Despite the diplomatic frills and savoir-faire, the United States has committed itself to a policy of extortion for decades: threats and mounting sanctions designed to bring Iranian civil society to its knees.
The U.S. governments targeted assasination of Iranian General Qassim Suleimani, characterized by the Trump administration as a preemptive defensive strike after the death of a military contractor, was the latest U.S. military provocation against Iran. A gleeful John Bolton, former assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, congratulated all involved in eliminating Qassem Soleimani, calling the assassination a decisive blow that he hopes will lead to regime change in Tehran.
While war hawks like Karl Rove and Ari Fleischer salivated at the prospect of another war, Democrats were quick to feign outrage over the killing of Suleimani, leaning into what they characterize as Trump's strategic failures: Elizabeth Warren described the incident as reckless. Biden's said Trump just tossed a stick of dynamite into a tinderbox. And Cory Booker criticized a president who has had, really, a failure in his Iranian policy and whos had no larger strategic plan. Former Obama aides, meanwhile, have been swift in blaming this latest provocation on President Trumps 2018 withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly referred to in the United States as the Iran nuclear deal.
Signed in 2015 after almost two years of negotiations, the JCPOA eased the U.S.-led sanctions regime imposed on the Islamic Republic by successive administrations since 1979 in exchange for severe restrictions on Irans civilian nuclear energy program. Democrats in Congress and running for president have told the U.S. public that by ripping up Barack Obamas signature foreign policy achievement just to tar his predecessors legacy, Trump undid a deal that was working. But how was the deal so easy to undermine? How have the most hawkish elements of the Republican party reasserted themselves at the highest level of a supposedly isolationist administration?
The answer is that Obamas legacy was to momentarily sideline the neoconservative project in the Middle East without questioning its key premises. The Democrats damned the Iran dealthey damned it with faint praise, veiled racism, and colonial arrogance. In fact, the Democrats have been undermining the cause of peace with Iran since before the JCPOA was a glimmer in John Kerrys eye.
In 2010, Obama was asked by a reporter for BBC Persian if he saw any contradiction between his conciliatory Persian New Year address (a gesture of goodwill on the hallowed spring equinox that his administration had already been established as an annual tradition) and the draconian sanctions hed just imposed against Iran, sanctions his administration would tout as crippling. He replied that what the Iranian government has said is, its more important for us to defy the international community, engage in a covert nuclear weapons program, than it is to make sure that our people are prospering. Heres the thing: Iran wasnt engaging in a covert nuclear weapons program, and every single U.S. intelligence agency would have told him so.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton went further the following year, telling BBC Persian that eventually the Iranian people will be free, they will not be oppressed by the kind of totalitarian regime that currently rules Iran. In other words, without declaring it the stated policy of the U.S. government that the Islamic Republic is illegitimate and should be overthrown, Clinton nevertheless suggests that it would be a nice idea. The de facto endorsement of regime change by Clintons State Department is echoed in the public position of her counterpart in the Trump administration, Mike Pompeo, who has said that the objectives are to change the behavior of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Then as now, the administrations rationale presents Iranians with a particularly cruel catch-22: No matter what the facts are, we know your government is up to no good, and if ordinary Iranians dont like it, you can just overthrow your supposedly totalitarian government. The logical conclusion of this paradox is, of course, regime change.
Obama and Clinton could have just said that Iran wasnt developing nuclear weapons. Instead, they repeatedly reminded Iran, the government and its people, that all options are on the table, a genocidal threat of preemptive military invasion justified by the image of a scary Islamic Republic whose fanatical leadership is a death cult, secretly pursuing nuclear weapons to wipe Israel off the map. They affirmed the fiction that a nuclear-armed Iran poses an existential threat to Israel, a claim that is predicated on the Islamophobic assumption that the government of Iran is suicidal and simply cannot be trusted with a nuclear deterrent against belligerent aggressors constantly threatening to bomb it. Only a view of the Middle East steeped in racism can explain the automatic according of victim status to Americas junior partner in the Middle East, an outpost of white supremacy apparently entitled to undeclared nuclear monopoly as carries out its settler-colonial expansion.
The nuclear deal was conceived in sin, an imperialist shakedown to guarantee U.S. and Israeli regional hegemony without becoming embroiled in another protracted military engagement. During her failed 2008 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton reminded Iranians that the United States would be able to totally obliterate them. This menacing disclosure was an effort on Clinton's part to get back to what worked during the Cold War, as she put it in remarks during her campaign. Despite the diplomatic frills and savoir-faire, the United States has committed itself to a policy of extortion for decades: threats and mounting sanctions designed to bring Iranian civil society to its knees.
As Kerry, newly sworn in as Secretary of State, began talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif in 2013, Democrats who opposed negotiations with Iran found the image of Iran as an irrational actor quite useful. Sen. Cory Booker and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, the latter currently running for president, were vocal critics of Obamas Iran policy from the right. When Booker (who just dropped out of the presidential race) ultimately declined to buck Obama, it was begrudgingly and with half a heart. He wrote by way of explanation that while negotiations with Iran have only delayednot blockedIrans potential nuclear breakoutwe have now passed a point of no return that we should have never reached, leaving our nation to choose between two imperfect, dangerous and uncertain options. He urged that we must be more vigilant than ever in fighting Iranian aggression.
And before Gabbard finally came around, she earned considerable attention from conservative media for her record of voting with Republicans on anti-Iran legislation aimed at scuttling diplomacy and for her hawkish rhetoric parroting GOP talking points about the worlds leading state sponsor of terrorism. She was lauded on the right for her concerns about the deal, which she voiced on Fox News and as a speaker at the 2015 conference of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Andimplicitly but undeniablyshe supported efforts to undermine the deal by attending Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus address to Congress on the invitation of Republican leaders that same year, a speech openly aimed at rebuking Obamas Iran policy and boycotted by 56 of her colleagues, including Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass), both of whom are running for president. Gabbards recent attempts to reposition herself as an anti-war politician notwithstanding, the only extended discussion of Iran policy during last years Democratic primary debates revealed how much ground the party shares on the need to actively restrict Irans sovereignty.
Booker was the only then-candidate who said at the June 26 debate that he would decline to rejoin the JCPOA to allow for the opportunity to leverage a better deal. Gabbard ceded that changes to the deal would be necessary after rejoining: It was an imperfect deal, there are issues like their missile development that need to be addressed. We can do both simultaneously to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.
In a September 2019 interview with CNN, Gabbard claimed with great confidence and urgency that Iran is moving forward towards developing a nuclear weapon. However much Rep. Gabbard, who is not running for reelection in Hawaii, may differentiate herself from the mainstream of the foreign policy establishment, she remains in lockstep with her partys overwhelming instinct to play up the threat of a nuclear Iran without a deal in place in hopes of frightening conservatives back towards the JCPOA.
It was unavoidable that this racist caricature of suicidal mullahs, hellbent on Israels destruction knowing full well that assured US retaliation means it would entail their own, informed the Democratic response to US withdrawal from the deal. Nowhere was the folly of this gambit more grotesquely typified for the Trump era than in the decision by Daily Show alumnus John Oliver and his producers at HBOs Last Week Tonight to buy ad time for a pro-Iran deal PSA in April of 2018 during Sean Hannitys time slot on Fox News, when the president is presumed to be watching. Oliver is the current golden child of a satirical news subgenre whose previous poster boy, Jon Stewart, was beloved by Democrats and even called to testify before Congress on issues close to their hearts. Like Stewart and Stephen Colbert, he is influential among liberals and symptomatic of their ideological blind spots.
0 is less than 10, an actor dressed as a cowboy repeats in the ad: 10 is the number of years the deal would have constrained Irans insatiable hunger for nukes due to its so-called sunset clauses (this is not true), and 0 how many years it would take Iran to develop one without it (this, too, is not true). The Iran deal may not be perfect, the cowboy concedes, but it restricts Irans ability to start making a bomb. The spot concludes with a black-and-white image of a mushroom clad. Even in supposed defense of the bill, the liberal framing validates the most fevered neoconservative fantasy of all, that a sovereign Iran is an existential threat to the United States, Israel and 'global security,' whatever that is.
In an interview with CNN, after he was barred from entering the United States where he had planned to to address the United Nations Security Council, Zarif delivered a pointed summation of Iranian attitudes in light of offenses committed by past and present administrations: The United States has to wake up to the reality that the people of this region are enraged, that the people of this region want the United States out, and that the United States cannot stay in this region. The retaliatory strike against US bases in Iraq marks a dynamic shift in U.S.-Iran relations, one which may potentially transform the region.
Trump has already promised further sanctions against Iran. As Democrats decry the presidents strategy as misguided, it is worth remembering that the first major violation of the nuclear deal occurred with their full support back in 2017, when every Senator save for Sanders and Kentucky Republican Rand Paul voted in favor of a sanctions package targeting Iran along with Russia and North Korea.
Now, at the current point in the administrations Maximum Pressure campaign, which has targeted food and medicine and sought to bring the Islamic Republics oil exports to zero, it is unclear what there is left to sanction. What should be clear to anyone seeking to meaningfully counter the momentum of military conflict is that diplomacy cannot be war by other means. An agreement between those who live in fear of annihilation and their prospective annihilators is no less coerced than any promise youd make with a gun to your head. As long as the United States attempts to dictate the future the Middle East in any capacity, half-measures in the name of progress will be undermined by the very relationship of domination that persists.
Read this article:
Top Democrats Say They Support the Iran DealBut Here's How They've Undermined It - In These Times
- Sen. Chris Murphy urges Democrats to follow Tom Suozzi and go on the offensive on the border - NBC News - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- New Mexico's Democrat-led House rejects proposal for paid family and medical leave - The Seattle Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrats see 2024 blueprint in N.Y. election that centered on immigration - The Washington Post - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrats cheer New York win as good omen for November. But is it enough to calm anxiety over Biden? - The Associated Press - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Leaning Into Migrant Woes, Suozzi Paves Election-Year Path for Democrats - The New York Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- New York Special Election Live Results: Tom Suozzi Wins George Santos's Seat - The New York Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrats win another special election, and 4 more takeaways from New York's House race - ABC News - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- NY Special Election Winner Tom Suozzi to Fill Santos Seat - Bloomberg - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrat Suozzi wins special election to replace Santos in New York - NPR - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- New House lines in New York would boost 2 Democrats and a Republican - POLITICO - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrats win back George Santos seat in hotly contested election - POLITICO - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrats and Republicans hold Black History Month celebrations with an eye on November's election - The Associated Press - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- NY-03 Special: Four Takeaways from Suozzi and Democrats' Decisive Win - The Cook Political Report - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- New York special election results: The Democrats flipped George Santos' old seat. But here's the real story. - Slate - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- West Virginia bill defining gender is transphobic and 'political rubbish,' Democrats say - The Associated Press - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Biden isn't leaving the 2024 race, but how would Democrats pick a nominee if he did? - ABC News - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Proposed TikTok ban dies in Virginias Democratic-controlled House - The Hill - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Opinion | Tom Suozzi Makes the Democrats Look Good for a New York Minute - The New York Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Tom Suozzi buoyed by higher Democratic turnout, decline in GOP voting - Newsday - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- We asked young Black voters about Biden and the Democrats. Here's what we learned - NPR - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- New York Special Election: Tom Suozzi Wins House Seat Vacated by George Santos - The New York Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrat Tom Suozzi to replace republican George Santos in U.S. House of Representatives - 13newsnow.com WVEC - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Who is Tom Suozzi, Democrat in New York's special election - The Washington Post - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrat Tom Suozzi wins special election to fill George Santos's House seat. Here's why it matters beyond New York. - Yahoo News - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Democrat Wins Special Election for George Santos' House Seat Mother Jones - Mother Jones - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Not an Ordinary Special Election, and Yet a Typical Result - The New York Times - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Trump slams Democrat Nikki Haley on home turf ahead of South Carolina primary: Shes finished - Washington Examiner - February 14th, 2024 [February 14th, 2024]
- Senate Democrat calls GOP hostage-taking in debt ceiling deal making dangerous: This cannot be the norm - The Hill - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Scoop: Dems told to say debt ceiling bill rejects GOP's "extreme demands" - Axios - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Debt Ceiling Is First Big Test for Hakeem Jeffries, the Top House Democrat - The New York Times - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Does the debt deal have enough GOP support? This Democratic senator says he's worried. - POLITICO - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Delbert the Democrat and his friends in the liberal media - leader-call.com - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Why I believe RFK Jr. will be the 2024 Democratic nominee - The Hill - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Republican blitz on LGBTQ issues exposes fractures among Texas ... - The Texas Tribune - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Texas Passes Bills Targeting Elections in Democratic Stronghold - The New York Times - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- The Rise of Religious 'Nones' Won't Save Democrats - New York Magazine - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Democrats trade insults over bill at committee meeting - Spectrum News NY1 - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Kentucky Democrat Who Lost Bid to Unseat McConnell Fined $10K ... - Heritage.org - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Mississippi Democrats improperly excluded candidate for governor ... - The Associated Press - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Asian voters in the U.S. tend to be Democratic, but Vietnamese ... - Pew Research Center - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Gilbert, Mesa lawmakers unimpressed with Democrat's reason for ... - Daily Independent - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- Former Republican and Democratic Governors from Alabama ... - Death Penalty Information Center - May 30th, 2023 [May 30th, 2023]
- 3 Tennessee Democrats face removal from office in Thursday vote after gun control protest on state House floor - CNN - April 6th, 2023 [April 6th, 2023]
- Democrat or Republican: The Official Differences | Merriam-Webster - March 31st, 2023 [March 31st, 2023]
- Truck driver who upset top N.J. Democrat in 2021 faces GOP primary challenge in big election year - NJ.com - March 31st, 2023 [March 31st, 2023]
- A top Democrats radical plan to deal with Trumps worst judge and protect abortion rights - Vox.com - February 20th, 2023 [February 20th, 2023]
- About the Democratic Party - Democrats - February 7th, 2023 [February 7th, 2023]
- Democratic Party (United States) - Simple English Wikipedia, the free ... - February 2nd, 2023 [February 2nd, 2023]
- Democrat NYC Mayor Adams calls on federal government to play more proactive role to secure border - Fox News - January 17th, 2023 [January 17th, 2023]
- Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin announces he has 'serious but curable form of cancer' - CNN - December 28th, 2022 [December 28th, 2022]
- Sen. Sinema's switch to Independent will not impact Democrats' control of the chamber, representatives say - CNBC - December 12th, 2022 [December 12th, 2022]
- 'People are fed up': As NC Democrats reflect on election missteps, a party shake-up is underway - WRAL News - December 12th, 2022 [December 12th, 2022]
- What is a Democrat? (with pictures) - Historical Index - November 23rd, 2022 [November 23rd, 2022]
- This is the late message some Democrats believe could make a difference in close elections - CNN - November 1st, 2022 [November 1st, 2022]
- Dylan Roberts in his words: The Democrat running for a seat in Senate District 8 promises to focus on living affordability, the environment and rural... - October 25th, 2022 [October 25th, 2022]
- POLITICO Playbook: Where Democrats can find some good news - POLITICO - POLITICO - October 21st, 2022 [October 21st, 2022]
- Kill the babies to curb inflation? Democrats are the real abortion extremists - Washington Examiner - October 21st, 2022 [October 21st, 2022]
- The vote to subpoena Trump shows Democrats have found their fighting spirit - The Guardian US - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Cameron Smith: Is the worst Republican better than the best Democrat? - AL.com - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Inflation report is bad news for Democrats - The Hill - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Democrats try to break through on drug pricing message - The Hill - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Meet the Black Republican whos aiming to flip a Democratic held House seat in heavily blue Connecticut - Yahoo News - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Democrats Worry They're Being Overshadowed in Arizona's Governor Race - Yahoo News - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Democrats suggest shifting weapons from Saudi Arabia to Ukraine - The Guardian US - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- WATCH: Voters react to Nancy Pelosi claiming Democrats will win midterm elections without Trump on the ballot - Fox News - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Former presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard says she is leaving the Democratic Party - NPR - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Oregon could elect a non-Democrat governor for the first time in 40 years - Statesman Journal - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- 'The Great Realignment': Democrats Leave Party in Droves, and What It Could Mean for GOP in November - CBN.com - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Texas Democrat uses edited photo of GOP opponent in campaign ad that makes her appear more aggressive - Washington Examiner - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- This Democrat Living On Nearly $400,000 Is Frustrated By Inflation - Washington Free Beacon - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Why Kansass Democratic Governor Isnt Talking About Abortion But Her GOP Opponent Is - FiveThirtyEight - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Can Democrats Win 52 Senate Seats And Kill The Filibuster? - FiveThirtyEight - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- Ricky Jones: Black men are not the problem for Stacey Abrams and Democrats - Courier Journal - October 13th, 2022 [October 13th, 2022]
- How Democrats are trying to counter a wave of GOP attacks on crime - POLITICO - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Why Democrats' midterm optimism could be misguided - The Hill - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Will The Polls Overestimate Democrats Again? - FiveThirtyEight - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Lauren Boebert's Democratic opponent forgot he was previously registered as a Democrat - Washington Examiner - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Democrats' No. 1 fall goal: Try not to 'poke the bear' - POLITICO - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Is This When Democrats Finally Learn How to Message? - The New Republic - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]
- Meet the Democrat on a Six-Figure Income Who Cant Afford To Buy Her Kids Shoes - Washington Free Beacon - September 20th, 2022 [September 20th, 2022]