A man convicted after sending upward of a million Facebook messages to a Denver musician was not using free speech protected by the First Amendment, and was instead making threats, the Court of Appeals decided on Thursday in rejecting a constitutional challenge to Colorados stalking law.
In upholding the conviction of Billy Raymond Counterman, a three-judge panel for the Court of Appeals applied recent state Supreme Court guidance for interpreting threats in the age of social media, as well as a basic recognition that perpetrators are able to easily target their victims online.
Recent widely reported cases of online harassment and stalking of public figures particularly of women involve internet users who are strangers to the victims granted previously unavailable access to their targets through social media, wrote Judge Craig R. Welling in the panels July 22 opinion.
Beginning in 2014 when Counterman first sent a Facebook friend request to singer-songwriter Coles Whalen, she received messages from him that she deemed weird and creepy. She did not respond to any of them, and blocked Counterman on multiple occasions.
Over the next two years, she grew fearful of Counterman and was worried about being hurt or killed after the messages kept coming.
I miss you, only a couple physical sightings, youve been a picker upper for me more times than I can count, one of them read. Another asked Whalen ominously: "Was that you in the white Jeep?
Whalen was too frightened to book shows because it meant we had to post online where we would be and at what time, said one of Whalens friends and bandmates, according to Westword. Coles became afraid to talk to people; she was anxious, unhappy, and constantly checking in with security.
Police arrested Counterman in May 2016 and a jury subsequently convicted him of stalking. He received a sentence of four-and-a-half years in prison.
Counterman appealed his conviction, asserting the stalking law was used to punish his free speech. Under Colorado law, stalking can occur when a person repeatedly contacts, surveils or communicates with an individual in such a way that a reasonable person would feel serious emotional distress.
At issue was whether his messages to Whalen, which reportedly numbered over one million, constituted a true threat not shielded by the First Amendment.
Mr. Counterman did not intend to make a threat or didnt have knowledge that the communication would be perceived as a threat, public defender Mackenzie Shields argued to the appellate judges. She added that Counterman's messages were "overwhelmingly mild."
In June 2020, the Colorado Supreme Court revised its standard for what constitutes threatening speech. The Court outlined specific factors to consider like the medium, the relationship between the people involved and the reaction of the recipient but emphasized that context also matters.
In determining whether a statement is a true threat, a reviewing court must examine the words used, but it must also consider the context in which the statement was made, wrote Justice Monica M. Mrquez in the courts opinion.
Although Counterman went to trial before the Courts decision, the trial court judge in his case evaluated the Facebook messages along those lines. For example, Counterman wrote on one occasion that Staying in cyber life is going to kill you. Come out for coffee. You have my number.
Then-Arapahoe County District Court Judge F. Stephen Collins observed that a reader could interpret the message in a couple different ways. I mean, one, its it could be just expressing a concern to someone, but it also could be interpreted, given the totality of the circumstances, as an implied threat that if she stays in cyber life, shes going to get killed. And I find that troublesome.
Afederally-funded study in 2009noted that the intent of stalking laws is to protect victims from behaviors that are not criminal in isolation, but add up to unlawful abuse. Data from a 2006 survey found 20 out of 1,000 women had been victims of stalking, compared to seven out of 1,000 men.
The U.S. Supreme Court has established that true threats, meaning statements where someone communicates a serious intent to commit violence, do not have First Amendment protection. However, in 2015 a majority of the justices reversed a man's conviction because prosecutors had not proven he knowingly threatened his wife with his online posts.
Attorneys Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky and Linda Riedemann Norbut have written about about how easy it is for outsiders to misconstrue statements, even violent ones, as true threats on social media. They advocate for the ability of alleged perpetrators to cite the context of the communications in their defense.
In evaluating the circumstances of Counterman's communications, the appellate judges noted his messages were completely uninvited, given that Whalen never responded. Some of them implied that he wanted to see her dead, or that he felt an entitlement to interact with her. Counterman also sent Whalen messages privately, indicating that his remarks were only intended for her.
"Here, there are details that heighten the credibility of Countermans threats. The references to surveilling [Whalen] particularly to seeing her with her partner or friend and the white Jeep indicate that Counterman may have had a familiarity with [Whalen] gained from secretly watching her," wrote Welling in the appellate panel's opinion. "These details add to the threat implied in Countermans messages."
The court also rejected the remaining claims in Counterman's appeal. The case is People v. Counterman.
- Biden Wants To Avoid a First Amendment Showdown Over WikiLeaks - Reason - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raises eyebrows with comment that First Amendment 'hamstrings' government - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- West Texas drag show becomes a First Amendment battleground - The Texas Tribune - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - The Associated Press - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, and Substantial Encouragement - Reason - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- News/Media Alliance Joins Brief Defending First Amendment Editorial Rights of Documentarians - News/Media Alliance - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The State of the First Amendment: Free Speech - University of Colorado Boulder - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justices Seem Likely to Side With N.R.A. in First Amendment Dispute - The New York Times - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh loses patience with the judiciarys far right - Vox.com - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justice Jackson ripped for worrying about the First Amendment 'hamstringing' government: 'Literally the point' - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Analysis: SCOTUS Oral Arguments Bode Well For NRA First Amendment Claim [Member Exclusive] - The Reload - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear First Amendment challenge to New York's financial 'blacklisting' of NRA - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- NRA Goes To The Supreme Court Today In First Amendment CaseHere's What To Know - Forbes - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear case of former Castle Hills councilwoman who claims First Amendment rights were violated - KSAT San Antonio - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in key First Amendment case challenging Biden admin teamwork with Big Tech - Fox News - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- "Black Lives Mat[t]er" + "Any Life" Drawing "Not Protected by the First Amendment" in First Grade - Reason - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - KXLY Spokane - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court hears free speech case that united the NRA and the ACLU - The Washington Post - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court Wary of States' Bid to Limit Federal Contact With Social Media Companies - The New York Times - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Opinion: A First Amendment Fizzle at the U.S. Supreme Court - The Atlanta Journal Constitution - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The First Amendment is under attack in Americas Oceania - Washington Examiner - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Education Institutions Grapple With Overlap of First Amendment and Anti-Discrimination Laws - JD Supra - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - The Caledonian-Record - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Note to Justice Jackson: First Amendment Should Hamstring Biden - Daily Signal - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says - KEYT - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- The First Amendment Supreme Court case right wingers are crazy for - The Independent - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Ketanji Brown Jackson concerned First Amendment is hamstringing government from censorship - Washington Examiner - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Justice Jackson: First Amendment "Hamstringing" Federal Response To "Threatening Circumstances, From The ... - RealClearPolitics - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Opinion: Sen. Chuck Grassley should stand up for the First Amendment and support the PRESS Act - The Gazette - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- The Supreme Court must protect the First Amendment in Murthy v. Missouri - Washington Examiner - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- A Hillsborough judge invokes the First Amendment in a case related to a 2022 election campaign - WMNF - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- John Stockton's lawyer claims first amendment violation as basis for COVID-19 lawsuit - KXLY Spokane - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Scientology Scores A First Amendment Win Over Leah Remini, But Harassment Claims Against Church Still Stand, Judge Rules - Deadline - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Supreme Court to hear First Amendment cases, weigh in on Texas immigration law - MSN - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- 7 Expert Takeaways As the Supreme Court Considers Government Influence on Content Moderation - Just Security - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Conflict between First Amendment and discrimination on Broadway | Strictly Legal - The Cincinnati Enquirer - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Maryland fraternities petition federal judge - Baltimore Sun - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Supreme Court to debate whether White House crosses First Amendment line on social media disinformation - News-Press Now - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Broadway Actors Race Discrimination Claims Sent Back to the Underworld in the Face of Producers First Amendment ... - JD Supra - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Congress Should Give Up on Unconstitutional TikTok Bans - EFF - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- U.S. House Votes in Favor of TikTok Ban Bill Amid First Amendment and Other Questions - Democracy Now! - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Review of Amicus Briefs Filed in Murthy v. Missouri Before the Supreme Court | TechPolicy.Press - Tech Policy Press - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Supreme Court defines when it's illegal for public officials to block social media critics - The Verge - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Doctor sues state of WA for his First Amendment rights - KXLY Spokane - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- ACLU To Defend NRA as Supreme Court Weighs Whether New York Violated Gun Group's First Amendment Rights - The New York Sun - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- U.Va. alumna settles First Amendment lawsuit against the University after her expulsion in abeyance - University of Virginia The Cavalier Daily - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- The Oregonian/OregonLive wins First Amendment ruling in Nike documents case - OregonLive - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Progressive attacks on the US constitution escalate - UnHerd - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Artificial intelligence: Tennessee ELVIS Act threatens First Amendment - Tennessean - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Eighth Circuit: Fun With the First Amendment - Law.com - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: First Amendment doesn't protect senators who walked out from consequences - Herald and News - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- What Is at Stake in the Florida, Texas First Amendment Cases - Disruptive Competition Project - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Poll: Almost a third of Americans say the First Amendment goes 'too far' - Reason - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Who will protect the First Amendment? - Voz Media - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Certainty and uncertainty: The tech platform cases First Amendment News 413 - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Social Media Content Moderation Laws 'Strike at the Heart of the First Amendment' - PEN America - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Does the First Amendment apply to social media moderation? The U.S. Supreme Court will decide - 25 News KXXV and KRHD - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Jacob Sullum - Sacrificing the First Amendment to save it? - Defiance Crescent News - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- God Help Us, but Brett Kavanaugh Could Save the First Amendment - The Daily Beast - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Editorial (N.Y) Daily News: The Supreme Court's sticky web: The First Amendment protects social media - The Daily News Online - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- In Supreme Court, Texas and Florida's Argument Against Big Tech Content Moderation Runs Afoul of First Amendment - Free Press - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Two students suing SUNY Cortland over alleged First Amendment violation | 870 AM 97.7FM News Talk WHCU - whcuradio.com - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Expert calls for Supreme Court to find middle way on First Amendment tech cases - ideastream - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court social media cases could put some First Amendment claims in the firing line - Freedom of the Press Foundation - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- One-third of adults say the First Amendment 'goes too far' - Washington Times - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Does the First Amendment apply to social media moderation? The U.S. Supreme Court will decide. - Palestine Herald Press - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court digs into Big Tech censorship and First Amendment - Washington Times - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- The Supreme Court's sticky web: The First Amendment protects social media - Shelbynews - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Supreme Court to decide how the First Amendment applies to social media - redlakenationnews.com - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- United States Mint Announces Release of Fourth Coin in Platinum Proof Series Celebrating Five Freedoms of the First ... - GlobeNewswire - February 9th, 2024 [February 9th, 2024]
- UNM Law professor joins amicus brief in Trump v. Anderson Supreme Court Case - UNM Newsroom - February 9th, 2024 [February 9th, 2024]
- CNN's Clarissa Ward Named a Recipient of the RTDNA's 2024 First Amendment Award - Adweek - February 9th, 2024 [February 9th, 2024]
- A new Supreme Court case threatens to take away your right to protest - Vox.com - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- No, Blocking Traffic Is Not Protected by the First Amendment - Reason - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- Cable Giants Insist That Forcing Them To Make Cancellations Easier Violates Their First Amendment Rights - Above the Law - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- Star-Spangled Fascism: Extremists and the First Amendment - GBH News - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- Know Your Rights: Students in Higher Education & the First Amendment - New York Civil Liberties Union - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- SPJ co-authors legal brief supporting First Amendment right to record and publish livestreamed court hearings - Society of Professional Journalists - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- SPJ co-authors legal brief supporting First Amendment right to record and publish livestreamed court hearings - Editor And Publisher Magazine - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]
- FCC's Jessica Rosenworcel On Trump Broadcast License Threats: First Amendment Guides Us. - Insideradio.com - January 27th, 2024 [January 27th, 2024]