Page 11234..1020..»

Category Archives: Mars Colony

‘For All Mankind’ season 4 episode 1 review: Lots of moving parts … – Space.com

Posted: November 15, 2023 at 3:00 am

After the obligatory time jump, Apple TV Plus's "For All Mankind" splashes down in 2003. The U.S. has teamed up with the Soviet Union and other allies to build a thriving colony on Mars, and plans are afoot to capture and mine asteroids that will help the base to become self-sustainable.

But, this being "For All Mankind," there's also plenty of human drama to unpack. Indeed, the key players are still dealing with the aftermath of a 1995-set season three finale in which NASA was left reeling by the Johnson Space Center (JSC) bombing that killed both Karen Baldwin (Shantel VanSanten) and hero-of-the-hour Molly Cobb (Sonya Walger).

Kelly Baldwin (Cynthy Wu), meanwhile, gave birth in orbit around Mars, as Danny Stevens (Casey W. Johnson) faced stern consequences for causing the deaths of some of the red planet's first human inhabitants. Plus, former NASA boss Margo Madison (Wrenn Schmidt) seemingly struck up a deal with the Soviets to defect and avoid punishment for passing on state secrets.

Related: Season 4 of 'For All Mankind' debuts with alternate asteroid history

Picking up the story eight years later, "For All Mankind"'s fourth season premiere, "Glasnost," has a lot of work to do establishing its new world order. As such it can sometimes feel like a case of information overload, but thanks to its big action set-piece we reckon it lays the groundwork to ensure the show's latest run of episodes is ready for launch.

Watch "For All Mankind" on Apple TV Plus

As ever with "For All Mankind", there's a lot of catching up to do in the opening minutes of this season premiere. In what's quickly become one of the show's hallmarks, the episode opens with a montage of news clips strategically placed to fill you in on eight years of alternative history.

Some of the pop culture events Woodstock '99, the rise of reality T.V., chess champion Garry Kasparov taking on IBM computer Deep Blue, hit movies "Jerry Maguire" and "Castaway" look remarkably familiar. However, beyond that it's clear that the "For All Mankind"-verse is diverging further and further from our own reality, nearly 40 years after the space race began to unfold very differently back in season one.

Since we last visited the Happy Valley Mars colony in 1995, humanity's expansion into the solar system has continued at pace. Trips to the moon are now increasingly commonplace, with plenty of job opportunities and even a hotel for the growing business of space tourism. Seven leading space-faring powers (including the U.S. and the Soviet Union) have established a "Mars-7" agreement to help keep things cordial on the Red Planet, while private sector space pioneers Helios have unveiled an advanced new plasma propulsion technology. This cuts the travel time to Mars down to one or two months, and will undoubtedly be a narratively expedient way for the writers to negate the vast distances and timescales generally involved in space travel. It's also surprisingly sci-fi tech (for now, at least) in a show that's generally kept one foot in the real world.

Back on Earth, Jimmy Stevens (David Chandler), younger son of former astronauts Gordo and Tracy (Michael Dorman and Sarah Jones, respectively), made a plea bargain after testifying against the perpetrators of the Johnson Space Center bombing. Meanwhile, ex-astronaut Ellen Wilson (former series regular Jodi Balfour) won an unexpected second term as President in 1996. So, during her term in office she legalized same-sex marriage and subsequently married her long-term sweetheart, Pam Horton (Meghan Leathers). Her running mate, George Bush Sr., fared less well than his son did in real-life, losing the 2000 election to Al Gore.

Former Beatle John Lennon performed a successful halftime show at Superbowl XXXVI (it was U2 in real-life) and over in the Soviet Union, Premier Mikhail Gorbachev had significant success with his new Glasnost and Perestroika reforms. Gore later declared the Cold War over.

With the alt-history revision done and dusted, the episode wastes little time reminding us where all the familiar "For All Mankind" faces find themselves in 2003. Series mainstay Ed Baldwin (Joel Kinnaman) is still employed by Helios and is the second-in-command at the thriving Martian mini-metropolis at Happy Valley. Part of the same generation of spacefarers as Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and the other Apollo astronauts, Ed is now well into his 70s, and as is the case with the other survivors from season one the show's make-up department has done extensive work adding three decades onto the 40-something. The results are both impressive and convincing.

Ed's due back on Earth in two months' time and daughter Kelly (Cynthy Wu) can't wait for his return. She's busy raising "space baby" Alex whilst she has a difficult house guest in the form of Olga, the mother of the kid's late cosmonaut dad, Alexei. Right now, however, Ed's busy commanding the Ranger One spacecraft on a groundbreaking mission to haul an asteroid into Mars' orbit, where it will be mined for resources that will help make Happy Valley self-sustaining. Cosmonaut Grigory Kuznetsov (Lev Gorn) the first Soviet on Mars has the honor of taking the first ever steps on an asteroid.

With the Johnson Space Center in Houston destroyed in the season three finale, the impressive Mars Mission Control Center at the renamed Molly Cobb Space Center has a modern new look. It's also under new management, with Eli Hobson (Daniel Stern) now pulling the strings as the boss of NASA. Interestingly he's a recruit from the private sector, credited with driving America's move to electric vehicles when he was CEO of Chrysler. The adoption of alternative energy sources seems set to be a major theme in this new season, as does Hobson's penchant for cost cutting.

A few feet away from him, engineer Aleida Rosales (Coral Pea) follows the action from her console, as Kuznetsov pilots his self-propelled suit towards the asteroid. Naturally, his efforts culminate with him as the focus of a beautifully composed shot of a guy standing on the horizon of a tiny, rocky world.

As teased by the season three finale, former NASA head Margo Madison wakes up in a sparse Moscow apartment, her morning routine a neat echo of the old days back at JSC albeit without her trusty piano. Living under the alias of Margaret Reynolds, she's now clearly doing her best to assimilate on the other side of the Iron Curtain she speaks Russian with a strong American accent and keeps up with current affairs via the International Tribune.

Meanwhile, Danielle Poole (Krys Marshall), the first American on Mars, has left NASA and is keeping a close eye on the family of disgraced astronaut (and Jimmy's elder brother) Danny Stevens. The episode never reveals what happened to Danny after he was banished to solitary confinement on the Martian surface, which suggests there's a big reveal to come later in the season. Whatever Danny's ultimate fate turned out to be, it still haunts Danielle.

The significant new addition to the cast is Miles Dale (Toby Kebbell), an offshore oil driller who's fallen on hard times following the decline of fossil fuels. Estranged from his young family, he applies for a job extracting natural resources from the moon, but doesn't bank on the booming popularity of careers in outer space, fueled, in part, by the hit "Moon Miners" reality T.V. show. After lying about his college experience, he manages to get a placement that will start in two years' time, but complains that it's not soon enough. He's ultimately offered a two-year trip to Mars harder, longer and further away, but with a "bigger upside." Reasoning that it's the best option for his family, he accepts the position.

"Glasnost" spends so long getting its pieces in the right place on the chess board that there's little time for actual plot. What story there is focuses on the aforementioned Martian asteroid and in the long-established tradition of the show what happens when something goes very, very wrong.

The mission starts out with plenty of promise, as astronauts, cosmonauts and private contractors team up to build the apparatus that will tow the rock back to Mars' orbit. In fact, the construction of this surprisingly Death Star-like structure plays out like an outer space version of the famous barn-raising scene in "Witness."

When the connection with the ship inevitably starts to malfunction, the episode makes ingenious use of sound effects, music and "2001: A Space Odyssey"-style silence to ramp up the tension. Grigory immediately volunteers for a spacewalk to fix the problem and he's joined by Parker, a private sector colleague keen to secure his bonus. The situation quickly goes from bad to worst, as Parker is fatally impaled and Grigory finds himself trapped with his suit running out of air. Ever the action hero, Ed wants to go outside to rescue his friend, but the Soviet commander tells him it's pointless and sacrifices himself for the good of the crew. For Aleida, the incident triggers flashbacks to the JSC bombing and she rushes out of mission control. She subsequently dodges all phone calls from NASA.

Like the space hotel disaster in the season three premiere, Polaris, this failed mission seems primed to be the catalyst that sets this year's events in motion. Within hours, Margo is making her way to Star City to meet with Soviet Space Agency director Catiche, although it turns out she's not as important as she used to be. She obviously made some kind of deal to consult on space matters when she relocated to Moscow, but nearly a decade after she left NASA, she's in danger of becoming obsolete. An official tells her never to come to Star City without an appointment again and she's escorted out of the building.

One week later, Margo has an interesting encounter with a woman on a park bench. Initially, the only thing that would raise eyebrows about this benchmate is her surprisingly deep knowledge of the migratory habits of bullfinches. However, she suddenly starts talking English and events shift into the realms of a Cold War spy movie. The woman claims to have Margo's "best interests at heart" and reminds her that she "must be patient." The fact she also knows Margo's real name suggests that the exiled former NASA boss still has a significant role to play this is no accident.

Back in the U.S., we learn that asteroid missions are grounded until the Mars Commission publishes its report. Changes are already afoot at Happy Valley, as commanding officer Colonel Peters' position has been deemed untenable in the wake of the debacle. Ed who's clearly not keen on heading back to Earth anyway uses it as an excuse to stay on Mars longer, reasoning that a new commander will need the continuity of a long-standing executive officer to help them settle in.

NASA director Hobson's first choice for the job is Danielle, but she's reluctant. It turns out that she only agreed to meet him because of what happened to Grigory, one of her closest friends. Unsurprisingly, Hobson's not inclined to take no for an answer and proves to be a master of persuasion, pointing out that she's the only person with a chance of controlling Ed Baldwin.

Danielle eventually accepts, and the episode ends with her floating on board a Unity spacecraft ready to fire up its plasma engines to Mars and sitting further back is none other than Miles Dale.

Not a vintage "For All Mankind" episode, perhaps, but it's one that puts this fourth season on the launchpad for an intriguing journey into the 21st century.

New episodes of 'For All Mankind' debut on Apple TV Plus on Fridays

Excerpt from:

'For All Mankind' season 4 episode 1 review: Lots of moving parts ... - Space.com

Posted in Mars Colony | Comments Off on ‘For All Mankind’ season 4 episode 1 review: Lots of moving parts … – Space.com

Five Surprisingly Perfect Song and Sci-Fi Book Pairings – tor.com

Posted: at 3:00 am

As an avid reader and watcher of science fiction, its really no surprise that I also love listening to music with a little sci-fi flair, as wellcue Jeff Waynes Musical Version of The War of the Worlds! But in addition to songs that are directly based on sci-fi books, there are also some tunes that are not inspired by literature and yet feel eerily reminiscent of specific books anyway. In that vein (and in the spirit of this previous list!), here are five song-and-book pairings that unintentionally, but perfectly, complement each other.

Song: Run Away to Mars by Talk Book: The Strange by Nathan Ballingrud

The entirety of Nathan Ballingruds The Strange (2023) is set on Mars, while Talks Run Away to Mars (2022) is about being on Earth and hypothetically running away to the Red Planet. Along with their shared Martian imagery, theres a sense of loneliness and a desire for connection that ties the song and book together.

The Strange follows fourteen-year-old Anabelle Crisp, who lives in a small colony on Mars with her father. Her mother had to return to Earth and after communication between the planets was severed, all Anabelle has been left with is a recording of her voice. One night a group of bandits break into her fathers diner and inadvertently steal the recording. With the law refusing to help, Anabelle boldly sets off into the Martian wastelands to recover her mothers voice. It reads like a Western by way of Ray Bradburys The Martian Chronicles (1950), along with a dash of weirdness and horrorbasically the recipe for a perfect book, in my eyes.

The opening verse of Run Away to Mars nails a couple of The Stranges key elements: Its a wild, wild world / And youre a wild, wild girl. Anabelle is certainly a wild (and prickly and audacious) girl in what is essentially the Martian version of the Wild West. But beneath her sharp surface, she just misses her mom (Three, two, one, I miss you / Im sorry, I got issues) and longs for connection, something thats hard to come by, given the vast emptiness of Mars (Its an empty world up here).

Song: Rocket Man by Elton John Book: Im Waiting for You by Kim Bo-young (translated by Sophie Bowman and Sung Ryu)

Elton Johns 1972 hit Rocket Man was actually inspired by Ray Bradburys short story The Rocket Man, which can be found in The Illustrated Man (1951). But aside from its brief mention of Mars, its also a great match for Kim Bo-Youngs short story Im Waiting for You, which is told via letters written by a man to his galaxy-traveling fianc. The laws of relativity mean that she will only be waiting a few months until their wedding, while he must wait years back on Earth, and so he decides to hop on a spaceship to speed towards the big day. But a series of mishaps in space keep the couple apart for far longer than expected.

While in Rocket Man the singers wife remains on EarthI miss the Earth so much I miss my wifehis longing for her across space and time mirrors the same longing in Kims Im Waiting for You. For much of the story, the main character is a Rocket man, burning out his fuse up here alone and its definitely gonna be a long, long time / Til touchdown brings me round again to find / Im not the man they think I am at home. But not only does the experience change him, the passage of time also changes Earth in absolutely fascinating ways. The womans side of the storyalso told in epistolary formatis called On My Way and is included in Kims short story collection Im Waiting for You: And Other Stories (2021).

Song: Light Up the Night by The Protomen Book: Sea of Rust by C. Robert Cargill

Light Up the Night is from a 2009 rock opera-style concept album inspired by the Mega Man video games, but its also a great fit for C. Robert Cargills Sea of Rust (2017). The novel is set after humankind has been wiped out by robots, but the world hasnt become a machine utopia. One World Intelligences (OWI)massive AI mainframes that assimilate other robotsare now in control, but main character Brittle is desperate to hold onto her individuality.

The Protomens songwhich has a short film as a music videois about a couple of people trying to fight back against the evil man who is using robots to control humanity. Sub out man for OWI and humanity for robots and youve got Sea of Rust. The lyrics Its like they gathered up the city, they sold it to the devil, and now / Its gone to hell and they wonder how perfectly describe the state of things in the novel. Brittle isnt a traditionally heroic character, but she finds herself compelled to join the fight when she realizes that Cut me down or let me runeither way its all gonna burn / The only way that theyll ever learn / Weve got to turn it off.

Both the book and the song tell bleak stories set in robot-filled dystopian/post-apocalyptic worlds, but a spark of hope propels both narratives forward.

Song: We Will Become Silhouettes by The Postal Service Book: Wool by Hugh Howey

The Postal Services We Will Become Silhouettes (2003) is sung from the perspective of someone who cant leave their house because the air outside will make / Our cells divide at an alarming rate / Until our shells simply cannot hold / All our insides in and thats when well explode. Hugh Howeys Wool (2012) is about a whole society living in a massive underground silo because an unknown event many years earlier turned the air toxic.

In the top level of the silo is a video feed of the barren landscape outside, but as humans arent naturally subterranean creatures, every so often someone cracks and wants to venture out. Reminiscent of this is Ben Gibbard cheerily singing Im looking through the glass / Where the light bends at the cracks / And Im screaming at the top of my lungs. While in the song all the news reports recommended that I stay indoors, in the book this is enforced by the silos secret-keeping authorities, which do occasionally allow someone to go outsidesomebodys got to clean the cameras after all!

Song: The Astronaut by Jin (of BTS) Book: Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir

BTS are no strangers to using space imagery in their songs and a couple of eldest member Jins solo songs have followed suit, namely Moon and The Astronaut. The latter song was released as a gift to BTSs fans, known as ARMY, before Jins military service (mandatory in South Korea) started at the end of 2022; it also happens to pair perfectly with Andy Weirs Project Hail Mary (2021), which is about a lone astronaut tackling a critical mission in space.

[Spoiler alert for Project Hail Mary.]

In Project Hail Mary, Ryland Grace is aboard a spaceship light-years from Earth when he comes across another solo astronaut, a Labrador-sized spider with a rocky exoskeleton, who he appropriately names Rocky. While trying to solve the complex problem of how to save their solar systems respective sunsand by extension, their home planetsGrace and Rocky come to rely on each other both scientifically and emotionally. In the (translated) words of Jin, Just as the Milky Way shines upon the darkest roads / You were shining towards me / The only light found in the darkness. Grace and Rocky share one of my very favorite fictional friendships.

The music video for The Astronaut is also about interspecies friendship, with Jin playing an alien (one that admittedly just looks human) who has crash-landed on Earth and befriends a little girl. In Weirs novel, Grace was a school teacher before being sent on his planet-saving mission and while he loved his job, he didnt have much direction. Similarly, Jin sings, Like that asteroid drifting by without a destination / I, too, was just drifting along. But Graces mission and his connection to Rocky gives him purpose and at the end of the book he decides to live on Rockys planet, just like Jin deciding to stay on Earth at the end of the music video for The Astronaut.

***

Have you get any suggestions for songs and books that share similar themes? Or any songs that you think match these books (or vice versa!) better than the ones Ive chosen? Let me know in the comments below!

Read more:

Five Surprisingly Perfect Song and Sci-Fi Book Pairings - tor.com

Posted in Mars Colony | Comments Off on Five Surprisingly Perfect Song and Sci-Fi Book Pairings – tor.com

Retired Apollo program physcist to speak at First Colony Branch … – Fort Bend Star

Posted: at 3:00 am

Retired NASA physicist F. Don Cooper will share his experiences creating the technology that helped launch Apollo 11 in 1969, and the efforts that his team went through to successfully bring the Apollo 13 crew home safely in 1970 in a program titled Apollo to the Moon & Back with F. Don Cooper, at Fort Bend County LibrariesFirst Colony Branch Libraryon Saturday,Nov. 18, from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. in the Meeting Room of the library, 2121 Austin Parkway, Sugar Land.

Cooper will also discuss the history of U.S. rockets, and his role in designing the Saturn V ascent guidance and trans-lunar targeting equations that would help make the lunar landing possible.

An Oklahoma native, Cooper became fascinated with math and science while still in high school. He attended Oklahoma Baptist University, where he majored in physics and mathematics with a minor in chemistry. His career after college took him to Huntsville, Ala., where he worked at the George C. Marshall Space Flight Center on NASAs Apollo program, developing the targeting equations to guide the manned spacecraft from earth orbit to the moon.

His career then led him to Houstons Johnson Spaceflight Center, which would later become known as the Johnson Space Center. During his years there, Cooper worked on eight Apollo missions, the Atlas Centaur, the Air Force Dyna-Soar, and the Mars rocket NOVA. For the Apollo 13 mission, he provided the trans-lunar coast abort options to Houston Mission Control.

Cooper retired in 2002, and soon found a new calling that of encouraging a new generation of students to pursue a future in the physical sciences. He enjoys speaking to youth groups, community organizations, schools and colleges, hoping to inspire the technology leaders of the future with his first-hand account of the events as they actually happened.

Of the seven primary people who did this, I am the last one alive, says Cooper. Students do not know much about Apollo since it all happened before they were born. My objective is to show them how it happened, emphasize that education is essential, and show how math and physics solve real-world problems.

The program is free and open to the public. For more information, see the Fort Bend County Libraries website (www.fortbend.lib.tx.us), or call the First Colony Branch Library (281-395-1311) or the library systems Communications Office (281-633-4734).

View post:

Retired Apollo program physcist to speak at First Colony Branch ... - Fort Bend Star

Posted in Mars Colony | Comments Off on Retired Apollo program physcist to speak at First Colony Branch … – Fort Bend Star

Have Elon Musk Been To Mars? – TickerTV News

Posted: at 3:00 am

Have Elon Musk Been To Mars?

In recent years, Elon Musk, the visionary entrepreneur and CEO of SpaceX, has captured the worlds attention with his ambitious plans to colonize Mars. His grand vision of making humanity a multi-planetary species has sparked both excitement and skepticism. One question that often arises is whether Musk himself has already set foot on the Red Planet. Lets delve into the facts and separate reality from speculation.

The Mars Mission: Musks ultimate goal is to establish a self-sustaining colony on Mars, ensuring the survival of humanity in the event of a catastrophic event on Earth. SpaceX, his aerospace company, has been actively working on developing the necessary technology to make this dream a reality. They have successfully launched and landed reusable rockets, significantly reducing the cost of space travel.

Elon Musks Personal Journey: While Musk has been instrumental in spearheading the Mars mission, there is no concrete evidence to suggest that he has physically traveled to Mars himself. Musk has openly stated that he hopes to visit Mars one day, but as of now, his focus remains on the technological advancements required to make interplanetary travel feasible.

FAQ: Q: What is SpaceX? A: SpaceX, short for Space Exploration Technologies Corp., is an American aerospace manufacturer and space transportation company founded Elon Musk. It is known for its development of the Falcon and Starship rockets, with the goal of enabling the colonization of Mars.

Q: Has anyone been to Mars? A: No human has ever traveled to Mars. All missions to Mars have been unmanned, with rovers and orbiters sent to gather data and explore the planets surface.

Q: Will Elon Musk go to Mars? A: Elon Musk has expressed his desire to visit Mars in the future. However, his current focus is on developing the necessary technology and infrastructure to make Mars colonization possible.

In conclusion, while Elon Musk has been a driving force behind the mission to colonize Mars, there is no evidence to suggest that he has personally traveled to the Red Planet. His dedication to advancing space technology and his vision for a multi-planetary future are what fuel his determination to make Mars colonization a reality.

Read more:

Have Elon Musk Been To Mars? - TickerTV News

Posted in Mars Colony | Comments Off on Have Elon Musk Been To Mars? – TickerTV News

The Bodily Indignities of the Space Life – The New York Times

Posted: at 3:00 am

While that collective experience is enough to have taught us how the body responds when gravitys pull is substantially reduced, the magnetosphere still shields the I.S.S., and only the 24 astronauts who flew in the Apollo program have gone beyond it. (The moon orbits an average of more than 238,000 miles away.) Though these two dozen astronauts spent little more than a week at a time without its protection, they have died of cardiovascular disease at a rate four to five times as high as that of their counterparts who stayed in low Earth orbit or never entered orbit at all, which suggests that exposure to cosmic radiation might have damaged their arteries, veins and capillaries.

We cant send people to Mars, or to live on the moon, until we can be reasonably confident that theyll survive getting and residing there. But the space-based medical science needed to make that possible has been hindered by small sample sizes that arent representative of the general population. (All of the Apollo astronauts were white men born between 1928 and 1936.) Space tourism, though, promises to offer opportunities to study the effects of radiation and low gravity on a much broader demographic than really well-selected superpeople, as Dorit Donoviel, the director of the Translational Research Institute for Space Health (TRISH) at the Baylor College of Medicine, describes those who have historically qualified to leave the planet. Old, young, pre-existing health conditions we are starting to gather a knowledge base that in the future will be essential even for NASA, Donoviel told me, because we have to learn about the edge cases to really understand what is going on in our bodies to adapt to a hostile environment. You dont learn as much from people who are healthy. Its when people get sick that you understand how people get sick and how to prevent it.

Epidemiologists face the same predicament on Earth: Before they can figure out how to protect the population, they must wait for harm to come to enough people to expose the causes. As less-rigorous medical screening allows more tourists to reach space, the chances increase significantly that someone will get hurt or have a health emergency there. Aerospace medicine is one of three specialties certified by the American Board of Preventive Medicine, because surgeons for a given flight tend to be stuck on the ground; they have to optimize the health of their patients and ward off potential disasters before departure. The problem is, they cant know what those disasters will be until they occur. Which means that, as with every expedition into the unknown, at some point some intrepid or desperate souls are just going to have to blast off and see what happens.

Scientists once predicted that we couldnt live in the absence of Earths gravity. Without this still-barely-understood force pulling us downward, how would we swallow? Wouldnt our tongues loll back into our throats? Wouldnt we choke on our own saliva? And if we survived those perils, wouldnt escalating pressure in our skulls kill us after a week or so? But when Yuri Gagarin returned from his single, 108-minute orbit around our world in 1961, humanitys first trip beyond the mesosphere, he proved that our internal musculature could maintain our vital functions in conditions of weightlessness. He ate and drank up there without difficulty. Technically, he hadnt escaped Earths influence; to orbit is to free-fall toward the ground without ever hitting it, and he was in a condition known as microgravity. This felt, he reported, like hanging horizontally on belts, as if in a suspended state, a circumstance passingly familiar to anyone who has been on a roller coaster or jumped off a diving board. Gagarin said he got used to it. There were no bad sensations, he added.

Either Gagarin was fibbing, or he had a strong stomach. Initially, many space travelers puke, or at least feel motion-sick space-adaptation syndrome, or S.A.S., is what such nausea, headache and vomiting are called outside our atmosphere. Its the same as sitting in the back of the car in childhood, reading something with your head down, says Jan Stepanek, director of the aerospace-medicine program at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Ariz. Its a mismatch of what the eyes are seeing and what the inner ear is telling you. Only in this case, that mismatched perception is a result of the organs and hairs of the vestibular system floating free without their usual gravitational signals. You acclimate eventually. In fact, researchers only learned about the prevalence of S.A.S. symptoms in the 1970s, when they heard Skylab astronauts talking about it with one another over a hot mic. Astronauts, it turns out, are not ideal subjects for medical study, because they are notoriously stoic and unforthcoming about any symptom that might ground them.

More here:

The Bodily Indignities of the Space Life - The New York Times

Posted in Mars Colony | Comments Off on The Bodily Indignities of the Space Life – The New York Times

Can Elon Musk Buy The Moon? – TickerTV News

Posted: at 3:00 am

Can Elon Musk Buy The Moon?

In recent years, Elon Musk has become a household name due to his ambitious ventures in the aerospace industry. With his company SpaceX, Musk has set his sights on colonizing Mars and revolutionizing space travel. But can he take his aspirations even further and buy the Moon? Lets delve into this intriguing question.

The Outer Space Treaty Before we explore the possibility of Musk purchasing the Moon, its important to understand the legal framework governing celestial bodies. The Outer Space Treaty, signed the United Nations in 1967, states that no nation can claim sovereignty over the Moon or any other celestial body. This means that the Moon cannot be bought or sold any individual or entity.

Private Ownership While the Outer Space Treaty prohibits countries from claiming ownership of celestial bodies, it does not explicitly address private ownership. However, most legal experts agree that the treatys principles extend to private entities as well. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that Musk or anyone else can legally buy the Moon.

FAQ

1. Can anyone own the Moon? No, according to the Outer Space Treaty, no individual or entity can claim ownership of the Moon or any other celestial body.

2. Has anyone tried to buy the Moon before? Yes, several individuals and organizations have claimed ownership of the Moon in the past, but their claims hold no legal validity.

3. What is Elon Musks interest in the Moon? While Musks primary focus is on Mars colonization, he has expressed interest in establishing a lunar base as a stepping stone for further space exploration.

4. What are the potential benefits of owning the Moon? Owning the Moon could potentially provide access to valuable resources such as helium-3, which could be used for nuclear fusion energy production. However, the feasibility of extracting these resources remains uncertain.

In conclusion, despite Elon Musks grand ambitions and entrepreneurial spirit, buying the Moon is simply not within the realm of possibility. The Outer Space Treaty prohibits any individual or entity from claiming ownership of celestial bodies, including the Moon. While Musks dreams of colonizing Mars and establishing a lunar base are commendable, they will have to be pursued within the legal boundaries set international agreements.

See the article here:

Can Elon Musk Buy The Moon? - TickerTV News

Posted in Mars Colony | Comments Off on Can Elon Musk Buy The Moon? – TickerTV News

Report: SpaceX Safety Lapses Leading to Severe Staff Injuries – Gizmodo

Posted: at 3:00 am

SpaceX has undoubtedly cemented its position as a leader in the emerging space industry, but that may have come at a painful price. A shocking new investigation by Reuters documents 600 workplace injuries and one death at Elon Musks rocket company, highlighting a dangerous disregard for safety practices for the sake of SpaceXs ambitious goals.

Astronomers Could Soon Get Warnings When SpaceX Satellites Threaten Their View

In its report, Reuters talked to more than a dozen current and former employees and reviewed medical and worker compensation records. The records included reports of more than 100 workers suffering cuts or lacerations, 29 with broken bones or dislocations, 17 whose hands or fingers were crushed, and nine with head injuries, including one skull fracture, four concussions and one traumatic brain injury, according to Reuters. The reports also indicated five burns, five electrocutions, eight accidents that led to amputations, and seven eye injuries.

The SpaceX employees described the workplace as chaotic, and that the staff is often undertrained and overworked to the point where they are forced to skip safety procedures to meet the companys aggressive deadlines. Elons concept that SpaceX is on this mission to go to Mars as fast as possible and save humanity permeates every part of the company, Tom Moline, a former SpaceX engineer, told Reuters. The company justifies casting aside anything that could stand in the way of accomplishing that goal, including worker safety.

SpaceX has also failed to report on workplace accidents to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and about two-thirds of the injuries Reuters uncovered took place during years when SpaceX did not submit its reports.

OSHA and California OSHA, a state-run workplace safety regulator, have fined SpaceX a total of $50,836 for violations regarding one workers death and seven serious safety incidents. In response, SpaceX has routinely denied allegations that it was disregarding workers safety and pushed back on the agencys findings.

SpaceX is currently focused on launching its Starship megarocket for a second time after its debut flight didnt go so well. Starships inaugural launch ended in a fiery explosion and the rocket has remained grounded ever since pending a safety review. Despite its botched first flight, Musk continued to push for a second test flight within two months of its April launch.

SpaceX is in a rush to launch Starship as it is under contract to use a modified version of its rocket to land humans on the Moon as part of NASAs upcoming Artemis missions. From there, Musks ultimate vision for his company is to land humans on Mars and build a colony on the Red Planet. The SpaceX CEO recently claimed that an uncrewed Starship could land on Mars within the next three to four years.

Musk speaks of his ambitious Mars plans as a way to save humanity and sustain our species beyond Earth, hence the sense of urgency. As a result, Musks execution of his space ambitions have leaned towards an aggressive schedule and unrealistic expectations.

SpaceX, therefore, doesnt waste its time on safety regulations and instead urges that its workers are responsible for protecting themselves, according to the Reuters report. The report cites an incident from 2014 in which a SpaceX employee by the name of Lonnie LeBlanc died at a SpaceX facility in McGregor, Texas, while transporting foam insulation. LeBlanc had reportedly offered to sit on top of the insulation because there were no straps to hold down the cargo on the truck while on its way to the hangar.

Another incident took place in January 2022 when a part flew off during pressure testing of a Raptor V2 rocket engine, fracturing the skull of SpaceX employee Francisco Cabada, which resulted in him being in a coma. Employees familiar with the incident told Reuters that the part was discovered to have a flaw but it was not fixed before the testing.

SpaceXs idea of safety is: Well let you decide whats safe for you, which really means there was no accountability, Travis Carson, a former Brownsville welder and production supervisor at SpaceX, told Reuters. Thats a terrible approach to take in industrial environments.

The Reuters report also highlighted Musks personal disregard to safety, with the CEO documented while waving around a flame thrower at the companys site in Hawthorne and his request to paint over the safety yellow color of machinery to change it to black or blue due to his aversion to bright colors.

SpaceX did not immediately respond to our request for comment.

Want to know more about Elon Musks space venture? Check out our full coverage of SpaceXs Starship megarocket and the SpaceX Starlink internet satellite megaconstellation. And for more spaceflight in your life, follow us on X and bookmark Gizmodos dedicated Spaceflight page.

Link:

Report: SpaceX Safety Lapses Leading to Severe Staff Injuries - Gizmodo

Posted in Mars Colony | Comments Off on Report: SpaceX Safety Lapses Leading to Severe Staff Injuries – Gizmodo

Luke O’Neill: ‘Diverse’ group needed to form Mars colony – Newstalk

Posted: September 29, 2023 at 7:12 pm

Diverse experiences, background and ethnicities is key to forming a group that will travel to Mars and form a colony, according to Professor Luke O'Neill.

Year after year, humans get one step closer to creating the technology capable of sending a human mission to Mars.

Experts predict a human mission to the red planet could be possible in the next 15 to 20 years as the research expands.

However, while engineering is essential to make the spacecraft, Prof ONeill told Show Me the Science its also essential to decide who is going to be on that spacecraft.

This mission to Mars would take three years, he said.

Youre going to be in a confined space they reckon the overall size of the spacecraft that will go there is about the size of an average campervan.

Imagine being stuck in a campervan with people for three years.

We like being together, were a social species, but anybody who remembers Christmas, by day three you can't wait to get out.

A recent study tried to dig deeper into the question of who can travel to and colonise the red planet through a simulation.

The simulation considered four personality types, Prof ONeill explained: agreeable people who are less inclined to be intensely competitive, sociable people who might not be thought of as important, reactive people who often have good technical skills, and neurotic people who get uptight about situations and worry a lot.

The study found that, while it was previously thought hundreds of people would be needed to colonise Mars, we only need about 10 to 50.

The simulation found the highest failure rate among the neurotic personalities.

Theres always a honeymoon period, Prof ONeill explained. The first few weeks everyone gets on great.

Then the traits begin to emerge what emerges early on is depression kicks in and some people get very low... theres also a lot of rudeness and shortness with each other.

The study found the best way to address this risk of depression is to make space travellers bond through shared meals and those space travellers are a diverse bunch.

If you have people with different backgrounds and different experiences in their lives, that predicts a better environment, Prof ONeill said.

It's partly because you're more interesting to each other, you can tell each other stories about your life and if youve all had the same lives there's not much to tell.

Original post:

Luke O'Neill: 'Diverse' group needed to form Mars colony - Newstalk

Posted in Mars Colony | Comments Off on Luke O’Neill: ‘Diverse’ group needed to form Mars colony – Newstalk

Lessons learned from first season with pitch timer, new MLB rules – MLB.com

Posted: at 7:11 pm

One hundred years from now, when baseball historians ruminate on the 2023 season while dodging dust storms in their Mars colonies, we can guess what they are most likely to observe.

With due respect to the great individual and team achievements weve witnessed and will yet witness this year, its the adoption of revolutionary new rules the pitch timer, defensive shift restrictions and bigger bases that serves as 2023s most historically relevant development.

So what have we learned from the new rules? What conclusions can we draw from the first season of the Pitch Timer Era and chronicle for our future Martian friends to find?

Here are a dozen observations.

1) Obviously, game times shortened.

There is no bigger takeaway from the timer, of course. As of this writing, the average nine-inning game time is 2 hours, 40 minutes -- a decrease of 24 minutes when compared to the same number of games in 2022 and the lowest such average since 1985 (2:39).

If we control for the run environment and events that typically increase game time (such as mid-inning pitching changes), then the year-over-year decline in nine-inning game times is 26 minutes.

And if you go back to 2021, which was an all-time high of 3:10 per game, we are down a half-hour compared to two seasons ago.

2) Game times did lengthen slightly in the second half.

Digging deeper, we do see a rise in game times within 2023 as players became more familiar with the nuances of the timer rules. In the first three weeks of the season, the average nine-inning game time was 2:38. In the most recent three-week span, the average time was 2:44.

How has this happened? One veteran pitcher said that hes learned to be comfortable stepping off the mound and using one of his allotted disengagements, rather than rush a pitch with a runner on base. Thats an interesting observation, because, as youll see later in this piece, the fewest violations have occurred between pitches with a runner aboard. When pitchers let the timer wind down and then step off, it adds 20 seconds to the at-bat. So thats one example of how adaptation to the timer has slightly expanded game times within the season.

All that said even if every nine-inning game were 2:44, that would still be the lowest average since 1986.

3) Pitch timer violations declined throughout the year.

Players adjust. Thats how they got to the big leagues in the first place, and they proved their adaptability as 2023 rolled along.

In the first batch of 100 games played, there were 0.87 violations per game (total for the two teams). In the most recent batch of 100 games, the rate was 0.34 per game. The rolling 100-game rate was never higher than that season-opening 0.87, and it got as low as 0.24 or about one violation every four games played.

Overall, since the All-Star break, there have been 0.30 violations per game. Two-thirds of games played this season (66%, to be exact) had zero violations, and 74% of games in the second half had zero. Of the players who have thrown or seen 100 pitches this season, 49% of pitchers and 68% of batters have not committed a single violation of the timer rules. Good job, guys!

4) Relatedly, there has been plenty of time on the timer.

Though the players pushed for more time on the timer for the postseason, there is no statistical evidence that 15 seconds with the bases empty and 20 seconds with runners aboard is not sufficient. Pitchers have had, on average, anywhere from 6.5 to 7.8 seconds remaining on the timer when they begin their deliveries, depending on the situation:

5) The defense commits the most violations.

Pitchers and catchers account for 71.1% of violations, while batters have been responsible for 28.9%.

6) Most violations occur between innings and batters.

Were into some serious timer violation minutiae now, but, for the insatiably curious, here are the percentages of pitch timer violations based on situation:

7) There is no evidence the timer caused more injuries.

We went in-depth on this subject midseason, about how injured list data is complicated and how MLB has seen a long-term increase in injured list days (particularly for pitchers) for decades, despite average game times gradually increasing in the years prior to the adoption of the pitch timer.

What weve seen this year is a decrease in both pitcher and position player injured list placements when compared to the same number of days last season and numbers that are relatively in line with recent full seasons (aside from the first full season post-COVID, when injuries ramped up dramatically).

8) The timer hasnt changed starting pitcher usage.

The increased pace hasnt led to starters fatiguing any earlier or lasting in games any longer than they once did.

9) Basestealing exploded.

The timer brought us back to the 1980s in terms of game times. The pickoff limits and slightly bigger bases didnt quite get us to the track meet that existed in that decade, but they definitely increased the aggressiveness on the basepaths, as the electric Ronald Acua Jr.can attest.

Stolen-base attempts have increased to 1.8 per game in 2023, a leap from 1.4 in 2022 and the highest rate of attempts since 2012 (also 1.8). The 80.4% success rate is not only a jump from 75.4% last year but the highest in MLB history.

The disengagement limit limited pickoff attempts from 6.0 per game to 4.9 per game.

10) But runners do still get picked off.

Perhaps the pickoff limits led some runners to be a bit too ambitious with their leads, because there have been more successful pitcher pickoffs this season (324) than in 2019 (291), 2021 (270) or 2022 (271).

Also, the stolen-base success rate is actually lower after two disengagements (78%) than it is with zero disengagements (80.6%), even though pitchers, predictably, rarely risk the automatic balk with a third pickoff attempt. There are less than 0.1 attempts per game in this situation.

11) More balls in play go for hits.

The goal of having infielders in their natural positions was to obtain more traditional results on balls in play. Weve seen that. The leaguewide batting average on balls in play (BABIP) has increased from .290 last season to .297 this season.

Predictably, given that extreme shifts were most prominently employed against left-handed batters, most of the improvement has come for lefties, who have seen their overall BABIP improve from .283 to .295 and their BABIP on pulled ground balls and pulled line drives increase by 35 points and 27 points, respectively.

12) Defensive shift infractions are exceedingly rare.

No real surprise here. The defensive shift restrictions requiring two infielders on each side of second base, within the outer boundary of the infield, is not especially difficult to abide by.

In more than 40,000 innings played this season, how many times has a defender committed an infraction, leading to an automatic ball? Only three! If youve witnessed one in person, go buy a lottery ticket and avoid lightning.

Read more:

Lessons learned from first season with pitch timer, new MLB rules - MLB.com

Posted in Mars Colony | Comments Off on Lessons learned from first season with pitch timer, new MLB rules – MLB.com

Opinion | Elon Musk, Geoff Hinton, and the War Over A.I. – The New York Times

Posted: at 7:11 pm

There is no shortage of researchers and industry titans willing to warn us about the potential destructive power of artificial intelligence. Reading the headlines, one would hope that the rapid gains in A.I. technology have also brought forth a unifying realization of the risks and the steps we need to take to mitigate them.

The reality, unfortunately, is quite different. Beneath almost all of the testimony, the manifestoes, the blog posts and the public declarations issued about A.I. are battles among deeply divided factions. Some are concerned about far-future risks that sound like science fiction. Some are genuinely alarmed by the practical problems that chatbots and deepfake video generators are creating right now. Some are motivated by potential business revenue, others by national security concerns.

The result is a cacophony of coded language, contradictory views and provocative policy demands that are undermining our ability to grapple with a technology destined to drive the future of politics, our economy and even our daily lives.

These factions are in dialogue not only with the public but also with one another. Sometimes, they trade letters, opinion essays or social threads outlining their positions and attacking others in public view. More often, they tout their viewpoints without acknowledging alternatives, leaving the impression that their enlightened perspective is the inevitable lens through which to view A.I. But if lawmakers and the public fail to recognize the subtext of their arguments, they risk missing the real consequences of our possible regulatory and cultural paths forward.

To understand the fight and the impact it may have on our shared future, look past the immediate claims and actions of the players to the greater implications of their points of view. When you do, youll realize this isnt really a debate only about A.I. Its also a contest about control and power, about how resources should be distributed and who should be held accountable.

Beneath this roiling discord is a true fight over the future of society. Should we focus on avoiding the dystopia of mass unemployment, a world where China is the dominant superpower or a society where the worst prejudices of humanity are embodied in opaque algorithms that control our lives? Should we listen to wealthy futurists who discount the importance of climate change because theyre already thinking ahead to colonies on Mars? It is critical that we begin to recognize the ideologies driving what we are being told. Resolving the fracas requires us to see through the specter of A.I. to stay true to the humanity of our values.

One way to decode the motives behind the various declarations is through their language. Because language itself is part of their battleground, the different A.I. camps tend not to use the same words to describe their positions. One faction describes the dangers posed by A.I. through the framework of safety, another through ethics or integrity, yet another through security and others through economics. By decoding who is speaking and how A.I. is being described, we can explore where these groups differ and what drives their views.

The loudest perspective is a frightening, dystopian vision in which A.I. poses an existential risk to humankind, capable of wiping out all life on Earth. A.I., in this vision, emerges as a godlike, superintelligent, ungovernable entity capable of controlling everything. A.I. could destroy humanity or pose a risk on par with nukes. If were not careful, it could kill everyone or enslave humanity. Its likened to monsters like the Lovecraftian shoggoths, artificial servants that rebelled against their creators, or paper clip maximizers that consume all of Earths resources in a single-minded pursuit of their programmed goal. It sounds like science fiction, but these people are serious, and they mean the words they use.

These are the A.I. safety people, and their ranks include the Godfathers of A.I., Geoff Hinton and Yoshua Bengio. For many years, these leading lights battled critics who doubted that a computer could ever mimic capabilities of the human mind. Having steamrollered the public conversation by creating large language models like ChatGPT and other A.I. tools capable of increasingly impressive feats, they appear deeply invested in the idea that there is no limit to what their creations will be able to accomplish.

This doomsaying is boosted by a class of tech elite that has enormous power to shape the conversation. And some in this group are animated by the radical effective altruism movement and the associated cause of long-term-ism, which tend to focus on the most extreme catastrophic risks and emphasize the far-future consequences of our actions. These philosophies are hot among the cryptocurrency crowd, like the disgraced former billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried, who at one time possessed sudden wealth in search of a cause.

Reasonable sounding on their face, these ideas can become dangerous if stretched to their logical extremes. A dogmatic long-termer would willingly sacrifice the well-being of people today to stave off a prophesied extinction event like A.I. enslavement.

Many doomsayers say they are acting rationally, but their hype about hypothetical existential risks amounts to making a misguided bet with our future. In the name of long-term-ism, Elon Musk reportedly believes that our society needs to encourage reproduction among those with the greatest culture and intelligence (namely, his ultrarich buddies). And he wants to go further, such as limiting the right to vote to parents and even populating Mars. Its widely believed that Jaan Tallinn, the wealthy long-termer who co-founded the most prominent centers for the study of A.I. safety, has made dismissive noises about climate change because he thinks that it pales in comparison with far-future unknown unknowns like risks from A.I. The technology historian David C. Brock calls these fears wishful worries that is, problems that it would be nice to have, in contrast to the actual agonies of the present.

More practically, many of the researchers in this group are proceeding full steam ahead in developing A.I., demonstrating how unrealistic it is to simply hit pause on technological development. But the roboticist Rodney Brooks has pointed out that we will see the existential risks coming, the dangers will not be sudden and we will have time to change course. While we shouldnt dismiss the Hollywood nightmare scenarios out of hand, we must balance them with the potential benefits of A.I. and, most important, not allow them to strategically distract from more immediate concerns. Lets not let apocalyptic prognostications overwhelm us and smother the momentum we need to develop critical guardrails.

While the doomsayer faction focuses on the far-off future, its most prominent opponents are focused on the here and now. We agree with this group that theres plenty already happening to cause concern: Racist policing and legal systems that disproportionately arrest and punish people of color. Sexist labor systems that rate feminine-coded rsums lower. Superpower nations automating military interventions as tools of imperialism and, someday, killer robots.

The alternative to the end-of-the-world, existential risk narrative is a distressingly familiar vision of dystopia: a society in which humanitys worst instincts are encoded into and enforced by machines. The doomsayers think A.I. enslavement looks like the Matrix; the reformers point to modern-day contractors doing traumatic work at low pay for OpenAI in Kenya.

Propagators of these A.I. ethics concerns like Meredith Broussard, Safiya Umoja Noble, Rumman Chowdhury and Cathy ONeil have been raising the alarm on inequities coded into A.I. for years. Although we dont have a census, its noticeable that many leaders in this cohort are people of color, women and people who identify as L.G.B.T.Q. They are often motivated by insight into what it feels like to be on the wrong end of algorithmic oppression and by a connection to the communities most vulnerable to the misuse of new technology. Many in this group take an explicitly social perspective: When Joy Buolamwini founded an organization to fight for equitable A.I., she called it the Algorithmic Justice League. Ruha Benjamin called her organization the Ida B. Wells Just Data Lab.

Others frame efforts to reform A.I. in terms of integrity, calling for Big Tech to adhere to an oath to consider the benefit of the broader public alongside or even above their self-interest. They point to social media companies failure to control hate speech or how online misinformation can undermine democratic elections. Adding urgency for this group is that the very companies driving the A.I. revolution have, at times, been eliminating safeguards. A signal moment came when Timnit Gebru, a co-leader of Googles A.I. ethics team, was dismissed for pointing out the risks of developing ever-larger A.I. language models.

While doomsayers and reformers share the concern that A.I. must align with human interests, reformers tend to push back hard against the doomsayers focus on the distant future. They want to wrestle the attention of regulators and advocates back toward present-day harms that are exacerbated by A.I. misinformation, surveillance and inequity. Integrity experts call for the development of responsible A.I., for civic education to ensure A.I. literacy and for keeping humans front and center in A.I. systems.

This groups concerns are well documented and urgent and far older than modern A.I. technologies. Surely, we are a civilization big enough to tackle more than one problem at a time; even those worried that A.I. might kill us in the future should still demand that it not profile and exploit us in the present.

Other groups of prognosticators cast the rise of A.I. through the language of competitiveness and national security. One version has a post-9/11 ring to it a world where terrorists, criminals and psychopaths have unfettered access to technologies of mass destruction. Another version is a Cold War narrative of the United States losing an A.I. arms race with China and its surveillance-rich society.

Some arguing from this perspective are acting on genuine national security concerns, and others have a simple motivation: money. These perspectives serve the interests of American tech tycoons as well as the government agencies and defense contractors they are intertwined with.

OpenAIs Sam Altman and Metas Mark Zuckerberg, both of whom lead dominant A.I. companies, are pushing for A.I. regulations that they say will protect us from criminals and terrorists. Such regulations would be expensive to comply with and are likely to preserve the market position of leading A.I. companies while restricting competition from start-ups. In the lobbying battles over Europes trailblazing A.I. regulatory framework, U.S. megacompanies pleaded to exempt their general purpose A.I. from the tightest regulations, and whether and how to apply high-risk compliance expectations on noncorporate open-source models emerged as a key point of debate. All the while, some of the moguls investing in upstart companies are fighting the regulatory tide. The Inflection AI co-founder Reid Hoffman argued, The answer to our challenges is not to slow down technology but to accelerate it.

Any technology critical to national defense usually has an easier time avoiding oversight, regulation and limitations on profit. Any readiness gap in our military demands urgent budget increases, funds distributed to the military branches and their contractors, because we may soon be called upon to fight. Tech moguls like Googles former chief executive Eric Schmidt, who has the ear of many lawmakers, signal to American policymakers about the Chinese threat even as they invest in U.S. national security concerns.

The warriors narrative seems to misrepresent that science and engineering are different from what they were during the mid-20th century. A.I. research is fundamentally international; no one country will win a monopoly. And while national security is important to consider, we must also be mindful of self-interest of those positioned to benefit financially.

As the science-fiction author Ted Chiang has said, fears about the existential risks of A.I. are really fears about the threat of uncontrolled capitalism, and dystopias like the paper clip maximizer are just caricatures of every start-ups business plan. Cosma Shalizi and Henry Farrell further argue that weve lived among shoggoths for centuries, tending to them as though they were our masters as monopolistic platforms devour and exploit the totality of humanitys labor and ingenuity for their own interests. This dread applies as much to our future with A.I. as it does to our past and present with corporations.

Regulatory solutions do not need to reinvent the wheel. Instead, we need to double down on the rules that we know limit corporate power. We need to get more serious about establishing good and effective governance on all the issues we lost track of while we were becoming obsessed with A.I., China and the fights picked among robber barons.

By analogy to the health care sector, we need an A.I. public option to truly keep A.I. companies in check. A publicly directed A.I. development project would serve to counterbalance for-profit corporate A.I. and help ensure an even playing field for access to the 21st centurys key technology while offering a platform for the ethical development and use of A.I.

Also, we should embrace the humanity behind A.I. We can hold founders and corporations accountable by mandating greater A.I. transparency in the development stage, in addition to applying legal standards for actions associated with A.I. Remarkably, this is something that both the left and the right can agree on.

Ultimately, we need to make sure the network of laws and regulations that govern our collective behavior is knit more strongly, with fewer gaps and greater ability to hold the powerful accountable, particularly in those areas most sensitive to our democracy and environment. As those with power and privilege seem poised to harness A.I. to accumulate much more or pursue extreme ideologies, lets think about how we can constrain their influence in the public square rather than cede our attention to their most bombastic nightmare visions for the future.

See more here:

Opinion | Elon Musk, Geoff Hinton, and the War Over A.I. - The New York Times

Posted in Mars Colony | Comments Off on Opinion | Elon Musk, Geoff Hinton, and the War Over A.I. – The New York Times

Page 11234..1020..»