Daily Archives: July 17, 2022

Crying over a religiously inclusive presidential ticket in a thicket of national woes, By Jiti Ogunye – Premium Times

Posted: July 17, 2022 at 9:21 am

It is quite astonishing how the critical issues of socio-economic justice are being banished to the background in this leadership renewal debate and emotive issues are being pushed to the foreground. Shouldnt the country, including our religious groups and denominations, rather engage in the fight for gender justice in our representative democracy and political system, to bring about a male-female/female-male ticket, across the board, as an immediate affirmative action, instead of crusading for a Christian-Muslim/Muslim-Christian ticket?

In liberal democratic elections, the ideology of political parties, including their programmes, manifestoes, platforms (containing social services, welfare issues and interests of the working class), and sensitivity to diversity, including the issue of gender justice, are the critical, ideal factors that should guide the choice of voters. The religious identity of candidates in a secular state like Nigeria should not be an overriding factor.

In Nigeria, a political party is not an ecumenical gathering or an interfaith amalgam. A political party system is the vehicle that drives governance of the affairs of men and society; not an ark that sails the righteous to the heavenly shore. The church, the mosque and the shrine must be kept separate from the affairs of the State; that is a neutral state.

The choice of a vice presidential candidate in the All Progressives Congress (APC) is generating a loud debate on whether that choice is sensitive to and respectful of the Christian faith.

We presume this debate has become urgent for many in view of the reality of religious intolerance and fanaticism in Nigeria. Since 2009, groups of Islamists and jihadists, known as Boko Haram and theIslamic State in West Africa Province (ISWAP) terrorists (that many Muslims have rightly condemned and denounced as not being true Muslims), have been waging a war against the Nigerian state with the declared goal of carving a theocratic Islamic state out of it.

For us, unless there is clear evidence or strong inferences that the said choice is meant to foster Islam as a state religion in Nigeria, promote political Islam and empower Boko Haram and ISWAP in such a way as to deny, abuse and abridge the enjoyment or religious rights and liberties, this loud debate is not important. The debate on the Muslim-Muslim ticket, we opine, should not be conducted in a ramifying and Islamophobic manner, as if the ticket, a free exercise of democratic right, is an extension of the murderous Boko Haram and ISWAPs theocratic campaigns.

The important issue is whether the political party that has put together this Muslim-Muslim ticket is deserving of renewal of the presidential mandate that it currently holds, and whether the joint ticket-holders have the qualifications, character, class interests, competence, fitness, capacity and integrity to lead Nigeria at this time.

In 1979, the Christian-Christian ticket of Chief Obafemi Awolowo and his Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN), under which Chief Philip Umeadi was fielded as a vice-presidential candidate, on the platform of the then newly adopted presidential system of government (in departure from the parliamentary system of the First Republic) was a no issue. In the Yoruba West, Awolowo secured votes across faith lines. The integrity of that Christian-Christian ticket was, in a way, litigated and validated in the election petition case of Awolowo v Shagari, up to the Supreme Court of Nigeria. The big issue in that ticket, by a way of recall, was whether Chief Obafemi Awolowo was trustworthy and electable by the Igbo electorate, and whether he did not hate the Igbo, given the roles he placed especially during the unfortunate civil war between 1967 and 1970, when he did not only serve as the war-time minister of Finance but also as the vice chairman of the Federal Executive Council under the Federal Military Government of General Yakubu Gowon, during the civil war.

In 1993, the Muslim-Muslim ticket of Chief MKO Abiolas Social Democratic Party (SDP) was not a big issue. Abiola attended a Christian institution, the Baptist High School, Abeokuta, where, although a Muslim, he compulsorily participated in Christian religious activities; learnt and indeed could sing Christian hymns. The fact that his joint presidential ticket was a Muslim-Muslim one was not a big deal; the real issue then was the need to democratically and electorally sack from stolen political power, a cunning military dictatorship, unwilling to vacate the military presidency, and thus perpetually manipulating the transition to civil rule programme.

Added to that burning issue was a pan-Nigerian, inter-faith unity to bring about an organic rotation of presidential power in Nigeria. Undeniably, across Southern Nigeria, there was an inter-ethnic and inter-faith solidarity to equally cause a power shift to the South and put an end to the political power hegemony of the Northern wing of the ruling class, represented then by a gang of military plutocrats, mainly of northern extraction, and their collaborating civilian bureaucrats.

It was that putative consensus on power-shift, truncated by the annulment of the June 12 election and the Abacha reign of terror that followed, that made the Nigerian ruling class seek vindication arranging for two Southerners to contest the presidential election in 1999, with the predictable outcome that, invariably, a Southerner would emerge the president of Nigeria.

The Abiola/SDP Muslim-Muslim ticket was a faith uniting one, not a faith-dividing ticket. Many Nigerians of different faiths were persecuted (imprisoned, exiled or killed) for fighting for the actualisation of the mandate that emanated from that Muslim-Muslim ticket. Many who fought and those who were killed while fighting, were not fighting for their religious beliefs or faiths when doing so. They were fighting (and for those who were slain or had died) for electoral and political justice to be done in the country.

A foremost patriot and celebrated atheist, Dr Tai Solarin, who repeatedly said he never believed in the existence of God, fought hard for the actualisation of that mandate, physically participating in the Campaign for Democracy-organised nationwide protests that greeted the annulment of the election, on July 5-7, 1993, leading a column of protesters from Ikene, his domicile in Ogun State, to Ikeja, Lagos.

We submit that religious identity or diversity, sect affiliation or denominational association was never intended to be the constitutionally prescribed plank for bringing that unity or inclusion about. The focus was to attempt to grow national unity and democratic government from our ethnically diverse communities. The goal was to prevent ethnic domination, subjugation or emasculation.

The Nigerian Constitution decrees no state religion, although the Nigerian state, immorally and unlawfully, has been using state funds and other resources to promote the hegemony and dominance of the two Abrahamic religions Islam and Christianity. This is in spite of the fact that the Constitution clearly recognises Nigeria as a secular or multi-religious state.

While it is true that in the Preamble to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, it is stated that the Constitution is made for the purpose of promoting the good government and welfare of all persons in our country on the principles of Freedom, Equality, and Justice, and for the purpose of consolidating the Unity of our people, it is submitted that this declared purpose, in constitutional theory, is achieved by the constitutional guarantees (freedoms) referenced below and the federal character principles etched on the pages of our Constitution.

We admit, though, that as it is the case in all spheres of our national life, there is a wide chasm between theory and practice on the issue of fostering these noble constitutional ideals.

Section 14(1) of the Constitution declares that, the Federal Republic of Nigeria shall be a State based on the principles of democracy and social justice, and the document further declares in Section 14 (3&4) that the composition of government in the Federation and in the States and Local Government Councils or any of their agencies; and the conduct of their affairs shall be carried out in such a manner as to reflect the federal character of Nigeria and the need to promote national unity, and also to command national loyalty, thereby ensuring that there shall be no predominance of persons from a few States or from a few ethnic or other sectional groups in that Government or in any of its agencies (and for the Government of a State or Local Government Council), the conduct of their affairs shall be carried out in such manner as to recognise the diversity of the people within its area of authority and the need to promote a sense of belonging and loyalty among all the peoples of the Federation.

It is crystal clear that the imagination and intendment of the framers of the cited provision is to foster unity amongst peoples, states, ethnic groups and such other sectional groups, and bring about their inclusion in government at all levels.

We submit that religious identity or diversity, sect affiliation or denominational association was never intended to be the constitutionally prescribed plank for bringing that unity or inclusion about. The focus was to attempt to grow national unity and democratic government from our ethnically diverse communities. The goal was to prevent ethnic domination, subjugation or emasculation.

Section 15(2) of the Constitution states that national integration shall be actively encouraged, whilst discrimination on the grounds of place of origin, sex, religion, status, ethnic or linguistic association or ties shall be prohibited.

We submit that while the goal of Section 15(2) is ostensibly to promote national integration, including religious harmony, still on the ground of that same Section 15(2), rejecting a Muslim-Muslim or a Christian-Christian presidential ticket, solely on the ground of religious differences, is discriminatory of the candidates, running foul of the non-justiciable prohibition of such discrimination.

The federal character principles in our Constitution are further strengthened by the establishment of the Federal Character Commission under Section 153 (1) of the Constitution, and a specific codification of the Federal Character Commission Act to enable the Commission discharge its mandate. The principles also are further strengthened by provisions like Section 147(3) and Section 192(2) of the Constitution, which respectively obligates the president and the governor to comply with the federal character provision in Section 14(3&4) of the Constitution in their appointment of ministers in the government of the federation, and commissioners in the government of a state.

In appointing ministers and commissioners, the Federal Character Principles stipulate that the ministers must be sourced from all the states in the federation, and the commissioners from the local government areas in a state. The religious background or beliefs of the appointees is not a constitutional requirement; nor is balance or equality of religious or faith representation in the Executive Council, of the federation or in the states, between the two religions or amongst all the faiths practiced in the country or state a constitutional mandate.

It is very instructive that in the prescribed qualification for the office of president under Section 137 of the Constitution, and in the prescribed qualification for the office of governor under Section 182 of the Constitution, the faith or religion practiced is not an eligibility requirement for an aspirant or a candidate, vying for a presidential or gubernatorial seat.

And it is also instructive to note that upon being elected on a Christian-Christian ticket, a Muslim-Muslim ticket or an atheist-atheist ticket, it is permissible under the law for a president-elect and/or a vice-president elect to decline to be sworn on the Holy Bible or the Holy Koran, and for him/her to take the right under the law to be sworn on affirmation, by raising his hand and affirming, without placing same on any Holy Book (see the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution for the Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Offices; also see Section 205 of the Evidence Act, 2011 ; and Section five, seven and eight of the Oaths Act, which make provisions for forms and manner in which oath may be taken; absence of religious belief; and affirmations. Under the provisions, affirmations and declarations may be made, without swearing or referencing God at the end of the oath).

Faith, religion and spiritual matters are very important to man. But they are not the critical and major determinants of mans socio-economic existence in temporal terms. There are, at any given time, many identities: social, economic, political, religious, group, professional, ethnic, national, international (country), gender, age-group, and class. A religious identity is not foundational in social relations. We affirm, class identity is.

Section 38 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria guarantees the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. And Section 42 guarantees the right to freedom from discrimination on account of community, ethnic, group, place of origin, sex or religious identity, or political opinion.

A combined application and effect of the two above cited constitutional (human rights) guarantees would mean that an atheist or a polytheist (for example an African indigenous religion believer) may contest for the presidency of Nigeria with the constitutional assurance that he shall not be discriminated against by voters on account of his non-belief in the existence of God or non-belief in monotheism. If such a scenario were to occur, it would be interesting to see whether the two main religions in Nigeria would, in defence of their beleaguered faiths, work in concert to shoot down the candidature of such a pagan, idolator or satanic instrument!

Faith, religion and spiritual matters are very important to man. But they are not the critical and major determinants of mans socio-economic existence in temporal terms. There are, at any given time, many identities: social, economic, political, religious, group, professional, ethnic, national, international (country), gender, age-group, and class. A religious identity is not foundational in social relations. We affirm, class identity is. Class identity largely determines how interests are advanced and protected, and who gets what in a class society. A practiced religion, therefore, should not be the overriding determinant of the qualification of any Nigerian to hold political office. And in our humble opinion, a forced religious balancing or pairing of political office seekers should not be an overriding determinant of eligibility or electability.

The critical question before Nigerians must be which of the presidential tickets thrown up by the current election cycle (presidential and vice-presidential candidates combined) is good enough (and not religious or religiously twined enough, religiously balanced being a misnomer, given the exclusion of the other faiths or non-faiths in the exclusionary and religiously arrogant equation) to govern Nigeria at the highest level, come May 2023.

It is quite astonishing how the critical issues of socio-economic justice are being banished to the background in this leadership renewal debate and emotive issues are being pushed to the foreground. Shouldnt the country, including our religious groups and denominations, rather engage in the fight for gender justice in our representative democracy and political system, to bring about a male-female/female-male ticket, across the board, as an immediate affirmative action, instead of crusading for a Christian-Muslim/Muslim-Christian ticket? How does equal faith representation in government override the need for gender justice, for example?

For our fellow Christians in the North, who in many places are a religious minority, who may regard the presence of a Christian in a joint presidential ticket at any point in time a sin qua non, there are many options, including voting for candidates of other political parties, who have such faith-balance. Multi-party democracy guarantees freedom of electoral choice.

For the APC (whether the presidential ticket is Christian-Christian, Muslim-Muslim or atheist-atheist), the real question is, given the calamitous manner in which the government produced by the party has governed at the federal level, especially on its tripod cardinal promises of enhacing security, the economy and an anti-corruption regime, should it be rewarded with a fresh mandate? Does the party have any redemption potential left in it? If it does, why is the Muslim-Muslim ticket a barrier to its acceptability? If it does not, are the other front-running political parties, whose presidential and vice presidential candidates are tainted and contaminated parts of the Nigerian ruling (ruining) class, viable options? If any one of them is viable, why cant the angry electorate embrace that alternative, not because of a Christian-Muslim or Muslim-Christian ticket, but because it is likely to provide a better leadership than another APC government? If none of them is a better alternative, as it is glaringly clear, can the Nigerian electorate search for their salvation elsewhere, by giving life to the other idealistic, fledgling political parties, earnestly asking for, and fervently praying for their support? What is to be done?

Chief Gani Fawehinmi (SAN, SAM), was one such giant of an idealist in 2003. With his National Conscience Party (NCP), he begged Nigerians, unsuccessfully, to embrace self-deliverance from oppression and liberation from the oppressive shackles and manacles of poverty. Alas, discounting the incidence of votes-rigging, which was rife in that year, the national conscience of Nigerians, largely, remained inactive!

The problem of governance in Nigeria, which the ruling class, election after election, has proven unable to solve is not insurmountable. It is not a problem to be solved only by the devout, spirit-filled, Holy Ghost fire-spitting, Holy Bible wielding, perennially-tithing, psalms-reading, night vigil-going, robe-wearing, and prayer mountain-visiting Christian; or a problem to be solved only by a devout, five prayers daily-observing, mosque-going, ever-fasting, Holy Quran-quoting, permanent Holy Pilgrimage-going, alms and Zakat-giving, hijab-donning, and ever rosary (tesbiu)-counting Muslim.

It is a problem to be solved by Nigerians of all faiths; or of no religious faith or belief at all.

Those who have brought our country to its sorry state on its crippled legs are persons of faith Christians and Muslims. Unfortunately, many Nigerians are sanctimonious in their ungodliness and pietistical in their immoralities and perversity.

Nigeria needs leadership redefinition and reinvention. She does not need religion but redemption.

Jiti Ogunye, lawyer, and Principal Counsel, Jiti Ogunye Chambers, is the Legal Adviser to Premium Times.

Donate

TEXT AD: Call Willie - +2348098788999

See original here:

Crying over a religiously inclusive presidential ticket in a thicket of national woes, By Jiti Ogunye - Premium Times

Posted in Atheist | Comments Off on Crying over a religiously inclusive presidential ticket in a thicket of national woes, By Jiti Ogunye – Premium Times

Commentary: Government has to uphold separation of church and state – Fredericksburg.com

Posted: at 9:21 am

By Katherine B. Waddell

HAS RELIGION become too much of a factor in politics? Have our religious leaders, and our elected and appointed leaders, become so involved in politics to a point that they no longer are able to separate church and state? Are people in positions of power imposing their personal religious beliefs onto all of us?

These questions all pose disturbing scenarios and warrant serious scrutiny. But speaking in opposition to those who impose their personal religious beliefs onto others is not easy because it can be misunderstood as being anti-religion. It actually is a decision in support of religious freedom and of a long-held American freedom: separation of church and state.

In a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut, Thomas Jefferson wrote, Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.

People are also reading

The role of religion in politics has dramatically changed over the past 50 years (Jan. 22, 1973, being the day of the Roe v. Wade decision). In 2022, religion has played a role of epic proportions in dictating public policy and opinions at both state and federal levels.

Freedom of and from religion is one of those distinct qualities that makes our country great. Americans cherish that freedom whether they are Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, fundamentalist, evangelical Christian, Mormon, agnostic, atheist, or other.

Has religion ever been an issue for voters?

In 1928, New York Gov. Al Smith reportedly lost his presidential bid due to his Catholic religion; and in 1960, that question again came up. Presidential candidate John F. Kennedy, a Catholic, also was questioned about his religion. Many feared he would be unable to separate his religious beliefs from policy.

To address those fears, Kennedy spoke to a group of ministers in Houston, saying: It is apparently necessary for me to state once again not what kind of church I believe infor that should be important only to mebut what kind of America I believe in. He continued, I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute ...

Does the candidates religion matter? It should not, but much has changed since 1960, back when many feared Kennedy would make policy decisions based on his personal religious doctrine. Today, that fear has become reality.

It is widely known that some elected or appointed officials at federal and state levels have initiated policies that impose their personal religious beliefs.

These include decisions on birth control, abortion, embryonic stem cell research, sex education, gay rights, and end-of-life issues.

It began with Pat Robertsons Christian Coalition and Jerry Falwell Sr.s Moral Majority movements.

Newer groups call themselves Value Voters or members of the Faith & Freedom Coalition, but their goal remains the same. Most prominently, Don McGahnWhite House counsel under former President Donald Trump and a board member of the Federalist Societyhelped select federal judges with the goal of establishing public policy and opinions that mirrored his own religious views.

Religious freedom is in the eye of the beholder. Religious leaders praise legislators who impose their religious beliefs onto women by restricting abortion rights.

But they also claim their religious freedom is at stake when government mandates contraceptive coverage in health insurance plans for employees.

Whose religious freedom is at stake?

You might be Jewish or Mormon and not want to be forced to live by the Catholic doctrine; just as if you are Catholic or Baptist, you might not want to live by the Mormon or Jewish doctrines.

It is not the role of government to promote policy that imposes one groups personal religious beliefs on all people.

Presently, the majority religious groups of elected or appointed officials who are imposing their religious views include Catholics, Protestants, and evangelical or fundamentalist Christians.

What if the predominate religious group of people in power was Muslims, Mormons or Scientologists? What if there was talk of imposing Sharia law? One might think it a ridiculous idea but many thought overturning Roe was a ridiculous idea, too.

Should public policy be established on the basis of an elected or appointed officials religious doctrine?

Of course not, but examples have been happening right under our noses.

This has happened because we didnt call it out and we didnt heed Kennedys 1960 warning: Today I may be the victimbut tomorrow it may be you...

Katherine B. Waddell, IRichmond, is a former member of the Virginia House of Delegates. She previously served as special adviser on womens issues for former Gov. Terry McAuliffe. Contact her at kbwaddell@comcast.net.

Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!

Read more from the original source:

Commentary: Government has to uphold separation of church and state - Fredericksburg.com

Posted in Atheist | Comments Off on Commentary: Government has to uphold separation of church and state – Fredericksburg.com

Parents, Could Your Teens Be Vaping? – Health Essentials

Posted: at 9:19 am

It looks like a flash drive, and it plugs into a laptops USB port like a flash drive, but its not a flash drive. Its actually an electronic cigarette, or e-cigarette, and its been causing a stir in schools across the country since it was introduced in 2015.

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services.Policy

Juul is a sleek, black vaping pen that fits in the palm of your hand. Like other top-selling e-cigarettes on the market (including Vuse, Logic, Blu and MarkTen), it comes with little cartridges of juice that contain nicotine, fruity flavorings and other chemicals. The cartridges snap into the device, and the juice is heated up when a user inhales, creating a vapor that delivers a quick hit of nicotine and the pleasant sensation that smoking cigarettes creates, explains pulmonologist Humberto Choi, MD.

But unlike other kinds of e-cigarettes, Juul and the newest class of devices are discreet enough that teenagers are using them in school bathrooms, hallways and even classrooms. Theyre small and easy to hide, and the fruity-smelling smoke dissipates quickly. Not only has juuling become so popular that its now a verb, but its even inspired a series of social media hashtags.

Though the companies that make these products say theyre intended to be used as alternatives for adult smokers over 21, teenagers are still getting their hands on them. In fact, use among teens is so rampant that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is officially authorizing all Juul brand flavored e-cigarettes to be pulled off the market. The agency has dedicated significant resources to review products from the companies that account for most of the U.S. market, said FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf, MD, in a statement. We recognize these make up a significant part of the available products and many have played a disproportionate role in the rise in youth vaping.

Dr. Choi explains the potential health concerns over vaping and what steps you can take to address it with your teens.

While theres been a significant drop in youth smoking over the last decade, the use of other tobacco products like e-cigarettes in this age group continues to climb. Youth are taking up e-cigarettes most often because family members or friends use them, or because the juice comes in appealing flavors like mint or fruit, according to a 2016 survey.

In that same survey, 17% of middle and high school-aged users also said they turned to e-cigarettes because of the belief that theyre less harmful than other forms of tobacco, like cigarettes.

While theres still research being done on the long-term safety of e-cigarettes, health experts like Dr. Choi say caution is warranted. A recent study by the American Journal of Preventive Medicine found that e-cigarettes are a significant risk factor for respiratory diseases.

Theres also concern over the rise of e-cigarettes and their potential risk for nicotine addiction. Because of the attractive design and appealing flavors, young people may not understand that theyre actually taking in high concentrations of nicotine (juices contain up to 5% nicotine), which is highly addictive and damaging to brain development.

So, what is the difference between vaping and smoking? The main thing that separates them is that one (smoking) burns tobacco, while the other (e-cigarettes) heats nicotine combined with flavorings and other chemicals into an aerosol. In both cases, a significant amount of vapor and fumes enter your lungs.

While vaping has been considered less harmful than smoking, that doesnt mean it doesnt come with its own set of long-term and short-term risks.

We know that in the short-term they can cause inflammation in the airways and in the lungs, Dr. Choi explains. It will take a while until we see the long-term consequences, but our expectation is that they can cause harm similar to smoking cigarettes. Experts also worry that teens who use e-cigarettes may be more likely to start smoking tobacco.

Its not just the nicotine that can have a negative effect. E-cigarettes dont contain tobacco or tar, but they do contain many other chemicals that can be harmful, sometimes in combination, Dr. Choi says. Propylene glycol, for example, is one ingredient. Its commonly used as a food additive and considered safe for ingestion, but its not clear if its safe to be inhaled for a prolonged period of time.

Another concern has been vitamin E a supplement that is fine to take orally and topically but evidence suggests its not something you want to coat your lungs with.

I think the point here is that we cannot consider the aerosols with these chemicals safe when inhaled, Dr. Choi notes.

In addition to flavored juices and nicotine, vaping cigarettes can also be used for smoking marijuana. In 2018, it was found that marijuana vaping in teens had increased from 9.5% to 13.1% in a year.

Vaping marijuana is often done through the use of marijuana concentrate, which contains highly potent amounts of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). According to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), vaping pens with marijuana concentrate can be up to four times stronger than other types of marijuana. A recent report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also showed that the use of THC vaping products has been linked to EVALI, a medical condition where a persons lungs become severely damaged.

Most of these THC-containing products come from informal and unregulated sources so they may contain unknown substances, cautions Dr. Choi.

There are also concerns over the trend of vaping CBD oil, mostly because it can also contain unregulated substances and harmful chemicals.

The truth is, your child may have been already exposed to the overall concept of vaping.

Whether or not you suspect your child may be participating or being pressured to vape, Dr. Choi suggests taking up the subject with your teenagers. I think its important to have the conversation anyway, he says. Odds are, they will come across a situation where someone is using e-cigarettes or they may be offered to use one.

Different people are attracted to e-cigarettes for different reasons, Dr. Choi notes, so theres no one good way to bring up their potential dangers with your kids. But understanding what might motivate them to try, or talking through ways to respond to peer pressure can be a good start.

Its normal for this conversation to happen over time, so dont feel discouraged if the first couple chats dont feel productive. You can also try working in the conversation about e-cigarettes and vaping through everyday situations such as:

Another good way of deterring your teen from vaping (or smoking) is to lead by example. Even taking the steps toward being tobacco-free in your own life may help influence your childs future actions.

If you suspect that your teen may have picked up vaping, the best you can do is approach it through open communication. Before you have the talk about e-cigarettes, it may be a good idea to get a fact sheet together on the harms and risks of vaping. Coming armed with information could be the best way to sway your teen from it.

The American Academy of Pediatrics actually recommends that pediatricians screen families and counsel patients about the health risks of e-cigarettes, Dr. Choi says. Unfortunately, the increase in the use of e-cigarettes among teenagers is so concerning that we need to be more proactive.

If you feel like youre not getting through, ask your doctor to discuss the dangers of smoking and e-cigarettes at your teens next appointment. Other resources such as the Office of the Surgeon General can also be helpful in presenting information to your teenager about vaping.

Go here to see the original:

Parents, Could Your Teens Be Vaping? - Health Essentials

Posted in Vaping | Comments Off on Parents, Could Your Teens Be Vaping? – Health Essentials

Vaping, COVID, And The Biden Administration’s Approach To Public Health : The NPR Politics Podcast – NPR

Posted: at 9:19 am

People hold banners as they protest against the New York City Council vote on legislation to ban flavored e-cigarettes outside City Hall on November 26, 2019 in New York City. Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images hide caption

People hold banners as they protest against the New York City Council vote on legislation to ban flavored e-cigarettes outside City Hall on November 26, 2019 in New York City.

The Biden administration says Americans now have access to the tools they need to protect themselves from COVID, as a new spike in cases begins. Deaths have remained low so far and the administration recognizing the political realities has not pushed for new restrictions.

Meanwhile, the Food and Drug Administration is moving ahead on a suite of initiatives aimed at reducing smoking and vaping the latest, surprisingly apolitical chapter in a public health crusade that's notched hard-fought wins over many decades.

Support the show and unlock sponsor-free listening with a subscription to The NPR Politics Podcast Plus. Learn more at plus.npr.org/politics Connect:Email the show at nprpolitics@npr.orgJoin the NPR Politics Podcast Facebook Group.Subscribe to the NPR Politics Newsletter.

Link:

Vaping, COVID, And The Biden Administration's Approach To Public Health : The NPR Politics Podcast - NPR

Posted in Vaping | Comments Off on Vaping, COVID, And The Biden Administration’s Approach To Public Health : The NPR Politics Podcast – NPR

The FDA Is Going to Regulate Synthetic Nicotine and Puff Bar – New York Magazine

Posted: at 9:19 am

Photo-Illustration: Intelligencer; Photos: Getty Images

This article was featured in One Great Story, New Yorks reading recommendation newsletter. Sign up here to get it nightly.

If you walk inside a smoke shop in New York looking for a vape that tastes like candy, you might think youre out of luck. Flavored e-cigarettes have not been allowed in the U.S. since the Food and Drug Administration banned them two years ago. The only choices visible behind the clerk are menthol and tobacco, made by large corporations such as Juul and still allowed by the FDA. But to taste the full rainbow of nicotine flavors out there, you just need to ask: Do you have Air Bar?

Out come the boxes, hidden under the counter or in the back, full of disposable vapes in varieties from Aloe Blackcurrant to Watermelon Apple Ice. A lot of the names end in ice, which usually indicates the addition of menthol or synthetic coolants to make the vegetable glycerin containing nicotine taste cool after its been heated to 400 degrees through a metal coil. You can even get pudding flavor, if you like that. But if you want to know more about this company thats putting lab-made nicotine and a slurry of other chemicals in your lungs, you are out of luck. No one knows who really owns it.

Air Bar is controlled by Shenzhen Goldreams Technology Co., Ltd, an LLC out of Chinas tech-industrial hub, which has become the global capital of vape manufacturing. (Two more disposable-vape brands also operate out of the building that Shenzhen Goldreams calls its headquarters.) Legal documents show that in the United States, Air Bar is marketed by a wholesaler in a strip mall near the Dallas airport whose phone number permanently goes to voicemail. (The company did not respond to requests for comment.) To get the vape in front of customers, shop owners can buy in bulk from distributors in the U.S. or, if theyre willing to risk getting a knockoff, go directly to a manufacturer in China.

Over the past year, Air Bar has become one of the many sleek, disposable vapes that have become extremely popular after filling the enormous demand for flavored products following an FDA crackdown just before the pandemic. These disposables have avoided regulators with a simple trick: They use synthetic nicotine, which the FDA had no authority over until recently. A negligible part of vape-shop business at the beginning of 2020, synthetics were in two-thirds of these stores nationwide by 2021, market research shows. During that window, authorities have been more or less helpless to stop the flavors concocted in labs in Shenzhen from being sold in the States.

But on Wednesday, when it officially closes the loophole that allows synthetic nicotine to be sold, the FDA can finally crack down. And if the agency gets its way, the industry titan Juul could soon be banned as well. But it may already be too late for the agency to chase down many of the corporations whose kid-friendly devices have dodged their authority for some time now. Even if faceless companies an ocean away from FDA jurisdiction are for some reason willing to cooperate with the regulators, counterfeiters are in tow and easy to get in touch with.

Since Juul first came out of Silicon Valley seven years ago aiming to disrupt Big Tobacco, regulators have been playing catchup. The company launched in 2015 with mango and cucumber pods that experts said would attract teens; it took the FDA five years to ban all vape flavors except for menthol and tobacco. Juul reps told high schoolers on campuses that their vape was a safer alternative to cigarettes; it took at least a year for the FDA to tell them that message was illegal. But the threat of enforcement didnt matter. Soon enough, it seemed like everyone was pulling on a Juul.

We as a nation had achieved a remarkable public-health accomplishment in driving teen smoking above 30 percent when I was in high school to below 5 percent as recently as a few years ago, says North Carolina attorney general Josh Stein, who sued Juul for marketing to minors. Then e-cigs came on the market, and those gains evaporated like a puff of vapor. Thats predominantly because of Juul, but now there are copycat companies trying to exploit young peoples addictions to make money at the expense of young peoples health.

But Juul which once had a valuation as large as Ford and controlled around 75 percent of the market could soon be gone for good. As part of an extremely delayed process in which the FDA is reviewing tobacco-based e-cigarette products already on the shelves, the agency moved to outlaw the sale of Juul after it found last month that potentially harmful chemicals may be leaching from their plastic pods into the nicotine mix that users inhale. After Juul asked a federal appeals court to temporarily block the ban, the FDA announced last week it would re-review Juuls application, citing scientific issues. During that process, Juul is allowed to keep selling its product, and its chief regulatory officer, Joe Murillo, said in a statement that we remain confident in the quality and substance of our applications.

Whatever happens to Juul, many vapers have already moved on. Earlier this year, the company lost its status as the top e-cigarette maker by sales to the R.J. Reynoldsbacked Vuse, one of the few vapes the FDA has actually authorized. (The two companies still lead other e-cigarette makers by a huge margin.) And during the pandemic, with stress sending people toward a nicotine fix and Juul restricted to old-fashioned cigarette flavors, the disposable-vape industry soared. Users wanted a product that looked nearly identical to Juul and tasted even better.

They found one in a company called Puff Bar.

The business had been around for at least a year when, in spring 2020, two 26-year-olds from the Los Angeles area Nick Minas and Patrick Beltran became Puff Bars co-owners and CEOs after taking it over from an entity in China. Or at least they say they did: The pairs ownership has never been independently confirmed, and the childhood friends have refused to discuss how they got the capital to buy a large vape manufacturer. (Previously, they ran an online e-cigarette store with a P.O. box in Glendale, California, for an address.) With flavors like Orange Mango Guava and ads that said their vapes were an escape from parental texts, business was thriving. Sales consistently cleared $3 million per week; in May, the duo bought a $1.7 million house together in the nearby San Rafael hills where they could park their Lamborghinis.

What they were doing technically wasnt against the law: A footnote in the FDAs 2020 flavor ban allowed disposable devices to be flavored. But by that July, the regulators caught up, ordering Puff Bar to halt sales for not applying for authorization in the first place. The company went quiet for about six months, until it borrowed an idea spreading among smaller players in the field. A 2009 law passed by Congress gave the FDA the power to regulate tobacco products the same way it oversees what corporations can put in food and pharmaceuticals. So Puff Bar stopped using tobacco as its source of nicotine, synthesized the addictive chemical in laboratories, and ran right through the loophole. By September 2021, according to federal data, over 26 percent of high-school kids vaping regularly and 30 percent of middle-school kids already vaping chose Puff Bar as their preferred brand. Nielsen data showed that Puff Bar sales for the past year up to that point totaled $156 million, even though the FDA had officially shut it down for seven months out of that period.

At the time, Beltran told CBS News that he and his business partner were not trying to side skirt, you know, kind of laws. On national television, he said that if theres a law that would order us off the market tomorrow, we would pull our products off the market tomorrow.

Closing the synthetic-nicotine loophole that Puff Bar made infamous could bring serious change to the industry. Retail establishments wont be able to say, Gee, I didnt know this brand wasnt okay, says Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. It ought to be pretty clear across the board. But in practice, its going to be a lot harder for the FDA to figure out how to enforce its new rule. First off, it assumes that companies that have been hesitant to cooperate with the FDA will adhere to the law.

Anything is possible with these folks, says Illinois representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, who co-authored the law passed in March giving the FDA oversight over synthetic nicotine. I think that the Puff Bar leadership is very much intent on making sure that they take advantage of any slowness or delay on the part of FDA, any loopholes in the regulatory framework to continue making money. And thats what theyve done in the past to great effect. It would not surprise me if they continue with that type of practice. Puff Bars Minas and Beltran did not respond to requests for comment.

FDA is now basically trying to put the genie back in the bottle, says a legislative aide for Senator Dick Durbin, who also helped lead the effort to close the synthetic-nicotine loophole. All these products flooded the market without adhering to the law.

The counterfeit market is an even bigger problem. Theres been a metastasis of the Puff brand, says Stanford professor Robert Jackler, who has researched the companys marketing and corporate structure. He says that anyone in the U.S. can order knockoffs from manufacturers in Shenzhen on a website called made-in-china.com; some firms listed on the site can make up to 50,000 vapes per day. If you want to start a cigarette company and have a billion dollars, you probably cant do it, he says. But if you want to start a vaping company and have $100,000, youre in business. Its really easy. One vape-shop owner in Florida said in an interview that at the height of Puff Bars popularity last year, 90 percent of the vapes on the market were fake clones. He also says the speed of market development plus a year of bad press means a lot of customers have moved on: If I had Puff products in my shop right now, I probably couldnt give them away.

Industry groups, who point to evidence that their products offer nicotine for adults without the known carcinogens in cigarettes, argue that the FDA is at fault for this knock-off market. Weve told them that in writing, your efforts to crush this industry are creating black and gray markets, says Jim McCarthy of the American Vapor Manufacturers Association. People arent going to stop using nicotine because the FDA commissioner told them to.

The scale of the synthetic-nicotine market might be the biggest challenge of all. Counterfeiters aside, many companies, Air Bar included, remain in stores though theyve already been told by the FDA to stop selling in the U.S. The agency, widely seen as underfunded, has a small number of enforcement officers responsible for in-store crackdowns in the thousands of vape shops in the country; the FDA did not disclose how many officers it will have on the job. Buying these vapes through the mail is already technically illegal, but when has that stopped anyone? Local authorities have not always been helpful with the fight either. New York City, which banned flavored e-cigarettes years ago, has done little to stop the proliferation of synthetic nicotine in the dozens of stores across the five boroughs.

When the synthetic-nicotine loophole closes, there will still be effective ways to stop sales. Large manufacturers cant afford to just ignore FDA, and they wont, says Myers. Retail chains will be hit too. Other than vape shops, the largest number of these disposables are distributed in gas stations and convenience stores, he says. Very few are truly independently owned, meaning they, too, probably wont risk selling illegal e-cigarettes as a corporate policy.

One vape-store owner in New York who doesnt deal in disposables blames the FDA for the synthetic boom. The best they could do was to make everything illegal and not enforce any of it, she says. That was their solution. So now because flavors are illegal, because the products are illegal, because disposables are illegal, everything is being sold from under the counter. Which means its being sold for cash, theyre not paying tax, and its being sold to underage kids without showing identification because theyre already selling illegal products, so they dont give a fuck if theyre selling it to a 15-year-old. So they have done nothing to help the situation. They have only made it worse.

If the feds actually do come knocking, the store owner expects the flavored-vape market to take a turn for the illicit: Its going to become like marjiuana was for the last 50 years. Its gonna be call a guy, word of mouth, tell a friend, you can get illegal vape flavors from this phone number. Text this person and theyll drop it off at your house and youll pay a $20 delivery fee and nobody gets any money in the government.

The one story you shouldnt miss today, selected byNew Yorks editors.

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice and to receive email correspondence from us.

See the original post:

The FDA Is Going to Regulate Synthetic Nicotine and Puff Bar - New York Magazine

Posted in Vaping | Comments Off on The FDA Is Going to Regulate Synthetic Nicotine and Puff Bar – New York Magazine

Ramsey County bans smoking, vaping on its property – Bring Me The News

Posted: at 9:19 am

A Ramsey County ordinance passed Tuesday will ban tobacco use on county property.

The Ramsey County Board of Commissioners passed the ordinance, which will take effect on Aug. 26., on Tuesday.

The ordinance bans smoking and vaping commercial tobacco on property owned, rented, leased or contracted by the county. It includes indoor and outdoor spaces, as well as private vehicles parked on county property.

Similar ordinances have been passed by 27 cities, counties and townships in the state, the county says.

Ultimately the objective of this ordinance is to protect the overall health of Ramsey County residents from the negative effects of commercial tobacco while in public places and places of employment, Ramsey County Public Health Director Sara Hollie said in a statement.

Members of the public passing through outdoor locations owned by the county are exempt from the ordinance, whichwill replace the 2015 Ramsey County Clean Air Ordinance.

But while it's banning tobacco use on its grounds, the county is also reducing the penalty for infractions to limit the impact on people from "historically marginalized backgrounds." The penalty for unlawful tobacco use is being reduced from $300 to $50.

Traditional tobacco used by Native Americans for ceremonial purposes is excluded from the ordinance.

See the article here:

Ramsey County bans smoking, vaping on its property - Bring Me The News

Posted in Vaping | Comments Off on Ramsey County bans smoking, vaping on its property – Bring Me The News

Parents in the UK: has your child or teenager taken up vaping? – The Guardian

Posted: at 9:19 am

Youth vaping is in the spotlight around the world. A leading vaping company was recently banned from selling e-cigarettes in the US due to its alleged role in the rise of youth vaping, although the ban was later suspended, and the EU is proposing a ban on the sale of flavoured vapes as part of its plan to fight cancer.

In the UK, selling vapes to under 18s is banned and there are rules on how they can be advertised. But the use of disposable vapes has risen sharply among children, with a recent study finding that many are trying them after seeing influencers promote them on social media.

We would like to speak to parents whose children use e-cigarettes in the UK. When did they take up vaping and what inspired them to try it in the first place? Have they become hooked on the habit?

We are also keen to speak to parents or teachers about vaping in schools. Do the pupils at your childs school vape? Are e-cigarettes being advertised on billboards or at bus stops near your local school? And how do you feel about it all?

We will only use the data you provide us for the purpose of the feature. We will delete any personal data when we no longer require it for this purpose. For more information please see our terms of service and privacy policy.

If you are 18 years or over, you can get in touch by filling in the form below. Your responses are secure as the form is encrypted and only the Guardian has access to your contributions. One of our journalists will be in contact before we publish, so please do leave contact details.

This article was amended on 15 July 2022. An earlier version stated that a leading vaping company was recently banned from selling e-cigarettes in the US due to its alleged role in the rise of youth vaping. This ban was later suspended, and the article has been updated to reflect this.

If youre having trouble using the form, click here.

Original post:

Parents in the UK: has your child or teenager taken up vaping? - The Guardian

Posted in Vaping | Comments Off on Parents in the UK: has your child or teenager taken up vaping? – The Guardian

E-cigarettes used by one in five UAE university students, study finds – The National

Posted: at 9:19 am

Nearly a quarter of students in the UAE used an e-cigarette in the past month, a study has found.

Research carried out at three universities in the country recorded higher vaping rates than other recent studies in the Emirates and elsewhere in the Gulf.

Experts have given a warning that while e-cigarettes are less harmful than traditional cigarettes, they do pose a risk to health and could be a gateway to more hazardous tobacco smoking.

Students at one private and two public universities were polled on whether and when they had used e-cigarettes.

Almost all of my friends vape. I can count on one hand the number of friends I have that don't

Karthik Mallya, a 23-year-old Indian designer living in Dubai

Researchers found 23 per cent said they had smoked e-cigarettes in the past month, while 37 per cent had used them in their lifetime.

The researchers, from Maudsley Health and Al Amal Psychiatric Hospital, both in Dubai, and Liverpool John Moores University in the UK, published their findings in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

E-cigarettes are electronic devices that contain a liquid and include nicotine, a battery and an atomiser, which produces vapour instead of cigarette smoke.

In the paper, the researchers highlighted a 2021 study, which found only 3.7 per cent of university students in the UAE were current e-cigarette smokers.

A 2020 study in Qatar put the figure at 14 per cent, while in Saudi Arabia, the latest research points out, scientists have found figures of 7.2 per cent (in 2020) and 10.6 per cent (in 2018).

The researchers behind the latest study found that students who used e-cigarettes were more likely to also smoke other forms of tobacco, such as traditional cigarettes, shisha or medwakh pipes.

Male students, who made up about a quarter of the studys 240 participants, were about twice as likely as females to have used e-cigarettes in their lifetime. Men tended to perceive them as less harmful than females did.

This is consistent with previous research about tobacco smoking among university students in the UAE, where males are more likely to consume tobacco, the researchers wrote.

In the GCC, this pattern has also been observed in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. This could be due to smoking being more socially acceptable for males in this region and that they could also be subject to peer influence.

Prof Kamran Siddiqi, professor in public health at the University of York in the UK, who researches smoking internationally, said the latest study, based on relatively small numbers and focused specifically on university students, may not necessarily indicate wider smoking rates among young people in the country.

More broadly, he said it was difficult to determine whether e-cigarettes were a gateway to the use of combustible cigarettes.

While research has, he said, found that people who vape were more likely to go on to smoke traditional cigarettes, this did not necessarily indicate that one caused the other.

Another possible explanation is what researchers call common liability, when people who take up vaping are already more inclined to smoke cigarettes.

In Britain people are more and more thinking along the lines of common liability, because despite young people experimenting with e-cigarettes, we havent seen a huge increase in smoking, said Prof Siddiqi, who was not connected to the latest study.

The National

Compared to combustible cigarettes, he said e-cigarettes caused significantly less harm but not zero.

Individuals are still inhaling liquids with the potential to damage the lungs, he said. Nicotine is highly addictive. There are other [substances] nicotine is mixed with. They could cause long-term lung damage.

From the evidence, its nowhere near as toxic or potentially harmful as the smoke from combustible cigarettes. That said, nobody wants young people to take up e-cigarettes.

The UKs National Health Service describes e-cigarettes as not completely risk free, and carry a small fraction of the risk of cigarettes.

Unlike traditional cigarettes, e-cigarettes do not produce carbon monoxide or tar, which Britain's National Health Service said were two of the most harmful substances found in tobacco smoke.

Arjun Chandavarkar, 22, from India, used vaping to help him quit cigarettes while he was at university and uses a refillable device regularly throughout the day.

Most of the times I tend to vape in the mornings, usually after meals and about six or seven times a day, said Mr Chandavarkar, who lives in Dubai and works as a financial analyst.

The frequency of when I vape isnt particularly set in stone, but I vape for about two minutes 'per session'.

It has helped me avoid cigarettes altogether.

The majority of the people I know within my age group tend to use a vape. I would say in a group of about 20 people, 16-17 of them will vape.

Considering the frequency of my vaping, I use one pod every two days, so I go through about four refills per week.

I am worried about my health and the impact vaping has. While it does offer a much safer and healthier alternative to smoking, I havent come across any research that suggests vaping is completely free from harmful effects.

That being said, I do exercise on a frequent basis, around five times a week, and tend to believe Im mitigating the harmful effects of vaping through this exercise.

However, based on my vaping experience over the last three or four years, I havent seen any harmful impact of vaping on my physical performance.

Karthik Mallya, a 23-year-old Indian designer living in Dubai, said vaping helps relieve stress.

Almost all of my friends vape, he said.

I think I can count on one hand the number of friends I have that don't.

Even friends of mine that don't use them regularly will usually vape when they get the chance to.

I'm definitely worried and very aware of the health risks associated with vaping.

Since there's not much research into the matter, I don't really know if it's a healthier alternative to smoking or not.

As of now, I vape to curb my urge to smoke tobacco products.

I like it because it doesn't stink up my clothes and hands and, of course, I like it for the many flavours.

Updated: July 17, 2022, 11:17 AM

The rest is here:

E-cigarettes used by one in five UAE university students, study finds - The National

Posted in Vaping | Comments Off on E-cigarettes used by one in five UAE university students, study finds – The National

Jill Biden’s ‘breakfast tacos’ remark was not a gaffe. It was intentional and will drive Latinos to the GOP – Fox News

Posted: at 9:18 am

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

First lady Jill Biden traveled to one of the most populous Hispanic communities in America on Monday to tell Latinos that all we are good for is our breakfast tacos and bodegas.

Mrs. Bidens inflammatory and offensive rhetoric about Hispanic diversity in San Antonio, Texas, was not a gaffe. It is another example of the Biden administrations insensitive, bullying and politically divisive attacks on minorities in America.

The White House rigorously reviews and scrutinizes all public remarks prepared for the president and first lady. Yet Bidens protectors in the left-wing media say that the words Jill read from a Teleprompter "didnt come out correctly."

JILL BIDEN SAYS TEXAS HISPANICS AS UNIQUE AS BREAKFAST TACOS DURING SAN ANTONIO SPEECH

Lets set the record straight: Jills rehearsed speech was out of touch, insulting and derogatory towards Hispanics. The problem is even deeper than just her words. It starts with the fact that she spoke at the LatinX incluXion luncheon. The vast majority of Hispanics reject the term "LatinX." Yet the Democrats insist on forcing their language doctrine on the Hispanic community. What will come next?LatinX Hispanic Heritage Month?

President Biden and first lady Jill Biden arrive on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington on Monday, May 30, 2022, after returning from Wilmington, Del. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

The first lady is a lifelong educator and teaches a writing class at a Virginia community college. Her husband Joe fawned over the English professor in their Vogue cover story for laboring over important speeches and grading student papers.

A White House spokesperson issued an apology on Jills behalf following Breakfast Taco-Gate. Latinos wont fall for a half-hearted one sentence mea culpa tweeted out from her press secretary when Jill herself drafted and delivered the insult-ridden speech.

JILL BIDEN APOLOGIZES FOR 'TACOS' COMMENTS ABOUT LATINOS

Dr. Jill Biden may have her doctorate, but she is in no way a healer. Her husband prescribed unity and truth for a nation reeling from blue state lockdowns and riots. The full-time Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, retirees, however, have exasperated cultural divisions in America and clearly have no interest in embracing Hispanic heritage, beyond a sign-of-life visit to a taqueria in Washington, D.C.

If Jill really cherished the "bodegas of the Bronx" and wanted safe communities for Hispanics, she would urge Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to drop the murder charge against Jose Alba, a bodega worker and immigrant from the Dominican Republic who stabbed an ex-con in an act of self-defense.

JILL BIDEN'S HISPANIC 'PANDERING' GAFFES ACCUSED OF CHANNELING JOE'S 7-ELEVEN, 'YOU AIN'T BLACK' REMARKS

She would also advocate for religious liberties, strong families and educational freedom with no leftist divisive propaganda.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

Democrats will always take minority voters for granted. They promise Hispanic-Americans opportunity, security, fairness and prosperity. Then they go to Washington, abandon you and sell you out. Instead of dealing with the issues that impact Latino families most, including historic inflation and energy costs, Biden is importing millions of illegal immigrants, enabling drug cartels and human traffickers and neglecting the hardworking and patriotic Hispanic-Americans who are already here.

Decades of pandering to identity politics is permanently pushing Hispanics away from the Democratic Party. A New York Times poll found 63% of Hispanics who said that they would vote in the 2024 Democratic primary do not want Biden to run again. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump's strongest support in 2024 comes from Hispanics in a Republican primary.

Hispanic-Americans will lead the red wave that swamps Democrats in 2022, and the Bidens in 2024.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"Far-Right Latinas," as inappropriately described by the New York Times, who embrace Trumps America First agenda are an essential coalition in returning peace, prosperity and freedom to all communities throughout this nation.

Now more than ever, Republicans need to support Latinos who can speak to Hispanic-Americans with humility and their own experiences so that they can serve and represent their constituents as they would their family.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM MERCEDES SCHLAPP

Mercedes Schlapp is a Senior Fellow for CPAC. She was a Senior Advisor to Donald J. Trump for President Inc. and formerly the White House Senior Advisor For Strategic Communicationsin the Trump administration.

The rest is here:

Jill Biden's 'breakfast tacos' remark was not a gaffe. It was intentional and will drive Latinos to the GOP - Fox News

Posted in Intentional Communities | Comments Off on Jill Biden’s ‘breakfast tacos’ remark was not a gaffe. It was intentional and will drive Latinos to the GOP – Fox News

The Health and Healing Powers of Community – The Epoch Times

Posted: at 9:18 am

There are unexpected nutrients in lifecertain experiences and habits that give the mind and body essential support and make a marked improvement in how well we think, feel, and move as we age.

Social determinants of health are aspects of everyday living that impact our health. They span from intuitive components, such as economic status, to less apparent determinants, such as community.

In their 1999 bookSocial Determinants of Health, Michael Marmot and Richard Wilkinson provide scientific evidence in support of this added dimension of well-being. They found that poverty alone doesnt explain discrepancies in health. When people change social and cultural environments, the authors write, their disease risks change.

What does this mean for everyday people trying to improve their own health and well-being? Access to health care, screenings, and checkups are only part of the story. A persons social and cultural environmenttheir communityalso impacts their physical and mental health. Here are five research-backed ways to tap into community-based health benefits.

Social ties are at the heart of every community and can help prevent age-associated cognitive decline, but which social ties are most important? Data collected as part of the longitudinal Survey of Ageing, Health and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) initiative have been helpful in exploring this question. The data measured cognitive scores using immediate recall, delayed recall, and fluency while also measuring five types of social connectionspouse, children, other relatives, friends, and volunteeringbased on the participants lists of confidants (maximum of seven).

In a 2021 study, researchers modeled the SHARE data to examine five social structure types:

Participants in the multi-tie group experienced less cognitive decline on all measures than those in other groups, an indication that varied connections might be the key to staying sharp in old age. The friend-enhanced and family-rich networks also led to benefits when compared to close-family or family-poor groups.

Theres more than one way to access the cognition-based benefits of community, which is good news for older adults whose familial ties may already be cemented. While a varied social network including family and friends is the gold standard, a friend-enhanced social network can be built at any time and offers health benefits.

The SHARE study found that volunteering was an attribute in two of three community groups most likely to improve cognitive decline. Other studies have looked at volunteering on its own and found good reason to head to your local soup kitchen or community center.

Beyond the cognition-based benefits of an enriched social network, volunteering is associated with a reduction in hypertension.Hypertension, or high blood pressure, can damage artery walls leading to stroke or heart disease, two major causes of morbidity.

Onestudy looked at Americans aged 50 and older and took baseline blood pressure readings from those who had volunteered more than 200 hours in the previous year and those who hadnt. The study found that the people who had volunteered were significantly less likely to develop hypertension over the next four years.

Retirement homes have long been a potential living arrangement for older adults, while group homes have been popular among young adults. Multigenerational living, however, is currently making a resurgence through intentional living arrangements including cohousing and familial multigenerational housing. Multigenerational communities can help delay age-associated cognitive decline by increasing a personsaccess to a diverse and multi-tiered social network.

Further, cohousing represents a unique model that allows Americans to live in a multigenerational, intentional community without giving up the independence of single-family living. The mental health benefits of these communities were highlighted during the COVID-19 period of isolation, with cohousing residentsreporting lower levels of anxiety, depression, and self-destructive coping strategies than their peers outside of intentional communities. Several studies also have reported an association with improved physical health, though more research needs to be done to corroborate these findings.

Its unclear whether familial multigenerational housing has a positive impact on elder health when compared to living with a partner. Seniors living alone, however, tend to subjectively experience poorer health and exhibitpoorer health outcomes.

Children growing up in multigenerational housingexhibit improved cognitive functioning, possibly due to the strengthening bonds generated between young children and their elders. Additionally, financial benefits and the development of a village atmosphere can decrease the burden of child-rearing in isolation for young families.

An excellent way to build a community of friends and level up into either the multi-tie or friend-enhanced social categories is to join a social group. This is especially important for retired people, as an important source of social cohesion and cognitive complexity can be lost when people leave their work.

Astudy of English retirees found that participants who remained actively engaged in two social groups after retirement experienced a 2 percent risk of death in the first six years of retirement. For participants who began retirement with two social groups but maintained neither, the rate of mortality shot up to 12 percent. The relationship was linear: For every group lost in the first year of retirement, a participant was likely to experience a 10 percent lower quality of life at the follow-up six years later.

The importance of social groups extends beyond retiree health. Stroke patients resiliency has beenlinked to the number of social groups they had before having a stroke, while people suffering from a brain injury areless likely to experience post-traumatic symptoms if they join a social group after their injury. Moreover, college students who belong to multiple social groups exhibit better mental health outcomes and higher levels of resiliency.

Gardening is a time-honored tradition known for getting people active and outdoors. In many circles, community gardening is considered an upgrade. In addition to the physical benefits of gardening, those who garden in communityreport an improved sense of well-being, resilience, and optimism. For people who dont live near a community garden, resources on how to get started and fundingopportunities have been sprouting up in support of their creation.

There are many ways to tap into your community as a resource for health. What works best is often personal and depends on a persons own interests and inclinations. If your community is lacking and the available options arent a great fit, you arent alone and you arent without options. You can be the one to take that first step by starting a book club, exploring cohousing, or spearheading a garden in our own community.

Read the original:

The Health and Healing Powers of Community - The Epoch Times

Posted in Intentional Communities | Comments Off on The Health and Healing Powers of Community – The Epoch Times