The Oxford English Dictionary identifies the first appearance of the term post-human as Maurice Parmelees 1916 Poverty and Social Progress. In a section entitled Eugenic Measures and the Prevention of Poverty, Parmelee, a sociologist, wrote:
But even though it is not possible, at present at any rate, to do much to improve the quality of the human stock by eugenic means, it is interesting and profitable to consider what would be the result if socially undesirable types could be eliminated entirely or in large part . . . . [But] it is evident, in the first place, that it is inconceivable that human nature could be changed to the extent that is contemplated by [the] theory of perfectibility. Such changes would bring into being an animal no longer human, or for that matter mammalian, in its character, for it would involve the elimination of such fundamental human and mammalian instincts and emotions as anger, jealousy, fear, etc. But even if such a post-human animal did come into existence, it is difficult to believe that it could carry on the necessary economic activities without using a certain amount of formal organization, compulsion, etc.[i]
Parmelees passage identifies several important issues that run throughout the lexicographical history of the term post-human into the present day. In answering What is the post-human? a corollary set of questions arise: Are we already post-human or is post-humanism permanently stuck in the future? At what point does a human stop being a human? What is the relationship between humans and animals? Does scientific advancement necessarily improve the human condition, or ought we limit it? If our social configurations (states, laws, families) are predicated on human nature, what happens to that order when we alter our nature? These inquiries stretch across disciplines from physics to anthropology, but they coalesce over the figure of the post-human. I would like to outline how three major thinkersN. Katherine Hayles, Jean-Franois Lyotard, and Jrgen Habermashave contributed to our understanding of the post-human. Speaking from different backgrounds and fields of study, Hayles, Lyotard, and Habermas each provide a unique perspective of the post-human, establishing multiple points of consensus and disagreement.
I: Hayles
We can infer much from the title of N. Katherine Hayles seminal book How We Became Posthuman: taken literally, the past-tense became connotes that the transformation from human to post-human has already occurred. But Hayles notes the multiple ironies of her title, since her thesis is more complex than That was then, this is now.[ii] Her argument is that human subjectivity is always historically specific: the changes [from human to post-human] were never complete transformations or sharp breaks; without exception, they reinscribed traditional ideas and assumptions even as they articulated something new.[iii] In other words, an element of or precondition for the post-human has always been among us (or more accurately, in us)hence, her title. People become posthuman because they think they are posthuman, not simply because they use dishwashers, the internet, or genetic engineering.[iv]
But Hayles does not deny that a real shift is taking place. Hayles impetus for her research was the 20th centurys articulation, by science fiction authors and cyberneticists like Norbert Weiner, that a great new epoch could be reached with the arrival of conscious computers, cyborgs, robots, and other variations of post-human beings which could finally separate mind from matter. She opens her essay Visualizing the Posthuman with the claim that, no longer a cloud on the horizon, the posthuman is rapidly becoming an everyday reality through physical prostheses, genetic engineering, and digital and artificial environments, all of which are necessary, but not sufficient, elements of post-humanity. [v] It is not that such technologies create the post-human object; rather, they allow for the possibility of a post-human subject. Thus, [o]ne cannot ask whether information technologies should continue to be developed. Given market forces already at work, it is virtually certain that we will increasingly live, work, and play in environments that construct as embodied virtualities.[vi]
Hayles elaborates her thesis by examining the practices of reading and writing within the digital media environment. For Hayles, the computer and digital technology have created the conditions for new conceptions of identity and subjectivity that demarcate the post-human era. In contrast to the pre-modern oral subject (fluid, changing, situational, dispersed) and the modern written subject (fixed, coherent, stable, self-identical), the postmodern virtual subject can be described as post-human because its subjectivity is formed through dynamical interfaces with computers:
The physics of virtual writing illustrates how our perceptions change when we work with computers on a daily basis. We do not need to have software sockets inserted into our heads to become cyborgs. We already are cyborgs in the sense that we experience, through the integration of our bodily perceptions and motions with computer architectures and topologies, a changed sense of subjectivity.[vii]
For Hayles the central issue in post-humanism is whether the body is superfluous: Should the body be seen as evolutionary baggage that we are about to toss out as we vault into the brave new world of the posthuman? she asks.[viii] In its philosophy and practice, the modern age sought to separate mind from body. It is only on that premise, Hayles argues, that we could conceive of discarding the body while keeping the mind, as many utopian/dystopian fictions describe, in scenarios predicting the downloading of brain matter. Instead, Hayles says our minds are bound up with our bodies, irrevocably: there is an inextricable intertwining of body with mind . . . . We are the medium, and the medium is us.[ix]
Thus, Hayles conception of the post-human is marked by two characteristics: it is not a sharp or radical break, but is a historically specific conception of subjectivity, just as Enlightenment humanism was. Because of this, the full-blown post-humanism of science fiction is necessarily incomplete: we can never completely isolate the mind and discard the body. Hence, the future is not pre-determined, neither as a positivist utopia with minimal labor, or as apocalyptic dystopia of human oppression: Technologies do not develop on their own. People develop them, and people can be guided to better or worse decisions through deliberation and politics.[x] Hayles goal is not to recuperate the liberal subject.[xi] Such a fantasy, she notes, was a conception that may have applied at best to that fraction of humanity who had the wealth power and leisure to conceptualize themselves as autonomous beings exercising their will through agency and choice.[xii] The post-human is, for better or worse, here: but it does not really mean the end of humanity. It signals instead the end of a certain conception of the human.[xiii]
II: Lyotard
Perhaps most poignant image of the post-human emerges from a thought experiment conducted by Jean-Franois Lyotard in his text The Inhumane. There, Lyotard asks, what happens when the sun explodes, as scientists tell us it will, in 4.5 billion years? It will surely mean the destruction of the planet. For Lyotard, this scenario is the prerequisite for post-humanity, and consequently, the only one worth philosophizing about as the sole serious question to face humanity today.[xiv] Even a world destroyed by nuclear weaponry does not suffice to create the post-human:
[A] human warleave[s] behind it a devastated human world, dehumanized, but with nonetheless at least a single survivor, someone to tell the story of whats left, to write it down . . . . But in what remains after the solar explosion, there wont be any humanness, there wont be living creatures, there wont be intelligent, sensitive, sentient earthlings to bear witness to it, since they and their earthly horizon will have been consumed.[xv]
Lyotards post-human is thus grounded not in the transcendence of certain human capabilities or features, like Parmelees emotions or Hayles digital subjectivity, but on a fundamental altering of the world as we have ever known it. For Lyotard, such a universe cannot even be thought ofbecause to grasp it in our minds still taints it with the trace of humanity. The universal apocalypse must remain unthought: if theres [total] death, then theres no thought. Negation without remainder. No self to make sense of it. Pure event. Disaster.[xvi]
But this does not mean we must take the attitude of Epicurus, referenced by Lyotard to stand for those who preach to only augment ones own worldly happiness. In a tone of urgency, Lyotard suggests that we must make way for the coming of the post-human. What is at stake in every field from genetics to particle physics is how to make thought without a body possible . . . . That clearly means finding for the body a nutrient that owes nothing to the bio-chemical components synthesized on the surface of the earth through the use of solar energy. Or: learning to effect these syntheses in other places than on earth.[xvii] Lyotard expresses nostalgia about this inevitability, concluding that we must say to ourselves . . . we shall go on.[xviii] This serves as the impetus for his exegeses on aesthetics and art, whose etchings and engravings capture the last vestiges of humanity, as he affirms: let us at least bear witness, and again, and for no-one.[xix] The possibility of a witness implies the possibility of a human. Thus, Lyotard presents a radicalized vision of the post-human as an essentially alien thing, even suggesting that the post-human condition is beyond the scope of our imaginations. The post-human is not a half-man, half-robot: he has no attachment to the earth whatsoever.
III: Habermas
A staunch defender of the unfinished modern project of human freedom, liberal philosopher Jrgen Habermas The Future of Human Nature speaks directly to the concerns raised by Parmelee on improving the stock of man. Habermas starting point is 1973, when the human genome was cracked. This scientific advance has allowed for embryo research and a liberal eugenics of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, which can manipulate an embryos eventual gender among other capabilities.[xx] Habermas believes developments of biology call into question our natural idea of the human being, and consequently, our laws, societal organization, nuclear families, and even philosophies. Mankind has hitherto taken birth (roughly) as a given fact of the world, meaning we make the assumption that the genetic endowment of the newborn infant, and thus the initial organic conditions for its future life history, lay beyond any programming and deliberate manipulation on the part of other persons.[xxi] However, modern technology is obliterating the boundary between persons and things because the embryo becomes subject to design, like any other object or commodity. [xxii] For the first time, the human species can take its biological evolution into its own hands. The post-human corresponds to the reversal of Jean Paul Sartres humanism, whose sloganexistence precedes essenceis now definitively called into question: now, a decision on existence or nonexistence is taken in view of the potential essence.[xxiii]
Because new technologies are regulated by supply and demand[xxiv] they leave the goals of gene-modifying interventions to the individual preferences of market participants.[xxv] But Habermas thinks merely intervening in the market through legislation cannot resolve the underlying conflict: Legislative interventions restricting the freedom of biological research and banning the advances of genetic engineering seem but a vain attempt to set oneself against the dominant tendency.[xxvi] Genetic technologies have obvious upsides that justify their application, like the eradication of debilitating genetic disorders. But the question is whether the instrumentalization of human nature changes the ethical self-understanding of the species in such a way that we may no longer see ourselves as ethically free and morally equal beings guided by norms and reasons.[xxvii] The strange science fiction accounts of humans being improved by chip implants is for Habermas only an exaggeration of an already present reality.[xxviii] Because genetic modification occurs before the moment of consciousness, subjects have no way of knowing that their characteristics were, to some degree, designed for them. In other words, the salient point for Habermas is the anti-democratic nature of the post-human: there is no choice of a red or blue pill, to use the famous scene from The Matrix.
Thus, in the post-human, Habermas sees the fate of the enlightenment project of freedom. While he does not clearly mark the threshold between human and object, his conception of the post-human is one where humans are not free to create themselves, connecting the human with the philosophy of humanism. In the mold of the Enlightenment philosophers, Habermas views humans as self-governing beings with the capacity for reason; new technologies, especially embryonic ones, undermine that modern view, ushering in the post-human.
[i] Parmelee, p. 350.
[ii] Hayles, How We Became Posthuman, p.6
[iii] Hayles, How We Became Posthuman, p. 6.
[iv] Hayles, How We Became Posthuman, p. 6.
[v] Hayles, Visualizing the Posthuman, p. 50.
[vi] Hayles, How We Became Posthuman, p. 48.
[vii] Hayles, Condition of Virtuality, p. 12.
[viii] Hayles, Visualizing the Posthuman, p. 50.
[ix] Hayles, Visualizing the Posthuman, p. 54.
[x] Hayles, Condition of Virtuality, p. 14.
[xi] Hayles, How We Became Posthuman, p. 5.
[xii] Hayles, How We Became Posthuman, p. 286.
[xiii] Hayles, How We Became Posthuman, p. 286.
[xiv] Lyotard, The Inhumane, p. 8.
[xv] Lyotard, The Inhumane, p. 10.
[xvi] Lyotard, The Inhumane, p. 11.
[xvii] Lyotard, The Inhumane, p. 14.
[xviii] Lyotard, The Inhumane, p. 105.
[xix] Lyotard, The Inhumane, p. 203.
[xx] Habermas, The Future of Human Nature, p. 43.
[xxi] Habermas, The Future of Human Nature, p. 13.
[xxii] Habermas, The Future of Human Nature, p. 13,
[xxiii] Habermas, The Future of Human Nature, p. 50.
[xxiv] Habermas, The Future of Human Nature, p. 30.
[xxv] Habermas, The Future of Human Nature, p. 19.
[xxvi] Habermas, The Future of Human Nature, p. 25.
[xxvii] Habermas, The Future of Human Nature, p. 40.
[xxviii] Habermas, The Future of Human Nature, p. 41.
WORKS CITED
Habermas, Jrgen. The Future of Human Nature. London: Blackwell, 2003.
Hayles, Katherine N. How We Became Posthuman. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1999.
-Visualizing the Posthuman
-The Condition of Virtuality.
Lyotard, The Inhumane: Reflections on Time. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.
Parmelee, Maurice. Poverty and Social Progess. New York: Macmillan, 1916.
Link:
posthuman | The Chicago School of Media Theory
- The Surprisingly Long History of Auto-Tune, the Vocal-Processing ... - Open Culture - December 3rd, 2023 [December 3rd, 2023]
- Drowning in Potential The Guardsman - The Guardsman Online - December 3rd, 2023 [December 3rd, 2023]
- Portraits of the Posthuman: Jon Rafman and AI | Berlin Art Link - December 26th, 2022 [December 26th, 2022]
- 7 Bio-Artists Who Are Transforming the Fabric of Life Itself - Gizmodo - December 23rd, 2022 [December 23rd, 2022]
- Book giveaway for Posthuman by M.C. Hansen Nov 14-Nov 30, 2022 - December 14th, 2022 [December 14th, 2022]
- Metahuman - Wikipedia - November 23rd, 2022 [November 23rd, 2022]
- More Posthuman Glossary | BibSonomy - November 23rd, 2022 [November 23rd, 2022]
- Paul Shapera Continues The Story Of The Fictional City New Albion In His Latest Concept Album, 'Jill's Psychedelic Sunday' - Broadway World - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Sacred Nature Review: Back to the Garden - The Wall Street Journal - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Harm's Way (band) - Wikipedia - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- Timothy Alberino - Author, Explorer, Filmmaker - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- The Writing Seminars | Princeton Writing Program - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- Five Brilliant Books of Aussie Spec Fic - tor.com - August 23rd, 2022 [August 23rd, 2022]
- The Best Electronic Music on Bandcamp: July 2022 - bandcamp.com - July 27th, 2022 [July 27th, 2022]
- Post-Human NarrativesIn the Name of Scientific Witchery - Announcements - E-Flux - July 27th, 2022 [July 27th, 2022]
- Transhumanism: Savior of humanity or false prophecy? - Big Think - July 27th, 2022 [July 27th, 2022]
- Physicist: Why the Alien Simulation Hypothesis Is Bunk - Discovery Institute - July 13th, 2022 [July 13th, 2022]
- More than 120 titles are coming to Prime Video today (July 1) - Amazon Adviser - July 4th, 2022 [July 4th, 2022]
- Ad agency news you need to know July 1, 2022 - AdAge.com - July 4th, 2022 [July 4th, 2022]
- 'Proof' We're Living In A Computer Simulation, According To TikTok And Elon Musk - YourTango - May 23rd, 2022 [May 23rd, 2022]
- Stranger Things to Obi-Wan Kenobi: the seven best shows to stream this week - The Guardian - May 20th, 2022 [May 20th, 2022]
- 'Ghost in the Shell: SAC_2045 Sustainable War' Ending Explained: Is Togusa compromised? - MEAWW - May 15th, 2022 [May 15th, 2022]
- 'A Baby at Any Cost' on Lifetime: 5 things you didn't know about Sarah Fisher - MEAWW - May 15th, 2022 [May 15th, 2022]
- The Biggest Asian-wide Mobile Game Developer DINO GAME Released A New Version of the Sci-Fi Action-RPG Punishing: Gray Raven - Digital Journal - April 15th, 2022 [April 15th, 2022]
- Sorry Grimes, Your Ex-Boyfriend Won't Save Us - Jacobin magazine - April 11th, 2022 [April 11th, 2022]
- Mapping Memory in the Wake of the Posthuman: India and ... - March 17th, 2022 [March 17th, 2022]
- The rise of robot dogs - Domus - March 15th, 2022 [March 15th, 2022]
- Simulation hypothesis - Wikipedia - March 11th, 2022 [March 11th, 2022]
- Neocolonialism, a History of Death and Richterian Melancholia: the Best Arts and Culture this February - ArtReview - February 5th, 2022 [February 5th, 2022]
- Transcendent (novel) - Wikipedia - January 19th, 2022 [January 19th, 2022]
- A Biohacker Implanted 50 Chips in Their Body to Become ... - January 7th, 2022 [January 7th, 2022]
- Posthuman Ensemble - Announcements - e-flux - December 22nd, 2021 [December 22nd, 2021]
- Stream another new Arca album, KiCK iiii - Treble - Treble - December 3rd, 2021 [December 3rd, 2021]
- The Public Theology of Noreen Herzfeld | Public Theology and Technology - Patheos - December 3rd, 2021 [December 3rd, 2021]
- The War Over Life, Liberty And Privacy Rights: From Abortion To COVID-19 And Beyond OpEd - Eurasia Review - December 3rd, 2021 [December 3rd, 2021]
- The sci-fi thriller on Amazon Prime Video with a big twist at the end - CNET - November 28th, 2021 [November 28th, 2021]
- The Posthuman Dog | MetaFilter - November 23rd, 2021 [November 23rd, 2021]
- Who could dogs become without humans in their lives ... - November 21st, 2021 [November 21st, 2021]
- Into the Metaverse | Samuel D. James - First Things - November 19th, 2021 [November 19th, 2021]
- Why dogs might actually be better off without humans - New York Post - October 26th, 2021 [October 26th, 2021]
- Trees Speak fuse krautrock with post-punk on Vertigo of Flaws - The Vinyl Factory - October 26th, 2021 [October 26th, 2021]
- The vinyl straw: Why the vinyl industry is at breaking point - Mixmag - October 26th, 2021 [October 26th, 2021]
- Apocalypse Yesterday: The Graphic Novel in the Anthropocene (Wednesday, 3rd November 2021) City, University of London - City, University of London - October 21st, 2021 [October 21st, 2021]
- You can only appreciate art when you're not worried about putting food on your plate: Abhay Deol - Times of India - October 3rd, 2021 [October 3rd, 2021]
- Conceptions of God - Wikipedia - September 29th, 2021 [September 29th, 2021]
- Anthropogenic transitions from forested to human-dominated landscapes in southern Macaronesia - pnas.org - September 29th, 2021 [September 29th, 2021]
- AWAY: The Survival Series Glides Onto PC and Console Today - GLYFE Nation - September 29th, 2021 [September 29th, 2021]
- Physicist's Kickstarter To Test Whether We Are Living In A Simulation Raises $236000 - IFLScience - September 16th, 2021 [September 16th, 2021]
- Bring Me the Horizon Wins Grand Prize at Heavy Music Awards 2021 | Music - Pennsylvanianewstoday.com - September 10th, 2021 [September 10th, 2021]
- AI Art: Kolkata Exhibition to Showcase Artworks Created With Assistance of Artificial Intelligence - Gadgets 360 - September 10th, 2021 [September 10th, 2021]
- Mayuri, or The New Human Chelsea Theatre, London - The Reviews Hub - August 14th, 2021 [August 14th, 2021]
- Story-based sugar glider adventure AWAY: The Survival Series is coming to PlayStation 5 in late Summer - - Mygamer.com - July 16th, 2021 [July 16th, 2021]
- Beyond Integralism and Progressivism | Michael Hanby - First Things - July 14th, 2021 [July 14th, 2021]
- Are Clothes Made From Mushrooms, Bacteria And Yeast The Way Forward For Fashion? - ELLE India - July 12th, 2021 [July 12th, 2021]
- Ian Volner on the 17th Venice Architecture Biennale - Artforum - June 28th, 2021 [June 28th, 2021]
- Posthumanist Criticism Literary Theory and Criticism - June 20th, 2021 [June 20th, 2021]
- Citizen Sleeper is a dystopian slice-of-life RPG on a space station - Rock Paper Shotgun - June 15th, 2021 [June 15th, 2021]
- Trees Speak prep 'PostHuman' watch the trippy Elements of Matter video - Brooklyn Vegan - May 20th, 2021 [May 20th, 2021]
- Splatoon 3 release date, trailer, news, and what we want to see - Texasnewstoday.com - May 20th, 2021 [May 20th, 2021]
- Point of Contact Gallery Announces the Opening of 'Carrying the Thick Present: Fabulation,' Syracuse University's 2021 M.F.A. Thesis Exhibition -... - March 31st, 2021 [March 31st, 2021]
- Posthuman | Tardis | Fandom - March 21st, 2021 [March 21st, 2021]
- Are We or Arent We? - National Review - March 21st, 2021 [March 21st, 2021]
- Connections and inspirations between science fiction, tech, and games - VentureBeat - March 3rd, 2021 [March 3rd, 2021]
- Has 2020 really been real? Or are we all living in a computer simulation? - Daily Maverick - November 15th, 2020 [November 15th, 2020]
- Futureshock: Herbie Hancock and the Body Politics of Pop - PopMatters - November 15th, 2020 [November 15th, 2020]
- Bring Me The Horizons Oli Sykes: Yungblud is a new breed of rockstar - NME.com - September 7th, 2020 [September 7th, 2020]
- Caitlin Cherry on digital abstraction and Black femininity - Artforum - July 21st, 2020 [July 21st, 2020]
- Posthuman | Discography | Discogs - June 15th, 2020 [June 15th, 2020]
- Posthuman | Transhumanism Wiki | Fandom - June 15th, 2020 [June 15th, 2020]
- Noourbanographies of the Information Age: Your Real Estate Interior - ArchDaily - May 4th, 2020 [May 4th, 2020]
- We Are Probably Living in a Simulation, Here's What You Need to Know About Simulation Theory - Interesting Engineering - April 21st, 2020 [April 21st, 2020]
- ICYMI: A wrap of the week's arts news - ArtsHub - February 28th, 2020 [February 28th, 2020]
- FAITH AND VALUES: Where does the buck stop? - Aiken Standard - January 26th, 2020 [January 26th, 2020]
- Architecture professor invents wearable garden - Daily Trojan Online - January 18th, 2020 [January 18th, 2020]
- Best of 2019: Harm's Way Pick 5 Favorite Albums of Year - Revolver Magazine - December 25th, 2019 [December 25th, 2019]
- Moscows Garage Museum Starts Pioneering Online Art Venueand Its More Than a Museum on the Internet - ARTnews - December 13th, 2019 [December 13th, 2019]
- 'The Expanse' Season 4 Review: Hard science, biological conflicts laced with emotions and action makes space d - MEAWW - December 13th, 2019 [December 13th, 2019]
- David Blandy and a Cadre of Essex Gamers Introduce us to a World After Homo Sapiens - frieze.com - November 30th, 2019 [November 30th, 2019]
- Ethics, Truth and Post-Truth: Political and social implications - Modern Diplomacy - November 30th, 2019 [November 30th, 2019]
- Diaspora review: a rave for the senses, a future that has already arrived - The Conversation AU - October 6th, 2019 [October 6th, 2019]