Commentary
Public health as a profession has fallen into dispute but it is hardly the only one. The economists bear responsibility too, for it is they who should have been aggressive, open, and loud about every aspect of the pandemic policy response. And yet, they were largely silent as markets were wrecked, Congress blew up the budget, and the Fed flooded the world with newly printed cash to pay the bills.
Every bit of training in economics should have signaled that this was not the right path. And yet all surveys we have from the last 30 months show that most establishment economists had not much to say at all. How to explain this? Its a combination of intellectual failing, cowardice, and careerism.
Today we are paying a very heavy price as economic conditions the world over grow ever worse.
The history of this intellectual apostasy is unerasable. For example, in late March 2020, the IGM Forum at the University of Chicago polled economists nationwide, as they have been on various issues for ten years, concerning the lockdowns. Enough of them acquiesced to the prevailing strategy to make it policy for the national press to announce with confidence that economists are all for these wealth-destroying measures.
Incredibly, and to the everlasting disgrace of all those polled, not one single American economist who was asked was willing to disagree with the following statement: Abandoning severe lockdowns at a time when the recurrence in infections remains high will lead to greater economic damage than sustaining the lockdowns to eliminate resurgent risk.
Fully 80 percent of American economists agreed or strongly agreed. Only 14 percent were uncertain. Not one economist polled disagreed or had no opinion. Not one! This allowed Vox to announce triumphantly: Top economists warn ending social distancing too soon would only hurt the economy. Further: There is no evidence of a disjuncture in views between what public health experts think and what economic policy experts think.
It was the same in Europe. Economists polled there were all for this completely destructive, unworkable, and essentially insane policy that had never been tried before to deal with a new virus that we knew then was mostly a threat to people above 70 years of age with comorbidities.
Why was it not obvious that the right approach was to encourage the vulnerable to shelter and otherwise let society function as normal? Anyone who raised such an incredibly obvious question about lockdowns was shouted down. Dont you dare question expert opinion! Look how the economists agree!
Who precisely is on the list of the economists surveyed in this poll? There are eighty of them. You are welcome to have a look at their names and affiliations. You will notice that, without exception among the Americans, they have Ivy League associations.
Now, this is a puzzle. Theres no question that elite opinion was squarely on the side of unprecedented restrictions on the lives of citizens. Did these people study virology? Did they look at the data? Did they know something by virtue of their elite affiliations that the rest of us did not know? Did their models give them special insight into the future?
The answer is surely no in each case. What we have here is a demonstration that even the smartest people are susceptible to the frenzies of political fashion, groupthink, crowd psychology, and mob behavior.
It was clear by late March which way the winds were blowing. And people of a certain status, even if they do not share in the panicked attitudes of people on the street, are savvy enough to know what they are supposed to say and when. They too experience fear; it is a different kind of fear, one for their reputations and professional standing.
The courage to stand up against prevailing winds is rare indeed, even for those who can afford to do so. To be sure, I knew plenty of economists who were against the lockdowns. Donald Boudreaux, David Henderson, Gigi Foster, and a few others wrote articles and said so. Among major public figures, only Ron Paul spoke out from day one. Its true that they were a tiny minority but they did exist. They also took enormous professional risks in daring to defy what quickly emerged as mainstream opinion.
All of which still begs the question of the rationale that the economists gave to justify their destructionist posture. Here is where a remarkable piece by Jayanta Bhattacharya and Mikko Packalen provides great insight.
The first justification concerned the precautionary principle. Here is the idea that in the presence of uncertainty, it is better to be safe than sorry. The principle got a huge boost from the movie Jaws: the police chief was right that they should have closed the beaches given the well-founded worry that a giant shark was on the loose. Those who ignored his advice were responsible for lives lost.
Its not obvious how this principle should lead immediately to lockdowns for COVID. We knew from mid-February that the risk gradients put the danger of this virus squarely on the old and infirm. The data was clear. The virus would become endemic just as all previous ones had, via natural immunity. That was going to happen regardless. You can prevent a shark attack by closing beaches but you cannot make a virus go away by closing economies!
Whats more, the precautionary principle has to apply to policies too. Lets say that we had some uncertainty about the virus. We still had absolute certainty about the consequences of lockdowns. We knew it would lead to business failure, depression, demoralization, capital destruction, supply-chain breakage, and vast loss without precedent. They favored the lockdowns anyway, trading in what they knew for sure with concern for that which they knew almost nothing.
This was highly irresponsible. A consistent application of the precautionary principle would also have assumed the worst about the collateral harms of COVID restrictions, our authors write.
The second justification is even more strange. Based on cell-phone mobility data coming out at the time, economists found a way to say that the lockdowns were really a market response to the virus, not a consequence of government policy. You see, the data showed that people were canceling dinner reservations and trips and generally staying off the highways.
Therefore:
Economists reasoned that the virus, not lockdown, caused economic harm. There was no tradeoff between viral spread and the economy, economists intoned. Lockdowns would stop the virus, and our lockdowns would not impose meaningful costs on society either at home or globally (in spite of the heavily connected global economy), economists reasoned.
Even at this time, I heard friends and colleagues saying these things, much to my astonishment. I knew for sure that it was all incorrect. Yes, some of the loss of mobility reflected virus fears but those fears themselves were irrational and fanned by media hysteria. They might have disappeared in days or weeks but for the forced lockdowns.
In addition, the mobility loss was in part due to public fear about the government response. There had been talk of closures and quarantines since early February. Everyone could see what was going on in China. It was hard to imagine that the same would happen here, but Americans know not to trust the government. We knew they were capable of anything.
Even on March 12, 2020, I was very reluctant to board an Amtrak, not because I thought I might get COVID but rather because I knew for sure that a panicked government had the power to stop the train and put us all in quarantine camps. This fear was legitimate, and a major reason why people stayed home.
This was NOT market workings. It was fear of government and trickery by media that drove the results. As our authors write:
The idea that people would have voluntarily locked anyway is spurious and ignores the grave distributional impacts of lockdowns. A lockdown imposes the same restrictions on everyone, whether or not they can bear the harm. Nevertheless, many economists favored imposing formal lockdowns and shelter-in-place orders rather than offering public health advice.
Of all people, the economists should have known. If they did know, not enough spoke out. The whole scene reminds me of the Prohibition period during which all the leading economists stepped up to defend and rationalize the policy that everyone knew was on its way.
It took more than ten years before it became stunningly obvious how goofed up was that opinion all along, that it completely failed to think through what economists are trained to think about, namely the relationship between means and ends and the tradeoffs involved in every policy decision.
The economists should have been out front in warning ahead of time where lockdown policies would take us. Its a tragic historical fact that they did not.
Why exactly do we pay intellectuals? So that they can use their knowledge and wisdom to provide guidance away from catastrophe and toward a better world. They failed to do so, and here we are.
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Follow
View original post here:
As the Economy Collapsed, Why Were Economists Silent? - The Epoch Times
- 'Shrinkflation'? Blame the Fed - Newsmax - March 22nd, 2024 [March 22nd, 2024]
- Ron Paul Tells Tucker Carlson the Exact Date There Was a Coup and We Lost Our Government - Mediaite - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Ron Paul: It Dawned On Me That The Republic Was Gone When Allen Dulles Was Appointed To The Warren ... - RealClearPolitics - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- The rise and - possible - fall of David Shafer - The Atlanta Journal Constitution - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Yes, that was Paul Hornung on Packers' sideline in Ice Bowl - Packers.com - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Cap Times Idea Fest 2023 save the dates | Paul Fanlund ... - The Capital Times - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Folks tell Ron Keller his memories of growing up in Naperville could ... - Positively Naperville - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- The Man Who Invented the Trillion-Dollar Coin - New York Magazine - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Opinion | Why Texas Republicans Are Targeting Renewable Energy - The New York Times - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- States that have produced the most NBA Finals champions - MaxPreps - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- All Community Pro-Am starting holes on Saturday, Sunday - McCook Daily Gazette - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- The World and Everything in It: June 2, 2023 - WORLD News Group - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Sen. Rand Paul staffer's parents speak out after he was 'brutally ... - March 31st, 2023 [March 31st, 2023]
- Rand Paul staff member stabbed in D.C., has life-threatening injuries - March 31st, 2023 [March 31st, 2023]
- Aide to Senator Rand Paul critically wounded in Washington DC stabbing ... - March 31st, 2023 [March 31st, 2023]
- The Antiwar Movement Roars Back to Life | CNSNews - March 4th, 2023 [March 4th, 2023]
- Ron Pauls Retirement Advice: Do This One Thing ASAP - March 4th, 2023 [March 4th, 2023]
- The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : The Antiwar Movement ... - March 4th, 2023 [March 4th, 2023]
- Feb. 19: Ron Paul, Tulsi Gabbard to Speak at Anti-War Rally ... - February 20th, 2023 [February 20th, 2023]
- 5 Things You May Not Know About Ron Paul : NPR - NPR.org - February 20th, 2023 [February 20th, 2023]
- The Real Disinformation Was The Russia Disinformation Hoax - February 5th, 2023 [February 5th, 2023]
- The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : The Real ... - February 5th, 2023 [February 5th, 2023]
- Paul McCartneys Decade-Long Creative Surge Post-Beatles To Be Explored In Man On The Run From Oscar Winner Morgan Neville - Deadline - February 5th, 2023 [February 5th, 2023]
- Ron Paul hospitalized after he appears to suffer stroke - New York Post - January 30th, 2023 [January 30th, 2023]
- Ron Paul Issues an Urgent Warning to Retirement Savers - January 30th, 2023 [January 30th, 2023]
- The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : Zelenskyy Regime to ... - January 30th, 2023 [January 30th, 2023]
- XPONENTIAL FITNESS, INC. : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance... - January 15th, 2023 [January 15th, 2023]
- Ron Paul: 'Twitter Files' Make It Clear, We Must Abolish The FBI - December 28th, 2022 [December 28th, 2022]
- Ron Paul: A Tale Of Two Midterms | ZeroHedge - December 28th, 2022 [December 28th, 2022]
- Retiring History Theatre artistic director Ron Peluso looks back at fond moments from his 27 years on the job - St. Paul Pioneer Press - December 26th, 2022 [December 26th, 2022]
- Ron Paul | Biography, Education, Books, & Facts | Britannica - December 21st, 2022 [December 21st, 2022]
- The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : Is Washingtons ... - December 21st, 2022 [December 21st, 2022]
- The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : Europe Commits ... - October 25th, 2022 [October 25th, 2022]
- Ron Paul 2012 presidential campaign - Wikipedia - October 23rd, 2022 [October 23rd, 2022]
- Nevada's micronation of Molossia has a sounder currency than the dollar - Washington Times - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Dune Sound Team on Finding "The Voice," Using "Fake Documentary Realism" & the Rescue of Paul Atreides - Below the Line |... - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Paul LePage has softened his stance on immigration. Or has he? - Bangor Daily News - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- 38 Celeb Couples Who Have Been Together More Than 20 Years, Which Is Like, 150 Years In Normal People Time - BuzzFeed - October 19th, 2022 [October 19th, 2022]
- Ron Paul: It's Time To Tell Biden We Say 'No!' To Nuclear War OpEd - Eurasia Review - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- The Moment the Republican Party Lost Control - The New Republic - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Paul Ryan: Trumps unelectability will be palpable by 2024 - The Hill - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Governor Ron DeSantis Appoints Fourteen to the Florida Rehabilitation Council for the Blind - Governor Ron DeSantis - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Paul Newman recalls losing his only son Scott to addiction in memoir: I never thought it would be fatal - Fox News - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- How To Resist CBDCs5 Ways You Can Opt Out of This Dystopian Future - International Man - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Bob Doucette: 2022 campaign a Wild West of ideas of how to govern Oklahoma - Tulsa World - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Warm start to the week, then chilly temps later; thunderstorm chance Tuesday evening - MPR News - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Ron Paul: Will Italys Election Foreshadow US Midterms? - Libertarian Party - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- With POTUS non-endorsement endorsement of Ron DeSantis, the race for Florida Governor is over - Florida Politics - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- Miranda Webb: Trauma, anarchy and perilous life on the run from Northeast Ohio to Mexico - Akron Beacon Journal - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- Ben Sasse and the battle over what kind of conservative leads the GOP - Washington Examiner - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- Slayden carries Wood River past Freeburg and back into the playoffs - St. Louis Post-Dispatch - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- 'The water came up so fast': The heroes of Tonya Court and Wisconsin Street - Naples Daily News - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- Wisconsin Republicans still fixated on 2020 election in 2022 - PBS Wisconsin - October 8th, 2022 [October 8th, 2022]
- The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : School Shutdowns ... - September 29th, 2022 [September 29th, 2022]
- Fans Discover Ron Paul Delivered Late Pop Icon Selena - September 29th, 2022 [September 29th, 2022]
- Flashback: Ron Paul Railed Against the FBI in 1988 - NOQ Report - September 29th, 2022 [September 29th, 2022]
- Paul Sullivan: Chicago White Sox need to shake up their clubhouse culture by dealing 1 or more of their core players this offseason - The Killeen... - September 29th, 2022 [September 29th, 2022]
- Tim Ryan Says Americans Need To Give Up Gas Cars as He Drives Around Ohio in Gas Guzzlers - Washington Free Beacon - September 29th, 2022 [September 29th, 2022]
- Pianist Paul Barnes and Native flutist Ron Warren to premiere piece Monday in Lincoln - Lincoln Journal Star - September 27th, 2022 [September 27th, 2022]
- POLITICO Playbook PM: Mitch McConnell and the tale of two moderate Dems - POLITICO - POLITICO - September 27th, 2022 [September 27th, 2022]
- Cam'ron and A-Trak 'U Wasn't There' Review - slantmagazine - September 27th, 2022 [September 27th, 2022]
- CBDCs, SDRs, and the Re-Monetization of Gold Here's What Happens Next - International Man - September 27th, 2022 [September 27th, 2022]
- Lessons Learned: Ron Paul's Warnings Against the War on Terror Stand True - Libertarian Party - September 17th, 2022 [September 17th, 2022]
- KRULL COLUMN: Maybe it's an oath they don't understand - Evening News and Tribune - September 17th, 2022 [September 17th, 2022]
- 9 Tips to Tackle Your Financial Goals and Still Have Fun - Money Talks News - September 17th, 2022 [September 17th, 2022]
- 10 States With the Most Homes at Risk of Wildfire - Money Talks News - September 17th, 2022 [September 17th, 2022]
- 5 Handy Keyboard Shortcuts That Make Internet Life Easier - Money Talks News - September 17th, 2022 [September 17th, 2022]
- What we know about Texas and Florida's transport of migrants - Axios - September 17th, 2022 [September 17th, 2022]
- 15 States With the Highest Union Participation Rates - Money Talks News - September 17th, 2022 [September 17th, 2022]
- Winter is Coming But the 2022 Ram 1500 Isn't Worried - MotorBiscuit - September 17th, 2022 [September 17th, 2022]
- '8 Simple Rules' Turns 20: 10 Big Names Who Appeared on the Sitcom - TV Insider - September 17th, 2022 [September 17th, 2022]
- Tech and finance moguls are putting money and weight behind Trump with a brain Ron DeSantis - Fortune - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- What Is Peter Thiel Thinking? - The New Republic - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- 7 of the Most Beautiful Places to Retire in America - Money Talks News - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- 3 Ways to Lower the Rising Risk of Electrical Fires - Money Talks News - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- Inflation Is State-Sponsored Terrorism - SchiffGold - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- Quick hits: Pujols clouts 696th homer to tie for fourth all-time as Cardinals rally to win - St. Louis Post-Dispatch - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- It's no coincidence that the most successful democracies are constitutional monarchies - The Telegraph - September 11th, 2022 [September 11th, 2022]
- "Distinguished," "loyal," "failure": Denver reflects on the retirement of Chief Paul Pazen and its hopes for new Chief... - September 6th, 2022 [September 6th, 2022]
- Trump faces possible obstruction of justice charges for concealing classified government documents - Ohio Capital Journal - September 6th, 2022 [September 6th, 2022]