On April 13, 2023, the Department of Education (ED) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance: Sex-Related Eligibility Criteria for Male and Female Athletic Teams. This Athletics NPRM would establish a new regulatory standard under Title IX that would govern sex-related criteria as it relates to gender identity for participation on sex-specific athletics teams at federally funded educational institutions. The 32-day public comment period closes on Monday, May 15.
In July 2022, when ED issued a proposed Title IX rule that would expand Title IXs sex discrimination prohibition to prohibit discrimination based on gender identity (among other things), the Department promised it would issue a separate NPRM to address whether and how ED should amend its current athletics regulation and the question of what criteria, if any, recipients should be permitted to use to establish students eligibility to participate on a particular male or female athletics team.
Proposed Regulatory Standard
Under the current athletics regulation, originally promulgated in 1980, educational institutions may operate or sponsor separate teams for members of each sex where selection for such teams is based upon competitive skill or the activity involved is a contact sport.
According to ED, the current athletics regulation isnt sufficiently clear to ensure Title IXs nondiscrimination requirement is satisfied. The proposed regulatory standard would provide needed clarity and would not affect a recipients discretion to offer sex-specific teams based on competitive skill or for contact sports.
Citing to Bostock v. Clayton County, Executive Order 13988 on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation, Executive Order 14021 on Guaranteeing an Educational Environment Free from Discrimination on the Basis of Sex, Including Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity, the Department proposes the following regulatory text:
If a recipient adopts or applies sex- related criteria that would limit or deny a students eligibility to participate on a male or female team consistent with their gender identity, such criteria must, for each sport, level of competition, and grade or education level: (i) Be substantially related to the achievement of an important educational objective; and (ii) Minimize harms to students whose opportunity to participate on a male or female team consistent with their gender identity would be limited or denied.
In crafting its proposal, ED conducted an extensive review of Title IXs implementing regulations, statutory text, and legislative history; federal and state case law (including Hecox v. Little, A.M. v. Indianapolis Public Schools, and B.P.J. v. West Virginia State Board of Education); relevant state laws; current athletic policies; public comments received during a June 2021 nationwide virtual public hearing on Title IX; and other information provided by stakeholders.
According to the NPRM, the proposed standard was informed by the current Title IX regulation governing single-sex classes and Equal Protection Clause caselaw, and is consistent with Title IXs nondiscrimination prohibition and the framework of the current athletics regulations.
Criteria for Each Sport, Level of Competition, and Grade or Education Level
Under the proposed regulatory standard, any sex-specific policy that does not permit participation based on gender identity would have to be evaluated based on (a) sport, (b) level of competition, and (c) the grade or education level. Indeed, the NPRM states that criteria that categorically exclude all transgender girls and women from participating on any female athletic teams would not satisfy the proposed standard because they would take a one-size-fits-all approach and rely on overbroad generalizations that are not specific to the sport, level of competition, and grade or education level to which they apply.
Without elaboration, the Department declares that it currently believes there are few, if any, sex-related eligibility criteria applicable to students in elementary school that would comply with the proposed standard. ED further believes it would also be particularly difficult for a policy that excludes students immediately following elementary school from participating on sex-specific teams consistent with their gender identity to comply with the standard. If adopted, this view would likely undermine any sex-specific distinctions for athletics in elementary schools.
Even in high schools and colleges, the level of evaluation required under the NPRM places an onerous burden on recipients seeking to adopt any sex-specific policy based on biology and provides a large incentive to adopt a blanket policy allowing participation based on gender identity for all sex-specific athletic teams.
Nevertheless, ED anticipates that some uses of sex-related eligibility criteria would satisfy the proposed standard in some sports, grade and education levels, and levels of competition (emphasis added).
Substantially Related to the Achievement of an Important Educational Objective
Under the proposed regulatory standard, any sex-specific policy must be based on a direct, substantial relationship between a recipients objective and the means used to achieve that objective.
ED acknowledges that ensuring fairness in competition and prevention of sports-related injury are possible important educational objectives, but is quick to point that that those interests do not necessarily require schools to adopt or apply sex-related criteria that would limit or deny a students eligibility to participate on a male or female team consistent with their gender identity. The NPRM points to alternative strategies and mitigating measures that could be taken instead, such as appropriate coaching and training, requiring use of protective equipment, and specifying rules of play.
According to the Department, the following would not qualify as an important educational objective:
Communicating or codifying disapproval of a student or a students gender identity;
Adoption solely for the purpose of excluding transgender students from sports;
Requiring adherence to sex stereotypes;
Adoption solely for the purpose of administrative convenience; or
As a pretext for an impermissible interest in singling out transgender students for disapproval or harm.
The NPRM emphasizes that any criteria must not rely on overly broad generalizations about male and female students talents, capacities, or preferences, noting that very few female student-athletes are transgender and transgender students do not necessarily have greater physical or athletic ability than cisgender students that would affect cisgender students equal opportunity to participate. As such, criteria that assume all transgender girls and women possess an unfair physical advantage over cisgender girls and women in every sport, level of competition, and grade or education level would rely on an impermissible generalization.
Benefits, Harms, and Costs
ED identifies two benefits of its proposal: (i) providing a standard to clarify Title IX obligations for recipients that adopt or apply sex-related eligibility criteria, and (ii) protecting students equal opportunity to participate on male and female teams consistent with Title IX.
Without the proposed regulation, ED claims some students may suffer harm as a result of being unable to gain the benefits associated with equal opportunity to participate on athletic teams at school because participation on a team inconsistent with a students gender identity is not a viable option for many students. No mention is made of any harm to other students, especially female athletes who could be denied equal opportunity to participate under the Departments proposal.
ED estimates that the cost to recipients over 10 years would be in the range of $23.4 million to $24.4 million, which seems low considering the number of schools that receive federal funding, the time needed to evaluate existing athletic policies for compliance, and the regular trainings on the policies.
Nevertheless, ED concludes that the benefits far outweigh the costs.
Federalism Concerns
As recognized in the NPRM, at least twenty states have passed laws that prevent biological males, regardless of how they identify, from joining female-specific athletic teams.
The Department acknowledges (without elaboration) that its proposal may have federalism implications or substantial direct effects on the states or the relationship between stated and the federal government. It is clear that the proposed regulation conflicts with state laws, setting up a legal battle between ED and those states if and when the proposed rule is finalized.
Opportunity for Public Comment
ED is accepting public comments on the Athletics NPRM until Monday, May 15, which can be submitted here. To learn more about public comments on agency rulemaking, see the Ethics and Public Policy Centers one-page explainer.
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. To join the debate, please email us atinfo@fedsoc.org.
More:
ED Proposes Title IX Athletics Rule Requiring Participation Based ... - The Federalist Society
- 2024 Lok Sabha Elections: Need to pitch for Federalism and Special Status for Goa - Herald Goa - April 6th, 2024 [April 6th, 2024]
- 1999 constitution and the quest for true federalism - Nigerian Observer - April 6th, 2024 [April 6th, 2024]
- Federalism is not Apartheid The Mail & Guardian - Mail and Guardian - April 6th, 2024 [April 6th, 2024]
- Modi has delivered confrontational federalism: Congress | Siddaramaiah highlights 'injustices to K'taka | Inshorts - Inshorts - April 6th, 2024 [April 6th, 2024]
- Lebanese Pro-Federalism Activist Alfred Riachi: Prior To October 7, The Standard Of Living In Gaza Was Pretty ... - Middle East Media Research... - February 22nd, 2024 [February 22nd, 2024]
- The Potential Impact of 'Disease X' on Federalism in the U.S. - Medriva - February 22nd, 2024 [February 22nd, 2024]
- 'People's Charter' Puts Federalism at The Heart of Myanmar's Democratic Future - The Irrawaddy - February 22nd, 2024 [February 22nd, 2024]
- Siddaramaiah vs Modi: The 'cess-y' mess in fiscal federalism - Deccan Herald - February 22nd, 2024 [February 22nd, 2024]
- Ideas Of India: Devendra Fadnavis To Take A Deep Dive Into Role Of Collaborative Federalism In Nation-Building - ABP Live - February 22nd, 2024 [February 22nd, 2024]
- Potential of federalism should be realized: PM Dahal - The Himalayan Times - February 22nd, 2024 [February 22nd, 2024]
- Sensible education policy needed - The Kathmandu Post - October 9th, 2023 [October 9th, 2023]
- Both cooperative federalism and competitive federalism have their ... - Insights IAS - August 18th, 2023 [August 18th, 2023]
- Federalism to poll promises: South India CMs bring up host of local ... - South First - August 18th, 2023 [August 18th, 2023]
- Justice Mitchell (Alabama): "The New Bar Exam Puts DEI Over ... - Reason - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Season of instability - The Kathmandu Post - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Trump Indictment Tests Congress's Role in State Investigations - Bloomberg Law - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Big Business' New Plan Would Create Fifty New Immigration Policies - Federation for American Immigration Reform - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Senator decries move to block bill loosening Wisconsin abortion law - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- "Illegally buying time": Congress leader Abhishek Singhvi chastises ... - ANI News - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Baby Ninth Amendments Part IV: All the Rights but Not ALL the Rights - Reason - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Amid the Fight for Myanmar, Federalism Rises from the Grass Roots - United States Institute of Peace - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Lesson from Karnataka respect states and India's federalism - Deccan Herald - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Dr. Paul Nolette named director of Les Aspin Center for Government ... - Marquette Today - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Sen. Cramer Welcomes ND Witnesses, Discusses Water ... - Kevin Cramer - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Utilities, Transmission, and the Grid: An Interview with Ari Peskoe - Brown Political Review - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Six months after elections, provincial governments are still incomplete - The Kathmandu Post - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- NON-FICTION: WHY FEDERALISM ENDURES IN PAKISTAN ... - DAWN.com - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Justice Scalia's Unpublished Dissent in Kelo v. City of New London - Reason - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Citizens, civil society hold the ruling party, BJP to account ... - SabrangIndia - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- The Mysterious Case of the Imposition of Article 355 in Manipur - The Wire - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Non-BJP State Governments Not Exercising Accountability, Allowing ... - Daily Excelsior - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Two years of Stalin government in Tamil Nadu: Two steps forward - Times of India - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- What is the issue of gubernatorial inaction in the legislative process ... - Insights IAS - April 29th, 2023 [April 29th, 2023]
- World Bank Approves $100 Million to Strengthen Nepal's Healthcare ... - ReliefWeb - April 29th, 2023 [April 29th, 2023]
- Canada's federal transfer payment system badly needs a tune-up - The Conversation - April 29th, 2023 [April 29th, 2023]
- 50 years of basic structure doctrine | Only safeguard against majoritarian govt: Sr Advocate Ramachandran - The Indian Express - April 29th, 2023 [April 29th, 2023]
- Federalism - Definition, Examples, Cases, processes - Legal Dictionary - February 20th, 2023 [February 20th, 2023]
- What is federalism? | State Policy Network - February 5th, 2023 [February 5th, 2023]
- UPSC Key- January 19, 2023: Learn about Annual Status of Education Report, Federalism and State Legislatures - The Indian Express - January 19th, 2023 [January 19th, 2023]
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Federalism American Government - January 6th, 2023 [January 6th, 2023]
- fiscal federalism | public finance | Britannica - December 26th, 2022 [December 26th, 2022]
- About ALEC - American Legislative Exchange Council - December 12th, 2022 [December 12th, 2022]
- Canadian federalism - Wikipedia - November 23rd, 2022 [November 23rd, 2022]
- U.P. bags top honours at PMAY-U Awards 2021 - The Hindu - November 23rd, 2022 [November 23rd, 2022]
- Political Line sc views on conversions rajiv convicts and federalism and more - The Hindu - November 21st, 2022 [November 21st, 2022]
- Byron Williams: The court is poised to rewrite federalism - Winston-Salem Journal - October 17th, 2022 [October 17th, 2022]
- Why Hindi may set the tone for 2024 - Deccan Herald - October 17th, 2022 [October 17th, 2022]
- A Myanmar roadmap: Charting the path to federal democracy - International IDEA - October 17th, 2022 [October 17th, 2022]
- Next generation of reforms should focus on reducing cost of doing business - Economic Times - October 17th, 2022 [October 17th, 2022]
- Nigeria And The Intrigues Of Insecurity -By Kene Obiezu - Opinion Nigeria - October 17th, 2022 [October 17th, 2022]
- Trudeau's aggressive federalism may leave Ottawa weaker than before - The Globe and Mail - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- What is Federalism? | CSF - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Kerala Against Hindi Imposition; Terms Recommendations Attack on Federalism and Diversity of Nation - NewsClick - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- 2023: Well Vote for Candidate Committed to Federalism, Diversity, Says UPU - THISDAY Newspapers - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Attorney General Knudsen fights Biden administration rule requiring states to reach net-zero highway emissions - Montana Department of Justice - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- How Scotland can learn from Quebec's third way on constitution - HeraldScotland - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Federalism and Why Presidents Fail - THISDAY Newspapers - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Vedanta and the missing spirit of federalism - The New Indian Express - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Federalism Most Suited Idea For India In View Of Its Diversity, Centralising Whole Things Will Lead To... - Live Law - Indian Legal News - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Urging the Use of One Federal Decision Rule to Speed Up Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Projects - Kevin Cramer - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Constitution Day 2022: Celebrating the right to govern ourselves - Yellowhammer News - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- From Augusta Constitution Day: What does it mean to you? - Press Herald - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Explained | The office of the Governor: its origins, powers, and controversies - The Hindu - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Geography Professional Speaker Series kicks off with alumnus from Ohio EPA on Sept. 23 - Ohio University - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Vector-borne diseases trouble Nepal every year as there is not a single entomologist - Online Khabar (English) - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- The Gujarat factor in the development project - Hindustan Times - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- The downslide in federal relations - The Indian Express - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Competition between states to attract investment will boost Indias economy - Moneycontrol - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- For state of the nation, look at states of the nation: Niti Aayogs new chief says it will help states learn - Times of India - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Letters to the Editor: Queen injected vitality, vigour into lives of many - The Kingston Whig-Standard - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Climate action that runs on cooperative federalism - The Hindu - September 15th, 2022 [September 15th, 2022]
- The spirit of federalism - The News International - September 15th, 2022 [September 15th, 2022]
- Javier Perez Sandoval Receives the 2022 William Anderson Award - - Political Science Now - September 15th, 2022 [September 15th, 2022]
- A new Constitutional Convention is a very bad idea | Opinion - Knoxville News Sentinel - September 15th, 2022 [September 15th, 2022]
- Rodney Hero Receives the 2022 Barbara Sinclair Lecture Award - - Political Science Now - September 15th, 2022 [September 15th, 2022]
- Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service: Migratory Bird Hunting; 20222023 Seasons for Certain Migratory Game Birds - Government... - September 15th, 2022 [September 15th, 2022]
- Increasing Threat To Federalism From Centrally Sponsored Schemes- Need To Form A Federal Front - Countercurrents.org - September 3rd, 2022 [September 3rd, 2022]
- Breakenridge: Supporting federalism is the only way Alberta can be a partner in LNG exports - Calgary Herald - September 3rd, 2022 [September 3rd, 2022]
- Two tools for tracking the American Rescue Plans local and national impacts - Brookings Institution - September 3rd, 2022 [September 3rd, 2022]
- Opinion | Will election candidates co-operate with CN over intermodal hub? - Toronto Star - September 3rd, 2022 [September 3rd, 2022]