representatives before becoming law.

In the last count six months ago, there were 40 votes in support, 27 opposed and around 50 MPs undecided.

The unknown factor is new MPs who will enter parliament after the September 23 election.

Across New Zealand, polling puts public support for legalising euthanasia above 70 per cent.

If successful it would be the second major piece of conscience legislation passed by New Zealand's parliament in the last few years.

While the same-sex marriage debate continues to rage in Australia, Kiwis have been happily marrying for four years.

State parliaments in both Victoria and New South Wales are expected to consider euthanasia legislation later this year.

But just last month legislation failed to pass Tasmania's lower house, with twice as many MPs opposing change as those in favour.

A bill in South Australia was defeated by a single vote last November.

AAP 2017

Auto News:2017 Mercedes-AMG E63 S - the one we've been waiting for - caradvice.com.au

Career news: Three common career progression questions answered- seek.com.au

Auto news:New BMW M5 detailed - caradvice.com.au

Auto news:Ford Australia vs Holden; who will win the battle on the racetrack? - caradvice.com.au

Auto news:Suzuki is Australia's lovable underdog - caradvice.com.au

Auto news:Jaguar's tough limited-tun XE SW Project 8 sports sedan - caradvice.com.au

Auto news:Battle of the V8 Beasts: 5.0L Ford Mustang vs 6.2L Holden Commodore - caradvice.com.au

View post:

New Zealand likely to legalise euthanasia - 9news.com.au

Shau Kei Wan tragedy sparks debate on euthanasia – EJ Insight

An 80-year-old man who killed his paralyzed wife in Shau Kei Wan did it to spare her from further suffering, his younger brother said.

He said the condition of his sister-in-law had deteriorated when he visited the couple during the Tuen Ng festival, news website hk01.com reports.

Half of her body was paralyzed. My brother gave her massages, cooked for her and bathed her, he said.

He said that as euthanasia is illegal in Hong Kong, his brother had no choice but to kill his wife to end her misery.

In December, Secretary for Food and Health Ko Wing-man said the government had no plans to legalize euthanasia or hold any public consultations on it.

Ko said there had been some requests for euthanasia from terminally ill patients who later changed their minds after being given proper palliative care.

Ko said patients can use advance directive to spell out decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time.

Lawmaker Shiu Ka-chun, who represents the social welfare functional constituency, said euthanasia is an issue civilized societies cannot avoid.

He said he hoped the Shau Kei Wan tragedy could induce more public discussions on the controversial subject.

Former lawmaker Cheung Kwok-che, said that while society can discuss and debate euthanasia, legislation alone cannot help prevent cases as happened in Shau Kei Wan.

Cheung said there are are strict requirements for legal euthanasia to be given, including certain medical conditions, and not just the will of the patient.

According to Ko, euthanasia is only legal in a few countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg.

Edward Leung Man-fuk, chairperson of the Hong Kong Association of Gerontology, said euthanasia or advance directive is the giving up of interventional treatment on a terminally ill patient. However, such conditions are not applicable for patients who suffered a stroke.

Leung said it is more important to improve the support system of the patients caregivers to avoid tragedies.

With Hong Kongs population rapidly aging, Leung said the government should review the relevant policies to tackle the issue.

In Taiwan, family caregivers can opt to take a short break from their long-term caregiving with government providing temporary caregivers.

This way, family caregivers who can choose to stay on premises provided by the government for a short period, can take a break from the burdens of looking after ailing family members.

- Contact us at [emailprotected]

EL/AC/RA

View post:

Shau Kei Wan tragedy sparks debate on euthanasia - EJ Insight

Oakland County animal shelter’s decreasing euthanasia rates mirror … – The Oakland Press

Over several decades, the Oakland County Animal Control and Pet Adoption Center is following a national trend toward euthanizing less animals brought in.

Bob Gatt, director of the shelter, says that the facility hovers at about a 90-percent no-kill rate, a number that is looked upon favorably in the industry.

Gatt says there are several factors in the trend in Oakland County toward lower euthanasia rates:

There is no time limit on how long an adoptable pet can stay in the shelter awaiting a new home, a change from decades ago. Weve had animals in here for over a year, he says.

Advertisement

There is better education about having pets spayed and neutered, resulting in less unwanted litters of puppies and kittens, Gatt said.

More prospective pet owners are aware of the option of adopting a dog or cat from a shelter, he said.

According to some estimates, animal shelters nationwide killed as many as 20 million cats and dogs annually in the 1970s. That had fallen to 2.6 million by 2011 and to 1.5 million currently, according to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

The Oakland County shelter handles 4,000 to 5,000 animals per year. Generally, only those deemed unadoptable are euthanized. Unadoptable animals are seriously ill or injured without a reasonable hope of improving, deemed vicious or have traits that make them unsuitable to be pets, Gatt said.

The shelter, at 1700 Brown Road in Auburn Hills, employs several full-time veterinary technicians and part-time veterinarians. Animals brought in sick or injured are treated on site whenever possible or sent out to a veterinarian for treatment if no staff member is available.

Animals rights groups consistently question the shelters euthanasia figures, but Gatt says those groups are an important factor in the decrease in animals being put down.

Over the years, the groups have brought awareness to more humane treatment of animals.

Even the ones who dont like me, I applaud them, Gatt said.

A new state-of-the-art shelter is to open this summer in the Oakland County municipal complex at Telegraph and Pontiac Lake roads.

See original here:

Oakland County animal shelter's decreasing euthanasia rates mirror ... - The Oakland Press

Lecretia Seales’ widower says she ‘would be over the moon’ with … – TVNZ

Lecretia Seales' widower says the late euthanasia campaigner would be "over the moon" at news that a voluntary euthanasia bill will be debated in parliament.

ACT leader David Seymour's End of Life Choice Bill was drawn from the member's bill ballot today.

Speaking to media at parliament today, Matt Vickers says, "Lecretia would be very happy ... she would be over the moon that this has finally got to the point where it's coming before the House".

Lecretia Seales died of brain cancer in June 2015. A Wellington based lawyer, she campaigned for voluntary euthanasia to be made legal.

In the week before she dieda High Court judgment ruled against Ms Seales allowing a doctor to euthanise her without fear of prosecution.

Mr Vickers today welcomed the issue of euthanasia once again being thrust into the spotlight.

"When Lecretia took her case in 2015 she was hoping to galvanise political action through that case ... but the hope of course was to get a bill introduced into parliament."

He went on to say that he's, "very happy with the news today and can't wait for it to be debated in parliament and for the proper evidence based discussion to take place".

Strong opposition in public submissions

The End of Life Choice Bill gives people with a terminal illness or a "grievous and irremediable medical condition" the option of requesting assisted dying.

It defines those eligible and details a comprehensive set of provisions to ensure it is a free choice made without coercion.

It also outlines a stringent series of steps to ensure the person is mentally capable of understanding the nature and consequences of their decision.

MPs will have a conscience vote on the bill, and parties won't take positions on it.

In May, 1 NEWS reported how an anti-euthanasia group's analysis of submissions made to the Health Select Committee investigating medically assisted dying, had found the majority opposed legalisation of euthanasia.

More than 21,000 written submissions were received, after a petition was taken to parliament in 2015 calling for an overhaul of euthanasia laws.

The Care Alliance reviewed each submission, and found 77 per cent opposed legalisation, 19.5 per cent were in support, and 3.4 per cent were neutral or unclear.

See the original post:

Lecretia Seales' widower says she 'would be over the moon' with ... - TVNZ

Julie Anne Genter’s medicinal cannabis bill, David Seymour’s … – TVNZ

Parliament is set to debate two big controversial issues - euthanasia and medicinal cannabis - in election year.

Medical cannabis.

Source: istock.com

ACT leader David Seymour's End of Life Choice Bill was drawn from the member's bill ballot today, along with Green MP Julie Anne Genter's Misuse of Drugs (Medicinal Cannabis and Other Matters) Amendment Bill.

Both will go on Parliament's agenda for a first reading.

The End of Life Choice Bill gives people with a terminal illness or a "grievous and irremediable medical condition" the option of requesting assisted dying.

It defines those eligible and details a comprehensive set of provisions to ensure it is a free choice made without coercion.

It also outlines a stringent series of steps to ensure the person is mentally capable of understanding the nature and consequences of their decision.

MPs will have a conscience vote on the bill, and parties won't take positions on it.

"Fantastic news, long awaited," Mr Seymour tweeted.

Assisted dying has been debated twice before by Parliament, the first time was in 1995, when the Death With Dignity Bill was defeated 61-29 on its first reading.

The second time was in 2003, when another Death With Dignity Bill was defeated 60-58, also on its first reading.

Green MP Julie Anne Genter also Tweeted her excitement about her medicinal cannabis bill being pulled from the ballot this afternoon.

The purpose of the medicinalcannabis bill is to make the drug legal for New Zealanders who are suffering from terminal illness or chronic illness to use cannabis or cannabis products with the support of a registered medical practitioner.

The bill aims to amend the Misuse of Drugs Act to give a person living with a terminal illness the right to "cultivate, possess or use the cannabis plant" and or "cannasbis products for therapeutic purposes" as long as the person is supported by a registered medical practitioner.

Currently, cannabis-based products can only be used with permission from the Ministry of Health and are dealtwith a case to case basis.

Read the original:

Julie Anne Genter's medicinal cannabis bill, David Seymour's ... - TVNZ

Independent business owners thank police and the ECHO for ending burglary "epidemic" – Liverpool Echo

Independent business owners suffering from a burglary epidemic today thanked Merseyside Police and the ECHO for bringing those responsible to justice.

An emergency meeting was called in April this year after we revealed a crime wave plaguing bars and restaurants in Liverpool city centre.

Some victims were even considering hiring their own security wardens to tackle determined crooks operating in Bold Street and Dale Street.

Frustrated owners sought help from the police, council representatives and members of Liverpool Business Investment District (BID).

Officers have arrested 19 suspects since April 10 and six of these men are now facing more than 11 years behind bars in total.

They include:

Alan Bell, 45, of Prescot Road, Old Swan - jailed for 18 months

James Riley, 38, of Boundary Street, Vauxhall - jailed for two years and four months

Marshall Tung, 30, of no fixed address - jailed for three years

Daniel Tung, 18, of no fixed address - jailed for two years

James Quarton, 28, of no fixed address - jailed for five months

Colin Spicer, 47, of Seel Street, Liverpool - jailed for 20 months

Gareth Morgan, who owns Dead Crafty Beer Company, suffered 1,600 of damage to a window and till area when Spicer and Bell struck.

He described the crime spree as an epidemic, but today said: It just shows what the police can do when they have the right resources for something.

Video Unavailable

Click to play Tap to play

Play now

Our CCTV has helped to catch one of these guys, so that was clearly worth the investment.

I think the ECHO drawing attention to it has certainly helped and possibly made the police step things up - which they have done and has clearly been a good thing.

Staff at nearby Dale Street Eatery were also happy with the results, tweeting they could sleep a little better after hearing Spicer had been jailed.

Tariq Batayneh runs the restaurant with his wife Lenka Balkova, which twice had its windows smashed during raids by Spicer and Quarton.

She said it was so sad to watch people on CCTV smashing through the business you have worked so hard on and ruining our livelihoods.

But today Mr Batayneh said: We feel a lot better after these results and we would like to thank the police for their work.

We would also like to thank the Liverpool ECHO who really helped us to get the message out. We just feel a lot safer now.

Both Dale Street Eatery and Dead Crafty Beer are now working with the council to look at installing new shutters at their premises.

City centre councillor Nick Small, who organised the urgent meeting, said small independent businesses were the lifeblood of our city centre.

The talks were also attended by Otto Mellouki, who runs Koop and Bakchich restaurants in Bold Street, both of which had been targeted.

A community policing team patrolled the areas to offer reassurance, while officers visited businesses to provide security advice.

Meanwhile undercover and uniformed officers walked city centre streets during the day and night to identify those responsible.

Superintendent Mark Wiggins said: Business burglaries are not victimless crimes.

Many of these businesses are local people who just want to earn a living and the actions of this group have not just left businesses out of pocket, they have the potential to damage the confidence of those local people running the businesses.

We committed resources to help combat this problem following a series of burglaries.

I hope todays result sends a strong message to anyone considering this type of criminality to think again.

Supt Wiggins said it was in everyones interest to help solve and prevent crimes against people providing a vital service to our communities.

He added: Liverpool city centre has continued year on year to be awarded Purple Flag status, and is consistently recognised as one of the safest cities in the UK.

We will continue to work hard with our partners to ensure the city remains a safe place with a good reputation, which encourages people to continue to enjoy what the city has to offer.

Anyone with information about these incidents is urged to contact Merseyside Police on 101 or the confidential Crimestoppers number 0800 555 111.

Read more here:

Independent business owners thank police and the ECHO for ending burglary "epidemic" - Liverpool Echo

Allison Hanes: Disgrace is the deterrent for Applebaum – Montreal Gazette

Michael Applebaum in 2016: It's hard to justify filling up overcrowded jails with white-collar criminals like the former mayor, Allison Hanes says, but corruption is not a victimless crime. Dave Sidaway / Montreal Gazette

The whiff of corruption in Quebec has claimed political careers and unseated administrations. It spawned a public inquiry and fuelled scandals. It has sparked legislative changes, led to the creation of watchdog bodies and generated investigative exposs.

But at the end of the day, when someone is charged, tried and convicted of breaching public confidence, the penalty meted out might seem underwhelming compared to all the outrage, debate and hand-wringing over the extent of the rot.

Michael Applebaum is in many ways a case in point. The former mayor of Montreal and long-time borough mayor of Notre-Dame-de-GrceCte-des-Neiges spent just two months behind bars after being convicted on eight fraud charges for demanding a $55,000 kickback connected to a construction project.

By all accounts, he was a model prisoner, participating in animal therapy sessions and going to Alcoholics Anonymous meetings even though he didnt have a drinking problem. And, perhaps most notably, he has now owned up to his crimes and the harm they inflicted after fighting the charges tooth and nail in court. So the Quebec parole board released him, after he served one-sixth of his 12-month jail term. He is still on probation and has to do community service, but he is out from behind bars and back at home.

These decisions are par for the course in the normal administration of justice, however they tend to be met with incomprehension, and sometimes fury, by society at large.

The court system, thankfully, isnt moved by the barometer of public opinion in such matters.But it is still valid to ask in such cases whether the punishment fits the crime and whether the justice system is accomplishing the goals it has set for itself.

Judges must weigh several principles in meting out sentences. Besides the circumstances of the case, the particular aggravating or mitigating factors can include denunciation, deterrence, rehabilitation and separation from society (a.k.a. protecting the public).

When it comes to corruption, I would argue deterrence is the most important of these considerations.

Specific deterrence is the message the censure sends to the offender, the consequences that are supposed to persuade them to not repeat their mistakes. In Applebaums case, its hard to see how he got off lightly.

He has lost his influence, power and profile. He is up to his eyeballs in debt to his lawyer. He torpedoed his career, both at city hall and in real estate. He has squandered all the respect, dignity and pride he garnered from his public service. He may have compromised his mental and physical health, too. And he has probably wounded his family by putting them through this ordeal.

This is a mess entirely of his own making, so you can hold the sympathy.He did this, he now admits, not to line his own pockets, but to feed the insatiable goat of campaign financing.

For a public officeholder like Applebaum, who staked his success on the approbation and approval of others, disgrace is the ultimate comeuppance.

But what message does the two months he actually served send to other officials who might be tempted to bend the rules, abuse their authority or otherwise breach the public trust out of personal or political greed? This is the real question.

General deterrence is another part of the puzzle judges must contemplate. Its the cautionary tale, the attempt to dissuade others from going down a similar path. Will two months discourage other risk-takers driven by hubris from cheating the public purse?

White-collar crime is not typically dealt with very harshly by the justice system.

Lets face it, its likely the only reason Applebaum got jail time in the first place was that he denied the fraud until the end, contesting the charges at trial, when his co-accused, councillor Saulie Zajdel and borough inspections director Yves Bisson, pleaded guilty. That was his right, but its also a risk. The court offers leniency in exchange for acknowledging wrongdoing.

Pragmatically speaking, its hard to justify filling up overcrowded jails with white-collar criminals who arent an imminent threat to security when there are many violent offenders who should be taken off the streets. But corruption is not a victimless crime.

Taxpayers and citizens suffer from being constantly forced to pay the inflated price of contracts won through deceptive means. Companies and contractors who play by the rules are hurt where there is a lack of fair competition for public work. And confidence in our very democracy is undermined when those who exploit their influence to cling to power.

This is no longer about Applebaum, who has done his time and will live with the consequences for the rest of his life (or as long as the collective memory endures). This is about uprooting the system his crimes served, the one Justice France Charbonneau (but not her co-commissioner Renaud Lachance) uncovered, and warned us is very deeply entrenched.

ahanes@postmedia.com

Read the original here:

Allison Hanes: Disgrace is the deterrent for Applebaum - Montreal Gazette

Best and Worst Political Cameos in Movies and TV – LifeZette

Some say politics is just Hollywood for ugly people but today the lines are more blurred than ever. Beloved Hollywood figures run for political office as easily as politicians jump in front of the cameras these days.

Sometimes its all a little cringe-inducing, and sometimes its rather amusing. Heres a look at some of the worst and some of the best political cameos ever in television and film.

Ron Paul, Atlas Shrugged III: Who Is John Galt? (2013).Former Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) has arguably been the biggest influencer on modern libertarianism next to novelist Ayn Rand, whose 1,000-plus-page 1957 novel Atlas Shrugged is reportedly the second highest-selling book after the Bible.

So when producers John Aglialoro and Harmon Kaslow adapted Rand's novel into three films, it was only natural they'd reach out to Paul to do a cameo as himself. Fox News host Sean Hannity also appeared in a collection of segments showing real-life political figures reacting to a fictional speech made by John Galt, the man working to "stop the motor of the world."

It was a fitting moment for Paul, as he's often said the book was a major influence on him. "Shrugged" follows a world in which the concept of the individual is quickly eroding and the public and government are more violent and angry toward entrepreneurs and creators than ever. When various business leaders and artists begin disappearing, business leaders and free market believers Dagny Taggart and Hank Rearden begin down a road that leads them to the mysterious John Galt and the ideal world he's working to build away from government.

Read more here:

Best and Worst Political Cameos in Movies and TV - LifeZette

Liberal Democrats rule out coalition with Labour as former leader Nick Clegg loses seat – Telegraph.co.uk

He had previously ruled out a coalition deal with other parties after warning their positions on Brexit could not be reconciled.

Speaking about the loss Mr Clegg said the next parliament will preside over a deeply, deeply divided and polarised nation.

We saw that in the Brexit referendum last year and we see it again tonight, he said, adding that the most grave gulf of all in society is between the young and the old. Accepting his defeat, he said that in politics You live by the sword and you die by the sword.

It came after the former leader warned he had seen an "uptick" in support for Jeremy Corbyn's party in his seat, which has a high student population.

The former Lib Dem leader ruled out a coalition between his former party and Labour or the Conservatives, addingthere is no "meeting point" between them because of their views on Brexit.

Speaking to ITV MrCleggsaid: "It's clearly a complete boomerang election for the Conservatives who when they started out in this election campaign were treating it as something of a coronation and clearly it's going to be a much tighter fought contest."

Asked about the possibly of a coalition with either Labour or the Tories he added:"There's no meeting point between the Conservatives and the Labour parties and the Lib Dems."

Read the original:

Liberal Democrats rule out coalition with Labour as former leader Nick Clegg loses seat - Telegraph.co.uk

‘A Proud Liberal’ Engages ‘a Proud Deplorable’ – New York Times

'A Proud Liberal' Engages 'a Proud Deplorable'
New York Times
Dear Friend: I write as a proud liberal with an open mind. Though there is much we disagree about, there is one thing you and I agree on: We live in a dangerous world. One of the greatest risks we face is our belief that those who disagree with us have ...

View post:

'A Proud Liberal' Engages 'a Proud Deplorable' - New York Times

Liberal, NDP MLAs take part in swearing-in ceremony – CBC.ca

Christy Clark reiterated that she doesn't expect to be B.C. premier much longer, while addressing media at today's Liberal MLA swearing-in ceremony.

"There is a very strong likelihood that the government will be defeated on a confidence motion, and I think that's a fair assumption to make," she said.

"We are in an unusual place in the province," she said. "It's an unusual situation when the party that gets the most seats does not govern."

The NDP and Greens won a combined 44 seats in last month's election and have agreed to work together to unseat the Liberals and form a minority government. The Liberals won 43 seats.

With the legislature set to berecalled June 22, there is growing intrigue over who will be elected Speakerand whether or not it will throw the legislature into gridlock.

Normally, the Speaker comes from the party forming government, which would have the effect of reducing the combined NDP-Green seat total to 43, tied with the Liberals.

Parliamentary convention has it that in the event of a tievote, the Speaker would continue debate and maintain the status quo. However, in the matter of a confidence vote, the speaker could cast the tie-breaking vote.

LiberalGovernment House Leader Mike deJongcautioned it would be dangerous to go against custom and politicizethe Speaker's position.

NDP leader John Horgan is introduced to his caucus in advance of the NDP swearing-in ceremony. (Mike McArthur/CBC)

"Whoever that person ends up being, there are parliamentary conventions in place for the approach the Speaker takes when called upon to cast a deciding vote," he said.

"To begin to amend the rules simply to buttress or make life easier in a precarious minoritysituation isfraught with problems."

The 41-member NDP caucus was sworn in this afternoon, one day after thethree elected members from theB.C. Green Party.

Clark said her party would be willing to support the NDP-Greens on issues they agree on, but that major decisions on Liberal-backed Kinder Morgan and Site C need to be pushed forward.

Clark and NDP Leader John Horganhave been waging a public letter-writing battle over the massive Site C hydroelectric dam, sparked by Horganadvising BC Hydro to not sign any new contracts related to the $8.8 billion project.

And the NDP-Green alliance has said it will attempt to stop the twinning of the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline, which has federal approval and is slated to begin work in September.

Excerpt from:

Liberal, NDP MLAs take part in swearing-in ceremony - CBC.ca

Liberal group MoveOn calls for Trump to be impeached – The Hill (blog)

Liberal advocacy group MoveOn.org called for President Trumps impeachmentThursday after the release of former FBI Director James Comeys opening testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee.

In the United States, no one is above the law. The testimony that former FBI Director James Comey is expected to deliver today makes clear that Congress must begin impeachment proceedings immediately, the statement reads.

Todays testimony puts us in fundamentally new territory. This is no longer about our opposition to Trumps policies and rhetoric.

ADVERTISEMENT

MoveOns call for Trumps impeachment is not the only one. Democratic Reps. Al GreenAl GreenRyan denies GOP would try to impeach Dem accused of same actions as Trump Liberal group MoveOn calls for Trump to be impeached Second Dem joins effort to impeach Trump MORE (Texas) and Brad Sherman (Calif.) have also called for the presidents impeachment.

Sherman said he was drafting a single article of impeachment due to Trumps firing of Comey. This would be the first step in any congressional bid to oust the president.

However, House Democratic leaders have pushed back on calls for impeachment,saying the efforts could undermine the congressional and federal investigations into alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Russian election meddling.

MoveOns statement comes hours before the former FBI chief will testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee. The former FBI head put out his opening own opening statement on Wednesday, in which he says the president said he expected Comeys loyalty and that Trump wanted him to lift the cloud surrounding the Russia investigation.

Visit link:

Liberal group MoveOn calls for Trump to be impeached - The Hill (blog)

Why I’m voting Liberal Democrat for the first time today – Spectator.co.uk (blog)

From a very early age Ive been put off by sanctimoniousness; its why, I think, Ive never been attracted to the political Left, which when I was growing up was heavy on the finger-wagging, and why I find a certain style of newspaper column irritating. They remind me of the sour-faced old guys we used to see at church all in competition to see who could look the most serious and disapproving. This whole idea that if you dont support Labour and the Left youre not just wrong or misguided but a bad person is what puts me off; this Daily Mash article is depressingly close to reality in my experience.

Yet this election has made me feel the same, for the first time; my area is flooded with Labour posters outside front doors and when I look at them I find myself shaking my head.

The extent to which Labour have done better than expected in polling is disappointing; they will certainly lose, but I hoped and expected that they would haemorrhage support from the start as people were put off by Jeremy Corbyn. Some seem to see him as a sort of Obi Wan Kanobi character saving the NHS; I look at him and see a man who has previously spoken of his admiration for the Venezuela regime which has brought such an economic miracle to that country; then theres a shadow chancellor who appears alongside Soviet flags at a rally, and a director of strategy who quite openly laments that the Berlin Wall came down. Even if supporters of the three parties have disagreements, we tend to think of each other as being wrong within normal parameters, as P.J. ORourke said of Hilary Clinton but these views seem so far beyond the bounds of normality I assumed most would be repulsed.

Instead huge numbers not just support him, but see Corbyn as a deeply moral man in a crusade; most troubling is the level of popularity among the young, estimated to be over 60 and maybe 70 per cent.

Sorry if I sound sanctimonious, but the Soviet Union was evil and if you stand beside its flag theres something wrong with you as a human being; yet over two-thirds of the next generation want Britain to be Venezuela with Jihadis. Where has the education system gone wrong?

Thats why Im voting Liberal Democrat for the first time today. The main practical reason is that I live in a two-horse constituency; I am also totally underwhelmed by the Tory party and, ideology aside, Im not sure they are competent enough to do the job. But I also believe the Lib Dems have been unfairly maligned, and the lack of support for them is not just surprising, but also unjust. Im not a natural liberal but they have been unfairly blamed for a coalition they had almost no choice to enter and in which they achieved much, as this Economist assessment points out.

The coalition has cut the deficit more pragmatically than it admits and more progressively than its critics allow. When the economy weakened, the Tories eased the pace (although not by as much as this newspaper would have liked). Though the poorest Britons have been hit hard by spending cuts, the richest 10% have borne the greatest burden of extra taxes.

Its not a perfect record, by any means, but in real life there are only imperfect governments, and terrible governments. (John Rentoul also wrote a good defence of the Lib Dems in government here.)

The Liberals didnt do enough to get their message across while in government, especially on the subject of cuts; a narrative seemed to emerge which went unchallenged, although I think thats probably a perennial problem with those in the political centre. (Likewise Ive come to appreciate the Blair government did lots of pretty good things but almost no one in the Labour party seems to defend them anymore.)

I thought that with Corbyn in charge the Liberal Democrats would become the natural home of Britains moderates, but it doesnt seem to have worked that way; liberals dont seem to support them, so I think its only sporting I should.

See the original post:

Why I'm voting Liberal Democrat for the first time today - Spectator.co.uk (blog)

James O’Keefe’s undercover video stings damaged liberal icons … – Washington Post

Project Veritas, the conservative activist group famous for damaging undercover videosthat recently forced two Democratic operatives out of their jobs, has been hit with a potentially expensive problem a $1 million conspiracy lawsuit.

The allegations: Project Veritas infiltrated a Democratic consulting firm under false pretenses, secretly recorded private conversations and published deceptively edited footage all to mislead the public and hurt former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's chances of winning the White House.In doing so, Project Veritas violatedfederal and Washington wiretapping laws, among other things, said attorney Joseph Sandler, a former Democratic National Committee general counsel who represents the plaintiff, Democracy Partners, a consulting group working with the Clinton campaign.

Project Veritas's founder, James O'Keefe, hasdenounced the lawsuit as an intimidation tacticto impedeProject Veritas's army of guerrilla journalists and their pursuit of the truth.

The lawsuit, which comes at a time of strong political divisiveness,will not be without significant challenges, legal experts say.

For one, pretending to be someone else to expose something that might be of public interest is hardly new. And courts in the pasthave protected constitutional rights to gather and publish news, whether by the institutional press or the average citizen, said David Heller, deputy director of the Media Law Resource Center.

[Two Democratic operatives lose jobs after James OKeefe sting]

Secondly, although wiretapping laws make it illegal to secretly tape conversations, they also say that it's okay to do so as long as one party knows about the recording and had consented to it. The exception, known as the one-party consent, is the reason why, for example, President Trump wouldn'thave broken any laws if he did tape conversations with former FBI director James B. Comey.

A judge or a jury will have to answer these questions: Do Project Veritas's undercover investigations serve the public interest? Or are they a smear campaign disguising asjournalism?

In the current environment of 'fake news' and hyper partisanship, it won't be surprising if judges struggle over what is or isn't for the good of the public, Heller told The Washington Post.

It all started in June 2016, when a man named Daniel Sandini introduced himself to Democracy Partners's founder, Robert Creamer. Using a false name, Sandini connected Creamer tohis niece who he claimed was interested in advocacy and political work, according to the complaint, which was filed last week. That niece, Allison Maas, used a false name and a fabricated resume to secure an internship at Democracy Partners.

Both Sandini and Maas are Project Veritas operatives, the lawsuit states.

During the course of her internship, which started in September, Maas wore a hidden camera and audio recording devices. Sherecorded conversations made with clients in person or via conference calls, the lawsuit states. Shehad access to confidential emails and documents and was present at confidential meetings.

Creamer had told her not to share information with anyone, the lawsuit states, although Maas never signed a nondisclosure agreement with Democracy Partners. Sandler said that even without a nondisclosure agreement, Maas owed it to Democracy Partners to not steal information.

[James OKeefe says CNN is the target of his next sting]

You essentially sign up for an internship and become part of an organization, Sandler said. You owe a basic duty of loyalty to that organization that you are not going to that you haven't deceived them, defrauded them. That's what she breached here.

Mason Kortz, an instructional fellow at Harvard University's Cyberlaw Clinic, said what will likely be a hurdle for Democracy Partners is the manner in which the conversations were recorded. Was Maasa bystander recording other people's conversations? Or was she a part of the conversations? If it's the latter, federal andWashington wiretapping laws' one-party consent couldgive Maas some reprieve, Kortz said.

But the laws also provide another exception that could help Democracy Partners, Kortz said.Secret recordings are illegal in Washington if they were done to purposely damagea person or an organization.

They would have to provide proof of what(Maas's) purpose was, her state of mind, Kortz said.

According to O'Keefe, his organization's purpose is investigative journalism that exposes malfeasance and corruption of certain organizations. Sandler calls it political espionage.

In the weeks leading up to the presidential election, Project Veritas released videos, some of which were from footage taken by Maas. The series, called Rigging the Election, purport to prove that Democracy Partners, including Creamer and a Democratic activist from Madison, Wis., had committed voter fraud and conspired to disrupt campaign ralliesof Trump, who was then a Republican presidential candidate.

Creamer announced that he was stepping back from his work for the Clinton campaign shortly after the videos were published. Scott Foval, the activist who contracted with Democracy Partners, was laid off. Democracy Partners and a consulting firm owned by Creamer also lost clients and contracts.

The lawsuit alleged that the videos, some of which Trump mentioned at presidential debates and which have been viewed millions of times on YouTube, were selectively and heavily edited and contained false commentary by O'Keefe.

[James OKeefes CNN Leaks are totally overrated]

Yael Bromberg, a supervising attorney for the Institute for Public Representation at Georgetown Law, said the videos gained widespread criticism across the political spectrum.

We're in an era of unprecedented hyper partisanship and fake news, and the integrity of the public domain is critical to the practice of democracy, said Bromberg, who's also representing Democracy Partners and Creamer. What's more is they degrade public discourse during a time of heightened importance, which is when the public is most in tuned into politics just before the election.

In an earlier statement, Democracy Partners denounced both Project Veritas and the statements caught on camera.

Our firm has recently been the victim of a well-funded, systematic spy operation that is the modern-day equivalent of the Watergate burglars, the firm said. The plot involved the use of trained operatives using false identifications, disguises and elaborate false covers to infiltrate our firm and others, to steal campaign plans and goad unsuspecting individuals into making careless statements on hidden cameras. One of those individuals was a temporary regional subcontractor who was goaded into statements that do not reflect our values.

O'Keefe saidthat he and his group are on the right side of the law.

This lawsuit further justifies the need to drain the swamp. We will not be intimidated. We will not be silenced. We will find out who is funding this lawsuit. We will never stop exposing the truth. We will not back down,said O'Keefe, whose organization received $10,000 from the Trump Foundation in 2015 before heannounced his candidacy.

O'Keefe first gained notoriety in 2009,when Project Veritas's undercover sting led to the destruction ofthe Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN. Another sting in 2011 led to two resignations at NPR, although subsequent investigations found discrepancies between what NPR executives actually saidin taped conversations and what was shown in the sting video.

In 2013, O'Keefe agreed to pay $100,000 to a former ACORN employee who said he was illegally recorded.

David Weigel contributed to this report.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story incorrectly characterized Shane Bauer's reporting when he worked as a prison guard for a Mother Jones expose. The article has been updated.

READ MORE:

James OKeefe finally realized that people will develop conspiracy theories all on their own

The left jousts with James OKeefe

New James OKeefe video: Clinton campaign allowed a foreigner to acquire official swag

Read more:

James O'Keefe's undercover video stings damaged liberal icons ... - Washington Post