For the first time since the Mongol invasion of Europe in the 13th century, Europe now views an Asian power as a direct security threat. Unlike Japan, which overran Europes East Asian colonies during World War II, China is a superpower with global reach. In NATOs new Strategic Concept, adopted at its Madrid summit last month, the alliance identifies Chinas ambitions and coercive policies as a challenge to its members interests, values, and security. However, focusing on China will be fundamentally different from the blocs traditional role of warding off territorial threats in Europe, with several fault lines between the United States and NATOs European members already built in.
Five factors explain NATOs landmark decision. Some have been familiar parts of the security debate for years; others gained salience only recently.
Firstand most obviouslyNATOs strategy is responding to Chinas rise and the emergence of a new bipolar international system, replacing the so-called U.S. unipolar moment of the 1990s and early 2000s. With Chinas economy estimated to be 25 percent larger than the United States by 2026 (measured in GDP at purchasing power parity), Beijing has the resources to further increase a defense budget that is already four times larger than Russias. As realists such as political scientist Kenneth Waltz have emphasized, a bipolar power structure compels other states to choose a side. Although the United States announced its rebalance to Asia in 2011, geographic distance and a certain strategic sloth have slowed Europes response to Chinas growing power. Thus, it has taken Europe and NATO another decade to categorize Chinas rise as a security challenge.
For the first time since the Mongol invasion of Europe in the 13th century, Europe now views an Asian power as a direct security threat. Unlike Japan, which overran Europes East Asian colonies during World War II, China is a superpower with global reach. In NATOs new Strategic Concept, adopted at its Madrid summit last month, the alliance identifies Chinas ambitions and coercive policies as a challenge to its members interests, values, and security. However, focusing on China will be fundamentally different from the blocs traditional role of warding off territorial threats in Europe, with several fault lines between the United States and NATOs European members already built in.
Five factors explain NATOs landmark decision. Some have been familiar parts of the security debate for years; others gained salience only recently.
Firstand most obviouslyNATOs strategy is responding to Chinas rise and the emergence of a new bipolar international system, replacing the so-called U.S. unipolar moment of the 1990s and early 2000s. With Chinas economy estimated to be 25 percent larger than the United States by 2026 (measured in GDP at purchasing power parity), Beijing has the resources to further increase a defense budget that is already four times larger than Russias. As realists such as political scientist Kenneth Waltz have emphasized, a bipolar power structure compels other states to choose a side. Although the United States announced its rebalance to Asia in 2011, geographic distance and a certain strategic sloth have slowed Europes response to Chinas growing power. Thus, it has taken Europe and NATO another decade to categorize Chinas rise as a security challenge.
Second, technological developments have finally forced Europes hand. Here, too, many European countries enjoying growing trade with China and preferring to view Beijing as a partner on all kinds of issues were slow to rise to the challenge. The opportunities for Beijing to weaponize cybertechnology, 5G, and other fourth industrial revolution technologies have brought China closer to Europe. More than any other topic, restricting Huaweis operations in Europe has dominated the debate on China between Washington and European capitals over the last three or four years.
What accelerated Europes shift on China is a third factor: increased uncertainty in Europe about U.S. long-term commitments to trans-Atlantic security. As long as Washington was committed to containing the Soviet Union during the Cold War, Europe could take the U.S. security guarantee for granted. This, of course, is no longer the case. For the past decade, Europe has seen the United States gradually rebalancing its strategic focus and resources to Asia, and then-U.S. President Donald Trump abruptly awakened European elites to the possibility that a U.S. withdrawal from Europe could be just one election away. In hopes of binding the United States to Europe more closely, European NATO members are aligning themselves with Washingtonincluding by shifting their stance on China sooner than they might otherwise have chosen.
Fourth, Chinas ideological shifts also accelerated Europes categorization of China as a threat. Beijings increasingly authoritarian turn under Chinese leader Xi Jinping, its tightened grip on Hong Kong, and its iron rule policy in Xinjiang did much to destroy Chinas image in Europe. The European Unions decision in 2021 to put the European Union-China investment agreement on ice was a direct response to Beijings policy in Xinjiang against it Uyghur population. Chinas more aggressive wolf-warrior diplomacy and increasing ability to block EU decisions in Brussels via its client states in Europe didnt go unnoticed either.
The fifth factor accelerating NATOs shift on China is the evolving Sino-Russian axis, most recently enhanced by Russias invasion of Ukraine. This is molding a distinct geopolitical divide. By stepping up its economic and diplomatic support for Russia since the start of the invasion, China has inserted itself as an actor into the most momentous war in Europe since 1945.
Nonetheless, even though the new Strategic Concept sends a strong signal of trans-Atlantic unity, it is too early to conclude that it enables a joint and well-coordinated U.S.-European approach on China. The reason for caution is geography. The U.S.-China rivalry presents NATO with a different challenge than the U.S.-Soviet one. During the Cold War, from its pivotal position in the Eurasian heartland, the Soviet Union constituted a threat to the entire Eurasian rim, from Europe all the way to the Far East, and it was a two-flank challenge to the United States. Europe was the core area of the Cold War strategic theater, and this consolidated not only a united threat perception among the United States and its European allies but also a common military strategy. Chinas geographic position, on the other hand, does not preordain trans-Atlantic unity in a similar way.
Moving from strategy to policy implementing the Strategic Concept, the United States and European NATO members will find that the geopolitical logic of U.S.-China rivalry will shape a new, and not always easy, trans-Atlantic division of labor in three major ways.
First, from its geographic position on the Asian rim facing the Pacific Ocean, China represents a one-flank challenge to the United States. U.S. balancing of China will thus be largely regional, focusing on the Indo-Pacific with a lower priority for the trans-Atlantic flank. In fact, the new U.S. National Defense Strategy presented in Marchafter the Russian invasion of Ukraine had already startedclearly states that priority will be given to deter the China challenge in the Indo-Pacific. One important outcome of the war in Ukraineand the consolidation of the European side of NATO with Finland and Sweden as new membersis a more balanced burden-sharing within NATO, which allows the United States to channel more resources to Asia over the long term. Even before Russias invasion of Ukraine, the debate had increasingly shifted toward putting Europe in a position to defend itself. With Germany and other European countries committing to greater defense expenditures in the wake of Russias war, European defenses will indeed be bolstered.
Secondly, balancing China in the Indo-Pacific theater will require the United States to lean more on Quadrilateral Security Dialogue members and other Asian partners than on NATO. In recent years, the larger European nations have eagerly deployed naval vessels to sail in Asian waters, though some of these deployments have been little more than symbolic. NATO is strengthening relations with its formal Asia-Pacific partnersAustralia, Japan, South Korea, and New Zealandwith an agreement to step up cooperation in areas such as cybersecurity, other new technologies, and countering disinformation. Nevertheless, it is still nebulous how exactly European militaries will add value to U.S. balancing efforts in Asia. European navies have been in constant decline since the end of the Cold War, whereas the Chinese navy has surpassed its U.S. counterpart in terms of number of vessels. China is now building theequivalentof the entire French Navy every four years. Elbridge Colby,co-founder of the Marathon Initiative, has suggested that it might serve the United States better to have Europe play to its strengths in the Euro-Atlantic area, an opinion echoed by U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin. Commenting on the British deployment of its new aircraft carrier, HMS Queen Elizabeth, to the Indo-Pacific region in 2021, Austin indicated that Britain is more helpful closer to home than in Asia.
Finally, due to its limited geographic reach across Eurasia, China will remain a lesser threat to European security than Russia. With Russia an openly belligerent threat for the foreseeable future, European resources will be pinned down at home, impeding the implementation of a joint trans-Atlantic approach in the Far East. For instance, NATO plans to increase the strength of its rapid reaction force dedicated to the defense of its Eastern European members nearly eightfold to 300,000 troops. Even though U.S. armed forces will remain engaged in Europe, the bulk of NATOs increased presence along its Eastern European frontier will have to be provided by European countries. And the security challenges in Europes own neighborhood are by no means limited to Russia. At a time when the United States is increasingly preoccupied in Asia, Europe faces crumbling stability in the Middle East, North Africa and other regions directly affecting Europe, not least through potential migration and refugee crises.
Against this background, it is inevitable that the main challenge for the United States and European allies over the coming years will be to design a trans-Atlantic division of labor. The problem is that this division has to be crafted in a more sophisticated fashion than the simple logic of Europe deterring Russia while the United States balances China. Such a simplistic division of labor not only risks a trans-Atlantic drift, but it could also result in a gradual military transformation gap, leaving NATO and Europe behind as a second-rate defense force. Moreover, deterring Russia is no simple, one-dimensional task. In Eastern Europe, it is a land-based theater, whereas in Northern Europe, it is largely sea based. Each creates different requirements for trans-Atlantic collaboration.
The division of labor debate has already begun. The Aspen Strategy Group has made the simple and obvious recommendation that Washington and Europe strengthen the trans-Atlantic dialogue on China. Others emphasize how the United States could save billions of dollars by suggesting NATO transcend geographic boundaries by focusing on defending cyber and outer space. As these examples show, the discourse is still in its infancy. A successful strategy will require much more work and fine-tuning, including inputs from policymakers, diplomats, defense officials, and the wider strategic communities in the United States, Europe, and Asian partner countries. NATOs belated acknowledgment in Madrid of a new global balance of power means this work can finally start.
Excerpt from:
NATO's New Division of Labor on Russia and China Won't Be Easy - Foreign Policy
- Dont come here: NATO sends message to Russia with Spring Storm training exercise - WTOP - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- Former NATO commander warned White House Afghanistan pullout would go very bad very fast before botched operation that left 13 US forces dead - New... - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- NATO and Armenia strengthen their defence education cooperation - NATO HQ - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- The 48th Annual Conference for the NATO Committee on Gender Perspectives focused on Military Planning and ... - NATO HQ - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- NATO Chiefs of Defence discuss the strengthening of NATO's defence plans - NATO HQ - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- NATO airborne forces train together in exercise Swift Response 2024 - b-roll - 17 May 2024 - DVIDS - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- Allied Chiefs of Defence meet with NATO Secretary General - NATO HQ - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- NATO and the Republic of Korea discuss cooperation at the military staff talks - NATO HQ - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- Eucom Commander: NATO Is Transforming to Defend Every Inch of the Alliance - Department of Defense - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- Dispatch from Estonia and Romania: How NATO burden sharing works on the ground - Atlantic Council - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- Allied Strength Across Waters: Wet Gap Crossing with NATO Forces - United States Army - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- NATO Deputy Secretary General: we must be big on cyber defence ambitions - NATO HQ - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- NATO and Its South: Redefining the Terms - CSIS | Center for Strategic and International Studies - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- Top NATO commander: Russia's offensive won't succeed - POLITICO Europe - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- NATO and Economic Security: A Political Oxymoron or Inevitability? - CSIS | Center for Strategic and International Studies - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- NATO must 'win up front but be ready to win long' in modern warfare, says General Christopher Cavoli - Atlantic Council - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- The Washington NATO Summit: Ukraine and transatlantic security in the age of marching authoritarians - Atlantic Council - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- Friday Briefing: NATO Considers Sending Trainers to Ukraine - The New York Times - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- Zelensky and Iohannis discuss support for Ukraine, NATO summit priorities, and security in Black Sea - Ukrinform - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- S-300: The Air Defense System Built to Attack NATO Fighters and Bombers - The National Interest Online - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- US chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff says NATO will deploy troops to Ukraine - WSWS - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- US says NATO military trainers will eventually be sent to Ukraine: report - Fox News - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- The Minister of Defense Zukan Helez is visiting the NATO headquarters - Sarajevo Times - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- NATO chief 'shocked and appalled' by shooting of Slovak PM Fico - Yahoo! Voices - May 21st, 2024 [May 21st, 2024]
- Trump says he'd 'encourage' Russia to attack NATO allies who don't pay their bills - NPR - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump suggests he'd disregard NATO treaty, urge Russian attacks on allies - The Washington Post - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- 'You got to pay!': Trump threatens to 'encourage' Russia to attack NATO allies behind on payments - FRANCE 24 English - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump says Russia can do what it wants to Nato allies who pay too little - Financial Times - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- White House calls Trump comments on NATO appalling and unhinged - The Hill - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump says Russia could do 'whatever the hell they want' to NATO countries that don't pay their share - Yahoo News - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump Says He Gave NATO Allies Warning: Pay In or He'd Urge Russian Aggression - The New York Times - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- White House says Trump comments on refusing to back NATO allies 'unhinged' - The Times of Israel - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- NATO allies warn Hungary not to hold up Sweden's membership as US patience wears thin - The Associated Press - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump comments on Russia, NATO 'appalling and unhinged' -White House - Yahoo News Canada - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- NATO Allies Pressure Hungary Over Blocking Sweden's Accession - Voice of America - VOA News - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump says he warned NATO: Pay in or he'd tell Russia 'to do whatever the hell they want' - The Spokesman Review - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Vladimir Putin on invading Poland, the war in Ukraine, American 'spies' and Russia joining NATO - Sky News - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump says he would support Russia in attacking NATO allies who dont pay' up - Hindustan Times - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump says he will encourage Russia to attack NATO states that pay too little - Ukrainska Pravda - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Orbn's party boycotts a session of Hungary's parliament to further stall Sweden's bid to join NATO - The Associated Press - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- US, NATO Reaffirm Need to Support Ukraine - Voice of America - VOA News - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Shocking moment Donald Trump tells cheering crowd he would encourage Russia to ATTACK fellow NATO members for - Daily Mail - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump says he warned NATO ally: Spend more on defense or Russia can 'do whatever the hell they want' - WV News - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump threatens to 'encourage' attack of NATO members behind on payments - Port Lavaca Wave - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- NATO, Gaza, and the future of US-Turkish relations - European Council on Foreign Relations - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- The Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict demands American diplomacy without NATO overreach - The Hill - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Putin tells Tucker Carlson Bill Clinton agreed that Russia could join NATO - WION - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump is slammed for encouraging Russia to attack NATO allies who 'don't pay their dues', with White House bra - Daily Mail - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Trump comments on Russia and NATO appalling and unhinged, says White House spokesperson - Firstpost - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Now we are not safe: Swedens Kurds fear Nato deal has sold them out - The Guardian - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Germany urges Orbn to ratify Sweden's NATO bid as 'a matter of loyalty' - POLITICO Europe - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Ukraine's Military to Receive Double Boost From NATO Allies - Newsweek - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg calls on Europe to ramp up arms production - The Hindu - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Nato chief urges Europe to ramp up arms production to avoid 'decades' of conflict with Russia - The Telegraph - February 11th, 2024 [February 11th, 2024]
- Russia likely upping jamming on NATO countries to test them: general - Business Insider - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Can NATO and the EU Survive and Thrive? - Gallup - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- NATO chief in DC trying to get blood from a stone - Responsible Statecraft - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- For Europe and NATO, a Russian Invasion Is No Longer Unthinkable - The New York Times - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Sen. Menendez Questions Witnesses During SFRC Subcommittee Hearing About the Possible Process for Ukraine to ... - Senator Menendez - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- NATO should be ambitious with its new Southern Flank Strategy - Atlantic Council - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Hungary parliament to meet on Monday at opposition request with Sweden's NATO bid on agenda - Reuters - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Pressure Grows on Hungary to Approve Swedens NATO Bid - Voice of America - VOA News - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Opinion | As war risks mount, Europe is sluggish to response - The Washington Post - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Opinion | How the E.U. and NATO should respond to Hungarys authoritarian Orban - The Washington Post - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- NATO chief warns 'Taiwan could be tomorrow' at Trump bastion - Nikkei Asia - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- ARTHUR CYR: NATO The Enduring Alliance | Opinion | henryherald.com - Henry Herald - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- NATO chief talks up alliance role in advancing US interests at think tank favored by Trump - Stars and Stripes - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Diplomacy Watch: NATO membership still on the table? - Responsible Statecraft - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- When will Sweden join NATO? | Opinion - Deseret News - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Trump hates NATO: Would he leave Canada out in the cold? - GZERO Media - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- China will learn that using force works if Russia prevails: NATO chief - Business Insider - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- NATO newcomer Finland's presidential election is headed for a runoff - NPR - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Letter | The US and NATO let 'never again' happen again in Ukraine - The Daily Progress - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Why Turkey Waited to Approve Sweden's NATO Membership - Foreign Policy - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Coalition of Three: BiH is grateful for all NATO Support - Sarajevo Times - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Former NATO head: Russia, Ukraine will have moment for potential negotiation after 2024 election - The Hill - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Code Red: How Russia Conquers the Baltics - Center for European Policy Analysis - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Orban Escalates Standoff Over Sweden's Accession to NATO - Yahoo News - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Trump Unleashes His Doubts On NATO: 'We Don't Get So Much Out Of It' - Yahoo News - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]
- Putin to visit NATO member Turkey on 12 February - EURACTIV - February 3rd, 2024 [February 3rd, 2024]