Last fall, Uber hired Jeff Jones, Targets former chief marketing officer, to serve as president of the companys core ride-hailing business, with a mandate to improve relationships with Uber drivers and counteract the companys increasingly negative public image. But Jones couldnt solve those problems, and over the weekend he resigned in a way that will exacerbate them, telling Recodes Kara Swisher and Johana Bhuiyan that the beliefs and approach to leadership that have guided my career are inconsistent with what I saw and experienced at Uber.
Joness resignation is the latest blow in whats been a brutal 2017 for the high-flying transportation startup, with problems ranging from a consumer boycott sparked by Ubers participation in a Donald Trump advisory council to a Google lawsuit alleging that Ubers key self-driving car technology was stolen, from serious sexual harassment allegations to the revelation of a secret program to foil local law enforcement.
Uber CEO Travis Kalanick apologized publicly for problems at the company, saying he needs to grow up. But at 40 years old, the paper billionaire has been an adult for a long time, and experts say the steps Kalanick is taking to address the harassment issues are woefully inadequate.
Joness departure is fundamentally a sign that Uber isnt really trying to change its ways. The company gained initial traction in the marketplace thanks to a pirate-ship mentality that viewed willingness to break the rules as a core competitive advantage. Having gained enormous revenue and visibility since it launched in 2010, it would probably have made sense to slow down, mature, and try to transform itself into something more like a boring utility company that maintains good relationships with drivers and regulatory stakeholders.
Ubers view of the marketplace, though, is that the ride-hailing platform is just a stepping stone to a future network of ubiquitous self-driving cars. Thats encouraged the company to plow ahead with the pirate mentality, including perhaps stealing from Google, in an all-out race to win the future of transportation.
Its far from clear that a rule-breaking company with a toxic public image at war with its own workforce can really pull this off without imploding in the process. The taxi market really was (and is) regulated with little concern for public safety or consumer interests. But Ubers sense that the rules dont or shouldnt apply to it is leading to an escalating series of problems that could easily destroy the company.
The classic taxicab market in the United States was plagued with regulations restricting the supply of cabs available to be hailed in a way that went far beyond basic safety concerns. All drivers of all cars require a license, and all vehicles on the road are heavily regulated objects that need to pass a battery of safety and environmental tests. Still, in all states obtaining the permission to drive a car is a fairly straightforward process. But in most cities, obtaining permission to not just drive a car but drive people around in exchange for money was cumbersome, requiring access to a limited supply of special permits.
This permit-rationing process generated extraordinary financial returns to the owners of the permits who, in most cases, were not the actual drivers of the cabs but also ensured that cabs were harder to find than they should have been.
In cities like New York and Washington, DC, that generally meant taxis were unavailable in lower-income and less central neighborhoods. In a more auto-oriented city like Los Angeles, it generally meant that the economics of the taxi industry was focused on exploiting tourists rather than providing a service to locals looking for an alternative to driving when heading out for a night of intoxicants.
Municipal regulation also often led to inefficiency. A Boston cab that took a passenger from South Station or Logan Airport to the MIT or Harvard campus in Cambridge could not, legally speaking, pick up a new passenger without crossing back to the other side of the Charles River first. This kind of regulatory fragmentation served no real public policy purpose, but as each local regulators politics would typically be dominated by the interests of incumbent license holders, it was very hard to get the rules changed.
The laws were, of course, always imperfectly enforced, and illicit gypsy cabs and out-of-jurisdiction pickups by real cabs were a longstanding fact of urban life.
Ubers solution to the basic problem was to boldly plow ahead in a legal gray area, and then wage political battles from a position of strength with customers already in place. As Bradley Tusk, one of Ubers main political impresarios, told Vanity Fair when recounting a fight in New York, We mobilized our customers, over 100,000 of them, either e-mailed or tweeted at City Hall or the city council.
This business strategy fundamentally worked.
Once Uber existed, most consumers in most cities liked it, and most political authorities gave way to the basic idea that more ride availability was going to make life better for most people. But while its certainly possible to believe that the taxi market was excessively regulated without believing that regulation is, in general, illegitimate (the cab market has long been deregulated in Sweden, for example), Kalanick appears to be a true believer in smashing the state.
Years ago, he used the cover image of Ayn Rands The Fountainhead as his Twitter avatar and told the Washington Posts Mike DeBonis that his companys regulatory issues bore an uncanny resemblance to the plot of Atlas Shrugged.
Still, in a practical sense, Uber operates overwhelmingly in big, dense liberal cities and needs political cooperation from Democratic Party elected officials. To that end, Uber has always sought political connections with blue-state politicians (Tusk was a former communications director to Chuck Schumer and top aide to Michael Bloomberg) who can help them in concrete ways that Republicans generally cant. But Kalanick and his inner circle, according to people familiar with the situation, are largely pretty hardcore right-wingers who understand a pragmatic need to go along and get along with progressive values without really believing in them.
Indeed, as Voxs Tim Lee has written, Uber has consistently applied the its better to beg forgiveness than ask permission to a huge range of conduct that has nothing to do with rent-seeking taxi regulation:
[W]hen Uber accepted a massive $3.5 billion cash infusion from Saudi Arabias sovereign wealth fund, I noted the irony of Uber accepting cash from a government that doesnt allow women to drive cars and that once punished a rape victim for being alone with a male nonrelative. And Uber didnt just take Saudi Arabias cash; it also gave the theocratic regime a seat on its board.
Over the years, Uber has allegedly spied on its own customers, threatened to dig up dirt on journalists, and downplayed sexual assault concerns.
In many of these cases, Uber has backpedaled in the wake of a public backlash. Kalanick, for example, tweeted out an apology in the wake of his executives comments about journalists. But often, Uber only seems to take this kind of step after becoming the target of a social media firestorm.
While this attitude was helpful in breaking through initial taxi cartel rules, applying the principle to every situation has enmeshed the company in an endless series of controversies thats unusual for a consumer-facing company.
All corporate management structures enter into some degree of conflict with their employees. At the same time, a companys workers are often its best allies in existential regulatory battles. Coal miners are a stronger face of public opposition to environmental regulation than coal company CEOs or electrical utility shareholders. And workers are not only more sympathetic than executives but also more numerous and geographically dispersed.
A natural step in the maturation process for a company like Uber, which faces a significant and dispersed regulatory challenge, would be to try to recruit drivers as allies for the basic proposition that the service is safe and useful.
Instead, Uber has resisted the notion that its drivers are employees at all, and only under threat of litigation came to a resolution of the basic question of how the workforce related to the company. The settlement, in the end, was a broadly reasonable compromise that allowed Uber to maintain the flexibility it wanted while addressing key driver grievances and even moving toward the creation of a formal group to represent the interests of Uber drivers. But this was dragged out of the company as a concession, not put forward proactively as a workforce model.
The key factor here is that to sell investors on Ubers sky-high valuation and lack of proven profits, the company has very openly espoused a vision of replacing all drivers with autonomous vehicles. The company maintains an aggressive research division based in Pittsburgh thats working on self-driving technology, and at corporate headquarters its taken for granted that the existing hailing business is just a stool to be kicked aside soon enough in favor of the robotic future.
That blocks the otherwise natural turn toward enlisting the broad mass of Uber drivers as political and public relations allies. There are other drawbacks too. Pairing an avowed indifference to a large share of the workforce with a corporate culture that valorizes rule breaking likely encourages misogynistic behavior at the home office, and almost certainly impedes efforts to create a more rule-bound, publicly appealing corporate culture.
Hence the recruitment of Jones from the outside to try to improve things, and his rapid departure as it becomes clear that problems are too deeply rooted from him to change them.
Of course, if the bet on self-driving technology pans out, this could all be irrelevant.
A fleet of cheaply operated fully autonomous taxis would be a massive game changer for the companys basic economics. And since Uber already owns the relationship with a mass of customers, it would be very difficult to dislodge them from a hypothetical position of leadership in the autonomous vehicle game.
But the bet on an unproven, nonexistent technology in a space where Uber does not have an obvious advantage over companies that are more distinguished either in mapping and artificial intelligence (like Google) or in actually making cars (like, well, car companies) is very much a shot in the dark. And its worth asking whether Ubers reputation for lawlessness could be a considerable impediment.
After all, the core of Ubers original case for brushing aside taxi licensing regulations was that this was a fundamentally silly area of government intervention into the economy. All of Ubers drivers had drivers licenses, and their cars were all legal to drive. The basic regulatory issue was whether legal drivers piloting legal cars should be allowed to let someone ride in the back seat in exchange for money.
Self-driving car technology, by contrast, poses obvious public safety hazards. Like any car, if self-driving cars malfunction, people will die. And there is a reason theres no such thing as an automaker that has deliberately courted a public image as defiant of the law or the basic legitimacy of the regulatory state nobody would buy a car they were worried didnt meet basic safety standards. Recalls at General Motors a few years back cost the company a small fortune, and led to high-profile congressional investigations. Its a much higher-stakes game than taxi regulation.
Reasonable people can and do disagree about what rules are genuinely necessary for safetys sake (the public doesnt realize it, but cars considered safe in Europe generally wouldnt be allowed on the road in North America, and vice versa), and there is a lot of low-key lobbying around the margins, but all the players in this industry accept that there will be rules and the rules should be followed.
Nothing about Ubers approach to taxi regulation, labor law, sexual harassment, public relations, or much of anything else, though, suggests the kind of cautious attitude that would tend to give a person or a city council member, or a state Department of Transportation official confidence in the safety of Ubers robot cars. Joness words, which characterized a culture thats so badly broken it took the person brought in to fix it just six months to decide that he couldnt, do not in any way suggest a company youd want to trust on life-or-death matters.
Uber has given life to the slogan move fast and break things in a way that Facebook, which coined it, never did. It was a perfect pitch for an early venture capital fundraising round, but its a frankly terrible motto for a company that aspires to play a critical infrastructure role in piloting fast-moving metal objects down the street.
Read more:
Uber's toxic culture of rule breaking, explained - Vox
- Why The Invincible Created New Characters Instead of Using Rohan - GameRant - November 2nd, 2023 [November 2nd, 2023]
- What is Objectivism? Ayn Rand's Philosophy - The Collector - November 2nd, 2023 [November 2nd, 2023]
- Sean Speer: The Left has a self-policing problem - The Hub - November 2nd, 2023 [November 2nd, 2023]
- It's 'Atlas Shrugged' and we're watching it live - Financial Times - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Jesse Kline: 'How to Blow Up a Pipeline' film's reprehensible attempt to mainstream terrorism - National Post - May 18th, 2023 [May 18th, 2023]
- Atlas (mythology) - Wikipedia - January 17th, 2023 [January 17th, 2023]
- Controversy King Aaron Rodgers Once Willingly F*cked Around With Everyone By Bragging About Owning Atlas Shrugged - The Sportsrush - January 4th, 2023 [January 4th, 2023]
- John Henry Kelley II: Everything you need to know about Michelle Pfeiffer's son - Yen.com.gh - October 17th, 2022 [October 17th, 2022]
- Five myths about Ayn Rand and Objectivism - Learn Liberty - October 15th, 2022 [October 15th, 2022]
- Atlas Shrugged Essay Contest - AynRand.org - October 6th, 2022 [October 6th, 2022]
- Mike Rowe and Ayn Rand on the Virtues of Thinking and Producing - The Objective Standard - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- The pandemic economy will outlast the outbreak of covid | Mint - Mint - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Much Of The Pandemic Economy Is Here To Stay - Financial Advisor Magazine - September 22nd, 2022 [September 22nd, 2022]
- Why I Think The EV Tax Credits In The Inflation Reduction Act Will Work Out - CleanTechnica - August 15th, 2022 [August 15th, 2022]
- 25 And Counting - The Source Weekly - August 15th, 2022 [August 15th, 2022]
- What is a Libertarian? Part I: The Libertarian Movement - 1819 News - August 6th, 2022 [August 6th, 2022]
- Heather Nepa: A Desire to be a Difference-Maker - UNLV NewsCenter - August 6th, 2022 [August 6th, 2022]
- The Top 10 Books Billionaires Recommend - Forbes - July 21st, 2022 [July 21st, 2022]
- Telling People About Atlas Shrugged Now? - Galt's Gulch - July 7th, 2022 [July 7th, 2022]
- Ken Griffin Spent $54 Million Fighting a Tax Increase for the Rich. Secret IRS Data Shows It Paid Off for Him. - ProPublica - July 7th, 2022 [July 7th, 2022]
- LETTER: Thank cadre deployment and BEE for the mess - BusinessLIVE - July 7th, 2022 [July 7th, 2022]
- Is American democracy already lost? Half of us think so but the future remains unwritten - Salon - June 26th, 2022 [June 26th, 2022]
- Atlas shrugged: Getting mad with maps with attitude about latitude - Times of India - June 11th, 2022 [June 11th, 2022]
- Short Redhead Reel Reviews for the week of June 10 - ECM Publishers - June 11th, 2022 [June 11th, 2022]
- Connecticut conservatives are wary about a misinformation officer overseeing 2022 election - Hartford Courant - June 11th, 2022 [June 11th, 2022]
- Which Dystopian Story Does 2022 Resemble the Most? - Foundation for Economic Education - June 11th, 2022 [June 11th, 2022]
- Free Books - AynRand.org - May 6th, 2022 [May 6th, 2022]
- Atlas Shrugged Is A Feminist Tome - datalounge.com - May 6th, 2022 [May 6th, 2022]
- Liberalism versus Reaction in Ayn Rand Liberal Currents - Liberal Currents - May 6th, 2022 [May 6th, 2022]
- Why Critics of Angry Woke College Kids Are Missing the Point - The New York Times - May 6th, 2022 [May 6th, 2022]
- Digging into the Atom Bomb's Effects on Cold War America - PopMatters - May 6th, 2022 [May 6th, 2022]
- Bong Joon-ho's Mickey7 Adaptation Has the Potential to Be a Truly Great Science Fiction Movie - tor.com - April 27th, 2022 [April 27th, 2022]
- Thomas Piketty Is Right Out of Ayn Rands Nightmare - The Wall Street Journal - April 17th, 2022 [April 17th, 2022]
- Members Outspoken on The Left's Priorities - AMAC - The Association of Mature American Citizens - AMAC - April 13th, 2022 [April 13th, 2022]
- In The Midst Of Election Night Success, There Are Concerns For November - Wisconsin Right Now - April 11th, 2022 [April 11th, 2022]
- OPINION | EDITORIAL: Gas on the fire - Arkansas Online - March 27th, 2022 [March 27th, 2022]
- The Right Is Still the Enemy of Freedom - Jacobin magazine - March 27th, 2022 [March 27th, 2022]
- Genetics and Geography Don't Make a Family - The Cut - March 13th, 2022 [March 13th, 2022]
- Adecoagro: The Most Inexpensive And Speculative Farmland One Can Buy - Seeking Alpha - March 13th, 2022 [March 13th, 2022]
- Why The Bioshock Film Adaptation Is Going To Be Huge - The Workprint - February 19th, 2022 [February 19th, 2022]
- The Woman Who Won't, and Wouldn't, Appear on the Quarter - New Ideal - February 17th, 2022 [February 17th, 2022]
- Letters and feedback: Feb. 13, 2021 - Florida Today - February 15th, 2022 [February 15th, 2022]
- Happy birthday to the great Ayn Rand - Press-Enterprise - February 9th, 2022 [February 9th, 2022]
- Ranking the 10 Best Manning Cast Guests During Eli and Peyton Manning's First Season - Sportscasting - January 19th, 2022 [January 19th, 2022]
- Novak Djokovic is a profile in selfishness, and sports leaders are failing us all - ESPN - January 19th, 2022 [January 19th, 2022]
- Atlas Shrugged: Part II - Wikipedia - January 11th, 2022 [January 11th, 2022]
- Atlas Shrugged: Part I (2011) - Full Cast & Crew - IMDb - January 11th, 2022 [January 11th, 2022]
- Twitter Freaks After Aaron Rodgers Touts 'Atlas Shrugged' - January 9th, 2022 [January 9th, 2022]
- Leftists completely lose it after Aaron Rodgers says Ayn ... - January 9th, 2022 [January 9th, 2022]
- Who is John Galt ? | Opinion | murrayledger.com - Murray Ledger and Times - January 9th, 2022 [January 9th, 2022]
- Wall Street is looking at Fed and the virus the wrong way, analyst says - MarketWatch - January 9th, 2022 [January 9th, 2022]
- Here's Aaron Rodgers' strong response to one NFL MVP voter - Packers Wire - January 9th, 2022 [January 9th, 2022]
- Your Opinion: Doomed to live in our mess - Jefferson City News Tribune - December 23rd, 2021 [December 23rd, 2021]
- The Remnant: Bitcoins Game Of Thrones - Bitcoin Magazine - December 23rd, 2021 [December 23rd, 2021]
- The Monster of We : Throughline - NPR - December 22nd, 2021 [December 22nd, 2021]
- Whats New on Netflix & Top 10s: December 17th, 2021 - What's on Netflix - December 22nd, 2021 [December 22nd, 2021]
- John Dutton, the Future First Spite-Governor in U.S. History - The Ringer - December 22nd, 2021 [December 22nd, 2021]
- The New Luxury Vacation: Being Dumped in the Middle of Nowhere - The New Yorker - November 25th, 2021 [November 25th, 2021]
- Top 10 medical exemptions granted to unvaccinated Conservative MPs - The Beaverton - November 25th, 2021 [November 25th, 2021]
- Capitalism's over: The man who made millions by betting the economy would never recover - New Statesman - November 19th, 2021 [November 19th, 2021]
- John Galt - Wikipedia - November 9th, 2021 [November 9th, 2021]
- Review of Edward Younkins, Exploring Atlas Shrugged: Ayn ... - November 9th, 2021 [November 9th, 2021]
- 'I wasn't an activist before that day' Newly released from prison, Vladislav Mordasov wants to put his time 'on the inside' to use Meduza - Meduza - November 5th, 2021 [November 5th, 2021]
- Elon Musk is just the latest in a long line of insecure billionaires - The Irish Times - November 5th, 2021 [November 5th, 2021]
- Atlas Shrugged II: The Strike (2012) - IMDb - November 1st, 2021 [November 1st, 2021]
- Biting the bullet on structural change The Bowdoin Orient - The Bowdoin Orient - November 1st, 2021 [November 1st, 2021]
- In the studio with Lucy McKenzie - Apollo Magazine - November 1st, 2021 [November 1st, 2021]
- Atlas Shrugged: Full Book Summary | SparkNotes - October 28th, 2021 [October 28th, 2021]
- Opinion | What 'Dune' Gets Right that 'Foundation' Doesn't - The New York Times - October 28th, 2021 [October 28th, 2021]
- Romney Says Billionaires Will Just Buy Paintings if Taxes Raised - Second Nexus - October 28th, 2021 [October 28th, 2021]
- UT Austin's Liberty Institute? What's that, professors ask - Inside Higher Ed - September 26th, 2021 [September 26th, 2021]
- FROM THE OPINION PAGE My literary palate continues to expand with each passing year - Bluefield Daily Telegraph - September 26th, 2021 [September 26th, 2021]
- Brandy Melville: Behind the Scenes at the 'Evil' Fast-Fashion Empire - Business Insider - September 8th, 2021 [September 8th, 2021]
- The Truly Amazing Al Ruddy Delivers Cry Macho After All These Years - Deadline - September 8th, 2021 [September 8th, 2021]
- 14 Best Books To Read Ever On National Read A Book Day 2021 - International Business Times - September 8th, 2021 [September 8th, 2021]
- On the frontier, trains brought progress. They still do. - Kansas Reflector - August 22nd, 2021 [August 22nd, 2021]
- Forum, Aug. 3: NH government back on a right-wing leash - Valley News - August 4th, 2021 [August 4th, 2021]
- Atlas Shrugged Part III: Who Is John Galt? - Wikipedia - August 2nd, 2021 [August 2nd, 2021]
- Atlas Shrugged: Who Is John Galt? (2014) - IMDb - August 2nd, 2021 [August 2nd, 2021]
- Of prophets, patriots, demons and the three C's - Santa Barbara News-Press - August 2nd, 2021 [August 2nd, 2021]