How can you boost your medical school application after graduation? | TopTestPrep.com – Video


How can you boost your medical school application after graduation? | TopTestPrep.com
http://toptestprep.com/admissions-counseling/medical-schools/overview/ | Learn more about how you can boost your medical school application if you don #39;t have...

By: Top Test Prep | #1 Tutors and Expert Admissions

Link:
How can you boost your medical school application after graduation? | TopTestPrep.com - Video

Review Jenny Craig Grand+weight loss clinic+Integrative Medicine+Phentermine Clinics Grand Junction – Video


Review Jenny Craig Grand+weight loss clinic+Integrative Medicine+Phentermine Clinics Grand Junction
This Video: http://youtu.be/HdDx8LEjdXo Our Review Sponsor: http://mkorte.tubetargets.com Our team here at TubeTargets.com works tirelessly in providing help...

By: Pete Meadows

Link:
Review Jenny Craig Grand+weight loss clinic+Integrative Medicine+Phentermine Clinics Grand Junction - Video

Canadian fashion mogul Nygard puts his faith in stem-cell science

Leonardo da Vinci painted the Mona Lisa.

Martin Luther King pioneered civil rights in America.

Thomas Jefferson authored the Declaration of Independence.

Peter J. Nygard sells polyester pants.

They all belong to an exclusive group of great men who have challenged the status quo and dared to dream, according to a 10-minute YouTube video highlighting Mr. Nygards belief hes living proof that human immortality is possible through stem-cell science.

Born in Finland and raised in Manitoba, the 70-year-old founder of the Nygard fashion empire is ranked 85th on a list of richest Canadians compiled by Canadian Business with a net worth of $944-million. But in recent years he has turned his focus away from running the business and toward searching for everlasting life.

While his efforts clearly loom large in his own mind, proponents of stem-cell research says his goals detract from the serious life-saving work many of them perform.

Immortality is not something we have in our mission statement, said Kathy Hebert, co-founder of the International Stem Cell Society, a Bahamas-based trade organization that recently made local headlines for hosting a conference attended by Mr. Nygard. Just to put it on the record, he had absolutely nothing to do with the conference. He walked in during the middle. He just showed up and left. He didnt ask questions or anything.

Mr. Nygards presence around anything related to stem cells is cause for controversy in the country. He has said he wants to make the Bahamas a worldwide centre for stem-cell research and claims in the video that he helped draft the countrys legislation to legalize the controversial somatic-cell nuclear transfer method of stem-cell therapy, a claim the government denies.

Boasts about his personal transformation are no less provocative. He has poured his money and his DNA into an effort to reproduce his own embryonic stem cells in a lab. He has been taking stem-cell injections four times a year.

Here is the original post:
Canadian fashion mogul Nygard puts his faith in stem-cell science

Renal System – Physiology – Part 4 – (Ureters, Bladder, Urethra, Obligatory Water Loss) – Video


Renal System - Physiology - Part 4 - (Ureters, Bladder, Urethra, Obligatory Water Loss)
Lecture series by G. Fuller, who has been teaching Physiology course for 35 years. This was the last semester teaching before he retired. In this lecture, yo...

By: Wizard of Science

More here:
Renal System - Physiology - Part 4 - (Ureters, Bladder, Urethra, Obligatory Water Loss) - Video

Science Under Pressure: Inside the Hyperbaric Chamber

Guest post by Lauren Burianek, doctoral candidate in cell biology

The basement of the Duke Clinic (called Duke South by everyone around here) seems like the last place youd expect to dive for treasure, but researchers and physicians at the Center for Hyperbaric Medicine and Environmental Physiology are doing just that diving for a better understanding of the human body.

Medical Director Rich Moon (standing) and chamber engineer Eric Schinazi at the controls of the hyperbaric chambers.

The $10 million facility was built in 1968 to study the effects of diving, altitude, and compressed gasses on human physiology. It features seven large steel chambers capable of simulating the high pressure of 1,000 feet below sea water to the low pressure of 100,000 feet above sea level. To put that into perspective, 1000 feet is the deepest the Smithsonian exploratory submersible, DROP, can dive, and 100,000 feet above sea level is considered to be near-space (with the peak of Mt. Everest at a measly 30,000 feet).

The deadly physiology of atmospheric pressure first came to light during construction of the Brooklyn Bridge in New York and the Eads Bridge in St. Louis in the late 1800s. High pressure tunnels were designed to keep the water out as footings were set in river beds, but the pressure also dissolved gas molecules in the blood streams of tunnel workers. When they emerged from the pressurized conditions, the gas would bubble out of solution like a freshly opened can of soda, causing life-threatening conditions, including damage to the organs and lungs, and killing about a quarter of the workers.

A news photo of workers in the Lincoln Tunnel under construction in the mid-1930s.

A couple decades later, a decompression chamber was used during the building of the Lincoln Tunnel under the Hudson River to slow the depressurization and reduce the chance of injury. This change reduced the deaths relating to decompression from 25% to almost 0%.

Similarly, SCUBA divers must carefully watch their rate of ascent; otherwise, they too might experience what is now known as decompression sickness or the bends.

The Hyperbaric facility at Duke is dedicated to researching exactly how the human body deals with these extreme pressures.

The interior of one of the hyperbaric chambers. The stickers are souvenirs of decades of research projects.

Go here to see the original:
Science Under Pressure: Inside the Hyperbaric Chamber

Genetic Engineering Pushback Against GMO Foods

Demand for food free of genetically modified organisms is growing fast and nowhere stronger than in British Columbia.

North American retail sales of Non-GMO Project verified foods have grown more than 300 per cent in three years, from $1.3 billion in 2011 to $5 billion today.

Products that display both an organic and non-GMO certification are out-selling their competitors five to one at Whole Foods Markets, company spokesman Joe Kennedy recently told a conference organized by the B.C. Food Processors Association.

The market share for organic groceries in B.C. is already double that of the rest of Canada, according to the Canada Organic Trade Association. Its 2013 market report found that two thirds of British Columbians buy organic foods each week and more than half of those surveyed said they want to avoid GMOs in their food.

A recent Ipsos Reid poll of 1,200 Canadians conducted for BioAccess Commercialization Centre, a non-profit organization that supports the natural foods industry, suggests that British Columbians are more likely to look for a non-GMO label than other Canadians.

But the Ipsos Reid survey also found widespread confusion about which crops, fruit and vegetables are likely to be the product of genetic engineering.

More than 60 per cent of respondents identified strawberries as a product of genetic engineering, but there are no commercially grown GE strawberries. Only 42 per cent identified tofu as a GMO product, despite the fact that more than 90 per cent of soybeans grown in North America are genetically engineered.

So many shoppers are convinced that perfect, red hothouse tomatoes are the result of genetic engineering that B.C.-based grower Houweling's Tomatoes obtained Non-GMO Project verification. There are no GE tomatoes on store shelves in Canada.

Explaining GMOs Genetically engineered or GE lifeforms - popularly known as genetically modified organisms or GMOs - are created when the genetic code of an organism is altered to express a desirable trait or when code containing undesirable traits is silenced or removed. Much of the opposition to genetic engineering of foods is focused on the practice of inserting genetic code from one organism into another, which cannot occur under natural circumstances. At its heart, genetic engineering is a short cut that scientists devised to speed up the work of selective breeding of plants into more useful and productive forms and to resist threats from the environment. Such selective breeding has been going on for most of human history and nearly every food crop grown today has been genetically modified through this older process.

What could have been a public relations coup for biotechnology with the promise to provide the world more nutritious, less expensive food using fewer resources has become a nasty fight driven by dislike of corporate power and fears of uncontrolled environmental and health effects. Companies such as Monsanto, Syngenta, Dupont and Bayer CropScience, which dominate the biotechnology landscape with billions of dollars in sales, are fighting allegations that they are using intellectual property law to monopolize the world's seeds and by extension the world's food supply.

Read more:
Genetic Engineering Pushback Against GMO Foods

What are GMOs and why are they here?

What are GMOs?

Genetically modified organisms - or more precisely genetically engineered organisms - are created when the genetic code of a life form is altered in a way that is not possible by natural processes. Genetic code may be removed, silenced or replaced by genetic code from another organism to promote the expression of desirable traits such as resistance to pests, or eliminate undesirable traits, such as susceptibility to disease. One of the first widely used GE crops was created by fusing a gene derived from a bacteria into the DNA of soybeans, making them resistant to the herbicide Roundup.

Bt corn was made resistant to insects by inserting a gene from a naturally occurring soil bacterium that produces a protein toxic to insect larvae, but harmless to mammals. A spray version of Bt toxin has been in use for more than 50 years. New technologies allow scientists to rewrite specic sections of genetic code without introducing outside genetic material, a technique recently used with success on monkeys.

Are certified organic and Non-GMO Project-verified foods GMO-free?

No. In the real world, pollen drifts, supply chains are shared and a low-level presence of GMOs in much of our food is a fact of life. This is why the Canadian government does not allow products to be labelled "GE free" or "GMO free."

But certified foods almost certainly contain less GE material than foods that do not carry certifi-cation. Products certified as organic may not be grown from GE seed nor can they contain ingredients derived from GMOs. However, organic certification is process-based, meaning that growers and processors must adhere to certain practices, which may not include testing for the low-level presence of GMOs. Detectable residue from GMOs does not necessarily constitute a violation of certification standards. Non-GMO Project verification does require testing for ingredients such as corn or soy, which have widely grown GE versions. Supply chain segregation, traceability and quality controls are employed to reduce risk that GMOs are present in the final product. The Non-GMO Project uses an "action threshold" of 0.9 per cent GMO. At or below is OK, above is not. The European Union employs the same threshold for food imports.

Are farmers starting to abandon GE crops?

Maybe, maybe not. It seems as if every anti-GMO activist has heard of farmers turning away from GE crops. So far, acreage numbers and biotech companies' balance sheets suggest otherwise. In 2012, more than 97 per cent of canola grown in Canada was GE, according to the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications. Global acreage under biotech crops rose six per cent, reaching a record 170 million acres in 2012, 52 per cent of that in the developing world. Global GE acreage increases in 2012 over the previous year include canola (+5%), maize (+4%), cotton (+7%) and soybeans (+8%).

Where are the GMOs hiding?

In plain sight. A handful of genetically engineered foods are in plain sight. Many thousands of ready-to-eat and processed foods contain ingredients such as oil, sugar, starch and protein made from the main GE commodity crops: corn, soy, sugar beets, canola and cottonseed. None of the genetically engineered whole foods or foods containing ingredients derived from GE commodity crops is required to be labelled in the United States or Canada.

Read more here:
What are GMOs and why are they here?