Turns Out Nazis Have Some Pretty Wrong Views About Genetics – New York Magazine

Photo: Stefano Bianchetti/Getty Images

Most people tend to have a certain idea about their heritage: that they simply are, well, whatever they are. Scottish or German or Nigerian or whatever else. Maybe theres some other stuff mixed in there, sure, but most people have a sense that theyre from one particular place, and thats where their culture and maybe some of their values originates.

Naturally, DNA tells a more complicated story, and a new article in Science by Ann Gibbons very usefully punctures a bunch of myths, some of them pretty harmful, about human ancestry. The vast majority of us are mutts, it turns out, and oftentimes the genetic heritage we think we have bears little resemblance to whats actually hiding in our chromosomes.

Gibbons starts the article by quoting a German neo-Nazi, doing what neo-Nazis tend to do, expressing alarm about the arrival of Syrian refugees and the prospect of them sullying his precious German genetic heritage.

From there she swiftly moves to the main point of the article:

Using revolutionary new methods to analyze DNA and the isotopes found in bones and teeth, scientists are exposing the tangled roots of peoples around the world, as varied as Germans, ancient Philistines, and Kashmiris. Few of us are actually the direct descendants of the ancient skeletons found in our backyards or historic homelands. Only a handful of groups today, such as Australian Aborigines, have deep bloodlines untainted by mixing with immigrants.

That aforementioned notion of German purity, to take one example, comes from a Nazi mangling of an already somewhat thinly sourced story about a Germanic fighter named Arminius who supposedly led a rebellion against the Romans 2,000 years ago the Nazis portrayed him as a blond-haired member of a supposed master race.

Now, it shouldnt be surprising that Nazis dont have a particularly sophisticated grip on genetics. But this article is still an interesting, comprehensive look at where researchers are in their quest to understand humanitys genetic legacy. And the short, also-unsurprising answer is: Weve moved around a lot and mixed it up a lot.

Gibbonss piece also usefully complicates the notion of genetic superiority, highlighting just how historically contingent this idea is. For example, she writes of two different groups that collided at one point and produced offspring: The unions between the Yamnaya and the descendants of Anatolian farmers catalyzed the creation of the famous Corded Ware culture, known for its distinctive pottery impressed with cordlike patterns According to DNA analysis, those people may have inherited Yamnaya genes that made them taller; they may also have had a then-rare mutation that enabled them to digest lactose in milk, which quickly spread It was a winning combination. The Corded Ware people had many offspring who spread rapidly across Europe. Today, of course, very few people are aware of the Corded Ware culture a group that was very much, for random genetic reasons, in the right place at the right time.

For most of human history, humans havent been great at recording history accurately, so along the way many cultures have developed myths about their lineage, about who was where, when. A lot of the time, the straightforward stories people tell to be proud of themselves and their ancestors are oversimplifications, at best. In the worst cases, these myths lead to ideologies like nationalism.

Its important to understand the appeal and functional role of bloodline myths, of course: This group could sully our bloodlines packs a bit more of a visceral punch than I am nervous this new group will cause the neighborhood to change. Because people dont tend to really understand genetics, and because the subject efficiently taps into many peoples most intimate feelings about disgust and purity, such talk can be a useful way to rile people up, almost always for the worse. Which is why its important to understand just how superficial it really is.

A new study found that when you pair two disagreeable people together, they both get what they want and have more fun in the process.

A new study looks at the sales of an at-home HIV-testing kit and finds some very encouraging results.

The psychology of how we choose who to leave out.

Research suggests that sexism in hiring cant explain the entire gender gap in leadership positions theres other stuff going on, too.

Just about everyone, everywhere, is a complicated mutt, and stories about pure bloodlines are almost always false.

Labels like organic and natural are impossibly vague and often misleading.

Most adults can do a decent job of understanding other peoples internal mental states. Not the leader of the free world.

Or its about to be, at least. Thats just the life cycle of any fad.

It might seem counterintuitive to advertise a place for injection-drug users to shoot up, but theres smart public-health reasoning behind the idea.

Not exactly, but theres some merit to the myth.

Time to find another hangover remedy.

A realization about monogamy that should make anyone getting married feel a little more hopeful.

Its a mixed bag.

The science behind a common-sense piece of advice.

Giving your mind time to wander is a key part of creativity.

Theres a bit of dissent within the American Psychological Association about the role of video games in contributing to violence.

A new TEDx video sums up the research of Bella DePaulo, a social psychologist who has been chipping away at the many myths surrounding marriage.

No matter how long they live in a loud urban environment.

The WHO and the CDC offer different recommendations for proper handwashing technique. Which is right?

Drinking with the author of Cork Dork, a new book about the obsessive world of wine.

Read the rest here:
Turns Out Nazis Have Some Pretty Wrong Views About Genetics - New York Magazine