Monthly Archives: March 2021

Newcastle, the heart of northeast England, is not a small city with its approximately 300,000 inhabitants.But to the few British Jews that cast their eyes northward from Manchester and London, the city is little more than what it was in Roman times an outpost straddling the edges of Hadrians Wall.To the Romans, Hadrians Wall marked the edge of the civilized world. To many Jews in London, Newcastle might as well be the edge of the Jewish world.The some 600 overlooked Jews who call Newcastle home are a microcosm of the challenges that have affected UK Jewish communities outside the London Bagel Belt: how to sustain a shrinking and aging community.Yet just across the slow-running River Tyne, the redbrick houses of Europes last great yeshiva town are visible in the smaller neighboring city of Gateshead.As if etched from an Isaac Bashevis Singer story, Gateshead is where prayer and Yiddish jokes escape through the open windows of the towns multiple yeshivas, and where on a Friday evening black-frocked Talmud scholars sprint home to place Shabbat candles in windows. The Tyne crossing takes you to a different Jewish world.Perhaps it was always meant to be this way Gateshead was founded, so the histories go, by a shocked and dismayed group of Lithuanian Jews who, having stepped off the bows of the ships that ferried Jews from the Russian Baltic to the beating heart of industrial England, thought that the Newcastle community had anglicized to such a degree that they had lost their authentic connection with Judaism.

cnxps.cmd.push(function () { cnxps({ playerId: '36af7c51-0caf-4741-9824-2c941fc6c17b' }).render('4c4d856e0e6f4e3d808bbc1715e132f6'); });

But in Newcastle, the rabbi warns, it would be a mistake to see the decline of one congregation as a net positive for the other.

It is important for the Jew in North London and the Jew in Manchester to know that there is Jewish life outside of those bubbles, he said. They have exactly the same Jewish life, in fact, probably more so because in North London you can drive on Shabbat and eat a bacon bagel and everyone will still call you a Jew. In Newcastle, you could never get away with that.

Read the original:

Jewish community in Newcastle, England, shrinks, but has unexpected help - The Jerusalem Post

This week on Behind the Headlines, pioneering Orthodox feminist Blu Greenberg gives a video interview about wrestling between faith and faith in womankind.

This special Womens History Month episode is already live for Times of Israel Community members, but its not too late to join ToI Community nowand access this weeks segment, along with past episodes and the rest of our wide-ranging library of exclusive content.

Greenberg, who is married to Rabbi Yitz Greenberg, is an American writer specializing in modern Judaism and womens issues. She is well known for her books On Women and Judaism: A View from Tradition, How to Run a Traditional Jewish Household, and Black Bread: Poems, After the Holocaust.

Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top storiesFree Sign Up

She gave the opening address at the first National Jewish Womens Conference in 1973; she chaired the first and second International Conference on Feminism and Orthodoxy; and she is the founder and first president of JOFA, the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance. In 2000, she received the Woman Who Made a Difference award from the American Jewish Congress Commission for Womens Equality.

The cover of Blu Greenbergs On Women and Judaism: A View from Tradition. (courtesy)

Greenberg speaks with The Times of Israels deputy blogs editor Anne Gordon, who also hosts the Talking Talmud podcast on daf yomi and The Chochmat Nashim Podcast, which speaks from inside the Jewish community about respect for tradition, and the need for justice.

The two discuss how Greenberg got her serendipitous start on this journey toward Orthodox feminism and how not everything in secular feminism aligns with Orthodoxy/religion. Greenberg identifies six areas of change for female access in Orthodoxy: learning (Torah); leadership (rabbinical degrees, programs, titles, credentials); life cycle ceremonies (bat mitzvah, simhat bat); liturgy (tefillah communal and individual); legal testimony (as witnesses); and officiating in legal roles, and divorce and agunot, or chained women.

Orthodox feminists have their plate full with internal issues, said Greenberg, but they should also be involved in global issues, such as the suffering of women around the world from abuse or poverty.

And finally, Greenberg answers the question of what she would do differently if she were coming of age now, in 2021.

To see this and future episodes of Behind the Headlines,join the Times of Israel Community today. Youll also gain access to all of our exclusive online content, an ad-free experience of the ToI site and apps, and a weekly insider letter from David Horovitz.

If you are already a ToI Community member, youll receive a link to all Behind the Headlines sessions by email.

I'm proud to work at The Times of Israel

Ill tell you the truth: Life here in Israel isnt always easy. But it's full of beauty and meaning.

I'm proud to work at The Times of Israel alongside colleagues who pour their hearts into their work day in, day out, to capture the complexity of this extraordinary place.

I believe our reporting sets an important tone of honesty and decency that's essential to understand what's really happening in Israel. It takes a lot of time, commitment and hard work from our team to get this right.

Your support, through membership in The Times of Israel Community, enables us to continue our work. Would you join our Community today?

Thank you,

Sarah Tuttle Singer, New Media Editor

Youre serious. We appreciate that!

Were really pleased that youve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month.

Thats why we come to work every day - to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world.

So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we havent put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.

For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.

See the original post here:

Join ToI Community and meet the matriarch of Orthodox feminism, Blu Greenberg - The Times of Israel

The Jewish Education Center of Cleveland announced the six recipients of its 2020 educator awards.

The awards will be presented at the JECs 27th annual celebration, which will be held virtually May 11.

Rebecca Faur, art specialist and second-grade teacher at Bnai Jeshurun Congregation in Pepper Pike, and Rabbi Rick Schindelheim, a seventh- to 12th-grade Talmud, Chumash and Jewish history teacher at Fuchs Mizrachi School in Beachwood, will receive the Albert B. Ratner and Jack and Esther Goldberg Israel Fellowship, which provides funding for study opportunities in Israel. The fellowship is given annually to two outstanding teachers, one from a day school and one from a supplementary school, according to a news release.

Sora Berger, who teaches seventh- to 12th-grade history at Yeshiva Derech Hatorah in Lyndhurst, will receive the Steiger Family Education Grant, which is given annually to an exceptional day school teacher to cover partial costs of formal Judaic study.

Vicki Teitelbaum, an early childhood educator at Gross Schechter Day School in Pepper Pike, will receive the Libbie L. Braverman Award, a parent-nominated award that recognizes a teacher who has demonstrated dedication and devotion to teaching, and has significantly contributed to developing methods or materials to the Jewish teaching profession, the release said.

Jacqueline Lausin of Jewish Day Nursery in Shaker Heights will receive the Dr. Lifsa Schachter Early Childhood Educator Award, which recognizes an early childhood educator who possesses a professional skill set and sophisticated understanding of the unique developmental, social, emotional and educational needs of children from birth to pre-K.

Estee and Yaakov Fleischmann, co-directors of Camp Stone in Sugar Grove, Pa., will receive the first S. Lee Kohrman Award in Jewish Experiential Education. This award recognizes an outstanding experiential or informal beyond-the-classroom Jewish educator or educators in the Cleveland Jewish community. This award is focused on educational experiences that take place outside of a traditional classroom.

We congratulate these outstanding educators and the institutions in which they work, for being models of excellence in Jewish learning and impacting the Jewish identities and journeys of learners of all ages, said Seymour Kopelowitz, executive director of the JEC, which is based in Cleveland Heights, in the release.

More here:

Six educators to receive awards from JEC of Cleveland - Cleveland Jewish News

Breadcrumb Trail Links

The B.1.351 variant first detected in South Africa and shown to be more resistant to some vaccines has spread to a fifth region in the province.

Author of the article:

The more contagious COVID-19 variants continued to spread across Quebec on Tuesday, with the number of confirmed cases rising by 179 to a cumulative total of 522.

Meanwhile, seven schools four in Montreal and three in Laval announced they had suspected variant cases among students, according to covidecolesquebec.org, the website run by Nuns Island parent Olivier Drouin that tracks COVID-19 in the educational sector.

Talmud Torah Elementary School in Cte-des-Neiges and Michelangelo International Elementary School in Rivires-des-Prairies are closing temporarily as a result of the variants. Michelangelo is overseen by the English Montreal School Board. Although the EMSB had installed air purifiers in 30 of its buildings, it did not deem it was necessary at Michelangelo.

The latest figures by Quebecs public health institute found that the B.1.351 variant first detected in South Africa and shown to be more resistant to some vaccines, including the one by AstraZeneca has spread to a fifth region in the province: the Montrgie, with one confirmed case. The variant first appeared in Abitibi-Tmiscamingue in western Quebec, where the number of confirmed infections has climbed by five to 100.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

(Lanaudire confirmed a second B.1.351 variant case Tuesday. The other regions with B.1.351 are the Laurentians and Montreal, each with one case.)

However, the variant that is circulating the most is B.1.1.7, which originated in the U.K. and has been found to be at least 50 per cent more transmissible than the older strains of the coronavirus. The number of confirmed cases of B.1.1.7 which is also considered to be more lethal jumped by 118 to 311 in Montreal. The total number of B.1.1.7 cases in Quebec now stands at 413.

However, that is half the picture. The other half are presumptive variant cases. The Institut national de sant publique du Qubec (INSPQ) revised that total downward by 66 to 2,179. (The INSPQ has previously explained that once confirmed, cases are withdrawn from its chart on presumptive variants. The INSPQ had also removed presumptive cases at one point because it had counted them twice.)

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Still, the INSPQs chart on presumptive cases shows that the number in Chaudire-Appalaches has nearly doubled, to 43 from 22.

A presumptive case is indeed a more transmissible so-called variant of concern that awaits lengthier genetic sequencing to determine its lineage: B.1.1.7, B.1.351 or P.1, the strain that is sweeping through Brazil, causing a spike in hospitalizations.

On Tuesday evening, Premier Franois Legault warned B.1.1.7 will become the dominant strain by the end of April.

We have to be realistic. By the end of next month, the majority of cases in Quebec will be with this variant, Legault said.

Despite the proliferation of the variants, Legault defended his decision to reopen theatres and concert halls in Montreal and other red zones as of March 26. In a previous announcement, the government scheduled the reopening of gyms on March 26, too.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

We still consider that its under control, Legault said. We have to be prudent. Thats why we announced only a few new measures.

Dr. Horacio Arruda, Quebecs chief public health officer, noted that around 21 per cent of COVID-19 cases in Montreal comprise the new variants. In the Capitale-Nationale region, its 33 per cent, he added.

The Laboratoire de sant publique du Qubec is now screening all positive COVID-19 samples for variants. Although such screening (known in French as criblage) is faster than genetic sequencing, there could still be some lag time in reporting results.

These variants are lurking behind the overall number of COVID-19 cases, which have declined for three days in a row in the province and for four days in Montreal.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Its worth noting that a similar scenario of declining cases played out in Ontario, which was hit earlier with the variants than Quebec, and which may now be at the start of a third COVID-19 resurgence. On Tuesday, Ontario reported a total of 1,208 confirmed variant cases, up by 27. Ontarios cumulative tally for presumptive variant cases rose by 501 to 9,131 a stark reminder of what might lie ahead for Quebec.

aderfel@postmedia.com

Twitter.com/Aaron_Derfel

All our coronavirus-related news can always be found atmontrealgazette.com/tag/coronavirus.

Sign up for our email newsletter dedicated to local COVID-19 coverage atmontrealgazette.com/coronavirusnews.

Help support our local journalism bysubscribing to the Montreal Gazette here.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Sign up to receive daily headline news from the Montreal Gazette, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Montreal Gazette Headline News will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notificationsyou will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Visit link:

Confirmed COVID-19 variant cases jump by 179 in Quebec, including in schools - Montreal Gazette

Majesty and humility. These two words have been swirling through my mind.

After consulting with health experts who confirmed my role as a community educator, I received the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine at the Moscone Center in San Francisco on March 10. The experience was breathtaking. Standing in an incredibly-well organized series of lines, having my appointment registered through a QR code, and watching the dozens of volunteers and healthcare workers vaccinate hundreds of humans within the span of one hour that I was there; it was the first time in my life that I felt as though I was taking part in a generation-defining moment of human progress.

Rav Soloveitchik in his Lonely Man of Faith famously described that the first responsibility God gave humanity (Adam 1) was to conquer the world with scientific progress and innovation. I saw that before my eyes at the Moscone Center.

The Ravs second term in the dialectic of humanity (Adam 2) is about the humility to stand in awe. The deeply emotional moment of receiving my first dose of vaccine brought back the immense feeling of humility.

Almost everything about this last year has been unbelievable in the literal sense of the term. As I was standing in line, I realized that I had not seen remotely that number of people at one time or place since Purim 2020. Back then, the thought of even a short lockdown was beyond grasp. How little do we know about the future? How little do we know about ourselves before we are tested in ways we could not have imagined?

These same feelings came to mind the following Sunday morning, when we opened doors and windows, plugged in industrial-sized fans, and held our first indoor service back in the Beth Jacob sanctuary in over one year. Our sanctuary that during the High Holy Days can hold close to 400 individuals was filled by fewer than 20 women and men. How majestic. And how humbling.

While I was sitting for the mandatory 15-minute waiting period after my vaccine, filled with gratitude and hope, I recited the blessing: Baruch Atah Hashem Elokeinu Melech Haolam, HaTov VeHameitiv. Blessed are You, God, Master of the Universe, Who is Good and bestows good.

Gods ways are beyond my comprehension. The line between exile and redemption is razor thin. And yet, I feel how our community is slowly inching back towards hope, towards renewal, towards life.

Our first service inside Beth Jacob in over a year was to celebrate Rosh Chodesh Nissan, the month of redemption. The Talmud states: In Nissan we were once redeemed. And in Nissan we will again be redeemed in the future. (Rosh Hashanah 10b)

With a sense of awe for the majesty of scientific achievements, and humility for how little we know of Gods ways in this world, may that redemption come soon in our days.

View original post here:

Getting vaccinated was a lesson in humility and gratitude J. - The Jewish News of Northern California

Nobody knows exactly when Jews first arrived in what later would become Germany. In all probability they came with the Romans who had been warring with Germanic tribes even before the Common Era. Arguably, there were Jews living as Roman citizens in the Rhineland as early as the second century CE.

What is known is that there was a Jewish presence in 321 CE in Colonia Claudia Ara Agrippinensium, a Roman colony on the Rhine River and the historical nucleus of todays city of Cologne. It was in that year that Emperor Constantine in a written edict allowed the colonia to appoint Jews to the municipal council. This is why a German organization, the Association 321 2021: 1,700 years of Jewish Life in Germany, decided to declare 2021 an official anniversary and celebrate it with a big splash with the blessing of the body politic as well as that of the Jewish community.

For the Jewish world, the anniversary year is a good opportunity to look back at the enormous contribution to the development of Judaism by the Jewish community in Germany. Many features of the Jewish world as we know it today, can be traced to German Jewry.

Ashkenaz, of course, is the original name of Germany in Jewish tradition while the term Germania is of Roman provenience. Ashkenaz appears in the Torah as the name of one of Noahs great-grandsons, but starting in the 11th century CE it came to designate the area of the Rhineland, the Palatinate (today in Western Germany) and parts of Northern France. How the biblical name ended up being identified with this specific region, is not really clear.

In any case, it was the cradle of German Jewry in particular and of Ashkenazi Jewry in general. A defining influence on the emerging Ashkenazi world originated in the 10th and the 11th century in the so-called SHUM cities, an acronym for Shpira, Vormayza, and Magentza, todays Speyer, Worms and Mainz. None other than Rashi whose commentary we still read in Talmud editions studied at the Worms yeshiva around 1060.

Groundbreaking halachic rulings were issued by poskim (scholars who determine Jewish law) from the SHUM cities. The most prominent among the SHUM rabbis was Rabbenu Gershom. Gershom was born in 960 in Metz, in the Lorraine area today in France but later he headed the famous yeshiva in Worms.

cnxps.cmd.push(function () { cnxps({ playerId: '36af7c51-0caf-4741-9824-2c941fc6c17b' }).render('4c4d856e0e6f4e3d808bbc1715e132f6'); });

ONE OF his formative rulings was the prohibition of polygamy, which adapted the structure of Jewish families to that of the Occident. Interestingly, Gershom also forbade reading letters by people who were not their intended recipients. In the 12th and 13th centuries SHUM deciders issued additional important edicts, known as Takkanot Shum, which dealt, among other topics, with business ethics.

Another important influence on the development of Jewish thinking was the Hassidei Ashkenaz movement. Starting out in the Bavarian city of Regensburg and in the SHUM cities in the 11th century, the movement took hold throughout Germany and later spread to other countries as well. Hassidei Ashkenaz stressed Gods incorporeality and omnipresence. In order to better understand Gods nature and true will, members of the movement immersed themselves in the study of supernatural phenomena and miracles, making an important contribution to Jewish mysticism. Their search for the right path also included turning away from worldly things.

In the following centuries, Talmud study and deep piety remained the foundation of Jewish life. If there was a continuous Jewish presence in Germany in the Middle Ages, it was primarily for lack of a strong central rule in German territories. Thus, German Jews escaped wholesale expulsion like the edicts of expulsion in England in 1290 or in Spain in 1492.

This does not mean that there were no regional acts of wanton and violent persecution, including regional banishments. Yet, despite the ups and downs, or, often enough, downs and downs, German Jewry remained a strong force in the Jewish world. The list of rabbinical luminaries living and teaching in Germany was long, even as the demographic center of European Jewry shifted to the east. According to estimates, some 60,000 to 80,000 Jews lived in Germany in the second half of the 18th century just one tenth of the Jewish population in the Polish-Lithuanian dual monarchy at that time.

In the 19th century, changes that took place in Germany would substantially shape the development of the modern Jewish world. Germany became the cradle of three streams of Judaism as we know them today: Reform, Conservative and Modern Orthodox (or Neo-Orthodox as it was originally called).

The point of departure of Reform Judaism in Germany was liturgy. Its pioneers strove to adapt services to modern times. In Reform synagogues, which began appearing in the second decade of the 19th century, the separation between men and women was gradually eased, organs were introduced and German at least partially replaced Hebrew as the language of the services.

There was, however, more than liturgy at stake. Rabbi Abraham Geiger, considered the key founder of the Reform movement, called for a new understanding of those mitzvot that he saw as the result of historical developments and therefore alterable among them the rules of kashrut, as opposed to those mitzvot that were regarded as universal.

FOR SOME Jews the Reform movement went too far, even though they favored a modernization of Jewish religious life as well. One of them was Rabbi Zacharias Frankel who founded the Conservative movement which put greater emphasis on Jewish tradition and the history of the Jewish people.

Change was introduced in Orthodox Judaism, too. Rabbis Samson Raphael Hirsch and Azriel Hildesheimer insisted on the compatibility of an Orthodox way of life with secular education, including academic education, which both of whom had enjoyed in addition to their religious studies. In 1873, Hildesheimer founded the rabbinical seminary in Berlin, which soon became an important rabbinical training center known and respected throughout the Jewish world.

Many Orthodox Jewish educators set out to ensure that young Jewish children obtained profound Jewish knowledge even as the winds of change were blowing strong. One of the most prominent was Rabbi Seligmann Baer Bamberger of Wrzburg, the Wrzburger Rav. In 1856, he founded, the Israelite Institution for Education and Studies an elementary school which combined secular studies with a rigorous religious curriculum.

Germany was also the home of a forerunner of religious Zionism, Rabbi Zvi Hirsch Kalischer (1795-1874). Kalischer, a Talmudic scholar, considered Jewish settlement in the Land of Israel as a contribution to the coming of the Messiah. In this, his views were similar to the concept of the State of Israel as the beginning of redemption.

In the 19th and early 20th century, Germany also became a magnet for countless Jewish intellectuals and ideologues from across the Jewish political spectrum, mainly from Eastern Europe. Many studied at German universities while planning a new Jewish future each one according to his own Weltanschauung. This rich Jewish life came to a tragic halt when Nazi hordes forced a major part of German Jews into exile and murdered nearly all of those who had not managed to escape (and repeated throughout much of Europe).

Today, there is a thriving Jewish community in Germany again. The registered membership of the Jewish communities is close to 100,000 while many other Jews among then a large number of Israelis living in Germany chose to remain unaffiliated.

Let there be no mistake: We know that the historical glory of German Jewry cannot be restored. We have, however, succeeded in creating quite a vibrant Jewish life. In todays Germany, there are some 90 Jewish communities, Jewish day schools, including five high schools and a multitude of Jewish institutions dealing with all aspects of communal life.

Without trying to go back in time, we do try to remember and to commemorate the history of Jews on German soil. This is why our three rabbinical seminaries, a liberal, an orthodox and a conservative one, are named after the founding fathers of the movements whose traditions they represent: Rabbi Abraham Geiger, Rabbi Azriel Hildesheimer and Rabbi Zacharias Frankel. Yes, 2021 is a good year to honor the illustrious past as we march on into the future.

The writer is the president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany.

Go here to read the rest:

The imprint of Jews in Germany on the Jewish world - opinion - The Jerusalem Post

That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. This is the entire Torah; the rest is commentary.

Rabbi Hillel, Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 31a

Introduction: Trump and Talmud

Israels largely enthusiastic support for Donald J. Trump represented a distressing irony of post-Holocaust Jewish history. Lest we forget, this former president was an American leader who made openly common cause with multiple hate groups; reversed a once-proud US national tradition of welcoming the refugee;[1]replaced elementary human compassion with indifferent family separations and beautiful barbed wire;[2] turned an unforgivably blind eye to genocide-like crimes in Syria[3] and made the United States glaringly complicit with Vladimir Putins crimes against humanity.[4]

Since 1945, an aptly proud Jewish mantra has been Never Again. From an authoritative Talmudic standpoint, this unambiguous stance must be applied to all peoples, and not just the Jewish People. Prima facie, to do otherwise would mean to disregard Judaisms immutably core commitment to higher law,[5] species universality and human oneness. As we may also learn from Talmud, The dust from which the first man was made was gathered in all four corners of the earth.

There is still more for Israelis to consider. During his continuously sordid presidency, Donald Trump actively celebrated the rancor of an everyone for himself national and international philosophy; that is, a conspicuously murderous posture intrinsically alien to everything Jewish. In Judaism, after all, whatever the particular sources, dignified human relations must always be founded upon cooperation and collaboration, not gratuitous belligerence or zero-sum conflict.[6]

Always.

But how did this defiling Israeli association with mendacious American leadership actually come to pass? Was it merely the result of a misguided Realpolitik or power politics orientation in Israel? To be sure, from the start of his anti-scientific[7] and anti-intellectual administration,[8] Donald Trump openly presented himself as a friend of Israel.

But why the reciprocal? Why would a nation founded upon human dignity and moral principle declare itself a witting friend of Trump? Because he sent his Jewish son-in-law to move Americas embassy tile from a building in Tel Aviv to another building in Jerusalem?

Oddly, because Israel is generally a country of smart and well-educated people,[9] this degrading reciprocity was widely accepted among otherwise thoughtful public citizens. Now, however, going forward in moral, legal[10] and pragmatic survival terms, there will be a continuously high price to pay for such shortsighted acceptance, for the Jewish States demeaning and corrosive complicity with Donald Trumps inexcusable cruelty.[11]

Origins of the Defilement

None of this was ever complicated. Looking back, the Trump administration actively sought to replicate some of the worst features of authoritarian governance. While such a normally grievous charge might once have seemed unreasonable or perhaps even outrageous, this could no longer be the case after January 6, 2021. On that lamentable day of fevered insurrection, this bitterly injurious president, with his unashamedly open support of white supremacy[12]and by his repeated subordinations of binding law to personal whim, focused more on dominating his nations streets[13] than on maintaining even the thinnest veneers of national justice.[14]

When, in the closing days of his still-aspiring dictatorship, Trump spawned violent uprising against his own government, a rebellion at the US Capitol replete with tee-shirts commending Camp Auschwitz, he exhibited the most egregiously fundamental tenet of Joseph Goebbels.[15] This was the supremely ironic message that once a lie becomes sufficiently monstrous[16] and preposterous, it can, if properly fashioned, become more credible.Intellect rots the mind, declared Nazi Minister of Propaganda Goebbels at a Nuremberg rally in 1934.I love the poorly educated, said then candidate Donald Trump to an American rally audience in 2016.

Nonetheless, in law and morality, truth is exculpatory.

Moral and intellectual judgment ought never have been so easily cast aside in Jerusalem as it was in Washington. From the start, Israel ought to have known much better than to openly align its core interests with unprecedented Trump crimes[17] and derangements. Stingingly ironic, too, is that a principal surviving remnant of the Jewish People that is, the legitimate Jewish State born directly from the ashes of genocidal murder[18] could have chosen to identify its interests and ideals with such a sorely manipulative American leader.

Never again. Makes sense, of course, but not just for us. Judicially and Judaically, any such suggested Jewish exclusivity is indefensible. Patently, it is an oxymoron.

There is more. Certain concrete or tangible wrongs must be re-considered and taken into full account. Proudly, Donald Trump stood cheerfully by assorted hate groups that vilify both universal human rights[19] and the particular Jewish ideals of Higher Law[20] and justice. When this former president adopted barbarous and illegal positions on immigration (i.e., positions that undermine various peremptory[21] legal obligations concerning the legitimate rights of refugees), and willfully separated thousands of young and infant children from their families at US borders, the pertinent American offenses were more serious than merely illegal. Simultaneously, they represented a slap in the face to a people that had long-suffered from a frightful history of forced expulsions and international exclusions The Jewish People.

Stephen Miller, Trumps favored personal architect of immigrant exclusions, is himself the grandson of Jewish refugees from anti-Semitic pogroms. A key tenet of his grim standard for refugee admission to the United States had been merit. Like Trump, Miller pompously stipulated that only the good ones ought to be admitted.[22]

What Happened to the Words of Emma Lazarus?

There is more. In once unimaginable cases, Trump-created immigration offenses[23] and his corollary criteria of selection reeked of earlier harms perpetrated against defenseless European Jews.[24] The ironies are unspeakable, but they still remain worth noting.

Now, for those Israelis who were willing to cultivate US presidential support at all costs and whatever the concessions, relevant details should appear painful to recount. To the end, under the starkly indifferent aegis of Donald J. Trump and his coterie of dedicated sycophants, an official US pattern of illegality included forced deportations of minor children and forcible expulsions of the most severely disadvantaged. It is not a pattern that ought ever to have been overlooked or embraced by a Jewish State.The contradictions are simply too plain to see, too monstrous and too defiling.

Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses.. say the words on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty, words from never-to-be-forgotten Jewish author Emma Lazarus.

Other serious issues were involved in Israels willingness to betray its most sacred ideals in realistic exchange for Trump patronage. Most perplexing and worrisome of all were those matters that centered on the always-key realms of war avoidance and peacemaking. In all these essential matters, this US presidents complete lack of any informed and coherent vision of foreign affairs was consequential and obvious. How could these irremediable debilities ever have been so totally ignored in Jerusalem?

By preferring visceral seat-of-the-pants planning (attitude, not preparation, said Trump) to any focused forms of policy creation,[25] the former president sought to reward Israel with a series of marginal victories e.g., moving the American Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, a demonstrably Faustian agreement to arm the UAE with US F35s as quid pro quo for diplomatic recognition by Abu Dhabi, and the so-called Abraham Accords.[26] At best, all of these alleged gifts to Israel will represent more-or-less Pyrrhic victories.[27]

Trump, Palestine and Iran

All presumed Trumpian benefits to Israel either ignore or exacerbate the more authentically critical security problems still at issue in Israels volatile regional neighborhood. Most obvious and enduringly problematic here are the expectedly continuous antipathies of the Palestinians, and also the still-accelerating nuclearization of Iran. In this regard, Trumps unilateral US withdrawal from the JCPOA pact with Iran and his subsequent enhancement of selected Sunni Arab states only made matters worse.

Further marginalizing Iran could hardly signal a propitious security outcome for Jerusalem.

Also, going forward, the several Palestinian elements seeking sovereignty with a determined prise de conscience, with an aroused consciousness, will not only remain fixed on achieving their overriding national goal. Plausibly, they will further prepare for the next hideous rounds of intercommunal violence. All this suggests, most urgently and with de facto compliments of Donald J. Trump, yet another intifada.[28]

What about the Trump-vaunted Abraham Accords? At every level of assessment, these agreements, negotiated via the American presidents good offices and also the kindred deals with Morocco and Sudan are devoid of any meaningfully gainful substance. In essence, to praise the Accords for enhancing Israels security is a bit like commending US President Ronald Reagans October 1983 invasion of Grenada on the grounds that Americans have not since had to face any catastrophic aggressions from Grenada.

When Israel-Palestinian relations and Israel-Iranian relations are taken into joint account, the whole of negative outcomes for Israel could prove vastly more injurious than the simple sum of the respective parts. Here, as authentic synergies, the net costs of pertinent Trump-brokered agreements would significantly exceed Israels net gains. By definition, this means that at least as long as we can assume an Israeli capacity to estimate the costs and benefits of alternative courses of action, Jerusalems participation in these concocted agreements was effectively irrational.

Self-evidently irrational.[29]

Even in the best of times, no one could reasonably describe the Middle East as a region of impending stability or collective security. In the worst of times, this endlessly-volatile region could very quickly descend into a substantially more far-reaching condition of chaos.[30]Such a potentially lethal descent could have its precipitating origins in an impending nuclear confrontation with Iran[31] a confrontation made more likely by Trumps earlier withdrawal from the Obama-era Iran pact (JCPOA) and by his mid-November 2020 queries about launching an American military first strike or in the still-expanding interstices of microbial assault (i.e., Covid19 pandemic).. In a credibly worst case scenario, these causes, augmented by similarly incoherent Trump withdrawals from Afghanistan and Iraq, would intersect synergistically.[32]

Again, by definition, the calculable whole of tangible injurious effects suffered by Israel[33] would be greater than the simple sum of its component parts.[34]

Reason and Anti-Reason

There is more. From its visibly disjointed beginnings, the posturing Trump presidency was detached from absolutely any identifiable considerations of history, law[35] or diplomacy.[36] Till the end, saddled with such overwhelming and self-inflicted debilities, the former American president advanced unashamedly toward ever-more conspicuous postures of anti-reason. These flagrantly non-analytic postures included conspiracy theories so morbidly vacuous and outrageous that they would make even the most witting fools blush with a well-deserved embarrassment. If this were not enough humiliation to worry about, all this critique ignores Donald Trumps unhidden disrespect for elementary logic, most distressingly his false correlation of Covid19 testing with increasing illness and his corresponding medical recommendation that citizens consider taking household disinfectants by injection.

There is little here that is actually subject to dispute. Former President Trumps disjointed Corona Virus policy continues to result in the needless deaths of a great many trusting Americans. Though lacking the intent or mens rea that is integral to the codified crime of genocide,[37] the presidents Covid19 policys effect upon US civilian populations had been effectively genocidal.[38]

From the standpoint of the victims and their families, the juridical fine point here is immaterial. Its a bit like the parable of frogs being killed by the playful rock-throwing of young children. The boys may not have intended any such harms, but the frogs remain dead nonetheless.

From the start of the Trump Era, Israel had been forewarned. In all complex matters of world politics and foreign policy, this American president had always been operating ad hoc, without any considered plan or doctrine, lurching fitfully from one inane whim to another, always without sturdy analytic moorings.[39] Whatever the subject, Trump navigated precipitously, jumping wildly from crisis to crisis, always without even an elementary grounding in theory, ideology or science. Like his appointed and uniformly obsequious subordinates, Trump read nothing, nothing at all. To the everlasting delight of his American followers, there were three places the former president would absolutely never choose to visit: a museum, the theatre or a library.

Is this an American president from whom Israel should ever have reasonably expected palpable wisdom or informed guidance?

Ever?

The question is silly, on its face.

For Jerusalem, though very late in the game, the cumulative security consequences of any Trump-induced regional disorder (Trump said on several occasions, I love chaos) are apt to be far-reaching and at least partially irremediable. By assuming, without verifiable reason, that this US President had ever had Israels best interests in mind, or that he could conceivably have figured out what those national interests might actually have been, Israel must soon find itself dealing with otherwise once-avoidable regional crises.

Among several examples of relevant Trump errors and deceptions, the American Presidents April 2018 attack against Syrian chemical warfare facilities should be brought to mind. This spasmodic or seat-of-the-pants US action had little tangible impact upon Bashar al-Assads genocidal dictatorship.[40] Even worse, this photo-op generated attack emboldened various anti-Damascus regime insurgents holding jihadist orientations.

What actually happened? These hapless insurgents were quickly crushed by al-Assads armed forces, hardly a victory for democratic rule in Syria or for any society allegedly bound to the peremptory Biblical principle, Justice, justice shall you pursue.[41] Also worth noting: Because of Trumps conspicuous disregard for scientific and theoretical underpinnings,[42] matters could just as easily have gone the other way, effectively strengthening what was then a pro-ISIS adversary.

Other basic questions should now arise in US policymaking circles. Whatever the specific issue at hand, Donald Trump remained steeply beholden to Vladimir Putin; he would never have considered doing anything that did not first comport with the Russian dictators presumptive personal preferences.[43] Why?

Its not a silly question.

It finally deserves a proper answer.

Donald J. Trump could have cared less about Israels national well-being or even its physical security. Always, his cynical outreach to Israelis and American Jews had only on self-serving objective. This goal was to re-elect Donald Trump, and to extract ebullient homage for Americas reigning emperor.[44]

Remembering History/Awaiting Chaos

Now, more than ever, history deserves appropriate pride of place. Since the seventeenth-century, the structure of world politics has been consistently anarchic or Westphalian.[45] But anarchy means only the absence of authoritative central government. To fully unravel still-meaningful effects of the destabilizing Trump presidency, Israel would need to prepare more systematically for various centrifugal foreign policy developments. The object of such rampant geo-strategic disorder would be identifiable as chaos.

Quo Vadis? For Israel, a true condition of chaos could prove far more threatening than mere anarchy. In virtually any still-expressible form, this bewildering condition could play havoc with even the nations best laid plans. From the particular standpoint of Israels military readiness, chaos represents a constantly unpredictable, deeply frightful and ever-changing correlation of forces.[46] Suddenly or incrementally, this correlation could impair all normal (and potentially indispensable) national security preparations.

There is more. This impairment could arrive suddenly, as a dissembling bolt-from-the-blue enemy attack, or less discernibly and less dramatically, in variously tangible but unforeseeable increments.

Whatever its mode of arrival, such results, for Israel, could be intolerable.

In large part, these results will have been generated by misconceived and manipulative US presidential thinking.

A new chaos is impending. For strategists and scholars, it must be differentiated from the more normaldisorder associated with Carl von Clausewitzs (the nineteenth-century Prussian military strategist) friction and correlative fog of war.[47] At its core, this Trump-boosted chaos describes a deep and systemic level of uncertainty, one that could create unprecedented and residually primal forms of international conflict. It follows, for Israel, that regional chaos could quickly and conclusively smother any still-simmering hopes for some cumulatively gainful Trump Effect.

In essence, there was never any defensible legal or strategic reason for Israel to make sordid deals with a clinically-deranged American president; that is, to betray its national interests and ideals at the same time.

At best, the US embassy move and the Abraham Accords will prove of very limited consolation to Israel. At worst, these rewards (designed only for Trumps domestic political benefit) will be responsible for accelerating anti-Israel passions and policies, including new waves of Palestinian terror in Judea. Samaria (West Bank) and Israel proper. Any such revived instances of Sunni-Arab terror[48] could hasten rather than hinder the creation of a Palestinian state,[49] a portentous outcome for Palestine that could generate certain ominous synergies with Iranian nuclear weapons development.

Once such creation had become a fait accompli, moreover, Israel would likely experience new incentives to initiate anticipatory self-defense options.[50]

Wittingly, many states in world politics, not just Israel, must soon acknowledge steadily increasing risks from assorted forms of nuclear conflict.[51] In this connection, Donald Trumps sorely evident incapacity to suitably manage a nuclear crisis and/or control any more-or-less related military escalations is difficult to dispute. Should this US President have failed to prevent a single escalation from an ongoing crisis to overt nuclear warfare, the corollary effects could have impacted several other parts of the world. These effects would have arrived in the form of prompt, immediate or latent physical casualties, and less dramatically, as the probable cause of unique social and economic misfortunes.[52]

Intersections and Synergies

World politics is not geometry. In these complex spheres of interaction, ones where complex synergies are often involved, the whole can become greater than the sum of its parts. For Israel, going forward, the most obvious chaos-generated perils could concern (1) escalating violence in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Sudan, Libya and/or Syria; and (2) near-simultaneous deteriorations in a still-ongoing Iranian nuclearization effort and/or in the many-sided Palestinian insurgency.

Facing these prospectively intersecting perils, Jerusalem is already well aware that the Hashemite monarchy in neighboring Jordan remains vulnerable to assorted new forms of Islamic radicalism. Also apparent to decision-makers in Jerusalem is that a continuously authoritarian el-Sisi military regime in Cairo might not be able to control the re-aspiring Muslim Brotherhood indefinitely. Nothing done by the Trump administration had addressed any of these key problems.

In principle, at least, the Brotherhood or its kindred organizations could sometime seek to get its hands on weaponized pathogens or even nuclear explosives.[53] Regarding the germ warfare components, there would be great uncertainties about plausible effects of use during an already ongoing viral pandemic. What then?

There is more. Apropos of any derivative Trump effects upon Israels national security, Pakistan exhibits another critical site of wider-area disintegration, one that could suddenly transform a merely volatile Middle East from basic Westphalian anarchy to a genuinely unfathomable chaos. To wit, if the already-nuclear regime in Islamabad should sometime fall toJihadists, all other regional sources of chaotic disintegration could promptly pale into comparative insignificance. In this regard, there is absolutely no evidence that the Trump administration had accomplished even a modicum of appropriate planning.

In an expectedly worst case scenario for Israel, assorted Jihadists, emboldened by multiple expressions of Trump administration confusion and indecisiveness, would take singular or hybrid control in one or several of the more plainly unstable Sunni Arab and/or North African governments. Ultimately, these martyrdom-driven leaders could acquire certain game-changing weapons of mass destruction. This worrisome prospect, even if all acquired weapons were to remain non-nuclear, bring to mind the fearsomely correlative scenario of a suicide-bomber in macrocosm.[54]

A Jihadist hybrid could be a terror-group amalgam (that is, no direct state component) or reflect an asymmetrical alignment between particular terror-groups and a kindred state or states.

With the still-expected advance of Trump-enhanced chaos in the Middle East, Israel could sometime have to face certain nuclear and ideologically Islamist enemies on both the Iranian (Shiite) and Arab (Sunni) fronts. Even in the absence of old enemies with new atomic arms, nuclear and biological materials could find their way to Hezbollahin Lebanonand/or Hamas in Gaza. Along the way, Jerusalem perhaps still following former President Trumps predictably uncertain and disjointed policies could find itself having to take sides with one or another set of mortal enemies.

Political Philosophy and the State of Nature

Back in the seventeenth-century, the English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, already recognized that although international relations exist indefinitely in a state of nature, a condition of anarchy (not one of genuine chaos), these decentralized relations are nonetheless more tolerable than the condition of individual human beings living in similarly everyone-for-himself circumstances. This is the case, argued Hobbes, because nations, unlike individuals, lack the capacity to destroy one another.

But today, this once reassuring distinction is no longer meaningful.[55] Thomas Hobbes was plainly unable to conceptualize a world with nuclear weapons. Now, proliferation of these weapons, especially in the Middle East, could quickly reduce the orthodox and relatively tolerable Westphalian anarchy of international relations to an authentically Hobbesianchaos, a stateof nature, one that could normally exist only between individuals.

Here, as more and more nations came to share what Hobbes had cleverly called dreadful equality, a more-or-less symmetrical capacity to inflict mortal destruction, the portent of regional nuclear calamity could become correspondingly more likely.

In his modern classic, The Second Coming, William Butler Yeats wrote of a time in which the blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere the ceremony of innocence is drowned. Succinctly, the celebrated Irish poet then revealed what continues to elude historians, diplomats, statesmen and scholars:In the not-too-distant future, there could arrive a moment wherein there would be no safety in numbers, treaties, or armaments; no help from civilizations; no counsel from public authority; and no last-minute rescue from science. Such an apocalyptic moment, one made more likely by the residual effects of Americas ill-prepared and steeply corrupted former president, might rage for a long while, perhaps even until every flower of human culture had been trampled and once-intact human communities had been ground insidiously into dust.

From this seemingly resurrected medieval darkness, from this foreseeably Trump-facilitated chaos, there would be neither escape nor sanctuary. Rather like the America First or know nothing illiteracy that Mr. Trump had championed in the United States, such darkness could envelop entire regions of our long-suffering planet in a suffocating pall. What then? What will Americans have learned from the still-enduring horrors of Trump era declensions?

For Israel, the prime inheritor of Genesis, Trumpian chaos augured severe and paradoxical kinds of national fragility. As a continuously beleaguered microstate, Israel could still become (depending upon the precise extent to which it would have allowed itself to be manipulated and misguided by Trump rewards) the principal victim of an even more-rampant regional disorder. In view of the far-reaching interrelatedness of all world politics always, everything is system this victimization could arise even if the conspicuously precipitating events of war and terror[56]were to occur elsewhere.

Oddly enough, a hideously triumphant global chaoscould reveal both sense and form. Generated by mutually reinforcing explosions of mega-war and mega-terror, any further Trump-induced disintegrations of world authority could assume a revealing shape. But how should such a unique shape, such a sobering geometry of chaos, be suitably deciphered and purposefully understood in Jerusalem? As a related and similarly vital question, Israels leaders would then need to inquire:

How should we deal with potentially irrational nuclear adversaries, dedicated foes operating within both state and terrorist groups?[57]

Israel as System

There is more. Among other things, the whole world, like the individual nation-states that comprise it, is best understood as a system. By definition, therefore, what happens in any one part of this world always affects what happens in some or all other parts. When, for example, global deterioration is marked, and begins to spread from one country to another, these effects could undermine international stability in general. When deterioration is sudden and catastrophic, as it would be following the onset of any unconventional war and/or act of unconventional terrorism, the unraveling effects could become more immediate and more overwhelming.

The State of Israel, a system of interdependent and interpenetrating parts like every other state, exists precariously in our larger world system. Aware that any Trump-inspired collapse of regional authority structures (most plausibly, in increments) had, in one way or another, impacted its few friends as well as its many enemies, leaders of the Jewish State should now advance variously informed expectations or scenarios of collapse. This would be done in order to best prepare suitable forms of response. Ultimately, recognizing that any rapid and far-reaching global collapse could spawn a more or less complete return to everyone for himself in world politics, or what philosopher Thomas Hobbeshad called in Leviathan a bellum omnium contra omnes, a war of all against all, Israels leaders must consider just how they should respond to any future national life in a global state of nature.

These considerations would not present encouraging or pleasing forms of analytic effort. Still, they would represent prudential national policy steps, and must therefore be undertaken. Such eleventh-hour considerations could be critical to the extent that the triggering mechanism of collapse would originate within the Middle East itself, from massive chemical, biological and, in the future, nuclear attacks against Israel. In these uncertain times of biological plague, the specific actions of any microbial assault would be largely unpredictable but nonetheless highly consequential.

Any chaotic disintegration of the regional or wider-world system, whether slow and incremental or sudden and catastrophic, would impact the Israeli system. Accordingly, following the intellectually and morally deficient Trump presidency, Israel will have to orient its military planning doctrines more expressly toward worst-case possibilities. Already, Trump-initiated US troop withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan, opposed internally by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are accelerating regional instabilities in ways that are foreseeable and unforeseeable.

Will one predictable result of these ill-considered withdrawals be increasing pressure upon Israel to carry out assassinations/targeted killings[58] on behalf of Washington?[59] If so, what would this suggest about the true cumulative costs to Israel of the Trump-brokered peace agreements? This is a question well worth answering.

Looking to a Less Damaging Foreign Policy Future

In the final analysis, it will be apparent that the overall security costs of these pacts to Jerusalem will exceed the overall benefits. And this is to say nothing about any corresponding Israeli violations of international law mandated by American largesse, or about indiscriminate Israeli submission to misconceived US presidential authority. Though every sham can have a patina, this moral and intellectual Trump Era surrender could haunt Israels national integrity and self-respect for a painfully long time.

There is one last time-urgent observation to make about Israels witting subordination to Donald J. Trumps incoherent plans and expectations. In mid-November 2020, Israel felt obligated to strike out at selected Iranian military targets in Syria. Simultaneously, in large part because of Trumps earlier (and counter-productive) withdrawal from the Iran nuclear pact, Tehran had already been accelerating its preparations to go nuclear. On both conventional and unconventional weapon fronts, this former American presidents errors and incapacities had encouraged Iranian belligerence and strategic threats toward Israel.

In the end, Israelis, not just Americans, will have to extricate themselves from grievous Trump-engineered misfortunes.[60]

To avoid similar judgments or mistakes in the future, Israeli leaders ought never calculate that the flamboyant wishes of an American president are ipso facto coincident with their own nations best interests. President Donald Trump inflicted deeply corrosive harms upon the United States, but he also set the stage for continuously creating corollary or corresponding harms to Israel. Now, these significant harms, left unresolved, could not only imperil the Jewish States physical security, but also its still-residual convictions concerning international justice and human rights.[61]

A small nation that earlier chose to follow a dissembling and dishonest American patron must expect a future of significant lamentations and potential despair.[62]

For Israel, from the start, any deal made by US President Donald J. Trump on its behalf was essentially a bad deal.[63] Proof of this once-preventable result is already evident in moral and legal realms; it will soon become similarly clear in pertinent matters of strategy and self-defense. These matters will involve, inter alia, adversarial actions issuing forth from various sectors of the Sunni Arab world (including some that have been beneficiaries of Trump deal making); Shiite Iran (including various cooperating elements of both Sunni al-Qaeda and Shiite Hezbollah); and Afghanistan (mainly once-dormant Taliban foes resurrected by Trumps seat-of-the-pants US troop withdrawals).

In this last example, the negative consequences of Donald Trumps misconceived foreign policy (terrorist training and terrorist safe havens) will not stem directly from any US actions undertaken on behalf of Israel. Rather, these unwanted results will stem indirectly from a policy intended originally by the former American president solely for presumed benefit of the United States. Some or all of these discrete consequences could sometime combine in more-or-less unforeseen ways, creating strongly synergistic outcomes that are far worse than the calculable sum of their component parts. Incrementally, in such once-avoidable cases, the tangible costs to Israel of having wittingly acceded to Donald Trumps lawless Realpolitik[64]will become more apparent and less remediable.

For Israel, the Jewish State, it doesnt have to be this way. Recalling Rabbi Hillel, the relevant standard of correct behavior is longstanding, clear and compelling: That which is hateful to you, instructs Talmud, do not do to your neighbor.

Its not complicated. For Israel and its American ally, the policy obligations are reciprocal, plain to see and altogether overriding.

[1]Prima facie, when President Trumps executive orders directed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to expand his coercive program of expedited removal, he was in flagrant violation of the legal principle known as non-refoulement. This principle is prominently codified at Article 33 of the 1951 Refugee Convention. Owing to the prior incorporation of international human rights law into US law, these always-serious violations extend authoritatively to the immigration laws of the United States.

[2] See https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-barbed-wire-montana-rally-beautiful_n_5bde3b9fe4b04367a87d2495

[3] See, by this author, Louis Ren Beres, https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2018/04/louis-beres-trump-syria/

[4]See, by this author, Louis Ren Beres, https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2018/03/trump-putin-benes/ For definition of crimes against humanity, See AGREEMENT FOR THE PROSECUTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE MAJOR WAR CRIMINALS OF THE EUROPEAN AXIS POWERS AND CHARTER OF THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL. Done at London, August 8, 1945. Entered into force, August 8, 1945. For the United States, Sept. 10, 1945. 59 Stat. 1544, 82 U.N.T.S. 279. The principles of international law recognized by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal and the judgment of the Tribunal were affirmed by the U.N. General Assembly as AFFIRMATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW RECOGNIZED BY THE CHARTER OF THE NUREMBERG TRIBUNAL. Adopted by the U.N. General Assembly, Dec. 11, 1946. U.N.G.A. Res. 95 (I), U.N. Doc. A/236 (1946), at 1144. This AFFIRMATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW RECOGNIZED BY THE CHARTER OF THE NUREMBERG TRIBUNAL (1946) was followed by General Assembly Resolution 177 (II), adopted November 21, 1947, directing the U.N. International Law Commission to (a) Formulate the principles of international law recognized in the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal and in the judgment of the Tribunal, and (b) Prepare a draft code of offenses against the peace and security of mankind. (See U.N. Doc. A/519, p. 112). The principles formulated are known as the PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW RECOGNIZED IN THE CHARTER AND JUDGMENT OF THE NUREMBERG TRIBUNAL. Report of the International Law Commission, 2nd session, 1950, U.N. G.A.O.R. 5th session, Supp. No. 12, A/1316, p. 11.

[5]See by this author, Louis Ren Beres, https://jewishwebsite.com/opinion/presidential-crimes-and-pardons-donald-j-trump-and-americas-higher-law/64169/

[6]The core origins of such belligerence and conflict in world politics are best explained by German historian Heinrich von Treitschke in his posthumously published Lecture on Politics (1896): Individual man sees in his own country the realization of his earthly immortality. Earlier, German philosopher Georg Friedrich Hegel opined, in Philosophy of Right (1820), that the state represents the march of God in the world. The deification of Realpolitik, a transformation from mere principle of action to a sacred and sacrilizing end in itself, drew its originating strength from the doctrine of sovereignty advanced in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Initially conceived as a principle of internal order, this doctrine underwent a specific metamorphosis, whence it became the formal or justifying rationale for international anarchy that is, for the global state of nature. First established by Jean Bodin as a juristic concept in De Republica (1576), sovereignty came to be regarded as a power absolute and above the law. Understood in terms of modern international relations, this doctrine encouraged the notion that states lie above and beyond any form of legal regulation in their interactions with each other.

[7]Could anything have been more markedly anti-science than Trumps utterly incoherent Covid19 advice? How could anyone take seriously his counsel to combat the pandemic with individual human injections of household bleach or disinfectant?

[8]During his presidency, too little attention was directed toward Trumps open loathing of science and intellect and his corresponding unwillingness to read. Ironically, the Founding Fathers of the United States were intellectuals. As explained by American historian Richard Hofstadter: The Founding Fathers were sages, scientists, men of broad cultivation, many of them apt in classical learning, who used their wide reading in history, politics and law to solve the exigent problems of their time. See Hofstadters Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1964), p. 145. A conclusion ought to surface: How far we Americans have fallen.

The rest is here:

Resurrecting the Reneged Deal - Modern Diplomacy

Quebec has now surpassed 300,000 recorded cases of COVID-19 a little over a year into the pandemic.

A day earlier, Dr. Mylne Drouin, Montreal's public health director, urged the public to remain vigilant in order to delay an inevitablethird wave of infections.

In an effort to deal with the growing spread of COVID-19 variants in the city'swest end, public health is putting together a pilot project to give priority vaccinations to some parents of school children.

According to a letter sent to parents at JPPS-Bialik,theUnited Talmud Torahand Herzliya, the campaign is "in responseto the urgency presented by the presence of the variant in our region."

Meanwhile, Quebec Health MinsterChristian Dubwas administered a dose ofAstraZenecaThursday afternoon. Holding a news briefing afterward, he was visibly emotional as he expressed his joy to finally have been inoculated after a long year.

"I am very happy to have received it," saidDub.

Dubinsisted, as he has in the past, that AstraZeneca is a safe, effective vaccine.

If you have been feelingisolated, we'vecompiledsome ways to help copeas part ofa special CBC Quebec project calledOut of the Dark: Real Talk on Mental Health.

If you think you may have COVID-19, the government asks that you call18776444545to schedule an appointment at a screening clinic.

To reserve an appointment for a COVID-19 vaccine, you can go on the online portal quebec.ca/covidvaccine. You can also call 1-877-644-4545.

Quebec government reminders for preventing the spread of COVID-19:

You can find information on COVID-19 in the provincehereand information on the situation in Montrealhere.

See the rest here:

COVID-19 in Quebec: What you need to know Thursday - CBC.ca