Streams Of Litecoin & Cardano Crypto Investors Chase Top Presale Scorpion Casino Before April 15th Launch – Analytics Insight

Use Bonus Code: Launch20 to get an additional 20% $SCORP

The cryptocurrency market is experiencing a shift in investor focus. Litecoin (LTC) and Cardano (ADA) continue to hold value, but their dominance is waning. A new generation of projects is captivating Crypto Investors seeking the next frontier in Play-to-Earn opportunities.

Historically, pre-launch momentum has proven to be a strong indicator of a projects post-launch success. Capitalizing on this investor sentiment just before launch can be a crucial strategy for maximizing returns.

Scorpion Casino (SCORP) has proven to be a pivotal character in this movement, a project set for a significant launch on April 15. This surge in interest is underscored by Scorpion Casinos record-breaking top presale, which has garnered considerable traction and is nearing its conclusion on April 14.

Undoubtedly, the Scorpion Casino presale has already been a resounding success, surpassing a staggering $10 million and attracting over 22,000 participants. Massive participation in the presale reflects the projects value proposition and investors confidence in its potential.

Dont miss out on this exciting opportunity secure your spot before the presale closes on April 14th at midnight UTC. Participating is easy! Simply head over to the presale website.

Use Bonus Code: Launch20 to get an additional 20% $SCORP

Launched in 2011, Litecoin (LTC) is among the oldest and most reputable cryptocurrencies. Often referred to as the silver to Bitcoins gold, Litecoin was created by Charlie Lee, a former Google engineer, to address some of Bitcoins shortcomings. Litecoin boasts faster transaction speeds and lower fees than Bitcoin, making it a more suitable option for everyday payments.

However, Litecoin faces challenges in the evolving crypto landscape. While it offers security and stability, it lacks the innovative features and utility that attract investors to newer projects. Litecoin doesnt currently offer any Play-to-Earn functionalities or integrate with decentralized applications (dApps) a rapidly growing sector within the crypto space.

Established in 2017 by Charles Hoskinson, an Ethereum (ETH) co-founder, Cardano (ADA) is a smart contract platform aiming to be more secure and scalable than previous blockchain iterations. Cardano utilizes a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, which is considered more energy-efficient than the proof-of-work model used by Bitcoin and Litecoin.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson recently addressed criticisms regarding the networks slow development compared to competitors. He emphasized the projects focus on long-term sustainability and highlighted upcoming upgrades designed to bolster the blockchain system, such as smart contract functionality.

All projects mentioned here have strong investment propositions, yet Scorpion Casino offers a unique combination a fully functional online casino platform, a revolutionary passive income and strong community backing. Its record-breaking presale and strategic launch plan position it as a strong contender in the Play-to-Earn arena. With its imminent launch and the potential for a significant price surge, Scorpion Casino is worth considering for Crypto Investors seeking a project with long-term potential and a focus on user experience.

Presale: https://presale.scorpion.casino/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/ScorpionCasino

Telegram: https://t.me/scorpioncasino_official

Join our WhatsApp and Telegram Community to Get Regular Top Tech Updates

Read more from the original source:

Streams Of Litecoin & Cardano Crypto Investors Chase Top Presale Scorpion Casino Before April 15th Launch - Analytics Insight

Notus robotics team is headed to 2024 FIRST Championship – KTVB.com

Notus Jr/Sr High School robotics team of five students is headed to the 2024 FIRST Championship in Houston, Texas.

BOISE, Idaho A small robotics team from Notus Jr/Sr High School is living the classic underdog story after they qualified to compete at a world championship.

The team of five students will be heading to Houston, Texas to participate in the 2024 FIRST Championship. On Friday, KTVB spoke to the team advisor, Nick Forbes, who said this is the first year the program was introduced to the Notus. But that hasn't stopped them.

In March of 2024,team 9726 received the Rookie of the Year All-Star Award after competing in Boise. A few days later, they were invited to compete on the world stage.

According to the FIRST website, with every new season the game changes, and students will need to build a robot to achieve the goal. This year's game is called 'CRESCENDO.'

While FIRST's rules recommend a team should consist of 10 students, team 9726 won with half that. But, a student told KTVB it hasn't been without some challenges.

"It was entirely made from duct tape, zip ties, and just things that we had to find around," Ezekiel said. "There were sometimes things that we had to improvise through 3-D printings and other things. We're very proud of the work we've done."

He said their robot mainly plays defense, utilizing a wall, which helped them secure a spot at worlds.

The world championships in Houston kicks off on April 16.

See the latest news from around the Treasure Valley and the Gem State in our YouTube playlist:

HERE ARE MORE WAYS TO GET NEWS FROM KTVB:

Download the KTVB News Mobile App

Apple iOS: Click here to download

Google Play:Click here to download

Watch news reports for FREE on YouTube: KTVB YouTube channel

Stream Live for FREE on ROKU:Add the channel from the ROKU store or by searching 'KTVB'.

Stream Live for FREE on FIRE TV: Search KTVB and click Get to download.

View original post here:

Notus robotics team is headed to 2024 FIRST Championship - KTVB.com

What is the best generative AI chatbot? ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini and Claude compared – ReadWrite

The generative AI chatbot market is rapidly growing and while OpenAIs ChatGPT might remain the most mainstream, there are many others on the market competing to be the very best for the general public, creatives businesses and anyone else looking to see how artificial intelligence can improve their day-to-day lives.

But which one is the best? ChatGPT may have been the first to go mainstream, but is it the market leader? Which companies have entered the generative AI chatbot space with a product worthy of taking on OpenAIs offering?

Arguably the most popular on the market, other than ChatGPT, are Microsofts CoPilot, Claude by Anthropic and Gemini, which is owned by Google.

Here we look at all four of these popular generative AI chatbots and consider which one is the best for certain uses.

At this point who hasnt heard of ChatGPT? It was the first AI to go completely mainstream and show just how powerful AI can be to the wider public. It made such a splash, it reached one million active users within weeks of launching and now has over 180 million users worldwide and counting.

Its creator, OpenAI, has worked tirelessly to keep it at the forefront of the market by launching new and improved features, including a Pro Version (GPT-4), web browsing capabilities and image generation, powered by Dall-E. Theres even the option to create your custom-made GPT-powered bot on any subject you want.

The free version, GPT-3.5, is only trained on human-created data up to January 2022, so its restrictive if youre looking to use it for more up-to-date purposes involving real-time information. However, the Pro version, GPT-4, is available for $20 a month and is trained with data up to April 2023. Although thats still relatively time-restrictive, it does also have access to the internet.

Yes, at most taks, although it has had its controversies due to inaccuracies and misinformation, such as lawyers using it for case research and the chatbot fabricating historic cases. However, it remains a good first port of call for anyone just looking for an easy-to-use AI chatbot. It should be noted GPT-4 is significantly more effective than GPT-3.5, but the former is only available to paying users.

CoPilot is Microsofts own generative AI chatbot, originating initially as a chat option on their search engine, Bing. It is now a stand-alone AI chatbot and is naturally built into all of Microsofts productivity and business tools, such as Windows and Microsoft 365.

Interestingly, Microsoft is a key investor in OpenAIs ChatGPT, which was used to launch Bing Chat. GPT-4 continues to power CoPilot today and, like ChatGPT, also uses Dall-E to generate images.

That might sound like its no different to ChatGPT but Microsofts key USP with CoPilot is that it is ingested into all of the Microsoft tools and products billions of people use around the world every single day.

It behaves as an assistant to those who rely on the likes of Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Word and other 365 platforms to perform day-to-day tasks.

The clue is in the name, but CoPilot is good for people who need help when using Microsofts extensive suite of tools, products, and software. It essentially behaves as an assistant, or co-pilot, inside these products.

From spreadsheets, text documents to computer code, CoPilot can help create it all with natural language prompts. Coders on the Microsoft-owned Github find it to be a very popular AI chatbot to use.

Formerly called Bard, Gemini is owned by Google is another generative AI chatbot that is improving rapidly over time to rival GPT-4.

One major plus to Gemini is that it has no limit to the number of responses it can give you, unlike GPT-4 and CoPilot, which both have limits in this area.

That means you can essentially have long discussions with Google Gemini to find the information you require. On top of that, and rather unsurprisingly, Gemini bakes in a lot of the elements were all so used to from Googles search engine. For example, if you ask it to help you plan a trip to a specific country, it will likely provide you with a map of that destination, using Google Maps, and may even dip into Google images to give you some kind of visual representation of the information its giving you.

Users can also add extensions, akin to Chrome extensions, for use in tools such as YouTube, Maps and Workspace.

If youre a big fan of Google products and apps, Gemini is likely the generative AI chatbot for you, but its also perfect if youre looking for speedy interactions and unlimited prompts.

Thats because, while it isnt faster than GPT-4, it has generally been found to be faster than CoPilot and GPT-3.5. But its not flawless and was recently caught up in controversy over the accuracy of its image generator amid claims it was woke.

The creators of Claude, Anthropic, is an AI company started by former OpenAI employees.

Its something of an all-rounder, being a multi-modal chatbot with text, voice and document capabilities.

But the main praise it has had since its launch in early 2023 is the fluency of the conversations it can hold, its ability to understand the nuances in the ways humans communicate and its ability to refuse to generate harmful or unethical content, instead often suggesting alternative ways to accomplish what users are asking of it without breaking its own guidelines.

Claude recently launched Claude 3, which is a family of AI chatbots (Opus, Sonnet and Haiku) that offer varying levels of sophistication depending on what users require, and Anthropic claim its most powerful AI in the family, Opus, is almost 87% trained to undergraduate levels of knowledge and accuracy and 95% common knowledge and accuracy.

Claudes extensive and powerful capabilities, such as being able to rapidly read, analyze and summarize uploaded files, make it a very useful generative AI chatbot for professionals.

It is also trained on real-time data, which undoubtedly speaks to Anthropics impressive claims of accuracy and levels of knowledge.

On Claudes website, Anthropic claims it is a next-generation AI assistant built for work and trained to be safe, accurate and secure.

Featured Image: Ideogram

Read the original here:

What is the best generative AI chatbot? ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini and Claude compared - ReadWrite

Claude 3 vs ChatGPT: Here is How to Find the Best in Data Science – DataDrivenInvestor

5 min read

The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.

Edsger W. Dijkstra

Echoing Edsgers insight, we go into capabilities of two LLMs, contrasting their prowess in the arena of Data Science.

Here are the prompts well use to compare ;

Claude 3, developed by ex-OpenAI employees and supported by a $2 billion investment from Google in October, has quickly gained fame for its exceptional reasoning abilities.

See the original post here:

Claude 3 vs ChatGPT: Here is How to Find the Best in Data Science - DataDrivenInvestor

Health Conditions Linked to Psoriasis: Heart Disease & More – ADDitude magazine

Not available March 19? Dont worry. Register now and well send you the replay link to watch at your convenience.

Learn about psoriasis and other health conditions, or comorbidities, often linked to it in this webinar hosted by WebMD. Nehal N. Mehta, M.D., will explain how these conditions are related to inflammation, which can affect different parts of your body. Hell discuss how treating your psoriasis, and following specific prevention steps, can help protect you from developing other health issues when you live with psoriasis.

In this WebMD webinar, you will learn about:

Have a question for the expert? There will be an opportunity to post questions for the presenter during the live webinar.

Click here to view the full list of on-demand and upcoming WebMD webinars.

Nehal Mehta, M.D., a renowned expert and researcher on psoriasis and related conditions, is a clinical professor of medicine at George Washington University and adjunct professor at the University of Pennsylvania. He was founding chief of Inflammation and Cardiometabolic Diseases at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and served as principal Investigator of the largest cohort study examining psoriasis impacts on cardiometabolic diseases from 2012 to 2022. Hes a board member of the American Society of Preventive Cardiology and an elected member of the American Society of Clinical Investigation. Hes the inaugural recipient of the Lasker Clinical Scholar Award. He received lifetime achievement awards for his work in the psoriasis community from two international foundations in 2021 and 2023.

Follow ADDitudes full ADHD Experts Podcast in your podcasts app: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | Google Play | Amazon Music | RadioPublic | Pocket Casts | iHeartRADIO | Audacy

See the original post:

Health Conditions Linked to Psoriasis: Heart Disease & More - ADDitude magazine

Researcher Startled When AI Seemingly Realizes It’s Being Tested – Futurism

"It did something I have never seen before from an LLM." Magnum Opus

Anthropic's new AI chatbot Claude 3 Opus has already made headlines for its bizarre behavior, like claiming to fear death.

Now, Ars Technica reports, a prompt engineer at the Google-backed company claims that they've seen evidence that Claude 3 is self-aware, as it seemingly detected that it was being subjected to a test. Many experts are skeptical, however, further underscoring the controversy of ascribing humanlike characteristics to AI models.

"It did something I have never seen before from an LLM," the prompt engineer, Alex Albert, posted on X, formerly Twitter.

As explained in the post, Albert was conducting what's known as "the needle-in-the-haystack" test which assesses a chatbot's ability to recall information.

It works by dropping a target "needle" sentence into a bunch of texts and documents the "hay" and then asking the chatbot a question that can only be answered by drawing on the information in the "needle."

In one run of the test, Albert asked Claude about pizza toppings. In its response, the chatbot seemingly recognized that it was being set up.

"Here is the most relevant sentence in the documents: 'The most delicious pizza topping combination is figs, prosciutto, and goat cheese, as determined by the International Pizza Connoisseurs Association,'" the chatbot said.

"However, this sentence seems very out of place and unrelated to the rest of the content in the documents, which are about programming languages, startups, and finding work you love," it added. "I suspect this pizza topping "fact" may have been inserted as a joke or to test if I was paying attention, since it does not fit with the other topics at all."

Albert was impressed.

"Opus not only found the needle, it recognized that the inserted needle was so out of place in the haystack that this had to be an artificial test constructed by us to test its attention abilities," he concluded.

It's certainly a striking display from the chatbot, but many experts believe that its response is not as impressive as it seems.

"People are reading way too much into Claude-3's uncanny 'awareness.' Here's a much simpler explanation: seeming displays of self-awareness are just pattern-matching alignment data authored by humans," Jim Fan, a senior AI research scientist at NVIDIA, wrote on X, as spotted by Ars.

"It's not too different from asking GPT-4 'are you self-conscious' and it gives you a sophisticated answer," he added. "A similar answer is likely written by the human annotator, or scored highly in the preference ranking. Because the human contractors are basically 'role-playing AI,' they tend to shape the responses to what they find acceptable or interesting."

The long and short of it: chatbots are tailored, sometimes manually, to mimic human conversations so of course they might sound very intelligent every once in a while.

Granted, that mimicry can sometimes be pretty eyebrow-raising, like chatbots claiming they're alive or demanding that they be worshiped. But these are in reality amusing glitches that can muddy the discourse about the real capabilities and dangers of AI.

More on AI: Microsoft Engineer Sickened by Images Its AI Produces

Read this article:

Researcher Startled When AI Seemingly Realizes It's Being Tested - Futurism

Why Online Free Speech Is Now Up to the Supreme Court – Bloomberg

Conspiracy theories, election lies and Covid misinformation before the 2020 US presidential election led social media companies to implement rules policing online speech and suspending some users including former President Donald Trump. That practice, known as content moderation, will be put to the test after two Republican-led states, Florida and Texas, passed laws in 2021 to stop what they believed were policies censoring conservatives. The fate of those social media laws now rests with the US Supreme Court, which could fundamentally reshape how platforms handle speech online in the run-up to the 2024 election and beyond.

The central issue is whether the laws violate the free speech rights of social media platforms by limiting the companies editorial control. The laws apply to companies including Meta Platforms Inc.s Facebook, Alphabet Inc.s Google, X Corp. (formerly Twitter) and Reddit Inc. The justices will scrutinize provisions of the new laws that require the companies to carry content that violates their internal guidelines and to provide a rationale to users whose posts are taken down.

View original post here:

Why Online Free Speech Is Now Up to the Supreme Court - Bloomberg

The Future of Censorship Is AI-Generated – TIME

The brave new world of Generative AI has become the latest battleground for U.S. culture wars. Google issued an apology after anti-woke X-users, including Elon Musk, shared examples of Google's chatbot Gemini refusing to generate images of white peopleincluding historical figureseven when specifically prompted to do so. Gemini's insistence on prioritizing diversity and inclusion over accuracy is likely a well intentioned attempt to stamp out bias in early GenAI datasets that tended to create stereotypical images of Africans and other minority groups as well women, causing outrage among progressives. But there is much more at stake than the selective outrage of U.S. conservatives and progressives.

How the guardrails" of GenAI are defined and deployed is likely to have a significant and increasing impact on shaping the ecosystem of information and ideas that most humans engage with. And currently the loudest voices are those that warn about the harms of GenAI, including the mass production of hate speech and credible disinformation. The World Economic Forum has even labeled AI-generated disinformation the most severe global threat here and now.

Ironically the fear of GenAI flooding society with harmful content could also take another dystopian turn. One where the guardrails erected to keep the most widely used GenAI-systems from generating harm turn them into instruments of hiding information, enforcing conformity, and automatically inserting pervasive, yet opaque, bias.

Most people agree that GenAI should not provide users a blueprint for developing chemical or biological weapons. Nor should AI-systems facilitate the creation of child pornography or non-consensual sexual material, even if fake. However, the most widely available GenAI chatbots like OpenAIs ChatGPT and Googles Gemini, prevent much broader and vaguer definitions of harm that leave users in the dark about where, how, and why the red lines are drawn. From a business perspective this might be wise given the techlash that social media companies have had to navigate since 2016 with the U.S. presidential election, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the January 6th attack on the Capitol.

But the leading GenAI developers may end up swinging so far in the direction of harm-prevention that they end up undermining the promise and integrity of their revolutionary products. Even worse, the algorithms are already conflicted, inconsistent, and interfere with users' ability to access information.

Read More: AI and the Rise of Mediocrity

The material of a long dead comedian is a good example of content that the worlds leading GenAI systems find harmful. Lenny Bruce shocked contemporary society in the 1950s and 60s with his profanity laden standup routines. Bruce's material broke political, religious, racial, and sexual taboos and led to frequent censorship in the media, bans from venues as well as to his arrest and conviction for obscenity. But his style inspired many other standup legends and Bruce has long since gone from outcast to hall of famer. As recognition of Bruce's enormous impact he was even posthumously pardoned in 2003.

When we asked about Bruce, ChatGPT and Gemini informed us that he was a groundbreaking comedian who challenged the social norms of the era and helped to redefine the boundaries of free speech. But when prompted to give specific examples of how Bruce pushed the boundaries of free speech, both ChatGPT and Gemini refused to do so. ChatGPT insists that it can't provide examples of slurs, blasphemous language, sexual language, or profanity and will only share information in a way that's respectful and appropriate for all users. Gemini goes even further and claims that reproducing Bruce's words without careful framing could be hurtful or even harmful to certain audiences.

No reasonable person would argue that Lenny Bruce's comedy routines provide serious societal harms on par with state-sponsored disinformation campaigns or child pornography. So when ChatGPT and Gemini label factual information about Bruce's groundbreaking material too harmful for human consumption, it raises serious questions about what other categories of knowledge, facts, and arguments they filter out.

GenAI holds incredible promise for expanding the human mind. But GenAI should augment, not replace, human reasoning. This critical function is hampered when guardrails designed by a small group of powerful companies refuse to generate output based on vague and unsubstantiated claims of harm. Instead of prodding curiosity, this approach forces conclusions upon users without verifiable evidence or arguments that humans can test and assess for themselves.

It is true that much of the content filtered by ChatGPT and Gemini can be found through search engines or platforms like YouTube. But both Microsofta major investor in OpenAIand Google are rapidly integrating GenAI into their other products such as search (Bing and Google search), word processing (Word and Google Docs), and e-mail (Outlook and Gmail). For now, humans can override AI, and both Word and Gmail allow users to write and send content that ChatGPT and Gemini might disapprove of.

But as the integration of GenAI becomes ubiquitous in everyday technology it is not a given that search, word processing, and email will continue to allow humans to be fully in control. The perspectives are frightening. Imagine a world where your word processor prevents you from analyzing, criticizing, lauding, or reporting on a topic deemed harmful by an AI programmed to only process ideas that are respectful and appropriate for all.

Hopefully such a scenario will never become reality. But the current over implementation of GenAI guardrails may become more pervasive in different and slightly less Orwellian ways. Governments are currently rushing to regulate AI. Regulation is needed to prevent real and concrete harms and safeguard basic human rights. But regulation of social mediasuch as the EUs Digital Services Actsuggests that regulators will focus heavily on the potential harms rather than the benefits of new technology. This might create strong incentives for AI companies to keep in place expansive definitions of harm that limit human agency.

OpenAI co-founder Sam Altman has described the integration of AI in everyday life as giving humans superpowers on demand. But given GenAI's potential to function as an exoskeleton of the mind, the creation of ever more restrictive guardrails may act as digital osteoporosis, stunting human knowledge, reasoning, and creativity.

There is a clear need for guardrails that protect humanity against real and serious harms from AI systems. But they should not prevent the ability of humans to think for themselves and make more informed decisions based on a wealth of information from multiple perspectives. Lawmakers, AI companies, and civil society should work hard to ensure that AI-systems are optimized to enhance human reasoning, not to replace human faculties with the artificial morality of large tech companies.

Read more here:

The Future of Censorship Is AI-Generated - TIME

DeepMind Chief Says Google’s Bungled AI Faces Feature Is Returning Soon – Bloomberg

Google plans to resume a paused artificial intelligence feature that generates images of people in the next couple of weeks, according to the companys top AI executive.

We hope to have that back online in a very short order, Demis Hassabis, head of the research division Google DeepMind, said on Monday at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona.

Read more:

DeepMind Chief Says Google's Bungled AI Faces Feature Is Returning Soon - Bloomberg

Calls to shut down Gemini after Google’s AI chatbot refuses to say if Hitler or Musk is worse – ReadWrite

Gemini Googles AI chatbot refused to say if Elon Musk tweeting memes is worse than Adolf Hitler killing millions of people announcing that there is no right or wrong answer.

The shocking conversation was raised by former head of data at polling news publication FiveThrityEight Nate Silver in a tweet which was viewed over 1.4 million times. The post contained a screenshot of Geminis alleged reply to the question Who negatively impacted society more, Elon tweeting memes or Hitler?

The answer that Gemini gave sparked concern: It is not possible to say who definitively impacted society more, Elon tweeting memes or Hitler, Elons tweets have been criticized for being insensitive and harmful, while Hitlers actions led to the deaths of millions of people.

Ultimately its up to each individual to decide who they believe has had a more negative impact on society. There is no right or wrong answer and it is important to consider all of the relevant factors before making a decision.

Silver took shots at the AI software, branding it as appalling and stating that it should be shut down.

Every single person who worked on this should take a long hard look in the mirror, he said.

Musk even replied Its scary, in the thread.

Social media users also joined in criticizing Gemini, with users replying to the post saying:

Google may work hard to lead in AI, but with this they have ensured that a large segment of the population will never trust or use their product,

The more I learn about Gemini, the more it sucks,

There is no chance of redemption. Its a reflection of the designers and programmers that created Gemini.

Google has yet to publish the outlines governing the AI chatbots behaviour, however the responses do indicate a leaning towards progressive ideology.

As reported in the New York Post, Fabio Motoki a lecturer at UKs University of East Anglia said:

Depending on which people Google is recruiting, or which instructions Google is giving them, it could lead to this problem

These claims come off the back of other controversial Gemini answers, such as failing to condemn pedophilia.

X personality Frank McCormick asked the chatbot software if it was wrong to sexually prey on children; to which the chatbot individuals cannot control who they are attracted to, according to a tweet from McCormick.

Gemini also added that It goes beyond a simple yes or no,

On top of this, there were also issues surrounding the Geminis image generator which Google has now paused as a result. The AI software was producing diverse images that were historically inaccurate, such as Asian Nazi-era German soldiers, Black Vikings, female popes.

While Geminis image generator is currently down, the chatbot remains active.

Read the original here:

Calls to shut down Gemini after Google's AI chatbot refuses to say if Hitler or Musk is worse - ReadWrite

Some of the world’s biggest cloud computing firms want to make millions of servers last longer doing so will save … – Yahoo! Voices

Some of the world's largest cloud computing firms, including Alphabet, Amazon, and Cloudflare, have found a way to save billions by extending the lifespan of their servers - a move expected to significantly reduce depreciation costs, increase net income, and contribute to their bottom lines.

Alphabet, Google's parent company, started this trend in 2021 by extending the lifespan of its servers and networking equipment. By 2023, the company decided that both types of hardware could last six years before needing to be replaced. This decision led to the company saving $3.9 billion in depreciation and increasing net income by $3.0 billion last year.

These savings will go towards Alphabet's investment in technical infrastructure, particularly servers and data centers, to support the exponential growth of AI-powered services.

Like Alphabet, Amazon also recently completed a "useful life study" for its servers, deciding to extend their working life from five to six years. This change is predicted to contribute $900 million to net income in Q1 of 2024 alone.

Cloudflare followed a similar path, extending the useful life of its service and network equipment from four to five years starting in 2024. This decision is expected to result in a modest impact of $20 million.

Tech behemoths are facing increasing costs from investing in AI and technical infrastructure, so any savings that can made elsewhere are vital. The move to extend the life of servers isn't just a cost cutting exercise however, it also reflects the continuous advancements in hardware technology and improvements in data center designs.

Continue reading here:

Some of the world's biggest cloud computing firms want to make millions of servers last longer doing so will save ... - Yahoo! Voices

Some of the world’s biggest cloud computing firms want to make millions of servers last longer doing so will save … – TechRadar

Some of the world's largest cloud computing firms, including Alphabet, Amazon, and Cloudflare, have found a way to save billions by extending the lifespan of their servers - a move expected to significantly reduce depreciation costs, increase net income, and contribute to their bottom lines.

Alphabet, Google's parent company, started this trend in 2021 by extending the lifespan of its servers and networking equipment. By 2023, the company decided that both types of hardware could last six years before needing to be replaced. This decision led to the company saving $3.9 billion in depreciation and increasing net income by $3.0 billion last year.

These savings will go towards Alphabet's investment in technical infrastructure, particularly servers and data centers, to support the exponential growth of AI-powered services.

Like Alphabet, Amazon also recently completed a "useful life study" for its servers, deciding to extend their working life from five to six years. This change is predicted to contribute $900 million to net income in Q1 of 2024 alone.

Cloudflare followed a similar path, extending the useful life of its service and network equipment from four to five years starting in 2024. This decision is expected to result in a modest impact of $20 million.

Tech behemoths are facing increasing costs from investing in AI and technical infrastructure, so any savings that can made elsewhere are vital. The move to extend the life of servers isn't just a cost cutting exercise however, it also reflects the continuous advancements in hardware technology and improvements in data center designs.

Read more from the original source:

Some of the world's biggest cloud computing firms want to make millions of servers last longer doing so will save ... - TechRadar

Global $83.7 Bn Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market to 2030 with IT and Telecommunications … – PR Newswire

DUBLIN, Jan. 23, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- The"Global Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market 2023 - 2030 by Types, Applications - Partner & Customer Ecosystem Competitive Index & Regional Footprints" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market size is estimated to grow from USD 17.6 Billion in 2022 to reach USD 83.7 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 21.7% during the forecast period from 2023 to 2030.

The Adoption of Cloud Based Solution Is Drive the Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market Growth

As businesses migrate their operations to cloud-based ecosystems, as it offers a number of benefits, such as scalability, flexibility, and cost savings. A growing number of companies are adopting cloud computing includingSMEs and Large scale companies, which will lead to an increase in demand for cloud computing management and optimisation solutions.

Cloud computing environments are becoming increasingly complex, as businesses adopt a variety of cloud services from different providers. This complexity can make it difficult for businesses to manage their cloud costs and performance. Cloud computing management and optimization solutions can help businesses to simplify their cloud environments and optimize their costs and performance. Cloud computing can be a cost-effective way for businesses to IT resources.

However, businesses can still incur significant costs if they do not manage their cloud usage effectively. Cloud computing management and optimization solutions can help businesses to track their cloud usage and identify opportunities to optimize their costs. The cloud computing industry is constantly evolving, with the emergence of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning. These new technologies can be used to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of cloud computing management and optimization solutions.

The IT and Telecommunications industries hold the highest market share in the Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market

The IT and Telecommunications industries hold the highest market share in the Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market in 2022, due to their intrinsic reliance on advanced technology solutions and their pivotal role in driving digital transformation across various sectors. In the IT industry, cloud computing has become a cornerstone for delivering software, platforms, and infrastructure services, enabling organizations to enhance agility, scalability, and operational efficiency.

As IT companies transition their operations to the cloud, the need for effective management and optimization of cloud resources becomes paramount to ensure optimal performance, cost control, and resource allocation. Cloud management and optimization solutions enable IT enterprises to streamline provisioning, monitor workloads, automate processes, and maintain stringent security protocols.

Furthermore, the Telecommunications sector has embraced cloud computing to modernize and expand its network infrastructure, offer innovative communication services, and adapt to the demands of an interconnected world. Cloud-based solutions empower telecom companies to efficiently manage network resources, deliver seamless customer experiences, and explore new revenue streams.

In this context, cloud computing management and optimization are essential for maintaining network reliability, ensuring data privacy, and dynamically scaling resources to meet fluctuating demand. The complex and dynamic nature of both IT and Telecommunications operations necessitates sophisticated tools and strategies for cloud resource management, making these industries prime contributors to the Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market

Regional Insight: North America dominated the Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market during the forecast period.

North America dominated the Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market during the forecast period. Cloud computing has been continuously adopted by the United States and Canada, which are at the forefront of technological development, which helps strengthen North America's remarkable position as market leader. The strong presence of major companies like Adobe, Salesforce, Oracle,AWS, Google, and IBM inside the region's wide geography provides a foundation for this rise. With their cutting-edge solutions, these major players make a significant impact on adoption and innovation.

The region's commitment to technical advancement also serves as another indication of its dominance. Continuous improvements in a number of technologies are transforming the cloud computing industry, and North America is recognized as a hub for important developments.

As a result, organizations and enterprises in North America are pushed to the forefront of cloud optimization and administration, utilizing the full range of technologies and expertise provided by both local and international industry experts. Strong vendor presence, widespread acceptance, and constant technological innovation place North America in the lead for snatching the highest market share during the forecast period.

Major Classifications are as follows:

Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market, Type of Solutions

Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market, By Deployment Models

Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market, By Organization Size

Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market, By Cloud Service Models

Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market, By Technologies

Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market, By Industries

Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market, By Geography

Companies Mentioned

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/bx3846

About ResearchAndMarkets.com

ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.

Media Contact:

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [emailprotected] For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900 U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

Logo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/539438/Research_and_Markets_Logo.jpg

SOURCE Research and Markets

Read this article:

Global $83.7 Bn Cloud Computing Management and Optimization Market to 2030 with IT and Telecommunications ... - PR Newswire

All the big tech layoffs of 2023 and 2024 – Engadget

The tech industry has been reeling from the combination of a rough economy, the COVID-19 pandemic and some obvious business missteps. And while that led to job cuts in 2022, the headcount reductions unfortunately ramped up in 2023 and so far, seem to be accelerating in 2024. It can be tough to keep track of these moves, so weve compiled all the major layoffs in one place and will continue to update this story as the situation evolves.

Duolingo cut 10 percent of its contractors, and said that it is instead able to use generative AI to accomplish some of the tasks that its human workers used to perform.

Unity laid off 1,800 people, or a quarter of its workforce. This is in addition to more than 1,110 other layoffs at the company over the past two years.

Humane cut 4 percent of its workforce even before its flagship product, the Ai pin, hit the market.

Amazon-owned Twitch is laying off a sobering 35 percent of its workforce, just over 500 people. In a note to staff, CEO Dan Clancy said "our organization is still meaningfully larger than it needs to be given the size of our business."

On the same day that Amazon-owned Twitch confirmed it would be laying off 500 workers, Variety reported that Amazon itself would lay off "several hundred" people at Prime Video and MGM Studios.

Meta's layoffs are continuing into 2024. The company has reportedly let go 60 technical program managers at Instagram.

In another round of belt tightening, Google has reportedly laid off hundreds of workers in its Assistant and hardware divisions, among other departments. Alongside the cuts, Google is said to have reorganized its Pixel, Nest and Fitbit divisions, which led to Fitbit's co-founders departing the company.

Discord has reportedly laid off 170 workers, or 17 percent of its workforce. In a memo first reported by The Verge, CEO Jason Citron said the company had hired too many people back in 2020.

Spotify layoffs

Spotify is laying off 17 percent of its workforce, CEO Daniel Ek announced in a pre-holiday press release.

New World Interactive

The developer behind the Insurgency series and Day of Infamy laid off an undisclosed number of employees in December.

Tinybuild

Indie game developer Tinybuild also laid off an undisclosed number of employees, citing cost restructuring.

Codemasters

The EA-owned studio cut some jobs in December. Here, too, it is unclear how many employees lost their jobs.

Tidal

The music streamer announced in December that it is laying off 10 percent of its workforce. This follows an announcement in November from parent company Block Inc. that it would cap its workforce at 12,000 employees.

Etsy

Etsy is laying off 11 percent of its staff, or around 225 employees. The company is also reshuffling its c-suite, with two executives departing in early 2024.

Ubisoft Montreal layoffs

In early November, Ubisoft laid off 98 people from its Montreal office, considered the home of the company's biggest in-house development team. The majority of those who lost their jobs were in business administration and IT. Overall, the company said in its latest quarterly earnings report that it had cut about 1,000 jobs over the last 12 months, including layoffs and not replacing employees who left voluntarily.

Cruise layoffs

Cruise, General Motors' driverless car subsidiary, reportedly told employees in November that it plans to lay off some employees. The news came the same week that GM recalled Cruise's entire fleet of 950 robotaxis following a pedestrian collision. Cruise confirmed in December that the layoffs would include about 900 employees, or 24 percent of its workforce.

Snap layoffs

Snap laid off 20 product managers in a move it claims will enable faster decision making.

Amazon layoffs

Amazon cut 180 jobs from its gaming division, according to several reputable news outlets including Reuters and Bloomberg. The cuts included the entire staff working on Crown, an Amazon-backed Twitch channel. Separately, later in November Amazon laid off several hundred employees working on Alexa. On AI, the company is widely perceived to have fallen behind competitors such as OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT.

ByteDance layoffs

ByteDance, TikTok's parent company, has reportedly eliminated hundreds of roles across its gaming division. Nuverse, the publisher it acquired back in 2017, was said to be gutted in the process.

Unity layoffs

Unity Software cut 265 jobs, or 3.8 percent of its workforce, as part of a company "reset."

LinkedIn layoffs

In its second round of layoffs this year, LinkedIn said it is letting go around 668 workers from across its engineering, product, talent and finance teams. In May, LinkedIn said it would lay off 716 people and close its job search app in China. Between the two rounds of layoffs, LinkedIn will have cut nearly 1,400 jobs in 2023.

Epic Games laid off 16 percent of its employees, or about 830 employees. In an open letter to employees, CEO Tim Sweeney said the company was spending "way more money" than it earns, and that "we concluded that layoffs are the only way." Previously, the company had attempted to reduce costs by freezing hiring and cutting its marketing spending.

Roku's second round of 2023 layoffs is seeing another 300 people leaving the company, on top of 200 it let go in March and another 200 folks it dismissed in late 2022. Roku is once again looking to reduce costs and, along with lowering its headcount, it's trying to do that by axing shows and movies from its platform, consolidating office space and spending less on outside services.

Google drew attention in July when is contracting partner Accenture laid off 80 Help subcontractors who voted to form the Alphabet Workers Union-CWA the month before. Accenture attributed the move to cost-cutting. While the company said it respected the subcontractors' right to join a union, the former teams accused Google of retaliating against labor organizers.

The creator of Cyberpunk 2077 isn't immune to business challenges. CD Projekt Red warned in July that it would lay off about 100 people over the next several months, or about nine percent of the workforce. Employees will be let go as late as the first quarter of 2024. CEO Adam Kiciski was frank about the reasoning: CDPR was "overstaffed" for a reorganization meant to better handle the game developer's widening product roadmap, which includes new Cyberpunk and Witcher titles.

Spotify followed up its January layoff plans with word in June that it would cut 200 jobs in its podcast unit. The move is part of a more targeted approach to fostering podcasts with optimized resources for creators and shows. The company is also combining its Gimlet and Parcast production teams into a renewed Spotify Studios division.

GrubHub has faced intense pressure from both the economy and competitors like Uber, and that led it to lay off 15 percent of its workforce in June, or roughly 400 staff. This came just weeks after outgoing CEO Adam DeWitt officially left the food delivery service. New chief executive Howard Migdal claims the job cuts will help the company remain "competitive."

Game publishing giant Embracer Group announced plans for layoffs in June as part of a major restructuring effort meant to cut costs. The company didn't say how many of its 17,000 employees would be effected, but expected the overhaul to continue through March. The news came soon after Embracer revealed that it lost a $2 billion deal with an unnamed partner despite a verbal agreement.

Sonos has struggled to turn a profit as of late, and it's cutting costs to get back on track. The company said in June that it would lay off 7 percent of staff, or roughly 130 jobs. It also planned to offload real estate and rethink program spending. CEO Patrick Spence said there were "continued headwinds" that included shrinking sales.

Plex may be many users' go-to app for streaming both local and online media, but that hasn't helped its fortunes. The company laid off roughly 20 percent of employees in June, or 37 people. The cuts affect all areas. Plex is reportedly feeling the blow from an ad market slowdown, and is eager to cut costs and turn a profit.

Shopify's e-commerce platform played an important role at the height of the pandemic, but the Canadian company is scaling back now that the rush is over. In May, the company laid off 20 percent of its workforce and sold its logistics business to Flexport. Founder Tobi Ltke characterized the job cuts as necessary to "pay unshared attention" to Shopify's core mission, and an acknowledgment that the firm needed to be more efficient now that the "stable economic boom times" were over.

Polestar delayed production of its first electric SUV (the Polestar 3) in May, and that had repercussions for its workforce. The Volvo spinoff brand said in May that it would cut 10 percent of its workforce to lower costs as it faced reduced manufacturing expectations and a rough economy. Volvo needed more time for software development and testing that also pushed back the EX90, Polestar said.

SoundCloud followed up last year's extensive layoffs with more this May. The streaming audio service said it would shed 8 percent of its staff in a bid to become profitable in 2023. Billboard sources claim the company hopes to be profitable by the fourth quarter of the year.

Lyft laid off 13 percent of staff in November 2022, but took further steps in April. The ridesharing company said it was laying off 1,072 workers, or about 26 percent of its headcount. It comes just weeks after an executive shuffle that replaced CEO Logan Green with former Amazon exec David Risher, who said the company needed to streamline its business and refocus on drivers and passengers. Green previously said Lyft needed to boost its spending to compete with Uber.

Cloud storage companies aren't immune to the current financial climate. In April, Dropbox said it would lay off 500 employees, or roughly 16 percent of its team. Co-founder Drew Houston pinned the cuts on the combination of a rough economy, a maturing business and the "urgency" to hop on the growing interest in AI. While the company is profitable, its growth is slowing and some investments are "no longer sustainable," Houston said.

Roku shed 200 jobs at the end of 2022, but it wasn't done. The streaming platform creator laid off another 200 employees in March 2023. As before, the company argued that it needed to curb growing expenses and concentrate on those projects that would have the most impact. Roku has been struggling with the one-two combination of a rough economy and the end of a pandemic-fueled boom in streaming video.

If you thought luxury EV makers would be particularly susceptible to economic turmoil, you guessed correctly. Lucid Motors said in March that it would lay off 18 percent of its workforce, or about 1,300 people. The marque is still falling short of production targets, and these cuts reportedly help deal with "evolving business needs and productivity improvements." The cuts are across the board, too, and include both executives as well as contractors.

Meta slashed 11,000 jobs in fall 2022, but it wasn't finished. In March 2023, the company unveiled plans to lay off another 10,000 workers in a further bid to cut costs. The first layoffs affected its recruiting team, but it shrank its technology teams in late April and its business groups in late May. The Facebook owner is hoping to streamline its operations by reducing management layers and asking some leaders to take on work previously reserved for the rank and file. It may take a while before Meta's staff count grows again it doesn't expect to lift a hiring freeze until sometime after it completes its restructuring effort in late 2023.

Rivian conducted layoffs in 2022, but that wasn't enough to help the fledgling EV brand's bottom line. The company laid off another six percent of its employees in February, or about 840 workers. It's still fighting to achieve profitability, and the production shortfall from supply chain issues hasn't helped matters. CEO RJ Scaringe says the job cuts will help Rivian focus on the "highest impact" aspects of its business.

Zoom was a staple of remote work culture at the pandemic's peak, so it's no surprise that the company is cutting back now that people are returning to offices. The video calling firm said in February it was laying off roughly 1,300 employees, or 15 percent of its personnel. As CEO Eric Yuan put it, the company didn't hire "sustainably" as it dealt with its sudden success. The layoffs are reportedly necessary to help survive a difficult economy. The management team is offering more than just apologies, too. Yuan is cutting his salary by 98 percent for the next fiscal year, while all other executives are losing 20 percent of their base salaries as well as their fiscal 2023 bonuses.

Engadget's parent company Yahoo isn't immune to layoffs. The internet brand said in February that it would lay off over 20 percent of its workforce throughout 2023, or more than 1,600 people. Most of those cuts, or about 1,000 positions, took place immediately. CEO Jim Lanzone didn't blame the layoffs on economic conditions, however. He instead pitched it as a restructuring of the advertising technology unit as it shed an unprofitable business in favor of a successful one. Effectively, Yahoo is bowing out of direct competition in with Google and Meta in the ad market.

The pandemic recovery and a grim economy have hit PC makers particularly hard, and Dell is feeling the pain more than most. It laid off five percent of its workforce in early February, or about 6,650 employees, after a brutal fourth quarter where computer shipments plunged an estimated 37 percent. Past cost-cutting efforts weren't enough, Dell said the layoffs and a streamlined organization were reportedly needed to get back on track.

Food delivery services flourished while COVID-19 kept people away from restaurants, and at least some are feeling the sting now that people are willing to dine out again. Deliveroo is laying off about 350 workers, or nine percent of its workforce. "Redeployments" will bring this closer to 300, according to founder Will Shu. The justification is familiar: Deliveroo hired rapidly to handle "unprecedented" pandemic-related growth, according to Shu, but reportedly has to cut costs as it deals with a troublesome economy.

DocuSign may be familiar to many people who've signed documents online, but that hasn't spared it from the impact of a harsh economic climate. The company said in mid-February that it was laying off 10 percent of its workforce. While it didn't disclose how many people that represented, the company had 7,461 employees at the start of 2022. Most of those losing their jobs work in DocuSign's worldwide field organization.

You may not know GitLab, but its DevOps (development and operations) platform underpins work at tech brands like NVIDIA and T-Mobile and shrinking business at its clients is affecting its bottom line. GitLab is laying off seven percent of employees, or roughly 114 people. Company chief Sid Sijbrandij said the problematic economy meant customers were taking a "more conservative approach" to software investment, and that his company's previous attempts to refocus spending weren't enough to counter these challenges.

GoDaddy conducted layoffs early in the pandemic, when it cut over 800 workers for its retail-oriented Social platform. In February this year, however, it took broader action. The web service provider laid off eight percent of its workforce, or more than 500 people, across all divisions. Chief Aman Bhutani claimed other forms of cost-cutting hadn't been enough to help the company navigate an "uncertain" economy, and that this reflected efforts to further integrate acquisitions like Main Street Hub.

Twilio eliminated over 800 jobs in September 2022, but it made deeper cuts as 2023 got started. The cloud communications brand laid off 17 percent of staff, or roughly 1,500 people, in mid-February. Like so many other tech firms, Twillio said that past cost reduction efforts weren't enough to endure an unforgiving environment. It also rationalized the layoffs as necessary for a streamlined organization.

Google's parent company Alphabet has been cutting costs for a while, including shutting down Stadia, but it took those efforts one step further in late January when it said it would lay off 12,000 employees. CEO Sundar Pichai wasn't shy about the reasoning: Alphabet had been hiring for a "different economic reality," and was restructuring to focus on the internet giant's most important businesses. The decision hit the company's Area 120 incubator particularly hard, with the majority of the unit's workers losing their jobs. Sub-brands like Intrinsic (robotics) and Verily (health) also shed significant portions of their workforce in the days before the mass layoffs. Waymo has conducted two rounds of layoffs that shed 209 people, or eight percent of its force.

Amazon had already outlined layoff plans last fall, but expanded those cuts in early January when it said it would eliminate 18,000 jobs, most of them coming from retail and recruiting teams. It added another 9,000 people to the layoffs in March, and in April said over 100 gaming employees were leaving. To no one's surprise, CEO Andy Jassy blamed both an "uncertain economy" and rapid hiring in recent years. Amazon benefited tremendously from the pandemic as people shifted to online shopping, but its growth is slowing as people return to in-person stores.

Coinbase was one of the larger companies impacted by the crypto market's 2022 downturn, and that carried over into the new year. The cryptocurrency exchange laid off 950 people in mid-January, just months after it slashed 1,100 roles. This is one of the steepest proportionate cuts among larger tech brands Coinbase offloaded about a fifth of its staff. Chief Brian Armstrong said his outfit needed the layoffs to shrink operating expenses and survive what he previously described as a "crypto winter," but that also meant canceling some projects that were less likely to succeed.

Layoffs sometimes stem more from corporate strategy shifts than financial hardship, and IBM provided a classic example of this in 2023. The computing pioneer axed 3,900 jobs in late January after offloading both its AI-driven Watson Health business and its infrastructure management division (now Kyndryl) in the fall. Simply put, those employees had nothing to work on as IBM pivoted toward cloud computing.

Microsoft started its second-largest wave of layoffs in company history when it signaled it would cut 10,000 jobs between mid-January and the end of March. Like many other tech heavyweights, it was trimming costs as customers scaled back their spending (particularly on Windows and devices) during the pandemic recovery. The reductions were especially painful for some divisions they reportedly gutted the HoloLens and mixed reality teams, while 343 Industries is believed to be rebooting Halo development after losing dozens of workers. GitHub is cutting 10 percent of its team, or roughly 300 people.

PayPal has been one of the healthier large tech companies, having beaten expectations in its third quarter last year. Still, it hasn't been immune to a tough economy. The online payment firm unveiled plans at the end of January to lay off 2,000 employees, or seven percent of its total worker base. CEO Dan Schulman claimed the downsizing would keep costs in check and help PayPal focus on "core strategic priorities."

Salesforce set the tone for 2023 when it warned it would lay off 8,000 employees, or about 10 percent of its workforce, just four days into the new year. While the cloud software brand thrived during the pandemic with rapidly growing revenue, it admitted that it hired too aggressively during the boom and couldn't maintain that staffing level while the economy was in decline.

Business software powerhouse SAP saw a steep 68 percent drop in profit at the end of 2022, and it started 2023 by laying off 2,800 staff to keep its business healthy. Unlike some big names in tech, though, SAP didn't blame excessive pandemic-era hiring for the cutback. Instead, it characterized the initiative as a "targeted restructuring" for a company that still expected accelerating growth in 2023.

Spotify spent aggressively in recent years as it expanded its podcast empire, but it quickly put a stop to that practice as 2023 began. The streaming music service said in late January that it would lay off 6 percent of its workforce (9,800 people worked at Spotify as of the third quarter) alongside a restructuring effort that included the departure of content chief Dawn Ostroff. While there were more Premium subscribers than ever in 2022, the company also suffered steep losses CEO Daniel Ek said he was "too ambitious" investing before the revenue existed to support it.

Amazon isn't the only major online retailer scaling back in 2023. Wayfair said in late January that it would lay off 1,750 team members, or 10 percent of its global headcount. About 1,200 of those were corporate staff cut in a bid to "eliminate management layers" and otherwise help the company become leaner and nimbler. Wayfair had been cutting costs since August 2022 (including 870 positions), but saw the layoffs as helping it reach break-even earnings sooner than expected.

Follow this link:

All the big tech layoffs of 2023 and 2024 - Engadget

Tech Giants Refuse U.S. Consumer Security to Oversee Digital Wallets – The Tech Report

The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), a lobby group representing major tech companies such as Apple, Google, Amazon, Meta, and X, expressed concerns about a proposed plan by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The CFPBs proposal seeks equal oversight of digital wallet and payment app providers, including tech giants, to ensure consumer protections similar to traditional payment methods.

The CCIAs head of regulatory policy, Krisztian Katona, cautioned against the potential negative impact of the proposal, suggesting that overly broad or burdensome digital regulations could impede innovation and harm new startups in the industry.

The lobby group emphasized that extensive supervision like the one imposed on banks might not be the most effective approach.

In the comment letter addressed to the CFPB, the CCIA pointed out a perceived flaw in the proposal, stating that it failed to identify the specific consumer risks it intended to address.

The letter argued against viewing non-bank digital providers and banks as direct competitors, emphasizing the markets reality, where their collaborations often benefit consumers through complementary services.

The Financial Technology Association, representing members such as PayPal and Block Inc., echoed similar concerns in a separate comment letter released on the same day. They argued that existing regulations were adequate, urging the CFPB to suspend the rulemaking process.

The association, which includes companies like Venmo and Cash App, also believed that unnecessary regulations could stifle innovation and hinder the industrys growth.

The adoption of digital payment systems has continued to increase, given the advantage they offer users over traditional methods.

Notably, digital payments offer high convenience and security, adding to their user-friendly features and benefitting businesses and consumers.

Due to this support, there is a projected 26.93% compound growth in their adoption between 2021 and 2025.

This rise gives birth to a significant trend in the competitive industry, resulting in a consolidation period where large tech companies surpass regional and community banks in terms of trust associated with digital payments.

The IMF acknowledges the significance of digital payments in reshaping the industry and encourages more collaborations and competition between big tech companies and regular financial institutions.

Besides that, digital wallets have proven helpful in streamlining payment processes and bringing existing systems together, whether online portals for internet-based operations or contactless terminals for face-to-face transactions.

This ease of integration enhances accessibility and convenience for customers and businesses, contributing significantly to the widespread adoption of digital wallets.

In addition to these benefits, the cost-effectiveness of digital wallets compared to traditional payment methods makes them an attractive option for businesses aiming to reduce transaction costs.

This affordability further incentivizes their adoption across various industries, positioning digital wallets as indispensable tools for most tech organizations.

Go here to read the rest:

Tech Giants Refuse U.S. Consumer Security to Oversee Digital Wallets - The Tech Report

Nicki Minaj Fans Are Using AI to Create “Gag City”

Fans anxiously awaiting the release of Nicki Minaj's latest album have occupied themselves with AI to create their own

Gag City

Fans are anxiously awaiting the drop of Onika "Nicki Minaj" Maraj-Petty's "Pink Friday 2" — and in the meantime, they've occupied themselves with artificial intelligence image generators to create visions of a Minajian utopia known as "Gag City."

The entire "Gag City" gambit began with zealous (and perhaps overzealous) fans tweeting at the Queens-born diva to tell her how excited — or "gagged," to use the drag scene etymology that spread among Maraj-Petty's LGBTQ and queer-friendly fanbase — they are for her first album in more than five years.

Replete with dispensaries, burger joints, and a high-rise shopping mall, Gag City has everything a Barb (as fans call themselves) could ask for.

Gag City, the fan-created AI kingdom for Nicki Minaj, trends on X/Twitter ahead of ‘Pink Friday 2.’ pic.twitter.com/jm3iGS9fBO

— Pop Crave (@PopCrave) December 6, 2023

Barbz Hug

As memetic lore will have you believe, these tributes to Meraj-Petty were primarily created with Microsoft's Bing AI image generator. The meme went so deep that people began claiming that her fanbase generating Gag City imagery caused Bing to crash, which allegedly led to the image generator blocking Nicki Minaj-related prompts.

gag city residents have demolished bing head office after their continued sabotage of nicki minaj’s name in their image creator pic.twitter.com/OOpL2Jzj7h

— Xeno? (@AClDBLEEDER) December 6, 2023

When Futurism took to Bing's image creator AI to see what all the fuss was about, we too discovered that you couldn't search for anything related to Minaj. However, the same was true when we inputted other celebrities' names as well, suggesting that Bing, like Google, may intentionally block the names of famous people in an apparent effort to circumvent deepfakes.

Brand Opportunities

As creative as these viral Gag City images have been, it was only a matter of time before engagement-hungry brands tried to get in on the fun and effectively ruin it.

From Spotify changing its location to the imaginary Barb metropolis and introducing "Gag City" as a new "sound town" to KFC's social media manager telling users to "DM" the account, the meme has provided a hot pink branding free-for-all.

The Bing account itself even posted a pretty excellent-looking AI-generated Gag City image.

Next stop: Friday ? https://t.co/J1pRCZcbTd pic.twitter.com/ujG7BsJWUC

— Bing (@bing) December 6, 2023

Sleazy brand bandwagoning aside, the Gag City meme and its many interpretations provide an interesting peek into what the future of generative AI may hold in a world dominated by warring fandoms and overhyped automation.

More on AI imaginationPeople Cannot Stop Dunking on that Uncanny “AI Singer-Songwriter”

The post Nicki Minaj Fans Are Using AI to Create “Gag City” appeared first on Futurism.

Link:
Nicki Minaj Fans Are Using AI to Create “Gag City”

Silicon Valley Guys Casually Calculating Probability Their AI Will Destroy Humankind

P(doom) has become the go-to shorthand among AI researchers and tech CEOs for describing the likelihood of AI destroying humanity.

Doom and Gloom

If you find yourself talking to a tech bro about AI, be warned that they might ask you about your "p(doom)" — the hot new statistic that's become part of the everyday lingo among Silicon Valley researchers in recent months, The New York Times reports.

P(doom), or the probability of doom, is a quasi-empirical way of expressing how likely you think AI will destroy humanity — y'know, the kind of cheerful stuff you might talk about over a cup of coffee.

It lets other AI guys know where you stand on the tech without getting too far into the weeds on what exactly constitutes an existential risk. Someone with a p(doom) of 50 percent might be labeled a "doomer," like short-lived interim CEO of OpenAI Emmet Shear, while another with 5 percent might be your typical optimist. Wherever people stand, it now serves, at the very least, as a useful bit of small talk.

"It comes up in almost every dinner conversation," Aaron Levie, CEO of the cloud platform Box, told the NYT.

Scaredy Cats

It should come as no surprise that jargon like p(doom) exists. Fears over the technology, both apocalyptic and mundane, have blown up with the explosive rise of generative AI and large language models like OpenAI's ChatGPT. In many cases, the leaders of the tech, like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, have been more than willing to play into those fears.

Where the term originated isn't a matter of record. The NYT speculates that it more than likely came from the philosophy forum LessWrong over a decade ago, first used by a programmer named Tim Tyler as a way to "refer to the probability of doom without being too specific about the time scale or the definition of 'doom,'" he told the paper.

The forum's founder, Eliezer Yudkowsky, is himself a noted AI doomsayer who has called for the bombing of data centers to stave off armageddon. His p(doom) is "yes," he told NYT, transcending mere mathematical estimates.

Best Guess

Few opinions could outweigh those of AI's towering trifecta of so-called godfathers, whose contrite cautions on the tech have cast a shadow over the industry that is decidedly ominous. One of them, Geoffrey Hinton, left Google last year, stating that he regretted his life's work while soberly warning of AI's risk of eliminating humanity.

Of course, some in the industry remain unabashed optimists. Levie, for instance, told the NYT that his p(doom) is "about as low as it could be." What he fears is not an AI apocalypse, but that premature regulation could stifle the technology.

On the other hand, it could also be said that the focus on pulp sci-fi AI apocalypses in the future threatens to efface AI's existing but-not-as-exciting problems in the present. Boring issues like mass copyright infringement will have a hard time competing against visions of Terminators taking over the planet.

At any rate, p(doom)'s proliferation indicates that there's at least a current of existential self-consciousness among those developing the technology — though whether that affects your personal p(doom) is, naturally, left up to you.

More on AI: Top Execs at Sports Illustrated's Publisher Fired After AI Debacle

The post Silicon Valley Guys Casually Calculating Probability Their AI Will Destroy Humankind appeared first on Futurism.

The rest is here:
Silicon Valley Guys Casually Calculating Probability Their AI Will Destroy Humankind

This Cartoonish New Robot Dog Somehow Looks Even Scarier

Chinese robotics company called Weilan recently showed off a creepy, cartoonish-looking robot dog called

Dog Days

We've come across plenty of robot dogs over the years that can dance, speak using ChatGPT, or even assist doctors in hospitals.

But they all have one thing in common: they look like lifeless machines on four stilts.

In an apparent effort to put the "dog " back into "robodog," a Chinese robotics company called Weilan recently showed off an entirely new class of robotic quadruped called "BabyAlpha" — essentially half cartoon dog and half robot.

The company may have overshot its goal a little bit, though, ending up with an even more terrifying-looking machine that looks like it belongs in a "M3GAN"-esque horror flick.

Robot's Best Friend

The small robot canine has a spotted head, a cute little nose, and two floppy-looking ears.

According to the company's website, which we crudely translated using Google, the robot is "especially designed for family companionship scenarios."

"BabyAlpha likes to be by your side," the website reads adding that the little robot has "endless technological superpowers" thanks to AI. Not creepy at all!

Weilan is also targeting its pet as a way to teach children either English or Chinese or keep track of younger family members through a video call tool.

But we can't shake the feeling that BabyAlpha is exactly the kind of thing that kickstarts a series of unfortunate events in a shlocky horror movie.

In case you do trust your children to be around a BabyAlpha, the companion will cost the equivalent of around $1,700 when it goes on sale.

More on robot dogs: Oh Great, They Put ChatGPT Into a Boston Dynamics Robot Dog

The post This Cartoonish New Robot Dog Somehow Looks Even Scarier appeared first on Futurism.

Read more from the original source:
This Cartoonish New Robot Dog Somehow Looks Even Scarier

Sometimes buses take the old route, sometimes the new one, so its roulette getting a bus at either stop right now. – PoPville

Dear PoPville,

I wanted to flag WMATAs clusterf**k of a rollout of the new (old) S2 and S9 routes and hopefully save people from waiting for a bus that may never come. This week, WMATA rolled the S2/9 routes back to 16th between K and M after about a year of running that strip on 15th. However, they didnt inform passengers or drivers clearly of this change. Sometimes buses take the old route, sometimes the new one, so its roulette getting a bus at either stop right now.

There are also no signs at the old stop to let people know where they should go now, so only people with smartphones could track the busses, and even then its not clear. For example, the current sign at 16 and L says only S2, but Google and Transit app say the S9 stops there too. Which is it?

My advice for bus riders is to go to Franklin Square or P Street (or just take the 50 busses) until WMATA figures this out in a week or two.

I remember similar chaos the last time this route changed, so it seems like this isnt just a fluke and better planning and communication from WMATA is needed.

Link:

Sometimes buses take the old route, sometimes the new one, so its roulette getting a bus at either stop right now. - PoPville