Libraries across Multnomah County celebrate Banned Books Week by prominently displaying banned or challenged books Oct. 1-7.
Multnomah County libraries Banned Books Week celebrations have added significance this year. With book bans and challenges rising throughout the United States and Oregon, challenges or requests for reconsideration keep the Oregon Library Association, or OLA, Intellectual Freedom Committee busy addressing censorship issues.
Librarians throughout Multnomah County and the state look forward to raising awareness about intellectual freedom in the wake of schools and librarians facing threats and harassment regarding books with LGBTQIA+ content.
Displays include books like Gender Queer: A Memoir by Maia Kobabe, the most challenged book in America from 2022, according to the American Library Association. Many educators consider this young adult graphic novel, which deals with gender identity, to be appropriate for high school students.
The State Library of Oregon reports book challenges are at a historic high, with many attempts focused on multiple titles at once. Of 46 challenges, 82% were at public libraries and 18% at school libraries. Patrons, parents or groups, some explicitly political or religious, file the challenges. These challenges range from requesting librarians move a book to a separate library shelf to asking librarians to remove materials altogether.
The First Amendment allows individuals to gather, speak, publish, read and view what they wish with few restrictions. The legal bar for restricting speech is extremely high, so banning books in public libraries is on shaky ground when it comes to the First Amendment.
Regardless of dubious legality, groups and individuals are ramping up efforts to ban books, particularly those written by marginalized people, Shawn Cunningham, Multnomah County Library spokesperson, said.
Across the country, so-called parent advocacy groups put pressure on school districts to ban books addressing race, sexuality and gender identity. Leading groups include Citizens Defending Freedom, Parents Rights in Education and Moms for Liberty, which are typically funded by special interest groups and promote a far-right or religious agenda. Often, the groups have few local ties, if any, but work to create a superficial fervor for banning books in a given area.
Multnomah County Library stands against censorship, Cunningham said. Public libraries are vital civic spaces, places for differing ideas and points of view. Promoting civil discourse about difficult subjects and upholding the principles of intellectual freedom are core library values.
In light of organized efforts to suppress marginalized voices and perspectives, those values are more important than ever.
Emily ONeal, OLA Intellectual Freedom Committee chair, leads OLAs efforts around intellectual freedom.
ONeal said the committee has been busier than usual in recent years. Four years ago, the committee tracked one challenged book at a time. Now, the committee typically tracks three or four book challenges at a time.
Bans, challenges, censorship; a lot of folks use the term banning universally, but it is the least likely of scenarios, ONeal, also a public librarian in Bend, said. A ban is the result of a process when a book has been removed. It does not happen very often and is not a concern nationwide. We more often see a challenge process, the act of asking for removal.
Request for Reconsideration is a formal process to challenge a book. Questions on the form from the OLA include whether someone read the entire book, what concerns they have and suggestions for how they want the library to provide more information and other viewpoints. The complainant completes the form and talks to the librarian, teacher or principal about their concerns.
According to Miranda Doyle, a school library media specialist who serves on the OLA Intellectual Freedom Committee, the process can continue from there. If unresolved, the school district can form a committee that meets once or several times; they vote on their recommendation. Most often, there are teachers, parents, students and librarians on the committee. These meetings can be public or summarized for the public afterward. Sometimes, the recommendation to retain, remove or relocate books goes to the school board or superintendent for approval or a different outcome.
Multnomah County Library operates based on a set of values and goals that reflect its mission of service to the community, Cunningham said. Library patrons are welcome to submit statements of concern about library materials; the library evaluates each of those separately and with care.
Currently, 90 books, two films and one magazine are on the State Library of Oregons list of challenged items. Almost all have been retained or are under review. One, Crank by Ellen Hopkins, has been restricted. Libraries are still reviewing some items and have not removed any.
Most challengers follow the process, but sometimes people circumvent this by going straight to the library board, school administration or local government, according to the state library. A few resort to aggressive tactics, such as harassing library staff and lobbing death threats, as was the case for three Oregon public libraries challenged over LGBTQIA+ books this year.
The state library reports challengers accused the libraries of promoting content, distributing pornography to minors, and encouraging sexualization of young children. In addition to death threats and general harassment, challengers called library staff groomers and "pedophiles," according to the state librarys Oregon Intellectual Freedom Clearinghouse 2023 Report.
These instances in Oregon reflect what is happening around the country. OLAs Intellectual Freedom Committee maintains a statement regarding its stance on the First Amendment and book banning.
We support the right of parents and guardians to guide their childs reading and viewing choices, but that right does not extend to removing choices for others, the statement reads. The work of libraries and librarians is to serve everyone in their community and provide resources that are reflective of the world around us.
All the books on the American Library Associations list of the 13 most challenged books of 2022 face claims of sexually explicit content or content pertaining to LGBTQIA+ communities. A 2022 Gallup poll found 7.1% of the U.S. population identifies as LGBTQIA+, double the number in 2012. These books reflect a growing demand, and the pushback reflects an intensifying reaction from people and groups with anti-LGBTQIA+ views.
The American Library Association Office of Intellectual Freedom documented challenges to 3,923 book titles nationwide between Jan. 1 and Aug. 31. Challenges are up from last year and the highest number of challenges in the last 20 years. Most of these books were written by or about people of color or members of LGBTQIA+ communities. Some depict violence or abuse.
While libraries removing books altogether is rare, its not unheard of in Oregon.
In April 2022, North Medford High School removed the graphic novel version of Margaret Atwoods book, The Handmaids Tale, from shelves. A parent complained about images of nudity, sexual assault and suicide in the dystopian science fiction novel, and the school has not returned the title, according to ONeal.
In March 2023, KGW News reported the Canby School District removed 36 titles outside of the review process. Two community members wanted to remove the books because they allegedly depict violence, sexual content, profanity and drug addiction.
KGWs published list of challenged titles included mostly books by and about people of color, LGBTQIA+ people and books with alleged sexual content.
The district planned to review the books over the summer, according to ONeal. Hundreds of parents and students wanted the books returned to the shelves. They attended board meetings, protested and the students set up an Instagram account.
Ultimately, a school board-established committee decided to keep all books except one, Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov. ONeal said the school board did not involve the OLA in the process.
Other school districts in Oregon have faced similar requests from parents, but chose to keep the books available until the matter was resolved. Some, like West Linn-Wilsonville School District, chose to restrict certain books to high school libraries.
PEN America, a writing advocacy group, reports most book bans this school year are in Texas, Florida, Missouri, Utah and South Carolina.
At least seven states passed or are considering obscenity laws penalizing librarians for providing LGBTQIA+ content or what the state considers sexually explicit content, according to The Washington Post.
One thing that is important to this current situation is the folks that are pushing for materials to be removed are organized and pushing at a higher level, ONeal said. They are political and organized, with extreme views, not what communities want. I dont want a protected worldview, and Im baffled as to who these people are because it is an organized extreme effort.
In December 2022, The Bulletin reported some parents asked a director of library services in Crook County to remove childrens books with LGBTQIA+ content to a different part of the library. Moving and labeling the books would be a violation of the First Amendment and could put funding for the library in jeopardy, according to an attorney hired by Crook County.
In turn, the Crook County Library Board of Trustees voted not to move or label the books reflecting the LGBTQIA+ community. Following this, students were not given access to school library materials.
Social media posts targeted the director with misinformation, and patrons subjected library staff to harassment and name-calling. The director eventually resigned, partly due to the overwhelming pressure, The Bulletin reported.
The Oregon Library Association helps libraries through challenges across the state as a resource with policies and information. It may issue public statements against the challenges.
There are things a library can and should do, ONeal said.
She recommends well-trained library staff work with library boards and their community to make sure they understand what to do about book challenges. They can be sure to follow the process and not sidestep policies. Community members can speak up at board meetings in support of libraries and First Amendment rights.
In states with less official resistance to book banning, libraries fight back against First Amendment violations with lawsuits.
This year, libraries in Arkansas, Texas, Florida, Missouri and Wisconsin filed lawsuits because of First Amendment violations, with the help of the Freedom to Read Foundation, the First Amendment legal defense branch of the American Library Association.
In June, the Freedom to Read Foundation, along with authors, librarians, readers, publishers and booksellers, filed suit for Arkansas to remove Act 372, which restricts reading materials in libraries and bookstores.
In Texas, citizens filed a suit against the Llano County government for removing materials from the county library that some library users complained about.
PEN America and Penguin Random House sued the Florida Department of Education on May 16 over unconstitutional book bans targeting books about LGBTQIA+ identities along with race and racism. The ACLU has been involved in other lawsuits, fighting against censorship and upholding the Constitution.
Banned Books Week is a time to call out the need to fight against censorship and to celebrate the freedom to read. This year, the ALAs theme for Banned Books Week is Let Freedom Read!.
Young people in Multnomah County weighed in on the topic of banning or challenging books. The library published some of their comments.
Ive read many banned books, a youth from Gresham said. For example, Stamped by Jason Reynolds & Ibram X. Kendi. I believe people challenged it because of its content on racism. And the history they wrote about it. I found it very interesting and a very important novel. We learn about history so we make sure it doesnt happen again.
Multnomah County Library states on its website that everyone should have the opportunity to see themselves represented on the shelves.
I think books are being banned/challenged because people are afraid of what they dont understand, so they try to get rid of it altogether, a young reader from Woodstock Library said.
Street Roots is an award-winningweekly investigative publication covering economic, environmental and social inequity. The newspaperis sold in Portland, Oregon, by people experiencing homelessness and/or extreme poverty as means of earning an income with dignity.Street Roots newspaper operates independently of Street Roots advocacy andis a part of the Street Roots organization.Learn more about Street Roots.Support your community newspaperbymaking a one-time or recurring gift today.
2023Street Roots. All rights reserved. |To request permission to reuse content, emaileditor@streetroots.orgor call503-228-5657, ext. 404
Visit link:
Oregon libraries celebrate Banned Books Week - Street Roots News
- Senate Passes TikTok Ban Bill, Setting Up Legal Battle Between App and U.S. on First Amendment Issues - Variety - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- How the TikTok ban could survive a court challenge - Platformer - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- Senate Passes TikTok Ban Bill, Setting Up Legal Battle Between App and U.S. on First Amendment Issues - AOL - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- Eighth Circuit Affirms Denial of Qualified Immunity to Mayor and Police Chief of Missouri City in First Amendment ... - Law.com - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- Get the Facts: How far does the First Amendment go? - WMTW Portland - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- Say 'Yes' to the First Amendment Minding The Campus - Minding The Campus - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- Civics lesson: First Amendment rights are broad, but there are limits - Tennessean - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- SCOTUS won't review decision that ratchets up legal risk at protests - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- NPR Against the First Amendment - The New York Sun - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- NPR boss once called the First Amendment a 'challenge' and 'reverence for the truth' a distraction - Fox News - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- Here are the winners of the inaugural Poynter Journalism Prizes - Poynter - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- Can Congress actually ban TikTok? - Vox.com - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- New Stablecoin Bill Faces Criticism for Stifling Innovation and Breaching First Amendment Regulation Bitcoin News - Bitcoin.com News - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- Elon Musk's Plan To Fund National Signature Campaign In Support Of First Amendment Met With Praise - Yahoo! Voices - April 24th, 2024 [April 24th, 2024]
- Trump: First Amendment protects efforts to overturn election - USA TODAY - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- To Fight Ban Bill, TikTok's Best Hopes Lie in First Amendment Challenge - The Information - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Supreme Court must rely on the First Amendment, not its own precedent, when deciding government censorship case - Washington Examiner - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION?: Man removed from Cape council meeting files lawsuit - FOX 4 News Fort Myers WFTX - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump team's First Amendment argument is 'so weak' in Georgia election interference case - MSNBC - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump's team cites First Amendment in contesting charges in Georgia election interference case - The Associated Press - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- A national TikTok ban and the First Amendment - National Constitution Center - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump attorney says Georgia election case hinges on First Amendment Deseret News - Deseret News - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump's team cites First Amendment in contesting charges in Georgia election interference case - The Atlanta Journal Constitution - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Courts Should Affirm First Amendment Rights of Youths in the Digital Age: The Case for a 21stCentury Tinker - Cato Institute - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump legal news brief: Prosecutors tell Judge McAfee that First Amendment doesn't apply to Trump's 'criminal intentions' - Yahoo! Voices - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump attorney tries to have Georgia case dismissed on First Amendment grounds - MSNBC - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump attorney, prosecutors spar over move to have Georgia case dismissed on First Amendment grounds - 11Alive.com WXIA - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Donald Trump Georgia court motions hearing today live stream - 11Alive.com WXIA - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump's team cites First Amendment in contesting charges in Georgia election interference case - Bowling Green Daily News - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- First Amendment protects Trump from Fani Williss election interference charges, attorney argues - Washington Examiner - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Judicial Rulemaking and Lucidity: Justice Barrett's First Amendment Opinion in Lindke v. Freed - American Enterprise Institute - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- First Amendment protects Trump from Fani Willis's election interference charges, attorney argues - Colorado Springs Gazette - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump's team cites First Amendment in contesting election interference charges - Southernminn.com - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump's team cites First Amendment in contesting charges in Georgia election interference case - messenger-inquirer - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Lawyers for the State argue against Trump First Amendment challenge in Georgia case - 11Alive.com WXIA - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- OPINION: The possible TikTok ban is an infringement on our First Amendment rights - The Suffolk Journal - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump's team cites First Amendment in contesting charges in Georgia election interference case - Times Daily - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- An iPhone, YouTube & the First Amendment: Man in St Louis tests boundaries of constitution through videos - First Alert 4 - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Lawyer argues Georgia election RICO case against Trump be dismissed over First Amendment - 11Alive.com WXIA - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Abridging, Not Coercing, Is The First Amendment's Yardstick for Speech Violations - Reason - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Judge hears Trump's First Amendment challenge to Georgia charges: Watch live - Yahoo Singapore News - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Trump's attorney says election inference case should be thrown out over 1st Amendment protections - Yahoo! Voices - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Judge hears Trump's First Amendment challenge to Georgia charges: Watch live - AOL - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Judge sets new hearing date in 2020 Georgia election interference case - 11Alive.com WXIA - March 29th, 2024 [March 29th, 2024]
- Biden Wants To Avoid a First Amendment Showdown Over WikiLeaks - Reason - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raises eyebrows with comment that First Amendment 'hamstrings' government - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- West Texas drag show becomes a First Amendment battleground - The Texas Tribune - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - The Associated Press - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, and Substantial Encouragement - Reason - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- News/Media Alliance Joins Brief Defending First Amendment Editorial Rights of Documentarians - News/Media Alliance - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The State of the First Amendment: Free Speech - University of Colorado Boulder - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justices Seem Likely to Side With N.R.A. in First Amendment Dispute - The New York Times - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh loses patience with the judiciarys far right - Vox.com - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justice Jackson ripped for worrying about the First Amendment 'hamstringing' government: 'Literally the point' - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Analysis: SCOTUS Oral Arguments Bode Well For NRA First Amendment Claim [Member Exclusive] - The Reload - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear First Amendment challenge to New York's financial 'blacklisting' of NRA - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- NRA Goes To The Supreme Court Today In First Amendment CaseHere's What To Know - Forbes - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear case of former Castle Hills councilwoman who claims First Amendment rights were violated - KSAT San Antonio - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in key First Amendment case challenging Biden admin teamwork with Big Tech - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- "Black Lives Mat[t]er" + "Any Life" Drawing "Not Protected by the First Amendment" in First Grade - Reason - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - KXLY Spokane - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court hears free speech case that united the NRA and the ACLU - The Washington Post - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court Wary of States' Bid to Limit Federal Contact With Social Media Companies - The New York Times - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Opinion: A First Amendment Fizzle at the U.S. Supreme Court - The Atlanta Journal Constitution - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The First Amendment is under attack in Americas Oceania - Washington Examiner - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Education Institutions Grapple With Overlap of First Amendment and Anti-Discrimination Laws - JD Supra - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - The Caledonian-Record - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Note to Justice Jackson: First Amendment Should Hamstring Biden - Daily Signal - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - KEYT - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The First Amendment Supreme Court case right wingers are crazy for - The Independent - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Ketanji Brown Jackson concerned First Amendment is hamstringing government from censorship - Washington Examiner - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justice Jackson: First Amendment "Hamstringing" Federal Response To "Threatening Circumstances, From The ... - RealClearPolitics - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Opinion: Sen. Chuck Grassley should stand up for the First Amendment and support the PRESS Act - The Gazette - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- The Supreme Court must protect the First Amendment in Murthy v. Missouri - Washington Examiner - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- A Hillsborough judge invokes the First Amendment in a case related to a 2022 election campaign - WMNF - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- John Stockton's lawyer claims first amendment violation as basis for COVID-19 lawsuit - KXLY Spokane - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Scientology Scores A First Amendment Win Over Leah Remini, But Harassment Claims Against Church Still Stand, Judge Rules - Deadline - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear First Amendment cases, weigh in on Texas immigration law - MSN - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- 7 Expert Takeaways As the Supreme Court Considers Government Influence on Content Moderation - Just Security - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Conflict between First Amendment and discrimination on Broadway | Strictly Legal - The Cincinnati Enquirer - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]