In 2011, voters in Mississippi were given the opportunity to amend their state constitution to provide all of the constitutional rights that you and I haveor at least are supposed to haveto a fertilized egg.
And Mississippians resoundingly said no. But it wasnt just abortion advocates who opposed the ballot initiative. National Right to Life opposed it, as did Americans United for Life. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the states Episcopal and Methodist church leadership also refused to support it.
It was a crushing blow to the so-called personhood movement, which suffered repeated humiliating losses during the 2010s. Voters in North Dakota rebuffed the personhood movements advances, as did voters in Coloradotwice.
The personhood advocates retreated with their tail between their legs. The will just wasnt there.
But its ten years later, and the will of the people doesnt mean much anymore. Conservatives are in the midst of a power grab, and something as minor as the will of the peopleas democracy itselfis not going to stop them from imposing their rules of Christian theocracy and forcing the rest of us to live by them.
And personhood? Well, personhood is Christian evangelicals holy grail.
A Supreme Court ruling in Mississippis favor in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization wont end the fight for the anti-abortion movement. It will galvanize it. Disparate wings of the anti-abortion movement that have clashed in the past over the efficacy of pushing for personhood will come together. Republican-controlled states will rush to amend their constitutions to reflect the fetuss new status as a person, while anti-choice advocates push Congress for federal personhood legislation.
Because ending abortion is not enough.
If you thought the fight to protect Roe v. Wade was bad? The fight to ensure that women and pregnant people in this country dont have to share human and constitutional rights with a fertilized egg will be worse.
They want fertilized eggs, embryos, and blastocysts to have full constitutional rights under the 14th Amendmentthe right to due process, the right to equal protection, the right to lifeeven at the expense of the person whose body is sustaining fetal life.
That means anything that interferes with a fertilized egg making its way to the uterus and implantingalong with anything that interferes with that developing pregnancywould be classified as killing a person, and potentially as murder.
Someone suffering from infertility who, as is often the case during in vitro fertilization (IVF), does not implant every fertilized egg could be brought up on charges. A pregnant person who suffers a miscarriage could expect a visit from the cops to determine whether the miscarriage was accidental.
Any contraceptives that prevent, or even potentially prevent, a fertilized eggpardon me, a personfrom implanting into the uterus would be banned.
That this has grave consequences for abortion rights is a gross understatement. If you thought the fight to protect Roe v. Wade was bad? The fight to ensure that women and pregnant people in this country dont have to share human and constitutional rights with a fertilized egg will be worse. Because the end result isnt just forced pregnancy and unsafe abortion care. Its total control over women and other people capable of reproducing.
Thats always been the anti-choice movements goal, which is why they wont stop if the Supreme Court upholds the Mississippi Gestational Age Act, the 15-week abortion ban at issue in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health.
Exactly one week after the Supreme Courts decision in Roe v. Wade, the first federal personhood amendmentthe Human Life Amendmentwas introduced by Rep. Larry Hogan Sr. For the next 40 years, personhood amendments would be introduced and would fail. Anti-choice politicians would try to slip personhood language in unrelated legislation. (In 2012, Rand Paul threatened to block a bill to reauthorize funding to the National Flood Insurance Program unless a personhood amendment was attached to it.) Ultimately, those efforts would fail as well.
Meanwhile at the state level, personhood activists within the anti-abortion movement found themselves fighting an uphill battle alone. While they were in sync when it came to ending legal abortion, the movement was split on what tactic to deploy.
Personhood activists insisted that ending legal abortion required declaring that life begins at conception and that fertilized eggs deserved full constitutional protection. The rest of the anti-choice movement preferred a less controversial approachattack abortion around the edges and reduce abortion by restricting access. It would be death by a thousand cuts.
This incremental approach became the dominant strategy. After decades of brutal and violent attacks on abortion providers, accompanied by a pervasive narrative that women who get abortions are baby killers, a dramatic shift occurred in the way that the anti-abortion activists talked about abortion.
The cries about baby killers and murderers abated for a while as anti-choice advocates turned their attention toward crafting an image of caring abolitionists concerned about the harm that abortion caused women. Women werent baby killers. Rather, they were being coerced into abortion by providers who were falsely painted as motivated by profit. (One thing that remained from the tactics of the 1980s: attacking abortion providers and making them unsafe with wild claims about justifiable homicide.)
The real challenge for pro-lifers in 2009 is to effectively address the assumption that abortion is good for women.
Thats what Clarke Forsythe, senior counsel for Americans United for Life, said in an article published by CBS News in 2009. AULs model anti-choice legislation would go on to be a big force in the avalanche of abortion restrictions that came pouring out of statehouses across the country during the rise of the Tea Party in the Obama administration.
Screaming at women that they were baby killers wasnt working, so anti-abortion activists began to couch anti-abortion activism in woman-protective terms and promoted legislation that would purportedly protect women.
The flood of state abortion restrictions in the early 2010s marked this rhetorical shift and reflected the anti-abortion movements decision to focus on womens health and safety. Anti-abortion advocates keened about women being coerced into abortion, and invented medical conditions they claimed post-abortive women had suffered, including the ludicrous claim that women were being traumatized by the sound of vacuum cleaners after their abortions.
In addition, biased informed consent laws forced doctors to lie to patients about, among other things, an increased risk of breast cancer or an inability to bond with subsequent children, and to read scripts impressing upon the patient that theyre terminating the life of a whole separate unique living human being (as one law in South Dakota required), just to impress upon the hapless pregnant person that abortion is an abrogation of their maternal duties. Unwanted ultrasounds and heartbeat listening sessions were forced upon patients because hapless pregnant women simply needed to see and hear the little dot on the sonogram in order to tap into the well of maternal instinct that evangelicals believe resides inside every woman.
And then there were the regulations aimed at providers. Those were ostensibly about health and safety too. Requirements that clinics spend millions of dollars to retrofit their facilities to act as outpatient hospitalseven clinics that only provide medication abortion. States forced doctors to get admitting privileges at local hospitalseven though abortion is safer than childbirth and, on the rare occasion that a complication does occur, an ambulance will take the patient to a hospital nearest to their home, which, thanks to the legislators who enact these restrictions, may be hundreds of miles away from the clinic.
Womens health and safety. Thats what politicians repeatedly claimed their goal was when it countedin the legislation, in hearings, and in court. But in the media, they crowed about how successful these restrictions were at closing clinics.
The Supreme Court ended the womens health and safety charade in Whole Womans Health v. Hellerstedt, the case challenging Texas HB 2, sweeping legislation that Texas Republicans admitted was intended to close clinics.
In Whole Womans Health, the Court said states could no longer pass laws willy-nilly and claim that they protect the health and safety of pregnant people. The burdens of any restriction would have to be weighed against benefits the restriction conferred. The Court rejected Texas claim that its admitting privileges law was in place to protect women, finding that, in practice, the law hadnt done anything of the kind.
In one of her shorter concurrencesclocking in at two pagesRuth Bader Ginsburg said, When a State severely limits access to safe and legal procedures, women in desperate circumstances may resort to unlicensed rogue practitioners, faute de mieux, at great risk to their health and safety. Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers laws like H. B. 2 that do little or nothing for health, but rather strew impediments to abortion, cannot survive judicial inspection.
Whole Womans Health effectively put a nail in the we have to protect women from abortion strategy, which means the anti-choice movement is coalescing around the we have to protect the fetus strategy. That strategy could take many forms. Anti-choice activists may push for federal personhood legislation. They may push for an amendment to the Constitution establishing personhood. They may take a stab at both simultaneously.
Its certainly on their radar.
During a Newsweek podcast appearance with Rewire News Groups Executive Editor Jessica Mason Pieklo, anti-abortion leader Lila Rose laid the anti-choice movements cards on the table:
Theres no reason that we should treat children at the moment of birth different than children before birth. They are still human beings. Human life startsthe science is clear when human life beginsit begins at the moment of fertilization: sperm, egg fusion. You have a unique, individual human being and they deserve legal protection, just like anybody else. Thats not just a general argument for human rights; its based on our own Constitution. The 14th Amendment says that all people should have equal protection under the law and that no state should deprive anyone of their right to life without due process.
Theyve got momentum, theyve got power, and theyve got a Supreme Court stacked with justices just waiting to back them up.
And this time, theyre not particularly concerned about protecting women. They cant possibly be. Conferring legal rights to eggs turns every miscarriage into a potential criminal investigation. It also raises awkward questions about whose rights matter more when pitted against each otherthe fertilized egg or the person carrying it.
Enshrining fetal personhood into law will prevent millions of people suffering from infertility from being able to have children. And it will prevent millions of people who rely on certain forms of contraception from using them.
And while this may not be the most critical issue, it does raise the question: Can a pregnant person drive in the HOV lane?
The point is, fetal personhood will lead to chaos. And its that chaos that led to the myriad defeats the personhood movement suffered in the early 2010s. But its a new decade with a new cultural zeitgeist. The protect women drumbeat is silent, and increasingly the claim to care about womens well-being has given way to the rhetoric of the early days of the anti-choice movement: Abortion is murder and anyone participating in it deserves to be punished. They dont care anymore if a pregnancy is a result of rape or incest. Gone are the concerns about the safety and well-being of women. Some Republican lawmakers have outright called for people who get abortions to be put to death.
Now its fetus ber alles. Its the fetus that deserves a chance at life. The pregnant person? They already screwed up by getting pregnant. Better luck next time.
The fight to keep personhood at bay will be tough, but its not unwinnable. Advocates will be fighting a united anti-choice movement with one goal in mind, to be sure. But fetal personhood has severe consequences outside of the abortion context; the anti-choice movement may not be able to convince enough people that fetal personhood even makes sense.
But that doesnt mean theyre not going to try.
The anti-choice movement may have been splintered in its approach to gutting Roe v. Wade in the lead-up to Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health, but after that decision comes down, the movements approach to ending abortion entirelyor trying to anywaywill be unified. And that should make every abortion rights advocate nervous.
See more here:
What's Next After the Supreme Court Reverses 'Roe'? Attack of the Egg People #ABLC - Rewire.News
- Five years since #MeToo, Tarana Burke is looking beyond the hashtag - Yahoo News - October 15th, 2022
- After Florence Pugh Freed The Nipple, Olivia Wilde Supported The Movement On New Magazine Cover - CinemaBlend - October 15th, 2022
- Barbara Kay: The Movement to Normalize Pedophilia Hits a Roadblock, but We Mustn't Let Our Guard Down - The Epoch Times - October 15th, 2022
- Is it Time to Decolonize Global Health Data? - Research Blog - Duke University - October 15th, 2022
- Claire Foy Doesnt Think Women Talking Could Have Been Made Before #MeToo - Yahoo Entertainment - October 15th, 2022
- Can the Congress rewrite its chronicle of a death foretold? - Scroll.in - October 15th, 2022
- We need a strong nationalist as a president - Daily Sun - October 15th, 2022
- The 19th Century Movement to Canonize Columbus - Catholic Exchange - October 13th, 2022
- Audemars Piguet toasts 50 years of Royal Oak with new watches, book - New York Post - October 13th, 2022
- Claire Foy Doesn't Think 'Women Talking' Could Have Been Made Before #MeToo - Yahoo! Voices - October 13th, 2022
- Best Bets: 6 nights of live music at Wussow's and more - Duluth News Tribune - October 13th, 2022
- Five Burning Questions: Bad Bunny Spends a 13th Week at No. 1 With Un Verano Sin Ti - Billboard - October 13th, 2022
- San Diego artist uses creativity to uplift Black culture and 'determine how we are seen' - The San Diego Union-Tribune - October 13th, 2022
- The Premier League at thirty - what should it sound like next? - Broadcast - October 13th, 2022
- Steve Braunias on Peter Ellis case: 'Moral panic, contaminated evidence and an innocent ghost' - New Zealand Herald - October 13th, 2022
- Constituency Statutes: The Overlooked Predecessor to the ESG Movement - JD Supra - October 2nd, 2022
- 10 books to add to your reading list in October 2022 - Los Angeles Times - October 2nd, 2022
- The Multiple Religions Coexisting Within the Catholic Church - Crisis Magazine - October 2nd, 2022
- 2023 Oscar Predictions The Rules of the Game - Awards Daily - October 2nd, 2022
- Kathy Sheridan: Brace yourselves for where Giorgia Meloni and Italy end up - The Irish Times - October 2nd, 2022
- The rise and fall of Sir Philip Green, the retail king who fell from grace - Evening Standard - October 2nd, 2022
- The lying flat movement standing in the way of China ... - Brookings - September 29th, 2022
- Namwali Serpell Distills the Disorienting Experience of Grief in 'The Furrows' - Shondaland.com - September 29th, 2022
- Dance & House Music Ruled the Summer. What Now? - Complex - September 29th, 2022
- It is time to back a new party in the elections - Morning Star Online - September 29th, 2022
- The empty feminism of Dont Worry Darling - The Guardian - September 27th, 2022
- Sunburn The morning read of what's hot in Florida politics 9.26.22 - Florida Politics - September 27th, 2022
- GOP candidate Trevor Lee ran a secret Twitter account that attacked LGBTQ people and Utah Gov. Cox. Now he's been rebuked by Republican leadership. -... - September 27th, 2022
- Peeling Back the Slasher-Inspired Look of HBO Maxs Pretty Little Liars: Original Sin with Cinematographer Anka Malatynska - Dread Central - September 27th, 2022
- If theres a settlement, XRP will pump: Finder founder and other experts speculate on ... - Stockhead - September 27th, 2022
- Natural Born Killers: the soundtrack that changed the 90s - Louder - September 27th, 2022
- Uttara (2000): Capturing the Zeitgeist of a Contemporary Turbulent Period and Decoupage - High on Films - September 3rd, 2022
- From Sri Lanka to Salinas: Will California Learn Anything from Sri Lankas Green Apocalypse? - California Globe - September 3rd, 2022
- Northeastern Creatives Bringing Their Art & Identities Into The Cultural Zeitgeist - Homegrown - September 3rd, 2022
- "I Think It's Limitless": MORTEN On the Volcanic Potential of the Future Rave Movement - EDM.com - September 3rd, 2022
- Chipotle workers in Lansing fear closure after union vote: Delta Twp. location first in the nation to be unionized - City Pulse - September 3rd, 2022
- @Jamwanda2 on Saturday: Triple C: Rendezvous of problems! - The Herald - September 3rd, 2022
- L.A. fashion trend analysis: It's time to reconsider Uggs - Los Angeles Times - September 3rd, 2022
- How Eliza Rose made the song of the summer - Dazed - September 3rd, 2022
- Friday essay: Joanna Bourke, the NSW arts minister, and the unruly contradictions of cancel culture - The Conversation - September 3rd, 2022
- Human Rights in the Crosshairs - Just Security - August 25th, 2022
- Around the Circle This Week: August 25, 2022 - lakesuperior.com - August 25th, 2022
- Australias Lockdown and Vaccine Narrative Has Fallen Apart - Brownstone Institute - August 25th, 2022
- Why Dont Millennials Have Hobbies? - The Walrus - August 25th, 2022
- Cheap, green vehicles are taking off overseas. Why are they banned here? - The Spinoff - August 25th, 2022
- The clock is ticking on the Rohingya crisis - The Business Standard - August 15th, 2022
- Augustus Owsley Stanley III: The sound engineer who kickstarted the counterculture movement - Far Out Magazine - August 15th, 2022
- Shailene Woodley Used to Get Offended When People Called Her a Hippy - Showbiz Cheat Sheet - August 15th, 2022
- Never Have I Ever Co-Stars Visit Phoenix, Talk About Their Netflix Hit Teenage Dramedy - Phoenix New Times - August 15th, 2022
- The real world is terrifying: Anne-Marie Duff on sisterhood, survival and Shameless - The Guardian - August 15th, 2022
- 'He wanted to break one of your ribs and eat it': Women describe Armie Hammer's sick requests in new docu - MEAWW - August 15th, 2022
- Never Have I Ever Season 3 review: Still one of the best teen comedies out there - Entertainment News , Firstpost - Firstpost - August 15th, 2022
- Black Panther: How Sound and Vision Made the 2017 Trailer a Zeitgeist Moment - Muse by Clio - August 2nd, 2022
- The five best albums produced by Butch Vig - Far Out Magazine - August 2nd, 2022
- Jennifer Lopez's 1990s-style summer hair: how to achieve the half-up, half-down look - The National - August 2nd, 2022
- 'The establishment didn't know what to do with me': Sanjeev Bhaskar on marriage, success and stereotypes - The Guardian - August 2nd, 2022
- Tasty ways to satisfy that craving for the iconic Choco Taco - FoodSided - August 2nd, 2022
- Publishing will never be fair - UnHerd - August 2nd, 2022
- Lena Dunham's "Sharp Stick" Is Sneakily Traditionalist Just Like the Rest of Her Work - InsideHook - August 2nd, 2022
- Attacking TV presenters, ruining Glastonbury and being banned by the BBC: how Carter USM became Britain's unlikeliest chart-toppers - Louder - August 2nd, 2022
- Gugu Mbatha-Raw on Apple TV+ show Surface, her dream role and why she likes to dig into the darkness at work - Evening Standard - August 2nd, 2022
- The Great Resignation: How Beyonc became the anti-work movement queen we didn't know we needed - New Zealand Herald - July 13th, 2022
- Dobbs is a win for the American experiment - Washington Examiner - July 13th, 2022
- 'Thor: Love and Thunder' Review: A Sequel Heavy on Humor That Almost Feels Like a Superhero Parody - Nerdcore Movement - July 13th, 2022
- Social Justice Ideology and the Decline of American Medicine: A Conversation with Stanley Goldfarb - Public Discourse - July 13th, 2022
- This political ad from Jerone Davison is pretty unhinged, even for the MAGA crowd - Mic - July 13th, 2022
- Riding the wave of the Crocs - Chicago Reader - July 13th, 2022
- Whats New on DVD Blu-ray in July: 'Everything Everywhere,' 'Drive My Car,' 'The Beatles: Get Back' and More - TheWrap - July 13th, 2022
- Where The Crawdads Sing director Olivia Newman on mysteries and myth-making - The A.V. Club - July 13th, 2022
- Local artist/writer duo document 2021 and beyond - The San Diego Union-Tribune - July 13th, 2022
- The best games of 2022 so far - NME - July 13th, 2022
- Children of the Counter-Revolution - Quillette - July 13th, 2022
- Boris Johnson Could Have Been Another Thatcher - Novara Media - July 13th, 2022
- How Google is Amplifying Alternative Youth Culture - THISDAY Newspapers - July 7th, 2022
- The revolution will be televised: why we are witnessing a big-boss backlash - The Guardian - July 7th, 2022
- The Origin of Vibes - The Atlantic - July 7th, 2022
- 4 Powerful Photography Exhibitions Will Debut at the National Portrait Gallery This Year - AFAR Media - July 7th, 2022
- Battleground Director Cynthia Lowen On Roe V. Wade And Pro-Life Views - Exclusive Interview - The List - July 7th, 2022
- Club culture in the 1990s: How Dublin danced to a new beat - Irish Examiner - July 7th, 2022
- Agency of the Year and MARKies Malaysia 2022 shortlists unveiled - Marketing Interactive - July 7th, 2022