Monthly Archives: May 2020

NEW YORK The billions of dollars in coronavirus relief targeted at small businesses may not prevent many of them from ending up in bankruptcy court.

Business filings under Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy law rose sharply in March, and attorneys who work with struggling companies are seeing signs that more owners are contemplating the possibility of bankruptcy.

Companies forced to close or curtail business due to government attempts to stop the virus's spread have mounting debts and uncertain prospects for returning to normal operations. Even those owners receiving emergency loans and grants aren't sure that help will be enough.

The most vulnerable companies include the thousands of restaurants and retailers that shut down, many of them more than a month ago. Some restaurants have managed to bring in a bit of revenue by serving meals for takeout and delivery, but even they are struggling financially. Small and independent retailers, including those with online stores. are similarly at risk; clothing retailers have the added problem of winter inventory that they are unlikely to sell with spring here and summer approaching.

Independent oil companies whose revenue was slammed by the collapse in energy prices also are strapped, as are other companies that were already burdened with high debt levels before the virus struck.

Jennifer Bennett, who closed one of her San Francisco restaurants on Wednesday, was still waiting for the financial aid she sought from the federal, state and city governments. Even with the money, she doesnt know if the revenue will cover the bills when shes finally able to reopen Zazie especially if shes required to space tables six feet apart for social distancing.

Our occupancy is going to be cut 60% to 65%, Bennett says. I fear bankruptcy is a possibility.

Other small companies have similar anxieties, says Paul Singerman, a bankruptcy attorney with Berger Singerman in Miami.

There is no reliable visibility into when business operations will be able to resume the pre-COVID normal, Singerman says.

Even larger companies are in trouble, including already struggling retailers who had to shut their stores.

The jeans company True Religion filed for Chapter 11 earlier this month, saying extended closures of its stores in the pandemic have hurt its business. Recent reports say department store chains Neiman Marcus and J.C. Penney, which has struggled for years with slumping sales, could soon file for bankruptcy protection.

The number of Chapter 11 filings rose 18 percent in March from a year earlier, a dramatic swing from the 20 percent decrease in February, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute, a trade organization for attorneys and other professionals involved in bankruptcy proceedings. The numbers dont break out filings by company size, but given that the vast majority of companies are small to mid-size, it does give an indication that smaller companies are struggling.

The federal government has already approved or given out more than 2 million loans and grants to small businesses totaling nearly $360 billion; another $310 billion is on the way to one of the programs. Still, the money may be at best a stopgap for companies with little to no revenue coming in. And the new funds are expected to go so quickly that thousands of owners wont get loans.

Theres no way to predict how many companies will file for bankruptcy. There were over 160,000 bankruptcy filings from 2008 to 2010, during the Great Recession and its aftermath, according to statistics compiled by the federal court system. The numbers dont break out filings by company size. The majority were for liquidations. although some companies restructured their debt and continued operating under Chapter 11.

Many companies, however, just shut their doors, and thats likely to be the case again, Singerman says. According to some estimates, 170,000 companies failed during the recession.

But the Small Business Reorganization Act, which took effect in February, may encourage more companies to seek Chapter 11. The law is aimed at allowing owners to retain their ownership rather than lose their companies to their creditors; that is generally what happens in Chapter 11. The law also streamlines the reorganization process so a company is not wiped out by attorneys fees, says Edward Janger, a professor at Brooklyn Law School in New York whose expertise includes bankruptcy law.

Another change under the law is that a bankruptcy judge can approve the reorganization over creditors objections, Janger says.

Business owners will try to avoid bankruptcy by seeking leniency from landlords, lenders and vendors, bankruptcy attorney David Wander says. But with their companies financial troubles beyond their control because of the virus outbreak, many will file for Chapter 11 because the stigma that bankruptcy has long held will be gone, says Wander, a partner at Davidoff Hutcher & Citron in New York.

The tsunami is going to happen in the coming months and its going to be ongoing, Wander says.

Read the original here:

A Flood of Business Bankruptcies Likely in Coming Months - The New York Times

Feature Image: Trevor Bexon

Business owners in the Reno area arent rushing to file for bankruptcy protection, but theyre beginning to ask their lawyers about the possibilities.

Thats a good thing, the lawyers say. Too often in the past, business owners have waited until theyve watched all their assets personal, sometimes, along with the business dwindle away before they seek the shelter of bankruptcy.

Plus, it reduces the worry.

The unknown is what is so scary for a lot of people, says Tricia Darby, who practices bankruptcy law in Reno with her husband, Kevin. Were visiting today with smart people who want to understand what their options might be.

Timothy Lukas, who specializes in bankruptcy as a partner at the law firm of Holland & Hart in Reno, says unknowns abound for business owners as a result of the freeze-in-place orders by state and local officials six weeks ago.

There are still a lot of unknowns about when and how our local economy will emerge from the current financial crisis, says Lukas. The abrupt, system-wide disruption to the economy means business owners and lenders need to work out the problems theyre facing.

The federal stimulus packages designed to help business weather the COVID-19 storm present even more issues to sort through.

The current stimulus bills prohibit or limit relief if a business chooses to file for bankruptcy.Right now, all of the obligations and commitments for business owners remain in place, Lukas says.

On the other hand, Darby says Congress opened the doors for more small businesses that are floundering as a result of the pandemic to reorganize under the protection of Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Some filing deadlines were extended.

But Lukas cautions that those measures are valid only for a year.

If one waits too long to file for bankruptcy, it can be a disaster, he says, recommending that business owners and their attorneys understand today what a bankruptcy filing could accomplish or not if theres even a chance that a company will go under.

Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings cases in which businesses try to regroup while they get their feet back underneath themselves were declining in the region before the pandemic-related shutdowns. Last year saw 14 filings of Chapter 11 cases in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Reno. That compared with 26 a year earlier.

Chapter 7 cases the ones in which a judge oversees the liquidation of a business totaled 566 last year. A year earlier, 1,133 of those cases were filed in the bankruptcy court in Reno.

A note from our publisher

This Is Reno, like most other news outlets, has been hit incredibly hard by COVID-19. We have cut back on some important news coverage; however, we are continuing to provide daily news on COVID-19s impacts on the Reno area. These articles are provided free of charge and outside of our paywall. If you can help, any amount is appreciated whether a donation, subscription or advertising your business with This Is Reno.

Criticism against Governor Steve Sisolak is ramping up after he surprised Nevadans with plans to reopen the state on national media.

OPINION: With such an abundance of health and nutrition information, how do you separate fact from fiction? UNRs Extension provides tips to sort through the junk science.

There was another death announced today from the coronavirus disease. County officials reported a man in his 70s with underlying health conditions died. He is the 30th

A group of local business leaders launched Hospitality Industry Partnerships, HIP, to help feed out of work restaurant, bar and gaming employees.

OPINION: Berkbigler, a lobbyist and politician by trade, is showing she believes she knows more about science than medical specialists, epidemiologists and public health experts.

Business owners in the Reno area arent rushing to file for bankruptcy protection, but theyre beginning to ask their lawyers about the possibilities.

Learn more about COVID-19, its origins, how it spreads, and why scientists and healthcare providers say it is far more worrisome than the flu.

OPINION: At a time in history when positive news is hard to come by, Renos citizens should be proud that our Specialty Court system is both resilient

Governor Steve Sisolak announced Monday Nevada would be joining the Western States Pact, a group of state governors working together on a coordinated plan to manage the

This Is Reno was contacted by readers who were concerned and dismayed upon seeing photographs of officers shaking hands and without masks.

Continued here:

Suddenly, bankruptcy is on the mind of business owners - ThisisReno

As states struggle under the weight of the coronavirus pandemic, Congress and the president have enacted a series of massive bills to try to bolster the health care response and help rescue the economy.

But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., recently made a comment that suggests hes tired of big spending for cash-strapped states.

The National Governors Association has asked Congress for $500 billion more in direct federal aid, on top of the $150 billion provided in the $2.2 trillion coronavirus relief bill that passed in recent weeks. Depending on how long the crisis lasts, that number could go higher.

McConnell said in a radio interview that states might be better off declaring bankruptcy than by expecting additional funding from the federal government.

"I would certainly be in favor of allowing states to use the bankruptcy route. It saves some cities. And theres no good reason for it not to be available," McConnell said. "My guess is their first choice would be for the federal government to borrow money from future generations to send it down to them now so they dont have to do that. Thats not something Im going to be in favor of."

Bankruptcy gives a "fresh start" to debtors who are unable to satisfy their debts. Declaring bankruptcy may involve a restructured payment schedule for obligations, such as pension debt or interest payments on bonds, as well as relief from bills from vendors. The parties may negotiate over the terms, overseen by specialized bankruptcy courts.

For states, bankruptcy would be a novel approach, since it doesnt currently exist under law. And given the unusual confluence of urgent congressional business, along with the difficulties of carrying out ordinary legislative activities in an era of social distancing, experts do not expect state bankruptcy to become a reality in the immediate future.

McConnells comments prompted widespread criticism, including from some Republicans.

Maryland Republican Gov. Larry Hogan, said, "Mitch McConnell, I think, probably regrets saying that. If he doesn't regret it yet, I think he will regret it. The last thing we need in the middle of an economic crisis is to have states filing bankruptcy all across America and not able to provide services to people who desperately need them."

Rep. Pete King, R-N.Y., called McConnells comment "shameful and indefensible," while New Yorks Democratic governor, Andrew Cuomo, called it "one of the really dumb ideas of all time."

So whats the hubbub all about? Lets take a closer look.

Currently, can states declare bankruptcy?

Its important to note that, under current law, states cannot declare bankruptcy. So Congress would need to pass a law allowing it.

The primary reason for the lack of state bankruptcy provisions is the U.S. Constitution. "Under the Constitution, states are sovereign entities, and the federal government has limited power to act on them directly," said Vincent Buccola, an assistant professor of legal studies and business ethics at the University of Pennsylvanias Wharton School.

In an analysis, Kenneth Katkin, a law professor by Northern Kentucky University, wrote that "the contracts clause of the Constitution prohibits state governments from impairing the obligation of contracts. As originally understood and enforced, this clause prohibited state legislatures from passing any laws to relieve either private debt or the state government's own debt."

While the Supreme Courts interpretation of bankruptcy law has varied during the 20th century, state bankruptcy was never seen as a permissible option. Even if a law did pass, David Schleicher, a professor at Yale Law School, told us there would be constitutional challenges.

Is there historical precedent for state bankruptcy being on the table?

While there is no historical precedent for states having access to bankruptcy, "there are many historical instances of states defaulting on their debts," Schleicher told PolitiFact.

In the 1840s, eight states and one territory defaulted on their debt; for some, payments resumed quickly, while others renounced their debt and never paid. In the 1870s, he said, most southern states renounced their Reconstruction-era debt, and in 1933, Arkansas defaulted on its debt.

Most recently, there was discussion of allowing state bankruptcies in the wake of the Great Recession. The U.S. House even held a hearing on the idea.

However, the concept drew fire from Wall Street, public-employee unions, and governors from both parties, who worried about the risk of rising interest rates, Bloomberg reported. Nothing was enacted.

Matt Fabian, a partner with Municipal Market Analytics, told Bloomberg that todays discussion of state bankruptcy is "just a red herring. State bankruptcy is probably not possible under the U.S. Constitution, and theres even less chance that Congress would attempt to allow it."

Are cities treated differently when it comes to the bankruptcy option?

Unlike states, cities are able to declare bankruptcy under Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code. That chapter allows for the reorganization of municipalities, which include cities, towns, villages, counties, taxing districts, municipal utilities, and school districts.

"Municipalities, which are created by states, can use Chapter 9 as part of the bankruptcy law designed specifically for governmental organizations," even though states cannot use it, Buccola said. To avail itself of bankruptcy, the municipality must be authorized by its state.

The Great Depression in the 1930s saw a spike in municipal defaults, but they became less common in subsequent decades. Many of those that did occur stemmed from small local governments facing a giant debt due to embezzlement or a sizable legal judgment, Schleicher said.

New York City managed to avoid bankruptcy in the 1970s thanks to negotiations between the state, investors, and labor unions. There has been another uptick of municipal bankruptcies since the Great Recession, including Jefferson County, Ala., Stockton, Calif., and Detroit.

What would "bankruptcy" look like for a state?

Buccola said that a state bankruptcy provision would likely look more like chapter 9 for municipalities than either chapter 11, which is used by businesses, or chapter 7, which is used by individuals.

Under such a system, "the state alone could propose adjustments to its debts, and it would be up to a federal judge to determine whether the package of adjustments a debtor state proposes meet the requirements of the law," Buccola said.

Samir Parikh, a law professor and co-director of the Center for Business Law and Innovation at Lewis & Clark Law School, said the states current fiscal challenges stem not just from the unusual circumstances of the coronavirus pandemic, but also from past decisions on matters such as pensions for retired state workers.

States "need to find a way to address their pension underfunding," Parikh said. "Concessions from labor unions represent the best bet. Many state constitutions prohibit states and municipalities from unilaterally altering pension and health care benefits. Municipal bondholders are the other group that would need to take a haircut."

He said that in Detroits now-ended bankruptcy, for instance, judges were asked to serve as arbitrators to negotiate with unions and bondholders with an eye toward a consensus settlement. "The parties were incentivized because they were worried about the debtor having the power to unilaterally alter payments and benefits."

Why are states wary of allowing bankruptcy?

For a state, declaring bankruptcy could have negative consequences on the future perceptions of their creditworthiness.

"States and municipalities are hesitant because they could get locked out of credit markets, and those funds are necessary to fill large gaps in budgets," Parikh said.

In addition, potential vendors might decline opportunities to work with the state, for fear that they wouldnt get paid the agreed-upon amounts. And state officials might have to contemplate selling off state assets, such as park lands, to raise money.

What are the alternatives to bankruptcy?

The main alternative to state bankruptcy is the one McConnell was reacting against increased federal financial support for states, which ultimately must come either from taxpayers or from issuing additional debt.

Another possibility would be a hybrid model that includes higher federal aid along with a bankruptcy system for the most difficult cases, such as states that have had longstanding pension imbalances.

Original post:

Can states file for bankruptcy? Should they? What you need to know - PolitiFact

The nations governors have asked for at least $500 billion in federal bailouts to make up for falling state revenues and to backfill their systemically underfunded pension plans. Some members of Congress have seconded the request, but, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellCapitol physician doesn't have enough coronavirus tests for all lawmakers as Senate plans return Overnight Health Care: Pelosi floats almost T for states | US intel investigating COVID-19's origins | Trump outlines efforts to protect nursing homes The Hill's Campaign Report: Pressure grows on Biden to address Tara Reade allegations MORE (R-Ky.) recently suggested that states have another option: Bankruptcy.

The fact is, no state or local government will need to declare bankruptcy just because of COVID-19. Rather, if states or municipalities do face insolvency, it will be the result of decades of fiscal mismanagement.

The important takeaway behind Sen. McConnells statement is that the federal government is not responsible for states budgets.

Yes, the federal government has an obligation to help cover the costs of addressing the pandemic. To that end, Congress has already sent states unprecedented aid.

And, yes, state and local governments are experiencing a decline in income-, sales-, and some other tax revenues. But unforeseen circumstances is one of the reasons states have rainy day funds. In aggregate, those funds were at an all-time-high prior to COVID-19, but not every state was well-prepared. While Wyoming had an entire years worth of revenue saved away, Illinois and Kansas had mere minutes of revenue saved.

COVID-19 could be the straw that broke the camels back for states already headed toward insolvency. But it alone isnt sufficient to create a need for either bailouts or bankruptcy.

When Puerto Rico entered bankruptcy, its debt equaled about three times its annual revenues. And when Detroit entered bankruptcy in 2013, the citys debt was 13 times its annual revenues. A few months or even a few years of lower revenues wont create bankruptcy situations for states. Government insolvency results from prolonged, systemic mismanagement.

Already, the federal government has provided state and local governments with direct grants worth $150 billion to help cover COVID-19 expenses. And it appears that states dont need more money for that. Otherwise, why have governors asked for flexibility to use these funds for non-pandemic costs? Why have some used the money for temporarypay raisesandbonusesfor public-sector workers, while26 million Americans have lost their paychecks?

Then theres the Federal Reserves $500 billion in unprecedented short-term lending to state and local governments. That amounts to half of every state and local governments annual income- and sales-tax revenues. Its unlikely those revenues will fall by 50 percent, if only because Congress has provided roughly $1.3 trillion in the form of small-business grants and loans, checks to households and massively-expanded unemployment insurance benefits all of which will help prop up state and local tax receipts.

Its becoming increasingly clear that what states really want is just an all-purpose bailout for their pre-existing problems.

Prior to the pandemic and despite the exceptionally strong economy, New York Gov. Andrew CuomoAndrew CuomoNewsom signs order allowing couples to obtain marriage licenses via videoconference Connecticut governor unveils four-stage plan to reopen state's economy Overnight Defense: Sexual assaults increase across military | Army defends bringing cadets back for Trump graduation speech MORE was facing a $6.1 billion annual budget deficit. Illinois had projected a $3.2 billion deficit.

The $40 billion in federal taxpayer funds requested by Illinois Senate Democratic Caucus would go mostly to financing the states consciously-enacted deficit and propping up its bloated pension systems, which entered the year with an unfunded liability of $137 billion.

If Congress were to provide a nation-wide state bailout proportionate to what Illinois requested, it would cost federal taxpayers an additional $1 trillion. Thats not far off from what House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiMcCarthy doubtful Republicans will participate in coronavirus select committee Overnight Health Care: Pelosi floats almost T for states | US intel investigating COVID-19's origins | Trump outlines efforts to protect nursing homes On The Money: 3.8M more Americans file for unemployment benefits | Stocks cap off best month since 1987 even as coronavirus leaves millions jobless | Pelosi floats almost T for states in next relief package MORE (D-Calif.) is seeking.

Theres a fundamental unfairness to state bailouts. They force taxpayers in well-run states to subsidize those who have systematically squandered a strong economy and shortchanged pension plans of trillions of dollars worth of required contributions.

Some have suggested requiring more prudent budgeting from states that accept bailouts. Its a rather ironic suggestion, considering that the federal governments fiscal recklessness has created over $70,000 in debt per capita, while state debt averages less than $10,000 per capita.

Moreover, bailing out states denies the problems of socializing costs. If youve ever gone out to dinner with a large group, you might remember how the expensive steak, an extra drink and dessert are more appealing if those costs are split by everyone at the table. If thats what everyone is thinking, then everyone pays more in the end.

Socializing government debts by redistributing state and local costs to federal taxpayers in times of crisis is like splitting the check: Everyone still pays they just wind up paying a lot more.

Rachel Greszler is a research fellow in The Heritage Foundations Center for the Federal Budget. Adam N. Michel is a senior policy analyst in the center.

Read this article:

State bankruptcy is irrelevant to COVID-19 and bailouts aren't the answer | TheHill - The Hill

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 15 states have identified new holes in their budgets which by state constitutional provisions must be balanced.

Moodys Analytics predicts that our shrinking economy could result in state revenue drops of 18 to 23 percent.

North Dakota payrolls have been cut; Main Street has been closed; tax collections have nose-dived and manufacturing curtailed. While the North Dakota Legacy Fund, now bulging with over $6 billion, may look like a solution, raiding the fund would require an impossible two-thirds vote in both houses of the legislature.

RELATED

Even in the face of tremendous needs in states rising out of the coronavirus, McConnell alleges that states should solve the problem themselves without getting bailout money from the federal government.

Fund Restrictions

States have been bastions of frugality, saddled with scores of restrictions on taxing and spending accumulated through the years. Most states have constitutional or statutory restrictions that reduce their ability to respond to a sudden crisis.

Almost half of the states have provisions for proposing and amending statutes by citizen petition. Under these provisions, citizens can impose restrictions, thereby reducing options at the state level. North Dakota citizens have the initiative and referendum as well as the power to amend the state constitution.

Poverty Budgets

Because of all of these fiscal controls, governors and legislatures have kept their budgets on the edge of poverty. Even North Dakota policymakers will look at the $6 billion Legacy Fund while claiming poverty.

In addition to the virus pandemic, North Dakota is experiencing a collapse of the oil industry, which is no small matter in a state that ranks second to only Texas in oil production.

Associated Press Writer James McPherson reports that the legislature estimated oil at $48 per barrel for the present biennium. The market has been as low as $10 and $25.

Big oil Losses

According to McPhersons report, Tax Commissioner Ryan Rauschenberger estimates that price and production cuts could cost the state $288,000 in daily tax revenue.

There is little doubt that the legislature will be making draconian cuts in the state budget when it meets in Bismarck this winter. Basic government services will be funded, but social service, health programs and education will be on the chopping block.

For years North Dakota has had some citizens who favor reducing the number of universities and colleges in the state higher education system. In the anticipated budget crunch, the smaller colleges will not escape changes.

Some will propose closing Mayville, Bottineau, Williston and Devils Lake for starters. If not closing, a strict realignment of programming will alter the missions of various institutions.

With every state program in jeopardy, it would be wise to invest your government stimulus check in Bismarck hotels for the session. They should be very profitable.

North Dakota wont go bankrupt but it will go frugal. More than usual, that is.

Read the original:

Omdahl: Is state bankruptcy on the horizon? - INFORUM

Cities across the country are facing a red-ink cascade. On April 22, Mitch McConnell recommended that cities and states try bankruptcy if theyre struggling during the coronavirus pandemic. This is a terrible idea, and we dont need to look farther than Detroit to see why.

Although filing for bankruptcy enables a city to renegotiate debts with its creditors, freeing future revenues for uses beyond interest payments on outstanding debt, the maneuver exacerbates negative trends. Bankruptcy does not bring back lost jobs or shuttered businesses, nor will it magically reconstruct a tax base.

While some cities with resilient industries may have reserves to weather the storm, many that were already contending with unemployment, stagnant wages and rising inequality will fare worse. Officials in San Jose, Calif., anticipate losses of $110 million in revenue, three times higher in relative terms than the 2008 financial crisis. The mayor of Dayton, Ohio, has modeled a future with 30 percent fewer firefighters and police officers, while the New Orleans mayor forecasts $100 million in reductions from the citys operating budget.

Detroits 2013 bankruptcy and the experiences of people who endured it demonstrate the limits of a bankruptcy declaration as a cure-all. Instead, its important to invest in people directly.

I got to know Miles, a man in Detroit in his late 40s, as I studied the lingering effects of Detroits bankruptcy.

Everywhere you look someones getting sick or they cant go to work, he told me recently. Its getting thick out there, real thick.

Already struggling to make a living in construction, he fears the loss of his livelihood, his house and his ability to afford food. Since bankruptcy, Detroit has balanced its budget by welcoming speculative property investment and levying costs on residents like Miles. A company in Florida scammed him on a house with unpaid property taxes, triggering tax foreclosure a few months after the sale. He has been juggling minimum payments on bills in a suddenly more expensive metropolis. Now, faced with the loss of more income from Michigans stay-at-home order, he wonders in earnest: Could I quarantine myself at a job site in order to get work?

In the private sector, bankruptcy only helps companies with viable business models and temporary revenue disruptions. Many have repeatedly entered bankruptcy before permanently going out of business. Similarly, municipal bankruptcy is most effective in addressing onetime debt imbalances such as a large, outstanding legal judgment or to cover losses on misguided investments. Declaring bankruptcy will not reverse deeper and more pervasive challenges.

Though the Families First Coronavirus Act eased some pressures on state unemployment insurance programs and augmented federal coverage of Medicaid payments, similar aid during the financial crisis was more generous. The 2020 CARES Act pledged loans, loan guarantees and other investments to businesses, states or municipalities, but that money can only be used to reimburse costs stemming from the virus. It cannot boost general revenues, Medicaid spending or unemployment insurance.

The CARES Act also provides only half as much funding to state and local governments as they received following the 2008 financial crisis. Senator Elizabeth Warren has highlighted the need for guarantees that the funds available under the act would first flow to state and local governments rather than to large corporations.

In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, federal grants increased to support state and local government spending. By 2011, that spigot had largely run dry. In 2012, Stockton, Calif., became the largest city at that time to file for bankruptcy. Several hundred cities struggled on the brink of default, shrinking their public payrolls, cutting services and selling public land. Since 2007, more than 70 American municipalities have entered bankruptcy, a deluge in comparison to the three cities that chose that route between 1970 and 2007.

The choice to abandon cities to their own insufficient budgets created weaknesses that still hamper the response to the coronavirus. In the lead-up to bankruptcy, for example, Detroit reduced spending by outsourcing the responsibilities of the public health department to a private agency. To boost revenues from Detroits water system and leverage its value as a city asset in the bankruptcy, service shut-offs of customers with delinquent accounts surged. During the bankruptcy episode, the water department turned off water at 900 houses a day, threatening a public health crisis.

During this period, Miles found himself responsible for an unpaid water bill from the company that sold him his home. When added to the companys unpaid property taxes, he nearly lost the house. Detroits attempts to raise revenues from residents, through higher taxes, fines and fees, left residents like Miles with less savings to withstand a crisis like the coronavirus.

Isnt the economy us thats sitting at home, and us that have no choice but to go to work? Miles asked.

Municipal balance sheets reflect the financial health of city residents. In Detroit, when Miles can fully realize his talents, he will pay more in city income taxes and spend more in the local economy. The future of cities lies in investing in people like him.

Originally posted here:

Bankruptcy Didn't Help Detroit Fight the Coronavirus - The New York Times

The company will take the money but the state won't get a say: this is a concise summary of what Lufthansa's Executive Board, headed by CEO Carsten Spohr, has been telling German politicians in the past few weeks.

According to an investigation by Business Insider, Lufthansa is now so up to its neck in water, the airline's management had to come to an agreement with the German state on the afternoon of Monday, April 27, after hours of negotiations.

The agreement entails the state using $10 billion to bail out Germany's last remaining international airline.

But the state should not be given a say in corporate policy, insiders say.

It's expected that one or two supervisory board mandates will be given to the German federal government.

The company could face insolvency within weeks. Reuters

However, as a result of the worldwide travel restrictions in the Corona crisis, Lufthansa is currently making losses of around $1 million every hour.

The company could face insolvency within weeks.

Founded in 1953, Lufthansa began flight operations two years later and was, until 1963, entirely in state hands.

The federal government, however, sold its shares in the mid-1990s, so Lufthansa has been fully privatized since 1997.

Spohr wants to formally seal the deal with Merkel and Germany's finance minister, Olaf Scholz on Tuesday, April 28. Getty

According to the investigation, the state is pumping just under $10 billion into the badly hit company.

In return, the government, as the new shareholder, will receive a blocking minority and one or two supervisory board seats, but these will not be filled by civil servants or politicians.

Formally, the company will then be associated with the Federal Ministry of Finance as a state holding.

According to the group, a rough agreement has been reached.

The most crucial factor in the agreement was that the appointment of civil servants or politicians to the supervisory board was unacceptable in the eyes of Lufthansa's executives.

The state is pumping just under $10 billion into the badly hit company. Larry Downing/Reuters

Spohr himself didn't officially take part in yesterday's talks but on Tuesday, he wants to formally seal the deal with Chancellor Angela Merkel and Germany's finance minister, Olaf Scholz.

Through the investigation, Business Insider learned that it's unlikely the matter will be negotiated again.

Spohr had recently proposed an Airbus model for Lufthansa. Germany, France, and Spain hold a quarter of the shares of the aircraft manufacturer but don't exercise any direct influence over the company.

See original here:

German government to bail Lufthansa out of bankruptcy with nearly $10 billion state aid - Business Insider - Business Insider