OpenAI’s Agent Has a Problem: Before It Does Anything Important, You Have to Double-Check It Hasn’t Screwed Up

Operator, OpenAI's brand new AI agent, doesn't quite deliver the hands-off experience some might hope it would.

Behold Operator, OpenAI's long-awaited agentic AI model that can use your computer and browse the web for you. 

It's supposed to work on your behalf, following the instructions it's given like your very own little employee. Or "your own secretary" might be more apt: OpenAI's marketing materials have focused on Operator performing tasks like booking tickets, restaurant reservations, and creating shopping lists (though the company admits it still struggles with managing calendars, a major productivity task.) 

But if you think you can just walk away from the computer and let the AI do everything, think again: Operator will need to ask for confirmation before pulling the trigger on important tasks, which throws a wrench into the premise of the AI agent acting on your behalf, since the clear implication is you need to make sure it's not screwing up before allowing it any real power.

"Before finalizing any significant action, such as submitting an order or sending an email, Operator should ask for approval," reads the safety section in OpenAI's announcement.

This measure highlights the tension between keeping stringent guardrails on AI models while allowing them to freely exercise their purportedly powerful capabilities. How do you put out an AI that can do anything — without it doing anything stupid?

Right now, a limited preview of Operator is only available to subscribers of the ChatGPT Pro plan, which costs an eye-watering $200 per month. 

The agentic tool uses its own AI model called Computer-Using Agent to interact with its virtual environment — as in use mouse and keyboard actions — by constantly taking screenshots of your desktop. 

The screenshots are interpreted by GPT-4o's image-processing capabilities, theoretically allowing Operator to use any software it's looking at, and not just ones designed to integrate with AI.

But in practice, it doesn't sound like the seamless experience you'd hope it to be (though to be fair, it's still in its early stages). When the AI gets stuck, as it still often does, it hands control back to the user to remedy the issue. It will also stop working to ask you for your usernames and passwords, entering a "takeover mode."

It's "simply too slow," wrote one user on the ChatGPTPro subreddit in a lengthy writeup, who said they were "shocked" by its sluggish pace. "It also bugged me when Operator didn't ask for help when it clearly needed to," the user added. In reality, you may have to sit there and watch the AI painstakingly try to navigate your computer, like supervising a grandparent trying their hand at Facebook and email.

Obviously, safety measures are good. But it's worth asking just how useful this tech is going to be if it can't be trusted to work reliably without neutering it.

And if safety and privacy are important to you, then you should already be uneasy with the idea of letting an AI model run rampant on your machine, especially one that relies on constantly screenshotting your desktop.

While you can opt out of having your data being used to train the AI model, OpenAI says that it will store your chats and screenshots up to 90 days on its servers, TechCrunch reported, even if you delete them.

Because Operator can browse the web, that means it will potentially be exposed to all kinds of danger, including attacks called prompt injections that could trick the model into defying its original instructions.

More on AI: Rumors Swirl That OpenAI Is About to Reveal a "PhD-Level" Human-Tier Intelligence

The post OpenAI's Agent Has a Problem: Before It Does Anything Important, You Have to Double-Check It Hasn't Screwed Up appeared first on Futurism.

Visit link:
OpenAI's Agent Has a Problem: Before It Does Anything Important, You Have to Double-Check It Hasn't Screwed Up

Scientists Baffled by Orcas Wearing Dead Salmon as Hats

Orcas have once again been observed swimming around with dead salmon on their snout as

Hatful of Sorrow

You've probably heard all about orcas' daring feats, like sinking yachts. But are you aware that they can be quite dashing, too?

Yep. It appears that these snazzy cetaceans are fond of wearing "hats" in the form of dead salmon on their snouts, and sometimes other fish.

First observed in 1987, the morbid fashion trend quickly came and went like so many questionable choices in dress  — but like baggy trousers, it now it appears to be back in style again.

As New Scientist reports, photographers have spotted killer whales donning salmon hats off the coast of the Pacific Northwest, reigniting debate about why orcas exhibit this puzzling behavior.

"Honestly, your guess is as good as mine," Deborah Giles, the science and research director at the non-profit Wild Orca, told New Scientist.

"We saw one with a fish on its head," she described. "So that was fun — it's been a while since I've personally seen it."

Boast to Coast

As New Scientist notes, only west coast orcas appear to favor dressing this way. East coasters, it seems, are either too cool or too démodé to bother.

Because orcas can live up to ninety years, it's possible that it's the same trendsetter from nearly four decades ago — or its acolytes — that's reviving the salmon hats. Who knew that orcas had fashion icons of their own?

"It does seem possible that some individuals that experienced [the behavior the] first time around may have started it again," Andrew Foote, an evolutionary ecologist at the University of Oslo, Norway, told New Scientist.

Fishful Thinking

In reality, there could be a practical reason behind the hats. Perhaps this is how the orcas set aside some food for later after an especially plentiful hunt.

"We've seen mammal-eating killer whales carry large chunks of food under their pectoral fin, kind of tucked in next to their body," Giles told New Scientist.

Either way, it's a testament to the intelligence of the creatures, which are social to such an almost primate degree that they develop their own cultures. It's this cultural bent — and the trends that come with it — that's believed to be responsible for how orcas not only began attacking human vessels, but learned how to immobilize and even sink them.

Nevertheless, it'll take more observations to bear out the saving-a-snack hypothesis — which Giles suggests could be done with camera-equipped drones.

"Over time, we may be able to gather enough information to show that, for instance, one carried a fish hat for 30 minutes or so, and then he ate it," she told New Scientist.

More on whales: Footage Shows Orca Blasting SeaWorld Visitors With Liquid Feces

The post Scientists Baffled by Orcas Wearing Dead Salmon as Hats appeared first on Futurism.

Read this article:
Scientists Baffled by Orcas Wearing Dead Salmon as Hats