Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship …

Posted: September 16, 2021 at 6:32 am

On Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas announced that the Supreme Court soon will have to put an end to Big Tech tyranny. Amen. If the high court fails to act, it could mean the end of free speech in the 21st century and the shriveling of our constitutional rights to mere paper rights still there on paper but functionally hollowed out.

Thomas cited the problem ofsocial-media platforms like Facebook and Google wielding unlimited power to censorusers whose views they dont like.His opinion offers hope at a time when Democrats controlling Congress are demanding that tech giants censor more.On March 25,Democrats ontheHouse Committee on Energy and Commerceordered tech CEOs to silence views that undermine social-justice movements.

Thomas announcement camein the context of a case involving former President Donald Trump. In office, Trump occasionally blocked his Twitter critics, and some of those critics sued, claiming the presidents Twitter account is a public forum.The high court ruledthe case is now moot, because Trump is out of office. Thomas concurred and agreed with a lower court holding that Trump had violated his critics First Amendment right to be heard.

But Thomas said the more glaring concern isnt what Trump did to a few critics, but rather the power of tech giants to censor or ban users entirely, even the leader of the Free World.The justice expressed astonishment that Facebook and Google could remove Trumps accountat any time for any or no reason.

Wrote Thomas: One person controls Facebook . . . and just two control Google.Three people, in other words, have the power to disappear any of us from the digital public square, even a commander in chief. The Supremes, Thomas concluded, must rein in this unaccountable tyranny.

Big Tech apologists argue that private companies are free to censor as they please. And its true that the First Amendment prohibits only government from silencing viewpoints. But private ownership is never the beginning and end of constitutional analysis, not when there is so much at stake.

As Thomas showed, these companies aremore like common carriers or public utilities than private companies. And they must be regulated as such: AT&T cant refuse to open a phone account for you or limit your conversations based on your worldview. Likewise, Southwest Airlines cant pick and choose who rides its aircraft based on their opinions about transgenderism or #Russiagate. Yet the tech giants get to do exactly that. Why?

Thomas also likenedBig Tech to public accommodations, such as hotels and baseball stadiums, which are legally required to serve everyone and not discriminate.

Nor did Thomas buy free-market absolutists argument about competition limiting Big Tech tyranny. He pointedto the substantial barriers to entry facing newcomers.The fate of Parler proves the justices point.When the Twitter alternative offered a censorship-free platform,Big Tech colluded to crush it.

Were facing a new form of censorship, in some ways far more sinister than the state-directed variety. Democrats and their media allies are happy to deputize Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to censor the deplorables; there is no recourse or appeal, because the people doing the censoring are nameless, faceless Silicon Valley operatives.

And dont count on President Joe Biden. Astaggering 14 of his picksto serve in the transition or in his new government are Big Tech alumni, according to a Daily Caller tally. Indeed, Biden probably owes his presidency in part to Big Tech which rushed to censor this newspapers reporting on the Hunter Files, on the patently false pretext that The Post had peddled disinformation or hacked material.

Its salutary, then, that Thomasbelieves the high court can apply his reasoning without waiting for Congress. Until then, the public will hear only what Silicon Valley wants, and the place is awash with wokesters more dangerous than any college campuses because these people control the levers of information.

Last week, Lara Trump posted an interview with the former president on Facebook. Immediately,Facebook took it down, explaining that further content posted in the voice of Donald Trump will be removed.

Only the high court will restore uncensored discourse, an American ideal.Thomas opinion illumines the way.

Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York.

Visit link:

Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship ...

Related Post