WASHINGTON Amnesty Internationals board has sat for months on a report critical of the group after it accused Ukrainian forces of illegally endangering civilians while fighting Russia, according to documents and a person familiar with the matter.
The 18-page report, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, underscores the complexity of applying international law to aspects of the conflict in Ukraine and the continuing sensitivity of a matter that prompted a fierce and swift backlash to the human rights group.
In a lengthy statement on Aug. 4, Amnesty International accused Ukrainian forces of a pattern of illegally putting civilians in harms way by housing soldiers nearby and launching attacks from populated areas. Russia, which has shelled civilian buildings and killed many civilians, portrayed the finding as vindication, but it otherwise incited outrage.
In response, the group expressed deep regret for the distress and anger its statement caused and announced it would conduct an external evaluation to learn what exactly went wrong and why. As part of that, Amnesty Internationals board commissioned an independent legal review of whether the substance of what it had said was legitimate.
A review panel of five international humanitarian law experts received internal emails and interviewed staff members.
In some respects, the report by the review panel absolved Amnesty International, concluding that it was proper to evaluate whether a defender, not just an aggressor, was obeying the laws of war, and saying that Amnestys records made clear that Ukrainian forces were frequently near civilians.
Under international law, it wrote, both sides in any conflict must try to protect civilians, regardless of the rightness of their cause. As a result, it is entirely appropriate for a rights organization to criticize violations by a victim of aggression, provided that there is sufficient evidence of such violations.
But the review panel nevertheless unanimously concluded that Amnesty International had botched its statement in several ways and that its key conclusions that Ukraine violated international law were not sufficiently substantiated by the available evidence.
The overall narrative of the Aug. 4 release was written in language that was ambiguous, imprecise and in some respects legally questionable, the report found. This is particularly the case with the opening paragraphs, which could be read as implying even though this was not A.I.s intention that, on a systemic or general level, Ukrainian forces were primarily or equally to blame for the death of civilians resulting from attacks by Russia.
An earlier version of the report was harsher, according to the person briefed on the matter. But Amnesty International lobbied the panel to soften its tone, and it did so in some respects like revising its characterization of Amnestys conclusion that Ukrainian forces violated international law from not substantiated to not sufficiently substantiated.
The panel delivered its final revision in early February, the person said, and asked to be consulted if Amnesty Internationals board decided to release only excerpts. But instead, the board decided to merely use it as one of several sources for a lessons-learned document to circulate internally, the person said.
In an email, an Amnesty International spokesperson characterized the independent review as part of an ongoing internal process, and these findings will inform and improve our future work.
The statement did not indicate whether the group agreed with the reports critiques.
The panel consisted of Emanuela-Chiara Gillard of the University of Oxford; Kevin Jon Heller of the University of Copenhagen; Eric Talbot Jensen of Brigham Young University; Marko Milanovic of the University of Reading; and Marco Sassli of the University of Geneva.
Inside Amnesty International, the panel found, some staff members had expressed serious reservations about whether the group had sufficiently sought to consult with the Ukrainian government to understand why it deployed forces where it did and whether it would have been feasible to station them elsewhere.
These reservations should have led to greater reflection and pause before the organization issued its statement, the report said.
Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Russian forces appear to have committed a series of atrocities, indiscriminately shelling and killing civilians and destroying civilian infrastructure. (The International Criminal Court recently accused President Vladimir V. Putin of the war crime of abducting and deporting thousands of Ukrainian children to Russia and issued a warrant for his arrest.)
Against that backdrop, Amnesty Internationals denunciation of Ukrainian tactics received a large amount of attention. Proponents of the Kremlin portrayed the findings as essentially showing that Ukraine was to blame for the deaths of Ukrainian civilians at Russias hands.
Russias ambassador to the United Nations, Vasily Nebenzya, cited the findings as part of justifying Russias occupation of a nuclear power plant in Ukraine.
We dont use the tactics Ukrainian armed forces are using using the civilian objects as military cover, I would say, what Amnesty International recently proved in a report, which we were saying all the time in all the meetings with the Security Council, he said.
The statement did not, in fact, accuse Ukraine of using civilians as human shields, only of failing to take precautions to protect them. Still, the backlash was fierce. President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine accused the organization of trying to shift the responsibility from the aggressor to the victim.
Inside Amnesty International, its statement was deeply contentious. Its Ukraine director, Oksana Pokalchuk, resigned in protest, noting that Russia was accused of atrocities in the towns it occupied and Ukraine was trying to prevent more such places from falling. She accused the group of giving Russia a justification to continue its indiscriminate attacks. The groups branch in Canada issued a statement expressing regret over the magnitude and impact of these failings from an institution of our stature.
While condemning Amnesty Internationals analysis, the review panel agreed that the statement which had lacked much detail was backed in part by fact.
The report said the groups researchers had documented at least 42 specific instances in 19 towns and villages where Ukrainian soldiers were operating near civilians. It also determined that several attacks by Russian forces that appeared to be targeting the Ukrainian military resulted in death or injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects.
That raised the question of whether the Ukrainian military had violated its legal obligations, under a 1977 expansion of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, to take precautions to protect civilians in their areas of operations to the maximum extent feasible.
Essentially, that means if there are two equally good locations for the military to station itself, one closer to civilians and one farther away, combatants should opt for the latter so that any enemy does not kill civilians as collateral damage. If there is no equally good alternative, a military force should try to evacuate civilians to a safer place.
The news release accused Ukraine of a pattern of failing to take either step, while also saying it should have warned civilians. But the report said Amnesty International failed to meaningfully engage with Ukrainian authorities about whether equally good alternative locations, evacuations or warnings were feasible.
The report also said the descriptor pattern was imprudent because it implied that generally, many or most of the civilian victims of the war died as a result of Ukraines decision to locate its forces in the vicinity of civilians, as opposed to Russias willingness to target civilians or civilian objects deliberately or indiscriminately.
Lacking sufficient information, it said, the group should have used more cautious language.
Link:
Amnesty International Sat on a Report Critical of Its Ukraine Concerns - The New York Times
- Now It's Germany's Turn to Frustrate Allies Over Ukraine - The New York Times - March 6th, 2024 [March 6th, 2024]
- Nato is growing reckless over Ukraine and Russias German military leak proves it - The Guardian - March 6th, 2024 [March 6th, 2024]
- Putin the only winner as Poland's Tusk flounders over Ukraine border fight - POLITICO Europe - March 6th, 2024 [March 6th, 2024]
- Ukraines Zelensky struggles to draft more troops as Russia advances - The Washington Post - March 6th, 2024 [March 6th, 2024]
- Ukraine Slams the Door on Bringing Russian Gas to Europe - Bloomberg - March 6th, 2024 [March 6th, 2024]
- Ukraine first lady declines State of the Union invitation - The Hill - March 6th, 2024 [March 6th, 2024]
- Ukraine war: Germany under pressure to explain intercepted phone call - BBC.com - March 6th, 2024 [March 6th, 2024]
- Poland sees its most violent protest yet by farmers and supporters against Ukraine imports, EU rules - The Associated Press - March 6th, 2024 [March 6th, 2024]
- Ukraine hits behind frontlines as Odesa blasts rock Greek PM visit - Yahoo! Voices - March 6th, 2024 [March 6th, 2024]
- Even Without Speaker Johnson, Democrats Could Act to Save Ukraine Today - Kyiv Post - March 6th, 2024 [March 6th, 2024]
- Key highlights of proposed bipartisan Senate package for border security and Ukraine - The Associated Press - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- Senate releases border package with aid to Ukraine, Israel; House says DOA - Turn to 10 - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- What's in the bipartisan Senate package to aid Ukraine, secure U.S. border - Yahoo News - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- Putin casts the Ukraine conflict as a fight for Russia's survival as he seeks reelection - The Associated Press - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- US must not interfere Biden's advisor on possible dismissal of Ukraine's Commander-in-Chief - Yahoo News - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- Dozens detained as Russian soldiers' wives call for their return from Ukraine - Yahoo News - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- Senators race to release their package of border policies and aid for Ukraine and Israel - CNBC - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- Ukraine war live updates: World Court rules in favor of Kyiv on genocide case; Zelenskyy says EU aid sends clear signal to both Moscow and the U.S. -... - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- Ukraine made surprisingly realistic decoys of weapons to fake out Russia - Business Insider - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- Russia forced to use ancient tanks as materiel fails en masse in Ukraine, veteran says - Yahoo News - February 5th, 2024 [February 5th, 2024]
- Russia Is Denied a Seat on the U.N. Human Rights Council - The New York Times - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- Opinion | We Need to Reframe the Debate Over Ukraine - POLITICO - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- U.S. Envoy to NATO Says Aid to Israel Won't Come at Ukraine's Expense - The New York Times - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- Army to Congress: Do your job so we can help Israel and Ukraine - POLITICO - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- DFC Commits $250 Million to Strengthen Food Security in Ukraine - DFC - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- What Ukraines operation against Russian-annexed Crimea means ... - openDemocracy - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- Russia recruits Serbs and Cubans for war in Ukraine - Ukrainian World Congress - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- Pressure Grows on Germany to Give Ukraine Long-Range Missiles - The New York Times - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- The bruising artillery battle in Ukraine has left a scar that is visible ... - NPR - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- Military briefing: the advance of Ukraine's 'mosquito navy' - Financial Times - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- The fate of Ukraine funding lies in the balance with speaker's race - NPR - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- INTERVIEW: Planning the post-invasion return of citizens to Ukraine - UN News - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- Ukraine and Impacted Countries Crisis - Emergency Appeal n ... - ReliefWeb - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- Digital Collaboration between UK and Ukraine | BCS - BCS - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- Called Up: Sergii Kryvtsov Called Up by Ukraine National Team - Inter Miami CF - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- Are Ukraine's Airstrikes Inside Russia Strategically Effective in the ... - Foreign Policy - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- Today's D Brief: Hamas-Israel war; US reaction; Rain arrives in ... - Defense One - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- 5 policy issues the leaderless House faces, from Ukraine to NDAA to ... - NPR - October 10th, 2023 [October 10th, 2023]
- The Miles of Obstacles Slowing Ukraines Counteroffensive - The New York Times - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Russia-Ukraine War: Putin, Projecting Control, Tries to Contain Fallout From Mutiny - The New York Times - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- With Wagner's Future in Doubt, Ukraine Could Capitalize on Chaos - The New York Times - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Biden refers to Ukraine as Iraq when asked about Putin - The Hill - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Kremlin Says Only Hits 'Military' Targets After Ukraine Restaurant Strike - The Moscow Times - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Dark, damp and deathly: inside a hospital on Ukraine's front line - The Economist - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Russia mutiny revives stagnant talk of increasing Ukraine aid in Congress - POLITICO - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Opinion | Putin, Prigozhin and the Danger of Disorder - The New York Times - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Switzerland Blocks Sale of Leopard 1 Tanks Bound for Ukraine - Yahoo News - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Ukraine Situation Report: U.S. Replenishes Kyiv's Bradley Fighting Vehicle Force - The War Zone - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Prigozhin surrendered too quickly, occupiers in Ukraine did not have time to lose heart Ukraine's Foreign Minister - Yahoo News - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Netanyahu considering visit to Ukraine, Kyiv's envoy to Israel says - The Jerusalem Post - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- On this part of the eastern front, Russia is still on the attack - The Washington Post - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Cheap Russian drone a menace to Ukrainian troops and equipment - The Jerusalem Post - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Kremlin 'Welcomes' Vatican Peace Efforts Over Ukraine - The Moscow Times - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Why Ukraines Counteroffensive Is Off to a Slow, Bloody Start - The New York Times - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- Russia-Ukraine war latest: Kremlin reportedly threatened Wagner families as soldiers marched to Moscow - Yahoo News - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- New Books on the Russian Invasion of Ukraine - The New York Times - June 28th, 2023 [June 28th, 2023]
- An illustrated explanation of Russia's deportation of Ukrainians, from the war zone to a remote camp - USA TODAY - May 31st, 2023 [May 31st, 2023]
- Taiwan Ambassador Says Ukraine's Success Against Russia Will Help Deter China - The New York Times - May 31st, 2023 [May 31st, 2023]
- Russia reports hits on oil refineries and town near Ukraine - Yahoo! Voices - May 31st, 2023 [May 31st, 2023]
- Oligarch's Bell 427 Is The Ukrainian Military's Latest Helicopter - The War Zone - May 31st, 2023 [May 31st, 2023]
- How Ukraine Followed the ISIS Playbook - Newsweek - May 31st, 2023 [May 31st, 2023]
- Ukraine Situation Report: Kyiv To Hold First Person Video Drone 'Super Bowl' - The War Zone - May 31st, 2023 [May 31st, 2023]
- U.S. Adds Aid to Ukraine to Deliver Ammunition for Drones and Artillery - The New York Times - May 31st, 2023 [May 31st, 2023]
- Russian Guards Beat and Tortured Kherson Prisoners, Leading to Deaths - The New York Times - May 31st, 2023 [May 31st, 2023]
- Equipment for Ukraine drawn from Kuwait wasnt combat-ready, IG says - Yahoo News - May 31st, 2023 [May 31st, 2023]
- UN considers comparing drone attack on Moscow with constant shelling of Ukraine inappropriate - Yahoo News - May 31st, 2023 [May 31st, 2023]
- Opinion | 'America First' reasons why the U.S. should support Ukraine - The Washington Post - May 31st, 2023 [May 31st, 2023]
- Ukraine plays down talk of Bakhmut gains being start of counteroffensive - Reuters - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- EU tells ministers they must recalibrate China policy over support for Russia - The Guardian - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- United in Music: Over 500 young musicians perform Ukraines winning Eurovision entry - Classic FM - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- Ukraine has choice of targets as it plots counteroffensive - The Guardian - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- Russia denies reports of Ukrainian breakthroughs along front lines - Reuters - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- Ukraine war: Inside the fight for the last streets of Bakhmut - BBC - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- Ukrainian historian Serhii Plokhy: This may not be the last chapter of the Russian empire, but its an important one - The Guardian - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- Russian woman convicted of desecrating grave of Putins parents - Al Jazeera English - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- Putin runs out of "adequate responses", worst for Russia about to begin Ukraine's National Security and Defence ... - Yahoo News - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- Russia-Ukraine war at a glance: what we know on day 443 of the invasion - The Guardian - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- Ukraine war: WFP chief Cindy McCain says grain deal with Russia needed to feed world - BBC - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- A Ukrainian counterattack has the Wagner boss sounding alarms on a counteroffensive in 'full swing,' claiming Zelenskyy played everyone - Yahoo News - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]
- Russia says it repelled surge of Ukrainian attacks in the east - Reuters - May 12th, 2023 [May 12th, 2023]