Tag Archives: swiss

Scientists Check Whether Space Telescope Could Detect Life on Earth – Futurism

Posted on by

A pretty smart reality check! Planet Here

We have some truly epic news.

There is indeed life on Earth.

A team of American and European scientists have confirmed this not-so-surprising observation after they simulated the workings of a proposed space telescope, and then focused the telescope on Earth, treating it like a distant exoplanet to see if the instrument could pick up evidence of life.

In this kind-of-round-about way, the scientists can estimate the future performance of the space telescope, called LIFE or Large Interferometer For Exoplanets, when it's deployed into space to search for exoplanets that are similar to our own.

The scientists detailed the findings in a study published in The Astronomical Journal. Currently, there is no exact date when the LIFE telescope being overseen by the Swiss university ETH Zrich would start getting built, but this paper at least shows that its ambitions are viable.

The scientists created a synthetic version of Earth and had a simulated version of the telescope examine it for "biosignatures," or chemicals in the atmosphere that would indicate life such as nitrous oxide and methylated halogens.

"[T]hese biogenic gases is most consistent with a productive global photosynthetic biosphere," the scientists write.

The LIFE telescope, which would actually be made up of five satellites working in tandem, would operate by picking up infrared radiation in exoplanets' atmosphere. From this raw data, scientists hope they'd be able to calculate the chemical composition of the exoplanets' atmosphere.

The ultimate goal of the ambitious project is to study in further detail 30 to 50 exoplanets that are of similar size to Earth and see if there's is any glimmer of life in their atmospheres. Astronomers will be focusing their search on systems that are at most 65 light years away from us.

If LIFE is indeed deployed, it may go a long way towards answering one of the universe's biggest mysteries: are we alone?

More on space telescopes: James Webb Spots "Extremely Red" Black Hole

See the rest here:

Scientists Check Whether Space Telescope Could Detect Life on Earth - Futurism

Patients’ perceptions and practices of informing relatives: a qualitative study within a randomised trial on healthcare … – Nature.com

Posted on by

Prince AE, Cadigan RJ, Henderson GE, Evans JP, Adams M, Coker-Schwimmer E. et al. Is there evidence that we should screen the general population for Lynch syndrome with genetic testing? A systematic review. Pharmacogenomics Pers Med.2017;10:4960.

CAS Google Scholar

Nelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, Haney E, Holmes R. Risk Assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Jama. 2019;322:66685.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Monahan KJ, Bradshaw N, Dolwani S, Desouza B, Dunlop MG, East JE, et al. Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG). Gut. 2020;69:41144.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Young AL, Imran A, Spoelma MJ, Williams R, Tucker KM, Halliday J, et al. Proband-mediated interventions to increase disclosure of genetic risk in families with a BRCA or Lynch syndrome condition: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023;31:1834.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ahsan MD, Levi SR, Webster EM, Bergeron H, Lin J, Narayan P, et al. Do people with hereditary cancer syndromes inform their at-risk relatives? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PEC Innov. 2023;2:100138.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gaff CL, Collins V, Symes T, Halliday J. Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands perceptions. J Genet Couns. 2005;14:13340.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Frey MK, Ahsan MD, Bergeron H, Lin J, Li X, Fowlkes RK, et al. Cascade testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: should we move toward direct relative contact? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:412943.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Menko FH, van der Velden SL, Griffioen DN, Ait Moha D, Jeanson KN, Hogervorst FBL, et al. Does a proactive procedure lead to a higher uptake of predictive testing in families with a pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 variant? A family cancer clinic evaluation. J Genet Couns. 2023 [Internet]. Aug 21. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37605508.

National clinical guidelines of breast cancer management [Internet]. Confederation of Regional Cancer Centres in Sweden. [cited 2023 Sept 10]. Available from: https://kunskapsbanken.cancercentrum.se/diagnoser/brostcancer/vardprogram/.

National clinical guidelines of colorectal cancer management [Internet]. Confederation of Regional Cancer Centres in Sweden. [cited 2023 Sept 10]. Available from: https://kunskapsbanken.cancercentrum.se/diagnoser/tjock-och-andtarmscancer/vardprogram/.

Hawranek C, Ehrencrona H, Ofverholm A, Hellquist BN, Rosen A. Direct letters to relatives at risk of hereditary cancer-study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial of healthcare-assisted versus family-mediated risk disclosure at Swedish cancer genetics clinics (DIRECT-study). Trials. 2023;24:810.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport, Exerc Health. 2019;11:58997.

Article Google Scholar

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77101.

Article Google Scholar

Forrest K, Simpson SA, Wilson BJ, van Teijlingen ER, McKee L, Haites N, et al. To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clin Genet. 2003;64:31726.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gaff CL, Clarke AJ, Atkinson P, Sivell S, Elwyn G, Iredale R, et al. Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15:9991011.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

McGarragle KM, Hare C, Holter S, Facey DA, McShane K, Gallinger S, et al. Examining intrafamilial communication of colorectal cancer risk status to family members and kin responses to colonoscopy: a qualitative study. Hered Cancer Clin Pr. 2019;17:16.

Article Google Scholar

Henrikson NB, Blasi P, Figueroa Gray M, Tiffany BT, Scrol A, Ralston JD, et al. Patient and family preferences on health system-led direct contact for cascade screening. J Pers Med. 2021;11:538.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Pedrazzani C, Aceti M, Schweighoffer R, Kaiser-Grolimund A, Brki N, Chappuis PO, et al. The communication chain of genetic risk: analyses of narrative data exploring probandprovider and probandfamily communication in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. J Pers Med. 2022;12:1249.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Srinivasan S, Won NY, Dotson WD, Wright ST, Roberts MC. Barriers and facilitators for cascade testing in genetic conditions: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28:163144.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Daly MB. Family communication of genetic risk: a personalized approach. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2016;4:3540.

Article Google Scholar

Finn KS, Pacyna J, Azevedo Tsou C, Jewel Samadder N, Sharp R. Patient-reported anticipated barriers and benefits to sharing cancer genetic risk information with family members. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30:5361.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Srinivasan S, Hampel H, Leeman J, Patel A, Kulchak Rahm A, Reuland DS, et al. Stakeholder perspectives on overcoming barriers to cascade testing in Lynch syndrome: a qualitative study. Cancer Prev Res. 2020;13:103746.

Article Google Scholar

Ballard LM, Band R, Lucassen AM. Interventions to support patients with sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives: a synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM). Eur J Hum Genet. 2023;31:9881002.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Mendes A, Paneque M, Sousa L, Clarke A, Sequeiros J. How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:31525.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Vos J, Menko F, Jansen AM, van Asperen CJ, Stiggelbout AM, Tibben A. A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives. Fam Cancer. 2011;10:8796.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Jacobs C, Dancyger C, Smith JA, Michie S. Accuracy of recall of information about a cancer-predisposing BRCA1/2 gene mutation among patients and relatives. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23:14751.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

van den Heuvel LM, Hoedemaekers YM, Baas AF, Baars MJH, van Tintelen JP, Smets EMA, et al. A tailored approach to informing relatives at risk of inherited cardiac conditions: results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30:20310.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Jacobs C, Patch C, Michie S. Communication about genetic testing with breast and ovarian cancer patients: a scoping review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27:51124.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

van den Heuvel LM, Smets EMA, van Tintelen JP, Christiaans I. How to inform relatives at risk of hereditary diseases? A mixed-methods systematic review on patient attitudes. J Genet Couns. 2019;28:104258.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Eijzenga W, de Geus E, Aalfs CM, Menko FH, Sijmons RH, de Haes H, et al. How to support cancer genetics counselees in informing at-risk relatives? Lessons from a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101:16119.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Pedrazzani C, Ming C, Burki N, Caiata-Zufferey M, Chappuis PO, Duquette D, et al. Genetic literacy and communication of genetic information in families concerned with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a cross-study comparison in two countries and within a timeframe of more than 10 years. Cancers. 2021;13:6254.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Paul J, Metcalfe S, Stirling L, Wilson B, Hodgson J. Analyzing communication in genetic consultations-a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:1533.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Henrikson NB, Blasi PR, Fullerton SM, Grafton J, Leppig KA, Jarvik GP, et al. It would be so much easier: health system-led genetic risk notification-feasibility and acceptability of cascade screening in an integrated system. J Community Genet. 2019;10:46170.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Lucassen A. Is this knowledge mine and nobody elses? I dont feel that. Patient views about consent, confidentiality and information-sharing in genetic medicine. J Med Eth. 2016;42:1749.

Article Google Scholar

Tam NT, Huy NT, Thoa le TB, Long NP, Trang NT, Hirayama K, et al. Participants understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93:18698H.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Blasi PR, Scrol A, Anderson ML, Gray MF, Tiffany B, Fullerton SM, et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and limited efficacy of health system-led familial risk notification: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022;8:174.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kim S, Aceti M, Baroutsou V, Burki N, Caiata-Zufferey M, Cattaneo M, et al. Using a Tailored Digital Health Intervention for family communication and cascade genetic testing in Swiss and Korean families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: protocol for the DIALOGUE study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021;10:e26264.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Siglen E, Vetti HH, Augestad M, Steen VM, Lunde A, Bjorvatn C. Evaluation of the Rosa chatbot providing genetic information to patients at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e46571.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Read more from the original source:

Patients' perceptions and practices of informing relatives: a qualitative study within a randomised trial on healthcare ... - Nature.com

A week into 2024 and Big Tech has earned enough to pay off all 2023 fines – TechRadar

Posted on by

2023 surely was an eventful year in tech. To cite just a few key moments, generative AI became mainstream thanks to software like ChatGPT; we had to say goodbye to the iconic blue bird while welcoming Twitter's new name (I know very well the pain of writing 'X, formerly known as Twitter' over the past six months); and big tech companies got fined the most under GDPR's data abuses for a total of more than $3 billion.

Well, on the latter point, data protection regulators' efforts turned out to be not as effective as it was hoped they'd be.

Swiss privacy firm behind popular email and VPN service, Proton reported that only after a week into 2024 the likes of Meta, Google, Apple and Microsoft earned enough to pay off all last year's fines. Let's take a look at what needs to change and, most importantly, what you can do in the meantime to truly protect your privacy.

"Whats clear is that these fines, though they appear to be a huge amount of money, in reality are just a drop in the ocean when it comes to the revenues that the tech giants are making. In other words, they arent a deterrent at all," Jurgita Miseviciute, Head of Public Policy & Government Affairs at Proton, told me.

Researchers at Proton have calculated that Alphabet (Google's parent company) needs only a bit more than a day to pay off its $941 million fines. Amazon and Apple's earnings of just a few hours are then enough to repay their data protection's sanctions of $111.7 and $186.4 million respectively.

While biggest data abuse perpetrator Meta, which got a record $1.3bn fine for its (mis)handling of EU user data in May last year, managed to accumulate all the necessary money in just about five working days.

These findings make it clear that data regulators' fines, as founder and CEO of Proton Andy Yen put it, are "little more than pocket change for these companies" instead of a mean to stop them abusing users' data. Not only that, he said, as "these minuscule fines essentially give the green light to tech giants to run riot in a marketplace skewed in their favor."

It's also quite common that big tech firms might appeal to these sanctions or simply refuse to pay, delaying the repayment for years. Take how Google contested India's fine, for instance, about the Android-related inquiry for abusing its dominant position in the market which started in 2019.

On this point, Yen said: "Its the average consumer that's losing outfacing higher prices, less choice, and no privacy. It has to stop and we need real, tangible change that puts people first, not profits."

According to Miseviciute, there are two main things that must happen for things to really change.

Did you know?

Fully enforced in May 2023, the EU Digital Market Act (DMA) brought new obligations for tech companies to ensure fair competition and protect people's digital rights. A similar bill, so-called Digital Markets, Consumer and Competition Bill (DMCC) is currently passing through the UK Parliament, too.

For starters, she believes that governments have to issue fines with a real financial effect in order to fight back against big monopolies.

"Thats why fines up to even 20% of global revenues for breaches of laws such as the EUs DMA [Digital Market Act] and up to 10% in case of the proposed DMCC [Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers] Bill in the UK are a step in the right direction," she told me.

If heavier sanctions are important, they are not everything. Miseviciute explained that regulators need to combine these with practical measures such as enforced behavioral and structural changes, for example.

Again, she sees the EU quite well-placed to do so due to the new powers gained with the DMA. However, elsewhere there are also some small steps in this direction.

"We hope Googles antitrust trial in the US serves as a catalyst for comprehensive antitrust regulation on the other side of the Atlantic. We also see promising potential regulatory developments in South Korea, Japan, Australia and other major jurisdictions," she told me.

"If you open up the marketplace, and you give innovators like Proton a chance to succeed, youll get solutions that are more private and more secure for consumers."

As we have seen, 2023 was yet another hard year for our online privacy.

The US, for instance, still lacks a federal data protection law with the proposed ADPPA being stalled at the time of writing. Enforced in August last year, India's new privacy law was strongly criticized for favoring government and big tech instead of citizens. Well, where allegedly strong legislations are in place like in the EU, these seem to have not enough teeth just yet.

Commenting on this point, Miseviciute told me: "Until laws like the DMA in the EU and the proposed DMCC in the UK are effectively put into practice we are living in a world where big tech rules the internetand all our privacy is at the mercy of their surveillance capitalism business model."

Did you know?

Two thirds of people in the UK would rather lose their passport than access to their email account. Yet, despite these concerns, most of them lack the necessary knowledge and tools to protect their digital privacy. Big Tech knows that, researchers revealed.

The glimpse of light in this gloomy scenario is that it's ultimately our choice if we want to keep using data-hungry products. Luckily, there are some smaller companies offering privacy-first alternatives you can switch to.

On its part, Proton appear to have been working hard to cut Google out of our digital life. Likewise the popular service, the Swiss-based provider offers an encrypted email service Proton Mail (which even beat the big tech giant by landing with a standalone desktop app in December), secure calendar and its own cloud storage Proton Drive, too.

Proton's product offering also includes one of the best virtual private network apps on the market (Proton VPN) to help you boosting your anonymity while browsing among other things, as well as a password manager tool (Proton Pass) to secure all your login details. Even better as all the provider's services come both with free and paid plans.

However, Proton is just one of the many companies developing privacy-first alternatives to big tech software. Worth a mention there are also encrypted messaging app Signal if you wish to replace WhatsApp with a more secure application and Mullvad browser to make the switch from Safari and Chrome.

Compare today's best overall VPNs

We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.

See the original post:

A week into 2024 and Big Tech has earned enough to pay off all 2023 fines - TechRadar