LONDON A British court ruled on Friday that Julian Assange can be extradited to the United States to face charges that could result in decades of jail time, reversing a lower-court decision in the long-running case against the embattled WikiLeaks founder.
The ruling was a victory, at least for now, for the Biden administration, which has pursued an effort to prosecute Mr. Assange begun under the Trump administration. Mr. Assange will seek to appeal the decision to Britains Supreme Court, according to his legal team.
The Justice Departments decision to charge Mr. Assange under the Espionage Act in connection with obtaining and publishing secret government documents has raised novel First Amendment issues and alarmed advocates of media freedom. But because he has been fighting extradition, those questions have not been litigated and his transfer to the United States could set off a momentous constitutional battle.
The extradition case in Britain has not turned on whether the charges against Mr. Assange are legitimate a lower-court judge ruled they were but on whether prison conditions in the United States are too harsh for his mental health.
In ruling that Mr. Assange can be extradited, the High Court in London said that it was satisfied by the Biden administrations assurances that it would not hold him at the highest security facility in the United States which houses the nations worst criminals and that, if he were convicted, it would let him serve his sentence in his native Australia if he requested it. The United States also said Mr. Assange would receive any necessary psychological treatment.
In January, the lower court judge had rejected the extradition request on the grounds that Mr. Assange might be driven to suicide by American prison conditions.
Several doctors have said Mr. Assange suffers from depression and memory loss and could attempt suicide if he were extradited.
Wyn Hornbuckle, a spokesman for the Justice Department, said the government was pleased by the ruling and would have no further comment. But an American lawyer for Mr. Assange, Barry J. Pollack, called it disturbing that the British court had accepted the American governments vague assurances of humane treatment.
The U.K. court reached this decision without considering whether extradition is appropriate when the United States is pursuing charges against him that could result in decades in prison, based on his having reported truthful information about newsworthy issues such as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, he said.
Mr. Assange fled to the Ecuadorean Embassy in London in 2012 when he was facing an investigation on accusations of sexual assault in Sweden, which was eventually dropped. He said he feared his human rights would be violated if he were extradited in that case.
He remained in the embassy for seven years until he was ejected in 2019. The United States unsealed an indictment against him on hacking charges on the day of his expulsion, and charged him under the Espionage Act weeks later. He has been detained in Londons Belmarsh prison since 2019.
The case against Mr. Assange centers on his 2010 publication of diplomatic and military files leaked by Chelsea Manning, a former Army intelligence analyst not on his publication during the 2016 election of Democratic emails stolen by Russia.
Over the course of three indictments developed during the Trump administration, prosecutors have made two sets of accusations.
The first is that Mr. Assange participated in a criminal hacking conspiracy, both by offering to help Ms. Manning mask her tracks on a secure computer network and by engaging in a broader effort to encourage hackers to obtain secret material and send it to WikiLeaks. The other is that his solicitation and publication of information the government deemed secret violated the Espionage Act.
Hacking is not a journalistic act. But the second set of charges could establish a precedent that journalistic-style activities like seeking and publishing information the government considers classified may be treated as a crime in the United States a separate question from whether Mr. Assange himself is considered a journalist.
Mr. Assanges fianc, Stella Moris, in a statement called Fridays decision a grave miscarriage of justice. Ms. Moris and Mr. Assange have two children, conceived while he was in the Ecuadorean embassy in London.
What are the criminal charges brought on by the U.S.? After his expulsion from the embassy, the U.S. unsealed an indictmentagainst Mr. Assange and soughthis extradition. Prosecutors have accused him of violating the Espionage Actfor his role in the 2010 disclosures and of participating in a hacking conspiracy. (He is not charged for the publication of the D.N.C. emails in 2016.)
Why does his case raise media freedom issues? The solicitation and publication of government secrets is a journalistic-style activity, whether or not Mr. Assange counts as a journalist. That raises novel First Amendment issuesand could establish a precedent constraining investigative journalism about military, intelligence and diplomatic matters.
Where is Mr. Assange now? After he was expelled from the embassy, he was sentenced to 50 weeks in jail in London for for breaching bail conditions related to the rape inquiry; he has remained in prison while the U.S. extradition case is pending.
Can the U.S. extradite him? In January, a court rejected the U.S. extradition requeston the grounds that Mr. Assange might be driven to suicide by American prison conditions. The Trump administration appealed, and the Biden administration later made assurances of humane treatment. On Dec. 10, a higher court ruled that Mr. Assange can be extradited. His lawyer said they will seek to appeal.
Kristinn Hrafnsson, the editor in chief of WikiLeaks, warned that Mr. Assanges life is once more under grave threat, and so is the right of journalists to publish material that governments and corporations find inconvenient.
He added, This is about the right of a free press to publish without being threatened by a bullying superpower.
Activists who gathered outside the courthouse in central London erupted in protest after the news of the decision filtered outside. And rights groups quickly condemned it.
Christophe Deloire, the head of Reporters Without Borders, said in a statement that we defend this case because of its dangerous implications for the future of journalism and press freedom around the world.
Jameel Jaffer, the executive director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, who testified in the extradition proceeding, reiterated profound concerns about the case in a statement.
The indictment, he said, focused in large part on activities that investigative journalists engage in routinely.
The message of the indictment is that these activities are not just unprotected by the First Amendment but criminal under the Espionage Act, he said. The Trump administration should never have filed this indictment, and we call on the Biden administration again to withdraw it.
See more here:
U.K. Court Rules Julian Assange Can Be Extradited to U.S. - The New York Times
- Biden Wants To Avoid a First Amendment Showdown Over WikiLeaks - Reason - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raises eyebrows with comment that First Amendment 'hamstrings' government - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- West Texas drag show becomes a First Amendment battleground - The Texas Tribune - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - The Associated Press - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, and Substantial Encouragement - Reason - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- News/Media Alliance Joins Brief Defending First Amendment Editorial Rights of Documentarians - News/Media Alliance - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The State of the First Amendment: Free Speech - University of Colorado Boulder - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justices Seem Likely to Side With N.R.A. in First Amendment Dispute - The New York Times - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh loses patience with the judiciarys far right - Vox.com - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justice Jackson ripped for worrying about the First Amendment 'hamstringing' government: 'Literally the point' - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Analysis: SCOTUS Oral Arguments Bode Well For NRA First Amendment Claim [Member Exclusive] - The Reload - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear First Amendment challenge to New York's financial 'blacklisting' of NRA - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- NRA Goes To The Supreme Court Today In First Amendment CaseHere's What To Know - Forbes - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear case of former Castle Hills councilwoman who claims First Amendment rights were violated - KSAT San Antonio - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in key First Amendment case challenging Biden admin teamwork with Big Tech - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- "Black Lives Mat[t]er" + "Any Life" Drawing "Not Protected by the First Amendment" in First Grade - Reason - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - KXLY Spokane - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court hears free speech case that united the NRA and the ACLU - The Washington Post - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court Wary of States' Bid to Limit Federal Contact With Social Media Companies - The New York Times - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Opinion: A First Amendment Fizzle at the U.S. Supreme Court - The Atlanta Journal Constitution - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The First Amendment is under attack in Americas Oceania - Washington Examiner - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Education Institutions Grapple With Overlap of First Amendment and Anti-Discrimination Laws - JD Supra - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - The Caledonian-Record - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Note to Justice Jackson: First Amendment Should Hamstring Biden - Daily Signal - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - KEYT - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The First Amendment Supreme Court case right wingers are crazy for - The Independent - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Ketanji Brown Jackson concerned First Amendment is hamstringing government from censorship - Washington Examiner - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justice Jackson: First Amendment "Hamstringing" Federal Response To "Threatening Circumstances, From The ... - RealClearPolitics - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Opinion: Sen. Chuck Grassley should stand up for the First Amendment and support the PRESS Act - The Gazette - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- The Supreme Court must protect the First Amendment in Murthy v. Missouri - Washington Examiner - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- A Hillsborough judge invokes the First Amendment in a case related to a 2022 election campaign - WMNF - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- John Stockton's lawyer claims first amendment violation as basis for COVID-19 lawsuit - KXLY Spokane - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Scientology Scores A First Amendment Win Over Leah Remini, But Harassment Claims Against Church Still Stand, Judge Rules - Deadline - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear First Amendment cases, weigh in on Texas immigration law - MSN - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- 7 Expert Takeaways As the Supreme Court Considers Government Influence on Content Moderation - Just Security - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Conflict between First Amendment and discrimination on Broadway | Strictly Legal - The Cincinnati Enquirer - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Maryland fraternities petition federal judge - Baltimore Sun - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Supreme Court to debate whether White House crosses First Amendment line on social media disinformation - News-Press Now - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Broadway Actors Race Discrimination Claims Sent Back to the Underworld in the Face of Producers First Amendment ... - JD Supra - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Congress Should Give Up on Unconstitutional TikTok Bans - EFF - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- U.S. House Votes in Favor of TikTok Ban Bill Amid First Amendment and Other Questions - Democracy Now! - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Review of Amicus Briefs Filed in Murthy v. Missouri Before the Supreme Court | TechPolicy.Press - Tech Policy Press - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Supreme Court defines when it's illegal for public officials to block social media critics - The Verge - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Doctor sues state of WA for his First Amendment rights - KXLY Spokane - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- ACLU To Defend NRA as Supreme Court Weighs Whether New York Violated Gun Group's First Amendment Rights - The New York Sun - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- U.Va. alumna settles First Amendment lawsuit against the University after her expulsion in abeyance - University of Virginia The Cavalier Daily - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- The Oregonian/OregonLive wins First Amendment ruling in Nike documents case - OregonLive - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Progressive attacks on the US constitution escalate - UnHerd - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Artificial intelligence: Tennessee ELVIS Act threatens First Amendment - Tennessean - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Eighth Circuit: Fun With the First Amendment - Law.com - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: First Amendment doesn't protect senators who walked out from consequences - Herald and News - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- What Is at Stake in the Florida, Texas First Amendment Cases - Disruptive Competition Project - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Poll: Almost a third of Americans say the First Amendment goes 'too far' - Reason - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Who will protect the First Amendment? - Voz Media - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Certainty and uncertainty: The tech platform cases First Amendment News 413 - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Social Media Content Moderation Laws 'Strike at the Heart of the First Amendment' - PEN America - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Does the First Amendment apply to social media moderation? The U.S. Supreme Court will decide - 25 News KXXV and KRHD - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Jacob Sullum - Sacrificing the First Amendment to save it? - Defiance Crescent News - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- God Help Us, but Brett Kavanaugh Could Save the First Amendment - The Daily Beast - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Editorial (N.Y) Daily News: The Supreme Court's sticky web: The First Amendment protects social media - The Daily News Online - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- In Supreme Court, Texas and Florida's Argument Against Big Tech Content Moderation Runs Afoul of First Amendment - Free Press - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Two students suing SUNY Cortland over alleged First Amendment violation | 870 AM 97.7FM News Talk WHCU - whcuradio.com - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Expert calls for Supreme Court to find middle way on First Amendment tech cases - ideastream - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court social media cases could put some First Amendment claims in the firing line - Freedom of the Press Foundation - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- One-third of adults say the First Amendment 'goes too far' - Washington Times - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Does the First Amendment apply to social media moderation? The U.S. Supreme Court will decide. - Palestine Herald Press - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court digs into Big Tech censorship and First Amendment - Washington Times - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- The Supreme Court's sticky web: The First Amendment protects social media - Shelbynews - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court to decide how the First Amendment applies to social media - redlakenationnews.com - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- United States Mint Announces Release of Fourth Coin in Platinum Proof Series Celebrating Five Freedoms of the First ... - GlobeNewswire - February 9th, 2024 [February 9th, 2024]
- UNM Law professor joins amicus brief in Trump v. Anderson Supreme Court Case - UNM Newsroom - February 9th, 2024 [February 9th, 2024]
- CNN's Clarissa Ward Named a Recipient of the RTDNA's 2024 First Amendment Award - Adweek - February 9th, 2024 [February 9th, 2024]
- A new Supreme Court case threatens to take away your right to protest - Vox.com - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- No, Blocking Traffic Is Not Protected by the First Amendment - Reason - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- Cable Giants Insist That Forcing Them To Make Cancellations Easier Violates Their First Amendment Rights - Above the Law - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- Star-Spangled Fascism: Extremists and the First Amendment - GBH News - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- Know Your Rights: Students in Higher Education & the First Amendment - New York Civil Liberties Union - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- SPJ co-authors legal brief supporting First Amendment right to record and publish livestreamed court hearings - Society of Professional Journalists - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- SPJ co-authors legal brief supporting First Amendment right to record and publish livestreamed court hearings - Editor And Publisher Magazine - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- FCC's Jessica Rosenworcel On Trump Broadcast License Threats: First Amendment Guides Us. - Insideradio.com - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]