WASHINGTON The lawsuit, a federal judge found, bordered on the delusional. A Louisiana police officer injured in a protest tried to sue the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter, which amounted, wrote Judge Brian A. Jackson of the Federal District Court in Baton Rouge, to picking a fight with an idea. A hashtag, Judge Jackson wrote, is patently incapable of being sued.
The officer also sued Black Lives Matter, which the judge said was also a nonstarter. It is, he wrote, a social movement rather than an organization or entity of any sort that could be a defendant in a lawsuit.
A third part of the lawsuit seeking to hold a leader of the movement liable for the officers injuries reached the Supreme Court on Friday. Judge Jackson had dismissed that part of the case on First Amendment grounds, but an appeals court revived it, alarming civil rights lawyers and experts on free speech.
The officer, according to a lawsuit in which he was identified as John Doe, was injured in Baton Rouge by a demonstrator who threw a rock that broke the officers teeth and left him with injuries to his jaw and brain. The demonstrator has not been found.
The protest, which occurred in the summer of 2016, concerned the fatal shooting of a black man, Alton B. Sterling, by two police officers. The demonstration started peacefully but turned violent.
The officer sued DeRay Mckesson, a Black Lives Matter activist, claiming, without providing details, that Mr. Mckesson had incited the violence that led to his injuries. Mr. Mckesson was present at the protest, which blocked the highway in front of the Police Departments headquarters, but he did not throw the rock that hit the officer in the head.
Judge Jackson ruled for Mr. Mckesson, saying he was protected by the First Amendment. Liability may not be imposed merely because an individual belonged to a group, some members of which committed acts of violence, he wrote, quoting a landmark 1982 Supreme Court decision, N.A.A.C.P. v. Claiborne Hardware Co.
Allowing such lawsuits, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the court, would chill free speech rights and hand government officials a powerful tool to suppress the rights of black citizens to challenge a political and economic system that had denied them the basic rights of dignity and equality that this country had fought a Civil War to secure.
The federal appeals court in New Orleans reversed the part of Judge Jacksons ruling concerning Mr. Mckesson, letting the officers lawsuit move forward.
Officer Doe alleges that Mckesson was negligent for organizing and leading the Baton Rouge demonstration because he knew or should have known that the demonstration would turn violent, Judge E. Grady Jolly wrote for a unanimous three-judge panel of the court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. That was enough to let the case proceed, Judge Jolly wrote.
Mckesson should have known that leading the demonstrators onto a busy highway was most nearly certain to provoke a confrontation between police and the mass of demonstrators, yet he ignored the foreseeable danger to officers, bystanders and demonstrators, and notwithstanding, did so anyway, the judge wrote.
Garrett Epps, a law professor at the University of Baltimore, called the ruling an affront.
The decision was not simply lawless, but insolently so, he wrote in The Atlantic.
On Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union asked the Supreme Court to hear Mr. Mckessons appeal. David Cole, the groups legal director, said the appeals court had made a grave and dangerous mistake.
If the law had allowed anyone to sue leaders of social justice movements over the violent actions of others, he said, there would have been no civil rights movement.
The officers lawsuit contended that Mr. Mckesson was liable for his injuries by failing to calm the crowd.
The one comment from Mr. Mckesson quoted in the officers lawsuit did not support the idea that he had incited the violence, Judge Jackson found.
The comment was part of an interview with The New York Times the day after the demonstration. The police want protesters to be too afraid to protest, Mr. Mckesson said.
Judge Jackson said the statement was protected by the First Amendment.
Mckessons statement does not advocate or make any reference to violence of any kind, and even if the statement did, mere advocacy of the use of force or violence does not remove speech from the protection of the First Amendment, Judge Jackson wrote, quoting from the Claiborne Hardware decision. This statement falls far short of being likely to incite lawless action, which plaintiff would have to prove to hold Mckesson liable based on his public speech.
In its petition seeking Supreme Court review, the A.C.L.U. said the principle announced in the Claiborne Hardware case was no relic.
Indeed, the petition said, the rule is of particular value to the rights of protesters be they same-sex marriage opponents in Berkeley, Calif., or gun control proponents in Boise, Idaho who take to the streets to persuade their fellow citizens to reconsider locally orthodox opinions.
Read more from the original source:
Violent Protests and Free Speech: Whos to Blame for an Officers Injuries? - The New York Times
- We like our first amendment rights whatever they are - Burnett County Sentinel - October 21st, 2021
- No Government Action (and Thus No First Amendment Violation) in Suspension of Plaintiffs' YouTube Accounts - Reason - October 21st, 2021
- Supreme Court will hear Boston flag case that pits First Amendment religious liberty clauses against each other - Baptist News Global - October 21st, 2021
- Activision's Banking On The First Amendment To Win Warzone.com Trademark Lawsuit - SegmentNext - October 21st, 2021
- The Second Amendment vs. the Seventh Amendment: Procedural Rights and the Problem of Incorporation - Reason - October 21st, 2021
- Court Tells Arkansas Troopers That Muting Anti-Cop Terms On Its Facebook Page Violates The 1st Amendment - Techdirt - October 21st, 2021
- Swedish ambassador to the United States to visit the Cronkite School - Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication - October 21st, 2021
- Teachers and civil rights groups sue over Oklahoma's ban on critical race theory - NPR - October 21st, 2021
- ACLU of South Dakota: Dept. of Education revisions to Social Studies Standards, creation of second working group likely violate federal and... - October 21st, 2021
- Judicial Secrecy: How To Fix the Over-sealing of Federal Court Records - Just Security - October 21st, 2021
- Removing obscenities from vanity plates will take time - LimaOhio.com - October 21st, 2021
- Magna Carta | The First Amendment Encyclopedia - October 17th, 2021
- FIRST 5: For these 5, First Amendment is everyday essential - Salina Post - October 17th, 2021
- Addressing First Amendment limitations - Boothbay Register - October 17th, 2021
- Fired Spanish Fort magistrate alleges termination amounts to violation of First Amendment rights - FOX10 News - October 17th, 2021
- Stealing election signs is a First Amendment violation - The Robesonian - October 17th, 2021
- First Amendment Art Mural, The Prairie newsroom - The Prairie - October 17th, 2021
- 'More reporting:' How journalists should cover threats to democracy | NewsChannel 3-12 - KEYT - October 17th, 2021
- The Purpose Of The Jan. 6 Select Committee Is To Suppress Free Speech - The Federalist - October 17th, 2021
- Testing the waters of conventional wisdom and the law - Manchester Ink Link - October 17th, 2021
- Former Trump press secretary says Psaki may have violated Hatch Act with praise for McAuliffe - Washington Times - October 17th, 2021
- Krull: The things we put on Facebook should be subject to libel laws - The Herald-Times - October 11th, 2021
- Texans to vote on amendment that would bar government from shutting down churches - KGBT-TV - October 11th, 2021
- It seems that all individuals are protected at SU, except student veterans - The Daily Orange - October 11th, 2021
- So you want to address the Indian River School County Board? New rules may be coming - TCPalm - October 11th, 2021
- Grassley, GOP Senators to AG: Don't Interfere with Parents' Right to Address School Boards - The Iowa Torch - October 11th, 2021
- I refused to lie under oath for the state of Arizona, and the courts aren't on my side - USA TODAY - October 11th, 2021
- Will Roe survive new Supreme Court case, or is this the term it falls? - MinnPost - October 11th, 2021
- The First Amendment Right to Cancel - The Wall Street Journal - October 7th, 2021
- Column: Should COVID-19 Kill the First Amendment? - The Herald-Times - October 7th, 2021
- Our view: Violence chills First Amendment rights to free speech, assembly and petition - Joplin Globe - October 7th, 2021
- Is YouTube Violating the First Amendment by Removing Anti-Vaccine Videos? - News@Northeastern - October 7th, 2021
- Are government bans on the teaching of critical race theory unconstitutional? - ABA Journal - October 7th, 2021
- Colleges Learning Costly Woke Math in the Courtroom School of Hard Knocks - 69News WFMZ-TV - October 7th, 2021
- First Amendment Center | Freedom Forum Institute - October 3rd, 2021
- Some Capital Gazette shooting victims say they werent the only targets, 1st Amendment was - WTOP - October 3rd, 2021
- Judge: Sheriff violated First Amendment with jail threat over COVID posts - Wisconsin Newspaper Association - October 3rd, 2021
- Libraries, censorship, and the First Amendment | SDPB - SDPB Radio - October 3rd, 2021
- Trump lawyers cite First Amendment in asking judge to force Twitter to restart his account - NewsNation Now - October 3rd, 2021
- Annie Kapnick joins Reporters Committee as litigation fellow - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - October 3rd, 2021
- Conspiracy Theories and Your Clearance: Should You Be Worried if You Get Banned from YouTube Like Robert Kennedy Jr. - ClearanceJobs - October 3rd, 2021
- Are Human Rights Violations Becoming More Difficult to Hide? - Columbia University - October 3rd, 2021
- Libraries: Strongholds of the First Amendment | SDPB - SDPB Radio - September 29th, 2021
- What does the first amendment mean to you? - Royal Purple News - September 29th, 2021
- UNO hosts online First Amendment webinar - Gateway - The Gateway - September 29th, 2021
- Liz Cheney to speak at Loeb School First Amendment event - The Union Leader - September 29th, 2021
- Judge Explains First Amendment Basics to Wisconsin Sheriff Who Threatened Teen with Jail for Instagramming Her COVID Infection - Reason - September 29th, 2021
- Is It Autumn for the First Amendment? - FlaglerLive.com - September 29th, 2021
- First amendment groups invite public to virtual session on open government - The Union-Recorder - September 29th, 2021
- Fact check: Shouting profanity about the president is protected by the First Amendment, legal experts say - USA TODAY - September 29th, 2021
- Sheriff Violated First Amendment by Ordering Teen to Take Down Post Saying She Had COVID - Reason - September 29th, 2021
- OPINION: UGA, your promise to protect First Amendment rights is not enough - Red and Black - September 29th, 2021
- The Texas Social Media Law Is Blatantly Unconstitutional: Government Restrictions On Private Editorial Discretion Violate the First Amendment, by... - September 29th, 2021
- Democrats have the GOP playbook: They know how to fight back, but just won't do it - Salon - September 29th, 2021
- First Amendment day is a reminder we get to have a say - White Bear Press - September 24th, 2021
- ACLU Thinks the Second Amendment Is a Threat to the First Amendment - Reason - September 24th, 2021
- Fact check: Shouting profanity about the president is protected by the First Amendment, legal experts say - Yahoo News - September 24th, 2021
- Texas sues Biden admin for the First Amendment right to misgender trans people while they work - LGBTQ Nation - September 24th, 2021
- CP Brand Solutions | Threats to the First Amendment are GrowingWe Need Your Input. - Christian Post - September 24th, 2021
- Big Tech Sues Texas Over New Law Targeting Social Media Censorship - The Texan - September 24th, 2021
- A Critic Talks About Where Florida's 'Anti-Riot' Law Came From And The Impact It's Having On Protesting - WUSF News - September 24th, 2021
- Citizens have the right to develop their own convictions - The Altamont Enterprise - September 24th, 2021
- Banned books, disinformation, and how public libraries are the solution | Opinion - Tennessean - September 24th, 2021
- Could the 1st Amendment destroy America? | News, Sports, Jobs - Williamsport Sun-Gazette - September 17th, 2021
- Technology Giants and the Deregulatory First Amendment - Lawfare - September 17th, 2021
- Florida Anti-Riot Law 'Violates the First Amendment,' Says Court in Scathing Rebuke of Gov. Ron DeSantis - Reason - September 17th, 2021
- Could the First Amendment destroy America? | News, Sports, Jobs - Bollyinside - BollyInside - September 17th, 2021
- Poll: Most Americans incorrectly believe Facebook protected by First Amendment - The Week Magazine - September 17th, 2021
- Woman gets probation for 'minimal' role in Capitol riot - Associated Press - September 17th, 2021
- Opinion | Amy Coney Barrett Is Right About Problems With the Media. She Has a Chance to Fix It. - POLITICO - September 17th, 2021
- We must make the First Amendment 'durable.' Here's why | Miraldi - Poughkeepsie Journal - September 10th, 2021
- Learn about the history of the First Amendment during talk at senior center - The Sun Chronicle - September 10th, 2021
- GK Quiz on First Amendment of the Indian Constitution - Jagran Josh - September 10th, 2021
- Facebook, YouTube and Twitter will fight Texas crackdown on 'censorship' of Trump, conservative speech - USA TODAY - September 10th, 2021
- First Amendment Timeline | The Free Speech Center - August 28th, 2021
- Cuyahoga County Probation Officer Hits Union with Federal Lawsuit for Years of Unconstitutional Dues Seizures - National Right to Work Foundation - August 28th, 2021
- The Conundrum of the Separation of Church and State Divided We Fall - Divided We Fall - August 28th, 2021
- 7 Capitol Police officers sue Trump, others over Capitol riot - POLITICO - August 28th, 2021
- Capitol Police officer who killed Ashli Babbitt on January 6 speaks publicly for first time: I know that day I saved countless lives - WTOP - August 28th, 2021
- The Supreme Court Will Decide If the First Amendment Grants the Right to Film Cops - The New Republic - August 20th, 2021