Category Archives: Evolution

Inkay and its evolved, powerful counterpart Malamar were very recently released during the Psychic Speculator event in Pokmon GO. The event began on September 8 and will end on September 13. They are dark and psychic-type Pokmon that can appear as one-star raid bosses during the event. They will also spawn more frequently in the wild. By the end of this guide, you will learn how to evolve Inkay into Malamar in Pokmon GO.

Inkay was introduced into Pokmon GO during the Psychic Spectacular event. You can mainly find Inkay in the wild, during one-star raids, and in photobombs. Inkay will also likely still be available after the event ends. Once you find Inkay and level it up to level 30, you will be a step closer to evolving it. Normally when you evolve a Pokmon, you must turn your phone upside down and press the evolve button. This will start the evolution process, turning your Pokmon into its evolved form. Inkay is the same, but there is an additional requirement. You must also obtain 50 Inkay Candy before you can evolve Inkay into Malamar.

To get Inkay Candy, you will need to feed wild Inkays a Pinap Berry. You will get Pinap Berries by leveling up. The higher level you are, the more opportunities you will have to get the berries among other rewards.

Another method to getting Inkay Candy is completing the Misunderstood Mischief research story quest. Upon completing Stage 5, you will receive 10 Inkay Candy as a reward. Through the Season of Mischief, stages are periodically released that you can complete for items. Stage 5 also gives rewards such as 15 Great Balls, encounters with Abra and Wobbuffet, and 10 Revives. To finish Stage 5, however, you will need to progress through the first four stages!

Good luck with evolving Inkay into Malamar in Pokmon GO!

Pokmon GOis available on iOS and Android.

Originally posted here:

Pokmon GO: How to Evolve Inkay - The Nerd Stash

In the midst of a physically and mentally exhausting training camp where Joe Burrow entered the home stretch of a complicated rehab from knee surgery, another early, less-than-ideal camp practice came to a close.

As after most practices, Burrow and a smattering of others, nearly always including close friend, former LSU teammate and practice squad tight end Thad Moss, gathered and unpacked the days events.

JaMarr Chase knows about these conversations. The three former Tigers experienced many during their historical championship run in 2019.

The teammates noticed something different in Burrow.

Joe had powerful words when he was at LSU his last year, Chase said. I dont know if it was from the hit or wanting to be better, I definitely noticed once when we got here, he wasnt so vocal about the offense yet. And Thad told him.

As only a friend who knows you well can, the hard truth struck a chord.

He just asked me why I wasnt speaking up like I used to, Burrow said. I was like, You know what? Youre right. Why am I not doing that? I realized that I kind of when Im more vocal, it kind of gets me into a rhythm and I stop thinking about what I have to do and I start thinking about what everybody else has to do. It reverts back to muscle memory. I think that played a part in me starting to play really well.

Burrows voice always loomed large over the franchise. The entire fabric of its success hinges on his right arm (and left knee). Only now, with a nudge from a good friend, the voice shows up more often.

See the article here:

'Im voicing my opinion more': The evolution of Joe Burrows offensive ownership - The Athletic

Evolution

Type of site

Evolution was a darknet market operating on the Tor network. The site was founded by an individual known as 'Verto' who also founded the now defunct Tor Carding Forum.[4]

Launched January 14, 2014, it saw rapid growth within its first several months, helped in part by law enforcement seizures of some of its competitors during the six-month-long investigation codenamed Operation Onymous.[5] Speaking about why Evolution was not part of Operation Onymous, the head of the European police cybercrimes division said it was "because there's only so much we can do on one day."[6] Wired estimated that as of November2014[update] it was one of the two largest drug markets.[7][8]

Evolution was similar to other darknet markets in its prohibitions, disallowing "child pornography, services related to murder/assassination/terrorism, prostitution, ponzi schemes, and lotteries".[8] Where it most prominently differed was in its more lax rules concerning stolen credit cards and others kinds of fraud, permitting, for example, the wholesaling of credit card data.[8][9]

In mid-March 2015, administrators froze its users escrow accounts, disallowing withdrawals, citing technical difficulties.[10] Evolution had earned a reputation not just for its security, but also for its professionalism and reliability, with an uptime rate much higher than its competition.[11][10] Partly for that reason, when the site went offline a few days later, on March 18, the user community panicked.[10] The shut down was discovered to be an exit scam, with the operators of the site shutting down abruptly in order to steal the approximately $12 million in bitcoins it was holding as escrow.[12][13]

Read the original here:

Evolution (marketplace) - Wikipedia

If $H$ is hermitian then $U=e^{-itH}$ is unitary if and only if $t$ is real. Making a change of variables $t=itau$ won't change that. The point is that when you do a Wick rotation to imaginary time you are not making a simple change of variables - a change of variables after all can't actually affect the physics.

The basic place where an imaginary time quantity arises is the thermal density matrix$$ rho = frac{e^{-beta H}}{Z}$$with $beta=1/(k_BT)$ the inverse temperature, which to have physical meaning must be real. This is the same thing as $U$ for an imaginary time $t=-ibeta$. This should be enough to convince you that in the vast majority of cases when talking about imaginary time one really does consider the time to be imaginary, and not purely real as needed for $U$ to be unitary.

In a QFT context, the Wick rotation is less physical and more of a mathematical trick - there you decide that the observables $O(t)$ asked for are hard to compute along the real line and instead compute them along the imaginary axis $O(it)$ and hope that the resulting formulas are analytically continuable to the entire complex plane.

Continue reading here:

quantum mechanics - Why is imaginary time evolution non ...

"Life finds a way." With dinosaurs on the loose in the United States, Jurassic World Evolution 2 fully embraces Ian Malcolm's famous warning. We're going to learn what life is like living among these thunder lizards.

Frontier Developments says players will encounter over 75 dinosaurs species within this sequel. We likely won't learn exactly which dinosaurs are included prior to the game's November 9 launch, but Frontier is trickling out videos that highlight some the new additions and returning favorites.

With an expanded focus on marine and flying reptiles, there should be a diverse amount of creatures to study and perhaps contain within your theme parks. The wider variety also means more ways that guests can be devoured. We all want to know if a flying dinosaur can feed the Mosasaurus by dropping a guest into the lagoon.

The list below rounds up all of the known dinosaurs that will be in Jurassic World Evolution 2. We're currently sitting at just under half of what we can expect to see in the game. Odds are some of the hybrids like the Indominus Rex will return, and will likely be joined by other Frankensteined monstrosities. We also don't know if Frontier is adding dinosaurs from the ongoing Camp Cretaceous Netflix show. Bumpy would surely be a draw for parks.

We'll update this list whenever new dinosaurs are announced or discovered and will also provide a full list upon the game's release. Here are the known dinos:

See original here:

All Of The Known Dinosaurs In Jurassic World Evolution 2 ...

Photo: Tesla factory, by Steve Jurvetson / CC BY.

Lets say someone asks you, Do you believe in evolution? You dont have time to give a 30-minute answer outlining the different meanings of the word evolution and the evidence pro and con for each, and you know your questioner wouldnt listen to a 30-minute answer anyway. The other individual wants a simple yes or no. However, if you say yes it will be assumed you believe Darwins implausible theory on the origin of species, and if you say no it will be assumed you believe all species were created in six days several thousand years ago.

So what do you say? Heres my suggestion:

Yes, I believe in the evolution of life, and I believe in the evolution of automobiles, but I dont believe either could have happened without intelligent design.

If you watch the second half of the videoWhy Evolution Is Different, you will see why this is actually a very informative and reasonable answer. Like automobiles, life evolved step-by-step, but not really gradually. The video points out how similar the fossil record is to the history of human technology, with obvious similarities between each new invention and previous designs but with large gaps where major new features appeared. That is for the same reasons: gradual development of the new organs that gave rise to new orders, classes, and phyla would require the development of new but not yet useful features. Gaps among known orders, classes, and phyla are systematic and almost always large, wrote Harvard paleontologist George Gaylord Simpson. So Darwinism could not explain the development of these new features even if they did occur gradually and they dont.

The video highlights further similarities between the evolution of life and the evolution of human technology. With automobiles, if you try to to sketch an evolutionary tree showing which models evolved from which, you may be able to produce a tree that is generally reasonable. But closer inspection shows that car species do not really fit so nicely into a tree structure: often even the designers might have a hard time identifying the ancestor of a particular model because it inherited ideas from several different automobile lineages. Contrary to Darwinian expectations, the evolutionary tree of life is equally confused. There are many indications that humans might have evolved from earlier primates, or that birds might have evolved from reptiles (though this evolution was not gradual). But hereconvergencealso confuses things greatly. Similar new features (e.g., the echolocation abilities of bats and dolphins) and similarnew genesoften appear independently in distant branches of the supposed tree of life, suggesting common design rather than common descent. In fact, Winston Ewert has shown in a 2018BIO-Complexityarticle that instead of a tree, the history of life is much better modeled by adependency graphlike we see in the evolution of software development!

This video carries the analogy between the evolution of life and the evolution of automobiles even further. It invites us to imagine that human engineers were able to design cars with fully automated car-building factories inside, with the ability to build new cars and not just normal new cars, but cars with car-building factories insidethem.If we left these cars alone to reproduce themselves, generation after generation, there would inevitably be duplication errors. But who would possibly imagine that these duplication errors, guided by natural selection, could ever accumulate into more advanced car models? Human-designed self-replicating machines are still pure science fiction, so we really have no idea how living species are able to pass their current complex structures down through many generations, much less how they could evolve even more complex structures.

If you offer the above-suggested reply, you may then be asked to explain why you dont believe evolution could have happened without design when most scientists still insist that it must have. Again you know you only have a few seconds to reply, so may I suggest:

I dont believe that the four fundamental, unintelligent forces of physics alone could have rearranged the fundamental particles of physics on Earth into computers, science libraries, and cell phones, for the same reasons I dont believe tornadoes will ever run backward and turn rubble into houses and cars.

And if you watch the first half ofWhy Evolution Is Different,you will see that this is a very informative and reasonable answer, too.

By the way, theold versionof this video has been updated. The above links are to the new version. And notice there are subtitles in English, Spanish, Polish, and Dutch.

See the original post:

Do You Believe in Evolution? A Short Answer - Discovery Institute

Evolution is typically a slow processbut one toad species may have inadvertently figured out a way to speed it up: by eating their young.

Cane toads are native to Central America, but they were introduced to countries around the world in a failed effort to provide pest management on farms. The venomous species thrived in these new placesand in Australia, especiallyand are now considered one of the globe's most invasive species.

In Australia, the toads have no natural predators and will eat practically anything, including birds and small mammalsa combination of factors that has led to a rapid population boom, resulting in millions of cane toads across the region.

Because cane toads in Australia do not have any predators, the species' only threat lies in each other. If the population gets too big, cane toads will be forced to compete for increasingly scarce resources.

As a result, they began to eat their own hatchlings to keep their population numbers in check. This sort of cannibalistic behavior has been observed in the species' native populations, reported Smithsonian Magazine, but it is far more common in Australia, where the lack of predators makes overpopulation their primary concern.

However, a new study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) now suggests that young toad hatchlings are adjusting rapidly in an effort to avoid the cannibalistic behavior of their elders.

Within Australian cane toad populations, tadpoles will devour the hatchlings laid in ponds by female toads. "When these eggs first hatch, the young can't swim or eat yet, so they can pretty much only lie there on the bottom of the pond until they develop into tadpoles," explained the study's lead researcher, Jayna DeVore, to Live Science.

The cannibalistic behavior can only take place during this brief periodmerely a few daysbefore hatchlings have matured into tadpoles. "Once the hatchlings develop into tadpoles, they are too large and mobile for other tadpoles to eat them, so the cannibals have to work quickly if they want to consume them all," added DeVore.

As a result, cane toad hatchlings have started to develop at a faster rate than seen in their native populations, effectively minimizing the window where they may be eaten by tadpoles. Explained DeVore: "If cannibals are looking for you, the less time you can spend as an egg or hatchling, the better."

Developing faster may save hatchlings from an unfortunate, cannibalistic fate, but the accelerated maturation rate has its downfalls. Those that spent less time as hatchlings are less successful once they reach the tadpole stage.

While cannibalism seems like the sort of behavior that may lead to a population declineor even extinctionDeVore doesn't believe that's on the horizon for cane toads. "Australian cane toads may well be their own worst enemy, but I wouldn't expect them to go extinct anytime soon," she told Live Science.

"The good news is that cannibalism can control population growth," she added. "So, although cane toads are unlikely to drive themselves extinct, these cannibalistic behaviors may help to regulate their abundance post-invasion."

Newsweek has reached out to DeVore for further comment.

Read more:

Invasive Cannibal Frog Species is Accelerating Evolution by Eating Its Own Offspring - Newsweek

Opposable thumbs and walking upright are just two of the many developments brought on by the process of human evolution over many millennia. It may seem that humans are a stable speciesfully decided in our anatomy with little variation over the generations. However, this is not exactly true. Humans are still evolving. A new study published in the Journal of Anatomy has found that over the past century, more and more humans have a third artery in their forearm in addition to the previously typical two.

This research on human evolution was conducted by Dr. Teghan Lucas at Flinders University and Professor Maciej Henneberg and Dr. Jaliya Kumaratilake at the University of Adelaide. The team focused on the forearm, which typically contains the radial and ulnar arteries. They examined 80 forearms of cadavers donated to science by Australians of European descent. Aged 51 to 101, the individuals were all born in the 20th century. The team found that 30% of these modern Australians had a sizable third central artery in their forearms, known as the median artery.

The median artery has long been known to anatomy experts. It forms in utero to supply blood to the hands of a developing fetus. In most people the artery is replacedstill in uteroby the development of the radial and ulnar arteries. However, some people retain the median artery through development and into their adult life. It can continue to function, providing the benefit of extra blood to the hand. It runs along the median nerve and can also increase the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome.

To examine how humanity has evolved with the respect to the median artery, the researchers did some historical investigation. The median artery has been documented in autopsies since the 18th century. Dr. Lucas said in a statement, The prevalence was around 10% in people born in the mid-1880s compared to 30% in those born in the late 20th century, so thats a significant increase in a fairly short period of time, when it comes to evolution. This may indicate that this element of human evolution is an accelerating change in general anatomy.

Dr. Lucas elaborated, This increase could have resulted from mutations of genes involved in median artery development or health problems in mothers during pregnancy, or both actually. If this trend continues, a majority of people will have median artery of the forearm by 2100. While the evolutionary purpose and cause of the increased retention of a median artery may still require some research, the body part is not the only one to change over the time. For example, humans have recently re-developed a bone in the knee known as the fabella, which decreased in incidence and then rebounded in the present century. What is certainly clear is that we humans remain an evolutionary work in progress.

h/t: [Science Alert]

Research Finds Human Brains Can Easily Adapt to Controlling a Robotic Third Thumb

10 Calming Creative Apps for Anxious Minds To De-Stress

Study Finds That Your Metabolism Doesnt Drastically Slow Down Until Youre 60

Study Shows That Petting a Dog Can Have Long-Lasting Health Benefits

View original post here:

More and More Humans Have an Extra Artery, Proof of Ongoing Evolution - My Modern Met

The last two decades have witnessed the relentless march of global capital and technical expertise, and, with it, the advance of a distinct building typologythe supertall skyscraper. From Central Park South to the shores of the Persian Gulf, to the megalopolises ringing the South China Sea, the supertall is now an increasingly common physical manifestation of commercial and national prestige. SUPERTALL! 2020, an exhibition currently on view at New Yorks Skyscraper Museum, examines this trend and explores the structural innovations therein.

The exhibition combines two prior shows examining the topic at the Skyscraper Museum; Worlds Tallest Building: Burj Dubai in 2007, and SUPERTALL! in 2011. Both set a baseline height of 1,250 feet (the height of the Empire State Building) for their surveys, which included supertall skyscrapers in varying states of completion. SUPERTALL! 2020 presents a similar script and highlights a dozen such towers through the display of physical models and narratives of their respective structural and facade systems.

Size isnt everything and SUPERTALL! 2020excels in its explanation of how developments in architectural technology and building program have reshaped the form and layout of such projects. The show cites the rapid evolution of computational design as fundamentally altering the former predominance of rectilinear massing and replication of floorplan story on story, a circumstance accompanied by the greater use of bearing-wall or mega-column concrete structural systems; a significant shift away from steel frame construction. The exhibition also notes a shift from the single-use skyscraper of yore to those that stack multiple functions vertically, often with a tapered form that incorporates deeper floorplates at the lower levels to accommodate office space and a more slender profile towards the top for residential or hotel use.

Of particular note, especially for the New York audience, is the considerable curatorial space devoted to our very own nexus of supertall skyscrapers, Billionaires Row. There, aided by floorplans and models of 432 Park Avenue and 111 57th Street, the exhibition effectively conveys their deft innovation in skyscraper design, the former possessing a slenderness ratio of 10:1 and the latter a startling 23:1. The layout also emphasizes their economics; many of the towers on the stretch only have one or two apartments per floor to maximize the salable area, a critical strategy to buff up the profit margins for projects with construction and acquisition costs of thousands of dollars per square foot.

The exhibition is accompanied by a virtual lecture series, WORLD VIEW: Designing Global Supertalls, which was conceived as a semester of related talks. The 13-part series includes detailed presentations by the architects and engineers of supertalls featured in the exhibition and dives into the design decisions that shaped them and the structural systems that hold it all together.

SUPERTALL! 2020The Skyscraper Museum39 Battery PlaceThrough January 2022

Original post:

SUPERTALL 2020! examines the structural evolution of the supertall skyscraper - The Architect's Newspaper

von Humboldt, A. Ansichten der Natur mit Wissenschaftlichen Erlauterungen (J.G. Cotta, 1808).

Perrigo, A., Hoorn, C. & Antonelli, A. Why mountains matter for biodiversity. J. Biogeogr. 47, 315325 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Badgley, C. et al. Biodiversity and topographic complexity: modern and geohistorical perspectives. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 211226 (2017).

PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Rahbek, C. et al. Building mountain biodiversity: geological and evolutionary processes. Science 365, 11141119 (2019).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Steinbauer, M. J. et al. Topography-driven isolation, speciation and a global increase of endemism with elevation. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 10971107 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Fjelds, J., Bowie, R. C. K. & Rahbek, C. The role of mountain ranges in the diversification of birds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 43, 249265 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Hughes, C. & Eastwood, R. Island radiation on a continental scale: exceptional rates of plant diversification after uplift of the Andes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1033410339 (2006).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Antonelli, A. et al. Geological and climatic influences on mountain biodiversity. Nat. Geosci. 11, 718725 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar

Quintero, I. & Jetz, W. Global elevational diversity and diversification of birds. Nature 555, 246250 (2018).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., West, G. B. & Brown, J. H. The rate of DNA evolution: effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 140145 (2005).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Martin, A. P. & Palumbi, S. R. Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 40874091 (1993).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Rohde, K. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos 65, 514527 (1992).

Article Google Scholar

Allen, A. P., Gillooly, J. F., Savage, V. M. & Brown, J. H. Kinetic effects of temperature on rates of genetic divergence and speciation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 91309135 (2006).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Rabosky, D. L. et al. An inverse latitudinal gradient in speciation rate for marine fishes. Nature 559, 392395 (2018).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Igea, J. & Tanentzap, A. J. Angiosperm speciation cools down in the tropics. Ecol. Lett. 23, 692700 (2020).

PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Schluter, D. Speciation, ecological opportunity, and latitude (American Society of Naturalists address). Am. Nat. 187, 118 (2016).

PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Anderson, K. J. & Jetz, W. The broad-scale ecology of energy expenditure of endotherms. Ecol. Lett. 8, 310318 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Clarke, A. & Gaston, K. J. Climate, energy and diversity. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 22572266 (2006).

PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Dowle, E. J., Morgan-Richards, M. & Trewick, S. A. Molecular evolution and the latitudinal biodiversity gradient. Heredity 110, 501510 (2013).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Brown, J. H. Why are there so many species in the tropics? J. Biogeogr. 41, 822 (2014).

PubMed Article Google Scholar

Stevens, G. C. The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. Am. Nat. 133, 240256 (1989).

Article Google Scholar

Boucher-Lalonde, V. & Currie, D. J. Spatial autocorrelation can generate stronger correlations between range size and climatic niches than the biological signal a demonstration using bird and mammal range maps. PLoS One 11, e0166243 (2016).

PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar

Cutter, A. D. & Gray, J. C. Ephemeral ecological speciation and the latitudinal biodiversity gradient. Evolution 70, 21712185 (2016).

PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

MoralesBarbero, J., Martinez, P. A., FerrerCastn, D. & OlallaTrraga, M. . Quaternary refugia are associated with higher speciation rates in mammalian faunas of the Western Palaearctic. Ecography 41, 607621 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Xing, Y. & Ree, R. H. Uplift-driven diversification in the Hengduan Mountains, a temperate biodiversity hotspot. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E3444E3451 (2017).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Lagomarsino, L. P., Condamine, F. L., Antonelli, A., Mulch, A. & Davis, C. C. The abiotic and biotic drivers of rapid diversification in Andean bellflowers (Campanulaceae). New Phytol. 210, 14301442 (2016).

PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Testo, W. L., Sessa, E. & Barrington, D. S. The rise of the Andes promoted rapid diversification in Neotropical Phlegmariurus (Lycopodiaceae). New Phytol. 222, 604613 (2019).

PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Dowsett, H. et al. The PRISM4 (mid-Piacenzian) paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Climate 12, 15191538 (2016).

Google Scholar

Hartley, A. J. Andean uplift and climate change. J. Geol. Soc. 160, 710 (2003).

Article Google Scholar

Aron, P. G. & Poulsen, C. J. in Mountains, Climate and Biodiversity (eds Hoorn, C., Perrugi, A. & Antonelli, A.) Ch. 8 (2018).

Hewitt, G. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405, 907913 (2000).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wallis, G. P., Waters, J. M., Upton, P. & Craw, D. Transverse Alpine speciation driven by glaciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 916926 (2016).

PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Luebert, F. & Muller, L. A. H. Effects of mountain formation and uplift on biological diversity. Front. Genet. 6, 54 (2015).

Huang, S., Meijers, M. J. M., Eyres, A., Mulch, A. & Fritz, S. A. Unravelling the history of biodiversity in mountain ranges through integrating geology and biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 46, 17771791 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Whittaker, R. J., Triantis, K. A. & Ladle, R. J. A general dynamic theory of oceanic island biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 35, 977994 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Li, Y. et al. Climate and topography explain range sizes of terrestrial vertebrates. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 498502 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Kisel, Y. & Barraclough, T. G. Speciation has a spatial scale that depends on levels of gene flow. Am. Nat. 175, 316334 (2010).

PubMed Article Google Scholar

Spooner, F. E. B., Pearson, R. G. & Freeman, R. Rapid warming is associated with population decline among terrestrial birds and mammals globally. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 45214531 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Rowley, D. B. & Garzione, C. N. Stable isotope-based paleoaltimetry. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 35, 463508 (2007).

CAS Article Google Scholar

Mulch, A. Stable isotope paleoaltimetry and the evolution of landscapes and life. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 433, 180191 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S., Mooers, A. . & Thomas, G. H. A simple polytomy resolver for dated phylogenies. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2, 427436 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Rolland, J., Condamine, F. L., Jiguet, F. & Morlon, H. Faster speciation and reduced extinction in the tropics contribute to the mammalian latitudinal diversity gradient. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001775 (2014).

Meredith, R. W. et al. Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg Extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334, 521524 (2011).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Britton, T., Anderson, C. L., Jacquet, D., Lundqvist, S. & Bremer, K. Estimating divergence times in large phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 56, 741752 (2007).

PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Drummond, A. J. & Rambaut, A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 214 (2007).

PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar

Schliep, K. P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592593 (2011).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444448 (2012).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Redding, D. W. & Mooers, A. . Incorporating evolutionary measures into conservation prioritization. Conserv. Biol. 20, 16701678 (2006).

PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Rabosky, D. L. Automatic detection of key innovations, rate shifts, and diversity-dependence on phylogenetic trees. PLoS One 9, e89543 (2014).

PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar

Moore, B. R., Hhna, S., May, M. R., Rannala, B. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. Critically evaluating the theory and performance of Bayesian analysis of macroevolutionary mixtures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 95699574 (2016).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Meyer, A. L. S., Romn-Palacios, C. & Wiens, J. J. BAMM gives misleading rate estimates in simulated and empirical datasets. Evolution 72, 22572266 (2018).

PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Rabosky, D. L., Mitchell, J. S. & Chang, J. Is BAMM flawed? Theoretical and practical concerns in the analysis of multi-rate diversification models. Syst. Biol. 66, 477498 (2017).

PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar

Original post:

Global topographic uplift has elevated speciation in mammals and birds over the last 3 million years - Nature.com