Microsoft’s AI Secretly Copying All Your Private Messages

Microsoft is relaunching its AI-powered Recall feature, which records everything you do on your PC by constantly taking screenshots.

Microsoft is finally relaunching "Recall," its AI-powered feature that records almost everything you do on your computer by constantly taking screenshots in the background.

The tool is rolling out exclusively to Copilot+ PCs, a line of Windows 11 computers built with specific hardware optimized for AI tasks. And if it sounds like a privacy nightmare, your suspicions are not unfounded. 

Originally launched last May, Microsoft quickly withdrew Recall after facing widespread backlash, one of the reasons being that security researchers found that Recall's screenshots were stored in an unencrypted database, making it a sitting duck for hackers who'd be able to see potentially anything you'd done on your computer if they broke into it. Since that disastrous debut, the feature has been tested out of the spotlight through Microsoft's Insider program.

Huge risks were still being flagged even as it was being revamped. In December, an investigation by Tom's Hardware found that Recall frequently captured sensitive information in its screenshots, including credit card numbers and Social Security numbers — even though its "filter sensitive information" setting was supposed to prevent that from happening.

For this latest release, Microsoft has tinkered with a few things to make Recall safer. For one, the screenshot database, though easily accessible, is now encrypted. You now have to opt in to having your screenshots saved, when before you had to opt out. You also have the ability to pause Recall on demand.

These are good updates, but they won't change the fact that Recall is an inherently invasive tool. And as Ars Technica notes, it also poses a huge risk not just to the users with Recall on their machines, but to anyone they interact with, whose messages will be screenshotted and processed by the AI — without the person on the other end ever knowing it.

"That would indiscriminately hoover up all kinds of [a user's] sensitive material, including photos, passwords, medical conditions, and encrypted videos and messages," Ars wrote.

This is perhaps its most worrying consequence — how it can turn any PC into a device that surveils others, forcing you to be even more wary about what you send online, even to friends.

"From a technical perspective, all these kind of things are very impressive," warns security researcher Kevin Beaumont in a blog post. "From a privacy perspective, there are landmines everywhere."

In his testing, Beaumont found that Recall's filter for sensitive information was still unreliable. And that encrypted screenshot database? It's only protected by a simple four digit PIN. But the most disturbing find was how good Recall was at indexing everything it stored.

"I sent a private, self deleting message to somebody with a photo of a famous friend which had never been made public," Beaumont wrote. "Recall captured it, and indexed the photo of the person by name in the database. Had the other person receiving had Recall enabled, the image would have been indexed under that person's name, and been exportable later via the screenshot despite it being a self deleting message."

Beaumont's advice is simple, but a sobering indictment of the state of affairs.

"I would recommend that if you're talking to somebody about something sensitive who is using a Windows PC, that in the future you check if they have Recall enabled first."

More on Microsoft: Microsoft's Huge Plans for Mass AI Data Centers Now Rapidly Falling Apart

The post Microsoft's AI Secretly Copying All Your Private Messages appeared first on Futurism.

Visit link:
Microsoft's AI Secretly Copying All Your Private Messages

Google Is Allegedly Paying Top AI Researchers to Just Sit Around and Not Work for the Competition

Google has one weird trick to hoard its artificial intelligence talent from poachers — paying them to not work at all.

Google apparently has one weird trick to hoard its talent from poachers: paying them to not work.

As Business Insider reports, some United Kingdom-based employees at Google's DeepMind AI lab are paid to do nothing for six months — or, in fewer cases, up to a year — after they quit their jobs.

Known as "garden leave," this type of cushy clause is the luckier stepsister to so-called "noncompete" agreements, which prohibit employees and contractors from working with a competitor for a designated period of time after they depart an employer. Ostensibly meant to prevent aggressive poaching, these sorts of clauses also bar outgoing employees from working with competitors.

Often deployed in tandem with noncompetes, garden leave agreements are more prevalent in the UK than across the pond in the United States, where according to the Horton Group law firm, such clauses are generally reserved for "highly-paid executives."

Though it seems like a pretty good gig — or lack thereof — if you can get it, employees at DeepMind's London HQ told BI that garden leave and noncompetes stymie their ability to lock down meaningful work after they leave the lab.

While noncompetes are increasingly a nonstarter in the United States amid growing legislative pushes to make them unenforceable, they're perfectly legal and quite commonplace in the UK so long as a company explicitly states the business interests they're protecting.

Like DeepMind's generous garden leave period, noncompete clauses typically last between six months and a year — but instead of getting paid to garden, per the former's logic, ex-employees just can't work for competitors for that length of time without risking backlash from Google's army of lawyers.

Because noncompetes are often signed alongside non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), we don't know exactly what DeepMind considers a "competitor" — but whatever its contracts stipulate, it's clearly bothersome enough to get its former staffers to speak out.

"Who wants to sign you for starting in a year?" one ex-DeepMind-er told BI. "That's forever in AI."

In an X post from the end of March, Nando de Freitas, a London-based former DeepMind director who now works at Microsoft offered a brash piece of advice: that people should not sign noncompetes at all.

"Above all don’t sign these contracts," de Freitas wrote. "No American corporation should have that much power, especially in Europe. It’s abuse of power, which does not justify any end."

It's not a bad bit of counsel, to be sure — but as with any other company, it's easy to imagine DeepMind simply choosing not to hire experts if they refuse to sign.

More on the world of AI: Trump's Tariffs Are a Bruising Defeat for the AI Industry

The post Google Is Allegedly Paying Top AI Researchers to Just Sit Around and Not Work for the Competition appeared first on Futurism.

Read more:
Google Is Allegedly Paying Top AI Researchers to Just Sit Around and Not Work for the Competition

Zuckerberg Tells Court That Facebook Is No Longer About Connecting With Friends

In a federal antitrust testimony, Zuckerberg has admitted that Facebook's mission of connecting users is no longer a priority.

As times change, so do mission statements, especially in the fast-and-loose world of tech. In recent months, we've seen Google walk back its pledge to "do no evil," and OpenAI quietly delete a policy prohibiting its software's use for "military technology."

Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook is no exception. Its 2008 motto, "Facebook helps you connect and share with the people in your life," is now a distant memory — according to Zuckerberg himself, who testified this week that Facebook's main purpose "wasn't really to connect with friends anymore."

"The friend part has gone down quite a bit," Zuckerberg said, according to Business Insider.

Instead, he says that the platform has evolved away from that model — its original claim to fame, as old heads will recall — in its over 20 years of life, becoming "more of a broad discovery and entertainment space," which is apparently exec-speak for "endless feed of AI slop."

The tech bigwig was speaking as a witness at a federal antitrust case launched by the Federal Trade Commission against Meta, the now-parent company to WhatsApp, Instagram, Threads, and Oculus.

The FTC's case hinges on a series of messages sent by Zuckerberg and his executives regarding a strategy of buying other social media platforms outright, rather than compete with them in the free and open market — a scheme that's more the rule than the exception for Silicon Valley whales like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft.

The FTC alleges that Meta began its monopolistic streak as early as 2008, when Zuckerberg buzzed that "it's better to buy than compete" in a series of emails about then-rival platform Instagram. He finally got its hands on Instagram in 2012, after sending a memo that Facebook — which changed its name to Meta in 2021 "had" to buy the photo-sharing app for $1 billion, fearing competition and a bidding war with fast-growing platforms like Twitter.

"The businesses are nascent but the networks are established," Zuckerberg wrote in a leaked email about startup platforms Instagram and Path. "The brands are already meaningful and if they grow to a large scale they could be very disruptive to us."

"It’s an email written by someone who recognized Instagram as a threat and was forced to sacrifice a billion dollars because Meta could not meet that threat through competition,” said the FTC’s lead counselor, Daniel Matheson.

Those internal memos are now smoking guns in what could be the biggest antitrust case since the infamous AT&T breakup of 1982, which had many similarities to the FTC's suit against Meta. Back then, AT&T held unrivaled market influence that it used to box out smaller fish and shape laws to its whims — to chase profit above all, in other words.

Meta, in parallel, has spent millions lobbying lawmakers, is the dominant player in online advertising, and currently wields a market cap of $1.34 trillion — higher than the value of all publicly traded companies in South Korea, for perspective.

The FTC's challenge will depend on whether federal prosecutors can convince US District Judge James Boasberg that Meta's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp were illegal by notoriously weak US antitrust standards. They'll have no help from Boasberg, an Obama appointee, who has voiced skepticism with cases against Meta in the past.

"The [FTC] faces hard questions about whether its claims can hold up in the crucible of trial," Boasberg said in late 2024, adding that "its positions at times strain this country’s creaking antitrust precedents to their limits."

Whatever happens, it's clear that Zuckerberg has moved on from the idealism of the early internet — to the sloppified money-grubbing of whatever it is we have now.

More on Meta: Facebook Is Desperately Trying to Keep You From Learning What's in This Book

The post Zuckerberg Tells Court That Facebook Is No Longer About Connecting With Friends appeared first on Futurism.

Go here to see the original:
Zuckerberg Tells Court That Facebook Is No Longer About Connecting With Friends