Branson’s Kids Will Be on Board For First Spaceport Flight

POSTED AT: 11:32 am

FARNBOROUGH, England (AP) The first space flight of Richard Bransons Virgin Galactic venture will be a family affair: The billionaire adventurer says he will be joined by his adult children.

The British tycoon behind the Virgin business empire that spans cable television, airlines and space tourism revealed that the three will make a 60-mile journey on the SpaceshipTwo (SS2) next year. Some 120 other tourists who have signed up for the $200,000 two-hour trips into space over the coming years were also present at the Farnborough Airshow south of London.

British billionaire Richard Branson poses for the photographers in the window of a replica of the Virgin Galactic, which according to the company will be the worlds first commercial spaceline, at the Farnborough International Airshow in Farnborough, England, Wednesday. (AP Photo/Lefteris Pitarakis)

Next year, Holly and Sam will be joining me for a first voyage into space, the thrill-seeker told a packed conference Wednesday on the third day of the show. Going into space is a hard business. It keeps my mind buzzing.

Virgin says it has 529 paid up passengers already one more than the total of space travelers since the former Soviet Unions Yuri Gagarin became the first man to go into space in 1961.

The future space tourists got their first glimpse of the SS2, with a replica set up outside the auditorium as the real one gets fixed up in the Mojave Desert. It will take off from a spaceport in New Mexico that was designed by British architect Lord Foster. The craft is designed to seat six people as well as the two pilots.

The tourists will have to undergo a week of training at the spaceport before taking their flight.

I wanted to be the first Irishman in space and Im really looking forward to it, said 70-year-old businessman and author Bill Cullen, who was the first to sign up for the ride in 2004.

Grant Roberts, 36, said his dream of space flight came from his grandfather, who was a pilot for Britains Royal Air Force and flew on missions over Germany in World War II.

Link:

Branson’s Kids Will Be on Board For First Spaceport Flight

Bransons will ride his company's 1st space flight

The first space flight of Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic venture will be a family affair: The billionaire adventurer confirmed Wednesday that he will be joined by his two adult children.

The British tycoon behind the Virgin business empire that spans cable television, airlines and space tourism said the three will make the journey 62 miles above the Earth aboard SpaceshipTwo (SS2) next year.

"Next year, Holly and Sam will be joining me for a first voyage into space," Branson said at the Farnborough Airshow south of London. "Going into space is a hard business. It keeps my mind buzzing."

Virgin says it has 529 paid-up passengers already - one more than the total of space travelers since the former Soviet Union's Yuri Gagarin became the first man to go into space in 1961. The cost of the two-hour trip is $200,000.

At the air show, some future space tourists glimpsed a replica of the SS2 set up outside the auditorium as the actual one undergoes flight testing in California's Mojave Desert. It will take off from a spaceport in New Mexico that was designed by British architect Lord Foster. The craft is designed to seat six people as well as the two pilots.

The tourists will have to undergo a week of training at the spaceport before taking their flight.

"I wanted to be the first Irishman in space, and I'm really looking forward to it," said 70-year-old businessman and author Bill Cullen, who signed up for the ride in 2004.

Grant Roberts, 36, said his dream of space flight came from his grandfather, who was a pilot for Britain's Royal Air Force and flew on missions over Germany in World War II.

Branson also said a new launch vehicle - LauncherOne - would take small satellites into space at a much lower cost than is now possible. The Virgin Galactic team said a number of companies were hoping to use LauncherOne, which is expected to begin operations in 2016 and can carry up to 500 pounds of weight.

"It will be a critical new tool for the global research community, enabling us all to learn about our home planet more quickly and affordably," he said.

Read the original post:

Bransons will ride his company's 1st space flight

NASA Space Flight Awareness Program Honors Ames' Shuttle Operations Manager

MOFFETT FIELD, Calif. - John Allmen of Gilroy, Calif., a senior project manager at NASA's Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif., recently was honored by NASA's Space Flight Awareness Program for his outstanding support of human space flight.

Allmen was honored for his exceptional leadership while serving as manager of NASA Ames' Shuttle Operations Program from 2005-2011. This program provided direct and on-call support for space shuttle operations beginning with the shuttle's return to flight. His creative application of Ames' technical expertise and use of center facilities to gain access to vital shuttle information allowed NASA to obtain a more detailed understanding of mission risks and be better prepared to make mission go/no-go decisions.

"Supporting the Space Shuttle Program and working with some of the most talented people at NASA has been the pinnacle of my career," said Allmen. "Helping to ensure the safe launch and return of the space shuttles and our brave astronauts over the last six years would have been impossible without the focus and commitment of our dedicated team at Ames."

In recognition of such flight program contributions, Allmen traveled to NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida for a tour of the center and to participate in activities in conjunction with the July 2, 2012 arrival of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle. Orion's delivery to Kennedy marks a critical milestone in preparation for its first test flight, scheduled for 2014.

The Honoree Award is one of the highest honors presented to civil service and contract employees and recognizes their dedication to outstanding job performance and contributions to the excellence in quality and safety in support of human space flight. Recipients must contribute beyond their normal work requirements toward achieving a particular human space flight program goal or a major cost savings; been instrumental in developing material that increases reliability, efficiency or performance; assisted in operational improvements; or been a key player in developing a beneficial process improvement.

Established in 1939 as the second laboratory of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Ames became NASA's Ames Research Center with the formation of NASA in 1958. Due, among other things, to its origins as an aeronautics center, Ames has played a major role in the development of the space shuttle since the program's inception in the spring of 1969. Ames built the largest arc jet complex in the world to test, in near-realistic re-entry conditions, large samples of many generations of shuttle tiles and blankets and more than half all preflight tests of the shuttle, totaling more than 35,000 hours, were conducted in Ames' wind tunnels. Shuttle cockpit designs and flight procedures were refined at a unique set of flight simulators built at NASA Ames while, in the Flight Simulator for Advanced Aircraft, Ames human factor specialists developed the shuttle orbiter display technology. Over the 30 years of the shuttle program, every shuttle pilot has practiced approaches and landings in the Ames Vertical Motion Simulator.

For information about NASA's Ames Research Center, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/ames

Please follow SpaceRef on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.

See more here:

NASA Space Flight Awareness Program Honors Ames' Shuttle Operations Manager

NASA satellites show extent of power outages after the "derecho"

NASA’s Earth Observatory has posted before and after satellite images of the mid-Atlantic region showing the extent of the power outages after the June 29th storm. The land hurricane – technically called a “derecho”, or “long-lived wind storm that is associated with a band of rapidly moving showers or thunderstorms” – left over 4 million people without power for several days. The images are from ...

Go here to read the rest:

NASA satellites show extent of power outages after the "derecho"

Terrified? NASA has reason to be when it comes to Mars landing

Sit throughNASA'sdramatic "Seven Minutes of Terror" video, about the upcoming landing of the Curiosity rover on Mars, and you might come away certain of one thing: It's not going to work.

No way. No how.

With the new video, NASA has stirred up interest in its $2.5-billion Mars mission, which aims to determine whether conditions existed at any time to support microbial life on the Red Planet.But "Terror," with its thrumming soundtrack and movie-preview aura, could inspire serious doubts in viewers about the advisability of the project.

SPACE IMAGES: Mickey on Mercury and more

But look beyond this little infusion of Hollywood at NASA and you'll find that scientists at California's Jet Propulsion Laboratory aren't shaking in their boots. JPL manages the Mars rover projects for NASA.

"Are we terrified? I think we're confident in what we've designed," scientist Ashwin R. Vasavada said in an interview Wednesday morning with the Los Angeles Times. "But we're all human. Everything we've worked for -- the scientific discoveries, the proven engineering, the contributions we make toward future NASA missions -- it all lies on the other side of those seven minutes."

There are four main segments to the landing, according to Vasavada, deputy project scientist with the Mars Science Laboratory at JPL.Here, very briefly, is what should happen in the seven minutes it takes for the craft to descend from the atmosphere of Mars and for the rover to land on the surface of the planet:

1) Entry: The heat shield withstands the initial heat (1,600 degrees Fahrenheit) of entering Mars' atmosphere and slows the spacecraft from its speed of 13,000 miles per hour.

2) Opening of the supersonic parachute: Several miles above the surface of the planet, the parachute pops open while the craft is still traveling at Mach 1.7, almost twice the speed of sound. "Even though we've taken off 99% of the speed with the heat shield, we're still going really fast," Vasavada said. Then the heat shield pops off.

3) Rover exit: About a mile above the surface, Curiosity pops out of the shell attached to the parachute, with eight rockets firing, further slowing its descent.

Read the original:

Terrified? NASA has reason to be when it comes to Mars landing

NASA News Conference to Preview August Mars Rover Landing

PASADENA, Calif. -- NASA will hold a news conference at 10 a.m. PDT (1 p.m. EDT) Monday, July 16, to discuss the upcoming August landing of the most advanced robot ever sent to another world. A new public-engagement collaboration based on the mission also will be debuted.

The event for NASA's Mars Science Laboratory spacecraft will be held at NASA Headquarters in Washington. The event will be broadcast live on NASA Television and streamed on the agency's website. To view a JPL live stream with a moderated chat, visit: http://www.ustream.tv/nasajpl .

Mars Science Laboratory will deliver the Curiosity rover to the surface of Mars at approximately 10:31 p.m. PDT on Aug. 5 (1:31 a.m. EDT on Aug. 6). Curiosity, carrying laboratory instruments to analyze samples of rocks, soil and atmosphere, will investigate whether Mars has ever offered environmental conditions favorable for microbial life.

Participants will be:

-- Doug McCuistion, director, Mars Exploration Program, NASA Headquarters -- Michael Meyer, lead scientist, Mars Exploration Program, NASA Headquarters -- John Grotzinger, MSL project scientist, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif. -- Pete Theisinger, MSL project manager, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena -- Jeff Norris, manager, planning and execution systems, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Local reporters are invited to watch the news conference via satellite, with two-way question- and-answer capability, at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. Reporters who would like to come to JPL must arrange access by contacting the JPL Media Relations Office by 3 p.m. PST on Friday, July 13, at 818-354-5011. In addition, valid media credentials are required, and non-U.S. citizens must also bring a passport.

Media representatives may also ask questions from other participating NASA centers or by telephone. To participate by phone, reporters must contact Steve Cole at 202-358-0918 or stephen.e.cole@nasa.gov by 7 a.m. PDT (10 a.m. EDT) on July 16.

For NASA TV streaming video, scheduling and downlink information, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/ntv

For more information about the mission, and to view or submit events surrounding the landing, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/mars and http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl .

The public can follow the mission on Facebook and Twitter at: http://www.facebook.com/marscuriosity and http://www.twitter.com/marscuriosity .

Go here to see the original:

NASA News Conference to Preview August Mars Rover Landing

NASA's Planetary Science Program Endangered by Budget Cuts

Image: Scott Brundage

Last year, after a lengthy, circuitous journey through the solar system, a NASA probe known as MESSENGER entered into orbit around Mercury. No spacecraft had visited the innermost planet in more than three decades, and none has paid an extended visit. With MESSENGER's arrival, NASA and its international counterparts now have spacecraft stationed at Mercury, Venus, Mars and Saturnnot to mention Earth and the moon. Two more NASA craft are en route to Jupiter and Pluto; yet another ought to reach the dwarf planet Ceres in 2015. Humankind's presence has never stretched so far.

It could stretch farther still, with robots spying down on bizarre moons that might harbor alien life or on the little-understood outermost planets. An even more novel campaign would ferry Martian rocks back to Earth for analysis. NASA had been on track to begin such an ambitious project, but alas, political maneuvering recently forced the space agency to scrap its plans.

The president's proposed budget for 2013 includes drastic cutbacks to planetary science of more than 20 percent that could derail many future missions. Such erratic handling of NASA threatens the nation's steady progress of solar system exploration, which is hypersensitive to the vicissitudes of budget politics.

Sending robotic missions out into the solar system requires years of preparation. Interplanetary probes depend on cutting-edge technologies that are developed and tested over time. And flight plans often demand a well-timed launch during a brief planetary alignment. Nurturing these complex missions calls for patience and a steady hand. That is why a group of planetary scientists draws up a blueprint for exploration every 10 years or so under the auspices of the National Research Council. This advisory panel issued its most recent report last year, which prioritizes the missions and objectives that will yield the most science per dollar. Shaking up the planetary science division now, for a relatively meager savings of $300 million, would force NASA away from these sensible, well-defined goals.

The most severe cuts were to Mars exploration, long a U.S. specialty. NASA was to begin the process of returning samples from the Red Planet during a joint 2018 mission with the European Space Agency (ESA). That campaign, perhaps the most important flagship project this decade, appears to be dead. With the release of the president's budget request, NASA had to concede that it would withdraw from the 2018 Mars mission, as well as from a 2016 launch, also in collaboration with ESA, of an orbiter that would have sought out the origins of trace gases in the Martian atmosphere. Both missions would have made significant progress toward answering the question of whether Mars was ever habitable.

The budgetary ax also threatens to push other top targets for exploration further into the distance. Foremost among them is Jupiter's moon Europa, which scientists suspect holds an internal ocean that could harbor life. The ice giants Uranus and Neptune have only been investigated in fleeting flybys. These worlds will remain unsolved puzzles without a reversal of regressive policies.

In a fraught fiscal climate, NASA should focus on what it does best and on what offers the best return on investment. Solar system exploration meets both criteria: the U.S. has long led the interplanetary charge, and the resulting scientific benefits have come at a relative bargain. This year NASA's planetary science program cost about $1.5 billionless than what NASA spent designing a congressionally mandated rocket, the Space Launch System, which appears more likely to satisfy aerospace contractors than to aid the cause of space exploration. Such directives from lawmakers all too often land in NASA's lap without the funds to carry them out.

A mere fraction of a cent from every tax dollar seems a small price to pay for the extension of humanity's robotic reach to distant worldsone of our greatest accomplishments as a nation, not to mention as a technological species. If planetary science must suffer, the reduction should be phased in gradually so that scientists can try to soften the disruption to long-term plans.

Excerpt from:

NASA's Planetary Science Program Endangered by Budget Cuts

AstraZeneca Acquires Neuroscience Assets From Link Medicine

LONDON, July 12, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- AstraZeneca today announced that it has acquired a portfolio of neuroscience assets from Link Medicine Corporation, a privately held biopharmaceutical company based in Massachusetts, USA. Link Medicine has focused its research and development efforts in the field of autophagy, an intracellular process that clears and recycles misfolded proteins and has been developing potential new treatments for a range of neurodegenerative diseases.

AstraZeneca acquired multiple small molecule assets in clinical and preclinical stage that target the enzyme farnesyltransferase and modulate autophagy. Autophagy is an emerging area of research that can be applied to a range of neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease. Both of these conditions are characterised by a build-up of incorrectly folded, aggregated and ultimately neurotoxic proteins.

Neuroscience is a challenging yet highly exciting area of science where there is huge unmet medical need. The agreement is the third for AstraZeneca's new neuroscience Innovative Medicines Unit, which was established earlier this year. Under this new model, AstraZeneca is continuing to invest in neuroscience discovery research and early development for small and large molecules by tapping into the best available external science.

Under the terms of the agreement, AstraZeneca will make specified upfront and milestone payments and will assume all of the programme's research and development activities. The financial terms of the deal have not been disclosed.

John F. Dee, President and CEO of Link Medicine, said: "We are delighted to have reached an agreement with AstraZeneca, who have a strong heritage in neuroscience research and development. We are confident their scientists will accelerate the development of this truly novel programme that has broad applications in neurodegenerative diseases."

Dr. Menelas Pangalos, executive vice president of Innovative Medicines, AstraZeneca, said: "AstraZeneca is committed to neuroscience drug discovery and development, and is always looking for new ways to share cost, risk and reward with other research partners. This agreement provides us with an entry into an exciting and vital piece of research into autophagy-- an area of considerable importance in neuroscience."

This innovative therapeutic approach is designed to restore the natural balance between the production and clearance of toxic protein aggregates. The long-term aim of this research is to develop disease-modifying drugs that will benefit patients with neurodegenerative diseases.

NOTES TO EDITORS

About AstraZenecaAstraZeneca (AZN)is a global, innovation-driven biopharmaceutical business with a primary focus on the discovery, development and commercialization of prescription medicines for gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, neuroscience, respiratory and inflammation, oncology and infectious disease. AstraZeneca operates in over 100 countries and its innovative medicines are used by millions of patients worldwide. For more information please visit: http://www.astrazeneca.com

About AstraZeneca-NeuroscienceNeuroscience is a high risk, yet highly exciting area of science with huge unmet medical need. AstraZeneca is committed to neuroscience drug discovery and development, and is pioneering new ways to share cost, risk and reward with other research partners. We have created an Innovative Medicines Unit (iMed) in Neuroscience, with a team of experts based in major neuroscience hubs -- Boston (US) and Cambridge (UK)-- a network of partners focused on small and large molecule research, discovering and developing new treatments in neurology, psychiatry and neuropathic pain. Through this innovative approach, AstraZeneca is accessing the best science, expertise and capabilities-- wherever in the world they exist-- and progressing new projects flexibly and quickly from discovery through early development.

Excerpt from:

AstraZeneca Acquires Neuroscience Assets From Link Medicine

Liberty homeowners suspicious of project

By Leonard Sparks

Published: 2:00 AM - 07/12/12

LIBERTY A group of Town of Liberty property owners continued its campaign to derail a metal-recycling project on Tuesday, clashing with other residents and town officials who say the project promises much-needed jobs.

Youngs Hill Road homeowners Jeffrey Cohen and Howard Perez took turns criticizing Owego-based Ben Weitsman and Son Inc.'s plans to build a recycling facility on Sheehan Road off Exit 99 of Route 17. Both have also joined two other property owners in filing suit to have a judge overturn a Town Board approved zoning change they claim was done to directly benefit Ben Weitsman and Son Inc.

"I never say something smells funny, but something smells funny," Cohen said.

Ben Weitsman's plan calls for construction of a facility on Sheehan Road. Up to 20 people would be hired to prepare metals for daily shipping to the company's shredding operation in Owego. No shredding will take place in Liberty, owner Adam Weitsman said. And the plans call for new brick buildings, paved parking and landscaping, he said.

"I understand the public but the public's never seen a scrap yard like ours," Weitsman said.

The recycling facility would be located in a six-parcel area that was zoned residential under a revised zoning map approved by the town in 2011.

Town officials said a zoning review committee had intended to zone the parcels as industrial. The Town Board approved a local law in December, "correcting" what it said was a mistake after the recycler showed interest in the land.

"That strip of land is not suitable for much else," Liberty Supervisor Charlie Barbuti told the Planning Board Tuesday.

See the original post:

Liberty homeowners suspicious of project

Liberty Power named Largest Hispanic-owned Energy Company in United States

FT. LAUDERDALE, Fla., July 12, 2012 /PRNewswire/ --Liberty Power, the nation's largest independent retail electric provider, today announced that it was named the largest Hispanic-owned energy company in the country by Hispanic Business Inc.The company was alsorecognized as the eighth largest Hispanic-owned company overall. The Hispanic Business 500 list which ranks, by revenue, the 500 largest Hispanic-owned companies in the United States isnow celebrating its 30th year. The2012 list wasofficially released on June 27thon Hispanic Business.com.

(Logo:http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20120712/FL38325LOGO )

With $655 million in revenues in 2011, Liberty Power is significantly larger than its counterparts, accounting for more than 36% of the total revenues for the Top 10 Hispanic enterprises in the energy sector. In total, there are nine categories: Automotive, Energy, Finance, Manufacturing, Retail, Service, Transportation, Construction, and Wholesale. The Energy Industry rankings by Hispanic Business were first established in 2009, when Liberty Power ranked as the third largest in that sector based on previous year's revenues of $302 million. That same year the company ranked 21st overall.

Over the last three years, Liberty Power has more than doubled its revenues by expanding its customer base and delivering the offers and exceptional service valued by customers and channel partners alike.The independent energy retailer also experienced significant year-over-year growth as the company grew by 25%, outpacing the Hispanic Business 500 enterprises, which grew by 19% in reaching $38 billion in total revenues.

"Liberty Power is honored to be recognized as the top energy company and the eighth largest Hispanic-owned company on this distinguished list. We would like to thank our team members, our customers, and our business partners. Our achievements over the last decade have been a direct result of working together," said David Hernandez, CEO of Liberty Power.

About Liberty Power Headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Liberty Power is the largest independent retail electric provider in the United States based on 2012KEMArankings of retail energy providers. The company is also the first minority-owned, retail electric provider with a national footprint. Currently serving over 170,000 accounts, Liberty Power provides large and small businesses, government agencies, and residential customers, with low-cost electricity and exceptional customer service.

For more information on Liberty Power, please visit http://www.libertypowercorp.com.

Liberty Power is a registered trademark of Liberty Power Corp. LLC encompassing Liberty Power Holdings LLC, Liberty Power Delaware LLC, Liberty Power Maryland LLC, Liberty Power District of Columbia LLC, and LPT LLC, dba LPT SP LLC.Liberty Power is certified and licensed by the Public Utilities/Service Commissions of: CA, CT, DC, DE, IL, ME, MD (IR793), MA (CS-057) MI, NJ (ESL-0001), NY, OH, PA, RI, TX (10118) and VA; as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

More:

Liberty Power named Largest Hispanic-owned Energy Company in United States

Our View: Political parties earn freedom more fans

July 11, 2012 11:23:34 PM

Is libertarianism, the philosophy of voluntary arrangements, free markets and individual liberty, en vogue? After years of overreaching government by the Republican and Democratic parties, there are signs that a freedom movement is beginning to bristle.

The Associated Press moved a story on Saturday with the headline: "With 'freedom' in fashion, is libertarianism back?" AP reporter Pauline Arrillaga wrote: "Something's going on in America this election year: a renaissance of an ideal as old as the nation itself that live-and-let-live, get-out-of-my-business, individualism vs. paternalism dogma that is the hallmark of libertarianism." She is correct.

Those yearning for a liberty movement in the United States often cite the 2010 mid-term elections, where voters, some reacting to the passage of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul, ousted Democrats from office throughout the country and gave control of the House of Representatives to the Republicans. But even before that, liberty-minded voters began rejecting intrusive government policies.

In 2006, Republicans lost control of the House and Senate and a majority of the contested governorships. In 2008, Democrats won the White House, and increased their majorities in both chambers of Congress.

Those discouraging reversals for Republicans were due, at least in part, to the disenfranchisement felt toward the GOP by freedom-focused voters and the libertarian wing of the Republican Party. Too many policies enacted by the GOP during the George W. Bush presidency, especially when the GOP controlled both houses of Congress, were suspect. Republicans went along with bailouts, stimulus packages, unpopular wars and an arguable precursor of Obamacare, the Medicare Part D prescription drug program.

Every time politicians of either major party step on liberty, which they do far too frequently, voters react. Now, with the odious requirement in Obamacare that all Americans buy government-approved health insurance or pay what a Supreme Court majority decided to call a tax, the libertarian streak within many American voters may play a deciding role in the presidential election, now less than four months away.

Judging by this week's annual FreedomFest conference in Las Vegas, the liberty movement is gaining momentum. Thousands will pour into Nevada, a key swing state, to promote all things free-market and pro-liberty. FreedomFest provides insight into what liberty-leaning voters are thinking. This year's event could even turn out as the unofficial kickoff of a push that decides the winners in November.

Here is the original post:

Our View: Political parties earn freedom more fans

Libertarian candidate having trouble getting on November ballot

July 11, 2012 Updated Jul 11, 2012 at 7:42 PM CDT

PEORIA, Ill -- Chad Grimm is a Libertarian vying for the 92nd district seat and has encountered some trouble preventing him from getting on the November ballot.

He says a select group volunteering for the Democratic party helped him gather around 1,800 signatures to get on the November ballot.

Grimm says the problem is that the people who helped him, also gathered signatures for State Senator Dave Koehler during the primary election, which may be against the law during the same election cycle.

"I don't know their motivations behind doing this but I asked them very specifically in the beginning have they circulated for any other candidate and I was told no," said Grimm.

Another hearing is set for July 24th in front of Peoria city election officials.

At that time a decision is expected to be made whether Grimm will be on the ballot.

Visit link:

Libertarian candidate having trouble getting on November ballot

Islands spat with Tokyo flares again

Thursday, July 12, 2012

Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi met Japanese counterpart Koichiro Gemba in Phnom Penh where he "reaffirmed China's principled position" on the islands, known as Senkaku in Japanese, and Diaoyu in Chinese.

"He stressed the Diaoyu Islands and their affiliated islets have always been China's territory since ancient times, over which China has indisputable sovereignty," the Chinese delegation said.

Japan summoned the Chinese ambassador in Tokyo as three patrol boats approached the chain of islands.

The crew of the vessels, which have since left the islands' immediate vicinity, initially rebuffed Japanese orders to leave.

"We are conducting official duty in Chinese waters. Do not interfere. Leave China's territorial waters," the crews said, according to Japan Coast Guard.

The waters around the disputed islands, which are close to oil reserves, have been the scene of previous rows, including the arrest of a Chinese trawlerman in late 2010.

Yesterday's spat is the latest clash over disputed territory between China and its neighbors that threatens to overshadow attempts to smooth regional relations at an Asian security summit in Cambodia this week.

The 10 members of Southeast Asian regional body ASEAN have been trying to agree a long-stalled "code of conduct" for the South China Sea that would help settle overlapping claims in the resource-rich waterway.

The Philippines is leading a push for ASEAN to unite to persuade China to accept a code based on a United Nations law on maritime boundaries that would delineate the areas belonging to each country.

Excerpt from:

Islands spat with Tokyo flares again

Hominins did not need boats to settle islands

The early human colonisation of islands might not have been plain sailing. Instead of using boats to deliberately settle on Indonesian islands, hominins may have arrived as castaways, carried on floating debris after floods.

David Wilkinson of Liverpool John Moores University and Graeme Ruxton of the University of St Andrews, both in the UK, used population estimates from the early settlement of Polynesia to model the likely success of island settlement attempts in human prehistory.

They found that five young couples had a 40 per cent chance of giving rise to a population of 500 or founding a population that survived for 500 years. Ten random castaways had only a 20 per cent chance of similar success. But throwing in between one and four additional castaways every 50 years raised the chances of an accidental settlement succeeding to 47 per cent.

Stone tools show that hominins possibly Homo erectus reached Flores 1 million years ago. The famous Homo floresiensis may have descended from this population of H. erectus. Meanwhile, a study earlier in the year concluded that Neanderthals had access to boats 100,000 years ago, which they used to reach the Greek islands of Lefkada, Kefallonia and Zakynthos, where their stone tools have been found.

The new finding suggests that in both cases the hominins could have reached the islands without boats. We already know that other mammals managed the feat: rats and Stegodon, an extinct relative of the elephant, crossed the deep-water channel between the Indonesian islands of Java and Flores. Elephants are strong swimmers, and rats could have travelled on storm debris.

Accidental colonisation of Flores by hominins would have been difficult, but not impossible, says Mike Morwood of the University of Wollongong in New South Wales, Australia. However, he adds, "the rapid colonisation of Greater Australia and major islands of western Melanesia 45,000 to 50,000 years ago indicates deliberate colonisation voyages by people using directed craft".

Journal of Human Evolution, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.05.013

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.

Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article

See the original post:

Hominins did not need boats to settle islands

China media: Islands sovereignty

12 July 2012 Last updated at 01:24 ET

Newspapers continue their coverage on the East China Sea islands dispute after Japan protested at the entry of Chinese patrol boats into disputed water.

Three Chinese fishery patrol boats entered the waters near the disputed islands - known as Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China - early on Wednesday and have since left, reports say.

Both People's Daily and its subsidiary the Global Times ran reports on their front page, saying the Chinese boats were conducting "routine patrols".

Hong Kong's Ming Pao Daily News said official Chinese media such as the Xinhua news agency had run prominently featured reports on the patrol on Tuesday, almost immediately after the boats had reached the area.

Reports in Beijing News said the Chinese boats had asked intercepting Japanese coast guard boats to leave.

Japan summoned the Chinese ambassador in Tokyo to lodge a protest over the incident, but Beijing rejected the complaint, foreign ministry spokesman Liu Weimin said in Beijing on Wednesday.

China Daily reported that Chinese foreign minister Yang Jiechi met his Japanese counterpart Koichiro Gemba in Phnom Penh, on the sidelines of the Asean regional forum.

Mr Yang reaffirmed China's stance on the disputed islands, and urged Tokyo to "get back to managing differences through dialogue and reconciliation," the report said.

The Beijing Times said that academics had accused the Japanese government of collaborating with right wing activists to create an impression that Tokyo has been in actual control of the islands.

Go here to see the original:

China media: Islands sovereignty

Democrats: GOP Health Care Vote Will Go Nowhere – Video

11-07-2012 13:10 House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Democratic Whip Steney Hoyer said Wednesday that a planned vote by congressional republicans to repeal President Barack Obama's health care law has "no chance of going anywhere." (July 11) Subscribe to the Associated Press: Download AP Mobile: Associated Press on Facebook: Associated Press on Twitter: Associated Press on Google+:

Go here to read the rest:

Democrats: GOP Health Care Vote Will Go Nowhere - Video

House Votes to Repeal Obama’s Health Care Law – Video

11-07-2012 15:41 The Republican-led US House votes to repeal President Obama's health care law, but the effort is doomed to fail in the Democratic-controlled Senate. (July 11) Subscribe to the Associated Press: Download AP Mobile: Associated Press on Facebook: Associated Press on Twitter: Associated Press on Google+:

Read more from the original source:

House Votes to Repeal Obama's Health Care Law - Video

Jimmy Kimmel Mocks CNN Over Gallup Poll, Health Care Ruling Mistake (VIDEO)

Nancy Pelosi Speaker John Boehner Jerrold Nadler

"Today, in upholding the Affordable Care Act, the Supreme Court has shown that, even at a time when Washington seems to have reached a new level of dysfunction, there remains a respect for the rule of law, for precedent, and for the ability of Congress to legislate on matters that affect the American people," Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said in a statement. "By not caving in to the most craven political calls, it appears the Court has stood by more than 70 years of legal precedent to ensure that: some 32 million Americans will have access to health insurance; we stop the unnecessary deaths of 42,000 Americans annually who die simply because they lack health insurance; insurers can no longer deny a child health care because of pre-existing conditions; millions of young adults receive coverage on their parents' plans until age 26; insurers can no longer impose lifetime limits on coverage; millions of Americans receive free preventive care; and, seniors save billions of dollars on prescription drugs. "The Affordable Care Act will now assume its rightful place, along with Social Security and Medicare, as powerful testimony to what our nation can achieve to benefit the lives of all Americans. Today's decision will, I truly hope, put to rest the partisan attacks from the Right against the law and many of its provisions. Republicans have threatened to continue their attempts to repeal these provisions, but let us all hope that they will respect the Court's ruling and put the health and wellbeing of the American people ahead of insurance companies."

"Today's decision makes one thing clear: Congress must act to repeal this misguided law," said Sen. Republican Leader Mitch McConnell. "Obamacare has not only limited choices and increased health care costs for American families, it has made it harder for American businesses to hire. Today's decision does nothing to diminish the fact that Obamacare's mandates, tax hikes, and Medicare cuts should be repealed and replaced with common sense reforms that lower costs and that the American people actually want. It is my hope that with new leadership in the White House and Senate, we can enact these step-by-step solutions and prevent further damage from this terrible law."

Republican Governors Association Chairman Bob McDonnell issued the following statement regarding the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: "Today's ruling crystallizes all that's at stake in November's election. The only way to stop Barack Obama's budget-busting health care takeover is by electing a new president. Barack Obama's health care takeover encapsulates his Presidency: Obamacare increases taxes, grows the size of government and puts bureaucrats over patients while doing nothing to improve the economy. It's never been more important that we elect a President who understands the marketplace and will make job creation his top priority. By replacing Barack Obama with Mitt Romney, we will not only stop the federal government's healthcare takeover, but will also take a giant step towards a full economic recovery."

"Dr. Coburn will be reviewing the ruling and will respond with an updated plan to repeal and replace this unworkable law. The Court affirmed Congress' power to tax people if they don't eat their broccoli. Now it's up to the American people to decide whether they will tolerate this obscene abuse of individual liberty," said John Hart, a spokesman for Sen. Coburn.

"Today's Supreme Court decision sets the stakes for the November election. Now, the only way to save the country from ObamaCare's budget-busting government takeover of health care is to elect a new president," said RNC Chairman Reince Priebus. "Under President Obama's signature legislation, health care costs continue to skyrocket, and up to 20 million Americans could lose their employer-based coverage. A panel of unelected bureaucrats now has the unprecedented authority to come between elderly patients and their doctors. Meanwhile, the rules and regulations placed on job creators and small businesses make it nearly impossible to hire new workers at a time when Americans desperately need jobs. "We need market-based solutions that give patients more choice, not less. The answer to rising health care costs is not, and will never be, Big Government. "We must elect a president who understands the economy, respects free enterprise, and can provide the leadership we now so desperately need. On Election Day, we must elect Mitt Romney and put America on the path toward a brighter economic future and successful health care reform."

Today, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) released the following statement on the Supreme Court ruling on the President's health care law: "The Supreme Court's decision to uphold ObamaCare is a crushing blow to patients throughout the country. ObamaCare has failed to keep the President's basic promise of allowing those who like their health care to keep it, while increasing costs and reducing access to quality care for patients. In this tough economy, jobs and economic growth are on the minds of most Americans, but ObamaCare has increased uncertainty for small businessmen and women and forced them to put their hiring decisions on hold. "During the week of July 9th, the House will once again repeal ObamaCare, clearing the way for patient-centered reforms that lower costs and increase choice. We support an approach that offers simpler, more affordable and more accessible health care that allows people to keep the health care that they like. "The Court's decision brings into focus the choice the American people have about the direction of our country. The President and his party believe in massive government intrusions that increase costs and take decisions away from patients. In contrast, Republicans believe in patient-centered, affordable care where health care decisions are made by patients, their families and their doctors, not by the federal government."

House Democratic Whip Steny H. Hoyer (MD) released the following statement today after the Supreme Court's decision on the Affordable Care Act: "Our highest court has weighed in, and its decision to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is a victory for all Americans who have ever worried about being able to access or afford the care they need. Democrats are proud to have worked hard to pass this landmark legislation in 2010 and of our efforts to make sure it is implemented in a way that continues to yield new benefits for patients, employers, and care providers. "The Affordable Care Act made it illegal for insurance companies to discriminate against patients on the basis of pre-existing conditions, allowed young people to remain on their parents' plans until age 26, and prohibited insurance companies from charging women higher premiums than men. The Medicare Part D 'donut hole' is closing, and seniors on Medicare now have access to free preventive services like mammograms and colonoscopies. Moreover, the Affordable Care Act provides deficit savings of more than $1 trillion over the next two decades. The Affordable Care Act further brought peace of mind to the 30 million uninsured Americans who will finally be able to access affordable coverage once the law is fully implemented. "Republicans have been trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act since the day it was enacted, and they have been eagerly awaiting today's ruling. But they must now accept that the Affordable Care Act will remain in place and that the time for litigation and partisan posturing on this issue ought to come to an end. Republicans now have a responsibility to work with Democrats to implement the Affordable Care Act, and I call on them to do so in order to make care affordable and accessible to Americans."

Following the Supreme Court's decision affirming the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, former Governor and U.S. Senate candidate Tim Kaine today released the following statement: "The Affordable Care Act is an important first step in curbing discriminatory insurance company practices and increasing access to health care, but more needs to be done to bring down costs. Our government, businesses, and citizens cannot continue to spend more than any other nation on health care while getting second-rate results. As Senator, I am committed to working with all stakeholders to find additional improvements to the Affordable Care Act that give all Americans affordable access to high quality services. "While there is more work to do, it is worth noting what has already been accomplished under the Affordable Care Act. Nearly 63,000 more young people in Virginia have health coverage, more than 800,000 Virginia seniors have received free preventive care, millions of small businesses are now eligible for tax credits, and twenty million American women have access to cancer screenings and contraception without co-pays. And we've put an end to the egregious abuses by insurance companies that denied coverage to children with preexisting conditions, charged women higher premiums for the same coverage, and dropped folks when they got sick. "My opponent regularly calls for a full repeal of this law, despite the positive results it's already delivering for Virginia. In the decade encompassing George Allen's six years as a U.S. Senator, the average insurance premium for families more than doubled and over 12 million more Americans were uninsured. Clearly, inaction was not a solution, and neither are continued calls for repeal. Instead we must work together to strengthen this existing program and improve cost controls."

"In passing health reform, we made history for our nation and progress for the American people. We completed the unfinished business of our society and strengthened the character of our country. We ensured health care would be a right for all, not a privilege for the few. Today, the Supreme Court affirmed our progress and protected that right, securing a future of health and economic security for the middle class and for every American."

Read more:

Jimmy Kimmel Mocks CNN Over Gallup Poll, Health Care Ruling Mistake (VIDEO)

6 reasons health care costs keep going up

There are many reasons health costs keep going up. Bigger ticket items in hospital care and doctor visits are among the reasons why.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Health care reform will help millions more Americans get insurance.

But experts say the Affordable Care Act itself won't stop the cost of health care from continuing to rise and consumers from paying bigger bills.

Insurance premiums -- the monthly fees consumers pay to get coverage -- continue to rise much faster than the 2% rate of overall inflation. In 2011, average premiums rose 8% for individual coverage and 9% for family coverage, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

There are many reasons costs are going up; some apply to all patients, and others only to patients who get insurance through big insurance plans. But experts identify six main drivers.

Hospital care: Hospital care accounts for nearly one-third of the nation's annual health care expenditures.

According to the American Hospital Association, factors driving up hospital costs include the rising cost of goods and services used for patient care -- such as workers, equipment and information systems. Other factors are rising demand for care and compliance with regulatory requirements.

An increasingly significant issue for hospitals is the increase in patients covered by Medicare and Medicaid -- 60% of all admissions. Neither program fully reimburses the cost of hospital care, the hospital association said.

Hospitals are also seeing a jump in the cost of care for patients who can't pay, which averages about 6% of hospital expenses. Hospitals assume those costs as part of their legal duties to provide "charity care."

Doctor visits: According to the American Medical Association, the cost of physician care, both to insurance and patients, has risen 1.3% during the past year.

See the original post:

6 reasons health care costs keep going up