Monthly Archives: March 2021

Ambani Bomb Threat: Terrorist Tehseen Akhtar To Be Questioned In Tihar Today; NIA Probing Sachin Vazes Alibi – Swarajya

Posted: March 21, 2021 at 5:34 pm

Today, Indian Mujahideen terrorist Tehseen Akhtar lodged in Tihar jail will be questioned by a team of officers from the Delhi polices special cell in connection to the Ambani bomb threat case.

Akhtar, former chief of the banned radical Islamist organisation, was questioned for over seven hours on Saturday (13 March). Reportedly, he was evasive and gave misleading answers.

Akhtar was convicted in the 2013 Hyderabad blasts case and has also been named in the 2011 Mumbai blasts, and 2010 Varanasi blasts, among other cases.

On 11 March, Delhi police had recovered the SIM card and cell phone used to threaten Ambani from Akhtars barracks in Tihar jail.

The SIM and cell phone were used to create the Jaish-ul-Hind Telegram account which claimed the responsibility for the explosive-laden SUV and demanded cryptocurrency.

The user of the mobile phone was using an app to generate virtual numbers and then using those to make a Telegram account. He was also using a TOR browser to mask his IP address on the internet.

Meanwhile, after the dramatic arrest of Mumbai police encounter specialist Sachin Vaze, NIA is probing if Vaze was present at the spot near Ambanis house where the explosive-laden Scorpio was abandoned on the night of the incident.

NIA also suspects that the man in the PPE kit near the car as seen in the CCTV footage might be Vaze, and is verifying his alibis.

Also read: The Sachin Vaze Story: A Timeline Of Ambani Bomb Threat Case That Can Shake Up Maharashtras Politics

See the original post here:
Ambani Bomb Threat: Terrorist Tehseen Akhtar To Be Questioned In Tihar Today; NIA Probing Sachin Vazes Alibi - Swarajya

Posted in Tor Browser | Comments Off on Ambani Bomb Threat: Terrorist Tehseen Akhtar To Be Questioned In Tihar Today; NIA Probing Sachin Vazes Alibi – Swarajya

Bill would protect juveniles’ Fifth Amendment rights | Serving Carson City for over 150 years – Nevada Appeal

Posted: at 5:33 pm

The view outside the Nevada Legislature on Sunday, Aug. 2, 2020.

Assemblywoman Lisa Krasner, R-Reno, joined by public defenders across the state, called on lawmakers to pass legislation designed to make sure juveniles younger than 18 dont waive their Fifth Amendment rights without first talking to a parent, guardian or an attorney.Kendra Bertschy of the Washoe County Public Defenders Office said more than 40 percent of juveniles waive those rights without understanding the consequences. AB251 would require police with a juvenile in custody get them in contact with a parent, guardian or attorney before asking any questions.But Chuck Callaway, representing the sheriffs and police, said if officers cant question juveniles, officers will just arrest everyone. The Nevada DAs Association also came out against AB251 as did several juvenile officers.Bertschy responded saying she was disappointed that law enforcement thinks their only option is arresting everyone.Krasner said the bill would also seal a juveniles arrest record at age 18 to give them a clean slate as they become adults under the law. She said a series of misdemeanors on juveniles records can impact their ability to get a job, go to college and other things.Serious crimes in a juvenile record, including sex offenses, would not be sealed.Alex Ortiz of Clark Countys financial office said he has no problem with the policy in the legislation but is concerned about its potential cost. He said the county would have to open, staff and run another juvenile housing unit at a cost of $2 million a year.The committee took no action on the bill with Krasner saying she would work with stakeholders to resolve some of their issues while still trying to protect juvenile suspects from themselves when taken into custody.

See the original post here:
Bill would protect juveniles' Fifth Amendment rights | Serving Carson City for over 150 years - Nevada Appeal

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on Bill would protect juveniles’ Fifth Amendment rights | Serving Carson City for over 150 years – Nevada Appeal

SCOTUS to Decide Whether There Is a Fundamental Right to Kick People Off Your Property – Law & Crime

Posted: at 5:33 pm

The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments Monday in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, a case about the union rights of farmworkers. It could impact the future of anti-discrimination law and much more.

The plaintiffs in the case are two California fruit producers who are suing over a 1975 state regulation that allows union organizers to have temporary access to an agricultural employers property during non-work hours. The laws rationale is to support workers right to unionize by allowing workers access to their workplace premises for after-hours meetings.

California law requires agricultural businesses to allow labor organizers onto their property three times a day for 120 days each year. The state contends that the regulation is necessary in the specific context of farming: farmworkers tend to be inaccessible to union organizers through other channels, and farm properties lack parking lots or public areas that other workers typically use for gathering. From Californias brief:

[Farmworkers] are highly migratory, moving to follow the harvest every few weeks or months; they often live in temporary housing, sometimes on their employers property; they frequently lack access to modern telecommunications technology; many speak only indigenous languages; and many are illiterate even in their native language. The Boards regulation authorizes a limited number of organizers to access the property of agricultural employers, for brief periods, during non-work hours, solely for the purpose of discussing organizing with employees, and only after notifying the Board and the employer.

Cedar Point Nursery and Fowler Packing Company sued to have the law invalidated, and their argument is based on land use. They say that the law allowing union organizers to meet with workers on their property is an easement that amounts to a per se taking something that would require compensation under the Fifth Amendment.

The after-hours union meetings dont disrupt the employers businesses, and the state of California isnt actually taking the property so to make a Fifth-Amendment argument, the plaintiffs needed to frame their loss as interference with a guarantee that is constitutionally protected. They chose the right to exclude unwanted persons. In other words, the California unionizing regulation deprives the owners of their inherent property right to kick people off their land.

A panel of the Ninth Circuit sided with California, as did the district court. The panel said that because the regulation didnot amount to a physical taking because it did notallow random members of the public to unpredictably traverse their property 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.The panel also ruled that the statute wasnt a regulatory taking because the only property right affected was the right to exclude and thats simply not enough.

Now, SCOTUS will decide whether the Fifth Amendment protects a right to exclude on par with other inherent property rights. If the justices side with the landowners and agree that the regulation amounts to a taking, it would mean the regulation cannot continue to operate without California paying compensation for its taking of the land. Thats novel in itself, but theres far more drama to be had outside the arena of farming and unionizing.

The fruit-producer plaintiffs argue that the right to exclude should take its rightful place among the most sacred of protected interests: fundamental rights.

When a right is fundamental, any law abridging that right triggers the highest level of constitutional scrutiny. Accordingly, a state regulation that interferes with a fundamental right must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest in order to pass constitutional muster. In short, state regulations fail almost always fail this test, because the right being protected has been deemed basically untouchable. (Other fundamental rights include the right to marry, the right to privacy, freedom of religion, and freedom of assembly.)

In an email to Law&Crime,Pacific Legal Foundation attorney Wen Fa, who represents the petitioner fruit sellers in the litigation, explained his clients position in the case:

The Constitution prohibits government from requiring you to allow unwanted strangers into your property. The California regulation here is unconstitutional because it forces property owners to allow unwanted union activists onto their property, and violates the property owners fundamental right to exclude trespassers.

However, Aaron Tang, a constitutional law professor and former clerk to Justice Sonia Sotomayor, warned in a Washington Post piece Thursday that as devastating as a ruling for the plaintiffs would be in the context of unions, its real danger lies outside far outside the context of employment law.

Tang writes:

The disputethreatenshavoc just as great outside the union context. Considerstate lawsthat permit child protection inspectors to make unannounced home visits. Now suppose a homeowner suspected of abuse or neglect wants to keep the inspector out. Under the challengers logic, such individuals would have a Fifth Amendment right to do so unless the government paid the suspected abuser to access the property. The same problem would ensnarenursing home visitsandfood safety inspections.

Indeed, we have seen anti-discrimination ordinances challenged on the grounds that they interfere with First Amendment rights; a ruling that the right to exclude is fundamental would mean an entirely separate basis for bringing legal challenges, rooted in property law (a legal landscape far less politically-charged than religious freedom). The cases potential for broad impact is underscored by the more than 30 amicus briefs submitted to the Court by interested yet uninvolved parties.

As for the justices, their position in the case poses some intriguing questions. The Court decided a landmark union case in 2018; it ruled that an employee who is not a member of a union could not be forced to pay union fees for the collective bargaining done on his behalf. In that case, conservative justice Samuel Alitopenned a decision joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch. JusticesSotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer dissented.

A conservative majority might similarly side against the pro-union ordinance in the Cedar Point litigation. However, if decided on Fifth Amendment grounds, such a decision threatens to create just the kind of chaos the conservative justices usually endeavor to avoid.

Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for at 10:00 a.m. on Monday, March 22, 2021.

[Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images]

Have a tip we should know? [emailprotected]

Read the rest here:
SCOTUS to Decide Whether There Is a Fundamental Right to Kick People Off Your Property - Law & Crime

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on SCOTUS to Decide Whether There Is a Fundamental Right to Kick People Off Your Property – Law & Crime

What sold, and for how much, in Marion County – Ocala

Posted: at 5:30 pm

Warranty deed transfers in excess of $60,000 as recorded at the Marion County Clerk of the Circuit Courts office from Feb. 8-12:

Alderbrook. D R Horton Inc. to Kiritkumar Jani: $227,990.

Avalon Condos. Ashcroft Properties Inc. to Aaliyah Decoursey: $162,000.

Avalon Condos. Ashcroft Properties Inc. to Robert F. Welch III: $168,000.

Avondale. David Otzel to Mike Kakande: $349,500.

Avonlea. Avonlea LLC to Kenneth Padgett: $220,000.

New track, research milestone: Business news for Ocala/Marion County for March 15

Belleview Heights Estates. Larry Allen Ducat to Michael Smithson: $145,900.

Belleview Manor. Rex Lanctot to Jennifer Garbutt: $100,000.

Belleview Ridge Estates. Charles Riley to Brianne Flory: $60,000.

Belmar Estates. John Hessey to Carl Edge: $154,000.

Belmont Oaks. Elizabeth Hoop to Sharon Lynn Sprenger Trust: $252,400.

Boulder Hill. Howell Bates to David Rosado Rodriguez: $188,000.

Brighton Condo. Ingrid Duarte to Iride Morales: $160,000.

Brookhaven. D R Horton Inc. to Felipe Albino: $268,920.

More: SR 200 corridor to get another traffic light, this time at Southwest 80th Street

Caldwells Addition to Ocala. James Michael & Rebecca A. Broadbent Revocable Trust to Mannie Massengale: $190,000.

Caldwells Addition to Ocala. Jonathan Walker to Nicholas Master: $232,500.

Candler Hills West, Newcastle. On Top of The World Communities LLC to Patricia Giacalone: $399,655.

Cherrywood Estates. Donna Cochrane to David Wilson: $172,500.

Citrus County. Craig Zacke to Monte Kewley: $175,000.

Cobblestone. Kevin Russell to Charissa Felgemacher: $375,000.

Cobblestone North. D R Horton Inc. to Steven Joseph Defilippo Sr.: $194,990.

Cobblestone North. D R Horton Inc. to Dorothy Catherine Richards: $214,990.

Cobblestone North. D R Horton Inc. to Sean Theodore Kaplan: $215,495.

Cobblestone North. Philip Lopiano to Brent Nichols: $262,500.

Confidential. PAP Holdings LLC to Terri Rosado: $113,500.

Confidential. John Chiguina to Richard Zimmerman: $245,000.

Country Hill Farms. Bruce Ettenger to Ralph Sutter: $650,000.

Crescent Ridge. Marilyn Blane to Bobby Ross: $221,000.

Crestwood. A Frame West Coast LLC to Joshua Brown: $295,000.

More business news: Marion County restaurant inspections for the week of March 1-6

Darby Downs of Ocala. David Whisanant to Betty Sasina: $125,000.

Derby Downs Condo. Davy Campbell to Christine Bass: $71,000.

Druid Hills. Thomas Morgan to Lucio Vasquez: $232,200.

Fairways at Silver Springs Shores Condo. Peggy Nelson to Marsha Vezina: $85,900.

Florida Highlands. Louis Rockwell to Toni Anne Angelo: $85,000.

Florida Tung Oil Groves Inc. Development. Keith Smith to Yahaira Waters: $135,000.

Galloway & Sands Subdivision. McBride Holdings LLC to Deb3 LLC: $432,990.

Golf View Villas Condo. Sharlene Pickard to Joseph Robinson: $144,000.

Greystone Hills. D R Horton Inc. to Andres Eduardo Mistage: $234,490.

Greystone Hills. D R Horton Inc. to Steven Elijah Cassell III: $260,420.

Greystone Hills. Rolling Hills Development Inc. to D R Horton Inc.: $494,494.

More: Development in Ocala: New VA clinic under construction, national dental chain coming to town

Hendersons Yellow Bluff. Angelique Louise Ditman to Darcie Clifford: $137,542.

Hillsdale. Dh Homes LLC to Ken Geist: $80,000.

Hunterdon Hamlet. Omar Jawad to Diego Ormedilla: $477,500.

JB Ranch Subdivision. JB Ranch Partners LLC to D R Horton Inc.: $220,000.

JB Ranch Subdivision. D R Horton Inc. to James Frederick Bandoli Jr.: $232,325.

Kingsland Country Estates. Eileen Kastanas to Kathleen Kelso: $335,000.

Kingsland Country Estates, Forest Glenn. Clayton Properties Group Inc. to Andrea Ceceila Miller Smith: $264,505.

Kingsland Country Estates, Forest Glenn. Clayton Properties Group Inc. to Travis Joseph Watson: $286,359.

Kingsland Country Estates, Whispering Pines. Marco Polo Builders Inc. to Richard Waters: $322,000.

Lake Diamond North. D R Horton Inc. to Sasika Suchithra Mesthrige: $219,990.

Lake Diamond North. MR4 LLC to D R Horton Inc.: $342,000.

Lake Tropicana Ranchettes. Geri Roberts to Justin Matthew Jones: $95,000.

Lake View Village. Daniel Sharpe to Preston Boyd Kirkpatrick: $297,500.

Lake Weir Gardens. United Florida Investments LLC to Samuel Byron Green: $174,000.

Lake Weir Heights. Maryann Rose Mansur to Tony Haglund: $85,000.

Lake Weir Meadows. Fowler Bros. Holdings LLC to Sunset Harbor Acres LLC: $341,300.

Laurels at Bellechase. Sarojini Pericherla Living Trust to Rajasekhar Ventrapragada: $180,000.

Leeward Air Ranch. KAL Holdings 1 D LLC to Jeffrey Roberts: $65,000.

Longleaf Ridge. On Top of The World Communities LLC to Bruce Tighe: $223,681.

Longleaf Ridge. On Top of The World Communities LLC to Jane Hall: $336,030.

Lynnewoods. Majesta Morissette to Michael Turpak: $66,200.

More: Causes: Upcoming fundraisers in Ocala/Marion County for March 15, 2021

Marion County. Dawn Marie Bernir to Gioconda Lopez Mena Luwins Mena: $62,500.

Marion County. Runa Zurbel to Vernon Nevoraski: $68,000.

Marion County. Betty A. Roberson Revocable Trust to Jax Home Ventures Inc.: $71,500.

Marion County. Mg Land Development LLC to Jason Gould: $77,900.

Marion County. Jax Home Ventures Inc. to Mejia Investments LLC: $80,000.

Marion County. Barbara Maguire to Jerry Rodgers: $85,000.

Marion County. Steven Weitlauf Trust to Andrew Perico: $124,000.

Marion County. Frances D. Bliss Living Revocable Trust to 37 SE Chinica Drive LLC: $126,000.

Marion County. Iva Meadows to Kelly George: $130,000.

Marion County. Safe IRA Homes LLC Trust to Sarah Rupert: $168,000.

Marion County. Jen Homes LLC to Joanna Fernandez: $178,000.

Marion County. Timothy Logan Thompson to Wendy Dee Lambert: $228,000.

Marion County. Joseph Watkins to Lavon Tindell: $235,000.

Marion County. Maria Class to Nichole Montanez Class Montanez: $270,000.

Marion County. Angela Benejam to John Hoctel: $275,000.

Marion County. Susan Garrett to Debra Lynn Bailey: $285,000.

Marion County. Kharabsheh Suleiman to Domenick Galatolo: $295,000.

Marion County. Kyle Andrew Migetz to Kristen Clifford: $345,000.

Marion County. Travis Daniel Lang to Adam Dean: $399,764.

Marion County. Windemere Farm LLC to Kevin Lyons: $425,000.

Marion County. Mark Raney to 1500 SW 59th Street LLC: $850,000.

Marion County. HHS Property Investments LLC to Watermark Infrastructure LLC: $1,475,000.

Marion Landing. Pamela Lasell to Maureen Amengual: $90,000.

Marion Oaks. Charles Berk to Southern Impression Homes LLC: $72,000.

Marion Oaks. Unity Development Investments LLC to BBG Poinciana LLC: $74,900.

Marion Oaks. BIL Investment Properties LLC to A Plus Homes Inc.: $102,400.

Marion Oaks. Linda Bryan to Warshi Property Services LLC: $140,000.

Marion Oaks. Harold McNally to Ana Rosa Mulero Nieves: $146,000.

Marion Oaks. Red Brick Developments Inc. to Nelson Gonzalez Diaz: $147,999.

Marion Oaks. Worldwide Alliance LLC to Mirna Acevedo: $154,000.

Marion Oaks. Drc24 LLC to Carl Jeffrey Lacey: $156,900.

Marion Oaks. Worldwide Alliance LLC to Valerie Kim Bosler: $159,900.

Marion Oaks. Worldwide Alliance LLC to Valerie Kim Bosler: $159,900.

Marion Oaks. Group Capital 3 LLC to Odvin Duvert: $162,000.

More here:

What sold, and for how much, in Marion County - Ocala

Posted in Marie Byrd Land | Comments Off on What sold, and for how much, in Marion County – Ocala

Biden: It Will Be ‘Tough’ To Pull US Troops Out Of Middle East By May Deadline – The Federalist

Posted: at 5:29 pm

In an interview that aired Wednesday with ABC News George Stephanopoulos on Good Morning America, President Joe Biden stated that it would be tough to withdraw U.S troops currently stationed in Afghanistan by the scheduled deadline of May 1.

Im in the process of making that decision now as to when theyll leave. The fact is, that was not a very solidly negotiated deal that the president, the former president, worked out, Biden said. So were in consultation with our allies as well as the government, and that decisions its in process now.

Last year, then-President Donald Trump negotiated with the Taliban to yank U.S. military forces from Afghanistan and Iraq. The Afghan government agreed to release as many as 5,000 Taliban prisoners in a trade for 1,000 Afghan prisoners held hostage by the Taliban. The historic peace deal came after nearly two decades of war in Afghanistan.

Out of the troops that have not yet been withdrawn, 3,500 remain. According to The New York Times, more than 1,000 Special Operations forces remain in Afghanistan, of this number. The peace agreement has not yet been authorized by the Afghan government.

I dont think a lot longer, Biden told Stephanopoulos on the length of sustaining troops in the middle east. [It] could happen, but it is tough, he added on making the May 1 deadline that Trump put in place.

To date, 3,500 troops stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan is the lowest number since the conflict initiated. Bidens decision comes just a month after he put a freeze on Trumps decision to withdraw troops from Germany in July. About 11,900 troops were relocated to the U.S. or other parts of Europe.

We dont want to be the suckers anymore, Trump said to reporters in July. The United States has been taken advantage of for 25 years, both on trade and on the military. Were protecting Germany, so were reducing the force because theyre not paying the bills. Its very simple. Theyre delinquent. So were reducing the force. Now if they start paying their bills I would think about it.

Bidens interview aired a day prior to a meeting in Moscow between leaders from Russia, China, the United States, Pakistan, top Afghan officials, and opposition leaders, as well as Taliban representatives. The Taliban continues to deny that al-Qaida terrorists are responsible for the attacks on Sep. 11, 2001.

This week, Secretary of State Antony Blinken urged Afghan President Ashraf Ghani to display urgent leadership in talks to craft a peace plan with the Taliban.

In reaction to Bidens indeterminate stance on the withdrawal of troops, a spokesperson for the Taliban said that there would be consequences if Trumps agreement was not abided by. The threat is a warning to resume attacks on U.S forces.

More:

Biden: It Will Be 'Tough' To Pull US Troops Out Of Middle East By May Deadline - The Federalist

Posted in Federalist | Comments Off on Biden: It Will Be ‘Tough’ To Pull US Troops Out Of Middle East By May Deadline – The Federalist

‘Justice League’ Is Zack Snyder’s Trimphant Return To Big Heroes – The Federalist

Posted: at 5:29 pm

If you are like mehandsome and coolyou love a great action movie. You love the superhero archetype because the character development, if done properly, can reveal what is best about us as a species. You love watching attractive people with amazing physiques do impossible things in impractical clothesunless your name is Martin Scorsese, who famously hates the genre.

People who cant get past the dazzle of science fiction plot devices just dont have the creativity to achieve suspension of disbelief. They have lost their childlike sense of wonder for the wonderful.

If you love your sense of wonder, you likely love Wonder Woman. If you love the supernatural, you love Superman. If you love oceanic, robotic, and fast action, you love Aquaman, Cyborg, and The Flash. If you love all of these characters and their flaws in one film, you are a true fan and your name might be Zack Snyder.

If you are wondering if this film came out in 2017, you are mostly right. Snyder had a family tragedy that cut short his ability to finish this film, and Joss Whedon was tapped to complete it. Snyder had set up his own vision for the DC cinematic universe in 2013 with Man of Steel, which I thoroughly enjoyed.

This would have been an Avengers-esque team-up to launch more films and a vehicle to introduce new characters to the screen. Whedon basically came in and crapped all over that vision and delivered a disjointed, half-baked CGI, dryly performed, and meandering film that was only mildly enjoyable.

Snyder fixes all of that. The Snydercut was demanded by the fans, who made it happen, and the payoff is worth it. In a way, the fans were Snyders own Justice League who brought him back like Superman to vanquish Whedons evil spawn.

There is character development, beautiful cinematography, better banter, and more emotional sinew in the performances. The score is better, the colorization is better, Snyders desaturated and almost film noir grit really works to cement this fantasy into reality and to blend the CGI with the live action.

Speaking of CGI, it is light years ahead of the 2017 version. The bad guys look better, scarier, and more threatening. Steppenwolf is given a character arc that comics fans will recognize. Even though he seems more threatening (spoilers ahead) he is heralding an even greater evil to comea really well done Darkseid.

Darkseid-Thanos comparisons will be made, and I like the Darkseid CGI treatment better than Thanoss. He seems more tangible and real. For the record, he also came first as a character.

We are treated to battles from time past. A Green Lantern makes an appearance alongside the old Greek gods, Amazonians, Atlanteans, and early men. This backstory was important to set up the struggle to get our heroes to unite.

A fractured Earth led to distrust between the peoples, and that reflects in the main characters. The idea of uniting to defeat a common foe should resonate today. In addition to new and better battles, we also get to see new and revamped characters in Martian Manhunter and Jared Letos Joker, who seems more menacing and developed in this film, although his frames are few.

All of the characters seem more deftly acted. Was that better editing, alternate takes, or reshoots? The world may never know. Superman looks cool in his back in black super-suit and his return seemed even scarier than in the 17 version, even though the scenes seemed very close to the same.

The slow-motion scenes will seem superfluous to some, but to me they really drove home the idea of how fast the action was and how insanely fast The Flash is. In fact, his power is expanded from the first film, as is his heroism.

The score is more epic and tender, and the pop music in the soundtrack gives us well-timed emotional connection. Batman totally fell in love with guns!

This was a great film; not without flaws, but Im comfortable calling it great. It is worth viewing maybe even twice. That brings me to some of the flaws.

Four hours. Four hours in 4:3 aspect ratio! If you have an older plasma widescreen or even LED, it could burn black bars into the sides of your screen (just kidding, but if it happens I want to hear about it). To me, this was the worst choice Snyder made. It made the film seem less expansive.

I mostly ignored it once the film was going for a bit, but I have the good fortune of viewing on a 120-inch 4K Dolby Atmos projection system with audio to match. I imagine this film was envisioned for IMAX screens, which are giant 4:3. The sidebars would have annoyed me more had I been watching on the 75-inch downstairs.

Some of the pacing seemed slownot painfully slow, just slowenough to make you think a 3.5-hour version might be just as good. Thats all I have for flaws, but those may prove too massive for some to overcome. Now, back to the good.

The fact that this film was available to stream and to view in theaters was really great. I think this COVID model will stay long after we have burned our masks.

I cant think of another filmmaker who was ever given a chance to recover his or her vision. It is an extraordinary occasion and well worth the effort. As I mentioned earlier, the fandom that made this happenthey demanded it and thus ensured a return on the investment. It gave them some ownership, and the fandom should take a bow.

This film is an example of what movie-making should and can be when producers and execs arent given too much control over content. When you have a master visual storyteller like Snyder, you turn him loose.

One cant help but wonder if the results would have been better had they just shelved it until he had gotten past his tragedy in the first place. We wouldnt be watching this film with the bad taste of the first still in our mouths. Still, I am thankful for this palate-cleanser.

Watch this film, make lots of popcorn, and plan to pause for bathroom breaks at the chapter slates. Oh, and if you talk about this movie with your fanboy friends, make sure you know the names of all the characters, no matter how small, or prepare to be nerdured.

If you are friends with Mr. Scorsese, just pretend you hated it.

Chris Loesch is the owner of creative concept company Intuation Studios.

Read the original:

'Justice League' Is Zack Snyder's Trimphant Return To Big Heroes - The Federalist

Posted in Federalist | Comments Off on ‘Justice League’ Is Zack Snyder’s Trimphant Return To Big Heroes – The Federalist

Californians Gather More Than 2 Million Signatures To Recall Gavin Newsom – The Federalist

Posted: at 5:29 pm

More than 2 million signatures were submitted to California state election officials Wednesday on the final day to reach the 1,495,709 needed to secure a recall for Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom on the calendar this year.

The state will now conduct a monthlong review to validate the signatures. If valid, a recall election expected to be scheduled for sometime between August and December.

Were gonna take this extremely seriously were gonna get ready and fight like hell, Newsom senior strategist Sean Clegg told Politico Wednesday, labeling the referendum on Newsoms leadership a partisan Republican recall with a capital R.

Anne Dunsmore, however, who runs the recall committee, RescueCalifornia.org, told The Federalist that more than a third of the signatures are independent and Democratic voters. Dunsmore emphazied the bipartisan nature of the movement triggered in large part by the governors aggressive and hypocritical lockdowns. Fifty-eight percent of those who signed the petition were women, Dunsmore said.

On Tuesday, Newsom complained the recall effort was motivated by racism, a routine accusation foisted by Democrats on any criticism from political opponents.

Look at the petition, look at the actual reasons they themselves listed. It has to do with immigration. The browning of California, Newsom told reporters.

Dunsmore called Newsoms comments an insult to the two million people who signed the petition with a very strong showing from people that were no party preference and Democrats.

Newsom said on the ABCs The View Tuesday that he is worried about the effort to remove him from office.

Of course Im worried about it, Newsom told the daytime panel. The nature of these things, the up or down question, the zero-sum nature of the question is challenging so were taking it seriously.

The recall ballot gives voters a yes-or-not vote on whether Newsom stays in office, followed by a list of candidates competing for Newsoms replacement if Californians vote in favor of removal.

While five recall attempts on Newsom failed in the past, the sixth effort picked up momentum in December, about a month after the governor was caught enjoying indoor dining at a three-star Michelin restaurant in Napa Valleys wine country. Photos of the scene showed Newsom, who had just prohibited gatherings of more than three households before the Thanksgiving holiday, at a dinner party with a dozen others with no masks, and no social distancing.

Newsom tightened statewide restrictions after he apologized for getting caught.

Californians have been subject to some of the harshest lockdowns in the country provoking an exodus to business-friendlier states such as Texas and Arizona. Families have also fled the state in search of better education for their children as many California schools remain closed despite overwhelming evidence that in-person instruction is safe.

A new poll out Monday shows more than 58 percent of California voters believe its time for someone new in the 2022 election. Only 42 percent said they would vote to keep Newsom in office in an upcoming recall.

While Newsoms lockdowns, implemented with little transparency, have fueled the governors recall movement, California Republican Congressman Darrell Issa told The Federalist Newsoms problems stem far beyond aggressive COVID-19 restrictions.

Rolling blackouts caused by insensitivity to the transition from fuel, Issa said, gripped the state last year with an energy crisis which has left Californians relying on imported power from other states at peak periods.

Issa, the wealthiest member in Congress who bankrolled the states last recall in 2003 when voters replaced incumbent Democrat Gray Davis with Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, told The Federalist the stakes are higher in this years contest than they were nearly 20 years ago.

Weve got to turn around the direction of the state in a much more meaningful way, Issa said, who cited the states fleeing population putting California on track to lose a congressional seat for the first time in its history.

Issa said he is committed to supporting the effort however he can, though he wont be running as a candidate himself.

While no prominent Democrats have come forward to challenge Newsom in the recall, several Republicans have already declared their candidacies including former San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer and former Republican Congressman Doug Ose.

Former President Donald Trumps former Director of National Intelligence, Ric Grenell, has also hinted at a run but has not yet announced any decision.

Read more:

Californians Gather More Than 2 Million Signatures To Recall Gavin Newsom - The Federalist

Posted in Federalist | Comments Off on Californians Gather More Than 2 Million Signatures To Recall Gavin Newsom – The Federalist

Poker Strategy With Jonathan Little: Three Tips For Crushing Live Poker – Poker News – CardPlayer.com

Posted: at 5:27 pm

Live poker has been essentially shut down for the last year due to COVID, but casinos in many parts of the world are starting to re-open. Here are three tips that will give you the best chance for success when you return to the live arena.

Take Advantage Of Opponent Mistakes

Whenever poker has a lot of hype surrounding it either because a major tournament series is in town or because everyone is getting to play for the first time in a year, local recreational players flock to the casino to test their luck and hope to turn a little money into a lot. This results in the games being much softer than normal because there are proportionally more recreational players in the field.

You make money when your opponents make mistakes that you adjust to take advantage of. While many players see their opponents making mistakes, they forget to take advantage of them.

For example, suppose you raise with A J from middle position and a loose, passive calling station calls from the big blind. The flop comes J 9 6. Your opponent checks, you bet, and your opponent calls. The turn is the 2. Your opponent checks, you bet, and your opponent calls. The river is the Q. Your opponent checks.

While the Queen is certainly not a great river for you, you should make another small value bet, expecting your calling station opponent to call with worse jacks, nines, and perhaps even some worse made hands. If your opponent raises your river bet, make the disciplined fold unless they are known to check-raise bluff the river.

Embrace Variance

When playing against lots of recreational players, you will see all sorts of interesting plays. Recreational players will frequently make erratic moves. They may even get lucky on you. Instead of being disgruntled when this happens, realize that every time they make a mistake, their equity goes straight into your pocket.

Suppose you raise with A A from middle position and the big blind calls. The flop comes A 7 6. Your opponent checks, you bet, and your opponent calls. The turn is the 2. Your opponent checks, you bet, and your opponent goes all-in. You call with the nuts and your opponent turns up 9 8 for an open-ended straight draw.

Whether you win or lose, your opponent just tried to give their stack to you. When you happen to lose, realize that if the bad players never won, they would quickly quit playing, making the game unprofitable. In exchange for them getting to win from time to time, the game of poker gets to thrive forever.

One helpful way to view bad beats is to consider how the casino feels when someone gets lucky and hits their number on the roulette wheel a few times in a row. When someone gets lucky against the casino, they celebrate them, comp them, and do everything they can to keep them playing/coming back in the future. They certainly do not get annoyed or berate them. The casino realizes that every time someone makes a bet, they are losing little bits of equity.

When someone plays poorly against you, they are losing little bits of equity to you. Sometimes they are going to beat you, but in the long run, if you play better than your opponents, you will win all the money.

Enjoy Yourself

Poker is a game, and games are supposed to be fun. While I fully understand that tensions are high right now, make a point to enjoy yourself. It is always amazing to me how after a few days of losing, most people look completely worn down. They walk the casino like zombies. Instead of being sad and depressed about standard variance, remember the great opportunity that you have to play the awesome game of poker.

If you find that your mind wanders to a dark place when you are on a downswing, do not forget that you came into this world with nothing. If you have the ability to play poker (or read this article) then you are one of the most fortunate humans to ever live. It is all about perspective!

Good luck in your games, and stay safe!

Jonathan Little is a two-time WPT champion with more than $7 million in live tournament earnings, best-selling author of 15 educational poker books, and 2019 GPI Poker Personality of the Year. If you want to increase your poker skills and learn to crush the games, check out his training site at PokerCoaching.com/cardplayer.

Go here to see the original:

Poker Strategy With Jonathan Little: Three Tips For Crushing Live Poker - Poker News - CardPlayer.com

Posted in Poker | Comments Off on Poker Strategy With Jonathan Little: Three Tips For Crushing Live Poker – Poker News – CardPlayer.com

2021 Heralds The Return Of Grudge Poker – Gaming Post

Posted: at 5:27 pm

By Ben Hamill - March 21 2021

A Poker world literally starving for news and entertainment resulting from the big hiatus on every form of live action that was 2020 has resulted in the rise of a strange and peculiar set of circumstances. And among those at the very top of the list ranks something of a Poker pantomime: the heads-up grudge match.

It isn't as if all of that has been in any way devoid of entertainment value, either. Who will forget Andy Beal taking on The Corporation? Or Doug Polk bashing out keyboard threats about having to back up his truck to Daniel Negreanu's backdoor to load up the Canadian's fortune?

The message soon became clear: heads-up grudging was back in vogue.

Read More...Polk Celebrates Grudge Match Win

Much of what's been happening on the heads-up grudge scene originated from a different kind of Poker era one not yet embraced out of need. One such grudge match was Beal taking on The Corporation back in 2001.

The billionaire banker had agreed to play against not only one or two Poker champions of the day, but against an entire collective of Poker masters of the day. The money was in the kitty, the entertainment value lacked absolutely nothing, and it soon became clear that that it was a winning combination and all that was really needed to grab the world's attention.

It would be difficult to beat or even recreate that type of showdown. It was Beal against the likes of Phil Ivey, Howard Lederer, Chip Reese, Doyle Brunson, Tod Brunson, Jennifer Harmon, and Lyle Berman. And even though Beal would eventually be forced to throw in a $16 million towel, kudos to him for having stuck it out for as long as he did.

Cut to 2020, and it would be Phil Helmuth strutting his stuff in very much the same way as what Beal did way back. Granted, he'd be up against a single contender only, but then again, that contender was Antonio Esfandiari, one of the biggest names in modern Poker.

Plus, it would effectively set the spread for what would have to be the grudge match of all time: Doug Polk vs Daniel Negreanu. 25,000 hands of grudge-style action, live streaming of the proceedings via Twitch and YouTube, and the ultimate finish few would have seen coming, Polk taking the beloved Kid Poker for a rough-and-tumble $1.2 million.

And best of all, especially since we've now all developed an appetite for ultimate grudge Poker, is that Negreanu and Phil Helmuth will be going at it next.

March 31 is D-Day.

Here is the original post:

2021 Heralds The Return Of Grudge Poker - Gaming Post

Posted in Poker | Comments Off on 2021 Heralds The Return Of Grudge Poker – Gaming Post

Join the St Patricks Day celebrations at Intertops Poker today – Yahoo Finance

Posted: at 5:27 pm

Bloomberg

(Bloomberg) -- Wall Street hasnt been this bullish about lithium in years.Investors are betting on a comeback in the metal key to rechargeable batteries as the worlds biggest automakers ratchet up their electric-vehicle lines. Miners once shunned amid supply overhangs have raised almost $3.4 billion in equity offerings in the Americas this year, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Thats seven times the total amount raised from 2018 to 2020.The change breathes new life into an industry that saw prices of its main product plunge by more than half from a record high reached in 2018. It also highlights a bullish wager thats still available on the EV frenzy as sentiment toward electric-vehicle stocks, which surged last year, sours.Talks with investors and discussions on potential supply agreements with automotive-equipment and battery manufacturers which were only in my dreams a year ago are now filling my calendar, Robert Mintak, chief executive officer of Vancouver-based Standard Lithium Ltd., said by phone.Interest in the industry is resurgent as electric-vehicle targets set by big automakers and a change in the U.S. administration signal that a battery boom is finally gathering momentum. After the punishing three-year sell-off, prices of the soft silvery-white metal have started to rebound, and analysts including those at BloombergNEF expect further gains on rising demand and tight supplies of battery-grade lithium.A lithium price index compiled by Benchmark Mineral Intelligence jumped 32% this year through February, after plunging 59% from mid-2018 to mid-2020. The metal reached an all-time high in May 2018.Bigger PoolThe investor pool is expanded to technology investors and others, said Mintak, as major automakers determination to deploy hundreds of billions of dollars to electrify their fleets gives investors that safety that theres going to be a supply pinch.The majority of the financing has been done by the worlds top two lithium miners -- Albemarle Corp. and SQM, or Soc. Quimica & Minera de Chile SA, as its known formally -- as they took advantage of their recent stock surges. Albemarle completed a larger-than-planned equity offering of $1.5 billion in early February, while Santiago-based SQM raised $1.1 billion in January.Junior miners, most of which have yet to produce substantial amount of lithium, are also attracting strong interest from investors. Take the case of Standard Lithium, which opened its first direct lithium extraction plant in El Dorado, Arkansas, in September, with the facility using a new technology that allows for a 90% lithium recovery rate. It raised C$34.53 million ($27.6 million) in an over-subscribed share offering in December. Investor interest was so strong that it had to turn away offers for more, said CEO Mintak.Lithium Americas Corp., which is developing the Thacker Pass mine in Nevada, raised a total of $500 million through two primary share offerings in October and January, respectively.Turning TideThe tide is finally turning, and much faster than I thought, Chris Berry, president of House Mountain Partners, an industry consultant, who said Wall Street hasnt been this bullish on the lithium industry since 2017. You see that with Lithium Americas being able to raise a total of half a billion dollars recently. This is for a pre-revenue company regarding lithium.Sigma Lithium Resources Corp., which is developing a hard-rock lithium project in Brazil, had to upsize its private placement and increase offering price, which says a lot about investor demand for lithium exposure, that asset, and that companys vision, said Berry.Junior lithium miners raised $529 million this year, Bloomberg data showed. Thats about $63 million more than the total amount raised from 2018 to 2020.Ford Motor Co. announced last month that its passenger-vehicle range will be all-electric in Europe by 2030. General Motors Co. plans to sell only zero-emission models by 2035. Volkswagen AG went further, announcing plans this week to build six battery factories in Europe and invest globally in charging stations, as ensuring scaling battery production has become a key in the EV race.Batteries make up about 30% of an electric cars cost. And automakers around the world look to pivot to EVs, with hopes to get batteries at the cheapest price possible but also secure enough supply to meet those ambitions.Meanwhile, U.S. President Joe Biden has pledged to build back the economy after the devastation of Covid-19 with cleaner energy and a lower carbon footprint. The administration said in late February it would conduct a government review of U.S. supply chains to seek to end the countrys reliance on China and other adversaries for crucial goods.The election of Biden is a very favorable signal to investors as it boosted confidence that the switch to clean energy will accelerate, which along with existing favorable subsidies and regulations in Europe and China bodes well for raw materials needed for that energy transition, said Seth Goldstein, an analyst at Morningstar Inc. The U.S. is the second-largest EV market, after China.Andrew Bowering, a director at Vancouver-based American Lithium Corp., called the U.S. review on supply chains huge for the lithium industry as it shows the governments realization that in order to meet clean-energy goals, its important for the U.S. to have a security of supply of raw materials such as lithium.All of a sudden, after three years of downturn, youve got the price of the commodity starting to go up again and a change in the administration in the U.S. thats pushing a green new deal and support big money going into the green automobile industry, said Bowering. That leads investors into the space.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.2021 Bloomberg L.P.

More:

Join the St Patricks Day celebrations at Intertops Poker today - Yahoo Finance

Posted in Poker | Comments Off on Join the St Patricks Day celebrations at Intertops Poker today – Yahoo Finance