Twitter’s CEO Had Already Been Selling Ads for the Don Lemon Show That Elon Musk Suddenly Canceled – Futurism

If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.

X-formerly-Twitter owner and self-proclaimed "free speech absolutist" Elon Musk abruptly canceled journalist Don Lemon's upcoming X show on Wednesday, an incident that put Musk's glaring double standard when it comes to his town square "for all" on full display.

Despite Musk telling Lemon he had his "full support," he apparently canceled the show "hours after an interview I conducted with him on Friday," Lemon wrote in a statement.

Now, as Semafor reports, more details are coming to light, further complicating the story. According to two insider sources, Lemon let a contract languish for "weeks"without signing it. But Lemon's associates shot back, arguing that it was X's legal department that "took weeks to get a contract to the hosts team."

Perhaps most glaringly of all, X CEO Linda Yaccarino was apparently already selling ads for the show at CES in January, despite never having signed a deal.

Musk has yet to give a coherent reason as to why he mysteriously canceled Lemon's show.

In a vague tweet, MuskaccusedLemon of trying to recreate "'CNN, but on social media,' which doesn't work, as evidenced by the fact thatCNNis dying."

"And, instead of it being the real Don Lemon, it was really just Jeff Zucker talking through Don, so lacked authenticity," he added, referring to the former president ofCNN,without clarifying further.

It's a bizarre change of heart that highlights Musk's often self-serving nature and morally dubious business practices.

Was Musk left with a bad taste in his mouth after his interview with Lemon? Is X financially unable to hold up its end of the bargain?

Lemon maintains that "there were no restrictions on the interview that he willingly agreed to," and that his questions "were respectful and wide ranging, covering everything from SpaceX to the presidential election."

In a follow-up video posted to X however, Lemon conceded that the conversation was "tense at times."

According to Silicon Valley chronicler Kara Swisher, the interview also touched on Musk's alleged drug use. The conversation "was not to the adult toddlers liking, including questions about his ketamine use," she tweeted.

"I had told Don that this is exactly what would occur, including at a recent book tour event in NYC for my memoir, 'Burn Book,' he moderated," she added in a follow-up, "despite promises by Musk and CEO Linda Yaccarino who extravagantly touted this deal at CES to advertisers that this time was different."

"Why is he so upset?" Lemon said in his video."Does he even have a reason he's upset?"

Without a written agreement, chances are the former CNN anchor is out of luck. It's also unclear if Yaccarino will ever face any consequences for pushing ads against a show that never existed.

The latest news, however, is unlikely the last time we'll hear about the Lemon deal that had gone sour. The former anchor's spokesperson Allison Gollust told Semafor that Lemon "expects to be paid for it."

"If we have to go to court, we will," she added.

More on the deal: Elon Musk Doesn't Like Don Lemon's Interview Questions, Abruptly Cancels His Twitter Show

Read the original here:

Twitter's CEO Had Already Been Selling Ads for the Don Lemon Show That Elon Musk Suddenly Canceled - Futurism

SantaCon Spent Charity Funds on Crypto, Burning Man

SantaCon claims to raise money for charity, but that apparently includes Burning Man and failed crypto investments.

SantaCon — that horrific event in which thousands of drunkards dress like Kris Kringle and descend upon New York City's bars in a boozy and ostensibly charitable push — may not be so philanthropic after all.

In an investigation, Gothamist found that over the past decade, less than a fifth of the $1.4 million the money the event's organizers have raised have gone to registered nonprofits. More than a third of those cumulative funds, meanwhile, have gone to Burning Man-affiliated organizations and individuals — and in a strange tech twist, more's even gone to questionable cryptocurrency investments.

What began as an anti-consumerist protest in San Francisco in 1994 has morphed into something far more boorish in recent years, as the NYC metropolitan area's normiest and most alcohol-oriented denizens take Manhattan to wreak havoc in red velvet. If you'd forgotten or never knew in the first place that the whole debacle is supposed to be about quote-unquote "raising money for charity," you'd be forgiven.

As the SantaCon NYC website exclaims, the proceeds from revelers' $15 tickets "will be split between the various charities listed on this page, as well as charities in line with Santa’s mission." Other than a second off-handed reference to the org's "charitable mission" on the event's press page, the website itself doesn't explicate what that mission is supposed to be.

As Gothamist reports, the 501(c)(3) nonprofit that undergirds SantaCon, known as Participatory Safety, Inc., does have a mission statement: "to bring art to underserved communities." In remarks to the website, Stefan Pildes, Participatory Safety's founder and director, echoed as much.

"Our mission is to bring more art out into the world," Pildes said. "I want to continue to see more creative outlets and opportunities and more people in costume and more cheer being spread."

To that end, its largest named recipient, the makers of a documentary about unconscious or nonconsensual pelvic exams, received $66,340.

That figure pales in comparison, though, to the more than $832,000 that was nearly 60 percent of the funds SantaCon has raised since 2014, going to business expenses. According to Pildes, that figure has covered all manner of bills, from venue rentals and temporary staff fees to permits for street closures and DJs.

"It’s not a small undertaking," Piles told Gothamist.

And speaking of not-insignificant undertakings: in 2018, per the website's analysis, someone at SantaCon lost $17,498 in cryptocurrency investments, which equaled a third of its so-called charitable giving for the year. There's no telling how many shitty DJs or mediocre street vendors organizers could have paid for with that much dough.

As for the Burning Man-adjacent expenditures, Pildes had an explanation for that too. While admitting that SantaCon and Participatory Safety had spent money on multiple Burn-related art projects, he insisted that some of that cash was spent in the form of loans that were repaid.

The same year SantaCon lost so big on crypto, for instance, its nonprofit parent org spent $60,000 to rent out four floors for a post-Burn party. That was apparently a zero-interest loan, per Pildes, and saying it was repaid with a swiftness.

While legal experts Gothamist interviewed said they don't believe SantaCon or its not-for-profit parent company spent money illegally, its "charitable" nature seems fuzzy at best.

"Charities play fast and loose with how they account these things all the time," Lloyd Mayer, a Notre Dame law professor who specializes in nonprofits, told Gothamist.

More on nonprofits: There Are Now Zero Women on OpenAI's Board

The post SantaCon Spent Charity Funds on Crypto, Burning Man appeared first on Futurism.

Read the rest here:
SantaCon Spent Charity Funds on Crypto, Burning Man

Mario Cuomo: The Last Liberal Part 1 – Rising up the political ranks – Spectrum News NY1

2023 marks 40 years since Mario Cuomo was sworn in as governor of New York for the first time.

Cuomo was one of the most unlikely politicians the state had seen in a long time. The child of illiterate working-class immigrants who owned a grocery store in South Jamaica, Cuomo was a public-school genius who found himself graduating at the top of his class at St. Johns Law School. After taking a few pro-bono cases representing homeowners in Queens, Cuomo found himself encouraged to enter politics by legendary journalists Jimmy Breslin and Pete Hamill, as well as NYC Mayor John Lindsay. What followed was a wild rise up the ranks, one that included a highly publicized run for mayor, as well as turns as lieutenant governor and New York secretary of state before finally being elected governor.

From the perspective of his advisers and the reporters that covered him some of them speaking about their experiences with Cuomo for the first time we'll find out how Cuomo managed to become a major political figure in the Democratic Party despite having a background that differed from most elected officials.

See more on our Mario Cuomo series at ny1.com/mariocuomo.

ABOUT THE SHOW

NY1s Errol Louis has been interviewing powerful politicians and cultural icons for years, but its when the TV cameras are turned off that things really get interesting. From career highlights, to personal moments, to stories that have never been told, join Errol each week for intimate conversations with the people who are shaping the future of New York and beyond. Listen to "You Decide with Errol Louis" every Wednesday, wherever you listen to podcasts.

HOW TO LISTEN

APPLE PODCASTS

SPOTIFY

STITCHER

GOOGLE PODCASTS

RSS

Follow this link:

Mario Cuomo: The Last Liberal Part 1 - Rising up the political ranks - Spectrum News NY1