Daily Archives: April 22, 2024

Report: Apple acquires French startup behind AI and computer vision technology – 9to5Mac

Posted: April 22, 2024 at 8:25 pm

Apple has reportedly acquired Datakalab, a Paris, France-based startup specializing in artificial intelligence compression and computer vision technology. According to French business magazine Challenges, the acquisition was finalized in December.

Datakalab described itself as experts in low power, runtime efficient, and deep learning algorithms that work on device.

On its LinkedIn page, Datakalab highlights industry leading compression and adaptation to deploy embedded computer vision that is fast, cost-effective and precise. Prior to the Apple acquisition had between 10 and 20 employees.

From Datakalabs now-defunct website:

Datakalab is a French technology company that develops computer image analysis algorithms to measure flows in public space. The images are instantly transformed into anonymized statistical data processed locally in 100ms.

Datakalab does not store any images or personal data and only keeps statistical data. Datakalab products are built according to the principle of Privacy by Design.

Datakalab teamed up with the French government in May 2020 to deploy AI tools into Paris transportation systems to check whether people were wearing face masks. The company also worked with Disney and other partners in the past.

While neither Apple nor DatakaLab have acknowledged the acquisition, Challenges says that the deal was reported to the European Commission this month. The report says that Datakalabs two founders did not join Apple, but multiple other employees did make the jump. Datakalab also held multiple patents related to AI compression and vision technology.

The acquisition comes as Apple is expected to bring a suite of AI features to iOS 18 later this year. Datakalab also developed advanced vision-based technology, which could play a role in Apples Vision Pro ambitions into the future. The companys advanced facial recognition technology could also contribute to things like Photos and Face ID.

(via iPhoneSoft)

Follow Chance:Threads,Twitter,Instagram, andMastodon.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Visit link:

Report: Apple acquires French startup behind AI and computer vision technology - 9to5Mac

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Report: Apple acquires French startup behind AI and computer vision technology – 9to5Mac

CACI Awarded $1.3 Billion Task Order to Provide Communications and Information Technology Expertise to U.S. … – Business Wire

Posted: at 8:25 pm

CACI Awarded $1.3 Billion Task Order to Provide Communications and Information Technology Expertise to U.S. ...  Business Wire

Visit link:

CACI Awarded $1.3 Billion Task Order to Provide Communications and Information Technology Expertise to U.S. ... - Business Wire

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on CACI Awarded $1.3 Billion Task Order to Provide Communications and Information Technology Expertise to U.S. … – Business Wire

What is semi-automated offside technology and how does it work? – The Athletic

Posted: at 8:24 pm

As Victor Torp sprinted toward the Wembley corner flag and fell onto his back, Coventry City looked like they had produced one of the greatest moments in FA Cup history.

Having been 3-0 down against Manchester United after 70 minutes, they had pulled off a remarkable comeback to lead 4-3 in stoppage time of extra time.

More than 36,000 Coventry fans were in euphoria and some Manchester United supporters left the stadium. The noise was deafening but then came the silent wait for the VAR.

But 118 seconds after Torp had put the ball past Andre Onana, the goal was chalked off for the tightest of offsides as Coventry forward Haji Wrights toe was judged to be slightly beyond Aaron Wan-Bissakas toe.

Championship side Coventry went on to lose 4-2 0n penalties, missing out on what would have been just their second FA Cup final appearance, having won it in 1987.

It led to widespread outcries on social media about the delay diminishing Coventrys outpouring of emotion but also doubt being cast over the accuracy of the VARs call.

From next season, the Premier League will have technology that should see these gripes consigned to history: semi-automated offside technology (SAOT).

It is yet another acronym that fans will have to get used to after Premier League clubs unanimously approved the use of SAOT for the 2024-25 season, which is estimated to be available for use after one of the autumn international breaks.

Despite being in its fifth season, complaints about the time delays when the VAR has to study marginal offside calls still exist. In that context, the addition of SAOT feels like an important step.

The Premier League believes it will save an average of around 31 seconds per offside and there is the bonus of officials being instantly informed of the decision via an earpiece, which means an assistant referee can raise their flag as soon as they hear, rather than having to wait on the phase of play to come to an end.

But how does SAOT work?

The answer is: it depends. There is more than one path that leagues and competitions can take when implementing SAOT.

FIFA and UEFA use Hawk-Eyes SAOT technology but FIFA uses the connected ball add-on. Both require a camera-based optical skeletal tracking system, which uses video cameras to monitor around 30 joints on each players body.

The cameras automatically pick these up like antennas as soon as they go onto the pitch and its algorithms constantly calculate whether an attacker is in an offside position.

But the major difference between the two is that the latter uses the connected ball and the Premier League does not intend to use that.

Munich-based Kinexon is the company that worked in conjunction with FIFA and Adidas for five years to produce 1,500 of these high-tech footballs for the mens 2022 World Cup and 1,500 for the 2023 Womens World Cup.

After its success, it will do the same for the mens Euro 2024 and womens Euro 2025 match ball called Fussballliebe German for love of football.

Our in-ball chip is an advanced add-on for SAOT, says Daniel Linke, product marketing and strategy lead at Kinexon.

Using only an optical-based system has a greater error margin due to the shutter time of the camera, motion blur, picture angle and resolution.

The standard broadcast cameras (used by VAR) record at 50 frames per second but Kinexons in-ball chip can judge when the ball has been touched 500 times per second.

With VAR in its current form, there is contention about whether the picture was frozen on the correct frame for offside calls eg, working out the exact moment the ball had left Callum OHares boot for Coventrys disallowed goal on Sunday but this is where Kinexons in-ball chip can offer a more precise judgement.

Weve all watched games with VAR where play is interrupted and they spend five minutes looking, only to draw the wrong conclusion, says Linke.

Its so tricky to see from the video images exactly when the ball is touched as the picture might be blurred or occluded. With our connected ball, you get that information instantly. It is in perfect synchronisation with the video signal; we have it down to one or two milliseconds.

Then the camera systems algorithms are constantly working to assess offside every time a touch signal is sent by the ball chip.

Linke talks to The Athleticthrough one of FIFAs example videos, which shows how the chip complements the cameras to provide virtually real-time offside calls.

What you see in red is the touch signal, he says. There is a peak when the ball is touched and that means you can see the picture instantly.

Every line you see is a frame. When we detect a touch we send this to the VAR software. Between two picture frames we have 10 data points from the ball whenever there is a touch, so when you see the video with the touches overlayed you click on the image and the line is drawn instantly on the correct frame.

That high-resolution sensor allows it to detect a full-strength kick to a subtle graze undetectable to the naked eye.

The chips other strength is that the sensor has an inertia measurement unit inside, which is basically an accelerometer, he says.

It has a high-resolution touch signal so every time you kick it or a feather drops on it, you will see it. Its critical for the offside technology.

You can also tell when the ball has been touched but also ifit has been touched. There was the example of Cristiano Ronaldo when he claimed he headed it but the technology proved he had not. They do it with sound in cricket (snickometer) but the idea is similar.

Domestic leagues typically wait for the International Football Association Board (IFAB, the body that oversees the laws of the game) and FIFA to deploy new technology before it cascades down the football pyramid. FIFA trialled SAOT in the 2021 Arab Cup and Club World Cup before using it for the Qatar World Cup.

Its success meant it was retained for the 2023 Womens World Cup, while Italys Serie A has used SAOT for the past 18 months.

Spains La Liga announced last October it will introduce SAOT from the start of the 2024-25 season but how long before it is almost universally used like VARs?

There are other ball providers following (Adidas) but it takes a year of research and development to find the best way to implement the sensor. You need to design it in a way that it does not affect the physics of the ball.

A lot of testing is required to prove the concept is fail-safe and that the technology does not impact the games aesthetics. The nightmare scenario would be for a player to take a throw-in and hear the chip rattling around.

SAOT is generally less expensive than VAR because less manpower is needed to operate the system. It is fully automated and can be overseen by one operator, whereas VAR requires several people to manually find the right frame and apply the offside lines.

Could there be a double benefit of the chip helping to determine whether the ball is in play or not?

There have been two goals this season when blindspots in VARs camera inventory have been exposed. Unfortunately for Arsenal, both incidents (against Newcastle United and West Ham United) went against them.

VAR has access to all broadcast cameras but the number in operation varies across each match, so there is no uniformity across all 20 stadiums.

Hawk-Eye is the provider of goal-line technology and normally places cameras at the back of the stands or on the roof. Contrary to popular belief, no cameras are placed inside the goalposts or crossbar, so Hawk-Eyes ability to triangulate the balls position to within an average of three millimetres in goal-line decisions is not applicable further along the byline.

We had the same question in the World Cup with the Japan goal that people thought had gone out, says Linke.

People were asking us why we didnt use our technology, but to determine whether the ball has crossed the line or not it needs to be sub-centimetre accurate.

Our strength is in the refresh rate of when the ball is connected with. We can determine the position of the ball but it would only be accurate to within two, three, four or five centimetres.

(Top photo: Ed Sykes/Sportsphoto/Allstar via Getty Images)

Read the original post:

What is semi-automated offside technology and how does it work? - The Athletic

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on What is semi-automated offside technology and how does it work? – The Athletic

Can technology save us from an ecological apocalypse? – interview – CyberNews.com

Posted: at 8:24 pm

As the world celebrates Earth Day, I decided to sit down with one expert to discuss whether technological advancements can help us protect our environment or whether its at the core of all ecological problems.

Earth Day is celebrated annually to honor the achievements of the environmental movement and to raise awareness of the need to protect Earths natural resources for future generations.

Todays reality is that the worlds temperature continues to rise at a concerning rate, plastic waste is still ineffectively recycled, and deforestation threatens biodiversity. However, it's not all doom and gloom, and in some cases, these new technologies are helping out.

For example, Internet of Things (IoT) powered smart grids are already helping produce and distribute electricity more efficiently, reducing our overall carbon footprint. Environmentally sustainable smart cities are being constructed with the help of artificial intelligence (AI), IoT, and big data. AI can now analyze data from drones, infrared cameras, and audio sensors to help detect poachers, and satellite imagery helps spot and calculate deforestation rates.

Does this mean that we still have hope? Can technological advancements help fight the ecological zeitgeist? We discussed these future scenarios with Eugene Berko, Director of Tech Practices at Intellias, the IT company leading the charge in implementing digital solutions to increase sustainability.

Berko works for a multinational company that has collaborated with Marvel Fusion, a company developing laser-driven fusion as a solution for the global energy transition to zero carbon emissions, a smart city project in the Middle East, and created systems for businesses to track their carbon footprint and solutions for smart agriculture.

Employing disruptive technologies such as AI and smart devices primarily assists in a quest for a more sustainable future by optimizing the usage of resources.

Originally, optimization was driven by monetary reasons more effective energy distribution means less overhead, cheaper costs, and so on. But recently, more and more companies are thinking about the environmental impact. And I think that's great,

Data gathered by smart devices and processed using AI models can tailor energy production, storage, and distribution to consumption while helping to reduce our carbon footprint. For example, so-called smart gridsan enhanced electric grid with the help of IoT devices that communicate both ways are helping to manage the demand.

Smart home technologies are also contributing to reducing energy consumption.

Power is used whenever needed, and instead of people like me just going through the apartment and turning off the lights, saying to my daughter, why did you leave the light on, there are automated systems that do that way more efficiently, says Berko.

Optimization of consumption also applies to food waste reduction. Many companies are experimenting with AI and machine learning (ML) to optimize food distribution to minimize waste by providing optimal routes to avoid spoilage, explains Berko.

Smart solutions in the agricultural sector can reduce environmental impact by monitoring plant growth and quality of soil, optimizing irrigation, and dosing agrochemicals. This technology can even help track the health and condition of livestock.

Technology can also play an important role in preserving wildlife tracking the movements of individual animals or herds to ensure they are not going into the cities or densely populated areas

You can use drone surveillance to prevent poaching, track the health of those animals, and make sure that they get information about the environment so they are in a safe environment, Berko points out.

Another way technology contributes to solving ecological problems is by providing accurate and extensive data. Data gathered by smart devices and processed by various computational systems helps to see the actual environmental impact, contributing to its preservation.

The changes made in the last several hundred years were unseen previously. Tracking those things is extremely important,

While world economies are trying to tackle the upcoming climate change apocalypse by reducing their carbon footprint, accurate calculation is crucial. New technologies are helping in this field. For example, the Intellias analytics platform integrated into a transportation companys management system can show carbon emission statistics in real-time to help fleets offset their CO2 footprint.

I think it's very good for companies to focus on their nearest future, really getting a better understanding of what's happening with us, our planet, and how we are contributing to that. How are we affecting this?

In that way, the companies can start having more responsibility for their actions, understand what they are doing, understand the impact, and then take responsibility for that.

While there are some obvious perks, technology is like a double-sided sword. We can calculate our carbon footprint, however, at its essence, climate change is caused by man-made technologies.

While AI models can process tremendous amounts of data, they also consume a lot of energy, increasing their carbon footprint. Blockchain technology is disruptive in tracking carbon emissions, but yet again, the network is highly energy-hungry.

It's like with nuclear energy. You can use it to provide clean energy for the people. On the other hand, it can be used to produce bombs. So it's really about what we as a society are doing with that technology,

Berko points out that energy consumption is a very complex problem with many variables. He does not distinguish AI from other IT services, such as Google services, which also consume high amounts of energy. There are a couple of questions to be asked here. Can we really avoid using this technology? Are there alternatives? he asks. If the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, bearing the cost is more likely.

Also, the source of energy is important. If energy is created using fossil fuels, it will, of course, increase our overall carbon footprint. However, cleaner and renewable energy solutions like wind or solar power, change the dynamics.

Berko also highlights the evolution of technology and that it tends to get more energy-efficient over time. If you take processors in our computers, they started using more energy with time compared to the 90s, and the performance increased so much. That means we are doing way better. Previously we had to have X amount of PCs doing the work, and now we need a significantly smaller amount of that. I am a bit on the optimistic side, I guess, he says.

Another argument is how technology is used. Technology could be used purely for entertainment purposes, but it could also serve a higher purpose: to save lives and improve human living conditions.

So what is there for us in the future? Berko believes it is hard to predict, as the history of humanity shows that predictions are rarely accurate.

Berko suggests that if one were to engage in conversation with an individual from the early 1900s, it's unlikely that they could have anticipated the vast array of socio-economic transformations that unfolded over the course of the 20th century.

That person would not be able to predict two world wars, the dismantling of empires that had existed for hundreds of years, and the emergence of the Soviet Union. That person would definitely not be able to predict technological advances, commercial flights, personal computers, or the Internet,

While predictions for further technological advancements are hard to narrow down, Berko invites us to stay realistic but hope for the best. We as a species can mitigate the risks while still having the best technology can provide.

He points to the invention of cars, which completely disrupted how our society functions by transforming the concept of distances and connecting people. Of course, as a downside, cars produce CO2 emissions, and there are accidents on the road.

Despite the downside, cars can now be made with hybrids or electric engines to reduce their carbon footprint while still having all the benefits of bridging society. So, while new technology brings risks, there is always potential to manage them for the common benefit.

Based on our previous history, I have a lot of hope in humanity. I try to be realistic but maintain hope that if things get tough, we will hopefully work it out,

Wave of ransomware on the cheap: junk guns still okay for small targets

Multi-year Volkswagen breach points to Chinese hackers

Apple is reportedly canceling the production of its FineWoven iPhone case

AI Salvador Dali awaits your call

Subscribe to our newsletter

See the original post:

Can technology save us from an ecological apocalypse? - interview - CyberNews.com

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Can technology save us from an ecological apocalypse? – interview – CyberNews.com

Does LaLiga have goalline technology? What about other major leagues? – AS USA

Posted: at 8:24 pm

Does LaLiga have goalline technology? What about other major leagues?  AS USA

Read more:

Does LaLiga have goalline technology? What about other major leagues? - AS USA

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Does LaLiga have goalline technology? What about other major leagues? – AS USA

BASF to Buy Stake in German Offshore Wind Farms From Vattenfall — Update – MarketWatch

Posted: at 8:23 pm

BASF to Buy Stake in German Offshore Wind Farms From Vattenfall -- Update  MarketWatch

Read more:

BASF to Buy Stake in German Offshore Wind Farms From Vattenfall -- Update - MarketWatch

Posted in Offshore | Comments Off on BASF to Buy Stake in German Offshore Wind Farms From Vattenfall — Update – MarketWatch

Denmark Launches Massive Offshore Wind Auction | Offshore Wind – Offshore WIND

Posted: at 8:23 pm

Denmark has opened a new offshore wind tender, the countrys largest ever, offering a minimum of 6 GW of new capacity spread over six wind farms, with the overplanting option allowing for 10 GW or more of new capacity to be added.

The Danish Energy Agency published the tender for the wind farms located in the North Sea I, Kattegat, Kriegers Flak II, and Hessel areas. The tenders follow the political agreement on tender frameworks from the spring of 2023.

The offshore wind farms must deliver at least 6 GW, and as a new element, there will be freedom to establish as much offshore wind as possible on the tendered areas, with the exemption of Hessel with a maximum capacity of 1.2 GW.

If the market utilizes this freedom to optimize the usage of the areas, it could result in the construction of 10 GW offshore wind or more, the agency said.

The power produced by the new wind farms will be used not only for Danish consumption, but also for export to the neighboring countries and for green hydrogen production. This plan is in line with the political agreement made in the beginning of April on the financial framework for hydrogen infrastructure.

Finally, we are able to publish the biggest offshore wind tender in Danish history. With hundreds of wind turbines, we are insuring ourselves against Putins black gas, and as of today Denmark is one large step closer to becoming Europes green power house. When the wind turbines are operating, we can cover all of Denmarks power consumption with green electricity and we can produce hydrogen and green fuels for ships and planes. It is projects of this scale that can make a big, green difference for the climate and our security. Not just for Denmark, but for all of Europe, said Lars Aagaard, Denmarks Minister for Climate, Energy, and Utilities.

The projects tendered in this round will be built without state subsidies and with a yearly concession payment. This means, that the bidders will participate in the tenders by bidding a yearly concession payment to the Danish state across a 30-year period, for the right to use the seabed. The concession payment is combined with the Danish state co-owning each of the tendered offshore wind farms with a minority ownership of 20 percent.

Now it is up to the market to take part in Denmarks next big wind adventure. The next chapter will thus be written and carried out by the market it is the market that must bring these tenders across the finish line, said Minister Aagaard.

An offshore wind farm with 1 GW capacity is expected to require capital investments of around DKK 16 billion (around EUR 2.14 billion), and, according to calculations from market actors from 2020, around 9,500 workers.

The minimum capacity of all the offshore wind farms, of a total of 6 GW, has to be commissioned before the end of 2030.

The tender also includes a number of requirements with regards to sustainability and social responsibility, including the obligatory use of recyclable wind turbine blades, unless a market analysis from the Danish Energy Agency deems that the requirement will prevent commissioning of one or more of the 6 GW before the end of 2030. If this is the case, it will instead be required that the blades are reused for other purposes at the time of decommissioning.

The developers will also have to monitor the offshore wind farms effect on nature and the environment. Two wind farms, one in the North Sea and one in Kattegat in internal Danish waters, will require a so-called nature inclusive design to provide a positive impact on the marine environment and biodiversity.

Denmarks operating offshore wind farms currently have a capacity of 2.7 GW.

Continued here:

Denmark Launches Massive Offshore Wind Auction | Offshore Wind - Offshore WIND

Posted in Offshore | Comments Off on Denmark Launches Massive Offshore Wind Auction | Offshore Wind – Offshore WIND

rsted and OEG Renewables Form Offshore Wind Pact in US | Offshore Wind – Offshore WIND

Posted: at 8:23 pm

OEG Renewables, part of OEG Energy Group Limited, has entered the US offshore wind market after signing a multi-year framework agreement with rsted.

The multi-year agreement gives OEG Renewables topside division exclusivity for all temporary power scopes rsted have during commissioning on their projects.

This agreement has begun immediately with the provision of temporary power scope to the offshore South Fork Wind project operated by rsted and Eversource, with OEG Renewables providing eight portable generator sets with technician support.

Temporary power generators provide power to the turbine during commissioning activities prior to a grid connection and during operations and maintenance (O&M) downtime.

The 132MW South Fork Winds project has recently started delivering power at full capacity to New Yorks Lond Island.

In addition, rsted and Eversource are developing the 704 MW Revolution Wind project which will provide clean power to Rhode Island and Connecticut.

John Heiton, OEGs Chief Executive Officer, said: We are delighted to have signed this multi-year framework agreement supporting rsted on its US projects, which will support the expansion of offshore wind in the US and pave the way for future projects. OEG Renewables is uniquely placed to service global clients and projects with its extensive operating footprint in over 60 countries and ability to offer integrated service solutions to blue-chip clients.

Follow offshoreWIND.biz on:

Read the original post:

rsted and OEG Renewables Form Offshore Wind Pact in US | Offshore Wind - Offshore WIND

Posted in Offshore | Comments Off on rsted and OEG Renewables Form Offshore Wind Pact in US | Offshore Wind – Offshore WIND

Vestas and Maersk team up for South Korean offshore wind – Recharge

Posted: at 8:23 pm

Turbine-making giant Vestas has signed an agreement with its Danish compatriot Maersk to establish a nacelle manufacturing plant and logistics base for offshore wind turbines in South Korea, the company revealed today (Monday).

A plant and logistical base envisioned in the memorandum of understanding will help supply offshore wind turbines for the Mokpo New Port Hinterland Complex, Vestas stated in a LinkedIn post.

Continue reading here:

Vestas and Maersk team up for South Korean offshore wind - Recharge

Posted in Offshore | Comments Off on Vestas and Maersk team up for South Korean offshore wind – Recharge

Denmark’s offshore wind parks currently generate 2.7 gigawatts of electricity – The Mountaineer

Posted: at 8:23 pm

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

See the original post here:

Denmark's offshore wind parks currently generate 2.7 gigawatts of electricity - The Mountaineer

Posted in Offshore | Comments Off on Denmark’s offshore wind parks currently generate 2.7 gigawatts of electricity – The Mountaineer