Republican Sen. Ted Cruz wants to throw it out. Some Democrats agree, but for different reasons. Either way, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has generated a lot of buzz on Capitol Hill when it comes to its role in protecting internet platforms from liability in content moderation.
Virtually any platform that hosts content by users also moderates that content, whether its comments posted by readers on articles, blogs, photos, videos or other items shared on social media. Its not the first time there have been calls to change the law that gives platforms leeway on how much they can moderate that content.
Lawmakers across the political spectrum have criticized the law but for different reasons. Cruz argued to repeal the law in a 2018 debate with Beto ORourke because he believes it allows social media platforms to quash conservative voices. Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has called it a real gift to Big Tech, and she has called for social media companies to take more responsibility for content shared on their platforms.
Democratic nominee Joe Biden has called for the law to be revoked, specifically saying Facebook is not merely an internet company. It is propagating falsehoods they know to be false.
Section 230 took the spotlight again last week when Twitter limited sharing on a New York Post story that suggested Biden used his position to benefit his son Hunters business dealings in Ukraine. Conservatives, who have long argued their speech has been impeded on social media, used the opportunity as a battle cry to summon Big Tech CEOs before Congress and challenge Section 230.
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted Thursday to subpoena Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to testify about their handling of the New York Post story.
This poses the single greatest threat to free speech in America today, Cruz said in a press call with the Media Research Center Monday. It poses the single greatest threat to democracy in America, and it also poses the single greatest threat to a free press.
But what is Section 230? And what does it allow and not allow?
Dubbed the 26 words that created the internet, by Jeff Kosseff, a cybersecurity law professor at the United States Naval Academy, Section 230 was signed into law in 1996, in the nascence of the internet.
While the internet looked very different from the way it does now, platforms still existed and hosted content by third-party sources. And some of that content was libelous.
As libel cases kept coming to courts, lawmakers had to decide who to hold responsible for that content, said Victoria Ekstrand, associate professor of journalism at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Should platforms be held to the same liability standards of publishers, like a newspaper? Or should they be considered an entity that doesnt have that secondary liability, like a bookstore?
At the time, lawmakers knew very little of what the future internet would look like, but they knew it was capable of doing things that were never possible before. Eric Goldman, professor of law at Santa Clara University School of Law, said thats why Section 230 was born.
In order to preserve the opportunity for the internet to reach its potential, Section 230 said: Were going to give the internet more favorable treatment than other media so that it can do the things its capable of, Goldman said.
In that spirit, Section 230s Good Samaritan clause says that internet platforms are not publishers, so they are broadly not responsible for what users post (with the exception of federal criminal liability, privacy violations and intellectual property-based claims), and they cannot be held liable for actions taken in good faith to restrict access to content they believe could be harmful to others.
While at first, it may seem the clause gives no incentive for businesses to moderate their platforms, its actually the opposite. Companies want to police their platforms because if they dont, the platforms become cesspools of spam and harassment, Goldman said.
But they dont want to risk legal trouble every time they moderate content.
Section 230 was passed to create a robust atmosphere for speech online, and for the growth of the internet, Ekstrand said. But the other part was to encourage what we think of now as content moderation, so the platform can go in there and content moderate, but theyre protected from that secondary liability.
If the only way to moderate content without liability is to do it perfectly, then there is very little incentive to do so. Goldman calls it the moderators dilemma.
Section 230 allows internet platforms to moderate content or not without that fear, but lawmakers on the right and the left argue that Big Tech now has too much power over public discourse.
Republican lawmakers, including Cruz, argue that the law allows Big Tech companies to use their power to silence conservative voices.
But whether platforms should host content they do not want to is not a Section 230 question, said Daxton Stewart, professor of journalism at Texas Christian University. It is a First Amendment question.
Thats really what web moderation is about in all these companies, Stewart said. They get to pick and choose who is welcome on their site and whos not. And because theyre not the government, theyre a private company, they get to do that. And thats the First Amendment. That has nothing to do with Section 230.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats argue that tech companies need to take more responsibility for content on their platforms, specifically misinformation. But that can be a slippery slope, said Goldman. If platforms are held liable for certain kinds of content, they might just restrict that content, so they dont have to worry about it at all.
The main question of Section 230 debate, Stewart said, is who should be in charge of making companies responsible for their moderation practices the government or their users?
The problem is, neither of those are great answers because the government gets involved, you get First Amendment concerns, Stewart said. And you do have to worry that the governments going to start picking winners and losers about what a good platform is, but with companies like Facebook, which are basically monopolies, walkouts from individual consumers are unlikely to make much of a difference.
Either way, in a market partly shaped by Section 230, it is likely that changes to the law could change the internet environment we are used to, which some experts view as a net loss.
We, as internet users, are the most likely to lose, Goldman said.
Whoever wins that battle is almost certainly going to create an internet that is less of what we think we enjoy today ... Think about so many things that have gone right with the internet, how many ways it makes our lives better on an hour-by-hour basis. And if those start folding, rolling up and exiting the market, then whats left for us?
More here:
Section 230: What is the law that's causing so much big tech buzz? - The Dallas Morning News
- Report Sounds Alarm Over Growing Role of Big Tech in US Military-Industrial Complex - Common Dreams - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Big Tech's ad transparency tools especially X's are failing at their jobs, report finds - Mashable - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Big Tech Taps AI Agents to Drive Revenue Growth - PYMNTS.com - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- National privacy standard eyed by Congress for data harvested by big tech companies Nebraska Examiner - Nebraska Examiner - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Big Tech is on a generative AI hiring spree - Fast Company - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Disruptive Innovation in the Era of Big Tech - HBR.org Daily - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Betting on US Big Tech? Top Earnings Reports to Watch in the Coming Week - FX Empire - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Big Tech Earnings Are Just Around the Corner - Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) - Benzinga - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- WATCH LIVE: Will Cain holds panel to discuss Big Tech and Trump trial - Fox News - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Google fires 28 workers in aftermath of protests over big tech deal with Israeli government - The Bakersfield Californian - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Big Tech offices are getting smaller and that spells trouble for landlords - Quartz - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Asking Big Tech to police AI is like turning to 'oil companies to solve climate change,' AI researcher says - Fortune - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Big Tech Comes to Small Town: A Bitcoin Mining Story in Spur - CoinDesk - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Big Tech loses its appetite for office space, adding to landlords woes - Inman - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Google restructure leads to job cuts - Mobile World Live - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- FTC's Lina Khan talks big tech monopolies on The Daily Show - The Ticker - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Digital public infrastructure will drive the future, not big tech: Amitabh Kant - BusinessLine - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Big tech is downsizing work space in another blow to office real estate | Mint - Mint - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- UK Plans Talks With Big Tech to Limit Online Harm for Teens - Bloomberg - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Canada to Start Taxing Tech Giants in 2024 Despite US Complaints - Bloomberg - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- US quarterly earnings to feature big growth in tech-related companies - Reuters - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Our View: Big Tech: Google continues to harm news groups for its own profit - Mankato Free Press - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Deepfake victims must punish Big Tech because Congress wont - The Hill - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Big tech kneecaps anyone researching it. The online harms bill needs to remove barriers to analysis - Policy Options - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Global future will not be driven by big tech but by India's DPI: Amitabh Kant - Moneycontrol - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Kids Code bills prompt epic showdown between regulators, activists and big tech firms - Biometric Update - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Tech Firms Retreating From Office Market - The Real Deal - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- UKs antitrust enforcer sounds the alarm over Big Techs grip on GenAI - TechCrunch - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Time for government to regulate big tech - ACS - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- UK Markets Authority Warns of AI Market Capture by Big Tech - BankInfoSecurity.com - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- 2023 Boosts Big Techs AI monopoly? Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, and others wield money power - HT Tech - January 2nd, 2024 [January 2nd, 2024]
- Alphabet (GOOGL) and Meta Shows Power of Ads Over Subscriptions - Bloomberg - January 2nd, 2024 [January 2nd, 2024]
- Looking Beyond The 'Magnificent 7' Analysts Just Upgraded These Three Large-Cap Stocks - Anheuser-Busch - Benzinga - January 2nd, 2024 [January 2nd, 2024]
- Mapping the Biggest Tech Talent Hubs in the U.S. and Canada - Visual Capitalist - January 2nd, 2024 [January 2nd, 2024]
- Google, Meta, other tech giants slash DEI-related jobs, resource groups in 2023: Report - Fox Business - January 2nd, 2024 [January 2nd, 2024]
- South Koreas proposed tech regulations would be a gift to China - The Hill - January 2nd, 2024 [January 2nd, 2024]
- Outlook 2024: Big changes to expect in personal tech - The Indian Express - January 2nd, 2024 [January 2nd, 2024]
- Big Tech Dumped $17 Billion Into AI Companies in 2023 Despite Frozen Market - The Messenger - January 2nd, 2024 [January 2nd, 2024]
- Why OpenAI signals the start of the post-Christensen startup world - Tech.eu - January 2nd, 2024 [January 2nd, 2024]
- Opinion | Lindsey Graham and Elizabeth Warren: When It Comes to Big Tech, Enough Is Enough - The New York Times - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- Globe editorial: Canada can't tackle Big Tech on its own - The Globe and Mail - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- July jobs report and more Big Tech earnings are in the week ahead after markets notch historic run for Dow - CNBC - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- A Setback in the F.T.C.'s Fight Against Big Tech - The New Yorker - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- Be strong in the fight against Big Tech, Canada - Canada's National Observer - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- Decoding volatility: Are big tech stocks as stable as we think? - CryptoSlate - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- Patients think their health data will be leaked and don't trust big tech ... - Contemporary Pediatrics - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Big Tech Earnings Season - Fagen wasanni - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- The problem with Big Tech's voluntary AI safety commitments - Emerging Tech Brew - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- How the Crypto Market Prepares Ahead of Big Tech Earnings ... - BeInCrypto - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- Tony Anscombe: It's Misleading to Ask if Big Tech Wants to Read ... - BroadbandBreakfast.com - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- The Week Ahead: Fed, ECB and BoJ set rates, and Big Tech ... - Financial Times - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- China's Big Tech making a comeback with Beijing offering fresh ... - The Straits Times - July 29th, 2023 [July 29th, 2023]
- Montgomery County school district sues Big Tech over youth mental ... - Washington Times - June 18th, 2023 [June 18th, 2023]
- Big Tech knows most Brits don't know how to protect their online ... - TechRadar - June 18th, 2023 [June 18th, 2023]
- The time for talk is over is time for action on data privacy - The Hill - June 18th, 2023 [June 18th, 2023]
- Meet the man calling out Big Techs climate hypocrisy - Corporate Knights Magazine - June 18th, 2023 [June 18th, 2023]
- Letter: UK watchdog's tough stance on Big Tech should reassure MPs - Financial Times - June 18th, 2023 [June 18th, 2023]
- Peter Thiel on Big Tech: A Throwback Lecture - Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence - June 18th, 2023 [June 18th, 2023]
- Big Tech Is Big Tobacco - The Lever - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Graham fires warning shot at Big Tech: Were going to unleash the courtrooms of America on you - Fox News - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Experts weigh the current cost of anticompetitive behavior in Big ... - NYU Law - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Big Tech lobbying on AI regulation as industry races to harness ... - Center for Responsive Politics - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- 'Big Tech is knowingly fueling a mental-health crisis in this country ... - Morningstar - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- EY's Abandoned Split Exposes Obstacles to Big Tech Consulting - Bloomberg Tax - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Apple CEO Tim Cook calls mass layoffs a last resort, as the company avoids the giant job cuts of its Big Tech peers - Yahoo Finance - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Big Tech stocks are flying! Which ones are the best buys today? - Motley Fool UK - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Why Indian start-ups have accused the Internet and Mobile Association of India of spreading Big Tech propaganda - The Indian Express - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Intimate Images Protection Update Big Tech Warned To Be Ready ... - BC INJURY LAW - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Apple Stock and Big Tech Are Winners. Why Cathie Wood's ARK Is Still a Loser. - Barron's - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]
- White House officials will meet Big Tech CEOs as President Biden looks to tackle AI safety concerns - Yahoo Canada Finance - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]
- The top 10 buzziest companies Gen Z wants to work fornone of them are in Big Tech, says new report - CNBC - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]
- Apple Reports Earnings Today. What to Expect. - Barron's - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]
- Big Tech Earnings: Time to Take Another Bite of Apple? - Yahoo Finance - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]
- Vibe Check: Big Tech Is Losing Its 'Luster' For The Class Of 2023 Amid Mounting Layoffs And An Uncertain Economy - Forbes - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]
- Lindsey Graham says Big Tech will kill online child safety bill, teases plan with Elizabeth Warren - Washington Times - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]
- 'Break them open' new EU rules coming for Big Tech - TNW - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]
- EY's Abandoned Split Exposes Obstacles to Big Tech Consulting - Bloomberg Law - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]
- Open Source Communities Need More Than Funding From Big Tech - DevOps.com - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]
- Night School, Class 3: Big Tech vs the insurgents - Financial Times - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]
- MM View: The Big Tech monster is coming for you - but only if you let it - Money Marketing - May 4th, 2023 [May 4th, 2023]