Crew Escape System Tested

Click here to view the embedded video.

NASA just tested an emergency escape system in the event of an aborted launch attempt.  In light of the current end to human space flight, you might be asking yourself, why?

For one thing, they put a lot of work into the project, I’d want to see it work too. Eventually the private space industry WILL be doing human spaceflight.  I’m sure they will be able to use some of the technology. Besides I think NASA should act as enablers to the private industry, because in the end private industry will be more efficient.  There is 1.2 billion in NASA’s budget to greatly help in that regard.

While I’ll make no bones about my displeasure of us becoming dependent on others to continue just getting a ride to the ISS — to the tune of a half billion dollars.  Not everything about the NASA budget is (IMO) bad, sure there are a couple big ticket items I’d toss, still it sounds we could end up with a couple pretty good Mars missions and a moon mission.  The James Webb telescope appears still to be funded, plus an increase in the budget to look for asteroids potentially hazardous to Earth.

There is also hope for getting some of our bright students employment in the aerospace field, certainly a positive idea.

We’ll just have to wait and see what actually transpires.  I keep hearing “transparency” bandied about where the government is concerned.  Let’s just hope the meaning of transparency starts to be defined as open, and not invisible like it currently seems to be.

I’ll get off my soapbox now. Be sure the have a look at some of the comments posted to the video at YouTube, I got a kick out of them.

AND FINALLY (!!)  Happy Mother’s Day to all the mom’s out there.

The Posing Snake [Science Tattoo] | The Loom

womanwithsnake440An anonymous reader writes, “I am a computer programmer and amateur herpetologist. On my leg is Henry, a North Brazilian Boa constrictor — rare in captivity at the time. I brought him in for photos before we began, and again after it was completely healed. As you can see in this photo, his colors were altered in the tattoo to stand out better. It took 20 hours over the course of 14 months to complete and was done completely freehand. Each scale was drawn individually. This photo is so special, since he’s posed very much the way he came out on my leg, tongue and all. It’s not like I could give him instructions on what to do.”

Click here to go to the full Science Tattoo Emporium.


Perspective

Cross posted from original at The Space Tweep Society

I frequently get asked what I think about the direction NASA is taking. I wrote this post a couple of weeks ago but didn’t post it at the time. I’m not really sure why. This post does not outline my personal take on what we should be doing with our space program; it just provides a little bit of perspective on things from where I sit.

Written on April 20th:

After the president’s visit to Kennedy Space Center last week where he laid out the emerging plan for NASA to go forward, I’ve noticed a fair amount of negativity in the space community. Personally, I have high hopes for our nation’s future in space. It isn’t because anything particularly revolutionary was disclosed at Obama’s Space Summit. My perspective has just changed gradually over the past year or so, and a lot of that I owe to my interactions on Twitter. I used to look at space exploration very narrowly. Like this is the way we go to space, and this is the right way and the only way. And this is how it has to be (I’m exaggerating, but just go with it). I looked at the changes to the program more in terms of how they affected me and my community.

Now, after quite some time on Twitter, I have much greater knowledge of commercial space operations, robotic missions, and international perspectives. Because of this I am able to take myself out of the equation and look at the plan more optimistically. It has made me start to challenge the traditional thinking that is ingrained in us about NASA’s role and see more of a big picture view.

Seeing Discovery land today reminded me how impressive the shuttle is as a launch vehicle, and how sad I’ll be to see the program end. That being said, if we waited another five years, ten years, or even more to retire it, would it be any easier? For me, the answer is no. The shuttle is an icon, a symbol of pride, and a treasure. It is going to be hard to see it go no matter when it happens. And there is no denying that as time goes on it would become more difficult to maintain due to issues like aging hardware and availability of spares. So, while I might not be ready for shuttle to end, I probably won’t ever be, in the same way I would never be ready for a loved one to die. It will be a time to grieve and then move on.

I have heard the argument that it would be easier to lay shuttle to rest if we had something better coming along. Ares-1 might have filled that role, but there were funding issues. So now we’re trying something different, with a greater emphasis on commercial spaceflight roles. Our destinations are different, and we aren’t quite sure what kind of vehicle we will be using to get to them. But we’re going SOMEWHERE. We have a commitment to develop a heavy-lift vehicle. These are steps in the right direction, yet they don’t seem to have been met with much optimism. Of course, people have every right to feel the way they do and to question the decisions. Personally, I’m choosing not to. I just don’t see the point.

Regardless of what I think is the the right path to take, I’m not the one who gets to make that decision. Rather than expend energy fighting it or fretting over it, I’m going to accept the new plan for what it is and be hopeful. I’m going to look around for new opportunities arising from it where I can make a difference and seize them, or create my own. I’m going to savor everything about the last few shuttle missions, and remember the program fondly.

Overall I see that there is potentially a bright future out there for NASA and space exploration, it just looks different than what most of us expected. A lot different. If we can approach the new plan with open minds, accept that there are other valid ways of doing things and embrace them, we can make the most of the situation. If, instead, we consider it a tremendous loss and spend our time wallowing in it, then it will most likely manifest as one. For me, it was a simple choice.

Orion Abort Test Photos

Abort Test Photos, Aviation Week

"NASA tested the launch abort system for the Orion crew exploration vehicle for the first time today, with spectacular results. Regardless of the ultimate fate of Orion -- now at the center of a Washington dispute over the future path of U.S. human spaceflight -- the test produced valuable data that can make future crew capsules much safer. William Faulkner, a freelance photographer in Las Cruces, N.M., took these shots of the test at nearby White Sands Missile Range for Aviation Week & Space Technology."

Reactive Collision Avoidance Algorithm

Algorithm is used for safe operation of autonomous, collaborative, vehicle formations.

The reactive collision avoidance (RCA) algorithm allows a spacecraft to find a fuel-optimal trajectory for avoiding an arbitrary number of colliding spacecraft in real time while accounting for acceleration limits. In addition to spacecraft, the technology can be used for vehicles that can accelerate in any direction, such as helicopters and submersibles.

Pioneer in Sickle Cell Genetics Dies at 89

Dr. Helen M. Ranney, a hematologist who pioneered sickle cell genetic research in the 1950s, died early this month at 89 years old – one week short of her 90^th birthday.

Ranney's revolutionary research was the earliest link between heredity and sickle cell anemia. Little

Obama’s Campaign Promises on Energy, versus Reality

Above is a political cartoon about energy, from 2008.  In his latest email Bill McKibben of 350.org says,

“Most of us like what President Obama campaigned for. But after taking office, he has not acted courageously on climate and energy issues. In fact, just a month ago he ended a longstanding moratorium on new offshore oil drilling. He told Americans it was safe. Hopefully this tragedy will be a wake up call that can help President Obama see that he was wrong.”

It is unlikely that President Obama will ‘wake up’ and see he was wrong about anything having to do with drilling for oil.   There is ample evidence that President Obama intends for the use of fossil fuels to grow a lot in the next few years.   There is little  indication that he feels drilling for oil in the oceans around the United States is something we should not do, even after the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded and sank and now is gushing oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

To say this is disappointing is an understatement.   ‘Business as usual’ is not really what we expected from President Obama.  The reason I finally ended up supporting President Obama (after supporting several other people) was because he said we have to fight climate change with the equivalent of an “Apollo program”.  By November 2008,  I believed it was realistic to think that he would, as a Democrat, fight climate change seriously,  and work to end our dependence on fossil fuels.  His campaign rhetoric on climate change and energy was the main reason many environmentally-aware people voted for him.  But now, at this point, I don’t believe Obama ever intended to fight climate change seriously,  and that it was all just a lot of campaign-speak.   It’s seems to me now that his campaign promises to  “environmental types” was just to placate us and get us to vote for him.   President Obama is our first Greenwash President.

The reasons I no longer trust Obama will do the right thing on climate are many:  he wants to give billions in government money to “clean coal” technology, which is like throwing money down the toilet.  Coal will never be clean.  Surely he knows that.   He wants to give coal and other fossil fuel companies big allowances in the future energy and “climate” cap and trade bill — a bill that has been endorsed by anti-environmentalists and by big oil companies.  He wants us to start drilling offshore for oil again, in deep pockets of oil miles under the ocean surface.  (To what end?  It will still run out.)  And he never intended for the U.S. to stop using oil, until it was all gone.  He never intended for us to stop using coal and he has even called natural gas “clean”.  It is clear the President Obama feels oil and coal will be a part of our energy sources until at least 2035, (despite the problem of peak oil having [...]

Gattaca: “The Matrix” of Genomics

Gattaca is as much about genomics is The Matrix is about informatics —which is to say: nothing and everything.

NOTHING because YOU LEARN NOTHING ABOUT EITHER FROM THE MOVIE. You actually understand less about the subject than you did before the movie because now domain language has been conflated with the cinematic affect of the movie. After 106 minutes of the world’s most sophisticated propaganda, your squishy mammal brain leaves that theatre with strong opinions, high confidence, and a grab bag of superstitions superficially identical to the language of the actual science, but entirely inapplicable to representing physical reality.

Wearing a trenchcoat and calling yourself a hacker does not write software. Supporting awareness and calling yourself an ethicist does not cure diseases.

EVERYTHING because EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS BOTH FROM THE MOVIE. You left that theatre with all the right passion, confidence, and signals: congratulations, you are now perfectly sociologically equipped to infect the collective domain understanding with noise. Go forth! Even if you yourself don’t watch the movie, other people did, and they now understand you by it.

And, I don’t mean “everybody except you because you know better.” I mean “everybody especially you because you know better.” For example, you will learn more about Gattaca reading this post than you will about genomics. You’ll learn more about The Matrix than genomics from this post. You think that because you “know better” that you’re immune from your own humanity? No! Personally, the best I can cope is by some tortured parody. I know that Pepsi is terrible for me. I know that I’m being manipulated to want it despite my own interests. Yet, somehow, I’ll be wandering around the Stop-n-Shop, and magically a Pepsi product has appeared in my hand. At least a tortured hostility sometimes results in me successfully rejecting the impulse. It works better than arrogant rationalization.

“Hmph, I’m wise to this game, so like a good American, I’ll completely overlook that I’ve completely complied with all the objectives of the propaganda while applying my intelligence to rationalize the propaganda’s success invisible to me because I prefer to understand myself as the sort of person who is too sophisticated to be affected by such crude manipulation. ”

See, let’s watch how well rationalization doesn’t work. I’ll now spend the rest of this post infecting you with all ideas Gattaca because we’re all just too clever to be affected by such things.

For example, after I mocked Steve Dickman at Boston Biotech Watch for presenting the Gattaca movie poster as credible expert commentary about medical testing company Counsyl, commenter John cleverly searched the Think Gene archives. The Gattaca Movie Poster is ubiquitous in hack genomic commentary. Think Gene is hack genomic commentary. Surely, I must have posted the poster myself… Yes!

But ah ha!

“For example, when you are an astronaut assigned to critical mission in space, you had better not have a 90% chance of dying of a heart attack during the mission. Oh… I guess the scene where Vincent dies in space and the mission is aborted at the cost of decades and trillions… was cut.”

John responds:

That’s what I thought when I watched it. It’s a risk. Do we want to take a risk in order to give someone the chance to fulfill a dream or to prove to people that they can meet their dreams? Once something becomes an objective fact, it’s hard to ignore it. The fact that Vincent faked his physical training and checkups, in the movie, demonstrates that the scriptwriters for the movie apparently felt that those processes are unnecessary. Ok, so I guess NASA should no longer do them since Gattaca says so?

Yes! Of all possible occupations, “interplanetary astronaut” is probably the MOST appropriate occupation for exhaustive medical screening. It’s even more appropriate than “olympic athlete.” If you have a heart attack on the 100 meter butterfly —that’s annoying. If you have a heart attack on the the 1,000,000,000 meter  —that’s also annoying, but also, while the world’s most incompetent doctor humors your angina as “indigestion,” you were supposed to be piloting the world’s largest ballistic missile to Saturn. The “triumph of the human spirit” is not going to help you pump your blood at 10Gs, and I generally prefer my world’s largest ballistic missiles to be piloted by people generally healthy enough to prevent them from exploding over… well, so don’t explode at all.

Also, the inspirational quote? “I never saved anything for the swim back.” Translation: “suicidal.” Olympic swimmer: good attitude. Pilot of world’s largest ballistic missile: bad attitude.

Why can’t Vincent be a navigator and not an astronaut? Or get his heart fixed?

Further, I am entirely unable to practically distinguish a common RFID employee identification badge —which every NASA-like facility already uses— and the “DNA test” used in Gattaca. Even a driver’s license works better than those crappy DNA scans —they include a color, high resolution photograph of your face.

And when Vincent is hired by a prestigious firm solely by his “profile” before the hiring manager even meets him… what, that’s never happened to a Stanford graduate? Come on.

We wish the real world was as lenient or dramatic as Gattaca’s. In real life, some prig threatened by Vincent’s ambition would have reported Vincent to Human Resources for something as lame as a resume mis-reference and —strictly per the employee handbook— Vincent would be transferred or fired because he wouldn’t have the political connections with management as the “mysterious, gifted outsider” to make an exception.

Product Review: SteelSeries Siberia Headphones

If you're like me and listen to lots of music, headphones are a necessity. I have a pair that I keep at home, a pair for working at the office, and a pair for when I'm outdoors. Recently, the Sennheiser PC156 headphones that I'd been using in the office started showing some wear and tear. They