The Power of Moderate Exercise

Moderate exercise improves life expectancy: "Undertaking regular jogging increases the life expectancy of men by 6.2 years and women by 5.6 years, reveals the latest data from the Copenhagen City Heart study ... the study's most recent analysis (unpublished) shows that between one and two-and-a-half hours of jogging per week at a 'slow or average' pace delivers optimum benefits for longevity. ... SThe study, which started 1976, is a prospective cardiovascular population study of around 20,000 men and women aged between 20 to 93 years. The study, which made use of the Copenhagen Population Register, set out to increase knowledge about prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke. Since then the study, which has resulted in publication of over 750 papers, has expanded to include other diseases ... The investigators have explored the associations for longevity with different forms of exercise and other factors. For the jogging sub study, the mortality of 1,116 male joggers and 762 female joggers was compared to the non joggers in the main study population. All participants were asked to answer questions about the amount of time they spent jogging each week, and to rate their own perceptions of pace (defined as slow, average, and fast). ... The first data was collected between 1976 to 1978, the second from 1981 to 1983, the third from 1991 to 1994, and the fourth from 2001 to 2003. For the analysis participants from all the different data collections were followed using a unique personal identification number in the Danish Central Person Register. ... These numbers have been key to the success of the study since they've allowed us to trace participants wherever they go. ... Results show that in the follow-up period involving a maximum of 35 years, [risk] of death was reduced by 44%."

Link: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-05/esoc-rjs050212.php

Source:
http://www.longevitymeme.org/newsletter/latest_rss_feed.cfm

Cryonics Magazine, March-April 2012

I'm a little late in pointing out the latest issue of Cryonics, the magazine published by cryonics provider Alcor, is presently available as a PDF.

The March-April issue of Cryonics features an extensive treatment of protecting one's cryonics arrangements against inflation through life insurance. Insurance agent and Alcor member Rudi Hoffman makes the case for "superfunding" your cryonics arrangements to keep pace with the rising costs of advanced medical procedures. The author explains the differences between the major forms of life insurance (term life, whole life, universal life, etc.), gives advice on how to evaluate the various bells and whistles insurances companies offer, and provides guidance how to read those long policy illustrations. This issue continues the recent focus on identity-destroying brain disorders by offering an article by Alcor staff member Mike Perry about the latest developments in Alzheimer's Disease diagnosis. Alcor CEO Max More reports on the upcoming Alcor conference and both book reviews deal with the topic of immortality, albeit from a different perspective.

The main topic of the issue ties into the ongoing discussion on maintaining Alcor's reserve of funds at a sufficient level for the long term - which is essentially a battle against the predatory inflation produced by the self-serving actions of politicians and political appointees. The political class can be expected to create ever more money from nothing, continually reducing the value of money in circulation and savings accounts, because it is the most effective way to tax the masses - all other forms of taxation generate far more unrest, resistance, and non-compliance, and are thus much more self-limiting in the revenue they can generate.The battle against the inflation resulting from depreciation of the currency is fought by all entities that must tie contracts inked today to outlays required years from now:

As evidenced by recent exchanges on the Alcor Member Forums, our members have a wide variety of suggestions for how to close the substantial funding gap that has been produced by Alcor's practice to date of not raising cryopreservation minimums for existing members. If there is one area of strong agreement, however, it is that all members who are underfunded for today's cryopreservation minimums and who can afford to change or upgrade their life insurance, should do so. This will not just reduce Alcor's funding shortfall but it will also allow the member to secure new cryopreservation and storage technologies that cannot be offered without charging an additional amount. Surplus funding can also be allocated to a personal revival trust or to Alcor's hardship fund to help members with poor funding and/or challenges to pay annual dues.

The March-April issue of Cryonics magazine features an extensive review of life insurance options by Alcor member and life insurance agent Rudi Hoffman. Rudi introduces the topic by presenting the disturbing long-term effects of (medical) inflation. Not all of Alcor's services may be subject to the kind of cost increases we see in medicine but it is prudent to plan using conservative assumptions. After this sobering introduction, Rudi runs us through the various forms of life insurance, their pros and cons, and how to read those long, intimidating policy illustrations. We at Alcor hope that many of you will make efforts to update your cryonics funding to make it easier to solve the underfunding problem and to assist with the really hard cases.

Alcor has its cultural roots firmly in the non-profit world and mindset, as you can see from the above material. This is admirable, but would produce challenges in any organization that must have continuity over decades of serving the same customers. Prices must change to suit the times, and business models must take that into account.

It has occurred to me once or twice over the years that, setting aside the cultural history, an organization similar to Alcor might be best suited to growth and stability as a for-profit subsidiary of a large insurance company. Many of these challenges could be met by a strong relationship with a group that manages insurance and accounts with customers that span many years. In any case, this is another of the possible business models that has yet to be explored in cryonics - and is unlikely to be explored until such time as the industry grows larger.

Source:
http://www.longevitymeme.org/newsletter/latest_rss_feed.cfm

More Evidence to Show that Excess Fat Causes Chronic Inflammation

Chronic inflammation is a bad thing - it greatly increases your risk of suffering age-related disease, and may be one of the more important mechanisms linking excess fat tissue to risk of disease and lowered life expectancy. Here is more evidence to show that being overweight exposes a person to greater inflammation: "Postmenopausal women who were overweight or obese and lost at least 5 percent of their body weight had a measurable reduction in markers of inflammation. ... Both obesity and inflammation have been shown to be related to several types of cancer, and this study shows that if you reduce weight, you can reduce inflammation as well. ... Women in the trial who were assigned to a weight loss intervention had a goal of 10 percent weight reduction during the course of one year achieved through a diet intervention with or without aerobic exercise. ... The researchers measured levels of C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, interleukin-6, leukocyte and neutrophil in 439 women. At the end of one year, C-reactive protein reduced by 36.1 percent in the diet-alone group and by 41.7 percent in the diet and exercise group. Interleukin-6 decreased by 23.1 percent in the diet group and 24.3 percent in the diet and exercise group. ... there were greater reductions in these measures among women who lost at least 5 percent of their body weight. They also found that exercise alone, without a dietary weight loss component, had little effect on inflammation markers."

Link: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-05/aafc-wll042412.php

Source:
http://www.longevitymeme.org/newsletter/latest_rss_feed.cfm

Telomeres in Disease and Aging

An introduction to what is known of telomeres can be found at the Scientist: "The ends of linear chromosomes have attracted serious scientific study - and Nobel Prizes - since the early 20th century. Called telomeres, these ends serve to protect the coding DNA of the genome. When a cell's telomeres shorten to critical lengths, the cell senesces. Thus, telomeres dictate a cell's life span - unless something goes wrong. Work over the past several decades has revealed an active, though limited, mechanism for the normal enzymatic repair of telomere loss in certain proliferative cells. ... Telomeres shorten as we age. By analogy to the cellular mitotic clock, telomeres have been postulated as a marker of 'genetic age,' and telomere length has been marketed as a simple predictor of longevity. Assays of telomere length have been bundled with recommendations for lifestyle modification and for drug therapy, neither based on appropriate clinical studies. Simple but appealing arguments relating telomeres and aging are currently controversial, likely simplistic, and potentially harmful. Telomere length does indeed reflect a cell's past proliferative history and future propensity for apoptosis, senescence, and transformation. Cellular aging, however, is not equivalent to organ or organismal aging. ... Studies in humans have attempted to relate telomere length to life span. In the provocative initial publication from the University of Utah in 2003, individuals around 60 years of age who had the longest telomeres lived longer than did subjects with the shortest telomeres, but the main cause of death in the latter group was, inexplicably, infectious disease; the persons with shorter telomeres did not have a higher rate of cancer deaths. Moreover, these findings have not been confirmed in other studies of older subjects. In another study evaluating a different population, telomere length failed to predict survival, but interestingly it correlated with years of healthy life. In a Danish study of people aged 73 to 101 years, telomeres correlated with life expectancy in a simple univariate analysis, but only before the researchers corrected for age, suggesting that the correlation was driven simply by the fact that younger subjects had longer telomeres. And a Dutch study of 78-year-old men found that while telomere lengths eroded with age, they failed to correlate with mortality."

Link: http://the-scientist.com/2012/05/01/telomeres-in-disease/

Source:
http://www.longevitymeme.org/newsletter/latest_rss_feed.cfm

Enhancing Lysosomal Function and PADK in the Latest Rejuvenation Research

The April 2012 edition of Rejuvenation Research includes the proceedings of the SENS5 conference, so there's a lot of material you'll have already seen there. The sole open access paper is worth reading as an update on research into the use of Z-Phe-Ala-diazomethylketone (PADK) to boost lysosomal function. The lysosome, you will recall, is a form of roving recycling unit that exists within the cell. Its task is to break down waste and unwanted materials - and that function is vital, as demonstrated by the many ultimately fatal conditions caused by lysosomal dysfunction. Unfortunately for all of us, lysosomal functionality deteriorates with age. This is most likely due in large part to accumulating waste materials, such as lipofuscin, that lysosomes cannot break down. They instead bloat and malfunction.

One body of research aiming to fix this issue is organized and advocated by the SENS Foundation, and focuses on ways to safely break down the waste materials that cannot be handled by lysosomes. For example, through biomedical remediation and the use of tailored bacterial enzymes. Meanwhile, other research groups have worked on boosting lysosomal activity in various ways, which seems to have generated some benefits where successful. For example, reversing decline in liver function, and restoring mental capacity in mice engineered to generate the signs of Alzheimer's disease.

It is that second example that is the subject of this open access paper, showing that enhancing lysosomal activity can potentially help with aggregates of damaging material outside cells, as well as the state of the cell interior:

Positive Lysosomal Modulation As a Unique Strategy to Treat Age-Related Protein Accumulation Diseases

Knowing the link between lysosomal dysfunction and selective pathogenesis, one logical step toward therapeutic intervention is the enhancement of enzymatic activity in lysosomes. [Some age-related diseases] may be slowed or reversed by the positive modulation of the lysosomal system. Many studies suggest that lysosomal activation occurs with age and in diseased brains, but not to the necessary extent that would prevent the gradual loss of neuronal integrity and brain function.

Enhancement of lysosomal function has been proposed as a plausible strategy to reduce protein accumulation events in age-related disorders, including those events in Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, and Huntington disease. Several of the studies indicate that induction of protein degradation processes is an attempt to clear amyloid peptides and tau species, as well as ?-synuclein and mutant huntingtin. Another potential therapeutic strategy that may involve the endosomal-lysosomal system is the disaggregation of extracellular A? peptide, with the idea that the disaggregation would promote uptake of monomers and small oligomers into neurons and microglia where they are trafficked to lysosomes for degradation.

...

Of the list of lysosomal modulatory agents [provided in the paper] only PADK, diazoacetyl-dl-2-aminohexanoic acid methyl ester, glycyl-phenylalanyl-glycine-aldehyde semicarbazone, and bafilomycin A1 have been reported to elicit protection against protein accumulation pathology under appropriate low-dose conditions.

...

From the in vitro and in vivo findings, unique lysosomal modulators represent a minimally invasive, pharmacologically controlled strategy against protein accumulation disorders to enhance protein clearance, promote synaptic integrity, and slow the progression of dementia.

Source:
http://www.longevitymeme.org/newsletter/latest_rss_feed.cfm

Complex cancer industry trial literature is too confusing for patients to understand

By J. D. Heyes

Have you ever read something so complex and confusing that it frustrated you to
the point of distraction? Well, a new study has found that cancer trial
literature causes that kind of frustration - and may be misleading to patients
as well.

According to Prof. Mary Dixon-Woods, professor of Medical Sociology at the
University of Leicester Department of Health Sciences in Great Britain, a
number of cancer patients found information leaflets describing cancer trials
too long, too incomprehensible and too intimidating.

"These information sheets are poorly aligned with patients' information
needs and how they really make decisions about whether to join a cancer
trial," said Dixon-Woods, lead author of the research http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-03/uol-cti032612.php,
which was published in the international journal Sociology of Health and
Illness.

"Some patients did find them very useful, but many others paid them little
attention. They preferred to rely on discussions they had with their doctor to
make up their minds," she said. Read more…

Source:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/integratedmedicine

Making Nanotechnolgy Safer for Breast Implants

For more than 20 years, the main choice for breast implants has been some form of silicone rubber. Recent cancer research suggests nanotechnology may make breast implants safer as an alternative to silicone. Approximately 75 percent of post-mastectomy patients choose some form of breast reconstruction. While no medical device is free of risks, silicone breast implants still present a relatively high level of risk. This makes nanotechnology a promising alternative.

Similarly, nanotechnology may speed up recovery after breast reduction. Recovery from plastic surgery of any type has its risks. A University of Akron study suggests that nanotechnology produces additional properties that offer additional medical benefits patients cannot get from silicone or other traditional procedures. Some of the potential dangers of silicone materials include a greater instance of various forms of cancer, systemic diseases and psychological diseases. Dr. Judit E. Puskas, who led the study at the University of Akron, believes that nanostructured material may eliminate such risks and present a safer alternative to silicone-based breast implants.

Dr. Laura Kruper of the City of Hope Medical Center in Duarte, California is among doctors pointing out the psychological benefits of reconstruction following a mastectomy. While expense is a concern for some women, another factor is safety. This adds to the appeal of materials constructed using nanotechnology. The idea of using nanotechnology in breast implants is to alter the characteristics of the silicone. The manipulation would take place in the atoms of the silicone. Implants with the capability of delivering chemicals may speed up the recovery process and reduce side effects following surgery and initial treatment.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the United States. It is the leading cause of death among women of all races. While breast cancer rates have been decreasing by about 2 percent since 2005, it is still estimated that 1 in 8 women will develop some form of breast cancer during their lifetime. This makes exploration of nanotechnology a worthwhile effort, according to Dr. Puskas and other doing similar research. The primary goal is to ensure that such technology is safe. Early research has shown promise. Some researchers have gone beyond Dr. Puskas’ early optimism and suggest that nanotechnology may result in materials that are not only safer, but materials that have the ability to deliver cancer medications more directly.

Nanostructured materials, by nature, are smaller. This includes smaller components within the material that minimizes complications. The new material will also have the ability to deliver certain cancer drugs more locally. The ability to deliver cancer drugs in this manner could help patients who have a breast reduction or have to have a mastectomy or double mastectomy due to breast cancer. Delivering cancer drugs this way could further minimize risks and side effects associated with chemotherapy. Right now, such technology is in the testing phase. The goal of nanotechnology research is to create alternatives to silicone implants that sharply reduce side effects and potential risks at the time of the implants and in the future. According to Breastcancer.org, there are about 3 million breast cancer survivors in the United States. A common concern among survivors, especially those who had some form of mastectomy or lumpectomy, is finding a way to restore the natural appearance of the breast.

Some women express a hesitation to get breast implants following breast cancer due to a fear that the implants themselves will cause additional medical problems. According to a study of breast cancer patients in California, fewer women are electing to have breast implants following mastectomy. On a nationwide level, however, statistics show that about 90 percent of women who have had a mastectomy following breast cancer choose some form of reconstruction. Nanotechnology is showing promise among all fields of science, but still must receive FDA approval to be used in breast implants. Early studies, however, are highlighting the potential of nanotechnology.

Source:
http://www.biotechblog.org/rss.xml

Do genes make a person Homosexual?

This is the main question that is lurking the minds of biologists for quite some time now because many possibilities for the occurrence of a homosexuality gene exist. During the 1990s many researcher were studying the topic but by the end of the 20th century all such research work was slowed down as many people are shy when they are asked on topics related to sex and specially homosexuality. Scientists Sergey Gavrilets and William Rice have developed some guidelines for explaining the causes of homosexuality. During the past decade the scientists have discovered some patterns that might point to genetic causes of homosexuality. Among the discoveries the main finding was that in case of male homosexuality it seems to be inherited more from the mother than the father and the female maternal relatives of gay men have higher that average reproduction capacity. Another shocking discovery was that the chances of homosexuality increases in males with the number of older brothers he has even if the child has grown up away from his brothers. The reason for this is that the with each male fetus the mother develops an increased immunization to an antigen that is produced by male fetuses and this antigen plays an important role in masculinizing the brain. All the studies have strong evidences that homosexuality is caused by a gene but no research has pointed to any specific gene and the idea to which each research points is towards a polymorphic gene. Rice commented that, ‘We know that homosexuality (gay or lesbian) can be caused by simple genetic changes in fruit flies, and since so many reproductive and neurological genes are shared by flies and humans, it seems highly likely that there are major genes influencing homosexuality in humans, However, we also have firm evidence for a birth-order effect on male homosexuality, and discordance in the expression of homosexuality of identical twins, so clearly there is also an environmental influence on the trait.’ This research is the most guiding research on the topic, though it also has not pointed out any particular gene but this will be the backbone of all future researchers that can one day tell us the exact cause of Homosexuality.

Source:
http://www.biotechblog.org/rss.xml

Another > $100M month for companies in the cell therapy space

Tweet 


Last month we reported here on this blog that March was more than a $100M month for companies in the stem cell and cell-based regenerative medicine space in terms of monies raised.  

What we missed was a $15M grant from Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) for UK-based CellMedica.  This pumps last month's total to just under $140M.

This month, according to our sources, betters even March's better numbers by coming in at just over $170M though that is largely on the back of one large deal in Asia.  Here's how the numbers break down.

Allocure kicked off the month with a decent $25M Series B round from new syndicate member Lundbeckfond Ventures, as well as previous investors SV Life Sciences and Novo A/S.  Allocure is headed into phase 2 for acute kidney injury with an allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell therapeutic they currently call AC607.  


Little-known Canadian-based, Sernova then announced a $3.6M PIPE to fund continued development of its proprietary Cell Pouch System(TM), and, in particular, to fund the upcoming first-in-man clinical trial for patients with diabetes receiving an islet transplant.  The application to proceed with this trial is currently under review by Health Canada.


Next up was NeoStem closing a $6.8M public offering for "expanding" their contract manufacturing business, Progenitor Cell Therapy, and "enrolling the PreSERVE AMR-001 Phase 2 clinical trial for preserving heart function after a heart attack".  


The biggest deal of the month was a $65M convertible debt financing of China Cord Blood by none other than global powerhouse Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR) through it KKR China Growth Fund L.P., a China-focused investment fund managed by KKR.  We believe this is deal is certainly an investment in the future of China's healthcare market potential but that it is bigger than that.  We believe a significant driver for this deal may likely have been the opportunity to consolidate this sector globally - to use a significant operation and 'war chest' to fund mergers and acquisitions on both the public and private cord blood banking sector worldwide.


The only classic first-round venture raise this month was a milestone-based $5M Series A by Bay City Capital into Phil Coelho's new company, SynGen, to fund his latest iteration of stem cell processing devices.


Forbion Capital then announced that it was leading a series D round, joined by fellow existing investors TVM Capital, Lumira Capital, Intersouth Partners, Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec, Morningside Group, and Aurora Funds, of $25M into Argos Therapeutics in order to kick them into their phase 3.  The hope here is that with some early phase 3 data they may be able to attract the elusive partner they couldn't land with a mere bucket of phase 2 data.


Innovacell landed the only European deal by announcing an 8.3M Euro (~$11M) investment by Buschier, Fides, HYBAG, and Uni Venture.  This will be used for the continued clinical development of its cell-therapy (ICES13) for the treatment of stress-urinary incontinence currently in a ph 3 study in several European countries.


ReNeuron announced a private placement also open to existing shareholders that brought in just under $10M (£6.1M) to support their phase 1 trial in stroke and other pre-clinical, clinical, and regulatory milestones. 


Finally, the Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, in an apparent ongoing quest to continuously reinvent itself, announced at month's end that they had formed a new subsidiary named Regen BioPharma and that they had raised $20M in a financing commitment from Southridge Partners II to purchase its common stock as required over the term of the agreement at a price set by an agreed formula.  This money is said to be dedicated to the acquisition of discovery-stage intellectual property and driving it through to phase 2 trials in an exercise of maximum value creation over a period they claim to be as short as 18-24 months.


..


So in the end, the month saw companies in the space raise just over $170M and even if you back out the stem cell banking deal its still over $100M for cell therapy companies.  


Over the 2 months, then, we've seen just over $311M raised through a variety of means by companies at every stage of maturity and for intended purposes ranging from acquisition, consolidation, early stage clinical development, and phase 3 testing.


--Lee


p.s. If you are aware of other deals in the sector this month, let us know and we'll update this accordingly.


Source:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/CellTherapyBlog

Another > $100M month for companies in the cell therapy space

Tweet 


Last month we reported here on this blog that March was more than a $100M month for companies in the stem cell and cell-based regenerative medicine space in terms of monies raised.  

What we missed was a $15M grant from Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) for UK-based CellMedica.  This pumps last month's total to just under $140M.

This month, according to our sources, betters even March's better numbers by coming in at just over $170M though that is largely on the back of one large deal in Asia.  Here's how the numbers break down.

Allocure kicked off the month with a decent $25M Series B round from new syndicate member Lundbeckfond Ventures, as well as previous investors SV Life Sciences and Novo A/S.  Allocure is headed into phase 2 for acute kidney injury with an allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell therapeutic they currently call AC607.  


Little-known Canadian-based, Sernova then announced a $3.6M PIPE to fund continued development of its proprietary Cell Pouch System(TM), and, in particular, to fund the upcoming first-in-man clinical trial for patients with diabetes receiving an islet transplant.  The application to proceed with this trial is currently under review by Health Canada.


Next up was NeoStem closing a $6.8M public offering for "expanding" their contract manufacturing business, Progenitor Cell Therapy, and "enrolling the PreSERVE AMR-001 Phase 2 clinical trial for preserving heart function after a heart attack".  


The biggest deal of the month was a $65M convertible debt financing of China Cord Blood by none other than global powerhouse Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR) through it KKR China Growth Fund L.P., a China-focused investment fund managed by KKR.  We believe this is deal is certainly an investment in the future of China's healthcare market potential but that it is bigger than that.  We believe a significant driver for this deal may likely have been the opportunity to consolidate this sector globally - to use a significant operation and 'war chest' to fund mergers and acquisitions on both the public and private cord blood banking sector worldwide.


The only classic first-round venture raise this month was a milestone-based $5M Series A by Bay City Capital into Phil Coelho's new company, SynGen, to fund his latest iteration of stem cell processing devices.


Forbion Capital then announced that it was leading a series D round, joined by fellow existing investors TVM Capital, Lumira Capital, Intersouth Partners, Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec, Morningside Group, and Aurora Funds, of $25M into Argos Therapeutics in order to kick them into their phase 3.  The hope here is that with some early phase 3 data they may be able to attract the elusive partner they couldn't land with a mere bucket of phase 2 data.


Innovacell landed the only European deal by announcing an 8.3M Euro (~$11M) investment by Buschier, Fides, HYBAG, and Uni Venture.  This will be used for the continued clinical development of its cell-therapy (ICES13) for the treatment of stress-urinary incontinence currently in a ph 3 study in several European countries.


ReNeuron announced a private placement also open to existing shareholders that brought in just under $10M (£6.1M) to support their phase 1 trial in stroke and other pre-clinical, clinical, and regulatory milestones. 


Finally, the Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, in an apparent ongoing quest to continuously reinvent itself, announced at month's end that they had formed a new subsidiary named Regen BioPharma and that they had raised $20M in a financing commitment from Southridge Partners II to purchase its common stock as required over the term of the agreement at a price set by an agreed formula.  This money is said to be dedicated to the acquisition of discovery-stage intellectual property and driving it through to phase 2 trials in an exercise of maximum value creation over a period they claim to be as short as 18-24 months.


..


So in the end, the month saw companies in the space raise just over $170M and even if you back out the stem cell banking deal its still over $100M for cell therapy companies.  


Over the 2 months, then, we've seen just over $311M raised through a variety of means by companies at every stage of maturity and for intended purposes ranging from acquisition, consolidation, early stage clinical development, and phase 3 testing.


--Lee


p.s. If you are aware of other deals in the sector this month, let us know and we'll update this accordingly.


Source:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/CellTherapyBlog

Kudos to CIRM: Stem Cell Agency Sticks with Full Financial Disclosure


A key panel of directors of the $3
billion California stem cell agency yesterday voted unanimously to
retain full public disclosure of the financial interests of its
directors and top executives.
The director's Governance Subcommittee
bypassed a proposal that would have substantially weakened disclosure at a time when the agency is moving closer to industry in an effort
to develop cures.
"Because of CIRM's unique mission
and the agency's longstanding commitment to transparency," said
Kevin McCormack, the agency's spokesman, "they believed that
CIRM should continue to set an example by requiring the broadest
disclosure of members of the board and high level staff."
Currently CIRM board members and top
executives must disclose all their investments and income – in a
general way – along with California real property that they hold.
Under the rejected changes, disclosures would have instead been
required only "if the business entity or source of income is of
the type to receive grants or other monies from or through
the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine." 
The proposed changes would also have
relieved CIRM officials of reporting investment in or income from
venture capital or other firms that may be engaged in financing
biotech or stem cell enterprises, since the firms do not receive cash
from CIRM or engage in biomedical research.

The subcommittee's action will go before the full CIRM board later this month, where it is expected to be ratified. 

Our take? The Governance Subcommittee
took the right action and is to be commended for going beyond the
letter of the law. The integrity and credibility of CIRM are
paramount. As the California Stem Cell Report wrote last week, narrowing disclosure would only have engendered suspicion and
unnecessarily raised questions about the conduct of the agency as it
embarks on an aggressive push for stem cell cures.

Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Researcher Alert: First Look at Proposed Rules for California's Stem Cell Bank


The California
stem cell agency today unveiled initial details of how it plans to
run its $30 million bank of reprogrammed adult stem cells.

The proposed
regulations are the first step this year in the $3 billion agency's
project to make IPS cells available worldwide at low cost. It is part
of an effort to stimulate the science and develop commercial cures by
removing research roadblocks.
As Amy Adams,
CIRM's communications manager wrote earlier this year on the agency's research blog,

"One way for CIRM to accelerate research is by creating more of a library system
for stem cells – except we don’t want the cells back."

The agency expects
to issue its first RFA next month in the stem cell banking initiative, which consists of three grant rounds to be approved by
the CIRM board no later than Feburary of next year.

To clear the way
for the first round, CIRM plans to revise its IP regulations to
ensure that they don't hamper the distribution of stem cells in its bank and their wide use.  The revisions will come before the CIRM directors'
IP/Industry Subcommittee next Tuesday. The six-member panel is
co-chaired by co-chaired by Stephen Juelsgaard, former executive vice
president of Genentech, and Duane Roth, CEO of Connect in San Diego,
a nonprofit that supports tech and life sciences entrepreneuers.
Sites where the public can participate in the meeting will be
available in San Francisco, La Jolla, Los Angeles and two in Irvine.
Under the new IP rules, CIRM will retain ownership of the cells in its bank instead
of the grantee, as the current IP rules state.
In a memo to
directors, Elona Baum, general counsel for the agency, said,

"This permits
CIRM to have complete control of this valuable resource and is
consistent with the practice of NIH’s Center for Regenerative
Medicine
which is also creating a repository for iPSC lines and
derived materials."

Baum also said,

"The (current) IP
regulations were drafted to address conventional drug discovery
activities and did not contemplate creation of a comprehensive
repository of cell lines intended for broad distribution. As a
result, the IP regulations contain a number of provisions which are
either not applicable or worse could impede the success of the hiPSC
bank. For instance, IP regulations permit the exclusive licensing of
CIRM funded inventions and technology. This would be
counterproductive to the goals of the hiPSC repository which are
predicated on wide spread access."

Baum provided the
following summary of the $30 million banking initiative:

"These lines
will serve as valuable tools in drug discovery and will be available
to researchers worldwide. The Tissue Collection RFA No. 12-02 will
fund clinicians and other scientists to identify, recruit and consent
sufficient numbers of affected individuals within a disease
population so as to effectively represent the disease’s
manifestations. Tissues will be collected and appropriate clinical,
medical or diagnostic information, will be obtained to enable
informed discovery of disease-related phenotypes and drug development
activities using hiPSC-based models. These tissue samples will be
provided (without charge) to the recipient of the CIRM hiPSC
Derivation Award (RFA No. 12-03) for the production of the hiPSC
lines. Once derived, characterized and released, the lines will be
deposited in the CIRM hiPSC bank funded under RFA No. 12-04."

Specific addresses
for the public meeting locations can be found on the agenda.

Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Researcher Alert: First Look at Proposed Rules for California’s Stem Cell Bank


The California
stem cell agency today unveiled initial details of how it plans to
run its $30 million bank of reprogrammed adult stem cells.

The proposed
regulations are the first step this year in the $3 billion agency's
project to make IPS cells available worldwide at low cost. It is part
of an effort to stimulate the science and develop commercial cures by
removing research roadblocks.
As Amy Adams,
CIRM's communications manager wrote earlier this year on the agency's research blog,

"One way for CIRM to accelerate research is by creating more of a library system
for stem cells – except we don’t want the cells back."

The agency expects
to issue its first RFA next month in the stem cell banking initiative, which consists of three grant rounds to be approved by
the CIRM board no later than Feburary of next year.

To clear the way
for the first round, CIRM plans to revise its IP regulations to
ensure that they don't hamper the distribution of stem cells in its bank and their wide use.  The revisions will come before the CIRM directors'
IP/Industry Subcommittee next Tuesday. The six-member panel is
co-chaired by co-chaired by Stephen Juelsgaard, former executive vice
president of Genentech, and Duane Roth, CEO of Connect in San Diego,
a nonprofit that supports tech and life sciences entrepreneuers.
Sites where the public can participate in the meeting will be
available in San Francisco, La Jolla, Los Angeles and two in Irvine.
Under the new IP rules, CIRM will retain ownership of the cells in its bank instead
of the grantee, as the current IP rules state.
In a memo to
directors, Elona Baum, general counsel for the agency, said,

"This permits
CIRM to have complete control of this valuable resource and is
consistent with the practice of NIH’s Center for Regenerative
Medicine
which is also creating a repository for iPSC lines and
derived materials."

Baum also said,

"The (current) IP
regulations were drafted to address conventional drug discovery
activities and did not contemplate creation of a comprehensive
repository of cell lines intended for broad distribution. As a
result, the IP regulations contain a number of provisions which are
either not applicable or worse could impede the success of the hiPSC
bank. For instance, IP regulations permit the exclusive licensing of
CIRM funded inventions and technology. This would be
counterproductive to the goals of the hiPSC repository which are
predicated on wide spread access."

Baum provided the
following summary of the $30 million banking initiative:

"These lines
will serve as valuable tools in drug discovery and will be available
to researchers worldwide. The Tissue Collection RFA No. 12-02 will
fund clinicians and other scientists to identify, recruit and consent
sufficient numbers of affected individuals within a disease
population so as to effectively represent the disease’s
manifestations. Tissues will be collected and appropriate clinical,
medical or diagnostic information, will be obtained to enable
informed discovery of disease-related phenotypes and drug development
activities using hiPSC-based models. These tissue samples will be
provided (without charge) to the recipient of the CIRM hiPSC
Derivation Award (RFA No. 12-03) for the production of the hiPSC
lines. Once derived, characterized and released, the lines will be
deposited in the CIRM hiPSC bank funded under RFA No. 12-04."

Specific addresses
for the public meeting locations can be found on the agenda.

Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

ACT and CIRM Together on Eye Research Webinar


Executives of Advanced Cell Technology,
which has been repeatedly rejected for funding by the $3 billion
California stem cell agency, will participate this week in the agency's Internet "webinar" on research involving the human eye.
ACT, which is engaged in the only hESC
clinical trial in the nation, was held up earlier this month (see
here and here) at an Institute of Medicine hearing as a prime example
of the California's agency's failure to fund the stem cell industry
in any significant way.
Gary Rabin, CEO of ACT
Nonetheless, three ACT execs are scheduled to be online for the CIRM session on Wednesday: Gary Rabin, the CEO of
ACT; Matthew Vincent, director of business development, and Edmund
Mickunas
, vice president of regulatory affairs. The webinar will deal with regulatory issues
with the FDA and clinical trials involving the eye.
Also on the panel are Samuel Barone,
medical officer with the FDA, and Mark Humayun, professor of
opthamology at USC, who is the PI on a $16 million macular
degeneration grant from CIRM.
So what is the significance of ACT's
participation in the CIRM event? If the relationship between ACT and
CIRM has been touchy, this sort of cooperation is probably a good
sign for both. For one, CIRM could have hardly staged the webinar
without ACT, given the subject matter. But if the agency did not
want to engage ACT, it could have simply done nothing about setting
up a webinar in which the firm would participate.
Does this mean that ACT is going to
receive a handsome grant or loan from CIRM? CIRM has established
procedures (RFAs, peer review, etc.) for approval of funding, and ACT
would have to go through that process unless CIRM does something very
unusual.
Wednesday's event is aimed at researchers and
is likely to be technical. Persons interested in taking part must
register in advance.

Source:
http://californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Freezing Parkinson's in its tracks

Public release date: 2-May-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: George Hunka ghunka@aftau.org 212-742-9070 American Friends of Tel Aviv University

Parkinson's disease, a disorder which affects movement and cognition, affects over a million Americans, including actor Michael J. Fox, who first brought it to the attention of many TV-watching Americans. It's characterized by a gradual loss of neurons that produce dopamine. Mutations in the gene known as DJ-1 lead to accelerated loss of dopaminergic neurons and result in the onset of Parkinson's symptoms at a young age.

The ability to modify the activity of DJ-1 could change the progress of the disease, says Dr. Nirit Lev, a researcher at Tel Aviv University's Sackler Faculty of Medicine and a movement disorders specialist at Rabin Medical Center. Working in collaboration with Profs. Dani Offen and Eldad Melamed, Dr. Lev has now developed a peptide which mimics DJ-1's normal function, thereby protecting dopamine- producing neurons. What's more, the peptide can be easily delivered by daily injections or absorbed into the skin through an adhesive patch.

Based on a short protein derived from DJ-1 itself, the peptide has been shown to freeze neurodegeneration in its tracks, reducing problems with mobility and leading to greater protection of neurons and higher dopamine levels in the brain. Dr. Lev says that this method, which has been published in a number of journals including the Journal of Neural Transmission, could be developed as a preventative therapy.

Guarding dopamine levels

As we age, we naturally lose dopamine-producing neurons. Parkinson's patients experience a rapid loss of these neurons from the onset of the disease, leading to much more drastic deficiencies in dopamine than the average person. Preserving dopamine-producing neurons can mean the difference between living life as a Parkinson's patient or aging normally, says Dr. Lev.

The researchers set out to develop a therapy based on the protective effects of DJ-1, using a short peptide based on the healthy version of DJ-1 itself as a vehicle. "We attached the DJ-1-related peptide to another peptide that would allow it to enter the cells, and be carried to the brain," explains Dr. Lev.

In pre-clinical trials, the treatment was tested on mice utilizing well-established toxic and genetic models for Parkinson's disease. From both a behavioral and biochemical standpoint, the mice that received the peptide treatment showed remarkable improvement. Symptoms such as mobility dysfunctions were reduced significantly, and researchers noted the preservation of dopamine-producing neurons and higher dopamine levels in the brain.

Preliminary tests indicate that the peptide is a viable treatment option. Though many peptides have a short life span and degrade quickly, this peptide does not. Additionally, it provides a safe treatment option because peptides are organic to the body itself.

Read more here:
Freezing Parkinson's in its tracks

Freezing Parkinson’s in its tracks

Public release date: 2-May-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: George Hunka ghunka@aftau.org 212-742-9070 American Friends of Tel Aviv University

Parkinson's disease, a disorder which affects movement and cognition, affects over a million Americans, including actor Michael J. Fox, who first brought it to the attention of many TV-watching Americans. It's characterized by a gradual loss of neurons that produce dopamine. Mutations in the gene known as DJ-1 lead to accelerated loss of dopaminergic neurons and result in the onset of Parkinson's symptoms at a young age.

The ability to modify the activity of DJ-1 could change the progress of the disease, says Dr. Nirit Lev, a researcher at Tel Aviv University's Sackler Faculty of Medicine and a movement disorders specialist at Rabin Medical Center. Working in collaboration with Profs. Dani Offen and Eldad Melamed, Dr. Lev has now developed a peptide which mimics DJ-1's normal function, thereby protecting dopamine- producing neurons. What's more, the peptide can be easily delivered by daily injections or absorbed into the skin through an adhesive patch.

Based on a short protein derived from DJ-1 itself, the peptide has been shown to freeze neurodegeneration in its tracks, reducing problems with mobility and leading to greater protection of neurons and higher dopamine levels in the brain. Dr. Lev says that this method, which has been published in a number of journals including the Journal of Neural Transmission, could be developed as a preventative therapy.

Guarding dopamine levels

As we age, we naturally lose dopamine-producing neurons. Parkinson's patients experience a rapid loss of these neurons from the onset of the disease, leading to much more drastic deficiencies in dopamine than the average person. Preserving dopamine-producing neurons can mean the difference between living life as a Parkinson's patient or aging normally, says Dr. Lev.

The researchers set out to develop a therapy based on the protective effects of DJ-1, using a short peptide based on the healthy version of DJ-1 itself as a vehicle. "We attached the DJ-1-related peptide to another peptide that would allow it to enter the cells, and be carried to the brain," explains Dr. Lev.

In pre-clinical trials, the treatment was tested on mice utilizing well-established toxic and genetic models for Parkinson's disease. From both a behavioral and biochemical standpoint, the mice that received the peptide treatment showed remarkable improvement. Symptoms such as mobility dysfunctions were reduced significantly, and researchers noted the preservation of dopamine-producing neurons and higher dopamine levels in the brain.

Preliminary tests indicate that the peptide is a viable treatment option. Though many peptides have a short life span and degrade quickly, this peptide does not. Additionally, it provides a safe treatment option because peptides are organic to the body itself.

Read more here:
Freezing Parkinson's in its tracks

Soon, therapy to freeze Parkinson's in its tracks

Washington, May 3 : Researchers are developing a preventive therapy to halt symptoms in Parkinson's patients.

Parkinson's disease is characterized by a gradual loss of neurons that produce dopamine. Mutations in the gene known as DJ-1 lead to accelerated loss of dopaminergic neurons and result in the onset of Parkinson's symptoms at a young age.

The ability to modify the activity of DJ-1 could change the progress of the disease, said Dr. Nirit Lev, a researcher at Tel Aviv University's Sackler Faculty of Medicine and a movement disorders specialist at Rabin Medical Center.

Working in collaboration with Profs. Dani Offen and Eldad Melamed, Dr. Lev has now developed a peptide which mimics DJ-1's normal function, thereby protecting dopamine- producing neurons. What's more, the peptide can be easily delivered by daily injections or absorbed into the skin through an adhesive patch.

Based on a short protein derived from DJ-1 itself, the peptide has been shown to freeze neurodegeneration in its tracks, reducing problems with mobility and leading to greater protection of neurons and higher dopamine levels in the brain.

Dr. Lev said that this method could be developed as a preventative therapy.

As we age, we naturally lose dopamine-producing neurons. Parkinson's patients experience a rapid loss of these neurons from the onset of the disease, leading to much more drastic deficiencies in dopamine than the average person.

Preserving dopamine-producing neurons can mean the difference between living life as a Parkinson's patient or aging normally, said Dr. Lev.

The researchers set out to develop a therapy based on the protective effects of DJ-1, using a short peptide based on the healthy version of DJ-1 itself as a vehicle.

'We attached the DJ-1-related peptide to another peptide that would allow it to enter the cells, and be carried to the brain,' explained Dr. Lev.

Continue reading here:
Soon, therapy to freeze Parkinson's in its tracks

Soon, therapy to freeze Parkinson’s in its tracks

Washington, May 3 : Researchers are developing a preventive therapy to halt symptoms in Parkinson's patients.

Parkinson's disease is characterized by a gradual loss of neurons that produce dopamine. Mutations in the gene known as DJ-1 lead to accelerated loss of dopaminergic neurons and result in the onset of Parkinson's symptoms at a young age.

The ability to modify the activity of DJ-1 could change the progress of the disease, said Dr. Nirit Lev, a researcher at Tel Aviv University's Sackler Faculty of Medicine and a movement disorders specialist at Rabin Medical Center.

Working in collaboration with Profs. Dani Offen and Eldad Melamed, Dr. Lev has now developed a peptide which mimics DJ-1's normal function, thereby protecting dopamine- producing neurons. What's more, the peptide can be easily delivered by daily injections or absorbed into the skin through an adhesive patch.

Based on a short protein derived from DJ-1 itself, the peptide has been shown to freeze neurodegeneration in its tracks, reducing problems with mobility and leading to greater protection of neurons and higher dopamine levels in the brain.

Dr. Lev said that this method could be developed as a preventative therapy.

As we age, we naturally lose dopamine-producing neurons. Parkinson's patients experience a rapid loss of these neurons from the onset of the disease, leading to much more drastic deficiencies in dopamine than the average person.

Preserving dopamine-producing neurons can mean the difference between living life as a Parkinson's patient or aging normally, said Dr. Lev.

The researchers set out to develop a therapy based on the protective effects of DJ-1, using a short peptide based on the healthy version of DJ-1 itself as a vehicle.

'We attached the DJ-1-related peptide to another peptide that would allow it to enter the cells, and be carried to the brain,' explained Dr. Lev.

Continue reading here:
Soon, therapy to freeze Parkinson's in its tracks