Monthly Archives: July 2022

The US Supreme Court: what is its role and its powers? – The Conversation

Posted: July 7, 2022 at 9:26 am

The US Supreme Court is in the news around the world. The reason: a series of decisions which are already having and will continue to have a massive impact on the lives of ordinary Americans.

The Dobbs v Jackson Womens Health Organization ruling gathered the most coverage, hardly surprising for a decision which overturned Roe v Wade and ended national protection for accessing abortion services after 49 years. But the day before, on June 23, the court also expanded the right to publicly carry weapons (in the aftermath of two mass shooting events and the passage of the first federal gun control legislation since the 1990s).

It has also fundamentally reinterpreted the relationship between church and state, by lowering what has for decades been described as the wall of separation between the institutions of government and those of the church. Holding that excluding religion from government consideration discriminates against people of faith. The ruling makes even more religion in public life possible.

And the court also restricted the power of federal agencies to take actions not explicitly handed to them by Congress. It held that the Environmental Protection Agency, a national government body, cannot regulate carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants. This could severely restrict US president Joe Bidens climate change agenda if states are no longer bound by strict carbon emissions limits.

In all of these cases the three conservative justices appointed by former president Donald Trump (Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett) were in the majority, with the courts three liberals (Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan) in the minority.

The court sits at the top of the nations legal system. On the lower level are the trial courts, those that initially hear cases, often with a jury. Then there are a level of appeals courts which hear challenges to the result or the procedure followed by the trial court. Each state then has its own supreme court responsible for interpreting state laws and constitutions. If, however, a case involves federal law or the US constitution, the document which created and governs the system of government, the parties may appeal to the supreme court.

The chances of cases reaching the supreme court are small. It is asked to review more than 8,000 cases every year and only generally accepts around 60-70 of those. The cases that do make it, though, are usually important. Since 1925 the nine justices who make up the court have held the power to decide which cases they hear. Since then, cases must meet certain criteria to be heard by the court. They must pose a substantial question of federal (national) law; there must be a genuine dispute; and there must be a legal remedy that falls within the power of the court. Understanding the court often means understanding why it took a particular case at a particular moment in time.

Judicial review is the term given to the courts power to review legislation that potentially conflicts with either federal law or the constitution, including any of the 27 amendments made since it was originally written. Among the most significant of these are the rights to freedom of religion, speech, and press (first amendment), the right to bear arms (second amendment), and the right to silence (fifth amendment).

Article III of the constitution implies the power of judicial review, since it states the powers of a supreme court shall extend to disputes under the constitution and the laws of the nation.

Those who wrote the constitution hoped to ensure the court could act as a check and a balance on the other government branches. They were fearful of creating an overly powerful central government similar to that of Britain, against which they had just fought a revolution.

Read more: The Supreme Court has curtailed EPA's power to regulate carbon pollution and sent a warning to other regulators

Judicial review was firmly established in an 1803 case, Marbury v Madison. There, the then chief justice, John Marshall, declared that not only was the constitution superior to all other ordinary legislation, but that when there was doubt about whether laws were in conflict with constitutional provisions it was the courts role to adjudicate. It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is, Marshall wrote.

The modern power of the court dates from this decision. And, although deciding the meaning of the constitution makes up a small proportion of the courts work, the principles involved are often so crucial and so divisive that these are the cases which most often make the headlines.

The court has never been far from the major political issues of the day. Marshall pushed the court towards support of greater federal power at the expense of the states, one of the fundamental questions shaping the new nation. In the middle of the 19th century, when the nation was riven by the question of slavery, a court dominated by southern slave-holding justices ruled in Dred Scott v Sandford that the constitution never intended to extend citizenship to people of African descent. The ruling deepened the tensions that led to the American Civil War.

Half a century later, in another decision widely condemned today, the court ruled that it did not violate the constitution to have separate but equal public services based on race, in this instance railroad carriages. This effectively gave legal sanction to the Jim Crow laws that would keep the southern states segregated until the court reversed itself in Brown v Board of Education in 1954. And, in the mid-1930s, as Congress and the then president, Franklin Roosevelt, sought to address the economic crisis of the Great Depression with a legislative programme known as the New Deal, a conservative court repeatedly struck down core programmes until a shift in 1936 saw the justices reverse this course. Shortly afterwards a series of retirements allowed Roosevelt to make a series of new appointments who were more sympathetic to his legislative program.

But especially in the period known as the rights revolution from the late 1950s through to the early 1970s, the court extended constitutional protections to unpopular and marginalised minorities otherwise ignored or hurt by legislatures. Jehovahs Witnesses, Seventh-Day Adventists and other religious minorities benefited from the courts broad readings of the first amendments protections for free exercise of religion.

The court also expanded protections for those in the criminal justice system, including the right to silence and the right to a lawyer, both considered basic in todays society. It ensured access to contraception for married and then single women, protected many of the gains won by the civil rights movement, and ensured fair practices in voting.

In more recent years the court has also found a constitutional right to same-sex marriage and held that the 1964 Civil Rights Act protects LGBTQ+ workers from discrimination.

The supreme court is not inherently liberal or conservative, progressive or dogmatic. As an appeals court it can only respond to the cases brought before it, and those reflect the politics, culture and temperament of the times.

The court is the product of its time and the people who constitute it at any given moment. It is shaped by individuals, usually lawyers, appointed by the sitting president when a justice retires, or dies. As such, it is never entirely removed from the political process. It has been both benefit and hindrance to the US. It has protected and trampled the rights of minorities, expanded and limited the power of the federal government, resisted and encouraged social change.

The current controversies are not new. The court has been at or near the centre of national debates since its founding. Its role as a branch of government and the power of judicial review ensure it will continue to be part of controversies large and small for decades to come.

Excerpt from:
The US Supreme Court: what is its role and its powers? - The Conversation

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on The US Supreme Court: what is its role and its powers? – The Conversation

Big lie harassment continues to take its toll in Nevada The Nevada Independent – The Nevada Independent

Posted: at 9:26 am

You may have missed the recent story on the resignation of Washoe County Registrar of Voters Deanna Spikula, who departed after 15 years on the job.

Prior to her announcement, Spikula had taken a leave of absence after receiving threats at her office from promoters of baseless claims of voter fraud. The pressure faced by Spikula and other county registrars and clerks responsible for election security in Nevada has been intense and continues even as Donald Trumps big lie continues to collapse in scandal.

In a week that saw a former White House insider calmly tell the House Jan. 6 committee that former President Trump knew many of his supporters were armed on the day they stormed the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, the departure of a respected protector of one Nevada countys election didnt rate as a top-line news event.

Maybe it should have.

It was one more troubling reminder that Trumps big lie about widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election continues to take a toll in Nevada. Its a fever that shows little sign of breaking as the 2022 campaign grinds on.

Not when sour grapes also-ran candidates can still attract crowds for their angry laments about how the primary vote was tainted. Not when Republican Party candidates for Nevadas top offices continue to tout their Trump endorsements and fail to distance themselves from a parade conspiracy of enablers.

Nor can we expect a better day when Nevadas role in Trumps fake electors scandal continues to hit close to home. Beyond Republican State Party Chairman Michael McDonald recently having his cell phone confiscated by federal investigators in connection with the Jan. 6 investigation, fellow phony elector signatory Durward James Hindle III managed to get elected clerk-treasurer in Storey County. That means one of the promoters of Trumps voter fraud scheme will be in charge of that countys election security.

Other imbibers of potent conspiracy swill include Jim Marchant, who sees a ghost in every Dominion voting machine and yet easily prevailed in his partys primary for secretary of state. He continues to campaign on the big lie throughout the rurals.

Say that Hindle represents a county populated by fewer voters than fit into a busy Walmart, that nearly empty Esmeralda Countys recent ballot hand count was kind of quaint, and that Marchant has canaries circling his head, but admit these numbers are adding up.

Its easy to laugh at super Trumper gubernatorial candidate and former boxer Joey Gilbert declaring I wuz robbed due to voter fraud and demanding a self-funded recount in the recent Republican primary. He lost to Joe Lombardo by only 26,000 votes!

Democrats seem confident its a sign that Lombardo is struggling to rally the partisans. Nevada Democratic Victory spokesperson Mallory Payne: With Joey Gilbert dead set on overturning the election, Lombardos own party is ensuring he faces a brutal general election.

That makes sense. But just remember Gilberts continued whimpering about fraud also keeps the fires of conspiracy stoked in the GOPs big lie base. And when candidates are constantly jawing about rigged elections, it erodes faith in the system and as weve seen makes grievance litigation no matter how specious a lot more likely.

Perhaps it was all to be expected from a party that ate one of its own when it censured Republican Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske for displaying the courage of her convictions by not going along with the GOPs voter fraud charade. Surely Cegavske feels Spikulas pain.

Maybe this shouldnt be surprising at a time Nevadas top-of-the-ticket Republicans continue to trumpet their Trump endorsements even as his criminal behavior comes into sharp relief.

As if U.S. Senate candidate Adam Laxalts unwavering fealty toward Trump werent enough, the state GOPs super star doesnt appear to have distanced himself from the endorsement of big lie soldier Mike Flynn. Thanks to the efforts of the Jan. 6 committee, weve learned Flynn repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in connection with the failed coup attempt.

Flynns endorsement of Laxalt was a dog whistle to all those who still imagine the election was stolen and that the violent attempted insurrection was a price paid in the name of liberty. Or some such hogwash.

Somewhat perplexing is the political holding pattern of gubernatorial nominee Lombardo, who is in the awkward position of being endorsed by Trump and embraced by former cop McDonald, the walking ethics scandal. So far top lawman Lombardo has, politically speaking, invoked his own right to remain silent. Well see how long he can keep smiling while holding his nose.

Deanna Spikula will move on, and I hope enjoy brighter days when right-wing extremists and gutless social media trolls tire of menacing her.

We owe her and others who professionally secure our elections a debt of gratitude and a promise to stand up for them.

John L. Smith is an author and longtime columnist. He was born in Henderson and his familys Nevada roots go back to 1881. His stories have appeared in Time, Readers Digest, The Daily Beast, Reuters, Ruralite and Desert Companion, among others. He also offers weekly commentary on Nevada Public Radio station KNPR.

See the original post:
Big lie harassment continues to take its toll in Nevada The Nevada Independent - The Nevada Independent

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on Big lie harassment continues to take its toll in Nevada The Nevada Independent – The Nevada Independent

BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES INC : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an…

Posted: at 9:26 am

Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.

As previously disclosed, on October 25, 2019, Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc.(the "Company"), R. L. Drake Holdings, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of theCompany, Blonder Tongue Far East, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Companyand MidCap Business Credit LLC ("MidCap") entered into a Loan and SecurityAgreement (All Assets) (the "Original Agreement"), which was subsequentlyamended by a Consent and Amendment to Loan Agreement and Loan Documents dated asof April 7, 2020 (the "First Amendment"), a Second Amendment to Loan Agreementdated as of January 8, 2021 (the "Second Amendment"), a Third Amendment to LoanAgreement dated as of June 14, 2021 (the "Third Amendment"), a Fourth Amendmentto Loan Agreement dated as of July 30, 2021 (the "Fourth Amendment"), a FifthAmendment to Loan Agreement dated as of August 26, 2021 (the "Fifth Amendment"),a Sixth Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of December 16, 2021 (the "SixthAmendment," a Seventh Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of February 11, 2022(the "Seventh Amendment"), an Eighth Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as ofMarch 3, 2022 (the "Eighth Amendment"), a Ninth Amendment to Loan Agreementdated as of April 5, 2022 (the "Ninth Amendment"), a Tenth Amendment to LoanAgreement dated as of May 5, 2022 (the "Tenth Amendment") and an EleventhAmendment to Loan Agreement dated as of June 14, 2022 (the "Eleventh Amendment")together with the Original Agreement, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment,the Third Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, the SixthAmendment, the Seventh Amendment, the Eighth Amendment, the Ninth Amendment, theTenth Amendment and the Eleventh Amendment, (the "Loan Agreement").

The parties have entered into a Twelfth Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as ofJuly 1, 2022 ("Twelfth Amendment"), to, among other things, modify the LoanAgreement's definition of "Borrowing Base" to extend the Company's WIP advanceand the amortization of the Company's overadvance facility until July 15, 2022.All other substantive terms of the Loan Agreement continue in full force andeffect.

The foregoing summary of the Twelfth Amendment is not complete and is qualifiedin its entirety by reference to the full text of the Twelfth Amendment, which isattached as Exhibit 10.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporatedherein by reference. In addition, the Original Agreement is attached as anexhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2019, the FirstAmendment is attached as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed onApril 9, 2020, the Second Amendment is attached as an exhibit to our CurrentReport on Form 8-K filed on January 11, 2021, the Third Amendment is attached asan exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2021 the FourthAmendment is attached as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed onAugust 2, 2021, the Fifth Amendment is attached as an exhibit to our CurrentReport on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2021, the Sixth Amendment is attached asan exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 17, 2021, theSeventh Amendment is attached as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-Kfiled on February 15, 2022, the Eighth Amendment is attached as an exhibit toour Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2022, the Ninth Amendment isattached as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 8, 2022,the Tenth Amendment is attached as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-Kfiled on May 5, 2022 and the Eleventh Amendment is attached as an exhibit to ourCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2022. We encourage you to read eachof the Original Agreement, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the ThirdAmendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, the Sixth Amendment, theSeventh Amendment, the Eighth Amendment, the Ninth Amendment, the TenthAmendment, the Eleventh Amendment and the Twelfth Amendment in its entirety.

Item 2.03 Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an

The information contained in Item 1.01 above with respect to the TwelfthAmendment is hereby incorporated by reference into this Item 2.03. Upon adefault under the Loan Agreement, as amended, including the non-payment ofprincipal or interest, the obligations of the borrower may be accelerated andMidCap may pursue its rights under the Loan Agreement, as amended, and therelated pledge agreement, security agreement and guaranty agreement, and underthe Uniform Commercial Code and/or any other applicable law or in equity.

Edgar Online, source Glimpses

Original post:
BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES INC : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an...

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES INC : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an…

Henry Kyereme: Could advances in technology undermine the future of humans? – Myjoyonline

Posted: at 9:24 am

One critical concern over technology is the fear that it could unleash severe havoc on humanity if misused.

Technology misuse alongside ecological disruption and the possibility of nukes misuse are viewed as the most potent existential (immediate and remote) threats to humanity.

Whilst all three threats are highly disruptive, technology misuse is receiving attention in recent times owing to technologys accessibility, speed of growth in knowledge in technological tools and, finally, the high degree of vulnerability in technology.

The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its high application could soon change humans algorithms. Already, we are witnessing an advanced form of AI with gene therapy and bionic implants; these advances may quickly change the biological makeup of humans. Moreover, their pace of evolution is advancing at a rate never seen before in biotechnological engineering.

Ultimately, these advanced AIs aim to create superior humans with additional functionalities above those of ordinary humans. This notion of human upgrade or gravitating toward the robotic status is a difficult concept to look at from a religious perspective.

However, from a scientific and sociological point of view, significant developments lend credence to the idea that humans may be tilting gradually to a robotic or somewhat unknown status.

Unsurprisingly, transhumanists have long yearned for any attempt that could alter human DNA. For instance, Stalin is on record to have immensely pursued an agenda of creating a genetically engineered army with capabilities superior to ordinary citizens.

What, however, is unclear is whether the enhancement of humans guarantees superior capacity or could end up debasing humanity.

Need I mention that this revolutionary AI advances, should they go wrong, could spell doom for humanity perpetually as there are no known full-proof standards and protocols currently in place to govern such a situation.

Indeed, all the prominent actors in the AI space, including Elon Musk, have shared their concern over AI producing significant adverse effects on humanity. It is one thing to innovate, but it takes a great deal of grit to predict accurately and put in place mitigating protocols for possible future externalities to come from todays innovation.

Undoubtedly, the human way of life in society building relationship, work, and socialization, among others have markedly changed over the last several epochs, mainly influenced by advances in technological know-how.

Technology now has become an enabler of life and, in some instances, replacing chores originally preserved for humans. The cognitive capabilities of robots and technologically engineered machines have improved so much that some robots are even alleged to be sentient.

As robots improve in cognitive capacity and assume the characteristics of humans, humans are, on the other hand shifting gradually to robotic status. The shift in humans is in two-fold: inventors of robots who control the rest of society and those controlled by robots.

The first reason humans are becoming more of robots is that in the era of increased automation, no meaningful and unique thinking apart from following processes is required to perform any particular work. Automation is seen as optimal and desirable in the world of work today, driven by efficiency and profit.

Robots are more efficient in performing some specific tasks, and if profit is the underlining consideration, it makes sense to automate to maximize such gains. In such an environment, humans require very little thinking, as robots do all the thinking for us. Beyond human enslavement to machines, the unprecedented technological advances also exacerbate the division between humans those who control us (creators of robots) and those who are controlled.

Secondly, humanitys social construct, defined based on communalism and interdependence, has fast disappeared. The social support mechanism no longer relies on broader community support but is now based on the individuals traits. Individualism freedom of action for individuals over collective or state control appears to have been embraced as a modern way of life and taken hold of us humans.

The meaning of a community where people live together and share in each others joy and pain has drastically faded. Human social bond has been damaged, and people have less sense of group identity resulting in less and less feeling toward their community or people in their community.

It is not uncommon to have individuals live in a particular community for years and yet not notice or identify as neighbours. The proliferation of internet and new media have exacerbated individualism as people now prefer and can build a virtual community of their own without support from their locality.

The unintended consequences of technology could be addressed if regulation is brought to the front burner of policy discourse. Without such deliberate action, the world may struggle if artificial intelligence goes wrong.

In the same vein, the world could be surprised by the exploits of the bad guys who constantly seek to take advantage of cyber-systems vulnerabilities to harm innocent users. Undeniably, there are many vulnerabilities in technology.

These vulnerabilities have always been the conduit for bad geeks to either advance their interest or sometimes that of a sponsored State[s]. As a result, cyber-attacks on national, regional, corporations networks and sometimes on individuals have become common. The pain often inflicted on technology users by these bad guys becomes unmeasurable and often results in the loss of lives and property of those attacked.

Another critical concern is that as humans become more robotized, thereby seeking unending bliss and superiority, isnt there a possibility that they may become more powerful such that they too will begin to exploit cyberspace vulnerabilities and afflict more misery on unassuming technology users?

Moreover, what will be the faith of those already enslaved by technology in such space? Indeed, these questions are possibilities one cannot overlook since the desires of transhumanists to have an unending bliss of life will come at a cost and who must bear that cost?

Therefore, one must be careful with technology as its misuse could spell doom for humanity and possibly extinguish humankind forever.

****

Henry Kyeremeh

Kyeremeh@gmail.com

Co-Founder, iWatch Africa

Continued here:
Henry Kyereme: Could advances in technology undermine the future of humans? - Myjoyonline

Posted in Transhumanist | Comments Off on Henry Kyereme: Could advances in technology undermine the future of humans? – Myjoyonline

Iris Van Herpen Explores Life Beyond the Physical Realm for A/W 22 Couture – vmagazine.com

Posted: at 9:24 am

The groundbreaking designer continued to push the mold forward with a transcendent show for couture week in Paris.

The groundbreaking designer continued to push the mold forward with a transcendent show for couture week in Paris.

Iris Van Herpen, fashions most future-forward designer, looked to the past for her Autumn/Winter 2022 couture show. Inspired by the many identities from OvidsMetamorphoses, from Arachne, to Narcissus, to Apollo, to Daphne, the collection explores oscillating identities and life beyond our physical bodies.

Of course, Herpen didnt forget the future, crafting the collection with eye on the metaverse. As such, the collection, which explores both hyperreality in the digital realm and expands upon introspection in fashion, is called Meta Morphosis (emphasis on the meta.)

Though the meta component of the collection couldnt be showcased in Paris, Herpen worked with a team from Microsoft to create a mixed runway experience, where digital avatars as seen through HoloLens 2 technologywere set to walk alongside models, coexisting in their multiple realities.

Despite the technical difficulties (the Microsoft team got sick) the Meta Morphosis show still paid homage to Ovids centuries-old theme of transhumanism, and the modern theme of blurred lines between physical and digital.

The collection, which was the brands 15th anniversary showcase, included 16 couture looks, built upon Herpens prior technological innovations, like the 3-D printed dresses from 2009. With gradient dyes, unspun laces, and translucent layers, the collection reimagines some of the brands most iconic looks from years past. As is traditional for Herpen, the collection mostly stuck with a general color scheme of light and dark, though there were some unusual shades of amethyst and metallic copper.

Herpen worked with Dutch designers Eric Klarenbeek and Maartje Dro to create the 3-D printed Singularity jumpsuit, using sustainable materials like cocoa shell beans. Other sustainable elements include a biodegradable silk from a species of banana called Abaca, native to the Philippines, created by ForWeavers, and 100 percent recycled Mylar from Solaris.

The use of upcycled materials works to further eliminate the distinctions between man and nature, physical and digital. Herpen also worked with sculptor Casey Curran to create a statue of a future Daphne, bursting from the center of the runway.

By continuing to push the limits of fashion, Herpen has cemented herself as a designer of the future - the Meta Morphosis collection is merely proof of that.

Credits: Images courtesy of Iris Van Herpen.

View post:
Iris Van Herpen Explores Life Beyond the Physical Realm for A/W 22 Couture - vmagazine.com

Posted in Transhumanist | Comments Off on Iris Van Herpen Explores Life Beyond the Physical Realm for A/W 22 Couture – vmagazine.com

Virtual Beauty, Virtual Freedom, Virtual Love: Is the Metaverse Our Future? – PRESSENZA International News Agency

Posted: at 9:24 am

When is the last time you were outside in the morning to experience a glorious dawn? Or sat watching the sun set across the ocean horizon?

How do you feel when you touch the skin of someone you love? A grandparent, parent, lover or child?

Have you ever seen a spiders web full of morning dew, or after the rain, when the sun is shining through the droplets in the web to reveal the flashing diamonds, sapphires, rubies and emeralds hidden within?

Have you ever stood in a natural environment a beach, desert, rainforest far from a city and noticed that strange and subtle feeling of freedom tremor through your body?

Have you ever marveled at the breath of wind that cools your face on a hot Summers day? Or been intoxicated by the smell of blossom in Spring?

Have you gaped in wonder at the birth of new life: a chick pecking out of its shell, a seed germinating or a baby being born?

Or paused to ponder the sheer magic of being alive yourself?

Or do you find life in the real physical world too constricting, painful, frightening and demanding: something from which you seek to escape, with some distraction or another (work, television, sport, a novel, a drug), as often as you can?

Well, very soon now, we are promised, you will be able to escape reality far more effectively than those primitive means of distraction made possible previously. And far more effectively than even the outcomes promised in those dystopian novels.

So the fundamental questions we must ask ourselves are simple: Do you want real life, with all of the pains, sorrows, fear and fury that go along with beauty, freedom and love? Or do you believe what they tell us and want everything unpleasant to go away? Permanently. And to live in delusion thereafter, given synthetic versions of all of the pleasant feelings and experiences described above?

Remember the dialogue between the Savage and Mustapha Mond during the closing stages of Aldous Huxleys dystopian novel Brave New World?

But I dont want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.

In fact, said Mustapha Mond, youre claiming the right to be unhappy.

All right then, said the Savage defiantly, Im claiming the right to be unhappy.

Not to mention the right to grow old and ugly and impotent; the right to have syphilis and cancer; the right to have too little to eat; the right to be lousy; the right to live in constant apprehension of what may happen tomorrow; the right to catch typhoid; the right to be tortured by unspeakable pains of every kind.

There was a long silence.

I claim them all, said the Savage at last.

Well, after nearly one hundred years, the dystopian future described by Huxley is almost upon us and, if we are to defeat it, we need a lot more savages willing to forego the promised comforts.

Because if those who see themselves as our global masters get their way, we are about to enter a virtual world that will become more complete by the day and from which there will be no escape.

The Metaverse

Based on many years of effort, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has recently launched its plan to create our new all-digital world, called the metaverse. See Defining and Building the Metaverse.

So if you find natural phenomena ranging from rainforests, beaches and weather variations to ill-health, danger and unhappiness annoying, you will soon be able to escape them, compliments of the metaverse. Or so we are promised. And you wont be troubled by anything resembling what might be called free will either. You will be content to do as you are told, even more than you are content to do already. See Terrified of Freedom: Why Most Human Beings are Embracing the Global Elites Technotyranny.

After all, your mind will no longer be your own. And while the usual descriptions, written by elite agents, fail to mention it, a quick flash of metaverse-induced fear will make sure that you comply, whatever you are required to do. The point is this: You wont be escaping all of those unpleasant feelings after all. They can just be used to control you more directly, to fulfill an elite-determined purpose. But that is a fact they are not advertising.

In their iconic hit song In the Year 2525, written in 1964 by Rick Evans and later recorded by he and Denny Zager to become a No.1. hit around the world in 1969, Evans captured key elements of what is already upon us somewhat ahead of the schedule mapped out in the song.

[Chorus 2]

In the year 3535

Aint gonna need to tell the truth, tell no lies

Everything you think, do, and say

Is in the pills you took today

[Chorus 3]

In the year 4545

Aint gonna need your teeth, wont need your eyes

You wont find a thing to chew

Nobodys gonna look at you

[Chorus 4]

In the year 5555

Your arms are hanging limp at your sides

Your legs got nothing to do

Some machines doing that for you

[Chorus 5]

In the year 6565

Aint gonna need no husband, wont need no wife

Youll pick your sons, pick your daughters too

From the bottom of a long glass tube

Whoa-oh-oh

So what is the Metaverse?

According to the WEF: The metaverse is a future persistent and interconnected virtual environment where social and economic elements mirror reality. Users can interact with it and each other simultaneously across devices and immersive technologies while engaging with digital assets and property. See Defining and Building the Metaverse.

Moreover, if technologists are right that 2022 will separate thinkers from builders, then last years technical advances will produce this years first steps towards making the metaverse a reality.

But from the perspective of the human experience, one development stands out above all others: extended reality (XR) technologies. These include virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and brain-computer interfaces (BCI), which together position themselves as the next computing platforms in their own right.

Nevertheless, it is clear that a precise definition of the term metaverse (for a start: is it a product, service, place or moment in time?), upon which there is broad agreement even among those who routinely use the term, is yet to emerge. See 3 technologies that will shape the future of the metaverse and the human experience.

Having written that, here is one definition elaborated in the article above that reveals just how far some of those heavily involved in this work have become disconnected from any sense of themselves and, hence, reality: Specifically, the metaverse is the moment at which our digital lives our online identities, experiences, relationships, and assets become more meaningful to us than our physical lives. The original quotation can be read here: Spheres of Self: Performativity and Parasociality in the Metaverse.

And, as Cathy Li describes it, the metaverse is most useful as a lens through which to view ongoing digital transformation. The belief is that virtual worlds, incorporating connected devices, blockchain and other tech, will be so commonplace that the metaverse will become an extension of reality itself. See Who will govern the metaverse?

Let me reiterate two points from the paragraphs immediately above: our digital lives become more meaningful to us than our physical lives. And the metaverse will become an extension of reality itself.

Really?

While statements such as these reveal the breathtaking level of insanity that underpins this entire enterprise see The Global Elite is Insane Revisited it does not mean that we are not under enormous threat. Just as vast arsenals of nuclear weapons, by some insane logic, are supposed to provide us with security while actually threatening the existence of all life on Earth, the metaverse is part of a substantial package of measures that will reduce human life to one not worth living.

Why? Well, as noted by authors such as Tom Valovic: The metaverse is one element in the path to implementing technocratic governance over all of humanity.

As Planet Earth and our physical world continue to experience massive biospheric degradation and disruption, the elites that are now in many cases pulling the strings of governance at the country level are heading for the exit doors. Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are exploring the realm of space and Musk has a Mars mission planned. Globally oriented elites looked out for themselves which is what they do best.

Paralleling the notion of space flight as a form of existential escapism is the metaverse. So what if our cities are crumbling, infrastructures falling apart, and the biosphere is seriously degrading? So what if our wasteful consumer-driven lifestyle has created unprecedented levels of pollution so extensive that its now the number one cause of health problems globally? No problem well just kick back and don our Meta headsets (or worse get a brain implant) and escape into an artificially fabricated world that lets us turn our back on the massive ecological and environmental problems we now face. See Why We Should Reject Mark Zuckerbergs Dehumanizing Vision of a Metaverse.

Education in the Metaverse

Of course, the metaverse is deeply interwoven with other components of their plan, such as those in relation to what they call education, which is more accurately described as the process by which young transhuman slaves are programmed to perform their function in the technocratic economy that is being imposed upon us. Of course, education sounds better than virtual programming of young transhuman slaves so, in the interests of not raising obvious concerns, the word education has been used.

As noted by Dr. Michael Nevradakis, discussions on this subject at the recent gathering of the World Economic Forum emphasized the importance of virtual reality (VR) and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies with participants touting the purported educational and economic benefits that would derive from use of these technologies in the classroom by helping, according to Dr. Ali Saeed Bin Harmal Al Dhaheri & Dr. Mohamad Ali Hamade, to increase accessibility, enhance quality and improve the affordability of education globally. See Experiential learning and VR will reshape the future of education.

However, as Nevradakisalso noted, these discussions had little to say about the need to protect childrens data or digital identities or, for that matter, providing the types of early-life experiences children require as part of their socialization. See Future of Education? WEFs Vision Heavy on Virtual Reality and AI Technologies, Light on Privacy Concerns.

Of course, there is no need for concern about the early-life experiences of those young transhumans who are being programmed for decades of servitude prior to being terminated when they are no longer functional.

Beyond claimed educational and economic benefits, however, some authors argue that digitalizing education can play a role in easing pressures on the environment and climate. How so? Nevradakis again: Indeed, the WEF said the use of textbooks, notebooks and pencils as critical learning tools is on the way out, due to environmental pressures and COP26 goals (from the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference), which will drive the digitalizing of education streams. See Future of Education? WEFs Vision Heavy on Virtual Reality and AI Technologies, Light on Privacy Concerns

But it is clearly delusional to suggest that the use of textbooks, notebooks and pencils has greater adverse impact on the environment and climate than the environmental cost and climate impact of producing sophisticated technology for each student. And despite claims of improved affordability it is equally delusional to ignore the economic and social cost, for example, to the child laborers in the Congo working in appalling conditions to extract strategic minerals to produce this technology. See Humanitys Dirty Little Secret: Starving, Enslaving, Raping, Torturing and Killing our Children.

Besides, as touched on below, education is already a monstrous experience, destroying the Selfhood of the child so that they become submissively obedient. Removing the bulk of educationsremaining social component by technologizing it can only make it even worse.

Babies in the Metaverse

Then again, maybe children will no longer be put through school. It simply wont be necessary because children, for transhuman slaves at least, will no longer exist.

By 2070, the metaverse will offer you virtual babies, environmentally-friendly digital children, according to UK artificial intelligence (AI) expert Catriona Campbell. Parents will see and interact with their offspring through next-generation AR [augmented reality] glasses and haptic gloves. The latter devices enable users to experience a realistic sense of touch when handling virtual or holographic objects. As a bonus, these children take up no space, cost nothing to feed and remain healthy, if that is what you want, for as long as they are programmed to live. A subscription might cost as little as $25 each month.

And if this seems like a monumental leap out of reality to you, Campbell also believes that within 50 years technology will have advanced to such an extent that babies which exist in the metaverse are indistinct from those in the real world. As the metaverse evolves, I can see virtual children becoming an accepted and fully embraced part of society in much of the developed world.See Virtual babies who grow up in real time will be commonplace by 2070, expert predicts.

Thats right, Campbell is claiming that within 50 yearsbabies which exist in the metaverse are indistinct from those in the real world! Pause a moment. How does that sound to you?

Just in case you cannot wait, you are welcome to start using early versions now. See, for example, Virtual Baby, Adopt a Virtual Baby and My Virtual Child.

Oh, and by the way, you wont be having sex either, whether for reproductive purposes or otherwise. You will prefer virtual sex. See Sex And Pornography Aim To Strike Gold In The Metaverse.

Critiquing the Metaverse

Beyond the criticisms already noted above, there area great many other criticisms of the metaverse and the role it will play in the overall elite program being implemented under what the WEF callsits Great Reset. This comprehensive program will transform human society and human life for those people left alive after the eugenics component has been fully implemented. See The Final Battle for Humanity: It is Now or Never in the Long War Against Homo Sapiens.

If you like, you can read a little more about what the masters of this metaverse intend for us, as well as critiques of it, by authors such as these.

Derrick Broze: While some people may not intend for The Metaverse to become an all encompassing reality that supersedes physical reality, for the Zuckerbergs, Microsofts, and WEFs of the world, that is exactly what they intend for The Metaverse. For the billionaire class and their puppet organizations, such as the WEF and the United Nations, the Metaverse offers up the potential to commandeer all life into digital prisons where the people can be charged for services and products in the digital realm. With the people of the world safely tucked into their digital beds, the Technocrats could complete their total takeover of natural resources, the economy, and humanity itself. See The Great Narrative And The Metaverse, Part 2: Will The Metaverse End Human Freedom?

Dr. Michael Nevradakis: Who will govern the metaverse? According to the WEF, real-world governance models represent one possible option for metaverse governance. However, far from referring to constitutionally defined institutions of governance, with checks and balances, the WEF cites Facebooks Oversight Board as an example of such a real-world governance model. See WEF Launches Metaverse Initiative, Predicts Digital Lives Will Become More Meaningful to Us Than Our Physical Lives.

But an earlier World Economic Forum report from its Global Redesign Initiative was more blunt: The report postulates that a globalized world is best managed by a coalition of multinational corporations, governments (including through the UN system) and select civil society organizations (CSOs). See Sustainable Development Goals and Human Rights p. 209, citing Everybodys Business: Strengthening International Cooperation in a More Interdependent World.

So if you believe that you and I are destined to have a say in the metaverse that is unfolding, you would be wise to keep investigating. Elite proposals are invariably very distant from the type of governance models usually considered by ordinary people in a multiplicity of contexts, where the emphasis is on facilitating widespread grassroots participation, not rule by technocrats.

You can read considerably more about what our technocratic overlords have in mind including the existing trade in such things as virtual real estate, virtual clothing and virtual art and what is wrong with it, in the articles on the metaverse published by Patrick Wood on Technocracy News & Trends: Metaverse. And there is more in articles such as these: The Top 10 Creepiest and Most Dystopian Things Pushed by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and How Our Lives Could Soon Look: The World Economic Forum Posts An Insane Dystopian Video.

And heres another simple issue to ponder. Remember how I mentioned above that a quick flash of metaverse-induced fear would ensure that you complied with an elite-determined directive, how does the idea of eating bugs, processed sewage and human flesh appeal? Well, given that your mind will no longer be your own, what appeals now, or doesnt, will be irrelevant once the metaverse is determining how you perceive things. See Canadian Company Pledges To Produce TWO BILLION BUGS Per Year For Human Consumption and Will You Eat Cultured Meat Grown From Human Cells?

You will eat Soylent Green because that is what the program tells you.

So why are people embracing the Metaverse?

In a recent article in which he described taking his son to watch a film through 3D glasses, Charles Eisenstein noted The on-screen reality was so vivid, stimulating and intense that it made the real world seem boring by comparison. See Transhumanism and the Metaverse.

How can this happen?

Because we terrorize our children into submissive obedience, devoid of the unique and powerful individual Self they were gifted by evolution at birth. See Why Violence?,Fearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology: Principles and Practiceand Do We Want School or Education? Why? Essentially to keep them performing tasks that bore them senseless throughout their school and working life.

Fundamentally, this terrorization works because it compels our children into suppressing awareness of how they feel. As a result, only the most intense experiences register emotionally: The capacity to experience a subtle feeling has been lost. And without this capacity, they cannot develop into the powerful, courageous Self-willed individuals that evolution intended. They are human relics. Ready and willing to be turned into a transhuman slave in the unconscious hope they will be finally able to experience, in the metaverse, what was taken from them in the real world as a child.

But they wont get that experience, even in the metaverse. It is not what the elite has in mind for us.

Resisting the Metaverse

Of course, the metaverse is just one feature of the Global Elite agenda that is being imposed upon us. And it is not enough to resist individual features of the Great Reset program. We must strategically resist its most fundamental elements so that the entire agenda is defeated.

If you are inclined to join those strategically resisting the Great Reset and its related agendas, you are welcome to participate in the We Are Human, We Are Free campaign which identifies a list of 30 strategic goals for doing so.

In addition and more simply, you can download a one-page flyer that identifies a short series of crucial nonviolent actions that anyone can take. This flyer, now available in 16 languages (Czech, Danish, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Spanish & Slovak) with more languages in the pipeline, can be downloaded from here: The 7 Days Campaign to Resist the Great Reset.

If strategically resisting the Great Reset (and related agendas) appeals to you, consider joining the We Are Human, We Are Free Telegram group (with a link accessible from the website).

And if you want a child who is powerfully able to perceive the dysfunctional lure of the metaverse, and is able to join you in resisting it, consider making My Promise to Children.

CONCLUSION

So, for just a little longer, the choice is yours.

Read more here:
Virtual Beauty, Virtual Freedom, Virtual Love: Is the Metaverse Our Future? - PRESSENZA International News Agency

Posted in Transhumanist | Comments Off on Virtual Beauty, Virtual Freedom, Virtual Love: Is the Metaverse Our Future? – PRESSENZA International News Agency

How Google is Amplifying Alternative Youth Culture – THISDAY Newspapers

Posted: at 9:22 am

The technology company Google is keen on building a home for African creators who are promoting the Alternative movement through its platforms such as YouTube. It demonstrated this in a recent two-day programme in Nairobi, Kenya, for 25 creators from different parts of the continent, Isioma Usiade witnessed the event

The Alternative Movement, colloquially known as the Alt Movement, is getting the spotlight from the technology company Google. Recently, the company hosted a two-day Residency Programmein Nairobi, Kenya for creators who identify as Alternative and Non-mainstream.

Similar to a Bootcamp, the two-day program was aimed at upskilling and celebrating 25 young creatives whose idea of being misfits or nonconformists is not easily acceptable in mainstream media. The movement champions unconventional self-expression in all aspects of life but mainly through music, fashion and visual arts.

The creatives were a mixed bag. They were alternative artists, and creative and cultural arts journalists from Nigeria, South Africa, Accra, Botswana, Kenya and other parts of the continent.

The Alt Community is an emerging culture that is uniquely African and is increasing in popularity among the Gen Z demographic. Alt, short for Alternative, originated as an avenue for unconventional self-expression that transcends the traditional. At the centre of the Alt movement, is the desire to remain sincere to oneself regardless of existing traditions or cultural restrictions.

The Alt movement arguably has its origin in Nigeria, with musical Artists like Teezee, BOJ, Tems, Odunsi and Lady Donli, driving the movement but the sub-culture is visible among young Africans across the continent. Sichangi, from Kenya and Amaarae from Ghana, are among the musical artists from other parts of Africa who are propagating Alt sounds. Beyond music, Alt has grown as a lifestyle and its influence is also visible in fashion and the visual arts. Mowalola and Tse are some of the creative influencers that are driving the Alt movement in fashion and photography respectively.

There is also a growing number of creative entrepreneurs in the Alt community. These young individuals are running their own businesses and thriving within Africas creative ecosystem. By optimising the internet, they are carving their distinctive identity and propagating the growth of the Alt community in Africa.

Historically, alternative youth culture is rarely recognised in mainstream media, therefore creators have turned to YouTube to connect with their audiences because there are no barriers to entry.

Speaking during the Residency, Sharon Machira, Communication and Public Affairs Manager for Google Kenya said, Its exciting to see creators that identify as non-mainstream find community on our platform. This comes just a few days after we announced a call for applications for the YouTube Black Voices Fund for 2023 aimed at elevating marginalised voices.

The residency aims toamplify the impact of the Alt movement in Africa and the world. We also want to showcase how products like YouTube and YouTube Shorts and platforms like Google Arts and Culture can help drive the culture forward, added Machira.

Recent Google Search trends from across Africa show an increase in `Alt related searches from 2020, with questions like What is alt?, Who is an alt? and How to dress alt?, being the most searched alt related questions.

Google, through the Alt Residency, is spotlighting and contributing to Africas cultural zeitgeist by exposing Alt creatives and expressionists to skills that can be harnessed through the lens of YouTube, YouTubeShorts, Search and Google Arts and Culture, and enable creatives to scale up in their businesses and career.

The Residency ran from Tuesday, June 28 to Thursday, June 30, 2022, and helped them learn how to better connect with their audiences and move the culture forward. They will be equipped with entrepreneurial skills on how they can enhance the visibility of their brands.

Google also invited Tshepo the Jeans maker for an interactive fireside career talk with the young creative entrepreneurs on how to further build and monetise their brands.

Follow this link:

How Google is Amplifying Alternative Youth Culture - THISDAY Newspapers

Posted in Zeitgeist Movement | Comments Off on How Google is Amplifying Alternative Youth Culture – THISDAY Newspapers

The revolution will be televised: why we are witnessing a big-boss backlash – The Guardian

Posted: at 9:22 am

The cultural zeitgeist around work is changing. Last week, many of us will have been frantically adjusting our journeys amid nationwide train strikes. If the transport gods were merciful, we will have got home in time for the latest episode of Sherwood, a twisty drama about the legacy of the miners strike. You may have just finished Apple TVs Severance, which depicts a future where work is so bleak the only way it can get done is by creating alternate versions of ourselves. Now we have Minions: Rise of Gru which asks if there is a place in todays world for a morally compromised but lovable boss supported by a legion of subservient, amorphous workers.

Having worked in retail in the mid-to-late 2010s, no collection of words makes me shudder like: It might seem crazy what Im bout to say. This is the opening line to Pharrell Williamss Happy, as featured on the Despicable Me 2 soundtrack, which was blasted across shop floors like audible amphetamine to keep workers conscious and adequately cheery. The song also defined much of the 2010s, frantically screaming at us to be happy while the world around us, in many ways, became increasingly grim. The Despicable Me franchise also loomed large in the same era, becoming the highest-grossing animated film series of all time in the space of seven years. The films breakout stars the Minions were ubiquitous throughout the decade. They were plastered on everything from tic tacs to salad bags and Amazon parcels, they led Zumba classes and adorned the tops of NYC yellow taxis. They were quite literally everywhere.

When the first Despicable Me film was released in 2010, ultra-rich business moguls received a mostly positive reception in popular culture. Elon Musk guest-starred in an episode of The Simpsons in 2015 where he was presented as a world-saving genius whose immense wealth was a secondary concern. The episode ends with Musk rocketing off into the sky like a tech-bro Mary Poppins. In the same year, Steve Jobs was eulogised as a troubled visionary in the Danny Boyle-directed biopic. But the seeds of a big business backlash were planted with The Big Short, which lamented Wall Streets role in the 2008 financial crash.

In the years since, the cultural backlash against the ultra-rich has only intensified. 2019s Joker reimagined the aristocratic Wayne family as a cruel, selfish clan while recontextualising the villains rampage as a tragic consequence of a failing society. Dont Look Up, which saw a Jobs-esque billionaire annihilate our planet after promising (and subsequently failing) to stop a comet filled with lucrative minerals from crashing into Earth became the second most-watched film in Netflixs history last December. Earlier this year, The Dropout, Super Pumped and WeCrashed, three shows about Silicon Valley entrepreneurs meteoric rises and cant-look-away falls debuted within weeks of each other, all but cementing popular cultures assault against this once vaunted section of society.

This shift isnt confined to English-language fare. The best picture-winning Parasite resonated around the world with its wildly entertaining exploration of wealth inequality. Squid Game twisted universal fears about debt into a gore bonanza. Javier Bardem plays a factory owner who meddles in the lives of his employees in order to win a business award in the Spanish film The Good Boss (on release later this month in the UK). An exploration of the toxic impact of work and its overreach into our personal lives, the film is another addition to this burgeoning canon of pro-worker, anti-big boss on-screen work.

The parallels between Gru, the supervillain protagonist of the series, and the legion of ultra-rich business moguls in the public eye is striking. Like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, Gru is interested in space exploration. Perhaps most potent, he has a workforce so voiceless and obedient, these bosses would probably salivate with envy. Though, in this area, he faces tough competition from Bezos and Amazon where warehouse workers report frequent injuries and fear of getting fired for not packing enough items an hour while their delivery drivers are so overworked, they have to urinate in bottles.

Most revealingly, real-world corporate culture loves the Minions. HR managers use them as a not so subversive allegory for their workforce. On LinkedIn, you will find many posts about the lessons workers could learn from the Minions, from offering colleagues a helping hand to eating bananas to stay productive or even that having a big bad boss is desirable. Minions, in their eyes, are what workers should be loyal, infantile and replaceable.

The cultural shift against work and big business has opened a vacuum that the burgeoning workers movement is filling. As workers from all sorts of jobs, from barristers to call centre staff, vote for strike action, it is likely that the political and cultural landscape will only tilt further towards pro-worker sentiment. Perhaps it is time to lay the cute-as-a-button do-badders to rest.

Here is the original post:

The revolution will be televised: why we are witnessing a big-boss backlash - The Guardian

Posted in Zeitgeist Movement | Comments Off on The revolution will be televised: why we are witnessing a big-boss backlash – The Guardian

The Origin of Vibes – The Atlantic

Posted: at 9:22 am

Vibes has become a ubiquitous word in the past half decade, one many people now reach for when describing the distinct emotion given off by a place, or a thing. It is the prevailing shorthand for a cultural atmosphere, mood, and zeitgeist.

Vibe talk has also entered politics. In this magazine in 2021, Derek Thompson invited readers to think of politics as a vibes war. This spring, again in these pages, David A. Graham argued that John Fetterman won the Democratic Senate primary for Pennsylvania less on policy than on vibes. And Rolling Stone pronounced that Fetterman was neither centrist nor a progressive. Hes a vibe.

To the political commentator Will Stancil, vibes is the idea that politics is rooted in and governed by mass psychology, which makes political behavior intrinsically difficult (and sometimes impossible) to model as a series of quantifiable inputs and predictable outputs, the approach favored by econometrically-inclined disciplines.

In place of data, vibe-talk promises instead to capture deeper emotional currents. What interests me about this form of analysis is that it is a rejection of analysis itself. Its a way of saying: Numbers lie, and emotion always lurks beneath the surface, so lets stop pretending. It expresses the suspicion that dry objectivity is never quite sufficient.

Read: The vibe shift on Capitol Hill

What also interests me is that, not too long ago, the commentators who reach for vibes now would have reached for charisma, and that latter word may help us understand what vibes conveys about emotional politics today.

The rejection of hard evidence in favor of emotional intuition is one of the oldest moves in modern political thought. At the end of the 18th century, Romanticism pushed back against empiricism, as symbolized in William Blakes 1795 painting of Isaac Newton: The scientists obsession with measurement leads him to literally turn his back on the natural world. In the 19th century, positivists like Auguste Comte, who believed that society could be explained in coldly scientific ways, split with anti-positivists like Friedrich Nietzsche, who argued for more subjective, affective approaches. Perhaps the most influential of these anti-positivists was the German sociologist Max Weber, and among his more influential contributions was the word charisma.

Charisma comes from the ancient Greek for gift for grace. Its classical origins give it a timeless feel. Yet its modern usage is only a century old. In the 1910s, Weber dusted off this obscure theological term to describe forms of political authority based on the extraordinary powers of specific individuals. Charisma, he argued, is the specifically creative revolutionary force in human history.

Heres how Weber described the concept in his posthumous 1920 book, Sociology of Religion:

Not every person has the capacity to achieve the ecstatic states which are viewed, in accordance with rules of experience, as the pre-conditions for producing certain effects in meteorology, healing, divination, and telepathy. It is primarily, though not exclusively, these extraordinary powers that have been designated by such special terms as Mana, Orenda, and the Iranian Maga (the term from which our word magic is derived). We shall henceforth employ the term charisma for such extraordinary powers.

Weber, famous as a chief architect of modern social science, was not rejecting nonempirical, magical ideas such as telepathy, the Polynesian mana, or the Iroquois orenda, but repackaging them. Rather than economic forces or ideologies, it was the ecstatic state between rulers and their followers that explained politics.

This new usage remained obscure for almost half a century. Charisma owes its popularity to its journey across the Atlantic, where it was enthusiastically adopted first by postwar American intellectuals sympathetic to Weber, and then by a mass public eager to explain the new world of televisual political celebrity.

In 1949, the sociologist and journalist Daniel Bell tried to slip the word into a Fortune magazine piece only to have it rejected by the editors as elite jargon. But within two decades, the word was widespread enough for a 1969 piece in Time to call it one of the dominant clichs of the 1960s. Google Books data confirm this, showing charisma and charismatic leaping 1,700 percent from 1940 to 1970, and continuing the same exponential curve through to the 2000s, by which time it had grown 6,000 percent.

The 1960s articles that introduced the concept to the American public are eerily like todays vibe think pieces: They acknowledge that the word mystifies rather than clarifies, yet embrace its value as an alternative to dry analysis. The big thing in politics these days is charisma, pronounced karizma, an April 1968 New York Times piece told a readership it clearly assumed to be new to the word. Noting how the idea was being used to describe the mysterious powers of political figures such as Stokely Carmichael and Bobby Kennedy to enchant audiences, the author concluded that charisma was a symbol for telling a complex story in simple terms.

From the September 2016 issue: The charisma effect

Six months later in the same paper, a multipage splash by Richard Lingeman under the title The Greeks Had a Word for ItBut What Does It Mean? championed charisma and suggested that the word persists perhaps because it reflects some deep-rooted need we have to believe in the magic of personality. A need, he added, that was quite separate from traditional demands of proof, evidence, or data.

When it was embraced in the 1960s, charisma offered a way of talking about the ever more entwined worlds of politics, celebrity, Hollywood, and television. It gave a secular label to a mood of spiritual resistance to existing institutions, and not coincidentally, gave its name to the charismatic movement in evangelical American Protestantism. Above all, charisma was useful as a way of avoiding reliance on statistics or technical analysis and a deft means of side-stepping ideological sciences of history such as Marxism or liberalism.

These anti-empirical qualities inspired many lines of attack. In 1968 the British sociologist Peter Worsley thought charisma a hopelessly blunt instrument; in the 1980s, the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu derided it as a means of escape from having to think about social relations; in 2009, the American political theorist Fredric Jameson dismissed it as an utterly useless pseudo-concept that led away from lived realities.

Yet, again, the take-up of charisma suggests that most people simply found the term useful.

Even those contemporary commentators, such as Matt Yglesias, who pour scorn on the imprecision of vibes today are content to use the equally anti-empirical charisma.

Is this shift from charisma to vibes merely history repeating itself, or is vibes doing something different from its illustrious predecessor? The answer is yes, and yes.

Like charisma, vibes can be seen as an artifact of the 1960s, specifically the good vibrations language of the counterculture borrowed from older esoteric traditions that described social relations as vibratory. As Google Books data testify, vibrations were a particularly important part of 19th-century language, peaking in the 1880s at the height of the Spiritualist movement. Hippie revival of this language owed as much to Victorian sances as it did to California communes.

Derek Thompson: Democrats are getting crushed in the vibes war

Both vibes and charisma make the case that politics is experiential. Where charisma appealed to a 20th-century discourse with its whiff of classical antiquity, however, vibes today instead meets the needs of a looser, self-consciously atomized algorithmic world. Where charisma was admiring and grand, vibes is noncommittal and irreverent. Charisma, like glamour, is about an exotic superiority: Someone with compelling vibes can be extremely ordinary, and in fact the very vibe they communicate can be that of ordinariness.

And where charisma describes an individuals power, vibes focuses attention on collective emotion. Rather than describing gifted or extraordinary people, modern vibe-talk puts the significance back on the crowd. This emphasis was present in 19th-century Spiritualist uses of vibes. Some people had a stronger relationship to shared spiritual vibrations in the ether than others, and they could perceive and then channel an ambient mood. They might be unnaturally empathetic or open to the vibes. But they werent where the power truly lay.

In this way, vibe-talk reaches back beyond charisma to describe a fascination with people, like Fetterman, who seem to have a powerful receptivity to their immediate milieu. In place of hero worship and subordination, vibes is all about authenticity and what the philosopher Robin James calls sympathetic resonance.

The tools we use to describe political psychology matter. As linguistics and psychologists are eager to point out, metaphors and abstract nouns are not just linguistic conventions but real elements of thought that control how we think. Tracing their rise and fall offers a window into shifting values.

The vibe-shift away from data and dry analysis might simply be a fad. But it also allows us to measure the distance between the ideas that younger and older generations hold about the individual, about collective emotion, and about the politics of language itself.

The rest is here:

The Origin of Vibes - The Atlantic

Posted in Zeitgeist Movement | Comments Off on The Origin of Vibes – The Atlantic

4 Powerful Photography Exhibitions Will Debut at the National Portrait Gallery This Year – AFAR Media

Posted: at 9:22 am

From photographs of remarkable Black women to an exploration of the definition of kinship, these new exhibits explore the breadth of the modern American experience.

The saying goes that good things come in threes, but four good things are coming to Washington, D.C.s Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery this year. Over the course of the summer and fall, the museum will show four new exhibits that examine what it means to be an American today.

Opening July 8, I Dream a World: Selections from Brian Lankers Portraits of Remarkable Black Women will showcase a selection of portraits of contemporary Black American women whove shaped the country with their work in the arts, literature, activism, and politics. Next up, One Life: Maya Lin takes a biographical look at the award-winning Asian American architect behind D.C.s Vietnam Veterans Memorial (September 30April 16, 2023). Kinship, which features more than 40 works by eight U.S. photographers, explores the interpersonal relationships that bind us (October 28January 27, 2024). And slated to debut November 10 is Portrait of a Nation: 2022 Honorees, which pays respect to seven notable Americans who have made a significant impact on the country in the past year.

Together, the four exhibits create a poignant representation of the ever-evolving, modern American identity and the commonalities that unite usa powerful balm in todays divisive times. Because the gallery is a Smithsonian institution, admission is free and tickets are not required.

I Dream a World may look familiar to those who know the work of late Pulitzer Prizewinning photographer Brian Lanker; his 1989 book of the same name serves as the basis of the exhibit, with the likenesses of 25 extraordinary Black women. Although Lanker passed away in 2011, the iconic photographs have been in his familys possession since then and were first displayed at the Mulvane Art Museum in Topeka, Kansas, in 2020. In the first installation (July 8, 2022January 29, 2023) at the National Portrait Gallery, photographs of women like Alice Walker, Maya Angelou, and Rosa Parks will be on display while in the second (February 10September 10, 2023), visitors may recognize familiar faces like Oprah Winfrey and Odetta, the voice of the Civil Rights Movement.

This exhibition is important because, through compelling portraits, it invites us to consider the achievements of inspiring Black women who overcame tremendous challenges to succeed in fields as diverse as literature, law, music, sports, and politics, said Ann Shumard, senior curator of photographs, in an email.

The next to make its big entrance will be the latest chapter in the National Portrait Gallerys One Life series, which involves the museum dedicating a full gallery to the life of one significant American. This time, the special exhibition will focus on the heralded architect, environmentalist, and sculptorMaya Lin, who is perhaps best known for designing the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C. The exhibit uses photographs, sketchbook drawings, architectural models, sculptures, and personal items that guide viewers through the four decades Lin has produced work. Lin is passionate about the environment, and part of her What Is Missing? project, which addresses the global biodiversity crisis, will also be on display. One Life: Maya Lin will be the first time the series has honored an Asian American since it began in 2006. The exhibition opens September 30.

Kinship features the work of international contemporary photographers Njideka Akunyili Crosby, Ruth Leonela Buentello, Jess T. Dugan, LaToya Ruby Frazier, Jessica Todd Harper, Thomas Holton, Sedrick Huckaby, and Anna Tsouhlarakis, who were all tasked with exploring the nature of love and relationships of all kinds. Some themes that the installation will touch on include childhood and adulthood, gender roles, the geographic and regional diversity of the country, and life and death. Kinship is the latest exhibition of the Gallerys Portraiture Now series, which showcases the work of the most renowned and innovative photojournalists of the 21st century. Visitors can catch the exhibit beginning October 28.

Last but not least is Portrait of a Nation: 2022 Honorees, which is scheduled to run starting November 10 for nearly a year. The gallerys Portrait of a Nation series commemorates seven Americans who had a huge impact in their respective field within the year, and have subsequently become a part of the countrys zeitgeist. Honorees this year include director Ava DuVernay, for her work in television and film; Dr. Anthony Fauci, the chief medical advisor to the U.S. President who guided the nation through the COVID crisis; and Serena Williams and Venus Williams, tennis stars whose lives were explored in the Oscar-winning film King Richard.

Read the original:

4 Powerful Photography Exhibitions Will Debut at the National Portrait Gallery This Year - AFAR Media

Posted in Zeitgeist Movement | Comments Off on 4 Powerful Photography Exhibitions Will Debut at the National Portrait Gallery This Year – AFAR Media