The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: March 2021
OPINION: The Second Amendment and the right to bear arms an outdated relic – Tommie Media
Posted: March 11, 2021 at 12:32 pm
This essay was written by Jakub Cajk, a graduate student in Prof. Jana Sehnlkovs class, Major Issues in Contemporary Public Debates in the Department of North American Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, at Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic. Her class partnered with Dr. Mark Neuzils TommieMedia students to produce opinion pieces on issues of interest to Czech students. Dr. Neuzil edited.
In the Czech Republic, we have a strict law for the possession of arms. Only the holders of the firearms license may legally own guns. Our legislation determines the conditions for obtaining a firearms license. If we want to acquire the license for keeping arms, we must meet several requirements. We cannot have any criminal record, we must undergo a medical examination, and we must pass a test of qualification for holding a weapon. The law even states that we have to be responsible to gain the firearms license and defines this responsibility. This process ensures that all owners of guns are thoroughly selected and registered.
Meanwhile, in the United States, the right to bear arms is embedded in the Second Amendment of the Constitution and deeply rooted in society. Each day an average of 100 people die from gun violence in the United States. The estimated number of guns owned by civilians is 393 million. There are more guns than people in the United States. The more weapons, the bigger the risk of an intentional or unintentional shooting. Consequences of such shooting may be serious injury, death or everlasting trauma of survivors.
It is time to take action and limit the ownership of guns by stricter legislation.
No other constitutional amendment has recently gained so much attention and has been so controversial as the Second Amendment. It is more remarkable if we realize that the amendment consists of one single sentence: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. In my opinion, the interpretation in favor of an individual right to bear arms is incorrect.
Written documents reflect the times during which they were created. Americas founding documents were mostly written between 1787 and 1791. It should appear obvious that some sentiments from these times may now be outdated, such as the Third Amendment, which forbids the quartering of the soldiers in any house. This amendment was aimed against the British, who had forced people to take soldiers into their homes before American independence. In 2020, this is no longer a concern of U.S. citizens.
Any governing document older than 230 years needs updating in order for the system to function. Clinging to old documents is an obstacle to progress. No document should be inviolable, no matter its importance. Based on the Founding Fathers vision, the Senators should be elected by the legislature. This vision has altered during history, and since 1913, people have elected Senators directly.
The Second Amendment allows states to organize militias. The right to bear arms allowed the people to be ready for a possible British intervention after the Revolution. The Second Amendment served for the protection of the newly emerged Union against foreign powers. If such a threat existed today, the military would defend the citizens against foreign intervention. Law enforcement protects Americans from domestic intervention. I reckon the state Militia is not necessary since the U.S. military is so numerous and powerful.
If the Second Amendment means the right to bear arms for individuals, likely it serves for people to overthrow the government. However, if todays government becomes too oppressive, it can be toppled by peaceful protests or elections where guns are not needed.
Stricter gun laws would not limit ownership for people who use their guns for hunting or sport shooting. The law could moderate conditions for acquiring the firearms license for people who want to use guns for these activities. Such people would prove their intentions with guns by certain documents which would validate the reasons for keeping arms. Limiting gun ownership means that the number of guns would decrease and reduce the risk of mass shootings, suicides and intentional or unintentional shootings.
Anti-regulation supporters are right when they say that todays regulation is ineffective. However, the regulation can be enhanced. If we strengthened the regulation and pushed through stricter gun laws similar to the Gun Control Act of 1968 or Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, the regulation would become efficient. It is also necessary to unify the states laws of carrying weapons. This unification will be best ensured by a federal law that would establish a standard for the whole United States.
Amending the Constitution is almost impossible. But stricter gun laws are not impossible. If you want them, write to your Congressperson.
More:
OPINION: The Second Amendment and the right to bear arms an outdated relic - Tommie Media
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on OPINION: The Second Amendment and the right to bear arms an outdated relic – Tommie Media
Boebert’s Second Amendment stand appreciated by many in Garfield County – The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel
Posted: at 12:32 pm
Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., is often seen carrying one of the worlds most widely used pistols: a 9 mm caliber Glock.
Whether challenging open-carry protocol at Capitol Hill or holding a rally in downtown Rifle, Boebert almost always has the Austrian-made pistol at her side.
More recently, the 34-year-old Republican made headlines during an online Congressional House committee meeting aimed at addressing gun control. Boebert displayed two modern sporting rifles along with a shotgun and a Glock on a shelf behind her.
Shes a strong supporter of (the Second Amendment), as am I, said Garfield County Sheriff and longtime Boebert supporter Lou Vallario, during a conservative rally in Glenwood Springs in January. Our Second Amendment rights are always trying to get eroded. Im proud of her for being able to stand up for the Second Amendment.
Glenwood Springs pawn shop gunsmith and seller Greg Algazi said he not only agrees with Boeberts support of the right to bear arms, but also her go-to weapon of choice.
I think shes just part of that mentality that the Glock is inexpensive, lightweight, easy to service (and there are) a lot of accessories for it, he said. The accessory market and the after market parts for the Glock are enormous. You can change sights out quickly and cheaply, you can get extra mags quickly and cheaply.
Algazi also said parts including slides, frames and barrels are manufactured in the United States.
According to the companys website, Glock has a subsidiary manufacturing facility in Smyrna, Georgia, where they produce the Glock 42 model. The production line makes up a small fraction of total Glock output, most of which occurs in Deutsch-Wagram and Ferlach, Austria, as well Bratislava, Slovakia.
Though Algazi also owns a Glock, he said he prefers to openly carry an American-made, American-based handgun.
For me, the Glock doesnt fit me, he said. When I pick up a Glock, its not a natural fit and doesnt point naturally for me. My everyday carry is a Smith & Wesson.
As to whether members of Congress should be allowed to open carry in the Capitol, Algazi said he appreciates the professional law enforcement who provide protection but that he didnt see any harm in allowing for open carrying either.
I think they have enough Capitol security. I really dont think they have to, he said. But why not? Why not be prepared?
In addition to Washington gun protocol, Algazi said Boeberts in a key position to advocate for American gun rights. Algazi said 2020 saw 6 million new gun owners because of politics, pandemic worries and summer protests. He also appreciates Boeberts support for open carry without requiring a permit.
I dont want to go get fingerprinted, go to the county sheriff and apply for it and be on someones list as a concealed carry, he said. If I can carry it open for free, thats what I prefer. When I walk with my gun, I notice people see it, and I notice people give me a bit more space.
Former chair of the Garfield Democratic Party John Krousouloudis said he also supports Second Amendment rights, but disagrees with Boeberts laissez-faire approach.
Taking a step back and looking at the position shes taking on handguns, my personal view is that people should own guns responsibly, which includes training and background checks. Nobody owns a car without a drivers license and proper testing And (Boebert) has a very cavalier, free-for-all view on weapons, which are incredibly dangerous, which have one purpose in life, which is to kill somebody.
Krousouloudis is far more concerned about other issues COVID-19, health care and economy and said he hopes Boebert would prioritize those more.
She should not focus on what kind of weapons she carries or what she does with it, Krousouloudis said of Boeberts position in Congress. She should focus on what is she going to do for the people of Garfield County that are hurting, in the areas of COVID, health care, education and the need to diversify the economy because oil and gas is deteriorating?
Put simply, Krousouloudis said he would like for Boebert to work in a bipartisan fashion with people in Congress to come up with constructive legislation.
Attempts to reach Boebert for this story were unsuccessful.
See more here:
Boebert's Second Amendment stand appreciated by many in Garfield County - The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Boebert’s Second Amendment stand appreciated by many in Garfield County – The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel
Voters Praise Lauren Boebert for Giving Them a Voice on Second Amendment Rights – Newsweek
Posted: at 12:32 pm
Republican Colorado Representative Lauren Boebert has been praised by some of her constituents for giving them a voice, particularly on the Second Amendment's right to bear arms.
However, other constituents have felt differently, especially following her January 6 vote against certifying President Joe Biden's electoral victory. Critics say that votes like hers legitimized insurrectionists who rioted inside the Capitol in hopes of overturning the 2020 election. Others think that her focus on guns overshadows more-pressing issues facing her Colorado constituents.
Boebert has achieved notoriety in her opening days as a freshman representative. Barely two months into her first term, she is perhaps best known for supporting gun rights and expanding the fossil fuel industry as well as opposing Biden's election and his legislative effortsincluding putting forth bills to counter some of the president's executive orders on the environment and energy policy.
"I feel like she's my voice when I didn't feel like I had one," Boebert-supporter Jamie Cure told 5280, a Denver publication. "She's ignited me to be proud to be American again."
"She's a strong supporter of (the Second Amendment), as am I," Lou Vallario told The Daily Sentinel. Vallario is the sheriff of Garfield County, Colorado. "Our Second Amendment rights are always trying to get eroded. I'm proud of her for being able to stand up for the Second Amendment."
The freshman Republican Congress member has made guns a focus of her time in the Capitol. In a January 3 ad, she told viewers that she would "carry my Glock to Congress." She was also one of several Republicans who refused to participate in Capitol security measures following the January 6 insurrection.
On February 18, Boebert displayed three large firearms and a handgun in her background during a virtual House committee hearing. At the hearing, she pushed back on efforts to forbid Congress members from bringing guns to committee meetings.
She has repeatedly asserted that the Constitution gives all Americans the right to bear arms. She has also said that Congress members, in particular, should be allowed to carry guns in order to fight off any attackers in Washington D.C. or within the Capitol building.
But despite her advocacy for guns, it's unlikely that Boebert will vote on a firearms reform bill before she has to run for re-election in 2022, according to Mesa County Republican party chair and former Colorado state legislator Dan Thurlow.
"She should focus on what is she going to do for the people of Garfield County that are hurting, in the areas of COVID, health care, education and the need to diversify the economy because oil and gas is deteriorating," John Krousouloudis told The Sentinel. He is one of Boebert's constituents and the former chair of the Garfield Democratic Party.
Boebert has seats on the House Budget and Natural Resources Committees. On those committees, she has advocated for allowing for increasing multiple-use access on public lands, varying approaches to energy production, reducing the national debt and other issues, according to 5280.
Her approach to non-gun issues will most likely impact her re-election chances. Though she won her 2020 race by over 26,500 votes, representing just over 6 percent of the overall vote, a Democratic lawyer named Colin Wilhelm has already decided to challenge her in 2022.
Wilhelm told the Denver publication that he decided to run because of the January 6 insurrection. He added that he has heard from numerous Republicans who dislike Boebert's rhetoric. Unless Boebert adds more legislative accomplishments to her notoriety, Wilhelm and other opponents may use her focus on guns to make her more of a vulnerable political target.
Newsweek contacted Boebert's office for comment.
Go here to see the original:
Voters Praise Lauren Boebert for Giving Them a Voice on Second Amendment Rights - Newsweek
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Voters Praise Lauren Boebert for Giving Them a Voice on Second Amendment Rights – Newsweek
Effort Underway to Make all of Idaho County a 2nd Amendment Sanctuary Zone – bigcountrynewsconnection.com
Posted: at 12:32 pm
GRANGEVILLE - An effort is underway in Idaho County to add the entire county to the growing list of areas to declare itself a "Second Amendment Sanctuary" zone in Idaho.
The Idaho County 2A Coalition is leading the effort and is planning events to gather support and ask residents to sign petitions. Gatherings are planned on the next three Fridays (3/12, 3/19, 3/26) at the Idaho County Veterans Center at 318 E. Main Street in Grangeville.
A Second Amendment Sanctuary is typically a city or county that has adopted laws or resolutions that oppose the enforcement of certain gun control measures.
Once collected, the group plans to present the signatures to Idaho County Commissioners. "With a large number of citizens behind this action, we can raise the bar on our desire for Idaho County Commissioners and Idaho County Sheriff to declare Idaho County a Second Amendment Sanctuary with protections from outside governments that would infringe on these rights as described in the Constitution of the United States," says the group's website.
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Effort Underway to Make all of Idaho County a 2nd Amendment Sanctuary Zone – bigcountrynewsconnection.com
NASA Will Map Every Living Thing on the International Space Station – Scientific American
Posted: at 12:31 pm
Astronauts never travel to space alone. Each person voyaging off-world is accompanied by up to 100 trillion bacteria, viruses and other microorganisms, any number of which could jeopardize human health. Yet we are still mostly in the dark about how these communities of microscopic hitchhikers react to microgravity. We do not even know the full spectrum of spacefaring species living onboard the International Space Station (ISS). New studies, however, are designed to change that. Last month astronauts collected samples from across the interior of the ISS to build an unprecedented three-dimensional map of its microbiome. This effort at a space-based microbial census is the first step toward understanding, preventing and mitigating dangerous outbreakswhether they arise onboard the station, during long-duration flights toward Mars or even back home in hospitals.
We are constantly overrun by microbes. From the bacteria lining our guts to the too-small-to-see mites living at the base of our eyelashes, it is estimated that there are at least as many microbes on and within us as there are human cells. You can think of people as walking ecosystems, says Pieter Dorrestein, a chemical biologist at University of California, San Diego. Most of these minuscule creatures are actually essential and have such far-reaching impacts on our healthaffecting our immunity, our heart and perhaps even our mental healththat scientists often refer to the microbiome as an invisible organ. In fact, the microbial multitudes within us are so numerous that their total mass can add up to roughly the weight of our brain.
It might not come as a surprise, then, that understanding how the microbiome behaves during spaceflight is crucial if we want to send astronauts on long-term missions to Mars and beyond. But scientists are not only worried about the human microbiomethey are also worried about the spacecrafts microbiome. Take the Russian space station Mir as an example. In 1998about three years before the station deorbited into the Pacific Oceanscientists discovered several dozen species of bacteria, fungi and dust mites hiding behind a service panel. I never pictured an inanimate objecta machine that works beautifully like the stationas having a microbiome similar to someone whos alive, like a human, says Serena M. Aun-Chancellor, who is both a physician and a NASA astronaut. Yet, counter to the notion of space as a sterile, inert environment, any spacecraft will inevitably host an assortment of microbes in numbers sufficient to make any astronauts skin crawl.
A spacecrafts microbiome could prove hazardous to the health of the astronauts. Can you imagine youre on a long flight and all of the sudden you start to get, lets say, a flesh-eating bacterium, and you cant get rid of it? Dorrestein says. Those are the kinds of consequences that could materialize.
It is not a crazy idea. In 2006 a team of scientists sent a culture of salmonella bacteria for an 11-day ride on the space shuttle Atlantis only to find that once the microbes returned to Earth, they more easily killed mice. Bacteria that have slipped Earths surly bonds can also become more resistant to antibioticsa recipe for disaster, given the fact that long-duration spaceflight tends to weaken astronauts immune systems.
The new project launched by NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory and U.C. San Diego could help mitigate the microbial threat. In February astronaut Kate Rubins swabbed 1,000 different locations throughout the ISS. That is about 100 times greater than the number of swabs in typical microbial tracking studies, which usually focus on the most suspect parts of a living space such as kitchens, bathrooms and exercise areas. The samples will be placed in cold storage and, in a few months, sent back to Earth, where scientists will analyze their genetic signatures and name the various microbes to build a three-dimensional map of the ISSs full microbiome.
Moreover, each swab will capture trace molecules from food, oils, skin, and more. That prospect particularly excites Dorrestein, who is working on the project. Scientists currently know very little about what kinds of molecules are present on the ISS that nourish the growth of different microbial communities there. The new map will help them link specific molecules or nutrients to specific microbes. With that connection, scientists can craft guidelines to promote the growth of beneficial microbes and reduce the dangerous onesthrough nutrients alone. That might be as simple as utilizing specific construction materials on a spacecraft to Mars. All of this suggests the problem of a sick spacecraft could be partially solved before it even reaches the launchpad.
But Kasthuri Venkateswaran, a microbiologist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and principal investigator of the project, is most excited about the protective measures that could take place in transit. Although the current samples are being sent back to Earth, he notes that astronauts will need to cut out that middleman on future missions. When we go all the way to other planets, you dont have a FedEx to send the samples back, Venkateswaran says. Although scientists do have the capability to perform genomic analysis onboard the ISS, the process is not particularly speedy, and in the event of a dangerous outbreak, every moment may count (just think about how long it often takes to get results back from a PCR test for COVID-19). You want to make sure you can stay on top of thatas were all too aware these days of how some little bug can kind of mess up your world, says David Klaus, a space microbiologist at the University of Colorado Boulder.
To combat that issue, the swabs Rubin used in the station-sweeping assay are double-headed. One tip collects microbes for simple detection whereas the other intends to capture their metabolitesthe microorganisms natural chemical by-products. Once Venkateswaran and his colleagues have created a database linking specific microbes with certain metabolites, they can build small biosensors that look for just the metabolites. Picture a handheld device that could diagnose the presence of bacteria or fungi on the spacecraft and alert astronauts of an outbreak immediatelysimilar to a carbon monoxide detector.
A notification from such a system (which Venkateswaran suspects will take another five to 10 years to become a reality) would spark immediate actionas astronauts would intensify their cleaning protocols to prevent the an onboard outbreak. This will make for a better maintenance of tomorrows habitat, Venkateswaran says. Astronauts onboard the ISS already work hard to keep the microbiome population under control. Every week they vacuum the vents and wipe down surfaces with disinfecting wipes. Aun-Chancellor estimates that when she was in orbit, each of the crews six astronauts spent roughly three hours a week cleaning. That is 18 hours each week for the ISSs total habitable volume of just 388 cubic meters (around half of the passenger space in a Boeing 747), which may seem excessive. But given the ISSs unique circumstances, all that sanitizing is necessary. Up there, food just doesnt fall to the floor, she says. Food goes to the ceiling. Food sticks to the walls. Food is everywhere. So its 3-D cleaning.
This kind of conscientious cleaning leads some scientists to dismiss worries about an outbreak en route to Mars. I dont think that the influence of bacteria is really a big showstopper for long term spaceflight because evidence suggests otherwise, Klaus says. Weve had people living on the [ISS] with rotating crews continuously for over 20 years now. And there hasnt been any kind of outbreak there. Aun-Chancellor notes that simply finding dangerous bacteria is not cause for alarmit is only worrying if the microbes are making astronauts sick. I see it more as an identification and a heads up, she says. And then were just kind of watching and mapping and waiting to see what those bacteria do in that stressful environment, she adds.
But Venkateswaran is worried not only about risks to the astronautsbut also the chances of microbial contamination of any otherworldly destinations they visit. Astronauts are basically a pathogen to the planet, Aun-Chancellor says. Theyre a new microbiome thats suddenly stepping foot on Mars. Even the spacesuit that they step out in will have their own missions microbiome on the material surface of that suit. If scientists could map the microbiome on that suit better, they might be able to clean it better, too. Venkateswaran is hopeful that the research will even help scientists design superior suits with joints that prevent even the smallest microbes from leaking through.
The unique applications do not end there. For Liz Warren, senior program director at the ISS U.S. National Laboratory, the most tantalizing aspect about all this research has little to do with space. Any partially closed environmenta house, an airplane, a hospitalwill have its own microbiome. So learning how to prevent certain microbes from thriving in space (or how to halt them when they do) offers helpful lessons for similar environments on Earth. For example, consider another project running on the ISS that tests the efficacy of antimicrobial coatings manufactured by Boeing. The idea is that if the coatings work in spacewhere microbes can be far more dangerousthen they will work on Earth. In short, the ISS is an incredible laboratory in its own right. You cant do that on Earthyou cant take gravity out of the picture, Klaus says. Having microgravity is kind of like having a microscope for the first time in a different way. You see behaviors that you couldnt otherwise see.
Follow this link:
NASA Will Map Every Living Thing on the International Space Station - Scientific American
Posted in Space Station
Comments Off on NASA Will Map Every Living Thing on the International Space Station – Scientific American
China and Russia agree to build lunar space station together – Chron
Posted: at 12:31 pm
China and Russia have agreed to build a new lunar space station together, according to a statement by the China National Space Administration (CNSA).
CNSA and Russian federal space agency (Roscosmos) leaders signed a "memorandum of understanding" on Tuesday to move forward with plans to construct a lunar research station, according to Jessie Yeung with CNN.
MARS ROVER DOCUMENTARY: 'Good Night Oppy' will tell the story of a Mars rover that refused to give up
"China and Russia will use their accumulated experience in space science, research and development as well as the use of space equipment and space technology to jointly develop a road map for the construction of an international lunar scientific research station (ILRS)," CNSA said.
A statement from Roscosmos said the two space agencies plan to "promote cooperation on the creation of an open-access ILRS for all interested countries and international partners, with the goal of strengthening research cooperation and promoting the exploration and use of outer space for peaceful purposes in the interests of all mankind," Yeung wrote.
Neither statements from the CNSA or the Roscosmos provide a target date for the ILRS.
NASA isn't far behind with its plans to send astronauts to the moon and "establish sustainable exploration by the end of the decade," according to the space agency'sArtemis program.
Back in October, NASA signed the Artemis Accords to work with eight other nations and several partners in the private sector on future moon explorations, according to Mike Wall with Space.com.
A company called the Orbital Assembly Corporation (OAC) has set its sights on constructing the first commercial space station by 2025.
Russia and China, however, are not part of the Artemis agreement to work with the United States on their race to the moon, according to Wall.
While Russia has collaborated with the U.S. through the International Space Station, China is prohibited from collaborating on space projects unless Congress approves the partnership in advance, Wall said.
China also plans to send astronauts to the moon by the 2030s, and if they succeed, they will be only the second country after the U.S. to accomplish such a mission, Yeung wrote.
Originally posted here:
China and Russia agree to build lunar space station together - Chron
Posted in Space Station
Comments Off on China and Russia agree to build lunar space station together – Chron
New study from space station looks at human cells infected with salmonella | TheHill – The Hill
Posted: at 12:31 pm
In a new study published in the journal npj Microgravity, scientists and astronauts conducted experiments with human cells and pathogens to see how the two would change and interface differently in a low-gravity environment. The researchers used the microbial species salmonella typhimurium to infect human cells in controlled experiments on Earth and on the International Space Station.
The researchers found that there were changes in RNA and protein expression in the human cells in a microgravity environment. They also found that salmonella was able to cause the human cells to upregulate increase the rate or level of expression of compounds that would help fight an infection in both cells that were inflight and on the ground.
Inflight cells upregulated genes that were associated with inflammation, one of the human bodys mechanisms for fighting pathogens. Other genes that are related to virulence or stress regulators were also upregulated in the cells in space compared to the cells on the ground.
"We appreciate the opportunity that NASA provided our team to study the entire infection process in spaceflight, which is providing new insight into the mechanobiology of infectious disease that can be used to protect astronaut health and mitigate infectious disease risks,"said one of the studys authors Cheryl Nickerson, who is based at the Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State University, in a press release. "This becomes increasingly important as we transition to longer human exploration missions that are further away from our planet."
There were limitations to the study; not all samples that came back from space were able to be analyzed as fully as the scientists were hoping to. There were also small differences in the amount of pathogen administered to cells on the ground compared to inflight.
America is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.
Still, this studys findings are a good start to understanding how infections in space might affect our bodies. Scientists will need to know a lot more about the bodys response to a variety of pathogens, not just salmonella. This is all so that in the future humans may be able to spend more time in space and on longer flight missions.
"We knew that spaceflight also impacted several important structural and functional features of human cells that Salmonella normally exploits during infections on earth," the studys lead author Jennifer Barrila, who is also based at the Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State University,said in the press release. "Our study indicates that there are some pretty big changes in the molecular landscape of the intestinal epithelium in response to spaceflight, and this global landscape appears to be further altered during infection with Salmonella."
READ MORE LIKE THIS FROM CHANGING AMERICA
NEW PSYCHEDELICS STUDY SUGGESTS PLACEBO WORKS TOO
NEW STUDY WARNS PFIZER AND MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINES COULD BE FAR LESS EFFECTIVE AGAINST SOUTH AFRICA VARIANT
1 IN 4 AMERICANS REFUSE TO GET COVID-19 VACCINE: POLL
ALASKA BECOMES FIRST STATE TO OPEN VACCINES TO ADULTS OF ANY AGE
Read more:
New study from space station looks at human cells infected with salmonella | TheHill - The Hill
Posted in Space Station
Comments Off on New study from space station looks at human cells infected with salmonella | TheHill – The Hill
China and Russia are building a lunar space station together – Insider
Posted: at 12:31 pm
China is now one step closer to achieving its goals of bringing its people to the moon.
The country's national space administration announced this week that it had signed an agreement with Russia to build a lunar space station together. This station, they say, will be "open to all countries."
The International Scientific Lunar Station will also "carry out a wide range of scientific research including exploration and utilization of the moon," a statement from both agencies said.
This memorandum of understanding was signed by Dmitry Rogozin, general director of the Roscosmos State Corporation, and Zhang Kejian, head of China's National Space Administration.
"China and Russia will use their accumulated experience in space science, research and development as well as the use of space equipment and space technology to jointly develop a road map for the construction of an international lunar scientific research station (ILRS)," the statement continued.
Al Jazeera previously reported that China had poured billions into its "space dream" in the hopes of one day building a crewed space station and sending humans to the moon.
This investment has clearly paid off. The Chang'e-5 space probe last December brought back samples that it had picked up during its moon landing. The success of the Chang'e-5 was noted at the time to be a landmark demonstration of China's rapidly accelerating space capabilities.
According to a CNN report, the Chinese have now put in motion plans to send astronauts to the moon by the 2030s, which would make it the second country to send a man to the moon.
A statement from Roscosmos also noted that the organizations would "promote cooperation on the creation of an open-access ILRS for all interested countries and international partners, with the goal of strengthening research cooperation and promoting the exploration and use of outer space for peaceful purposes in the interests of all mankind."
This announcement to cooperate with the Chinese comes four months after Russia reportedly snubbed NASA's invitation to join the Artemis Accords, a plan that was meant to facilitate the US's preparations to build a permanent base on the moon and, eventually, send astronauts to Mars. At the time, NASA had announced its resolve to return to the moon in 2024, complete with plans to land the first woman and the next man on the moon by that deadline.
In October last year, however, Russia opted not to sign on to the Accords despite being courted by NASA, and despite seven other countries (including Australia, Canada, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom) getting on board with the agreement.
The Artemis Accords, named after NASA's moon-and-Mars-bound human-spaceflight program, also outlined guidelines for space exploration for nations to follow if they joined the effort: such as being peaceful, cooperating, and mining resources sustainably from space.
See the rest here:
China and Russia are building a lunar space station together - Insider
Posted in Space Station
Comments Off on China and Russia are building a lunar space station together – Insider
3D Scanning Tech Developed For Space Station Can Help Feed People On Earth – Forbes
Posted: at 12:31 pm
A flowering perennial ryegrass spike
Perennial ryegrass is fed to livestock in the United States and many other countries. The Artec Space Spider is a handheld 3D scanner created for use on the International Space Station. Travis Tubbs is a major with U.S. Space Force using the scanner to measure ryegrass varieties on Earth and help identify specific plants with the most desirable traits for breeders and farmers.
The problem here is with seeds that fall off too early. In the state of Oregon alone, where Tubbs has conducted published research, 360 million pounds of ryegrass seed was harvested in 2019, valued at more than $186 million. But 20% of the ryegrass grown there very year is lost due to something called early seed shattering, when seeds break off from the plant prematurely.
Artec Studio x-ray representation of a scan of a perennial ryegrass spike
Tubbs says creating 3D scans of individual plants, a simple process that takes about a minute, can help scientists pinpoint plants with the most desirable traits and outcomes in the field and use them to breed superior ryegrass and other kinds of plants, from rice and barley and wheat to fruits and vegetables.
These superior plants will be highly insect-resistant and drought tolerant, and require little to no pesticides, he says.
Technology is going to march forward and this is a great tool that can be used to help all farmers in analyzing whats out in their field.
Space Force and the Spider
The Space Force, the newest branch of the U.S. Armed Forces, was established in December 2019, before Tubbs started the project.
Hes a professor at the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado who teaches in the Biology Department and conducted his research at Oregon State University. Space Force is part of the Air Force.
Travis Tubbs
Tubbs came across the Artec Space Spider while looking for ways to study ryegrass and early seed shattering. I was literally going to build my own camera system to make this work, he says.
His research involved using the Space Spider to precisely capture ryegrass spikes and literally count the number of seeds that particular plants were losing every week. Coming back to specific plants was as simple as marking them with pieces of tape, then using intuitive software to analyze the scans, Tubbs says.
The advantage to 3D scans is that you can observe the unique characteristics of a plant, twisting a stalk around, for instance, to see how many seeds a spike of ryegrass has retained.
One big takeaway of the research: The height of the plant has something to do with how well it can retain seeds, Tubbs says. The taller the plant, the less likely it is to hold on to those seeds. So you want to breed shorter plants.
Also, plants with a wider angle of spikes, or spikes that dont grow too closely together, are more desirable.
Throughout two years of the project, Tubbs had 640 ryegrass plants under his care, originating from seeds collected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture from 40 different locations around the world. A total of 160 individual plants in the field were measured six to eight times over the duration of the work. The Artec Space Spider costs about $20,000.
The Moon and Mars
At first blush, you might think this ryegrass research by a Space Force major has something to do with growing crops for upcoming missions to the moon, or Mars.
Not yet, but this is definitely something thats useful for that, Tubbs says. You can digitize a 3D structure and send it off to whenever you need, around the world. Or above the world.
Tubbs predicts that improved plant varieties derived from 3D scanning will be sprouting from the ground in the near futuremaybe a decade or more. And farmers can be involved in using the technology.
As the world population continues to grow, weve got to get better and faster at producing food.
Excerpt from:
3D Scanning Tech Developed For Space Station Can Help Feed People On Earth - Forbes
Posted in Space Station
Comments Off on 3D Scanning Tech Developed For Space Station Can Help Feed People On Earth – Forbes
An Early History of the Eugenics Movement
Posted: at 12:29 pm
The eugenic movement, therefore, cannot be a short campaign like many political or social movements. It is, rather, like the founding and development of Christianity, something to be handed on from age to age.
~Report of the President of the American Eugenics Society, Inc., 1926.
As this short history of the eugenics movement shows, eugenicists have always been associated with bigotry, racism, and elitism while working in favor of wealthy white people.
In 1798, the Rev. Thomas Robert Malthus published An Essay on the Principle of Population as It Affects the Future Improvement of Society. This shortwork stressed that the human population was growing at a geometrical rate, but food production was only growing at an arithmetic (straightline) rate. This meant that, sooner or later, widespread starvation and famine would occur, resulting in a catastrophic collapse in the human population. As the following ninety-second video explains, Malthus reasoning was faulty.
This idea was argued in academia and in other milieu for several decades. For example, Charles Dickens character Ebenezer Scrooge presented Malthus ideas in his novella The Christmas Carol.
The debate over the possibility of an inevitable food shortage reached a full boil when Charles Darwin set the scientific world on its ear in 1856 by publishing On the Origin of Species, which set forth for the first time a coherent explanation of the theory of evolution. In his preface, Darwin stated that evolution was an application of the theories of Malthus to the entire animal and vegetable kingdom. Darwin stated that his theory of natural selection why some species endured as others disappeared was based on Malthus mathematical theories.
In 1871, Darwin extended this thesis in his book The Descent of Man. He stated that humanity would see some of the weaker races reduced in number or even wiped out by natural selection in the form of famine, diseases, war, and other influences, while the stronger races would survive and thrive.
Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, coined the term eugenics in 1883, a derivation of the Greek good birth (it is no coincidence that the term euthanasia, the control of death, is derived from the Greek good death). Galton described eugenics as the science of improving [human] stockto give the more suitable races a better chance of prevailing speedily over the less suitable.1 He founded the Eugenics Society in 1907, whose purpose was to spread eugenic teaching and bring human parenthood under the domination of eugenic ideals.2
Galtons new science, which came to be known as Social Darwinism, held that the struggle for existence in society and evolution would inevitably lead to the fittest races achieving domination over the less fit.
In 1869, Galton had published his work Hereditary Genius, in which he wondered if it might be possible to produce geniuses by inbreeding the upper classes through several generations, while sequestering the less desirable elements in monasteries, convents, and institutions, a combined program of both positive and negative eugenics.
Galton held the popular view that the naturally occurring evolution of the human race was being thwarted by philanthropy directed towards undesirable segments of the population. He proposed allowing Darwins natural selection to operate more freely without interference by society, and, further, combining it with humanengineered artificial selection in order to accelerate the evolution of the human race.
Galtons desire to eliminate these undesirable portions of humanity remains at the core of the eugenics movement until this day, as we shall see.
One of the first tasks at hand for the new eugenicists was to cut off, as far as possible, aid to the poor so that natural selection could once again do its work.
Margaret Sanger, in her book Pivot of Civilization, stated:
Such philanthropy, as Dean Inge has so unanswerably pointed out, is kind only to be cruel, and unwittingly promotes precisely the results most deprecated. It encourages the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant.3
Galton believed in the power of religion to move mens souls and minds, so he proposed that eugenics evolve from a hard science into national policy and eventually into a religion.4 The American Eugenics Society even published a Eugenics Catechism for Clergymen, which outlined the tenets and dogmas of this new religion.5
Atheist and racist Julian Huxley was the most important strategist of the early twentieth-century eugenics movement. He was the first DirectorGeneral of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and President of the English Eugenics Society. He also founded the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), and was a member of both the British Euthanasia Society and Great Britains Abortion Law Reform Association (ALRA). His grandfather, Thomas Henry Huxley, was a leading advocate of Darwins theories. His brother Aldous was the famous New Age psychedelic drug lobbyist.6
Julian Huxley seconded Galtons view that eugenics should eventually evolve into a religion:
I find myself inevitably driven to use the language of religion, for the fact is that all this does add up to something in the nature of a religion: perhaps one might call it Evolutionary Humanism. The word religion is often used restrictively to mean belief in gods; but I am not using it in this sense.I am using it in a broader sense, to denote an overall relation between man and his destiny, and one involving his deepest feelings, including his sense of what is sacred. In this broad sense, evolutionary humanism, it seems to me, is capable of becoming the germ of a new religion, not necessarily supplanting existing religions but supplementing them.7
One of the foremost eugenicists of the first half of the twentieth century is known to almost all prolifers as the founder of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) Margaret Sanger. Her journal The Birth Control Review, along with her many books, features hundreds of examples of racist and eugenicist thinking, culminating in her 1932 Plan for Peace. In light of all of these racist and eugenicist statements, it is astounding that Planned Parenthood continues to deny that Margaret Sanger had a program for Negroes.
American eugenicists confined themselves primarily to theorizing and philosophizing until the early 1920s, when state and local governments began to try out (purely for academic or fiscal reasons, of course) some of their more apparently innocuous schemes. These plans naturally targeted those who had the weakest voices, the poor and the institutionalized. The eugenicists soon found the simplest and most effective way of preventing the less desirable classes from reproducing widespread involuntary surgical sterilization.
Famous New York urologist William Robinson was certainly not unique in his view that it is the acme of stupidity to talk in such cases of individual liberty, of the rights of the individual. Such [unfit] individuals have no rights. They have no right in the first instance to be born, but, having been born, they have no right to propagate their kind.8 And this disgustingly arrogant attitude within the eugenics movement would find even more extreme measures.
Adolf Hitler was personally fascinated by the American eugenics program, and at one point said:
Now that we know the laws of heredity, it is possible to a large extent to prevent unhealthy and severely handicapped beings from coming into the world. I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock. Im sure that occasionally mistakes occur as a result. But the possibility of excess and error is still no proof of the incorrectness of these laws.9
In the early 1930s, a number of leading German academics began to lay the foundation of thought and theory that would soon culminate in the mass elimination of the unfit, and ultimately the Holocaust. For example, Halle Universitys Professor Doctor Karl Krtner pioneered the first German university course on race hygiene for physicians. He based it on the American pathfinders Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard Stoddard being, of course, the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White World-Supremacy and a board member of Margaret Sangers American Birth Control League for a decade. Krtner also explained that he used American racial and eugenic legislation as a model for the German extermination program.10
By 1935, leading American geneticist Hermann J. Muller complained that the legitimate aspects of the science of eugenics had been hopelessly perverted into a cult for advocates for race and class prejudice, defenders of vested interests of church and state, Fascists, Hitlerites, and reactionaries generally.8 He was right: if there was ever any ethically sound eugenics which focused simply on improving the overall health of the human race, it has been entirely taken over by bigots who want all non-whites and all poor classes eliminated.
Of course, Britain, the United States, and Germany were not the only nations to violate their citizens rights on a vast scale through enforced eugenic sterilization. As shown in the history of the world eugenics movement, Japan, Sweden, Finland and other nations enacted and enforced draconian sterilization measures on their most helpless citizens.
The eugenics movement is not an aspect of American history that we should be proud of. Why are we supporting those who continue to propagate eugenics(such as Planned Parenthood), when we ought to be exposing the injustice of the abortion industry toward the poor and racial minorities?
[1] Francis Galton. Inquiries into Human Faculty. London: Macmillan, 1883, page 25.
[2] Francis Galton. Memories of My Life. London: Melhuen Publishers, 1908.
[3] Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization. New York: Brentanos, 1922. See especially Chapter V, The Cruelty of Charity. Sanger condemns philanthropy repeatedly in this book. She also said:
The curious situation has come about that while our statesmen are busy upon their propaganda of repopulation, and are encouraging the production of large families, they are ignoring the exigent problem of the elimination of the feebleminded. In this, however, the politicians are at one with the traditions of a civilization which, with its charities and philanthropies, has propped up the defective and degenerate and relieved them of the burdens borne by the healthy sections of the community, thus enabling them more easily and more numerously to propagate their kind. [pages 82 and 83]
But there is a point at which philanthropy may become positively dysgenic, when charity is converted into injustice to the selfsupporting citizen, into positive injury to the future of the race. Such a point, it seems obvious, is reached when the incurably defective are permitted to procreate and thus increase their numbers. [page 99]
My criticism, therefore, is not directed at the failure of philanthropy, but rather at its success. These dangers inherent in the very idea of humanitarianism and altruism, dangers which have today produced their full harvest of human waste, of inequality and inefficiency, were fully recognized in the last century at the moment when such ideas were first put into practice. Readers of Huxleys attack on the Salvation Army will recall his penetrating and stimulating condemnation of the debauch of sentimentalism which expressed itself in so uncontrolled a fashion in the Victorian era. [pages 108 and 109]
The effect of maternity endowments and philanthropy would have, perhaps already have had, exactly the most dysgenic tendency. The new government program would facilitate the function of maternity among the very classes in which the absolute necessity is to discourage it. Such benevolence is not merely superficial and near sighted. It conceals a stupid cruelty, because it is not courageous enough to face unpleasant facts. Aside from the question of the unfitness of many women to become mothers, aside from the very definite deterioration in the human stock that such programs would inevitably hasten, we may question its value even to the normal though unfortunate mother. [page 115]
[4] Francis Galton. Eugenics, Its Definition, Scope and Aims. Sociological Papers. London, 1905.
[5] Eugenics Catechism for Clergymen, prepared by the Committee on Cooperation with Clergymen of the American Eugenics Society. Advertised among other publications in the Report of the President of the American Eugenics Society, Inc., June 26, 1926, page 25.
[6] Julian Huxley wrote:
The negro mind is as different from the white mind as the negro body from the white body. The typical negro servant, for instance, is wonderful with children, for the reason that she really enjoys doing the things that children do.You have only to go to a nigger campmeeting to see the African mind in operation the shrieks, the dancing and yelling and sweating, the surrender to the most violent emotion, the ecstatic blending of the soul of the Congo with the practice of the Salvation Army. So far, no very satisfactory psychological measure has been found for racial differences; that will come, but meanwhile the differences are patent.[intermarriage between the] negro and Caucasian typegives rise to all sorts of disharmonious organisms.By putting some of the white mans mind into the mulatto, you not only make him more capable and more ambitious (there are no wellauthenticated cases of pure blacks rising to any eminence), but you increase his discontent and create an obvious injustice if you continue to treat him like any fullblooded African. The American negro is making trouble because of the American white blood that is in him.
Julian Huxley. America Revisited III. The Negro Problem. The Spectator, November 29, 1924.
[7] Julian Huxley. Evolution in Action. New York City: Signet, 1957, page 132.
[8] Gregory E. Pence, M.D. Classic Cases in Medical Ethics: Accounts of the Cases That Have Shaped Medical Ethics, with Philosophical, Legal, and Historical Backgrounds. New York City: McGrawHill Publishers, 1990. Chapter 14, Preventing Undesirable Teenage Pregnancies, pages 286 to 302.
[9] Adolf Hitler, quoted in Otto Wagener. Hitler aus nchster Nhe: Aufzeichnungen eines Vertrauten 19291932, edited by Henry A. Turner. Frankfurt am Main: Ullstein, 1978, page 264.
[10] Reich Opens Race Study: Halle University Course Said to be Based on American Models. The New York Times, August 2, 1933
William McDonald revealed that Grant openly advocated for the establishment of a Nordic, Protestant America in his review of Grants book The Conquest of a Continent, or the Expansion of Races in America [New York City: Charles Scribners Sons, 1933]. This book featured a foreword by prominent eugenicist and racist, Professor Henry Fairchild Osborn.
The rest is here:
Posted in Eugenics
Comments Off on An Early History of the Eugenics Movement







