Spotify CEO Daniel Ek surprised at negative impact of laying off 1500 Spotify employees – Fortune

When Spotify announced its largest-ever round of layoffs in December, CEO Daniel Ek hailed a new age of efficiency at the streaming giant. But four months on, it seems he and his executives werent prepared for how tough filling in for 1,500 axed workers would be.

The music streamer enjoyed record quarterly profits of 168 million ($179 million) in the first three months of 2024, enjoying double-digit revenue growth to 3.6 billion ($3.8 billion) in the process.

However, the company failed to hit its guidance on profitability and monthly active user growth.

It didnt seem to put off investors, who sent shares in the group soaring more than 8% in New York after markets opened Tuesday morning.

Still, as he addressed those investors following the latest earnings release, Ek didnt shy away from the obstacles that stopped the streamer from hitting some of its targets this year.

In addition to surprisingly successful 2023 growth to compare against and the impacts of falling marketing spend, Ek blamed operational difficulties linked to staffing for the group missing its earnings target to start the year.

In December, Spotify culled 1,500 jobs, equivalent to 17% of employees, as part of an aggressive efficiency drive as the group strived for profitability.

Staff costs for those employees carried a long tail, as most workers received five-month severance packages when they were let go in December.

At the same time, the footprint left behind by those employees was bigger than Ek and his executives anticipated.

Another significant challenge was the impact of December workforce reduction, Ek said on an investors call following Spotifys Q1 earnings release.

Although theres no question that it was the right strategic decision, it did disrupt our day-to-day operations more than we anticipated.

It took us some time to find our footing, but more than four months into this transition, I think were back on track and I expect to continue improving on our execution throughout the year getting us to an even better place than weve ever been.

Ek didnt elaborate on what aspects of operations were most affected by the layoffs.

Back in December as the platform he founded faced persistent losses and a falling share price, Spotify CEO Ek used a well-trodden path by tech giants to steer the ship around: mass layoffs.

We still have too many people dedicated to supporting work and even doing work around the work, rather than contributing to opportunities with real impact, Ek said in a memo as he announced he would be cutting his workforce by 17%.

Investors initially reacted well to the news, though skeptical voices asked whether the move merely put a sticking plaster over harder-to-solve issues at the group, particularly its low margins thanks to the costs of bumper record deals.

However, it appears to have worked so far. In the four months since the layoff announcements, shares in the group have jumped more than 60%.

Spotify has also recently proved it is able to raise prices in some of its key markets without seeing a flight of listeners to rival services like Apple Music.

In the long run, Spotify and Ek also remain convinced the tough round of layoffs has set Spotify up for long-term profitability.

The apparent collective surprise at how that can affect operations in the short run, though, marks a dash of hubris for the newly bullish streaming group.

Continue reading here:

Spotify CEO Daniel Ek surprised at negative impact of laying off 1500 Spotify employees - Fortune

Zoho is the Google Workspace alternative African tech companies are choosing – Rest of World

When Nigerian edtech startup, Flexisaf, decided to cut costs earlier this year, it realized it needed to reduce its spending on technology.

One of the companys biggest costs was the money it paid Google to use its Workspace a collection of Google products including Gmail, Drive, Calendar, Meet, and Docs. Flexisaf had used Google Workspace since 2010, but with 100 employees now, it was becoming too expensive for the small business.

In March, Flexisaf found a solution to its problem in Zoho, an Indian company that offered similar products as Google, but at a fraction of the price. Flexisaf has started the process of migrating to Zoho once that is completed, it will save the company around 8,000,000 naira ($6,960) a year, Saad Shehu, Flexisafs people and talent manager, told Rest of World.

The approach weve taken is to introduce the mail and meeting tools first, and drive adoption of the other features within the coming months, Shehu said.

Zoho, a lesser-known rival of Google and Microsoft in the enterprise software space, has been stepping up in Africa as an affordable alternative to the global giants. The company has hired local staff, introduced payment options in local currencies, and even sponsored a cricket tournament to dig its heels into the market. But even as it has seen some early success, African tech experts say Zoho needs to strengthen its branding and engage with the local tech community to give serious competition to its larger rivals in the future.

There is a tremendous opportunity for digital transformation in African countries, Praval Singh, vice president of marketing and customer experience at Zoho, told Rest of World. A lot of companies are adopting digital, either for the first time or theyre on that path of making their businesses more efficient using technology, he said. Rest of World spoke to seven startups in Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa that have ditched Google and switched to Zohos products over the past year or so.

While Zoho launched in India in 1996, it was only in 2019 that it started on-the-ground operations in Africa, with one salesperson each in South Africa and Nigeria. Now, it has about 60 employees across the continent, Zohos regional manager for Africa, Andrew Bourne, told Rest of World. Besides work management tools like the equivalent of Gmail or Google Drive, Zoho sells software for customer relationship management, human resource management, and accounting, among other products.

Globally, Zoho has over 100 million users. Its clients include e-commerce major Amazon, leading carmaker Mercedes-Benz Group AG, Indian airline SpiceJet, and food delivery platform Zomato. Zohos advantage over its bigger rivals is that it does not run ads or sell customers data to third parties, Singh said.

In 2023, Zohos user base in Nigeria grew by 50% year-on-year, while its revenue from South Africa rose by 73%, Bourne said. The company refused to disclose how many users it had in Africa or how much revenue it had made from the continent. A Zoho spokesperson told Rest of World its clients include Kenyan lifestyle app Pesapal, South African fintech Payfast, and events ticketing portal Quicket. The companys combined annual revenue has crossed $1 billion.

But despite its initial success, Zoho doesnt have the same support for the local developer ecosystem as Google does in Africa, according to Prosper Otemuyiwa, a Nigerian software engineer and co-founder of ForLoop, an African nonprofit developer community. They dont have enough goodwill yet, Otemuyiwa said. [Google] has built an ecosystem of tools and support, [and] users are likely going to hesitate before clocking out of [it], just as people would rather pay for an Apple product just to remain within that ecosystem of tools.

In 2021, Zoho started allowing African companies to pay for its software in local currencies. This decision has been a major reason for Zohos success in Africa as it allowed customers and potential clients to avoid regulatory hurdles around dollar spending, Kehinde Ogundare, country director for Nigeria, told Rest of World. We saw the rise in adoption of Zoho technology in Nigeria when we started pricing in local currency and building a local support team.

In comparison, African companies can pay for Google Workspace only in dollars and euros, as verified by Rest of World.

As long as theres a naira equivalent for anything thats coming in dollars, Zoho will win, Adewale Yusuf, co-founder and CEO of edtech startup AltSchool Africa, told Rest of World. They have great products and pricing whats left is to build trust and engage in strong marketing activities to completely shake out the big guys. Yusuf, who has co-founded three startups, said all his companies now use at least one Zoho product.

Google and Microsoft did not respond to Rest of Worlds queries about offering localized solutions in Africa, including adding payment options in local currencies.

Zoho has also been aggressive with its pricing in Africa. Zoho One, a bundle of more than 45 products, sells for just $6.70 per user in Nigeria, compared to $30 in the rest of the world.

Cost is the biggest driver for me, Neto Ikpeme, founder and CEO of Nigerian health-tech startup Wellahealth, told Rest of World. Ikpeme had opted for Zoho over Google when he launched his company in 2016. We know that its difficult enough to access dollars, and if you can, you might want to reserve it for other services that you cant pay for locally, he said. But the low pricing may not be enough for Zoho to dethrone its larger rivals. Users told Rest of World the companys products lack sophistication.

Zoho hasnt done a design upgrade in a while and it is starting to get a little bit stale. They also need to have better mobile apps, said Vijay Anand, an Indian angel investor and founder whose startups use Zoho. When he tested Zohos new Slack-like service, Cliq, Anand was disappointed by the lack of emojis and GIFs. Its the one happy thing the teams have, he said.

ForLoops Otemuyi said Zoho lacks a developer community that can support its products in Africa. Theres no strong community to leverage when you run into a problem, he said. Google has that in abundance and across the continent in terms of developers, startups, and IT professionals generally.

Zoho is partnering with local business communities, incubators, accelerators, and venture capital firms to tackle that challenge, Veerakumar Natarajan, the companys regional manager for East Africa, told Rest of World. In Kenya and South Africa, for instance, it has partnered with startup incubator hubs like J-Hub Africa and Silulo Foundation, respectively, Natarajan said.

Google is a lot bigger than we are in terms of size, Singh said. But our portfolio, with a spread of 55-plus apps, is the most prolific in the industry, owing to our bullish focus on [research and development]. He said some customers might use only Zoho, while others might use it along with Googles products to meet different needs. It takes each of a kind to make a village, said Singh.

Read more:

Zoho is the Google Workspace alternative African tech companies are choosing - Rest of World

Notus robotics team is headed to 2024 FIRST Championship – KTVB.com

Notus Jr/Sr High School robotics team of five students is headed to the 2024 FIRST Championship in Houston, Texas.

BOISE, Idaho A small robotics team from Notus Jr/Sr High School is living the classic underdog story after they qualified to compete at a world championship.

The team of five students will be heading to Houston, Texas to participate in the 2024 FIRST Championship. On Friday, KTVB spoke to the team advisor, Nick Forbes, who said this is the first year the program was introduced to the Notus. But that hasn't stopped them.

In March of 2024,team 9726 received the Rookie of the Year All-Star Award after competing in Boise. A few days later, they were invited to compete on the world stage.

According to the FIRST website, with every new season the game changes, and students will need to build a robot to achieve the goal. This year's game is called 'CRESCENDO.'

While FIRST's rules recommend a team should consist of 10 students, team 9726 won with half that. But, a student told KTVB it hasn't been without some challenges.

"It was entirely made from duct tape, zip ties, and just things that we had to find around," Ezekiel said. "There were sometimes things that we had to improvise through 3-D printings and other things. We're very proud of the work we've done."

He said their robot mainly plays defense, utilizing a wall, which helped them secure a spot at worlds.

The world championships in Houston kicks off on April 16.

See the latest news from around the Treasure Valley and the Gem State in our YouTube playlist:

HERE ARE MORE WAYS TO GET NEWS FROM KTVB:

Download the KTVB News Mobile App

Apple iOS: Click here to download

Google Play:Click here to download

Watch news reports for FREE on YouTube: KTVB YouTube channel

Stream Live for FREE on ROKU:Add the channel from the ROKU store or by searching 'KTVB'.

Stream Live for FREE on FIRE TV: Search KTVB and click Get to download.

View original post here:

Notus robotics team is headed to 2024 FIRST Championship - KTVB.com

NEURA and Omron Robotics partner to offer cognitive factory automation – Robot Report

Listen to this article

NEURA has developed cognitive robots in a variety of form factors. Source: NEURA Robotics

Talk about combining robotics and artificial intelligence is all the rage, but some convergence is already maturing. NEURA Robotics GmbH and Omron Robotics and Safety Technologies Inc. today announced a strategic partnership to introduce cognitive robotics into manufacturing.

By pooling our sensor and AI technologies and expertise into an ultimate platform approach, we will significantly shape the future of the manufacturing industry and set new standards, stated David Reger, founder and CEO of NEURA Robotics.

Reger founded the company in 2019 with the intention of combining sensors and AI with robotics components for a platform for app development similar to that of smartphones. The NEURAverse offers flexibility and cost efficiency in automation, according to the company.

Unlike traditional industrial robots, cognitive robots have the ability to learn from their environment, make decisions autonomously, and adapt to dynamic production scenarios, said Metzingen, Germany-based NEURA. This opens new application possibilities including intricate assembly tasks, detailed quality inspections, and adaptive material handling processes.

We see NEURAs cognitive technologies as a compelling growth opportunity for industrial robotics, added Olivier Welker, president and CEO of Omron Robotics and Safety Technologies. By combining NEURAs innovative solutions with Omrons global reach and automation portfolio, we will provide customers new ways to increase safety, productivity, and flexibility in their operations.

Pleasanton, Calif.-based Omron Robotics is a subsidiary of OMRON Corp. focusing on automation and safety sensing. It designs and manufactures industrial, collaborative, and mobile robots for various industries.

Weve known Omron for quite some time, and even before I started NEURA, we had talked about collaborating, Reger told The Robot Report. Theyve tested our products, and weve worked together on how to benefit both sides.

We have the cognitive platform, and theyre one of the biggest sensor, controllers, and safety systems providers, he added. This collaboration will integrate our cognitive abilities and NEURAverse with their sensors for a plug-and-play solution, which everyone is working toward.

Omron Robotics Olivier Welker and NEURAs David Reger celebrate their partnership. Source: NEURA

When asked whether NEURA and Omron Robotics partnership is mainly focused on market access, Reger replied, Its not just the sales channel there are no really big limits. From both sides, there will be add-ons.

Rather than see each other as competitors, NEURA and Omron Robotics are working to make robots easier to use, he explained.

As a billion-dollar company, it could have told our startup what it wanted, but Omron is different, said Reger. I felt we got a lot of respect from Olivier and everyone in that organization. It wont be a one-sided thing; it will be just Lets help each other do something great. Thats what were feeling every day since weve been working together. Now we can start talking about it.

NEURA has also been looking at mobile manipulation and humanoid robots, but adding capabilities to industrial automation is the low-hanging fruit, where small changes can have a huge effect, said Reger. A lot of things for humanoids have not yet been solved.

I would love to just work on household robots, but the best way to get there is to use the synergy between industrial robotics and the household market, he noted. Our MAiRA, for example, is a cognitive robot able to scan an environment and from an idle state pick any known or unknown objects.

MAiRA cognitive robot on MAV mobile base. Source: NEURA Robotics

NEURA and Omron Robotics promise to make robots easier to use, helping overall adoption, Reger said.

A big warehouse company out of the U.S. is claiming that its already using more than 1 million robots, but at the same time, Im sure theyd love to use many more robots, he said. Its also in the transformation from a niche market into a mass market. We see thats currently only possible if you somehow control the environment.

Its not just putting all the sensors inside the robot, which we were first to do, and saying, OK, now were able to interact with a human and also pick objects,' said Reger. Imagine there are external sensors, but how do you calibrate them? To make everything plug and play, you need new interfaces, which means collaboration with big players like Omron that provide a lot of sensors for the automation market.

NEURA has developed its own sensors and explored the balance of putting processing in the cloud versus the edge. To make its platform as popular with developers as that of Apple, however, the company needs the support of partners like Omron, he said.

Reger also mentioned NEURAs partnership with Kawasaki, announced last year, in which Kawasaki offers the LARA CL series cobot with its portfolio. Both collaborations are incredibly important for NEURA and will soon make sense to everyone, he said.

Reger will be presenting a session on Developing Cognitive Robotics Systems at 2:45 p.m. EDT on Wednesday, May 1, Day 1 of the Robotics Summit & Expo. The event will be at the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center, and registration is now open.

Ill be talking about making robots cognitive to enable AI to be useful to humanity instead of competing with us, he said. AI is making great steps, but if you look at what its doing, like drawing pictures or writing stories these are things that Id love to do but dont have the time for. But if I ask, lets say, AI to take out the garbage or show it a picture of garbage, it can tell me how to do it, but its simply not able to do something about it yet.

NEURA is watching humanoid development but is focusing on integrating cognitive robotics with sensing and wearables as it expands in the U.S., said Reger. The company is planning for facilities in Detroit, Boston, and elsewhere, and it is looking for leadership team members as well as application developers and engineers.

We dont just want a sales office, but also production in the U.S., he said. We have 220 people in Germany I just welcomed 15 new people who joined NEURA and are starting to build our U.S. team. In the past several months, weve gone with only European and American investors, and were looking at the Japanese market. The U.S. is now open to innovation, and its an exciting time for us to come.

Learn from Agility Robotics, Amazon, Disney, Teradyne and many more.

Read this article:

NEURA and Omron Robotics partner to offer cognitive factory automation - Robot Report

There Might Be No ChatGPT-like Apple Chatbot in iOS 18 – The Mac Observer

The recent months in the tech scene have been all about artificial intelligence and its impact, but one company that has been late to the party is Apple. Apple first hinted about inhouse-AI development during a recent earnings call, which followed the earlier reports of the company reaching out to major publishers to use their data to train its AIs dataset, canceling the Apple Car project and shifting the team to AI. However, according to Bloombergs Mark Gurman, Apple might not debut a ChatGPT-like chatbot, at all. Instead, the company is exploring deals with established tech giants such as Chinas Baidu, OpenAI, and Google about potential partnerships.

That said, Apple might instead focus on licensing already-established chatbots like Googles Gemini (fka Bard) or OpenAIs ChatGPT. They might delay all plans to release an Apple chatbot, internally dubbed Ajax GPT.

Nevertheless, Mark Gurman believes AI will remain in the shows spotlight at the upcoming Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC), slated for June 10-14, 2024 where we expect to see iOS 18, iPadOS 18, watchOS 11, tvOS 18, macOS 15, and visionOS 2. Although he doesnt delve into details of the upcoming AI feature, he mentions the companys plans to unveil new AI features, which could serve as the backbone of the next iOS 18. This suggests that even if Apple doesnt intend to bring a native AI chatbot to the devices, we might see a popular chatbot pre-installed on the phones or supported natively by the device. For reference, a London-based consumer tech firm, Nothing, recently partnered with the Perplexity AI search engine to power up its latest release, Phone 2(a), and Apple might have similar plans, but with generative AI giants.

CEO Tim Cook recently spoke to investors that the company will disclose its AI plans to the public later this year. Despite Apples overall reticence on the topic, Cook has been notably vocal about the potential of AI, particularly generative AI.

More importantly, according to previous reports, he has indicated that generative AI will improve Siris ability to respond to more complex queries and enable the Messages app to complete sentences automatically. Furthermore, other Apple apps such as Apple Music, Shortcuts, Pages, Numbers, and Keynote are expected to integrate generative AI functionality.

Source

Read the rest here:

There Might Be No ChatGPT-like Apple Chatbot in iOS 18 - The Mac Observer

iOS 18 won’t have a big focus on ‘ChatGPT-like generative AI features’ New leak says we should expect ‘ a slew of AI … – iMore

A new report into Apples rumored iOS 18 AI shift has revealed that Apple will focus on tools to improve the daily life of iPhone users, rather than its answer to ChatGPT, when the software is unveiled in June.

Ever since the explosion of AI in the public domain last year, rumors have indicated that Apple is frantically trying to play catch up to rivals like Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI, allegedly spending millions of dollars a day on its own answer to ChatGPT. Bloombergs Mark Gurman has been at the forefront of these rumors, most recently reporting that Apple is in discussions with Google to bring Gemini AI to iPhone in a landmark deal. Now, Gurman has tempered expectations.

In his latest Power On Newsletter, Gurman states that while iOS 18 is still considered internally to be the biggest update to iOS since the original iPhone, and while the main event will be artificial intelligence, iOS 18 wont have a big focus on ChatGPT-esque generative AI.

According to Gurman we shouldnt expect a big focus on ChatGPT-like generative AI features. To be clear, this doesnt necessarily mean that Apple wont have any generative AI features. Indeed, earlier on in his report Gurman indicates that Apple could open up iOS so any developer could build a generative AI system deep into the iPhone, building on swirling rumors of the Google partnership, and reported discussions with Chinese multinational and AI company Baidu.

Instead, Gurmans report seems to indicate that Apples focus for consumers at WWDC 2024 (when we should see iOS 18 unveiled) will be on a slew of AI tools that help manage your daily life. Previously, weve heard that there are six iPhone applications Apple plans to improve with AI, including its Xcode development software, Messages, Pages, and Keynote.

Alongside these AI incursions, Gurman also reports that Apples iPhone Home Screen will offer more customizability in iOS 18, including the option to have blank spaces and columns, just like Android. iOS 18 will likely debut in September alongside Apple's next best iPhone, the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro.

iMore offers spot-on advice and guidance from our team of experts, with decades of Apple device experience to lean on. Learn more with iMore!

View post:

iOS 18 won't have a big focus on 'ChatGPT-like generative AI features' New leak says we should expect ' a slew of AI ... - iMore

Why is Elon Musk suing Open AI and Sam Altman? In a word: Microsoft. – Morningstar

By Jurica Dujmovic

Potential ramifications extend far beyond the courtroom

In a striking turn of events, Elon Musk, Tesla's (TSLA) CEO, has initiated legal action against OpenAI and its leadership, alleging that the organization he helped found has moved from its original altruistic mission toward a profit-driven approach, particularly after partnering with Microsoft (MSFT).

The lawsuit accentuates Musk's deep-seated concerns that OpenAI has deviated from its foundational manifesto of developing artificial general intelligence (AGI) for the betterment of humanity, choosing instead to prioritize financial gains. But is that really so, or is there something else at hand?

Musk was deeply involved with OpenAI since its inception in 2015, as his concerns about AI's potential risks and the vision to advance AI in a way that benefits humanity aligned with OpenAI's original ethos as a non-profit organization.

In 2018, however, Musk became disillusioned with OpenAI because, in his view, it no longer operated as a nonprofit and was building technology that took sides in political and social debates. The recent OpenAI drama that culminated with a series of significant changes in OpenAI's structure and ethos, as well as a what can only be seen as Microsoft's power grab, seems to have sparked Musk's discontent.

To understand his reasoning, it helps to remember that Microsoft is a company with a long history of litigation. Over the years, Microsoft has faced numerous high-profile legal battles related to its market practices.

Here are some prominent cases to illustrate the issue:

-- In the United States v. Microsoft Corp. case, which began in 1998, the U.S. Department of Justice accused Microsoft of holding a monopolistic position in the PC operating-systems market and taking actions to crush threats to that monopoly. In April 2000, the case resulted in a verdict that Microsoft had engaged in monopolization and attempted monopolization in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

-- In Europe, Microsoft has faced significant fines for abusing its dominant market position. In 2004, the European Commission fined Microsoft 497.2 million euros, the largest sum it had ever imposed on a single company at the time??. In 2008, Microsoft was fined an additional 899 million euros for failing to comply with the 2004 antitrust order.

-- In 2013, the European Commission levied a 561 million euro fine against Microsoft for failing to comply with a 2009 settlement agreement to offer Windows users a choice of internet browsers instead of defaulting to Internet Explorer.

In light of these past litigations, it's much easier to understand why OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman's brief departure from the company and subsequent return late last year - which culminated in a significant shift in the organization's governance and its relationship with Microsoft - was the straw that likely broke Musk's back.

After Altman was reinstated, Microsoft solidified its influence over OpenAI by securing a permanent position on its board. Furthermore, the restructuring of OpenAI's board to include business-oriented members, rather than AI experts or ethicists, signaled a permanent shift in the organization's priorities and marked a pivotal turn toward a profit-driven model underpinned by corporate governance.

The consequences of this power grab are plain to see: Microsoft is already implementing various AI models designed by the company in its various products while none of the code is being released to the public. These models also include a specific political and ideological bias that makes them problematic from an ethical point of view. This too, is an issue that cannot be addressed due to the closed-source nature of AI models generated and shaped under the watchful eye of Microsoft.

Musk's own ventures, like xAI and Neuralink, suggest he's still deeply invested in the AI space, albeit in a way he has more control over, presumably to ensure that the technology develops according to his vision for the future of humanity.

On the other hand, proponents of Microsoft's partnership with OpenAI emphasize strategic and mutually-beneficial aspects. Microsoft's $1 billion investment in OpenAI is viewed as a significant step in advancing artificial-intelligence technology as it allows OpenAI to utilize Microsoft's Azure cloud services to train and run its AI software. Additionally, the collaboration is positioned as a way for Microsoft to stay competitive against other tech giants by integrating AI into its cloud services and developing more sophisticated AI models????.

Proponents say Microsoft's involvement with OpenAI is a strategic business decision aimed at promoting Azure's AI capabilities and securing a leading position in the industry. The partnership is framed as a move to democratize AI technology while ensuring AI safety, which aligns with broader industry goals of responsible and ethical AI development. It is also seen as a way for OpenAI to access necessary resources and expertise to further its research, emphasizing the collaborative nature of the partnership rather than a mere financial transaction??.

Hard truths and consequences

While many point out that Musk winning the case is extremely unlikely, it's still worth looking into potential consequences. Such a verdict could mandate that OpenAI returns to a non-profit status or open-source its technology, significantly impacting its business model, revenue generation and future collaborations. It could also affect Microsoft's investment in OpenAI, particularly if the court determines that the latter has strayed from its founding mission, influencing the tech giant's ability to protect its investment and realize expected returns.

The lawsuit's outcome might influence public and market perceptions of OpenAI and Microsoft, possibly affecting customer trust and market share, with Musk potentially seen as an advocate for ethical AI development. Additionally, the case could drive the direction of AI development, balancing between open-source and proprietary models, and possibly accelerating innovation while raising concerns about controlling and misusing advanced AI technologies.

The scrutiny from this lawsuit might lead to more cautious approaches in contractual relationships within the tech sector, focusing on partnerships and intellectual property. Furthermore, the case could draw regulatory attention, possibly leading to increased oversight or regulation of AI companies, particularly concerning transparency, data privacy and ethical considerations in AI development. While Musk's quest might seem like a longshot to some legal experts, the potential ramifications of this lawsuit extend far beyond the courtroom.

More: Here's what an AI chatbot thinks of Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman

Also read: Microsoft hasn't been worth this much more than Apple since 2003

-Jurica Dujmovic

This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

03-09-24 1003ET

Original post:

Why is Elon Musk suing Open AI and Sam Altman? In a word: Microsoft. - Morningstar

European Space Agency Launches First Metal 3D Printer To ISS – Aviation Week

https://aviationweek.com/themes/custom/particle/dist/app-drupal/assets/awn-logo.svg

A metal 3D printer could allow astronauts to make complex metallic structures in orbit, as well as at future Moon and Mars bases.

Credit: ESA

The European Space Agency (ESA) has launched what it says is the first metal 3D printer to be hosted on the International Space Station (ISS). While plastic 3D printers have been used aboard the ISS since 2014, a machine that prints stainless steel would be new and could allow astronauts greater...

European Space Agency Launches First Metal 3D Printer To ISS is published in Aerospace Daily & Defense Report, an Aviation Week Intelligence Network (AWIN) Market Briefing and is included with your AWIN membership.

Already a member of AWIN or subscribe to Aerospace Daily & Defense Report through your company? Loginwith your existing email and password.

Not a member? Learn how you can access the market intelligence and data you need to stay abreast of what's happening in the aerospace and defense community.

Apple app store ID

6447645195

Apple app name

apple-itunes-app

App argument URL

https://shownews.aviationweek.com

See the original post here:

European Space Agency Launches First Metal 3D Printer To ISS - Aviation Week

A week into 2024 and Big Tech has earned enough to pay off all 2023 fines – TechRadar

2023 surely was an eventful year in tech. To cite just a few key moments, generative AI became mainstream thanks to software like ChatGPT; we had to say goodbye to the iconic blue bird while welcoming Twitter's new name (I know very well the pain of writing 'X, formerly known as Twitter' over the past six months); and big tech companies got fined the most under GDPR's data abuses for a total of more than $3 billion.

Well, on the latter point, data protection regulators' efforts turned out to be not as effective as it was hoped they'd be.

Swiss privacy firm behind popular email and VPN service, Proton reported that only after a week into 2024 the likes of Meta, Google, Apple and Microsoft earned enough to pay off all last year's fines. Let's take a look at what needs to change and, most importantly, what you can do in the meantime to truly protect your privacy.

"Whats clear is that these fines, though they appear to be a huge amount of money, in reality are just a drop in the ocean when it comes to the revenues that the tech giants are making. In other words, they arent a deterrent at all," Jurgita Miseviciute, Head of Public Policy & Government Affairs at Proton, told me.

Researchers at Proton have calculated that Alphabet (Google's parent company) needs only a bit more than a day to pay off its $941 million fines. Amazon and Apple's earnings of just a few hours are then enough to repay their data protection's sanctions of $111.7 and $186.4 million respectively.

While biggest data abuse perpetrator Meta, which got a record $1.3bn fine for its (mis)handling of EU user data in May last year, managed to accumulate all the necessary money in just about five working days.

These findings make it clear that data regulators' fines, as founder and CEO of Proton Andy Yen put it, are "little more than pocket change for these companies" instead of a mean to stop them abusing users' data. Not only that, he said, as "these minuscule fines essentially give the green light to tech giants to run riot in a marketplace skewed in their favor."

It's also quite common that big tech firms might appeal to these sanctions or simply refuse to pay, delaying the repayment for years. Take how Google contested India's fine, for instance, about the Android-related inquiry for abusing its dominant position in the market which started in 2019.

On this point, Yen said: "Its the average consumer that's losing outfacing higher prices, less choice, and no privacy. It has to stop and we need real, tangible change that puts people first, not profits."

According to Miseviciute, there are two main things that must happen for things to really change.

Did you know?

Fully enforced in May 2023, the EU Digital Market Act (DMA) brought new obligations for tech companies to ensure fair competition and protect people's digital rights. A similar bill, so-called Digital Markets, Consumer and Competition Bill (DMCC) is currently passing through the UK Parliament, too.

For starters, she believes that governments have to issue fines with a real financial effect in order to fight back against big monopolies.

"Thats why fines up to even 20% of global revenues for breaches of laws such as the EUs DMA [Digital Market Act] and up to 10% in case of the proposed DMCC [Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers] Bill in the UK are a step in the right direction," she told me.

If heavier sanctions are important, they are not everything. Miseviciute explained that regulators need to combine these with practical measures such as enforced behavioral and structural changes, for example.

Again, she sees the EU quite well-placed to do so due to the new powers gained with the DMA. However, elsewhere there are also some small steps in this direction.

"We hope Googles antitrust trial in the US serves as a catalyst for comprehensive antitrust regulation on the other side of the Atlantic. We also see promising potential regulatory developments in South Korea, Japan, Australia and other major jurisdictions," she told me.

"If you open up the marketplace, and you give innovators like Proton a chance to succeed, youll get solutions that are more private and more secure for consumers."

As we have seen, 2023 was yet another hard year for our online privacy.

The US, for instance, still lacks a federal data protection law with the proposed ADPPA being stalled at the time of writing. Enforced in August last year, India's new privacy law was strongly criticized for favoring government and big tech instead of citizens. Well, where allegedly strong legislations are in place like in the EU, these seem to have not enough teeth just yet.

Commenting on this point, Miseviciute told me: "Until laws like the DMA in the EU and the proposed DMCC in the UK are effectively put into practice we are living in a world where big tech rules the internetand all our privacy is at the mercy of their surveillance capitalism business model."

Did you know?

Two thirds of people in the UK would rather lose their passport than access to their email account. Yet, despite these concerns, most of them lack the necessary knowledge and tools to protect their digital privacy. Big Tech knows that, researchers revealed.

The glimpse of light in this gloomy scenario is that it's ultimately our choice if we want to keep using data-hungry products. Luckily, there are some smaller companies offering privacy-first alternatives you can switch to.

On its part, Proton appear to have been working hard to cut Google out of our digital life. Likewise the popular service, the Swiss-based provider offers an encrypted email service Proton Mail (which even beat the big tech giant by landing with a standalone desktop app in December), secure calendar and its own cloud storage Proton Drive, too.

Proton's product offering also includes one of the best virtual private network apps on the market (Proton VPN) to help you boosting your anonymity while browsing among other things, as well as a password manager tool (Proton Pass) to secure all your login details. Even better as all the provider's services come both with free and paid plans.

However, Proton is just one of the many companies developing privacy-first alternatives to big tech software. Worth a mention there are also encrypted messaging app Signal if you wish to replace WhatsApp with a more secure application and Mullvad browser to make the switch from Safari and Chrome.

Compare today's best overall VPNs

We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.

See the original post:

A week into 2024 and Big Tech has earned enough to pay off all 2023 fines - TechRadar

Amazon Discounts Apple AirTags; UK PM Impersonated on Social Media; Tech Giants Make Waves at CES 2024 – BNN Breaking

Amazon Discounts Apple AirTags; UK PM Impersonated on Social Media; Tech Giants Make Waves at CES 2024

In a notable move, Amazon is currently offering a substantial deal on a four-pack of Apple AirTags, marking a 10 percent discount on the original price of $99. This offer is fortified by an additional $10 coupon, which further slashes the price down to a mere $79. These AirTags, slightly larger than a quarter, are designed with precision, aiding Apple device owners in keeping track of their possessions effortlessly.

These Bluetooth trackers, a product of Apples innovation, operate in coordination with Apples Find My network, providing location information rapidly and efficiently. They do not require charging, boasting a life span of about a year before the battery necessitates replacing. Capable of tracking up to 32 items, AirTags carry an IP67 rating, ensuring robust resistance against water and dust.

In a startling revelation, a communications firm recently uncovered 143 different ads impersonating the UK Prime Minister on social media in the previous month. This raises serious questions about the security measures in place on these platforms.

The tech landscape continues to evolve, with the new Vision Pro headset requiring a Face ID scan to ensure a precise band fit. Pre-orders for this tech marvel commence on January 19. Meanwhile, the focus at CES 2024 saw giants like Nvidia, LG, Sony, and Samsung making significant announcements, reshaping the technological future.

Adding to the tech narrative, Microsoft momentarily overtook Apple as the most valuable company, sparking a wave of discussions about their investments and advancements in AI. This event also shed light on the implications of the declining iPhone demand in China.

On the international front, a historic decision unfolded in Victoria as Robert Farquharson, convicted of murdering his three young sons in 2005, was stripped of the right to his childrens gravesite. Concurrently, Ukrainian Air Force spokesperson Yuriy Ihnat made a statement on national television regarding President Volodymyr Zelenskyys claim about the destruction of 26 Russian helicopters and 12 planes.

See more here:

Amazon Discounts Apple AirTags; UK PM Impersonated on Social Media; Tech Giants Make Waves at CES 2024 - BNN Breaking

Tech Giants Refuse U.S. Consumer Security to Oversee Digital Wallets – The Tech Report

The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), a lobby group representing major tech companies such as Apple, Google, Amazon, Meta, and X, expressed concerns about a proposed plan by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The CFPBs proposal seeks equal oversight of digital wallet and payment app providers, including tech giants, to ensure consumer protections similar to traditional payment methods.

The CCIAs head of regulatory policy, Krisztian Katona, cautioned against the potential negative impact of the proposal, suggesting that overly broad or burdensome digital regulations could impede innovation and harm new startups in the industry.

The lobby group emphasized that extensive supervision like the one imposed on banks might not be the most effective approach.

In the comment letter addressed to the CFPB, the CCIA pointed out a perceived flaw in the proposal, stating that it failed to identify the specific consumer risks it intended to address.

The letter argued against viewing non-bank digital providers and banks as direct competitors, emphasizing the markets reality, where their collaborations often benefit consumers through complementary services.

The Financial Technology Association, representing members such as PayPal and Block Inc., echoed similar concerns in a separate comment letter released on the same day. They argued that existing regulations were adequate, urging the CFPB to suspend the rulemaking process.

The association, which includes companies like Venmo and Cash App, also believed that unnecessary regulations could stifle innovation and hinder the industrys growth.

The adoption of digital payment systems has continued to increase, given the advantage they offer users over traditional methods.

Notably, digital payments offer high convenience and security, adding to their user-friendly features and benefitting businesses and consumers.

Due to this support, there is a projected 26.93% compound growth in their adoption between 2021 and 2025.

This rise gives birth to a significant trend in the competitive industry, resulting in a consolidation period where large tech companies surpass regional and community banks in terms of trust associated with digital payments.

The IMF acknowledges the significance of digital payments in reshaping the industry and encourages more collaborations and competition between big tech companies and regular financial institutions.

Besides that, digital wallets have proven helpful in streamlining payment processes and bringing existing systems together, whether online portals for internet-based operations or contactless terminals for face-to-face transactions.

This ease of integration enhances accessibility and convenience for customers and businesses, contributing significantly to the widespread adoption of digital wallets.

In addition to these benefits, the cost-effectiveness of digital wallets compared to traditional payment methods makes them an attractive option for businesses aiming to reduce transaction costs.

This affordability further incentivizes their adoption across various industries, positioning digital wallets as indispensable tools for most tech organizations.

Go here to read the rest:

Tech Giants Refuse U.S. Consumer Security to Oversee Digital Wallets - The Tech Report

Why Casey Left Substack, Elon Musk and Drugs, and an A.I. Antibiotic Discovery – The New York Times

Listen and follow Hard Fork Apple | Spotify | Amazon | YouTube

Casey is taking his newsletter Platformer off Substack, as criticism over the companys handling of pro-Nazi content grows. Then, The Wall Street Journal spoke with witnesses who said that Elon Musk had used LSD, cocaine, ecstasy and psychedelic mushrooms, worrying some directors and board members of his companies. And finally, how researchers found a new class of antibiotics with the help of an artificial intelligence algorithm used to win the board game Go.

Todays guests:

Kirsten Grind, enterprise reporter for The Wall Street Journal

Felix Wong, postdoctoral fellow at M.I.T. and co-founder of Integrated Biosciences

Additional Reading:

Hard Fork is hosted by Kevin Roose and Casey Newton and produced by Davis Land and Rachel Cohn . The show is edited by Jen Poyant. Engineering by Alyssa Moxley and original music by Dan Powell, Marion Lozano, Diane Wong and Pat McCusker . Fact-checking by Mary Mathis.

Special thanks to Paula Szuchman, Pui-Wing Tam, Nell Gallogly, Kate LoPresti and Jeffrey Miranda.

Read the rest here:

Why Casey Left Substack, Elon Musk and Drugs, and an A.I. Antibiotic Discovery - The New York Times

The Twitter CEO ousted by Elon Musk has resurfaced with an AI startup – Quartz

Parag Agrawal spent 11 months at the helm of Twitter, now known as X. Photo: Brendan McDermid ( Reuters )

Parag Agrawal, who was briefly CEO of Twitter before Elon Musk took over the social media platform, has reportedly raised about $30 million in funding for an AI startup.

Is the Apple Heart the next great innovation? | Whats next for Apple?

His company is building software for developers of large language models (LLMs), according to The Information, which cites unnamed sources. LLMs power generative AI tools like ChatGPT.

Agrawals AI venture marks the start of a new journey for him. After joining Twitter in 2011, he served as a software engineer before being promoted to chief technology officer and replacing Jack Dorsey as CEO. He then spent 11 tumultuous months at the helm before being ousted after Elon Musk closed the $44 billion acquisition of Twitter, now known as X, in April 2022.

Agrawal is yet another tech executive to jump on the bandwagon of pivoting to AI as venture capital keeps flowing into the space. For example, former Twitter board chair Bret Taylor was named chairman of the new OpenAI board late last year. Even X boss Musk has launched his own AI startup, xAI.

This rush by tech execs comes as global funding for AI startups hit nearly $50 billion in 2023, up 9% from the previous year, according to market research firm Crunchbase. Leading players OpenAI, Anthropic, and Inflection collectively raised $18 billion last year. AI is still a bright spot for launching a new company, even as overall startup funding remains lackluster.

More:

The Twitter CEO ousted by Elon Musk has resurfaced with an AI startup - Quartz