No sooner had the radical equations of quantum mechanics been discovered than physicists identified one of the strangest phenomena the theory allows.
Quantum tunneling shows how profoundly particles such as electrons differ from bigger things. Throw a ball at the wall and it bounces backward; let it roll to the bottom of a valley and it stays there. But a particle will occasionally hop through the wall. It has a chance of slipping through the mountain and escaping from the valley, as two physicists wrote in Nature in 1928, in one of the earliest descriptions of tunneling.
Physicists quickly saw that particles ability to tunnel through barriers solved many mysteries. It explained various chemical bonds and radioactive decays and how hydrogen nuclei in the sun are able to overcome their mutual repulsion and fuse, producing sunlight.
But physicists became curious mildly at first, then morbidly so. How long, they wondered, does it take for a particle to tunnel through a barrier?
The trouble was that the answer didnt make sense.
The first tentative calculation of tunneling time appeared in print in 1932. Even earlier stabs might have been made in private, but when you get an answer you cant make sense of, you dont publish it, noted Aephraim Steinberg, a physicist at the University of Toronto.
It wasnt until 1962 that a semiconductor engineer at Texas Instruments named Thomas Hartman wrote a paper that explicitly embraced the shocking implications of the math.
Hartman found that a barrier seemed to act as a shortcut. When a particle tunnels, the trip takes less time than if the barrier werent there. Even more astonishing, he calculated that thickening a barrier hardly increases the time it takes for a particle to tunnel across it. This means that with a sufficiently thick barrier, particles could hop from one side to the other faster than light traveling the same distance through empty space.
In short, quantum tunneling seemed to allow faster-than-light travel, a supposed physical impossibility.
After the Hartman effect, thats when people started to worry, said Steinberg.
The discussion spiraled for decades, in part because the tunneling-time question seemed to scratch at some of the most enigmatic aspects of quantum mechanics. Its part of the general problem of what is time, and how do we measure time in quantum mechanics, and what is its meaning, said Eli Pollak, a theoretical physicist at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. Physicists eventually derived at least 10 alternative mathematical expressions for tunneling time, each reflecting a different perspective on the tunneling process. None settled the issue.
But the tunneling-time question is making a comeback, fueled by a series of virtuoso experiments that have precisely measured tunneling time in the lab.
In the most highly praised measurement yet, reported in Nature in July, Steinbergs group in Toronto used whats called the Larmor clock method to gauge how long rubidium atoms took to tunnel through a repulsive laser field.
The Larmor clock is the best and most intuitive way to measure tunneling time, and the experiment was the first to very nicely measure it, said Igor Litvinyuk, a physicist at Griffith University in Australia who reported a different measurement of tunneling time in Nature last year.
Luiz Manzoni, a theoretical physicist at Concordia College in Minnesota, also finds the Larmor clock measurement convincing. What they measure is really the tunneling time, he said.
The recent experiments are bringing new attention to an unresolved issue. In the six decades since Hartmans paper, no matter how carefully physicists have redefined tunneling time or how precisely theyve measured it in the lab, theyve found that quantum tunneling invariably exhibits the Hartman effect. Tunneling seems to be incurably, robustly superluminal.
How is it possible for [a tunneling particle] to travel faster than light? Litvinyuk said. It was purely theoretical until the measurements were made.
Tunneling time is hard to pin down because reality itself is.
At the macroscopic scale, how long an object takes to go from A to B is simply the distance divided by the objects speed. But quantum theory teaches us that precise knowledge of both distance and speed is forbidden.
In quantum theory, a particle has a range of possible locations and speeds. From among these options, definite properties somehow crystallize at the moment of measurement. How this happens is one of the deepest questions.
The upshot is that until a particle strikes a detector, its everywhere and nowhere in particular. This makes it really hard to say how long the particle previously spent somewhere, such as inside a barrier. You cannot say what time it spends there, Litvinyuk said, because it can be simultaneously two places at the same time.
To understand the problem in the context of tunneling, picture a bell curve representing the possible locations of a particle. This bell curve, called a wave packet, is centered at position A. Now picture the wave packet traveling, tsunami-like, toward a barrier. The equations of quantum mechanics describe how the wave packet splits in two upon hitting the obstacle. Most of it reflects, heading back toward A. But a smaller peak of probability slips through the barrier and keeps going toward B. Thus the particle has a chance of registering in a detector there.
But when a particle arrives at B, what can be said about its journey, or its time in the barrier? Before it suddenly showed up, the particle was a two-part probability wave both reflected and transmitted. It both entered the barrier and didnt. The meaning of tunneling time becomes unclear.
And yet any particle that starts at A and ends at B undeniably interacts with the barrier in between, and this interaction is something in time, as Pollak put it. The question is, what time is that?
Steinberg, who has had a seeming obsession with the tunneling-time question since he was a graduate student in the 1990s, explained that the trouble stems from the peculiar nature of time. Objects have certain characteristics, like mass or location. But they dont have an intrinsic time that we can measure directly. I can ask you, What is the position of thebaseball? but it makes no sense to ask, What is the time of thebaseball? Steinberg said. The time is not a property any particle possesses. Instead, we track other changes in the world, such as ticks of clocks (which are ultimately changes in position), and call these increments of time.
But in the tunneling scenario, theres no clock inside the particle itself. So what changes should be tracked? Physicists have found no end of possible proxies for tunneling time.
Hartman (and LeRoy Archibald MacColl before him in 1932) took the simplest approach to gauging how long tunneling takes. Hartman calculated the difference in the most likely arrival time of a particle traveling from A to B in free space versus a particle that has to cross a barrier. He did this by considering how the barrier shifts the position of the peak of the transmitted wave packet.
But this approach has a problem, aside from its weird suggestion that barriers speed particles up. You cant simply compare the initial and final peaks of a particles wave packet. Clocking the difference between a particles most likely departure time (when the peak of the bell curve is located at A) and its most likely arrival time (when the peak reaches B) doesnt tell you any individual particles time of flight, because a particle detected at B didnt necessarily start at A. It was anywhere and everywhere in the initial probability distribution, including its front tail, which was much closer to the barrier. This gave it a chance to reach B quickly.
Since particles exact trajectories are unknowable, researchers sought a more probabilistic approach. They considered the fact that after a wave packet hits a barrier, at each instant theres some probability that the particle is inside the barrier (and some probability that its not). Physicists then sum up the probabilities at every instant to derive the average tunneling time.
As for how to measure the probabilities, various thought experiments were conceived starting in the late 1960s in which clocks could be attached to the particles themselves. If each particles clock only ticks while its in the barrier, and you read the clocks of many transmitted particles, theyll show a range of different times. But the average gives the tunneling time.
All of this was easier said than done, of course. They were just coming up with crazy ideas of how to measure this time and thought it would never happen, said Ramn Ramos, the lead author of the recent Nature paper. Now the science has advanced, and we were happy to make this experiment real.
Although physicists have gauged tunneling times since the 1980s, the recent rise of ultraprecise measurements began in 2014 in Ursula Kellers lab at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich. Her team measured tunneling time using whats called an attoclock. In Kellers attoclock, electrons from helium atoms encounter a barrier, which rotates in place like the hands of a clock. Electrons tunnel most often when the barrier is in a certain orientation call it noon on the attoclock. Then, when electrons emerge from the barrier, they get kicked in a direction that depends on the barriers alignment at that moment. To gauge the tunneling time, Kellers team measured the angular difference between noon, when most tunneling events began, and the angle of most outgoing electrons. They measured a difference of 50 attoseconds, or billionths of a billionth of a second.
Then in work reported in 2019, Litvinyuks group improved on Kellers attoclock experiment by switching from helium to simpler hydrogen atoms. They measured an even shorter time of at most two attoseconds, suggesting that tunneling happens almost instantaneously.
But some experts have since concluded that the duration the attoclock measures is not a good proxy for tunneling time. Manzoni, who published an analysis of the measurement last year, said the approach is flawed in a similar way to Hartmans tunneling-time definition: Electrons that tunnel out of the barrier almost instantly can be said, in hindsight, to have had a head start.
Meanwhile, Steinberg, Ramos and their Toronto colleagues David Spierings and Isabelle Racicot pursued an experiment that has been more convincing.
This alternative approach utilizes the fact that many particles possess an intrinsic magnetic property called spin. Spin is like an arrow that is only ever measured pointing up or down. But before a measurement, it can point in any direction. As the Irish physicist Joseph Larmor discovered in 1897, the angle of the spin rotates, or precesses, when the particle is in a magnetic field. The Toronto team used this precession to act as the hands of a clock, called a Larmor clock.
The researchers used a laser beam as their barrier and turned on a magnetic field inside it. They then prepared rubidium atoms with spins aligned in a particular direction, and sent the atoms drifting toward the barrier. Next, they measured the spin of the atoms that came out the other side. Measuring any individual atoms spin always returns an unilluminating answer of up or down. But do the measurement over and over again, and the collected measurements will reveal how much the angle of the spins precessed, on average, while the atoms were inside the barrier and thus how long they typically spent there.
The researchers reported that the rubidium atoms spent, on average, 0.61 milliseconds inside the barrier, in line with Larmor clock times theoretically predicted in the 1980s. Thats less time than the atoms would have taken to travel through free space. Therefore, the calculations indicate that if you made the barrier really thick, Steinberg said, the speedup would let atoms tunnel from one side to the other faster than light.
In 1907, Albert Einstein realized that his brand-new theory of relativity must render faster-than-light communication impossible. Imagine two people, Alice and Bob, moving apart at high speed. Because of relativity, their clocks tell different times. One consequence is that if Alice sends a faster-than-light signal to Bob, who immediately sends a superluminal reply to Alice, Bobs reply could reach Alice before she sent her initial message. The achieved effect would precede the cause, Einstein wrote.
Experts generally feel confident that tunneling doesnt really break causality, but theres no consensus on the precise reasons why not. I dont feel like we have a completely unified way of thinking about it, Steinberg said. Theres a mystery there, not a paradox.
Some good guesses are wrong. Manzoni, on hearing about the superluminal tunneling issue in the early 2000s, worked with a colleague to redo the calculations. They thought they would see tunneling drop to subluminal speeds if they accounted for relativistic effects (where time slows down for fast-moving particles). To our surprise, it was possible to have superluminal tunneling there too, Manzoni said. In fact, the problem was even more drastic in relativistic quantum mechanics.
Researchers stress that superluminal tunneling is not a problem as long as it doesnt allow superluminal signaling. Its similar in this way to the spooky action at a distance that so bothered Einstein. Spooky action refers to the ability of far-apart particles to be entangled, so that a measurement of one instantly determines the properties of both. This instant connection between distant particles doesnt cause paradoxes because it cant be used to signal from one to the other.
Considering the amount of hand-wringing over spooky action at a distance, though, surprisingly little fuss has been made about superluminal tunneling. With tunneling, youre not dealing with two systems that are separate, whose states are linked in this spooky way, said Grace Field, who studies the tunneling-time issue at the University of Cambridge. Youre dealing with a single system thats traveling through space. In that way it almost seems weirder than entanglement.
In a paper published in the New Journal of Physics in September, Pollak and two colleagues argued that superluminal tunneling doesnt allow superluminal signaling for a statistical reason: Even though tunneling through an extremely thick barrier happens very fast, the chance of a tunneling event happening through such a barrier is extraordinarily low. A signaler would always prefer to send the signal through free space.
Why, though, couldnt you blast tons of particles at the ultra-thick barrier in the hopes that one will make it through superluminally? Wouldnt just one particle be enough to convey your message and break physics? Steinberg, who agrees with the statistical view of the situation, argues that a single tunneled particle cant convey information. A signal requires detail and structure, and any attempt to send a detailed signal will always be faster sent through the air than through an unreliable barrier.
Pollak said these questions are the subject of future study. I believe the experiments of Steinberg are going to be an impetus for more theory. Where that leads, I dont know.
The pondering will occur alongside more experiments, including the next on Steinbergs list. By localizing the magnetic field within different regions in the barrier, he and his team plan to probe not only how long the particle spends in the barrier, but where within the barrier it spends that time, he said. Theoretical calculations predict that the rubidium atoms spend most of their time near the barriers entrance and exit, but very little time in the middle. Its kind of surprising and not intuitive at all, Ramos said.
By probing the average experience of many tunneling particles, the researchers are painting a more vivid picture of what goes on inside the mountain than the pioneers of quantum mechanics ever expected a century ago. In Steinbergs view, the developments drive home the point that despite quantum mechanics strange reputation, when you see where a particle ends up, that does give you more information about what it was doing before.
More:
Quantum Tunnels Show How Particles Can Break the Speed of Light - Quanta Magazine
- Netflixs 3 Body Problem: The science explained by an astrophysicist - Vox.com - March 24th, 2024 [March 24th, 2024]
- Entanglement entropies of nuclear systems gro - EurekAlert - March 24th, 2024 [March 24th, 2024]
- The Quest for a Theory of Everything Scientists Put Einstein to the Test - SciTechDaily - March 24th, 2024 [March 24th, 2024]
- Vibrating atoms are seen 'tuning' the energy of a single electron - Earth.com - March 24th, 2024 [March 24th, 2024]
- Innovator Spotlight: Joseph Maciejko | The Quad - University of Alberta - March 24th, 2024 [March 24th, 2024]
- A Breakthrough in the Control of Quantum Phenomena at Room Temperature Has Been Achieved, Researchers Say - The Debrief - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- The End of the Quantum Ice Age: Room Temperature Breakthrough - SciTechDaily - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Quantum computer outperformed by new traditional computing - Earth.com - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- URI program to help STEM professionals pivot into quantum information science careers - The University of Rhode Island - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Quantum realm controlled at room temperature for the first time - Earth.com - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Quantum Breakthrough: New Method Preserves Information Against All Odds - SciTechDaily - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Quantum computers get new design that makes them more "useful" - Earth.com - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Beyond Classical Physics: Scientists Discover New State of Matter With Chiral Properties - SciTechDaily - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Quantum research sheds light on the mystery of high-temperature superconductivity - Tech Explorist - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Unlocking the Mysteries of Quantum Many-Body Systems: A Look at Quantum Simulators and Universal Scaling ... - Medriva - February 16th, 2024 [February 16th, 2024]
- Functioning quantum internet makes giant stride closer to reality - Earth.com - February 13th, 2024 [February 13th, 2024]
- Exploring New Futures in Space: A Revolutionary Integration of Neuroscience, Quantum Physics, and Space Exploration - SETI Institute - February 13th, 2024 [February 13th, 2024]
- Uncovering the Quantum Plateau: Significance and Implications | Nature Physics - Medriva - February 13th, 2024 [February 13th, 2024]
- The State of the Art in Quantum Computing - Medium - February 13th, 2024 [February 13th, 2024]
- Beyond the Visible Universe: New Research Reveals How Gravity Influences the Quantum Realm - SciTechDaily - February 13th, 2024 [February 13th, 2024]
- Leader of IBM's Quantum Safe Team to speak at URI - University of Rhode Island - September 23rd, 2023 [September 23rd, 2023]
- University Assistant Predoctoral, Physics job with UNIVERSITY OF ... - Times Higher Education - September 23rd, 2023 [September 23rd, 2023]
- Zentropy A New Theory That Could Transform Material Science - SciTechDaily - September 23rd, 2023 [September 23rd, 2023]
- Researchers Studying the Quantum Realm Observe Alice in ... - The Debrief - September 23rd, 2023 [September 23rd, 2023]
- Augusta University graduate starts business in the artificial ... - Jagwire Augusta - September 23rd, 2023 [September 23rd, 2023]
- Quantum Echoes: A Revolutionary Method to Store Information as Sound Waves - SciTechDaily - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- 'Quantum superchemistry' observed for the 1st time ever - Space.com - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- Quantum Avalanche A Phenomenon That May Revolutionize Microelectronics and Supercomputing - SciTechDaily - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- Applications of quantum mechanics at the beach - Symmetry magazine - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- Book Review: On the Origin of Time Stephen Hawking's Final Theory - Moose Jaw Today - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- Harnessing Quantum Technologies: The Next Big Leap in Global ... - Fagen wasanni - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- The quantum avalanche - At the Vienna University of Technology, it ... - Chemie.de - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- Semiconductors: The Linchpin of AI in Quantum Computing - Fagen wasanni - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- The Promising Collaboration Between AI and Quantum Computing - Fagen wasanni - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- String theory physicist changed quantum field theory - USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- QUANTUM SUPERCOMPUTERS. The words Quantum and ... - Medium - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- Fourteen MIT School of Science professors receive tenure for 2022 ... - MIT News - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- The Fascinating World of Quantum Integrated Circuits: The Next Big ... - Fagen wasanni - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- Conclusive Evidence for Modified Gravity: Collapse of Newton's and ... - SciTechDaily - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- Physicists Open New Path to an Exotic Form of Superconductivity - SciTechDaily - August 14th, 2023 [August 14th, 2023]
- The Principle of Least Action Now Exists in the Quantum Realm - Popular Mechanics - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- Quantum materials: Electron spin measured for the first time - EurekAlert - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- Life in a hologram | MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology - MIT News - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- If Black Holes Evaporate, Everything Evaporates - Universe Today - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- Clever Ant-Man Easter Egg Links The Movie to the Real World's ... - Startefacts - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- Quantum Cryptography: The Cutting Edge of Secure Communication - CityLife - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- This 17-year-old works to make quantum mainstream - Indiatimes.com - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- The multiverse is doomed and even Spider-Man and The Flash can't save it - Yahoo Entertainment - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- Physics of Time Travel: A Scientific Perspective - Mirage News - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- Quantum Spin Liquids: The Future of Superconductors - EnergyPortal.eu - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- Interview: Three Books That Make Tess Gunty Angry - The New York Times - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- Events Calendar School of Mathematics and Statistics Colloquium ... - Carleton University - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- Graphene and Quantum Computing: A Match Made in Heaven - CityLife - June 10th, 2023 [June 10th, 2023]
- A Quantum Computer Simulation Has Reversed Time And Physics May Never Be The Same - Twisted Sifter - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Realizing the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox for Atomic Clouds - Physics - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- The US and UK team up to advance quantum information science - Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- How plants can perform feats of quantum mechanics - Big Think - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Physicists Make Matter out of Light to Find Quantum Singularities - Scientific American - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Eventually everything will evaporate, not only black holes - Science Daily - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Julius-Maximillians-Universitt Wrzburg Researchers Use ... - HPCwire - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- TNTs The Lazarus Project Uses Suspense Trapping to Ask Smart ... - Roger Ebert - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Quantum Exponential: building a cutting edge quantum technology ... - The Armchair Trader - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- IMDEA Software and IMDEA Networks work to deploy in the ... - EurekAlert - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Ian Hacking, Eminent Philosopher of Science and Much Else, Dies ... - The New York Times - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Does mass increase when nearing the speed of light? - Big Think - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Answering Questions about Boring Numbers, Disasters, Fusion, and ... - Scientific American - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- Spiderman: Across the Spider-verse | Reel World | timesnewspapers ... - Webster-Kirkwood Times, Inc. - June 2nd, 2023 [June 2nd, 2023]
- There's a Secret Way to Get to Absolute Zero. Scientists Just Found It. - Popular Mechanics - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Photon Precision: How Quantum Physicists Shattered the Bounds of Sensitivity - SciTechDaily - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Do we live in a hologram? Why physics is still mesmerised by this idea - New Scientist - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Is Ultimate Truth an Equation? Nah. The Stute - The Stute - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- UChicago Lab Creates 'Quantum Casino,' a Win-Win to Educate and ... - Polsky Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Physics - Tweezers in Three Dimensions - Physics - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Brave new world: On the edge of a second quantum revolution - University of Cape Town News - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Researchers pull back the quantum curtain on 'Weyl fermions' - Phys.org - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Scale separation: Breaking down unsolvable problems into solvable ones - Phys.org - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Postdoctoral Research Associate in Quantum Optics job with ... - Times Higher Education - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Australia's first quantum strategy predicts $6 billion in revenue and ... - SmartCompany - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Nature's Quantum Secret: Link Discovered Between Photosynthesis ... - SciTechDaily - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Two ERC proof of concept grants for the University of Bonn - EurekAlert - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]