The SEC v. LBRY: How a New Hampshire Court Battle Could Rewrite the Rules of Crypto – The Information

Less than two hours before we spoke on the phone last week, Jeremy Kauffman tweeted that if voters elected him as New Hampshires next U.S. senator, his goal would be for America to never launch another drone strike in the Middle East. It was a sentiment shared by many self-identified libertarians, who have long opposed U.S. military incursions abroad. But then came the next line of Kauffmans post: Failing that, my fallback goal is to have Liz Cheney strapped to the next bomb.

A 37-year-old computer scientist, blockchain CEO and dark-horse Senate candidate from Manchester, N.H., Kauffman considers himself a dissident, one whos living under a government regime of soft totalitarianism. But he also likes to keep things light: I play a little bit, at times, this character of a bombastic, over-the-top libertarian. But thats what social media is. This is the game that we're playing.

But the primary focus of our call was not Kauffmans controversial tweets, or his long-shot campaign to oust Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., from Congress this November, or even his red-pilledcampaign site. It was his ongoing fight against the Securities and Exchange Commission, which sued Kauffmans blockchain startup LBRY in March 2021, nearly three years after the agency began investigating the company for securities violations. The case is being closely watched by crypto executives and investors, as well as by regulators in Washington, D.C., as a potential watershed moment in the industrys history. When a judgment is issued sometime in the coming weeks, it could mark a significant step forward for cryptoor a dramatic leap backward, depending on where you stand.

Go here to see the original:
The SEC v. LBRY: How a New Hampshire Court Battle Could Rewrite the Rules of Crypto - The Information