New DNA Test Can Now Determine Hair, Eye Color Of A Possible Suspect

August 26, 2012

Lawrence LeBlond for redOrbit.com Your Universe Online

The next time you leave your DNA behind be forewarned that you are now not only leaving your biological fingerprint behind for prying eyes, but also leaving evidence of what color your hair and eyes are. Until the mid-1980s, DNA at a crime scene went largely unchecked due to lack of technology to search it out. And for the last two decades, in order for a crime scene detective to match DNA to a suspect, samples had to be taken from possible matches.

But now, according to a team of researchers, led by professor Manfred Kayser of Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, a new forensic test can predict both the hair and eye color of a possible suspect using DNA at a crime scene. The team said it could provide valuable leads in cases where suspects cannot be identified through DNA profiling.

The test, called the Hirisplex system, could allow crime scene investigators to narrow down a large group of possible suspects, making it easier to pinpoint the perpetrator. Details of the research appear in the journal Forensic Science International: Genetics.

Predicting phenotypes is quickly becoming an emerging field in forensics. The current approach, genetic profiling, involves comparing crime scene DNA to possible suspects or to a database of stored profiles. Genetic profiling relies on the person either being among a pool of suspects identified by police or having their profile previously stored.

The Hirisplex approach could be very useful in cases where a perpetrator is completely unknown to the authorities, said Kayser.

The test includes the 24 currently best eye and hair color predictive DNA markers, Kayser said in a press release. In its design we took care that the test can cope with the challenges of forensic DNA analysis such as low amounts of material.

The test is very sensitive and produces complete results on even smaller DNA amounts than usually used for forensic DNA profiling.

Kayser told BBC News Paul Rincon that the research article outlines everything needed to establish the test in a forensic lab, but that the team was also in touch with industry regarding their knowledge about hair and eye color prediction.

See the rest here:
New DNA Test Can Now Determine Hair, Eye Color Of A Possible Suspect

Posted in DNA

Ohio Prisoner Hopes DNA Test Proves Innocence

A former Ohio police captain who has spent 14 years in prison, largely because of a bite mark found on his ex-wife's blood-soaked body, now has new DNA test results that his attorneys say prove his innocence.

If a judge agrees, Doug Prade could become the latest of more than a dozen prisoners across the country to be set free after comparisons between their teeth and bite marks found on victims turned out to be wrong.

An Akron judge, in a ruling that could come as early as October, could exonerate Prade, order a new trial or find that the DNA test isn't strong enough for either.

"'I told you I was innocent. Now there's proof,'" the 66-year-old Prade said after getting the test results back, according to his attorney, Carrie Wood with the Cincinnati-based Ohio Innocence Project.

Once considered cutting-edge science, bite-mark comparisons have been under fire for more than a decade. Across the country, at least 11 prisoners convicted of rape or murder based largely on bite mark-comparisons were exonerated eight of them with DNA evidence. At least five other men more were proved innocent as they sat in prison awaiting trials.

Some forensic dentists have renounced the practice altogether, while many say it's still a useful tool if applied properly.

In Prade's case, a new test has found that male DNA taken from around a bite mark on a lab coat that his ex-wife was wearing when she was killed is not his.

The test conducted for free by the private DNA Diagnostics Center in Fairfield, Ohio, wasn't widely available at the time of Prade's trial.

Prade said Thursday that he hopes the results are enough to free him, although he'd be happy with a new trial.

"For them to find what I had known all that time was no surprise to me," he told The Associated Press in a phone interview from a central Ohio prison. "I guess it was an epiphany to everyone else 'Hey, this guy was telling the truth.'"

Excerpt from:
Ohio Prisoner Hopes DNA Test Proves Innocence

Posted in DNA

DNA could have existed long before life itself

THE latest twist in the origin-of-life tale is double helical. Chemists are close to demonstrating that the building blocks of DNA can form spontaneously from chemicals thought to be present on the primordial Earth. If they succeed, their work would suggest that DNA could have predated the birth of life.

DNA is essential to almost all life on Earth, yet most biologists think that life began with RNA. Just like DNA, it stores genetic information. What's more, RNA can fold into complex shapes that can clamp onto other molecules and speed up chemical reactions, just like a protein, and it is structurally simpler than DNA, so might be easier to make.

After decades of trying, in 2009 researchers finally managed to generate RNA using chemicals that probably existed on the early Earth. Matthew Powner, now at University College London, and his colleagues synthesised two of the four nucleotides that make up RNA. Their achievement suggested that RNA may have formed spontaneously - powerful support for the idea that life began in an "RNA world".

Powner's latest work suggests that a rethink might be in order. He is trying to make DNA nucleotides through similar methods to those he used to make RNA nucleotides in 2009. And he's getting closer.

Nucleotides consist of a sugar attached to a phosphate and a nitrogen-containing base molecule - these bases are the familiar letters of the genetic code. DNA nucleotides, which link together to form DNA, are harder to make than RNA nucleotides, because DNA uses a different sugar that is tougher to work with.

Starting with a mix of chemicals, many of them thought to have been present on the early Earth, Powner has now created a sugar like that in DNA, linked to a molecule called AICA, which is similar to a base (Journal of the American Chemical Society, doi.org/h6q).

There is plenty still to do. Powner needs to turn AICA into a base, and add the phosphate. His molecule also has an unwanted sulphur atom, which helped the reactions along but now must be removed. Nevertheless, a DNA nucleotide is just a few years away, says Christopher Switzer of the University of California, Riverside. "It's practically a fait accompli at this point."

That could have important implications for our understanding of life's origins. Prebiotic chemists have so far largely ignored DNA, because its complexity suggests it cannot possibly form spontaneously. "Everybody and his brother has been saying 'RNA, RNA, RNA'," says Steven Benner of the Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution in Gainesville, Florida.

Conventional wisdom is that RNA-based life eventually switched to DNA because DNA is better at storing information. In other words, RNA organisms made the first DNA.

If that is true, how did life make the switch? Modern organisms can convert RNA nucleotides into DNA nucleotides, but only using special enzymes that are costly to produce in terms of energy and materials. "You have to know that DNA does something good for you before you invent something like that," Switzer says.

Originally posted here:
DNA could have existed long before life itself

Posted in DNA

Vt. DNA exoneration law is headed for 1st test

MONTPELIER, Vt.A state law passed in 2008 that allows people convicted of crimes to try to be exonerated based on DNA evidence appears headed for its first test.

John Grega, a Long Island man convicted in 1995 of killing his wife, Christine, while on vacation in Vermont, was released from prison Wednesday, a day after a judge vacated his sentence and ordered a new trial because DNA from an unknown man was found on her body. He was released on $75,000 bail.

The case marks the first time a court in Vermont has even entertained -- never mind granted -- a request that a felony conviction be overturned based on new DNA evidence.

Grega's lawyers said Thursday that the Vermont Innocence Protection Act doesn't spell out the procedures that take place when new DNA evidence raises questions about a conviction and the defendant is granted a new trial.

"There are some basic procedural questions that need to be answered. They probably need to be discussed with the court," lawyer Ian Carleton said.

Gretchen Bennett, executive director of the Boston-based New England Innocence Project, which works on such cases around the six-state region, said DNA evidence has resulted in numerous prisoners being freed, as well as the person who actually did a crime then being charged and convicted.

Bennett said the Grega case was the first to her knowledge in which the state had pushed for a new trial. When new DNA evidence points to someone other than the person convicted, "it's generally considered to be pretty conclusive," she said.

Prosecutors had accused John Grega of raping, sodomizing, beating and strangling his 31-year-old wife in 1994 and leaving her body in a whirlpool bathtub at the West Cover condominium where they were staying on vacation with their then-2-year-old son. He had been found guilty of aggravated murder.

Grega, a former Lake Grove, N.Y., resident, walked out of the Southern State Correctional Facility in Springfield and into the arms of family and friends late Wednesday afternoon.

A month earlier, Carleton and the Vermont defender general's office had filed a motion in court saying new analysis showed that skin cells taken from inside Christine Grega's rectum belonged not to her husband but to another unknown man.

Here is the original post:
Vt. DNA exoneration law is headed for 1st test

Posted in DNA

Research and Markets: Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/pmbk5w/advanced_topics_in) has announced the addition of Elsevier Science and Technology's new report "Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology" to their offering.

Intended as a companion to the Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing volume published in 2009, Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology contains 18 chapters with 4 appendices providing up-to-date coverage of essential topics in this important field and citation to more than 2800 articles and internet resources. The book builds upon the previous two editions of John Butler's internationally acclaimed Forensic DNA Typing textbook with forensic DNA analysts as its primary audience. This book provides the most detailed information written to-date on DNA databases, low-level DNA, validation, and numerous other topics including a new chapter on legal aspects of DNA testing to prepare scientists for expert witness testimony. Over half of the content is new compared to previous editions. A forthcoming companion volume will cover interpretation issues.

Key Topics Covered:

1. Sample Collection, Storage, and Characterization

2. DNA Extraction Methods

3. DNA Quantitation

4. PCR Amplification: Capabilities and Cautions

5. Short Tandem Repeat (STR) Loci and Kits

6. Capillary Electrophoresis: Principles and Instrumentation

Follow this link:
Research and Markets: Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology

Posted in DNA

New laboratory test assesses how DNA damage affects protein synthesis

ScienceDaily (Aug. 21, 2012) Transcription is a cellular process by which genetic information from DNA is copied to messenger RNA for protein production. But anticancer drugs and environmental chemicals can sometimes interrupt this flow of genetic information by causing modifications in DNA.

Chemists at the University of California, Riverside have now developed a test in the lab to examine how such DNA modifications lead to aberrant transcription and ultimately a disruption in protein synthesis.

The chemists report that the method, called "competitive transcription and adduct bypass" or CTAB, can help explain how DNA damage arising from anticancer drugs and environmental chemicals leads to cancer development.

"Aberrant transcription induced by DNA modifications has been proposed as one of the principal inducers of cancer and many other human diseases," said Yinsheng Wang, a professor of chemistry, whose lab led the research. "CTAB can help us quantitatively determine how a DNA modification diminishes the rate and fidelity of transcription in cells. These are useful to know because they affect how accurately protein is synthesized. In other words, CTAB allows us to assess how DNA damage ultimately impedes protein synthesis, how it induces mutant proteins. "

Study results appeared online in Nature Chemical Biology on Aug. 19.

Wang explained that the CTAB method can be used also to examine various proteins involved in the repair of DNA. One of his research group's goals is to understand how DNA damage is repaired -- knowledge that could result in the development of new and more effective drugs for cancer treatment.

"This, however, will take more years of research," Wang cautioned.

His lab has a long-standing interest in understanding the biological and human health consequences of DNA damage. The current research was supported by the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health.

Wang was joined in the research by UC Riverside's Changjun You (a postdoctoral scholar and the research paper's first author), Xiaoxia Dai, Bifeng Yuan, Jin Wang and Jianshuang Wang; Philip J. Brooks of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Md.; and Laura J. Niedernhofer of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Penn.

Next, the researchers plan to use CTAB to investigate how other types of DNA modifications compromise transcription and how they are repaired in human cells.

View original post here:
New laboratory test assesses how DNA damage affects protein synthesis

Posted in DNA

DNA may solve 21-year-old murder case

DNA evidence may help solve the murder of a young NSW nanny more than 20 years ago, with police collecting samples from more than 100 people across the state.

Penny Hill, 20, died from her injuries two weeks after she was found unconscious on the side of a country NSW road on July 8, 1991.

The young woman had just started working as a live-in nanny for former Billy Thorpe and the Aztecs drummer Col Baigent and his then wife, Barbara Baigent, at the Black Stump Motel in Coolah.

In July, a second inquest into her death failed to shed any light on how she died, and the case was referred back to homicide police.

Now, in a bid to 'follow every rabbit down a hole', police are taking DNA samples from anyone who was in the Coolah area, or had contact with Ms Hill in 1991.

Detective Sergeant Jason Darcy said every person required to give a sample has previously been questioned by police in connection with the murder.

'It's a basic process of elimination,' he told AAP on Wednesday.

'The DNA material we got ... we don't know where it fits into the investigation.'

Police will test the new DNA samples against evidence collected from the scene at the time of the murder, and additional evidence taken from the Black Stump Motel earlier this year.

Sergt Darcy said each of 100 people contacted about the samples were happy to co-operate with police.

Read the original here:
DNA may solve 21-year-old murder case

Posted in DNA

Harvard scientists encode an entire book onto DNA

Summary: A team of Harvard researchers have managed to encode a book onto DNA, paving the way for wider use of the technology as a storage medium.

Harvard researchers have succeeded in storing an entire book on DNA and reading the information back, paving the way for the use of the building block of life as a high-density storage medium.

The research was published in Science on Friday. The researchers used a combination of commercial tools for DNA synthesis and new methods of DNA sequencing to store a copy of lead researcher George Church's forthcoming book Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves in DNA onto DNA.

"The density is remarkably high," Church says in a video explaining the research. "We can store on the order of almost a zettabyte [of data] in a gram of DNA."

This method can store data at densities many orders of magnitude greater than current non-biological techniques. By comparison, Church's DNA method can store around 125TB of information in one cubic millimetre of DNA, while prototype heat-assisted magnetic recording technology from Seagate can store 125GB of information per square inch.

The team stored the information by encoding the book as binary code and using the base pairs of DNA for binary characters. A and C stood for zero, while T and G for one. The book was split into 96-bit data blocks which each had a 19-bit address to allow them to be reassembled. Each block was written as its unique DNA sequence, which the team sequenced 54,898 of to create the book.

In the future, Church imagines a world full of "very inexpensive [DNA-based] biological cameras" that record video footage for later analysis by big data technologies. However, the cost of the sequencing and encoding technology would need to dramatically come down for such a scenario to be possible.

The funding for the research came from the US office of Naval Research, Agilent Technologies and the Wyss Institute.

See original here:
Harvard scientists encode an entire book onto DNA

Posted in DNA

The First Book To Be Encoded in DNA

Two Harvard scientists have produced 70 billion copies of a book in DNA code --and it's smaller than the size of your thumbnail.

Lisa Poole / AP FILE

In his lab at the Harvard Medical School in Boston, George Church, Harvard Medical School Genetics professor, shows DNA sequence data for Dr. John Halamka, chief information officer, following a news conference on Monday, Oct. 20, 2008 where a group of mostly scientists and researchers said they will post their medical records and DNA sequence of some of their own genes online for the sake of research. Both George Church and Dr. Halamka are part of the group that plan to post their medical and DNA sequence of some of their own genes online.

Despite the fact there are 70 billion copies of it in existence, very few people have actually read the book Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves in DNA, by George Church and Ed Regis. The reason? It is written in the basic building blocks of life: Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA.

Church, along with his colleague Sriram Kosuri, both molecular geneticists from the Wyss Institute for Biomedical Engineering at Harvard, used the book to demonstrate a breakthrough in DNA data storage. By copying the 53,000 word book (alongside 11 jpeg images and a computer program) theyve managed to squeeze a thousand times more data than ever previously encoded into strands of DNA, as reported in the August 17 issue of the journal Science. (To give you some idea of how much information were talking about, 70 billion copies is morethan three times the total number of copies for the next 200 most popular books in the world combined.)

(MORE: The Meaning of Life According to Geneticist J. Craig Venter)

Part of DNAs genius is just how conspicuously small it is: so dense and energy efficient that one gram of the stuff can hold 455 billion gigabytes. Four grams could in theory hold ever scrap of data the entire world produces in a year. Couple this with a theoretical lifespan of 3.5 billion years and you have a revolution in data storage, with wide ranging implications for the amount of information we could record and store.

Dont expect your library to transform from paperbacks to vials of DNA anytime soon though. It took a decade to work out the next generation of reading and writing of DNA Ive been working on reading for 38 years, and writing since the 90s, Church tells TIME.

The actual work of encoding the book into DNA and then decoding it and copying it only took a couple weeks. I did it with my own two hands! says Dr. Church, which is very rare to have that kind of time to spend doing something like this. Church and Kosuri took a computer file of Regenesisand converted it into binary code strings of ones and zeroes. They then translated that code into the basic building blocks of DNA. The 1s stand for adenine (A) or cytosine (C) and the zero for guanine (G) and thymine (T), says Kosuri. Using a computer program, this translation was simple.

While the future implications and applications are not yet clear, the DNA storage industry is moving at an incredible speed. Classical electronic technology is moving forward something like 1.5 fold per year, says Dr. Church, whereas reading and writing DNA is improving roughly ten fold per year. Weve already had a million-fold improvement in the past few years, which is shocking.

Read more:
The First Book To Be Encoded in DNA

Posted in DNA

IntegenX Launches First RapidHIT Human DNA Identification System in Europe

PLEASANTON, Calif. & THE HAGUE, Netherlands--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

IntegenX Inc., a leading developer of rapid human DNA identification technology, today launched its RapidHIT Human DNA Identification System to the European law enforcement and forensic communities at the 6th European Academy of Forensic Science (EAFS) Conference in The Hague, The Netherlands. Representatives from IntegenX are on site at the meeting to demonstrate the self-contained desktop system and share data produced by its first users.

The RapidHIT System automates and accelerates the process of producing standardized DNA profiles from cheek swabs and other human samples in about 90 minutes. Rapid DNA analysis is a transformative technology that promises to fundamentally change the way investigations are conducted by enabling law enforcement personnel to quickly and definitively link suspects to crimes while they are still in custody.

We have spent a great deal of time working closely with the law enforcement, forensic and judicial communities to understand their needs and priorities for DNA-based human identification, and are now confident that we are the partner of choice to help the international community to successfully deploy this important advance in crime solving, said Stevan Jovanovich, President and Chief Executive Officer of IntegenX. This is a very exciting time as we introduce the worlds first rapid DNA analysis system to the professionals who will be on the cutting edge of implementing it to identify offenders, clear innocent suspects quickly, and prevent future crimes.

Numerous international law enforcement and security agencies use DNA-based human identification to make informed decisions regarding the arrest, detention or release of suspects, as well as to analyze crime scene evidence. By integrating a multi-step, multi-system process, rapid DNA technology has the potential to accelerate and expand the use of proven DNA technologies to help the efforts of law enforcement, homeland security, and defense to create safer communities.

The RapidHIT System will be on display at EAFS in exhibit space #58. Technical marketing manager Keith Elliot will describe the instrument and early data from users in Real-time DNA Using the RapidHIT 200, Tuesday, August 21 at 11:00 AM, and IntegenX will contribute additional information at the Mobile DNA Technologies workshop on Wednesday, August 22 at 9:30 AM.

IntegenX will begin shipping early access RapidHIT systems this month. The company will launch the system to the U.S. market at the 119th Annual International Association of Chiefs of Police Conference and Law Enforcement Education and Technology Exposition in San Diego, California, September 29 October 3, 2012.

In celebration of this historic milestone in forensics, IntegenX has produced a short video that features leaders in law enforcement discussing the impact of rapid DNA in crime fighting. The video is available for download and distribution at http://integenx.com/video-rapid-dna-with-the-integenx-rapidhit-200/.

About IntegenX Inc.

IntegenX, headquartered in Pleasanton, California, is a leading developer of rapid human DNA identification technology, next-gen sequencing library preparation, and DNA/RNA ambient temperature stability and storage products. IntegenX technology platforms are the result of the integration of advanced fluidics, optics, and biochemistry capabilities to produce products for DNA-based human identity testing and forensics, next generation sequencing and biodefense applications. The companys expertise and extensive intellectual property includes its patented MOVe valve technology, patent-pending PrepX reagent kits for next generation sequencing library preparation, as well as a portfolio of patented reagents for DNA and RNA preservation including GenTegra for stabilization and storage of purified DNA and RNA, and GenPlate for storage of blood samples. For more information, please visit http://www.integenx.com.

Originally posted here:
IntegenX Launches First RapidHIT Human DNA Identification System in Europe

Posted in DNA

Harvard Stores 70 Billion Books Using DNA

Harvard researchers have been able to use sequencing technology to store 70 billion copies of a yet-unpublished book in DNA binary code.

The results of the project by researchers at Harvard University's Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University were published last week in the peer-reviewed journal Science.

"The total world's information, which is 1.8 zettabytes, [could be stored] in about four grams of DNA," said Sriram Kosuri, a senior scientist at the Wyss Institute and senior author of the paper, in a video presentation.

The researchers created the binary code through DNA markers to preserve the text of the book, Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves in DNA. The book was written by research team member George Church.

"We ... wanted something that represents modern digital, so we used an HTML version of a book," Church said in a video presentation.

"The HTML form -- let's say the web form -- includes digital images [and a] Java script programming language that performs something interactively with a person. So we encoded that into zeros and ones into DNA," Church added.

A DNA double helix in an undated artist's illustration released by the National Human Genome Research Institute. (Source: Reuters)Church, a professor of genetics at the Harvard Medical School, helped develop the first direct genomic sequencing method in 1984. He was also a member of the team that initiated the Human Genome Project that year as a scientist working at Biogen Inc.

The Harvard researchers stored 5.5 petabits, or 1 million gigabits, per cubic millimeter in the DNA storage medium. Because of the slow process for setting down the data, the researchers consider the DNA storage medium currently suitable only for data archive purposes.

"The information density and scale compare favorably with other experimental storage methods from biology and physics," Kosuri said.

The team also included Yuan Gao, a former Wyss postdoctoral scholar and now an associate professor of biomedical engineering at Johns Hopkins University.

Read this article:
Harvard Stores 70 Billion Books Using DNA

Posted in DNA

DNA touted as a data-storage device

Researchers have encoded a full book in DNA, the largest amount of information stored on the biological medium yet.

The data encoded is the digital version of the book, made up of more than 50,000 words, 11 images and one computer program.

The overall size of the data is around 0.7 megabytes, report the scientists, led by George Church of Harvard Medical School. For their work, the researchers have used only off-the-shelf technology.

In their article, published online by Science magazine, the scientists argue that DNA has unique advantages for data storage.

They calculate that their method has by far the highest data density of any medium until now, beating flash media or even quantum holography by orders of magnitude. This is partly because DNA is three dimensional while other storage techniques are restricted to two dimensions.

Yet the main advantage of DNA storage may be durability. DNA can survive millenniums unharmed, as demonstrated by the sequencing of genetic information from ancient fossils.

At the same time, the tools and techniques necessary for reading out the information will be present in future generations, because they are ubiquitous in nature, the scientists write.

The main disadvantage at this time is expense. The authors admit that the cost and time needed to encode the information make it largely impractical at the moment.

But they point out that the cost of DNA synthesis and sequencing has been dropping by a factor larger than five each year, much higher than the rate for electronic media, albeit from a much higher starting point.

The scientists conclude that DNA is becoming an increasingly practical storage medium at a time when digital information is accumulating at an exponential rate.

Excerpt from:
DNA touted as a data-storage device

Posted in DNA

Researchers write book using DNA

Researchers have encoded a full book in DNA, the largest amount of information stored on the biological medium yet.

The data encoded is the digital version of the book, made up of more than 50,000 words, 11 images and one computer program. The overall size of the data is around 0.7 megabytes, report the scientists, led by George Church of Harvard Medical School. For their work, the researchers have used only off-the-shelf technology.

In their article, published on-line by Science magazine, the scientists argue that DNA has unique advantages for data storage. They calculate that their method has by far the highest data density of any medium until now, beating flash media or even quantum holography by orders of magnitude. This is partly because DNA is three dimensional while other storage techniques are restricted to two dimensions.

Yet the main advantage of DNA storage may be durability. DNA can survive millennia unharmed, as demonstrated by the sequencing of genetic information from ancient fossils. At the same time, the tools and techniques necessary for reading out the information will be present in future generations, because they are ubiquitous in nature, the scientists write.

The main disadvantage at this time is expense. The authors admit that the cost and time needed to encode the information make it largely impractical at the moment, except for highly specific applications, like century-scale archiving.

But they point out that the cost of DNA synthesis and sequencing has been dropping by a factor larger than five each year, much higher than the rate for electronic media, albeit from a much higher starting point. The scientists conclude that DNA is becoming an increasingly practical storage medium, at a time when digital information is accumulating at an exponential rate.

For their work, the researchers split into pieces the information of the book Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves, co-written by Church. They then synthesized short DNA fragments of around 160 nucleotides the bits in DNA. Each fragment carries part of the book, information about its position, as well as parts necessary for reading and replicating the piece.

In the process, the scientists have created 70 billion copies of the book. When reading out the information, the data was recovered with but 10 errors overall.

The first demonstration of encoding information into DNA dates back to 1988. Until now, the largest amount of data encoded in nucleic acid has been only 7,920 bits, around one-700th what Churchs team has accomplished. The authors report on a number of improvements over previous methods that make this feat possible, including a more flexible method of encoding data, using shorter and thereby easier to handle DNA pieces, and next-generation technologies for synthesis and sequencing.

For the future, the researchers propose improvements in compression and accuracy, to make the storage denser and less error-prone.

Go here to see the original:
Researchers write book using DNA

Posted in DNA

DNA evidence could bring PC Blakelock killers to trial

DNA evidence could finally bring the killers of PC Keith Blakelock to justice, 27 years after the policeman was murdered during the Broadwater Farm riots in Tottenham.

Reports yesterday claimed Scotland Yard were just weeks away from bringing charges against a man who was under 18 at the time of the murder. Two QCs agreed there is a "realistic prospect of prosecution", a key test for the Crown Prosecution Service, the Sunday Telegraph claimed.

Last night the Metropolitan Police denied charges were imminent but confirmed modern scientific techniques had been used to analyse DNA evidence from PC Blakelock's flame-retardant overalls and more than a dozen murder weapons as part of an ongoing cold case review of the crime.

Five men aged between 40 and 51 were arrested in 2010 and are still on police bail.

PC Blakelock, a 40-year-old father of three, was attacked as he tried to protect firefighters who were tackling a supermarket blaze at the height of the riot on the Broadwater Farm estate in October 1985. After stumbling he was surrounded by a mob screaming: "Kill the pig."

He was stabbed more than 40 times with different weapons, including a machete, and when he was finally dragged free by colleagues a kitchen knife was still embedded in his throat.

Winston Silcott, Mark Braithwaite and Engin Raghip were convicted in March 1987 of his murder but all three convictions were quashed four and a half years later after forensic tests on pages of key interview records suggested they had been fabricated. Silcott accepted 50,000 compensation from the Home Office but remained in prison for an unrelated murder and was released in 2003. None of the three men originally convicted is the suspect in the new case.

In 2003, Scotland Yard reopened the murder investigation after a review indicated there were possible new lines of inquiry. Fourteen men were arrested in 2010 on suspicion of involvement in PC Blakelock's murder or the attempted murder of PC Richard Coombes, who was also viciously attacked during the riot.

Since then nine of the men have been released without charge. The other five are still on police bail.

Botched convictions

Read more from the original source:
DNA evidence could bring PC Blakelock killers to trial

Posted in DNA

DNA checks done on family trees

Some people who have traced their family trees are now turning to science to see whether historical data is accurate.

For a few hundred dollars, a growing number of people are buying online DNA kits.

Dale Johns is president of the South Australian Genealogy Society.

"People who want to have their tests done, they can find a provider on the web and there's one we use in America," he said.

"They pay their money, they get a little kit and they take a swab out of their mouth and seal that up and send it back."

Ancestry researcher Antoinette Wade is enjoying the process.

"I recently had a test called Family Finder done and I have actually found some second cousins that I'm in communication with based on our DNA and that's very exciting," she said.

Another society member Robert Blair has had several tests done on DNA, and even had some cousins tested as well, to prove a person in his family tree did not belong there.

"The DNA tests showed that I was right. The ancestor that we thought was an ancestor wasn't really an ancestor," he said.

A DNA special interest group is among several that meet at Genealogy SA's headquarters, with others including English, Irish, German and other European groups.

See more here:
DNA checks done on family trees

Posted in DNA

'DNA wires' could help physicians diagnose disease

ScienceDaily (Aug. 19, 2012) In a discovery that defies the popular meaning of the word "wire," scientists have found that Mother Nature uses DNA as a wire to detect the constantly occurring genetic damage and mistakes that if left unrepaired can result in diseases like cancer and underpin the physical and mental decline of aging.

That topic DNA wires and their potential use in identifying people at risk for certain diseases is the focus of a plenary talk on August 19 during the 244th National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

"DNA is a very fragile and special wire," said Jacqueline K. Barton, Ph.D., who delivered the talk. "You're never going to wire a house with it, and it isn't sturdy enough to use in popular electronic devices. But that fragile state is exactly what makes DNA so good as an electrical biosensor to identify DNA damage."

Barton won the U.S. National Medal of Science, the nation's highest honor for scientific achievement, for discovering that cells use the double strands of the DNA helix like a wire for signaling, which is critical to detecting and repairing genetic damage. She is a professor of chemistry and is chair of the division of chemistry and chemical engineering at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.

Damage is constantly occurring to DNA, Barton explained damage that skin cells, for instance, receive from excessive exposure to sunlight or that lung cells get hit with from carcinogens in cigarette smoke. Cells have a natural repair system in which special proteins constantly patrol the spiral-staircase architecture of DNA. They monitor the 3 billion units, or "base pairs," in DNA, looking for and mending damage from carcinogens and other sources.

Barton and other scientists noticed years ago that the DNA architecture chemically resembles the solid-state materials used in transistors and other electronic components. And DNA's bases, or units, are stacked on top of each other in an arrangement that seemed capable of conducting electricity.

"It's like a stack of copper pennies," said Barton. "And when in good condition and properly aligned, that stack of copper pennies can be conductive. But if one of the pennies is a little bit awry if it's not stacked so well then you're not going to be able to get good conductivity in it. But if those bases are mismatched or if there is any other damage to the DNA, as can happen with damage that leads to cancer, the wire is interrupted and electricity will not flow properly."

Barton's team established that the electrons that comprise a flow of electricity can move from one end of a DNA strand to the other, just as they do through an electrical wire. In one recent advance, the team was able to send electricity down a 34-nanometer-long piece of DNA. That might not sound like much -- a nanometer is one-tenth the width of a human hair. But that is just the right scale for use in medical diagnostic devices and biosensors to pick up on mutations, or changes, in DNA that could lead to cancer and other diseases.

Barton's research suggested that DNA uses its electrical properties to signal repair proteins that fix DNA damage. If the DNA is no longer conducting electricity properly, that would be a signal for repair proteins to do their thing. Barton's team is applying that knowledge in developing "DNA chips," devices that take advantage of DNA's natural electrical conductivity and its ability to bind to other strands of DNA that have a complementary sequence of base units, and thus probe that sequence for damage. Such a DNA chip would help diagnose disease risk by changes in electrical conductivity resulting from mutations or some other damage.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

See more here:
'DNA wires' could help physicians diagnose disease

Posted in DNA

Communicating with Aliens through DNA

DNA encodes the information for all the proteins inside the cell, their amino acid sequence, when and where to turn them on, and a whole lot of other things that we probably dont fully understand yet. With the ability to write DNA, to synthesize our own arbitrary stretches of As, Ts, Cs, and Gs, we can create our own instructions for cellular proteins or we can encode sequences that would be junk to a cell but that we could read as a message. This week, George Church, Yuan Gao, and Sri Kosuri published a short paper demonstrating that not only could we encode a few phrases here and there, but write a whole book in DNA. The book, Churchs Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves, which will be published using more traditional means this fall, includes 53,426 words, 11 jpgs, and one JavaScript program. The text and images were converted to html format and then read as bits, 1s and 0s that can be easily encoded into DNA: A or C for 0 and T or G for 1. Having two possible letters for each bit means that the sequence wont end up with long stretches of any single letter, a challenge for chemical DNA synthesis. The perl code they used to covert bits to DNA is available in the papers supplementary information (PDF).

This is by far the largest amount of non-biological information synthesized and stored in DNAa total of 5.27 megabits, way beyond the 7,920 bit record previously held by the Venter Institutes watermarks in their chemically synthesized genome (written using an undisclosed code for each letter and punctuation mark).

The sequence of Watermark 4 in the Venter Institute's synthetic genome

While news reports about the DNA book often acknowledge this previous DNA message, as well as a 1999 paper encoding the World War II spy message JUNE 6 INVASION: NORMANDY in DNA (PDF), they dont mention the very first synthetic DNA message cited in the paper. In 1988, Joe Davis, an artist collaborating with molecular biologist Dana Boyd in Jon Beckwiths lab at Harvard Medical School (and currently a research affiliate in George Churchs lab), designed and synthesized an 18 base-pair message encoding the image of the ancient Germanic rune representing life and the female earth. The Microvenus message was then pasted into a vector and transformed into E. coli, creating a living work of art.

Microvenus--The first non-biological message encoded in DNA, by Joe Davis

The Arecibo Message

The coding scheme for Microvenus was inspired by the binary message sent by Carl Sagan and Frank Drake from the Arecibo radio telescope in 1974, an attempt to open up communication with extraterrestrial intelligence (as well as demonstrate the capabilities of the newly remodeled telescope). The image is a 2373 rectangle (having the dimensions be two prime numbers makes it easier to decode the single stream of binary digits) showing pictures of the telescope, a person, and information about our solar system and our DNA. Microvenus is coded with a similar principle, the lines of the image translated to ones and zeros in a 57 grid, converted to DNA with phase-change values rather than numerical values. The DNA bases are arranged by size C= 1, T=2, A =3, G=4 and represent the number of bits needed before you switch to the opposite bit. For example, 10101 translates to CCCCC because each digit occurs once before it switches, and 00011 would be AG because there are three 0 before it switches to two ones.

Despite its tendency to mutate and evolve as cells divide, DNA is a remarkably inert and stable chemical on its own, lasting long enough for archeologists to be able to sequence strands of DNA many thousands of years old. In a microbial spore hurtling through space, DNA could theoretically last long enough to be found by an extraterrestrial civilization that could sequence it and decode the message inside. In the late 1970s, some scientists even hypothesized the inverse possibilitythat viruses on Earth could have been sent as messages from extraterrestrials. Attempts to decode the X174 viral genome sequence into two dimensional images of course didnt yield any striking alien messages, but did open up the possibility of sending out different kinds of messages of our own.

For Davis, the messages that we send to aliens arent just about sending out a friendly description of life, art, and science on Earth, but of better understanding those things ourselves. He writes in his paper describing the Microvenus project:

By sending messages to extraterrestrial intelligence, human beings are importantly engaged in a search for themselves. They must first reveal themselves to themselves before they can reveal themselves to anyone else. This has not only been a central dilemmain the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, but it has also been an essential element of art, history, psychology, and classical philosophy.

Go here to read the rest:
Communicating with Aliens through DNA

Posted in DNA

Synthetic Biology Book Published in DNA

The data storage project represents the largest piece of non-biological data ever stored in this manner

By Monya Baker and Nature magazine

Image: dna, synthetic biology

Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...

Read More

From Nature magazine

A trio of researchers has encoded a draft of a whole book into DNA. The 5.27-megabit tome contains 53,246 words, 11 JPG image files and a JavaScript program, making it the largest piece of non-biological data ever stored in this way.

DNA has the potential to store huge amounts of information. In theory, two bits of data can be incorporated per nucleotide the single base unit of a DNA string so each gram of the double-stranded molecule could store 455 exabytes of data (1 exabyte is 1018 bytes). Such dense packing outstrips inorganic data-storage devices such as flash memory, hard disks or even storage based on quantum-computing methods.

The book, which is fittingly a treatise on synthetic biology, was encoded by geneticists George Church and Sriram Kosuri at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering in Boston, Massachusetts, and Yuan Gao, a biomedical engineer at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. They report their work in Science1 this week.

It marks a significant gain on previous projects the largest of which encoded less than one-six-hundredth of the data but organic flash drives are still many years away. There are a number of reasons why the method is not practical for everyday use. For example, both storing and retrieving information currently require several days of lab work, spent either synthesizing DNA from scratch or sequencing it to read the data.

Visit link:
Synthetic Biology Book Published in DNA

Posted in DNA

Harvard Scientists Write Book In DNA And Accurately Copy, Read It Back

Lawrence LeBlond for redOrbit.com Your Universe Online

DNA, the building block of life, is now home to more than just the worlds living creatures. Scientists from Harvard University report that they have written an entire novel in DNA, a feat that could revolutionize our ability to save data.

Our genetic code packs billions of gigabytes into a single gram. That is significantly more information that a single microchip could even think about storing. In fact, a single milligram of genetic code could encode the entire Library of Congress and still have room to spare.

Long held as only a theory, the storage of data in DNA has now tipped the genetic scale and has become a reality. George Church of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues stored an entire genetics handbook in less than a picogram trillionth of a gram of DNA.

The experiment, reported in Thursdays edition of the journal Science, could pave the way for eventual data-storage systems that can handle vast amounts of data, perhaps millions of times more data than a single hard drive can handle. Using next-generation sequencing technology, the Harvard team, were not only able to encode the book in DNA, but also were able to accurately copy and read it.

A few other teams have tried to write data into the DNA of living cells. But because the approach carries some disadvantages, it may not prove feasible. Because cells die, writing data into genetic code could mean that you are going to ultimately lose your work. And because cells also replicate, there would be the possibility that new mutations could change the data.

To work around these possible scenarios, Church and his colleagues created a DNA information-archiving system using no cells at all. Instead, they utilized an inkjet printer to embed short fragments of chemically synthesized DNA onto the surface of a tiny glass chip. To encode the file, the team divided it into tiny blocks of data and converted it not into typical digital storage 1s and 0s, but rather DNAs four-letter alphabet of As (adenine), Cs (cytosine), Gs (guanine) and Ts (thymine).

The team explained that each DNA fragment also contains a digital barcode that records its location in the original file. Reading the data requires a DNA sequencer and a computer to put back together the DNA puzzle of fragments in order to convert them into digital format. The computer also corrects for errors; each block of data is replicated thousands of times so that any chance glitch can be identified and fixed by comparing it to the other copies.

To demonstrate the technology, the team used the DNA chips to encode a genetics book co-authored by Church Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves in DNA. After converting the book into DNA and translating it back into digital form, the teams system only produced a rate of two errors per million bits of information, and only amounted to a few single-letter typos, which is on par with DVDs and far better than magnetic hard drives.

However, the impracticability of such a system is not there right now. Sequencing DNA is a costly procedure and is not feasible for general use, according to Daniel Gibson, a synthetic biologist at the J. Craig Venter Institute in Rockville, Maryland. However, he noted, the field is moving fast and the technology will soon be cheaper, faster, and smaller.

Read this article:
Harvard Scientists Write Book In DNA And Accurately Copy, Read It Back

Posted in DNA