Posted by Jason Davis
21-02-2017 15:43 CST
Topics: Europa, Europa lander, Europa Clipper
NASA is boldly going to Europahopefully.
Two separate missions to send a flyby spacecraft and lander to Jupiter’s ocean-harboring moon are steadily gaining steam. Today, NASA said the flyby craft, internally dubbed the Europa Clipper, has officially entered the preliminary design phase, having cleared a program milestone called Key Decision Point B. The lander also took another step toward reality earlier this month, when a team of scientists formally delivered a report laying out the mission’s science goals and some overall engineering concepts.
Together, the missions would attempt to discover whether Europa is habitable, and directly search for signs of lifesomething NASA hasn’t done since the Viking missions to Mars in the mid-1970s.
Neither mission is fully funded. And even in a best-case scenario, the lander mission wouldn’t touch down on Europa until 2031 or 2032, meaning it could be 15 years before we know whether something is swimming under Europa’s icy crust. Will the wait pay off? I spoke with two experts about this audacious pair of spacecraft, and looked into what needs to happen to make them a reality.
NASA / JPL-Caltech
The first thing I learned about the Europa Clipper is that the spacecraft’s name is more than a mere nod to the romantic sailing ships of yesteryearit’s an apt description of how the mission works.
The radiation environment around Jupiter is hard on spacecraft, due to the planet’s large magnetic field, which traps charged particles from the sun. Rather than orbiting Europa in the heart of that radiation, the Clipper will fly around Jupiter in large, egg-shaped orbits that are mostly outside the harmful radiation belts. Over the course of two to three years, the Clipper will dive into the radiation 45 times, whizzing past Europa to gather data before the spacecraft then, as Dipak Srinivasan puts it, “gets out of Dodge.”
Srinivasan is the RF telecommunications lead for Clipper at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. He told me the spacecraft will behave like an ancient sailing ship speeding between trade stops. After a Europa flyby, the Clipper will spend about three weeks in safe harbor beyond Jupiter’s radiation, transmitting science data back to Earth. Srinivasan said these signals serve double duty: Not only do they carry mission data, ground controllers measure their Doppler shifts to pinpoint the spacecraft’s location.
The Clipper mission’s goal is to assess whether Europa is habitable.
“We really want to understand the composition of Europa’s interior and exterior, and see whether that composition is commensurate with what we think is required for life,” Srinivasan said.
Europa is slightly smaller than Earth’s Moon. Its surface is an icy shell 25 kilometers thick, sitting atop an ocean about 100 kilometers deep that contains twice as much water as our own. Scientists suspect the ocean is salty, and stays liquefied because of the immense tidal forces exerted by mighty Jupiter.
“Wherever there’s water on Earth, there’s life,” said Srinivasan. “Given the fact that there is liquid water on Europa, and the fact that it’s been there for billions of years, makes it one of the likeliest places for life in our solar system.”
During each flyby, the Clipper will scan Europa with an array of science instruments. There’s an ice-penetrating radar, a magnetometer to measure the ocean’s salinity, and a thermal camera to look for warm spots near the surface. Other instruments will examine plumes of saltwater that may periodically spray into space. Cameras aboard the Clipper will deliver views of the surface in resolutions down to a meter per pixel; our best views of Europa so far come from the Galileo mission, and have a maximum resolution of 6 meters per pixel.
The mission is being jointly developed between the JHU Applied Physics Laboratory and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
“It’s kind of neat,” Srinivasan said. “You have an all-star cast of people across both institutions, both of which have significant deep space experience. You’re kind of pulling from a really, large bench and you’re coming up with really clever solutions on how to make this work.”
NASA / JPL-Caltech
In June 2016, NASA convened a science definition team, or SDT, to investigate what kind of questions a lander could answer on the surface of Europa. The SDT was also tasked with defining some of the lander’s high-level engineering and instrument requirements.
Earlier this month, the SDT released its 264-page report, with this grin-inducing quote on page six:
“Europa may hold the clues to one of NASA’s long standing goalsto determine whether or not we are alone in the universe. The highest-level science goal of the mission presented here is to search for evidence of life on Europa.”
The implications of that goalwhich was set by officials at NASA headquartersare stunning. The agency has not directly searched for life on another world since the Viking missions to Mars in the mid-1970s. The dual Viking landers contained three biological experiments that tried to metabolize soil samples. The results were inconclusive, and in the decades since, there has been a lot of debate on how to go about detecting extraterrestrial lie.
Deciding how a Europa lander would search for life was “a little surreal,” said Sarah Hrst, a planetary scientist and assistant professor at Johns Hopkins University who served on the SDT.
“Would this be life? What is life? It’s not a conversation I normally have on a daily basis,” she told me.
For guidance, the team included experts familiar with subglacial lakes in Antarctica, and scientists who study extremophilesorganisms that thrive in some of the harshest conditions on Earth.
The Europa lander would collect five, 7-cubic-centimeter surface samples, scraped from 10 centimeters below the surface. The samples would be analyzed with a suite of instruments, including a gas chromatograph and mass spectrometer to detect organics, a microscope system to look for microbial cells, and an ultraviolet spectrometer to characterize possible organic material.
It would likely take a combination of measurements, said Hrst, to conclude life might be present.
“As far as we know, right now there’s not one measurement where you say, ‘Okay, if we measure that, then there’s life,'” she said.
Since the lander’s samples would only come from 10 centimeters below Europa’s radiation-flooded surface, what are the chances of finding anything alive?
Hrst said reconnaissance work by the Clipper spacecraft might yield younger sections of ice that have been bombarded by less radiation. Additionally, not all areas of the moon are irradiated at the same level. Europa, like Earth’s moon, is tidally locked, meaning the same side always faces Jupiter.
And even if the lander scoops up some life that, as Hrst puts it, is “no longer intact,” there might be leftover chemical footprints showing something was once there.
“Even samples that have been highly radiation-processed on Earth still retain chemical signatures that you could interpret as a evidence of life,” she said.
NASA / JPL / Ted Stryk
NASA officials say the Clipper mission is still on track for a mid-2022 launch.
Using a powerful boost from NASA’s new heavy lift rocket, the Space Launch System, the Clipper would fly directly to Jupiter and arrive in 2025. Without SLS, the journey would take five years longer, and require flybys of Venus and Earth to reach the right trajectory.
Flying past Venus means flying closer to the Sun. Flying closer to the Sun means extra heat shielding. And extra heat shielding means a heavier spacecraft. Though Congress has ordered NASA to use SLS for both the Clipper and lander missions, the agency is still keeping the extra heat shielding in the Clipper’s design for nowjust in case anything derails development of the yet-to-be-flown rocket.
Without SLS, the lander as currently designed might not be able to fly at all, according to the SDT report. That’s because the spacecraft will be heavy. In addition to the lander itself, there are three other components: a carrier and relay stage, a de-orbit stage, and a descent stage. Officials aren’t publicly saying how heavy the entire package might be, but it would currently require a deep space thruster burn and Earth gravity assist to put it on the correct path to Jupitereven with the added boost from SLS. The earliest the lander would launch is 2024 or 2025, putting it at Jupiter around 2030.
Once in orbit around Jupiter, the lander spacecraft would spend 18 months slowly spiraling inward to Europa, swinging past Callisto and Ganymede on the way. At Europa, the carrier and relay orbiter would separate and act as a data relay satellite. The Clipper, ideally still operating in an extended mission, would be used as a backup relay. The lander would not have the capability to talk to Earth on its own.
Remember the Curiosity spacecraft’s seven minutes of terror, during which it plunged to the Martian surface in a harrowing process known as entry, descent and landing, or EDL? Since Europa has no atmosphere, and the descent begins in orbit, a new acronym is in play: DDL, which stands for de-orbit, descent and landing.
First, the de-orbit stage will pull the descent stage and lander out of orbit. As the thruster-powered descent stage approaches the surface, it will perform the same skycrane maneuver that deposited Curiosity onto Mars, where a tether lowers the lander. The descent stage then cuts loose and flys away for an intentional crash-landing.
Once the lander is safely on the surface, scientists will have to work fast to gather their data. The spacecraft is powered only by a 45-kilowatt-hour battery designed to last between 20 to 40 days. Why not find a way to stay longer? Because the carrier relay orbiter, which will be bathed in Jupiter’s radiation, is expected to fail in just a single month.
Federal fiscal year 2017 began back on October 1, 2016, but Congress has not yet passed a 2017 budget. As of now, with the notable exception of Orion and the Space Launch System, NASA is operating under 2016 funding levels.
In 2016, Congress earmarked $175 million for the Clipper mission. In proposed 2017 spending bills, the House allocated $260 million to be used for both the Clipper and lander, while the Senate did not mention the missions at all. One source I spoke with said NASA is internally estimating a cost of $2 billion for the Clipper alone, and that doesn’t include the cost of the Space Launch System, which could have have a price tag between $500 million and $1 billion, according to statements by various NASA officials.
That means that despite the progress, there are a lot of hurdles to overcome before humanity gets a chance to search for life on Europa. But NASA missions have endured far worse; look no further than the 16-year struggle to get the New Horizons mission to Pluto on the launchpad.
And in this case, the end result could be a confirmation of life beyond Earth.
“Just imagine if that ends up being the case,” Srinivasan said. “That’s transformative, to be able to say that we lived in a time when that discovery was made.”
Or read more blog entries about: Europa, Europa lander, Europa Clipper
NASA’s audacious Europa missions are getting closer to reality – The Planetary Society (blog)